PAINE Pennsylvania frauds PENNSYLVANIA FRAUDS! HOW STATE OFFICIALS TEACH A POLITICAL ARITHMETIC! What Dr, Paine Jcnows of the Frauds of the •M Fen nsylvania War Claims, His Persecutions, and a Plain Statement of Facts, History of the Philadelphia University, Etc. In 1856, I was induced by Dr. Calkins and other friends, to leave Ohio, where I was engaged in a large and lucrative practice, and come to Philadelphia to deliver a Course of Lectures on Anatomy. At the close of the course, I returned to Ohio, resumed my practice ; in 1857 repeated the Lectures, and the following year again gave a series of lectures on Anatomy, and also on Surgery, and the Practice of Medi- cine. These lectures were given in the Eclectic Medical College of Pennsylvania. At the close of the session of 1858, I resigned my Professorship in the Eclectic College, returned to Ohio, with the inten- tion of remaining in private practice, but the next year was again persuaded to accept a Professorship in the American College of Medi- cine in Pennsylvania, and was appointed Dean of the Faculty., In 1858, I edited and published the University Medical Journal of Phila- delphia, and also published the Epitome of Surgery, Midwifery, and Materia Medica, and in 1860, the New School Remedies, in which I first announced the fact that the improvements we had made, and the new remedies discovered were so numerous as to result in a new system of practice, differing from all others in so much that it embraced a much broader range in practice, and united all that was new and useful with all that was previously known to the profession, thus giving to the student of medicine the advantage of all methods of treating disease. In 1863 the Trustees of the American Medical College purchased the property of the Penn Medical University, the Pennsylvania Medi- cal College, and the Philadelphia Medical College ; these schools were all suspended, and the names changed to the Philadelphia University of Medicine and Surgery. Thus organized, an able corps of medical teachers was appointed, and the school grew in influence and useful- ness, so much so, that its patronage was quite as large as that of many of its older competitors. It will be remembered that while the medical instructions embraced all the principles of practical medicine and surgery known to the profession, the Old School, Eclectics, Homoeo- paths, etc., etc., it also included all the new resources and improve- ments instituted by my colleagues and myself. The Graduates, armed as they were, with all the new and old weapons with which to combat disease, met with wonderful success. This success of the Faculty and Graduates became so famous that a diploma from the Philadelphia University of Medicine and Surgery was a ready passport to secure an extensive and lucrative practice. My own practice embraced over fifty thousand patients annually, including every form of medical and surgical disease. The new remedies we had introduced, and the new application of old ones enabled us to effect such astonishing cures, as could not have resulted by any other class of practitioners. This success and prosperity excited the envy and jealousy of other colleges and schools of medicine, and soon was manifested by their assaults upon us. The Old School commenced the usual cry, Quackery !!! Irregularity !!!; the Homoeopaths, that of Old School, having Beel- zebub as its father, while the Eclectics claimed that we gave Mercury and Antimony, and were no better than the Old School. Their oppo- sition only consisted in false reports, and the usual denouncements against all new discoveries and improvements, until the year 1867, when the Professors of the University of Pennsylvania united with their former enemies of the Eclectic Medical College of Pennsylvania, and applied to the Legislature to break up the Philadelphia University of Medicine and Surgery. They succeeded in getting the Legislature to request the Board of Education to inquire into the matter, and cite the Trustees to appear before them, and give an account of the faith they held. They met their strangely allied opponents, the Eclectic Faculty and the Faculty of the Pennsylvania University, when, through their attorney, Cadwallader Biddle, Esq., they made known their grief, which consisted in charging the school with teaching heresy, and various other irregularities. At this time the diploma dodge was not thought of; the charges were so ridiculous, and so trans- parently the result of jealousy, that the Committee dismissed the sub- ject at once. Professors Rogers, Stille & Co., of the old regular Uni- versity, and Professor Buchanan & Co., of the Eclectic School, returned to their trades very much chagrined, and evidently of the opinion that some other subterfuge would be required in order to obstruct the progress of a school that was so rapidly obtaining all their students, and monopolizing the best practice of the city and country. Therefore, they adopted another form of tactics, and