THREE MEMOIRS ON THE TEETH AND EPITHELIUM. f£e r^eeZ/C R. C. 9. M'uc/m'e of Mle fffufi, emc/ ffevefo/iemcn/ of Jfjovy. /fuc-tut'e of Me Sname/. THREE MEMOIRS ON THE DEVELOPED!ENT AND STRUCTURE OF THE TEETH AND EPITHELIUM, BEAD AT THE NINTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR THE ENCOURAGEMENT OP SCIENCE, HELD AT BIRMINGHAM, IN AUGUST, 1839; WITH DIAGRAMS EXHIBITED IN ILLUSTRATION OF THEM. ALEXANDER NASMYTH, F.L.S., F.G.S. MEMBER OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, &C. LONDON: JOHN CHURCHILL, PRINCES STREET, SOHO. 1841. LONDON : PRINTED BY G. J. PALMER , SAVOY STREET, STRAND. INTRODUCTION. In the early part of 1839, having the highest idea of the independence and utility of the British Association for the encouragement of science, and the fullest confi- dence in its protection and fostering care, I prepared three communications for its ninth meeting held at Bir- mingham, sparing no exertion to render them worthy of the occasion; and I have since been gratified to find that they have been regarded by many eminent physiolo- g.sts as important contributions to science, and have been recognized as throwing new light on the organization of animal tissues. As it has been, and I find from a recent publication, still is, industriously attempted to disseminate the most ridiculous errors and misrepresentations with re- spect to the nature of the theory of the formation of ivory embodied in these communications, and as many inquiries have been made for an authentic account of them, I think it best to publish the original materials of my communica- tions as they were delivered at Birmingham; and I ac- cordingly now proceed to lay before the public my papers as they were there read, my diagrams as they were there demonstrated, and the necessary remarks descriptive of the diagrams,—these remarks being printed within brackets at those parts of the papers where the diagrams were re- ferred to.* 1 must premise, however, that the following papers were not written with a view to publication : though most of the facts which they contain are the results of long in- * The foot-notes in the following papers are, as will at once be seen, obser- vations which have been rendered necessary by the misrepresentations above mentioned. IV vestigation, and of frequently repeated observations; the papers were, nevertheless, hastily drawn up for the meet- ing at Birmingham, writh a full confidence in the generous encouragement of the body, under whose protection I sought to introduce them to the world. They are accordingly somewhat defective in style and arrangement, but the liberal and ingenuous reader, I have no doubt, will look over such defects, and also minor inaccuracies, in consi- deration of the nature of their origin, of the evidently uniform tenor of the whole, and of the spirit of candour iu which, notwithstanding all disadvantages, they are laid before the public. I need scarcely observe that the papers and the diagrams, taken severally, form but sections of the entire communication ; and that each section, having been prepared to accompany the other, gives necessarily but an incomplete idea of the whole: the diagrams are essential for the full comprehension of the papers, and the latter necessarily contain many passages embodying a de- scription of the diagrams. As Mr. Phillips, the editorial secretary of the Associa- tion, has informed me that ‘ I was at full liberty to publish elsewhere,’ (that is to say, besides in the Transactions of the Association,) c and at any time, the whole papers illustrated as I please,’ and as the Council itself has since distinctly confirmed the statement that the papers have always been and still are ray private property, the step w hich 1 at present take will not of course in the slightest degree affect the due publication of my own condensed report of these researches in the Transactions of the British Association—a report which was furnished at the request of the editorial secre- tary to the Association, wTas regularly approved and ac- cepted by him, and is thus, though it has not yet been delivered to them, the indefeasible property of the body of Associates. In consequence of the above-mentioned information con- veyed to me by Professor Phillips, I proceeded long ago to V make use of my original manuscripts in the prosecution of my researches, and prepared them for incorporation with the forthcoming second part of my work on Odon- tology, but my professional avocations have retarded its publication, which the proceedings of the Council of the British Association with regard to my communications have also impeded ; and indeed the retrograde movements of the Council in reference to the publication of a report of them, leave me at length no other alternative than to adopt the present course. No one can regret more than myself the necessity I am under