OBSERVATIONS CHOLERA, TOGETHER WITH REFERENCES AND QUOTATIONS FROM SEVEKAL OF THE BEST AUTHORITIES OF THE TIME, CALCULATED TOR THE PERUSAL OF THE GENERAL HEADER. BY GEORGE GWYNNE BIRD, M. D., CIAN TO THE SWAHSEA lITFIRMA3 US POPTJLI SUPREMA ]?/• SWANSEA: PUBLISHED BY T. R. DAVIES, 30, CASTLE-STREET. >O BOLD BY WM. WO' BEET, COVENT-GAKDEN, LONDON, BOOKSELLERS. "'/ings and Sixpet 1849. OBSERVATIONS ON THE SUBJECT OP CHOLERA, ADAPTED FOR TIIE GENERAL READER. j/ BY GEORGE G. BIRD, M.D., PHYSICIAN TO THE SWANSEA INFIRMARY. SALUS POPULI SUPREMA LEX. " There is an old terra, as old as the good old English Physician Sydenham — 'Constitution of the Atmosphere;' and to what else than to some inscrutable condition of the element in which we live, and breathe, and have our being — in fact, to an atmospheric poison beyond our ken — can we ascribe the terrific gambols of such a destroyer." — Dr. Fergusson. SWANSEA : PUBLISHED BY T. R. DAVIES, 30, CASTLE-BAILEY-STREET, ALSO SOLD BY WM. WOOD, 39, TAVISTOCK-STREET, COVENT-GARDEN, LONDON. 1849. RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED TO MICHAEL JOHN MICHAEL, ESQ., ifflagor of Stoansea, AS A TRIFLING TOKEN OF THE GRATITUDE AND ADMIRATION FELT BY THE AUTHOR, IN COMMON WITH THE INHABITANTS OF SWANSEA AND ITS NEIGHBOURHOOD, ON ACCOUNT OF THE PATRIOTIC ZEAL, MANLY DETERMINATION, THE PROMPT BENEVOLENCE, AND THE UNWEARIED PERSONAL EXERTIONS, OF THE MAYOR, IN INSTITUTING AND CARRYING OUT SANATORY MEASUBSfjSfo AND PROMOTING AND PROTECTING THE PUBLIC HEALTH, IN THE COMMUNITY OVER WHICH HE PRESIDES. '•' No man can be a useful member of society, except so far as his talents are employed in a manner conducive to the general advantage." — Godwin. Swansea, Aug. 13, 1849. 6 generally entertained, or that such comparative individual safety and doubtful immunity should be sought, excepting in cases of absolute necessity, because it would evidently seem best that in a case of common danger, all alike should face their common enemy, and make common cause to check and effectually resist the evil threatened. It is evidently as right and proper to do this when a disease arising out of natural causes generally prevails, and by which the public health is threatened, as it would be in any other case where discreet and effectual combined resistance may be legitimately exercised for the general good with probable success. Nothing that can be said carries with it more the aspect of truth than the old adage, which declares, the " weakest go to the wall;" yet, on the other hand, it is equally and most comfortably true, that in contemplating personal health and protection against the ravages of disease, there is another proverb Avhich the expei'ience of mankind has fully verified, namely, that " Glass will last as long as iron, if you take care of it." I think this last very significantly and truly applies to the present epidemic. I have not yet personally witnessed any instance (and I have seen many) of Cholera that could not be accounted for fairly and rationally, as arising out of some one or more of the known causes which were likely to have given rise to its appearance ; and as by far the majority of such ascertained causes are of a nature which admit either of removal or important amelioration, it is right they should not only be known, but duly considered and carefully obviated. This becomes the more urgent, in as much as these causes to a great extent are of a character which are likely to affect the many rather than individuals, and therefore it is highly probable that in such instances, on the appearance of Cholera 7 from such causes, those who are similarly situated will be likely to be similarly affected, unless all combine promptly and effectually to perform the highly important duty of seeking for and removing all probable causes, which favour the developement of disease ; and, unfortunately, many of these are of such a diffusive or spreading nature, that no one can offend against sanatory laws without the greatest danger of injuring his neighbour quite as much as he does himself. I think the necessity for a well connected and combined plan of sanatory operations, having the object of protecting the public health in towns and other communities will be sufficiently apparent to every rational mind, because epidemics generally (the one present being no exception to the general rule) for the most part select as the scene of action places where the damaging forces that militate against health most prevail ; consequently, the localities selected by Cholera are especially those where filth, bad ventilation, and other fostering causes of pestilence are present, so that there can be no security for such vicinities, however careful the neighbouring residents may be in their own individual conduct in sanatory particulars. A recent medical writer has well expressed the above sentiment in the following words :—": — " During the prevalence of a pestilence, no domestic habitation is safe merely by reason of cleanliness and strict sanatory arrangements observed by the inhabitants; for if the same care be taken in a whole row of houses, save and except in one near which jilthy accumulations, undrained cesspools, or putrid matter of any kind, or stagnant water, shall be allowed to accumulate, it is obvious that the wind so setting in as to waft the effluvia into the adjoining habitations or premises, may reach the inhabitants of any buildings in the entire row." * * Dr. Collier's Code of Safety, page 35. 8 It will be seen, I think, that Cholera in these climates for the most part riots amidst scenes of filth, fear, intemperance, over crowding, bad diet, and bad. ventilation, and is no less deadly in its influence where it finds the twice afflicted victims of want and grief, viz., amongst such of the poor of the community as are exhausted by all the hardships of penury, immediate fatigue, -and depression of mind. The latter causes well bespeak the kind consideration and elemosynary aid of the charitable, compassionate, and wealthy, not only on account of the immediate objects of their bounty, but also on account of the public safety, for one of the most sure ways of checking the general spread of a pestilence is to remove as many probable victims as possible from its deadly influence; and thus charity judiciously and effectually bestowed, and intelligent advice duly followed, are as effective often in arresting the progress of some epidemics, by improving the condition of the people, as vaccination has proved successful in defying and almost annihilating the ravages of small pox, by fortifying the constitution against its attacks. Ido not wish to be understood as by any means asserting, that in all cases Cholera selects its victims from the purlieus of wretchedness and dirt, for it is quite otherwise in many instances ; yet, for the most part in this climate, such has hitherto been the case. True it is, the palace may be visited as severely as the peasant's hut, and this is not very extraordinary, and it is even so with some other occasionally prevailing diseases; for instance, typhus fever may make and has made similar visitations, so did the sweating sickness, another epidemic, and so with several others. This Ido however mean to assert, viz., that, as a general rule, the more cleanly the cottage and its vicinities, the more safe is it for the mansion and its adjacencies ; and the less (particularly in contagious diseases) there is of 9 such sickness amongst tlie most numerous class, " the poor," the less are they likely or competent to carry it and spread it, by means of their clothes and personal vicinity or contact, amongst the population and persons whom they approach. How such things may happen may be readily gathered from the well known fact, that washerwomen are very liable to take contagious diseases ; and as regards clothes, I myself remember an instance when a gentleman sent a coat to a village tailor to be repaired ; in this tradesman's house ¦ there was small pox, but he had not the candour to state the fact, and the coat was returned and worn by the owner, who immediately sickened with the disease and died. Again, ¦as regards some contagious diseases, and how readily they may be spread, I may instance the fact, that in the dire disease called puerperal fever, if a medical person or nurse happens to attend a patient so situated, they are apt, take what ever pains they may, to communicate the same for some time to lying-in patients whom they may subsequently attend. A little serious reflection on such facts would lead to wise determinations and actions, and proper proceedings in many epidemics. As to the malarious influences in spreading diseases, I will present to the reader, before I close these general observations, the following extract from the author just quoted, namely, Dr. Collier, to shew with what curious precision such emanations may affect individuals :—": — " On the 11th of May, 1750, at the Old Bailey, the prisoners were kept nearly a whole day in small, ill ventilated, and crowded apartments, some of them then labouring under the jail fever. When they were brought into court, the windows at the end of the hall, opposite to the place where the judges sat, were thrown open. The people on the left of the court, on whom the wind blew, were infected with malignant fever, while those B 10 on the opposite side escaped. The Lord Chief Justice and the Recorder, who sat on the Lord Mayor's right hand, escaped, while the Lord Mayor and the rest of the bench, who sat on his left, were seized with the distemper. Many of the Middlesex jury, on the left side of the court, died of it, while the London jury, who sat opposite to them, received no injury." * In the following few pages I shall frequently illustrate my assertions and statements by similar quotations, because I believe such a mode best, in as much as truth, when conveyed in the words and with the prestige of men of well ascertained wisdom and indisputably great reputation, carries, I think, with it greater weight, and naturally impresses the mind more effectually with conviction, than it does when it emanates, unsupported by such evidence, from persons of ordinary capacity and humble attainments. I shall now proceed to give a brief general outline of the history, nature, and causes of Cholera, together with some short observations as to its prevention and general treatment. As to the history of Cholera. — The question that would probably first occupy the interest of the general reader would be, whether or not this disease had occupied the attention of the ancients ; and in this respect I may briefly observe, the subject has given rise to discussion and difference of opinion, for the evidence on this point is by no means entirely free from doubt. A correct knowledge of the facts of ancient history can only be derived from the records of such times, and the testimony procurable from such source as regards the disease in question is obscure, much being left open to inference or conjecture, neither of which can enable us to arrive at clear and unquestionable certainty. lam inclined to think it has * Op. Cit.j.par. 09, fol. 35. 11 been observed at earlier periods than the present. Two circumstances especially may have contributed to the uncertainty alluded to ; the first is, the comparatively unfrequent commercial and general intercourse which took place between the inhabitants of different parts of the world, in earlier times, so that what occurred in various places was not likely to be so generally well known, or accurately recorded as in our own days, when communication is frequent and scientific enquiry ever active: the other cause alluded to is, that although the same complaint may have existed in the earlier ages, the precise form in which it then appeared, and many of the phenomena displayed, may have assumed an altered character, as contrasted with our times, so as on comparison, at this distant period, not to be so clearly and distinctly recognized. It is hardly to be wondered at that such uncertainty should exist with regard to the more early times with reference to this subject, when much doubt has been expressed even as to whether Asiatic Cholera really ever existed in our own country at any period of its earlier history. Sydenh&m has described such a disease, and it is by many believed and affirmed from the evidence, that the complaint he wrote on was identical in its general character with the epidemic which has so devastated the world in the present age. Yet many writers, and some of them of high professional reputation, and unquestionably great bibliothecal pretensions and learning, have questioned the correctness of this conclusion. I may mention that the late Dr. M. Good, Dr. Copeland, and others, have done so. In so far as my humble judgment can guide me, looking at Sydenham's own words, and regarding the way in which the evidence has been set forth by several writers, particularly by the late Dr. James Johnson,* I think it was the same disease. * Diseases of Tropical Climates. 