WX 28 AM4 B7C7C 1918 53210030R LM D5276fib3 3 NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE U.S. NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE return to national library of medicine before last date shown £>EP 15 191)1 .i> NOV 41962 *%y 1983 JAr^0 1937 APR 16 1987 (W MAR M 1988 ff0 1 4 2000 i£ . riiii]ii»iiitii»tiriiMiiiiiriiiiiiuiifiitiiMiii;iiiiijiiiiiiiiiiiijitiiiijiiiiiiriiMirjiifiiuiiiiijiiiiiii:t!Mfiiriitiiiiiriiijiitiiititiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiii(iiiiiiiiifliiittiii)iitiiiiiHiiMiPiiiiiitiii^ A STUDY IN I HOSPITAL EFFICIENCY^! AS DEMONSTRATED BY THE CASE | REPORT OF THE FIRST FIVE I YEARS OF A PRIVATE I HOSPITAL ! f]Tf^v> .1 v - ^# BY <• ■r,-:•>. E. A.rCOI>!MAN, M.D. -V /r- u ( i "I Ml "\'J t *-•*■> a* '.-tl -*^fc :.::_.. , ' ( V ■i'-i-i /I ^lllllii/i'tlliiiliilltlliritpiMiriiiniinillTilFiiiriii -vr-iitrrMMir'iFrttrriiiiinpii^i!iMltrr^rvp'"'!:.'!fimiimiiirvTripiprrsittnilprillllic'tiriiiitrFll^ri'.litir-iir'-1!'. iiu:n'innki.■ irntinniihjiiH(He= This Report will be sent gratis to any member of the American College of Surgeons or to any member of the Massachusetts Medical Society. To others the price will be one dollar. When you are through with this copy, kindly hand it to some other person—preferably to a Hospital Trustee. A STUDY IN HOSPITAL EFFICIENCY As Demonstrated by the Case Report of the First Five Years of a Private Hospital BY E. A. CODMAN, M.D. THE FOREWORD OF THIS REPORT IS THE LAST WORD OF THE LAST REPORT : It is Idle to Consider the Standardization qf Hospitals without considering the Standard of the Product of each Hospital, the part which the Professional Staff plays in raising the Standard of the Product, and the Compensa- tion which the Hospital grants the Staff in return for their services. This Hospital has for sale a Product of the Standard found on pages 12-63. It aims to be a Hundred Dollar Hospital with a Hundred Dollar Surgeon. 28 hfAA ists This Volume is Dedicated to RICHARD C. CABOT BECAUSE I RESPECT HIS MOTIVES, ADMIRE HIS COURAGE AND ENERGY, BUT HEARTILY DISAPPROVE OF SOME OF HIS OPINIONS AND METHODS, FOR HE SEEMS^TO WANT TO REFORM THE BOTTOM OF THE PROFESSION, WHILE I THINK THE BLAME BELONGS AT THE TOP. PART I THE CASE REPORT A PRACTICAL ILLUSTRATION OF THE FACT THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO USE THE END RESULT SYSTEM IN A HOSPITAL PAGE Introduction ........ 5 Quotation from Previous Report .... 8 Abstracts of Cases for Five Years . . . . 12 The Advantages of the End Result System to Surgical Science ....... 64 Essential Steps in the End Result System for the Use of Cards and Chart ...... 71 The Chart........Loose leaf The Chart in Print ....... 77 The Educational Factor in Placing the Diagnoses on the Chart ....... 78 Working for This Generation or for the Next . 85 The Ownership of Hospital Cases .... 87 Rare Cases ......... 89 Routine Case* ........ 90 Standards ......... 91 Our Contribution to the Cancer Problem ... 94 Authority ......... gg Statistics and Experience ...... qq Analysis of Our Total Errors in Five Years with a View to Future Improvement . . qq 4 PART I THE CASE REPORT A PRACTICAL ILLUSTRATION OF THE FACT THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO USE THE END RESULT SYSTEM IN A HOSPITAL INTRODUCTION The argument in our previous Reports has been somewhat as follows: That the Trustees of our Charitable Hospitals do not consider it their duty to see that good results are obtained in the treatment of their patients. They see to it that their financial accounts are audited, but they take no inventory of the Product for which their money is expended. Since the Product is given away, they do not bother to standardize it and to see whether it is good enough to be sold. It is against the individual interests of the medical and surgical staffs of hospitals to follow up, compare, analyze, and standardize all their results, because: 1. It is seldom that any single individual's results have been so strikingly better than those of his colleagues, that he would desire such comparison and analysis. Perhaps the results as a whole would not be good enough to impress the public very favorably. 2. An effort to thus analyze is difficult, time-consuming, and troublesome, and would lead, by pointing out lines for improvement, to much onerous committee work by members of the staff that would be still more time-consuming, difficult, and troublesome. 3. Neither Trustees of Hospitals nor the Public are as yet will- ing to pay for this kind of work. Although the staff would admit that such follow-up and analysis was a good thing for all, yet each "practical" man (and the prac- tical men always hold the power) would wait for somebody else to do the work. The superintendent would lose his position, if he undertook to insist on "good results." It is already more than he can do to listen to the wails of "lack of economy," "lack of politeness," "lack of common sense" with which the trustees, staff, and patients deafen him. 5 Therefore, if the trustees, the staff, and the superintendent all avoid the analysis of results, and it is only for the interest of the patients, the public, and medical science,—why bother about it? The truth is, the patients and the public do not yet understand the problem. They suppose that of course somebody is looking into this important matter. They do not realize that the responsibility is not fixed upon any person or department. As for Medical Science's not caring,—this is the consequence of our medical schools' paying their teachers by giving them the opportunity to advertise. Our method of teaching medical science is as fraught with evil as if our Professors of Chemistry were per- mitted to organize a monopoly of the Trade in Chemicals, so as to illustrate to their students the "practice" of chemistry. As unpaid or partially paid medical teaching is the custom in mpst parts of the world, we have become used to it. If the professors advertised only the goods they actually could deliver, such a practice would be de- fensible; but it is a rare teacher who can avoid the assumption of knowledge which he does not possess, as this is the time-honored habit of our profession. We have not offered this destructive criticism without a con- structive remedy: THE END RESULT SYSTEM We have advocated a simple system of hospital organization first recommended by the Committee on Standardization of Hospitals of the Clinical Congress of Surgeons. In brief, it,is this: That the Trustees of Hospitals should see to it that an effort is made to follow up each patient they treat, long enough to deter- mine whether the treatment given has permanently relieved the condition or symptoms complained of. That they should give the members of the Staff credit for taking the responsibility of successful treatment and promote them accord- ingly. Likewise they should see that all cases in which the treat- ment is found to have been unsuccessful or unsatisfactory are care- fully analyzed, in order to fix the responsibility for failure on: 1. The physician or surgeon responsible for the treatment. 2. The organization carrying out the detail of the treatment. 3. The disease or condition of the patient. 4>. The personal or social conditions preventing the cooperation of the patient. This will give a definite basis on which to make effort at improve- ment. 6 Technically, to start this System in a hospital, it is necessary to introduce the use of an "End Result Card" which is kept for each patient, and on which is recorded in the briefest possible terms (see pages 72-73): The symptoms or conditions for which he seeks relief. The diagnosis of the pathologic conditions which the doctor who gives the treatment believes to be the cause of the symptoms, and on which he bases his treatment. The general plan or important points of the treatment given. The complications which followed before the patient left the hospital. The diagnosis which proved correct or final at discharge. The result each year afterward. Obviously, the number of details given under these headings might be infinite in extent, but still no case is so complex, that it cannot be reduced to an abstract referring to a detailed record. To take two extremes: A simple case of appendicitis may be abstracted thus: Came for the relief of: acute abdominal pain for 24 hours. Diagnosis on which treatment was based: acute appendicitis. Important points of treatment: a gangrenous appendix removed and drainage established. Complications: none. Final diagnosis: acute appendicitis. Result one year later: perfect. whereas another complicated case might be: Came for the relief of: many ill-defined symptoms. Diagnosis on which treatment was based: consultants varied in opinions. Treatment: expectant for 4 weeks, and then exploratory laparotomy which revealed no pathologic conditions. Complications: phlebitis, cystitis. Final diagnosis: undetermined except for phlebitis and cystitis. Result a year later: condition the same as before treatment. Certainly even a trustee could pass the first case as O. K., and satisfy himself that the whole organization of the hospital did not relieve the second. Undoubtedly a layman could not enter authoritatively into the details of the reasons why, but he could insist that the End Result System should be used, that some one must see that it is used; and that an efficiency committee be appointed for that purpose. At present, in most hospitals, no such investigation is made by any one. There is no standard of good results to go by, but we are setting standards in this Report. We believe they are as high as any. The questions which should interest you are: Are yours better or worse? Are you making any effort to find out? In our Charitable Hospitals it is the Duty of no person or Depart- ment to ask these questions. It is a disagreeable Duty which neither the Staff nor the Board of Trustees nor the Superintendent has the strength to assume alone. An Efficiency Committee composed of 7 members of each of these departments should assume this burden. The cooperation of the Board of Trustees is necessary both to authorize the expense and to guarantee the standard of the work reported. Even if a detailed report is not published, a typewritten review should be kept for the use of the Efficiency Committee. When this step is taken by our Great Hospitals, True Clinical Science will begin. (For the Benefit of Those Readers Who Have Not Seen the First Report, the Following Portion is Reprinted to Make the Ensuing Cases Intelligible) The object of this study is to give a practical illustration of the theory of hospital organization based upon an End Result System. This system, with its simple details, is set forth in the Report of the Committee on Standardization of Hospitals presented before the Clinical Congress of Surgeons of North America, at its meeting November 10-15, 1913.1 (See also page 71.) We believe that all hospitals should have such reports, even, and perhaps especially, private hospitals. We believe that it is for the private hospitals to begin this publicity, as well as for the large, general institutions with national reputations. The reports of such large institutions would form minimum standards, and all private hospitals and small non-teaching hospitals should show much better results than the larger institutions. We publish this study to show that it is possible for a private hospital to make such a report, and we believe that if a private hos- pital can thus expose its weaknesses, the public hospitals should certainly be able to do so. In the following Report we have not in all cases attempted to follow the letter of the suggestions of the above mentioned Commit- tee. If we had done so, we should probably have had no readers, because a mere set of abstracted case histories would have been too dull even for a statistician. We want to have this report read—partly because we are as proud of the cases from a mere surgical point of view as we usually are of the cases reported in our papers on special subjects, and partly because we want to illustrate a definite method by which the organization of a Surgical Service of a Hospital can be based on the End Result System. We believe the same general method can be applied to other branches of clinical work besides surgery. The Idea is so simple as to seem childlike, but we find it ignored in all Charitable Hospitals, and very largely in Private Hospitals. It is simply to follow the natural series of questions which any one asks in an individual case: What was the matter ? Did they find it out beforehand? 1 Surgery, Gynecology, and Obstetrics, January, 1914. 8 Did the patient get entirely well? If not—why not? Was it the fault of the surgeon, the disease, or the patient? What can we do to prevent similar failures in the future? We believe that the general acceptance of a system of hospital organization based on the truthful record of the answers to these questions means the beginning of True Clinical Science. The reader must not suppose that we recommend the publication of such criticisms as we have here inflicted on ourselves, or even recommend that the Chiefs of Surgical Services should be so merci- less to their Juniors. In this report we are proud to say that we have suppressed noth- ing, but have given even the smallest details of lack of success. We are not afraid to do this, because we believe we have obtained as good results in these cases as any surgeons could have. To the lay- man who chances to read this paper, the fates of these cases may seem far better or far worse than his vague imaginations of the re- sults of surgery, but we believe that few surgeons would say that they are not excellent. Therefore, why should not the layman see them, if he cares to ? Why should he not look farther and study the reports of the large hospitals for himself, to learn where such and such a branch of surgery is well done? In making our marginal symbols, with their accompanying criti- cisms, we have been hypercritical — and in fact have had to be, to find sufficient illustrations to show the points we wish to make! The absence of post-operative complications has made it difficult to make one of our chief points clear—that reduction of the number of surgical complications, such as sepsis, phlebitis, cystitis, etc., is one of the easiest ways of economizing hospital funds. Every patient- day lost in a charitable hospital by these complications should be multiplied by the daily per capita expense, and an account kept of the same. This amount can be greatly reduced by efficient organization. To effect improvement, the first step is to admit and record the lack of perfection. The next step is to analyze the causes of failure and to determine whether these causes are controllable. We can then rationally set about effecting improvement by enforcing the control of those causes which we admit are controllable, and by directing study to methods of controlling those causes over which we now admit we have but little power. A hospital that has an End Result System, has an authoritative method of admitting and recording its failures in diagnosis and treatment. The present paper deals with the analysis of the causes of failure and the determination of the degree within which we can control these causes. We believe that the most difficult step has been taken when the staff of a hospital once agrees to admit and record the lack 9 of perfection in the results of its treatment. Improvement is then sure to follow, for it often is the error of which we are ignorant that we persist in carrying with us. To illustrate a practical method of making such an analysis, we have taken the Results of our own private hospital for the first two1 years of its existence. These abstracts have been edited from the End Result Cards in the way recommended. In a few of the more interesting cases (Cases 24, 33, 42, 53, 55, 78, etc.) we have made quite a long abstract, partly to interest the reader and partly to show that many cases of great interest and importance would be con- veniently placed at the disposal of science if such a system existed in the large hospitals. These unusual usual cases, if we may so call them, are now lost, because surgeons are too busy to write them up. The rare cases of primary cancer of the Fallopian tube (Case 42), and the enormous distention of the common duct (Case 33), are unique in our experience; but if we could skim through the abstracts of some of the large hospitals we could no doubt make collections of such cases large enough for comparative study. It is the usualness of things which we think are unusual which often keeps us blind to important facts before our noses. The reader must suppose himself the Chief of a Surgical Service or a member of a Hospital Efficiency Committee. The End Result Cards of the week are before him. In a large hospital the Chief of each Service, at a certain hour, can have handed to him the End Result Cards of all of his cases which have been discharged during the previous week, and also all returns brought in during that week by the Follow-up System. A service of 60 beds can thus be easily reviewed in one hour a week. He must read them through and mark in the margin of those cases which lack perfection the symbols indi- cated below. He may O. K. where he sees no flaw, and he may also graciously star the cases which he considers creditable. A key to the writer's reasons for criticism will be found on pages 98—107. To the thoughtful person it will be at once apparent that a Chief of Service who criticizes the results of his juniors or colleagues as exactingly as we have done here would soon lose the esprit de corps which is necessary in successful work. Successful leadership always requires tact, whether the driving is done by criticism of the failures or by praise of the successes. To enthusiasm nothing is so dead- ening as to be ignored. To most men it is enough to know that the work is observed and measured, and if found of value, will be appreciated. If the Chief has the gift of leadership, he will praise here and condemn there, under any system of organization; but whatever the gifts of the Chief, there must be a difference in systems, and it is our belief that an organization based on the consideration of the actual Results accomplished must be better than one by which they are ignored. 1 Now five years. 10 THE CASE REPORT FROM THE OPENING OF THE HOSPITAL IN AUGUST, 1911, TO AUGUST, 1916 Each patient has a permanent number—no matter how many times he reenters the hospital. Each number will be abstracted once and succeeding reports will simply give the number and the state- ment of the condition of the patient at that date. When the death of the patient has once been announced, the number will merely be omitted from future reports. Thus far no case has been refused admission, because of the gravity of the condition or the critical character of the operation involved, although we by no means agree to take every case. There are two important words to be used in a report of this kind. None — referring to complications—means that there literally were no complications such as local or general sepsis, phlebitis, cystitis, pulmonary conditions, burns from hot-water bottles, sinuses, secondary abscesses, or any other complication resulting directly from the operation or following it from other causes. Well—referring to a result—means well, except so far as in- evitable consequences of the operation are concerned, such as normal scars in abdominal operations, the absence of the limb after amputa- tion, or the anesthesia inevitable after removal of the Gasserian ganglion. It should be qualified by a detail if sinuses, hernia?, pain- ful scars, or other troublesome post-operative complications have occurred. In the report of a charitable hospital the duration of the patient's stay should also be recorded, because this item is important in the study of the efficiency of the institution. No patient's stay should be prolonged unnecessarily in such institutions, because each day lost means a fraction less relief given to some other patient. ALL RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT WHICH LACK PERFECTION MAY BE EXPLAINED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CAUSES Errors due to lack of technical knowledge or skill E-s Errors due to lack of surgical judgment E-j Errors due to lack of care or equipment E-c Errors due to lack of diagnostic skill E-d These are partially controllable by organization. The patient's unconquerable disease P-d The patient's refusal of treatment P-r These are partially controllable by public education. The calamities of surgery or those accidents and complications over which we have no known control C These should be acknowledged to ourselves and to the public, and study directed to their prevention. 11 In order to give readers who have not seen the two previous Reports the opportunity to try out the use of the Index Chart and to otherwise make the text more intelligible, I here repeat abstracts of those Reports. If a large hospital followed this system, it would, of course, only print the abstracts of cases which had entered since the last report, and only the late notes of all cases previously abstracted. There are minor errors in the earlier reports, but it has seemed best to ignore them, as they are unimportant. The only authority I can give for the truthfulness of these reports is my own word. They, therefore, cannot carry the weight that they would if the Trustees of an Endowed Hospital had had them audited, as they do the financial accounts. The pity of it is that such trustees do not feel it their duty to thus O. K. the work of their staffs. They content themselves with hiding behind their reputations, and rely on what the staff is said to be able to do, not what it actually does do, to the patients. I claim that though the only authority I have for the accuracy of these reports is my own word, the publicity discourages decep- tion on my part. And I claim that the reverse is true in the case of the Endowed Hospitals—the privacy maintained as to their results encourages deception. The practice of medicine and surgery will always be to a certain extent experimental. Every operation done, in any public or private hospital, is an experiment. I do not claim that such experiments are wrong, but that privacy in regard to them is wrong. The public is entitled to know the results of the experiments it must endure. Both the successful and unsuccessful experiments and experimenters should be advertised (made public). If charitable hospitals are to continue to pay their staffs only by the opportunity to acquire reputation, let us make sure that the reputation is earned. Let the hospital do the advertising of good and bad alike, and the Public will respond. If necessary, the hospital itself can pay for the pro- fessional care and study of cases whose cure or relief is so doubtful that the "practical" men see no credit or profit in attending them. Case 1. Admitted Aug. 25, 1911. Male—35. Recurrent attacks of painful indigestion. Pre-operative diagnosis—duodenal ulcer. Consultant—Dr. E-d H. F. Hewes. Op. (E. A. C.)—Abdominal exploration. No ulcer found. Appendectomy. Appendix not abnormal. Complications—None. Result: Oct. 26, 1914—Well. Scar solid. No pain like that previous to operation, but in Jan., 1914, an attack of indigestion soon relieved by lavage. 2. Aug. 28, 1911. Female—18. Inability to breathe through nose. Con't E_8 —Dr- D- Crosby Greene. Op. (D. C. G.)—Submucous excision of sep- tum. Comp.—None. July 20, 1915—Better, but still annoyed by scabs on septum. Result: Aug. 3, 1916—Condition same. 3. Aug. 28, 1911. Male—8. Enlarged tonsils and adenoids. Mouth O k breather. Con't—Dr. D. Crosby Greene. Op. (D. C. G.)—Tonsillectomy and removal of adenoids. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 3, 1916—Sister reports, "Well." 12 4. Sept. 4, 1911. S. female—41. Double chronic mastitis. Con't—Dr. R. B. Greenough. Op. (E. A. C.)—Amputation of both breasts. Comp. —None. Aug. 11, 1915—Has since been operated on by another sur- -. ~ geon for fibroids of uterus. Scars normal. Result: Sept. 12, 1916—Well, except that every 28 days she has a pain in scar of left breast which resembles pain she had before operation. 5. Sept. 5, 1911. Male—46. Constipation and pain due to fissure of the anus. Op. (E. A. C.)—Stretching of sphincter. Comp.—None. O K Result: July 15, 1916—Well. 6. Sept. 5, 1911. Male—31. Balanitis. Op. (E. A. C.)—Circumcision. Comp.—None. Result: July 17, 1915—Still slight eczema on glans. Aug. 7, 1916— ° Letter—Condition same. 7. Sept. 5, 1911. Female—34. Hernia in appendectomy scar from previ- ous op. by E. A. C. for acute appendicitis. Recurrent attacks of vomit- ing and indigestion. Op. (E. A. C.)—Radical cure of hernia. Comp.— _ . None. Dec. 6, 1911, re-entry—Fissure in anus. Op. (E. A. C)— ^-J Stretching sphincter. Dec. 27, 1911, re-entry—for rest and further study. Result: Aug., 1913—General condition much improved. Scar solid. Still has distressing attacks of vomiting and indigestion, for which explora- tory operation has been advised but not urged. Aug. 12, 1915—Brother P-r reports "about the same." Aug. 4, 1916—Physician reports, "She is better, but still has some nausea, and is more or less nervous." 8. Sept. 14, 1911. Male^9. Renal colic and hematuria. Con'ts—Dr. A. L. Chute and Dr. F. B. Harrington. Op.—Cystoscopy and ureteral catheterization by Dr. Chute. Old blood withdrawn from renal pelvis. E-d Symptoms immediately improved and disappeared entirely in a few P-d days. Explor. op. on the kidney was advised but refused. Result: Died in May, 1913. Autopsy—Banti's disease and chronic nephritis. 9. Sept. 1, 1911. Male—12. Fracture of both bones of forearm. Op. (E. A. C.)—Reduction of fragments. Comp.—None. O K Result: Perfect. (Exam. Aug., 1912.) July 25, 1915—Well. 10. Dec. 5, 1911. Male—84. Hemorrhage from a gangrenous melanotic sarcoma of the left cheek. Op. (E. A. C.)—Cocaine. Removal of sar- p d coma and skin plastic to cover defect. Comp.—None. Result: Died of recurrence on Mar. 7, 1912. 11. Dec. 12, 1911. Male—18. Acute hematogenous infection of kidney simulating appendicitis. Operation not advised. Con't—Dr. Farrar Cobb. No op. O K Result: July 19, 1915—Well. July 28, 1916—Letter—Well. 12. Jan. 4, 1912. Case of apoplexy admitted as an emergency under the charge of her private physician. p_j Result: Death on second day. 13. Jan. 17, 1912. Female—43. Persistent vomiting; abdominal pain; painful hemorrhoids, backache, etc. Op. (E. A. C.)—Removal of adherent obliterated appendix; ventral fixation; clamp and cautery for hemorrhoids; dilatation of sphincter ani. Later dilatation of oesophagus O K by Drs. Robinson and Mosher. Comp.—None. Result: Sept. 8, 1916—Exam.—Well, only twinges of the spasm. Scar solid. 14. Jan. 21, 1912. Female—11. Recurrent mild attacks of right-sided abdom. pain. Pre-op. diag.—Chr. appendicitis. Op. (E. A. C.)__Re- O K moval of a strictured appendix. Comp.—None. Result: Sept. 3, 1915—Physician reports, "Well." 13 15. Jan. 27, 1912. Male—16. Large splinter in sole of foot for three O K weeks. Op. (E. A. C.)—Removal of splinter. Cocaine. Comp.—None. Result: July 29, 1915—Well. 16. Feb. 8, 1912. Female—26. Necrotic tuberculous gland of neck; re- current. Op. (E. A. C.)—Thorough curettage. Result: June, 1913—Well. One small palpable gland. In autumn of 1914 was well. May 24, 1916—Re-entry. Annoying pain in right iliac O K region for several months. Pre-op. diag.—Chronic appendicitis. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.) Local anaesthesia. A thickened appendix with concretions and stricture at the base, removed. Comp.—None. July 30, 1916—Letter—Well. Jan. 4, 1917—Re-entry. Excision of painful wart on sole of foot. Otherwise well. 17. Feb. 10, 1912. Female—39. Hemorrhoids. Op. (E. A. C)—Clamp p, ■ and cautery. Comp.—None. J Result: Sept. 8, 1913—Well, except for annoyance from skin tabs which were not removed. 18. Feb. 11, 1912. Female—38. Intermittent right-sided abdominal pain E d and one attack of jaundice. Pre-op. diag.—Gallstones. Op. (E. A. C.) —No gallstones. Appendix removed; not abnormal. Comp.—Mild £ sepsis in abdom. fat, not delaying conval. S. albus. Attack malaria in second week. Parasite demonstrated by Dr. G. C. Shattuck. Result: July 24, 1916—Well. Scar O. K. Minor complaints. 19. Feb. 12, 1912. Female—49. Abdom. pain and fibroid tumors of uterus. Op. (E. A. C.)—Hysterectomy and appendectomy. Ap. strictured and O K adherent. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 5, 1916—Letter—Well. 20. Feb. 13, 1912. Neurasthenic female—44. Persistent vomiting, abdom. pain and low urinary output. Great improvement under proper feed- O ^ ing and care for three weeks. Result: July 26, 1915—Better, "but still has trouble and constipation." 21. Feb. 15, 1912. Male—59. Recurrent attacks of painful indigestion of many years' standing. Recent profuse hematemesis. Pre-op. diag.— _ Duodenal ulcer. Op. (E. A. C.)—Post. gast. ent. and infolding ulcer. ^ **■ Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 4, 1915—Well. Aug. 5, 1916—Letter—Well. Jan. 26, 1917 —Well until within a few months, when hyperacidity symptoms re- turned. Vacation advised. 22. Feb. 15, 1912. Male. Emergency case of severe epistaxis under charge OK of another physician. Result: July 16, 1915—Well. 23. Feb. 24, 1912. Male—59. Comminuted fracture and external displace- ment of head of humerus. Removed to Corey Hill Hospital. Op. (E. A. C.)—Excision of head of humerus by "sabre cut" incision. Comp.—None. n K Result: Aug., 1913—Excellent. Can play a good game of golf " Aug. 23, 1916—"Golf handicap 17." Useful but by no means perfect shoulder. Most of the motion is accomplished with the scapula on the chest wall. Somewhat awkward in many motions, but on the whole satisfactory. 24. Mar. 5, 1912. Male—59. Crippled with infectious arthritis of many joints and suffering from pronounced digestive disturbances of many years' standing; also profuse purulent chronic bronchitis. Referred bv )r. C. F. Painter, to whom he had applied for relief from his arthritis The patient was kept two weeks before operating in hope of improv- ing his general condition, which was wretched. Con't—Dr. R. H. Fitz Pre-op. diag.—Gallstones. Op. (E. A. C.)—Multiple adhesions. Con- 14 tracted gall bladder containing a large stone and connected by tortuous suppurating sinus with duodenum. Cholecystectomy and drainage of sinus. Comp.—Pneumonia and leakage of duodenal contents and finally peritonitis. Result: Lived 13 days. This was a case of diffuse chronic pneumococ- cus infection before operation, for pneumococcus-like organisms were obtained from the sputum and from the stomach washings. The latter came from the stomach tube in the form of false membranes resembling p_j rose leaves in consistency and color. Under the microscope these proved to be almost pure masses of pneumococci. At autopsy pure cultures were also obtained from peritoneal cavity and from joints. The lungs showed multiple chronic bronchiectases and small areas of pneumonic j£-\ consolidation. This case also illustrates the point which has been brought out by E. A. C, that the reason that Courvoisier's law holds true is that contracted gall bladders in the presence of common duct stone probably always have intestinal fistulae at some time. Hence one never finds a contracted gdll bladder that is not adherent to the intestine. 25. Mar. 7, 1912. Female. Under the care of Dr. W. P. Graves. Severe metrorrhagia. Op. (W. P. G.)—Abdom. hysterectomy for uterine in- n v sufficiency. Comp.—None. ^ "• Result: Aug., 1913—No report. 26. Mar. 8, 1912. Female. Under the care of Dr. W. P. Graves. Op.— Plastics on cervix and perineum; ventral fixation; appendectomy. Qr K Comp.—None. Result: Sept. 27, 1915—Dr. G. reports O. K. 27. Mar. 10, 1912. Male—17. Carbuncle of the upper lip. No op. Re- covery, q K Result: Aug. 13, 1915—Well. No scar. 28. Mar. 13, 1912. Female—32. Chronic mastitis and mastodynia. Both nipples had previously been removed by another surgeon. Op. (E. A. C.)—Removal of both breasts. Comp.—None. Result: Sept., 1913—Great relief from the above op. Now has distress- O K ing abdom. symptoms. July 19, 1915—Satisfactory result, but patient has since had an abdominal operation by another surgeon. July 27, 1916 —Physician reports, "Much better this past year." 29. Mar. 28, 1912. Female. Under the care of Dr. W. P. Graves. Back- ache, fatigue and pelvic lacerations. Procidentia. Op. (W. P. G.)— Myomectomy and ventral fixation. Plastic on cervix and ant. and post. colporrhaphy. Comp.—Secondary hemorrhage from cervix of no prac- tical importance. Result: Nov. 14, 1913—Well (physician). 30. Mar. 29, 1912. Female—16. Separation of right sacro-iliac synchon- drosis from an automobile accident. Rest in bed for three weeks. Result: Sept. 9, 1915—Well, except for chronic tonsillitis and chronic 0 -^ organic heart disease, which were present at time of accident. Aug. 21, 1916—Same. 81. Apr. 2, 1912. Male—45. Acute biliary colic and chronic indigestion. Pre-op. diag.—Gallstones. Op. (E. A. C.)—Cholecystostomy and re- moval of stones. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 21, 1913—Well. Slight digestive symptoms. Aug. 19, 1915—Since last report digestive symptoms became worse and op. was E-s again advised. This was done by another surgeon, who writes that he gall bladder was removed and the common duct drained. After this was healed, a hernia in an appendectomy scar was repaired. Later the patient had attacks of abdominal pain with slight jaundice, and in one 15 attack passed a small gallstone. Better since. Aug. 1, 1916—Looks well, but still has numerous minor complaints. Scars normal. Still particular about diet. Has had no attacks of biliary colic. Has acid indigestion and severe headaches. 32. Apr. 7, 1912. Female—40. Intermittent hydro-nephrosis. Palpable tumor in left flank size child's head. Op. (E. A. C)—Kinking of ureter found to be due to aberrant vein to lower pole of kidney. Kinking pre- O K vented by suturing vein to pelvis of kidney. The vein was too large to be safely divided. Comp.—None. Result:"July, 1913—Well. Kidney palpable. July 29, 1916—Letter- Well. 33. Apr. 8, 1912. Female—29. Deep obstructive jaundice and a tumor in epigastrium. Pre-op. diag.—Empyema of gall bladder. Op. (E. A. C.)—The tumor proved to be an enormously distended common duct. 28 ounces of bile were aspirated and several ounces of bile later sponged out. The duct also contained about 2 ounces of muddy material and one very small facetted gallstone. The dilatation extended into the hepatic ducts, but the cystic duct and gall bladder were of normal size and contained normal bile. Much bleeding at the operation; oozing E-j continued from the wound until the 13th day, when after consultation with Dr. M. H. Richardson and Dr. R. H. Fitz transfusion was clone by Dr. Beth Vincent. Bleeding at once ceased and the patient made a good recovery, leaving the hospital on the 54th day with a small biliary sinus. On Aug. 8, 1912, a choledocho-duodenostomy was performed by Dr. Hugh Williams and Dr. E. A. Codman at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Six days after this op. typical cholemic bleeding again occurred to some extent, but was controlled by local packing and by injection of rabbit serum, 15 c.c, on the 14th day. No other comp. Result: Dec. 9, 1913—Well, but has had several attacks of mild jaun- dice with slight pain. Feb., 1914—Well. Aug. 1, 1916—Brother reports, "Fairly well." Occasional pain in region of scar. 34. Apr. 10, 1912. Male—44. Inflamed perineal sinus exactly resembling a pilonidal sinus, but extending anteriorly from the rectum. Op. (E. OK A. C.)—Cocaine. Opening and packing sinus. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 10, 1916—Exam.—Well. No scar of sinus. 35. Apr. 16, 1912. Female—37. Vague abdom. discomfort, constipation and inertia. For diagnosis and X-ray. Explor. op. was advised but p not urged, under the diagnosis of ptosis and retroversion. Op. refused. Result: Sept. 4, 1913—No improvement. July, 1915—Phys. reports, I? a "Patient has since had an abdominal operation by another surgeon." July 28, 1916—Writes that the operation she had after leaving this hospital surely has been beneficial. 36. Apr. 20, 1912. Male—40. Vague abdom. discomfort. For diag. and X-rays. Palpable tumors, evidently tuberculous mesenteric glands were found. Severe degree of ptosis. The patient, on hearing that the chance . of any relief from operation was small, did not wish to be operated k-J upon. Result: Aug., 1913—No improvement. Sept. 19, 1913—Decided to take r-a any risk. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.) at Copp Hospital, Cambridge. Removal of four broken-down tuberculous glands of mesentery near *~ ligament of Treitz. Removal of a greatly dilated prolapsed cecum with ascending colon and a small portion of ileum and a stenosed appendix. Acute dilatation of stomach on 3d day, relieved by repeated lavage Result: Recovered from the operation, but died on Oct. 16 of pneu- monia of six days' duration. 37. Apr. 22, 1912. Male—21. Right inguinal hernia. Op. (E. A. C )— q t^ Ferguson method. Comp.—None. Result: In 1916, friend reported, "Well." 16 38. May 6, 1912. Female—51. Cancer of right breast. Op. (E. A. C.)— Amputation and dissection of axilla. Axillary glands involved. Comp. —None. r p_j Result: Dec. 1, 1913—No sign of recurrence. Pain in arm. Died in summer of 1914. Recurrence in spine? 39. June 3, 1912. Female—67. Details the same as case 38. Comp.— _ Slight necrosis edges of skin flaps. E"S Result: Died in July, 1913, of spinal metastasis. P-d 40. June 2, 1912. Male—19. Septic olecranon bursitis. Op. (E. A. C.)— Incision and packing of bursa. Comp.—None. r> K Result: No report. 41. June 5, 1912. Female—78. Epithelioma of eyelid. Op. (G. W. M )— Removal of growth. Comp.—None. OK Result: Unknown. 42. June 8, 1912. Female—54. Recently recovered from a subacute attack of appendicitis. During this attack she had been seen in consultation by E. A. C. and conservative treatment advised, because her symptoms suggested that some other serious abdominal condition al^o existed— probably gallstones. As a difficult operation was to be avoided if pos- sible in a private house, it was felt wiser to wait until the patient could come to Boston. Op. (E. A. C.)—The gall bladder was normal; the appendix (still subacutely inflamed) was removed. There were a few small uterine fibroids which were not removed. The left tube was the size of a banana and was closed at the fimbriated end, and presented the appearance of a chronic hydrops. It was removed entire and after removal showed on section a remarkable pedunculated cystic papillom- atous tumor. The specimen was examined by Dr. W. F. Whitney and was pronounced a unique case of carcinoma of the Fallopian tube. It P-d is preserved in the Warren Museum of the Harvard Medical School. From the specimen alone one would say that the possibility of recur- rence was infinitesimal, so much healthy proximal tissue was removed with it; and yet the sequel showed a rapid recurrence, for 6 months later a second operation was done by E. A. C. at the patient's home and a diffuse carcinomatosis of the peritoneum found. The omentum was studded with the same minute beautiful yellow green and orange cysts which characterized the original tumor. Result: The patient has since been treated by her physician under the direction of Dr. R. B. Greenough and Dr. E. H. Risley with cancer serum. Sept. 23, 1913—Is still living, but rapidly failing. Nov. 29, 1913—Apparent improvement. Able to be up (physician). Died Jan. 6, 1914. Autopsy—Diffuse carcinomatosis. 43. June 8, 1912. Emergency case of hemiplegia under the charge of another physician. ^ , Result: Death on 16th day. F"d 44. June 9, 1912. Male—38. Perineal urethral abscess. Op. (G. W. M.) —Incision and drainage. Dilatation of stricture. O K Result: Aug. 8, 1916—Dr. M. reports, "Perfectly well May, 1916." 45. June 10, 1912. Female—54. Bad organic heart lesion. Sought relief from recurrent right-sided abdominal pain and digestive disturbances. X-ray examination unexpectedly showed a large stone in the right kidney. The combined urine was normal. Ureteral catheterization _ . showed that both kidneys secreted normal urine. The pheno-sulph. test **"J appearing in t\ minutes and showing 7% on right and 23% on left. n Op. (E. A. C.)—Knowing that the left kidney was sound and believing C as I do that one sound kidney is better than one sound one and one bad one, and that kidneys long blocked by stone seldom return to normal 17 after nephrolithotomy, I removed the right kidney. After removal it showed besides the large stone several small ones one of which.was so buried in the kidney substance that it would not have been reached by pyelotomv. The patient made a good operative recovery. The wound was soundly'healed and she was beginning to sit up, when on the 19th dav she suddenly died. No autopsy was obtained, so it is uncertain whether death was due to the heart lesion or to pulmonary embolism from the renal vein, probably the latter. 46. June 13, 1912. Female—59. Purulent discharge from the right nipple and chronic mastitis. Op. (E. A. C)-Excision of right breast and removal of an epithelioma of the nose (incidentally discovered). Comp. \J iv —NonCt Result: Aug. 25, 1913—Well. Aug. 21, 1916—Exam.—Scars O. K. General health good. 47. June 18, 1912. Female—22. Dysmenorrhcea. Op. (E. A. C.)—Dila- tation of cervix. Comp.—None. „„,«,* P-d Result: July 25, 1915—Great improvement. (Letter.) July 27, 1916— Mother writes that she is better, but still has menstrual pain at times. 48. July 1, 1912. Male—6. Constipation. Congenital dilatation of the n «- sigmoid. Radioscopic examination and observation. Op. not advised. U Result: Aug., 1913—Somewhat improved by conservative treatment. 49. July 5, 1912. Female—29. Marked neurasthenia and subsiding acute appendicitis. Op. (E. A. C.)—Appendectomy. Ap. subacutely inflamed. Comp.—None. . n K Result: Sept. 20,1913—Greatly improved but still has vague abdominal symptoms. Aug. 10, 1916—Physician writes, "She says she is feeling better than she has for years." 60. July 6, 1912. Male—85. Typical symptoms of acute appendicitis of 12 hours' duration. Op. (E. A. C.)—Gangrenous appendicitis. Appen- dectomy and drainage. Comp.—None. E-s Result: Oct., 1913—Well, except for small hernia in scar. July 19, 1915 —Well. Hernia not examined. Aug. 18, 1916—Telephone—" No further symptoms." 51. July 8, 1912. Female—42. Tumor of breast. Pre-op. diag. in favor of fibroma. Op. (Dr. C. C. Simmons present in consultation) (E. A. C.) —After exploration with cocaine, amputation of breast and dissection of axilla under ether, one axillary gland involved. Path, report—Cancer. Result: Nov., 1913—Well (exam.). A small cyst in other breast. Feb., E-d 1914—Cyst has entirely disappeared. Well. July 16, 1915—Under treat- ment for fracture of olecranon. Aug. 5, 1916—Exam.—Well. Union of olecranon excellent, but lacks about 45' of flexion. Weight normal. No recurrence. 52. Aug. 3, 1912. Female. Lipoma of forearm. Op. (E. A. C.)—Excision. O K Comp.—None. Result: No report. 63. Aug. 12, 1912. Female—37. Cauliflower cancer at umbilicus size of fist, infiltrating the adjacent muscles and having a fecal fistula in its center. Pelvic induration. Patient bedridden. Operation at first re- fused by E. A. C. on the ground of inoperability. As the patient and p j her husband begged that some attempt be made, even at great risk, a consultation was held with Drs. C. A. Porter, D. F. Jones and H. Cabot. Dr. Cabot had some years previously successfully removed a tuberculous stricture from the patient's rectum. It was decided to attempt opera- tion and Dr. Porter consented to do it. Op. (C. A. P. and E. A. C.)__ The growth with an oval area containing about one-half the abdominal wall with most of the transverse colon and omentum were removed 18 en masse; end to end anastomosis of colon. When this had been com- pleted another annular carcinoma of the sigmoid was found buried in pelvic adhesions. This was obviously causing obstruction and yet could not be removed; a lateral anastomosis was done which successfully short-circuited it. At this time her condition, though one of shock, seemed viable if the abdominal wall could be closed. This seemed im- possible, for the edges would not meet by several inches even under tension. Dr. Porter resorted to an expedient which he has before used but never published. With a few sweeps of his hand he mobilized the whole peritoneum back to the psoas muscle on each side. The intestines were easily sewed up in this free membrane as in a bag. Over this the fascia and skin were pulled as far as possible, but could by no means be brought together, and gauze was packed down to the peritoneal bag. lhe patient recovered in spite of leakage from the colon anastomosis and a troublesome fecal fistula. (I have no hesitation in saving that this was the most remarkable abdominal operation I have ever seen which resulted successfully; nor have I ever seen such courage as this patient exhibited both before and after her operation.) Result: Sept. 1, 1913-Her husband (a doctor) writes that in spite of a troublesome sinus she is up and about every day and that there is no sign of return of the growth. Died in Nov., 1913. 