The Diagnostic Significance of the Venous and Arterial Murmurs in the Neck, Based on Examinations of Fifteen Hundred Persons. BY JAMES K. CROOK, M.D., LECTURER ON CLINICAL MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL DIAGNOSIS AT THE NEW YORK POST-GRADUATE MEDICAL SCHOOL AND HOSPITAL. FROM THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, February, 1893. Extracted from The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, February, 1893. THE DIAGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THE VENOUS AND ARTERIAL MURMURS IN THE NECK, BASED ON EXAMINATIONS OF FIFTEEN HUNDRED PERSONS.1 / By James K. Crook, M.D., LECTURER ON CLINICAL MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL DIAGNOSIS AT THE NEW YORK POST- • GRADUATE MEDICAL SCHOOL AND HOSPITAL. The occurrence of certain auscultatory phenomena in the great ves- sels of the neck has been familiar to the profession since the days of Laennec, more than seventy years ago. Their presence has generally been attributed to those pathological changes in the blood constituting the condition known as anaemia, but their exact diagnostic relations have never seemed to reach any fixed or settled status in practical med- icine. The following quotations from text-books and contributions to medical periodicals published within the last fifteen years will show the diversity of opinion regarding the clinical value of these sounds, referring more particularly to the venous hum : A. Weil'2 expresses the opinion that “neither the presence of the venous hum in itself, nor its intensity, its rhythm, nor its persistence in various positions of the head or neck, stands in connection with any particular form of disease.” Immermann3 writes as follows: “ Two symptoms often met with in anaemic patients are worthy of special notice because of their importance in relation to diagnosis. They are supposed, not altogether unjustly, to furnish valuable evidence of the presence of anaemia. I refer to the so-called ‘ anaemic murmurs ’ over the region of the heart, and the bruit de diable heard in the veins of the neck.” Gerhardt4 believes that “when the venous hum is not produced by some accidental influence, it is apt to be due to anaemia.” He thinks those cases in which a thrill is appreciated by the finger are significant of anaemia and of diagnostic importance. Guttmann5 states “ that the typical venous hum is found only in anaemia.” 1 Read before the New York Academy of Medicine, June 21, 1892. 1 Auscultation of the Arteries and Veins. Leipzig, 1875. 4 Art. “ Anaemia,” Ziemssen’s Cyclopaedia. New York, 1877. 4 Lehrbuch der Auscultation und Percussion. Tubingen, 1884. 5 Lehrbuch der klinischen Untersuchung-Methode. Berlin, 1886. 2 CROOK: MURMURS HEARD IN THE NECK. Fagge1 makes the following statement: “ It is important to notice that none of these murmurs (arterial and venous) are of the slightest significance from a clinical point of view, so far as the diagnosis of anaemia itself is concerned.” Flint2 writes thus: “ Of special significance in the diagnosis of anae- mia is the presence of certain physical signs. . . . The arterial mur- mur is present in only a certain proportion of cases, but the venous hum may be heard almost invariably.” Eiehhorst3 does not attach much significauce to the venous hum, as shown by the following remark: “ The bruit de diable is often heard over the bulb of the internal jugular vein (in anaemia), but this sound is also often heard in healthy individuals.” Striimpell4 concludes as follows: “ Murmurs in the large veins of the neck are very often heard in anaemia, either with or without cardiac murmurs. . . . We believe that the loud venous murmurs are more frequent in the anaemic than in other persons. We cannot claim, how- ever, that they are of any great diagnostic value.” Apetz5 claims that among six hundred and sixty patients examined by him in hospital wards, two hundred and eighty-four (forty-three per cent.) presented venous murmurs. Dividing his cases into three classes, anaemic, slightly anaemic, and non-anaemic, he claims to have discovered fifty-one per cent, of murmurs in anaemic persons, forty-six per cent, in slightly anaemic, and thirty-nine per cent, in those not at all anaemic. Apetz, therefore, concludes that “ as this phenomenon is so often heard in persons who