12 I may also add, that Dr. Billing * and others support this view of the question. It has been clearly proved, and is I believe universally admitted, that the first visitation of the present epidemic Cholera in our times occurred in the year 1817 in the East Indies, in the presidency of Calcutta, whence it has spread nearly over the whole earth's habitable surface at different periods. I may here observe, that a question has arisen, and has been much discussed, as to whether this identical disease had ever appeared before in India. I will also unhesitatingly express my own opinion that it had done so. Dr. George Budd's f able paper on Cholera has, so far as I can arrive at a conclusion, in addition to other testimony, fairly set this point on its indisputably correct basis. I think the history of Cholera, like that of other epidemics, of interest and vital importance, equally so in some respects with its actual treatment, at. a time when the disease is present; because, if it be true that a given epidemic has appeared from time to time, the same in its general characters, but protean and varying in some of its symptoms and morbid phenomena, it follows that the treatment to be adopted, like the history, must necessarily vary, if success be the object. Of this we are very sure, that even within a short distance of geographical space, the type, intensity, and mortality of epidemics will vary in an extraordinary degree, so that whilst at a given time and locality the same disease will be deadly, and medical treatment very unsatisfactory, at the same time in another place, at no great distance off, it will be quite otherwise. This is one mode of accounting for the many specifics which are so absurdly and shamelessly vaunted as being curative of Cholera. For the disease itself can * Principles of Medioine, p. 248, pub. 1849. t Library of Medicine, vol. 4, p. 101. 13 obviously only be properly dealt with by being correctly studied and adequately administered to by those who, so far as human knowledge and information extend, are competent to do this ; for even individual cases, as must be readily acknowledged by anticipation on the part of rational and educated persons, will, in the same place and at the same time, vary much in many important particulars, and require considerably modified treatment. It will be foreign to the present object that I should minutely capitulate the geographical progress of Cholera, in its visiting and revisiting various parts of the globe, since the year 1817, its first appearance. The details would be tedious, and such accounts are seldom perused by the general reader. I may add, however, that those who desire to be informed on this subject will find, amongst many other accounts treating of the history of Cholera, much masterly information and sound argument in the respective able writings of Dr. J.Johnson,* and by Dr. Annesley,f Dr. Greaves, I Dr. G. Budd,§ Dr. Copeland,|| &c. I would also refer to an admirable paper on this subject which, appeared in the " Lancet," so far as my recollection at present serves me, either in the year 1832 or 1833; and as relating to the history of epidemics generally, I would refer to Hecker's History of the Epidemics of the Middle Ages, one of the volumes published by the Sydenham Society, a book replete with interesting information. It will be sufficient here shortly to remark, that Cholera first appeared in India at Jessore, in the Sunderbunds of Bengal, about 100 miles from Calcutta, in August, 1817. During that and the succeding year it ravaged the peninsula * Op. Cit. t Sir J. Annesley on the Diseases of India. t Dr. Greaves' Clinical Medicine. § Library of Medicine. || Dr. Copeland's Medical Dictionary. 14 of India; in 1823 it reached the borders of the Caspian Sea, and in the year 1830 it appeared in a malignant form in the south-eastern provinces of the Russian empire, and reached Moscow in the month of September; in June, 1831, it was present at Petersburg; in September it reached Berlin; in October it appeared in Sunderland; and in February, 1832, this disease broke out in London. In the present year we have a repetition of the pestilence, which does not appear by any means to have diminished in its severity. This has been equally the case with several other epidemics, which, when they have visited mankind, have over and over again returned with no lessened virulence ; indeed, the repetitions of the influenza have often been far more widely spreading and fatal than at first, — a highly important fact, which, as it seems to me, plainly shews the interests of all classes to be closely connected and vitally identified, in the important duty of making common cause against those circumstances which are ascertained to favour the inroads of epidemics, and calculated to promote their extension, and should therefore urge all to use every effectual and useful means that human power can command to protect the people from such influences. The following extract willshow this importance, and significantly points out some curious and ascertained tendencies in the history of certain epidemics : — " The average visitations of new fatal exotics have been calculated as recurring at each revolution of forty years, and there is none on record which has been in this country less fatal than Asiatic Cholera- After the first appearance of an exotic epidemic, failing of naturalization, it has a tendency to repeat its visit once in each revolution of sixteen years. Thus the sweating sickness, which was said to have been brought over along with the army of Richmond, afterwards Henry VII., first appeared at 15 Milford Haven in the year 1483, when, meeting with no apt epidemical condition, it soon disappeared. It repeated its visitation under epidemic influence in 1485 ; and it reappeared altogether five times, with an average interspace of sixteen years; not until its fourth visitation reaching the court, and proving mortal to many of the courtiers in six hours, Henry VIII. owing his emergence from a severe attack to the well known vigour of his constitution. At its fifth and last return, or sixth visit, in 1551 it carried off 120 in a day, within the precincts of Westminster alone, where the two sons of Charles Brandon, both Dukes of Suffolk, died of it. 1551— 1485=66-^4= l6h, which agrees with the interspace between the two visits of Asiatic Cholera."* I think that these facts are worthy of the deepest consideration, and that they carry with them to all who have any power to do good a solemn call to duty, — a declaration that the zealous performance thereof cannot be neglected with impunity.f A similar but striking appeal of the same nature has been pointedly manifested in our own times, and which another quotation from the same intelligent and faithful author fully sets forth ; he adds — " In the capricious visits of an exotic, as in sweating sickness, the earlier visitations may prove Collier's Code of Safety, par. 116, page 57. t v In all new epidemics, from the black death downwards, traced from the reign of Edward 111., and in the more extended space of ancient history, derived from the Grecian, Roman, and Arabian authorities, as well as from Chinese and Brahminical tradition, we learn, that such new forces first commit their ravages on the lowest classes of society ; but as contagious force gains ground so as to reach the upper classes, these suffer the greatest mortality, in proportion to the number of cases supplied by, and occurring in, such classes. This may not be manifested in a first visitation, but has always been verified in the sequel." — • Collier, Op.Cit.,-p.52. 16 fatal to the poor ; in the later the poor shall escape altogether, and the highest classes shall be the victims. Thus in the three first visits of the sweating sickness the rich escaped; in the fourth, they berjan to suffer; in the fifth, severely; and in the sixth, extensively and exclusively, the poor escaping universally. So in our own times, this capricious character is still preserved. The Irish typhus,* a new epidemic which appeared first in 1816, was for many years limited to the poor ; but in the progress of its unhappy naturalization, it has found its way to the upper classes, and when contagiously introduced among their families, it is growing proportionally more fatal to them than to the poor themselves." The author adds in a note, — " The mortality (according to the government report) has been much greater among the higher ranks of society, whom the disease attacked, than in the labouring classes ; and the physicians and other attendants, as well as the clergy, have felt its destructive force in much more than an ordinary proportion." I shall here make no comment on the text thus derived from Dr. Collier further than to observe, that his sound and well written little publication is one of the most interesting I ever read, and, in my opinion, well worthy of the careful perusal and attentive consideration of the intelligent of the British public, particularly those who really have the general good at heart in. sanatory measures. In the " history" of disseminative diseases, nothing seems to me more curious and remarkable than their appearances from time to time, and the differences in character and effects; * I may as well here as elsewhere advert to a curious instance observed in a chemical manufactory as relating to "chlorine" in connection with this fever in Ireland. Dr. Christison observes, "It is an interesting fact, that during the epidemic fever which raged over Ireland from 1816 to 1819, the people at the manufactory at Belfast were exempt from it." Christison on Poisons, edit. 1836, p. 737, subject Chlorine. 17 c for the same diseases present at different visitations different features, that is, they often materially alter in type and intensity. It is also remarkable how some of them have been controlled by human discoveries, and appropriate antagonistic agents. As a matter of historical illustration, I may briefly remark, that small pox and measles first shewed themselves in the sixth century, scarlet fever early in the seventeenth century, and vaccination was introduced in the eighteenth century; syphilis became first known about the year 1494, and that the present malignant Cholera first appeared in 1817. It is sufficiently obvious to every one, that, Providentially, some of the diseases enumerated have been brought in a great measure under control by human efforts, and that the treatment of all of them is better understood than formerly. This is encouraging ; for whilst, on the one hand, we see formidable diseases appearing occasionally, so we perceive there are remedies to be discovered for averting or remedying such evils. It would appear that it is ordained as necessary in the Divine government of the universe, that such visitors should appear from time to time among men for wise and good purposes; amongst these probably it is ordained that the family of mankind should, through such practical warnings from time to time, be compelled to learn the value of health by reason of sad reverses, and induced to use carefully the means of preserving this valuable blessing, so that the race should not be permanently deteriorated by their own indifference, carelessness, and neglect. One further remarkable fact in the history of epidemics is, that they seem to convert the ordinary causes of diseases, and even the diseases themselves occurring during the visit of the epidemic, into something foreign to their general form, 18 and impart to such causes and diseases a new character, — in other words, such diseases become either the epidemic which prevails, or like it. Thus, when Cholera prevails, those causes which would usually produce ordinary continued fever or typhus, such as dirt, filth, bad ventilation, &c, all which we well know frequently occasion these complaints, are, when acted on by the Choleraic epidemic influence, apt to induce, not typhus or other continued fever, but Cholera or diarrhoea ; and similar laws apply to many other epidemics.* Again, during the operation of epidemic influence, diseases present will often cease to carry out the usual phenomena observed in their progress, and in lieu thereof will assume the character of the epidemic prevailing. Taking Cholera, again, for an instance, a patient may have fever or inflammation of any organ, a common cold, or even an injury ; * The atmosphere of organic matter thrown off insensibly by every population, more or less dense, as a district may be more or less open or close, and rendered more poisonous by the exhalations from common sewers, church-yards, vaults, slaughter houses, cesspools, factories, all commingling therein, may be sufficient to impress distinctive force in the living, so as to receive and impart the processes of reaction in the zymotic principles necessary to the spread of typhus fever ; but it 'is insufficient to develope epidemical disease, unless aided by that epidemic influence, to which all progressive epidemics have been traced." — Collier, Op. Cit., p. 53. The same author also observes — " A new and extraordinary epidemic force brings all things under it, and sways the character of all acute diseases, so long as such force prevails. Thus a woman dying in child- bed may have presented some traces of Cholera — a man stabbed may die with symptoms of Cholera — some may die of prevailing inflamma- tions, yet shewing signs of Cholera — a case of poisoning may receive the impress of Cholera. Even the intelligent of the public, ignorant of this law, are apt to deride us for calling every thing Cholera, when we have merely described this last link of a chain, this crowning impress of epi- demic force." — Collier, Op. Cit., par. 113, p. 56. 19 and in the course attendant on either, the usual symptoms will cease and be lost by an attack of the disease epidemically prevailing; — this is what medical men call "the convertibility of disease." There is another circumstance attaching to epidemics which may be considered as constituting a portion of their history, namely, the ascertained effects of general panic ; for most undoubtedly, in proportion to the intensity of this state of the public mind, so is the impression and spread of epidemic disease.