48000704060201020123482348532348482348 5480484786 PROPERTY OF THE NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE i 1 u JU 66 THE MODERN LIBRARY OF THE r 0 R L D'S B E S T BOOKS THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE The publishers will be pleased to send, upon request, an illustrated folder setting forth the purpose and scope of THE MODERN LIB R ARY, and listing each volume in the series. Every reader of books will find titles he has been looking for, handsomely printed, in unabridged editions, and at an unusually low price. By William James THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE: A STUDY IN HUMAN NATURE. Gifford Lectures delivered at Edinburgh University. 8vo. New York, London, Bombay, and Calcutta: Longmans, Green & Co. PRAGMATISM: A NEW NAME FOR SOME OLD WAYS OF THINKING: POPULAR LECTURES on philosophy. 8vo. New York, London, Bombay, and Calcutta: Longmans, Green & Co. the meaning of truth: a sequel to "pragmatism." 8vo. New York, London, Bombay, and Calcutta: Longmans, Green & Co. a pluralistic universe: hibbert lectures on the present situation in philosophy. 8vo. New York, London, Bombay, and Calcutta: Longmans, Green & Co. some problems of philosophy: a beginning of an introduction to phi- losophy. 8vo. New York, London, Bombay, and Calcutta: Longmans, Green & Co. essays in radical empiricism. 8vo. New York, London, Bombay, and Calcutta: Longmans, Green & Co. THE WILL TO BELIEVE, AND OTHER ESSAYS IN POPULAR PHILOSOPHY. I2mO. New York, London, Bombay, and Calcut'*i: Longmans, Green & Co. memories and studies. 8vo. New York, London, Bombay, and Calcutta: Long- mans, Green & Co. the principles of psychology. 2 vols., 8vo. New York: Henry Holt & Co. London: Macmillan & Co. psychology: bp.iefer course. 12mo. New York: Henry Holt & Co. London: Macmillan & Co. TALKS TO TEACHERS ON PSYCHOLOGY: AND TO STUDENTS ON SOME OF LIFE'S IDEALS. i2mo. New York: Henry Holt & Co. London, Bombay, and Calcutta: Long- mans, Green & Co. HUMAN IMMORTALITY: TWO SUPPOSED OBJECTIONS TO THE DOCTRINE. l6lT10. BoS- ton: Houghton Mifflin Co. London: J. M. Dent & Sons, Ltd. collected essays and reviews. Edited by R. B. Perry. 8vo. New York, Lon- don, Bombay, and Calcutta: Longmans, Green & Co. 1920. habit. Reprint of a chapter in "The Principles of Psychology." i6mo. New York: Henry Holt & Co. on vital reserves. Reprint of "The Energies of Men" and the "Gospel of Re- laxation." i6mo. New York: Henry Holt & Co. on some of life's ideals. Reprint of "On a Certain Blindness in Human Beings" and "What Makes a Life Significant." i6mo. New York: Henry Holt & Co. annotated bibliography of the writings of william james. By R. B. Perry. 8vo. New York, London, Bombay, and Calcutta: Longmans, Green & Co. 1920. the literary remains of henry james. Edited, with an Introduction, by Wil- liam James. With Portrait. Crown 8vo. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. 1885. letters of william james. Selected and edited with Biographical Introduction and Notes by his son Henry James. 2 vols., 8vo. Boston: Atlantic Monthly Press, Inc. London: Longmans, Green & Co. 1920. the thought and character of william james. By R. B. Perry. 2 vols., 8vo. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co. ..1935. THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE A Study in Human Nature BEING THE GIFFORD LECTURES ON NATURAL RELIGION DELIVERED AT EDINBURGH IN 1901-1902 BY WILLIAM JAMES SVIedicsl ib^uy \,v-'-- a..;-.v.yv liosp. Waco, Texas THE MODERN LIBRARY NEW YORK ^ COPYRIGHT, 1902, BY WILLIAM JAMBS This edition of THB VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE is authorized by LONGMANS, GREEN AND COMPANY Random House is the publisher of THE MODERN LIBRARY BENNETT A. CERF • DONALD S. KLOPFER • ROBERT K. HAAS Manufactured in the United States of America Printed by Parkway Printing Company Bound by H. Wolff WILLIAM JAMES (1842-1910) A NOTE ON THE AUTHOR OF "THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE" The road by which William James arrived at his position of leadership among American philosophers was, during his child- hood, youth and early maturity, quite as circuitous and unpre- dictable as were his father's ideas on the training of his children. That Swedenborgian theologian foresaw neither the career of ^ novelist for his son Henry, nor that of pragmatist philosopher for the older William. The father's migrations between New York, Europe and Newport meant that William's education had ^ variety if it did not have fixed direction. From 13 to 18 he '^> studied in Europe and returned to Newport, Rhode Island, to ^ study painting under the guidance of John La Farge. After a year, he gave up art for science and entered Harvard University, where his most influential teachers were Louis Agassiz and Charles W. Eliot. In 1863, William James began the study of medicine, and in 1865 he joined an expedition to the Amazon. Before long, he wrote: "If there is anything I hate, it is collect- ing." His studies constantly interrupted by ill health, James re- turned to Germany and began hearing lectures and reading voluminously in philosophy. He won his medical degree at v^ Harvard in 1870. For four years he was an invalid in Carn- ey bridge, but finally, in 1873, he passed his gravest physical and O^ spiritual crises and began the career by which he was to influ- "-"^ ence so profoundly generations of American students. From 1880 to 1907 he was successively assistant professor of phi- losophy, professor of psychology and professor of philosophy at Harvard. In 1890, the publication of his Principles of Psychol- ogy brought him the acknowledged leadership in the field of , functional psychology. The selection of William James to de- ^^s^ liver the Gifford lectures in Edinburgh was at once a tribute to ^5 him anc^ a reward f°r the university that sponsored the under- taking. These lectures, collected in this volume, have since be- come famous as the standard scientific work on the psychology of the religious impulse. Death ended his career on August 27th, 1910. To E. P. G. IN FILIAL GRATITUDE AND LOVP CONTENTS LECTURE I RELIGION AND NEUROLOGY..... Introduction: the course is not anthropological, but deals with personal documents—Questions of fact and questions of value—In point of fact, the religious are often neurotic—Criticism of medical materialism, which condemns religion on that account—Theory that re- ligion has a sexual origin refuted—All states of mind are neurally conditioned—Their significance must be tested not by their origin but by the value of their fruit« —Three criteria of value; origin useless as a criterion- Advantages of the psychopathic temperament when a superior intellect goes with it—especially for the religious life. LECTURE II CIRCUMSCRIPTION OF THE TOPIC Futility of simple definitions of religion—No one spe- cific "religious sentiment"—Institutional and personal religion—We confine ourselves to the personal branch— Definition of religion for the purpose of these lectures —Meaning of the term "divine"—The divine is what prompts solemn reactions—Impossible to make our defi- nitions sharp—We must study the more extreme cases —Two ways of accepting the universe—Religion is more enthusiastic than philosophy—Its characteristic is en- thusiasm in solemn emotion—Its ability to overcome un- happiness—Need of such a faculty from the biological point of view. ix X CONTENTS LECTURE III THE REALITY OF THE UNSEEN .... Percepts versus abstract concepts—Influence of the latter on belief—Kant's theological Ideas—We have a sense of reality other than that given by the special senses—Examples of "sense of presence"—The feeling of unreality—Sense of a divine presence: examples—Mys- tical experiences: examples—Other cases of sense of God's presence—Convincingness of unreasoned experi- ence—Inferiority of rationalism in establishing belief— Either enthusiasm or solemnity may preponderate in the religious attitude of individuals. LECTURES IV AND V THE RELIGION OF HE ALTH Y-MINDEDNESS Happiness is man's chief concern—"Once-born" and "twice-born" characters—Walt Whitman—Mixed na- ture of Greek feeling—Systematic healthy-mindedness— Its reasonableness—Liberal Christianity shows it—Op- timism as encouraged by Popular Science—The "Mind- cure" movement—Its creed—Cases-—Its doctrine of evil —Its analogy to Lutheran theology—Salvation by relaxa- tion—Its methods: suggestion—meditation—"recollec- tion"—verification—Diversity of possible schemes of adaptation to the universe—Appendix: Two mind- cure cases. LECTURES VI AND VII THE SICK SOUL . . Healthy-mindedness and repentance—Essential plural- ism of the healthy-minded philosophy—Morbid-minded- ness: its two degrees—The pain-threshold varies in indi- viduals—Insecurity of natural goods—Failure, or vain CONTENTS XI success of every life—Pessimism of all pure naturalism —Hopelessness of Greek and Roman view—Pathological unhappiness — "Anhedonia" — Querulous melancholy —Vital zest is a pure gift—Loss of it makes physical world look different—Tolstoy—Bunyan—Alline—Mor- bid fear—Such cases need a supernatural religion for relief—Antagonism of healthy-mindedness and morbid ness—The problem of evil cannot be escaped. LECTURE VIII THE DIVIDED SELF, AND THE PROCESS OF ITS UNI- FICATION 163 Heterogeneous personality—Character gradually at- tains unity—Examples of divided self—The unity at- tained need not be religious—"Counter conversion" cases —Other cases—Gradual and sudden unification—Tol- stoy's recovery—Bunyan's. LECTURE IX CONVERSION l86 Case of Stephen Bradley—The psychology of charac- ter-changes—Emotional excitements make new centres of personal energy—Schematic ways of representing this —Starbuck likens conversion to normal moral ripening— Leuba's ideas—Seemingly unconvertible persons—Two types of conversion—Subconscious incubation of mo- tives—Self-surrender—Its importance in religious history —Cases. LECTURE X conversion—concluded 213 Cases of sudden conversion—Is suddenness essential? —No, it depends on psychological idiosyncrasy—Proved Xll CONTENTS existence of transmarginal, or subliminal, consciousness —"Automatisms"—Instantaneous conversions seem due to the possession of an active subconscious self by the subject—The value of conversion depends not on the process, but on the fruits—These are not superior in sudden conversion—Professor Coe's views—Sanctifica- tion as a result—Our psychological account does not exclude direct presence of the Deity—Sense of higher control—Relations of the emotional "faith-state" to in- tellectual beliefs—Leuba quoted—Characteristics of the faith-state: sense of truth; the world appears new— Sensory and motor automatisms—Permanency of con- versions. LECTURES XI, XII, AND XIII SAINTLINESS ....... Sainte-Beuve on the State of Grace—Types of charac- ter as due to the balance of impulses and inhibitions— Sovereign excitements—Irascibility—Effects of higher excitement in general—The saintly life is ruled by spir- itual excitement—This may annul sensual impulses per- manently—Probable subconscious influences involved— Mechanical scheme for representing permanent altera- tion in character—Characteristics of saintliness—Sense of reality of a higher power—Peace of mind, charity— Equanimity, fortitude, etc.