National Commission on AIDS WASHINGTON, DC ° UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DECEMBER 1992 . The Challenge of © HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color National Commission on AIDS WASHINGTON, DC ¢ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The National Commission on Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) was established by Public Law 100-607 "for the purpose of promoting the development of a national consensus on policy concerning AIDS and of studying and making recommendations for a consistent national policy” concerning the HIV epidemic. The Commission is a bipartisan body whose members were appointed by the President, the United States Senate, and the United States House of Representatives. Additional copies of this report are available from the National AIDS Clearinghouse, P.O. Box 6003, Rockville, Maryland 20849-6003, Tel. 1-800-458-5231, TDD 1-800-243- 7012, or the National Commission on AIDS, 1730 K Street, N.W., Suite 815, Washington, D.C. 20006, Tel. 202-254-5125, TDD 202-254-3816. NATIONAL COMMISSION ON AIDS June E. Osborn, M.D., Chairman David E. Rogers, M.D., Vice Chairman The Honorable Diane Ahrens K. Scott Allen Harlon L. Dalton, Esq. Don C. Des Jarlais, Ph.D. Eunice Diaz, M.S., M.P.H. Mary D. Fisher Donald S. Goldman, Esq. Larry Kessler Charles Konigsberg, Jr., M.D., M.P.H. The Honorable J. Roy Rowland, M.D. Ex Officio The Honorable Richard B. Cheney © The Honorable Anthony J. Principi The Honorable Louis W. Sullivan, M.D. Former Members The Honorable Edward J. Derwinski Earvin Johnson, Jr. Belinda Mason iit COMMISSION STAFF Roy Widdus, Ph.D., Executive Director Thomas D. Brandt, M.LS. Tracy L. Brandt Megan L. Byrd Adriana Carmack Jason Heffner, M.Ed. Sherell Jackson Carlton H. Lee, Jr. _ Frances E. Page, B.S.N., M.P.H. Juanita O. Pendleton Karen Porter, Esq. Tracy Shycoff Patricia Sosa, Esq. Vicky M. Tsaparas Report Development for The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color Karen Porter, Esq. Consultants for Community Profiles Milagros Davila, M.P.H. Larry Miike, M.D., J.D. Ron Rowell, M.P.H. Dawn Smith, M.D., M.P.H., M.S. Glen Meyers (Summer Intern) Editors Linda C. Humphrey Frances Porcher TABLE OF CONTENTS > PREFACE | . . Vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS | a oO ix Part | The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of © Color | | rs Introduction - Oo 1 Race and the HIV Epidemic es | Epidemiology os rn’ Toward an Understanding of the Disproportionate Impact of HIV/AIDS on Communities of Color 7 Societal and Community Influences: Looking Beyond . HIV as Solely an Individual Behavioral Problem - dil Assessing the Federal Response to the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Communities of Color 13 Prevention 13 Health Care 14 Clinical Trials | 18 The Challenge for Policymakers and Program Implementers 23 Conclusion and Recommendations 2A Part Il Community Profiles The African American Community The Hispanic/Latino Community The Asian American and Pacific Islander Community The American Indian and Alaskan Native Community REFERENCES a SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDIX A: Witness List APPENDIX B: Agendas APPENDIX C: Planning Committees APPENDIX D: Commission Documents vi 27 27 38 48 56 65 PREFACE During the past three years, the National Commission on AIDS has conducted public hearings and site visits to foster a greater understanding of the challenges facing communities of color as they confront the HIV/AIDS epidemic. These activities served as a crucial part of the Commission’s effort to meet its statutory mandate of "promoting the development of a national consensus on policy concerning AIDS." Since December 1990 the Commission has collected information and advice from hundreds of individuals within communities of color in forums that examined issues specific to African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino, and Asian American/Pacific Islander communities. This report is a result of the Commission’s finding that the HIV/AIDS epidemic presents unique challenges to communities of color and, in this context, to all public policymakers. For people of color, America’s racial divides are an ever-present reality—this is particularly true for those who are HIV infected. The abiding and widespread stigmatization of people of color creates enormous difficulties in mobilizing effective responses to the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Racial inequality in the United States is preeminent among the festering social problems that HIV highlights and upon which the epidemic feeds. It forms the backdrop against which efforts to deal with HIV/AIDS take place. Therefore, as a nation we have no choice but to take account of race if we are to alter the course of the epidemic. If we succeed, we will have learned much that is important to the country as a whole and of particular significance to those who would safeguard the public’s health. This report does not address the entire range of issues related to HIV disease in communities of color. As a national advisory body, the Commission seeks to highlight key issues for consideration by the President and Congress in the formulation of HIV/AIDS policy. The Commission feels strongly that the challenges raised in this report warrant diligent attention and present opportunities for collaboration in creating the best possible response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Effective intervention requires that each of us appreciates that communities themselves are significant units and that they must be taken into account when developing programs geared toward the health of the public as a whole. June E. Osborn, M.D. David E. Rogers, M.D. Chairman . Vice Chairman vil ACKNOWLEDGMENTS During the past three years, the Commission has heard from individuals and organizations in all parts of the country who are involved in programs of prevention, care, and advocacy in communities of color. Through hearings and site visits from New York City to Los Angeles, from Chicago to Florida, and from the Pine Ridge Oglala Sioux Reservation to rural townships we have witnessed the remarkable commitment of such people in the struggle to confront the HIV epidemic effectively. We must express our sense of obligation as well as gratitude to all those who helped further our understanding of the impact of AIDS in their communities. In particular, the Commission thanks those who presented formal testimony. They are named in Appendix A. In addition, the Commission received valuable support and advice from a number of individuals and entities without whose help an exploration of issues confronting communities of color would not have been possible. They are: Jacob Gayle, Ph.D.; Ron Rowell, M.P.H.; Mark Smith, M.D., M.B.A.; Aida Giachello, Ph.D.; Miguel Gomez; Steve Lew, the board members of the National Minority AIDS Council; Mayor Kurt Schmoke of Baltimore; Former Mayor Art Agnos of San Francisco; Mayor Richard Daley of Chicago; chiefs, chairpersons, tribal leaders, and AIDS service providers of the Pascua-Yaqui, Tohono O’cdham, Navajo, Comanche, Muskegee (Creek), Mdewakanton Sioux, Oglala Sioux, Rosebud Sioux, Sac & Fox, Winnebago, Chippewa, and Cherokee Nations; members of the Hispanic Hearing Planning Committee (see Appendix C); COSSMHO; members of the Asian American and Pacific Islander Planning Committee (see Appendix C); Frank Arcari, M.P.A.; Nat Blevins, M.Ed.; Stacey Bush; Renée Peterson; Joan Piemme, R.N.; Jane Silver, M.P.H.; Jeff Stryker; and Ellen Tynan, M.A. ' _— Part | The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color Introduction The HIV/AIDS epidemic is composed of thousands of uniquely personal tragedies. Behind every statistic is a flesh and blood human being whose life is filled with pain and whose death will come much too soon. Yet, as a nation, we are profoundly unable to identify with the majority of people living with HIV disease—they remain faceless and their suffering distant and unreal. This is especially true of people of color. Their plight as individuals has been overshadowed by their identification with communities that have been pushed to the margins of our society. Race, and to a lesser extent social class, is used to define people as different, as "not like us,” and as therefore not the concern of the majority of Americans. We must recognize that the HIV/AIDS epidemic affects communities as well as individuals. The term "community" is used here to describe people who have particular characteristics in common, such as race or ethnicity, and to describe the social and cultural networks they form. In this report, we have chosen to focus on four such communities: African Americans, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, American Indians and Alaskan Natives (Native Americans), and Hispanics/Latinos. Three of these communities are defined by race. The fourth—the Hispanic/Latino community—is a multiracial ethnic group. Socially and to some extent by law, however, Hispanics/Latinos have been treated in much the same way as racial minorities; therefore, we include this unique ethnic group along with the three "minority" races, noting differences where appropriate. Race and the HIV Epidemic The term “race” has no fixed biological or anthropological meaning. In the United States, people are lumped into one of four racial categories based broadly on physical characteristics (principally skin color, hair texture, and facial features) and/or ancestry. In so doing, we sometimes lump together cultures that have been historical antagonists and have little in common except that they are viewed as indistinct by the majority of Americans. The "Asian American/Pacific Islander" category is a striking example, for in that official designation is coalesced four thousand years of human history and conflict, brought only recently to American shores. The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color 4 All races are marked by cultural heterogeneity. For example, within the Native _ American designation are many nations (commonly called "tribes," a term that minimizes sovereignty) that differ markedly from one another. As the current strife in the former Republic of Yugoslavia makes abundantly clear, the