* This is a most important fact, for it leads, in the first place, to shew, that there is what may be called an epidemic state of the mind, which materially influences the propagation and spreading of epidemic disease; and, secondly, it shews us how necessary it is on such trying occasions to cultivate by all means a calm, rational, and religiously trustful state of thought and feeling, and to discourage by all means sentiments and emotions of a contrary character.! Hence it is obvious, how fatally injurious is conduct that can only have the effect of creating alarm, and depressing the feelings. I believe no one circumstance is more calculated to disseminate epidemic and contagious disease, than the culpable habit that many persons too frequently practice of going about prophesying woe, spreading ill news, and of adding to or colouring what is reported by aid of the imagination or invention, so as to give their communications an intense interest of a sombre and disastrous character. It is awful to contemplate the extent of mischief an active individual, busily employed after such a degrading fashion, * " Learned medical writers have endeavoured to shew, that there are epidemics of the mind as well as of the body. The history of disease furnishes us with strong proofs of such occasional inflictions on the human race." — Collier, par. 4, p. 10. t " Sound religion exerts a preventive force against all diseases."— Collier, Op. Cit., p. 69. 20 may be able to cause and perpetrate in the course of a day, and therefore all such conduct should, for public safety's sake, be avoided as much as possible. The practice, too, of making such themes unnecessarily the subject of social and domestic conversation, especially before children,* or encouraging or permitting servants and others to collect news of this kind and to discuss such topics, is highly undesirable. It seems to me to be the first cousin to the bringing disease into a family, which it unquestionably too often does ; indeed, it is frequently as contaminating as contagion itself. Almost every medical person of observation and experience can call to mind numerous instances in which illness may be readily and certainly traced to such abominable indiscretion and unenviable love of exciting wonder. The little Cholera mobs and Cholera coteries, for such they are, which we continually observe collected in the streets and dwellings occupied by the industrial classes, do an infinity of harm ; and no less calculated to be hurtful are the "Cholera conversaziones" of the drawing-rooms and servants' halls and kitchens of the wealthier classes.f For my own part, I would almost as soon, so far as safety is concerned, continually live next door to a well planted graveyard as in such a circle. The business of sickness and human destruction is likely to thrive almost equally well in both localities ; for fear is readily imparted and highly contagious, and almost as dangerous in an epidemic season,, as the smell of a foul drain or grave-yard emanations ; and it were well occasionally that persons guilty of such unsavoury and unsafe conduct should have justice done them, in being * " Children from very slight emotions of fear will have diarrhoea." — Laycock on the Nervous Diseases of Women, p. 173. t " In all communities, large or small, the spread of an epidemic bears a relation to the panic pervading the community," — Collier, Op. Cit., p. 24. 21 personally reminded of the nature and consequences of such hurtful proceedings, and ill-timed gossiping propensities. I have ventured to allude strongly to this circumstance, because I have so frequently seen calamity incidental to the evil practice. It has been truly remarked by Liebig, — " Disease begins where resistance ends ;" and I would ask, what more effectually deprives an individual of resistile force, than excessive fear and deficient courage, whether natural or acquired ? What in an army tends more to depress the spirits of the soldiery, and to lessen their vigorous determination, than the " spreading of ill news ?" I have, furthermore, adverted to the subject in this place, because it seems to me to form a most important practical item in the history of epidemics, and ought to receive weighty consideration on the part of the public. " Fear doth make cowards of us all." — The best we can do in seasons of Cholera or other epidemics, is " to study to be quiet, and to mind our own business," and to do our duty, — a considerable portion of which consists in doing all the good we can to every body, and ill to none : this tends to tranquillize the feelings and satisfy the conscience ; and further, it authorises us justly to expect the kind considerate sympathy and good offices of our neighbours and friends in the time of need. As a matter of " history," so far as I am informed, this plan has answered exceedingly well, and I think it much demands close imitation. It has not, however, been invariably followed. There have been instances derogatory to human nature and degrading to the Christian, in which people have conducted themselves in a cruel and cowardly manner towards the afflicted during seasons of pestilential visitations. Certainly it is no more disgraceful in a soldier (and what can be more so ?) to run away and 22 forsake his comrades, colours, and cause, in the hour of battle strife, than it is in a Christian man to abandon his neighbour in the time of common danger and calamity. In seasons of epidemic peril (to their honour be it spoken) women have been most eminently distinguished for genuine fortitude and steadfast benevolence; for scarcely ever even in such times, have they been known to abandon their post, or exhibit the semblance of fear for self safety, so long as they could be useful in mitigating the sufferings of those they loved or regarded, or to whom they owed duty or allegiance. How often do we see the most fragile and timid of the sex, who may have participated painfully and largely in the common apprehension felt, instantly on a calamity befalling a relative, husband, or child, appearing in a new and great character, and exhibiting the most determined courage and firmness, and evincing perfect and praiseworthy indifference to fatigue, trials, or danger, indeed to every thing save the calls of afaffection, duty, and piety. I have thus briefly adverted to some points on what may be termed the practical, popular, and daily history of epidemics. As regards the causes of Cholera, I have already observed they are to a great extent obscure, — not more so, however, than are those of many other epidemics. It may, perhaps, be desirable to explain to some extent what the word " cause," as applicable to disease, implies in a medical sense. "Causes of disease are those circumstances which generally precede it, and to the operation of which its occurrence is due. In many instances these circumstances elude our observation. In many of these, the true cause, if apparent, is combined with many other antecedent circumstances which have -no share in producing the disease, and yet are liable to be mistaken for causes. These circumstances are to be sifted, and 23 the true cause discovered only by the attentive observation of large numbers of cases by which disease is produced."* It must be remembered, that even decided common causes of diseases often will not produce their results, unless there is coexisting in the constitution of the person to whom they are presented a certain predisposition or proneness which is favourable to their operation ; thus a " healthy person living in a marshy district may not get an ague until he becomes debilitated by any cause, such as cold or fatigue ; then the poison will act."f Those causes which give such "proneness" or "predisposition" are called the predisposing or remote causes, those which immediately cause the disease are called the exciting or immediate causes. Thus in ague just spoken of, the antecedent circumstances, as cold or fatigue and their effects, are predisposing, and the aguish attack itself is produced by the effects of malaria, — therefore the exciting cause. To oppose those causes, there is in man, often assisted by favourable circumstances in which he is placed, a protective or resistile power of constitution, which is ordinarily greatest in perfect health. This resistile form is called " vis * " Principles of Medicine," by Dr. J. B. Williams, p. 5, edit. 1848. t " But without his being thus weakened, if the exciting cause be made stronger by his sleeping on the marshy ground itself, then the poison may act without any predisposition, and the ague begins." — Op. Cit. The consideration of such facts will, to the intelligent, afford sig- nificant hints for their conduct and reflections, on causes of disease affecting public health ; they will see that the dose of poison or direct " cause," and the " predispositions" also, are to be considered ; therefore, that not only is the epidemic to be thought of, but the health of the people and the attendant circumstances, — not only the strength of the epidemic poison, but that which helps to give it power and effect.— G. G. B. 24 conservatrix;"* and when this is overcome up to a given point by damaging causes, disease is manifested on its incentives being presented. Liebig observes, " Disease occurs when the sum of vital force, which tends to neutralise all causes of disturbance (in other words, when the resistance offered by the vital force), is weaker than the acting cause of disturbance. "f It is, however, to be observed, as may naturally be inferred from the preceding observations, that, generally speaking, the action of both "predisposing" and "exciting" causes is necessary to produce disease, which seldom ordinarily occurs from any one cause, and often from many combining.]: The predisposing causes are numerous, and of these one may suffice, or many may combine, to produce a particular adequate result ; and it matters little which, provided the effect is the same, or equal. Hence it behoves the public to know generally what constitutes such predisposing causes of disease, and how they act ; and it seems to me that this is the business to some extent of every intelligent person and well wisher to himself or others, — for whether in the domestic circle, or professional or public life, there is no safety nor certainty in ignorance ; and this fact ought to offer a strong inducement to us all to be well informed, notwithstanding we are told on high authority, "no man is bound * " There is in organized beings a certain conservative power which opposes the operation of noxious agents, and labours to expel them when introduced." — Op. Cit., p. 7. t Liebig's " Organic Chemistry of Physiology and Pathology," p. 254, edit. 1842. $ " A great variety of circumstances and causes may thus act on the body, so as to produce disease." — Dr. Williams, Op. Cit., p. 5. " Cause never acts simply or singly. One cause suffices not to pro- duce disease." — Collier, Op. Cit., p. 12. 25 to know every thing."* Lord Bacon also informs us that " boldness is ever blind," and certainly the " bold" recklessness and indifference shewn by numerous persons, even at the present epidemical era, with regard to deadly causes of disease, easily remediable, by which they are surrounded, clearly illustrate the truth of the axiom of this wise philosopher of an earlier a^e. The frequent exhibitions of careless and reckless conduct of this kind, considering the high importance and obvious duty imposed in such cases of danger, and the solemn warnings offered to mankind from time to time of the evils of neglect, can, even though the perpetrators escape with impunity, constitute no argument in favour of evincing indifference to such evident moral obligations, f I would here remark, it must be obvious that the fact of varying and apparently connective evidence on the point of contagion or no contagion, merely derived from instances observed, which appear to declare for the one or the other, is no iiTesistible proof on either side, for there can be no clear demonstration until doubt is removed through the investigation of truth. Like the fable of the travellers and the chamelion, an observer in the wide extent of pathology may witness a fact which he may truly declare, and which he may infer to be conclusive on the side which he espouses ; * Bacon. t The dangerously crowded and disgracefully managed burial grounds, the narrow streets, the open public ditches and drains and stagnant waters, the ill scavenged streets and unflushed sewers of towns, the neg- lected cesspools and drains, and the crowded state of private houses, the dirt and filth and ill ventilation of many of these and of factories and work-shops, are all striking and terrible instances, verifying the truth of Lord Verulam's aphorism, and clearly shewing that there are many in public, private, and clerical life, and even whole communities, who are " very ' bold' indeed!!" \> 26 another may witness an instance of a perfectly opposite nature, and may with as much propriety and equal pertinacity maintain his own deductions to the contrary; whereas it may turn out eventually, that although both have truly and faithfully declared what they observed, still a third party may have seen that which indisputably proves that they have only observed and made known 'part of the truth, although they unquestionably stated with veracity that which they witnessed and believed. I think it will be found that such is unquestionably the case with Cholera, — namely, that occasionally it is contagious, and often not so. I think there is nothing very extraordinary in this, supposing it to be true ; it seems to me rational to expect it would be so, and to believe it on the merits of the evidence without much hesitation. I am aware that in stating these convictions, I am placing myself in opposition to some of the most eminent medical authorities. On the other hand, the views I have advanced seem in some instances to be practically adhered to, whilst in others they receive the decided advocacy of writers of equal medical pretensions. I may here remark, the subject is one on which recent authors have received no light of personal experience in our own country prior to the year 1817, when the cholera first appeared amongst us. And it is obvious that now, in districts where the disease is present, we are being furnished with enlarged and increasing materials from which to form a judgment respecting the contagious or non contagious nature of the disease. Sir James Annesley has declared it to be his conviction, that Cholera is not a contagious disease. The medical board of India declared for non contagion.