of complaining of the conduct of the Council to- wards me in this matter; nor am I in the least disposed to indulge in acrimonious feelings against the enlightened members of that body, because I am confident that they had been improperly informed as to the circumstances of the case, when they first committed themselves to the line of conduct in which they have since thought it proper to persevere. Then, again, I am confident that had the official me chanism of the Association been in somewhat more perfect order, had the provinces of its respective functionaries been more distinctly marked out, and the communications of its officers with each other been more easy and frequent, the irregularities of which I have to complain would not have arisen. As it is, it appears to me that these irre- gularities have arisen from two steps taken in the first instance hy the editorial secretary, and from the Council itself having been induced for some reason to per- severe in the course thus commenced. The first of these irregularities was that mentioned above, of the editorial secretary, who, after having accepted the condensed report of my communications, which was drawn up at his request, abbreviated at his suggestion, after he had carefully examined it, corrected under his superintend- ence, and of which I afterwards received a hundred separate VI perfect copies, without any restriction as to the use I might make of them; nevertheless, without the authority qf any law > custom, or precedent, subsequently withheld it from pub- lication, merely because the accuracy of a paragraph of this report, which extended to eight pages and comprised a great variety of topics, was made the subject of ground- less comments by a member of the Council, he (Mr. Phillips) stating at the same time that he expressed no opinion as to the merits of those comments, though he was the very person whose office imposed upon him the obligation of doing so, were interference justifiable. In order to prevent him from thus abdicating his office in favour (or for the “ protection,” to use his own phrase) of an interested party, who, by inducing him to take this step, removed the question from the jurisdiction of the officer specially appointed to decide on such matters, to a tribunal of which he, the interested party, a member, and where accordingly he would sit as judge in his own case, I immediately offered, (although entirely released by Pro- fessor Phillips’own deliberate official acts just mentioned from any such obligation) at great inconvenience to myself j to carry to his residence at York, for his further satisfac- tion, the whole of the original materials of my communi- cations exactly as delivered at Birmingham ; and I may here state, that I have always been willing, and indeed de- sirous, to exhibit my communications, in an entire state, to any one who might wish to examine them. The next irregularity of which I have to complain is, that both Professor Phillips and the Council, which im- mediately afterwards took the matter into its own hands, not only did not accept this offer, hut never even alluded to it, and that the Council instantly proceeded, as if the offer had never been made, and without even exhibiting any charge, to instruct a committee to search for evidence on the accuracy of my own condensed report, not in the ori- ginal documents which I had instantly and spontaneously VII offered to exhibit, hut in unauthenticated reports of third parties in the weekly journals. Such a singular step evidently shows that the Council must have had at that time very erroneous or imperfect impressions on this matter; and it is quite impossible to credit that, had the Council been left to itself to form a deliberate judgment, it could have ever decided on totally disregarding my offer, and on committing itself at once to such an irre- levant course. The Council having been once induced to involve itself in an anomalous line of conduct, of which the direct tendency was to attempt to remove the question under consideration from its only natural sphere, and to place it upon altogether irrelevant grounds, no one can be surprised to find, that a series of objectionable and incon- sistent proceedings has flown out of these first measures; in complaining of which, as I am forced to do, my prin- cipal feeling is one of regret that the Council, which I am well aware cannot have been actuated by inimical feelings towards me, should, from some unfortunate causes, have permitted itself to be led into such a devious and unsatisfactory course. 