same is true of white "tribes." Although "race" and "ethnicity" are sometimes used interchangeably, the latter usually refers to cultural commonality and is associated with people who once shared a common geographic region and language. For example, the official designation "Hispanic" is applied by the government to people of many nationalities whose racial heritage is varied but who share common cultural roots. "Race’ itself would be irrelevant to the HIV/AIDS epidemic if as a nation we ascribed no special meaning to it or if people of all races were treated equally. That, unfortunately, has not been the American way. For much of our history, racial lines have been drawn not with an eye toward capturing and honoring that which is distinctive about each grouping, but instead to assert control and maintain power. Those who have had the power to define race have used it to construct inequalities and maintain a racially stratified society in which persons who are nonwhite (people of color) have been consigned to the bottom. Until relatively recently, people of color were subjugated on the basis of race and purposely, even forcibly, kept from competing with whites on terms of equality. The specific history of each group differs: slavery, Jim Crow laws, lynching, and segregation for African Americans; physical conquest, land expropriation, treaty abrogation, and a guardian/ward relationship for Native Americans; racially restrictive immigration quotas, Alien Land Laws, and internment for Asian Americans; land annexation, occupational subordination, and forced mass repatriation for Hispanics/Latinos. Although their specific historical experiences have varied, each of. these communities of color has faced broad, sustained, systematic discrimination designed to maintain racial inequality. Of course, much has changed in recent decades, but the legacies of the past stil) surround us. The cumulative effects of racial discrimination, the chronic lack of access to resources, and the resulting underdevelopment of community infrastructures have had lasting effects. For communities of color, the sense of economic inequity, social distance, discrimination, and social stratification—of not being accorded full equality—is undoubtedly strong and persistent. The relative impoverishment of African Americans, Hispanics/Latinos, Native Americans, and many Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders (contrary to the "model minority" myth) bears testament to the enduring nature of yesterday’s burdens, and the difficulty of playing catch-up at a time when the dominant society is apt to discount matters of race. In addition, barely concealed appeals to racial hatred remain a staple of our national political life, promoting prejudice and discrimination against people of color and reinforcing social and institutional arrangements that limit opportunities for members of these communities. | The continuing widespread stigmatization of people of color creates enormous difficulties for effectively combatting the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Perhaps the greatest of _ these is that communities of color fear that stigmatization and discrimination are likely to increase as the public becomes more aware of the disproportionate number of people of color who are infected with HIV. For these communities, disproportionate representation raises the fear that they will be saddled with the disease—blamed for it, stigmatized by it, and left to deal with it on their own. As one witness stated: 2 The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color As the American public becomes increasingly aware of AIDS as a significant health problem in the black community, there will both be danger and opportunity. The opportunity is to deal comprehensively -rather than haphazardly with the problem as a whole—to see it as a social catastrophe brought on by years of economic deprivation and to meet it as other disasters are met, with an adequacy of resources. The danger is that AIDS will be attributed to some innate weakness of black people and used to justify further neglect and to rationalize continued deprivation. (Thomas, 1992) In short, racial inequality in the United States is preeminent among the festering social problems that HIV highlights and upon which thé epidemic feeds. It forms the backdrop against which efforts to deal with HIV/AIDS take place. Therefore, as a nation we have no choice but to take account of race if we are to alter the course of the epidemic. If we succeed, we will have learned much that is of importance to the whole country and of particular significance to those who would safeguard the public’s health. The Commission recommends that: e Federal, state, and local governments should squarely confront problems associated with racial inequality and its effect on the public health. Public health officials should ensure that effective and equitable HIV policy, program, and funding efforts are brought to bear in communities of color. Epidemiology | People of color have been affected by the HIV/AIDS epidemic since its inception. The first report of AIDS in an African American man was made in June 1981; by August 1981, one in nine of the reported homosexual males with AIDS were African American. The first case-series report on women with AIDS, published in April 1982, described five women: three Hispanics/Latinas, one white, and one African American. Indeed, as early as 1982, statistical evidence suggested that the epidemic posed a disproportionately serious problem for African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos and that most of the people at risk for infection in these groups were of relatively low socioeconomic status. In 1982 African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos accounted for just under half of the males, more than three-fourths of the females, and almost two-thirds of the children diagnosed with AIDS in the United States. Of all those who died of AIDS from 1981 through 1990 (a total of 100,777 people), 28 percent were African American and 15.7 percent were Hispanic/Latino. As early as 1988, HIV disease was the leading cause of death among African American women aged 15 to 44 in New York State and New Jersey (CDC, 1991b). African American and Hispanic/Latino men with AIDS have comprised between 30 percent and 40 percent of all AIDS cases among adult and adolescent men; the proportions of African American and Hispanic/Laiino women and children with AIDS have remained considerably more than half of all cases among women and children. The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color 3 As of September 1992, reported U.S. AIDS cases totaled 242,146 and deaths from AIDS totaled 158,243 (CDC, 1992e). HIV disease has continued to have a profoundly disproportionate impact on African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos. African Americans constitute 12 percent of the United States population, but account for nearly 30 percent of AIDS cases—71,984 as of September 1992. Hispanics/Latinos constitute 9 percent of the population, but account for 17 percent of AIDS cases—40,353 as of September 1992. (See Figure 1.) Thus, African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos together account for 46 percent of U.S. AIDS cases so far. Death rates from HIV-related causes have been highest for African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos. During 1990, the number of reported deaths per 100,000 population was 29.3 for African Americans and 22.2 for Hispanics/Latinos, as compared with 8.7 for whites (CDC, 1991b). Figure 1: Comparison of U.S. AIDS Cases (through September 1992) and Estimated 1991 Population, by Race/Ethnicity 52.5% 29.7% 0.2% 11.8% AIDS Patients U.S. Population (242,146) (250,675,419) CL] Whites [J African Americans i Native Americans [CJ Hispanics/Latinos EJ Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders SOURCE: Centers tor Disease Control/Nationat Center on Infectious Diseases/Division of HIV/AIDS. The impact of the epidemic has been particularly profound on the African American community. It is striking to note that in 1989 the age-adjusted HIV-related death rate among African American males was three times that of white males (40.3 deaths per 100,000, as compared with 13.1 deaths per 100,000). African American - females were nine times more likely to die from HIV than white females (8.1 deaths per 100,000, as compared with 0.9 per 100,000). Accordingly, the years of potential life lost per 100,000 population due to HIV was 177 percent higher for African American males than white males and 796 percent higher for African American females than white females (Department of Health and Human Services, 1992). : Examination of trends in AIDS diagnosis and HIV infection shows that this disproportionate impact is likely to continue. In 1991 the reported number of AIDS 4 The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color cases rose 5 percent overall as compared to 1990. However, cases increased by 11.5 percent among Hispanics/Latinos, increased by 10.5 percent among African Americans, and decreased by 0.5 percent among whites. African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos were, respectively, nearly five and three times more likely to be diagnosed with AIDS than were whites in 1991 (CDC, 1992c). The Centers for Disease Control noted that during 1991 the proportion of reported cases rose most among women, African Americans, Hispanics/Latinos, persons exposed through heterosexual contact, and persons living in the South. The number of reported AIDS cases does not, however, accurately portray the scope of the epidemic in these communities because such figures represent only a portion of the total number of people now infected with HIV. Although data are uneven and sparse, there are strong indications that people of color are also disproportionately represented among persons with HIV infection. One study in South - Carolina has examined the distribution of newly identified HIV infection as compared to that of AIDS cases. The proportion of new HIV infection in women (27%) and African Americans regardless of gender (71%) was significantly higher than that observed for AIDS cases—19 percent for women and 60 percent for African Americans (CDC, 1992a). The rates of HIV infection among applicants to the military and the Job Corps also give cause for concern. With the exception of Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders, for whom HIV antibody seroprevalence rates were comparable to whites, communities of color had significantly higher prevalence of HIV infection, indicating a disproportionate future impact of HIV disease. Since most persons with HIV infection are unaware that they are infected, present rates of HIV transmission in racial/ethnic groups are likely to parallel the disproportionate prevalence of infection. (See Figures 2 and 3.) Figure 2: HIV Seroprevalence in Civilian Applicants for Military Service by Sex and Race/Ethnicity, United States, October 1985-December 1990 Males Females & i? . gw ek S ye x Y we SOURCE: Department of Defense; CDC, 1991 National HIV Serosurveillance Summary. The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color 5 Figure 3: HIV Seroprevalence in Job Corps Entrants by Sex and Race/Ethnicity, January 1988-December 1990 Males Females 0.60 0.50 — HIV Seroprevalence (percent) o Se 2e 2 o «6 8—hl6ShUS ! { ! ! 