64. Aug. 19, 1912. Female. Fracture of clavicle. Result: Aug., 1913—Well, but has considerable bony callus. 65. Aug. 23, 1912. Female—79. Extensive carcinoma of thyroid. Con't —Dr. C. A. Porter. Op. (C. A. P. and E. A. C.)—Radical dissection. lhe growth had penetrated the capsule and invaded the carotid sheath. All visible malignant tissue was removed. Comp.—None. ?«£*?•' The Patient Ieft the hospital with the wound healed on the 15th day. Recurrence was evident within a week and at once became fulminating. Death occurred within a month, at which time the re- current growth was twice the size as at the time of operation. 66. Sept. 1, 1912. Female—36. Had suffered from abdominal pain sugges- tive of duodenal ulcer and had previously had an unsuccessful appen- dectomy (?) by another surgeon. Pre-op. diag.—Peripyloric adhesions. Op. (E. A. C.)—Multiple adhesions separated and raw surfaces covered by peritoneal plastic. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 2, 1916—Letter—Well. 57. Sept. 7, 1912. Male-^15. "Neuritis" and subacromial bursitis. Op. (E. A. C.)—Excision of a portion of bursa. Comp.—Protracted con- valescence with much pain. Result: Aug., 1913—Well, except for occasional twinges in shoulder. Sept. 8, 1915—Well. July 28, 1916—Letter—No inconvenience since last report. Patient states that shoulder has never regained its normal size in spite of exercise. 58. Sept. 13, 1912. Very stout male—54. Right inguinal hernia. Op. (E. A. C. Spinal anaesthesia by Dr. Freeman Allen)—Radical cure (Bassini). Comp.—None. O Result: Aug. 28, 1913—Well. Aug. 18, 1915—Well, except for same chr. cough. July 27, 1916—Letter—Well. 59, Sept. 18, 1912. Female—58. Constipation, weakness, vague stomach symptoms, and a very tight sphincter ani. Op. (E. A. C.)—Proctoscopy and stretching sphincter. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 18, 1913—Much relieved. No constipation. Slight hyper- acidity. Aug. 21, 1916—Exam.—Much improved, but still under treat- ment by physician for acid indigestion. No constipation. 19 E O K 60. Sept. 19, 1912. Female. Deformed and painful great toe nail, previ- ously unsuccessfully operated on by another surgeon. Op. (E. A. C) O K —Removal of nail and excision of matrix. Comp.—None. Result: Nov. 1, 1913—Well. April 18, 1916—No further trouble. Scar rough and horny. 61. Oct. 11, 1912. Female—9. Under the care of Dr. Harvey Cushing. Acute internal hydrocephalus, complicating an interpeduncular (hypo- physial) tumor. Op. (H. C.)—Callosal puncture and ventricular drain- p . age. Relief of pressure symptoms. Comp.—None. ^"d Result: Aug., 1913—Condition unchanged. Dec, 1913—Has since been operated on by Dr. Cushing at the Brigham Hospital. June, 1915— "Her father states that her condition is about as a year ago." Brigham Hospital, No. 278 and No. 1217. July 31, 1916—Dr. C. reports, "Con- dition unchanged." O K 62- 0ct- 1L 1912- See note on case 125- Result: July 31, 1916—Dr. B. reports, "Well." 63. Oct. 17, 1912. Female—64. Under the care of Dr. Harvey Cushing. Major trigeminal neuralgia. Op. (H. C.) Oct. 19, 1912—Sensory root avulsion. Comp.—None. Result: July 31, 1916—Dr. C. reports, "Well." 64. Male—35. Right-sided abdominal pain. Pre-op. diag.—Appendicitis. O K Op. (G. W. M.)—Appendectomy for subacute appendix. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 13, 1913—Well. Gained 30 pounds. Dr. M. reports, "Perfectly well June, 1916." 65. Oct. 19, 1912. Male—52. Under the care of Dr. Harvey Cushing. Pituitary struma with hypopituitarism and blindness. Op. (H. C.) P-d Oct. 21, 1912—Transphenoidal sellar decompression with partial re- moval of struma. Comp.—None. Result: July 31, 1916—Dr. C. reports, "Condition unchanged." 66. Oct. 22, 1912. Male—20. Epilepsy. Old gunshot wound of head which p , had caused depressed fracture of skull. Con't—Dr. Harvey Cushing. Op. not advised. Result: Aug., 1913—Imp'roved under bromides. 67. Oct. 22, 1912. Male—68. Under the care of Dr. Harvey Cushing. n v Major trigeminal neuralgia. Op. (H. C.)—Sensory root avulsion. w *■ Comp.—None. Result: July 31, 1916—Dr. C. reports, "Well." 68. Oct. 23, 1912. Male—43. Pain, constipation and palpable rectal tumor. Pre-op. diag.—Cancer of rectum. Con't—Dr. D. F. Jones. Op. (E. A. C.)—Exploration showed a high cancer of rectum with adhesion to bladder, and multiple metastases scattered over pelvic peritoneum. The P-d splenic flexure was sutured to abdominal wall in such a manner as to make cocaine enterostomy easy later. Comp.—None. Result: The patient returned to his work, but the enterostomy was necessitated several months later and since then two secondary opera- tions have been done; but in Nov., 1913, the patient was rapidly failimr Died in Dec, 1913. F * e' 69. Oct. 28, 1912. Male—54. Under the care of Dr. Harvey Cushing Major trigeminal neuralgia. Op. (H. C.)—Sensory root avulsion! '-' ^ Comp.—None. Result: Mar. 16, 1916—Dr. C. reports, "Well." 70. Nov. 1, 1912. Male—5$. Under the care of Dr. Harvey Cushinn. O K Cerebral birth palsy. No op. g" Result: No report. 20 71. Nov. 1, 1912. Male—64. Under the care of Dr. Harvey Cushing. Major trigeminal neuralgia. Op. (H. C.)—Sensory root avulsion. 0 v Comp.—None. u **■ Result: July 31, 1916—Dr. C. reports, "Well." 72. Nov. 6, 1912. Male. Right inguinal hernia. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—Ferguson method. Comp.—None. q jr Result: Aug., 1913—Well (physician). Nov. 4, 1916—Friend reports him "Well." 73. Dec. 4, 1912. Female. Turkey bone impacted in oesophagus. Bone pushed into stomach by bougie. Comp.—None. O K Result: Sept., 1913—No further trouble from this cause. 74. Dec 4, 1912. Female—30. For many years had suffered from con- stipation, lassitude, toxic headaches, undue fatigue, dysmenorrhoea, abdominal discomfort and soreness. The appendix had been removed a year previously by E. A. C. Pre-op. diag.—Intestinal stasis. Operation was undertaken with the intention of doing iliosigmoidostomy. Op. (E. A. C.)—Double hydrosalpinx with enormous flaccid dilatation of both tubes was found. Double salpingectomy and peritoneal plastic. ^*s Comp.—Slight serous discharge from wound causing no delay in con- , valescence. P-d Result: Aug. 24, 1913—Greatly improved, but still has toxic headaches. Jan., 1914—Well, except slight headaches. July 18, 1915—"I am enjoy- ing better health than ever before. Once in a while sick times with my stomach." Aug. 9, 1916—Letter—Not as well as last year. Abdominal soreness, but no pain. Other minor symptoms. 75. Dec. 5, 1912. Male. Injury to elbow. X-ray. No fracture. Prompt q jj recovery. No report. 76. Dec. 7, 1912. Male—43. Symptoms of duodenal ulcer for many years. Persistent vomiting, loss of compensation in muscular power of stomach, arterio-sclerosis, marked albuminuria. Bid. pressure 240. This patient was kept under lavage for 9 days to restore the compensation of the stomach. The operation was then done without post-operative pain or shock under the principles of anoci-association. Op. (E. A. C.)—Moy- „ , nihan operation of gastro-enterostomy and infolding of duodenal ulcer. Comp.—None. Result: The patient had no return of stomach symptoms during his life. He returned to hard work as a lawyer and seemed in better health than for years until May, when he was taken with acute cardio-renal symptoms and died on May 14, 1913. 77. Dec. 9, 1912. Female—59. Recent attacks of gallstone colic. Op. (E. A. C.)—Cholecystostomy for cholelithiasis. Ap. adherent. Appendec- tomy. Comp.—None. Result: Sept., 1913—Well. July 17, 1915—Well. Not exam. Aug. 1, 1916—Letter—"During the last year or so I have had several attacks of pain exactly like the old ones and typical of gallstones, but not quite so severe, though on one occasion I packed a suit case, expecting to sojourn with you again." (P.S. After completion of analysis.) April 17, 1917. Re-entry for persistent biliary colic recurring at short intervals. General malaise. Op. (E. A. C. and G. F. L., Jr.)—Exten- sive adhesions found in whole right upper quadrant. A small gall bladder contracted on a single gallstone was removed with great diffi- culty. (The five gallstones removed at the previous operation had been black and friable, but this one was lemon-yellow, hard and crystalline. The mucosa was studded with crystalline deposits and had the "straw- berry" appearance.) The dissection was extremely difficult on account 21 of the old adhesions, fat, and high position of the gall bladder. The common duct was very small and thin-walled, so that I felt sure it contained no stones. The gall bladder was freed and the cystic duct tied off. At this point there was a sharp hemorrhage from the cystic artery, which was soon checked with a clamp, and a tie placed, lhe tie on the cystic duct was left long, as is my custom in cholecystectomy, so that, should a stone in the common duct be overlooked and jaundice develop, the tie could be pulled off. The wound was closed with cigar- ette drains. Following the operation there seemed to be an undue amount of post-operative pain. On the second day slight jaundice began to de- velop, but at the same time a profuse discharge of bile came through the wound and the intense pain abated somewhat. On the third and fourth days the jaundice deepened, and yet the bile drained even more profusely. On the fourth day the temperature and respiration rose, and signs of consolidation in the right base appeared soon after. The tie was pulled off the cystic duct under the supposition that the jaundice might be due to a stone in the common duct which had escaped our notice. The biliary drainage through the wound I supposed due to the oozing of the raw surface of the liver in which the gall bladder had been embedded. The patient died on the seventh day. During all this anxious period the condition of the abdomen and of the wound itself remained so good that I was sure that no peritonitis existed. There was evidently some consolidation in the right base, but the patient's condition seemed worse than could be accounted for by this alone. I was so sure that I had done the operation correctly, that I never once suspected the true cause of the unusual condition—division and ligation of the hepatic duct. A post-mortem examination through the incision showed that the cut ends of the hepatic duct lay free in the wound. There was no sepsis and the tissues looked exactly as they had done when I closed the wound after operation, except that the tie had been pulled off the cystic duct and there was no tie on the proximal end of the hepatic duct—where I remembered having placed one at the time of the hemorrhage, and had supposed the duct was a vein. In other words, I had made an error of skill of the most gross character, and even then failed to recognize that I had made it. More than that, I would not have believed it, unless I had made the post- mortem examination myself and seen it with my own eyes. It was then clear why the intense pain came in the first 24 hours (total biliary obstruction from ligation of the hepatic duct) ; why it abated when the biliary discharge came (hyperdistention of the duct pushed off the tie) ; why the jaundice came even when the wound was discharging bile (absorption of bile in the blood for the first 24 hours), and why the abdominal condition was good (the wound was clean). I think the patient died from pneumonia, but she could not have lived with a divided hepatic duct, and she might have survived the pneumonia if not handicapped by the temporary biliary obstruction. To such errors experience owes its value. Some of the knowledge thus gained cannot be transmitted, but it needs only this case to teach me that if a case of cholecystectomy shows excessive pain in the first 24 hours which abates on the second day at the time of slight jaundice and an excess of biliary discharge, probably the hepatic duct has been cut and ligated, even if the surgeon who operated is sure that it was not. 78. Dec. 16, 1912. Female—54. Had been operated on by E. A. C. three years previously for cancer of the breast. For more than a year before entrance she had showed symptoms of a metastasis in the dorsal spine. There was intense girdle pain, excessive nausea and incessant vomiting. 22 For three weeks no nourishment had been retained and even a grain of morphine in 24° failed to keep her comfortable. She was taken into the hospital for diagnosis and an X-ray exam, of the spine. The latter showed a well-marked defect in the body of a dorsal vertebra. Abdom- inal operation was considered because for years she had had symptoms of gallstones and it was felt that possibly the latter might be causing the present symptoms. Operation was decided against by E. A. C. on the ground that the patient's condition was too poor and offered very little hope. Emaciated, almost pulseless, she was taken home to die. Result: After her return home this patient was treated by her husband (a physician) and another physician and by a Christian Scientist. For several weeks she lay between life and death but eventually recovered. On Aug. 26, 1913, her husband wrote as follows: "My dear doctor: I am glad to report that Mrs. ------ is gaining every day. She has gained six pounds since the first day of July. She is better than she ever has been. She is able to eat things she has never been able to eat before since she was twenty years old, and digest them perfectly with- out any trouble. Has no gases and is free from pain of any kind in „ ,- her spine. I feel satisfied that her trouble was gallstones, and I believe she expelled a large one on the 25th or 26th of December, as on that day p . we had a great deal of trouble during a movement. And after that time I examined and weighed everything that entered her stomach or left her, but she certainly is better than she has been for years." This was certainly a recovery "when the doctors had given her up." It was as miraculous as any surgical "cure" that I have ever seen. Should it be placed to the credit of Christian Science or added to the lists of the Follies of Wisdom, at least it will always leave me with some hope for hopeless cases. (E. A. C.) On May 2, 1914, reported well. July 29, 1915—Husband reports symptoms suggestive of recur- rence in lungs; dyspnoea, loss of weight, and abdominal attacks requir- ing morphia. Aug. 21, 1916—Husband reports that on Dec. 3, 1915, an exploratory laparotomy for pelvic symptoms was done by another surgeon. Metastases in the liver, and other abdominal metastases were found. At present, patient is in fair condition and still enjoys life. Mar. 23, 1917—Seen at patient's home. Is able to sit up and obtains much comfort from Christian Science. Somewhat emaciated. Abdomen greatly enlarged. Evident metastases in cervical glands. T9. Dec. 20, 1912. Female—68. Carcinoma of the right side of the tongue. O K Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—Removal of right half of the tongue and dissection of the right side of the neck. Drainage. Path, report— Cancer. Comp.—None. Result: Feb. 25, 1917—Died of apoplexy. Had had no recurrence of cancer. 80. Dec. 22, 1912. Male—71. Hematuria from hypertrophied prostate. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M. Spinal anaesthesia by Dr. Freeman Allen) —Suprapubic prostatectomy. Comp.—Double epididymitis. Re-entry „ May 19, 1913. Transient attack of epididymitis which quieted down 8 with rest. Result: Aug. 23, 1913—Well. Bacteriuria. Mar. 30, 1915—Died of angina pectoris and grippe. 81. Dec. 30, 1912. See note on case 125. Result: July 31, 1916—Dr. B. reports, "Well." u K 82. Dec. 30, 1912. Female—30. Dysmenorrhoea. Op. (G. W. M.)—Dila- tation and curettage. O K Result: Sept., 1913—Well. 23 83. Jan. 10, 1913. Male—8. Congenital right inguinal hernia. Op. (G. W M.)—Radical cure of right inguinal hernia. Comp.—None. O K Result: Au A. C. and G. W. M.)—Excision of an intussusception of small bowel in which the advancing point was a Meckel's diverticulum. Lateral anastomosis and temporary proximal enterostomy which was closed on E-d *ne f°urth day without ether. Comp.—None. Result: Sept. 8, 1913—Re-entry for removal of proximal end of bowel which practically made a hernia in scar. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.) —Old scar excised and redundant portion of bowel removed. Careful peritoneal plastic. Comp.—None. Result: May 2, 1914—Well (exam.). No hernia. Slight pain in scar. Aug. 17, 1916—Physician reports, "Patient has some trouble with bowels, but as well as before intestinal obstruction occurred." 106. Mar. 23, 1913. S. female—32. Large abdominal tumor. Pre-op. diag. —Large fibroid or cyst of ovary. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)— O K Hysterectomy for fibroid tumor. Comp.—None. Result: Aug., 1913—Well. July 22, 1915—Scar O. K. but rather weak. Ever since operation has noticed hot flashing. Aug. 8, 1916—Well, though still has hot flashes. 107. Mar. 24, 1913. Male—40. Recurrent attacks right-sided epididymitis. O K °p" (G" W" M-)—Epididymectomy. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 8, 1916—Dr. M. reports, "Still has thickening in cord on left." 6 108. Mar. 26, 1913. Female—24. Varicose veins of right leg. Under the p.d care of Dr. Hermann Bucholz. Op. (H. B.)—Partial excision of veins. Comp.—None. E-s Result: July 25, 1915—Still suffers a good deal from pain in the lee and arch of foot. (Letter to Dr. B.) ° 26 109. Mar. 26, 1913. Male—25. Chronic inflammatory epididymitis. Double. Op. (G. W. M.)—Partial double epididymectomy. Comp.—None. Result: Aug., 1913—Well. Re-entry, Sept. 20, 1913—Remains of right E-j epididymis removed. Drainage. Sinus to stump of left wound removed. Comp.—None. E-d Result: Nov. 1, 1913—Well. June, 1915—Dr. M. reports: "Although patient has no symptoms, there is still thickening in stump of vas, and twice since operation a small sinus has broken open (Tuber.?), although path, report was chronic inflamm." 110. Mar. 27, 1918. Male—57. Tumor in right iliac fossa. Cachexia; loss of weight and abdominal pain. Pre-op. diag.—Cancer of cecum. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—Excision of cecum, ascending colon and a portion of ileum and another coil of small intestine together with a por- tion of the abdominal wall en masse. Four end closures and two lateral anastomoses of the intestine. Plastic of abdominal wall to cover defect, q jr This operation was done under the principles of anoci-association. It was started with a pulse of 72, took 3$ hours and finished with a pulse of 80. There was no obvious shock and almost no post-operative pain. Comp.—Serous discharge along the course of wick—probably ascitic peritoneal leakage. Result: Apr. 17, 1917—Exam.—Well. Scar rather weak. No evidence of recurrence. 111. Mar. 27, 1913. Male—68. Cystitis and gout which were temporarily relieved by rest in bed. Prostatectomy advised and refused. p_r Result: July 20, 1915—Writes that he is still alive but gives no details. June 25, 1916—Son reports that he is about the same. 112. Apr. 4, 1913. Stout female—47. Stiff, partially flexed knee and symp- toms of dislocation of semilunar cartilage of many years' duration. No relief from a recent ether manipulation by another surgeon. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—A damaged semilunar cartilage removed in halves by ant. and post, incisions. Comp.—None except induration in popliteal space, probably from escaping fluid. E-j Result: Aug. 14, 1913—Patient still limps badly and motion of knee is a little less than 90 degrees, but still improving. Apr., 1914—Much improved. July 21, 1915—Walks without limp, unless tired. Leg serviceable but still cannot bend knee beyond right angle. Has to sidle downstairs. Dec. 30, 1916—Exam.—Walks without limp, but flexion only to right angle. 113. Apr. 6, 1913. Male—12. Acute right-sided abdominal pain. Diag.— Acute appendicitis. Op. (G. W. M.)—Appendectomy. Appendix gan- q K grenous. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 8, 1916—Dr. M. reports, "Well." 114. Apr. 13, 1913. S. female—46. Irregular fibrous enlargement of both breasts. Pre-op. diag.—Chronic mastitis. Con't—Dr. R. B. Greenough. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—Amputation of both breasts. Comp.— None. Path. exam, showed fibrosis with nearly complete disappearance „ of glandular tissue. In one#breast was an area of cancer so small that ^"s the whole tumor was visible* in low power field of microscope. Comp.— A slight necrosis of edge of skin size half dime. Result: Aug., 1913—Well, except for a small uncomfortable tab on scar. This was removed under cocaine. Aug. 19, 1916—Letter—Well. 115. Apr. 22, 1913. S. female—30. Clear history of repeated attacks of ' appendiceal colic. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—Appendectomy under local anaesthesia with a few breaths of nitrous oxide. Appendix stric- q g tured; filled with concretions. Scarcely any operative or post-operative pain. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 2, 1916—"I have never felt more absolutely well." 27 116. Apr. 23, 1913. Nervous female—24. Persistent pain in right iliac region worse at ctm. Pre-op. diag.—Cecum mobile. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—Appendix was found plastered on cecum by a "Jackson's veil." Partial rotation of cecum so that ileum entered from behind; P-d appendectomy; appendix normal. Comp.—None. Result: Greatly improved by operation, but still has vague pain on right of abdomen. July 27. 1915—Scar O. K. Many vague complaints, including dysmenorrhoea, dvspareunia, leucorrhoea, and sterility. Looks perfectly well. Feb. 12, 1917—Exam.—Much depressed. No benefit from operation. Nevertheless, physical examination is negative. 117. Apr. 24, 1913. Female—26. Persistent abdominal discomfort, nausea, constipation, weakness and nervousness. Came for diagnosis and X-ray examination. A diagnosis of general ptosis was made and operation P-d was not advised. Careful instruction in hygiene was given. Result: Aug. 29, 1913—Considerable improvement but same symptoms persist (letter). Aug. 6, 1915—Has improved steadily, but this summer has had several attacks of "colitis." Nov. 10, 1916—Letter—Well, except for some attacks of colitis last winter. 118. Apr. 30, 1913. Male—38. Dislocation of wrist and fracture of carpal scaphoid of several weeks' duration. Under ether without incision the dislocation was reduced and the scaphoid fragment replaced by E. A. C.'s method. Comp.—None. P-r Result: Aug., 1913—Fair motion. Improving. Aug. 8, 1915—Exam.— Good serviceable wrist, but some tenderness and pain on forced flexion and extension. Nov. 29, 1916—Strained wrist a week ago. States that wrist bothers him a little all the time. Advised to have scaphoid frag- ment removed. Refused. 119. May 2, 1913. S. female—43. E. A. C. had operated for cancer of the breast 3 years before. Palpable supraclavicular gland. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—Glands removed from supraclavicular space proved to j£_d be normal. Comp.—None. Result: Aug., 1913—Well. May, 1914—Has since been op. for glands in opposite axilla. Died at Huntington Hospital (No. CI—15—20) on Mar. 5, 1915, of metastases in lungs. 120. May 9, 1913. Male—25. Traumatic amputation of finger. Op. (G. W. M.)—Reamputation. Comp.—None. O K Result: Aug., 1913—Well. Aug. 8, 1916—Dr. M. reports, "Small piece of new finger nail removed in July, 1916." 121. May 12, 1913. S. female—24. Recurrent attacks of pain in right iliac fossa, dysmenorrhoea and prolapse of the right ovary. Pre-op. diag.— Chronic appendicitis. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—Removal of a strictured appendix and suspension of right ovary. Comp.—None. Result: Apr., 1914—Well. July 30, 1915—At present somewhat run down, but symptoms for which operation was undertaken were com- pletely relieved. Scar solid. Aug. 12, 1916—Exam.—Married since O K operation. Lacerated from instrumental delivery from which she is still convalescent. No further symptoms similar to those previous to opera- tion. Perineorrhapy advised. Re-entered Dec. 29, 1916. Op. (E. A. C. and W. P. C.)—Extremely bad lacerations of the cervix, lateral walls of the vagina and anal sphincter were repaired by plastic operation. Levator ani on left side had been practically destroyed, and vaginal scar had healed to inner side of pubes. Comp.—Slight post-operative hemorrhage and grippe. June 20, 1917—Husband reports, "Well." 122. May 15, 1913. M. female—42. Diagnosis—Gallstones. Lost her courage p_r and went home without operation. Result—No report. 28 123. May 19, 1913. Female—29. Admitted as an emergency. Hysteria. Result: Sept., 1913—No report. Aug. 24, 1915—Physician reports O K improvement. 124. May 19, 1913. Female—45. Hematemesis, distress and vomiting. Also profuse uterine hemorrhage and abdominal tumors. Pre-op. diag.— Ulcer of stomach and uterine fibroid. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.) —No ulcer. Hysterectomy for multiple fibroid tumors. Appendectomy. Comp.—None. E-d Result: Aug., 1913—Progressive improvement, but has not yet re- covered from her chronic invalidism. July 21, 1915—Still has hemop- E-s? tysis, but this is evidently not from stomach. Hot flashes, indigestion, and general invalidism. Not exam. Physician writes that patient died June 5, 1916, of hemorrhage from stomach and bowels, in spite of transfusion which temporarily did much good. 125. May 19, 1913. This case and also cases 62, 81, 97, 100, were tertiary cases treated with salvarsan. All were improved. No more cases of this kind will be accepted. P-d Result: Sept. 27, 1915—Dr. B. reports that patient died of specific disease of spinal cord. 126. May 20, 1913. Female—36. Three attacks of right-sided abdominal pain. Pre-op. diag.—Chronic appendicitis. Op. (G. W. M.)—Appen- q jr dectomy. Freeing of abdominal adhesions. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 8, 1916—Dr. M. reports, "Well, 1915." 127. May 22, 1913. Male—49. Acute empyema of unknown origin, pre- ceded by an alveolar abscess. Condition very poor. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—Resection of rib and drainage. Comp.—None. Result: Sept. 25, 1913—Still discharge from wound. General condition P"d excellent. June 8, 1915—Later thoracoplasty at P. B. B. Hosp. Sudden collapse during dressing at dispensary at P. B. B. Hosp. Admitted, ^ case No. (2557). Result: Died twelve days later—probably from cerebral embolism and brain abscess. 128. May 23, 1913. Male—57. Right inguinal hernia. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—Local anaesthesia. Ferguson method. Comp.—None. O K Result: Aug. 9, 1916—Letter—Well. 129. May 26, 1913. Female—26. Severe constant abdominal pain in lower left quadrant. Pre-op. diag.—Chronic salpingitis and retroversion. Op. (G. W. M.)—Left salpingectomy. Left oophorectomy, appendectomy and ventral suspension. Comp.—None. . Result: Aug., 1913—Well. June, 1915—Dr. M. reports patient better, E-j but recently has had signs of pelvic inflammation which have subsided. Aug. 8, 1916—Dr. M. reports: "Had abdominal pain for one month in January, 1916. Since then has gained weight and is well except for flat foot." 130. May 26, 1913. Male—44. Septic dog bite of leg and popliteal abscess. Op. (E. A. C.)—Incision and curettage. Comp.—None. O K Result: Apr. 1, 1916—Letter—Well. 131. May 28, 1913. Male—52. Hand crippled by a painful swelling of the tendon sheaths of the wrist and palm extending into the little finger. Pre-op. diag.—Tuberculous tenosynovitis. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.) __Amputation of little finger with thorough dissection of gelatinous tissue from tendons of palm and wrist, the annular ligament being g^ divided. Closed without drainage. Path, report showed chronic inflam- matory tissue not inconsistent with a tertiary or tuberculous lesion. Wasserman reaction was positive. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 20, 1915—Well. Useful hand but ring finger does not have quite perfect flexion. 29 132. May 29, 1913. An obese male—42. Right inguinal hernia. Op. (G. ^ • O K M.)—Radical cure of right inguinal hernia. Result: June, 1916—Well. (Dr. M.) 183. June 8, 1913. Male—68. Ulcerated carcinoma of floor of mouth at frenum and attached to gum. Op. (E. A. C)—Wide excision of ulcer- ated area with removal of 1} inches alveolar process and dissection of O K submental and submaxillary glands through floor of mouth. Wound packed without sutures. Comp.—None. Result: Aug., 1918—Well. Minute sinus in gum. May 2, 1914—Re- ported to be well. Dec. 9, 1916—Well. 134. June 4, 1913. Male—69. Right inguinal hernia. Op. (E. A. C.)— Bassini. Double sac. Comp.—None. 0 v Result: Aug. 23, 1916—Letter—Well. "My back is about the same. u K I still play golf. Got 90 yesterday for 18 holes. Used to go around in the 80's. My handicap is 26. Play tennis also. That is too strenuous for an old chap of 73." 135. June 6, 1913. Thin feeble female—58. Marked visceral ptosis; com- plaining of vague abdominal pain and distress. X-ray exam., etc. O K Operation not advised. Result: Aug. 2, 1916—Physician reports that patient was "never better in her life." She has never been operated upon. 136. June 11, 1913. M. female—48. General abdominal discomfort and nervousness. Vague symptoms which have been called "sciatica." Polypoid mass protruding from the cervix uteri. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—Polyp proved a pedunculated cyst of cervical canaL Excised with a portion of base. Plastic repair of cervix. Comp.—None Path, report—Benign. O K Result: Aug. 21, 1913—Much better, but still has leucorrhoea. Aug. 20, 1915—Exam.—A good cosmetic result on cervix. Looks and feels well, but "nervous." No leucorrhoea. Aug. 11, 1916—"Last winter I was troubled some with dizziness. I saw a doctor who said my blood pres- sure was forty above normal, but except for that I have been well. I have no pain or discharge of any kind, and seem perfectly well in the parts where I was operated on. In fact, am better than for a great many years." 137. May 29, 1913. W. female—43. Widow of an old patient of E. A. C.'s with same disease. Incipient tuberculosis. Slept on roof for 25 days pending admission to state sanitarium. Con't—Dr. John B. Hawes. P-d July 26, 1915—At Westfield State Sanitarium. Fairly comfortable with gas injections of pleural cavity. Result: Aug. 15, 1916—Still under treatment at Westfield Sanitarium. 138. June 21, 1913. Male—69. Indigestion and epigastric pain for many years. Pre-op. diag.—Duodenal ulcer. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)— Post, gastroenterostomy for duodenal ulcer. (Anoci.) Comp.—Serous discharge from wound causing slight delay in healing. E.s Result: June, 1915—Well. Sept. 8, 1916—Small hernia in scar which is not troublesome. An attack of "bronchitis" last winter which left him somewhat "pulled down." Better now. No digestive symptoms when careful about diet. 139. June 80, 1913. Male—39. Incompetent sphincter ani due to fistula operation many years before. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—Scar q jj excised and edges of sphincter approximated. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 18, 1913—Improved a great deal but not yet perfect con- trol of gas. Apr., 1916—Well. Good control. 30 140. July 8, 1913. Male—51. Another surgeon had performed cecostomy to permit irrigation of the colon for chronic intestinal stasis. The open- ing had contracted and was painful. Op. (E. A. C)— Novocaine. Excision of scar tissue and resuture edge of bowel. Catheter tied in. Comp.—None. O K Result: Sept., 1913—The result of the original operation has been excellent; gain in weight and strength and a sense of well-being having replaced constant distress, depression and malnutrition. The second operation was also efficacious. 141. July 8, 1913. S. female—65. Chronic indigestion and epigastric pain. Stiff and painful right shoulder. Pain in left hip. Pre-op. diag.— Duodenal ulcer and adherent subacromial bursitis. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—Infolding ulcer and post, gastroenterostomy. Manipulation o K of shoulder. Comp.—None. Result: Oct., 1913—Well except for hip, which is still troublesome (exam.). Aug. 16, 1916—Exam.—Well. Scar solid. 142. July 9, 1913. Large well-developed male—45. Recurrent attacks of indigestion and epigastric distress. Pre-op. diag.—Duodenal ulcer. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—A contracted pylorus. First portion of duodenum fixed high and attached to gall bladder by adhesions (con- genital). No ulcer demonstrable. Appendix twisted and kinked and wholly adherent behind cecum. Marked Lane's kink divided but no plastic done. Appendectomy. Duodenal adhesions not disturbed. Comp.—None. E-d Result: Sept., 1913—Well. July 14, 1915—Re-entry. No abdominal symptoms. For a year has had an indurated area in submaxillary region. Operation showed that this was due to a calculus in the sub- maxillary gland. The gland and calculus were removed entire, under the impression that malignancy or actinomycosis existed. No comp. Path, report—Sclerosis of submaxillary gland. July 15, 1916—Well. Scars normal. "Nervous." O K 143. July 16, 1913. M. female—47. Cyst of right lobe of thyroid, size of chestnut. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—Enucleation of cyst. Comp. —None. Result: Aug. 3, 1916—Letter—"I have been perfectly well since you operated, and the scar is not troublesome; in fact, is almost indis- tinguishable." 144. July 19, 1913. Male-^8. Infected wound of hand. Op. (G. W. M.)— Opening and cleaning wound. Comp.—Cellulitis to elbow. O K Result: No report. 145. July 24, 1913. Male—43. Persistent severe epigastric pain. Pre-op. diag.—Cancer of stomach. Op. (E. A. C. and G. W. M.)—Exploration showed inoperable cancer cardiac end of stomach and large multiple „ . soft metastases of liver. Comp.—Although nothing beyond exploration * was attempted, the pain was greatly relieved. -p, - Result: The patient died about 2 weeks after his return home. Autopsy showed masses in liver to be broken down malignant disease. Primary growth at cardiac opening of stomach and lower oesophagus. 146. July 22, 1913. Male—74. Large inoperable cancer of the thyroid causing extreme dyspnoea by displacement of the trachea. Con't—Dr. p , C. A. Porter. Op. was undertaken by Dr. Porter as a purely palliative g" measure. Tracheotomy was accomplished by removal of a portion of p" • the growth. Comp.—Severe secondary hemorrhage and sepsis. ~* Result: Died on the tenth day (Aug. 3, 1913). 31 147. July 30, 1913. Male— 9. Compound fracture lower end of humerus. E-s? Op. (G. W. M.)—Cleansing and replacement of fragments. Comp.— None. P-d? Result: Aug. 10, 1915—Mother reports a satisfactory result with some (gunstock?) deformity. 148. Aug. 12, 1913. Male—63. Sarcoma ulna; size olive, previously incised by another surgeon. Amputation advised but refused. Op. (E. A. C.) —Excision tumor and (4 in.) adjacent portion ulna, with much of sur- n tj- rounding soft parts. Plastic on skin to fill defects. Comp.—None. Path, report—Giant celled sarcoma of periosteum, not involving bone. Result: July 29, 1915—Local phys. reports a perfect result; hand al- most as strong as before op. Does same work. Died July 21, 1916— Death certificate: Chronic nephritis and arterio-sclerosis. 149. Aug. 13, 1913. Male—54. Recurrent cancer of lip. Previous op. at E.c M. G. H. E. S. 182344. Op. (G. W. M.)— V-shaped excision. No dis- section of neck. Comp.—Stitch sepsis and spreading of wound. Result: Aug. 8, 1916—Dr. M. reports, "Well in Jan., 1916." 150. Aug. 25, 1913. Male—43. Abscess of leg, opened and packed. Comp. O K —None. Result: July 20, 1915—Well. 151. Sept. 1, 1913—Female^6. Emergency. Pre-op. diag.—Acute cholecyst- itis. Op. (E. A. C.)—Revealed old and new adhesions about gall bladder, which were not disturbed because pelvic condition seemed more urgent. A large pelvic abscess was drained and both tubes re- moved. (Pyosalpingitis.) Left ovary containing old hemorrhagic cyst, size orange, removed. (Multilocular cystoma.) Uterus, which was large and boggy, was curetted. Adhesions, causing partial obstruction of sigmoid, divided. Comp.—Sepsis from drainage area involved wound slowly, so that it had to be laid open and packed. Satisfactory recov- ery. Re-entry Jan. 1, 1914, with jaundice and other symptoms justify- p_r ing diagnosis of stone in common duct. Op. (E. A. C.)—A small con- tracted gall bladder containing a large stone and connected by an old fistula with duodenum (see Case 24. This is a second case illustrating E. A. C.'s explanation of Courvoisier's law). A large stone was also removed from the common duct (?) through dense inflammatory tissue. Cholecystostomy. Choledochostomy. Result: July 25, 1915—Letter—Well. Has since had one severe uterine hemorrhage. Aug. 3, 1916—Well except for irregular metrorrhagia, which at times is severe. Abdominal scar bulges throughout. Uterus of normal size. No abdominal symptoms. Digestion good. Curetting advised for probable uterine polyp. 152. Sept. 7, 1913. Female—26. Extra-uterine pregnancy. Op. (G. W. M.) —Salpingectomy (left) and removal of foetus. Comp.—None. O K Result: Aug. 23, 1915—Dr. M. reports, "Well, except for chronic organic heart disease. Scar O. K." Aug. 8, 1916—Dr. M. reports, "Well, except for 'heart trouble' in Feb., 1916." 153. Sept. 8, 1913. Male—41. Old fracture internal condyle femur. Op. (G. W. M.)—Removal of spicule of bone which was causing annoyance. O K Comp.—None. & J Result: Nov. 1, 1913—Well. 154. Sept. 8, 1913. Female—25. Hydramnios. Op. (G. W. M.)— Delivery of twins. One alive (4 mos.) and the other macerated. Comp.—None u K Death of foetus. Result: Nov. 15, 1913—Well. 32 155. Sept. 14, 1913. Male—66. Emergency. Intestinal obstruction. Op. (E. A. C.)—Gigantic dilatation of a freely movable cecum of fetal type. The appendix and tip of cecum were adherent at left costal margin and volvulus had occurred. Excision of cecum and ascending E-c colon with a portion of the ileum. Lateral anastomosis. Drainage of wound which was soiled. Comp.—Sepsis in portion of wound about wick; not serious. Result: Aug. 17, 1916—Physician reports well and at work as black- smith. 156. Sept. 15, 1913. Male—40. Persistent hyperacidity and epigastric pain. Pre-op. diag.—Duodenal ulcer. Op. (E. A. C.)—Adhesions holding pylorus high under liver, thought to be congenital rather than inflamma- tory. A plastic operation was done to free these. The appendix wa« then found to be adherent in pelvis, and was with great difficulty re- moved by enlarging the wound downward. No ulcer was found. Comp. , —Three successive pulmonary emboli. Slight sepsis in wound (largely E-j due to cough). Recovery under care of Dr. John B. Hawes. This or patient barely recovered from emboli and was feeble for many weeks. E-C Result: May, 1915—Well. Weak scar—almost a hernia. July 19, 1915 —Well. "About the only unpleasant result of my illness is that I am . somewhat short of my physical and nervous strength." Aug. 7, 1916— Telephone—Much better than before operation, but still occasional attacks of "acidity." Wound does not trouble him. 157. Sept. 16, 1913. Male—19. Tuberculous cervical gland under angle of right jaw. Op. (E. A. C.)—Excision of gland. Comp.—Slight serous discharge. O K Result: Sept. 14, 1915—Well. One small gland size of pea. Aug. 22, 1916—Letter—No further trouble. 158. Sept. 23, 1913. Female—15. Chronic appendicitis. Op. (G. W. M.)— Adherent appendix removed. Comp.—None. Result: Dec. 1, 1913—Well. Aug. 17, 1915—Phys. reports occasional P-d? pain in right side. Aug. 8, 1916—Dr. M. reports, "Still has abdominal trouble and constipation." Report in May (Dr. Boos). 159. Sept. 29, 1913. Female—45. Fibroid of uterus. Op. (G. W. M.)— Hysterectomy and appendectomy. C Result: Sudden death on 7th day from pulmonary embolus. 160. Oct. 25, 1913. Female—60. Subacromial bursitis (adherent). Op. (E. A. C.)—Adhesions broken under ether without incision. Abduction maintained ten days. Result: July 1, 1915—Well. Convalescence was slow and painful. Re- O K cently (sciatica), but shoulder is well. See Case W. S. 202633, Mass. Gen'l Hosp. records. July 24, 1916—Sacro-iliac symptoms passed away spontaneously. No further trouble with shoulder. 161. Nov. 3, 1913. Male—34. Drug habit. No operation. 162. Nov. 17, 1913. Male—33. Salvarsan. Under care of Dr. Wm. F. Boos. Result: July 31, 1916—Dr. B. reports, "Well." O K 163. Nov. 18, 1913. Male—32. Chronic appendicitis. Op. (E. A. C.)— Q „ Strictured appendix removed. Comp.—None. 164. Dec. 14, 1913. Female—25. Ureteral catheterization. X-rays, etc., for diagnosis. Intermittent hydronephrosis (?). Chronic endometritis. Fissura ani. Refused operation. Later curettage of uterus and dila- p_r tation of anus by her own physician. Result: Unknown. 165. Dec. 21, 1913. Emergency case of syncope. Pulmonary tuberculosis. Remained in hosp. over night. O K Result: No report. 33 166. Dec. 26, 1913. Female—35. Acute appendicitis. I'nder the care of Dr. Ed. P. Richardson. Op. (E. P. R.)—Appendectomy. No drainage. O K Comp.—None. Result: Sept. 9, 1915—Scar solid. Well except for constipation, which was present before op. June 2, 1916—Died of acute nephritis. 167. Dec. 30, 1913. Female—40. Prolapse of uterus. Op. (E. A. C.)—Ap- pendectomy (normal). Hysterectomy by Crile's method for prolapse. Comp.—None. Oct. 16, 1914—Cystocele which protrudes when recum- bent, but disappears when standing. Remaining ovary tender; size of E-j golf ball. Some vague discomfort, but practically well. Result: Sept. 24, 1915—Husband reports patient well except for occa- sional pain in side. Feb. 25, 1916—Condition same. June 23, 1917— Small abscess has recently come in abdom. scar and discharged several silk sutures. 168. Dec. 31, 1913. Female—35. Prolapse of uterus; uterine polyp; perineal lacerations. Op. (E. A. C.)—Hysterectomy and fixation of vaginal stump to abdominal wall. Appendectomy (ap. contained pus and pin- worms). Extensive perineal lacerations not repaired owing to patient's O K poor condition. Comp.—None. Result: July 31, 1915—Well. No abdominal symptoms. Scar O. K. When recumbent, cervix is low, but when standing is very high. Chief complaint now is pruritus vulvas, which was present before operation and is occasionally still troublesome. Pinworms? Perineal repair not necessary. Aug. 14, 1916—Letter—Well, except for pruritus ani. 169. Dec. 81, 1913. Male—53. Double inguinal hernia. Op. (G. W. M.)— O K Double Bassini. Comp.—None. Result: No report. 170. Jan. 5, 1914. Male—29. Varicocele. Op. (G. W. M.) Comp.—None. ° K Result: Aug. 18, 1915—Friend reports, "Well." 171. Jan. 7, 1914. Male—20. Feruncle on elbow. Lymphangitis. No. op. Jan. 15, 1914, and Feb. 8, 1914—Re-entries for other feruncles. Treated by Dr. A. E. Steele with vaccines. O K Result: July 27, 1915—Patient convinced that vaccines caused improve- ment. July 31, 1916—Re-entered with a septic pilonidal sinus which has troubled him since January. Sinus excised with local anaesthesia. Still has some acne and constipation. Dec, 1916—Exam.—Well. 172. Jan. 8, 1914. Male—40. Left varicocele and enlarged ext. ring almost amounting to hernia. Weak right ing. ring. Chronic epididymitis. Op. q j£ (E. A. C.)—Excision of varicocele and Ferguson operation for hernia without ligation of sac. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 3, 1916—Letter—Well. 173. Jan. 12, 1914. Female—49. Cancer of stomach. Case No. 859 at Peter E-d Bent Brigham Hospital, where operation had been advised against. Op. (E. A. C.)—Local anaesthesia. Exploration. Condition inoperable. p_ \ Result: Aug. 24, 1916—Letter—Well. 197. Apr. 21, 1914. Female—32. Cystic lymphoma of neck. Op. (G. W. M.) —Incision and evacuation of clear fluid. Comp.—None. p_ered a rapid exploratory operation imperative, m Peri?*:£' KJOne!* ViS dlagn°Sis WaS: (O Perf. appendicitis! LnV 1 T°rMdU£dfnir- -(3) Extra«terine pregnancy. Op. O K fmmH :S h" arlJ*- ^ G)-TyPical ruptured tubal prfgnancy w^s found and the left tube and ovary excised. Immediately after the operation, Dr. Beth Vincent performed indirect transfusion from the patients sister Patient rallied well, and had a comfortable convales- cence. Uomp.