n IMbH a ii epo r t )BB IN I«4N A STATE MEDICAL SOCIETY, B=r T 4 ¦ ¦¦ ' * ¦," % *9t' ¦ ' L ~ ~w¥ i —^~ '. T'j&^j usa en «_ — ;Jl||P! lji|i| / ' W IT FHKVAILKU WITHIN — ¦H: THE STATE OF INDIANA. J- -g P'^'S ¦' I^RING THE YEARS 1849, 1860, 1861 & 1852.1 E_ -g^ ' ' IB ) WITH OBSERVATIONS ON THE LAWS WHICH GOVERN ITS PROGteSSZT __^ Hi in (iKiiiiiii-. >i i f" ¦¦-. •' !• ,'— U-| "£ iS INDIANAPOLIS: I |' ' § ft ELDER & HARKNE3S STEAM PRESS PRINT. J |j • .yl j 18 54. Js>: c : 'ii\">o 'uo»>po»s ' "A 'N '»«nJDi^s SiONII AO33dS 0 ,NAL lllltir OF MIDICINi NAT.ONAI lli«A«Y OF MtDICINI NAIIONAI MSIAtV OF MIDI C id rtaSsX * Vif * ' 'SAL / i \ . • ' s aiw io a»v»«ii IVHOIIVM iNmaiw jo ilVltli ivnoiivn inijioiw jo A»y»«n ivnoiim i>l!<' i >s^z : - SNAL U»«A«Y OF MIDICINI NATIONAL LIMAIV OF MtOICINI NATIONAL llt«A«Y OF MEDICI r/ 1 <*% I * ! vjr I / Ix^l imw»«m IVNOIIVN INIDIOIW 10 A»Vi«M 1»MOUI iaiw to A»v»«n i»noii»n iNiaiaiw iv »•?¦¦•¦ uku 3^U UIUIT OF MTbICNI NAT.ONAI U•.A . V OF MiD.C.NI NATIONAL L.ttA.Y OF MIDICH , Q3W JO A.yi.ii IVNOUVM MIIMH io A.y.tu i*nou*n in.dioiw jo ilfllM IVHOIJ O^fl UMAIf OF MtOICINI NAT.ONAI 1111*11 OF MIDICINI NATIONAL 1 1 M Alt OF MIO.C. IOJW JO MVIIII imU.N "iN.D.OIW JO 1.*!.. 1 IVNO-IVN I H OI«I« JO A.V..11 IVNOII c c ONAL H.tAtY OF MID.C.NI NATIONAL 1.1.A.V OF MID.CNI NAT.ONAL IIi.A.Y OF MID.C. > < \ E>\se who had died. " Scattered as these cholera localities were in different parts of the county, it would be quite a task to go into a statistical detail of names, ages, periods of the duration of the disease, &c, all of which can be had if necessary. I have repeatedly conversed with the practitioners of the county whose field of practice embraced these localities, and every one will corroborate the statements I have made. "The length of titne which the epidemic lasted, last winter, was so brief, and the cases so few in number, 1 will give the history in detail. On the night of the. 30th of November, a stranger from off the Ohio river, stopped all night at the house of Lanahan, an Irishman, living in the town of Vernon. In the night he had an attack of diarrhea, but was able the next morning to travel, and went off and was not heard of afterwards. In the afternoon of the next day, a child of Lanahan's, ten years old, took the cholera, and died in twelve hours. In three days afterwards, Lanahan's wife took the disease, and died after two or three days' illness. On the 7th of December, three men — Burk, Dougherty, and Ford — all of whom had attended the wake of Mrs. Lanahan, were attacked and died in a short time. On the 9th, Sally, who had waited upon Ford, was attacked, and lived about twelve hours. The next and last case was McManamie, who had visited Sally; he was attacked shortly after, and died after three days' illness."' The Doctor concludes his letter by saying — M As to the bare question, is cholera a contagious disease ? I don't see how any person who has been in the least observant of its history and progress here in the west, can give any other than an aflirma- 29 Dr. P. Hill, of Madison, writes me that the principtrebmedies used in the treatment of cholera at Vernon, were caWmel, opium, camphor, and capsicum. B A RTHOLO MX W COUNTY. Dr. J. W. Con way, of Taylorsville, writes me that cholera prevailed in that county to some extent in 1849, 1850, and there were a few cases in 1851. He says — "Not being in the county at that time, I am unprepared to give statistics." DECATUR COUNTY. In this county there hr been but few cases of cholera. Dr. G. W. New, of Greensburgh, writes me there has not been a case since 1849. Dr. G. W. Moody, of Greensburgh, informs me that in September, 1849, there occurred five or six cases resembling cholera at that town, two of which proved fatal. The first case was a gentleman who was attacked the day after his return from Cincinnati, where the cholera was at that time prevailing. He treated the disease with camphor, capsicum, and calomel. SHELBY COUNTY. Dr. Milton Robins, of Shelby ville, informs me, "that cholera made its appearance in that town on the 10th of July, 1850, and remained about three wrecks."w r eeks." He writes — "the first case was a traveler from Cincinnati at one of our hotels ; he recovered so as to leave for home. A day or two afterwards, the landlord took the disease, and recovered. Immediately after his recovery, three others in the family were attacked and died. Across the street from the tavern, two others took the disease and died. Some persons from a distant part of the town were with them, who immediately contracted the disease and died. After this it seemed to go without any regard to contagion; yet it was principally confined to one part of the village. After the first few cases, immediate contact with the sick seemed to have no effect in spreading the disease. During the prevalence of the epidemic, all our citizens were affected with diarrhea, or a rumbling and pain in their bowels, with loss of appetite and sickness at the stomach. It is said all the birds left the village during the prevalence of the epidemic. Several conies, pet squirrels, and dogs died while the disease was prevailing. The dogs vomited like their masters. u lt is difficult to say what proportion of cases recovered alter urgent symptoms occurred. Yet some of our physicians could count their fifties, or almost hundreds of cures ; while others, equally as intelligent, thought that treatment 'liter true 30 lolera made its appearance, had but little effect in abating ; mortality. The stimulating plan of treatment was most polar — consisting of brandy, capsicum, camphor, essential s, ether, &c, Avith sinapisms to the stomach, back, and exmities. The mortality was between fifteen and twenty. Ie next season dysentery prevailed in Shelby ville, and was •re fatal than the cholera. It, like the cholera, was confined certain parts of the town, although the localities attacked re not considered the most unhealthy." The Doctor thinks it neither changes in the atmosphere, habits of life, age, c, or locality, had any influence over the disease. RUSH COUNTY. I Dr. John Moffett, of Rushville, informs me that there h; c-n but few cases of cholera at that town. In 1851, there we three deaths from this disease ; they occurred in the nily of a man who had returned a few days previous from the river, and it was supposed that he introduced the disse into the place. The Doctor thinks, however, that the idence that such was the fact, is by no means conclusive. j informs me that diarrhea has prevailed to a considerable tent in that town and neighborhood since the appearance cholera in the country. UNION COUNTY. I Dr. A. B. Casterlinc, of Liberty, writes to me u that cholera availed in that town and county, in 1849, during the months July and August, and not since then. The disease appeared mtaneously. The causes which favored its progress were mt of cleanliness, and permitting the decay of animal and getable matter within the locality in which the disease was availing. Its influence was felt in nearly all parts of the nnty, there being a predisposition to diarrhea and dysen- He states, "that when the intemperate were attacked, it was nearly always fatal. It occurred mostly among persons of middle ages , both sexes were equally attacked." He says, ''that when the atmosphere was warm, dry and sultry, then, and with that condition of the atmosphere, the disease progressed most rapidly ; but, on the other hand, a cool and gentle breeze had the contrary effect." In reference to the number of deaths in proportion to the number of cases, he thinks there were about fifteen out of two hundred. HeVsays the remedies employed were tonics, stimulants, antispasmodics, and narticularly 31 to the lower extremities, 41 and in some cases it was necessary to resort to alteratives, calomel being the best. IVATNE COUNTY. Dr. John T. Plummer, of Richmond, informs me that cholera appeared at that place in 1833, 1834, and 1849, as an epidemic, and they have had sporadic cases in subsequent years. He writes, "our town population is about three thousand. We are situated on an anticlinal axis of Trenton limestone, among the head waters of the White Water river. He states that in 1849, it seemed to have been brought into Richmond by physicians who visited patients at Boston, six miles south of us.'' lie thinks "that fear and filth were causes that favored the progress of the disease, although families the most cleanly in their habits were often attacked. It was also probably aggravated by low, damp situations ; but the healthiest piaces were by no means exempt from the disease. The temperate and intemperate, all nges and both sexes, were indiscriminately attacked." He also writes that he had not been able to discover that any unusual condition of the atmosphere had more influence over this than other diseases. In the treatment of the disease he states, "of those prescribed for earl y, not more than one-tenth died ; of the collapsed cases about one-half recovered." The remedies which he depended upon M were calomel and Dover's powder, with perfect quietude where practicable." These, the Doctor says, "were unquestionably eilicient means. " Dr. V. Kersey writes to me that at Milton, in this county, there were no cases of cholera. HENRY COUNTY. I have been informed by Dr. Joel Reed, of New Castl that cholera prevailed in that county in 1833, and continuec about two months, July and August. He writes, that th disease was brought into the county, and in every instanc could be traced to an exposure, to some one laboring unde the malady. He says that at that time there were 40 case and 18 deaths. He does not write whether the disease ha ever prevailed in that county since ; by his silence we infe not. GRANT COUNTY. Dr. Loinax, of Marion, informs me that in July 1849, diarrhea and cholera morbus prevailed in that county to a considerable extent. The epidemic was generally mild, but in 32 fie five or six deaths in each ; the patients dying withsympis resembling cholera. He also states that the disease in se localities appeared as if communicated from one individto another. ALLEN COUNTY. From this county I received information from Dr. B. S. Woodworth, of Fort Wayne, he informs me that cholera prevailed in that city and in the surrounding country, during the summer and fall of 1852. He states that the first case that occurred at Fort Wayne " was a German who went to meet his brother, who was emigrating to this part of the country. The brother died of cholera on the canal boat between Toledo and this place. The next day after the German returned home, he was attacked with cholera and died. On the following day a girl about 10 or 12 years of age in the same house died with the disease. On the next day a German boy aged 10 years, living two squares from the house where it first appeared, was attacked and died in 10 or 12 hours illness. The first case occurred on the 25th of July. There were no other cases until the 9th of August, when it broke out in a row of old, damp, filthy, dilapidated buildings, occupied by French and German families, most of these recent emigrants. Some 10 or 12 died at these buildings in the course of a week. From the 9th to the 15th of September there were a" few cases almost every day in various parts of the town. After the 15th of September there was but one case in town, this was on the 28th. As to whether the disease was introduced, or appeared spontaneously amongst us, it is difficult to say. There was a great picdisposition to the disease in the community, for several weeks previous to its appearance, diarrhea and dysentery being unusually prevalent, besides solitary cases occurred in the county in various directions where* there had been no exposure to contagion." v The principal predisposing cause seemed to be unacclimation — previous ill-health — filthy habits — living in low, damp, unventilated dwellings — fear, &c. The principal exciting causes were intemperance, in eating and drinking — living on unwholesome or insufficient diet, and especially overloading the stomach with crude, indigestible vegetables; as to locality, it appeared almost exclusively in the lowest and dampest places in the town, in houses having wet cellars or stagnant w.:ter under them. Want of elevation seemed to have a great effect in favoring its progress, neither age or sex had any influence over the disease, but the intemperate were especially liable to i ck *%i t'\r*]z f*(\ A t !YHi*?nhprif plvint'o** li'id ix in'ii'Kcd influence 33 upon the epidemic. A cool and humid atmosphere, succeeding a warm and dry one, was calculated to increase the disease. I noticed particularly that at the commencement of every North East rain storm, several of which we had during the prevalence of the epidemic — there was a great increase in the number of attacks and that it abated when the weather became clear and dry. The number of deaths in proportion to the number attacked, we cannot accurately nor even approximately specify, I may say that it was at least 3 out of 4 — that is to say, that three-fourths of the number, who had what we called cholera, viz. vomiting, purging, and cramps died. Many had slight attacks, who recovered by abstinence, and a few doses of laudanum and camphor. " a With regard to treament, I have nothing new to ofler. Mercury was given in one half the cases, but it seemed to have no influence upon the disease. Stimulants, opiates, and a host of mixtures that were freely given, only hastened the fatal result. The treatment which I found the most successful was very simple. I first put the patient into a warm bath of the temperature of 110 or 120 to bring about a reaction if possible, when the bath was practicable, if not I used all the external heat the patient could bear ; such as bottles of hot water, sinapisms, dry frictions, &c, &c,. I gave ice to allay the irritability of the stomach and bowels, and some simple astringent, generally a vegetable one — such as tannic acid, catechu, kino. I preferred tannin. I sometimes gave acetate of lead ; I also gave enema of the same. I carefully avoided stimulates and opiates, I have seen many cases where it was difficult to teil whether they died from the disease, or from congestion of the brain* produced by acohol, or opium, or x>th. Quinine was given in several cases with apparently *ood effect." The Doctor closes his letter by stating, that he is lot fully convinced of the "contagiousness of cholera, or that t spreads by the communication of the infected, with the lealthy." wabXsh county. Dr. S. G. Thompson, informs