AARP J MARCH 2022 PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE Fact Sheet Over 9 Million Adults Ages 50 and Older Faced Food Insecurity in 2020 Olivia Dean and Carlos Figueiredo AARP Public Policy Institute In 2020, nearly 9.5 million (or about 8 percent of) Americans ages 50 and older were food insecure, meaning they had limited or uncertain access to adequate, nutritious food. The data reveal significant differences by state, age, race and ethnicity, and other demographic characteristics. Every year, millions of Americans ages 50 and older experience food insecurity, meaning they have limited or Key Takeaways uncertain access to adequate, nutritious food. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread job loss that hit older Food insecurity is most workers particularly hard.' However, perhaps resulting in part prevalent among older adults from short-term pandemic-related policy, the overall share of TE older Americans experiencing food insecurity did not change significantly from 2019 to 2020, according to annual data from v Are younger (i.e., ages 50-59) the United States Department of Agriculture." Nevertheless, food insecurity has not been hitting everyone equally. This Fact Sheet describes trends in food insecurity and selected characteristics of food-insecure adults ages 50 and older. State- [RRARNANA atten level data are included in the appendix. ¥ Are Black, Native American, or Hispanic a EWM Conical (1 SKN Trends in Older-Adult Food Insecurity educational attainment Over the past decade, food insecurity among adults ages 50 and older has roughly remained between 8 and 11 percent of the population (figure 1). After peaking at 10.8 percent in 2012, FIGURE 1 Food Insecurity among Adults 50+, 2010-2020 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Source: AARP Public Policy Institute analysis of 2020 Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement (CPS-FSS) MARCH 2022 food insecurity prevalence among adults ages 50 and older dropped to a low of 7.9 percent in 2019. Between 2019 and 2020, food insecurity among this age group did not change substantially (7.9 to 8.1 percent). Among adults ages 50 and older, food insecurity prevalence decreases with age. Adults ages 50 to 59 experience food insecurity at nearly twice the rate of those ages 70 and older (figure 2). From 2019 to 2020, food insecurity prevalence increased by about 1 percentage point among the 50-59 age group and stayed basically the same among adults ages 60 to 69 and 70+. State-Level Differences in Food Insecurity among Older Adults Food insecurity among adults ages 50 and older differs widely by state (figure 3). All top 10 states with the highest rates of older-adult food insecurity are southern states. In 2020, New Hampshire had the lowest prevalence of food insecurity among this age group FIGURE 2 (3.0 percent); the District of Columbia had the highest (13.4 percent; see appendix). Demographic Characteristics Linked to Older-Adult Food Insecurity In 2020, certain subgroups of adults ages 50 and older experienced considerably higher levels of food insecurity than others. e Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Hispanic: Nearly one in five Black and American Indian/Alaska Native adults ages 50 and older experienced food insecurity in 2020. Among this age group, 14.6 percent of Hispanic adults were food insecure, compared with 5.6 and 5.2 percent of Asian and White adults ages 50 and older, respectively (figure 4). Racial and ethnic disparities in food insecurity also widened between 2019 and 2020 (figure 5). Food insecurity increased among older Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Hispanic, and Asian adults, while it decreased slightly among older White adults. Food Insecurity Prevalence by Older Age Group, 2010-2020 a= 50-59 == 60-69 70+ 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% _-_- DS -- = 10.4% a 8.1% 5.5% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Source: AARP Public Policy Institute analysis of 2020 Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement (CPS-FSS) MARCH 2022 FIGURE 3 State-Level Food Insecurity Prevalence among Adults 50+, 2020 Source: AARP Public Policy