Armored Medical Research Laboratory Port Knox, Kentucky Fourth Partial Report On PROJECT NO. T-5 - TEST OF FLaMEPROOFED CLOTHING Subject: Test of Physiological Heat Load of Flameproofed Clothing Project No. T-5 28 September 1945 ARMORED MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY Fort Knox, Kentucky 28 September 1945 SPMEA 727-2 Project No. T-5 10 PROJECT: No0 T-5 - Test of Flameproofed Clothing, Fourth Partial Report, Subject: Test of Physiological Heat Load of Flameproofed Clothing0 a0 Authority: Letter Headquarters Army Ground Forces, Washington, D.C., File 426 (9 Sept. 1945) GNRQT-ll/40812, dated 9 Sept. 1945- b0 Purpose: To determine the physiological heat load induced by the wearing of flameproofed clothinge 2C DISCUSSION; This report is a continuation of the studies on the influence of wearing flameproofed garments on the ability of men to work in hot environ-* mentSo In the present tests, a new type of commercial flameproofing, '’Ban- flame, n was evaluated from the standpoint of heat load and general accept- ability to troopso 3. CONCLUSIONS: Herringbone twill uniforms made of cloth impregnated by the !5Banflame!f ADG process do not impose any greater load on acclimatized men than ordinary herringbone twill* Tests were performed at both hot dry (D.B, 120°F», V?,B0 8o°F., R.Hc 26%) and hot humid (D0B. 880Fo, W«B. 84°F0, R.H, B$%) environments0 U o RECOMMENDATIONS; That if field tests show the garment to have satisfactory durability, "Banflame" treated uniforms be considered suitable for issue0 APPROVED / S WILLED MaCuLE Colonel, Medical Corps C omraanding Submitted by: Steven M, Horvath, Major, SnC Walter B. Shelley, Captain, MC Assisted by: Howard Golden, Tec 3 John Eo Wagar, Tec 3 Arthur F. Kunes, Tec 3 James P. Stack, Tec 3 Kenneth C. Davis, Tec 3 Robert A. Kleinmann, Tec 4 William J0 Robinson, Tec 5 James W, Gregg, P-4 3 Incise #1 - Appendix #2 - Tables 1-2 #3 - Photographs 1-2 APPENDIX 10 SUBJECTS, EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES: This investigation was conducted in the laboratory hot room during August and September 1945* Twelve normal healthy soldiers were studied. Their ages ranged from 2C to 31 years (average 25)j heights from 6? to 71 inches (average 69)j weight from ,135 to 190 pounds (average 155) and surface areas from 1,7 to 2,0 square meters (average l09)o The clothing was tested on men in two different environments which were representative of two types of hot climates9 Eo Hot dry - D.B. 120°F., W.B0 86°Fo, R.H0 26% b« Hot humid - D0B, 8S°F0, W.B. 84°F0, R.H0 B$% Throughout the tests, the dry and wet bulb temperatures were measured every fifteen minutes with four motor-driven fan psychrometers at a level of four feet from the floor* The values rarely varied from the desired dry or wet bulb temperature by more than I°Fo The temperature of the walls, floor and ceiling was measured twice daily. In the 120°F environment the average of J,hese measurements was 116 J 1°F0 and in the 88°F. environment the average was 87 f Ce3°Fo A mildly -turbulent air movement in all parts of the room resulted from the combination of hot air inflow from four anemostats in the ceiling and four 16-inch fans operating on the floor in the center of the room. Wind velocity was not measured but was essentially that produced by the movement of the men marching at 3 mph0 The men lived in barracks and were in the hot room five hours each day<> The standard test work consisted of carrying a 20-pound pack and walking for four continuous hours at 2*9 mph around a 67-foot track in the hot room* This work rate was previously determined to be approximately 250 Calories per hour. Acclimatization to the heat was achieved by having the men march in the hot room for 25 days before the clothing was tested. Afternoon marches were taken to maintain physical fitness0 All water drunk during the test periods was solution of sodium chloride. In the 120°Fo environment the saline solution was kept at a tempera- ture of 96°Fj in the 88°F, environment, it was kept at 88°F* "Banflamc** is the trade name for a commercial flameproofing process" formulated by Joseph Bancroft and Sons Company. It is applied to the uncut fabric. The specific treatment received by the cloth of the garments tested was the "Banflame ADG process n which imparts a launder resistant flameproof ing which is satisfactory* The ADG process is an improvement over the former mixture Impregnation. Inclo #1 Bancroft processes which have been tested at other laboratories (1,2), The add-on is approximately 20%o Tests of tensile strength have revealed it to be somewhat impaired by this impregnation. The significance of this finding is being studied elsewhere. This clothing protects against flame alone and affords no gas-proofing. It is superior to other flameproofed garments tested in that the after-glow is negligible. A Latin Square method of testing was used. Each of the men wore new unlaundered herringbone twill fatigues which had been treated with the "Banflame” flamcproofing and new untreated herringbone twill uniforms once in each of the two environments. The clothing was always worn in the