1 am hence, in proceeding to enumerate these proceed- ings, only influenced by a sense of duty, and have no wish to reproach the Council, which I am convinced has still the intention of doing justice to the Associates by restoring to them my report, which the acts of Professor Phillips have rendered their property, and of re-instating me in the enjoyment of my inalienable rights. In the first place, I think it very strange that though the authentic condensed report of my three communications has been withheld from publication, and an inquiry has been instituted with respect to it, no charge has, even to the present day, been exhibited against it, and no distinct object of inquiry recognized. Then, again, it has caused me no little surprise that the Council, though in the first place it spontaneously undertook an irregular inquiry, has viii since declared itself “ incompetent ” to prosecute it, owing to what it denominates “ the delicate physiological con- siderations ” which it involves. The Committee delegated to undertake the inquiry, and mentioned above as having been so singularly instructed by the Council, not only never availed itself of my offer to re-exhihit all my original documents, but had recourse, in the anomalous investiga- tion which it was appointed to carry on, to such evidence, in lieu of these original documents in their entire state, that it confounded, in its report to the Council, one subject of my investigations, viz. the formation of ivory, with “ dentition,” or the protrusion of the tooth through the gum, a topic never even hinted at in any of the three com- munications. Consistently with the impression which led to the declining of my offer above mentioned, both Council and Committee have persevered in neglecting even to acknowledge a mass of direct and positive evidence which, in my desire to assist them in obtaining a complete view of the case, I have been, in the course of our correspondence, at the trouble to submit to them. Several attempts have been made definitively to suppress the publication of my report; that is to say, to destroy what had been, by the deliberate, official acts of the Editorial Secretary, rendered the indefeasible property of the Associates, because the inquiry, it has been al- leged, could not be prosecuted to any definite result on the partial and limited grounds on which, in despite of my offer, it had been attempted to base it; though, according to ordinary principles of justice, such an abrupt termina- tion of the inquiry, without the proof of any allegation whatever against my report, ought instantly and indis- putably to ensure its publication. Finally, both Council and Committee, after insisting, exclusively, in the first place, on the unauthenticated reports of my papers published in the weekly journals, have, in the second place, confined IX themselves, in their pursuit of evidence, to intimating a request that certain portions only, specified by them, of my original communications, should be delivered up to them, though, as I have stated before, ray communications at Birmingham were threefold, consisting of papers, dia- grams, and observations descriptive of the latter ; though for these communications to be properly judged of, it is evidently necessary not only that all the materials should be present, but that each of them should be considered in its proper place; though I had previously volun- tarily offered to submit the whole of ray communications as evidence, without any reserve whatever, and though the only portions required were manuscripts, to which, as I have stated above, and as the Council and Committee have known from the very first, additions have been made, rendering them unfit to leave my custody. Surprised at the continued neglect of my offer above mentioned, both by the Council and Committee, as also at the plea of incompetency to judge the matter set forth by the former, and at the singular misconception already alluded to in the report of the latter, I at length, in my earnest desire to afford the fullest satisfaction, and to place the whole matter on an unexceptionable and natural footing, offered to refer the question, whatever its precise nature may be, and to submit the whole of my original documents to the President and Council of the Royal College of Surgeons, the only constituted body of ana- tomists in this country, and therefore the best tribunal for the decision of any physiological point; but, strange to say, this proposition, like my original offer to Professor Phillips, has been passed over in utter silence. Such have been the proceedings by which this un- fortunate transaction between the Council and myself has been characterized; and I feel that it is impossible for any one to consider them, without coming instantly to the conclusion, that an explanation of the irregular course X which the Council has been induced to adopt, can alone be found in some singular misrepresentation : at all events, it must be perfectly evident to every impartial mind, that had the matter been allowed to take its natural course, that is to say, had the editorial secretary or the Council fortu- nately consented to avail themselves