are not anaemic, it possesses very little diagnostic value, and should hardly be counted in favor of, or against, the presence of this affection.” Loomis6 expresses himself thus: “ The constant and important signs of anaemia are haemic murmurs, which may be cardiac, arterial, or venous.” Dr. Bewley,7 in a paper presented to the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, March 6, 1891, arrives at the following conclusion: More than half the young persons who are not anaemic have a murmur in the neck. The presence of a hum, therefore, is of no diagnostic significance in any individual case.” Vierordt8 says: This murmur (the venous hum) is sometimes heard 1 The Principles and Practice of Medicine. London, 1886. 2 The Principles and Practice of Medicine. Philadelphia, 1886. 3 A Handbook of Practical Medicine, 1886. 4 A Text-book of Medicine, 1887. 5 Virchow’s Archiv, cvii. 6 A Text-book of Practical Medicine, 1889. 7 Lancet, vol. i., 1891. 8 A Text-book of Clinical Diagnosis. Leipzig, 1891. CROOK: MURMURS HEARD IN THE NECK. 3 in many healthy persons. . . . Strictly speaking, no diagnostic impor- tance is to be attached to the phenomenon.” It will thus be seen that the testimony in reference to the meaning of these vascular sounds, as shown by the foregoing statements and opin- ions of recognized authorities, is very confusing, and in some instances absolutely contradictory. In view of this unsatisfactory state of con- temporaneous evidence, the author determined, about a year since, to make a personal investigation of the subject, and ascertain, so far as examinations of a large number of persons would show, what relations these phenomena bear to diseased conditions, and what value to place upon them as a means of diagnosis. The investigation was begun early in June, 1891, and was terminated early in March, 1892. During that period fifteen hundred persons of various ages and conditions were examined. With reference to the diseases from which these persons were suffering, they may be classified as follows: Bronchitis, with various complications of asthma, emphy- Cases. sema, influenza, malaria, etc. . 611 Dyspepsia and intestinal disorders 177 Phthisis pulmonalis ........ 122 Diseases of the heart, functional and organic 95 Anaemia and chlorosis 31 Muscular rheumatism, lumbago, etc. .... 41 Renal affections, acute and chronic ..... 17 Articular rheumatism, acute and chronic . Various unclassified complaints, headache, nervousness, 14 insomnia, pregnancy, pneumonia, etc. . . . . Normal cases, persons presenting no appreciable patho- 349 logical condition 43 Total 1500 The great preponderance of thoracic diseases is explained by the fact that a majority of the cases were seen at the Chest clinic of the Bellevue Hospital, Out-door Department, and at the clinic for General Medicine of the New York Post-Graduate Medical School and Hospital. It should be stated here that all of these patients were under my own treatment or observation. Many of them were kept under treatment for a long period of time, and not a few were examined by successive classes at the Post-Graduate School. The instrument employed in examining the neck. was an ordinary flexible Cammann’s binaural stethoscope. The patients were almost invariably examined in sitting or standing posture, with the head and neck in an easy and un- constrained position ; a small number only being auscultated while recumbent. 4 CROOK: MURMURS HEARD IN THE NECK. The examinations of these fifteen hundred persons, as shown in the table on the opposite page, resulted in the discovery of fifty-one cases of well-marked and unmistakable haemic bruits or murmurs originating in the bloodvessels, which equal 3.4 per cent, of the whole number. These figures do not include those accidental murmurs induced by improper pressure of the stethoscope, or twisting of the neck unduly, nor do they include those cases of inspiratory breathing-sounds, which in some persons so nearly simulate the bruit de diable. In every case of doubt the patient was instructed to temporarily suspend respiration. A study of the statistics comprised in the table will reveal the following important, and, it seems to the author, conclusive facts: Of the fifty-one cases pre- senting haemic bruits, we find that forty-three were females, in a total of six hundred and