* Dr. G. Budd, ia * Dr. James Johnson, Op, Cit. 27 the paper already referred to, sides with the non contagionists, and the metropolitan sanatory commissioners have arrived at a similar conclusion. Mr. Bell, who had seen much of the disease, and who wrote a treatise on Cholera in 1832, ridicules the idea of contagion ; and the late Dr. Fergusson, who had large opportunities for observation, is equally positive in expression of the same opinion. Dr. James Johnson seems to leave the subject for future decision ; and Dr. Parkes, in his admirable treatise, entitled Report on Cholera,* appears to have a similar inclination. Indeed, whatever may be the opinions expressed by any one as to non contagion, I think there can be no doubt whatever, looking at facts, but that the generality of authorities, learned and official, seem by no means indisposed to act on the side of caution ; and as the causes of Cholera are undoubtedly " obscure," f it is very proper that all persons of discretion should follow this prudent example. It is due to the reader here to state, that Dr. Sutherland, of Liverpool, whose sphere of observation has been most extensive, and Mr. Bowie, of London (both gentlemen being inspectors to the board of health), have expressed to me personally their entire conviction that Cholera is not a contagious disease. No one, however, so far as I am informed, appears to deny that it is capable of localizing itself; and when so localized, of abiding for a season, and laying hold of all within its reach who are constitutionally " predisposed" to its attacks. Dr. Greaves, I go on to say, whose opportunities have been great, appears to lean to the side of the contagiousness * A most important document. t " Its causes are very obscure." — Marshall Hall. 28 of Cholera, and to attach great weight to the evidence in favour of this view of the subject. Certainly the judgment of one who has so closely observed, and who has so admirably adorned the page of medical wisdom in recording the practical results of his experience, is entitled to great weight. Dr. Watson, also, is in favour of the communicability of Cholera. Sir Gilbert Blanc held the same opinion, and so does Dr. Elliotson. Dr. Browne, the author of the admirable article on Cholera in the Encyclopaedia of Medicine, expresses his convictions to the like effect ; and Dr. Copeland, whose inquiries into the subject have been most extensive, patient, and laborious, appears to me to offer evidence of the most weighty kind as to the communicability of Cholera, — the more entitled to weight on account of his extensive medical acquirements, and his habits of close inquiry into pathological history. Doctor Gregory likewise expresses his opinion in favour of contagion in Cholera. I will not go further into the subject matter of difference ; enough has been said to shew, that such differences of opinion do exist amongst men of the highest intellectual attainments and matured experience; notwithstanding this, it may be hoped, and I believe, that ere long these discrepances of opinion will be settled by more extended inquiry, and the results of further investigation. Now, I would ask, why it should be supposed that Cholera is incapable of being propagated by contagion? why unable to spread by communication with the sick ? , It was for a long season debated what continued fevers were contagious, and what were not so ; but more patient inquiry seems to have settled the point, namely, that it is the nature and character of all continued fevers to be contagious.* * See Dr. Watson's Practice of Physic, vol 2, p. 499; also Dr. Chris- tison's Paper on Fever, Library of Medicine, vol. 1, p. 158. 29 Indeed it may further be asked, is not Cholera itself a fever ? I think there is no doubt of it. Dr. Billing has very plainly stated this as a fact,* and so have many others. Moreover, this view of the subject seems to me to be one not easily controverted. Although it is the nature and property of continued fevers to spread by contagion, it does not always follow that they must do so, for often times they do not ; but yet it may be, and is, their property and tendency, as a class and as a general rule, although not invariably, for exceptions frequently occur. I think this same rule applies remarkably to Cholera, — not by any means, generally speaking, one of the eminently contagions diseases.f There are some observations from the elegant and accomplished pen of Dr. Holland, in a paper (published in his " Medical Notes and Observations"), entitled, " Method of Enquiry as to Contagion," page 276, 2nd edition, which are in my judgment of the greatest use and importance in guiding the inquirer in the investigation of this subject. After alluding to certain points, all of intrinsic moment, necessary to be inquired into in the study of contagious diseases, he says, " Duly considering these several points, they will be found, I think, to shew adequate cause for all the * "I consider Cholera an essentially febrile disease, whether it assume the remittent or intermittent form." — Principles of Medicine, edit. 1849, p. 248. t See Mayo's "Outlines of Pathology," where some most judicious remarks may be found. "The Asiatic Cholera, like any other epidemic, maybe pronounced to be not appreciably, but weakly, capriciously, and inconsiderably contagious for a month or more, and shortly afterwards it may become decidedly communicable, so that proximity and inhalation, in common with the sick, may become a formidable assisting cause, to make up, along with other forces, the aggregate sufficing force." — Collier, Op. Cit. 30 strange and perplexing appearances of contagious disease. So far from its being difficult to explain why a given disorder should occasionally appear infectious, at other times not,* — why it should spread rapidly and virulently in some localities, and not at all in others, — why it should affect some persons, and leave others free, — why the cases should be violent at one period, and mild at another, — it is rather, perhaps, matter of wonder that the circumstances are not still more varied and irregular than we find them to be. Where there are such numerous and ever changing elements of difference, the combinations of these may well give scope to every assignable variety of result." The three main heads, which, according to Dr. Holland, jDrincipally deserve consideration in respect to the apparently singular variations we witness in observing the laws of contagion, and which remarkably influence such phenomena — are, first, the condition of the person having the infection; secondly, the state of the person receiving it; and thirdly, the condition of the medium through which the transference is made.f " I believe," says this able writer, " that reflection will shew the whole subject to be comprised under these three heads; and that we are bound to refer to them severally, all 'particular questions or instances which come before us." Dr. Holland further observes, in reference to what I have just quoted, "It is clear that very many of the contradictions of opinion and statement, as to the contagious nature of certain diseases, may be solved by a reference to these considerations." * "He who thinks that Asiatic Cholera, or any other malady, must either be infectious or not, is only clinging to a logical quibble." — Collier, Op. Cit. t A most extended, varied, and interesting field of observation and enquiry. 31 I would further state, it is my belief that a perusal of this admirable paper will amply reward any impartial seeker after a truthful interpretation of the laws of contagion. Controversy, in my humble opinion, does far loss good than patient investigation ; patience will "do its perfect work," which controversy seldom accomplishes, as we may well expect when we know that too many of those engaged therein, will see nothing but what they believe, whilst others will believe nothing but what they see. One most important and encouraging ascertained truth, amidst all the doubt, controversy, and dismay, by which the nature and the history of contagion are surrounded, ought to engage the attention and quicken and direct the exertions of every good member of society — viz., " experience shows that, however fatal the character of any epidemic, and however imperfect our knowledge of cure, an early recourse to rational and prudent aids lessens the aggregate mortality ensuing therefrom."* I have thus endeavoured in some measure to show generally what is the import of the question regarding contagion in Cholera. No doubt, however, exists but that the more important and primary question is, in what does the visitation originate ; and I think the answer certainly is, that it arises out of epidemical influences. On this part of the subject I proceed to offer a few remarks. On the epidemical nature of Cholera. — This is a most important topic for consideration and discussion in two aspects — the first, as to the nature of epidemic force as a cause in inducing disease, in other words, epidemic force " per se ;" and secondly, with reference to those causes and circumstances which assist in adding to its power, and.; giving it a greater tendency and facility to spread. * Collier, Op. Cit. 32 Supposing (to use an arbitrary mode of explanation in numbers) that the sum of cause or causes required to produce the given effect is five, then, if the epidemic force were equal to five, it would attack any one with whom it came in contact ; but supposing it were equal to three only, it would not affect a healthy individual ; but if the additional two were made out by intemperance, fear, anxiety, bad air, or other cause or causes, the effect would be the same, or equal to the same, as if the necessary number were made up of epidemic force alone. The wt)rd "epidemic" scarcely in its literal sense implies the meaning conventionally attached thereto, for it means in its archaeological sense "on or upon the people;"* whereas it is usually received in its medical meaning to imply, an occasional travelling visitor, in the form of sickness, abiding in and haunting the abodes of man in its progress for a season, and then disappearing, it may be, to return again. There are three terms of this kind in vogue — ¦ viz., "epidemic," just referred to, and "endemic/'f a word implying diseases which are usually found existing amongst communities, either with reference to their locality or. calling, or both, as "sea scurvy" may be said to be endemic amongst sailors, and "goitre" endemic in some of the valleys and gorges of Switzerland; the third term, " pandemic," J signifying all the people, is used to imply that a disease, of an epidemic kind, affects the whole population generally. The epidemic character of certain diseases is not only a remarkable but most important circumstance. Their influences appear to visit, and impart certain properties to, unhealthy places, in which other diseases are ordinarily found, or even healthy places, to which no diseases are peculiarly * itti, upon, and (Jjj/iocr, the people, t iv, in, and e%to variations" of Cholera, which, as I have already said, are often remarkable, both as to the severity and difference of the symptoms, and their fatal character, or otherwise, — requiring, as may be readily supposed, very modified or different modes of treatment.* Saving already stated that Cholera is a disease of the fever class, I proceed to give some general reasons for entertaining this belief. In the first place, Cholera is found in the same localities, under the same circumstances, and is produced (or at least greatly influenced) by the same known causes, as those which bring about or influence other fevers and febrile epidemics, whether local or migrating.