of my original offer to submit the entire evidence on the subject, instead of the Council referring, in the first place, exclusively, to unauthenticated reports, and, in the second place, ex- clusively confining itself to requiring as evidence isolat- ed portions of the original manuscripts, selected at its own discretion, for the behoof of an inquiry, the object of which was never distinctly specified—I say, had the Council or Committee availed itself of my original offer, I think that not one of the strange irregularities which I have been com- pelled, with pain, to enumerate, could have arisen, and that even if my proposal to submit this question, involving “ delicate physiological considerations” to the Council of the College of Surgeons for its decision had been ac- ceded to, the whole matter would have been easily, speedily, and satisfactorily settled, I may here state, however, that in fact all inquiry on the subject, leaving out of the question its evident irregula- rity, was quite superfluous, for the accuracy of my own condensed report had been, some time before the Council entertained the question, satisfactorily vindicated in the Lancet, Medical Gazette, and Dublin Medical Press, by a reference exclusively to the unauthenticated reports of my communications published in the Literary Gazette and Athenaeum. In the Lancet for 1839-40, vol, ii. p. 644, the editor states,—“ Mr. Nasmyth has demonstrated “ in the clearest manner that he was acquainted with, “ and had published, an account of the organised nature “ of the teeth long before the month of December, 1839; u and, furthermore, that he considered the teeth to be “ developed ‘ by a transition of the pulp cells [at, not on XI “ the external surface) into the cells of the ivory.’ ” . . . . “ The essence of the theory evidently is a transition of “ pulp cells into ivory cells; and this essential element “ is developed in the papers of Mr. Nasmyth, which “ were published fourteen weeks before the presentation “ of Mr. Owen’s memoir to the Academy of Sciences.” In the Medical Gazette for 1839-40, vol, ii. p. 593, is the following passage. “ He (Mr. Owen) will never suc- “ ceed in convincing a single rational being that Mr. Nas- “ myth, in the papers from which we have quoted above, “ (viz. the reports in the Literary Gazette and Athenaeum,) “ teaches the old doctrine of secretion or exudation of the “ ivory from the bulb, in contradistinction to Mr. Owen’s “pretended ‘ nouvelle theorie’ that the ivory is formed “ by the transition of the pulp to an ossified state.” The Dublin Medical Press says, in its No. for August 19, 1840, p. 121,—“ We have now given the substance of “ Mr. Nasmyth’s researches and discoveries, as related in “ the report of his papers published in the Literary Ga- “ zette of Sept. 21, 1839, and in the Athenaeum of Sept. “ 14, 1839. The most careless reader cannot cast his eyes “ over these reports without perceiving at once that they “ attempt to establish the vesicularity or cellularity of the “ pulp, and its conversion into the cells and fibres of the “ ivory by the deposition of osseous matter.” As a specific and direct confirmation of the above public testimonies to the consistency of my opinions, it was with great pleasure that I was able to submit to the Council the following documents, which contain an account of the nature of my communications drawn up by three eminent physiologists, who saw them before 1 took them to Birming- ham, and consequently before there could be any motive for misrepresentation ; but I am sorry to say that even the receipt of them, as was the case with the other gratuitous aids to inquiry which I have afforded, has never been acknowledged: xii 6, Holies Street, March 17, 1841, As you have asked me to stale my recollections of a visit to your house for the purpose of seeing your diagrams, and hearing your demonstration of them prior to your visit to Birmingham in 1839, I can have no hesitation in complying with your wish. On the afternoon of the day immediately prior to your starting for Birmingham, where you were engaged to read some papers at a Meeting of the British Association, on the minute structure of the teeth, I availed myself of your invitation, and met several gentlemen, amongst whom I well remember to have seen the late Sir A. Cooper, Mr. Liston, Mr. Burrowes, Mr. Gulliver, the Rev. Mr. Daniell, and one or two others. On the floor of your room were laid a great many very beautiful diagrams on various subjects connected with the developement of ivory, enamel, the pulp of the tooth, &c., as well as some on the microscopic characters of epithelium. You explained your views of these drawings, and read various extracts from the papers you were about to communicate to the Asso- ciation, and this meeting I considered as a private view to your friends, none of whom I believe were able to