—Connection of this wich re- laxation—Purity of life—Asceticism—Obedience—Pov- erty—The sentiments of democracy and of humanity— General effects of higher excitements. LECTURES XIV AND XV THE VALUE OF SAINTLINESS .... It must be tested by the human value of its fruits— CONTENTS The reality of the God must, however, also be judged— "Unfit" religions get eliminated by "experience"—Em- piricism is not skepticism—Individual and tribal religion —Loneliness of religious originators—Corruption fol- lows success—Extravagances—Excessive devoutness, as fanaticism—As theopathic absorption—Excessive purity —Excessive charity—The perfect man is adapted only to the perfect environment—Saints are leavens—Excesses of asceticism—Asceticism symbolically stands for the heroic life—Militarism and voluntary poverty as possible equivalents—Pros and cons of the saintly character— Saints versus "strong" men—Their social function must be considered—Abstractly the saint is the highest type, but in the present environment it may fail, so we make ourselves saints at our peril—The question of theological truth. LECTURES XVI AND XVII MYSTICISM Mysticism defined—Four marks of mystic states— They form a distinct region of consciousness—Examples of their lower grades—Mysticism and alcohol—"The anaesthetic revelation"—Religious mysticism—Aspects of Nature—Consciousness of God—"Cosmic consciousness" —Yoga—Buddhistic mysticism—Sufism—Christian mys- tics—Their sense of revelation—Tonic effects of mystic states—They describe by negatives—Sense of union with the Absolute—Mysticism and music—Three conclusions —(i) Mystical states carry authority for him who has them—(2) But for no one else—(3) Nevertheless, they break down the exclusive authority of rationalistic states __They strengthen monistic and optimistic hypotheses. XIV CONTENTS PAGE LECTURE XVIII PHILOSOPHY 421 Primacy of feeling in religion, philosophy being a sec- ondary function—Intellectualism professes to escape subjective standards in her theological constructions— "Dogmatic theology"—Criticism of its account of God's attributes—"Pragmatism" as a test of the value of con- ceptions—God's metaphysical attributes have no practical significance—His moral attributes are proved by bad arguments; collapse of systematic theology—Does tran- scendental idealism fare better? Its principles—Quota- tions from John Caird—They are good as restatements of religious experience, but uncoercive as reasoned proof— What philosophy can do for religion by transforming herself into "science of religions." LECTURE XIX OTHER CHARACTERISTICS ...... 448 ^Esthetic elements in religion—Contrast of Catholicism and Protestantism—Sacrifice and Confession—Prayer— Religion holds that spiritual work is really effected in prayer—Three degrees of opinion as to what is effected -^•First degree—Second degree—Third degree—Au- tomatisms, their frequency among religious ieaders— Jewish cases—Mohammed—Joseph Smith—Religion and the subconscious region in general. LECTURE XX CONCLUSIONS . 475 Summary of religious characteristics—Men's religions need not be identical—"The science of religions" can only suggest, not proclaim, a religious creed—Is religion CONTENTS XV a "survival" of primitive thought?—Modern science rules out the concept of personality—Anthropomorphism and belief in the personal characterized pre-scientific thought —Personal forces are real, in spite of this—Scientific objects are abstractions, only individualized experiences are concrete—Religion holds by the concrete—Pri- marily religion is a biological reaction—Its simplest terms are an uneasiness and a deliverance; description of the deliverance—Question of the reality of the higher power—The author's hypotheses: i. The subconscious self as intermediating between nature and the higher region—2. The higher region, or "God"—3. He pro- duces real effects in nature. postscript ........ 510 Philosophic position of the present work defined as piecemeal supernaturalism—Criticism of universalistic supernaturalism—Different principles must occasion dif- ferences in fact—What differences in fact can God's existence occasion?—The question of immortality— Question of God's uniqueness and infinity: religious ex- perience does not settle this question in the affirmative —The pluralistic hypothesis is more conformed to com- mon sense. INDEX 519 1 PREFACE THIS book would never have been written had I not been honored with an appointment as Gifford Lec- turer on Natural Religion at the University of Edinburgh. In casting about me for subjects of the two courses of ten lectures each for which I thus became responsible, it seemed to me that the first course might well be a descriptive one on "Man's Religious Appetites," and the second a metaphyical one on "Their Satisfaction through Philosophy." But the unexpected growth of the psycho- logical matter as I came to write it out has resulted in the second subject being postponed entirely, and the de- scription of man's religious constitution now fills the twenty lectures. In Lecture XX I have suggested rather than stated my own philosophic conclusions, and the reader who desires immediately to know them should turn to pages 501-509, and to the "Postscript" of the book. I hope to be able at some later day to express them in more explicit form. In my belief that a large acquaintance with particulars often makes us wiser than the possession of abstract for- mulas, however deep, I have loaded the lectures with con- crete examples, and I have chosen these among the extremer expressions of the religious temperament. To some readers I may consequently seem, before they get beyond the middle of the book, to offer a caricature of the subject. Such convulsions of piety, they will say, are not sane. If, however, they will have the patience to read to the end, I believe that this unfavorable impression will dis- xvii XV111 PREFACE appear; for I there combine the religious impulses with other principles of common sense which serve as correctives of exaggeration, and allow the individual reader to draw as moderate conclusions as he will. My thanks for help in writing these lectures are due to Edwin D. Starbuck, of Stanford University, who made over to me his large collection of manuscript material; to Henry W. Rankin, of East Northfield, a friend unseen but proved, to whom I owe precious information; to Theodore Flournoy, of Geneva, to Canning Schiller of Oxford, and to my colleague Benjamin Rand, for docu- ments; to my colleague Dickinson S. Miller, and to my friends, Thomas Wren Ward, of New York, and Win- centy Lutoslawski, late of Cracow, for important sugges- tions and advice. Finally, to conversations with the la- mented Thomas Davidson and to the use of his books, at Glenmore, above Keene Valley, I owe more obligations than I can well express. Harvard University, March, 1902. THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE Lecture I RELIGION AND NEUROLOGY IT is with no small amount of trepidation that I take m} place behind this desk, and face this learned audience, To us Americans, the experience of receiving instruction from the living voice, as well as from the books, of Euro- pean scholars, is very familiar. At my own University of Harvard, not a winter passes without its harvest, large or small, of lectures from Scottish, English, French, or German representatives of the science or literature of their respective countries whom we have either induced to cross the ocean to address us, or captured on the wing as they were visiting our land. It seems the natural thing for us to listen whilst the Europeans talk. The contrary habit, of talking whilst the Europeans listen, we have not yet acquired; and in him who first makes the adventure it begets a certain sense of apology being due for so presumptuous an act. Particularly must this be the case on a soil as sacred to the American imagination as that of Edinburgh. The glories of the philo- sophic chair of this university were deeply impressed on my imagination in boyhood. Professor Fraser's Essays in Philos- ophy, then just published, was the first philosophic book I ever looked into, and I well remember the awestruck feeling I received from the account of Sir William Hamilton's class- room therein contained. Hamilton's own lectures were the first philosophic writings I ever forced myself to study, and after that I was immersed in Dugald Stewart and Thomas Brown. Such juvenile emotions of reverence never get out- grown ; and I confess that to find my humble self promoted 3 4 THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE from my native wilderness to be actually for the time an of- ficial here, and transmuted into a colleague of these illustri- ous names, carries with it a sense of dreamland quite as much as of reality. But since I have received the honor of this appointment I have felt that it would never do to decline. The academic career also has its heroic obligations, so I stand here without further deprecatory words. Let me say only this, that now that the current, here and at Aberdeen, has begun to run from west to east, I hope it may continue to do so. As the years go by, I hope that many of my countrymen may be asked to lecture in the Scottish universities, changing places with Scotsmen lecturing in the United States; I hope that our people may become in all these higher matters even as one people; and that the peculiar philosophic temperament, as well as the peculiar political temperament, that goes with our English speech may more and more pervade and in- fluence the world. As