4. ° ° °o | SOURCE: Department of Labor; CDC 1991 National HIV Serosurveillance Summary. _ In addition, estimates of the percentage of youth in the United States who have been or will be left motherless by the HIV epidemic suggests that by the year 1995, 17 percent of U.S. children and 12 percent of U.S. adolescents whose mothers die will lose their mothers to HIV/AIDS. More than 80 percent of all youth whose mothers have died or will die of HIV/AIDS (an estimated 36,560 youth) are offspring of /African American or Hispanic/Latina women (Michaels and Levine, 1992). . In contrast to the experience of African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos, Native Americans and Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders are as yet underrepresented among AIDS cases in proportion to their numbers in the total population. As of September 1992, Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders, who make up 3 percent of the US. population, accounted for 0.6 percent of the AIDS cases so far. As of September 1992, Native Americans accounted for 0.8 percent of the U.S. population and 0.17 percent of the AIDS cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control. While the number of AIDS cases in Asian American/Pacific Islander and Native American populations is relatively low at present, these communities are still in the early stages of a growing HIV epidemic. Because of their relative insularity, which magnifies the effect of infectious diseases once they take hold, the course of the epidemic in these communities could come to resemble that of the African American and Hispanic/Latino populations if effective prevention interventions are not brought to bear. Focusing on the relatively low number of Native Americans and Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders with AIDS has resulted in complacency and a lack of attention to efforts targeting these communities both by public health officials and by community members. Even more troubling, the relatively low number of cases has sent an inaccurate message to these communities that they do not have to worry about AIDS. 6 | The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color Careful attention should be given to how HIV/AIDS statistics are interpreted and used. An effort must be made to assure that populations that are currently underrepresented are not overlooked in HIV prevention efforts. If we wait to see large numbers of AIDS cases before we begin targeted HIV prevention, we will have missed a brief opportunity to prevent those cases from ever occurring. It is important to note that from 1989 to 1990 the number of Native American AIDS cases increased faster than cases among any other ethnic or racial group (Metler, Conway, and Stehr-Green, 1991). AIDS cases among Native Americans rose 23 percent, as compared to 13 percent for Hispanics/Latinos, 12 percent for African - Americans, and 2.5 percent for whites. Additionally, the number of actual AIDS cases may be significantly undercounted in these communities. A Centers for Disease Control study of death certificates and AIDS service organization records in Los Angeles and Seattle reported that between two-thirds and three-fourths of Native American AIDS cases were misrepresented as white or Hispanic/Latino (Conway, 1990). Additionally, studies of applicants for military service from 1985 to 1990 indicate that Native American male recruits have a seropositivity rate twice that of white male recruits. There is currently a dearth of information regarding the HIV/AIDS epidemic among Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders and Native Americans. Demographic information by racial group and nationality is critically needed for health planning and public policy use. The Commission recommends that: e The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention should review the adequacy of demographic information regarding HIV/AIDS currently available by race, ethnicity, and _ nationality, particularly with regard to Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders and Native Americans. Additionally, the National Center for Health Statistics should make information available regarding HIV/AIDS knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors among Asian Americans/ Pacific Islanders and Native Americans. e The federal government should work with the states to establish and support foster care programs for children with HIV infection and noninfected youth orphaned by the loss of parents to HIV/AIDS. Federal and state government should also support programs designed to assist family members in caring for children whose lives have been affected by HIV/AIDS. Toward an Understanding of the Disproportionate Impact of HIV/AIDS on Communities of Color In discussing race and its relevance to the HIV/AIDS epidemic, it is important to stress that there is no evidence that race is a biological risk factor for HIV infection. That is, even though greatly disproportionate numbers of African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos have developed AIDS, there is no demonstrated genetic reason why HIV/AIDS has had a disparate impact on these communities. Therefore, in trying to understand racial differences in HIV seroprevalence, in AIDS diagnosis, and in the length of time from diagnosis to death, it is important to look for social explanations. The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color | 7 Social and Economic Factors Currently, it is impossible to determine the extent to which differentials in HIV/AIDS can be explained by differentials in income, education, and other social and economic differences between the races. However, even though we cannot sort out the complex interactions among these factors, we do know from past experience that disease incidence is associated with particular social arrangements, especially economic inequality. Thus, while HIV is transmitted by individual behavior, we can infer that social and economic factors have a powerful influence on how individuals behave as well as on the overall shape of the epidemic. It has often been demonstrated that underdevelopment (comparatively fewer economic, material, and organizational resources), unemployment, poverty, and illiteracy are correlated with decreased access to health education and to health care, which in turn result in poor health prospects and increased risk of disease. These factors, combined with high rates of sexually transmitted diseases and injection drug use, favor the spread of HIV. Over all, people of color fare poorly in indices that determine socioeconomic status. On average, people of color have higher rates of unemployment and lower incomes than white Americans. In 1991 the poverty rate among whites was 11.3 percent, among Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders it was 13.8 percent, among Hispanics/Latinos it was 28.7 percent, and among African Americans it was 32.7 percent (Bureau of the Census, 1992).! In September 1992 the unemployment rate was 6.7 percent for whites, 11.9 percent for Hispanics/Latinos, and 13.7 percent for African Americans (Department of Labor, 1992). In 1991 the median income was $15,332 for © whites, $14,754 for Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders, $10,877 for Hispanics/Latinos, $10,542 for African Americans, and $10,503 for Native Americans (Bureau of the Census, 1992). As noted above, low income and poor health are strongly linked. Persons with low incomes generally experience a higher incidence of illness and a poorer survival rate than do the economically advantaged. The association of poverty, underdeveloped community structures, and disease is well demonstrated by the impact of the HIV epidemic in communities of color. Poor people of color often are isolated from all but the most rudimentary health care. Urban public hospitals that serve a high proportion of African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos are often overcrowded and are increasingly less able to meet the growing needs of the communities they serve. Poor people of color are less likely to seek early treatment for HIV infection, are likely to have been less healthy when they contracted the virus, and are likely to have more advanced symptoms when they present themselves for treatment. Consequently, African ~ Americans and Hispanics/Latinos tend to die sooner from AIDS. Another disease illustrates the links between race, poverty, and disease. Tuberculosis (TB) is a disease caused by a bacterium known as Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Transmission of this organism occurs most commonly in cough-generated air droplets from a person with active (infectious) pulmonary tuberculosis. _ Transmission occurs more frequently where persons are routinely in close proximity with inadequate ventilation. Such conditions—crowded housing, shelters for the ! The Census Bureau has not calculated the poverty rate for Native Americans owing to the smallness of the sample size. 8 The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color homeless, prisons—are disproportionately shared by persons of color. Exposure to the