be present at the Association. I distinctly remember being struck with one particular diagram, which I then considered as demonstrative of the views you then expressed as to the conversion of the cells of the reticulations of the pulp into the cells of the ivory. In answer to several questions of Sir A. Cooper, who told us he had many years before attentively studied this subject with Mr. Fox, you controverted his opinions as to the formation of the ivory being simply an ossific secretion from a vascular pulp, and showed him the cor- respondence in figure and size between the cells of the ivory and those of the reticulations observed on the sur- face of the pulp, I recollect, also, most distinctly observ- My Dear Sir, xiii ing, in the particular diagram alluded to, that there were several leaf-like processes, which I could not help com- paring, in my own mind, with some of the fan-like coral- lines, which were coloured partly blue and partly yellow : you observed that the artist had in all the diagrams pre- served the same colour for similar structures; thus, in all, the yellow represented the ivory, and the blue the pulp. Upon being struck with the exact resemblance be- tween the yellow and blue portions of this drawing, we were informed that in the lighter parts (yellowish) the pulp cells were in a transition stage of change into ivory ; and in those more deeply tinted yellow, that change had been completed; and that the original curiously-arranged pulp cells had been converted into bone. There were several other diagrams more or less demonstrative of this fact, but I well remember to have considered, at that time, that this particular diagram distinctly demonstrated the facts you then tried to impress upon us, because of its representing in one view the successive changes from original pulp cells into the complete ivory of the tooth. My memory does not serve me as to whether the drawing was made from the human or some animal’s tooth, but I satisfied myself of the correctness of the artist as to the arrangement of the cells and the reticulations, by an ex- amination of a preparation which was placed under the microscope in another part of the room, which I examined immediately after Sir Astley Cooper, who expressed him- self satisfied of the fidelity of your artist. Yours faithfully, (Signed) John Dalrymple. A Nasmyth, Esq. I have read Mr. Dalrymple’s statement, and am able to confirm it in every particular; indeed, my recollection XIV of the transactions in question coincides precisely with Mr. Dalrymple’s narration. (Signed) George Gulliver. Hyde Park Barracks, March 17, 1841. I recollect perfectly the meeting at Mr. Nasmyth’s house above referred to, and T have the same impression of what then passed as Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Gulliver have expressed. (Signed) Rob. Liston. 5, Clifford Street, March 17, 1841. In addition to all these distinct and unimpeachable pub- lic and private testimonies regarding the nature of my re- searches, I have still another witness to call, and his evidence cannot, like the above, be passed over in silence by the Council, for he is no other than its own editorial secretary, Professor Phillips, who himself drew up a report of my communications, (the proof of which was sent to me under cover of a note from him, and is still in ray possession.) This report, with which I had nothing whatever to do, except that, on the very morning I first received it, having never heard of it before, I protested, by letter to Professor Phillips, against its insertion in the Transactions, on account of its brevity and inadequacy, was still accurate as far as it wTent, and contained the very pas- sages embodying that particular theory of the formation of ivory, on account of the presence of which, in my own con- densed report, Professor Phillips, that is to say, so far as I am able to understand his motives, withheld the latter from publication in the Transactions of the Associa- tion. As the Council, in the course of this transac- tion, has sanctioned an irregular and unprecedented act of the editorial secretary, (viz. in withdrawing from publication an officially accepted report,) in favour of XV another party, it will not, of course, refuse to recognise one of his ordinary proceedings, which happens unintention- ally, and therefore the more unimpeachably, to establish the accuracy of my own report. Professor Phillips’s notice of ray communications is as follows, and the statements above alluded to I have printed in Italics. u On the Structure of Fossil Teeth. By Alexander “ Nasmyth, Esq. F.G.S. u During the author’s microscopic researches in the “ structure of the teeth, he was led to the discovery of the “ organized nature of the interjibrous substance of the “ proper dental substance, which Purkinje, Fr'dnkel, “ Retzius, Muller, and others, have regarded