regards the manner in which I shall have to adminis- ter this lectureship, I am neither a theologian, nor a scholar learned in the history of religions, nor an anthropologist. Psychology is the only branch of learning in which I am particularly versed. To the psychologist the religious pro- pensities of man must be at least as interesting as any other of the facts pertaining to his mental constitution. It would seem, therefore, that, as a psychologist, the natural thing for me would be to invite you to a descriptive survey of those religious propensities. If the inquiry be psychological, not religious institutions, but rather religious feelings and religious impulses must be its subject, and I must confine myself to those more de- veloped subjective phenomena recorded in literature pro- duced by articulate and fully self-conscious men, in works of piety and autobiography. Interesting as the origins and RELIGION AND NEUROLOGY 5 early stages of a subject always are, yet when one seeks earnestly for its full significance, one must always look to its more completely evolved and perfect forms. It follows from this that the documents that will most concern us will be those of the men who were most accomplished in the re- ligious life and best able to give an intelligible account of their ideas and motives. These men, of course, are either comparatively modern writers, or else such earlier ones as have become religious classics. The documents humains which we shall find most instructive need not then be sought for in the haunts of special erudition—they lie along the beaten highway; and this circumstance, which flows so naturally from the character of our problem, suits admir- ably also your lecturer's lack of special theological learning. I may take my citations, my sentences and paragraphs of personal confession, from books that most of you at some time will have had already in your hands, and yet this will be no detriment to the value of my conclusions. It is true that some more adventurous reader and investigator, lectur- ing here in future, may unearth from the shelves of libraries documents that will make a more delectable and curious en- tertainment to listen to than mine. Yet I doubt whether he will necessarily, by his control of so much more out-of-the- way material, get much closer to the essence of the matter in hand. The question, What are the religious propensities? and the question, What is their philosophic significance? are two entirely different orders of question from the logical point of view; and, as a failure to recognize this fact distinctly may breed confusion, I wish to insist upon the point a little before we enter into the documents and materials to which I have referred. In recent books on logic, distinction is made between two orders of inquiry concerning anything. First, what is the nature of it? how did it come about? what is its const'tu 6 THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE tion, origin, and history? And second, What is its impor- tance, meaning, or significance, now that it is once here? The answer to the one question is given in an existential judgment or proposition. The answer to the other is a proposition of value, what the Germans call a Werthur- theil, or what we may, if we like, denominate a spiritual judgment. Neither judgment can be deduced immediately from the other. They proceed from diverse intellectual pre- occupations, and the mind combines them only by making them first separately, and then adding them together. In the matter of religions it is particularly easy to distin- guish the two orders of question. Every religious phenomenon has its history and its derivation from natural antecedents. What is nowadays called the higher criticism of the Bible is only a study of the Bible from this existential point of view, neglected too much by the earlier church. Under just what biographic conditions did the sacred writers bring forth their various contributions to the holy volume? And what had they exactly in their several individual minds, when they delivered their utterances? These are manifestly questions of historical fact, and one does not see how the answer to them can decide offhand the still further question: of what use should such a volume, with its manner of com- ing into existence so defined, be to us as a guide to life and a revelation? To answer this other question we must have already in our mind some sort of a general theory as to what the peculiarities in a thing should be which give it value for purposes of revelation; and this theory itself would be what I just called a spiritual judgment. Combining it with our existential judgment, we might indeed deduce an- other spiritual judgment as to the Bible's worth. Thus if our theory of revelation-value were to affirm that any book, to possess it, must have been composed automatically or not by the free caprice of the writer, or that it must exhibit no scientific and historic errors and express no local or personal RELIGION AND NEUROLOGY J passions, the Bible would probably fare ill at our hands. But if, on the other hand, our theory should allow that a book may well be a revelation in spite of errors and passions and deliberate human composition, if only it be a true record of the inner experiences of great-souled persons wrestling with the crises of their fate, then the verdict would be much more favorable. You see that the existential facts by themselves are insufficient for determining the value; and the best adepts of the higher criticism accordingly never confound the existential with the spiritual problem. With the same conclusions of fact before them, some take one view, and some another, of the Bible's value as a revelation, according as their spiritual judgment as to the foundation of values differs. I make these general remarks about the two sorts of judg- ment, because there are many religious persons—some of you now present, possibly, are among them—who do not yet make a working use of the distinction, and who may there- fore feel first a little startled at the purely existential point of view from which in the following lectures the phenomena of religious experience must be considered. When I handle them biologically and psychologically as if they were mere curious facts of individual history, some of you may think it a degradation of so sublime a subject, and may even sus- pect me, until my purpose gets more fully expressed, of de- liberately seeking to discredit the religious side of life. Such a result is of course absolutely alien to my intention; and since such a prejudice on your part would seriously ob- struct the due effect of much of what I have to relate, I will devote a few more words to the point. There can be no doubt that as a matter of fact a religious life, exclusively pursued, does tend to make the person ex- ceptional and eccentric. I speak not now of your ordinary religious believer, who follows the conventional observances S THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE of his country, whether it be Buddhist, Christian, or Mo- hammedan. His religion has been made for him by others, communicated to him by tradition, determined to fixed forms by imitation, and retained by habit. It would profit us little to study this second-hand religious life. We must make search rather for the original experiences which were the pattern-setters to all this mass of suggested feeling and imitated conduct. These experiences we can only find in in- dividuals for whom religion exists not as a dull habit, but as an acute fever rather. But such individuals are "geniuses" in the religious line; and like many other geniuses who have brought forth fruits effective enough for commemoration in the pages of biography, such religious geniuses have often shown symptoms of nervous instability. Even more perhaps than other kinds of genius, religious leaders have been sub- ject to abnormal psychical visitations. Invariably they have been creatures of exalted emotional sensibility. Often they have led a discordant inner life, and had melancholy during :t part of their career. They have known no measure, been liable to obsessions and fixed ideas; and frequently they have fallen into trances, heard voices, seen visions, and pre- sented all sorts of peculiarities which are ordinarily classed as pathological. Often, moreover, these pathological features in their career have helped to give them their religious au- thority and influence. If you ask for a concrete example, there can be no better one than is furnished by the person of George Fox. The Quaker religion which he founded is something which it is impossible to overpraise. In a day of shams, it was a religion of veracity rooted in spiritual inwardness, and a return to something more like the original gospel truth than men had ever known in England. So far as our Christian sects today are evolving into liberality, they are simply reverting in es- sence to the position which Fox and the early Quakers so long ago assumed. No one can pretend for a moment that RELIGION AND NEUROLOGY Q in point of spiritual sagacity and capacity, Fox's mind was unsound. Everyone who confronted him personally, from Oliver Cromwell down to county magistrates and jailers, seems to have acknowledged his superior power. Yet from the point of view of his nervous constitution, Fox was a psychopath or d€traque of the deepest dye. His Journal abounds in entries of this sort:— "As I was walking with several friends, I lifted up my head, and saw three steeple-house spires, and they struck at my life. I asked them what place that was? They said, Lichfield. Immedi- ately the word of the Lord came to me, that I must go thither. Being come to the house we were going to, I wished the friends to walk into the house, saying nothing to them of whither I was to go. As soon as they were gone I stept away, and went by my eye over hedge and ditch till I came within a mile of Lichfield; where, in a great field, shepherds were keeping their sheep. Then was I commanded by the Lord to pull off my shoes. I stood still, for it was winter: but the word of the Lord was like a fire in me. So I put off my shoes and left them with the shep- herds; and the poor shepherds trembled, and were astonished, Then I walked on about a mile, and as soon as I was got within the city, the word of the Lord came to me again, saying: Cry, 'Wo to the bloody city of Lichfield!' So I went up and down the streets, crying with a loud voice, Wo to the bloody city of Lichfield! It being market day, I went into the market-place, and to and fro in the several parts of it, and made stands, cry- ing as before, Wo to the bloody city of Lichfield! And no one laid hands on me. As I went thus crying through the streets, there seemed to me to be a channel of blood running down the streets, and the market-place appeared like a pool of blood. When I had declared what was upon me, and felt myself clear, I went out of the town in peace; and returning to the shepherds gave them some money, and took my shoes of them again. But the fire of the Lord was so on my feet, and all over me, that 1 did not matter to put on my shoes again, and was at a stand whether I should or no, till I felt freedom from the Lord so to do: then, after I had washed my feet, I put on my shoes again. 