TIIE Stigmata of Degeneration. -BY- Frederick Peterson, M. D., Consulting Neurologist to Randall’s Island Hospital for Idiots; Consulting Physician to the Manhattan State Hospital for the Insane; Chief of Clinic, Nervous Department, Vanderbilt Clinic, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York; Clinical Pro- fessor of Insanity, Woman’s Medical College of the New York Infirmary. Reprint from the State Hospitals Bulletin for July, 1896. UTICA, N. Y. Utica State Hospital Pbess. 1896. THE STIGMATA OF DEGENERATION. Consulting Neurologist to Randall’s Island Hospital for Idiots ; Consulting Physician to the Manhattan State Hospital for the Insane; Chief of Clinic, Nervous Department, Vanderbilt Clinic, College of Physi- cians and Surgeons, New York; Clinical Professor of Insanity, Woman’s Medical College of the New York Infirmary. Frederick Peterson, M. D., The subject of degeneracy in the human race has for some years been exciting much interest and discussion among scientific men. Unusual facilities have been afforded the writer for the study of this condition in con- nection with work in reformatories, prisons, asylums and institutions for idiots, and he believes that a thorough un- derstanding of the various indices of degeneration would be of value not only to physicians in institutions of the character mentioned, but also to the general practitioner who is frequently brought into contact with degenerates outside of institutions, and commonly at so early a period in life—during childhood or adolescence—that he may often do an untold amount of good by calling attention to an indication of a degenerative proclivity in some member of a family, a discovery occasionally of enormous significance as regards prophylaxis, education and care. Degeneracy may be defined as a marked deviation from the normal original type or standard. We recognize it as a rule in its effects upon the intellectual life, in the devia- tions from the intellectual habits and social conduct which we hold in common with our fellows. To the class of degenerates not only belong many criminals, idiots, and insane individuals, but also the great majority of persons whom we call cranks or eccentrics,—the people who live among us a sort of original life, with peculiarities of mental habit and conduct, and whom we characterize as feeble- minded, odd, quaint, queer or singular. A man of talent or of genius often presents eccentricities of the kind to which we refer, but such deviation from the original normal standard need not be morbid in character; 2 PETERSON: THE STIGMATA OF DEGENERATION. it may be a deviation toward a higher and better standard recognized by his contemporaries or posterity to be such, and to which we, on our part, try in the end to conform. It might be difficult at times to distinguish between the eccentricities of genius and the eccentricities of degeneracy. There are one or two indications or tests which will aid us in this. One of the indications, in fact the chief test of a normal state is naturally conformity to the social condition in which a man lives. This test applied by itself, how- ever, does not exclude talented individuals and geniuses. Another criterion must be applied to these cases. Is there conjoined with the eccentricity a morbid self-centering of his interests? It is in individuals who concern themselves little with the affairs of the world, but much with personal and selfish matters, that eccentricity of intellectual habit or conduct warrants a grave diagnosis. Now one of the essential characteristics of degeneracy is its inclusion of transmissible elements, so that the degenerate individual not only bears in himself the germs which render him more and more incapable of fulfilling his own functions in human life, but by his hereditary bequests he menaces the in- tellectual stability of his descendants. So much for the definition of the term degeneracy. We will now pass on to a consideration of the indications of degeneracy. Stigmata of Degeneration. The indications of degeneracy are known as stigmata- hereditatis or stigmata of degeneration. They may be defined as anatomical or functional deviations from the normal, which in themselves are usually of little import- ance as regards the existence of an organism, but are characteristic of a marked or latent neuropathic disposition. Much study has of late years been devoted to these indices by many investigators, particularly in their relation to insanity, idiocy, and criminal anthropology, and it be- hooves all who have to do with the development and care of the human body in any particular,—and this refers espe- PETERSON: THE STIGMATA OF DEGENERATION. 