causative organism for tuberculosis may result in infection followed fairly rapidly by active disease, or in latent (nontransmissible) infection, which may last for years. About 5-10 percent of immunologically normal persons who are latently infected will later in life develop active tuberculosis. In the United States, African Americans, Hispanics/Latinos, and Native Americans have historically had higher rates of TB than whites, probably because the . conditions under which they live favor higher rates of infectious exposure. The present social conditions of a disproportionate number of people of color and their relative lack of access to curative care also perpetuate the cycles of exposure—disease—exposure and exposure—latent infection—disease—exposure. In recent times,. Asian and Pacific Islander immigrants to the United States have had high rates of tuberculosis because of high rates in their countries of origin (which result in high rates of latent infection and subsequent reversion to disease). : Roughly fifty percent of persons infected with both HIV and M. tuberculosis are likely to develop active tuberculosis within two years, compared with the lifetime risk of TB of 5-10 percent for persons infected with M. tuberculosis alone. Hence exposure to or latent infection with M. tuberculosis is a significant risk for persons with HIV infection. Thus, many persons of color are in triple jeopardy: from a greater likelihood of latent infection with M. tuberculosis, from a greater likelihood of HIV infection, and from a resultant greater likelihood of developing active tuberculosis. Injection Drug Use Injection drug use has played a significant role in the disproportionate impact of AIDS on African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos. In these communities the proportion of AIDS cases attributable directly to injection drug use is four times that for whites (40 percent, as compared to 9 percent). Similarly, of persons with AIDS whose disease is linked to injection drug use, fully half have been African American (as of 1992) and another 29 percent have been Hispanic/Latino (CDC, 1992e). According to National Institute on Drug Abuse estimates, there are 1.1 to 1.3 million injection drug users in the United States, all of whom are potentially at risk for HIV infection, as are their sexual partners and children (NIDA, 1990). The Public Health Service estimates that in communities with large populations of illicit drug users, such as New York City, between 30 percent and 40 percent of injection drug users aged 15 through 24 are infected with HIV (PHS, 1990). Furthermore, numerous studies have shown the HIV infection rates among African American and Hispanic/Latino drug users to be higher than among white drug users. Although members of subordinated racial and ethnic groups are not the only people who use illicit drugs, in the United States injection drug users tend disproportionately to be African American and Hispanic/Latino. The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse found that African Americans are twice as likely as whites to have used drugs intravenously. While the reasons for this greater prevalence are not fully understood, several factors seem implicated. Certainly significant is the fact that over the last several decades, African Americans have migrated to and been abandoned in inner-city areas, where drug trafficking is heaviest. Although the injection of illicit drugs is thought to have begun in the American South (O’Donnell and Jones, 1968), centers of narcotic distribution The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color 9 historically have been located in impoverished urban areas of the northeast where they are less likely to generate a police response or political opposition. As a result, injection drug use has been disproportionately associated with northeastern urban life. It is estimated, for instance, that between one-fourth and one-half of injection drug users live in New York City alone (Turner, Miller, and Moses, 1989), a disproportionate number of whom are African American and Hispanic/Latino (Friedman et al., 1987). As some researchers have suggested, African American injection drug use has been "a concomitant of urbanization" (Courtwright, Joseph, and Des Jarlais, 1989). As a result of the mass migration of the African American population from the rural South to urban centers, African Americans, who prior to World War II were not considered heavy drug users, increasingly were exposed to narcotics and to conditions that spawned illicit narcotic use (Singer, 1991). Unlike the immigrants who lived in these same or similar neighborhoods before them, low-income African Americans have been unable to distance themselves from decaying inner-city conditions in which heroin has become a staple of the local economy. According to researchers, "by 1970, African-Americans had become an urbanized population, even more.so than the U.S. population generally" (Singer, 1991). Demographic trends indicate that one of the fastest-growing groups of African Americans are those who are poor and live in census-defined poverty areas of central cities (Bureau of the Census, 1992). Asimilar set of circumstances has occurred in the Hispanic/Latino community, especially with regard to Puerto Ricans. In the 1950s and 1960s, Puerto Rico’s shift from an agricultural to an industrial economy brought about an increase in migration—from the island to the continental United States. In search of jobs, Puerto © Ricans settled in urban areas where they were likely to find employment as unskilled laborers. Their experience in these urban areas was not unlike that of African Americans. In these urban areas, Puerto Ricans often found open drug markets, oppressive conditions, and few economic opportunities. As one researcher observed, "Heroin is seemingly everywhere in black and Puerto Rican ghettos and young people - are aware of it from an early age” (Waldorf, 1973). Furthermore, during the late 1970s and early 1980s there was a substantial increase in the supply of both heroin and cocaine in many urban areas. This led to increases in the use of these drugs, primarily among persons who already had histories of injecting drugs. A permanent African American and Hispanic/Latino "ghetto," characterized by a virtually unchecked heroin trade, widespread unemployment, and poverty, among other factors, has assured that urban African. American and Hispanic/Latino populations suffer high rates of addiction to injection drugs (Courtwright, J oseph, and Des Jarlais, 1989). Not only is injection drug use. disproportionately high among African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos within the universe of injection drug users, HIV infection is also highest among these same groups. The reasons are several. It is increasingly clear from a decade of research that where sharing of injection equipment is common, frequency of injection is positively correlated with likelihood of HIV ' infection. A study in New York City found that white users inject less frequently than African Americans or Hispanics/Latinos (Friedman, Des Jarlais, and Sterk, 1990). In addition, the use of shooting galleries—places where one may rent reusable drug injection equipment—provides a mechanism for the spread of HIV to large numbers of other injection drug users and has also been linked to HIV exposure. White users patronize shooting galleries less often than other groups (Des Jarlais et al., 1989). Also, 10 The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color HIV may have entered African American and Hispanic/Latino injector groups earlier than white groups and may have saturated these drug-using communities, resulting in a high prevalence of infection in the local drug population network (Schoenbaum et al., 1989). Significantly, injection drug use has played a major role in spreading HIV among heterosexuals and newborn babies. Of all AIDS cases attributed to heterosexual contact, 53 percent involved persons who reported sexual contact with an injection drug user. Three-fifths (59%) of all heterosexual AIDS cases related to injection drug use are African American. Whites represent 21 percent of these cases and Hispanics/Latinos represent another 19 percent. In addition, perinatal transmission associated with a mother’s exposure to HIV owing to injection drug use represents 40 percent of all cases among children. Of these cases three-fifths (59%) are African American, one-fourth (25%) are Hispanic/Latino, and one-seventh (15%) are white. Perinatal transmission associated with a mother’s exposure to HIV owing to sexual contact with an injection drug user represents 17 percent of all cases among children. Of these cases African Americans represent 45 percent, Hispanics/Latinos 39 percent, and whites 15 percent (CDC, 1992e). Societal and Community Influences: Looking Beyond HIV as Solely an Individual Behavioral Problem As noted earlier, AIDS cannot be seen as solely an individual behavioral problem. In communities of color, attention must be paid to the social and economic setting of risk behaviors. To the extent that poverty and unemployment are risk factors, proposed interventions must take these conditions into account. Where communities are unable to support healthy behaviors, AIDS intervention efforts will not work. As one witness Stated, The one thing we know about poverty in this country in the last twenty years is that it has really altered the structure of many of the neighborhoods in the United States. Blacks and Latinos are increasingly concentrated in areas that are becoming poorer and _poorer, and with that concentration has come a tremendous increase, not just in HIV infection, but a whole host of other serious social problems ranging from crime to just about anything that you can possibly describe. .. . Until we’re able to stabilize these communities, there simply is no place for the seed of the individual prevention measure to take fruit. Unless we’re able to do something dramatically to alter the economic structure of these neighborhoods, we really fear very, very strongly that the things we have embarked on for the last nine or ten years simply are not going to see the kind of results that we desire. (Fullilove, 1991) We cannot continue to