me there were no cases of cholera in this county. FULTON COUNTY. Dr. Charles Brackett, of Rochester, writes to me that the cases resembling cholera which occurred in this county, were poradic. There were occasional cases of this character from he summer of 1849 until the fall of 1851. He says, Mwe lad no deaths from this disease, and but very few cases that vere not easily controlled by remedies as a general thing." b 34 CARROLL COUNTY. I Dr. H. W. Beck, of Delphi, informs me that there were r eral deaths from cholera in that town, in July 1 849, the only ;es that occurred in the county. The disease appeared to se spontaneously, although he says that one of their citizens nt to Lafayette 18 miles distant, during the prevalence of ! cholera there. A few days after his return, a man living he adjoining house to his, was attacked with the cholera, and d, and the disease prevailed in this family until there were en deaths. The family attacked had not been away front lphi, and the question may be asked,, did the disease arise »ntaneously, or was infection communicated by the man on return from Lafayette ? This man was not unwell. It >uld be borne in mind, that Delphi is on one of the principal roughfares leading from Lafayette, and the disease may re been communicated otherways. BENTON COUNTY Dr. A. Hurd, of Oxford, informs me that cholera has not prevailed in this county. TIPPECANOE COUNTY. I received information from Dr. McFarland, of Lafayette, that cholera made its appearance in that city on the 3rd of July, 1849, and disappeared about the middle of September. He says, that the first case that occurred was a man who had just arrived from Louisville, Ky., where the disease was then prevailing, and the next case, and succeeding cases, were traceable to it. A damp atmosphere, in combination with a South west wind, seemed to increase and favor the malignancy of the disease. It was not influenced foy locality. It prevailed upon the healthy and unhealthy localities alike ; neither age oi sex had any influence over the disease ; but intemperate habits had a predisposing effect. About one-fifth of those attacked, died, and very few if any recovered who passed into the collapsed stage of the disease. In reference to the best mode of treatment, the Doctor says, " there was great diversity of opinion, and he could advance nothing new. The total number of deaths at Lafayette from cholera, were one hundred and thirty ; but during the prevalence of cholera, and after it had subsided, dysentery and diarrhea prevailed as an epidemic, and from these diseases, in addition to those produced from cholera, there were over 300 deaths. " CLINTON COUNTY. Dr. C. J. Miller, of Frankfort, writes that several deaths 35 1849. He says it was brought into the neighborhood from Lafayette, by a gentleman whose family took the disease and died. He states that the only cause which produced cholera in his neighborhood, was communication with the sick. Locality had no influence over the disease, that he could discover. The number of deaths to the number attacked, w about 4 out of 6. The principal remedies were camphor, opium, and capsicum. MONTGOMKRY COUNTY. I have been informed by Dr. T. W. Florer of Alamo, that cholera has not prevailed in this county. MADI SON COUNTY. From this county Dr. Clay Brown, of Anderson, writes me that v there ht never been any cases of Asiatic cholera here ; but during the summer of 1849, 1850, and 1851, an epidemic form of diarrhea and dysentery prevailed ye ry extensively throughout the county. " MARION COUNTY. Dr. W. R. Smith, of Cumberland, informs me that choler made its appearance at that place on the 6th of August, 1 850 and disappeared on the 24th of the same month. He write that M the first case was a young Frenchman recently arrivec He had been at Indianapolis, and in communication wit friends sick with cholera. He was attacked with diarrhea th evening of his return, I saw him the next evening, and foum him in the collapsed stage of cholera. The next evening, th family where he was staying at, who were also French, re recently arrived, ate a very hearty supper of meat and bean and about two o'clock the following morning, two were a tacked with diarrhea. I was not called until 10 o'clock, A. M and both died, between 12 and 1 o'clock the same day one was 45 years of age, the other his little son 8 years ok In this house, which was a small frame with two very sma rooms, and badly ventilated, there were about twenty persons all French ; the whole of them eating and sleeping in thi house. Nearly the whole number had cholera in its worst form Besides these cases the French in the neighborhood, who visi ted and attended on the sick, were very generally attacked. The native portion of the community mostly escaped the disease. There were several cases amongst the Germans ; but they had also communication with the sick. I saw no case of this disease that had not communication with cholera patients. One case, a German, although living entirely out of the infec|;d, 36 and then helped to bury him — took the cholera the same $ht, and died before noon the next day. Dr. Edwards, Palestine, came up to see some of my cases, the Doctor ver having seen a case of Asiatic Cholera ; he returned me, took the disease that night and died.'" The Doctor says it locality appeared to have no influence over the disease ; ither had age or sex. Atmospheric changes also appeared have but little influence, for while the cholera was prevail;, the atmosphere was clear and dry, and the weather warm. The Doctor also writes, v Having lost nearly 40 per cent of my cases of confirmed cholera, I do not know that it will be of much benefit to detail my treatment except to show that its success has not proved it to be the best that could be done. If I saw the case before it was absolutely moribund, I at once administered an emetic cathartic of calomel and ipecacuanha; and after its free emetic 'operation, I gave the following in doses as the symptoms required : #. — Tine, of opium oz. ii ; Tine, of best African Ginger, oz. ii ; Ess. of Peppermint oz. ii ; Sulph. Ether, oz. iss ; Tine, of Camphor, oz. iii ; Tine, of Kino, oz. ii ; Brandy, dr. x ; Syrup half a pint ; shake well, in very bad cases I also administered capsicum, and gave camphor quite freely. I generally gave to all the following : Jfc. — Calomel, gr. ii ; Camphor, gr. i ; Acetate of Lead, gr. jss ; Gum Arabic sufficient to make a pill ; these were given every three hours. In the cold and pulseless state, I enveloped the patient in a blanket, wrung out of water as hot as he could bear. This I found serviceable in relieving the cramps, which were the most unpleasant symptom. To some of my cases, I applied bottles of hot water and hot bricks ; but I preferred the blanket. At the same time cholera was raging here the entire community was generally affected with serous diarrhea." Endianapolis. — Prof. J. S. Bobbs, furnishes the following inrmtion of the prevalence of cholera in this city. >v . i :—ln: — In the night, July 31, 1849, 1 was called to the first case of Cholera, occurring under my observation in this city. Two Irish laborers came to town about two weeks before, from the vicinity of Laurel, Indiana, whence they had been driven by the presence of the disease. They had eaten a very hearty supper, after having worked in a brickyard the previous day, and having drank copiously of water, according to their own representation, and were seized with violent vomiting and purging during the night — followed by cramps, and the other symptoms of cholera. The vomiting and purging were gradually arrested, the cramps were more persistent. The one patient died the following morning, reacrll w j k v v .. ] ]¦ ¦ f pvpr I |j n . .. ? n » n 37 health in the other. The father, sister, and an adult brother, with some children, occupied the same room with these patients, during part of their illness, and some of their friends visited them. The house was old, dilapidated, and comfortless, at best, was nausesome from the accumulated filth, arising from carelessness, and disproportion between the space and number of occupants. No other members of the family were seized, and so far as we are apprised no other cases of cholera occurred that season among those subject to exposure in that quarter. One, or perhaps two cases, reported to have been cholera, and ending fatally, fell under the care of other physicians here, that season. They were among emigrants recently arrived, who had passed through districts where it prevailed ; but I have no particulars of their cases. The first summer month in 1850, was characterized by a marked predilection to involve the bowels in all the forms of disease which existed. These were in some instances diarrheaic. in others dysenteric, and in others again both — the first from the small bowels, and the other from the large. As the summer advanced, more decided evidences of a sickly season were manifested, at a period unusually early, and the predominant type assumed from the first, become more decidedly developed ; until little else fell under the observation of the physician but dysentery, diarrhea, or diseases of which one of these constituted an essential part. A great many were ill throughout the community, but during the first summer months the mortality was not so great as it became later in the season. During this time no marked cases of cholera were observed. The same night, July 31, 1850, giving one year's interval, at 4 o'clock in the morning, I was called to see a German grocer, living near the centre of town. Another physician had been previously summoned, and finding the patient verging on the collapsed stage of cholera, requested me to see him. The vomiting and purging were promptly arrested, the spasmodic contraction of the muscles were more protracted. He died at nine o'clock the same morning. The marked cholera symptoms had set in between eleven and twelve ; but he did not call his physician until between three and four o'clock. He had been harrassed with diarrhea for a month before the complete development of the cholera. A short time before this case occurred, a German emigrant, who had returned to Germany to bring his family, had arrived, and shortly after was taken with cholera, with which he died. Some other emigrants who came with him, were also attacked. Diminc his illnps<4 hp rpmninprl with •P* r ' 1 f P H 38 t.'icKca, ana during nis illness, ana alter nis decease, tne wite and a son of the grocer, just mentioned, were with him. Being intimate acquaintances, the sudden and unexpected death of C. H , greatly distressed and alarmed Mr. R , the grocer. No other member of either family were attacked. The former had a wife and several children, the latter a wife and six children. Mrs. R. and her daughter were attacked with diarrhea, followed by some fever, but no other cholera symptoms. The abrupt decease of Mr. R., produced considerable sensation in the community. I August Ist, Wm. P. S., resident of Madison, Indiana, who d charge of the Railroad running to Shelbyville, Shelby co., d where he had been actively employed during the prevalce of cholera at that place, requested me to see him at a )tel, at which he had just arrived. He had vomiting and rging of a suspicious character, but no cramps beyond inluntary muscular twitchings. He was greatly alarmed and ich excited, under the conviction that he had cholera in its >rst form. A very liberal mustard emetic soon enlisted his icitude more particularly for his stomach, and copious ernebeing followed with an anodyne, and small but repeated rtions of a mercurial, he progressively improved, and in a v days was able to accompany his wife and son home, whence had brought them in his state of apprehension. A number persons visited Mr. S. during his illness, but we are not are that any of them contracted the disease. In the latter part of July, P. S. was attacked with vomiting and purging, which were represented to be copious and greenish, accompanied with some cramps, copious perspiration, and oppressed breathing. These symptoms were allayed without much trouble, reaction ensued, followed by fever, and in a couple of days by delirium tremens. He resided in the North west part of the city. His son, G. S. was at work in a gravel pit at the north east margin of the city. The pit was several feet below the surface of the ground, and thus the laborers were cut off from a circulation of air, and the weather being warm, they drank copiously of water. He resided with his father, and on the 2nd of August in the evening, called at my office to know how his father was progressing, soying he had quit work several days, because he had not felt very well. August 3rd. — Early in the morning was called to see this G. S. Found him in the collapsed state of cholera. He died before noon. His father had been troubled with diarrhea, for which he had taken a number of cholera nostrums, that the apothelimiting. 