CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE Mr. FOGARTY. Mr. Chairman, I speak onee again before my colleagues. in the House, as I have done numerous times before, on behalf of proposed legis- lation in which I believe with the ut- most conviction. I refer to my bill, H.R. 9579, to provide for the establishment of the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities. In this instance, I am pleased to take special note of the many Members of the House who have joined with me and the distinguished Representative from New Jersey [Mr. Tuompson]-in the joint sponsorship of this important legisla- tion. And let me point out that I. use the word. “important” with great care, and that I take no risk at overemphasis . in so doing. This proposed legislation is of deep importance to the national welfare—an importance not to be meas- ured solely in terms of the moneys au- thorized. Its importance is to be meas- ured rather by the fact that, for the first time, the Federal Government of : this Nation would be creating an organiza- tion which would give support and. visi- bility to all aspects of the arts and the humanities.in our national life. It is not my purpose here to delve into the many compelling reasons why such Federal support and recognition of the arts and humanities is as necessary as our wide-ranging support of the sciences. These have been amply described in the past by me and by like-minded colleagues in both House and Senate. I wish in- stead to point to several features of the proposed legislation which seem to me September 15, 1965 either to lend special urgency fo passage by the House at this time, or which lay to rest any doubts or reservations con- cerning the inherent wisdom of the prin- cipal provisions of the bill. The first of these provisions I call to your attention concerns the authoriza- tion, in section 13, of teacher training institutes arranged by the Commissioner of Education with institutions of higher education, to, “strengthen the teaching of the humanities and the arts in ele- mentary and secondary schools,” Over- looked in other legislation designed to improve the training of teachers, the extension and improvement of teaching of these areas of the curriculum is a must if we would raise the involvement of students with the arts and the hu- Mmanities as. major forces in shaping their lives. The next provision I would single out authorizes, in section 12, limited pay- ments to each State educational agency for the “acquisition of equipment—suit- able for use in providing education in the humanities and the arts—and for minor remodeling.’ While the funds proposed are relatively modest, State educational agencies would be assisted for the first time in obtaining long needed equip- ment to enable teachers to present more effectively the arts and the humanities. With this nominal Federal support as an initial impetus, the States could be expected to move ahead on their own to improve the equipment and facilities available for their arts and humanities programs. This leads me to point out the follow- ing in answer to those who hold that Federal assistance to the arts and the humanities. would reduce private and foundation support. First, the authori- zation of matching Federal funds in section 11 of the bill would actually in- crease support from the private sector. In addition, we could reasonably expect that Federal support in these areas would elicit: the same increase in non- Government spending in their behalf-as has been found to be the case in those States providing seed moneys for arts and humanities programs. In some in- stances the Federal-private ratio has been as high as 1 to 8. Surely this is eloquent answer to those who fear a lessening of private initiative. With regard to the timeliness of the proposed bill, passage now would pro- vide a most effective complement to the recently enacted Hlementary and Sec- ondary Education Act of 1965-—Public Law 89-10:..This act. will provide, among other things, improved library resources and textbooks;. supplementary centers ~ and services with broad implications for arts and humanities programs and per- sons; expanded research and research training programs, including those in arts and humanities; and, finally, assist- ance to. State educational agencies in strengthening their overall effectiveness, including employment of needed per- sonnel such as State directors of pro- erams in the areas of the arts and the “humanities. By providing badly needed assistance to the institutions of the arts and the humanities and to their indi- vidual practitioners, the proposed Na- tional Foundation would enable them to September 15,-1965 serve better the needs of the educational corimunity in these, areas, as well as to be better served by it. My fellow legislators are aware that the Senate has. already passed this meas- ure now before us, due in large part to the enlightened leadership of my most able colleague from Rhode Island, Sena- tor Penn. The funds proposed in the legislation are. modest indeed in com- parison to the undoubted benefits which will acerue to our arts and humanities programs at all levels throughout the country. We have already established the National Council on the Aris. Now we must also create a National Council on the Humanities and we must provide the organizational framework and the means by which the programs proposed by these two Councils can be imple- mented. We dare not delay further in taking this modest but vital step. I re- spectfully urge each of you to join me and our many colleagues who have spon- sored the proposed. legislation, in order that its enactment may be assured at this time. / Wir. RHODES of Arizona, Mr. Chair- man, T would like te place in the Recorp at