teach individuals about the dangers of certain behaviors as if they choose to engage in them indiscriminately. We would do well to take account of social forces and institutions that undermine individuals’ capacity to adopt and sustain a healthy lifestyle. It is difficult to change practices effectively without changing circumstances. As another witness stated, The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color 11 The first decade of AIDS was characterized by an almost single- minded focus on interrupting the cycle of HIV transmission. Our approach to AIDS prevention reflected an illusion that we as a society are all educated individuals eager to do the right thing if only we have all the appropriate information. We cannot expect a national prevention campaign based only on information alone to change recalcitrant problems. The spread of HIV has highlighted the complex relationship among social class, gender, and race in a society where health care facilities are impoverished, access to care is inadequate, and prevention technology is devalued. We must enter the second decade of AIDS with the knowledge that existing public health efforts have failed to stop the disproportionate spread of HIV infection. (Thomas, 1992) This is not to say that AIDS prevention efforts should wait for a solution to our overall social ills. Obviously, they cannot. But as with other facets of the epidemic, if we use this tragic stimulus of HIV as a prod to readdress old problems that have been bandaged or ignored, we have the opportunity to emerge a stronger society. The Commission recommends that: e Public health officials should work with researchers, health professionals, and community-based service providers to gain a better understanding of the role of cultural and socioeconomic factors in the transmission of HIV, the disease process, and access to care. Information gleaned from these efforts should be taken into account in designing HIV prevention messages, services, and programs, and in providing expanded treatment opportunities. 12 The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color Assessing _ the Federal Response to the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Communities of Color Prevention In this second decade of the HIV epidemic, there will be an increasing need to supplement individual behavior change strategies with a concept of intervention that focuses on the community as a whole. Interventions aimed at changing the norms of entire communities are among the most promising HIV prevention strategies. These interventions have proven to be effective in promoting a variety of health behaviors, such as family planning, cardiovascular risk reduction, and smoking cessation. For such interventions to be successful, health educators must first understand the behavior patterns and cultural norms of the community. More often than not, health departments and AIDS service organizations have failed to integrate such knowledge into their planning and programming processes. This is especially true with regard to the Native American and Asian American/Pacific Islander communities. Improving channels of communication with communities of color is crucial to successful prevention efforts. For example, efforts at communication must employ appropriate language. Language is more than a catalog of words and grammatical rules; it is an integral part of culture. The values, beliefs, incentives, hopes, and fears of a people are absorbed in it. For cultures constantly under siege, both by subtle and by obvious forces, language is a means by which the community preserves its distinct way of life and makes sense of its experience, history, and struggle. Thus, understanding the importance of language and ascertaining its potential as a point of entry to a community is essential to public health efforts. Health education must be developed in a manner that properly informs the community about the benefits and risks of HIV interventions and treatments. Health education must also empower the community by providing sufficient guidance and - technical information for communities to undertake public health efforts themselves. The potential for misinformation must be explicitly recognized and addressed. The Commission recognizes that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has worked hard to listen to, understand, and address concerns voiced by people of color. In many instances the CDC has borne the burden of the frustration individuals and communities have felt in the face of government failure to respond adequately to the threat of HIV in communities of color. In particular, the CDC has played an important role in responding to community suggestions on how to improve surveillance efforts and prevention activities. In addition, the CDC has provided much-needed funds to programs serving racial and ethnic populations at risk of HIV infection and worked to establish credibility for the targeting of resources to specific populations in need. With regard to programs sponsored by the CDC, communities of color have benefitted most from those that have provided direct funding to national minority organizations and to community-based organizations. These programs have been important because they have helped communities of color embrace HIV/AIDS as a The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color | 13 serious concern, enabled better targeting of resources, and in many instances provided desperately needed resources to direct service providers. Federal efforts to design, fund, and implement prevention programs that reach communities of color have not, however, been without problems. First, serious questions have been raised as to whether the populations most at risk for AIDS within communities of color are being appropriately targeted. For example, fully half of African American and Hispanic/Latino male adults with AIDS are men who have sex with men. Yet, HIV services in communities of color are often not designed to reach them. Since the same can be said of services in predominantly white gay organizations, gay men of color frequently are left in limbo. Second, funds allocated by Congress and budgeted by the CDC for programs in communities of color have simply not been enough to support the intense and ‘ sustained national effort needed to ensure that effective prevention efforts reach these communities. Third, the CDC must act more vigorously to provide sustained funding or help organizations build the capacity to effectively seek alternative funds from other sources. In addition, program dollars have been awarded without ensuring that the necessary technical assistance for fiscal management is provided to help organizations comply with federal regulations and effectively manage these scarce resources. Fourth, national education programs such as the "America Responds to AIDS" campaign have been generally ineffective in reaching communities of color. The information provided is often vague and targeted toward an anonymous general public. The Commission recommends that: e The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention should ensure that the prevention and education needs of persons of color who engage in high-risk behaviors are appropriately addressed by current and future prevention initiatives and funding efforts. Programs specifically targeted toward men of color who have sex with other men, toward injection drug users, and toward women are needed. e Federal, state, and local governments should join forces with the private sector in providing long-term support to community-based organizations serving communities of color. As part of this effort, the U.S. Public Health Service should expand and promote comprehensive and integrated programs for technical assistance to and capacity building in these communities. Health Care There are many people of color in the early phases of HIV disease who could benefit from treatments designed to retard the onset of symptoms, as well as from social and mental health services. Unfortunately, many of these people have no point of entry into the health care system. Access to care for people of color has been impeded both by a lack of sufficient health insurance coverage and by a dearth of appropriate health services. People of color historically have had difficulty in gaining access to and paying for primary care services. In many instances, limited income precludes the purchase of 14 The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color insurance. For example, individuals who are employed in low-paying or minimum wage jobs in the service industry often do not have any health insurance coverage, or at least not adequate coverage. For those who are forced to rely on public programs, Medicaid eligibility criteria in some states are very restrictive (GAO, 1992). Persons living with HIV disease can attest to the difficulties they confront in the absence of insurance. Even those with insurance may exhaust the coverage and be left with limited government support and community assistance. Lack of access to health care has many ramifications. Delay in seeking care may result in complications and more clinically serious and costly conditions. As with other chronic diseases, waiting until symptoms are persistent or severe can result in preventable morbidity and can shorten survival time. In the era of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylaxis, aggressive TB therapy, and antiretroviral therapy, health care is optimally begun early in the course of HIV infection. However, many people of color are diagnosed with HIV disease for the first time only when serious symptoms of opportunistic infections develop. In order to more adequately meet the health needs of people of color living with HIV disease greater priority must be given to delivery of comprehensive services and primary care, with a focus on prevention of illness, early intervention in the disease process, continuity of care, and coordinated service delivery, as well as better integration of medical and social services. Improvements in these areas will depend in part on achieving a better supply and distribution of primary care providers. Unfortunately, for many medically underserved communities the only access to care is the emergency room or