39 The son provided himself too, and on the night of c 2nd day of August, took a large allowance of something at was warranted to cure or prevent cholera. Before day his bowels required him to go out several times, and the last time remaining longer than usual, his wife went to see after him, and found him laying in the garden unable to reach the house. I found him cold, blue, shrivelled, pulseless, and vomiting at short intervals. But his chief distress was the cramps, which seemed to seize all the voluntary muscles at intervals, and were very violent. Diarrhea, with occasional vomiting, but presenting no characteristic of cholera, seized several other members of the family. They were generally controllable, were followed by fever, and recovered, as did also the father after a protracted illness. The alarm became so general that few persons visited the family during their illness. August 4th. — Visited Mrs. G. R., who had just removed to the South east surburbs of the city into a new house. She had been vomitingand complained of great distress of the stomach. Bowels lax and occasionally painful. She was greatly alarmed, as her residence was neai those of a number of German emigrants, many of whom were said to have died, or were then ill with the cholera. During the next ten days she passed through a pretty severe attack of dysentery, but had so far recovered as to be about, and I had ceased visiting her. On the evening of the 14th, she sent for me to advise her as to the propriety of her removing to the country for a while, as she felt assured she would take the cholera where she then was, being near the most afflicted part of the city. I urged her to do so, and she made arrangements to remove the next day. Early in the morning of the 15th of August, was sent for to see her. She had the usual symptons of cholera, soon collapsed and died at noon. Taking a great interest in her case, I watched her with much care. The vomiting became less, as did also the purging seemingly, and the cramps somewhat abated. But just, before her decease, the bowels discharged with scarcely any intermission. The restraining injections had prevented their evacuation ; but effusion seemed to have been going on, and when all control of the sphincter was lost in articulo mortis, the contents of the bowels ran away. The first case to which this report for 1850 alludes, occurred in the north east part of the city. The second near the center. The third was imported from Shelby ville. The fourth and fifth, in the north west part of it, and the sixth in the south east. They cover a period of about three weeks. Our citizens generally discredited the first reports of cholera, and 40 questioned. Even at present many can be found who deny that we ever had cholera here ; but it is among those who never believe until they see themselves, and they will never see the cholera, unless it steps into their own dwellings. While we had many that acted the part of the good Samaritan, there were those who passed by on the other side, and were too prudent to verify by their own observation, the correctness of reports authorized by the doctors. During the month of August, the disease increased, was probably at its height about the first of September, and had pretty well ceased by the end of this month. Dysentery prevailed at the same time with the cholera, and as the season advanced, the former became epidemic, as the latter receded. Among the native or long resident population, dysentery was very prevalent, and often fatal ; but these were rarely seized with cholera, in comparison with those who had recently emigrated. These were mostly Germans, and a number ol families having recently arrived, were crowded into other families already scantily provided with room, or huddled together in masses, without comforts, conveniences, or care. Probably over two-thirds of those who were ill, received their advice from irregular practitioners, and the mortality was very great among them, in some instances sweeping large families out of existence. But whether from cholera, or dysentery, or some other form of disease, could not always be known ; as these irregular practitioners habitually called every thing cholera, that came under their care. It is also impracticable for the same reason to estimate the number of deaths from the disease. We should suppose, however, fifty to be a moderate estimate, nearly all of whom were among our foreign population. Our soil is alluvion deposited upon sand. Running from the north east to the south west. Poague's Run cuts off an angle of the city. This south east angle is the highest part of the city, and is a clay soil. Along the base of the rise, a channel had been recently cut out for Poague's Run, and south of but adjacent to this, the population was chiefly of these Germans. Among them however, were interspersed native citizens, and some who had lived here all their lives. This portion of the city suffered greatly more than any other. Few persons lived there during the season, and escaped having either cholera or dysentery, and whole families, both foreign and native, were broken up with one or the other of these diseases. The mortality was also beyond all proportion in this portion of our population. Except this part of the city, no marked exemption or prevalence 01 inese discuses was or)ser\uuie-~-iii" oybeijiery esi)cci«niv, 41 Irevailing more or less through all parts of the city. No obious causes could account for the marked preference given y the disease to this angle of the city. Its eastern limits bounded by a strip of woods, immediately beyond which, number of hogs were fed by some butchers from the offal f slaughter houses, and the swill and garbage of the c'ty. 'his place was said to be very offensive, and we have heard itizens resident in that part of, the city, say it was particuirly so after night. There was much complaint in reference y this matter from those living there, and many of them ascried the prevalence of the disease to this cause. rr» i I 1 " T» 1 _ T» . _ I I The new channel given to Poague's Run, as also some excaation and embankment for railroad purposes in this part of the ity, exposed much new soil to the weather. This soil was deosited by the run, and was chiefly vegetable, mixed with some nimal debris. In the opinion of many, this had much to do nth producing the disease. About the time the disease reached its height in the city, ccasional cases were reported in the country about ; but no eneral prevalence of the disease occurred here August 28. — r isitcd J. H., about three miles from town, and found him with all the characteristics of cholera His habits were dissi- Eated. He had been in town a few days before he was attacked, ut not where there was any cholera that he was aware of, although he believed he had contracted the disease there. He died on the 30th. His wife was taken immediately atter, and died with all the characteristic symptoms of the disease in the hands of another physician. His daughter, Mrs. J., who resided in the city, visited her father and remained with him during his illness. Sept. Ist. — Visited her at her father's residence when she had all the characteristic symptoms of cholera. ihe vomiting and purging and cramps abated during the day. he ensuing night violent uterine hemorrhage supervened, llovved by great prostration, and death the night of the 2nd of September. We are not aware that any other cases occurred in this _•111111 . .1 • 1 »T (eighborhood, where exposure was traced to this house. No ther member of the family, which is large, contracted the isease, although several of them had diarrhea. Owing to the arm, not many persons visited them during their illness. Nov. 13. — Visited Mr. V., member of the Legislature from helby co. He had been troubled with diarrhea several days, 'hen vomiting and cramps supervened, which induced him to send for me. He had taken a number of things to arrest the diarrhea at the suggestion of others ; but without avail. He had all the symptoms of the disease, and the same night collap- 6 0 questioned. Even at present many can be found who deny that we ever had cholera here ; but it is among those who never believe until they see themselves, and they will never see the cholera, unless it steps into their own dwellings. While we had many that acted the part of the good Samaritan, there were those who passed by on the other side, and were too prudent to verify by their own observation, the correctness of reports authorized by the doctors. During the month of August, the disease increased, was probably at its height about the first of September, and had pretty well ceased by the end of this month. Dysentery prevailed at the same time with the cholera, and as the season advanced, the former became epidemic, as the latter receded. Among the native or long resident population, dysentery was very prevalent, and often fatal ; but these were rarely seized with cholera, in comparison with those who had recently emigrated. These were mostly Germans, and a number of families having recently arrived, were crowded into other families already scantily provided with room, or huddled together in masses, without comforts, conveniences, or care. Probably over two-thirds of those who were ill, received their advice from irregular practitioners, and the mortality was very great among them, in some instances sweeping large families out of existence. But whether from cholera, or dysentery, or some other form of disease, could not always be known ; as these irregular practitioners habitually called every thing cholera, that came under their care. It is also impracticable for the same reason to estimate the number of deaths from the disease. We should suppose, however, fifty to be a moderate estimate, nearly all of whom were among our foreign population. Our soil is alluvion deposited upon sand. Running from the north east to the south west, Poague's Run cuts off an angle of the city. This south east angle is the highest part of the city, and is a clay soil. Along the base of the rise, a channel had been recently cut out for Poague's Run, and south of but adjacent to this, the population was chiefly of these Germans. Among them however, were interspersed native citizens, and some who had lived here all their lives. This portion of the city suffered greatly more than any other. Few persons lived there during the season, and escaped having either cholera or dysentery, and whole families, both foreign and native, were broken up with one or the other of these diseases. The mortality was also beyond all proportion in this portion of our population. Except this part of the city, no marked exemption or prevalence OI li I" SC (JiSCtiSCS Wu S OlJoCfv v Ul" ¦ ¦ inu CJyN"IJI"IV (^Si)CC^l*lllV« 0 Irevailing more or less through all parts of the city. No obious causes could account for the marked preference given y the disease to this angle of the city. Its eastern limits ,-ere bounded by a strip of woods, immediately beyond which, number of hogs were fed by some butchers from the oflal f slaughter houses, and the swill and garbage of the city, 'his place was said to be very offensive, and we have heard itizens resident in that part of. the city, say it was particuirly so after night. There was much complaint in reference > this matter from those living there, and many of them ascried the prevalence of the disease to this cause. The new channel given to Poague's Run, as also some excaation and embankment for railroad purposes in this part of the ity, exposed much new soil to the weather. This soil was deosited by the run, and was chiefly vegetable, mixed with some nimal debris. In the opinion of many, this had much to do ut not where there was any cholera that he was aware of, il though he believed he had contracted the disease there. He died on the 30th. His wife was taken immediately atte and died with all the characteristic symptoms of the diseas in the hands of another physician. His daughter, Mrs. J., wh resided in the city, visited her father and remained with hi liring his illness. Sept. Ist. — Visited her at her father's re encewhen she had all the characteristic symptoms of choler he vomiting and purging and cramps abated during the da he ensuing night violent ulerine hemorrhage supervenec llowed by great prostration, and death the night of the 2n( of September. We are not aware that any other cases occurred in this neighborhood, where exposure was traced to this house. No Other member of the family, which is large, contracted the disease, although several of them had diarrhea. Owing to the alarm, not many persons visited them during their illness. Nov. 13. — Visited Mr. V., member of the Legislature from Shelby co. He had been troubled with diarrhea several days, when vomiting and cramps supervened, which induced him to send for me. He had taken a number of things to arrest the diarrhea at the suggestion of others ; but without avail. He had all the symptoms of the disease, and the same night collap- 6 42 t] and died soon. Mr. X., member from Henry co., roomed side him, and had suspicious diarrhea ; but it was arrested thout developing any further evidences of cholera. No case cholera had been in the city for several weeks before, and ne followed this one. He had been exposed to the disease Shelby co., when it prevailed there. As an example of the violence of the disease, we will give an instance. Before day t>n the 20th of August, we were called out. Passing a small shoe shop, the door of which was open, we observed a person on a cot. It arrested our attention so, that we stepped in. It was a young woman of about 18 years, in the collapsed stage of cholera. She belonged to a German emigrant family recently arrived. Since which she had lost her mother, and several brothers and sisters. The previous evening being acquainted with the shoemaker, to whom she was engaged to be married, she called to see him on an errand, when she was taken ill and could not get home. The shoe maker had called an irregular doctor, and was doing his best to carry out his instructions, and was the only nurse the poor girl had. During our absence he left her alone in the shop to bring her father, who resided perhaps a mile off, in the most infected district. The two were with her on my return ; but she was hopelessly collapsed. Early in the morning I passed again. She was dead, and had already been carried to her grave, or somewhere else, we believe the On the subject of treatment, we have but little to say. While we put in requisition most of the means creditably recommended, we were not flattered with the result. We had no great trouble in arresting vomiting and purging by astringent injections and anodynes ; but when the mucous surfaces desisted throwing off discharges, the skin was apt to take up the office, and generally executed it quite as efficiently. The cramps were mostly in the extremities ; but the other muscles were often involved in them. Left without attempts to relieve them, they were frequent, painful, and exhausting ; and to bring them under the subjection of an anodyne was apt to reduce the patient to an undesirable state of stupor, in which he would sweat to death, or be visited by dangerous reaction. We always employed mercurials in some form, where our patients got well ; but they did not always get well where we employed them ; and in violent cases, we believe they are too slow in their action, however appropriate they may otherwise be. We believe we have read every thing on the treatment of cholera which has fallen in our way, and have had some o o o^ r 1 w n 1 1 v 10 r* o oso i*\'o i m^ n oiii solves* io till »y e oo iic \ c we 43 would treat it quite as satisfactorily to ourselves, if we had never seen or heard of it, as with these seeming advantages. Sometimes my patients got well, and I hoped I had contributed to the result; sometimes they died, and I fear I did the same ; and frequently I thought the treatment neither good nor bad, so far as it influenced the issue. JOHNSON COUNTY. In this county there were but few cases of cholera. At Franklin, the county seat, I have been informed there