this point the statement of policy which was adopted by the House Repub- lican policy committee regarding HR. 9460, the Arts and Humanities Act of 1965: , This bill was reported by the Committee on Education and Labor after only 15 min- utes of consideration. It reflects the hasty and inadequate consideration that it re- ceived. T% refers to a National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities which will consist of a Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities which will coordinate the ac- tivities of the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Council on the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the National Council on the Humanities. All but one of these, the National Council of the Arts, are created by. this bill. It is no wonder that the majority of the Republican members of the Education and, Labor Committee felt obliged to state that the bill is so full of ambiguities “as to puzzle the mind, paralyze the faculties, and numb the imagination.” Last year the National Council on the Arts was created by the Congress to study and analyze the state of the arts in this Na- tion and to make recommendations concern- ing methods to encourage and improve the arts. This bill, however, is not based upon any such study. or recommendations. As a mat- ter of fact, the members of the Council were not. even appointed by the President until after the subcommittee hearings on this bill wore underway: As far as is known, the Council has never even met, or carried out any of the duties and functions of the sta- tute which created it. . Aside from the unseemly haste which has~ attended the advent of this legislation from committee, the idea of federally dominated endeavors in the arts and humanities threatens the very foundation of our Nation’s cultural activities, State domination of the arts in the Soviet Union should be sufficient warning against experiments of this nature in this country. Moreover, the prospect. of political interfer- ence with the arts should be repugnant to all Americans. : The arts and humanities are thriving to- day, and will continue to thrive so long as the deadening hand of the Federal bureauc- CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE . racy is kept from the palette, the chisel, and the pen: - ‘ The Republican policy committee opposes | ALR. 9460, Mr. RONCALIO. Mr. Chairman, T am proud to support H.R. 9460, to establish 9, National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities. This long-needed action will correct the inequality which has ex- isted because of Federal support for sci- enee, through the National Science Foundation, and health, through the Na- tional Institutes of Health, without any federal support of the arts and humani- ties. The bill recognizes that aiding the arts and humanities is primarily a matter of private and local concern but that it is appropriate for the Federal Government to assist programs supported by local, State, regional, and private organiza- tions. The National Endowment for the Arts would provide grants to cover from 50 to 100 percent of the cost of projects to encourage artists and develop apprecia- tion of the arts, such as commissioning works of art, developing artistic talent, educating the public through museums and other organizations, constructing facilities, and acquiring equipment. The Humanities Endowment would promote research and training in the arts and humanities at the graduate school level through assistance to students, State or lecal public agencies, and pri- vate nonprofit organizations. The En- dowment could also support publication of scholarly works, projects to improve public understanding, the interchange of information by such means as assisting universities in providing for visting lec- turers, and @ university theater or or-~ chestra. The bill would also initiate a program of grants to State educational agencies and loans to nonprofit private schools to purchase equipment for instruction in the arts and humanities and to provide for minor construction to accommodate the new equipment. The Commissioner of Education could also arrange, by grants or contracts with institutions of higher. edueation, for special programs for elementary. and secondary school teachers and student-teachers to im-~- prove teaching of the arts and humani- ties in elementary and secondary schools. Congressional legislation has long been concerned with civil rights, health, hous- ing, and economic development, to pro- vide a more comfortable and affiuent life for our people, but we have neglected the arts and humanities, which will bring meaning and understanding to our Great Society. This bill will bring the fruits of participation in arts and humanities to many people who live in relatively iso- lated areas and are not. now able to en- joy these programs. The gains made through our social and econemic pro- grams will take on greater meaning as our people develop common bonds through sharing experiences in the arts and humanities. Mr. YATES. Mr. Chairman, in our brief visit yesterday with Astronauts Conrad and Cooper, the House honored 23109 its pathfinders of space. Today we have before us legislation to encourage men and women who can be pathfinders for Avaerica’s imagination. and understand~ ine. : , , Lam a cosponsor of the bill tc establish a National Arts and Humanities Foun- dation. In its essence, this bill seeks to advance the humanities and I am mind- ful of the statement of my good friend, formerly editor of the St. Louis Post- Dispatch, Irving Dilliard, who said: When we advance the humanities we yance man himself. For the state of the humanities, high, mediocre, and low, is the state of man—where be has been, where he is now, what in prospect