a hospital bed. This situation is both economically foolish and medically unsound. Much greater priority should be given to the development of outpatient ambulatory care services. When such services are available persons with HIV disease are able to avoid inpatient hospitalization during much of the course of their illness, thus lowering their medical costs and increasing their sense of control over their lives. For example, many drugs previously administered on an inpatient basis during lengthy hospitalizations can safely be offered in a clinic setting. Increasingly, hospitals are giving higher priority to providing ambulatory care services that focus, in particular, on better primary care delivery. The availability of primary care services can also be facilitated by ensuring that community-based health services such as community health centers, migrant health centers, and clinics funded by the Indian Health Service are given increased support. In many communities of color, such centers provide primary care services as well as mental health and social services. Such care is cost-effective as well as more accessible to patients. Awareness that HIV disease is a serious threat to our nation’s young people is growing. The number of teenagers with AIDS almost doubles each year. An estimated 75,000 teenagers are now infected with HIV. Over 20 percent of all reported AIDS cases are among individuals in their teens and twenties, most of whom were infected during adolescence. The majority of these cases are among young adults of color. Of all AIDS cases among 13- to 19-year-olds, approximately 38 percent are African American and 20 percent are Hispanic/Latino (CDC, 1992b). Meeting the health needs of the adolescent population will require innovative approaches to the design of health services that address the host of risk factors leading to behaviors that place individuals at risk of HIV infection. Also needed are targeted initiatives such as improvements in school-based health, mental health, and social services. As the epidemic grows and resources become chronically strained, it is increasingly important to maximize available funding by ensuring that health and social The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color * 15 service delivery systems are coordinated. This has become particularly true in inner cities where available resources fall far short of what is needed to confront the HIV epidemic effectively. Thus, state and federal funding sources have encouraged localities to develop consortia and institutionalize mechanisms for sharing resources. Funds made available under the Ryan White CARE Act are the only resources targeted for addressing the crisis in HIV care brought on by the growing epidemic. The CARE Act provides critically needed relief to cities hardest hit by the HIV epidemic and to all states. Title I of the CARE Act distributes "emergency assistance” to metropolitan areas with more than 2,000 diagnosed AIDS cases. Each eligible area is required to establish an HIV planning council, whose task it is to set service priorities and to allocate resources for health care and support services for the geographic area, across all affected populations and subpopulations. Title II of the CARE Act provides funds for states to respond to an array of primary care needs. Such state responses include the creation of HIV care networks in both urban and rural areas, drug reimbursement, COBRA premium payments, and the delivery of home care services. Each state must document that 15 percent of their funds are targeted to women and children with HIV/AIDS, the vast majority of whom are people of color. Title III of the CARE Act provides crucial early intervention, primary care, and mental health services through community migrant and homeless health centers, as well as sexually transmitted disease, family planning, and tuberculosis clinics. The extent to which CARE Act funds have resulted in greater access to quality care has not yet been adequately documented. It is clear, however, that the effectiveness of the CARE Act in providing relief to cities and states hard hit by HIV has been hampered by inadequate funding levels. The shortfall between needed and available funds has been particularly detrimental to communities of color, where resources are needed for financial relief of institutions providing care to underserved and indigent patients. Strained public hospitals and health clinic infrastructures, which for too long have borne the burden of HIV care, require urgent and ongoing assistance, both to continue providing current services and to expand to meet the rising demands of both the HIV positive and seronegative populations. The Commission strongly believes that the Ryan White CARE Act should be funded at the fully authorized level. While comprehensive health reform is desperately needed in order to rescue a health care delivery system heading for collapse, full funding of the Ryan White CARE Act can help to fill the breach by creating cost-effective alternatives to hospitalization. By establishing HIV Health Service Planning Councils and local consortia, the CARE Act creates an innovative community partnership process by which affected individuals and community-based organizations are empowered to participate in the decision-making process of setting priorities and allocating resources. While many communities participating in the planning process have reported frustrations regarding the adequacy of efforts to ensure that all communities are represented, this nontraditional model for decision-making has challenged many of the existing power structures and worked increasingly to allow community entities to share responsibility for determining how HIV health services are provided. The Commission is encouraged that many of these frustrations are being addressed by efforts to ensure that communities of color are adequately represented in the planning process and appropriately served by the resources available. In recent guidance to grantees, the Health Resources and Services Administration has made clear its commitment to increasing the objectivity of local needs assessment and subsequent resource allocation 16 The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color decisions, and to ensuring a participatory HIV Health Services Planning Council process. The Commission believes that it is important to explore the Ryan White CARE Act planning council experience and the role of representatives of communities of color as participants. This must be done in order to begin to understand what these communities have set as priorities and why, how they perceive their funding needs and their relationship to other communities, the nature of their organizational infrastructure, and the capacity of the Ryan White CARE Act to help them provide services both in the present and in the future. The Commission believes that in addition to ensuring the availability of primary care services, it is also important to recognize that people of color living with HIV disease may not have sufficient information about the benefits of early care or may not learn of their HIV infection until far along in the disease process, despite contacts with health care providers. It is important that people of color be educated about the availability and effectiveness of early care. Thus far, educational efforts have focused on information about transmission risks and have emphasized the mortality of AIDS. Not enough effort has been made to communicate to people of color that many of the manifestations of HIV disease are amenable to prophylaxis and/or treatment. In addition, information about treatment options may be inadequate. Many people of color are initially tested for HIV because of institutional requirements. Testing is often a condition for admission to drug treatment programs and military service, required within the criminal justice system, offered by legislative mandate (for example, to prenatal patients), or routinely practiced because of provider perception of high risk (for example, in hospital emergency and operating rooms). Except in the case of the military, the attendant counseling is often cursory, and testing frequently is not linked to the provision of medical care for HIV mntechion, Improvement on both counts is needed. Increased emphasis also should be placed on training and equipping health care practitioners in communities of color to provide care to persons infected with HIV. The federal government has made important strides in this area through the development of the AIDS Education and Training Centers and through increased efforts by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to provide updates on developments in HIV care to physicians. The need continues, however, for better coordination of government dissemination of the results and implications of clinical research. Also needed is better information on the regulatory status of investigational therapies and their availability, for example, through expanded access/parallel track mechanisms. Information should also be disseminated on epidemiologic trends, such as those in tuberculosis, which may affect clinical management of persons with HIV. An effort should be made to target physicians who practice in communities of color. Similarly, there must be increased assistance to schools and professional associations that traditionally have trained and educated minority health professionals in order to assure that the populations they serve have the benefit of current developments in AIDS care and treatment. The importance of these efforts cannot be overstated, given the growing complexity of HIV-related care and treatment. The Commission believes there is an urgent need to improve the availability of primary care services in communities of color. To accomplish this a multifaceted approach is needed, including but not limited to the following efforts. The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color 17 e The President and the Congress should increase support for community- based primary care, including community health centers, migrant health centers, and clinics funded by the Indian Health Service to ensure delivery of prevention and care services, including those for HIV/AIDS. e The President and