was not a case. MORGAN COUNTY. Dr. David Hutchinson, of Mooresville, writes me that there has been no cholera at that village ; although in 1850, while cholera was prevailing at Indianapolis, they had frequent cases of diarrhea, or cholerine. He states that the principal diseases for the last three years, in the neighborhood of Mooiesville, were dysentery and typhoid fever. Last summer, dysentery and scarlatina prevailed at that place. Dr. G. B. Mitchel, of the same place, informs me that cholera made its appearance at Martinsville, the county seat of this county, in 1851, on the 15th of June, and disappeared about the Ist of July. It was supposed by the citizens to have been introduced into the town. lie says that the locality where it prevailed was the same as the surrounding country ; and he did not discover that habits of life, age, or sex, had any influence over the disease. But it was modified by the condition of the atmosphere, — for while it was prevailing the weather was warm and sultry, and the atmosphere dry. It subsided after a few showers. He writes that about half the number attacked died. The remedies which he found the most successful, were stimulants, given internally and applied externally, also opiates administered in such doses as symptoms seemed to require. PUTNAM COUNTY. I received information from Dr. S. Ritter, of Pleasant Garden, that cholera appeared in the neighborhood of that village, in June, 1851. He writes that it was confined to an area of about two miles square. The inhabitants were farmers, of stout and healthy constitutions. The land was flat, and rather inclined to be wet. There were ten cases seen by the Doctor and his partner. He remarks, as to the cause of this outbreak of cholera, he could not detect anything in the locality, or any 44 to have produced the disease. He also remarks that it was the prevalent idea in the neighborhood that the disease was brought to the house of an old gentleman, by his son, who had just returned with his wife from St. Louis, where the cholera was then prevailing. His son had the cholera on the boat, and his wife had the diarrhea when they returned. "They brought home a large amount of dirty bed-clothes and wearing apparel. These were exposed to air the next day after their arrival. They returned on the 23d of June, 1851. On the 27th, the old man was attacked, and died in six hours — his age was seventy. On the 29th, his son-in-law, living in the same house, was attacked, and died in nine hours. The house was vacated by all but the man and his wife who had just returned from St. Louis. This house was cleaned, the beds aired, the clothes well washed, and there were no more cases until the 17th of July ; and between this time and the 28th of the month, the others were attacked. AH lived within threequarters of a mile from where the first patients died, and were in attendance on them, with the exception of one who lived about two miles distant, and did not see any of these cases, but he was at the house while they were clearing it. There were five deaths, — three males, one young woman about twenty years of age, and one infant. All of the patients had vomiting, purging, cramps, great prostration, blueness of the skin, suppression of urine, &c. The persons who attended the sick, or who lived within the immediate vicinity, that escaped the disease, were affected with diarrhea." The Doctor also writes, that twelve miles east of Pleasant Garden, at Mt. Meridian, which is situated on a hilly and limestone country, cholera prevailed in 1849. He says, "that lam informed by Dr. Brenton that nothing like the disease prevailed until a couple of cattle drovers from Washington County, Pennsylvania, stopped there ; both were attacked with the disease, and died the same day. The disease from these cases seemed to rapidly spread through the town and surrounding country." The Doctor believes the disease both contagious and epidemic. In regard to the pathology of the disease, the Doctor adds: " It is probable that the poison, or poisons, acts primarily upon the nervous system, producing great nervous prostration, and as a consequence, cramp, vomiting, purging, suppressed secretion, &.c; therefore I believe the first great indication in the treatment, is to restore nervous power and arouse the secretions. The first of these will be met by quinine, given in quantities proportionate to the violence of the disease ; the second, by calomel or its equivalent, opium in moderation, — 45 re all useful. Ido not push the opium, for fear of narcotism, should the patient pass to the stage of reaction, I rely more n the tonics than on stimulants, and give mercury v ab initio" ntil ptyalism is produced. I consider that there is no better >reventative in the way of medicine than quinine and blue- Mil." At Greencastle, the county seat of this county, I have been nformed there were no cases of cholera. CLAY COUNTY. Dr. S. Ritter informs me that while cholera was prevailing t Pleasant Garden, in Putnam County, the disease made its ppearance at Brazil, which is five miles from that town in the lorth part of this county. The Doctor writes, so far as it is nown, the disease was not ttiken there, unless by the physiians, one of whom saw some of the cholera cases near Pleaant Garden. At the time he saw these cases, he was attending woman who had just been confined. In a few days afterwards, this woman took the cholera and died. From this :ase the disease seemed to spread: there were several deaths n the family, and he writes that he has been informed that all vho died, with the exception of one case, had visited this amily. He says that at the house where it first made its ppearance, there was a cellar filled with stagnant water, with dead animals in it. This may have acted as a predis>osing cause to the disease. The particulars he cannot give, s he did not obtain his information from medical men, but rom cilizens of the town. vioo county. Dr. Ezra Read, of Terre Haute, writes — •* We have been ingularly and entirely exempt from cholera, — but a single ;ise has ever occurred here. A traveler died at this town in 850, having passed through some districts in Illinois where holera was prevailing. He had premonitory symptoms when c reached the hotel, and died in about six hours. We can carcely assign a cause for our exemption from this disease, t has prevailed on the Wabash river towns, both above and >clow Terre Haute, and at Paris, 111., 20 miles west of us." OWEN COUNTY. I Dr. A. B. Allen, of Spencer, writes me that cholera has not revailed in this county. SULLIVAN COUNTY. LDr. C. C. Davis, of Carlisle, informs me that in this county ere h been no cases of cholera. 46 KNOX COUNTY. From Vincennes, Dr. W. W. Hitt writes that cholera made its appearance in that city July 15th, 1850, and disappeared about the 15th of August following. He says the disease appeared to arise spontaneously. At the house where the first case occurred, the yard was in a filthy condition. Intemperance favored its progress ; but atmospheric changes appeared to have no influence over the epidemic — neither had locality, for it prevailed in the different parts of the town. He writes that more than half of those attacked died. He relates a remarkable case that came under his observation and treatment in 1850. It was "that of a lady about the full term of uterogestation. She was attacked with cholera; labor pains came on about the commencement of the attack. The large doses of camphor in the prescription, calomel, camphor and pepper, ten grains each, appeared to suspend the labor pains for twelve hours, and until the violence of the attack had passed. During consecutive fever pains had reappeared, and she was delivered of a child apparently full grown, and some hope entertained of her recovery. The child was born with nearly all the symptoms of Asiatic cholera fully developed, and died three or four hours after birth. The woman also died some thirty hours after her accouchment, of consecutive fever." I M In the treatment of cholera," the Doctor remarks, umy neral course was to give prescription No. 1, viz : calomel, mphor, and pepper, from 8 to 10 grains each, every one, two. three hours, according to the urgency of the case, until Lrrhea ceases. Then give prescription No. 2 — the above Juced one-half, and add compound extract of colocynth Is, two, three, or four hours, until purging ensues. Then sen the dose of No. 2, and give at longer intervals for two three days. Warm the extremities with hot water by Iding them near the edge of the bed above a tub of hot iter, by pouring, or by means of cloths. The water is apsd as often as necessary to keep thorn warm. I allowed to be held in the mouth until dissolved. I noticed that all o recovered slept two days and nights after the violence of i disease had passed, and during consecutive fever had to aroused from slumber to give nourishment or medicine." PUBOIS COUNTY. I am informed by Dr R. M. Welman, of Jasper, that cholera appeared in this county in 1C49, on the 28th of June, and disappeared about the last of July. He writes, "it seemed to arise spontaneously, and a cloudy and damp atmosphere falealthy 47 localities." He says that habits of life, age, sex, and ccupation appeared to have no influence over the disease, 'he number of deaths, in proportion to the number attacked, were, the first and second week, about two to three; after that ime, one in five, or less. The remedies which he found most uccessful, were a combination of the most powerful stimulants nd antispasmodics, given without regard to quantity. He bund mercury most serviceable after the violent symptoms lad subsided. WASHINGTON COUNTY. Dr. Saml. Reid, of Salem, informs me that cholera prevailed at that town in 1833. He says at that time there were about 1,500 inhabitants in Salem, and there were about 150 deaths from cholera. In the month of August, 1 849, cholera appeared again, and disappeared in September. There were this time thirty deaths. In 1850, there was not a case. In 1851, during the month of July, there were four deaths. In July, 1852, there were three deaths from cholera. The Doctor thinks that the disease appeared spontaneously. He says that he lould not discover that habits of life, age, sex, or locality, had ny influence over the epidemic ; sudden changes in the .•eather he thinks had. He states that three-fourths of those ttacked died. In the treatment of the disease, the stimulating lan he found best. His principal remedies were brandy, amphor, opium, and chloroform, administered as symptoms •quired. He depended principally upon calomel, after reacon had taken place. FLOYD COUNTY. From New Albany. Dr. J. Sloan writes, " that cases of cholera had been landed at that place from steamboats during the winter of 1849, and some cases also occurred in persons who had been exposed upon the river. It first appeared as an epidemic in the latter part of April, and cases continued to occur with considerable frequency until the middle of autumn. The cases I saw early were more malignant than those of the summer and fall. Persons of broken-down health, and intemperate habits, were more frequently attacked than those in robust health. I am not aware that its prevalence in this place was influenced in a marked degree by locality, age, or •ex. There were, in 1849, one hundred and twenty cases reported, and forty deaths — probably the number is too great. "In 1850, the disease appeared in June, and occasional cases were reported during the summer and fall. There were 48 deaths, in proportion to the cases reported, than during the preceding year. "¦ln 1851, the disease did not prevail as an epidemic — a few sporadic cases occurred. "In 1852, there were a few cases in the city. The first was a lady; then her husband. These cases occurred durin the session of the Indiana State Medical Society. These persons had been in attendance on a niece in Portland, Ky., who died of cholera The lady was attacked immediately on her return, and the man two days after — both died. Cases had been landed at Portland, and the disease appeared to have been introduced there in that manner. I" Late in the summer, a boat-load of pauper German emiants shipped from New Orleans. On the trip they were tacked with cholera, and a large number died. Some fifty more landed here, and were charitably taken in by some srman families near the city. The larger number died of olera, and* in a number of instances the disease appeared to communicated to their attendants. The latter cases were tin the city. They were visited for the most part by a irman physician, who wrote a communication for the Louisle Medical Journal on the subject. I have not read the arle, and consequently cannot endorse it. t >l Various modes of treatment were tried, and in the milder ses were quite successful; in the more malignant, no treat;nt was of benefit. I think the most successful treatment is the early administration of an emetic of salt and water, th mustard, followed by mercurials, opiates, and astringents, stimulants. Say calomel, opium, and acetate of lead, or mphor, variously combined, to meet the particular indicans. Externally, sinapisms and dry heat were useful. 14 In 1849 and 1850, cholera was preceded by diarrhea, and bowel complaints were unusually prevalent during the summer, followed by dysentery in the fall. The latter was not of a malignant character. Since 1849, I have observed a great increase of what are usually known as fellons, boils, carbuncles, and pustular diseases." This agrees with my own observation. The Doctor also remarks, "that in 1850, 1851, and 1852, I have attended a smaller number of cases of tubercular diseases than in as many years before this period. I think the number again on the increase." He says, U I should be pleased to know if this is accidental, or if others have observed any thing like an antagonism between the diseases?'' In answer to this inquiry, I can state that as far as my observation has gone, we have had an increase of tubercular diseases since the cholera made its appearance. 