—None. Result: Aug. 19, 1916—Physician reports, "Well." 278. Sept. 8 1915. Female-42. Multiple tumors in both breasts. Pre-op. hnrhTr^ n TC CySt,° ma«titis- OP- (E- A. C.)-Amputation of F A both breasts. One tumor proved to be a small fibroma, the rest were E'd cystic. Comp.—Slight bronchitis. Wound O. K Result: June 13, 1916—Well. 279. Sept. 13, 1915. Female—27. Perineal lacerations following confinement several months previously. I have never seen such an extreme case. 1 he rents extended on each side practically to the cervix, and backward into the rectum, causing incontinence of feces. An attempt had been made by the attending physician to sew up with silk. The scars were still ulcerated, and bits of silk protruded here and there. Op (E A C. and A. It B.)—The entire scar tissue on both sides was dissected out, and a plastic operation done which repaired the sphincter, vagina and perineum. This operation was very extensive, and the hemorrhage was considerable. Owing to these conditions, as well as to the previous anemia and chronic sepsis, Dr. Beth Vincent was called in consulta- tion to consider the question of transfusion. This operation was done, not only on account of the present condition, but with the hope of aid- v r ing in the healing of the very extensive wound. No test for hemolysis was done. The donor was the patient's husband. During the trans- fusion a little air entered the vein, but no immediate symptoms oc- curred. A little later, however, the patient had a severe chill and seemed dangerously near complete collapse. For some time there was methemoglobinuria. We felt much anxiety as to her condition, but she eventually made a good recovery. Comp.—Slight delay in healing of a portion of the vaginal wound. Dr. Vincent found that the donor's blood belonged to Group 2 and the recipient's to Group 4. This ex- periment shows that even in this unfavorable combination transfusion may benefit. Result: Aug. 18, 1916—Husband reports, "Fairly well." 51 280 Sept 20, 1915. Female—27. Jaundice. Numerous attacks of bllia"T colic since cholecystectomy at Mass. General Hospital in July, IJli (No. W. S. 1831S1). Pre-op. diag.—Obstruction of common duct from (1) stone; (2) kinking from adhesions. Op. (E. A. C. and A. It. B.) —Duodenum mobilized and common duct found greatly dilated down to -, a strictured point just at the edge of duodenum. Adhesions separated E"C enough to free this obstruction. Common duct was not opened. Ab- dominal wound closed. Comp.—Slight serous discharge for 2 days. Immediate relief of symptoms. Result: Aug. 7, 1916—Physician reports that "she says she is quite well." 281. Nov. 17, 1915. Male—70. A left inguinal hernia of long standing, size of two fists. Pre-op. diag.—Hydrocele and hernia. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)— Spinal anaesthesia attempted by Dr. Freeman Allen, be- cause patient had chronic bronchitis with profuse purulent sputum. Anaesthesia unsatisfactory, so anassthol was used. Tumor proved to be wholly a hernia of small intestine, with no fluid or omentum. It must have contained most of the small intestine. Owing to the size of the hernia, the chronic bronchitis, and the age of the patient, the testicle E"c was removed and the canal closed tightly. Comp.—Cough very severe, but wound healed perfectly. Great improvement after syrup of hydri- odic acid. Aug. 18, 1916—Exam.—Scar solid. Now has a large right inguinal hernia. Operation advised. Nov. 16, 1916—Re-entered. Scar of former operation firm. Op. (E. A. C. and W. P. C.)—Novocaine. Radical cure of hernia by Ferguson method. Testicle was not removed. Comp.—Slight hematoma; entirely healed on 20th day. Chronic bron- chitis still persists. Result: Jan. 15, 1917—Well. 282. Nov. 18, 1915. Female—55. Recurrent attacks of biliary colic. Pre-op. diag.—Gallstones. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Gall bladder was found contracted about cluster of stones and densely adherent to sur- rounding structures. A fistula connected it with the duodenum. Chole- cystectomy and suture of duodenal fistula. An adherent, partially j£_j obliterated appendix removed. The wound was badly soiled in remov- ing gall bladder, and three drains were left. Comp.—The drains were removed on the 5th day, which proved an error of judgment, because a residual abscess formed which had to be opened with the finger on the 16th day. This delayed the patient's convalescence about 10 days; otherwise there was no complication. Result: Feb. 22, 1917—Husband reports, "Well." 283. Nov. 18, 1915. Female—49. Vague abdominal pain. Chronic discharge from left nipple. Appendix had previously been removed by E. A. C, but same pain persisted. A single gallstone shown by X-ray. Pre-op. diag.—Gallstone, pericecal adhesions. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)— One small adhesion of omentum to appendix scar separated. No peri- E-c cecal adhesions found. Gallstone removed and gall bladder drained. Comp.—None. Consultation with Dr. R. B. Greenough in regard to E-d breast, which he considered chronic mastitis, and for which he did not advise operation at present. Result: Aug. 2, 1916—"After returning home, a small abscess came in the scar." Probably due to a tie. "Soon healed." "Breast continues to discharge." "Do not gain as I wish in strength." 284. Nov. 22, 1915. Female—43. Metrorrhagia for 2 years. Large abdominal tumor noticed one year. Loss of strength. Two hard nodules size of marble in old scar of acute appendix. Op. by E. A. C, Oct 17 1905 at Mass. General Hospital (No. 144820 E. S.). Pre-op'. diag—Papil- lomatous ovarian cyst and post-operative hernia. Op. (E. A C and A R. B.)—Local anaesthesia. Appendix scar with nodules excised and 52 E-d ventral hernia repaired. Exploration with finger in abdomen showed a large, smooth, movable tumor, also whitish nodular metastases in the walls of both large and small intestines. In view of the metastases present, it was considered unwise to remove the tumor. The specimens removed with the scar were given to Dr. J. H. Wright for pathologic examination. He submitted the following report: "Microscopical ex- amination of sections from the two fibrous nodules in the subcutaneous tissue shows the following: They consist of connective tissue not sharply demarcated from the surrounding connective tissue, and some epithelial elements. The epithelial elements are in the form of tubular structures lined with cuboidal or cylindrical epithelium. These structures are disposed singly or in small groups well separated from each other. Immediately about the tubular structures, in many instances, is an accumulation of cells resembling the various forms of cells found in the interstitial tissue of the endometrium. The tubular structures them- selves, in many instances, resemble endometrium tubules. Some of the tubular structures are quite large in size, and there is considerable variation in their size. I can make out no unstriped muscle fibres in the connective tissue which makes up the greater part of the tumors. lhe microscopical appearances of these groups of tubular structures, with their accompanying cells, are very like those of the islands of endometrium found in adenomyoma of the uterus. It seems possible that tumors in this case are of the nature of metastases from such a tumor of the uterus." In view of this report, and of the fact that adenomyoma is a less malignant tumor than other forms, it seemed wise, at Dr. Wright's suggestion, to consider removal of the uterus. Accordingly, a consultation was held with Dr. W. P. Graves, who -c- r agreed with Dr. Wright. The patient was sent to the Good Samaritan Hospital (No. 2045) to recuperate for two weeks, and then returned for operation. Second operation, Dec. 21, 1915. Op. (E. A. C, with the assistance of Drs. F. H. Pemberton and A. R. B.)— The tumor, which had grown into the broad ligaments, was removed without much difficulty by supravaginal hysterectomy. After removing the tumor, the intestine was examined with great care. The small nodules previ- ously seen were found to be scattered over the intestine, especially on the transverse colon, which was in one place almost stenosed by little tumors. The appearance of these nodules was unique in my experience; they resembled somewhat tuberculous stricture of the intestine; they were hard and malignant in feel. Dr. Wright reported in regard to the large uterine tumor: "Shows nothing but plain fibromyoma. No endothelial islands found anywhere." Comp.—Phlebitis of the femoral vein delaying convalescence about 3 weeks. During convalescence pus and blood were found in the stools, and the patient was transferred to the Mass. General Hospital (No. 206470), to be under the care of Dr. Henry F. Hewes for a more careful study of the intestinal con- dition. This case presents a peculiar pathological problem, since metastatic tumors characteristic of a certain uterine growth were found in scar tissue at a distance from the uterus, which itself was not found to con- tain any primary growth, which may have given rise to them. The tumors in the wall of the intestines were not identified, so that it must be considered probable that these tumors in the intestines gave rise to the metastases—if so, the histologic type is a most unusual one. Result: May 6, 1916—Has gained 16 pounds. Looks and feels well. Nov. 29, 1915. Female—41. Persistent indigestion of the flatulent type, with several mild attacks of abdominal pain. Gallstone colic. Pre-op. diag.—Peripyloric adhesions from (1) gallstones; (2) duodenal ulcer; p j (3) also chronic adherent appendix. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)— Obliterated appendix removed. Post-inflammatory adhesions held the first portion of the duodenum to the liver and gall bladder, as if from 53 O K previous perforation. Adhesions freed and a small Induration which I considered duodenal ulcer was found just below the pylorus. Finney operation, with excision of a portion of the edge for microscopic exam- ination. Comp.—None, except a good deal of post-operative vomiting. Pathologic exam, of specimen removed showed no ulceration, but I was convinced clinically that I could see a very small ulcer, through which a stitch was passed. Result: Nov. 30, 1916—Well. 286. Dec. 4, 1915. Female—39. Under care of Dr. W. P. Graves. Fibroid of uterus. Op. (W. P. Graves and F. H. Pemberton)—Supravaginal hysterectomy. Comp.—None. Result: Mar. 28, 1917—Well. Scar solid. Twice since operation a swell- ing the size of a half horse-chestnut has appeared near lower end of wound; it lasted a few weeks and then disappeared. This was prob- ably cyst formation in a bit of transplanted ovary. On each occasion there was an increase of hot flashes. 287. Dec. 9, 1915. Female—62. Metrorrhagia for 2 years. Never profuse or prolonged. Loss of weight and strength. Diag.—Uterine polyp. p j Operation was postponed, because sugar was found in the urine. Result: Aug. 2, 1916—Physician reports: "Has had very slight bleed- ing on two occasions, but none for some time. She became sugar-free on Allen treatment, and remained so for 6 weeks, but now she shows some sugar on a modified diet. She feels at present quite well." 288. Dec. 29, 1915. Female—46. Under care of Dr. W. P. Graves. Pre-op. diag.—Multiple fibroids or ovarian cyst. Op. (W. P. G. and F. H. P.) —Appendectomy. Supravaginal hysterectomy for multiple fibroids. Comp.—Mild phlebitis in calf of leg, not delaying convalescence. Oct. 14, 1916—Has been troubled with constipation since spring. Weak- ness increasing. Has felt unable to work. Exam.—Tumor palpable by rectum and by abdomen, apparently not connected with cervix. Probable diag.—Cancer of rectum. Dec. 18, 1916—Dr. Graves writes: "I was called in to see ---- yesterday, and found her with an almost complete obstruction of the bowels. On account of the emergency of the case and the nearness to the Free Hospital, I took her there and operated on her this morning. I found the abdomen filled with huge adhesions, thick and tough; some of them two and three fingers in breadth. The adhesions were scattered about and did not seem to have any particular relationship to each other. The chief obstruction was in p , the rectum, beginning about 2 inches from the anus, the rectum and ^-d? sigmoid being twisted several times on itself and the coils attached by _ these extraordinary adhesions of dense scar tissue." E"d? "The operation was an extremely difficult one and took me nearly 4 hours. As the large intestine was enormously dilated, and the patient has a very small abdomen, there was much exposure of the intestinal content, with the result that the patient left the table in profound shock. I have never seen anything like this case, and am at a loss to account for the condition. A large piece of tissue attached to the ab- dominal wall, that looked and felt like cancer, showed microscopically dense fibrous tissue with areas of necrosis and calcification." Result: Dec. 19, 1916—"I am sorry to say that----died 24 hours after the operation, not being able to recover from shock. There was no autopsy, and I can shed no further light on the cause of the trouble. I may say that the adhesions were confined entirelv to the large intes- tine and occurred at intervals in its entire length' from the cecum to anus. It seemed to be some form of colitis. She passed considerable gas after the operation and some black, tarry, fecal matter which was present before the operation. There is some clinical evidence that it might have been a progression of some lesion which I did not find at the 54 E-c time of the first operation, as you suggested. She was not relieved of the severe constipation which she had before that operation, and it seemed to get progressively worse. The condition is one with which I am not familiar." 289. Dec. 31, 1915. Female—31. Persistent blood-stained uterine discharge. Had previously been twice curetted by other surgeons. Chronic con- stipation, fatigue. Poorly nourished. Pre-op. diag.—Uterine polvp, chronic salpingo-ovaritis, prolapsed cystic ovaries. Ptosis. Op. (E.A. C. and A. It. B.)—Supravaginal hysterectomy. Diag. correct in detail. p.,j Normal appendix also removed. Uterus contained a polvp attached high in fundus, and several small uterine fibroids. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 3, 1916—Some improvement, but still very nervous. Has hot flashes and constipation, and other minor troubles. 290. Jan. 4, 1916. Boy with early acute appendicitis. Transferred in a few hours to the Massachusetts General Hospital, because his father would not guarantee the hospital fee. M. G. H. (No. 206079). 291. Jan. 12, 1916. Female—49. Tumor of breast. Pre-op. diag.—Cancer, possible adenoma or cyst. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Tumor re- moved and examined immediately by Dr. J. H. Wright, who considered it non-malignant; but as other cysts were present, whole breast gland and adjacent axillary glands removed. Comp.—None. Dr. Wright's pathologic report follows: "I have prepared paraffin sections from 14 different places in the breast of case 291, Jan. 13, 1916. All but one Q £ of the sections show appearances of chronic proliferative mastitis. In one small section, however, there is a small area which is clearly of carcinomatous nature." In view of this report and the early character of the disease, it seemed to me unwise to recommend further dissec- tion of the axilla, although at the original operation only that group of glands which were adjacent to the breast were removed. Comp.— None. Result: Aug. 3, 1916—Letter—Well. 292. Jan. 14, 1916. Male—54. Chronic dyspepsia for many years. Blood pressure 220. Worse for the last 2 years. Pre-op. diag.—Ulcer on gastric side of pylorus, possibly malignant. Op. (E. A. C. and G. F. Leland, Jr.)—Indurated ulcer just above pylorus was removed by partial gastrectomy. Comp.—Slight serous discharge from wound in first week. No pus. Pathologic report by Dr. Wright: "The piece of stomach wall presented an irregular ulcer about 16 nun. across. The mucosa in the neighborhood was elevated and the wall of the stomach beneath and near the ulcer was thicker than normal. Microscopical examination of paraffin sections involving the tissue at the base and margins of the ulcer shows at the base fibrosis and chronic inflamma- tory tissue. At the margins in the situation of the mucosa there is infiltration with atypical epithelial cells arranged in columns and in P-d irregular tubules. This infiltration apparently does not extend beyond the limits of the mucosa. It is possible that we have in this case an E-c early carcinoma. 1 cannot convince myself that the atypical cells above mentioned are not to be regarded merely as manifestations of efforts at repair on the part of the mucosa." Soon after the patient returned home, he began to lose ground again for some unknown cause, apparently business worries. The ga-tric condition had improved, but his general strength did not, and his weight steadily became less. He returned to the hospital on May 22, 1916, for observation, having had a sudden attack of hemianopsia 2 weeks before. Under rest and enforced feeding his condition improved for a time, but at the end of 3 weeks he had an attack of facial paralysis and several periods of cardiac distress accompanied by tachycardia. At this time an aortic murmur appeared. He was transferred to the 55 Peter Bent Brigham Hospital (No. 9374) on June 21, 1916, with a diagnosis of endocarditis and emboli. Result: Physician reports that patient died of lung complications on July 22, 1916. Diagnosis of endocarditis was confirmed by autopsy. (Streptococcus septicaemia with emboli.) Scars in stomach O. K. 293. Jan. 21, 1916. Male—62. Carbuncle on back of neck. Chronic nephritis. Treated with boric acid poultices without operation. Comp.—None. p d Result: Aug. 3, 1916—Well. It took 8 weeks in all for the carbuncle to heal. After it healed, two others came, one on the left costal border and one on the left hand, which lasted about 3 weeks. Scar is incon- spicuous. Nephritis is not troublesome. No edema of ankles or face. 294. Jan. 31, 1916. Male—50. Typical case of subacromial bursitis. Pre-op. diag.—Calcification beneath base of subacromial bursa. Op. (E. A. C. q yr and A. R. B.)—Local anaesthesia. Bursa incised and i dram of cal- careous material removed. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 1, 1916—Letter—"I am entirely free from pain. Recovery seems permanent. Motion is as good as ever. Playing golf better than ever." 295. Feb. 1, 1916. Male—43. Acute abdominal pain for 24 hours. Tender- ness in small mass at McBurney's point. Distention. Pre-op. diag.— Acute appendicitis. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Tumor proved to be a mass of strangulated, purple, congested omentum, adherent to the £_£ parietal peritoneum at the site of tenderness; below this a mass of adhesions constricting ascending colon. The affected portion of omen- tum Was removed. Appendix long, hard, stiff, and full of concretions. Appendectomy. Lane's kink, but not disturbed. Post-op. diag.— Torsion of omentum. Chronic appendicitis. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 29, 1916—Exam.—Well. Scar solid. 296. Feb. 7, 1916. Male—54. Cancer of lip; small lipomas of back and shoulder. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Both lipomas removed. V-shaped excision of lip and dissection of submental glands. Patho- O K logic report showed cancer of lip, but the glands showed no evidence of involvement. Therefore, a thorough dissection of the neck was not done. Comp.—None. Result: Jan. 9, 1917—Well. 297. Feb. 10, 1916. Female—36. Several attacks of right-sided abdominal pain. Prolapsed vaginal walls. Pre-op. diag.—Chronic appendicitis. Lacerated cervix and peritoneum. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Re- moval of strictured appendix distended with clear fluid. Plastic opera- tions for cervix and perineum. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 8, 1916—Letter—Well. 298. Feb. 16, 1916. Female—57. A slight ulceration on the right edge of the tongue opposite a sharp tooth. Pre-op. diag.—Epithelioma of tongue. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Excision of right quadrant of tongue without dissection of neck. Pathologic report follows: "The specimen from the tongue, case 298, shows hyperplasia of the epithelium and very marked infiltration of the submucosa with plasma cells and cells of the lymphocyte series. There is little or no tendency for the epithelium to invade the underlying tissue. I am unable to make up my mind whether this specimen represents a chancre, a leukoplakia or a beginning carcinoma. I would suggest a Wasserman test" A Was- serman test was negative. Comp.—None. Result: Feb. 26, 1917—Physician writes 'that patient had a very small ulcer come at site of scar. It persisted for 3 months and then dis- appeared. 56 O K O K 299. Feb. 16, 1916. Male—57. Mole on temple. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.) —Excision. Pathologic report by Dr. Wright—Papillomatous mole. <-. „ Comp.—None. w Result: Aug. 9, 1916—Letter—Well. 800. Feb. 19, 1916. Male—5. Tuberculous glands of neck. Previously oper- ated on by E. A. C. for acute abscess, but now healed and showing tendency to increase. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Dissection of q k upper half of right neck. Comp.—None. Result: Sept. 11, 1916—Exam.—Well. Upper part of scar slightly keloidal. •01. Feb. 23, 1916. Female—44. Small tumors in both breasts. Pre-op. diag.—Cancer of right breast and cystic disease of both breasts. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Left breast removed and at once examined by Dr. Wright, who considered the specimen suspicious enough to advise dissection of axilla. Right breast also removed. Comp.—None. E-d Final pathologic report, "A number of sections from various places in the breasts show a good deal of epithelial proliferation, but nothing that I am confident is carcinoma." Result: Aug. 9, 1916—Exam, by Dr. B.—Scars O. K. except for annoy- ing irregularity in one. Otherwise well. 802. Feb. 25, 1916. Female—44. Persistent abdominal and pelvic pain. Worse at ctm. and sometimes coming in severe attacks. Pre-op. diag. —Uterine fibroids. Adhesions right ovary, strictured appendix. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Complete supravaginal hysterectomy. Uterus contained many small fibroids. There was a hydrosalpinx and cystic left ovary. Strictured appendix removed, and also two gallstones the E-d existence of which had not been suspected. Gall bladder was drained through a stab wound. Comp.—Trifling sepsis in median wound. Mild E-c sloughing about drainage tube. Hot flushes and erythema with intense itching. Result: Aug. 3, 1916—Well. Has just returned to work. Dec. 9, 1916 —Complains of tenderness in upper wound following strain. Exam.— Well. Scars O. K. 803. Feb. 27, 1916. Male—33. Fistula in ano of 4 months' duration. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Excision of fistulous tract and cauterization ~. « of hemorrhoids. Comp.—None. Result: Oct. 16, 1916—Friend reports, "Well." 804. Mar. 1, 1916. Male—45. Many vague abdominal symptoms. Intro- spective. Came for thorough examination. X-ray examination sug- gested chronic colitis. A greatly enlarged seminal vesicle was found with retention of spermatozoa, but no pus. Dr. J. D. Barney in con- P-d sulfation. Probable diag.—Nephroptosis and kinking of right ureter. Distended seminal vesicle. Massage advised. Result: Jan. 31, 1917—Somewhat better digestion, but otherwise no marked change. 805. Mar. 4, 1916. Male—53. An emergency case of general peritonitis with classical symptoms of board-like rigidity, collapse, cyanosis, and agonizing pain. Onset sudden, 20 hours before. Had not called physi- cian until 2 hours before arrival at hospital. Pre-op. diag.—Perforated duodenal ulcer. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Perf. gangrenous ap- P-d pendix with peritoneal cavity containing free pus and the intestines or distended and cyanotic. The gangrenous appendix was found to have ]£_a sloughed off at the base and several large concretions lay almost free in the peritoneal cavity. Appendectomy and drainage. Comp.—Oper- ation gave no relief; intense pain continued; peristalsis did not start up; persistent vomiting—only temporary relief by lavage. Result: Patient died on 4th day, in spite of an enterostomy which was 57 done after the distention became so severe as to cause the prolapse of a coil of bowel through the abdominal wound. 806. Mar. 4, 1916. Female—63. Adherent subacromial bursitis. Massage, baking and exercise with considerable relief. O K Result: Aug. 8, 1916—Letter—"Shoulder is very much improved, but there is still some stiffness." 807. Mar. 5, 1916. Female—H. Persistent menorrhagia for 2 years. Pre-op. diag.—Intrauterine polvp and intramural fibroids. Retroversion. Up. (E A. C. and A..R. ».)—The appendix was full of soft concretions; O K removed. Supravaginal hysterectomy was done and the uterus found to contain a polyp size of "an olive, and other intramural fibroids. Comp. —None. Result: Dec. 2, 1916—Physician reports, "Well." 808. Mar. 13, 1916. Female—55. Abdominal tumor extending from pelvis 2 inches above umbilicus. Pre-op. diag.—Fibroma of uterus, or cystoma of ovary. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)— Tumor proved an extensive malignant mass involving all pelvic organs and invading parietal peri- toneum with little tubercles. Piece of peritoneum excised and reported adeno-carcinoma (psammoma) by Dr. Wright. Condition considered inoperable and abdomen closed. On reflecting on this case, it occurred to me that as the tumor was evidently partly cystic, it might be possible to obtain through and through drainage and treat the tumor with radium from inside out through the pathway thus obtained. The patient's relatives were, there- fore, sent to consult Dr. H. A. Kelly of Baltimore, Dr. John G. Clark of Philadelphia, Dr. Francis D. Donoghue, and Dr. R. B. Greenough of Boston, to see whether such an operation would be justifiable, and it was advised that the attempt should be made, although no precedent existed. On Mar. 22 I operated again and carried a large rubber tube through the mass from the abdomen out the vagina. By introducing radium (obtained through the courtesy of the Huntington Hospital) through this tube, a thorough course of treatment was given. E-d To my great astonishment the bulk of the tumor vanished, so that at the time of her discharge on June 29 there was only a small pelvic mass left. From being moribund, her condition had become one of almost perfect health. After this she received several external radium treatments at the Huntington Hospital (No. 16.148) which were unfortunately followed by a severe burn of the abdominal wall, from which she suffered a great deal. On Mar. 21, 1917, she re-entered for treatment of the radium burns, which proved so intractable that I decided to excise them. At this time her general condition was excellent, and the only remains of the original tumor was an irregular pelvic mass occupying about half the pelvis. Apr. 10, 1917. Op. (E. A. C. and G. A. Leland, Jr.)—The burns were excised and the abdomen opened. The pelvic mass seemed oper- able, and after a five-hour operation, I succeeded in removing it with the uterus and adnexa. To my great surprise the peritoneum now showed no trace of disease, and the uterus and its adnexa, which previ- ously were indistinguishable in the cancerous mass, were now plainly recognizable, although adherent. The disease seemed wholly confined to the ovaries, which measured 7$ x 6^ x 4 cm. and 8 x 6$ x 5 cm., respectively. Vaginal drainage was established, and the abdominal wound was closed. The appendix, which contained a concretion, was not removed. Microscopic examination showed that the ovarian tumors resembled the original tumor, but the cells showed no metastases. In the abdominal scar a few small areas of disease were also found. Comp. 58 —An abscess in the abdominal fat and a very small recto-vaginal fistula. Result: June 23, 1917—The wounds have healed and the patient is in apparently good health. It is interesting to note also that a small pedunculated fibroid tumor which was present at the first operation was removed at the last oper- ation. It showed no apparent change in size, in spite of the energetic radium treatment. I attribute the favorable outcome in this case to the following factors: 1. The tumor could be treated from within outward. 2. The calcareous deposits by the cancer cells indicated that there was a tendency towards replacement of cancer tissue with lime salts. 3. The calcareous atoms could set up secondary radiation. 4. The toxic products of destruction could be drained away. 5. The patient had already shown that she could develop a very large malignant tumor without producing general cachexia. 6. The patient herself showed indomitable optimism and courage. The writer has previously had two surprising cases of peritoneal cancer, one of the papillomatous type. The patient is now free from the disease, 16 years after the original laparotomy, which showed malignant peritonitis. The other, whose peritoneum showed adeno- carcinoma, is still alive and free from the disease, 7 years after an exploratory operation. In the first case drainage was established, and after 10 years a secondary operation was done and a large tumor re- moved; but in the second case no treatment was given, and nothing was removed except a piece for pathologic examination. Both cases are verified by sections preserved in the laboratory of the Mass. Gen- eral Hospital (No. 167749) (No. 664-327 E. S.). 809. Mar. 15, 1916. Male—65. Epidermoid cancer of external canthus left eye, size 25-cent piece, and apparently attached to the malar bone. Edema of conjunctiva. Recurrent from operation 2 years ago. Ex- cision advised by E. A. C, but Dr. R. B. Greenough, who was called in consultation, advised radium; and as the patient preferred not to be ^~" operated on, he was transferred to the Huntington Hospital, and treated by radium (No. 16.99). Result: Dec, 1916—Still under treatment at Huntington Hospital. 310. Mar. 18, 1916. Female—39. Acid indigestion. Hunger pain. Loss of weight. Weakness. Inability to expel feces. Perineal lacerations. Came for thorough examination, diagnosis, and advice. Bismuth exam- ination showed no abnormality of stomach or intestines. Constipation entirely due to inactivity of the rectum, probably because of habit and q g slight hemorrhoidal condition. Probable diag.—Chronic appendix and possible gallstones, but operation was not urged until the patient had corrected her faulty intestinal habits, to see whether that alone would not relieve her symptoms. Result: Feb. 28, 1917—Much better, but still minor stomach symptoms. 311. May 23, 1916. Male—50. Left inguinal hernia for about 2 years. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Local anaesthesia. Radical cure by Ferguson q „ method. Comp.—None. Result: Mar. 8, 1917—Well. 312. Mar. 28, 1916. Female—16. Acute pain for 7 days. A rounded pelvic tumor projecting into rectum. Pelvic and left abdominal tenderness. Pre-op. diag.— (1) Impacted ovarian cyst. (2) Acute appendix with pelvic abscess. (3) Tuberculous peritonitis. Dr. A. K. Stone in con- q t^ sultation considered acute appendicitis most probable. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—A large pocket of odorless pus was opened and drained. Origin not determined, but probably appendicial. It was felt unwise 59 to break up the inflammatory wall to remove the appendix. Comp.— None. Result: Oct. 25, 1916—Exam.—Well. Scar O. K. 813. Apr. 6, 1916. Female—20. Persistent metrorrhagia for 2 months. Previous irregularity. Lacerated cervix. Pre-op. diag.—Uterine polyp. Op. (E. A. C. and *A. R. B.)—Internal os dilated and about 2 drams of soft material, probably polyp, curetted out. Trachelorrhaphy. Path- O K ologic report: "Microscopic examination of the curetting shows that the fragments consist of rather atypical endometrium. No evidence of malignant disease." Comp.—None. Result: Sept. 16, 1916—Letter—Well, except for feeling "pretty sick' at last ctm. 814. Apr. 8, 1916. Male—34. Persistent pyuria and dull pain in left flank. X-ray showed calculus in left kidney. This case was previously re- ported by E. A. C. in the Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. clviii, No. 22, pp. 828-831, May 28, 1908. Patient had been oper- ated on for intravesical cyst of the ureter, which was removed with a large number of calculi. The dilated ureter and renal pelvis had never E-j returned to normal. X-rays had been taken from time to time, but not until recently did they show any calculus formation. Dr. A. L. Chute in consultation advised operation. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)— Nephrectomy. The ureter, which had previously been so much dilated, was found to have contracted to approximately normal size. In spite of the presence of stone, the kidney substance appeared normal. Comp. —None. Result: Aug. 3 1916—Letter—Well. "Urine is perfectly clear." 315. Apr. 17, 1916. Male—62. Under the care of Dr. H. H. Haskell. Senile, mature cataract of left eye. Right eye had previously been success- fully operated on by Dr. Haskell. Comp.—Rupture of corneal wound 10 days after operation—the wound having fully healed and bandage E-c omitted 3 days previously. Result: Sept. 7, 1916—Physician writes: "Distant vision practically normal, and reads smallest print easily. He hasn't even enough astig- matism to amount to anything, although a prolapse usually causes a high degree. Ord. dist. L. V. V + 10- = + lfi0 X °' = Part °' 1- Ord. near. L. -f 13. = -f 1.50 X °' reads diam. 816. Apr. 25, 1916. Female—52. Abdominal pain, distress and distention 10 days. Not severe enough to make her call a doctor. Rounded, fluc- tuant pelvic tumor, size of two fists. Consultation with Drs. C. A. Porter and W. P. Graves. Pre-op. diag. by E. A. C.—Pelvic abscess from (1) Appendix. (2) Salpingitis with ovarian cyst. By C. A. P. —Tumor connected with uterus, tubo-ovarian, perhaps with infection. By W. P. G.—(1) Ovarian cyst with ascites. (2) Edematous fibroid. OK (3) Tubo-ovarian cyst or abscess. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Right rectus incision. A large, foul pelvic abscess opened and drained. Con- sidered unwise to look for appendix in inflammatory wall. Comp.— None. Superficial wound still granulating at time of discharge, June 13. Final diag.—Probably acute appendicitis, or perforated diverticulitis of sigmoid. Possibly salpingitis. Result: Mar. 19, 1917—Slight ventral hernia in scar. Uterus adherent. Cervical polyp removed. Feels perfectly well. No symptoms of any kind. 317. Apr. 26, 1916. Female—83. Menorrhagia. Recently discharge of a sloughy membrane through os uteri. Pre-op. diag.—Fibroids of uterus q K and uterine polyp. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Supravaginal hys- terectomy, right ovary removed, also a small strangulated hydatid cyst. Left ovary in situ. Appendix 6 inches long, distended with old feces' 60 adherent and kinked. Uterus on section showed multiple fibroids and two intrauterine polyps. Comp.—None. Result: Sept. 1, 1916—Physician reports, "Well." 318. May 3, 1916. Male—48. Tumor in central portion of tongue, size of marble and hard. 4 weeks' duration. Pre-op. diag.—(1) Chronic abscess. (2) Dermoid. (3) Cancer. Dr. J. H. Wright present. Local anaesthesia. Tumor incised. Thick pus escaped. Dr. J. H. W. reported that section of wall was chronic inflammatory tissue with no malig- O K nancy. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 23, 1916—Letter—"My tongue is all well, does not bother me in the least. I have gained 17 pounds since I entered your hospital, and am feeling first rate." 319. May 6, 1916. Male—44. Loss of weight and strength. Hyperacidity. Vague abdominal discomfort, especially in right iliac fossa. Patient apprehensive, imagines he has some internal disease. Pre-op. diag — (1) Cecum mobile. Chronic appendicitis. (2) Cancer of cecum. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Local anaesthesia. Appendix sessile; con- P-d tamed several fecoliths. Cecum mobile and general visceral ptosis. Pylorus and gall bladder normal. Camp.—None. Result: Feb. 28, 1917—Better, but still has a variety of vague com- plaints. 320. May 20, 1916. Female—38. Arthritis of both knees and right elbow. Both knees contracted to an acute angle, cannot be straightened. Dr. R. B. Osgood took charge of the case. Tonsils which were buried, adherent and contained suppurating crypts, were removed by Dr. J. L. Goodale without comp. Aug. 18, 1916—At time of discharge from p_d hospital, condition of knees greatly improved—they have been straight- ened, now permitting her to stand on her feet with especially con- structed splints. Result: Apr. 16, 1917—Letter—Still suffering from multiple arthritis. Unable to walk without crutches. 321. May 21, 1916. Male—63. Pain in right shoulder and inability to use arm in abduction since accident 2 years previously. Pre-op. diag.— Ruptured supraspinatus tendon (rt.). Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)— Subacromial bursa incised. The whole supraspinatus was found to have been torn from the tuberosity, as well as a portion of the infra- spinatus. A remnant of the supraspinatus was pulled forward and attached with silk to the stump of the tendon still left on the tuber- O K osity. The arm was kept in abduction for 2 weeks. Comp.—None. Result: Dec. 18, 1916—Patient's ability to use arm has increased. External rotation and abduction are now nearly normal in extent, but the motion is slow and irregular and lacks power. There is a decided jog as the tuberosity passes under the acromion. Patient states that his arm is decidedly better than it was. 322. May 22, 1916. Female—43. Abdominal pain, leucorrhoea, and supposed tumor. Patient had had several previous abdominal operations. Dr. R. B. Greenough, who had seen patient previously, was called in con- sultation. No tumor could be demonstrated, and a provisional diag. O K of chronic salpingitis and post-operative adhesions was made, but operation was not advised. Symptoms subsided under rest and douches. Result: Mar. 22, 1917—Looks and feels well. Not examined. 323. May 31, 1916. Male—60. Large carbuncle back of neck. Treated ex- pectantly. Slow, steady improvement. Small granulating area at time of discharge at the end of the 5th week. Result: Aug. 14, 1916—Exam.—Since leaving the hospital, there have q g been a few furuncles in the neighborhood of the scar. One is present today, containing a drop of pus. Scar is not conspicuous. General health good. 61 824. June 2, 1916. Female—26. Alveolar abscess treated by her own dentist O K No op. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 81, 1916—Still has trouble with sinus. 325. June 9, 1916. Male—70. Swelling of left cheek, one-half size of fist from ulcerated tooth 9 weeks before. Dr. K. H. Thoma in consultation. n v X-ray showed an unerupted wisdom tooth. Bad organic heart disease. Op. (K. H. T.)—Novocaine. Tooth chiseled out. Comp.—None. Result: Dec. 22, 1916—Physician reports, "Has had no trouble from his jaw." 326. June 12, 1916. Male—49. Pre-op. diag.—Epithelioma over right ear. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Tumor excised and the gap closed by O K plastic from temple. Comp.—None. Pathologic report—Papilloma with malignant change. Result: Dec, 1916—Well. 327. June 13, 1916. Male—59. Came for relief of pain in left hip, loss of weight and strength. Physical examination revealed a stricture of the rectum, and by X-ray pathologic changes in the ischium were disclosed. P-d Bit of rectal mass removedt proved to be adeno-carcinoma. Case con- sidered inoperable—so much* ulcerated that colostomy was unnecessary. Result: Sept. 15, 1916—Died of cancer of rectum. 328. June 19, 1916. Male—54. Loss of weight and strength for 2 years. Epigastric pain for one year. Blood present in stomach contents. No Hcl. Palpable, distended gall bladder. Pre-op. diag.—Cancer of E-d stomach. Metastasis in liver and pre-pancreatic glands. Op. (E. A. C. and G. A. Leland, Jr.)—Stomach normal. Gall bladder distended, stone impacted in cystic duct. Cholecystectomy. Comp.—None. Result: Nov. 14, 1916—Exam.—Well. Scar solid. 329. June 26, 1916. Male—22. Unsightly sinus on forehead since struck with skate 2 years ago. There has been a small sinus which opens at intervals and discharges crumbs of bone. Op. (E. A. C.)—Old scar _ „ excised. It was found that the anterior wall of the frontal sinus had u **• been crushed back into the sinus. As no definite necrosis was found, it was thought best not to remove any of the bone. Comp.—None. Result: Aug. 29, 1916—Father reports, "Has been quite well since the operation, and the scar has given him no trouble." 330. June 28, 1916. Female—27. Vague abdominal symptoms and neuras- p_r thenia. While waiting for operation, developed alveolar abscess. Ad- vised to return when mouth is in better condition. No report, and did not return. 331. July 5, 1916. Female—51. A large pelvic tumor noticed for only a week. Has been poorly for 6 months, with some pain in the epigastrium for 3 months. Pre-op. diag.—Uterine fibroids or advanced papilloma- tous cysts. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—An irregular mass of cancer P-d with metastases in omentum and peritoneum. Origin could not be de- termined. Small nodule from omentum removed for examination. Pathologic report by Dr. J. H. Wright—Carcinoma. Comp.—None. Transferred to Huntington Hospital for radium treatment. July 18 (No. 16.279; 118). 3 Result: Physician reports that she died about one month later. 332. July 27, 1916. Female—22. Pre-op. diag.—Dysmenorrhoea from ante- flexion. Cervix very readily dilated and uterine cavity curetted. Left E d ovary could be felt prolapsed into posterior cul-de-sac. Comp.—None. In view of the fact that the os was readily dilated and that the pro- p_d lapsed ovary was found, the probable diagnosis was changed from anteflexion to prolapsed ovary, but the result of the operation may determine whether first diag. was correct. Result: Dec. 11, 1916—Physician reports, "No marked improvement" 62 333. July 9, 1916. Male—28. A septic pilonidal sinus of 2 months' duration. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Excision of fistulous tract. O K Result: Aug. 29, 1916—Still granulating spots. 834. July 10, 1916. Female—59. Under care of Dr. K. H. Thoma. Em- pyema of left antrum. Pre-op. diag.—Empyema of left antrum, tumor of right antrum. Op. (K. H. T.)—Novocaine in spheno-maxillary o K fossae. Both antra opened, cleaned and packed. There was empyema of both, and a large polypus in the right one. Comp.—None. Result: Mar. 9, 1917—Healed, Sept. 27, 1916. 335. July 18, 1916. Male—48. A right inguinal hernia which does not de- scend into the scrotum. Op. (E. A. C.)—Hernia was direct, with a double sac separated by the epigastric vessels. The bladder formed a part of the wall of the inner sac. The fascia and muscles were infil- trated with fat and were so poorly developed that a very unsatisfactory closure was made. The cord was brought out at the upper end of the wound over all the layers, because the union of the internal oblique O K with Poupart's ligament seemed too flimsy without uniting the external oblique to it. During convalescence a small tumor in the skin over the left outer ham string was removed by Dr. Barrow. This tumor Dr. Wright reported to be fibro-sarcoma. Coinp.—None. Result: Aug. 5, 1916—Exam.—Scars O. K. Exacerbation of hemor- rhoids which have bothered him for years. Operation advised. 336. July 19, 1916. Female—61. A case of chronic bacteriuria, who had had several previous operations at the Mass. General Hospital (No. 157070). Came for cystoscopy and general examination. Cystoscopy showed P-d bladder almost normal. I have treated this patient with various uri- nary antiseptics for years, and have never been able to stop the bac- teriuria. At one time the ureters were catheterized and the bacteria were demonstrated to come direct from the pelves of both kidneys. Result: Feb. 1, 1917—Condition same. 337. July 19, 1916. Male—61. Tumor of the larynx of 4 years' duration. Hoarseness and dyspnoea. Pre-op. diag.—Cancer of the thyroid gland. Op. (E. A. C. and A. R. B.)—Novocaine. A gland about the size of a robin's egg behind the left sterno-mastoid removed for pathological ^'^ examination. Dr. Wright reports—Papillary adeno-carcinoma, prob- ably thyroid origin. Comp.—None. Nov. 12, 1916—Referred to Hunt- ington Hospital. Result: Feb. 26, 1917—Still under treatment with radium at Hunting- ton Hospital (No. 16.482; 205). Reader! You may or you may not agree with the criticisms indicated by the symbols; of course, they are open to doubt; but the point is this: At our charitable hospitals there is no one who dares make such criti- cisms at all. It is the duty of no one and it is for the interest of no one — except for the patients and for the community. 