the Congress should fully fund the Ryan White CARE Act and ensure that communities of color are adequately represented in the _ planning process and appropriately served by the resources available. e The President and the Congress should provide additional incentives for health care professionals to work in underserved areas by increasing support for programs such as the National Health Service Corps and programs such as the Disadvantaged Minority Health Improvement Act of 1990 targeted specifically at increasing the number of minority health care professionals. | e Likewise, state and local jurisdictions should increase support for public hospitals and other locally supported components of comprehensive primary care systems that deliver HIV prevention and care services. e Additionally, the Health Resources and Services Administration should assess the capacity of special initiatives, such as the Ryan White CARE Act and the Health Care for the Homeless Program, to develop and support a strong primary care infrastructure in communities of color. oe The federal government should provide adequate resources to community programs designed to improve access to health care and support services and to prevent the spread of HIV among adolescents. Passage of legislation similar to the proposed Comprehensive Services for Youth Act of 1992 would foster coordination and collaboration: among educators, health care providers, and community-based organizations through the development and operation of citywide and statewide youth service center systems. © The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, the Health Resources and Services Administration, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases should conduct a review of current efforts to educate physicians on developments in HIV/AIDS care and aggressively pursue methods to improve the quality of HIV/AIDS care. In order to assure that people of color living with HIV receive the benefit of current developments in HIV/AIDS care these agencies should strive to coordinate better the dissemination of information, target physicians who practice in communities of color, and work intensively with schools and professional associations that have traditionally trained minority health professionals. Clinical Trials Historically, the National Institutes of Health-sponsored AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) protocols have included significantly lower numbers of people of color living with HIV than their proportion among the HIV-infected population would 18 The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color warrant. This is particularly true regarding African Americans. As of August 1992, the ACTG has enrolled 20,070 individuals in clinical trials. Of this total, 68.6 percent were white, 15.7 percent were African American, and 14.3 percent were Hispanic/Latino. Whites, African Americans, and Hispanics/Latinos account for, respectively, 53 percent, 29 percent, and 16 percent of all adult and adolescent AIDS cases (NIH, 1992). It is also apparent that landmark studies on the treatment of HIV disease have failed adequately to enroll patients of color. In a special communication that appeared in the Jowmal of the American Medical Association, researchers from Harlem Hospital and Columbia University College of Physicians analyzed the racial composition of participants in a number of studies that dramatically influenced the treatment of HIV disease and found that the number of minority patients was disproportionately small (El-Sadr and Capps, 1992). As a result of the underrepresentation of people of color in HIV-related clinical trials, members of racial and ethnic minorities have not had equal access to the investigational treatments available through trials. While the Commission recognizes that a relative lack of access to health care seriously hampers efforts to recruit people of color into clinical trials, this does not mean it is impossible to do so. Current efforts at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to expand the recruitment of underrepresented populations in the ACTG have enjoyed initial success and should be continued and increased. ACTG accrual of people of color has improved over the last five years: African American and Hispanic/Latino representation in ACTG trials increased by 8.7 percent and 3.3 percent, respectively, between 1987 and 1992. (See Table 1.) TABLE 1: Patient Accrual to ACTG Trials as of August 1992. Population Percent of Percent of Percent in Percent in Group Total Population AIDS Cases Clinical Trials Clinical Trials 1987 August 1992 Sex , Male 48.7° 88.6 95 87.0 Female 51.3 11.4 5 13.0 Race White 80.9 52.8 | 82 68.6 African American 11.7 29.5 7 15.7 Hispanic/Latino 7.4 16.5 11 14.3 Other . . <1 1.4 Injection Drug Use : 28.6 Never 88 88.1 Previous/Current 12 11.9 Number of People in Trials 2,503 20,070 SOURCE: National Institutes of Health Over the last three years people of color have been offered greater access to clinical trials through the Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA) of NIAID. Established in October of 1989, the CPCRA involves 17 community-based research programs at about 160 sites in 13 U'S. cities. The program The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color 19 includes groups of primary care physicians and nurses who care for large numbers of people with HIV infection at community health centers and hospitals, private clinics and practices, and drug treatment facilities. The CPCRA enables community-based physicians to be involved in setting research priorities and conducting clinical trials, thereby enhancing the participation of underrepresented populations. The CPCRA has played a significant role in ensuring that research opportunities are available to people of color living with HIV. Of the 5,334 patients entered into CPCRA trials as of August 1992, more than 57.1 percent are people of color. (See Table 2.) TABLE 2: Patient Accrual to CPCRA Studies as of August 1992. Population Percent of Percent of Percent in Group Total Population AIDS Cases Clinical Trials August 1992 Sex Male . 48.7 88.6 80.6 Female 51.3 11.4 19.4 Race White 80.9 52.8 42.9 African American 11.7 29.5 39.5 ~ Hispanic/Latino 7.4 16.5 16.0 Asian American/Pacific Islander <1 0.4 Native American <1 0.3 Other <1 0.7 Injection Drug Use 28.6 “40 Number of People in Trials 5,334 SOURCE: National Institutes of Health © Efforts by NIH to ensure that its HIV-related research programs more appropriately reflect the demographics of the HIV epidemic are also apparent in some of its recently implemented programs. For example, as of August 1992, 30.9 percent of all individuals (albeit only a total of 49 to date) enrolled in the NIAID-sponsored Division of AIDS Treatment Research Initiative (DATRI) program were people of color. The DATRI program provides rapid evaluation of potential therapeutic agents and regimens against manifestations of HIV disease (NIH, 1992). (See Table 3.) Nevertheless, HIV-infected people of color continue to encounter considerable obstacles to participation in trials. Overall, the single most important factor is poor access to quality health care. Without a primary care provider knowledgeable about HIV disease, access to clinical trial opportunities is severely limited. For patients who have no previous involvement with or understanding of clinical trials and who are not well connected in the AIDS establishment, it is both difficult and frustrating to acquire and digest information about clinical trial opportunities. In addition, the strict entry criteria traditionally associated with controlled clinical research have excluded many who wish to participate in HIV-related trials, particularly drug users and women of childbearing age. Persons with HIV who are subject to these exclusions are disproportionately people of color. This correlation can, in part, account for the racial imbalance of the ACTG accrual. By inference we can assume that efforts to improve access for persons who have been excluded owing to 20 The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color TABLE 3: Patient Accrual to DATRI Studies as of August 1992. Population _ Percent of Percent of Percent in Group Total Population AIDS Cases Clinical Trials August 1992 Sex Male 48.7 88.6 87.8 Female §1.3 11.4 12.2 Race White 80.9 §2.8 67.4 African American ~~ 11.7 29.5 26.5 Hispanic/Latino 7.4 16.5 4.1 Asian American/Pacific Islander <1 - 20 Native American Col. Brenda Cummings, R.N. — Administrator, Indian Health Care Resource Center _Mr. Truman Geren, L.P.N. — AIDS Coordinator Mr. Stephen Short, M.D. W.W. Hastings Indian Hospital Ms. Dixie Stewart, R.N., B.S. AIDS Coordinator Ms. Ellen Wolfe, P.H.N. Claremont Hospital Comanche Nation Ms. Teresa Lopez, Director Comanche Tribe Substance Abuse Program Mr. Kenneth Saupity Tribal Chairman The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color Ms. Bonnie Turner Tribal Administer Creek Nation of Oklahoma Ms. Sherry Baker, R.N., Director Public Health Nurses Ms. Kathryn Bell Mr. Thomas Berryhill, Member Creek National Council .- Ms. Shelly Crow, R.N., Chair - Creek Nation Health Board Ms. Sally Foster, Administrator Creek Nation Healthcare System Mr. Ed Frye Mr. Toni Hill ‘Tribal Town Leader Mr. David Smith, D.O. Chief, Medical Staff Eufala Clinic Ms. Kathy Stubbs, D.O. Sac & Fox Nation "Mr. Gaylon R. Franklin, Sr. Second Chief Mr. Elmer Manatowa Principal Chief Indian Health Service Mr. Pat Gideon, M.D. Oklahoma Area Office Appendix B-9 March 11, 1991 2:00 p.m. 2:15 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. 3:15 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. 