eighteen females examined—slightly under seven (6.95) per cent. There were eight males who presented bruits out of a total of eight hundred and eighty-two males examined—a little less than 1 per cent. This would indicate that these vascular phenomena are about seven times as common in females as in males. Analyzing the cases with reference to the age of greatest frequency, we obtain the results, by decennial periods, exhibited on the opposite page. These numerical data indicate that these murmurs occur with far greater frequency during early adult life than at any other period of existence. Taking the period from fifteen to twenty-five years inclusive, we find that 39 of the 51 cases of the vascular bruits occurred during this time (more than 76 per cent, of the entire number). The youngest person presenting a bruit was a girl, aged thirteen years, with chlorosis, and the oldest was a man, aged forty-eight years, suffering from em- pysema. The average age of the 51 persons with cervical murmurs was a little over twenty-three years. A most important point for analysis relates to the diseases of those persons in whoTn the vascular murmurs were discovered. A study of the subject resulted as follows: Of 31 well-marked cases of anaemia and chlorosis, we find 28, or more than 90 per cent., presented haemic bruits. The next disease in order of frequency of vascular sounds is phthisis (in which affection we know anaemia to play an important part). Of 122 cases, we find that in 8 vascular murmurs were present. Among the remaining 1349 persons examined, we find only 15 in whom a true haemic bruit could be elicited. Several of these are marked “ anaemic ” as complications of some other affection, and, while the author has no numerical data bearing on this point, a majority of them might properly have been indorsed in the same way. We notice, further in the table, that in almost all of the cases of vascular bruit marked “ loud ” or “ distinct,” anaemia or chlorosis is given as the disease condition present. Of 43 healthy persons examined, only 1 exhibited a vascular murmur; in this case there was a rough carotid murmur heard on the right side only. CROOK : MURMURS HEARD IN THE NECK. 5 Table of Cases Presenting Cervical Murmurs. No. Sex. Age. Disease. Vascular sounds. 1 M. 20 Dyspepsia, cardiac palpitation Slight venous hum right side. 2 F. 18 Chlorosis Distinct venous hum right side. 3 M. 22 Phthisis ! Faint venous hum right side. ■ 4 M. 28 Phthisis Distinct hum right side. 5 F. 13 Chlorotic anaemia Slight hum right side. 6 F. 28 Dyspepsia; quite an- aemic Loud hum right, and carotid murmur both sides. 7 F. 18 Chlorosis Loud venous hum left side. 8 F. 24 Chlorosis Loud venous hum right side. 9 F. 23 Mitral regurgitation ; chlorosis Loud hum over right external jugular vein, arterial mur- murs both sides. 10 F. 16 Bronchitis; anaemic Slight carotid murmur left side. 11 F. 27 Phthisis Faint venous hum (side not noted). 12 F. 38 Metrorrhagia Venous hum right side. 13 F. 40 Menorrhagia Slight venous hum and arterial murmurs (location not noted). 14 F. 21 Peritonitis; very an- aemic Venous hum right, and arterial murmurs both sides. 15 M. 23 Normal ; no disease Rough carotid murmur right side. 16 M. 31 Phthisis ; somewhat anaemic Slight venous and arterial murmurs both sides. 17 M. 32 Ingrowing nail Slight venous hum (location not noted). 18 F. 24 Peritonitis Venous hum right side. 19 F. 24 Anaemia Faint arterial murmur right side. 20 F. 17 Debility Slight venous hum both sides. 21 F. 25 Phthisis; very anaemic Venous hum and arterial murmurs right side. 22 F. 17 Phthisis Slight venous hum both sides. 23 M. 48 Euipyaema Developed venous hum and arterial murmurs while un- der observation. 24 F. 27 Malarial fever Venous hum right side. 25 F. 18 Chlorosis Venous hum and arterial bruit right side. 26 F. 21 Chlorosis Faint carotid murmurs (side not noted). 27 F. 17 Chlorosis Faint venous hum right, carotid bruit left side. 28 F. 36 Probably aortic sten- osis Chlorosis Rough bruit over right carotid. 29 F. 14 Carotid and venous (location not noted). 30 F. 20 Chlorosis Venous hum right side. 31 F. 18 Chlorosis Carotid and venous right, carotid left side. 32 F. 18 Exophthalmic goitre Faint carotid bruit right side. 33 F. 30 Left subclavian aneur- Bruit from aneurism. 34 F. 16 Chlorosis Venous hum right and left sides. 