10 THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE After this a deep consideration came upon me, for what reason I should be sent to cry against that city, and call it The bloody city! For though the parliament had the minister one while, and the king another, and much blood had been shed in the town during the wars between them, yet there was no more than had befallen many other places. But afterwards I came to under- stand, that in the Emperor Diocletian's time a thousand Chris- tians were martyr'd in Lichfield. So I was to go, without my shoes, through the channel of their blood, and into the pool of their blood in the market-place, that I might raise up the memorial of the blood of those martyrs, which had been shed above a thousand years before, and lay cold in their streets. So the sense of this blood was upon me, and I obeyed the word of the Lord." Bent as we are on studying religion's existential condi- tions, we cannot possibly ignore these pathological aspects of the subject. We must describe and name them just as if they occurred in non-religious men. It is true that we instinc- tively recoil from seeing an object to which our emotions and affections are committed handled by the intellect as any other object is handled. The first thing the intellect does with an object is to class itliTong"with"something efeeTBut any object that is infinitely important to us and awakens our devotion feels to us also as if it must be sui generis and unique. Probably a crab would be filled with a sense of personal outrage if it could hear us class it without ado or apology as a crustacean, and thus dispose of it. "I am no such thing," it would say; I am myself, myself alone." The next thing the intellect does is to lay bare the causes in which the thing originates. Spinoza says: "I will analyze the actions and appetites of men as if it were a question of lines, of planes, and of solids." And elsewhere he remarks that he will consider our passions and their properties with the same eye with which he looks on all other natural things, RELIGION AND NEUROLOGY II since the consequences of our affections flow from their nature with the same necessity as it results from the nature of a triangle that its three angles should be equal to two right angles. Similarly M. Taine, in the introduction to his history of English literature, has written: "Whether facts be moral or physical, it makes no matter. They always have their causes. There are causes for ambition, courage, verac- ity, just as there are for digestion, muscular movement, ani- mal heat. Vice and virtue are products like vitriol and sug- ar." When we read such proclamations of the intellect bent on showing the existential conditions of absolutely every- thing, we feel—quite apart from our legitimate impatience at the somewhat ridiculous swagger of the program, in view of what the authors are actually able to perform—menaced and negated in the springs of our innermost life. Such cold- blooded assimilations threaten, we think, to undo our soul's vital secrets, as if the same breath which should succeed in explaining their origin would simultaneously explain away their significance, and make them appear of no more pre- ciousness, either, than the useful groceries of which M. Taine speaks. Perhaps the commonest expression of this assumption that spiritual value is undone if lowly origin be asserted is seen in those comments which unsentimental people so often pass on their more sentimental acquaintances. Alfred believes in immortality so strongly because his temperament is so emo- tional. Fanny's extraordinary conscientiousness is merely a matter of overinstigated nerves. William's melancholy about the universe is due to bad digestion—probably his liver is torpid. Eliza's delight in her church is a symptom of her hysterical constitution. Peter would be less troubled about his soul if he would take more exercise in the open air, etc. A more fully developed example of the same kind of rea- soning is the fashion, quite common nowadays among cer- tain writers, of criticizing the religious emotions by show- 12 THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE ing a connection between them and the sexual life. Conver- sion is a crisis of puberty and adolescence. The macerations of saints, and the devotion of missionaries, are only in- stances of the parental instinct of self-sacrifice gone astray. For the hysterical nun, starving for natural life, Christ is but an imaginary substitute for a more earthly object of affec- tion. And the like.1 1 As with many ideas that float in the air of one's time, this notion shrinks from dogmatic general statement and expresses it- self only partially and by innuendo. It seems to me that few con- ceptions are less instructive than this re-interpretation of religion as perverted sexuality. It reminds one, so crudely is it often em- ployed, of the famous Catholic taunt, that the Reformation may be best understood by remembering that its fons et origo was Luther's wish to marry a nun:—the effects are infinitely wider than the al- leged causes, and for the most part opposite in nature. It is true diat in the vast collection of religious phenomena, some are un- disguisedly amatory—e. g., sex-deities and obscene rites in poly- theism, and ecstatic feelings of union with the Savior in a few Christian mystics. But then why not equally call religion an aber- ration of the digestive function, and prove one's point by the wor- ship of Bacchus and Ceres, or by the ecstatic feelings of some other saints about the Eucharist? Religious language clothes itself in such poor symbols as our life affords, and the whole organism gives overtones of comment whenever the mind is strongly stirred to expression. Language drawn from eating and drinking is probably as common in religious literature as is language drawn from the sexual life. We "hunger and thirst" after righteousness; we "find the Lord a sweet savor;" we "taste and see that he is good." "Spir- itual milk for American babes, drawn from the breasts of both testaments," is a sub-title of the once famous New England Primer, and Christian devotional literature indeed quite floats in milk, thought of from the point of view, not of the mother, but of the greedy babe. Saint Francois de Sales, for instance, thus describes the "orison of quietude": "In this state the soul is like a little child still at the breast, whose mother, to caress him whilst he is still in her arms, makes her milk distill into his mouth without his even moving his lips. So it is here. . . . Our Lord desires that our will should be satisfied with sucking the milk which His Majesty pours into our RELIGION AND NEUROLOGY 13 We are surely all familiar in a general way with this method of discrediting states of mind for which we have an mouth, and that we should relish the sweetness without even know- ing that it cometh from the Lord." And again: "Consider the little infants, united and joined to the breasts of their nursing mothers, you will see that from time to time they press themselves closer by little starts to which the pleasure of sucking prompts them. Even so, during its orison, the heart united to its God oftentimes makes attempts at closer union by movements during which it presses closer upon the divine sweetness." Chemin de la Perfection, ch, xxxi.; Amour de Dieu, vii. ch. i. In fact, one might almost as well interpret religion as a perver- sion of the respiratory function. The Bible is full of the language of respiratory oppression: "Hide not thine ear at my breathing; my groaning is not hid from thee; my heart panteth, my strength faileth me; my bones are hot with my roaring all the night long; as the hart panteth after the water-brooks, so my soul panteth after thee, O my God." God's Breath in Man is the title of the chief work of our best known American mystic (Thomas Lake Harris); and in certain non-Christian countries the foundation of all religious discipline consists in regulation of the inspiration and expiration. These arguments are as good as much of the reasoning one hears in favor of the sexual theory. But the champions of the latter will dien say that their chief argument has no analogue elsewhere. The two main phenomena of religion, namely, melancholy and conver- sion, they will say, are essentially phenomena of adolescence, and therefore synchronous with the development of sexual life. To which the retort again is easy. Even were the asserted synchrony unrestrictedly true as a fact (which it is not), it is not only the sexual life, but the entire higher mental life which awakens during adolescence. One might then as well set up the thesis that the inter- est in mechanics, physics, chemistry, logic, philosophy, and soci- ology, which springs up during adolescent years along with that in poetry and religion, is also a perversion of the sexual insunct:—but that would be too absurd. Moreover, if the argument from syn- chrony is to decide, what is to be done with the fact that die re- ligious age par excellence would seem to be old age, when the uproar of the sexual life is past? The plain truth is that to interpret religion one must in the end look at the immediate content of the religious consciousness. The moment one does this, one sees how wholly disconnected it is in 14 THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE antipathy. We all use it to some degree in criticizing persons whose states of mind we regard as overstrained. But when other