Institute analysis of 2020 CPS-FSS e Low Educational Attainment: Food insecurity prevalence was highest among adults ages 50 and older without a high school diploma (20.4 percent) and decreased with increasing levels of educational attainment (figure 4). Fewer than 4 percent of adults ages 50 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher were food insecure. Low Income: Unsurprisingly, food insecurity prevalence decreases with increasing income. One fifth of adults ages 50 and older with household incomes below $30,000 were food insecure, compared with less than 2 percent of those earning $100,000 or more (figure 4). Nearly one quarter (22.7 percent) of adults in this age group with household incomes below Food Insecurity Prevalence among Adults 50+ 13.4% ae 3.0% 185 percent of the Federal Poverty Level' were food insecure. Women: Women ages 50 and older were slightly more likely than their male counterparts to be food insecure, but the difference was small (8.4 versus 7.7 percent; figure 4). Living Alone: Adults ages 50 and older who lived alone were more likely to be food insecure than those living with others (10.5 versus 7.4 percent; figure 4). Nonmetropolitan: Adults ages 50 and older living in nonmetropolitan areas were slightly more likely to be food insecure than those living in metropolitan areas (8.8 percent versus 8.0 percent; figure 4).* MARCH 2022 FIGURE 4 Food Insecurity Prevalence among Adults 50+ by Demographic Characteristics, 2020 20.4% 19.7% 19.5% 10.5% 8.7% 9 8.8% 8.4% 7 7% 7.4% 8.0% 5.6% 5.2% 4.2% 1.8% VO VU Vv VO Dt wo vo wo So a a wo wv wv ao wo c Cc aa a aa a ° a a s & s sif § #2 2/8 &8 & @ ees sz § 2 a2 82 281/656 3 5 FE'|S F EF. § <= 6 6 2 pa A a n © oO 5 4 ey R o LL oD ep a Q x= x= a ais < oO wo < c ° ° T 1 r OD vn c °o °o oO - | = = £ S cS = = E . © + - S = S $ Ps ° ° ° x= ° ° ° <= Oo Oo So a) a < < < = ° " ras 6 S S = a E = x c v o Si <= in - S oO ° cS o o 2 <x a oO o So So a zm ° = 2 £4 <& gs *- 8 3 * = " < 5) 3 ® - = Race/Ethnicity Education Household Income Sex Living Alone | Metropolitan Status Note on data limitations: Other racial/ethnic categories not included due to insufficient sample size. Currently, CPS measures sex as a binary variable and does not ask about gender identity, which excludes nonbinary people. Source: AARP Public Policy Institute analysis of 2020 Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement (CPS-FSS) FIGURE 5 Trends in Food Insecurity Prevalence among Americans Ages 50+, by Race/Ethnicity == White (non-Hispanic) ==<=<=Black (non-Hispanic) == <Asian (non-Hispanic) --<=American Indian/Alaska Native (non-Hispanic) Hispanic 30% 25% rN ° a -a NEON 19.7% 20% - A 18.9% 15% _ 14.6% 10% 5% -- Ss 516% 5.2% 0% 2010 2011 2012 #8 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 #2018 2019 2020 Note: Other racial/ethnic categories not included due to insufficient sample size. Source: AARP Public Policy Institute analysis of Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement (CPS-FSS). 4 MARCH 2022 Conclusion millions of older adults put food on the table in Over 9 million Americans ages 50 and older a time of need and prevented overall increases (about 1 in 12) were food insecure in 2020, in food insecurity. However, these findings a number that did not change substantially masked considerably higher food insecurity from 2019 despite a pandemic that caused among various demographic groups, likely widespread unemployment. This finding due to longstanding inequities across domains, suggests that congressional actions such such as employment, housing, and health care, as boosts to the Supplemental Nutrition that the pandemic exacerbated.