-]- Its * " And here, I cannot help stating it as my decided conviction, that the ever-varying causes of epidemic diseases will produce an ever-vary- ing character in them, and, consequently, an ever-varying pathology and treatment." — Mr. Jameson's Report on the Epidemic Cholera Morbus. See Dr. James Johnson on the Diseases of Tropical Climates, p. 289. t " There can be little doubt, that there are different kinds of malaria, besides that which causes remittent and intermittent fever. Thus yel- low fever and plague are endemic diseases, probably arising from aerial poisons. The propagation and mortality of the latter, perhaps its very existence, is very much to be ascribed to the filth and impurities of the towns where it prevails. — Dr. Williams's Principles of Medicine. N. B. I have only this day become possessed of the Report. of the 79 tendencies to produce convertibility of disease are similar ; for instance, if the " constitutio anni," (i. c., in its free translation, the constitution of the year or season, or period of time,) be typhoid, we know illnesses will be induced to put on a typhoid character in their course and progress. This is the case with small-pox, measles, scarlet fever, and others. If epidemic Cholera is the visitant, th.is epidemic influence gives these same "converting" tendencies to diseases occurring within its range and power. It is the character of fevers to cause disturbance and remarkably induce disorders in some of the vital portions of the human frame, and also to produce congestion and its consequences in the soft organs of the abdomen, chest, and head; this they do in accordance with the pathological laws incident to each disease, and modified by the states of the constitution of those attacked.* Through the observation of the operation of these laws, and the consequent symptoms and results, particular diseases are recognized and distinguished by those who make human bodily ailments their study. The general causes which at different times, under different circumstances, or in different epidemic conditions and seasons, produce very different diseases, often appear in the present state of our knowledge to be the same ; but yet the morbid states and the diseases induced at different times, often present very different 'phenomena ; for instance, common General Board of Health, dated July, 1849, a most important document. It will here be seen, on the testimony of Dr. Sutherland and others, how fearfully similar causes have influenced the mortality and frequency of Cholera. Sept. 1, 1849.— G. G. B. * For instance, it is the law of small-pox to determine to the skin, in the form of its peculiar eruption ; and so, in like manner, other dis- eases present peculiar indications, according to the pathological laws which influence and determine their character. 80 gastric fever is very different from true typhus, and this last not the same as Cholera, yet they may all be traced often to the same causes, and they are all fevers, and all characterised by blood poisons, or alterations in that fluid. It seems no more wonderful to me that it should be the law of "Choleric pestilence," or fever, to determine the watery parts of the blood to the alimentary tube in large quantities, than it is the province of haema gastric fevers to conduct a large flow of the general constituents of the same unhealthy circulating fluid to the same channel; or that small-pox should determine to the skin ; or that influenza should affect the respiratory organs; or that ague should effect violent congestions of the liver and spleen; or that the causes of bilious diarrhoea or bilious Cholera (sometimes epidemic) should induce a large secretion of unhealthy and irritating bile ; or, further, that certain pathological states of the intestines, constituting "tubular diarrhoea," should be attended by large secretions of plastic lymph, which take on and retain the form of that part of the intestinal canal in which it is secreted, and be at length expelled in the form of a cast or mould, so that to the common observer it would seem as if a part of the bowel itself had come away. I say no one of these facts or phenomena appears to me more wonderful than are the rest ; but if I were asked, how these differences were brought about, or on what causes intrinsically they depended, I must, in the present state of our knowledge, or at least of my own, be contented to answer, the subject appears to be beyond the power of human penetration.* * It is thus with many other well known natural phenomena, for in- stance, we continually, in adopting chemical language, speak of the " behaviour" of certain substances, meaning to point out, how or in what manner they are known or ascertained to act in particular or under 81 In proof of what I have advanced as to the febrile nature of Cholera, having already briefly quoted one able author, Dr. Billing, (see page 29, note *,) I will here add, that Dr. Parks (certainly, in my judgment, one of the most important writers on Cholera) observes, — " It belongs to the most marked order of epidemic diseases." And again, — "There is little doubt but that it 'nosologically'* belongs to the same order of diseases as small-pox and typhus. "f Speaking from my own personal experience, in those cases of severe Cholera where patients have recovered from the urgent symptoms of collapse, there were few who did not present afterwards the phenomena of adynamic fever, and in this stage I lost many of my patients. I now proceed to offer some general observations on the prevention of Cholera. I have already affirmed, that occasionally this disease is communicable from individual to individual. In addition to the reasons I have formerly given for this opinion, I will quote an extract I have recently perused in the " Lancet," a medical periodical of the greatest importance, and one, to say the least of it, which records fully as much of the practical and scientific information of the medical profession as any journal in the world. The Editor, with the knowledge varying circumstances, and in different quantities, or with different com- binations, or to declare in what their known properties or powers con- sist ; but, why they should have been invested with such properties, or have had certain powers or tendences originally assigned them, we are often unable to explain • and this is the state of the case in many patho- logical instances, equally as it is with many " chemical phenomena." — G. G. B. * voaoa, a disease, and Xoyotr, a discourse; " applied to that division of medical science which considers the most appropriate names of dis- eases, and their methodical arrangements and classification." t Original Reports, part 3d. L 82 of what is going on continually before his eyes, observes, in vol. ii. for 1849, No. 9, and page 202, in answer to a correspondent's enquiry as to the contagious nature of Cholera, — " The question is difficult to answer satisfactorily. The theory of non-contagion has been somewhat shaken by circumstances which have occurred in the present epidemic of Cholera. There can be no doubt but that the disease is, under certain aggravating circumstances, and to a certain extent, contagious ; but we believe there are no facts which would lead us to assert it is by any means eminently so." As far as my experience enables me to give an opinion, I believe these remarks to be perfectly correct. This view involves two important practical consideration — viz., that ordinarily there is no great danger from contagion ; and in the next place, that, with the knowledge and belief that it may be contagious, we should be careful to abrogate all these "aggravating circumstances" which tend to give the disease this dangerous character. To this end, I think it of the utmost importance to avoid crowding dwellings. I believe this is one of the most fearful causes which are calculated to render the disease communicable. " The house of refuge system," by whomever first suggested, appears to me one of the most important means of preventing the spreading of Cholera, in the crowded domiciles of the poor. Ventilating dwellings is, again, of high importance. The effects of impure air have already been spoken of; and it cannot be too well remembered, that breathing such air is not only injurious, but is, in its effects, most insidious in undermining the health ; — to use a common every-day phrase, " it cuts the ground from under a man before he is aware of it," and renders him the ready victim to all causes and sorts of diseases. 83 Personal cleanliness, again, is a most important preservative to gerieral health. It is extraordinary to what an extent this is neglected, and fearful, too, are the effects of this unseemly and degrading habit of personal and domiciliary want of cleanliness and attention. Well has it been said by an author often quoted in this work, namely, Dr. J. B. Williams — " Yet, with strange disregard to all instinctive feelings, and indolent neglect of the plainest dictates of reason, human beings are found continually exposing themselves to the influence of their own accumulated filth, until disease is engendered and aggravated into a pestilence, and the rate of mortality is doubled or tripled in the population."* Neglect of cleanliness, imperfect ventilation, the overcrowding of dwellings, bad water, open privies and cesspools and the like, imperfect drainage, intemperance, bad food, paucity or excess of the same, and excessive personal fear, all individually or combined, in a great measure act in the same way, and tend to produce the same dire results. They also tend to generate in diseased states of the frame animal poisons, and thus to render many diseases contagious which, but for these, would have been innocuous in this respect. Dr. Holland has written a paper, entitled, "On Points where a Patient may Judge for Himself." It is a valuable paper, and contains excellent ideas. I would observe, there are points where the 'public may judge for themselves ; and some of these points, of an important kind, I have endeavoured to bring before the notice of my readers. Pursuing this object, I will advert to going to funerals as one cause often of bringing home Cholera from " the burying." I believe * I think the wash-house system and public baths need greater public attention than they have hitherto abtained, as a great means of amelio- rating the sanatory condition "of the poor." — G. G. B. 84 the too frequent indiscriminate practice and permission, on the parts of heads of families, in either going to, or allowing their children, servants, and others, to attend such places, highly dangerous. I know several instances where people living in uninfected places have done this, and the consequence was, that, soon after their return from the fatal neighbourhood they visited, they themselves were attacked by the disease, and died. But this is not the worst part of the business ; the disease has sometimes spread in the family, and several additional victims were in this way added to the fatal category. As regards the use of disinfectants as a preventive. In my judgment they are useful — particularly in decomposing the destructive and offensive effluvia from drains and such places ; they are also useful often, I believe, in decomposing the "fomites" of disease, and animal poisons. I have before adverted to a fact of this kind which occurred at Belfast. — See page 16. I also well remember the late Mr. Abernethy used to relate an instance of the effects of chlorine on vaccine lympth. Exposure, he said, of this animal virus to the action of the gas rendered the virus inert. Important, however, as such disinfectants may be considered, the natural disinfectants, comprised in cleanliness, good ventilation, and sun-light, are far more so. Tliere are no disinfectants more easily accessible and salutary in their aj)plication and results. In ships and public establishments, such as poor-houses, prisons, and educational edifices, not only the ventilation, clothing, and cleanliness of the inmates, are of great importance, but their diet is equally so. In the note which I shall here append, being an extract from Dr. BlundelPs masterly treatise on obstetrics, the author is particularly adverting to the effects of loss of blood and debility on the 85 circulating system ; but the details are so germane to the point under discussion, that I shall offer them to the reader's consideration.