AUTHOR’S EDITION. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR. UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL SURVEY F. V HAYDEN, U. S. Geologist-in-Charge. NOTES ON THE HERPETOLOGY OF DAKOTA AND MONTANA. BY Drs. ELLIOTT COUES and H. 0. YARROW. EXTRACTED FROM THE BULLETIN OF THE SURVEY, Vol. IV, No. 1. Washington, February 5, 1878. ART. XI.—NOTES ON THE HERPETOLOGY OF DAKOTA AND MONTANA. Drs. Elliott Coues and H. C. Yarrow. The present article is based primarily upon a collection of Reptiles and Batrachians made in Dakota and Montana in 1873-74 by Dr. Coues, as Naturalist of the United States Northern Boundary Commis- sion. . In identifying these specimens, the authors have diligently compared them with other material from the same geographical area in the National Museum, and have added to the species collected by Dr. Coues others known to occur in the region under consideration, thus present- ing a tolerably complete list of the Reptiles and Batrachians of the two Territories. No species is introduced that is not fully identified and determined to inhabit this portion of the United States. Care has been taken with the synonymy to exclude doubtful references, except in one or two instances. The descriptions are drawn directly from the specimens, and considerable matter of popular interest has been intro- duced. The nomenclature and classification are mainly according to Professor Cope’s recent Check List, though the authors have not hesi- tated to difi'er from this authority on occasion. A.—REPTILIA. CIIELONIA. Family EMYDIDiE. Genus CHRYSEMYS. Gray. Chrysemys oregonensis. (Harlan) Ag, Emys oregonen8i8, Harl. Am. Jonrn. Sci. xxxi. 382, pi. 31.—Holbr. N. Am. Herpet. i. , 107, pi. 16.—DeKay, N. Y. Fn. iii. 1842, 20. Chrysemys oregonensis, Ag. Contr. Nat. Hist. U. S. i. 1857, 440, pi. 3, f. 1-3.—Bd. U. S. Mex. B. Surv. ii. pt. ii. 1859, Reptiles, 4 (Texas).—Allen, Proc. Bost. Soc. N. H. xvii. 1874, 68 (Fort Rice, Dakota). Oregon Golden Turtle. Specimen. 1096. Mouse River, Dakota. Aug. 30, 1873. Shield Reptiles are not well represented in the region surveyed by 260 BULLETIN UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. the commission, where the present, the only one observed, appears to be the most characteristic species. Professor Agassiz notices speci- mens from different localities in Minnesota and from the Yellowstone, where it was also observed by the Prince Maximilian and Mr. J. A. Allen. The former naturalist expresses great doubts respecting the accuracy of Nuttall’s statement that it is found in Oregon, as it has never been seen in that Territory by any of the recent explorers, the only true Turtle of the Pacific slopes being the Chelopus marmoratus Bd. & Grd. (Emys nigra of Hallowed). It is, however, a species of wide distribution in the central region, having been observed southward nearly to the Mexican border in Texas. The following additional species of this order are indicated by authors as occurring on or near the northern boundary:— Genus PSEUDEMYS. Gray. Pseudemys ELEGANS. {Maxim.) Elegant Terrapin. Emys elegans, Maxim. Reise Nord-Amer. i. 1839, 213 (Upper Missouri).—Hayd. TraDS. Am. Phil. Soc. xii. 1862, 177 (Yellowstone). Tracliemy8 elegans, Agass. Contrib. Nat. Hist. U. S. i. 1857, 435.—Bd. U. S. Mex. B. Surv. ii. pt.. ii. 1859, Reptiles, 3 (Texas.) Pseudemys elegans, Gray.—Cope, Check List Bat. Rept. N. A. 1875, 53. Emys cumberlandensis, Holbk. N. Am. Herpet. i. 115, pi. 118 (Tennessee).—DeKay, N. Y. Fauna, iii. 1842, 20. Emys holbrookii, Gray, Cat. Brit. Mus. 1844, 23. Emys terrapin, Wailes, Geol. Rep. Mississippi, 1854, p. — {fide Agass.). A species originally described from the Upper Missouri by Prinz Maximilian you Neu Wied, and subsequently ascertained to occur throughout the Central region, east to the Ohio, and south to Texas. Genus CISTUDO. Fleming. Cistudo ornata. Agass. Ornate Box-turtle. Cistudo ornata, Agassiz, Contrib. Nat. Hist. U. S. i. 1857, 445, pi. 3, f. 12, 13.—Cope, Check List Bat. and Rep. N. A. 1875, 53. The Northwestern type of Cistudo, Professor Agassiz remarked, in proposing C. ornata, is of all the forms the most likely to be distinct, and such has proven to be the case. *• It is round, broad, and flat, without keel, even when young, while the young of Cistudo virginea are always strongly keeled.” The species is based upon specimens from the Upper Missouri and from Iowa. CODES AND TARKOW ON HERPETOLOGY. 261 Family TRIONYCHIME. Genus ASPIDONECTES. Wagler. Aspidonectes spinifer. (Les.) Ag. Trionyx spiniferus, Le Sueur, M&n. Mus. d’Hist. Nat. xv. 258, pi. 6. Aspidonectes spinifer, Agass. Contrib. Nat. Hist. U. S. i. 1857, 403.—Cope, Check List N. A. Bat. and Rep. 1875, 51. Trionyx ocellatus, Le Sueur (young $, fide Agass.; not of DeKay, which is Amyda mutica). Trionyx ferox, partim, Aliq. The Northern and Northwestern Aspidonectes, the characters and synonymy of which were first satisfactorily distinguished from those of the Southern A.ferox by Professor Agassiz in the work above cited, is represented as a common species from New York and Pennsylvania to the Rocky Mountains, where it is mentioned as occurring by Lewis and Clarke. According to Say and Allen, it is frequently found in the trib- utaries of the Missouri; the last-named naturalist took it in the Mussel- shell and Yellowstone. (See Allen, Proc. JBost. Soc. Nat. Hist. 1874, p. 09.) Family CHELYDRIDiE. Genus CHELYDRA. Schw. Chelydra serpentina. (X.) Harl. Snapping Turtle. Testudo serpentina, Linn. Syst. Nat. ed. 12, i. 1766, 354 (localities erroneously assigned as Algiers and China). Also of other older authors.