only a few weeks after their ignominious defeat in the Legislature, they, by some strange manipulation, obtained from that body, a charter, entitled, “ The American University of Philadelphia,” under the pretence that it was to be a colored school. No sooner had they obtained the charter, than they organized it as a branch of the Eclectic Medical College, and commenced selling diplomas, and circulated at the same time the report that the Philadelphia University of Medicine and Surgery was connected in this diploma trade. They even omitted the first part of their charter name, and simply styled their school, “ The Philadelphia University.” The recipients of these worthless certificates, in oTder to make them useful, represented them to be from the Philadelphia Uni- versity of Medicine and Surgery, and became so bold in the matter that they published a Medical Journal, and in several instances the Philadelphia University of Medicine and Surgery was compelled to prosecute the parties in self-defence for publishing libelous articles. 3 They also obtained further publicity to their slanderous writings in some of the secular papers, the publishers of which, were entirely ignorant of the facts of the case. In order to expose this new effort to break up the school, we publish frequent exposes in the Phila- delphia University Medical and Surgical Journal. It was not, however, until the autumn of 1871, that they had an opportunity to do our school any serious damage. In August, 1871,1 was called to see George O. Evans, who was reported to be very sick in the Harrisburg Jail. I went to see him, and soon ascertained that he was more anxious to be released from prison than to be cured of any disease. The story he told me was that he had been appointed Agent to collect the War Claims due by the United States to the State of Pennsylvania, to the amount of about three millions of dollars ; that he had collected the same according to contract with the State Officials ; that he had paid over all the money with the exception of his commissions, which were ten percent; that he had even paid a large proportion of this to parties who had assisted him in putting these claims through; that now these very men had got at variance because some had received more than others; that they were endea- voring to make him disgorge that which rightfully belonged to him ; and that for the services he had performed, they had received infinitely more than he had. After hearing his statement, I left with a promise to call again. Upon my second visit, I met in his cell Mr. Samuel Moon who informed me that he was anxious to have Evans released: that he would willingly go his bail, but his property was so situated that he could not do so; that if I would go with him to see Governor Geary, I would be satisfied that everything was all straight; and that the whole thing would soon be fixed up. I went then to see the Governer, with him, at his house. He informed me that Evans was an honest and good man; that his arrest was caused by interested parties, who were not quite satisfied with the profits they had received out of the adjustment of the War Claims; that if Evans was out, the whole matter would soon be fixed up; and that if it were not for his official position he would go Evans’ bail himself so far as he was able. On my return to the prison, Mr. Evans showed me his books, receipts, cancelled checks, contracts, letters, and papers, proving that he had paid over his portion of the funds to parties authorized by law to receive them; that he had even after the settlement, paid quite large sums of money as a hush fund; and that he had now so far spent the balance of his commissions, that he had nothing left. I replied, that if this was a legitimate business, and he had paid over all he was obliged to, I did not see why he should be compelled to pay back money. To which he remarked, that the claims he had to collect were of such a nature, that in many instances, he was required to pay largely to have them allowed, and to some parties he had made larger promises than he could fulfil. He then showed me his memorandum in cipher, in which, he had to purchase his influence from a large number of persons, beside paying largely for his appointment; that after paying them and his own expenses he had nothing left; that they were now quarreling among themselves, and with him, because he could not pay more; and that his arrest was to squeeze more out of him. He also 4 showed me a paper that had been presented to him, purporting to come from State Officials, in which he was to account for all the delinquencies himself and upon acknowledging these defects he would be set at liberty. After investigating the case, I consented to interest myself in securing his hail, on the condition that he would place in my hands, all his papers, books, letters, and other evidence that he had paid over the principal portion of the money to the State Officials and others. To this he readily