35 F. 23 Chlorosis Venous hum both sides. 36 F. 23 Phthisis Faint arterial right side. 37 F. 25 Anjemia Faint venous left, carotid right side. 38 F. 16 Chlorosis Arterial murmur and venous hum right side. 39 M. 35 Nephritis; dyspepsia Hum over right external jugular. 40 F 16 Chlorosis Distinct right and taint left venous hum. 41 F. 15 Chlorosis Loud arterial and venous riglu, faint left side. 42 F. 18 Chlorosis Venous hum right side. 43 F. 16 Bronchitis ; constipa- tion Slight right carotid bruit. 44 F. 21 Chlorosis Venous hum (location not noted). 45 F. 16 Chlorosis Venous hum both sides. 46 F. 22 Chlorosis Venous and carotid bruits both sides. 47 F. 22 Chlorosis Right and left venous bruits. 48 F. 18 Chlorosis Slight venous and arterial murmurs both sides. 49 F ; 18 Chlorosis Venous hum both sides. 50 F. 16 Bronchitis Slight venous hum right side. 5! F. 16 Bronchitis; anorexia Faint venous hum right side. Years. Under 10 26 persons examined, no bruits Per Cent. From 10 to 20, 135 “ (< 22 (< (16.29 ) “ 20 to 30, 476 “ ( < 21 < i ( 4.41 ) “ 30 to 40, 374 “ U 6 << ( 0.016) “ 40 to 50, 239 “ (t 2 (< ( 0.008) “ 50 to 60, 155 “ no U “ 60 to 70, 80 “ u (< u “ 70 to 80, 13 “ a “ “ “ 80 to 90, 2 “ (t * * < 6 CROOK : MURMURS HEARD IN THE NECK. A question of some interest relates to the points of origin and the location of these lisemic bruits. An analysis of the facts in the table bearing on this subject shows venous murmurs present in 42 cases, as follows : Cases. On right side alone, in 21 On left “ “ ....... 2 On both sides, in 12 On side not noted, in 7 Venous murmurs present without arterial bruit in 26 cases. Arterial murmurs present in 25 cases : Cases. On right side alone, in 9 On left “ “ “ 3 On both sides, in 9 On side not noted, in 4 These data furnish some curious facts. They indicate that these cer- vical murmurs, both venous and arterial, are frequently present on one side of the neck alone, and far more frequently on the right than on the left side, the proportion being more than 10:1 for the venous and 3 : 1 for the arterial bruit. The figures show further that the bruit de diable is considerably more common than the arterial murmur, and, also, that each variety is frequently present in the same individual without the other. These facts were first noted by the author while engaged in the study of chlorosis in 1886, and were contained in an article on that dis- ease contributed to the New York Medical Journal of June 11, 1887. Until the present analytical investigation they seem to have received no subsequent verification. With reference to the location of the greatest audibility of these cervical sounds the author may be allowed to quote from this contribution : “ After numerous clinical investigations I would locate the maxim intensity of this bruit—i. e., the venous hum—in a plane rather external to the course of the great vessels of the neck. The space will correspond very nearly to a triangle having a base about two inches in length formed by the upper border of the inner third of the clavicle, the sides intersecting at a point about two inches above that bone.” After six years’ further experience with these murmurs, the author would now add that this area might be extended inward so far as to include the space underlying the sternal tendon of the sterno- clfeido-mastoid muscle. In many cases the bruit can be heard only in the triangular depression (when this exists) between the two tendons of this muscle. In other cases it is best heard at the outer border of the supra- sternal notch. In some cases, when the hum is not at all appreciable over the internal jugular vein, it may be heard over the external jugular, near the outer edge of the above-described triangular area. When heard over the external jugular the murmurs maybe caused to instantly CROOK: MURMURS HEARD IN THE NECK. 7 disappear by firm pressure with the stethoscope and arresting the flow of blood in the vessel. The bruit de diable is not absolutely continuous, but may rather be described as intermittent, being loudest during inspiration. This has been ascribed to an intra-thoracic suction-force which hastens the return-current of blood through the jugular veins during inspiration. Referring to the location of greatest distinctness of the systolic arterial bruit, we may again quote from the article above referred to. We there find it stated that “this area is located at the summit of the thorax in front, and the root of the neck over the carotid arteries.” The author would modify this statement only by noticing the fact that these hsemic systolic bruits of ansemia seem to be transmitted not infrequently up the carotid artery of one side only, and much oftener up the right than up the left side. Conclusions.