as structure- “ less, and which he is disposed to believe is so cha- “ racteristic in different animals as to be capable of “ affording valuable aid in the classification of the animal “ kingdom. This structure he first observed in a section “ of a fossil tooth of a rhinoceros, by the aid of a mag- “ nifying power of one-tenth of an inch focal distance, “ with an acromatic condenser of the light. The section “ presented the appearance of cells or compartments, their “ form varying in different animals. The structure also “ of the fibres presented an interrupted or baccated ap- “ pearance, the divisions differing in size and relative “ position in various series of animals. The laminated “ concentric structure of the tusk of the mammoth, the c; strength of ivory, when cut parallel to the axis of the “ tusk, and its weakness if cut at right angles, are urged “ in corroboration of this peculiar structure. The struc- “ ture of the enamel, as seen in a section parallel to the “ axis of a tooth, exhibits compartments of a semicircular “ form, the convexity of the semicircle directed upwards “ towards the free external part of the tooth. From recent “ analysis by Dr. Thomson, the proportion of animal XVI “ matter proper to the enamel appears to have been much “ underrated. The pulp is observed to he cellular “ throughout its internal structure, and this structure is “ essentially concerned in the developement of the ivory, “ which is neither more nor less than the ossified pulp. “ There exists a great analogy between the internal or “ productive surface of the capsule and the external or “ productive surface of the pulp. The membranous in- “ vestment of the enamel in human teeth (lately discovered “ by the author) displays a similar arrangement. The “ crusia petrosa is provided with a membranous invest- “ ment. The whole of this paper was illustrated by “ numerous interesting diagrams. “ The subject of the developement of the ivory was “ treated by Mr. Nasmyth in a separate paper read before “ the Medical Section.” I now wdth confidence leave the reader to form his own judgment of the consistency of my opinions from the fol- lowing documents, the original materials of my communi- cations at Birmingham, and after an examination of the whole, he will learn with surprise, I think, that the only plea, so far as I can guess, for withholding my own con- densed report from publication in the Transactions of the Association, has been, that it contains the theory of the formation of ivory by ossific transition instead of by “ exu- dation,” which latter theory it has been ridiculously at- tempted to show that I supported at Birmingham ; and I think it must be evident that the Council, in indirectly favouring this attempt, by neglecting my original offer to afford full satisfaction in the only possible manner, as wrell as by totally disregarding all the unexceptionable evidence quoted above, has shown that it has been unconsciously biassed in its proceedings ; but I have no doubt that it will yet restore me to my rights, and deliver to the asso- ciates my authentic report, which is their indefeasible property. THREE MEMOIRS. **# The subjoined extracts from the correspondence of Pro- fessor Phillips, the Editorial Secretary of the British Association for the Encouragement of Science, contain the instructions in strict conformity with which I drew up a report of the following commu- nications for insertion in the Transactions of the Association. The passages to which I wish more particularly to call attention, I have placed in Italics. On the 10th of Febuary, 1840, I received from the Editorial Secretary the following note “ Professor Phillips begs to inform Mr. Nasmyth, that the ar- rangements for printing the volume of the British Association re- quire the very earliest possible transmission of abstracts of Memoirs read, to Professor Phillips. There can only be an abstract of Mr. Nasmyth’s paper, not requiring plates, but Mr. N. is at full liberty to publish elsewhere, and at any time, the whole paper illustrated as he pleases. Professor Phillips encloses the MS. as read in the Geo- logical Section, for Mr. Nasmyth’s guidance in making his abstract. “ There will he, of course, only one abstract, though the subject of the paper was treated in two sections.” In a subsequent letter, dated Launceston, Cornwall, April 4, 1840, written after I had transmitted to him my own report, he in- formed me, that this report “ is to appear in the Proceedings of the Medical Section. On looking carefully over it,” he continues, “there seem to be a few parts capable of abbreviation; and as our rule of publication requires very close condensation of the communications to the sections, I return you the MS. with pencil-marks, proposing to you the omission of these few passages, to save space. They do not ajFect the substance of the Memoir.”