people criticize our own more exalted soul-flights by calling them 'nothing but' expressions of our organic dis- position, we feel outraged and hurt, for we know that, whatever be our organism's peculiarities, our mental states have their substantive value as revelations of the living truth; and we wish that all this medical materialism could be made to hold its tongue. Medical materialism seems indeed a good appellation for the too simple-minded system of thought which we are considering. Medical materialism finishes up Saint Paul by calling his vision on the road to Damascus a discharging lesion of the occipital cortex, he being an epileptic. It snuffs out Saint Teresa as an hysteric, Saint Francis of Assisi as an hereditary degenerate. George Fox's discontent with the shams of his age, and his pining for spiritual veracity, it treats as a symptom of a disordered colon. Carlyle's organ- tones of misery it accounts for by a gastro-duodenal ca- tarrh. All such mental overtensions, it says, are, when you come to the bottom of the matter, mere affairs of diathesis (auto-intoxications most probably), due to the perverted ao the main from the content of the sexual consciousness. Everything about the two things differs, objects, moods, faculties concerned, and acts impelled to. Any general assimilation is simply impossible: what we find most often is complete hostility and contrast. If now the defenders of the sex-theory say that this makes no difference to their thesis; that without the chemical contributions which the sex- organs make to the blood, the brain would not be nourished so as to carry on religious activities, this final proposition may be true or not true; but at any rate it has become profoundly uninstructive: we can deduce no consequences from it which help us to interpret religion's meaning or value. In this sense the religious life depends just as much upon the spleen, the pancreas, and the kidneys as on the sexual apparatus, and the whole theory has lost its point in evaporating into a vague general assertion of the dependence, some- how, of the mind upon the body. RELIGION AND NEUROLOGY 15 tion of various glands which physiology will yet discover. And medical materialism then thinks that the spiritual authority of all such personages is successfully undermined.1 Let us ourselves look at the matter in the largest possible way. Modern psychology, finding definite psycho-physical connections to hold good, assumes as a convenient hypoth- esis that the dependence of mental states upon bodily con- ditions must be thoroughgoing and complete. If we adopt the assumption, then of course what medical materialism insists on must be true in a general way, if not in every detail: Saint Paul certainly had once an epileptoid, if not an epileptic seizure; George Fox was an hereditary degener- ate; Carlyle was undoubtedly auto-intoxicated by some organ or other, no matter which—and the rest. But now, I ask you, how can such an existential account of facts of mental history decide in one way or another upon their spiritual significance? According to the general postulate of psychology just referred to, there is not a single one of our states of mind, high or low, healthy or morbid, that has not some organic process as its condition. Scientific theories are organically conditioned just as much as religious emo- tions are; and if we only knew the facts intimately enough, we should doubtless see "the liver" determining the dicta of the sturdy atheist as decisively as it does those of the Methodist under conviction anxious about his soul. When it alters in one way the blood that percolates it, we get the methodist, when in another way, we get the atheist form of mind. So of all our raptures and our drynesses, our longings and pantings, our questions and beliefs. They are equally organically founded, be they religious or of non-religious content. To plead the organic causation of a religious state of 1 For a first-rate example of medical-materialist reasoning, see an article on "les Varietes du Type devot," by Dr. Binet-Sangle, in the Revue de l'Hypnotisme, xiv. 161. l6 THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE mind, then, in refutation of its claim to possess superior spiritual value, is quite illogical and arbitrary, unless one has already worked out in advance some psycho-physical theory connecting spiritual values in general with deter- minate sorts of physiological change. Otherwise none of our thoughts and feelings, not even our scientific doctrines, not even our dis-belieis, could retain any value as revela- tions of the truth, for every one of them without exception flows from the state of its possessor's body at the time. It is needless to say that medical materialism draws in point of fact no such sweeping skeptical conclusion. It is sure, just as every simple man is sure, that some states of mind are inwardly superior to others, and reveal to us more truth, and in this it simply makes use of an ordinary spiritual judgment. It has no physiological theory of the production of these its favorite states, by which it may ac- credit them; and its attempt to discredit the states which it dislikes, by vaguely associating them with nerves and liver, and connecting them with names connoting bodily afflic- tion, is altogether illogical and inconsistent. Let us play fair in this whole matter, and be quite can- did with ourselves and with the facts. When we think cer- tain states of mind superior to others, is it ever because of what we know concerning their organic antecedents? No! it is always for two entirely different reasons. It is either because we take an immediate delight in them; or else it is because we believe them to bring us good consequential fruits for life. When we speak disparagingly of "feverish fancies," surely the fever-process as such is not the ground of our disesteem—for aught we know to the contrary, 1030 or 104 ° Fahrenheit might be a much more favorable temper- ature for truths to germinate and sprout in, than the more ordinary blood-heat of 97 or 98 degrees. It is either the dis- agreeableness itself of the fancies, or their inability to bear the criticisms of the convalescent hour. When we praise the RELIGION AND NEUROLOGY V] thoughts which health brings, health's peculiar chemical metabolisms have nothing to do with determining our judgment. We know in fact almost nothing about these metabolisms. It is the character of inner happiness in the thoughts which stamps them as good, or else their consist- ency with our other opinions and their serviceability for our needs, which make them pass for true in our esteem. Now the more intrinsic and the more remote of these criteria do not always hang together. Inner happiness and serviceability do not always agree. What immediately feels most "good" is not always most "true," when measured by the verdict of the rest of experience. The difference between Philip drunk and Philip sober is the classic instance in cor- roboration. If merely "feeling good" could decide, drunk- enness would be the supremely valid human experience. But its revelations, however acutely satisfying at the mo- ment, are inserted into an environment which refuses to bear them out for any length of time. The consequence of this discrepancy of the two criteria is the uncertainty which still prevails over so many of our spiritual judgments. There are moments of sentimental and mystical experi- ence—we shall hereafter hear much of them—that carry an enormous sense of inner authority and illumination with them when they come. But they come seldom, and they do not come to everyone; and the rest of life makes either no connection with them, or tends to contradict them more than it confirms them. Some persons follow more the voice of the moment in these cases, some prefer to be guided by the average results. Hence the sad discordancy of so many of the spiritual judgments of human beings; a discordancy which will be brought home to us acutely enough before these lectures end. It is, however, a discordancy that can never be resolved by any merely medical test. A good example of the im- l8 THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE possibility of holding strictly to the medical tests is seen in the theory of the pathological causation of genius pro- mulgated by recent authors. "Genius," said Dr. Moreau, "is but one of the many branches of the neuropathic tree." "Genius," says Dr. Lombroso, "is a symptom of hereditary degeneration of the epileptoid variety, and is allied to moral insanity." "Whenever a man's life," writes Mr. Nisbet, "is at once sufficiently illustrious and recorded with sufficient fullness to be a subject of profitable study, he inevitably falls into the morbid category. . . . And it is worthy of remark that, as a rule, the greater the genius, the greater the unsoundness." 1 Now do these authors, after having succeeded in estab- lishing to their own satisfaction that the works of genius are fruits of disease, consistently proceed thereupon to im- pugn the value of the fruits? Do they deduce a new spir- itual judgment from their new doctrine of existential con- ditions? Do they frankly forbid us to admire the produc- tions of genius from now onwards? and say outright that no neuropath can ever be a revealer of new truth? No! their immediate spiritual instincts are too strong for them here, and hold their own against inferences which, in mere love of logical consistency, medical materialism ought to be only too glad to draw. One disciple of the school, indeed, has striven to impugn the value of works of genius in a wholesale way (such works of contemporary art, namely, as he himself is unable to enjoy, and they are many) by using medical arguments.2 But for the most part the masterpieces are left unchallenged; and the medical line of attack either confines itself to such secular produc- tions as everyone admits to be intrinsically eccentric, or else addresses itself exclusively to religious manifestations. 