63 THE ADVANTAGES OF THE END RESULT SYSTEM TO SURGICAL SCIENCE [Read before the Surgical Section of the American Medical Association on June 7, 1917] My premise is that surgical science is now inaccurate and un- satisfactory, because of the constant necessity which the practical surgeon finds of compromising with accuracy m his dealings with human nature. I claim that the adoption of the End Result System by the hospitals of this country will at the same time render our work more scientific and our practice more efficient and honorable. I define surgical science as that surgical knowledge which is recorded and transmissible through the written description of facts and formulated general principles. Clinical science comprises all the recorded transmissible facts or principles which enable us to apply all other forms of human science to the cure or alleviation of disease. Human science means all the recorded knowledge which is available to the human race, and includes all the various branches —geology, physics, chemistry, electricity, etc. It is the sum of all the ologies. To the clinician all the various branches of science are of value, and his true success depends on his judgment and experi- ence in applying correctly to the sick patient whatever knowledge he possesses of the different branches of science which humanity has already put in available form. It cannot be denied that man possesses a wonderful curiosity in regard to the facts and laws of nature. It is a part of his enjoy- ment of life to ascertain and to classify these facts, and to formulate into laws and principles the data which observation gives him. The truly scientific man yearns to gaze directly at the truth, but there is constantly a tremendous temptation for him to deviate from his recognition of truth or its application, so that he may serve what he supposes to be his own ends. In all branches of science one sees the observer and investigator tempted to distort what he knows to be the fact for the sake of his own purposes, and usually for the sake of his own support in the struggle for existence. In no other branch of science is this struggle between the effort to recognize the truth, and the practical necessities of existence, more apparent than it is in the practice of medicine. It might almost be said that the man who is successful in practice, i. e., in applying the known facts of medical and surgical science to the actual patient, can never confine himself to definite scientific truth. He must always compro- mise with human nature in his patients, and give them what he can of truth without losing their confidence in him. Most practitioners claim that clinical science has not yet arrived at a point where it can stand on its own feet, as do many of the other sciences. For instance, in mathematics there is a premium on accuracy, while in medicine the premium is on the successful handling of each par- ticular patient's combination of character and pathology. 64 Life is so full of deception, and human nature indulges in so many curious pretenses, that the practical man in any form of busi- ness or applied science cannot help feeling occasionally that it is useless to try to be absolutely accurate. He is commonly placed in the position where if he sticks to what he knows to be the accurate truth, he will lose the business which might help him make his living. It even may be said that the great majority of students in any branch of science sooner or later get to a stage where they feel that the effort to be accurate, logical, and sincere is hopeless; they realize that practical success demands an adaptation of science to the immediate question which they call practical. But when one stops to think whether there is or is not a fund called human knowl- edge, which no man knows in its entirety, and yet which is available to all men, one must acknowledge that there is such a fund. There is a basis of recorded truth in geometry, in bacteriology, in path- ology, and in the other sciences from which we may draw. Yet to the hypercritical student a study of any of these sciences brings out innumerable inaccuracies. There is no branch of science which is complete, and yet of each there is a stock of knowledge which is recorded, and is transmissible from teacher to student. But the deep student finds that there is always an indefiniteness to what knowledge is possessed in each and every branch; and yet, on the other hand, his study leads him to know that he can extract from the infinite number of facts and principles which are not yet formu- lated and recorded a few which he himself can drag out of the darkness and put on record. He must eventually come to the con- clusion that the finite knowledge which man possesses is infinitely imperfect, but that the infinite knowledge which man does not yet possess can be made finitely perfect. The possession by humanity of some imperfect knowledge, already too vast for any one mind, is a proof of man's ability to go on approaching infinite knowledge, which is the truth. Truth is the one thing worth clinging to, and is too evasive and difficult to grasp to let any opportunity to do so slip by. Truth subordinated to even a supposedly good purpose confuses and postpones human happiness. In clinical practice, when the physician or the surgeon, for the sake of his own reputation or even for the sake of his sympathy for the patient's feelings, resorts to subterfuges or worse, the ad- vance of clinical science is postponed. And if the advance of the science is postponed, it means the subtraction of the opportunities to use that which is postponed, for with that knowledge relief might be given to future sufferers. The physician or surgeon who sub- ordinates a truth to his fear that the truth may be misinterpreted is actually doing harm to clinical science. In a broad way, the effect of this practice or habit of the profession (for I believe that such subterfuges are common enough to be called a habit of our profes- sion) can be illustrated by our system of medical education. Medical science and medical ethics are taught by precept in our medical 65 schools, but in our hospitals too often the great surgeon or teacher shows the student by demonstration and example that he considers it right to use his judgment as to when to subordinate truth; and he makes pretty free use of this form of poetic license. If a sponge is lost in an abdomen, the unfortunate fact is concealed as thoroughly as possible. For fear of damage to the surgeon's reputation and the hospital's reputation, all concerned are agreed that it is better that the patient and his friends should not know what has happened. The result has been that year after year has gone by, and no adequate measures have been taken to avoid this unfortunate happening in many hospitals. The lost sponge in the abdomen is a glaring error, obviously preventable, obviously a proof of wretched carelessness, but typical of the mediaeval state of mind which permits us practitioners from the highest to the lowest to defend ourselves under the old saying, " Do not blame the doctor, he does the best he can." The lost sponge is only a glaring example of the same sort of inefficiency as a careless diagnosis, a hurried preparation, a reckless operation, or a whimsical therapeutic experiment. But you will ask what all these platitudes on philosophy and morals have to do with the title of this paper. The answer is the description of the End Result System of Hospital Organization. There is nothing complicated about the End Result System. It is merely a plan for giving accurate, available, immediate records of each case which the hospital undertakes to treat. Its unit is an ideal result for each individual patient treated. It subordinates the indi- vidual interests of the staff, if those interests are incompatible with this ideal; it boldly encourages them, when they are not. It demands an analysis of the final result in each case treated and the fixation for responsibility of failure or success on the individual who under- takes the treatment. Such a system is truly scientific. Science is simply a record of truth. Science demands the facts about each case and their fearless record, even if brief. Efficiency demands the best possible application of recorded knowledge to each case. I find there is a constant confusion between the essential ideas of the End Result System and the Follow-Up System. The Follow-Up System is only a step in the End Result System. The cases should be followed up, to see whether the treatment given has or has not been successful. The End Result System demands an analysis of the reasons why the case has been successful or unsuccessful, and the utilization of the knowledge thus obtained for avoiding future errors and for securing future successes. The Follow-Up System is a useful but not an absolutely necessary part of the End Result System, because a great majority of the cases can be determined as successful or unsuccessful, even as early as the time when they leave the hospital. An analysis of the causes of the success or failure in these cases can be made even without in- cluding any of the cases which leave the hospital and are followed 66 up afterwards. But the more that are followed up and included, the better. It is obvious that the more effective the Follow-Up System is, the more useful and satisfactory will be the conclusions formed on the analysis of the cases in general. However, I coald write an End Result Report for the cases in any hospital, eve* if no Follow-Up System existed. The really difficult thing about the End Result System is to induce the staff in any hospital to be willing to make a truthful acknowledgment of the personal part which contributes to the suc- cess or failure of the cases. It is here that we meet the conflict between man s insatiable desire to ascertain the truth and his sup- posed necessity to deceive his fellowmen for the sake of his own self-preservation or ambition. In every hospital there are certain cases where the personal element is the cause of failure. The onus caused by the fixing of responsibility in such cases is so great, that it really does bring up the question of the actual struggle for exist- ence. Yet if we all permitted this fixation of responsibility, this onus would be pretty well distributed. Now since the End Result System demands accurate, available. immediate records for scientific, efficient analysis, it must also demand a classification and an index of the individual pathologic conditions which the hospitals treat. There must be some practical method by which we can turn to any given class of cases, in order to find the methods of treatment which have been effective in any group. If a case of papilloma of the bladder enters the hospital, we should be able to turn at once to the records of all cases of this condition which the hospital has previously treated, in order to make immediate use of what knowledge we have obtained from the thera- peutic experiments we have performed on these previous cases. We should be able not only to ascertain the methods of treatment, but the persons under whose responsibility the choice of method and its successful or unsuccessful application was made in each case. We want a simple method of finding out who has been successful in treating these cases and how he did it. The first thing is to be able to find the cases. I wish to suggest the practical value of using classifications as indices and vice versa. But classifications and indices will be of little use, unless there is a premium for those who use them. A seniority system of promotion does not require them. Classifications are only relatively useful. Where the number of patients is small, the number of subdivisions of classification need not be large. The greater the number of patients, the greater the number of subdivisions needed in a classification. My suggestion is to use classifications as we do the indices in books. We use an index in a book, in order to make it easy to turn to a page where a certain subject is mentioned. It is on the page referred to that we find out how much and how detailed that information is. An index in a book may be classified, and still be equally satisfactory as a rapid method of leading us to the desired information. The system of classification which I propose is simply to record each case under a number, like a page in a book. Each case will have an index reference to every anatomic and pathologic diagnosis which is men- tioned in the description of the case. The index itself will merely be classified anatomically and pathologically, instead of alphabeti- cally. In this way it will be easy to find from the index every case in which any particular disease occurred. For instance, suppose Case 161 had appendicitis, cholelithiasis, and fibroid tumor of the uterus. In looking in the index, we shall find after each of these diagnoses the number 161. By using the same method of classifica- tion of indices, we may make them practical for large or small hospitals, large hospitals merely having more subdivisions. How shall we make a classification of the index ? We must here again return to the finite and the infinite. I call your attention to the fact that if you take a straight line and divide it into halves, and one-half of this line into other halves, and so on indefinitely, you will arrive at what is called in mathematics a Variable which approaches its Limit. You can keep on dividing the half into other halves indefinitely to the end of time, theoretically, but practically you will be limited by the number of visible subdivisions you can make with your pencil. When we come to any kind of classification, we can use this same principle. By turning the line into a square, we can make our classification a double one; and by turning it into a cube, a triple one. BASIC PLAN OF A CARD CATALOGUE CABINET FOR STANDARD HOSPITAL USE 'malignani OTHER CONDITIONS \^ 1 1 ! A suggestion for a System of Classification and Case Reference Index of Diseases, based on the principle of the Variable increasing toward its Limit, which acknowledges that the Finite is infinitely imperfect, but be- lieves that the Infinite may be made finitely perfect. Consecutive and permanent case numbers are essential. Begin a new series on January 1, 1918. 68 Such a classification is scientific. It acknowledges the infinite and the finite, and admits the impossibility of excluding the in- finite from the finite or the finite from the infinite. To make a practical classification, we need merely to subdivide "other condi- tions" still further pathologically and anatomically. That any finite classification will be infinitely imperfect can readily be seen by the subdivisions in figure No. 1. For instance, anatomically we divide into "the head" and "other parts of the body," but where shall we say that the head is defined? How much of the neck shall we in- clude? Is the pharynx part of the head or of the neck? Likewise in the pathologic classification we divide into "malignant" and "other conditions"—shall we include mixed tumor of the parotid as a malignant condition? Who knows? We have not yet defined the answer. The infinite has not become finite. No more can we deny the finiteness of the infinite, for we certainly can divide "other parts of the body" into the trunk and "other parts of the body," and we can divide "other pathologic conditions" into inflammatory conditions and "other pathologic con- ditions." I hold that the most human science can do, is to make the infinite more finite, for the sciences of mathematics and philosophy show us that space and time, squares and circles, embody the in- finite and finite. We may suppose a circle which surrounds the most infinite record of knowledge the human mind is capable of knowing, and we may likewise suppose an inner circle which bounds the knowledge which man has already accumulated—human science. It is the growth of this inner circle of finite knowledge toward the outer circle of infinite knowledge which represents the development of the human mind. It gives us satisfaction to make the inner circle expand toward the outer circle. Life may be truly happy, when human science has reached the outer circle and contains all that the human collective mind can know of Truth, collected and arranged in available form for the individual. In this large chart which I present to you (see loose leaf), I offer a practical classification suited to our present-day knowledge of anatomy and pathology, in the intersecting squares of which are the numbers of the cases which have been operated upon at my own hospital. This classification and index are useful to me as far as my limited knowledge goes. It enables me to turn at once to any rare case, or to all the cases of any particular diagnosis which have fallen within my experience at the hospital. It is useful to me alike in studying the scientific side of my cases or the practical efficiency of the treatment which I have given. The whole chart and each sub- division in it contain the same relation of the finite and the infinite. So far as my pathologic and anatomic knowledge are finite, it is accu- rate ; but like all things in human science, it is infinitely imperfect and inaccurate. I merely claim that it is a step in the right direction; that it accords with the circle which represents human knowledge growing toward the great outer circle which represents all possible human knowledge. This chart could be subdivided, so that its divisions would be so detailed that one division would be found for self-inflicted gunshot injuries of the little toenail, or it could be condensed to the limits of the four-square chart shown above. In a large hospital, one can imagine this chart forming the face of a filing catalogue in which each drawer would have the label of each subdivision. If each drawer then took advantage of the third dimension, further subdivision could be carried on, and an almost infinite number of cases could be catalogued in it. If a hospital had such a card catalogue painstakingly, accurately, and infinitely subdivided, it would be of no use unless the human spirit in that hospital were willing to acknowledge and record its errors, and to persistently analyze their causes, in order to take steps to prevent them in the future. The seniority system, nepotism, and humbug would be gradually crowded out of such a hospital. Unless we use a merit system of promotion instead of a seniority system, there will be little incentive for clinical accuracy. The struggle for existence must be utilized to give the truthful and efficient an opportunity to survive. Like the individuals in the coral reef, each must be made to add his bit to the advance of clinical science. Human nature, particularly young human nature, wants to play the game according to the rules. If it has, or can acquire, merit, it wants that merit recognized and honored, whether paid or not paid. The pay is an added proof of the justice of the honor. Imagine nepotism and seniority in our National Game, either in the amateur or professional field! The work in a hospital is no less a team game, and the practice of surgery would be a far more interesting profession, if the game were played fairly. It needs supervision, referees, and rules, because if human nature needs them in play, it certainly needs them in the struggle for existence. 70 1 ESSENTIAL STEPS IN THE END RESULT SYSTEM FOR THE USE OF CARDS AND CHARt Treatment should not be undertaken without diagnosis. A per- son who takes the responsibility of treatment should not object to stating what diseases or conditions he thinks he is treating. He should not object to stating the symptoms from which he seeks to relieve the patient, nor to having the hospital and the public know whether or not he succeeded in relieving these symptoms. He should be willing and glad to state his general line of treatment or the essential findings and steps of his operation, and to record under his own signature any complications which result. If in the organization of a hospital, diagnosis, treatment, after- treatment, and follow-up examinations are each made by different persons, each should sign under the appropriate heading. If in a hospital these conditions are insisted upon, the members of the staff have a right to expect the administration to pay the expenses of following up their cases and of giving each the credit for his successes in the Annual Report of the institution. Each patient who enters the hospital shall have one number and one number only, no matter how many times he enters. The End Result Cards should be authoritative—signed by the persons responsible for saying what was the matter with the patient and for directing the treatment given. End Result Cards should be filed numerically and have a name index. When a case is once reported dead, file separately. The End Result Card is intended to be an epitome of the entire record of the life of one individual patient, so far as that life comes in contact with the hospital. The ideal scientific record would be a complete description of the individual from his conception to his grave, together with all pathologic conditions which arise in consequence of congenital deviations from the normal or in consequence of any reaction to his environment. In the present conditions of human society, extensive records in hospitals are impracticable except in a few instances. But extensive records are not necessary for science—brief, authoritative, accurate, fearless records of important facts are needed in clinical work today. Our effort in designing an End Result Card has been to make a record so brief, that any hospital, however small, can use it as well as a big hospital. It is intended to be the greatest common divisor of all clinical records. Therefore, do not crowd it, but arrange the important facts so clearly in your brain, that you can place them within the dimensions of this card. 71 N £ > 6. 'vi 0 ^ > °i V i" \ ~o \ 4 $ Reverse of End Result Card Date n-/::-&- /t/.^L-cc-//- ■&-■ J^ sCC~<-£Z/ ■ t^-cZ- <'?■/- <=>^S-e-KL. DIRECTIONS FOR FILLING OUT CHART When 100, or, if you please, 1,000 cards have accumulated, let two persons enter the diagnoses in the appropriate intersect- ing squares of the Chart. One (preferably a doctor) may read the diagnoses, no matter how many there are on a card; the other (preferably an accurate accountant) may enter the number of the card in the appropriate intersecting squares for each diagnosis. When an operation has been done, he may underline the number with red ink. If the patient died in the hospital, he may bracket with black ink. When more than one diagnosis should appear in the same square, add -2 or -3 or -m = multiple to the card number. The whole can be verified by reversing the process and calling the numbers from the squares and checking each card. When the squares become crowded, use a new sheet and enter the last number in the upper left-hand corner. Or if only one or two squares are crowded, enter them separately at the bottom of the sheet. Re-entries should have new diagnoses, entered on the old charts. In entering numbers which are large, as 224342, only the last one, two, or three figures need be entered, because the thousands will be given from the upper left-hand corner. If you now have these cumbersome large numbers, give them up and start fresh. SUGGESTIONS AND PRECEDENTS FOR THE RECORDING CLERK These may be increased in number by rulings of the Efficiency Committee of any individual hospital, and such rulings added to their reports. Gallstones and other calculi should be classed under "chronic inflammation." Displacements of organs under "unclassified," unless considered "congenital" or "traumatic." Perineal lacerations should appear under "traumatic." Abdominal adhesions under "unclassified abdominal," unless the organs involved are specified; e. g., the gall bladder being adherent to the pylorus would be classified under chronic inflammation of both regions, but if caused surely by cholecystitis or duodenal ulcer, it would fall under the appropriate organ only. Inguinal and femoral herniae should appear under "traumatic" of groin, unless specified as "congenital." Post-operative hernia? should appear under "unclassified abdom- inal" and "traumatic." If in doubt, reserve for the decision of the Efficiency Committee. See also pages 78-85. 74 VARIOUS USES As An Index If one desires to look up all the cases of a given disease of a given region, say tuberculosis of the wrist, he must look through all the cards whose numbers appear in the intersecting squares of Tuber- culosis and Joints. To be sure that the recording clerk has not put any cases under other headings, he might also look through Bones; but with the double check mentioned above, the clerk would be unlikely to put such a case in any other square. Large hospitals having a card index could use this sheet as a basis for their card index and subdivide to any extent under it, either anatomically or pathologically. For Morbidity Statistics The footing up of individual squares and vertical and transverse columns and their totals give statistics of all sorts, both of the inci- dence of a given disease and of the number of cases. A given case may have tuberculosis of the intestines and of the wrist, and thus be recorded as an instance of each of these diseases, and yet the investigator would easily see that both instances occurred in one patient. For Mortality Statistics Mortality appears in the chart in relation to the disease, to the combination of diseases, to the operation, to the individual, and to the hospital. To obtain the mortality in a column or in the whole sheet, it is merely necessary to make a list of all black bracketed numbers and to check off the duplicates. If, as we suggest, in addition to the tables every hospital pub- lishes abstracts of every fatal case, as in the Massachusetts General Hospital report, the investigator can make up his own mind as to whether he regards the death as due to any single pathologic con- dition or to the operation or to some inter-current calamity.1 For End Result Records On the chart itself or on a duplicate, which is easily made, one may record at the end of any given period, say a year, the fact of whether the result of the treatment is known or not known. This may be done by drawing a blue line through the number. Every case that turns up after that date may be marked with a blue line on the old chart by the clerk who records the note on the End Result Card. 1 In the chart here given, black brackets, red underlining, etc., have been omitted to prevent confusion. 75 As An Efficiency Study The Efficiency Committee may use a duplicate chart to mark each number, with a colored line denoting satisfactory or unsatisfactory results. It should be the aim of every hospital to have every square con- spicuous by the presence of O. K. marks or by the absence of the marks denoting errors of judgment, skill, care, and equipment. For the teaching hospitals, the Efficiency Committees should also aim to have some numbers in every square. Private hospitals will inevitably aim for a high percentage of satisfactory marks. Charitable hospitals should have the difficult squares well filled and be able to show that the deaths were under the care of men who had previously established good records in similar cases. OBJECTIONS TO USE OF CHART 1. It is too complicated. Answer. Try it for one month and really see if it is. 2. It is too expensive. Answer. Try it for a year and see if it does not save the cost in the elimination of waste products. 3. It is too difficult for a house officer to decide which squares to put the diagnosis in. Answer. Then let the senior surgeon do it, for it is the most impor- tant work in a hospital to make sure of a good Product. 4. Members of the Staff themselves would not know which square to put a given diagnosis in, and would not use it after it is done. Answer. Then get a staff who can do it, and who will use it. 5. A large hospital would use up the sheets too rapidly. Answer. Large hospitals should use the chart as a basis for a card index system. 6. Special hospitals would fill up some squares to overflowing and have few in the rest. Answer. Each special hospital could use one sheet for all its diag- noses except those in the squares of its specialty, and devise a still further subdivided sheet for its special cases. 7. It does not give the sex or age. Answer. No, nor the birthplace, nor the color of the hair and eyes. Nevertheless it is practical, if you are in earnest. 76 THE CHART IN PRINT The chart itself is perhaps a cumbersome thing to print, although it is very useful in filing the numbers. In a printed report, however, the numbers can appear just as well under printed headings. As an illustration, I present the following table, which the reader can use to look up any pathologic condition in this Report, although not as rapidly as on the chart, which has many subheadings. It would, however, be merely a matter of printer's ink to put the whole chart in this form. You can use this table as an index to common conditions, rare conditions, or un- named conditions. Try it. Find the cases of empyema, elephantiasis of the legs, or buckling of the liver. To locate the cases of empyema, you would have to look through all the numbers under inflammatory conditions of the thorax; but to find any other inflammatory condition of the thorax, you would only have to look through the same numbers. Thus time and space are saved, unless the index is in very frequent use. Why have a long list of names in a report, except to impress the Trustees? Why invest in expensive card catalogues? New Growths Head 10, 41, 46, 55, 61, 65, 78, 79, 96, 133, 143, 146, 149, 186, 197, 223, 251, 252, 261, 267, 296, 298?, 299, 309, 326, 334, 837 Thorax 88, 39, 51, 78, 114, 119, 197, 268, 278, 291 Abdomen 4, 19, 29, 42, 53, 68, 78, 87, 09, 106, 110, 124, 145, 151, 159, 173, 185, 204, 211, 226, 230, 231, 232, 237, 242, 253, 255, 256, 258, 265, 266, 269, 270, 274, 275, 284, 286, 288, 289, 292, 302, 307, 808, 817. 831 TtutiIc 63, 68, 85, 136, 151?, 168, 218, 237, 258, 269, 287, 289, 296, 807, 311, 313, 317, 827 Extremities 16, 52, 60, 148, 257, 259, 262, 273, 296, 335 General or Unclassified or Affecting All or Many Parts of the Body Inflammatory Conditions Head 2, 3, 16, 27, 30, 63, 67, 69, 71, 86, 89, 127, 142, 157, 171, 177, 184, 186, 193, 250, 293, 298, 300, 315, 318, 320, 323, 324, 325, 330, 334 Thorax 4, 24, 28, 30, 36, 45, 46, 77, 80, 86, 88, 92, 96, 114, 121, 125, 127, 137, 138, 152, 165, 174, 189, 190, 200, 201, 224, 244, 246, 252, 262, 274, 278, 281, 283, 291, 292, 293, 301, 325 Abdomen 1, 7, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 21, 24, 25, 26, 31, 33, 36, 42, 49, 50, 53, 56, 64, 74, 76, 77, 78, 84, 87, 89, 90, 93, 94, 102, 113, 115, 116, 117, 121, 122, 124, 126, 129, 138, 140, 141, 142, 151, 155, 156, 158, 159, 163, 166, 167, 168, 175, 176, 178, 179, 182, 183, 188, 189, 192, 193, 195, 196, 200, 202, 203, 208, 211, 212, 215, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 230, 233, 234, 235, 236, 240, 242, 243, 248, 249, 250, 254, 255, 256, 266, 271, 272, 274, 275, 276, 280, 282, 283, 285, 288, 289, 290, 292, 295, 297, 302, 304, 305, 307, 308, 310, 312, 316, 317, 319, 322, 328 Trvnk 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, 17, 34, 44, 45, 53, 76, 80, 95, 103, 107, 109, 111, 136, 139, 148, 160, 164, 166, 168, 171, 172, 178, 194, 214, 217, 223, 244, 245, 247, 250, 253, 274, 275, 293, 303, 314, 333 Extremities 24, 40, 57, 111, 112, 130, 131, 141, 144, 150, 160, 171, 187, 189, 191, 205, 206, 214, 216, 221, 227, 228, 229, 239, 252, 259, 264, 266, 273, 284, 288, 293, 294, 306, 320, 321 General or Unclassified or Affecting All or Many Parts of the Body 62, 81, 97, 100, 125, 162, 249, 292 77 Other Conditions Head 2, 12, 22, 43, 66, 70, 73, 79, 91, 142, 146, 186, 233, 253, 292, 325, 829 Thorax 13, 45, 54, 156, 159, 224, 288, 252, 264, 292 Abdomen 7,31, 33, 35, 36, 48, 50, 53, 68, 77, 94, 103, 105, 110, 116, 117, 121, 135, 138, 140, 142, 151, 152, 155, 156, 178, 179, 189, 196, 200, 211, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 224, 234, 236, 237, 250, 255, 258, 269, 275, 277, 280, 284, 288, 289, 295, 308, 319, 322 Trunk 13, 17, 26, 29, 30, 32, 34, 35, 87, 47, 58, 59, 72, 82, 83, 94, 95, 96, 101, 103, 104, 121, 128, 129, 132, 134, 139, 154, 164, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 176, 178, 180, 192, 193, 194, 199, 207, 208, 213, 230, 233, 234, 236, 241, 250, 253, 255, 260, 264, 275, 279, 281, 287, 297, 303, 304, 308, 309, 310, 311, 313, 314, 332, 333, 335, 336 Extremities 9, 15, 23, 51, 75, 98, 108, 112, 118, 120, 129, 130, 141, 147, 153, 174, 181, 191, 198, 205, 209, 210, 216, 221, 228, 238, 239, 255, 256, 263, 264, 274, 294, 321 General or Unclassified or Affecting All or Many Parts of the Body 8, 18, 20, 49, 76, 96, 123, 161, 168, 233, 241, 250, 264, 274, 287, 304, 309, 330 The Educational Factor in Placing the Diagnosks on the Chart The person who uses this chart should be willing to admit that a straight line has no width and may extend to infinity at either or both ends. But he must also admit that he can practically make a straight line a foot long and the width of a pencil mark. He can be more sure that the postulated straight line has no width than he can of the width of the pencil mark. Yet both are real to him. Thus in filling out the chart, he may be sure that the postulated distinctions are correct, and equally sure of his inability to accu- rately place each diagnosis in the appropriate squares. However, the inaccuracy in most cases will not be his fault, but that of present- day medical science. It is well enough to entitle one space "head" and another "neck," but more difficult to decide in which the pharynx or parotid belongs. In the case of a cystic cervix, it is hard to make up one's mind whether to class it as a "new growth" or a "chronic inflammatory" condition. The decision would depend on the degree of knowledge we possessed about the origin of cystic disease of the cervix, or of the opinion of the person making the classification. Personally, I con- sider it usually "chronic inflammatory." However, all knowledge is subject to the same restrictions of our lack of power to separate the finite from the infinite, but that we can to some extent is certain. It is on this general principle that the subdivisions of both the anatomic and pathologic conditions have been thought out. Ordi- nary methods of classification have been made by names, and the names have been subdivided. Unfortunately the names of symptoms, pathologic conditions, and anatomic regions—three different things —have been subdivided as if they were one thing. True subdivisions should divide a homogeneous thing. Separation is a different thing from division. Two kinds of fluid may be mixed in a bowl. We may divide the whole fluid into halves, but each half will contain the same proportion of each ingredient of the mixture. True separation would withdraw one kind of fluid from the mixture and leave the other. We apply this method to the previous methods of classifica- tion. Others have gone on making subdivisions of mixtures, whereas we separate the different ingredients. When wood and iron are mixed, we do not divide the two together, but we separate our wood from iron. So the subdivisions in our chart and tables would more properly be called subseparations. We are always separating each ingredient from the mixture as fast as science will permit us; and there will always be left a group of conditions which are unclassified anatomically or pathologically, in the lower right-hand corner of the chart. We think that all the other rectangular spaces in the chart represent the separations that science has already attempted to make from this chaotic group of "unclassified unclassified conditions." But the same principle that 78 applies to the whole chart applies to each individual separate rec- tangle. Each rectangle will always be capable of further subdivision, and it will always have a lower right-hand corner in which the "un- classified of unclassified conditions," under its own heading, should fall. The whole is a Variable increasing toward its Limit, and each subdivision is another Variable. Like all human experience, the chart is full of mistakes and errors, but the mistakes may always be remedied or at least acknowledged. In descriptive science, to name a condition, a division, a group, or any sort of subdivision, appears to be a natural process of human thought. We name the condition, so that for the time being we can tell one another about it; but another group of men in another place may name the same thing or condition by a different name. Hence the growth of languages, the confusion of the tongues of Babel, and the oft-quoted question, "What's in a name?" As a matter of fact, there are many pathologic conditions which have many names, and others which have no names. This is partic- ularly so when there are combinations of different conditions. A method such as the one described permits the reader to use this classification as an index to find even these many named or unnamed conditions which in an ordinary tabulation would be relegated to miscellaneous conditions. For example, Case 221 is so unusual a condition, that it has no name. It was a buckling of the edge of the liver due to ptosis of the liver, while the edge was held high by an epigastric scar. Even though there is no name to use, we unhesi- tatingly place it as a traumatic condition of the digestive glands (liver). Is the attempt to do this apparently tedious work worth while? The stupendous task of making a science of clinical medicine is to apply all the other sciences to neutralizing all the noxious effects which heredity and environment may thrust upon the indi- vidual by all sorts of detailed combinations of diseases in any portion or many portions of the body. And the science of preventive medi- cine implies even a further knowledge—so thorough an understand- ing of disease and anatomy, that the two can be prevented from combining. When this millennium can be attained, the whole chart will be separated and subseparated to an infinite degree — except a theoretic space in the lower right-hand corner. We may deny the possibility of ever reaching perfect knowledge, but we cannot deny that we have begun to try to do so. Human knowledge has begun in the, upper left-hand corner. We have already described and formulated much of our environment. We can al- ready apply our knowledge to curing and preventing some noxious influences. Is not the beginning of the chart quite as wonderful as the end is likely to be? To my mind, the effort to fill out the chart is a pleasurable one—only annoyed by my errors of inaccuracy. I feel that while I stick by what I know to be true, correct, and accurate I am in accord with the evolution of humanity, and am 79 contented. But when haste, fatigue, inaccuracy, laziness, or ambition hurry me into error. I get out of tune, and must penitently go back for the false notes. And a real error—one done with intent to deceive —the sacrifice of a truth, no matter how good the cause—would strike a discord in the harmony of the universe. It would ring loudest in my own ears, but my neighbors might suffer too. There are many doubtful conditions, some of which are still unclassified, because we do not know their pathology accurately, even though they are familiar enough as clinical entities. The fol- lowing are some of the conditions which have caused me trouble, and on which I have established precedents for myself which may help others. My doubt has been due to my imperfect knowledge. Inguinal and femoral hernia can be anatomically defined under groin, but there is doubt of their pathologic position. They are sometimes congenital and sometimes traumatic conditions, and some- times actually inflamed or strangulated. In the present state of my pathologic knowledge, I prefer to class them as "traumatic," unless they are obviously "congenital," i. e., the sac continuous with the tunica vaginalis. A ventral hernia following appendectomy or other abdominal operation is clearly "traumatic." In the chart previously published I classified such cases when following appendectomy as "traumatic of the appendix," but I think it is less confusing to consider them as "traumatic of the unclassified abdomen," and shall do so in the future. Shall cystocele be classified as a lesion of the female genitals or of the urinary organs? It is clearly a "traumatic condition of both genitals and urinary organs," but primarily of the former. I therefore classify it as "traumatic of the female genitals"; if cystitis were superimposed, I should classify it also as "acute or chronic inflammatory of the urinary organs." Should anteflexion and retroversion be classed under "uterus and adnexa" (abdominal), or under "female genitals" (not abdom- inal) ? I prefer to class malpositions of the uterus under " female genitals," because in my opinion they are not truly abdominal con- ditions. As to their pathology I am also somewhat uncertain. They certainly are not new growths or inflammatory conditions, nor am I satisfied that they are clearly congenital or clearly traumatic. I therefore leave them in the "unclassified" division. Scientific knowl- edge has not yet shown me whether they are congenital or traumatic. Spasms, such as pylorospasm and cardiospasm, are put under the "unclassified" of their respective anatomic regions. Spasms, hypertrophies, atrophies, dilatations, and functional disturbances of organs not known to be caused by definite pathologic conditions, I place under unclassified of the special anatomic regions. These are not clearly pathologic conditions, and yet they are more than symptoms such as epistaxis, hematemesis, jaundice, intestinal ob- struction, ascites, edema of legs. 80 The question of symptoms is a puzzling one. Shall we consider trifacial neuralgia, epilepsy, diabetes, as true pathologic conditions ? As our chart subdivides only pathologic and anatomic conditions, we do not wish to use it for symptoms. If trifacial neuralgia is a pain in the fifth nerve, it is merely a symptom, and we do not want to use it; but if it is a "chronic inflammatory" condition of the nerve, as I believe it is, it is a pathologic condition, and we want to include it. Modern medicine is continually fighting a battle to teach people the difference between treating symptoms and pathologic conditions. Yet the most learned of us scarcely know, ourselves. Which is epilepsy? To my mind it is a symptom, yet it appears in most lists of pathologic conditions. I have classified it as "unclassified of the brain," because I believe it is in most cases due to a pathologic condition of the brain. In other words, being in doubt, I have ac- cepted it—perhaps I am wrong; any time that I am convinced of it I can change it. If a case proves to be due to a glioma, it could be put under "benign or malignant" conditions, according to our view of the pathogenicity of glioma. Is diabetes a symptom or a pathologic condition ? A person may have sugar in the urine without diabetes, and vice versa. Yet to most of us the symptom, sugar in the urine, means diabetes, and vice versa. I shall therefore classify diabetes (sugar in the urine) as an "unclassified condition of the urinary organs." If in a given case diabetes were proved due to cancer of the pancreas, I should classify it under "malignant of the pancreas." But science has not yet taught us enough about the pathology of diabetes to classify all cases. The use of this chart is a good exercise in clear thinking and in teaching the fundamentals of medical knowledge to students. Personally, I want it as an index to my cases, so that I can tell whether I have a staff of colleagues and assistants who are compe- tent to prevent pathologic conditions from causing symptoms. Certain conditions may be traumatic in origin, and yet of im- portance, because of the chronic inflammation they cause. A sub- acromial bursitis is usually of traumatic origin, yet the trauma may be trivial and the chronic inflammation excessive. I think it is best to classify such conditions only as "chronic inflammatory," and yet I see no objection to listing them as both. The chart should not be unnecessarily duplicated, but certainly, when used as an index, such duplication is useful; and when used for rough statistics, such cases should be included under "trauma of the supraspinatus tendon," as well as under "chronic inflammation of