* The blood is in no cases more likely * " The essay of Dr. Kelly, which describes the appearances dis- covered in dissecting animals bled to death, is well known. It proves that when the general circulation has been drained to death, the vessels of the brain are still full of blood. But a far more instructive experi- ment was made a few years ago, at the Penitentiary at Millbank, — of course with no evil intention, and no suspicion of danger, — not on sheep or dogs, but on men and women. The Penitentiary stands on a spot made for the production of malaria, — a swamp below the level of the river, which runs within a hundred yards of the prison. The prisoners were, — -with what object and for what reason does not appear, — suddenly put upon a diet from which animal food was almost entirely excluded. An ox's head, which weighed about eight pounds, was made into pea- soup for ODe hundred people, which allows an ounce and-a-quarter of meat to each person. After they had been living on this food for some time, they lost their colour, flesh, and strength • and could not do as much work as formerly. The men could not grind as much corn, or pump as much water, as they once could ; and the women fainted at their work in the laundry. At length, this simple debility of constitution was succeeded by various forms of disease ; — they had scurvy, dysentery, diarrhoea, low fever, and (lastly) affections of the brain and nervous system. To show the causes and nature of these diseases, it is necessary only to mention the striking fact, that while the prisoners who fed on this diet were growing weak and falling into disease, the officers of the prison, with their families and servants, — who resided on the same spot, but lived well, — entirely escaped; and the still more striking fact, that about twenty of the prisoners, who were employed in the kitchen, and had an ample supply of meat and other food, with two or three exceptions, continued healthy. The affec- tions of the brain and nervous system, which came on during this faded, wasted, weakened state of body, were head-ache, vertigo, delirium, con- vulsions, apoplexy, and even mania. When bleeding was tried, the patients fainted after losing five, four, or even fewer ounces of blood ; and were not better, but perhaps worse. Leeches to the temples were equally useless. In some cases, these patients died very slowly, after the circulation had remained for a day or two, almost though not quite extinct ; yet, on examining their bodies after death, there was found 86 to be damaged than by bad food, or by the want of food ; it matters little whether blood is abstracted from the system, or the proper elements for its formation are denied. A man dies with equal certainty whether you cut his throat effectually, or starve him to death ; and next door to the latter, I fear, are many reduced by the inconsiderate and ill-regulated dietary of many public establishments even in the present day. It is not only the quantity of food, but its kind, nature, and quality, that tend to sustain the frame, and support animal heat and health. Unless the elements adequate to all this are judiciously administered, the effects will be disease and broken stamina, and sooner or later even the pecuniary burthen, although perhaps in another form, falls on the public purse. It matters little whether the impost be parochial, or of another kind. I have in the preceding pages, for the most part, been endeavouring to show, so far as they are known, what are the means which influence Cholera and other epidemics, whether in promotion or prevention, and little now remains excepting briefly to offer a few general observations on the curative means of Cholera. This I shall do briefly, for it is not my intention to assume the Quixotic task of essaying to inform the general public, what remedies they may adopt for such a desirable purpose. The question is beset with difficulties on all sides, — difficulties severely felt by the medical profession. I will, however, offer a few remarks on the general bearing and tendency of this part of the question, so far as appearing to me of general interest. On the curative agents of Cholera and choleric diarrhoea, and the means to be adopted in reference to either or both. It must be perfectly axiomic, that when a remedy is sugincreased vascularity of the brain, and sometimes fluid between its membranes, and in its ventricles." — Principles and Practice of Obstetric Medicine, by James Blundell, M.D., p. 584. 87 gested for any disease with hopeful prospect of success, the presumption must be entertained that such disease is curable. Now many cases of Cholera, from the moment they are seen by medical men, are known to be of an utterly hopeless nature, and in these, of course, it is useless to talk of effectual remedies. An important question, however, is, why it happens that many of these become so utterly hopeless and incurable, and whether anything can be done to lessen the number of such melancholy cases ? With reference to the latter point, I have endeavoured to shew T that much may be done ; and it is with this view of the subject that the public are mainly concerned. Herein the intelligent, the educated, and influential may perform essential benefit to their fellow creatures; herein, by the use of means within their power, magistrates, members of sanatory boards, and boards of guardians, masters of works, and owners of property, and heads of families, and the charitably disposed, may actively and worthily employ their ability and energy. The points to which I would advert as being most worthy of their consideration are briefly as follows : — Arrangements to prevent over crowding of houses; effective ventilation; an adequate supply of good water near at hand ; the removal and prevention of the deposit of putrefying animal and vegetable matter ; the separation of the sick when illness occurs, by removing from the locality of the active epidemic (whenever it can be effected) all persons, excepting those whose presence is necessary ; encouraging personal and domiciliary cleanliness ; inducing temperance ; inquiry into the circumstances and dietary of the poor, with a view to relief if required ; the establishment of regular house visiting, with the object of vigilant scrutiny, so that indisposition may be detected and administered to at 88 the earliest possible period; and placing medical assistance, with remedial agents, nurses, and other requisites, as readily as possible within the reach of those who may need gratuitous aid. Such regulations, well carried out, will wonderfully diminish suffering and calamity, and will be sure to effect a saving of parochial taxes, much greater in amount than the cost of such sanatary efforts. Under any circumstances, when Cholera is actively present in a district, much fatal sickness is inevitably to be expected ; but looking how ill prepared with the means of protection and aid many of the community are, the wonder is, that so few, comparatively, are* fatally attacked; the wonder is enhanced, when there are taken into the account the drunkenness, fear, utter want of discretion, obstinate neglect of advice, and of timely assistance, together with other unfortunate helps to the spreading of disease, which are so universally rife amongst the more numerous grades of society. I believe nothing short of legal enactment,* wisely framed, and temperately but firmly enforced, will remedy many of these evils, or gradually bring about better habits. I would, however, here express my great satisfaction, that of late years the Government has appeared equally as anxious to frame laws, the effects of which shall be to teach the people their duties, and the reasons for performing them, and to enlighten generally the minds of those who are willing to learn, as it has been to construct enactments to punish offenders. To teach wisdom, seems to my mind fully as necessary * There is a vile practice in force occasionally, where house proprie- tors will not allow of open windows in cottage tenants' houses, on ac- count of the additional risk of the glass being broken. I have known personally such flagitious instances ; and this execrable construction of dwelling-house windows ought, in my opinion, to be made illegal. 89 and desirable, as it is to chastise the faulty; and " chanty," which begins at home, and does not end there, often by kindness and good deeds, and good example, I believe effects as much advantage, and secures as large an amount of human happiness, as does retributive justice, — who, in her inflexible march, overtakes the guilty of mankind. Ignorance and prejudice, I well know (for I have seen much of the poor), are some of the greatest hindrances to sanatory improvement they have to contend with ; and an education which would cure these evils, would, I am sure, lead them to discern and pursue their true interests, far more effectually than penal statutes. These last, however, are obviously not to be dispensed with, as experience abundantly testifies, especially in bearing testimony, that the "enlightened" and better educated owner of property is often as culpable in neglecting, and fully as unwilling to do his part in promoting, sanatory measures, as are the poor and uninformed tenants and occupiers of humble dwellings. It is melancholy to reflect, that whilst worldy property is hedged around with laws of all kinds for its security, the poor, whose wealth chiefly consists in. good health and bodily strength, are too often utterly regardless of both, and view with distrust and thanklessness, any enactments for the better safety of these inestimable blessings. Can any one doubt, that this stupid obduracy arises, in a great measure, from the want of knowing better? I am certain it does; I daily see the men who would cheerfully fight to the death for the protection of their wives and children, were it needed, or who would strain sinew and bone to the last fibre to bring them sustenance and shelter, look with perfect indifference on the obvious causes of death and disease, with which their homesteads are filled, or by which they are surrounded. Why is this ? — because they are ignorant of the nature and effects of these things, or because M 90 habit lias inured them to their existence and presence. In either case, they are blind to the truth, — so that it is next to impossible to induce them to act in accordance with its dictates. It is quite as easy to suppose, a man may be incorrigibly accustomed to filth and dirt, as that he should be inured to crime and debauchery. Often, too, in doth alike, if he is roused for a time to "repentance" and better conduct, he is apt to fall back in his old ways ; such is the power of habit. Whilst, then, we coerce the stupid and wilful of the present, we ought to educate the rising generation, train them to knowledge, teach them the ways of wisdom, caution them against bad example, save them from forming bad habits, cause them to see the results of wrong and wicked doing, on the one hand, and the benefits of a virtuous character and good conduct on the other. I believe it is not far from the truth, that " cleanliness is next to godliness ;"* the benefits of both, in their respective applications, are inestimable. I have already said, I am not essaying to point out to the general public, how Cholera is to be cured ; lam only endeavouring to advocate such remedial measures as attach to the general question, and the general community, so far as I know them, and to give my reasons for so doing. To many, it might perhaps be more acceptable, that I should have gone into the question of therapeutics, or remedial medicinal agents ; but I think this would have been wrong, — for to suppose that any persons, save the effectually trained and experienced, can rightly select such remedies, or deal with formidable disease, would be an egregious fallacy; and * If this be, as I am inclined to think, true, then the clergy and ministers of religion, never backwards in her cause, may well advo- cate the claims of the sister virtue, and those of health and human life and happiness, as connected with her dictates. 91 to assume the contrary, by giving curative directions, would only be leading such as were weak enough to confide in them, or act on them, to " imagine a vain thing," probably to their hurt and sorrow. True it is, I see daily advertisements, from which a man would infer, nothing was more easy than to cure the Cholera, and that the writers were possessed of this valuable secret. Many of these announcements proceed from the unprincipled and worthless, to whom personal gain is a sole consideration ; and I never see the detestable pretensions of such persons vaunted forth so shamelessly, that I do not think of the wise old adage, which bids us " beware of an ox before, of an ass behind, and of a knave on all sides." To put faith in nostrums and nostrummongers in the hour of dangerous sickness, requiring patient skill, experience, and watchfulness, seems to me about as wise as it would be, in crossing a rapid river, to select deliberately a single plank, rather than a sound boat, for the perilous voyage: the danger is obvious ; the experience of mankind has proven the fallacy of such a course. The danger is two-fold, — a wrong and hurtful remedy may be selected, which will certainly do hurt; or a remedy may be chosen, not directly hurtful, still by its use, instead of the proper means, the precious time and opportunity for effectual aid may have passed by. What man of matured age and experience in the medical profession has not seen these evils, dozens of times over, and lamented their consequences? ' I am sure there have been abundant instances, in Choleric attacks, wherein the selection and perseverance for hours in wrong remedies, have, to the best of my belief, brought about fatal results, which might, by better judgment and action, have been prevented. The reader may now ask naturally, "are we, then, in cases of Cholera, to do nothing, — but stand by coolly, with our 92 hands in our pockets, perhaps for hours, until we can find a doctor?" It will be seen, on reflection, I have argued nothing of the kind ; I should myself act, I think, very differently, and would advise others to do the same. I have already suggested the importance of visitors, medical advice, and medicines, and medical men, being all rendered as easy of access as possible. Yet there are cases, where, with the best arrangements, neither can be had on the instant ; and are we, then, to wait and do nothing ? The clear reply of common sense is, "certainly not; if you can do no better, you must perforce do nothing ; if you can do better, do it, and do it quickly ; but take heed and think rationally what you are about, and do nothing without consulting common sense, — not a bad adviser oftentimes, — and endeavour to give yourself a good reason for any thing you put in force." I will give an instance of what I mean : — A gentleman, residing in the country, was a few weeks since roused in the night, by information that two of his women servants had the Cholera ; and on