3 cially to men of the medical and allied professions,—to familiarize themselves with these signs of degeneration in so far as they concern their own special provinces of work. These stigmata are vices of functional and organic evolu- tion. The deviations from the normal may be in the way of excesses or arrest of development. They must be dis- tinguished from the deficiencies or deformities produced by accidents at birth or by disease. I have said that these stigmata are anatomical and functional. But it is more convenient to divide the functional group into physiological and psychic classes. It is the latter which we are more apt to observe in our social relations with degenerate indi- viduals. The psychic stigmata are always characterized by a want of balance or lack of proportion between certain undeveloped or excessively developed faculties and other faculties which are normal. Defect of moral sense, of atten- tion, of memory, will, judgment, or unbalanced excess of musical or mathematical aptitudes may be cited as instances of psychic stigmata. Hence the three following divisions may be made of all of the degenerative indices: (1) Anatomical stigmata. (2) Physiological stigmata. (3) Psychical stigmata. Anatomical Stigmata. Cranial anomalies. Facial asymmetry. Deformities of the palate. Dental anomalies. Anomalies of the tongue and lips. Anomalies of the nose. Anomalies of the eye: Flecks on the iris, strabismus, chromatic asymmetry of the iris, narrow palpebral fissures. Albinism. Congenital cataracts. M icrophthalmos. Pigmentary retinitis. Muscular insufficiency. 4 PETERSON: THE STIGMATA OF DEGENERATION. Anomalies of the ear. Anomalies of the limbs: Polydactyly. Syndactyly. Ectrodactyly. Symelus. Ectromelus. Phocomelus. Excessive length of the arms. Anomalies of the body in general: Hernias. Malformation of the breasts, thorax. Dwarfishness. Giantism. Infantilism. Feminism. Masculinism. Spina bifida. Anomalies of the genital organs. Anomalies of the skin: Polysarcia. Hypertrichosis. Absence of hair. Premature grayness. Physiological Stigmata. Anomalies of motor function: Retardation of learning to walk. Tics. Tremors. Epilepsy. Nystagmus. Anomalies of sensory function: Deaf-mutism. Neuralgia. Migraine. Hyperaesthesia. Anaesthesia. Blindness. Myopia. Hypermetropia. PETERSON: THE STIGMATA OF DEGENERATION. 5 Anomalies of sensory function: Astigmatism. Daltonism. Hemeralopia. Concentric limitation of the visual field. Anomalies of speech: Mutism. Defective speech. Stammering. Stuttering. Anomalies of genito-urinary function: Sexual irritability. Impotence. Sterility. Urinary incontin- ence. Anomalies of instinct or appetite: Uncontrollable appe- tites (food, liquor, drugs.) Merycism. Diminished resistance against external influences and diseases. Retardation of puberty. Psychical Stigmata. Insanity. Idiocy. Imbecility. Feeble-mindedness. Eccentricity. Moral delinquency. Sexual perversion. Having attempted to classify the various stigmata in this manner, we may now proceed to a consideration seri- atim of the anatomical and physiological anomalies above described: Cranial Anomalies.—These I have treated of fully in an- other article to which the reader is referred (American Journal of Insanity, July, 1895). Briefly they consist of asymmetry of the cranium and of 6 PETERSON.- THE STIGMATA OF DEGENERATION. various deformities, such as microcephalus, hydrocephalus, leptocephalus, scaphocephalus, trigonocephalus, plagio- cephalus, and the like. Facial Asymmetry.—Inequality of the two sides of the face—when congenital and not due to some such disease as hemiatrophy—is to be looked upon as a stigma of degenera- tion. In the same category may be grouped various irreg- ularities, and such conditions as excessive prognathism or retrognathism. Great prominence, or unequal prominence, of the malar bones is to be observed, and also asymmetry of the orbits. Deformities of the Palate.—- In connection with the soft palate, bifurcation of the uvula may be mentioned.* As regards the hard palate, I have dwelt upon its deformities at some length in an article in the International Dental Journal (Dec., 1895), the facts there brought forward may be recapitulated as follows: While the palate occupies but a small place in this great category of hereditary stigmata of all kinds, it is one of the anatomical group, and this group is for many reasons the one of greatest importance. In this group, too, it occupies a distinctive place as being among the most striking, fre- quent and significant of the anomalies. I will not say of the palate what Dr. Amadee Joux said of the ear, “show me your ear and I will tell you who you are, whence you came, and where you go;” but I will say, “show me your palate, and I will probably be able to tell whether you be- long to the great class tainted by heredity, comprising many insane, imbecile, feeble-minded, criminal, eccentric, epileptic, hysterical, or neurasthenic individuals. The arch of the hard palate presents considerable varia- tion within strictly normal anatomical limits. A large, wide, moderately high vault is what may be called a nor- mal standard. It means the highest evolution, judging from the fact that the mouth cavity increases in capacity as we ascend the vertebrate series. Deviations from that *Dana on Deformity and Paralysis of the Uvula—Am. Jour, of Insanity, April, 1896. Fig. i. Palate with Gothic arch. Fig. 2. Palate with horseshoe arch. Fig. 3. The dome-thaped palate. Fig. 4. 1 he flat-roofed palate. Fig. 5. The hip-roofed palate. Fig. 6. The asymmetrical palate. Fig. 7. Torus Palatinus. (Broad, wide torus.) PETERSON: THE STIGMATA OF DEGENERATION. 