1 J. F. Nisbet: The Insanity of Genius, 3d ed., London, 1893, PP- xvi., xxiv. 2 Max Nordau, in his bulky book entitled Degeneration. RELIGION AND NEUROLOGY lO, And then it is because the religious manifestations have been already condemned because the critic dislikes them on internal or spiritual grounds. In the natural sciences and industrial arts it never oc- curs to anyone to try to refute opinions by showing up their author's neurotic constitution. Opinions here are in- variably tested by logic and by experiment, no matter what may be their author's neurological type. It should be no otherwise with religious opinions. Their value can only be ascertained by spiritual judgments directly passed upon them, judgments based on our own immediate feeling primarily; and secondarily on what we can ascertain of their experiential relations to our moral needs and to the rest of what we hold as true. Immediate luminousness, in short, philosophical reason^ ableness, and moral helpfulness are the only available cri- teria. Saint Teresa might have had the nervous system of the placidest cow, and it would not now save her theology, if the trial of the theology by these other tests should show it to be contemptible. And conversely if her theology can stand these other tests, it will make no difference how hys- terical or nervously off her balance Saint Teresa may have been when she was with us here below. You see that at bottom we are thrown back upon the general principles by which the empirical philosophy has always contended that we must be guided in our search for truth. Dogmatic philosophies have sought for tests for truth which might dispense us from appealing to the future. Some direct mark, by noting which we can be protected immediately and absolutely, now and forever, against all mistake—such has been the darling dream of philosophic dogmatists. It is clear that the origin of the truth would be an admirable criterion of this sort, if only the various or- igins could be discriminated from one another from this 20 THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE point of view, and the history of dogmatic opinion shows that origin has always been a favorite test. Origin in im- mediate intuition; origin in pontifical authority; origin in supernatural revelation, as by vision, hearing, or unaccount- able impression; origin in direct possession by a higher spirit, expressing itself in prophecy and warning; origin in automatic utterance generally—these origins have been stock warrants for the truth of one opinion after another which we find represented in religious history. The medical materialists are therefore only so many belated dogmatists, neatly turning the tables on their predecessors by using the criterion of origin in a destructive instead of an accreditive way. They are effective with their talk of pathological origin only so long as supernatural origin is pleaded by the other side, and nothing but the argument from origin is under discussion. But the argument from origin has seldom been used alone, for it is too obviously insufficient. Dr. Mauds- ley is perhaps the cleverest of the rebutters of supernatural religion on grounds of origin. Yet he finds himself forced to write:— "What right have we to believe Nature under any obliga- tion to do her work by means of complete minds only ? She may find an incomplete mind a more suitable instrument for a particular purpose. It is the work that is done, and the quality in the worker by which it was done, that is alone of moment; and it may be no great matter from a cosmical standpoint, if in other qualities of character he was singularly defective—if indeed he were hypocrite, adul- terer, eccentric, or lunatic. . . . Home we come again, then, to the old and last resort of certitude—namely the common assent of mankind, or of the competent by instruc- tion and training among mankind." x 1 H. Maudsley: Natural Causes and Supernatural Seemings, 1886 pp. 257, 256. RELIGION AND NEUROLOGY 21 In other words, not its origin, but the way in which it wor\s on the whole, is Dr. Maudsley's final test of a belief. This is our own empiricist criterion; and this criterion the stoutest insisters on supernatural origin have also been forced to use in the end. Among the visions and messages some have always been too patently silly, among the trances and convulsive seizures some have been too fruitless for conduct and character, to pass themselves off as significant, still less as divine. In the history of Christian mysticism the problem how to discriminate between such messages and experiences as were really divine miracles, and such others as the demon in his malice was able to counterfeit, thus making the religious person twofold more the child of hell he was before, has always been a difficult one to solve, need- ing all the sagacity and experience of the best directors of conscience. In the end it had to come to our empiricist cri- terion: By their fruits ye shall know them, not by their roots. Jonathan Edwards's Treatise on Religious Affections is an elaborate working out of this thesis. The roots of a man's virtue are inaccessible to us. No appearances what- ever are infallible proofs of grace. Our practice is the only sure evidence, even to ourselves, that we are genuinely Christians. "In forming a judgment of ourselves now," Edwards writes, "we should certainly adopt that evidence which our supreme Judge will chiefly make use of when we come to stand before him at the last day. . . . There is not one grace of the Spirit of God, of the existence of which, in any professor of religion, Christian practice is not the most decisive evidence. . . . The degree in which our experience is productive of practice shows the degree in which our experience is spiritual and divine." Catholic writers are equally emphatic. The good disposi- tions which a vision, or voice, or other apparent heavenly favor leave behind them are the only marks by which we 22 THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE may be sure they are not possible deceptions of the tempter. Says Saint Teresa:— "Like imperfect sleep which, instead of giving more strength to the head, doth but leave it the more exhausted, the result of mere operations of the imagination is but to weaken the soul. Instead of nourishment and energy she reaps only lassitude and disgust: whereas a genuine heavenly vision yields to her a har- vest of ineffable spiritual riches, and an admirable renewal of bodily strength. I alleged these reasons to those who so often ac- cused my visions of being the work of the enemy of mankind and the sport of my imagination. ... I showed them the jew- els which the divine hand had left with me:—they were my actual dispositions. All those who knew me saw that I was changed; my confessor bore witness to the fact; this improve- ment, palpable in all respects, far from being hidden, was bril- liantly evident to all men. As for myself, it was impossible to believe that if the demon were its author, he could have used, in order to lose me and lead me to hell, an expedient so contrary to his own interests as that of uprooting my vices, and filling me with masculine courage and other virtues instead, for I saw clearly that a single one of these visions was enough to enrich me with all that wealth." 1 I fear I may have made a longer excursus than was nec- essary, and that fewer words would have dispelled the un- easiness which may have arisen among some of you as I announced my pathological programme. At any rate you must all be ready now to judge the religious life by its re- sults exclusively, and I shall assume that the bugaboo of morbid origin will scandalize your piety no more. Still, you may ask me, if its results are to be the ground of our final spiritual estimate of a religious phenomenon, why threaten us at all with so much existential study of its conditions ? Why not simply leave pathological questions out? Autobiography, ch. xxviii. RELIGION AND NEUROLOGY 23 To this I reply in two ways: First, I say, irrepressible curiosity imperiously leads one on; and I say, secondly, that it always leads to a better understanding of a thing's significance to consider its exaggerations and perversions, its equivalents and substitutes and nearest relatives else- where. Not that we may thereby swamp the thing in the wholesale condemnation which we pass on its inferior congeners, but rather that we may by contrast ascertain the more precisely in what its merits consist, by learning at the same time to what particular dangers of corruption it may also be exposed. Insane conditions have this advantage, that they isolate special factors of the mental life, and enable us to inspect them unmasked by their more usual surroundings. They play the part in mental anatomy which the scalpel and the microscope play in the anatomy of the body. To under- stand a thing rightly we need to see it both out of its en- vironment and in it, and to have acquaintance with-the whole range.of its variations. The study of hallucinations has in this way been for psychologists the key to their comprehension of normal sensation, that of illusions has been the key to the right comprehension of perception. Morbid impulses and imperative conceptions, "fixed ideas," so called, have thrown a flood of light on the psychology of the normal will; and obsessions and delusions have per- formed the same service for that of the normal faculty ol belief. Similarly, the nature of genius has been illuminated by the attempts, of which I already made mention, to class it with psychopathical phenomena. Borderland insanity, crankiness, insane temperament, loss of mental balance, psycopathic degeneration (to use a few of the many syno- nyms by which it has been called), has certain peculiarities and liabilities which, when combined with a superior qual- ity of intellect in an individual, make it more probable that 24 THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE he will make his mark and affect his age, than if his tem- perament were less neurotic. There is of course no special affinity between crankiness as such and superior intellect,1 for most psychopaths have feeble intellects, and superior intellects more commonly have normal nervous systems. But the pyschopathic temperament, whatever be the intellect with which it finds itself paired, often brings with it ardor and excitability of character. The cranky person has extraor- dinary emotional susceptibility. He is liable to fixed ideas and obsessions. His conceptions tend to pass immediately into belief and action; and when he gets a new idea, he has no rest till he proclaims it, or in some way "works it off." "What shall I think of it?" a common person says to himself about a vexed question; but in a "cranky" mind "What must I do about it?" is the form the question tends to take. In the autobiography of that high-souled woman, Mrs. Annie Besant, I read the following passage: "Plenty of people wish well to any good cause, but very few care to exert themselves to help it, and still fewer will risk any- thing in its support. 