further enquiry, he found that both had been attacked, as he believed (correctly), with Choleric vomiting and diarrhoea. He instantly despatched a servant to require my attendance; but he did not stop here, — for, on my arrival, he told me to the effect, that these parties were extremely alarmed, and half dead with fright ; and not knowing what better to do, he had given a dose of laudanum and some brandy to each ; and had (to use his own words) "done it effectually, with a view to rouse them, and keep them up until assistance could be obtained." Both these patients, when I saw them, were better, and did perfectly well ; and as to fear, the effects of the remedies had entirely caused that to vanish. The brandy had, no doubt, thus been serviceable; so had the laudanum, given as it had been on the instant to quiet the action of the bowels, and 93 rouse the failing nervous energies. Brandy is often injurious, yet, given as it was then at the outset to a frightened sinking person, as I have also myself frequently given it, it has oft times a good result. lam very sure this party would have given no such thing to his children,* in any case where fair ordinary reasons and considerations, and the dictates of common sense suggested another course ; and I mention this, as an instance of following rightly the dictates of common sense, reason, and experience, in the absence of technical or professional guidance. I have good reason to believe, the indiscriminate use of brandy in Choleric epidemic seasons, both in sickness and ordinary daily use, has proven very hurtful, and tended to increase the evils it was either hoped or alleged it would tend to relieve or avert. I remember, in 1832, a respectable man asked me, "if I did not think a little brandy and water as a beverage, during the prevalence of Cholera, healthful?" and my reply was, " yes, in moderation, it is as good as any other, where it agrees." On this he rejoined, " Well, lam glad of that, for I have taken a glass every four hours for the last fortnight." Of course I need not state, that such reckless conduct is by no means to be imitated. In instances where Cholera and diarrhoea occur, and medical advice is not at hand, I think it were well, if people, before they took any steps, asked several cogent questions — viz., such as — what appears to be the matter, and under what circumstances, — what is required to be done, — and how this is most likely to be effected, so far as it comes within the scope of obtainable aid, of whatever kind? Clear * I have seen much mischief from giving brandy indiscriminately to children, in Choleric attacks. Their constitutions are very excitable, and it brings on febrile and nervous disturbance rapidly, in accordance with a general rule, that " action and reaction are contrary and equal." 94 common sense ideas lead, if rightly followed, to plain common sense conduct : for instance, the child of a friend of mine had taken some improper food, and soon after this he began to have active diarrhoea, pain in the head, cold skin, and nausea. His parents, very naturally, inferred the stomach was originally at fault, and the improper food the cause, and instead of resorting to chalk mixtures, laudanum, or brandy, they gave an emetic. The result was effectual, — the diarrhoea, and all other symptoms, quickly subsided. I have little doubt, if neglected, or treated improperly, this child would have had Cholera. One visit was all I found it necessary to pay. Emetics have, I think, been too little considered in some instances of Choleric diarrhoea. Their action is, when opportunely and jDroperly administered, often of great use. — ¦ See Dr. Holland, Op. Cit., p. 304, and Dr. James Johnson, Op. Cit., p. 303. I have spoken of the state of mind, as greatly influencing the frame, and of the importance of this in epidemic seasons ; and I may add, that change of air frequently proves serviceable, and also that, no doubt, such change often exercises great power over the mental state of individuals. During the epidemic season of 1832, a friend of mine was attacked severely with " Choleric diarrhoea ;" it had weakened him in a few hours considerably, and his despondency was extreme ; he addressed me earnestly on the improbability of his recovering, with which he was thoroughly impressed, and fairly gave himself up as a dying man; he had heard and seen much of what had been going on in the district during that fatal period ; and, no doubt, deep anxiety and painful excitement and apprehension, had reduced his mental powers considerably. It occurred to me, my best chance of being useful, would be to get him away at once 95 into a healthy place, where there was no Cholera, and where he would heaj" little or nothing of it ; and, accordingly, I ordered a conveyance to the door, and after having administered what remedies I thought proper, I informed him calmly that I had seen cases worse than his do perfectly well on being removed to uninfected places, out of the reach of the epidemic, and asserted confidently that an equally beneficial result would accrue from his leaving home. He protested vehemently against the folly and madness of removing a dying man from his own house, and refused to go ; however, the sequel was, that after some pains I partly persuaded and partly forced him to get up and try the experiment, which he did. By the next morning his diarrhoea had left him, his mind was perfectly calm and tranquil, and he informed me he had not been an hour in the fresh country breezes before he felt their calmative and beneficial effects, and he did perfectly well. I have little doubt but that he would have fallen a sacrifice to Cholera, had not these means been taken.* It would be well if the public generally considered the dangerous consequences of direct personal fatigue, as a predisposing cause of Cholera. I think many workmen and others fell victims to the epidemic from this cause, particularly when, after much over exertion, they add the predisposing circumstance of " drinking freely," in order to sustain their exhausted frames. I think employers of * I have frequently, during the present and past epidemic season, experienced the greatest benefit and rapid improvement from change of air, in caoes of what may be termed "epidemic indigestion," and which seemed to resist all remedies I could suggest for their removal. Change of air and scene in each of these seemed immediately to affect the threat- ening symptoms, on which medicines exerted no effectual and permanent good. I may add, that in one kind of diarrhoea, to which puerperal women are liable, change of air is the only known remedy. — G. G. B. 96 workmen and the workmen themselves would do well to turn their attention more to this circumstance, which, seems to my mind one of vital and practical importance. The indiscriminate use of purgative medicines is also a fearful evil; I have seen several severe cases of Cholera occur from this imprudent practice, and persons cannot be too wary of the dangerous practice, no less irrational than imprudent and perilous. It may be well here to advert to the various modes of treatment discussed and adopted. We hear of nostrums — of large doses of calomel, at long intervals ; of small doses, at frequent times administered; of opium, of astringents, of emetics, of bleeding, of applying cold, of applying heat, of stimulants, of cold water drank freely, of ice given freely, of hydropathy, of saline injections and medicines and treatment, and many others too numerous to mention. All this seems contradictory enough, but it proves one thing, that great doubt and difficulty as yet attend the treatment of Cholera.* * Seeming inconsistencies are often, when examined, not really of this character ; as for example, " Heat and cold, though so contradictory, apparently in their nature, have similar remedial effects ; and another singularity is, that, with this agreement between their respective agen- cies, they not only, severally, have a different operation according to the manner in which they are used, (like other powerful remedies, of which antimony and mercury may be adduced as examples,) but both may be made to produce directly opposite effects. Each may be made to exert a stimulant, and each a depressive or lowering action ; and much of the error that has prevailed in the use of these measures, has arisen from this double agency not having been always understood." — Dr. James Arnott on Indigestion, p. 9. Again, the following trite passage will show how readily, often times seemingly contradictory, circumstances may be divested of this, at first sight, apparent character, and rendered perfectly intelligible and satisfactory when they have been duly investi- gated, perfectly understood, and properly explained :—": — " To beginners, 97 How striking is the following passage, from the works of one of the great medical philosophers of the day, a man of well ascertained first-rate powers of mind, and well matured research, experience, and judgment. Dr. Marshall Hall, in his work on the Principles of Medicine (date, 1837), p. 283, observes, " I do not venture to give an opinion upon the treatment of Indian Cholera ; but I incline to recommend doses of the hydrargyri submuriatis "every half hour." Much of the moderate stock of information I possess, and the whole of some of it, to me most valuable, I have derived from the discoveries and writings of the author just mentioned; I therefore attach great weight to his assertions, and I think he is not an individual to express a doubt without good reason, or to experience a difficulty unless it really exists at the time in an insuperable form ; the mere fact of such a man hesitating to express an opinion, is sufficiently indicative of the uncertainty which at present surrounds the point in question ; however, as to the calomel frequently administered, I think T can safely bear testimony, from my humble experience, of its efficacy ; and this passage it was that first impressed the plan on my mind.* With reference to the various modes of treatment I have the treatment of inflammation in different ways must appear contra- dictory, — even to practitioners of experience it is sometimes difficult ; but it will be found rational and consistent by those who have a clear conception of the modus operand! of medicines, and by a reference to the various states, both of the parts and of the constitution, which exists under the name of inflammation." — Billing's First Principles of Medi- cine, p. 112. A similar course of reasoning, it must be obvious, may be expected equally to apply to the treatment of many other diseases. — G. G. B. * I am perfectly cognizant of the fact, that Dr. Ayre has suggested a somewhat similar mode of treatment to that recommended by Dr. M. Hall; and that, in accordance with his views, it is frequently put in practice. N 98 just enumerated, I feel little hesitation in saying (in the present state of our knowledge), that, under various circumstances, and on appropriate occasions, most of them may be selected with probable advantage.* We may hereafter arrive * I have before adverted to the singular differences which attend the symptoms and state of patients attacked by Cholera, even in short intervals of time, in the same place, or in localities not far apart; there is also, I believe, a more permanent change occasionally observable in whole classes of diseases, — a change going on and continuing for years. I have clearly recognised a remarkable alteration of this kind in certain inflammatory diseases, which seem not to require, nor oftentimes will they bear, the same active depletory means, as they did fifteen or sixteen years ago; and I am not singular in my observation of this fact, for several of my professional friends, now in matured life, have corroborated my opinion in this matter. In confirmation of it, I may adduce the following passage from Dr. Watson's work on the " Practice of Medi- cine," vol. ii., page 368 : — Speaking of puerperal peritonitis, he says, — ¦ " Of all the means we possess of arresting this malady, bleeding, general or topical, is, in Dr. Fergusson's opinion, by far the most extensively applicable. But," he adds, "while I admit this, lam equally certain that large bleeding has not been borne in this complaint, generally speaking, for the last twelve years." This, Dr. Watson declares, in the next paragraph, to be an "important truth." With respect to the difference in the type and intensity of Cholera, and also to the fatal tendency of the disease, despite of care and reme- dies, the following remarkable facts came under my observation in the year 1832 : — At the precise period I speak of Cholera was most dire and fatal at Swansea ; the disease seemed to baffle all known remedies ; and in the midst of the perplexity and anxiety I felt at the circumstance, I received a note from my esteemed and excellent friend the late Mr. W. Llewellyn, of Taibach, at which place Cholera was then also present : his communication was to the effect of recommending to my attention the "saline treatment" of Cholera, which, he assured me, was most efficacious, and might be considered an antidote for Cholera, as he cured thereby all his patients. In reply, I informed him, I was sorry to say such remedies had proved entirely useless in my hands ; and I accounted for it by supposing the type of the disease wa3 less malignant at Taibach than at Swansea. In a day or two after this, my kind friend, who was 99 at some more definite and more generally successful remedies, and