49 • Dr. Girdner writes from Greenville, in this county, and his remarks are endorsed by Dr. Links of the same place, that cholera prevailed in that neighborhood in 1849, 1850 and 1851. The first case that occurred was on the 18th of May, 1849 ; and they had occasional cases up to the Ist of August. The disease was not very malignant, for out of eighteen cases there were only two deaths. In 1850, there were seven cases and two deaths ; in 1851, three cases and two deaths. He says that the first year it appeared spontaneously; but in 1850 and ] 851, he thought the disease was introduced into the neighborhood. In 1850, '-it appeared in one family, and was evidently brought from off the river by the father ; three of the family were attacked." The remedies which he depended upon, were calomel, opium, acetate of lead, camphor, and ammonia. Externally, dry heat. Since the above was embodied in the report, Dr. Girdnei has sent me another communication, giving the particulars of the manner in which cholera was introduced into his neighborhood in 1850. He writes that on the 25th day of April, 1850, he was called to see Moses Scott, 65 years of age. who had just returned from lowa. On the steamboat on which this man came up the river, there were a number of cases of cholera, and he was attacked with vomiting, purging, and cramps. The captain gave him medicine, and when he arrived at New Albany, two days after his attack, he was able to be conveyed home, a distance of ten miles. When Dr. Girdner saw him he still had symptoms of cholera. Two days after lis return home, at 1 o'clock in the night, two of his daughters were attacked with cholera. When the Doctor arrived next day at the house, which was 1 1 o'clock, one of the daughters was dead, and the other vomiting, purging, and cramped — she lowever recovered. Five days afterwards, the husband of he daughter that died, was attacked with the same symptoms; ie recovered. The Doctor remarks, •* that many persons visited the sick, and nearly all had more or less of the symptoms of cholera, such as diarrhea, but by taking medicine in ime, no more had fully developed cholera." The Doctor also writes at the time this man Scott came home, there had been no cases of cholera in the county out of New Albany, nor even diarrhea. The disease, was confined to this family, and hose persons who visited there. There was nothing in the mbits of this family that was calculated to produce this disease. The Doctor also writes that cholera appeared again in that section of country about the Ist of July, in the same year. It was introduced as follows: A German, emigrating from Germany, with his family, was attacked with cholera on the 7 «*wiw,*AL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE WASHINGTON, D. C. 50 steamboat and died, and was buried between Madison and Utica. His wife packed his clothes and the bedding into a large chest, without washing or airing them. On arriving at New Albany, she had this chest taken into the country, where she commenced housekeeping in one end of a double log cabin. In tiie other end resided a German family — the passage between the two rooms served as a cook room for both families — a few days after her arrival, an old lady living in the one end of the house, who had not been away from home, was attacked with cholera and died ; about the same time two sons of the widow were attacked with cholera and died. In the other end of the house another woman was attacked with cholera, and also died. During her illness her mother, Mrs. Green, who resided some distance from her daughter, came to see her; on her way home she was attacked with cholera, and also died. The German widow had another son attacked, but he recovered. The Dr. saw these cases, although he did not attend any of them professionally, except Mrs. Green. They were attended by another physician. There were one or two deaths more at this house, but he did not see these. {Che Doctor writes, " these cases all occurred in the same ise, and were exposed to effluvia, arising from the unwashbed clothing, upon which the man died on the steamboat." ne of the neighbors contracted the disease except Mrs. ;en — however very few visited there. I The Doctor also remarks, that the appearance of the chole, in the spring as well as in this instance, was upon elevated, y, and usually healthy localities, where cholera had never en known before, nor has it appeared there since. In both stances neither of the families had been from home . The Dr. o writes, wt l was a total disbeliever in the] contageousness cholera, but these cases rather shocked my want of faith to ne extent." SPENCER COUNTY. From this county Drs. Morgan, Deßruler, and Crooks send me information that cholera first appeared in Rockport, in June, 1850; and the last case was in September following. — They say that it appeared spontaneously, or at least there was no evidence that the disease was imported. It prevailed in healthy and unhealthy localities alike, and during all kinds of weather. Intemperance appeared to increase its fatality. About one-third of the number attacked died. In reference to treatment they say that they have nothing new to ofier. 51 From Evansville, Prof. G. B. Walker writes, "that cholera has prevailed with considerable mortality in this city and its vicinity, for the last four years. It commenced during the summer of 1849; this summer and the summer of 1850 it prevailed in a distinctly epidemic form, destroying about 150 of our citizens each season, or one and a half per cent. In the summer of 1851, and summer of 1852 it prevailed, but not to the same alarming extent, carrying off about 50, or one-half of one per cent, of the population each season; and perhaps in the latter seasons had more the characteristics oi an endemic disease. As in other places it prevailed to the greatestextent amongst the poorer population, especially German and Irish emigrants, who were destitute of the means of comfort and more exposed by their occupations than those in better circumstances; and, also, in localities abounding in filth, as in the vicinity of foul streets and alleys, and still more strikingly near a steam mill and distillery, about which the grounds were exhaling a putrid odor." While cholera was prevailing the Doctor frequently observed it complicated with other diseases. He remarks that t was frequently complicated with bilious diarrhea. By this complication he says, "I only wish to signify that during the nvasion of cholera this form of diarrhea has been quite prevaent, sometimes terminating in cholera, that is in serous diarrhea with vomiting spasms and collapse; at other times continuing for weeks with no other untoward symtoms, except copious thin bilious stools, yielding reluctantly at length under he use of anodynes and astringents as well or perhaps better without the addition of mercurials than with them. Remitent fever has sometimes been manifested during an attack of cholera, and when simple the case has justified and borne a more or less free administration of quinine, the febrifuge proiucing such decided benefit as to induce some to suppose that t might be a useful remedy in the treatment of cholera proper, nd some have even gone so far as to ascribe the cholera itself to malaria. Instead of simple remittent fever, however, the more alarming congestive symtoms have not unfrequently manifested themselves. The seat of the congestion has genrally been the cavity of the cranium, indicated by deep coia; sometimes however the abdomen or postal circle seemed obe also involved. In these cases calomel was an indispenable remedy; opiates could not be endured, senapisms, counerirritants, and revulsives, with cold applications to the head, >ccasionally produced the most happy effects, especially a "*"HJ 1 V' vl Lilt. i ' CVjU 1* I 111«1 1 1« W llvll LI I*- r LI v* UL 1 1 VL. W I . 1 1 I I ) \j l_) ' | \ 52 fit to draw, (which was sometimes two or three days,) seemto contribute greatly to the cure." u The typhoid complications, which occasionally occurred, were found generally amongst foreigners, who had recently landed from on shipboard. These cases were extremely difficult to manage, and generally recovered best where stimulents were freely given, and persevered in conjointly with the remedies proper for cholera itself." Cholera, as the Doctor observed it, "presented no premonitory symtoms that could be relied upon as menacing an attack of the disease. The diarrhea has stolen upon the patient without attracting his attention or exciting discomfort, until the shafts of death have irretrievably entered his vitals. It is not sufficient to reply to this that a powerful nervous shock affects a large proportion of the people during the prevalence of this disease, since this is nothing more than a natural accompanyment upon so terrible a scourge, and by no means a premonition of this disease, and doubtless this debilitating mental anxiety and alarm not unfrequently ushers in an attack. But an attack does not always follow upon the most debilitating, nervous or mental impressions, while, on the other hand, it is often established without any such antecedents. Diarrhea has of late years, even more than at first, been a prominent and early symptom. This frequently advances by the slowest possible degrees ; the stools growing gradually thiner and paler, until the bilious tinge is entirely lost and nothing but colorless serum, or serum of a whitish color, or with white flocculi floating in it is evacuated. This constitutes the rice water discharge, from a resemblance to the water in which rice has been boiled. This serous or rice water diarrhea has continued from half an hour to several days, being generally more rapid when the discharge is copious, after which the peculiar vomiting in cholera, which, indeed, appears to be a spasmodic regurgitation, comes on, and now, between the vomiting and purging, the vital powers begin to sink rapidly. As soon as the prostration extends to the spasm point the cramps make their appearance, affecting all the voluntary muscles, but more especially those of the extremities, the stomach and bowels being occasionally seized with the most painful spasms ; soon after this the spasms subside apparently from exhaustion, and the fatal collapse commences. The recoveries after collapse has been fairly established, amount, according to my own observation, to about one per cent of such cases. I am inclined to consider the rice water stools and collapse, as characteristic symptoms of cholera, and as Dcmg so intimately associated, as 10 lcoeniuic 53 the relativeness of cause and effect, and, indeed, the serous stools so invariably precede the collapse in this disease, as to nake me regard the one the consequence and effect of the other. Be this as it may, I should consider the patient safe rom collapse so long as bilious stools are discharged, and the danger of this fatal result to be almost removed when such evacuations have been changed in quality or arrested. Such las generally been the order of its different stages : Ist, diarrhea ; 2d, vomiting; 3d, spasm ; 4th, collapse. In the treatment of cholera, the Doctor remarks : "that I am not clearly convinced that the profession has advanced materially since ts invasion in 1832. The simple medication practiced by he profession generally, has, according to my observations, >een the most satisfactory and successful, such as calomel, opium and camphor variously proportioned and modified. To hese may be superadded rubifacients and internal stimulants nnd astringents as symptoms may indicate. The opium should )e carried far enough to secure its anodyne or soporific effect; riven short of this, it is only an inferior stimulant,and carried too ar, it may, and indeed, I have known it to bring on a fatal oma. The camphor must always be given according to the udgment of the practitioner in each particular case. I have lever known it to be administered in a poisonous dose in the management of cholera, and like sugar of lead, catechu, and annin may be regarded as entirely of secondary importance, calomel, at last, is the Sampson in our system of medicaion. It may be asked, is it most beneficial in enormous, modrate, or minute doses — that is to say, sixty, ten, or one grain oses ? I, formerly, was in favor of the ten grain doses, but o\v prefer the small or one grain doses, sometimes even mailer and occasionally larger. lam also become convinced lat the mercury was useful only to maintain the secretions specially of the liver. When, therefore, the hepatic secreion is natural and sufficiently abundant, I have opposed its lse, depending upon anodynes and astringents ; preferring pium or morphia for the former, and tannin for the latter." 'he Doctor asks : v is Calomel always necessary when the tools are destitute of bile ? This is an important question, nd, I am inclined to believe that the profession generally vould answer in the affirmative. I am convinced from obervation that it is not indispensable ; on the contrary, the re:uperative powers of the system will sometimes restore the ilious secretion when entirely suspended in cholera. Such a esirable result, however, could notbe relied on, and the rnctitioner would be highly culpable who would trust to the Kissibility of this favorable change and abstain from the most 54 < efficient means (mercury) to aid the flagging powers of the liver in securing so desirable a result. After the function of the liver has been restored, the patient may be considered out of danger, at least from the present attack — but by no means free from danger from complications or relapses." REMARKS. I Such is the information which I have been able to obtrin the progress of cholera through the state of Indiana. The ncipal objects kept in view in drawing up this report, have sn to a«cprtain to what extent the epidemic has prevailed thin the state ; next, what are the evidences that this disse was introduced amongst us, and was propagated by contain ; also what were the predisposing and exciting causes tich favored its development, and also what was the treatnt adopted by our physicians. In reference to the contagiousness of cholera, we have seen from the statements of a number of our physicians residing in the interior of the state, that the disease has appeared in different parts of the country after the arrival of some person coming from an infected district, this person being first attacked ; then cases followed in succession as if communicated from one individual to another ; while the physicians of the towns along the river have generally, I believe, considered the disease as appearing spontaneously. I may here remark that the physicians of the West, particularly those who reside in the country, possess peculiar advantages in observing the progress of cholera. It is not amongst the crowded population of a large city or even along our great thoroughfares that we can satisfactorily ascertain whether cholera does or does not progress over the world by contagion or infection, for the means