We reviewed the clinical effectiveness of lovotibeglogene autotemcel (lovo-cel) and exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel) versus standard of care for the treatment of severe sickle cell disease. We also intended to compare lovo-cel to exa-cel via any evidence directly comparing the two therapies or by indirect comparisons of key outcomes. We sought evidence on patient-important outcomes, including resolution of vaso-occlusive crisis, health-related quality of life, and adverse events.
Copyright:
Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further use of the material is subject to CC BY license. (More information)