'Someone ought to do it, but why should I?' is the ever reechoed phrase of weak-kneed ami- ability. 'Someone ought to do it, so why not I?' is the cry of some earnest servant of man, eagerly forward springing to face some perilous duty. Between these two sentences lie whole centuries of moral evolution." True enough! and between these two sentences lie also the different destinies of the ordinary sluggard and the psychopathic man. Thus, when a superior intellect and a psychopathic temperament coalesce—as in the endless permutations and combinations of human faculty, they are bound to coalesce often enough —in the same individual, we have the best possible con- dition for the kind of effective genius that gets into the 1 Superior intellect, as Professor Bain has admirably shown, seems to consist in nothing so much as in a large development of the faculty of association by similarity. RELIGION AND NEUROLOGY 25 biographical dictionaries. Such men do not remain mere critics and understanders with their intellect. Their ideas possess them, they inflict them, for better or worse, upon their companions or their age. It is they who get counted when Messrs. Lombroso, Nisbet, and others invoke statistics to defend their paradox. To pass now to religious phenomena, take the melan- choly which, as we shall see, constitutes an essential moment in every complete religious evolution. Take the happiness which achieved religious belief confers. Take the trance- like states of insight into truth which all religious mystics report.1 These are each and all of them special cases of kinds of human experience of much wider scope. Religious melancholy, whatever peculiarities it may have qua reli- gious, is at any rate melancholy. Religious happiness is hap- piness. Religious trance is trance. And the moment we renounce the absurd notion that a thing is exploded away as soon as it is classed with others, or its origin is shown; the moment we agree to stand by experimental results and inner quality, in judging of values—who does not see that we are likely to ascertain the distinctive significance of religious melancholy and happiness, or of religious trances, far better by comparing them as conscientiously as we can with other varieties of melancholy, happiness, and trance, than by refusing to consider their place in any more general series, and treating them as if they were outside of nature's order altogether ? I hope that the course of these lectures will confirm us in this supposition. As regards the psychopathic origin of so many religious phenomena, that would not be in the least surprising or disconcerting, even were such phe- nomena certified from on high to be the most precious of human experiences. No one organism can possibly yield 11 may refer to a criticism of the insanity theory of genius in the Psychological Review, ii. 287 (1895). 26 THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE to its owner the whole body of truth. Few of us are not in some way infirm, or even diseased; and our very in- firmities help us unexpectedly. In the psychopathic tempera- ment we have the emotionality which is the sine qua non of moral perception; we have the intensity and tendency to emphasis which are the essence of practical moral vigor; and we have the love of metaphysics and mysticism which carry one's interests beyond the surface of the sensible world. What, then, is more natural than that this temperament should introduce one to regions of religious truth, to cor- ners of the universe, which your robust Philistine type of nervous system, forever offering its biceps to be felt, thump- ing its breast, and thanking Heaven that it hasn't a single morbid fiber in its composition, would be sure to hide for- ever from its self-satisfied possessors? If there were such a thing as inspiration from a higher realm, it might well be that the neurotic temperament would furnish the chief condition of the requisite recep- tivity. And having said thus much, I think that I may let the matter of religion and neuroticism drop. The mass of collateral phenomena, morbid or healthy, with which the various religious phenomena must be com- pared in order to understand them better, forms what in the slang of pedagogics is termed "the apperceiving mass" by which we comprehend them. The only novelty that I can imagine this course of lectures to possess lies in the breadth of the apperceiving mass. I may succeed in discussing reli- gious experiences in a wider context than has been usual in university courses. Lecture II CIRCUMSCRIPTION OF THE TOPIC MOST books on the philosophy of religion try to begin with a precise definition of what its essence consists of. Some of these would-be definitions may possibly come before us in later portions of this course, and I shall not be pedantic enough to enumerate any of them to you now. Meanwhile the very fact that they are so many and so differ- ent from one another is enough to prove that the word "reli- gion" cannot stand for any single principle or essence, but is rather a collective name. The theorizing mind tends al- ways to the oversimplification of its materials. This is the root of all that absolutism and one-sided dogmatism by which both philosophy and religion have been infested. Let us not fall immediately into a one-sided view of our subject, but let us rather admit freely at the outset that we may very likely find no one essence, but many characters which may alternately be equally important to religion. If we should inquire for the essence of "government," for example, one man might tell us it was authority, another submission, an- other police, another an army, another an assembly, an- other a system of laws; yet all the while it would be true that no concrete government can exist without all these things, one of which is more important at one moment and others at another. The man who knows governments most completely is he who troubles himself least about a defi- nition which shall give their essence. Enjoying an intimate acquaintance with all their particularities in turn, he would naturally regard an abstract conception in which these were 27 28 THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE unified as a thing more misleading than enlightening. And why may not religion be a conception equally complex?1 Consider also the "religious sentiment" which we see referred to in so many books, as if it were a single sort of mental entity. In the pyschologies and in the philosophies of religion, we find the authors attempting to specify just what en- tity it is. One man allies it to the feeling of dependence; one makes it a derivative from fear; others connect it with the sexual life; others still identify it with the feeling of the infinite; and so on. Such different ways of conceiving it ought of themselves to arouse doubt as to whether it pos- sibly can be one specific thing; and the moment we are willing to treat the term "religious sentiment" as a collec- tive name for the many sentiments which religious objects may arouse in alternation, we see that it probably contains nothing whatever of a psychologically specific nature. There is religious fear, religious love, religious awe, reli- gious joy, and so forth. But religious love is only man's natural emotion of love directed to a religious object; reli- gious fear is only the ordinary fear of commerce, so to speak, the common quaking of the human breast, in so far as the notion of divine retribution may arouse it; religious awe is the same organic thrill which we feel in a forest at twilight, or in a mountain gorge; only this time it comes over us at the thought of our supernatural relations; and similarly of all the various sentiments which may be called into play in the lives of religious persons. As concrete states of mind, made up of a feeling plus a specific sort of object, religious emotions of course are psychic entities distinguish- 11 can do no better here than refer my readers to the extended and admirable remarks on the futility of all these definitions of re- ligion, in an article by Professor Leuba, published in the Monis: for January, 1901, after my own text was written. CIRCUMSCRIPTION OF THE TOPIC 29 able from other concrete emotions; but there is no ground for assuming a simple abstract "religious emotion" to exist as a distinct elementary mental affection by itself, present in every religious experience without exception. As there thus seems to be no one elementary religious emotion, but only a common storehouse of emotions upon which religious objects may draw, so there might conceiv- ably also prove to be no one specific and essential kind of religious object, and no one specific and essential kind of religious act. The field of religion being as wide as this, it is mani- festly impossible that I should pretend to cover it. My lec- tures must be limited to a fraction of the subject. And, al- though it would indeed be foolish to set up an abstract definition of religion's essence, and then proceed to defend that definition against all comers, yet this need not prevent me from taking my own narrow view of what religion shall consist in for the purpose of these lectures, or, out of the many meanings of the word, from choosing the one meaning in which I wish to interest you particularly, and proclaiming arbitrarily that when I say "religion" I mean that. This, in fact, is what I must do, and I will now pre- liminarily seek to mark out the field I choose. One way to mark it out easily is to say what aspects of the subject we leave out. At the outset we are struck by one great partition which divides the religious field. On the one side of it lies institutional, on the other personal religion. As M. P. Sabatier says, one branch of religion keeps the divinity, another keeps man most in view. Worship and sacrifice, procedures for working on the dispositions of the deity, theology and ceremony and ecclesiastical organiza- tion, are the essentials of religion in the institutional branch. Were we to limit our view to it, we should have to define religion as an external art. the art of winning the