the bursa" which the rupture causes. In the previous report I should not have included them both under bursitis, but should have had the traumatic part apply to the supraspinatus tendon, and included it under "traumatic" of the un- classified extremities. That is, rupture of the supraspinatus tendon is one pathologic entity, and subacromial bursitis caused by it is another. One may occur without the other. Yet they usually occur 81 together, so statistically they should each count in adding one to the lists of chronic inflammatory conditions and traumatic conditions, respectively. But they occur in only one patient, person, or case, and cannot appear as two in statistics relating to persons, patients, cases, or cures. It must never be forgotten that these charts and tables are only a convenient means for different ends—that is: (l) indices, (2) gen- eral or detailed statistics; (3) efficiency, and (4) scientific studies. Multiple pathologic or anatomic lesions of the same region, or different pathologic or anatomic varieties of lesions which occur in the same case, must be arranged, subtracted, or added, accord- ing to the purpose for which the study is made, by verifying all details from the original records. I merely claim that these charts and tables are a simpler, surer, cheaper, and more scientific and accurate method than the usual card catalogues or lists of names, which are mere jumbled collections of anatomic, regional, functional, systemic, and arbitrary conditions of a mixed nature. Hydrocele I consider a "chronic inflammatory condition of the male genitals," unless it is clearly congenital. Fistula? are classed as "traumatic conditions" of the organ concerned. Abdominal adhesions I class as "chronic inflammatory" or "congenital," according to my opinion,—lacking exact knowledge. Intestinal obstruction. Is intestinal obstruction a symptom or a pathologic condition? Cases 105 and 155 are examples. In Case 105 the obstruction was due to a intussusception caused by a Meckel's diverticulum. Here was a congenital condition leading to a traumatic condition which produced the pathologic condition of intestinal obstruction. In Case 155 the obstruction was due to volvulus of a congenitally abnormal cecum,—-the volvulus might be considered "traumatic," or even "inflammatory," because the adhesion of the appendix to the left costal border was an important factor in permitting the volvulus to occur. Cases 53, 68, 110, 237, 258, 269 had cancer of the intestine or rectum as the primary cause. It would seem hardly fair to exclude an important surgical condi- tion such as intestinal obstruction from a pathologic classification on the ground that it is merely a symptom, and I have therefore placed these cases under "unclassified conditions of the intestine," and also placed each under the appropriate heading for its primary cause or causes. Extrauterine pregnancy I place as a "traumatic condition of the uterus and adnexa." Banti's disease, splenic anemia, Hodgkin's disease, etc., I con- sider as "unclassified of unclassified," unless some local condition is the chief manifestation, in which case I add it also under the local region as "unclassified" (for example, an enlarged spleen). A septic pilonidal sinus is practically an "acute inflammatory condition of the lower portion of the back," although it is primarily a congenital lesion. I class it under both. 82 Hemorrhoids, varicose veins, pelvic phleboliths, variocele, etc., are not new growths, inflammatory, congenital, or strictly traumatic conditions. I consider them as "unclassified." Neurasthenia I class as "unclassified of unclassified," although I think it is really a symptom of visceral anomalies. Insufficiency (uterine), atony (of stomach), I place under "unclassified" of the organ concerned. Hydronephrosis I place under "unclassified of the urinary organs," and add the pathologic cause, if known (as aberrent vessel), under its appropriate heading. Ptosis, Lane's kink, Jackson's veil, are unclassified conditions of the "unclassified abdomen." I do not feel at all sure whether they are "congenital" or "traumatic." Concretions, such as gallstones, I class as "chronic inflamma- tory" conditions of the containing organ. Organic heart disease is considered "chronic inflammatory," unless surely syphilitic. Prolapsed ovaries are considered "unclassified of the uterus and adnexa." Perinephritic abscess I class as "acute inflammatory of the urinary organs," as its origin is usually from the kidney. But if it were known to be from another cause, I should classify it accordingly. Cystic disease of the cervix is classed under "inflammatory conditions." Prolapsed uterus, lacerations of the cervix and perineum, are classed as "traumatic of the female genitals." The border line between uterine conditions classed as "uterus and adnexa" (abdominal), and uterine conditions to be classed as "female genitals" (extra-abdominal), is necessarily rather indefinite. Intrauterine tumors (polyps), hydramnios, pregnancy and its complications, appear under "female genitals"; while fibroids and other tumors in the uterine wall appear as "uterus and adnexa," since they are practically abdominal. Cancer of the cervix is under "female genitals," and when in the body of the uterus, as "uterus and adnexa," unless it evidently arose in the cervix (when in doubt, it may be classed under both headings). Floating kidney is classed as a "congenital condition of the urinary organs." It would be a matter of opinion as to whether to class this as "traumatic" or "congenital" or "unclassified." If science had yet taught us to be exact, we might place this condition under the right heading. Diverticuli of the intestine or bladder are also in my opinion usually "congenital," although they are considered by many writers to be traumatic. Mixed tumors of the parotid gland. There are certain new growths which science has not yet been able to decide to class as benign or malignant. In fact, some tumors may be potentially 83 benign or malignant, and we cannot by histologic examination tell the difference. I have classed mixed tumors of the parotid as "beni ex^pt and it! "^ 7 5 i S Vital intCreSt in this hosPital Proble"> to find the T0n„ ^A^1 PraCtiCe' * bdieve that they b«th desire he Dath whT" T Cr * If ^ T^™* t0 attract their attention to the path where I believe the trail lies. I bay at them, loudly enough cent Tor Zl T "° **t *"* m* lead the Pa^ °» *« right to talk to H 7 ^T 5 mn t0,haVC l0St the traih Jt would be useless to talk to them individually, for they are both partisans and leaders. Such men are strong, because they adhere to a purpose through h'n wM "• ^ ^ ^^'S ^"^ ^ ^more ha- tnan weak persons do. They believe that it is right for them to continue to use the prestige of the hospital to corner the "material." A well-endowed Charitable Hospital, with prestige and plenty of material, can set up "authorities" and "specialists" by assign- ing groups of material" to individuals. They thus give exceptional opportunity, and exceptional opportunity has a distinct money value in the Community. They can in this way corner the Genito-Urinary Surgery the Gall Bladder Surgery, or the Stomach Surgery of their neighborhoods. A surgeon who does not have the aid of the prestige and opportunity thus given is at a great disadvantage, no matter how able he may be nor how good results he gets in the few cases which come to him. Should not the recipients of these privileges at least give an account of the cases entrusted to them? It is unfair enough to give special privilege to those not qualified, but it is even worse to take away from those who are qualified the opportunity to benefit the patients and the world. Unfortunately, today, it is the opportunity which he has at some Charitable Hospital which determines the value of a surgeon's time, rather than the use he has made of that opportunity. As I see it, the main point on which I disagree with Richard Cabot is as to whether or not this hospital opportunity is to be assigned by special privilege or by fair competition. I claim that the End Result System will tend to bring about fair competition, and benefit alike the Patient, the Public, and Medical Science. The Value of Surgical "Material" The following quotation from our last Report seems worth repeating: "A surgeon needs at least 100 operations a year 'to keep his hand in'—that is, to operate twice a week. Any surgeon can do, and some do, 1,000 operations a year and even more. These are about the physical limits, apart from brains. Therefore, somewhere 115 between 100 and 1,000 operations will be the best number to get the best results; and undoubtedly some individuals will do better work with small numbers, and others with large numbers. For Cushing to do 100 brain operations is probably more than equiva- lent in time to Mayo's doing 1,000 laparotomies, yet to the indi- vidual the services of both are beyond price. To the ordinary practicing surgeon who is not a teacher or a scholar, there must be a mean between these extremes, varying with the character of the individual and type of operation he does. To do 1,000 operations a year under ordinary circumstances of practice would leave a man hardly any time (or inclination) for study or research; to do 100 might leave him too much. Doing over 1,000 would mean doing some badly, even if the operator were a very strong man. Doing less than 100 would soon mean too little experience and skill. Perhaps 300, with 300 working days, would give the highest percentage of satisfactory results. Let us throw in 100 for charity and do 200 for a living. 200 at $100 = $20,000 a year 200 at $200 = $40,000 200 at $500 = $100,000 200 at $1,000 = $200,000 1,000 at $100 = $100,000 1,000 at $1,000 = $1,000,000 Do these figures give you some inkling of the value of hospital appointments and the necessity of a surgeon's getting to the point of having at least 100 cases to keep his hand in? Do they suggest the value of hospital material?" I then presented the following statement of the fees I had received from the 270 cases whose abstracts appeared in the two previous Reports; my own fees only are included,— not those of the other surgeons who operated here: Cases paying less than Hospital Fee1 91 Cases paying Hospital Fee only 89 Cases paying E. A. C. less than $100 Professional Fee in addition to Hospital Fee 38 Cases paying from $100-$200 and Hospital Fee 23 Cases paying from $200-$300 and Hospital Fee 19 Cases paying from $300-$500 and Hospital Fee 10 270 Of these cases I operated on 193 myself, and received for them an average Professional Fee of $69.36 for the operation and after- care. lThe Hc«pital Fee is $50.00 for the first week and $25.00 for each week thereafter. 116 For the year ending July 31, 1916, the following is a similar statement Cases paying less than Hospital Fee 5 Cases paying Hospital Fee only 42 Cases paying E. A. C. less than $100 Professional Fee in addition to Hospital Fee \q Cases paying from $100-$200 and Hospital Fee 4 Cases paying from $200-$300 and Hospital Fee 4 Cases paying from $300-$500 and Hospital Fee 3 New Cases Re-entries 74 67 7 74 No patient has been charged a Professional Fee of over $500 no matter how long his stay. ' All of these fees were, of course, swallowed up in my loss. The average Professional Fee for the 67 cases on whom I myself operated during the last year was $61.12. Therefore, I have at least succeeded in approaching the ideal of a "hundred dollar hos- pital with a hundred dollar surgeon"; for whereas previously 91 cases paid less than the Hospital Fee, in this last year only 5 paid less. Previously, 52 were charged more than $100, and this last year only 11 were charged more. In other words, I do less for nothing and less for exorbitant prices. But if I could once establish a reputation that would assure me of 10 beds full of "material," you could see the value of it. The Concept of This Hospital1 This hospital assumes that the great middle class of the com- munity has now no method of obtaining good surgical treatment at fixed reasonable prices. Surgery is usually either hurriedly done at the Charitable Hospitals for nothing, or done at a relatively ex- orbitant price by the hospital surgeon in private practice. We plan to meet this demand for good surgery at low prices. The hospital assumes that any self-respecting individual can raise at least $100 for an operation, including his board and nursing. A man who has not saved, or who cannot find four friends, former employers or relatives, who will lend him, $25 apiece, need not mind going to a Charitable Hospital. (If any philanthropist doubts this, let me refer to him all such cases that come to me.) The average operation takes about three weeks of hospital care, and we assume that the $100 is to cover these three weeks, so that we arrange $50 for the first week and $25 for each week thereafter. I believe that I can afford to run a hospital of 12 beds and charge only the fee of $50 for the first week and $25 each week 'This page is repeated from the last Report. 117 thereafter as a minimum price. I plan to run the hospital on this scale, with an expense exactly equivalent to that standard, and to make my own living from what professional fees I can obtain from richer persons, or from operations outside the hospital, or from office practice. The standard of my hospital living and equipment will be about the same as that of a hotel charging $25 a week. This is good enough for even rich people, and a little better than what the medium classes have in their own homes in the city. Thus, if my reputation for care and thoroughness increased so that 10 of my 12 beds averaged full with a waiting list, the hospital itself could earn $17,333.33 per annum,—for it would take 173^ cases for 3 weeks. For this sum, the essential equipment and salaries could be main- tained on even a better scale than at present. This makes it for our interest and for the patient's interest to shorten the convalescence, since room is made for another patient; and the more often the $50 week is brought around, the better for us. Then, too, it makes it for our own interest to avoid complications, for we lose money by having any patient stay over three weeks on account of complications. Another assumption is this: that I personally can do my best work with about 12 beds. A surgeon who operates for more beds has to neglect detail and turn over too much to his assistants. One who operates for many less does not keep his hand in. Statement of Assets and Liabilities August 1, 1916 Assets Cash .... Accounts Receivable . Real Estate and Buildings Additions and Betterments Apparatus and Instruments X-ray Apparatus Furniture and Fixtures Liabilities Accounts Payable Bank Loans First Mortgage Profit and Loss $1,108.92 2,367.66 32,000.00 5,514.04 548.09 1,063.39 1,729.06 $44,331.16 $2,252.96 14,000.00 20,000.00 8,078.20 $44,331.16 The Real Estate and Equipment of the hospital are worth today just about what this statement shows — $32,000. This means that if the property were sold, the Profit or Loss would depend on what would be realized for improvements, furniture, and professional equipment for over or under $8,078.20. 118 Now as the hospital building is only a modified apartment house m a rather crowded part of the city, it is a decided contrast to the marble halls and spotless corridors of our Charitable Hospitals. However, can any Board of Trustees produce from their hospital records a consecutive series of major surgical cases which will show fewer errors of skill, knowledge, care, equipment, or surgical judg- ment than ours do? On the principle of the parable about the talents, have the Trustees of the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital done a proportionate amount more with their $6,612,679.77, or the Massachusetts General Hospital with their $8,405,874.72, than I have with this $8,078.20? Receipts and Expenditures August 1, 1911, to August 1, 1915 Receipts Hospital Fees .... Board Special Nurses and Guests Professional Fees Rents and Miscellaneous Revenue Loss ..... Expenditures Running Expenses .... Interest ...... Uncollectable Accounts Doubtful Accounts .... Depreciation Apparatus and Instruments Depreciation Furniture and Fixtures Depreciation Real Estate and Buildings Depreciation Additions and Betterments Maintenance Real Estate and Buildings August 1, 1915, to August 1, 1916 Receipts Hospital Fees .... Board Special Nurses and Guests Professional Fees Rents and Miscellaneous Revenue Loss ..... Expenditures Running Expenses .... Interest ...... Depreciation Real Estate and Buildings Depreciation Additions and Betterments $21,515.46 1,408.32 13,387.06 1,541.99 3,367.94 $41,220.77 $31,994.85 3,630.12 1,062.15 725.60 204.25 500.50 880.00 94.68 2,128.62 $41,220.77 $6,840.02 443.00 3,418.54 736.26 2,216.60 313,654.42 911,869.02 1,541.72 220.00 23.68 119 $13,654.42 As mar be seen in the first statement, my loss for running the hospital, including my Professional Fees, in the first four years was $3,367.94. In this last year alone (owing largely to the hospital's having been closed for two months) it was $2,216.60. This means that in five years I have lost $5,584.54 and a fraction of my labor. All the professional fees I have made here have been used to pay the expenses of my 5£ empty beds. If these beds had been full of Hospital Fee cases paying only their board, I should have been able to put my professional fees in the bank. Or, if some one should endow my 5^ empty beds, it would be equivalent to giving me a position at a Charitable Hospital, and I should begin to make a profit! But, after all, I have lost only $1,116.91 a year, and have not worked any harder than I used to for the cases under my care at the Massachusetts General. $1,116.91 is not much more than the hospital surgeons spend each year on new automobiles, so as to appear successful and ready to make the quickest time to any mem- ber of a millionaire's family who happens to have appendicitis. I am quite willing to pay $1,116.91 a year to force the End Result System on these Hospital Surgeons, because I rely on my own results to give me the position to which I am entitled. In the mean- time, I am paying the price of $1,116.91 a year for remaining in the market as a surgeon. Competition with the Charitable Hospitals A surgeon who is fortunate enough to have a good hospital appointment can get his 100 operations to keep his hand in very conveniently; but a surgeon like myself, who does not possess a hospital position, must find other means. He can run a private hospital as I do, where he can do operations for nothing without loss of time, or he can dash about to such private hospitals as take patients for small fees, and to the homes of patients who refuse to go to hospitals. To get his experience, he must bear the inevi- table financial loss on his private hospital, or the inevitable loss of time in going from one hospital or house to another to attend scattered patients. And he must take the responsibility and indi- vidual care of these patients, which is far more time-consuming than a hospital visit. I say inevitable financial loss for the private hospital, because the Charitable Hospitals spend on their patients an amount that is prohibitory for a poor patient to pay at a private hospital. Thus at the Massachusetts General Hospital, in 1915, $21 a week was spent on each patient. In 1915, the Peter Bent Brigham spent $31.22. And these hospitals pay nothing for taxes, very little for nurses, and no interest for invested capital. I must give what they give and collect from the patient before I can begin to make a profit. This means that a surgeon having the privilege of operating at these places, has a hospital run for him which is better than any 120 private hospital within the means of most wage-earners. His patients have the benefit of free consultation in all the other de- partments ; he has the assistance of a large and selected Junior Staff, who relieve him of many detailed responsibilities; and he has labo- ratories, libraries, and every possible facility under the same roof. His money is saved, his time is saved, he can take vacations or visit other clinics when he wants to, and he has many other advantages which the independent surgeon has not,—particularly in less risk of capital. Is it too much for the Trustees to ask him to fill out an End Result Card for each patient? Should he have the privilege of operating on any more cases than he can carefully study, follow, and make sure of relieving? Should the type of man who never records, analyzes, or formulates principles, be permitted to do experiments for his own advantage on the rare or difficult cases which he is unwilling to study and record in detail? Even if he does study, investigate, and write books, should he still have these privi- leges, unless this study fits him to cure his patients, and he proves that he can and does cure them? The funds left to a hospital for the sick poor are abused, when they are helping the hospital to compete with private practitioners for curable patients able to pay, unless they are first used to prove that the hospital itself gets standard results. Some of these funds could be more properly used to analyze the Product of the Hospital, to see whether the quality of the work of its staff is so much better than that of the average practitioner, that it is better for the public to force the latter to the wall. The financial report of my hospital for five years is evidence that I alone cannot compete with the Charitable Hospitals, and the Case Report is equally good evidence that I do my work as well or better. I cannot make a living, unless in the future I combine with other physicians, surgeons, and specialists; capitalize; build and equip a large hospital; and force the cliques who run the Charitable Hospitals out into the open, so that the Public can compare our results. And to begin such a combination, we shall have to assume the legal responsibility for carelessness which is now evaded by the Charitable Hospitals, and which still further increases our handicap. But if this is the only way to make an honest living in surgery, we shall have to do it. We are not going to give up surgery because the Charitable Hospitals compete with us, but we shall be glad to retire, if they can prove that they deliver better goods to the Public at as reasonable prices. When the results of open competition begin to be published, Clinical Science will be able to divorce Hypocrisy, and Commercialism will not pose as Charity. Here I am with a good surgical education, ready and willing to give my surgical services to the poor (for the sake of keeping my hand in and my reputation good), and I am not offered an appoint- ment at a large Charitable Hospital. Having once resigned from 121 the Massachusetts General Hospital as a protest against the Senior- ity System, I am as isolated as though I had come from another city. I charge that it would be as difficult for a good surgeon from another city to get an appointment on the staff of a Boston hospital as it would for a camel to enter the eye of a needle. But it may be said that a rich man might encompass both, although doubtless he can- not enter the Kingdom of Heaven even by endowing charitable institutions. A rich man could have a needle made so large, that a camel could enter its eye; and he could also, as I will show, erect a competitive hospital in Boston which on a "No Cure, No Pay" basis would take the rich Back Bay business away from the staffs of our Charitable Hospitals, so that appointments on their staffs would be so little in demand that the Trustees would be glad to give him one. If each reader of this Report will lend me $1,000 at 5 per cent interest, I will prove that this can be done. Ten thousand copies of this Report will be sent out; each will be read by several readers, but I do not care for more than 10,000 loans. This will give me $10,000,000, which will be enough to start with. I will then organ- ize as follows (for it will be necessary to compete with the actually good organizations of the Mayo Clinic and Battle Creek Sanitarium, as well as with the local impression that the Boston Charitable Hospitals and the Professors of the Harvard Medical School are all they should be, without any End Result System): I shall advertise extensively to the laity— "Codman Hospital; Capitalization, $10,000,000; No Cure, Ne Pay. All kinds of operations done which are likely to result favor- ably. We are legally liable for carelessness resulting in injury. Fixed Fee, not over $150 for two weeks. (Half the fee may be paid on the instalment plan.) We will not treat you, unless we can find out what the trouble is, and unless we believe we can give you relief for at least a year. Send for our End Result Report, which tells what we can and what we cannot do, and illustrates how we shall report your case. Do your share to help make the practice of medicine a science. If we refuse to accept your case, you may have our hospital services at half price, provided you have your own professional attendant and guarantee us an End Result report each year later. We will help you to select a specialist. "Any physician or surgeon can treat his patients here at half price, provided he will allow us to make a record examination of his patient before treatment, and again a year later. You will thus insure your own safety by putting your case on record with us. If you can afford to take the risk of being operated on, your surgeon can afford to take the risk of stating publicly whether he relieved you or not." Just as will be done in this little hospital, so a big hospital might divide its fees or its income from endowment into lay and profes- sional, and standardize both. The professional expense should 122 certainly equal the hospital expense, but at present I have to throw in my professional labor on account of my competitors, the Chari- table Hospitals. In this hospital, I have to use my judgment in proportioning expenditure. If I give larger nursing salaries, I must give less expensive food or compensate by economizing on some other item. The prevention of waste and the judgment of the pro- portion which each item should take, in order to be sure of a product — the satisfied and relieved patient—is the essence of good hospital management. This idea of proportioning the expenditure to the items necessary to obtain a perfect product has never penetrated hospital manage- ments. Their minds have been satisfied with treatment, not with the good results of treatment. The appended table shows how the expenditures were proportioned in this hospital (from August 1, 1915, to August 1, 1916) and in the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital (from January 1, 1915, to January 1, 1916.) COMPARISON OF PERCENTAGES OF VARIOUS ITEMS OF EXPENSE OF PETER BENT BRIGHAM HOSPITAL AND CODMAN HOSPITAL Adm. Expenses Prof. Care of Patients Dept. Expenses Hou^e and Property Expenses Items not Compa- rable Brigham Salaries...........0748 ] Office Expenses........0088 Telephone..........0082 Misc.............0122 Nurses...........1236 Ward Employees.......0145 Apparatus and Instruments . . .0128 Medical and Surgical Supplies . .0503 Alcohol, Wines, and Liquors . . .0015 X-ray............0404 Outpatient Dept........0228 Salaries...........0815 Supplies...........0252 Laundry...........0203 Bread ...........0084 Dairy Products........0642 Groceries..........0204 Fruit and Vegetables......0184 Meat, Poultry, and Fish.....0598 Water...........0073 Heat, Light, and Power.....1282 Insurance..........0034 Maintenance Real Est. and Bldgs. .0518 Taxes and Interest...... Janitor.......... Physicians, Surgeons, Orderlies . .0978 Druggists, Clerks, etc.....0086 Ambulance..........0348 1040 .2659 1510 .2982 .1907 }.1412 CODMAX .0574 } .0074 .0195 .0667 .1629 .0251 .0047 .0345 !• .2619 .0031 > .2719 .1139 .2013 100% 100% 100% 100% Explanation : These figures are the percentages of each item to the total expense of each institution. Notice the remarkable similarity. I have to provide, administer, and sell all of these things before I can make a cent. The so-called Charitable Hospital provides all this for the surgeon, and assures him of plenty of practice, all the prestige they can give him, and a fee besides (if one can be obtained); and yet the Trustees take no Inventory of his Product. 123 This tabic gives the proportions of expenditure for treatment, but not for product in the form of relieved and cured, or even cared-for cases. To make a proper balance sheet, the case reports of the two hospitals should be presented. The product could then be compared in quantity and in quality. One of Cushing's successful brain cases would be like a priceless painting, incomparable in value with any of my cases; but a successful inguinal hernia would be no better at the Brigham than at this hospital. It would merely be an ordinary commercial article, requiring so much capital and labor for its making. If the professors of our medical schools and the appointees of our large hospitals want the loyal support of the pupils they have sent out into practice, they must not compete with them for simple curable cases. We, the practicing surgeons and physicians of the Community, are glad to have the leaders of the profession given every oppor- tunity for study and research, so that they can make the most of their natural gifts and ambition. We want to have somebody to turn to when we are in doubt of our diagnosis or of our qualifications to give successful treatment. We want to see them get large fees for opinions or services to which their careful study or unusual success in special forms of treatment has entitled them. We are even willing to give up our own fees in unusual poor cases, so that what little money there is can go to the great man, in return for the time he has snatched from his studies. But what we are tired of is this: of seeing the prestige of the hospitals and the medical schools used by some members of their staffs to line their own pockets, and to help them pose as experts on things in which they are no more expert than we are. We don't wish to see the time which is saved for these men by their hospitals, their assistants, their patients, and their consultants used entirely to make more money. We want real contributions to medical science, real public demonstrations of new methods advantageous for us to use, real efforts to manage our medical organizations, and real protection of our legitimate interests in public matters and legisla- tion. We are tired of being criticized by men safely ensconced behind the academic fortifications and bulwarks of hospital prestige. We want honest End Result Reports of these hospital cases which we send in to them. We believe that natural qualifications, industry in study and experiment, opportunity, and practical experience have to be com- bined in judicious proportions to make the unusual teacher and leader. We practitioners ourselves have some claim to all of these things, with perhaps an excess of practical experience crowding out study; but still we are constantly learning things which the hospital professor never knows, and we resent his criticism of our habits and customs in the struggle for existence. Let him tell us what his own results are. If his results are better 124 than ours, we will ask him to show us his methods; but first we want to be convinced that his knowledge and study are really more efficient than our individual experience. As far as we can see, the cases which we cannot relieve, and which we send to his hospital, are occasionally, but not always relieved. He is welcome to what we cannot cure or relieve, but we resent his taking his valuable time (just to increase his income) to treat cases which we can handle successfully ourselves—just as satisfactorily and with less cost to the patient. He is welcome to our difficult cases, and we are glad to give him the credit when he can cure them. BALANCE SHEET OF THE COMMERCIAL SURGEON AND HIS CONSCIENCE Credit No obligation to study, teach, inves- tigate, and record, except in so far as such effort may enlarge the scope of his business. The opportunity to select his col- leagues and assistants, and to co- operate with them for the common purpose of making his institution a success. Freedom to refer to others: Difficult and troublesome cases. Cases who cannot pay. A free conscience in undertaking only work he is qualified to do, without being obliged, as in ordi- nary practice, to make all kinds of goods for the buyers who stray into his hands for articles which he has had no training in making. The opportunity to advertise the goods he is in a position to deliver. Debit Being obliged to take so much of his time for administration, petty de- tails, and economies, that he has little opportunity for study, travel, and the pursuit of further knowl- edge. The necessity of active competition to retain his practice and keep his hospital beds full, so that he does not lose as well as fail to gain money. Constant watchfulness to avoid errors which might lead to loss of pres- tige for his hospital, or even to loss of his private fortune, from a just or unjust legal decision. The necessity of keeping his fees low, because (if he is honest) he must always admit that if a person has money, he can afford the services of those Hospital Surgeons whose opportunities are greater than his for any particular class of cases. The loss of pride in saying to his patient, "Your case is too difficult for me—go to Dr. So-and-So." Being subject to pay the price of advertising—litigation for care- lessness; in other words, to risk his capital. To which side shall we add the End Result System? For this hospital it is distinctly on the credit side,— for it is the purpose of this hospital to force it on the Charitable Hospitals. But when the day comes (as it must, in justice) when it is legally enforced on all hospitals, the Commercial Hospital will put it in the Debit column. 125 BALANCE SHEET OF THE HOSPITAL SURGEON AND HIS CONSCIENCE Credit Having all the hospital expense given by the endowment. Having all the administrative work done for him. Having most of the details of physi- cal examination, laboratory tests, dressings, visits, and after-care done by subordinates. Being relieved of many interviews with friends and relatives in per- son and on the telephone. Being able to use the time saved in these things for study and visits to other clinics. Freedom to experiment without much medico-legal responsibility. The acknowledged right to charge rich persons large fees, because of his unusual opportunity to become truly expert. Having access to well-equipped li- braries and laboratories, and to the assistance and advice of col- leagues. Having his advertising done for him by the ever-changing stream of assistants, students, nurses, col- leagues, visiting physicians, and visiting medical societies, which day after day, week after week, and year after year pours steadily through the hospital. To which side shall we add the End Result System? Does he prefer to be known for what he can do, or for what he appears to be doing, says he can do, and teaches should be done? When all hospitals are obliged to add the End Result System, he will put it in the Credit column. Cheap Operations Since I have a 10-bed hospital, and have been able to keep only 4| beds full on the average; since my minimum professional fee is zero; since I actually pay more for expenses than I charge for board, it follows that I am anxious to get patients to operate on. My services have become cheap; for I must be doing surgery, to continue to pose as a surgeon. Unless I have at least a hundred operations a year, I must fall in the race, or else pretend to be what 126 Debit The obligation to make the most of his opportunities. The obligation to teach his students and subordinates. The obligation to be ever watchful for the errors of subordinates over whose appointment he has only partial control. The obligation to keep up to date with progress by reading, investi- gating, etc. The obligation to cooperate with col- leagues (who are sometimes un- congenial). The obligation to experiment. The obligation to set an example to the students who must get their living by the practice of medicine. The obligation to take cases as they come, without selection—usually the riffraff of society, or the most obstinate and difficult diseases to treat. The obligation to take an active part in local, state, and national medi- cal societies. The obligation to see that each case under his care receives attention and his best skill. I am not. It is no charity for me to do these operations; in fact, if I could pay some hospital $10 apiece to let me do a hundred operations a year, it would be less expensive for me than it is at present. But am I really in any different position from that of my com- petitors in this respect? Their services have also become cheap. They must go to the Charitable Hospitals, and pretend that their services are in demand. They have become dependent on these hos- pitals for their reputations; if they lost their appointments, most of them could not even run a little hospital like this. They go about to little hospitals, operating for nothing, with a pretense of kind- ness. The truth is, their services have become cheap. The Chari- table Hospital system has been run into the ground, and surgery has become cheap,— so cheap, that the whole Community suffers from it. The supply of mediocre surgeons far exceeds the demand for their services. Each charges a few wealthy patients for many operations on poorer ones, and the charge is governed, not by the quality of the services rendered, but by the pocketbook of the patient. No one, be he rich or poor, knows whether he really has the services of a good surgeon. This is because our Charitable Hos- pitals, which could do so, do not find out which surgeons get the best results, and let the public know. A person should be sus- picious of a surgeon who will operate on him for nothing. No opera- tion should be done for nothing, even at a Charitable Hospital, because it frees the surgeon of responsibility. Somebody, perhaps the Hospital Funds, should pay for it directly, or exact a sense of responsibility for the result. Services that are rendered for nothing are apt to be cheap. The fact that it is necessary for each surgeon to get a hundred operations a year has cheapened surgery more than surgeons. If a hospital hired its surgeons, it would not assign its cases by seniority or by the calendar. Services above the average would not be cheap, and the Community would learn that certain opera- tions called for more experienced services than others. Moreover, the Community would demand a penalty for failure due to care- lessness. It is ridiculous that I should be unable to average more than $61.12 for a major operation and three weeks of after-care! This is not enough to elicit a sense of moral responsibility! And yet, in publishing this Report I take more responsibility than the hospital surgeons do. The Value of My Time We are apt to think of time as if we had plenty of it. As a matter of fact, we have only about 2,000 hours a year of real work- ing time. Labor Unions and Efficiency Experts alike recognize the fact that long hours reduce the rate of accomplishment and the 127 quality of the work. Though opinions vary to a certain extent, we may take from the skilled workman the standard of eight-hour days, five days a week, for fifty weeks. Thus, 8X5X50 = 2,000 hours a year. If a skilled workman needs to conserve his energy for a maxi- mum output per hour, a surgeon certainly should. That a surgeon's hours are irregular, does not justify the overwork in our hospitals (the overwork is not infrequently due to a desire to corner "the material," and those that corner may do it in a hurry) and the consequent damage to the "material." People should certainly be willing to pay a larger rate per hour for skilled labor on their own bodies than on metal and wood. One dollar an hour is a high wage for a mechanic, but no thinking man would want to pay less, even to the mechanic's helper, when his own body is the material. Yet few surgeons in their early years can sell their time for as much as this, and there are few that do not work more than 2,000 hours. It is several years before a young surgeon can get even $1 an hour,— $2,000 for the year. And many years before he can count on $3 an hour,—$6,000 a year. My own 2,000 hours have never sold for over $5 an hour,— $10,000 a year. Yet I have on several occasions received $1,000 for a single operation. Society does not expect a prominent surgeon to go about in shabby clothes, to run an out-of-date automobile, or do so much work that he is tired out all of the time. Society exacts subscriptions to popular causes, wedding presents, reciprocative dining; attendance at funerals, and at social events. The greatest surgeon cannot omit some of these things, if he wishes to be known by the people who can pay big fees. Today, in an American city, he must spend $20,000 a year, if he has a family. If his share of the world's work is 2,000 hours, you must pay him $10 an hour. If he spends half his time at the Chari- table Hospital and the Medical School, you must pay him $20 an hour. When you take fifteen minutes of his office hour talking over your telephone about your maid, who is under his care at the Charitable Hospital, you owe him $5 ! I have no charitable hospital or medical school to demand my time, but I have to earn over $10,000 to pay the expenses of this hospital before I can make a cent; so that if I can assume that I must also have $10,000 a year to maintain my social position, my time is also worth $20 an hour. But, as a matter of fact, I am glad to work overhours at any time for $5 an hour! Surgeons that are any good are always working overtime — sometimes double time—on account of the competition. This is another abuse of the Charitable Hospital System, which does not separate the wheat from the chaff. If the able surgeons were allowed to excel, they would not have to work overtime. 