consented and I accordingly obtained Capt. J. Baker, of Chester, and his sister secured several others. A bail piece was drawn up, signed by myself, and others for the sum of $100,000 for the appearance of George O. Evans in court. Upon the release of Mr. Evans, he went directly to New York, having previously handed me a few papers, promising to bring others, and deposit them with me, and also give me an indemnify- ing bond in a short time. Soon did I learn that he was far more ready to promise than to perform, and it was only after most positive steps, and my .absolute refusal to continue his bail, that he gave me his papers, as will be noticed from the following letter:—(Sent by Mr. Strahan, Evans’ attorney, to Governor Geary, a copy of which Evans sent to me, with a promise to bring the paper over at once.) New York, January 20, 1872. My Dear Sir.—Such information has just reached me from Phila- delphia, that almost convinces me, that owing to the proceedings of Moon, Mackey, and Hartranft to attack Dr. Paine, I am no longer able to control matters. Paine demands that all the information in my possession as to Hartranft and Mackey be placed unreservedly in his- hands, otherwise he will withdraw his bail for Mr. Evans. This is a contingency I did not anticipate, and if it becomes a question between Evans and the officials, I shall not hesitate a moment as to how I shall act. I have received a request, which I cannot overlook, to be in Philadelphia on Sunday, to give my final decision. I go this afternoon to Albany, and will return on Saturday morning. I wish you would let me know your views on this new complication by Saturday, for at present I candidly confess that matters look as if it were imperative upon me to retire and allow Dr. Paine to take charge. If I do sor Mackey and Hartranft will be in custody in a very short time, and what may follow, God only knows. I beg you to give the matter your immediate attention, and advise me at once. Yours, Very Truly, JOHN H. STRAHAN. Then came this letter. Harrisburg, Pa., January 21st, 1872. Dr. Paine. Dear Sir:—It is very important that you withhold all movements in the Legislature and bring no suit until 1 can have an interview with you. Hoping you will comply with this lequest. I am respectfully, your friend, JOHN W. GEARY. A few days later, Mr. Evans and Mr. Strahan gave me the follow- ing letters and papers: Colonade Hotel, Philadelphia, Dec. 27, 1871. My Dear Sir :—I cannot see any reason for withholding executive 5 -clemency in the case brought to my notice this evening if properly supported by the names of men of influence. Yours truly, JOHN W. GEARY. John H. Strahan, Esq. Philadelphia, Dec. 26, 1871. Geo. O. Evans, Esq. Dear Sir:—I have given the papers, letters, checks, etc., relating to the transactions with H. and M., to our mutual friend. As you have seen them I will not go into any description, but merely say that they are very full, and all that will be required. Yours truly, CHAS. T. YERKES, Jr. Philadelphia, December 26, 1871. Geo. 0. Evans, Esq. Dear Sir:—hi case of need show this to our mutual friend who will let you copy any paper that may be required as pi’oof, that the original can be procured when wanted by you. Yours truly, C. T. YERKES, Jr. The following are the subjects of a few of the documents delivered into my hands :— 1. Introduction to the collection of the War Claims by the State Treasurer, W. H. Kemble. 2, Affidavit of C. T. Yerkes, Jr., December 23, 1871, in reference to transactions with R. W. M. 3. Affidavit of C. T. Yerkes, Jr., December 23,1871, in reference to transactions with J. F. H. 4. Copy of letter J. F. H. to C. T. Y., Jr., December 21, 1869. Calhoun mentioned therein was U. S. Pension Agent. 5, Copy of letter, of J. F. H. to C. T. Y., Jr., March 9, 1870. Mackey and Hartranft’s settlement of the account of the Oil Creek and Alleghany R. R. Co., was taken out of their speculation, by the Attorney General. It would appear that this decision spoiled Oil Creek as a future investment. 6. Copy of letter, R. W. M. to C. T. Y., Jr., August 4, 1871, in- closing draft on State Treasury, in payment of his over due promissory note for $20,000 private account. The following is a copy received of J. F. Hartranft’s due bill to George O. Evans:— Borrowed of George O. Evans, the sum of Seven Thousand Dollars. J. F. HARTRANFT. $7000,00. New York, March 31, 1871. As to the affidavits of C. T. Yerkes, Jr., I stated that the nature of these affidavits was such that I should like to see Mr. Yerkes’ books to ascertain if they corresponded with the statements. He promised to show them in a day or two. Mr. C. T. Yerkes called at my office, took me in his carriage to his office on Third Street, and when in his back office, showed me his books, and compared the statements with those I had received from Mr. Evans. At the same time he pointed out how the books were kept in order to elude detection. During this time various efforts were made by the parties to