he will be, what he nolds dear, what, he believes, what he seeks, and what he achieves of enduring worth. Thexe is a recognition in this bill that the Federal Government has long testi~ fied to the development of science and technology in this Nation but that it has largely ignored corresponding inspira~- tions to the arts and humanities. It would be well if this were as much a humanist age as it is an age of science, where science marches ahead on all fronts. The scientific method is being applied to nearly all sectors of human life. Po- litical scientists use the method te pre- dict elections. Social scientists use it to explain social phenomena we once thought were purely random occurrences. Economists use it to order the market- place and to reduce the real world to a series of abstract graphs and pictures. Politically, socially, and economically the world is becoming increasingly analytical, increasingly abstract, where the irra- tional and the emotional and the spirit- ual have less place. It is no surprise, then, that the arts have not received the attention they merit. ‘The Committee on Education and Labor posed the dilem~ ma bluntly: There is a financial crisis facing the arts in the United States. ad- The committee also cited a “serious imbalance between Federal support for the natural or pure sciences and for hu- manistic research and studies.” t do not demean the importance of science or. the huge sums we have appro- priated in this Congress for their applica- tion. No one will deny that scientific dis- covery has played a major role in revolu- ticnizing cur society. It is natural that in this revolution that we should look to the scientist as a kind of leader. He has created a better material world for us and he has shown us that a still better physical environment awaits us, if only we will follow him. But this better life— and this longer life—is not an end or @ goal in itself; it is what we make of the opportunities which improved living standards provide us with that is im- portant. Do we live for the purpose of living better, or do we seek to live better for some higher purpose? I believe the real reason for scientific advance lies in the second query. And it is here that our society requires the hu- manist. For as the scientist is concerned with improving life, so the humanist is concerned with the meaning of that life. Archibald MacLeish. reminds us of the 23119 dangers of stumbling blindly ahead into some scientific brave new world without human meaning when he writes: We know more about the planet and the galaxy and the universe in which. it drifts— about the substance of the earth and the uses of that substance—than men ever knew be- fore. But. who we are in this vast outward- bound of stars and constellations we do not know—or have forgotten. The bill to create a National Founda- tion on the Arts.and the Humanities is a relatively small, but necessary redress of the imperfect attention given to those who seek this larger meaning for our lives. it is apparent that this inattention cannet be. resclved by the private sec- tor alone. In 1963 slightly over half of the corporations in the United States made contributions in the area of the arts. Of all corporate contributions in that year, only about 4 percent went to the arts. This amounted to a sum of be- tween $16 and $21 million. This does not approach the full 5-percent tax exemp- tion that corporations are allowed to make on net corporate income for con- tributions to charitable and educational organizations. According to the Rocke- feller panel report on the future of thea- ter, dance, and music: It has been the practice of American corpo- rations in recent years to use only a little over one-fifth of their taxable income. At pres- ent only a handful of business firms use the full 5-percent tax exemption. Thus, lHberal allowances for tax ‘ex- emptions do not seem to alleviate the current financial starvation of the arts. Nor ¢an private individuals be depended upon to provide impetus for achievement in this area. Individual citizens today use only a small fraction of the 30-per- cent tax deduction permitted by the Government for philanthropic purposes. Many cultural institutions are unable to exist on their own receipts. One good example is the New York Metropolitan Opera, which in 1963 was able to cover only 73 percent of its total. expenses through box office receipts. | Of course, H.R. 9460 will not serve as a panacea for the ills troubling the arts today. But this legislation will serve as a ‘catalyst to encourage more gifted people toward a profession in the arts and it will encourage the public to take a@ greater interest in the arts and to con- tribute more to their support. And cer- tainly it will emphasize the importance of the arts to our Civilization. Iam in agreement with the committee finding that: The Foundation would have a profound impact on the burgeoning desire on the part of our citizens for greater exposure to cul- tural excellence. This desire is manifestly related to. the increasing availability of iei- sure time in an era of growing prosperity. Under this bill, the National Endow- ment for the Arts will provide matching grants to groups and individual engaged in the creative and performing arts, with special grants for States with organiza- tions performing similar. functions and one-time grants to States without aris councils. or similar.groups. The Na=- tional Endowment for the Humanities will provide nonmatching grants and CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE loans for-research, award fellowships and grants to institutional or individuals in training, support publications of schol- arly work, and provide for an exchange of information. The work of both en- dowments