—LeC. Ann. Lyc. Nat. Hist. N. Y. iii. 127. Chelonura serpentina, Say, Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. iv. 217.—Holbr. N. Am. Herpet. 1st ed. iv. 21, pi. 3; 2d ed. i. 139, pi. 23.—DeKay, N. Y. Fn. iii. 1842, 8, pi. 3, f. 6. Emys serpentina, Gray, Syn. Rept. in Griffith’s An. Kingd. ix. 14. Chelydra serpentina, Harl. Med. & Phys. Res. 1835, 157.—Agass. Contrib. Nat. Hist. U. S. i. 1857, 417. And of most late authors.—Cope, Check List N. A. Bat. and Rep. 1875, 51. Emy8auru8 serpentina, & Bibr. Erp. G6n. ii. 350.—Storer, Rep. Mass. , 212. Chelydra emarginata, Agass. op. cit. in text. “ Chelydra lacertina, Schw.” (young). “ Testudo serrata, Penn.” “ Testudo longicauda, Shaw.” A species of remarkably extended distribution, from the Northern border of the United States to South America; not, however, in the Pacific region. 262 BULLETIN UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. OPHIDIA. Family CROTALID.E. Genus CROTALUS. Linn. Crotalus confluentus. Say. Missouri Rattlesnake. Crotalus confluentus, Say, Long’s Exped. R. Mts. ii. 1823, 48.—Bd. & Gilt. Cat. N. Am. Reptiles, 1853, 8.—Bd. Pac. R. R. Rep. x. 1859, Reptiles of Whipple’s Route, 40; pi. 24, f. 4.—Bd. U. S. and Mex. B. Surv. ii. pt. ii. Reptiles, 14.—Coop. & Suckl. Nat. Hist. Wash. Terr. Ie60, 295, pi. 12.—Cope, Check List N. A. Bat. and Rep. 1875, 33. Caudi8ona covfluenia, Cope, App. Mitchell’s Researches, 1861, 122.—Cope, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 1866, 307, 309.—Allen, Proc. Bost. Soc. N. H. xvii. 1874, 69. Crotalus lecontei, Hallow. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. vi. 1851, 180.—Hallow. Sit- greaves’s Rep. Expl. Zufii and Colorado, 1853, 13Q, 147, pi. 18.—Hallow. Pac. R. R. Rep. x. 1859, Williamson’s Route, Reptiles, 18, pi. 3. Caudi8ona lecontei, Cope, App. Mitchell’s Researches, 1861, 121.—Hayd. Trans. Am. Phila. Soc. xii. 1862, 177.—Cope, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 1866, 307. Crotalus cinereus, LeConte apud Hallow. Sitgreaves’s Rep. Expl. Zufii and Colorado 1853, 140 (in text). Specimens. 1149. Sweet Grass Hills, Montana. , July 29,1874. 1150. Sweet Grass Hills, Montana. July 29,1874. 1197. Black Could, near Teton River, Montana. Sept. 6, 1874. 1198. Black Could, near Teton River, Montana. Sept. 6, 1874. 1199. Black Could, near Teton River, Montana. Sept. 6, 1874. The ascribed characters of G. lecontei, as compared with C. conflu- entus, are found not to hold good when sufficient series are examined. The number of superior labials in our specimens, and in others from the Yellowstone, ranges from thirteen to sixteen, while in others eighteen are described. Certain ascribed features of coloration are altogether uncertain, as specimens vary interminably in the distinctness of the dorsal blotches and in the details of the light markings about the head. This appears to be due in part to age, as the smaller specimens are usually the most boldly blotched, while on some of the largest examined the markings are nearly obsolete. These statements are fully borne out by our experience, we having noticed in this particular species that the blotching cannot be relied upon as a distinctive character, as in some individuals, notably from localities where the color of the soil is light, the blotches in some instances are barely perceptible; moreover, the forms of the blotches vary indefinitely, as some are serrated on their borders, others present an unbroken line. The distinctness of the pat- tern of coloration also depends somewhat upon seasou, the markings being clearest just after the shedding of the skin. There is certainly no specific difference between the two supposed species, and vari- COUES AND YARROW ON HERPETOLOGY. 263 etui distinction can hardly be predicated, at least upon the characters as yet adduced. In any event, the specimens above enumerated are the true 0. covfluentus of Say. Two of these are of unusual size, being both over four feet in length, a dimension near the known maximum of this species, though less than that of some others. The average length is less than three feet, and the calibre of the body, even in the largest examples, is relatively inferior to that of several Southern species. The number of rattles in this and other species, though of course increas- ing with age, is not an infallible clue to the age of a speciraeu ; for, acci- dental variation aside, it is far from proven that an annual increase by one is regular. On the contrary, the growth of the organ must depend largely, as in all parallel cases, upon the vigor of the individual, which is not the same at all periods of life, granting even a continuous state of perfect health. The purpose subserved in