7 standard are not at all infrequent, and yet such deviations may be normal. Thus the palate may be low and broad, or it may be high and narrow; it may be short or long in its antero-posterior diameter. It may be ridged unduly along the palatine sutures, or it may present marked rugosities on its surface, especially in the anterior region; yet these variations are normal. Probably we may look upon these peculiarities as a species of compensatory de- velopment. Just as in a study of heads we find some very long and low, and others short and round and high, and recognize the fact that the shortness in one dimension is compensated for by a corresponding increase in another; so we may regard variation in palatine diameters. The pathological palate has not been studied as much as it deserves to be. Save occasional and casual references to the “Gothic” palate in literature, and one or two papers upon the torus palatinus, very little has been written upon the subject. In my paper referred to above, I have attempted to classify such pathological palates as could be justly looked upon as indicative of degeneracy. The word Gothic having been so long in use, and the hard palate being much like an arch or roof,* I have followed architectural nomenclature in the classification offered. Pathological palates : (1) Palate with Gothic arch. (2) Palate with horseshoe arch. (3) The dome-shaped palate. (4) The flat-roofed palate. (5) The hip-roofed palate. (6) The asymmetrical palate. (7) The torus palatinus. The seven varieties named are to be looked upon as types merely. Each type will be found to present variations and combinations with other forms. Thus the Gothic arch may have a low or high pitch and be short or long. * There is some confusion in literature of the roof of the mouth, or hard palate, referred to in this paper, with the dental arch, which is quite another thing. 8 PETERSON: THE STIGMATA OF DEGENERATION. The horseshoe arch (a familiar one in Moorish architec- ture) is always easily distinguished, but, owing to its con- formation, a cast can not well be taken of it to show it in perfect outline. The dome-shaped palate may be high or low, may be combined with asymmetry or torus. The presence of a torus in the Gothic variety is apt to destroy the purely Gothic form, and may cause it to resemble the flat-roofed palate. Under the heading of flat-roofed palate I should include all such palates as are nearly hori- zontal in outline (of which I have not a good specimen to exhibit), as well as those with inclined roof sides but flattened gable. In the hip-roofed palate we have the sloping sides as usual, but also a marked pitch of the palate roof in front and behind; occasionally one may meet with a palate of this kind with so remarkable a pitch from before backward, that it is almost like a Gothic roof turned about so that the gable runs transversely. Asym- metry in the palate is commonly observed in many of the previously described forms, but occasionally is the only noteworthy peculiarity. It is usual to find asymmetry of the face and skull in cases with an asymmetrical palate. The torus palatinus (Latin torus, swelling) was first men- tioned by Chassaignac as a medio-palatine exostosis. It is a projecting ridge or swelling along the palatine suture, sometimes in its whole length, sometimes in only a por- tion of its course. It is always congenital. It varies con- siderably in its shape and size, so that as many as five or six different species of torus are recognized. It may be wedge-shaped, narrow, broad, very prominent, or irregu- lar. I have said nothing about cleft-palate, for I am not sure that it may be classed among the well marked stigmata of degeneration. I have found but two or three cleft- palates among the four hundred and fifty idiots and imbe- ciles on Randall’s Island, while a number of cases of this kind with which I have come in contact in my professional life were very far from degenerates. However it would seem that there is great need of a faithful study of a large number of cases of cleft-palate, in relation to the question of PETERSON: THE STIGMATA OF DEGENERATION. 9 degeneracy. The deformed palate is to my mind one of the chief anatomical stigmata of degeneration. It is true that from this single indication, it would not be strictly scien- tific to adjudge an individual a degenerate. Occasionally perhaps a case presents itself where this anatomical stigma alone would suffice to ensure a diagnosis of this nature, but usually other stigmata co-exist, such as cranial anomalies, deformities of the ear, and the like. The frequency of the pathological palate among marked degenerates, such as the insane, idiots and epileptics, has been testified to by many investigators. Thus Talbot re- ported 43$ of abnormal palates in 1,605 inmates in institu- tions for the feeble-minded. Ireland makes it nearer 50$. Charon, a later writer than these, found abnormal palates in 10$ of apparently normal people, in 82$ of idiots and feeble-minded, in 76$ of epileptics, in 80$ of cases of in- sanity in general, in 70$ of the hysterical insane, and in 35$ of cases of general paralysis. Nacke has studied par- ticularly the torus palatinus in 1,449 individuals, normal and psychopathic; he found it present in 23.9$ of psycho- pathic women (insane, epileptic, idiot, and criminal), 32.9$ of epileptic women, 34.4$ of criminal women, 22.7