of communication may be so various to those who are predisposed to the malady, that the connection between the different cases cannot be discovered; but, in a country where the population is sparce, and the in- Eitants, alarmed by the prevalence of the epidemic, live alt isolated from their neighbors, we have a better opportuof observing the connecting links, if there are any, been the different cases that occur. From my own obserons, and from reviewing the information I have been able btain, cholera appears to me in its progress through the c of Indiana, to present more the appearance of an infecs disease than thatof an epidemic dependingupon some widead cause in the atmosphere . The manner in which the epiic first made its appearance at Aurora, (and this was similar 55 to its first appearance at most of the towns along the river) did not resemble at first the progress of an infectious disease. This I believe was owing to the fact that cholera poison was first introduced into Aurora, as well as many other river towns, by passengers from the steamboats in the winter, a season of the year, when the disease would not prevail exceptinthe form of diarrhea. Persons were constantly arriving at that time from New Orleans, where the epidemic was prevailing, unwell with diarrhea, and the first cases which terminated fatally at Aurora, were individuals landed from steamboats; but the disease did not spread in a malignant form from these cases. We had at first an epidemic diarrhea ; this diarrhea gradually increased as the season advanced, and, although easily managed at first, I believe from the sudden prostration of the system which frequently accompanied it, and the clear serous discharges, to have been a mild form of cholera, and to have been introduced into our town by persons arriving from off the steamboats. I can see nothing inconsistent with the nature of this disease, in supposing it may assume a mild form — the form of a diarrhea alone. We have a mild type of scarlatina scarcely attended with any danger. The malignant form of this disease, as is well known, is almost as fatal as the worst forms of cholera. Does not a combination of circumstances make the poison of cholera more malignant, and change to a certain extent the character of the disease ? When the epidemic assumed a malignant form in Aurora, the first case that terminated fatally, appeared to spread the disease in its malignant character. This person, as I before mentioned, had not contracted the disease abroad, but she had seen persons shortly after their arrival from New Orleans who were unwell with diarrhea. The house at which this case occurred, is on an elevated situation, in one of the healthiest portions of the town. Within one week from this death, the disease appeared in a malignant form in nearly all the houses in front and in a Northeast direction within one hundred yards, while the inhabitants on the South and Southeast were not attacked so severely. There was nothing in the locality or the habits of the inhabitants that I am aware of, that would have favored the development of the disease more in this part of the lown than any other. I resided in this portion of the town eleven years, and scarcely had a day's illness until attacked by cholera. I consider it the healthiest portion of the town. When it was observed that the deaths principally occurred within a small locality, and most of the people in this part of the town had been in the habit of using water from a well near my ,>!(„ ji ¦(.¦ vi.t .»*>.- ¦ iKicnniiy W AH< "<> '>*iUt>M^ jVMWftv** *|T||kl a ,! ii, .. - .t ,slwl««»«lwvM|fi» !»*•¦. nirtU-Mt :-MW»m. %8 . . v to n^;«ru«»ii U> wbftt+iMMftt tb» «4»«^*« ¦»•?»* > , inn id i - fi r>m infn* til rrif|nwwinVii : l^ifnK|B 'm'H! out- n» ¦ -'. <^. the iivttr Ww |NMi MM«t
«t < <«»<(« firit «f>p^ irance at most of the towns along the river)did Ipf** ?'* **«iM*«in'f«t the iof an infectious disease. This I :w«^ * « w»« revai! except in the form of WBb*'ri#** fofWHM w^r* conrtantly arriving at that time from l|^HbM*o4*««*#4 wb*r« thftepidemic was prevailing, unwell with M^Hfcr*tae«**ja4ti}#firrt which terminated fatally at Aurora, |H»ats. kttpintent with tbt nature of this dis- I ™* * i)Bfll>*— trie form o( a ¦¦ fjtea scarcely s make | diseH Hk' nt^nH I- 56 influence in developing cholera, consequently the use of it was discontinued and cistern water used instead ; but there was no abatement in the cases of cholera. Limestone water however, may probably have acted, in some instances, sis an exciting cause to the disease ; but I think more importance has been attached to this cause by some persons than it really deserves. If limestone water was the principal cause in exciting cholera, why did not the disease prevail again the next year, when, after an unusually dry season, our wells and the wells throughout the whole country contained but little water, which, from its muddy appearance, might be considered a saturated solution of lime. Cholera was again amongst us, but it manifested no tendency to spread as an epidemic. But if we consider the disease as having prevailed in a mild form, and then as season and other causes favored its development, assuming a malignant character, and also that the infection is capable of accumulating and becoming concentrated in certain localities, it appears to me we can understand the manner in which cholera prevailed in Aurora, and the infected district. Six or seven hours before the first case terminated fatally, the evacuations from the bowels passed involuntarily into the bed, consequently the bed and straw became saturated with these discharges. Immediately after the death of the patient this bed was emptied in a vacant lot on the west side of this house. Now, if we can conceive that from this straw there emanated a poison capable of producing cholera, that part of the town which became affected, is just that portion which a vapor emanating from this place would be most likely to pass over. The patient died on the sth of June, and from the sth until the 9th the weather was calm, damp and sultry, with georcoiy any motion of the air. If a small dog had been lying upon this lot in a state of putrefaction, 1 have no doubt but all persons living within the infected district, would have been sensible of it from the offensive effluvia passing into the atmosphere. As this straw dried there must also have been a vapor rising from it into the atmosphere, and if we view this vapor as producing cholera, we I understand how the inhabitants in front and in a North - I direction became affected, and, as fresh cases occurred, different houses became foci of infection, and thus the disi gradually extended along the street. We mentioned a iber of instances which occurred at Aurora, that appeared le as if the infection had extended through the atmosre. One was the woman who died in the next house to one in which Dr. Loda died, and about fifty yards int. She had not seen the Doctor, I was informed, and 57 if the disease was communicated from one to the other, it imust have been through the air. The first case appeared to have been contracted in Cincinnati. These two were the only cases that occurred in that part of the town during the year. We also mentioned that an Irishman died with cholera in 1852, the day after his arrival from Rochester, where the disease was then prevailing, and that the day following, October the 4th, a woman living about 40 yards distant, was attacked with cholera and died. This female had not been away from Aurora nor seen any case of cholera. In five days after her death, on the opposite side of the street from where she resided, a child was attacked with cholera and died. If there was any communication between these cases, lit appears to me most probable, that it was through the atmosphere ; as the first case occurred in an Irish family, the next in an American, and the other in a German, and these families had no intercourse with each other. There were sev- leral cases of diarrhea in the same part of the town shortly after. Other instances were mentioned where the poison appeared to have been carried through the air. The disease certainly appears to have been introduced into the town. These individuals came from localities where cholera was prevailing I and contracted it abroad, and is it reasonable to suppose that a remarkable coincidence caused it to appear in the adjoining I houses in which they died, while no other cases appeared at that time in the whole township. I may here remark that after the summer of 1849, the in habitants of Aurora seemed to have lost their susceptibility the disease ; cholera had no tendency to prevail again as a epidemic, neither had we again the epidemic diarrhea or dy entery to any extent. If we admit the view to be correct tha the infection is capable of extending through the air, and pro ducing cholera to the distance of several hundred feet, we se at once how the atmosphere of certain localities may be affec ted, and how it may prevail as an epidemic, and extenc through a large city. In the first place, the infection must b I introduced into a community in which cholera has not prevailed for many years ; then a variety of causes favor its development, such as season of the year, wet weather, a high temperature, sudden changes in the atmosphere, and whatever has a tendency to produce diarrhea. When the disease prevails, each house at which a fatal case has occurred becomes a source of infection, first from the patient, next from the bed and bedding, also from the excretions which, from their watery appear- lance, are generally emptied on the ground. If the exhalations from a cholera patient or from the discharges were as easi- B 58 ly detected by the sense of smell, as the effluvia from carion, the odor of musk, or particularly the stench of the skunk, (Mephrtis Americana) we should not have the least hesitation in considering the disease as extending itself through the atmosphere. 1 have been aware of the presence of the skunk by the sense of smell four hundred yards from where the dogs were fighting it. On approaching the animal, I carefully avoided it touching me, yet when I visited town an hour afterwards, my clothing still retained the stench, and it was detected by persons with whom I came in contact. I think the manner in which this animal secretion is capable of extending through the atmosphere, throws some light on the manner in which the infection of cholera may be diffused through the air. We would say then, that cholera poison, like malaria, operates through the medium of the atmosphere, and like that, poison, it cannot be detected by our senses. — We know that exhalations must be constantly passing off from the secretions, from the surface of the body, and from the lungs of every cholera patient. Even in health the exhalations from the lungs and surface of the body, probably extend much farther than we are aware of. A good hound will follow the trail of his master an hour after he has passed, although the trail may have been crossed and recrossed by other persons. Is there any thing unreasonable in supposing that when a man is unwell with a cholera diarrhea, or cholera in its more advanced stage, that these exhalations may be poisonous, and that a person apparently but little unwell may be instrumental in extending the disease? When cholera was prevailing at Aurora, the disease was generally felt throughout the whole town in the form of diarrhea and dysentery, but in the infected districts, a combination of circumstances accumnlated a greater amount of poison, and consequently the disease was more malignant — the same as it appears wherever the infection can accumulate, as on board our steamboats crowded with passengers, or in our prisons, or in the army, or amongst large crowds of human beings. It is scarcely necessary to mention that because cholera does not attack all persons who are exposed to it, that that is evidence against it being infectious. We know that all persons are not equally susceptible to the influence of typhus fever or scarlatina, yet very few physicians at the present day have any doubts that these diseases are contagious — The same argument may be brought against the cause of the disease being atmospheric, or general because all persons are not brought under its influence. If the cause of cholera is atthe 59 same time? It may prevail severely in a section of country, while an adjoining neighborhood only a few miles distant will be perfectly free from the disease but be attacked at a subsequent period. Such has been the case in some of the townships in Dearborn county, and some of the counties within the state. How can these facts be reconciled with the progress of the epidemic around the globe, if the cause is general or atmospheric? Does it not look more like an infectious disease spreading through the country? I think we mny safely say that when an individual or a community has once been under the influence of cholera, that there is not, at least soon, the same susceptibility to a second attack. The system soon acquires the power of tolerating the poison and in a short time it ceases to produce any effect unless developed by some imprudence. Persons may have a second or third attack of cholera, but, from my own observation, this is not a common occurrence and when it does occur is generally brought on by We have many facts to favor the idea that persons leaving an infected district with diarrhea, have communicated cholera to others which has assumed its most malignant form. When the inhabitants left Aurora as I before mentioned, many of them were unwell with diarrhea, ond they appeared to extend the cholera into the country. One instance — a Mr. Moore and his wife who resided in the infected district in Aurora, in 1849, left soon after cholera made its appearance in the malignant form at that town and went eight miles into the country to the house of his father-in-law. Mrs. Moore had a severe attack of diarrhea but recovered in a few days. Her mother-in-law, Mrs. E., who had not been away from home, in a few days after was attacked with cholera, and died after a few hours illness. In three days after her death, her husband had a severe attack of diarrhea which was followed by a typhoid form of fever. These were the only cases that occurred in that neighborhood. Dr. Burt of Vernon, Jennings county, mentioned how it was introduced into that town by a traveler unwell with diarrhea, but not sufficiently so to prevent him from continuing his journey. Also Dr. Ritter of Putnam