the economy of the ani- mal by this singular organ has been the subject of much speculation and discussion. It is difficult to perceive of what use the rattle can be, either in procuring prey or avoiding enemies. We do not know that it comes into play at all in the pursuit of prey, while the actual result of its use as a menace in sell-defence is the reverse of beneficial to the serpent, since the sound serves to direct and provoke attack from all enemies which the animal has occasion to fear. The theory that the rattle is a part of the serpent’s means of terrifying its intended victim, used as an adjunct of other supposed powers of fascination, may be safely held in check until it is proven that this peculiar influence is ever exerted to the extent of preventing its prey lrom seeking safety in flight. The notion that the rattle is intended to serve as a warning, and thus offset the venomous nature and highly dangerous powers of the serpent, is contrary to all analogy, since animals are endowed with attributes for their own good, irrespective of the result upon others, and would re- quire a faith in the intervention, for the benefit of the dominant species of the Mammalia, of special Providences, a belief now held by few thought- ful persons. It has been suggested that the rattle may be used to call the sexes together, and thus servo a useful purpose in the perpetuation of the species,—a hypothsis less untenable than some of the others which have been advanced. Another supposition, made irrespective of u final causes”, is, that the rattle has resulted, in the course of time, from the continual agitatiou of the caudal extremity of these highly nervous and irritable creatures, and that it has no special function. This seems not unreasonable, although, in view particularly of the fact that rattlesnakes alone, of the many equally or more venomous reptiles, have such ap- pendage, it is not entirely satisfactory. One thoroughly established fact concerning the rattle is that its practical operation is injurious to its possessor by provoking attack from those who can cope with it success- fully. It may be suggested, that inasmuch as to an unpracticed ear the rattle of the Crotalus cannot be distinguished from the crepitation of the large Western grasshopper, it may serve the purpose of attracting 264 BULLETIN UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. witbin reach of the fangs of the snake the many birds who greedily de- vour these insects. The rattle has been heard at times when no apparent cause of irritation to the snake existed, and a case has been reported in which a biped was drawn within reach of a rattler, thinking it a grass- hopper. The principal enemies of the rattlesnake, besides man, are wild hogs, peccaries, and deer. The latter kill the serpent when coiled by striking with the hoofs; the former attack it successfully with hoofs and teeth, and in some regions derive no small part of their subsistence from this source. The popular belief that the venom of the rattlesnake is innoc- uous to hogs is merely a partial statement of the fact that the fluid usu- ally fails to enter the circulation through the layer of adipose tissue with which these animals are commonly covered. The venom is con- ceded to be innocuous when introduced to the stomach, and the flesh of the rattlesnake is as edible as that of other serpents. The fatality of the rattlesnake's bite is by no means the constant element generally supposed, but the result may vary from the slightest amount of poison- ing to one rapidly fatal. This depends altogether upon the amount of venom absorbed in the system, and the rapidity of its diffusion through the circulation, matters which turn upon the amount of venom in store at the moment of striking, the vigor of the auimal at the time, the pen- etration of the tooth, the part of the body struck, and, finally, the state of health of the person attacked. No positive specific antidote is kuown. Surgical means of preventing dispersion of the poison through the system, and alcoholic stimulation to the highest pitch, are the usual resorts. It may not be out of place to refer in this connection to the inter- esting mechanism of the poison apparatus, as it is a matter not very generally known as yet, though clearly set forth by the researches of specialists, notably Dr. S. Weir Mitchell. The venomous fluid to be injected iuto a wound made by the teeth has nothing to do with the ordinary saliva, as popularly supposed; nor does the forked tongue or any of the numerous small teeth of the mouth take part in the infliction of the wound. The tongue and smaller teeth are essentially the same as in any harmless serpent. The active instruments are a pair of fangs.* one on each side of the upper jaw, rooted in the maxillary bones, which bear no other teeth. The fangs vary in size, being sometimes half an inch long. They are somewhat conical and scythe-shaped, with an extremely fine point; the convexity looks forward, the point downward and backward. The fang is hollow, for transmission of the venom ; but *It may be mentioned, as a fact of some interest, that, while in C. confluenlus the fan