will be coordinated by a Fed- eral Council on the Arts and Humanities. To those who are concerned about ex- cessive Federai control of the arts, I point to: section 4(c) of the bill which states: In the administration of this act no de- partment, agency, officer, or employee of the United States shall exercise. any direction, supervision, or control over the policy deter- mination, personnel, or curriculum, or. the administration or operation of any school or other non-Federal agency, institution, or- ganization or association. Finally, Mr. Chairman, I would like to recall the humanistic conviction of the proverbs of Solomon, verse 18 of chap- ter SCAT of the Book of Proverbs: Where there is no vision, the people perish. i support this legislation as the Amer- ican” recognition of that imperative. This bill is worthy of that vision, and I urge its passage. Mr. HELSTOSKI. Mr. Chairman, I rise at this time to urge this House to pass H.R. 9460, to provide for the estab- lishment of a National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities. The legislation now before us, would establish an independent agency. in the executive branch of the Governnient, to encourage excellence in the arts and give recognition and emphasis to the values of humanities. This bill contains the recommenda- tions of President Johnson, who in his state of the Union message said: We must also recognize and encourage those who can be pathfinders for the Nation’s imagination and understanding. This bill will give encouragement to those who would give impetus to what President Johnson described .as “the frontiers of understanding in the arts and in humanistic studies.” On March 10 the President made a statement on this legislation in which he said: This Congress will consider many ‘programs which will isave an enduring mark on Ameri- can life, But it may well be that passage of this legislation, modest as it is, will help secure for this Congress a sure and honored place in the story of the advance cf our civilization. Asa cosponsor of this legislation, my bill being H.R. 9741, I have been grati- fied that it has received such widespread endorsement, not only by leading artists, scholars, and educators, but also by busi- ness and influential business leaders and many well-known civic leaders. Through the enactment of this legis- lation, we will be making a commitment on the part of the Federal Government to work in cooperation with public agen- cies, institutions of higher learning, mu- seums, and other nonprofit. groups, and numerous individuals, toward the ad- vancement of the arts and humanities throughout our Nation. I am quite confident that this legisla~ tion will pass this House today, to indi- ate that American culture is not stand- September 15, 1965 ing still, but is pushing forward toward creating a golden.age for all Americans. This bill will provide a vitally needed stimulus for all the segments of the arts and humanities in. every locality of the United States.. Under the provisions of the bill providing for direct grants and loans to cerforming groups, as well as to students of the various humanistic dis- ciplines, we shall see an inspiring up- surge in activity and creativity. In today’s world our society has be- come more and more science conscious. It is because of this fact that the Fed- eral Government and the public support the sciences in the manner they do. However, when the growth of man’s un- derstanding of technology is greater than the understanding of his fellow man, it is of utmost importance that we turn our attention te the humanities— to that which is human and common te all peoples. Tn the past there has been.a tendency to bring culture and art to persons in the higher income group, and it is up to us to take the initial step toward bringing artistic productions to the grasp of more of our American people. But the concept of Federal aid to the arts and humanities has been slow in evolving, and this legislation would be a great step in providing such Federal aid. However, in the past, such Federal aid has been opposed by many who fear that there will be Federal interference in their work of the performing arts. This is not so. We have had critics opposing our aid to education programs, to our urban renewal legislation, and in many other fields.. We have shown these critics that there can be Federal aid without Federal control. In this legis- lation we propose to do the same thing. The Federal Government will supply the money, but. the artists and their organi- zations will.suggest the proposals, select the performances which are to be pro- duced and de all the planning. The Fed- eral Government will be the means, but the end product will be the sole respon- sibility of the performing artists. Again, let me go back and repeat that we have made great strides in atomic energy, space exploration, in automation, in the sciences. But it will be an unbai- anced society in which we will live if, among these wonders we do not expand the human mind and spirit. This legislation wili supplement the efforts now being made by the public, foundations, and corporations so ‘that the people in the artistic field will obtain the widest range of support in their endeavors. This Congress, can fulfill the dreams of the American people to make available the fruits of culture to all of our citi- zens—just as we have been making eco- nomic abundance available to them. We can make great strides forward to- day in the field of culture by passing the legislation now before us.’ H.R. 9460 will meet the needs and fulfill our objectives. Mr. THOMPSON of New Jersey. Mr. Chairman, I have no further requests for time. Mr. CURTIS. Mr. Chairman, I renew my point of oraet that-a quorum is not present..