favor of 30 THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE the gods. In the more personal branch of religion it is on the contrary the inner dispositions of man himself which form the center of interest, his conscience, his deserts, his helplessness, his incompleteness. And although the favor of the God, as forfeited or gained, is still an essential feature of the story, and theology plays a vital part therein, yet the acts to which this sort of religion prompts are personal not ritual acts, the individual transacts the business by himself alone, and the ecclesiastical organization, with its priests and sacraments and other go-betweens, sinks to an alto- gether secondary place. The relation goes direct from heart to heart, from soul to soul, between man and his maker. Now in these lectures I propose to ignore the institutional branch entirely, to say nothing of the ecclesiastical organ- ization, to consider as little as possible the systematic the- ology and the ideas about the gods themselves, and to con- fine myself as far as I can to personal religion pure and simple. To some of you personal religion, thus nakedly con- sidered, will no doubt seem too incomplete a thing to wear the general name. "It is a part of religion," you will say, "but only its unorganized rudiment; if we are to name it by itself, we had better call it man's conscience or morality than his religion. The name 'religion' should be reserved for the fully organized system of feeling, thought, and in- stitution, for the Church, in short, of which this personal religion, so called, is but a fractional element." But if you say this, it will only show the more plainly how much the question of definition tends to become a dispute about names. Rather than prolong such a dispute, I am willing to accept almost any name for the personal religion of which I propose to treat. Call it conscience or morality, if you yourselves prefer, and not religion—under either name it will be equally worthy of our study. As for myself, I think it will prove to contain some elements which morality pure and simple does not contain, and these ele- CIRCUMSCRIPTION OF THE TOPIC 31 ments I shall soon seek to point out; so I will myself con- tinue to apply the word "religion" to it; and in the last lecture of all, I will bring in the theologies and the ec- clesiasticisms, and say something of its relation to them. In one sense at least the personal religion will prove itself more fundamental than either theology or ecclesias- ticism. Churches, when once established, live at second-hand upon tradition; but the founders of every church owed their power originally to the fact of their direct personal com- munion with the divine. Not only the superhuman found- ers, the Christ, the Buddha, Mahomet, but all the origi- nators of Christian sects have been in this case;—so personal religion should still seem the primordial thing, even to those who continue to esteem it incomplete. There are, it is true, other things in religion chrono- logically more primordial than personal devoutness in the moral sense. Fetishism and magic seem to have preceded inward piety historically—at least our records of inward piety do not reach back so far. And if fetishism and magic be regarded as stages of religion, one may say that personal religion in the inward sense and the genuinely spiritual ecclesiasticisms which it founds are phenomena of secon- dary or even tertiary order. But, quite apart from the fact that many anthropologists—for instance, Jevons and Frazer —expressly oppose "religion" and "magic" to each other, it is certain that the whole system of thought which leads to magic, fetishism, and the lower superstitions may just as well be called primitive science as called primitive religion. The question thus becomes a verbal one again; and our knowledge of all these early stages of thought and feeling is in any case so conjectural and imperfect that farther dis- cussion would not be worth while. Religion, therefore, as I now ask you arbitrarily to take it, shall mean for us the feelings, acts, and experiences of individual men in their solitude, so far as they apprehend 32 THE VARIETIES OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE themselves to stand in relation to whatever they may con- sider the divine. Since the relation may be either moral, physical, or ritual, it is evident that out of religion in the sense in which we take it, theologies, philosophies, and ec- clesiastical organizations may secondarily grow. In these lectures, however, as I have already said, the immediate personal experiences will amply fill our time, and we shall hardly consider theology or ecclesiasticism at all. We escape much controversial matter by this arbitrary definition of our field. But, still, a chance of controversy comes up over the word "divine," if we take the defi- nition in too narrow a sense. There are systems of thought which the world usually calls religious, and yet which do not positively assume a God. Buddhism is in this case. Pop- ularly, of course, the Buddha himself stands in place of a God; but in strictness the Buddhistic system is atheistic. Modern transcendental idealism, Emersonianism, for in- stance, also seems to let God evaporate into abstract Ideality. Not a deity in concreto, not a superhuman person, but the immanent divinity in things, the essentially spiritual struc- ture of the universe, is the object of the transcendentalist cult. In that address to the graduating class at Divinity College in 1838 which made Emerson famous, the frank expression of this worship of mere abstract laws was what made the scandal of the performance. "These laws," said the speaker, "execute themselves. They are out of time, out of space, and not subject to circumstance: Thus, in the soul of man there is a justice whose retributions are instant and entire. He who does a good deed is instantly en- nobled. He who does a mean deed is by the action itself con- tracted. He who puts off impurity thereby puts on purity. If a man is at heart just, then in so far is he God; the safety of God the immortality of God, the majesty of God, do enter into that man with justice. If a man dissemble, deceive, he deceives him- self, and goes out of acquaintance with his own being. Charac- CIRCUMSCRIPTION OF THE TOPIC 33 ter is always known. Thefts never enrich; alms never im- poverish; murder will speak out of stone walls. The least ad- mixture of a lie—for example, the taint of vanity, any attempt to make a good impression, a favorable appearance—will in- stantly vitiate the effect. But speak the truth, and all things alive or brute are vouchers, and the very roots of the grass under- ground there do seem to stir and move to bear your witness. For all things proceed out of the same spirit, which is differently named love, justice, temperance, in its different applications. just as the ocean receives different names on the several shores which it washes. In so far as he roves from these ends, a man bereaves himself of power, of auxiliaries. His being shrinks . . . he becomes less and less, a mote, a point, until absolute badness is absolute death. The perception of this law awakens in the mind a sentiment which we call the religious sentiment, and which makes our highest happiness. Wonderful is its power to charm and to command. It is a mountain air. It is the embalmef of the world. It makes the sky and the hills sublime, and the silent song of the stars is it. It is the beatitude of man. It makes him illimitable. When he says 'I ought'; when love warns him; when he chooses, warned from on high, the good and great deed; then, deep melodies wander through his soul from su- preme wisdom. Then he can worship, and be enlarged by his worship; for he can never go behind this sentiment. All the ex pressions of this sentiment are sacred and permanent in propor tion to their purity. [They] affect us more than all other com positions. The sentences of the olden time, which ejaculate this* piety, are still fresh and fragrant. And the unique impression of Jesus upon mankind, whose name is not so much written as ploughed into the history of this world, is proof of the subtle virtue of this infusion." 1 Such is the Emersonian religion. The universe has a divine soul of order, which soul is moral, being also the soul within the soul of man. But whether this soul of the universe be a mere quality like the eye's brilliancy or the skin's softness, or whether it be a self-conscious life like the 1 Miscellanies, 1868, p. 120 (abridged). 34 THE VARIETIES OF RELICIOUS EXPERIENCE eye's seeing or the skin's feeling, is a decision that never unmistakably appears in Emerson's pages. It quivers on the boundary of these things, sometimes leaning one way, sometimes the other, to suit the literary rather than the philosophic need. Whatever it is, though, it is active. As much as if it were a God, we can trust it to protect all ideal interests and keep the world's balance straight. The sentences in which Emerson, to the very end, gave utter- ance to this faith are as fine as anything in literature: "If you love and serve men, you cannot by any hiding or strat- agem escape the remuneration. Secret retributions are al- ways restoring the level, when disturbed, of the divine justice. It is impossible to tilt the beam. All the tyrants and proprietors and monopolists of the world in vain set their shoulders to heave the bar. Settles forevermore the ponder- ous equator to its line, and man and mote, and star and sun, must range to it, or be pulverized by the recoil." 2 Now it would be too absurd to say that the inner ex- periences that underlie such expressions of faith as this and impel the writer to their utterance are quite unworthy to be called religious experiences. The sort of appeal that Emer- sonian optimism, on the one hand, and Buddhistic pessi- mism, on the other, make to the individual and the sort of response which he makes to them in his life are in fact indistinguishable from, and in many respects identical with, the best Christian appeal and response. We must therefore, from the experiential point of view, call these godless or quasi-godless creeds "religions"; and accordingly when in our definition of religion we speak of the indi- vidual's relation to "what he considers the divine," we must interpret the term "divine" very broadly, as denoting any object that is god//^