county, stated some facts which appeared to me to show that the disease was introduced into his section of country either by the woman unwell with diarrhea or the dirty bed clothes he spoke of. To those who consider the disease infectious, there are some facts to favor the idea that the infection can be carried 60 ifcw minutes before I examined his lungs, I had been attendy the only case of cholera in the county; in five days nfterirds he was attacked with the disease and died, and there rtainly appeared to be a connection between the five cases it followed. The evidence presented by Dr. Girdner of Floyd county, certainly appears to show the disease was introduced into that section of the county by the unwashed bed clothes on which the man died of cholera on the Ohio river. The length of time which intervenes between exposure to the infection of cholera and the appearance of the disease, varies from a few hours to five weeks as we saw in the case of Dr. Edwards, mentioned by Dr. W. R. Smith of Marion county, and the case of Mrs. Brixner mentioned by myself, occurring on the 13th of December last, but the average length of time from my own observation, has been about six days. Our conclusions then are, that cholera is propagated by laws peculiar to itself, but that these laws come under the head of those which govern infectious diseases. The question as to whether cholera is infectious or not, is an important one in several respects. We know that many of our best medical works tell us that cholera is not infectious, and consequently, cannot be communicated from one individual to another, If these works are wrong, they may aid in extending the disease by putting physicians off their guard, and preventing them from adopting precautionary means to arrest its progress, such as allowing persons to remain crowded in poorly ventillated houses, where the disease has appeared, also by preventing the adoption of neccessary means to purify the buildings in which cases of cholera have occurred; by allowing the clothes and bedding to be exposed where the infection may be communicated; by permitting the excretions to be emptiedupon the ground, where, by their evaporation, they may infect the atmosphere, &c, &c, &c. These causes when not attended to, must in my opinion, have a tendency to spread the disease. Other causes also exist — fear may predispose the system in some instances, to an attack, but 1 do not think fear has a hundredth part as much to do in spreading cholera as neglecting to attend to these causes, and acting imprudently in the manner of living. This is exemplified in the fatal form in which the disease has prevailed amongst our foreign population, also from the fact that at Aurora and other places where the epidemic prevailed, it assumed as malignant a form amongst children who were too young to be influenced by fear as it did amongst adults. When cholera assumes its malicn'int t v no there fin Ijc l>ut little doubt thit it is more etisilv 61 prevented than cured, and although daily exposed to the disease, by acting prudently and carefully avoiding the exciting causes, persons soon become accustomed to the infection and lessen the risk of an attack. I stated that cholera, in my opinion, assumed the mild form of diarrhea, that this diarrhea was not the precursor of cholera, but the disease itself under a milder type. Accompanying cholera in the west has been another disease — dysentery, which I believe also was a modification of cholera. Ido not wish it understood that every case of dysentery that occurs while cholera is prevailing, I consider a modification of this disease. Dysentery prevails every season to a greateror less extent, but since cholera made its appearance in the country there has been a form of dysentery different from what we usually have, which I consider a form of cholera, and is capable under favorable circumstances of changing and appearing in the other forms of the disease. When cholera is prevailing in a malignant form, we often see one person attacked with diarrhea, another with dysentery, and another with the worst form of cholera. Are not all these cases produced from the same cause? It has appeared to me that in one case the disease expends itself upon the large intestines, in another upon the small, and in the other upon the whole system, overwhelming the functions of organic life at once. Accumulate the infection of cholera in a dense population predisposed to the disease and you will have cholera, and very probably have it in all its varieties — the malignant, the mild, the diarrhea, and the dysentery, although this last form of disease seldom prevails as early in the season as the other forms, and when it does prevail seems to depend upon some epidemic influence favoring the development of dysentery which gives direction to the action of the cholera poison. We then consider that cholera may be divided into Diarrhbal Cholera, Dysenteric Cholera, Mild Cholera, Malignant Cholera. The malignant form ol cholera does not prevail as exten sively in the country as either the diarrheal form, the dysen teric or the mild form of the disease. It is only where the in habitants are peculiarly susceptible to the disease, or a com bination of circumstances favors the accumulation of the in fection that it shows itself in its malignant character. Diarrheal cholera is characterized, as I before mentioned, by the peculiar sero-albumionus discharges, by a tendency to 62 it frequently occurs in so mild a form that it could not he told from common or ordinary diarrhea. I have known this to be the case, and after the disease had continued for several days, suddenly change and bring the whole system under its influence, and the malignant form in this instance seemed to be the manner in which the disease was about to terminate in death. Was it not cholera producing this diarrhea, and if it was, was not the system laboring under a mild attack of cholera? And when we see persons, as I have before mentioned, unwell with diarrhea appear to propagate cholera, is it not a rational inference that they would also propagate the disease in the form of diarrhea, when scarcely any cases commence without this derangement of the bowels? Why consider this diarrhea a premonitory symptom or the forming stage of cholera, as is generally done by our authors, when we see it prevail as extensively as an epidemic — often fatal in I few hours and appearing as it spreads over the country to remove the susceptibility of whole communities to the influence of cholera ?—? — When it causes death are we to consider that it was not a disease that produced death, but merely the premonitory symptoms of a disease ? We have yellow fever without black vomit, and certainly it is reasonable that we may have cholera without the worst phases the disease may assume. We then consider that cholera may be spreading through a neighborhood in the form of a mild diarrhea and public attention scarcely directed to it, when some person, or family, more susceptible to its influence are attacked and several deaths suddenly occur. The inference in such cases would generally be that the disease arose spontaneously. If these views are correct, that cholera may be propagated while in the form of a diarrhea, we see how rapidly this pestilence may extend over the whole country, even if only one out of ten contract the disease, which, in some sections of the country, under ordinary circumstances, appears to be about the proportion which is susceptible to its influence, although in towns or where the infection can accumulate, the proportion is much greater. Again, an individual having a mild attack of this infectious diarrhea, goes into a neighborhood where the inhabitants are predisposed to the disease, the person himself is scarcely aware that he is unwell; shortly afterward there is a sudden outbreak of cholera, and as all persons are not attacked who are exposed to it, if it does not occur at the house where this individual is staying, how difficult it would be to trace the manner in which the disease was introduced. Accordingly we consider that cholera differs from all other infectious diseases. Individuals laboring un- Hpr t voHim fV* vp r irp toonnwoll to foibrmH _Fhf* pxuntiipmii 1 XI I jillUti Iv IvlCl IKj \tVJ\J U ll WWI I LyJ " V/l* V 4 • '*¦ " AIA4X wV* I J It* 63 tous diseases would be detected by the eruption, and avoidec Scarlatina, however, has some resemblance to cholera in tl manner in which it is propagated. The infection, as in cho era, may remain latent, in the system for an indefinite leng of time — like that disease also, all are not equally susceptib to its influence. Both diseases also have amildand malignan form; the infection of both will be retained about clothing, or building lor a considerable length of time, and if scarlatina pr vailed amongst adults, and could be contracted more than one it would occasionally sweep over the country as cholern doe What we consider the dysenteric form of the disease has )een so intimately associated in the west with the malignant bnn of cholera, that I cannot avoid the conclusion as before stated, that this disease was cholera expending its violence upon the large intestines. It has prevailed in the same secions of country with cholera, appearing upon the healthy and unhealthy localities alike. It appeared to be governed ;y the same laws, being about equally as infectious. Sometimes it suddenly changed into the malignant form of chol- Ira, at others well marked cholera changed into dysentery. ?he worst forms of this disease frequently commenced with omiting. The discharges were of a sero-mucous character, f a bloody or reddish brown color. There was severe torlina or tenesmus. The pulse was small, and the skin freuently in forty-eight hours became cold and clammy. The ountenance shrunken; there was great prostration and restissness, but frequently in the same family the disease would eso mild as to resemble the mildest form of endemic dysenery. lam aware that as ''epidemics make other diseases year their livery" that it will be considered that cholera was lerely impressing its character upon this dysentery. But vhen we see cholera introduced into neighborhoods which previously free from bowel affections and give rise to ysentery and both of these diseases prevail together, as is requently the case, a very natural inference is, that these iseases have a common origin and the one is buta variety of be other. Dysentery, however, has prevailed where there /ere no well marked cases of cholera — it has been a wide pread epidemic since 1849. (This predisposition in the community to bowel affections vidently has favored the progress of cholera. When causes perate to produce a general predisposition to diseases of this haracter, then cholera rapidly spreads through neighborhoods, ounties, states, or even over the whole world. We know that occasionally whole communities are predisposed to the influence of infectious diseases* it such rioriods 64 scarlatina, measles, smallpox, typhus and typhoid fevers have a tendency to rapidly spread and more frequently at these times than any other, assume a malignant character. We know also that diarrhea and dysentery occasionally prevail as epidemics, but do these bowel affections at such times ever give rise to cholera ? We know of no instance of cholera upon the continent of America arising out of these diseases and making its first appearance in the interior of the country. We hear of it first at a sea port, or more correctly speaking, we hear of it first spreading from a country where it is endemic, and causes are probably in operation which originate the disease. We observe it spreading through Asia, progressing westwardly through Europe, it appears at the western coast of that continent; it shows itself upon a vessel at sea, bound for this country carrying passengers from a country where the epidemic is prevailing; it appears amongst these passengers upon their arrival at one of our sea port cities; it then prevails at this city amongst its inhabitants and spreads along the thoroughfares leading from this point throughout the country; in 1849 from the south towards the north and east; in 1832 from the north towards the west and south, and associated with it as it passes over our country in many places, we see diarrhea and dysentery, but why it should assume at times almost entirely a dysenteric form is difficult to say — probably caused by some epidemic influence favoring the development of dysentery as before mentioned; however, it has occurred to me as a question worthy of consideration, whether the infection of cholera may not be slightly changed by the violence of the disease being expended upon certain parts of the system, for instance when the force of the malady is directed to the large intestines producing dysenteric symptoms, whether the infection in this case would not be more likely to produce dysentery, and consequently spread a dysenteric form of the disease t iV^hat we consider the mild form of cholera is where there well marked symptoms of cholera, viz., vomiting conted with discharges from the bowels of the sero-albumincharacter, cramps, &c, but the disease yields readily to licine and the patient soon recovers from the attack. — !i cases musi have been so frequently observed by all who 3 witnessed cholera prevailing as an epidemic, that it is necessary to call attention to the fact that cholera pre-5 in this form. The malignant form of cholera wherever I observed it, presented the same symptoms, so well known, and accurately described in our medical works, that it would be superfluous 65 ' ally commenced with diarrhea, which was followed by vomit- ing and as it advanced we had the same profuse discharges from the bowels of a light watery or sero-albuminous charac- Iter described by authors; the same shrunken and blue appearance of the skin; coldness of the surface, with profuse perspiration; failure of the pulse; cramps of the muscles; sup- pression of urine; oppression of the chest; failure of the I voice, with but little derangement of the intellectual faculties. Sometimes the disease passed rapidly to a fatal termination I with but little vomiting or purging; the other symptoms, however, being present, this would constitute a variety of malignant cholera. It appears to me that I have observed premonitory nervou symptoms belonging to cholera which I have never see described in any of our medical works. They do not alwa) precede an attack of cholera, or always present the same a pearance. I divide