128 I should like to have a large salary or earn a large amount of money. Why, if I admit that I really don't need it? I am com- fortably off, and what I want is time to get to the woods and streams. But read the "Surgeon's Reward" (page 135). I should miss the daily flattery of my successful cases—and commendatory letters about the End Result System. I want more money, so that I can spend more on my hobbies. I want more cases to keep my hospital full, so that I can keep on putting numbers on the chart and scoring them with red ink, to show that they were good products. I want new kinds, so that I can put them in the spaces that have no numbers, just as I used to put stamps in my stamp book,—not printed counterfeits. I know that I shall die unsatisfied, with many spaces empty or not scored as perfect. I know that some day, in order to keep the successful spots coming on the chart, I shall have to ask others to do the operations and see them get the grateful looks. The Value of An Operation There are certain conditions under which an operation will save life. The financial value of such an operation will depend to a certain extent on how much the person who pays the bill values the life that is saved. It depends on whether it is your own life (and how much you enjoy it), your wife's life (and how much you care for it), or some "poor relation's" life (and how worthless you think it is). From this point of view, one can see how hospital Trustees value their patients' lives, for they do not pay the surgeon for the opera- tion. On the contrary, they pay the surgeon by the opportunity to do the operation. The same may be said of those operations which do not save life, but merely relieve suffering. Most persons value an operation which relieves their suffering more than one which saves their life. And they value the relief of the suffering of their poor relations—some- what, but not much. And Trustees of hospitals, as a rule, value the relief of the sufferings of their patients so little, that they do not even insist on following up their patients to see whether their sufferings are relieved. Nevertheless, one hears of enormous fees being paid for opera- tions. Why should one surgeon get a higher fee than another? The best operator in the world is undoubtedly a better operator than I am, but what is the money value of the difference, when it comes to a single operation on an individual patient? I have done about 3,000 operations to his (perhaps) 30,000. Yet to an individual patient, what difference would there be in the chances ? I have done perhaps 300 interval appendectomies without a fatality, and he has done perhaps 3,000 (with probably one or two fatalities). For other kinds of routine operations I can make 129 the same boast. What, then, is the financial value of the difference in risk in my hands or his ? But consider those grave cases listed on pages 143-155. It is in such cases that the difference would show. Undoubtedly he would have saved some of those cases, and, if there is a difference in value between our services, it would be shown by the proportion which he would have saved. He might have saved 5 per cent, 10 per cent, or 50 per cent, but the value of his services compared to mine would vary with this percentage—but only in these extremely sick cases. If you needed an operation, you might be willing to pay $1,000 more for a 1 per cent better chance, but how much more are you willing to pay for an increased 1 per cent chance in the case of your poor relation? The Trustees of the Massachusetts General Hospital showed their interest in their patients by allowing me to operate on that list of cases when I was first appointed on their Staff,— and you will find the same state of affairs in almost all the large hospitals in this country. The difference in surgeons' results is not as demonstrable as in their incomes. When you pay a high price for an operation, you pay not according to the value of the operation to you, nor accord- ing to the difficulty of the operation, nor according to the real ability of the surgeon, but according to the relation of the surgeon's repu- tation and your own bank account. The proper way to pay for a successful operation is to pay the surgeon a reasonable sum for his expert labor, and then give a large sum to some endowed institution for the advancement of surgical science. You owe much more to surgical science than you do to the surgeon. Has This Hospital Been a Success? A Success is the attainment of an object. The main object of this hospital has been to force the great Boston Hospitals affiliated with the Harvard Medical School to adopt the principles of the End Result System. It was necessary to demonstrate the feasibility of this End Result System, so that Trustees who must always be conservative, may have an example to follow.1 It was necessary to demonstrate that the Public are willing to have the facts about their cases published for the good of others. It was necessary to show that surgeons and their consultants may be willing to have their failures and errors known. It was necessary to show that a man who practices this doctrine can make his living and keep out of the courts. It will be necessary to show that End Result Reports of hos- 1 Trustees must avoid criticism. At present they would fear criticism, if they should introduce so radical a change. We want to put them in a position where they will fear criticism, unless they do introduce it. 180 pitals are of enough value to the Medical Profession to pay for their publication. Finally, it will be necessary to prove that a "No Cure, No Pay Institution" can be run on a definite standard of fees, and be able to pay a dividend to its stockholders. (See "The Dividing Line between Medical Charity and Medical Business." N. Y. Med. Rec. May 13, 1916. By E. A. C.) We believe that we have demonstrated all these things except the last two. We admit that we have not yet made a financial suc- cess of the hospital; but, as shown in Part III, we are now going to bend our energies to so doing. Aside from these great primary considerations, are there not other respects in which this hospital has been a success? Has it not furnished an opportunity to our employees to make an honest living? Has it not done something in teaching all the patients, doctors, nurses, and employees who have come into contact with it that a frank confession of our ignorance, and acknowledgment of our errors and shortcomings, is possible in surgical practice? Is it not fair to claim that its success is in some degree measured by the facts: That the Massachusetts General and Peter Bent Brigham Hos- pitals in their Annual Reports now publish abstracts of the cases which die while under their care? That an Abstract Report was made of all the cases operated on before the Clinical Congress of Surgeons of North America, at its meeting in Boston, and that another one is to be made of the meeting in Philadelphia?1 That the Massachusetts Medical Society now has a Section on Hospital Administration, and has recommended uniform Hospital Reports ? That the Surgical Staffs of the New York Hospital and the Presbyterian Hospital and the University of Pennsylvania Hospital hold weekly meetings at which the results of their cases are re- viewed and criticized? That the American College of Surgeons has obtained a large fund for an investigation of hospitals ? And will it not mean some measure of success, if this Report is distributed to all the members of the American College of Sur- geons and to all the members of the Massachusetts Medical Society, without the writer's receiving a vote of censure or a request for resignation from any of the following Societies of which he is a member ? : American Medical Association. Society of Clinical Surgery. American College of Surgeons. Massachusetts Medical Society. American Surgical Association. Various local medical societies. 1 Unless the surgeons of Philadelphia are afraid to stand comparison with those of Boston ! 181 Neither the Corporation of Harvard, nor the Trustees of the Massachusetts General Hospital, for whom I worked for years, have ever sought my advice individually or collectively on this subject. I have never talked with a Trustee of the Massachusetts General Hospital on hospital matters, either before or since my resignation. I never knew one to show the slightest interest in the End Result System. Yet, strangely enough, I shall never myself regard this hospital as a success, until the Trustees of the latter institution ask my advice about something. So great is the Conservatism of this Board, that I am convinced that the only way for me to show them anything is to show it first to the rest of the world, and then let the rest of the world show it to these Trustees. Richard Cabot had to do this with the Social Service Idea. Before making a New Organization to Demonstrate the Finan- cial Soundness of the End Result Idea, it is first necessary to consider Why This Hospital Has Not Been a Financial Success The following five reasons occur to me: 1. I have exhibited a Cartoon at a local medical meeting, and in fact publicly alleged: That Harvard pays her medical teachers for the most part by opportunity to practice among the richer people of the Com- munity,—the Back Bay. That the large Boston Charitable Hospitals are used as experimental clinical laboratories where, by cornering "the ma- terial," the "Harvard Ring" are able to keep themselves "the best doctors" in our Community. That they shirk the "End Result System," although they know it to be logically sound, because it is not "expedient," and would militate against the "Vested Interests." That it is only fair for them, if they claim superiority, to make public the records of their clinical experiments, to give the rest of us maximum standards. Is it any wonder that after this, my former colleagues do not patronize my hospital? Do you blame them for spreading and exaggerating the unfor- tunate facts that I am not a skillful operator, that I am hard to get along with, aggressive, independent, idealistic, and a monomaniac on the End Result Idea? Even my friends damn me with faint praise. A surgeon never really knows how poor a surgeon he is. No one could have been more surprised than I was, when the Surgical Staff, the Executive Committee, and the Board of Trustees of the hospital which I had served for years agreed that another surgeon deserved promotion more than I did. Even now I am not convinced. 132 But, at any rate, the fact that I was not promoted, is well known among any possible Back Bay consultants and among my friends and relatives, most of whom are well-to-do. Naturally they cannot risk themselves and their families in my care, when better operators are available. And besides, I will not accept their cases, if they are difficult, because now I am authoritatively assured that I am not qualified to undertake them. 2. But as they have not yet reappointed me, and until then, therefore, I have no right to the rich patients, I must lower my prices and try for those of moderate means. The fact that I served so many years at the Massachusetts General without being dropped, and that I am still honored with membership in the societies men- tioned on page 131, makes me feel justified in regarding myself as at least a mediocre surgeon. But how can I get patients of moderate means ? I meet in competition the Junior hospital surgeons, the assistants of the big surgeons, as well as the lone surgical pirates who, without hospital appointments, do privateering and possibly fee-splitting. Is it likely that any of these competitors will say a good word for me? They much prefer to call in consultation, when they are in trouble, the Big Hospital surgeons, who believe that it is right for them to "back up" consultants who have undertaken operations they had no business to do. As a young surgeon, if my cases went wrong, it was the man whose reputation would carry weight with the family that I wished to help me out, not the one who would put down my error in a book and publish it! So, without advertising directly to the patient, this hospital is not likely to find many consultants. It has been a wonder to me that my few faithful friends and consultants have stuck by me so far. It would only need a few more to fill my beds and give me power to force the situation. 3. There are also, perhaps, some personal reasons,—-perhaps I have not worked hard enough, been gracious enough, or taken enough personal interest in my patients. I can only say that I have been able to earn my living outside the hospital and to run the hos- pital fairly satisfactorily to the patients (thanks to my Superin- tendent, Mrs. Freeman). During the last year there has been a total increase of business of 25 per cent over the preceding year (1916 over 1915). This seems a fairly normal increase of personal practice. 4. I have been inefficient in my advertising. My previous Hos- pital Reports have hitherto brought me but one case. My Reports have been widely read, as I know by letters of congratulation and encouragement, but no patients are sent on account of them. The patients have come from personal friends or other patients, exactly the sources I least approve of, as such persons are least qualified to judge of the real efficiency of the institution. It is most illogical to go to a doctor, because you like him; or to a surgeon, because you trust him. When the End Result System is well seated in the saddle, 133 you can select a surgeon because he has demonstrated his ability to relieve cases similar to yours; and it is for his interest to relieve you, and not to attempt to, if he cannot make good. I want people to come to this hospital for the same reason that one goes to a certain grocer,—because he delivers standard goods, not because one likes him. When these Reports grow to cover large numbers of cases, they will attract consultants and patients, but now they merely show what a one-horse institution this is as compared with the Charitable Hospitals. From the expediency point of view, I have been ineffi- cient in my advertising, (for I consider that truthful advertising may be an honest act, and recommend it to the Charitable Hospitals, which have nothing to lose by being honest). 5. Last year the deficit was caused by shutting down the hos- pital for two months, so that I could take some vacation, write the last Report, and prepare the Report of the Committee on Hospital Standardization of the Clinical Congress of Surgeons. Much of this time was spent on thinking out the method of classification illus- trated in the chart inclosed in this Report. There has also been much time taken in correspondence about this and other public matters. After the new organization and the inclosed declaration of aggressive war on Harvard and her affiliated Hospitals, this energy is going into business for faithful managing of the affairs of the stockholders. If Truth prevails, we shall win even against Harvard, which is no worse than all other American Universities. It would, perhaps, be a good thing for Harvard and her affiliated Hospitals, if I had a fine army of efficient colleagues to enforce the End Result System. Having thus considered the reasons for our lack of Financial Success, we can make the following good resolutions for the future, and thus increase our business: 1. To publish no more cartoons. 2. To advertise directly to the laity. 3. To continue to employ the same superintendent. 4. To issue no more Reports, unless they are paid for. 5. To shirk committee work for national medical associations. In other words: To Mind Our Own Business. Thus I shall merely manage the End Result Idea for those who believe in it enough to want a Report for a dollar, or to loan money at interest to enlarge the hospital. This hospital would be a failure, if I accepted gifts and endow- ments. It must be self-supporting to succeed. The public must want honest surgery and be willing to invest in it. Many of my friends and acquaintances are among the richest people in this Community, yet to borrow $100,000 on a business basis would be more difficult for me than to beg the amount for a charity! They would continue to give money to prolong the reign of King Humbug rather than invest money in an institution whose only chance of success rests on the hope that some of the public are weary of his reign. In the Event of Financial Success Last year I did at this hospital 74 operations, at an average of $61.12 apiece. Suppose I should become a popular Back Bay surgeon and should get $500 apiece for 74 operations next year (a few of my patients actually do value my services at this amount). My professional income would be $37,000. How would this help me ? I could not give a more perfect illustration of the End Result System than I have already given in this Report! But I could make the End Result System fashionable! The Charitable Hospitals would adopt it! Harvard would have to O. K. it. Colleagues and assistants would flock to my Standard! A Surgeon's Reward The great surgeons of the world have certainly seemed to receive compensation, if we may judge by the ordinary standards of wealth, honor, and power. They have been chosen as presidents and executive officers of medical and surgical societies; they see their names mentioned in countless special articles and text-books; their original contribu- tions are credited for generations to come; they are honored by lay positions of trust and by academic degrees; they are the center of all eyes in their operating theaters; and they accumulate more wealth than they have time to enjoy. But these are not the real rewards which compensate for their untiring effort, and for the many worries and the petty frictions which mar their days. Why does a surgeon dread retiring from practice? Why do the older men cling to their hospital positions so tenaciously? The surgeon's reward is the daily pleasure of seeing the proof of his knowledge and skill as revealed in his convalescent patients. Imagine the pleasure which a busy surgeon has daily in the convalescent smiles of ten to twenty happy patients, each of whom feels he is indebted to that surgeon for his recent escape from the jaws of death. The flowers, the blue ribbons, the pink dressing wrappers, and the first shave add to this pleasant experience in proportion as the patients are attractive, interesting, rich, or promi- nent. Then add a hospital visit, with a trail of admiring students, nurses, and visiting doctors, and fifty or sixty more or less grateful patients. The wonder is that any surgeons have time or inclination to consider the joyless part of their lives, made up of professional honors, medical societies, sitting on platforms, keeping up the standards of their hospitals, wearily writing papers and text-books, or making original observations which will destroy their conservative 135 reputation in this generation, and only be recognized by the next. Yet our Hospital Trustees the Country over continue to put a premium on neglecting these joyless but essential things. It is only the giants like Crile, Cushing, Brewer, and Edward Martin who can do all these weary things and still have energy enough left to beat their "practical" competitors at their own games. When will Trustees realize that hospital opportunity is essential to the surgeon, and make him pay for it with some effort for the general good? Do they deny that study, care, thoroughness, and scientific analysis have more to do with the efficiency of a surgeon than his popularity and dexterity ? Surely it is time to bury the old ideas of "nerve," "steady hand," and "graceful" operating, and to teach the public that knowledge of surgical science and steadfast care and judgment in applying it make the surgeon of today. Eccentricity Persons are called eccentric, when their expressed view or behavior is distinctly different from the average, whether in hospital management or other affairs in life. Eccentricity is almost a term of reproach, but it is not quite so, for to be different from the average, one need not necessarily be below it. The eccentric whose eccentricity is eventually proved correct may in time become a conservative. Eccentrics are generally obliged to publish their own literature (as I do these Reports). It would be useless to offer them to the Boston Medical and Surgical Journal. The Editors do not care to contradict anything I have said in these publications, nor have they questioned the accuracy of any state- ment. They know that my contentions are correct, but they would not print them, because they fear the disapproval of those conserva- tive and vested interests which control the Harvard Medical School and its affiliated Hospitals. It is true that I am an eccentric from the Massachusetts General Hospital,—that I flew away from the center. So did Thayer, Finney, and Cushing to Baltimore; Moffatt and Lucas to San Francisco; Robinson and Hedbloom to Rochester; Murphy to St. Louis; Kidner to Detroit; Whiteside to Portland; John Little to Labrador, and a host of others to other places. I am, perhaps, less eccentric, since I have remained in sight of the Massachusetts General Hospital. What a hospital might have been made with these men, if we had kept them! How it might have turned the tide of sacred pilgrimage from Rochester, Minnesota, if we had monop- olized Clinical Truth, instead of letting the Mayos do it! There were, of course, many reasons why these men left, but one, I venture, weighed heavily with every one of them,^-they had no desire to stay in a seniority line for the ultimate privilege of keeping the young men down as they were kept down by their seniors. However, the eccentric quality of a Seniority System is perhaps its best argument. It may be a good system that drives away the 186 ambitious young men, and keeps the ones who are tame enough to let those in front pull them up, and those behind boost them up, but I do not believe it is. So I am called eccentric for saying in public: That Hospitals, if they wish to be sure of improvement, 1. Must find out what their results are. 2. Must analyze their results, to find their strong and weak points. 3. Must compare their results with those of other hospitals. 4. Must care for what cases they can care for well, and avoid attempting to care for cases which they are not qualified to care for well. 5. Must not pretend that work which they do as a competitive business is Charity. 6. Must assign the cases to members of the Staff (for treat- ment) for better reasons than seniority, the calendar, or temporary convenience. 7. Must teach medical students ethics by example instead of by precept. 8. Must welcome publicity not only for their successes, but for their errors, so that the Public may give them their help when it is needed. 9. Must promote members of the Staff on a basis which gives due consideration to what they can and do accomplish for their patients. Such opinions will not be eccentric a few years hence. Offers to Charitable Hospitals In retiring to a private hospital, I am not unwilling to do chari- table work. I will accept any position on the Surgical Staff of the Massachusetts General or Boston City Hospitals, provided that the End Results of the cases which are submitted to my care are considered in comparison with those of my colleagues whenever there is a question of promotion. If the Massachusetts General Hospital will reappoint me to my former position, I will provide the salary for an End Result Clerk to make out End Result Cards for all the cases which have been treated at the Hospital since the beginning of this century. I will do 100 operations a year at any Charitable Hospital— for nothing. Or, I will do 300 a year for $25 an operation, and no operating outside the Hospital. Or, I will do 200 or less for $10 an operation, provided I may do private practice as well. If any of our Charitable Hospitals, by an analysis of the End Results of their cases, find that the Results of any particular class of surgical cases are unsatisfactory, I will undertake to take charge of such cases and make them more satisfactory. If the Trustees of any of our Charitable Hospitals empower me to do so, I will organize an End Result System suitable to their 137 needs, which will permit them to keep a definite record of the thera- peutic efficiency of their whole organization, and of the individual members of their Staffs. But, in order to do this, I must be em- powered to insist that all doubtful cases must be referred to me for operation, or for assignment to that member of the Staff who in my opinion is best qualified to care for each particular case. An analysis of my results at the Massachusetts General Hospital and at this hospital shows: (1) That I had no deaths in cases of hysterectomy for fibroids of the uterus. (2) That in surgery of the gall bladder I have had 10 deaths. I should, therefore, like to offer my services to any hospital (1) Either to do hysterectomies for fibroids, which I can prove I do satisfactorily, or (2) To do gallstone surgery, which I am interested to study for the sake of my own improvement, and because there is much for all surgeons to learn in this branch of work. If any Charitable Hospital has a high mortality in its night emergency work, I should be happy to take charge of it, and will guarantee to improve the percentage of mortality during the next year, and the general character of the results in those who survive. But I ask for these positions. Emerson says: "The highest price one can pay for a thing is to ask for it." Altogether, I am unwilling to serve any Hospital under a Senior- ity System, because such a system assumes that I have something to give to the Hospital, not something to get out of the Hospital. "A fair exchange is no robbery." It saves the Trustees trouble to have a Seniority System. It is a wholesale bargain, and saves effort, — and therefore cannot be the best. Why not make some individual bargains ? I have made some tentative offers, and I will accept that position which seems the most to my interest, and the one for which I can best arrange. Trustees save themselves much trouble by let- ting the doctors seek the Hospital, rather than having the Hospital seek the doctors. The one allows the doctors to take their pay out in experimenting on the patient; the other means that the Trustees would pay the doctor for taking their responsibility. Now no Trustees will accept these offers. They neither wish to make sure that all their patients are relieved nor that they are all studied. They wish to go on in the same old way, and not be bothered. "Let the Staff run a monopoly, if they are smart enough to do it; to succeed, they will have to take care of the patients." Thus thinks the hard-headed business man. Nothing illustrates the vanity of this Pretense that Surgeons operate at Hospitals for Charity better than the fact that I am not only ready, but glad to operate for nothing on any Charitable Case at any Charitable Hospital. Ask your Staff to let me operate for a month, and see how indignant they will be. Ask them to give me a 138 chance to examine and select to operate on (if I think the chances good and the patients are willing) all cases in which they advise against operation! The Proof That the Writer Deserves an Appointment at a Charitable Hospital The following is an attempt to show that it is possible to rate a surgeon by the results which he obtains in those cases that are intrusted to his care. For fifteen years the writer served as assist- ant visiting surgeon to the Massachusetts General Hospital. During this period a great variety of surgical cases were intrusted to him for operation. At this time eighteen surgeons were on duty, and each operated on approximately the same number and variety of cases, and little attempt was made to select the best surgeons for the most difficult cases. In fact, the reverse was the case, for in general the emergency cases which came in at night or during the afternoon hours, were operated on by the younger and less experienced men, who gladly availed themselves of the opportunity, while their busier seniors were attending to their private practice or resting. These emergency cases, as a rule, were the most difficult possible cases to operate upon. They were usually "last resort" operations, requiring the keenest surgical judgment and intuitive ability (which only experience can cultivate) to make "snap diagnoses." If any kind of cases demands speed and manual skill in operating, these traumatic and septic emergencies certainly do. A hospital which was organized to obtain the best results, could not possibly allot such cases to its less experienced surgeons. However, the writer, like all other ambitious surgeons, was glad of the opportunity, and availed himself of it to the best of his ability. Even now, at forty- seven, he would be glad to have the same chance. If the records of the hospital during these fifteen years are examined, they will show that the cases on which I operated were 1,741 in number,1 and that they represented as large a proportion of difficult cases as those of the other surgeons. Would it be possible to compare the records of each of these surgeons with mine, and to determine by the End Results which was the best surgeon? Of course, in each surgeon's practice this hospital work formed only a proportion, and it would be quite pos- sible to argue that even if my results in the Hospital proved to be better than those of some other surgeon, he might have done much better work outside of the Hospital. My contention is, that even if this were the case, it would make no difference as far as the efficiency of the hospital work was concerned; that no matter how popular, how painstaking, how skillful the surgeon might be in his private practice, these virtues would not condone for good-natured slackness in discipline, carelessness, surgical gymnastics and dis- 1 Many of these had several operations at the same time, and many others were oper- ated on two or more times. 139 play, hurry, and neglect of disagreeable essentials in his hospital work. To make the whole hospital efficient, it is necessary to have a Staff who not only can be, but are efficient. As it is impossible for me to present the entire End Result Record of all the cases operated on by the eighteen surgeons for fifteen years, I can only base my argument on the consideration of my own record. Unfortunately, as explained previously, I cannot even present the End Result Record of my own successful cases. However, there can be no objection to my publishing the results of those of my cases which did not survive, and so I base my argu- ment on the corollaries taken from abstracts of these cases. By a consideration of all those cases which died after my operations, I propose to show that my standards of surgical skill, surgical judgment, surgical care, and of those qualities which contribute to successful results in surgical cases, were of the highest order. I claim that I had a minimum number of preventable fatalities, and I challenge any one to show that any other surgeon who oper- ated at the hospital during these fifteen years had as few in pro- portion to the number of difficult cases which were successful. I claim that in almost all of the cases in the following list, the cause of death was the patient's condition or disease, and not my errors of diagnosis, skill, judgment, or care. 107 of the 141 were grave emergencies. I claim that by a consideration of the records of these cases, a committee of surgeons (who had no personal interest in the matter) could tell that I had no deaths, during fifteen years' service, that were criticizable because of carelessness, neglect, lack of skill or judgment, or other obviously preventable cause. No cases where death was due to hemorrhage, sepsis, shock, anaesthesia accidents, lack of manual dexterity, anatomical knowledge, surgical instinct, pre-operative care, or even diagnosis or other preventable error, will be found in this list, unless the patient was in a very serious con- dition before the operation. Now if I served all these years, and did approximately 2,000 (many cases were operated on more than once) more or less serious operations without losing cases in which the pre-operative condition was not serious, it proves that I was a careful, painstaking, compe- tent operator. If any blame can be placed for these deaths at all, it must fall on the organization which permitted the assignment of such grave cases to so inexperienced a man, appointed through nepotism! It seems to me that I could hardly offer better evidence than this of my right to an appointment at a Charitable Hospital. Possibly the presentation of the abstract of all those cases which survived might be considered more reliable evidence, but to my mind this negative evidence is superior as demonstrating true surgical ability. If the positive evidence is desired,the Trustees of the hospital should have it in their records! They should be able to tell to what extent those cases which survived after my operations were benefited! How is any member of the Staff to realize that for the good of the hospital he should resign? He can only be sure of one, to him important, thing—that if he does resign, it will mean loss of pres- tige, loss of practice, and the end of his career as a surgeon. I have been through part of this experience during the last two years, but by assuming the financial burden of this hospital, I have been able to cling to my ambition to be a good surgeon. My opportunity to be a great surgeon has gone, unless some large hospital will give me opportunity for manual practice. If I can make such an analysis of my cases, why could they not do it at a Charitable Hospital when there is question of promotion ? In connection with reforms in most large hospitals, one often hears "They" spoken of. "They" usually leave things undone. It took a long time for me to realize that "They" meant "We" or "I," or any one that was interested enough to do the things for their own sake, without reward. The existence of this illusive "They" in a hospital is a sure sign of the need of an Efficiency Committee. "They" should suggest the resignation of the incompetent! 141 102 Emergencies DIAGNOSES OF THE 141 CASES WHICH DIED AFTER OPERA- TION BY E. A. C. AT THE MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL DURING THE YEARS 1900 TO 1914 INCLUSIVE ^Suppurative Appendicitis...... 23 Intestinal Obstruction from Cancer . . 5 Intestinal Obstruction from Other Causes From Adhesions and bands .... 3 " Mesenteric thrombosis .... " Tuberculous stricture .... " Meckel's diverticulum .... " Volvulus cecum...... " Undetermined....... Septic Conditions Abscess of cheek........ Pelvic abscess (fecal fistula) . . . Pelvic abscess (vaginal drainage) . . Unknown peritonitis....... Abscess of neck (enteritis) .... Acute pericarditis........ \ Abscess of neck (D. T.'s)..... Acute pancreatitis........ Acute endocarditis....... Pneumococcus peritonitis..... Acute pancreatitis (mania) .... Abscess of liver (?).......1—12 Other Conditions Skull fractures.........8 Crushed or septic legs—Amputations . 7 Multiple injuries........3 Traumatic tetanus........4 Fractured spine.........2 Ruptured or perforated viscera ... 19 Strangulated hernia.......8 Tuberculous peritonitis......1 Transfusion for ruptured liver . . . 1—58 r Operations for Cancer of Stomach ... 7 Other Operations for Cancer Uterus............2 Breast............1 Lower jaws..........1 Sarcoma intestine........1 Lip and neck..........1 Upper jaws..........1 Duodenal papilla........1---8 Complicated or acute gallstone cases . . 6 Operations for Various Other Conditions Chronic appendicitis (?)......1 Cleft palate..........1 Ventral hernia.........1 Contracture from burns .....1 Cirrhosis of liver........1 Huge renal calculi........1 Multiple pelvic operations.....1 Stricture urethra (perineal section) . 2 Gasserian ganglion.......1 Hydrocele and Hernia (Pneumonia on 45th day).........1—n Gastric and duodenal ulcer (chronic per- foration) .......... 7 141 39 Other Operations (including 3 emergencies for cancer of stomach and 2 emergency gallstone cases) All patients whom I operated on, and who died in the Hospital, are included, even if operated on also by other surgeons, or by house surgeons under my direction. Let the reader compare these abstracts with the abstracts of deaths in the last three Massachusetts General Hospital Reports. SUPPURATIVE APPENDICITIS 1. Apr. 29, 1900. E. S. 370-98. Male—22. Abdom. pain and vomiting for 7 days. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Median incision. Washed with salt sol. Died same day. 2. July 23, 1900. E. S. 374-140. Male—14. Abdom. pain 4 days. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Pus and fibrin in peritoneal cavity. Appen- dix gangrenous. Death on 2d day. 3. July 25, 1900. E. S. 374-146. Male—27. Sick 2 weeks. Violent abdom. pain 24 hrs. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Bowels injected; covered with fibrin and pus. Appendix gangrenous. Died in 24 hrs. 4. Aug. 15, 1900. E. S. 372-204. Female—15. Abdom. pain 5 days, and vomiting 2 days. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Seropurulent fluid. Appendix gangrenous. Death on 6th day. 5. July 2, 1901. E. S. 388-238. Female—13. Abdom. pain, etc., 4 days. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C—Median incision, free pus. Appendix gangrenous. Died in 24 hrs. 6. Aug. 24, 1901. E. S. 394-133. Male—19. Abdom. pain, etc., over 48 hrs. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Free turbid fluid. Ulcerated appendix. Death in 5 days. • 7. Aug. 30, 1901. E. S. 394-160. Male—17. Abdom. pain, etc., for 6 days. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Appendix gangrenous; near liver. Death on 7th day, probably from perforation of subdiaphragmatic abscess into lung. 8. Aug. 30, 1901. E. S. 394-158. Male—7. Had been operated on by another surgeon on 11th day of attack, Oct. 19, 1899. Abscess was drained without finding appendix. Re-entered Aug. 30, 1901, on 5th day of another attack. Op. E. A. C.—Large slough in place of appendix. Death on 6th day. 9. Sept. 6, 1901. E. S. 392-136. Female—5. Abdom. pain, etc., 4 days. General peritonitis. "Child lying in stupor." Op. E. A. C.—Free pus everywhere. Appendix too buried to attempt removal. Enterostomy. Died in 2 hrs. 10. Sept. 19, 1901. E. S. 394-234. Male—37. Abdom. pain, etc., 4 days. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Enterostomy without attempting to remove appendix. Drainage. Died on 2d day. 11. Mar. 12, 1902. S. S. 126401. Male—10. Abdom. pain, etc., 6 days. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Fecal contents washed from stomach. Abdom. full of pus. Gangrenous appendix. Enterostomy. Died same day. 12. Aug. 9, 1902. E. S. 128468. Female—8. Abdom. pain, etc., over 48 hrs. Localized appendix abscess in pelvis. Op. E. A. C.—Appendectomy and drainage. On 10th day operated on again for post-operative obstruc- tion in ileum. Died on following day. 18. Aug. 9, 1902. E. S. 410-185. Female—42. Abdom. pain, etc., 7 days. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Enterostomy and drainage under local anaesthesia. Death in 24 hrs. 143 14. Dec. 26, 1902. W. S. 130361. Male—21. Abdom. pain, etc., 4 days. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C—Free pus; fibrin on bowels; gan- grenous appendix. Enterostomy. Died on 2d day. 15. July 17, 1903. E. S. 133202. Male—9. Abdom. pain, etc., 3 days. Op. E. A. C—General peritonitis; gangrenous appendix. Two later ops. for drainage of secondary abscesses—pelvic and subdiaphragmatic. Death after the latter on 20th day. 16. Mar. 25, 1904. E. S. 136662. Male—38. Abdom. pain, etc., 4 days. Op. E. A. C.—General peritonitis; gangrenous appendix. Died on 8th day. Subphrenic abscess? 17. Aug. 1, 1904. E. S. 138518. Male—18. Abdom. pain, etc., 5 days. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Intestines red and coated with fibrin, etc. Died on same day. 18. Dec. 28, 1905. E. S. 145774. Male—54. Abdom. pain, etc., 5 days. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Free pus, etc. Died on 4th day. 19. Oct. 28, 1907. E. S. 155466. Female—9. Abdom. pain, etc., 24 hrs. Op. E. A. C.—Free pus in abdomen. Perforated appendix removed; drainage. Two days later op. by F. B. Harrington—Further drainage. Death on same day. 20. Jan. 17, 1908. E. S. 156660. Male—26. Abdom. pain, etc., for 7 days, but severe for only a few hrs. Op. E. A. C.—Turbid abdom. fluid. (Streptococci.) Appendectomy. Large wound for general exploration. Protrusion of bowel on 2d day. Wound broke down. Death on 6th day. 21. Oct. 14, 1908. E. S. 160677. Male—77. Abdom. pain, etc., for 4 days. Op. E. A. C.—Appendix abscess containing 10 ounces. A perforation located in posterior wall of cecum, probably in adherent appendix. Drainage without search for appendix. Died in 24 hrs. Autopsy showed appendix had .sloughed away. 22. Mar. 1, 1909. S. S. 162684. Male—45. Abdom. pain, etc., 7 days. Some jaundice. Op. E. A. C.—High appendix in wadded omentum removed. Thickening and induration about portal vein noted. Pylephlebitis? Died next day. 23. Dec. 18, 1912. E. S. 186626. Male—17. Abdom. pain, etc., 5 days. Large indurated abscess. Op. E. A. C.—1st incision in rt. loin. During manipulation abscess suddenly collapsed—evidently discharging into bowel. Abscess cavity, when opened, contained but little pus and a gangrenous appendix. A second anterior incision was made and through and through drainage established. A fecal fistula resulted. Death on 12th day from pneumonia which began on 10th day. Perhaps sub- phrenic abscess. Note on Suppurative Appendicitis It will be observed that fourteen of these twenty-three cases were lost before 1903, or during the first three years of my service, and that during 1909-1914 I lost only one case. This is a reflection on organization, not a compliment to my ability. Dur- ing the period from 1900-1908, Murphy and Ochsner were having their famous battle in regard to the proper treatment of general peritonitis, and I was keenly interested, and never failed to take the chance to operate for this condition. I often operated on cases which had been passed by my seniors. Examination of the hospital records will show that during this period many other cases, almost as severe in type as these, recovered after my operations. I was among the first to use the principles advocated by Ochsner, and among the first to find that perforation of a duodenal ulcer must always be considered in cases of general peritonitis. The treatment of these cases has improved greatly since those days. The use of rubber gloves, wet gauze, and cigarette wicks has diminished the 144 chance of post-operative obstruction, and we now know how dangerous pre-operative and post-operative catharsis is. A few of these cases I could probably save now, if I could do them over again, but the difference would be due to the general advance of surgery rather than to my own increased For instance, in Case 25, after end-to-end anastomosis of the sigmoid, a cathartic and an enema were given on the second day! Now, I should not attempt to move the bowels for a week. In those days it was customary to give calomel on the second day. It is my belief that many cases died from this cause. INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION FROM CANCER 24. July 15, 1901. E. S. 390-194. Male—32. Chronic obstruction with in- crease of symptoms. Op. E. A. C.—Free, dark red fluid. Large tumor of bowel resected; intestine torn in so doing. (Sarcoma.) Enteros- tomy. Died next day. 25. July 22, 1901. E. S. 390-230. Male—50. Obstruction for 5 days. Op. E. A. C.—Excision of cancerous stricture of sigmoid. End-to-end anastomosis. Death on 4th day—leakage. 26. Nov. 18, 1905. E. S. 528-26. Male—54. Chronic obstruction with acute symptoms. Op. E. A. C.—Cecostomy for cancer of hepatic flexure. Lived 12 days. Autopsy: Septicemia. Inoperable cancer with metas- tases. 27. Aug. 22, 1906. E. S. 149101. Male—35. A cachectic case previously operated on by two other surgeons by drainage of an ischio-rectal abscess and cecostomy. Op. E. A. C.—More complete drainage of ab- scess. Died 5 weeks later. Autopsy showed high cancer of rectum, pneumonia, and septicemia. 28. Oct. 2, 1909. E. S. 166158. Male—38. Hematuria and obstruction of bowels for 2 days. Distention. Op. E. A. C—Drainage of ascitic fluid. Extensive malignant disease of unknown origin. Nothing done. Died on 10th day. Wound clean. Autopsy: Cancer of stomach with metas- tases. Papilloma of bladder, etc. INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION FROM OTHER CAUSES 29. July 31, 1900. E. S. 374-176. Male—78. Obstruction 4 days. Op. E. A. C.—A constricting band obstructing small intestine found and cut Intestinal contents evacuated with trochar. Died same day. 30. June 26, 1901. E. S. 390-124. Male—68. Sick 3 weeks. Obstruction 3 days. Op. E. A. C.—Mesenteric thrombosis; resection 6 feet of intes- tine. No anastomosis. Died next day. 31. July 17, 1901. E. S. 392-36. Female—33. Chronic obstruction 2 yrs. Recently worse. Op. E. A. C.—Portion of small intestine, including several tuberculous strictures, removed. End-to-end suture. Death on 12th day from pneumonia. 82. Aug. 17, 1901. E. S. 394-102. Male-^.7. Partial obstruction 5 days. Had been op. by E. A. C. a year previously for appendicitis. Hernia in scar. Op. E. A. C.—Cecostomy. Vomiting and hiccough persisted for a week, when he died of exhaustion. 33. July 3, 1902. E. S. 412-163. Male—30. Sick for 3 weeks. Obstruction 2 days. Op. E. A. C.—Removal of a band from Meckel's diverticulum which had obstructed small intestine. Died on 2d day. Delirium tremens. 34. July 18, 1903. E. S. 133222. Male—19. Previously op. by another surgeon a year before for appendicitis. Typical symptoms of obstruc- tion for 2 days. Op. E. A. C.—Removal of a constricting band from Meckel's diverticulum. Enterostomy and evacuation of intestinal con- tents. Died on 2d day. 145 85 Dec 5 1907 E. S. 161404. Male—62. Obstruction 8 days. Op. E. A. C-Hui volvulus of cecum; reduced; cecostomy. Norma convales- cence until 16th day. Sudden death from pulmonary embolism. 86 Feb 18 1007. E. S. 151575. Female—49. Chr. abdom. symptoms for several mos Acute for 3 days. Waited 24 hrs^ for peritonitis to local- ize OpE A. C.-Fibrin on intestines, etc. Cause of obstruction and peritonitis not determined. Enterostomy. Died on 6th day. 37 Aor 11 1910. S. S. 169347. Male—18. Post-operative intestinal ob- ' struction several days after appendectomy (by a™th«/u!:^n>- '?en: eral peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.-Enterostomy. Died 14 days later of pneumonia. SEPTIC CONDITIONS 38 June 26, 1901. E. S. 390-126. Male—21. Septicemia and diffuse ab- scess of cheek. Op. E. A. C—Incision and drainage. Died the follow- ing day. 39. July 11, 1901. E. S. 392-26. Female—36. Sick 2 weeks. Op. E. A. C. —Abdom. incision and drainage of a pelvic abscess. Fecal fistula (probably pre-operative). Died on 13th day. 40. Apr. 6, 1902. E. S. 404-124. Female—23. Large pelvic abscess. Op. E. A. C—Vaginal drainage of abscess. Later three more attempts were made to establish satisfactory drainage. Two by E. A. C. and the last by F. B. Harrington. Death in 3 mos. 41. Aug. 27, 1902. E. S. 128713. Male—37. A moribund case of peri- tonitis of unknown origin. Op. E. A. C—Cocaine. Drainage of peri- toneum. Died same day. 42. Sept. 22, 1903. E. S. 134181. Male—8 mos. Double deep cervical ab- scess, opened by House Surgeon under E. A. C.'s direction. Complica- tions; severe diarrhcea. Died on 9th day. Wounds O. K. 48. Feb. 25, 1906. S. S. 146574. Male child—9 mos. Abdom. pain and fever for 4 days. Op. E. A. C.