[Reprinted from the American Gynaecological and Obstetrical Journal for March, 1895.] SOME PRACTICAL POINTS ON THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF PELVIC HEMATOCELE WITH REPORT OF A CASE.* By W. E. Colgrove, M. D., Horseheads, New York. The causes which lead to the production of pelvic hsematocele are well known to be rupture of any of the pelvic blood-vessels, sudden cessation of the menses, rupture of tubal or other forms of extra-uter- ine pregnancy, rupture of aneurisms of blood-vessels of the broad ligaments, reflux of blood from the uterus or Fallopian tubes or any general haemorrhagic diathesis of the patient or in some instances well-defined cases of purpura or transudation from the smaller blood- vessels in or around the pelvic cavity, so that in this brief paper I need not take up the time in discussing them, also that there are two general varieties, the intraperitoneal and the subperitoneal of which the intraperitoneal is by far the more dangerous. I beg, however, to differ with Thomas that the subperitoneal variety is not dangerous, in my judgment any amount of blood accumulated in the pelvic cavity is to be regarded with suspicion. With a brief report of a case I will try to bring out as well as time will permit some of the more important points in the diagnosis and treatment. I was called to see Mrs. S. aged thirty-five years on Au- gust 15th ; found her to be a plethoric woman of rather nervous tem- perament. She had been driving three or four days before and jumped from her carriage to the sidewalk. She felt a sudden pain in the pelvic region with faintness and some degree of shock, was as- sisted into a neighboring drugstore and after a short time resumed her journey home. A physician was called who pronounced it an acute retroflexion of the uterus and vainly attempted its reduction, the effort being attended with great pain and faintness and some vom- iting. On the next day another attempt was made to replace the sup- posedly retroflexed organ without success, on the fourth day I saw * Read before the New York State Medical Society, February 5, 1895. Copyright, 1895, by J. D. Emmet and A. H. Bickmaster. 2 W. E. Col grove, M. D. her, and after learning the history of the case made an examination per vaginam. The os uteri was of normal size and shape and not in the position usually assumed by the os of a retroflexed uterus. On passing the finger into the posterior cul-de-sac of Douglas a round hard tumor not unlike the occiput of a foetus was felt. No fluctua- tion could be detected, the mass was apparently fixed and immovable, very tender to the touch, a flexible uterine sound was introduced and the curve of the uterine canal found to be nearly normal. Examina- tion per rectum was attempted but as it was impacted with faecal mat- ter an enema was given and the bowel cleared. The finger revealed the tumor, hard, round, posterior to the uterus completely obstructing the bowel. '1'here had been no symptoms of extra-uterine pregnancy and as the temperature had risen to 102° and symptoms of general peritonitis could be detected, I diagnosed pelvic haematocele of sub- peritoneal variety which had existed so long that absorption of the blood serum had taken place, and we now had to deal only with the firm blood clot already partly decomposed which had dissected up the peritonaeum, which membrane now formed the roof or upper wall of the tumor. Calling in an assistant who kindly gave an anaesthetic and with the aid of a large sized duck-bill speculum holding the roof of the vaginal wall well up I made an incision an inch and a half in length in the post-cervical region and with a dull curette and a small placental forceps succeeded in clearing the cavity of the mass of blood clots which gave rise to quite a perceptible odor. The cavity was now thoroughly irrigated with solution of bichloride (1 to 4,000), a drainage-tube introduced, and the wound closed with interrupted suture of large size catgut, the vagina carefully and loosely packed with iodoform gauze which was changed twice the first day and once a day thereafter. The temperature fell to ioo° in six hours and to normal in twenty-four hours, the drainage-tube was removed on the second day and perfect recovery took place in ten days. I would especially call your attention to the character of the tumor, usually they are fluctuating, this one was hard and fibrous in char- acter, the diagnosis should be made carefully. To diagnose a retro- flexed uterus in a case like the one given is humiliating in the extreme. Diagnosis by exclusion is a very good way to arrive at a correct con- clusion. The uterine sound should in my judgment always be used before making pressure necessary to reduce a misplaced uterus ex- cepting in cases where pregnancy is certain or suspected. If the bowels are obstructed the rectal tube attached to the fountain syringe should be passed above the obstruction if possible and the contents Diagnosis and Treatment of Pelvic Hcematocele. 3 drained away in a semi-fluid state thereby reducing the pressure and aiding in relieving the danger of rupture into the abdominal or peri- toneal cavity. The existence of aneurysms and diseased blood-vessels should be carefully inquired into, also as to whether the menses occur regularly and without unnatural disturbances likely to occur in acutely misplaced uteri. The questions of extra-uterine pregnancy should receive careful attention. Surgical interference is in my opinion authorized and necessary when the amount of blood being poured out demands ligation of blood-vessels ruptured or when the blood clot becomes practically a foreign body and threatened septicaemia appears thereby proving that Nature is unable to absorb the product of the haemorrhage. Pressure should never be made in any case against a tumor in the cul-de-sac of Douglas to replace a retroflexed uterus until all doubt of its being an abscess or haematocele have been removed and never as an aid to diagnosis with any degree of force. The tumor always becomes harder and more tense on the third or fourth day. The malady may be almost certainly recognized by its sudden onset whereas ovarian cyst, perimetritis with abscess fibroids and extra-uterine pregnancy, etc., are of slower origin. The small aspirating needle is of value in the early stages but will fail to give positive signs after the serum has been absorbed. I do not regard the vaginal incision as dangerous and much prefer it to abdominal section, although in some cases the latter will be found necessary if ligation is to be resorted to. In a majority of cases the blood clot causes but a small amount of trouble and is removed by absorption. Should the patient be seen early hypodermic injections of ergot and caffeine may be given with success. The patient should be kept flat on the back with head but slightly raised. The predisposition to haematocele is most marked during the period of ovarian excitement and menstrual occurrence. Compresses and bandages applied to the abdomen are of service both in allaying the haemorrhage and causing absorption after the bleeding has ceased.