them for the sake of description in those of exaltation, those of depression, and those of a pec liar or an anomalous character. When the disease com mences with what we consider symptoms of nervous excit ment, there is generally an unusual exhilaration of spirits; th mind is clear, the thoughts are vivid, and the person in com mon language, seems full of life. This exalted condition of th nervous system is followed by a sudden attack of cholera, do not think this excitement is accidental, or that cholera the consequence of it, for, 1 have seen it in many instance and particularly amongst children. My son had these exhi arated feelings the day before he was attacked, and appearec unusually full of sport until a late hour at night. The opposit I symptom to this, the feeling of depression, or lassitude, which very often precedes an attack 6f cholera, isdescribed by mcd- ical writers, and I believe is generally accompanied with diarrhea. The other premonitory symptom, the one I wish particular- ly to direct attention to, is a peculiar nervous feeling which pases over the whole system and more resembles what I understand by the epileptic aura than anything else that I can compare it to. It is generally accompanied with an oppressive sensation at the stomach; difficulty of breathing and a desire for fresh air. Sometimes this symptom, accompanied with the oppressive sensation at the stomach and the other symptoms, comes on before the diarrhea and in those cases where they are present add greatly to the sufferings of the patient. I felt these symptoms myself, and have since observed them in others, frequently in children, who, while laboring under what I consider the same feelings, cannot lay still, they appear dis- l» 66 tressed, they raise in bed or change their position from one side to the other, make full inspirations, call for fresh air, and appear oppressed for breath. These symptoms are paroxysmal and generally precede the act of vomiting or discharge from the bowels or cramps; there seems to be a con nection between all these symptoms, also with the failure of the pulse which often takes place at the same time. It was from my own feelings during the attack of the disease, which were different from anything I had ever felt before, that led me to observe them in others, and it appears to me that 1 have noticed in those cases which terminate fatally with but little vomiting or diarrhea, they were the prominent symptoms. We then consider that cholera was introduced into our state; that it has appeared in the form of diarrhea, dysentery, mild cholera, and a malignant form ; that the attack is often preceded by peculiar nervous symptoms; that it is propagated by human intercourse, or to use a simile it spreads over our country us fire may be spread over our prairies, communicating from individual to individual, and raging with violence in some communities peculiarly susceptible to it, or where the infection becomes accumulated; in others again assuming the form of diarrhea or dysentery it may be so mild as scarcely to attract attention. In the mild form of diarrhea may not cholera exist in our cities, or in the south during the winter, and reappear again in its malignant form as season favors its development. We find from reviewing the observations of our physicians, that locality has had but little influence over the progress of cholera in the state. It prevailed upon the healthy as well as the unhealthy localities wherever it appeared to have been introduced. In Dearborn county it prevailed in a malignant form on the uplands and in some of the healthiest situations, while at Lawrenceburgh, Hardington, and Elizabethtown, upon the low alluvial bottom land, it was comparatively mild, and in many other places upon the low lands wnich annually produce malarious diseases, the epidemic was scarcely manifest. These facts do not coincide with the report of Mr. Farr on the mortality of cholera in England- He remarks " that cholera reigned wherever it found a dense population on the low alluvial soils of rivers, round the estuaries of the Thames, the Humber and Mersey, the Severn, the Tumar and their tributary waters. " He also says "that elevation of soil had a more constant relation to the mortality of cholera in London than any other known element." That; cholera selects low, damp situations, we are taught in nearly all our medical works which treat upon this disease but this is 67 not in accordance with the observations of a large number of I our physicians or my own experience in the progress of this epidemic. Another statement made by Mr. Farr which is worthy of a passing notice, is in the language of the report "that the cholera was not generally fatal on the primary geological formations on the granite, the silurian or devonian systems, while Herefordshire , however, on the old red sand stone escaped, Cornwall on the South of Devon, on the same formation suffered severely." In this country it is upon the silurian formation that cholera has prevailed in its most malignant form, for instance at Cincinnati, Sandusky, Nashville, Louisville, St. Louis and Aurora, but it was not confined to this formation alone, for we see it prevailing upon the carboniferous formation at Evansville, Vincennes. Rockport and many other places mentioned in this report. These facts show that in this country geological formations have but little influence over the epidemic. Cholera, however, in the west has been modified by season of the year; by sudden changes in the temperature and hygrometricalconditions of the atmosphere. It has uniformly, since 1849, subsided in the Avinterand reappeared again in the spring. Professor G. B. Walker, of Evansville, sends me a comparison between cholera as he observed it in 1832 and its last visitation. In reference to the season of the year in which it makes its appearance, he says that in its first visitation it was not so much influenced by season as it has been since 1849. He writes that "for the last four years it hasap- Ipeared with remarkable regularity in the latter part of June or early part of July, and continued to prevail for four or six weeks with variable extent and malignancy, almost invariably, however, being much more rapid and fatal on its first appear- ance, and gradually growing milder and subsiding as it were into the ordinary epidemics of the season or climate. " The Doctor also remarks that as he observed it in 1832 u the most striking peculiarity manifested by it was the suddenness of its attack. Patients were not unfrequently prostrated in the street from a state of good health by a sensation as of a blow over the stomach, and in homely but significant language were 'struck with cholera.' This sudden spasmodic or nervous seizure has never appeared to my observation so distinctly since the first outbreak of the disease in this country. Attacks of cholera without diarrhea, an apparent contradiction, have not been observed since 1832 to the extent then exhibited." The Doctor also writes that from his observation "it has been more frequently complicated of late years than formerly with the prevailing epidemics. Amoncst these oompli- 0 tr«iiv •nibo A .m change «l" v '« ponitioti from oik sid* to the oiliri . mnke full iiv , appenr opprettapd for Im-.viiH Phe« nympl 8 pftr otmmu! and j-.rnrr.illv precede the ftci ' f '• >>m the Km> rls or .r:\mps; ihc> ] I ''on t ion between nil thene nymptoitit, aliw with the FaHtti ulse which oUrn t.ike- |>h,-r ;it tlw- •mn' Imm. ¦ ll MM i p.iv own feelings during the .1 1 1 n«- K < < (> i' before, thfl 1— to obtrri them inotheri, nnH 11 appeurs to me thit ¦ have notiosd in thoM oatei which lermlhate fatally wrlth bw little vomiting orditiThea^thej werethf promlnenl lymptown Wo then consular th:H rholrrn Wftl Introduced klttJ OUf t: ' !l it has appeared in the Ibnn oC diatfhea, «i\ mild «-holera. ami a maHgnanl fonf»i t Km t the attach ii "i'' 1 " i by ptvuiiar ium-\.mis lymptomei thatit ii propagated iuinian mttM-.'iuirso, or to urn ¦> limile il Bprendi over oa .(iimtry as tiro may be eaveW over our prairiei, commuwc* tine ham wAwk\\wl in militiiliieli and raging with vioietXK 111 some communities peculiarly tueceptihie <<> it, or (i the infection beeoaaee aooußMileAe^i in othen tgain ay ¦— jugllw loiiii of iliaiiliee 111 djeaimry itßMiy |i(< ;< » «id as scarcely t«> attract aticntinn. In the mild lunn ol ihanhr.. may not clioleia anal m cur cities, or in the smith during lh« winter, and reappear tgaifc in it! inahirnant. tonn as seaaon i;ivors its development. Wo find lroin re viewing the observations of OUT physicians that locality has had but little influence over the progress a cholera in the state. It prevailed upon the healthy as wei M unhealthy localities wherever it appeared to have beei .1. In l>oaii>oriicoutitv it prevailed in a malignan on the uplands and in MUM ot" the healthiest situations 1 reocebuigb, Haruinizton, and Elizabethtown, 1 ; u\iai bottom land, it was comparatively mid ice* upon the lowlands which annua. idomic was scarcely man- These facti do not coincide with the report of Ma Farr oa ihemorU cholera in England, lie remarii.-found A dense populatior ..a oi nveia, round tlie estuaries 1 i Mtraey, the iSevern, the Taow .• ? lie alao says •• that ciev iiUOD to the moitulity ol That; Ught in jieurly bJ ¦ ""' ' ' ' -- ' ' ' In i ¦ i. ! . .. i. -» h unu I oMrniaruum nwv in If 89 riaMant n Mhw m m§ i ns oee. I Bmi ¦- M« fc V«M ihb; t Q ;.(.¦'. (":••. r nn ( v mr !-.:;•: . ". ; : . ¦ ; ci nmiiL'n: I miwwt tidmmu ncacn ore I nnr.ir r wattumorrv ooittieea •(. i i I nttac raasßTswfl! •n I ua>n»qufL MM "TOI :. Itfl 8 :KM H U-M I'-i it u;> i-.f. i•.• i . Utt> I ?rmic«» i i! I seiav r a •• .. -• = ,(. | lv f. t.»rri h ..;.. •.;•-¦ ..,-...¦ . . 68 Ittions may be named as conspicuous those with bilious diarea, dysentery, and several types of fever, such as remittent, •ngestive and typhoid. These complications made it necesry to modify the treatment greatly, but nevertheless did not igment the danger of a fatal issue, on the contrary the chola part of the attack was mitigated by being blended with her pathological phenomena. The evidence of cholera comications in these cases, consisted of the presence of serous arrhea with tendancy to collapse. It may be proper, hower, to say that although the mortality of the disease thus implicated, is not greater than the disease of 1832, it is per- Lps about equally grave in its character, or in other words, bile the purely cholera symptoms are less malignant than rmerly, the additional disease raises the mortality about to c old standard." All classes of the community have suffered from the epidemic, but our foreign population have been most severely afflicted. This was probably owing to their manner of living; to their imprudence in diet; to their intemperance; to being crowded together in ill-ventilated apartments, and not being acclimated. Passing by the different theories of the specific cause of cholera, I will merely notice the zymotic hypothesis, or the one which considers the specific poison of contagious diseases, as acting upon the blood in the manner of ferments. This theory is probably now the most popular, and from the recent researches of Leibig, the most plausable; but we meet with facts which we find difficult to reconcile with this view of the subject. In the language of Carpenter, "• the predisposing cause of zynatic diseases are all reducible to the one of three categories: Ist, Those namely which tend to introduce into the system decomposing matter that has been generated in some external source; 2d, Those which occasion an increased production of decomposing matter in the system itself; and 3d, Those which obstruct the elimenation of the decomposing matter normally or excessively generated within the system, or abnormally introduced into it from without.'' If these views are correct, it appears to me that the disease ought to have prevailed in its most malignant form where we should suppose these predisposing causes would exist, such for instance, as upon our low malarious bottom lands, or in the dwellings along the banks of the muddy creek at Aurora, or near the distillery and hog pens in the same town, where more than seven thousand hogs were confined, but it did not. It prevailed in the healthiest portions of the town and on the GO there was no local cause that we could discover, which would favor the development of the disease, and in some places where the inhabitants were perfectly healthy until the disease appeared to have been introduced amongst them. There is evidently a predisposition acquired to cholera which extends over whole communities and is independent of local causes. — This predisposition is removed by the cholera itself* for it is seldom that the disease prevails twice in a malignant form in the same locality even if the same local causes exist, unless there is a large influx of strangers. In regard to the treatment of cholera we have not been able to obtain anything new. You have probably perceived that our physicians have treated the disease in accordance with the rules laid down in our best medical works; but the results are far from being satisfactory. All agree, however, in considering the disease perfectly manageable in the diarrheal form, but after vomiting, purging, and cramps have commenced, and the circulation has bd£an to fail, nearly half the cases under the best course of treatment at present known amongst us. terminate fatally. * ¦ i \A i /\/ ? S/V I JK/ \ VI t DIC INS NATIONAL UltAtY OF MEDICINE NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE NATION A{ J MOI 1 v N INOIOIW JO *aVI 8 I 1 IVNOIIVN INOIQIW 1O i¦V¦ • 1 1 IVNO I 1 * N INOIQIn, |j >\c i >l^ i 3 \A • IBs/ i \J\ lA/ 3 v IDIC I '< | NATIONAL LIIRARY OF MEDICINE NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE NATI O N » , , * S. i 1 j NOUN INI3IOIW JO UVlill IVNOIIVN INOIOIW iO AIV¦ « I 1 IVNOIIVN iNIDI(] i a ,] • X • X • HH Nf NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE NATIONAL LIiRARY OF MEDICINE NATIONAII! MOII N INDIQIN JO UViail IVNOIIVN INOIOiW iO lirilll IVNOIIVN INDIOiX ll NE NATIONAL LItRARY OF MEDICINE NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE NATIONAIIIj Pap * N IMJIOJW JO IIVIIII IVNOIIVN INHiaiN JO A«V* ¦ I 1 IVNOIXVN INID I 0 3 W ]0 |j f I AC '¦¦ \ c national library of medicine national library of medicine national hi I ; } -; J : N iNUIOIW iO 11*1111 IVNOIIVN iNOIQiW IO A«V » t I 1 IVNOIIVN INOIQIW 10 I s- 2- ¦ • \(/ . : \ I ] SPEEDY BINDER ZZ^Z Syrocut*, H. V. ; ¦ Stockton, Calif. '•