—Negative abdom. exploration. Died suddenly next day. Autopsy showed acute pericarditis and status lymphaticus. 44. Dec. 24, 1906. E. S. 558-215. Alcoholic male—38. Abscess of neck. Operated on by House Surgeon under E. A. C.'s direction. Delirium tremens. Death on 6th day. 45. Jan. 7, 1907. E. S. 150980. Female—34. Severe epigastric pain and vomiting for 3 days. Obese woman in profound collapse. Op. E. A. C. __Distended bowels. No cause for obstruction found. Enterostomy. Died a few hours later. Autopsy: Acute pancreatitis. Impacted stone in ampulla. 46. Jan. 1, 1908. E. S. 156570. Female—54. Abdom. pain for 2 weeks. Op. E. A. C.—Multiple abdominal adhesions found. Nothing done. Healing by first intention. Transferred to medical on 34th day, under diagnosis of acute endocarditis. Died 5 days later. No autopsy. 47. Dec. 19, 1911. E. S. 180030. A girl of 5 yrs. Abdom. pain for 1 week. Op. E. A. C.—Cloudy fluid, peritoneum red and injected; appendix adherent and strictured, but not acute. Culture showed pneumococci. Died on 8th day. 48. Aug. 8, 1913. E. S. 190582. Male—25. Very acute abdom. pain 54 hrs. Op. E. A. C—Free bloody fluid. Hard hemorrhagic pancreas incised and drained. Died on 33d day of acute mania(?). Autopsy showed that pancreas had entirely sloughed away. 49. Feb. 20, 1914. E. S. 884-67. Colored male—48. Agonizing abdom. pain for 2 days. Op. E. A. C.—Greatly enlarged left lobe of liver presented. I considered it gumma and closed the abdomen. Patient was trans- ferred to care of another surgeon, and died on 7th day with symptoms strongly suggesting abscess of liver. Wasserman negative. Wound clean. 146 OTHER CONDITIONS SKULL FRACTURES 50. Aug. 8, 1901. E. S. 394-56. Male—43. Fell off roof. Comatose. Frac- ture of base of skull. Op. E. A. C.—Trephined and clot evacuated. Died same day. 51. Sept. 28, 1901. E. S. 396-32. Male—4. Fell from fire escape. Uncon- scious. Op. E. A. C—Raising depressed fracture of skull. Died next day without having recovered consciousness. 52. Nov. 18, 1905. E. S. 145249. Male—?. R. R. accident. Multiple in- juries and depressed fracture of skull. Op. E. A. C—Elevation of depressed fragment; puncture lateral ventricle. Died same day. Autopsy: Intra-peritoneal hemorrhage from ruptured liver, kidney, and adrenal. 53. Jan. 26, 1907. E. S. 560-191. Male—32. Brought in unconscious. Vague history of fall. Op. E. A. C—Exploratory craniotomy—nega- tive. Died next day. Autopsy: Hemorrhage from aneurysm of middle cerebral artery. Tuberculosis of lungs. 54. Nov. 2, 1907. E. S. 155538. Male—24. Fell off running-board of car. Comatose. Op. E. A. C—Trephined. Subdural hemorrhage. Fracture of base. Died same day. 55. Sept. 9, 1908. E. S. 160174. Male—31. Fell on head; bleeding from mouth; convulsions. Op. E. A. C—Negative exploratory craniotomy. Died 4 days after op. Delirium tremens. Autopsy: Cyst of brain, mitral disease, etc. 56. Jan. 11, 1909. E. S. 161930. Male—40. Injuries following epileptic attack in a drunkard. Unconscious. Convulsions. Op. E. A. C.—Ex- ploratory craniotomy. Fracture temporal bone. Brain had dark, bloody appearance. Regained consciousness for 24 hrs., but died 2 days later. 57. Jan. 3, 1911. E. S. 173779. Male—23. R. R. accident. Shock. Coma. Multiple injuries. Comp. fracture of tibia and fibula. Depressed frac- ture of skull. Op. E. A. C.—Raising depressed fracture. Died same day without recovering consciousness. Note.—I believed and still believe in operation on every case with severe symptoms, of fracture of the base. Several successful cases will be found in the records. CRUSHED OR SEPTIC LEGS (AMPUTATION) 58. May 2, 1901. E. S. 386-162. Male—26. Run over by express wagon. Comp. fracture of tibia. Operated on by House Surgeon and bone wired. Later sepsis and pyemia. Op. E. A. C.—Amputation at knee. Death from pyemia on 19th day. 59. Sept. 20, 1902. E. S. 129234. Male—22. Compound fracture of thigh and internal injuries. Op. by House Surgeon, under direction of E. A. C. Thigh amputation. Died same day. 60. Jan. 8, 1903. E. S. 425-147. Male—27. R. R. accident. Both legs crushed. Multiple injuries, including fractures of humerus and ulna. Op. E. A. C.—Amputation both legs and one arm. Died next day. 61 Mav 19» 1903- E. S. 444-1. Male—40. Charcots knee-joint, which had been excised by another surgeon and followed by severe sepsis. Op. g A C.__Thigh amputation. Death on 12th day from sepsis and exhaustion. 62 May 12, 1904. S. S. 137328. Male—21. Both legs crushed in R. R. accident. Op. E. A. C.—Rt. thigh amputation. Left leg amputation. Death same day. 147 63. Jan. 2, 1906. E. S. 145850. Male—55. Osteomyelitis of femur, previ- ously operated on by several other surgeons. Severe sepsis from knee- joint to groin. Op. E. A. C.—Thigh amputation. Died soon after op. 64. Jan. 5, 1910. E. S. 167717. Male—33. R. R. accident. Traumatic amputation both legs and left arm. Op. E. A. C.—Direct transfusion. Died while transfusion was being done. MULTIPLE INJURIES 65. Dec. 5, 1907. E. S. 156021. Male—25. Crushed by locomotive wheel. Op. E. A. C.—Irrigation and cleaning of extensive lacerations of scro- tum, perineum, thigh, and buttocks. Died same day. 66. Nov. 2, 1908. E. S. 160961. Male—43. Fell from roof. Fracture left ribs, clavicle, and left Colles fracture. Intra-thoracic hemorrhage. Op. E. A. C.—Negative exploratory laparotomy for suspected abdominal hemorrhage. (Cocaine.) Died same day. 67. Jan. 9, 1910. E. S. 672-75. Male—28. Run over by electric car. Lacer- ated wounds of left arm, hand, lower abdomen, urethra, and testicle. By direction of E. A. C. on telephone, the House Surgeon cleaned up all the wounds with great care. The patient died 6 days later with sepsis, sloughing, delirium, and pneumonia. TRAUMATIC TETANUS 68. Jan. 28, 1900. E. S. 374-58. Male—11. Blank cartridge wound of hand 10 days before. Tetanus. Op. E. A. C.—Powder and wadding excised with ragged tissue from hand. Wound packed. Antitoxin. Died on 5th day. 69. July 11, 1900. E. S. 374-118. Male—17. Blank cartridge wound of hand. Tetanus. Op. E. A. C.—Antitoxin injected in both lateral ven- tricles through small trephine holes. Died next day. 70. Aug. 20, 1900. E. S. 376-10. Male—33. Tetanus following rusty nail wound in foot 5 days before. Op. E. A. C.—Wound in foot excised and both lateral ventricles injected with antitoxin. Death next day. 71. Dec. 10, 1909. E. S. 670-95. Male—16. Revolver wound of palm of hand 7 days before. Tetanus. Op. by House Surgeon, under direction of E. A. C. Excision of wound of hand with paper wad. Antitoxin. Later another surgeon excised the axillary glands. Death on 6th day. FRACTURED SPINE 72. Aug. 4, 1900. E. S. 372-168. Female—34. Fell from bleachers. Com- plete paralysis below nipples. Op. E. A. C.—Laminectomy 8-5 dorsal. Found cord completely severed. Died suddenly as she was lifted from operating table. 73. Feb. 21, 1906. S. S. 146521. Male—88. Fell 30 feet. Fract. 5th cervical vertebra. Op. E. A. C.—Laminectomy. Became cyanotic and died on 2d day. RUPTURED OR PERFORATED VISCERA 74. Aug. 18, 1900. E. S. 376-2. Male-42. 24 hrs. before, struck abdomen on fence post when walking fast in dark. General peritonitis. Feces in abdominal cavity. Ruptured intestine found and closed. Died next day. 75. Male—28. Had been operated on by another surgeon 4 weeks previ- ously for acute appendicitis and general peritonitis. A sponge had been left in the abdomen. Op. by E. A. C. under diagnosis of residual abscess. Abscess cavity which communicated with intestine found and * sponge removed. Died soon afterward with fecal fistula. 148 76. Dec. 25, 1901. S. S. 60-16. Male—51. Sudden abdom. pain and signs of peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Peritonitis due to perforation of cancer of stomach. Gastroenterostomy. Died on 4th day. 77. July 21, 1902. E. S. 390-220. Male—40. Gunshot wound of arm, chest, and abdomen. Kidney and lung perforated. Op. E. A. C.—Laparotomy. Blood found in abdominal cavity, but no organ seemed to be wounded except kidney. As bleeding along drainage tract continued, a second operation was done which demonstrated punctate hemorrhages in in- testine, probably from wound of mesenteric vessels. Enterostomy. Death on 2d day. 78. Aug. 27, 1902. E. S. 418-83. Male—4. Abdominal injury from wagon. Op. E. A. C.—Abdomen full of blood from bleeding mesentery, which had been torn from intestinal attachment. Died same day. 79. Oct. 29, 1902. W. S. 129632. Male—21. Perforated typhoid ulcer. Op. E. A. C.—Exploration with cocaine followed by ether. Perforation found and closed. Died on 3d day. Autopsy showed a second perfora- tion and peritonitis. 80. Aug. 23, 1903. E. S. 133774. Male—37. Perforated duodenal ulcer with general peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Perforation closed. Drainage. Later two secondary operations were done by E. A. C, one for sub- diaphragmatic abscess and one for pelvic abscess. Still later, another surgeon operated for intestinal obstruction. The patient died 10 days after this, two months after my first operation. (I believe this to have been the first case of perforated duodenal ulcer recognized at opera- tion and closed by suture at the hospital.) 81. Sept. 25, 1903. E. S. 134230. Female—65. Peritonitis from perforated gastric cancer. Op. E. A. C.—Partial gastrectomy, gastroenterostomy; drainage. Died on 3d day. 82. Oct. 15, 1905. E. S. 144614. Male—9. Perforated typhoid ulcer. Op. E. A. C.—Suture perforation. Died on 13th day. Necrosis of suture line with abscess. 83. Dec. 30, 1905. E. S. 145792. Male—37. General peritonitis from rup- tured bladder. Op. E. A. C.—Free pus in peritoneum. Bladder small and wilted. Drainage. Died same day. 84. Jan. 4, 1906. E. S. 145839. Male—50. Abdom. pain and vomiting for 5 days. In medical ward 2 days without surgical consultation. Op. E. A. C.—General peritonitis. Drainage. Cause not searched for, as condition too poor. Died same day. Autopsy showed a perforation of a diverticulum of ileum, strictures of intestine, general peritonitis, etc. 85. Dec. 22, 1907. E. S. 156279. Male—49. Abdom. pain and vomiting 5 days. Much worse last 12 hrs. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.— Suture of perforated duodenal ulcer and drainage. Died soon after op. 86. Dec. 13, 1909. E. S. 167351. Male—49. Blow on abdomen 4 days be- fore. Op. E. A. C.—Peritonitis in right iliac region, where an ecchy- mosed coil of intestine was firmly adherent. In freeing it, it was rup- tured. Excision of damaged six inches. Enterostomy. Death on 4th day, shortly after wound had broken open from distention. 87 Nov. 13, 1910. E. S. 172960. Male—40. Perforated duodenal ulcer. Patient in desperate condition from several months' illness with hemor- rhages and obstruction. Op. E. A. C—Peritonitis. Closure perforation and drainage. Later a jejunostomy under cocaine. Died on 8th day. Autopsy: Tuberculosis of lungs with cavity formation. Tuberculous peritonitis. Tuberculous ulcers of duodenum, etc. 88. Dec. 5, 1911. W. S. 179789. Male—4. Abdom. pain 48 hrs. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Suture of perforation of gastric ulcer, and drainage. Died same day. 149 89. Feb. 8, 1912. E. S. 184939. Female—26. Abdom. pain 2 days. General peritonitis. Op. E. A. C—Abdomen full of stomach contents. Perfora- tion in duodenum closed. Drainage. Died in 24 hrs. 90. Mar. 8, 1912. E. S. 181351. Male—17. Abdomen injured in coasting 24 hrs. before. Op. E. A. C—General peritonitis. Nearly complete transverse rupture of intestine. Lavage. Double enterostomy in ends of rupture. Died in 48 hrs. 91. Jan. 10, 1913. E. S. 187040. Male—40. Perforated duodenal ulcer with general peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Closure of perforation and gastroenterostomy. Delirium tremens. Death on 3d day. Abdomen in good condition. 92. Feb. 26, 1913. E. S. 187822. Male—29. Perforated duodenal ulcer and peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—Closure of perforation. Appendectomy. Death on 2d day from hematemesis. Autopsy showed the hemorrhage had come from another duodenal ulcer. Note.—Bad as these cases were, the records will show that I saved other similar ones. STRANGULATED HERNIA 93. Aug. 24, 1901. E. S. 392-116. Female—42. Femoral hernia, strangu- lated 4 days. Op. E. A. C.—Resection gangrenous bowel. End-to-end anastomosis. Died next day. 94. Dec. 13, 1901. E. S. 400-80. Male—57. Inguinal hernia, strangulated 12 hrs. Op. E. A. C.—Local anaesthesia. Four inches of black bowel with adjacent Meckel's diverticulum resected. Lateral anastomosis and enterostomy in proximal end. Death on 3d day. 95. Sept. 16, 1902. E. S. 129024. Male—43. Strangulated umbilical hernia. Op. E. A. C.—Many coils in sac. One coil 10 inches long completely gangrenous. Free pus in abdomen. Excision gangrenous gut and en- terostomy. Death in 24 hrs. 96. Sept. 20, 1903. E. S. 134148. A new-born baby with a malformation of abdomen, so that most of intestine and liver were in the sac of an umbilical hernia. Op. E. A. C.—Organs replaced and sac closed. Death in 24 hrs. 97. May 3, 1905. S. S. 142437. Male—68. Inguinal hernia of long stand- ing; strangulated for 12 hrs. Op. E. A. C.—Many adhesions in sac Gut viable; returned to abdomen. Died on 2d day of double pneumonia. 98. Nov. 26, 1906. E. S. 150431. Corpulent female—52. Strangulated umbilical hernia for 4 days. Op. E. A. C.—Viable(?) gut returned. Vomiting continued. Death on 2d day. 99. Jan. 11, 1907. E. S. 151052. Male—26. Strangulated inguinal hernia for 5 days. Op. E. A. C.—Enterostomy. Died next day. 100. Dec. 6, 1910. E. S. 173325. Female—50. Laparotomy by another sur- geon in 1898. In 1907, op. by still another surgeon for hernia in scar. Came in with hernia in scar strangulated for 48 hrs. Op. E. A. C.— Multiple adhesions freed and a viable(?) coil of dark red-brown intes- tine reduced. Died soon after operation. Autopsy showed syphilitic aortitis, chronic meningitis, hypertrophy, and dilatation of heart, etc. Note.—Perhaps enterostomy and washing of inside of gut might have saved some of these. TUBERCULOUS PERITONITIS 101. June 12, 1903. E. S. 132668. Female—35. Entered as emergency. 12 days' abdom. pain and vomiting. Op. E. A. C.—Diffuse tuberculous peritonitis. Washed with salt solution and wound closed. Wound clean. 150 Two secondary operations were done by E. A. C. to drain abscesses. In one of these the bowel was nicked and a fecal fistula developed. Later another surgeon attempted (against my urgent advice) to close the fistula. Death soon after. This was 3 mos. after first operation. TRANSFUSION FOR RUPTURED LIVER 102. Feb. 5, 1908. W. S. 156904. Male—18. Multiple injuries. Intra-ab- dominal hemorrhage from ruptured liver, fractured skull, etc. Shock. Op. E. A. C.—Direct transfusion by Crile method. Laparotomy by S. J. Mixter. Ruptured liver packed with gauze. Patient was put in good condition by transfusion, but died on the 8th day of sepsis in the abdominal wound. Autopsy showed ruptured liver, hydrothorax, car- diac insufficiency, splenic tumor, thrombosis of portal vein, skull frac- tured in right temporal region and base, peritonitis. OPERATIONS FOR CANCER OF STOMACH 103. Jan. 6, 1910. E. S. 672-35. Male—46. Severe gastric symptoms. Op. E. A. C.—Excision of large indurated ulcer of lesser curvature (cancer). When the suture was completed, the stomach was a mere contracted tube. Gastrostomy was done, so that a catheter could be left in the duodenum. The patient improved for 2 weeks, when the wound broke down, and he died on the 17th day. Autopsy: Broncho- pneumonia and lung abscess. Septic wound. 104. Mar. 1, 1913. E. S. 187691. Male—52. Had been operated on 4 yrs. previously by another surgeon for same symptoms. A cholecystostomy had been done for supposed cholecystitis. Relief was only temporary. When seen by me he was anemic, emaciated, with typical symptoms of cancer of stomach. Op. E. A. C.—Partial gastrectomy with gall bladder, which was adherent in mass. Died 5 days later. Autopsy showed metastatic glands, peritonitis, etc. 105. May 14, 1913. E. S. 189130. Male—60. Symptoms suggesting ulcer or cancer of stomach. Op. E. A. C.—A large indurated ulcer, high on lesser curvature, adherent to pancreas (probably cancer). Ant. gas- troenterostomy and enteroenterostomy. Died on 5th day. Pulmonary embolus and nephritis. 106. July 7, 1913. E. S. 19005. Male—30. A case which had lain for weeks in the medical wards, with severe gastric hemorrhages; had been trans- fused. I had watched for a favorable opportunity to operate. Failure of medical treatment. Op. E. A. C.—Large ulcer (probably cancer) of lesser curvature adherent to pancreas. Gastroenterostomy satisfac- torily completed under local anaesthesia. Transfusion (indirect) by another surgeon. Suddenly died during transfusion. 107. July 19, 1913. E. S. 190225. An emaciated man of 63, with severe gastric symptoms. Op. E. A. C.—Large mass on lesser curvature. Local anaesthesia. Gastroenterostomy. Died in medical ward a month later from pulmonary condition. Autopsy: Cancer with metastases. Pneumonia and abscess of lung. 108. Sept. 8, 1913. E. S. 191105. Male—?. Symptoms of cancer of stomach. Op. E. A. C.—Partial gastrectomy for cancer of pyloric end. Suddenly died on 4th day of pulmonary embolus(?). 109. Dec. 2, 1913. E. S. 870-331. Male—25. An obscure abdom. emergency. Op. E. A. C.—Liver full of soft knobs. One tapped with trochar and bit excised for path. exam. Died same night. Autopsy: Cancer of stomach and liver, and peritonitis. 151 OTHER OPERATIONS FOR CANCER 110. Aug 16, 1902. E. S. 410-245. Female—52. Extensive cancer of uterus. Op E A C—Total hysterectomy and radical pelvic dissection, using Crile clamps on int. iliac arteries. Comp.—Thrombosis of external iliac artery. On 5th day op. E. A. C—Thigh amputation for gangrene. Died soon after. 111. Aug. 23, 1902. E. S. 128665. Female—36. Extensive cancer of uterus. Op. E. A. C—Total hysterectomy and radical pelvic dissection. Bladder and ureter involved. Comp.—Urinary fistula, and later recto-vaginal fistula. Died 3 weeks later. 112. June 6, 1900. E. S. 372-38. Female—73. Cancer of breast. Op. E. A. C—Amputation of breast and dissection of axilla. Died of pneumonia on 7th day. Wound * lean. 113. July 16, 1902. E. S. 412-239. Male—58. Extensive cancer of lower jaw. Op. E. A. C— Excision of almost whole lower jaw back to angles. Tongue suspended with silver wire. Died suddenly about 3 weeks later of pulmonary complications—probably embolism. 114. Jan. 5, 1906. E. S. 161772. Female—43. Prolapse of uterus and abdom. tumor (ovarian). Op. E. A. C.—Removal of tumor size of child's head (sarcoma), with 3 loops of involved intestine. End-to-end anastomoses. Died next day. Peritonitis and other lesions. 115. Sept. 24, 1906. E. S. 149612. Male—75. Extensive cancer of lip. Op. E. A. C.—Removal of whole lower lip and dissection of both sides of neck. Died 2 days after operation. Autopsy: Pneumonia. Cysts of kidneys. Hypertrophy and dilatation of heart. Wound clean. 116. Apr. 13, 1909. E. S. 163383. Female—59. This patient was given up as inoperable by another surgeon in Mar., 1904. She had extensive cancer of the face, involving the whole nose and both lower eyelids. Between this date and 1909, I operated on her 8 times—each time excis- ing portions of her facial bones and covering in the defects with flaps from the cheek and neck. Each operation made her presentable for a few months, and she would return when recurrence took place. At the final operation I removed what remained of both upper jaws. She died the same night. (See Bibliography.) 117. Jan. 27, 1910. E. S. 167909. Male—45. Symptoms suggesting cancer of stomach. Op. E. A. C.—A papillary adenoma of the duodenal papilla size of horse-chestnut. Excision and cauterization of base. Cholecyst- duodenostomy to insure drainage of bile into intestine. Died on 6th day. Sepsis and hemorrhage. Autopsy: Old tuberculosis both lungs, etc. COMPLICATED OR ACUTE GALLSTONE CASES 118. Sept 9, 1901. E. S. 392-152. Female—53. Violent abdom. pain, jaun- dice, and signs of peritonitis. Op. E. A. C.—General peritonitis. Dis- tended gall bladder. Distended intestines. Enterostomy. Died in 24 hrs. (probably acute gall bladder). 119. July 11, 1902. E. S. 128004. Female—36. Had previously been oper- ated on (Aug., 1901) by E. A. C. and 7 large gallstones removed from gall bladder. Returned with jaundice and severe attacks of pain (abuse of morphine). Op. E. A. C—Cholecystectomy; gall bladder contained more gallstones of entirely different shape and color from those first removed. Died on 20th day from exhaustion due to excessive fluid drainage from duct. 120. Aug. 19, 1902. E. S. 128602. Female—41. An emergency case, with typical gallstone symptoms and jaundice. Op. E. A. C—Gall bladder contained viscid fluid and small stones. Nothing felt in duct. Chole- cystostomy. After operation there were symptoms of common duct 152 obstruction,—all bile came through wound, and stools were clay-colored. At second operation, no cause for obstruction was found and a chole- cystenterostomy was done. Death 30 days after first operation. 121. June 15, 1903. E. S. 132686. Female—50. Deep jaundice and other severe symptoms of gallstones. Op. E. A. C.—Cholecystectomy and removal of stone in common duct. Drainage of small abscess of liver. Death on 14th day. At autopsy a sponge was found in the open wound in contact with the wick. 122. Dec. 26, 1905. E. S. 145736. Female—34. Jaundice and other severe symptoms. Op. E. A. C—Choledochoduodenostomy. A very large stone removed from papilla and others from common duct and gall bladder. Died on 11th day. 128. Jan. 2, 1907. E. S. 150917. Female—52. Had been operated on a year previously by another surgeon; some stones were removed from the gall bladder. Returned with pain and jaundice. Op. E. A. C.—Stone removed from common duct, etc. Died on 19th day. Pneumonia, etc. OPERATIONS FOR VARIOUS OTHER CONDITIONS 124. Feb. 12, 1906. E. S. 146396. Female—39. Seven months ago slight attack of abdom. pain, more marked on right side. Not confined to bed. Six months ago similar attack, but much more severe. In bed 2 weeks. Tenderness over appendix. Op. E. A. C.—Appendix twisted, somewhat enlarged, and adherent to cecum. Ileum somewhat adherent to other bowels and posterior peritoneum. Appendectomy. The patient died 48 hrs. later. Death was unexplained. There was distention, black vomit, and cyanosis. Note.—These notes are taken from the record. I have no recollection of this case, although I remember nearly all the others. I must have failed entirely to find the lesion which was the cause of her death. The case is catalogued as "chronic appendicitis." Possibly it was acute peritonitis from post-operative infection, but I think not. It was an exploratory operation in the course of which the appendix was removed, and it should not be classed as death from "appendectomy." 125. Jan. 1, 1908. E. S. 156415. Male—1. Extreme deformities of lip and palate. The double harelip and protruding maxillary bones were suc- cessfully operated on by E. A. C. in Oct., 1907, and the cleft palate operation postponed until Jan., 1908. Op. E. A. C.—Radical cleft palate operation apparently very successful. The child died next day of acetonemia(?). (Probably op. hemorrhage.) 126. Nov. 10, 1908. E. S. 624-221. Female—37. Operated on 8 yrs. before by another surgeon for fibroid of uterus. Ventral hernia in scar. Chr. phlebitis of leg. Chr. cough. Kept in bed a week for temp. (102) and cough to quiet down. Op. E. A. C.—Radical cure of ventral hernia. Cough increased at once after op. Died on 3d day. Pneumonia. 127. Nov. 12, 1908. W. S. 161115. Male—4. Ciccatrix from burn of neck and chest, causing great deformity. Neck was obliterated and chin drawn down to sternum. Op. E. A. C.—Extensive plastic and excision of scar tissue. Died on 17th day from pneumonia and sepsis. 128. Nov. 21, 1908. E. S. 630-151. Male—7. Advanced cirrhosis of liver. Op. E. A. C.—Abdom. exploration and evacuation of ascitic fluid. Erysipelas of face. Later another operation—omentopexy. Died on 6th day. 129. Nov. 12, 1909. E. S. 166890. Male—89. Enormous renal calculi in both kidneys. In Jan., 1909, E. A. C. had removed a stone weighing 220 grams (I think the largest on record in this vicinity) from left kidney, and sent patient home to recuperate before operating on right kidney. 153 He returned in poor condition. Op. E. A. C—Nephrotomy (rt.) and removal of stones nearly as large as the one from the other suie. Death on 14th day. 130. Dec. 7, 1909. E. S. 167264. Female—37. Multiple abdom. and pelvic symptoms and uterine displacement and lacerations. Op. E. A. C Uterus dilated and curetted. Trachelorrhaphy, perineorrhaphy, appen- dectomy, ventral fixation. Death on 6th day. Autopsy showed a variety of lesions, including gallstones and pneumonia. Wounds O. K. 131. Aug. 11, 1900. E. S. 374-222. Male—45. Multiple strictures of urethra, and periurethral abscess. Urinary incontinence 8 yrs. Op. E. A. C — External and internal urethrotomy. Sudden death on 14th day. Cause unknown. 132. Jan. 27, 1909. E. S. 636-139. Male—49. Stricture of urethra. Op. E. A. C—Perineal section. Post-operative bronchitis. Sudden death on 36th day. No autopsy. 133. Jan. 2, 1907. E. S. 150920. Female—63. In desperate condition from trifacial neuralgia. Had had previous peripheral operations. Op. E. A. C.—Total extirpation of Gasserian ganglion. Death on 2d day. Pneumonia and meningitis(?). 184. July 21, 1902. E. S. 412-273. Male—26. Hydrocele, varicocele, and double hernia. Op. E. A. C—Radical cure of above. Pneumonia fol- lowed the operation, and he was transferred to medical ward. All wounds healed by first intention, but patient died on 45th day. Note.—The above ten cases are, in my opinion, those most subject to adverse criticism. GASTRIC AND DUODENAL ULCER (all perforated, but adherent) 135. Jan. 23, 1910. E. S. 167863. Male—42. Post, gastroenterostomy had been done for duodenal ulcer in June, 1905, by another surgeon. Relief for nearly 4 yrs., when symptoms recurred with increasing severity. Persistent vomiting, hemorrhages, stasis, and dilatation. Op. E. A. C. —Stomach greatly dilated. Both pylorus and stoma contracted so as to be practically impassible. Ant. gastroenterostomy to another loop. Patient continued to have hemorrhages and died on 7th day. Autopsy showed active duodenal ulcer and contracted stoma of former gastro- enterostomy, with ulceration and a Pagenstecker thread hanging in lumen. Broncho-pneumonia. 136. Jan. 23, 1910. E. S. 167784. Male—40. Typical duodenal ulcer symp- toms, worse recently. Op. E. A. C.—A hard, matted mass near pylorus in duodenum—evidently perforation which had been closed by adhe- sions. Gastroenterostomy. Died on 8th day. Autopsy: Peritonitis,- streptococcus septicemia, broncho-pneumonia. 137. Dec. 7, 1910. E. S. 173186. Male—54. Typical history of duodenal ulcer. Op. E. A. C.—Gall bladder, which was full of stones and ad- herent to duodenal ulcer, removed. Ulcer, which was posterior, dis- sected up and infolded. Post, gastroenterostomy. Died on 6th day. Sepsis. 138. Mar. 7, 1913. E. S. 187959. Female—26. Had all the classical second- ary complications of gastric ulcer: perforation, hemorrhage, and ob- struction. Repeatedly seen in medical wards from Mar. 7 to Apr. 10, and her condition considered too feeble for operation. Op. E. A. C.— Apr. 10, 1913—A small ulcer of duodenum and a large penetrating ulcer of lesser curvature adherent to pancreas. Partial gastrectomy, with the aid of Dr. C. A. Porter, whom I called in to help me. Death next morning. Shock. 139. Mar. 29, 1913. E. S. 188207. Male—50. Typical ulcer symptoms for 15 yrs. Came to hospital as last resort. A poor risk. Op. E. A. C.— 154 Multiple duodenal ulcers. Multiple right-sided adhesions; adherent appendix. Appendectomy; post, gastroenterostomy. Died on 11th day. Pulmonary emboli. 140. June 12, 1912. E. S. 183136. Female—48. Typical severe symptoms of chr. gastric ulcer. Had been operated on by another surgeon 18 months previously—gastroenterostomy. Op. E. A. C.—Large posterior ulcer, adherent to pancreas. The old gastroenterostomy was patent, but was below the ulcer. Partial gastrectomy seemed the only thing likely to relieve her, and was attempted in spite of her feeble condition. Death within 24 hrs. from shock. 141. Dec. 30, 1912. E. S. 186816. Male—56. Typical advanced symptoms of duodenal ulcer. Op. E. A. C—A sub-acute perforation of an en- circling duodenal ulcer. Gastroenterostomy. A finger of omentum was adherent to the perforation. Instead of removing this bit of omentum and then infolding, I infolded over the fat. I attribute the leakage which occurred to this. Death on 7th day. Greater skill and better judgment undoubtedly might have saved a few of these cases, but where is such skill and judgment to be found? Can the Trustees of the Massachusetts General Hospital produce evidence of such skill and judgment from the consecutive records of any other surgeon? Do the abstracts of the fatal cases in their Reports point to it?1 If not, I claim the appointment as Chief of Staff under the same ruling that caused my resignation: "Resolved, that in making appointments the Trustees will con- sider the fitness of the applicant for the special services which he will be called on to perform, and will seek to secure the best service available, without being bound by any custom of promotion by seniority." And even if such superiority can be shown in the record of another, I claim the right to reappointment under him, so that I may try to serve the hospital better than he does. I only covet the position of Chief, in order to be forced out of it by a better man. The Truth is that no Boston Board of Trustees could give me a Surgical appointment without displacing one of my friends. Even if I were put in to fill a vacancy, the man who was "in line" for that vacancy would feel injured,— so deep-rooted is our Seniority System. Even if a single group of cases should be assigned to me, some one would feel robbed of his "material." And as for me, I do not wish to replace any of my friends, unless it is very clear that I can and will do the work more efficiently. However, I am only too well aware that to these Trustees honest aggression is far more heinous a crime than nepotism or humbug, so that I must prepare to make my own way in spite of their dis- approval. It is clear from the financial report just presented that I must reorganize my work, invite a consulting staff, obtain finan- cial backing, and actually drive the Massachusetts General out of Business and back into Charity. How this may be done will be developed in Part III. 1 Trustees may be sure that their hospitals are badly organized, if the Chiefs of Staff do not have a higher mortality from their operations than their Juniors do. 155 BIBLIOGRAPHY I publish this Bibliography as an evidence that, even if I did lose these cases, I studied and recorded the "material" which I had the "privilege of using." Many of the cases which died will be found reported and analyzed in these papers. Can the Trustees show that any other surgeon on their staff made better use of his "material"? What is the use of studying and writing and effort to add to the world's knowledge, if the mere operator is to be pro- moted? I could be satisfied if his End Results were better. But unless they were, the scholar, poor as he may be, should take precedence of the operator. Is surgery a science or a technique? Is the object relief or display? Then take my Papers on the Shoulder Joint. I do not boast when I state that these have been accepted in Surgical Literature. I have received credit from foreign writers, from the text-books, and from practically every writer on the "shoulder." But the Massa- chusetts General, the hospital for whose cases I did the work, has given me no credit for it, in spite of the fact that every case I treated was benefited. Was I asked to continue to treat the shoulder cases ? Are such cases ever referred to me now by the Hospital? Or are these cases simply neglected in the hurry of the Out-Patient work? Who cares whether they are relieved? Are the Trustees, the Chiefs of Staff, or any one else held accountable for them? Have my results ever been improved upon? 1. Experiments on the Application of the Roentgen Rays to the Study of Anatomy. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol. Ill, No. 8, 1898. 2. A Study of the X-ray Plates of One Hundred and Forty Cases of Fracture of the Lower End of the Radius. Boston Medical and Sur- gical Journal, Vol. CXLIII, No. 13, pp. 305-308, Sept. 27, 1900. 3. A Study of the Cases of Accidental X-ray Burns Hitherto Recorded. Philadelphia Medical Journal, March 8, 1902. 4. The Use of the X-ray in Surgery. Johns Hopkins Hospital Bulletin, Vol. XIV, No. 146, May, 1903. 5. The Formation of Loose Cartilages in the Knee Joint. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CXLIX, No. 16, p. 427, Oct. 15, 1903. 6. Report of a Case of Bone Cyst of a Digital Phalanx. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CL, No. 8, pp. 211-212, Feb. 25, 1904. 7. A Rtsumi of the Results of Dr. F. B. Harrington's Service at the Massachusetts General Hospital, from June 1 to Oct. 1, 1900, as Seen in the Following June or Later. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CXLVI, No. 20, May 15, 1902. (A similar study was also published for the two following years.) Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CL, No. 23, June 9, 1904. 8. Some Points on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Certain Neglected Minor Surgical Lesions. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CL, No. 14, pp. 371-374, April 7, 1904. 9. A Method of Rhinoplasty Illustrated by Plastic Operation for Rodent Ulcer on the Face. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLII No. 10, pp. 275-278, March 9, 1905. 156 10. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Fracture of the Carpal Scaphoid and Dislocation of the Semilunar Bone. Annals of Surgery, March and June, 1905. 11. Observations upon the Actual Results of Cerebral Surgery at the Massa- chusetts General Hospital. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLIII, No. 3, pp. 74-76, July 20, 1905. 12. On Stiff and Painful Shoulders. The Anatomy of the Subdeltoid or Subacromial Bursa and Its Clinical Importance. Subdeltoid Bursitis. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLIV, No. 22, pp. 613- 620, May 31, 1906. 13. A Case of Recurrent Spontaneous Gangrene of the Index Finger; Successive Amputations of the Phalanges; Abatement of the Process after Excision of a Portion of the Radial Nerve and Stretching of the Median. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLV, No. 2, pp. 33-36, July 12, 1906. 14. On the Bier Treatment of Infectious and Septic Wounds of the Ex- tremities. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLV, No. 16, pp. 434-435, Oct. 18, 1906. 15. Case of Bullet Wound of the Brain; Successful Removal of the Bullet Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLVIII, No. 7, pp. 228- 229, Feb. 13, 1908. 16. Observations on Six Cases of Acute Perforating Ulcer of the Duodenum. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLVIII, No. 7, pp. 217- 219, Feb. 13, 1908. 17. Remarks upon Intussusception, with a Suggestion for a New Method of Operation upon Cases in Which Reduction Is Not Possible. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLVIII, No. 14, pp. 438-446, April 2, 1908. 18. Chronic Obstruction of the Duodenum by the Root of the Mesentery. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLVIII, No. 16, pp. 503- 510, April 16, 1908. 19. A Case of Intra-Vesical Cyst of the Ureter; Dilatation of Ureter with Very Slight Dilatation of the Renal Pelvis, and Containing Twenty- eight Movable Calculi; Bacteriuria; Alkalinuria; Phosphaturia. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLVIII, No. 22, pp. 828- 831, May 28, 1908. 20. Bursitis Subacromialis, or Periarthritis of the Shoulder Joint. (Sub- Deltoid Bursitis.) Records of the Massachusetts Medical Society, June 9, 1908. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Oct. 22, 29; Nov. 5, 12, 19, 26; Dec. 3, 1908. 21. Bone Transference. Report of a Case after the Method of Huntington. Annals of Surgery, June, 1909. 22. The Diagnosis of Ulcer of the Duodenum. Proceedings of the Massa- chusetts Medical Society, June 15, 1909. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLXI, No. 22, Nov. 18, 1909; Vol. CLXI, No. 23, Dec. 2, 1909; Vol. CLXI, No. 25, Dec. 9, 1909. 23. The Use of the X-ray and Radium in Surgery. Keene's Surgery, 1909 and 1913. 24. On the Surgical Significance of Pus, Blood, and Bacteria in the Urine. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLXI, No. 6, pp. 177-183, August 5, 1909. 25. On the Importance of Distinguishing Simple Round Ulcers of the Duo- denum from Those Ulcers Which Involve the Pylorus or Are Above It Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLXI, Nos. 10, 11, 12, Sept. 2, 9, 16, 1909. 157 26. Case of Mesenteric Thrombosis; Resection of Intestine; End-to-End Anastomosis. Recovery. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLXII, No. 11, pp. 355-357, March 17, 1910. 27. Depressed Fracture of the Malar Bone. A Simple Method of Reduc- tion. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLXII, No. 16, p. 532, April 21, 1910. 28. Complete Rupture of the Supraspinatus Tendon. Operative Treatment with Report of Two Successful Cases. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLXIV, No. 20, pp. 708-710, May 18, 1911. 29. Duodenal Ulcer. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLXV, No. 2, pp. 54-59, June 13, 1911. 30. "On Stiff and Painful Shoulders," as explained by Subacromial Bursitis and Partial Rupture of the Tendon of the Supraspinatus. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLXV, No. 4, pp. 115-120, July 27, 1911. 31. Diagnosis of Diseases of the Stomach and Intestines by the X-ray. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLXVI, No. 5, pp. 155- 159, Feb. 1, 1912. 82. Abduction of the Shoulder. An Interesting Observation in Connection with Subacromial Bursitis and Rupture of the Tendon of the Supra- spinatus. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLXVI, No. 24, pp. 890-891, June 13, 1912. 33. Discussion of paper by S. W. Goddard, M.D.: Surgical Treatment of Pyloric Stenosis, with Report of Cases. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLXV, No. 13, pp. 482-483, Sept. 28, 1911. 34. Our Little Balloons. Some Observations on Gas and Ptosis. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLXIX, No. 15, pp. 540-542, Oct. 9, 1913. 35. Observations on a Series of Ninety-eight Consecutive Operations for Chronic Appendicitis. Medical Communications of the Massachusetts Medical Society, Vol. XXIV, 1913; Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLXIX, No. 14, Oct. 2, 1913. 36. The Prognosis of Sarcoma of the Testicle. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. CLXX, No. 8, pp. 267-269, Feb. 19, 1914. 37. Money Spent on Hospitals Is for Cure of Patients. Follow-up System the Only Way to Determine Value of Institution's Services — Ac- counts Must Include Death and Disability, Which Are Wasted Effort. The Modern Hospital, Vol. II, No. 2, Feb., 1914. 38. The Product of a Hospital. Surgery, Gynecology, and Obstetrics pp 491-496, April, 1914. 89. A Study in Hospital Efficiency. As Demonstrated by the Case Report of the First Two Years of a Private Hospital. May 10, 1914. 40. A Study in Hospital Efficiency. As Demonstrated by the Case Report of the Second Two Years of a Private Hospital. Oct. 19, 1915. 41. Report of Committee on Hospital Standardization. (Report of Com- mittee of Clinical Congress of Surgeons.) Surgery, Gynecology, and Obstetrics, Jan., 1914, and Jan., 1916. 42. The Dividing Line between Medical Charity and Medical Business. Medical Record, May 13, 1916. 48. A Wise Preliminary to the Adoption of Any Compulsory Health In- surance Act. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol CLXXVI No. 12, pp. 435-438, March 22, 1917. ' 44. Uniformity in Hospital Morbidity Reports. Boston Medical and Sur- gical Journal, Vol. CLXXVII, No. 9, pp. 279-283, August 30, 1917. 158 Have these papers any financial value? I certainly could find no buyer for the copyrights, but in my opinion they are of far more value to humanity than all the money I have ever made by treating my individual patients. By the shoulder work alone, countless patients have been and will be helped in the hands of other doctors. Now in your opinion my writings may not be worth the paper they are printed on, but you cannot say the same of the writings of really original surgical observers and students. Even these men, after they have gained reputations, not only are not directly paid for their original work, but they have to pay large amounts for the prepara- tion and illustration of their articles. And their enthusiasm for their work is so great, that they are even willing to humbug the rich, to get money to pay for their all-absorbing passion of making the most of their brains to benefit mankind. No, there is no market for plain, truth-telling clinical articles. They are not worth a cent, and most medical publications even demand that the author pay for the illustrations. The natural con- sequence is a tendency to write for advertising purposes. Nine- tenths of our medical and surgical literature is published for this purpose alone, and the best of it is but a mixture of advertisement and true science. It is the accepted usage of the profession to adver- tise in this way,— a man is not expected to report his errors and failures. Naturally, as his living depends on it, he keeps his best foot forward. Why did I write these articles? As I look back to analyze my intentions, so that I may see those of others, I find the following reasons: 1. Advertisement for personal business. 2. Hope of recognition of ability by my own hospital, the Massa- chusetts General, by my colleagues and friends, by my distant readers, and by the rising generation. 3. A real desire to use the best that lies in me to do my bit for humanity, recognition or no recognition. I always had all three in mind, and I believe most men who write have also. The proportion varies somewhat, and the true value and the financial value are usually in inverse proportion. I believe that in my own case the desire to be recognized by my own hospital weighed the strongest. I thought that if I could do well, I should receive recognition and be promoted. I imagined that the Trustees of the hospital wanted such work done, and that if I kept at it and took good care of all my cases, I should get on in time. I knew, of course that every hour I spent on such work instead of on technical experience and personal attention to patients, put me behind in private practice; but I hoped that some one was watching my efforts, and that the time would come when the Trustees would keep track of results and discover that study might really fit a surgeon to benefit their patients. I kept thinking that if the Trustees should advertise me by promotion for merit, there would be no need of diluting my articles with personal advertisement! If I had only been sure of promotion by merit for relieving my patients, I could have spent more and more time in studying how to relieve them! But no, I find that they expected me to go on accumulating a good private practice, in order to make a good living and a reputation. They would have pretended to be grateful when I had continued to hold my appoint- ment some years after my actual usefulness had ceased, and had allowed my reputation to cover their delinquencies. Would it not be possible to use the ambition of young men openly and fairly? None of us desires to spend energy in study and writing, unless thereby we become better surgeons. If technique and repu- tation are the things to acquire, to have better success with our patients, what is the use of wasting time reading and writing, once we have got our Degrees? If Trustees had an End Result System, they could tell whether to promote scholars or operators, and both scholars and operators might know their own deficiencies and be able to proportion their work. Some of these papers of mine have received recognition,—must I therefore be classed as a scholar, no matter how well my cases do? As a matter of fact, my "practical" colleagues might have written better papers, if they had been obliged to, to keep their positions. The whole realm of surgery is at present so permeated with humbug, that any one who will tell the plain, unvarnished truth about a series of cases, will find that he is writing an epoch-making paper! Can- not Trustees see that a true End Result Report of their hospital cases will be the first tangible directory to competent doctors, whether the hospital is associated with a university or not? But as for the money value of my papers,— I am determined to find this out by selling this Report. Let every reader send me what he considers the value of this Report to him. If I get back the money it has cost me, I shall write another one, but I do not care to write another for mere advertising. Whatever money comes in for this Report, will be returned in full value in the next Report. If this Report is not paid for, I shall know that my duty is done as far as writing papers goes. Writing papers is the hardest part of modern surgery! 