® Assistance Program (SNAP)° may have helped Appendix Food Insecurity Prevalence by Age Group, 2020 ate % # % # % # % # Alabama 13.1% 92,534 11.3% 63,140 7.7% 46,712 10.8% 202,386 Alaska 9.3% 8,088 7.4% 5,661 6.9% 3,860 8.0% 17,608 Arizona 11.5% 98,560 10.1% 87,051 2.8% 24,989 8.0% 210,600 Arkansas 17.7% 60,233 5.8% 21,711 46% 16,617 9.2% 98,562 California 10.7% 507,584 8.5% 373,109 5.5% 219,814 8.4% 1,100,507 Colorado 4.1% 29,450 6.5% 53,132 3.1% 13,895 4.8% 96,477 Connecticut 10.2% 55,936 5.9% 28,880 4.7% 18,636 7.2% 103,452 Delaware 12.9% 17,940 4.7% 6,014 3.1% 4,541 6.9% 28,495 District of Columbia 12.2% 7,982 15.2% 9,065 13.1% 7,654 13.4% 24,701 Florida 7.6% 212,117 = 9.5% 269,793 7.8% 252,006 8.3% 733,915 Georgia 13.3% 184,590 8.4% 98,565 9.0% 89,425 10.5% 372,579 Hawaii 6.3% 10,629 4.4% 7,373 »=--1.3% 2,536 3.9% 20,539 Idaho 10.1% 21,905 2.9% 6,266 5.0% 8,802 6.1% 36,973 Illinois 10.4% 150,859 9.4% 142,431 64% 91,396 8.8% 384,686 Indiana 10.6% 93,760 5.7% 41,427 6.1% 40,117. -s_ 7.7% 175,304 lowa 7.8% 30,116 6.2% 19,979 7.1% 29,314 7.1% 79,410 Kansas 10.7% 35,373 = 7.3% 24,656 1.5% 5,152 6.5% 65,182 Kentucky 14.5% 84,936 11.4% 66,194 5.9% 27,968 10.9% 179,097 Louisiana 10.2% 52,066 16.3% 93,821 11.2% 58,265 12.7% 204,152 Maine 2.2% 3,561 5.0% 9,447 5.7% 13,883 4.5% 26,891 Maryland 7.6% 59,750 8.1% 56,012 4.2% 28,522 6.7% 144,284 Massachusetts 8.1% 74,567 8.3% 67,963 3.5% 30,101 6.6% 172,632 Michigan 11.1% 150,006 10.3% 136,902 2.2% 25,736 8.1% 312,645 Minnesota 5.1% 42,039 3.9% 25,958 4.3% 23,289 4.5% 91,286 Mississippi 12.8% 49,781 13.4% 46,920 10.4% 31,712 12.3% 128,412 Missouri 13.6% 122,540 6.5% 43,541 5.5% 35,218 9.1% 201,300 Montana 10.1% 13,264 4.7% 6,109 1.9% 2,891 5.4% 22,264 Nebraska 13.2% 31,898 7.9% 16,398 3.7% 7,868 8.5% 56,164 Nevada 10.9% 43,383 7.9% 28,042 4.2% 15,606 7.7% 87,031 New Hampshire 2.9% 6,568 4.4% 7,902 1.6% 2,617 3.0% 17,086 New Jersey 11.8% 146,834 64% 69,372 6.5% 64,369 8.4% 280,576 New Mexico 16.2% 39,610 7.0% 18,575 3.5% 9,228 8.7% 67,413 New York 11.7% 275,167 7.2% 179,477 6.7% 163,313 8.5% 617,958 North Carolina 12.4% 158,398 8.9% 115,883 6.0% 81,151 9.0% 355,433 North Dakota 6.8% 5,857 =2.7% 2,422 0.4% 328 3.4% 8,607 Ohio 12.4% 191,922 64% 94,098 2.5% 36,618 7.2% 322,638 MARCH 2022 % # % # % # % # Oklahoma 16.2% 78,915 9.1% 41,351 8.5% 33,123 11.5% 153,389 Oregon 6.9% 34,466 6.4% 32,863 3.4% 17,984 5.5% 85,313 Pennsylvania 6.9% 108,737 4.1% 65,971 3.9% 65,954 5.0% 240,663 Rhode Island 9.6% 13,041 7.2% 10,009 6.6% 8,102 7.8% 31,152 South Carolina 13.2% 80,655 12.8% 89,623 8.5% 56,941 11.5% 227,218 South Dakota 9.5% 10,613 5.4% 5,535 3.4% 3,281 6.2% 19,429 Tennessee 10.2% 90,411 8.1% 68,086 5.1% 39,471 7.9% 197,969 Texas 12.7% 433,132 10.3% 286,699 6.4% 160,269 10.1% 880,100 Utah 6.1% 21,354 0.9% 2,148 4.2% 9,951 4.0% 33,454 Vermont 10.0% 8,022 4.8% 3,822 4.4% 4,294 6.3% 16,138 Virginia 9.0% 92,141 3.7% 40,348 5.8% 54,300 6.1% 186,789 Washington 7.5% 61,011 4.9% 45,302 1.0% 9,012 4.4% 115,325 West Virginia 15.5% 31,605 11.9% 30,297 8.3% 21,831 11.6% 83,732 Wisconsin 6.3% 56,067 10.7% 77,855 3.0% 19,293 6.8% 153,215 Wyoming 7.8% 5,133 11.6% 9,027 5.1% 3,405 8.3% 17,565 United States Source: AARP Public Policy Institute analysis of Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement (CPS-FSS). te 4,295,109 Ca) 3,152,227 Ey Ly 8.1% 9,488,694 Difference was not statistically significant at the 95 percent confidence level. The US Census Bureau for the US Department of Agriculture conducted the 2020 CPS-FSS in December 2020. In most states, the Federal Poverty Level was $12,760 for a one-person household in 2020. (See Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), "2020 Poverty Guidelines," https://aspe.hhs.gov/topics/poverty-economic-mobility/poverty- idelin rior-hhs-poverty-guidelines-federal-register-referen 2020-poverty-guidelin Metropolitan areas have at least one urbanized area of 50,000 or more inhabitants. SNAP is a federal program that provides benefits to low-income households to buy food. More information is available at www.aarp.org/SNAP. Kendal Orgera, Rachel Garfield, and Robin Rudowitz, "Tracking Social Determinants of Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Kaiser Family Foundation, December 15, 2021, https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/issue-brief/tracking-social-determinants- of-health-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/. Fact Sheet 1356501, March 2022 © AARP PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE 601 E Street, NW Washington DC 20049 Follow us on Twitter @AARPpolicy on facebook.com/AARPpolicy www.aarp.org/ppi For more reports from the Public Policy Institute, visit http://www.aarp.org/ppi/. https://doi.org/10.2641 AARP i.00162.001