4:45 p.m.:- 5:30 p.m. 6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. March 12, 1991 8:30 a.m. 8:40 a.m. Appendix B-10 NATIONAL COMMISSION ON AIDS Agenda HIV Disease in Hispanic Communities The Park Hyatt Hotel Terrace Room 800 North Michigan Avenue Chicago, Illinois March 11-12, 1991 Optional Site Visits Departure from the Park Hyatt Hotel 800 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago Visit Erie Family Health Center 1656 W. Chicago Avenue, Chicago | Contact: David Ley (312) 666-3488 Visit Cook County Hospital 1835 W. Harrison Street, Room 912, Chicago Contact: Dr. Marge Cohen (312) 633-5080 Visit Pilsen/Little Village Mental Health Center 2635 W. 23rd Street, Chicago Contact: Luis Ortiz (312) 927-1228 Reception Mexican Fine Arts Museum, 1852 West 19th Street, Chicago, Illinois Opening Remarks June E. Osborn, M. D., Chairman, National Commission on AIDS Framing the Problem Aida Giachello, Ph.D., Midwest Hispanic AIDS Coalition, | Chicago, Illinois The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color 9:00 a.m. 9:45 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 10:45 a.m. 11:30 a.m. 12:15 p.m. Prevention Illeana Herrell, Ph.D., Center for Prevention Services, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia Hortensia Amaro, Ph.D., Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts America Bracho, M.D., M.P.H., Latino Family Center, Detroit, Michigan Adolfo Mata, Center for Prevention Services, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia Break Services Nilsa Gutierrez, M.D., New York AIDS Institute, New York, New York . Emilio Carrillo, M.D., New York Health and Hospitals Corporation, New York, New York Manual Fimbre, A.C.S.W., San Jose State University, San Jose, California Paula Amaro Migrant, Rural, and Undocumented Populations Deliana Garcia, National Migrant Resource Program, Austin, Texas Sam Martinez, Washington State Migrant Council, Sunnyside, Washington . Barbara Garcia, Salud Para la Gente, Watsonville, California Policy and Leadership Issues Helen Rodriguez-Trias, M.D, Brookdale, California Alberto Mata, Ph.D., Division of Applied Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse John Zamora, Texas Department of Health, Austin, Texas Miguel Gomez, National Council of La Raza, Washington, D.C. . Miguelina Maldonado, Hispanic AIDS Forum, New York, New York Summary Discussion Ileana Herrell, Ph.D. Nilsa Gutierrez, M.D. Deliana Garcia Helen Rodriguez-Trias, M.D. The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color Appendix B-11 12:45 p.m. 2:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. 6:00 p.m. Lunch Commission Business Adjourn Reception Tania’s Restaurant, 2659 North Milwaukee Avenue, Chicago, Illinois Affiliations listed for identification purposes only. 8:30 a.m. 8:35 a.m. 8:45 a.m. . 9:30 a.m. 10:45 a.m. Appendix B-12 NATIONAL COMMISSION ON AIDS Agenda HIV Disease and Asian, Asian American, and Pacific Islander Communities San Francisco, California May 17, 1991 Opening Remarks: June E. Osborn, M.D., Chair Remarks: Paul Kawata Introduction: Historical Perspective Gen Iinuma Tessie Guillermo Suki Ports Moderator: Jane Po Roundtable Discussion: Impact of HIV Disease Among Asians, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders Kiki Ching Sharon Lim-Hing Merina Sapolu Lei Chou _ Sinh Nguyen Paul Shimazaki Billy Gill Robby Robison Velma Yemota Martin Hiraga Break The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color 11:00 a.m. 12:15 p.m. 12:45 p.m. 2:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Moderator: Fernando Chang-Muy Roundtable Discussion: Provision of Services Wayne Antkowiak Lori Lee Tony Nguyen Jaime Geaga John Manzon Joanna Omi Dean Goishi Nga Nguyen Dorothy Wong Kerrily Kitano Public Comments Lunch Commission Business Adjourn The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color Appendix B-13 APPENDIX C Pianning Committees Hispanic Hearing Planning Committee Rosemunt, Illinois 60018 February 14, 1991 America Bracho, M.D. Ileana Herrel, Ph.D. Medical Director Assistant Director for Minority La Casa Family Services Health 713 Junction Detroit, Michigan 48209 Aida Giachello, Ph.D. Acting Director Midwest Hispanic AIDS Coalition College of Social Work University of Illinois Post Office Box 4348, M-C 309 Chicago, Illinois 60680 Miguel Gomez Director, AIDS Center National Council of La Raza 810 First Street, N.E. Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20002 Nilsa Gutierrez, M.D. Assistant Medical Director AIDS Institute New York Department of Health 5 Penn Plaza, 4th floor New York, New York 10001 The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color Center for Prevention Services Centers for Disease Control Rd MSS. E-07, Rm 309 1600 Clifton Atlanta, GA 30333 Raul Magafia, Ph.D. 52 Shooting Star Road Urbine, California 92706 Miguelina Maldonado Executive Director Hispanic AIDS Forum 121 Avenue of the Americas Suite 505 New York, New York 10013 George Rivera, Ph.D. Catholic Hispanic AIDS Leadership Education (CHALE AIDS Project) 4535 Winona Court Denver, Colorado 80212 Appendix C-1 Jessie Sanchez 1017 North Main Street Suite 208 San Antonio, Texas 78212 John Zamora Minority HIV Education Specialist HIV Division Bureau of HIV and STD Control Texas Department of Health 1100 West 49th Street Austin, Texas 78756 Asian American and Pacific Islander Hearing Planning Committee San Francisco, California April 10, 1991 Sam Akinaka BAART 45 Franklin Street 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 Ignatius Bau Staff Attorney Immigration and Refugee Rights Project San Francisco Lawyers’ Committee for Urban Affairs 301 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94105 Rene Durazzo San Francisco AIDS Foundation 25 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 Michael Foo _ GAPA Community HIV Project 2261 Market Street #447 San Francisco, CA 94114 Tessie Guillermo Executive Director Asian American Health Forum 116 New Montgomery Street #531 San Francisco, CA 94105 Appendix C-2 Steve Lew Asian/Pacific AIDS Coalition Dept. 513 P.O. Box 597004 San Francisco, CA 94159 Jim Naritomi Asian American Communities Against AIDS 1840 Sutter Street Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94115 Tony Nguyen Community Health Outreach Worker Center for Southeast Asian Refugee Resettlement 875 0’Farrell Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Nicky Philips Association of Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations 1212 Broadway #730 Oakland, CA 94612 Jane Po Coordinator SFAF Filipino AIDS Hotline 25 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color é Alaine Raymundo Filipinos for Affirmative Action 310 8th Street Oakland, CA 94612 Robby Robison Treatment Advocate Early Advocacy and Care for HIV 625 O'Farrell Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Dorothy Wong Progam Director Asian AIDS Project 300 Fourth Street #401 San Francisco, CA 94107 Douglas Yaranon California AIDS Intervention Training Center 507 Divisadero Street, Suite B San Francisco, CA 922-6135 Velma Yemota Volunteer GAPA Community HIV Project 2261 Market Street #447 San Francisco, CA 94114 The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color Appendix C-3 APPENDIX D Commission Documents For any of the information about reports and proceedings of the National Commission on AIDS please contact: The National Commission on Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome 1730 K Street, N.W., Suite 815 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 254-5125 TDD (202) 254-3816 Records are kept of all Commission proceedings and are available for public inspection at the above address. For copies of all reports please contact: National AIDS Clearinghouse P. O. Box 6003 . Rockville, Maryland 20849-6003 1-800-458-5231 . TDD 1-800-243-7012 Reports First Interim Report to the President and the Congress: "Failure of U.S. Health Care System to Deal with HIV Epidemic." December 1989. Working Group Summary Report on Federal, State, and Local Responsibilities. March 1990. Second Interim Report to the President and the Congress: "Leadership, Legislation, and Regulation.” April 1990. Third Interim Report to the President and Congress: "Research, the Work-Force, and the HIV Epidemic in Rural America." August 1990. Annual Report to the President and the Congress. August 1990. Fourth Interim Report to the President and the Congress: "HIV Disease in Correctional Facilities." March 1991. The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color Appendix D-1 a Report of the Working Group on Social and Human Issues to the National Commission on AIDS. April 1991. Fifth Interim Report to the President and the Congress: "The Twin Epidemics of Substance Use and HIV.” August 1991. Technical Report Prepared for the National Commission on AIDS. "Financing Health Care for Persons with HIV Disease: Policy Options." August 1991. Second Annual Report to the President and the Congress: "America Living With AIDS." September 1991. Sixth Interim Report to the President and the Congress: "The HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Puerto Rico.” June 1992. Seventh Interim Report to the President and the Congress: "Housing and the HIV/AIDS Epidemic, Recommendations for Action.” July 1992. Eight Interim Report to the President and the Congress: "Preventing HIV Transmission in Health Care Settings.” July 1992. Statements Support for Passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act. September 6, 1989. Support for Increase in AIDS Funding in the FY ’90 Appropriations Bill. September 19, 1989. Support for the Goal of Treatment on Demand for Drug Users. September 26, 1989. Support for Continued Funding of Research on Effectiveness of Bleach Distribution. November 7, 1989. . Resolution on U.S. Visa and Immigration Policy. December 1989. Endorsement of Principles and Objectives of Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency (CARE) Act of 1990. March 6, 1990. Despite Debate Among Epidemiologist, HIV Epidemic Will Have Greater Impact in 1990s than 1980s. March 15, 1990. Endorsement of Principles and Objectives of AIDS Prevention Act (H.R. 4470) and Medicaid AIDS and HIV Amendments Act of 1990 (H.R. 4080). May II, 1990. Endorsement of Principles and Objectives of the Ryan White CARE Act of 1990. March 6, 1991. . Appendix D-2 The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color EH nn Statement on Immigration. July 1991. Statement on the Meeting Between the National Commission on AIDS and the Secretary of Health and Human Services. June 25, 1992. Statement by David E. Rogers, M.D., Vice Chairman, National Commission on AIDS, on the Resignation of Magic Johnson from the NBA. November 2, 1992. Information on the Commission Commission Fact Sheet Individual Commissioner Biographies Public Law 100-607 (Creation of the National Commission on AIDS) The Challenge of HIV/AIDS in Communities of Color | Appendix D-3