—The important deductions from the foregoing statistical study of these vascular phenomena may be briefly summarized as follows: 1. Hsemic bruits are rarely heard in healthy persons. 2. They are not often heard in persons not showing a considerable degree of ansemia. 3. They are heard in 90 per cent, of persons showing a well-marked degree of ansemia. 4. They are, therefore, of great significance in the diagnosis of this condition. Tfye Jotirijal ofthe MEDICAL SCIENCES. MONTHLY, $4.00 PER ANNUM. WITH 1892 The American Journal of the Medical Sciences enters upon its seventy- third year, still the leader of American medical magazines. In its long career it has developed to perfection the features of usefulness in its department of literature, and presents them in unrivalled attractiveness. It is the medium chosen by the leading minds of the profession on both sides of the Atlantic for the presentation of elaborate Original Articles; its Reviews are noted for discernment and absolute candor, and its Classified Summaries of Progress each month present an epitome of medical advances gleaned by specialists in the various departments. According to unquestionable authority, “It contains many original papers of the highest value; nearly all the real criticisms and reviews which we possess, and such carefully prepared summaries of the progress of medical science and notices of foreign works that from this file alone, were all other publications of the press for the last fifty years destroyed, it would be possible to reproduce the great majority of the real contributions of the world to medical science during that period.” zll\}e Medical Ne^7s* TIIE practical value of The News is proved by its continually increasing subscription list. Every method of conveying serviceable information is utilized. Leading writers, teachers, and practitioners furnish original articles, clinical lectures, and brief practical notes; hospital physicians and surgeons detail the latest approved methods developed under their enormous opportunities; progress is gleaned from the best journals of all civilized nations; a special department is assigned to important abstracts requiring ample space for adequate presenta- tion; able editorial writers deal with important questions of the day; medical literature is impartially reviewed; society proceedings are represented by the pith alone; correspondence is received from medical men in position to know all occurrences of medical importance in the districts surrounding important medical centres, and matters of interest are grouped under news items. The News, in short, is a crisp medical newspaper, a necessity to every practitioner. Its sphere is different from and complementary to that of the ideal medical magazine, The American Journal. To lead every reader of either to prove for himself the value of the two combined, the commutation rate has been fixed at the rate of $7.50 per annum. WEEKLY, $4.00 PEIl ANNUM. The Year-Book of Treatment for 1892 Gives a classified summary and review of the real advances in treatment made during 1891, in all departments of the science of medicine. Price $1.50; or in combination with either or both the above journals, 75 cents. Ready early in 1892. The Medical News Visiting1 List for 1892 Published in four styles: Weekly, dated, for 30 patients; Monthly, undated, for 120 patients per month; Perpetual, undated, for 30 patients weekly per year; Perpetual, for 60 patients weekly per year. The first three styles contain 32 pages of important data and 176 pages of assorted blanks ; the 60-patient perpetual consists of 256 pages of blanks. Price, each, $1.25. In com- bination with either or both above periodicals, 75 cents. Or, Journal, News, Visiting List and Year-Book, $8.50. Thumb-h tter index for Visiting List, 25 cents extra. LEA BROTHERS & CO., PUBL SHERS, PHILADELPHIA, 706 & 708 SANSOM STREET.