160 PART III THE NEW ORGANIZATION AN ILLUSTRATION OF HOW A GROUP OF EARNEST MEN MAY COMPETE WITH THE CLIQUES WHO DOMINATE THE CHARITABLE HOSPITALS IN ANY CITY PAGB The New Position of the General Practitioner . 163 Fkb-Splittino........164 The Business Value of a Consultant .... 165 Our New Finance ........ 166 Institutions from Which I Should Be Glad to Accept Proffered Loans ....... 169 How Can I Obtain a Staff of Specialists? . 169 Duties of the Consulting Staff . . . 172 A Staff Which Is Sought—Not One Which Is Seeking, 172 Cutting Prices or Raising Prices? . . . 174 How May the Young Surgeon Make His Start under the End Result System? ..... 175 Advertisement ........ 178 Last Word.........179 162 PART III THE NEW ORGANIZATION AN ILLUSTRATION OF HOW A GROUP OF EARNEST MEN MAY COMPETE WITH THE CLIQUES WHO DOMINATE THE CHARITABLE HOSPITALS IN ANY CITY1 The New Position of the General Practitioner The day of the general practitioner is passing, it has almost passed in thickly settled regions; but the day of the isolated special- ist has also begun to pass. Economic conditions do not permit the average person to employ the latter. Combinations of experts will to a great extent take the place of both, except in the unusual in- stances when the individual can maintain himself by his actual superiority in his own field. We believe that there is today a demand for institutions repre- senting combinations of specialists, to which the patient may pay one moderate fee and in return receive the benefit of the advice of one or all of the experts of the institution. We believe that the modern role of the general practitioner win be as confidential adviser to the patient, to help to obtain from such institutions the diagnosis and expert treatment necessary, and to interpret and weigh the advice received. This will lead to a reversal of the present relations. Now, the specialist sees few cases, and gets overpaid for each; the practitioner sees many cases, and gets underpaid for each. The time must come when the former cares for many cases at small fees, and the prac- titioner for fewer cases at relatively large fees. Logically, this state of affairs should come about, because the expert must necessarily acquire and retain facility by doing what he does many times; and, on the other hand, the general practitioner will have to take much time with each individual, and will have to have a wide knowledge, so as to understand to a certain degree all branches of medicine, and what results are to be expected. If an institution subdivides its work among many individuals, each like the specialized laborer in industry, will do the same thing again and again, and become more and more skillful. The patient »The same method may be used in competition with " Fee-Splittera." 163 J is like the buyer of a boot made by many workers. The doctor or general practitioner is the retailer. He fits the boot to the needs, taste, and pocketbook of the individual customer. The doctor of today cannot give expert treatment any more than the retail shoe dealer can make all parts of the boot. The doctor must hold his custom by fitting the individual with satisfactory boots. In the future, the Public will realize that what they want from the doctor is advice, as from a man and a friend, as to how to obtain (not to expect him to give) adequate diagnosis and treatment. They will realize the impossibility of his being able to diagnose and treat unusual conditions effectively. Their chief need for him will be as adviser and sympathetic friend, and he will be paid as such, not as a purveyor of makeshift and ineffective treatment. They will rely on him more because he does not give treatment, than because "he does the best he can." But the sine qua non of this honored relationship must be the establishment of institutions where the services of experts can be obtained when necessary, at reasonable prices. The Massachusetts General Hospital has recognized this fact in the establishment of their "pay clinic" for persons of moderate means. It is the intention of this hospital to put another competitive combination of specialists at the disposal of practitioners who would like to hold this relationship to their patients, and of patients who want to establish this relationship to their physicians. We plan to sell standard goods; we are not a Charity which gives away un- standardized "seconds," nor do we set up as experts, like the most fashionable "make to order" tailors. Fee-Splitting The much condemned practice of fee-splitting is the result of such large fees being charged for operations or other special forms of treatment, that the temptation to split them naturally arises. Fee-splitting means that a physician urges his patient to go to a certain surgeon. The patient pays a large fee to the surgeon, and the surgeon, without the knowledge of the patient, rebates a part of it to the physician for having brought him the case. To a business man, accustomed to the usual methods of giving a commission to the person who brings a customer, this practice does not seem so very shocking. It is the customer's lookout to see that he gets a fair bargain. But in the case of surgery, the fact that the customer is not qualified to protect himself (for he has no means of judging whether the services received are valuable) changes the question entirely. The patient must put his trust in his physi- cian, and if that physician betrays him, a criminal act is committed. In this community I sincerely believe that such acts are very rare, but we are not guiltless of the primary crime of overcharging for simple operations for which the laity shows a readiness to pay ridiculously high prices. No wonder the practitioner is tempted to 164 get his rake-off, when he sees some surgeon receive a large check for an hour's simple work, while he himself has done the real work and taken the real responsibility, by convincing the patient that an operation was necessary or wise. It is our intention to Split Fees among ourselves, and to make the lees thus split so small, that the patient may have something left with which to pay his friend the practitioner, enough to recom- pense him for the time and trouble he has taken. We shall try to teach each patient what responsibility his doctor has taken in advis- ing the operation. We shall urge each patient to ask his doctor to attend the operation, so that he may be convinced of the pathologic findings, and that he may know with what care his case is conducted. Few patients realize how important for their after-care it is, to have their doctor see the actual pathologic conditions demonstrated at the operation. The patient should pay him for his time and trouble, for the Fees we ask are too small to stand Splitting behind the patient's back. The Business Value of a Consultant If a person can understand the business value to a practitioner of a surgeon who will split fees with him, it will not be difficult for him to understand the reverse position of the value to a surgeon of a consulting general practitioner. A surgeon's income largely depends on his popularity with the general practitioners and medical consultants, for they can "steer" the patient into his hands. It is, therefore, for his interest to do the following things, which are well recognized as legitimate methods of increasing his clientele among the practitioners: 1. To make himself personally agreeable to them. 2. To back them up, when their cases go wrong. 3. To pay particular attention to those of their cases that enter the Charitable Hospitals. 4. To operate on or attend gratis the members of their families. 5. To insist that the practitioner's bill is paid before their own. 6. To take the conservative side on public questions pertaining to reforms of medical practice. If a new consultant brought me 100 new cases next year, and these cases paid me only the "Hospital Fee" and no "Professional Fee," my hospital would be a financial success, as shown on page 119. Ten consultants might send me ten cases each, or 100 might send me one each. This would mean 10,000 more dollars for my receipts, without any great increase in my expenditure. If these cases should each pay also $100 Professional Fee, I should have $10 000 more to spend on my colleagues and assistants. This would put my undertaking on a solid basis. One fashionable Back Bay practitioner could do this for me, if he had the courage to take his share in the publicity. 165 Two and two make four. Consider the financial value to a surgeon of friendship and cordial relations with some prominent Back Bay consultant whose practice is among the rich and fashion- able! Such "Entente Cordiale" relations seriously interfere with Hospital Efficiency. If you are rich, you probably do not see why. Our New Finance (See also page 122, Part II) The hospital is already equipped to do business and to take care of more patients than come to us, but in course of time we shall need more space and more equipment of various kinds. For instance, it is now clear to me that $10,000 invested in a better X-ray plant and an elevator would bring more than a 10 per cent increase in new business and in greater facility in conducting that which we already have. I shall, therefore, put in these improve- ments by calling in $10,000 of the proffered loans, of which there will always be the following list in the order in which they will be called in: 1. Employees' loans (to an amount not over $10,000 each) at 10 per cent interest. Of this 10 per cent, 5 per cent will be paid from the Hospital Fees and 5 per cent from the Professional Fees. 2. Loans at 5 per cent by members of the Staff for any appa- ratus or equipment they individually especially desire. (Provided they do not call the loan within five years.) 8. Loans by former patients at 5 per cent. 4. Loans by members of the medical profession at 5 per cent. 5. Loans by the laity in general at 5 per cent. Now, if there is a good subscription list of these loans, we can enlarge the plant each year in proportion to the net earnings of the previous year. As my personal property is worth $50,000/ and all loans will be secured by my note until the Institution is incorporated, no stockholder would run any risks except from my personal failure. Also, since I can make no income until the interest on the stock is paid, the stockholders' annual interest is guaranteed. The result will be the absorption of all the loans by the em- ployees, so that when the hospital is incorporated, it will be by the employees and myself. All the other persons who have proffered loans will merely be underwriters of the End Result Idea and of my personal ability to put it through. But an imposing list of under- writers, with the proffered loans running into millions, when pub- lished in our next Report, will make the Trustees of Hospitals and Corporations of Universities begin to take interest in the idea. *Even if this were $500,000, it should not exclude me from competition in a Charitable Hospital or with Charitable Hospitals. 166 Details of Plan All loans and the interest thereon will be secured by E. A. C.'s note until the total investment in excess of the present plant reaches $100,000, when the Hospital will be incorporated by the stockhold- ers, with the following statements in the articles of incorporation: 1. The Hospital shall be known as The End Result Hospital. 2. An End Result Report of all the cases who enter the Hospital must be published annually and sold at $1 apiece to any subscriber. 3. The rates of the Hospital and Professional Fees must never be increased, so that the standard of service will be kept propor- tionate to the economic conditions which give the value to a dollar. 4. Employees honorably retired from service may hold their 10 per cent stock during lifetime, and the principal will be paid to their heirs. 5. The appointment of the Acting Professional Staff shall be annual, by a merit system. 6. The members of the Acting Professional Staff shall retire to the Consulting Staff at forty-five. 7. Any member of the Staff or Acting Staff may loan, at 5 per cent, money for equipment which he especially desires, provided the loan is made for at least five years. 8. Any member of the Staff or any Employee may withdraw his loan at any time, and it shall be automatically withdrawn, if he is superseded, discharged, or resigns except as provided in Section 4. 9. The charter of incorporation may be revoked, if at any time it cannot be shown that at least 100 subscribers are ready to advance loans of $1,000 at 5 per cent. (This is to insure starting business again in case of adverse legal decision.) 10. Any physician or surgeon registered in Massachusetts may treat suitable cases at the Hospital with the same privileges as the Staff, provided the conditions of the End Result Report are com- plied with. 11. Such other articles as the incorporators deem necessary to insure the proper management and usefulness of the Institution- It will be seen that if the provisions of these articles are observed, the following advantages will be obtained: 1. There will be no opportunity for any employee or any mem- ber of the Staff to grow rich at the expense of the patients. 2. Persons of medium circumstances will always be able to obtain Standard Hospital Care and Standard Professional Service in proportion to the economic value of a dollar. There will be no Charity except in the way we all treat one another. (See reference, "The Dividing Line between Medical Charity and Medical Busi- ness." By E. A. C.) 3. Employees can raise their salary by borrowing at a lower rate and loaning to the Hospital at 10 per cent. This will give them an interest in the institution and assure them of a pension when 167 honorably retired. It will also allow them to invest their savings at 10 per cent. 4. The medical profession can be standardized, so that those who ask larger fees can organize to give better service, or others can organize at a lower standard, and the Charitable Hospitals can take care of the rest. 5. The legacies, which former pioneers who have made standard operations and other forms of treatment possible, will be given to the people, by making such safe operations as those for hernia and appendicitis purchascable at reasonable prices. 6. The true pioneers of this generation will have honor, and can demand recompense for treating the cases which this Hospital refuses as too experimental for business. 7. The rich will find our Reports directories to enable them to select surgeons or physicians as particularly competent, because we have referred our difficult cases to them, and our Reports show that they have been relieved. 8. Our End Result Report will show the public how far scien- tific medicine has become practical. 9. Surgeons not on our Staff, who believe in some unusual oper- ation which they recommend, can select favorable cases, operate on them here, and thus demonstrate to the Public, under our authority, the value of their ideas. 10. Patients who question their surgeon's sincerity, can insist upon putting their cases on record here, by asking him to operate here, or by spending a few days with us before being operated on. 11. The Acting Surgeons of this hospital will have records established of what their experience has been. 12. E. A. C.'s salary can never be any more than what the other members of the Staff choose to allow him from the Professional Fees, after paying the hospital expenses and interest. Like the other members of the Staff, he can, however, earn money outside of the hospital from patients who wish to retain his professional services apart from those of the rest of the Staff. 13. Although E. A. C. guarantees the loans and their interest from failure, the existence of a large number of proffered loans guarantees E. A. C. that, whenever the business justifies it, there is always plenty more money to invest in the Hospital or Profes- sional equipment. 14. The question of this hospital's existence is therefore put up to the Public. If they want "a hundred dollar hospital with a hundred dollar staff," they can have it. When our ten beds stay full, we shall add more, but never shall increase our investment faster than income, nor increase our business so fast that we cannot take time to trace the results. Those who loan to this hospital, loan to the End Result Idea. Their only risk is from E. A. C.'s inability to put the plan through. And their investment is guaranteed by his entire personal property. 168 No idea of charity is to be associated with this enterprise. It is a matter of business, not of philanthropy, except in so far as it will drive Business out of the Charitable Hospitals, so that their funds can be devoted to the sick poor of this generation, and to the pre- vention of sickness in all classes in the next generation. Institutions from Which I Should Be Glad to Accept Proffered Loans 1. The Massachusetts General Hospital, because the success of my hospital would relieve that institution of any obligation to use its funds for the care of the curable, wage-earning classes. It could then devote some of its funds to determining and increasing the degree of its efficiency in treating the incurable and the poor. It could use its new private ward for the very rich, who could get the benefit of the services of the same Staff which it honors with appointments to treat the very poor, and the difficult and obscure cases in all classes of society. 2. Harvard University, because the End Result System would enable her to teach her students the difference between curable cases, suitable for them to accept, and difficult, obscure, or incurable cases, which should be referred to others. It would also enable her to select for instructors or to retain as instructors men who can and do teach the relief of disease by example rather than by precept. 3. The American College of Surgeons, because the example of this hospital would help them in their program to clean up the abuses of Modern Surgery. 4. The American Medical Association. 5. The American Hospital Association. 6. The American Association for the Control of Cancer. 7. All other associations for the Promotion of Health or the Elimination of Disease. How Can I Obtain a Staff of Specialists? I make no secret of it,— I have tried unsuccessfully among my friends to gather a Staff who will do as I do, i. e., undertake to treat only such cases as I feel I am qualified to treat; and if I make a mistake, and do not succeed in relieving the patient, to report the case, as I have in this volume. For instance, I want an obstetrician who'is qualified, after making a prenatal examination, to accept for confinement such cases as will run a normal course or present only minor complications. I want him to have the moral courage to call in for cases which are unusually difficult or in which any serious complication occurs, some acknowledged leader in obstetrics, just as I have called in Dr. C. A. Porter for Cases 53 and 146. Now where can I get a man who has such judgment as this? Even if our medical schools graduated students with a guarantee of having 169 demonstrated such ability in a series of one hundred cases, would such a man be willing to work for his share of our professional fee? I want a throat specialist to do routine operations for tonsils, adenoids, and septums. Such operations are being done by the hundred at our Charitable Hospitals. They are not very difficult or dangerous, but they do not always help the patient. I think I could do them myself. But I do not think I can tell when they will do good and when they will not. Where can I find a specialist who will tell me? Is there any throat specialist who has a record of having had demonstrably good results in a series of a hundred con- secutive operations of this kind? Is there any throat clinic which is trying to graduate assistants with such a record? I will go even farther. Is there any throat specialist who will risk his reputation by undertaking to operate on one hundred successive routine nose and throat operations at my hospital? Reference to my report will show that Cases 2, 3, 193, 250, 320 had operations of this class done by the two best specialists I know in Boston, Dr. D. Crosby Greene and Dr. J. L. Goodale. The operations were skillfully done, but in only one case did they result perfectly. I can get Dr. Greene or Dr. Goodale to operate on any difficult cases I want to,—no matter if the patient cannot pay. They are "authorities" and they must do it, if I call them. But what I want is a throat specialist who is not an authority, who will only do the simple and clearly indicated operations. When such a man has been on the Staff of this hos- pital for about five years, and his results have proved his ability to use this amount of knowledge and judgment, he might legitimately begin to pose as an "authority" himself! A specialist to me is a man who can cure kinds of cases which I cannot. I want specialists of this kind to join my hospital,— not "authorities" in the various specialties. I can get the services of "authorities" for nothing for my poor patients! In the same way I want all sorts of specialists. Here is the hospital well-equipped, and I am ready to add any necessary special equipment. All I ask is that each specialist shall do as I do and be ready to take whatever discredit may come from the failure of his best efforts. Surely there must be men who dare to compete with the vested interests in Boston Medical Circles. Is there no one else who can see that Harvard and all other Medical Schools are teaching in the wrong way? Perhaps some specialists who are ready to retire from competitive practice as "authorities" will be willing to sink with me into the second class, and refer their difficult cases to others. Had we not better perish in this way by admitting that more and more cases had better be cared for by others than to continue to carry the "authority" and "experience" bluff to the same disastrous limit that we have seen our seniors carry it? If our experience counts for anything, it should enable us to make good in our selec- 170 tion of cases. When we refuse, and the younger specialist, who has more time and energy for study, succeeds, it will then be clearly to his credit. The truth is, that I am trying to find the place where the end of the rainbow touches the ground. A specialist who can select cases which he can relieve is harder to find than an "authority." Every specialist becomes an "authority" as soon as you or I call him. But if I found a specialist who could select relievable cases, he would soon become a real "authority," and his business would increase so rapidly, that he could not afford to work for his share of our Professional Fee. I have to be constantly on guard against becom- ing an authority myself, and often have difficulty in convincing patients that I am not. If I were appointed as the head of a Clinic at a Charitable Hospital, I could not get out of it! Having publicly expressed the opinions I have, the Trustees could hold me to giving my personal care to the doubtful and difficult cases, and to thus allowing my subordinates to establish records for efficiency in the easier cases. Every colleague who joins this Hospital Staff should take this same attitude. A Charitable Hospital appointment must mean an honor, not a privilege or a sinecure. The Charitable Hospital appointment should mean a fair exchange. It should be clearly understood that honor and opportunity must be paid for by respon- sibility and service. But the appointments at this hospital have no such compensa- tions. Here it must be give and take, in work and money. We want no pretense of charity. We sell guaranteed work as cheaply as is consistent with making a living. We must set fractures, remove gallstones, deliver babies, or excise tonsils, in return for money enough to pay the wages of our skilled labor, not our "authoritiy." We cannot pay our Staff with honor and opportunity. Not at present! Thus it is not difficult to see why my friends do not join me in this enterprise. They can take less responsibility, receive more honor and less discredit, as well as make more money, by continuing to play their roles as "authorities." How different is my position from that of Charitable Hospital Trustees! Their clinic, their "material," their privileges, are assets which they can barter for service. To introduce The End Result System, all they would have to do would be to pass a vote! They can put Hospital Humbug asleep forever by merely insisting on an End Result Report! Nevertheless, in spite of all these dis- advantages, I propose to begin my new organization by appointing the best Consulting Staff I can get after this Report has been pub- lished and distributed to every member of the American College of Surgeons and every member of the Massachusetts Medical Society. I shall pick the best Consulting Staff I can, adding one by one, so that each one elected may vote for the next. 171 I am well aware that it will be difficult to find men who will be conscientious enough to accept this position and yet forceful enough to dare to do it. Such men will be able to earn large incomes without association with such an outlaw institution as this which stoops to advertising, "No cure, no pay," "Results guaranteed," and "Payment on the instalment plan." But still I shall find some men who will do it. Duties of the Consulting Staff 1. The Consulting Staff will assist Dr. Codman and the Acting Staff to treat unusual or difficult cases. 2. They will aid Dr. Codman to select for appointment an Acting Staff of specialists. Appointments to the Acting Staff will be made annually on a merit system, chief consideration being given to what the Consulting Staff considers the best piece of work that has been done in this vicinity in each specialty. 3. They will advise Dr. Codman about the management and policies of the hospital. A Staff Which Is Sought—Not One Which Is Seeking I shall seek the help of this Consulting Staff, because I believe that they can help me to make a smaller percentage of errors in my own cases, and because they will increase the number of kinds of cases which this institution can successfully treat. I am not going to take advantage of their reputations to ask them to treat cases which will probably turn out badly. I seek their help in treating cases which will come out well, and I rely on their experience and judgment to enable them to choose such cases; and in the event of failure, to confess, as I have in Part I, what the cause of the failure was. We shall then act accordingly,— perhaps new equipment will be needed, perhaps better nursing, perhaps a new member on the Staff to do something which none of us know how to do. Perhaps a doubtful case will turn up which none of us feels is likely to be successful. We can either refer such a case to a Pro- fessor of Surgery at one of our Medical Schools, to a Chief of Service at one of the Charitable Hospitals, or to some individual surgeon to whom some Charitable Hospital has assigned such cases for special study, or any of us may take him to some private hospital and operate on him there (in which case, as is usual in our present practice, the result of the experiment will never be known, unless he has first entered here). By and by there will come a time when we shall have to admit that we cannot do certain special operations well enough to take the business risk on them. For instance, the technique of trans- fusion, especially the hemolysis test, is difficult for me to do, now that I have few opportunities. I have to seek this service from others who are having constant practice. Obviously it would be 172 better business for a member of our Staff to obtain an opportunity at one of the Charitable Hospitals to perfect himself in this tech- nique, but that would be changing the positions,—he would be seeking the opportunity to practice. And this is what positions on the Staffs of Charitable Hospitals are held for; men seek them instead of being sought for them. Trustees feign to appoint the best man they can get from those who apply. They do not seek competent men to make sure of a gocd result, but men who want practice, so that they can become compe- tent. At this hospital we shall have the reverse condition: We seek to make sure of a good result, not merely an opportunity to experi- ment, or practice technique. This policy of waiting for applicants for positions saves the Trustees no end of trouble, for by making a pretense to secure "the best surgeon available," they are able to keep the balance of power in their hands. If, instead of making a pretense, they actu- ally did seek the' best man available, it would turn the tables and put the power into the hands of the medical profession. The one who is sought makes the best of most bargains. I say "a pretense," because in this Community, year after year, appointments are made on a Seniority basis, and such a fact is incompatible with the devel- opment of modern Medical Science. It denies that study, effort, conscientious care, and natural qualifications can make one individual surpass another in his ability to relieve and cure symptoms due to definite pathologic conditions. The Result of this Trustees' Pretense of seeking (and in reality of saving their institutions trouble and expense) is one cause of the present pitiable fact that the greater portion of the Community is treated in our Charitable Institutions. The doctors are paid nothing except in the opportunity to even up by taking exorbitant amounts from private patients. And those patients who pay must get just as little as the poorest do, because when Hypocrisy reigns for two- thirds in the hospital work, it cannot break the habit for the other third. Certainly in this Community the time is nearly at hand when the worm will turn. The doctors are spending such a large propor- tion of their time at the Charitable Hospitals, without other pay than the opportunity to experiment and make reputations, and the Charitable Hospitals are outbidding each other so fast in what they give away ($3.50 to $4.48 per patient day), that presently there will be no public left to whom the doctors may sell the individual experience and skill gained by their hospital experiments and practice. Did you ever think what the Trustees of our Hospitals would do in case of a strike by the medical profession? They would Seek instead of being Sought. Moreover, if the plan of this hospital were carried out in other hospitals, they would know whom to seek for each class of cases. 173 They might have to pay salaries for men to work on the difficult cases. But the use of Charitable funds to pay a professional staff is legitimate, and furthermore, it would exact a sense of responsibility for End Results. Cases are now neglected at Charitable Hospitals largely because of this idea that hospitals should get their professional service for nothing. This false Charity runs through the whole profession, beginning with the student who gets his education by means of it. Cutting Prices or Raising Prices? Suppose the plan we have indicated should go through, and this hospital should succeed in establishing itself as a standard,— a Hundred Dollar Hospital with a Hundred Dollar Staff. Would it lower or raise professional charges? By some I shall be accused of a malign attempt to cut down surgeons' incomes. By others I shall be accused of demanding that Trustees use a part of their funds to pay for professional service to their patients, and thus deprive the sick poor of their comforts. I shall be accused of wanting to annihilate the isolated specialist's income and of making a plutocrat of the general practitioner. The truth is, I do recom- mend cutting down a few surgeons' incomes; I do recommend the elimination of specialists who arc specialists by name rather than by achievement; and I do recommend putting a premium on the practitioner who is an honest friend and adviser of his patient. Above all, I do recommend teaching the Public to distinguish three different qualifications in doctors for which they must pay in different ways: 1. The personal qualities of charm and sympathetic optimism which give transient mental comfort to the patient and for which the history of human nature shows him ready to pay. 2. The impersonal, efficient, skillful, thorough treatment of an organized group of specialists, who in a businesslike way give him the benefit of the truths hitherto acquired by medical science. The rise of the modern isolated specialist proves that the Public is ready to pay for this. 3. The ultra-educated, genius-like minds, who have the appli- cation and ability to wrest from the unknown the secrets which can be taught to the average intelligence. It is these men whom our universities now ask to teach the truth to their students, on the one hand, and to make their living by taking advantage of the ignorance of the rich, on the other. They should be well paid by endowed institutions for fearlessly telling the Truth. The recent rapid growth of endowed institutions, such as the Rockefeller Institute and vari- ous hospitals, shows that men of experience in organized industry are beginning to appreciate the value of original minds. It is our belief that in founding an institution on the End Result 174 Idea we are taking our part in the natural evolution of modern medicine. We shall help to lower those prices which are grossly unjust and to raise those which are likewise grossly unjust. But, in any event, we must wait on the education of the Public. The institution is started, financed enough to grow, and is ready to expand. But no matter how great the capitalization, it can grow no faster than the number of patients who are willing to have their cases reported. We do not sell Humbug, so the question is whether there is a demand for Honest Medicine and Surgery. On the other hand, if the principles involved in this organization are too far removed from what is called Medical Ethics, the Com- mittees on Ethics and Discipline of the Medical Organizations of which the writer is a member can call us to account. (See page 131.) If these organizations let us live, we can employ the recent graduates of such hospitals and medical schools as teach their students, by example, not to assume responsibihty which they know they are not fitted to undertake. How May the Young Surgeon Make His Start under the End Result System? It is clear from what I have just said that I should like to employ a young surgeon to do all the work at my hospital that he is fitted to do,—but that I do not want to give him a chance to learn surgery by making mistakes on my patients. I shall have to pay an assistant to help me, for I must fix responsibility on him. At present, at the Charitable Hospital, he is usually not paid, for he receives his reward in the opportunity to learn by his own mistakes. He has the appearance of taking responsibility, but is not really held account- able for his errors. If he is to be held accountable, he should be paid. This is the answer to the question. The End Result System would ultimately oblige Trustees to pay for much of their profes- sional labor. Is such a state of affairs as now exists necessary at the Charitable Hospitals? Why should not the student be taught what to do and how to do it, before being allowed to do it? If it is for my interest not to assign responsibility without making sure that the person who takes it is competent, why should it not be the duty of Trustees or of one of their representatives ? Is it not possible to conceive of a charitable hospital which makes it a rule not to accept for treatment any cases which its Staff cannot relieve? A business organization which started in on this basis would insist on its Staff becoming competent, or it would seek men who were competent. Who could they get, but men who had been trained in the universities and larger hospitals? At present, any one with an M.D. will do, for he does not have to be competent. To express it plainly,—if the End Result System were in common use, all hospital work would have to be done so much more thoroughly than it is today, that competent assistants would be in great demand. There would be more work to be done by the young surgeon, — not less work. If the chiefs were obliged to concentrate their attention on the difficult cases, they would be glad enough to let their juniors do what routine operating they could safely intrust to them. If a young surgeon devoted his time and brains to studying some difficult class of cases, and through the knowledge thus attained succeeded in developing a satisfactory method of treatment, his services would be in immediate demand. If his methods were really good, they would be advertised in the End Result Report of his hospital. Others would come from distant hospitals to learn from him. His work would be a credit to his hospital and a cause for his promotion. Those who came from distant hospitals to learn his methods would establish similar reputations locally, when they re- turned to their communities. The result of this would be a constant process of the rational diffusion of new and successful forms of treatment, instead of scattered instances of experiments performed by individuals, more or less aimlessly, and without adequate record to try out vaunted discoveries. After all, there is a certain amount of operating to be done, and a certain number of men to do it. Therefore, it cannot be said that the young surgeon would get less experience if the system of organization of our hospitals were changed, so that he began by doing what he could be trusted to do well. We should soon find that we should get better results by permitting him to do much of the actual operating, than by intrusting him with many of the really difficult and important details of pre- and post-operative treatment, which we now give over to him because they are tedious, time- consuming, and uninteresting. We should find, as is shown in our analysis in Part I, that since our failures result from errors of care, errors of skill, errors of knowledge, errors of judgment, and from our inability scientifically to cope with some of the diseases which affect our patients, the young surgeon's education should be developed with regard to these facts. We should therefore first make the young surgeon qualify by demonstrating that he can exhibit constant care in doing what he has been taught how to do. He can then attain skill by assisting, by dissecting, by operating on animals, and by doing routine opera- tions. He can acquire knowledge by study, travel, observation, and by following the End Results of cases he has helped to operate on, so that he can learn by his superiors' errors as well as by their successes. Judgment must come from experience, as well as from training and an inborn balance of mind. If the young surgeon is permitted to record his differences of opinion when he does not agree with his chief or his colleagues, his judgment can be actually measured. It will be found to be a more accurate test of judgment to oblige the junior to select the cases he is competent to relieve than, as is often done now,—to assign cases to him as a reward for 176 assisting his senior in private practice! Finally, having qualified at these tests, if he has the ability to search out from the Unknown «ome of the secrets of pathology, and to found successful methods of treatment on this knowledge, he may qualify as a great surgeon. Then there is always surgery to be done in remote communities and in the poorer districts, and now there is the war. Shall we let a Seniority System keep returning military surgeons at arm's length, as it does the surgeons who have gone to remote civil fields? Or shall we make the counter mistake of dropping tried civil surgeons to make room for returning military heroes? When this war is over, let us at least remember the lesson that Efficiency in Peace is the best training for Efficiency in War. It is well enough to believe that Right makes Might, but the corollary is, that Might is a proof of the Efficient use of Right. Truth is Right and Science is but a synonym of Truth. Efficiency must acknowledge Truth and use it in a truthful way. It is the scientific use of science. There is nothing evil about either Efficiency or Might. The Truthful use of Truth cannot be wrong. That indi- vidual, that group, that hospital, that community, that nation, that world, which plays the cleanest game will be the mightiest and the happiest! Individual leaders can never read the future clearly enough to justify their employing secrecy to increase Efficiency. The Few need the help of the Many when they seek such a difficult thing to obtain as Truth. Secrecy is the peculiar disease of Efficiency. It produces suspicion and distrust in the team itself, and victory depends on the superior integrity (in both senses of the word) of the team. Publicity is the cure of the disease, Secrecy. Publicity acknowledges not only the importance of Truth, but the fact that it is difficult to obtain, even when we all earnestly try for it. It is idle to say that we have not already much Truth at our disposal, but it can be said that we should find more Truthful ways in which to use it 177 ADVERTISEMENT Codman Hospital Clinic, 15 Pinckney St., Boston, Mass. Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays at 12 o'clock MAXIMUM FEES (Half of which will be used to maintain the Hospital and Clinic, and the other half divided among the Professional Staff) Physical examination, diagnosis, and advice.....$10.00 X-ray examination..........10.00 Later office visits for advice or treatment..... 8.00 Calls at patients' homes......... 5.00 (and $3 an hour after first hour) Consultation with patient's physician at home.....10.00 (and $10 for each additional hour) Care in Hospital (including operation and other professional services of Staff) For first week..........100.00 For each week thereafter........50.00 General Anaesthetic..........10.00 Operations at patients' homes or at other hospitals . No fixed charges MINIMUM FEES (For patients who claim inability to pay the above) One-half the above amounts (all used to maintain the Hospital and Clinic). Half the maximum fee may be paid on the instalment plan, but one-half must be paid in cash, weekly in advance. All Fees will be returned if at the end of a year the patient claims he was not benefited. All patients must be willing to have the record of their cases made public by number (not by name). Any patient may consult Dr. Codman or any member of the Staff privately, without having his case put on record at the Hospital. In such cases, the charge will be the same as if the patient consulted the Hospital and had the benefit of the advice of several members of the Staff. At the Hospital, Dr. Codman will see every patient and do every opera- tion if the patient wishes, but will refer to his colleagues and assistants all steps in the work which he knows they are as competent or more com- petent to do. The Clinic will not undertake to treat patients, if In doubt of the diag- nosis or of the probability of the success of treatment, but any member of the Staff may do so privately—just like any other doctor. 178 LAST WORD IF MEDICAL ETHICS SHOULD CRITICIZE US, WOULD THE CRITICISMS REFER TO THE PORTIONS OF OUR WORK WHICH WE DO On Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays AT THIS HOSPITAL Where we treat cases which our experience has qualified us to relieve, and where we advertise (enlighten the Public) as to what we can and cannot do. OR On Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays AT PUBLIC OR PRIVATE HOSPITALS Where we do not have to prove that we are qualified to treat the cases, and where we do not advertise (enlighten the Public) as to what we can and cannot do. 179 8961 1 WERT '3QOK BINOINC MIOOUTOWN PA MAR. 11 M-***» 801,