knowledge of treatment, than we at present possess. much my senior, with his well-known zeal and promptitude, rode over to Swansea, as he said, " to see what I was about, and get the thing properly explained." The result of this interview was by no means satisfactory to him, and he left me, unquestionably perfectly convinced I was somehow in error. In about nine days afterwards, however, he wrote to say the disease had assumed a more malignant aspect in Tai- bach, and was no longer beneficially influenced by saline treatment. In my personal experience of the disease in this neighbourhood, I observe also a difference in Choleric attacks in the present visitation, as com- pared with that of 1832. At that period, so far as my observation and judgment avail me, the disease came on often more suddenly, with less premonitory illness, and was more instantly and directly severe and pros- trative ; people seemed death-struck from the first moment of attack. During the present year, I could generally trace previous illness, and, for the most part, where this had been promptly treated, Cholera was averted. In my hands a different treatment, too, has been required. On the former occasion, viz., in 1832, large doses of calomel and opium, 20 grains of the former, with a drachm of laudanum, promptly administered, were often given by me, and was the most successful remedy. In the present epidemic I have not found it answer well ; smaller doses of calomel, and smaller doses of opium or morphine, have, so far as my judgment is concerned, answered better; and I have used the diacetate of lead also, and catechu and kino, in considerable doses, with good effect in checking profluvial discharges. In the case of children, also, the lead has answered well. In two or three cases where infants were attacked, they died. The feeble powers of infancy are soon prostrated; besides which, there is in infants a difference in the constitution of the blood, and in the blood corpuscles ; the circulation has not had time to acquire the full self formative action, or constituents, as in older children ; it partakes more of the character of foetal blood ; this, I apprehend, makes a diffe- rence. No doubt can exist, also, that not only does the blood differ in infants, children, and young people, but in adults. " A certain number of peculiar substances do certainly exist in the blood of some men, which are absent from the blood of others." — Watson, Op. Cit., vol. ii., p. 720. 100 It seems to me, that in selecting remedies, and treating Cholera, the first thing we have to do is to endeavour to find out, so far as we can, the precise pathological condition of the patient,* together with the attendant circumstances, (such as his previous history, state of mind, condition when in health, &c.,) and then to determine on what we wish to effect, and the best mode of doing it. With a view to explain my meaning, let me suppose I find a highly irritable and fluxual state of the alimentary tube, the aqueous parts of the blood running off rapidly, vomiting frequent, nervous system depressed, pulse sinking, and strength fast diminishing, and the functions of the liver and urinary apparatus entirely suspended. It may naturally occur to me, that in a group of such formidable symptoms, I wish to allay irritation, to rouse the dormant These are all important points for consideration, and so are all the various causes and circumstances incident to subjects such as we have been considering, as the following passage from Liebig will plainly shew : — This distinguished philosopher truly observes, — >" No one pro- bably who is historically acquainted with the developement of chemistry, and of many parts of physics, will fail to perceive that the chief cause of the progress of these sciences has been the gradually acquired con- viction, that every natural phenomenon, every state, has more than one determining condition ; that every effect has several causes ; and it is the simple search after this plurality of causes, it is the separation of the effects, which distinguished the modern from the earlier chemistry. — Liebig's Animal Chemistry, part 1, p. IG3. I think the same line of argument and deduction is equally applicable to medical enquiry into the nature and causes of epidemics, and their appropriate treatment and prevention. — G. G. B. * I should here have desired to offer some extracts from papers by Dr. James Bird, published in the " London Journal of Medicine !" but perceiving that Dr. J. Bird has recently published a pamphlet on Cho- lera, I have hesitated to do so. I have, however, no hesitation in strongly recommending the valuable papers to which I advert, to the careful consideration of the juniors of my profession. 101 functions of the nervous centres, to check the diarrhoea and vomiting;, to get the liver and kidneys to act, and to render the stomach less irritable. I then think of remedies likely to effect this, taking the type of the disease, the climate in which it occurs, and many other important circumstances, into calculation. I may desire to try the effects of cold, as a sedative to the stomach, and I administer ice or cold water ; to restrain the flux, I may give catechu and lead ; to act on the liver, calomel may suggest itself to my mind ; to support the frame, and sustain the nervous centres, opium offers advantages; and, accordingly, I proceed to consider, together with other points of treatment, which of these, or how many, I will give, and in what form I will administer them : and in like manner, throughout all the stages of the disease, would a man naturally reason, under whatever circumstances, or with whatever object in view. This mode of reasoning, which I suggest for explanation sake to the general reader, will readily shew the danger of nostrums. And I would here advert to "chalk mixtures." I cannot say I have found chalk useful in malignant Cholera, and I think it may sometimes act as a mechanical irritant to the already too irritable mucous membrane. In mixed diarrhoea, and often in some forms of premonitory diarrhoea, it may be useful, and experience has shewn its value in combination with calomel, in certain cases; but in active Cholera, I believe it is useless. I would advise, that families should rely on no "nostrums of any kind, but simply (under advice) keep medicines for use ; and that each should enquire of their medical adviser, who knows their families and their constitutions, what had better be done in case of illness. I think this seems the rational mode of proceeding, and the most likely to be effectual. In many cases where people cannot do better, 102 doubtless it is well to have " something" at hand j* it may be, that a chalk mixture, with laudanum and catechu, compounded by a respectable chemist, the ingredients and dose being affixed to the label, will be as good as any thing, and often beneficially check premonitory diarrhoea. I know it has frequently done so. lam only endeavouring to point out general rules. I have alluded to various, and sometimes apparently conflictive, plans of treatment, being often useful when judiciously put in force ; and this is perfectly true, and embraces no novelty. With a view of illustrating my meaning, I offer the reader the following quotation from the pen of Dr. Latham :—": — " Acute rheumatism has experienced strange things at the hands of medical men. No disease has been treated by such various and opposite methods. Venesection has wrought its cure, and so has opium, and so has calomel, and so has colchicum, and so have drastic purgatives. I speak of these remedies in the sense which medical men imply when they talk (as they sometimes do) of this, that, or the other thing being their "sheet anchor;" meaning, that they rest upon it alone for the cure of the rheumatism, and employ other remedies either not at all, or for very subordinate purposes. And, indeed, I bear my testimony to the success of each of these different remedies, as far as that, under the use of each, I have seen patients get well. "At the first view all this looks very strange. The cure, or seeming cure, of the same disease by different remedies, even by remedies which in their mode of operation have nothing in common, appears like luck or accident. At the first view it may shake one's faith in physic a little, and may a little excuse the pleasantry of some who choose to hint, that nature is our best friend after all, for that, do what * To keep the mind at ease has its effect. 103 we will, she brings things to a prosperous issue in spite of our blind interference. " But without disparaging the part that nature plays, I here see no subject of ridicule, and no fair reason for distrust of methods of rational treatment. The first maxim of all rational practice is, that nature is supreme ; the next, that nature is obsequious. The end, whether bad or good, death or recovery, and every step and stage conducive to it, are the unquestionable work of nature. But nature, in all her powers and operations, allows herself to be led, directed, and controlled. And to lead, direct, or control for purposes of good, this is the business of the physician. But how to do it best, he has to exercise a choice of modes and means in every case, which, though never exempt from the possibility of error, becomes less fallible by the teaching of experience. " This choice leads, and always will lead, to diversity of practice, which in no ways disparages, but -rather tends to enlarge and to enrich, the resources of our art. It is not possible that the treatment of diseases shall be ever set at rest by the consent of physicians, or that fixed and uniform plans and remedies shall ever be adopted in cases bearing the same nosological name and character. At least it cannot be until each disease has its own specific antidote, or until each has disclosed some seminal principle from which it springs, and shown where it is, and what it is ; some principle, too, it must be which is within reach, and which is destructible and easily destroyed." — Dr. Latham's Lectures on Diseases of the Heart," vol. i., p. 181. I have now completed the task I had assigned myself, and it only remains to apologise to the reader for the imperfect manner in which I have performed it. These pages have been written within the space of a few days, amidst the fatigues and anxieties of laborious practice, and with the 104 disadvantages of frequently interrupted leisure, and broken opportunity. It appeared to me,, that such a work would be useful to country gentlemen, members of boards of guardians and sanatory committees, and to the public generally. I was led to this conclusion, from the frequent enquiries made to me concerning points on which it treats. I shall rejoice if it is found useful, and be glad if in any way the results correspond with the object I had in view, by its general publication. I have neither written for profit, nor for fame ; with respect to the former, if any accrue, it will be applied to the purpose for which I designed it, and the character of the pamphlet is too insignificant to give reputation to the writer. I consider the notes by far the most valuable part of the work ; they have been collected by me, and extracted from references I have made in my " index rerum." I may hope, that at least the quotations will be of use to some of the juniors of my profession, as they have often proved to myself. For my own part, I always have looked on a wise man's truthful aphorisms, brought forward to elucidate and confirm an argument or affirmation, as in effect resembling the beautiful drawings, which at the same time illumine a page, and illustrate the subject of which it treats ;* and I can truly say, I seldom open the works of such men, without feelings of reverence, gratitude, and respect, for the benefits they confer on mankind, and especially for the aid and improvement I derive from the perusal of their records. * " It is no ordinary privilege to be permitted, by means of books, to hold converse with the wise and great ; besides the information which they communicate, we find that we imbibe their zeal, that we adopt their tone and methods of research, and discipline our minds to the same course of thought and reasoning." — Dr. Rigby's Introductory Lecture on Midwifery. 1846. T. R. DAVIES, PRINTER, CASTI.E-BAILEY-STREBT, SWANSEA. ERRATA. At page 23, last line of text, for "form" read force. At page 46, reference to note, for " Klein Grant's Medical Dictionary," read Klein Grant's edition of Hooper's Medical Dictionary. At page 49, first line of note, for " We have proofs," read We have no proofs. At page 52, line twelve, for "deastise" read diastase. At page 62, vol. i. is referred to in note relating to " Dr. Watson's Work on Medicine." This work is intended to convey information which may be of service to the Magistracy, Clergy, Members of Boards of Guardians and of Sanatory Boards, Heads of Families, and all Persons interested in "sanatory" matters, or engaged in lessening the amount of human sickness and mortality, by instituting and carrying out means for the removal of known and remediable causes of fevers and prevailing epidemics. N. B. The profits of this publication (if any) will be given to some of the most exigent of the widows and orphans in the Borough of Swansea, who have suffered bereavement, during the prevalence of the late epidemic. On application to the Publisher, at Swansea, forwarding 38 penny letter stamps, the work will be sent postage free to any part of the united kingdom.