same manner; trouser legs tucked inside of the pulled up socks, jacket shirt tucked into the waist of the trousers, and top button of the jacket buttoned. This affords greatest protec- tion against flame and since it reduces bellows action of clothing, these tests were carried out with the clothing Imposing a maximum heat load at the given environment, o Upon arrival in the morning, the men remained in a room at 75 F. until individually called into the hot room B-10 minutes before beginning to walk. Each roan entered the hot room completely nude, urinated, dried off any sweat present and was weighed (within 10 grams). Simultaneously the jacket and trousers he was to wear (placed in the hot room 30-45 minutes earlier) wore individually weighed (with-in 5 grams). The subject quickly dressed in these garments and stood erect 4 minutes during which the heart rate, rectal temperature and skin temperature were determined. He then began marching. During the walking period all water drunk, urine voided, and vomitus were carefully measured. At hourly intervals, the heart rate, rectal temperature and skin temperature were measured. He then stripped completely, urinated, dried off all of the sweat and was weighed. At the same time his removed clothing was weighed. Throughout the entire test, records were kept of the general appearance and reactions of the men. The skin temperature of five areas of the body, three covered and two uncovered (chest, forearm, calf, cheek, palm) were determined with a radiometer. For clothed areas, the clothing was pushed aside just sufficiently to permit placing of the radiometer. Undue exposure of clothed areas was avoided. The skin temperatures of individual areas were integrated into an average skin temperature by the following weighting formula based on the original formula of Hardy: chest, 0.44; forearm, 0.14; calf, 0,23; cheek, O.lOj palm, 0C09. Henceforth the term skin temperature will refer to this weighted average skin temperature. Rectal temperatures were measured with calibrated rectal thermometers. 1, NRC Project QMC, No. 27, July Progres-s Report., dated 10 August 1945o 20 Clothing, H.B.T., Effect of Flameproof Treatment on;Climatic Research Laboratory, Provisional Reports I-IVj Test No. 155, dated 24 May, 4 June, 14 June, 1 August 1945o lad. #1 20 RESULTS: a. Heat, Load at a High Dry Bulb Temperature: D.B. 120°F., W.B. S6°F., R.H. 26% This environment simulated that found in buttoned-up tanks operat- ing in the summer at Camp Polk. The humidity is higher than that found in desert environments. The responses of the men working at this temperature show that Impregnation imposed no added heat load on the men (Table 1). b0 Heat Load at a Lower Dry Bulb Temperature: D.30 S3°F0, W.B„ 34°F., R.K. 35% This environment simulates a typical tropical environment. Again the response of the men indicated that the Impregnation imposed no added heat load (Table 2)c Co Physical Characteristics of the Clothing; The "Banflame" clothing is almost indistinguishable from untreated herringbone twill in appearance (Photographs No. 1 and 2). Similar patterns in' sweat uptake by the clothing occurred in both environments0 The sweat uptake characteristics of the "Banflame” garment are very similar to those of the herringbone twill uniform. The following table represents the average data on 12 men and their clothing. TEST CLOTHING AVERAGE OF FOUR-HOUR SWEAT LOSS PER MAN (GRAMS) UPTAKE OF SWEAT (GRAMS) PERCENT OF TOTAL SWEAT IN GARMENT Do3o 120° WoB0 86° Flameproof ed Uniform \ 6,923 862 12 Herringbone Twill Uniform 7,035 883 13 DoBo 88© Wo3o 84° Flameproofed Unif orm 3,601 1,004 28 Herringbone Twill Uniform 3,300 1,037 31 Inclo #1 do Acceptability to Men; of the twelve subjects stated that they preferred wearing the ”3anflame" garments to wearing ordinary untreated herringbone twill uniforms. None of the men had any complaints concerning the garment. The subjective reactions of the men are of importance in view of the fact that in combat the men can wear or discard any item of clothing at will. e0 Flameproof tjalities: Preliminary tests have indicated that herringbone twill fabrics impregnated by phosphate-urea mixtures not only have superior flameproof qualities, but are glowproof0* These qualities are maintained following laundering and im- mersion in sea water. As no information was available regarding the possible effect of large amounts of sweat in leaching out the impregnation, the garments used in this test were sent to the Climatic Research Laboratory of the Quarter- master General,, It is understood that this organization-will report on the flameproof and glowproof qualities of the worn clothing in the near future„ * The Flameproofing of Army Clothing. July Progress Report: 1945 N0R0C0, Project CMC, No, 2?0 National Research Council Laboratories, Columbia University, N„ Y0 Inclo #1 4 CLOTHING al RECTAL TEMPERATURE °F PULSE RATE/lOK, SKIN (Avg. °r tm, Wtg.) VEIGHT LOSS (Sweat) Gm/Hr, 0 1 Hours 2 3 4 0 1 Hours 2 3 4 Init. 4 Hr. -!5l Abb 98 08 100.5 100.5 100.6 100.9 90 123 in 102 in 96,6 97-0 ££86 a o Aar 98„6 100.9 100.9 101.1 100.7 102 117 126 120 n7 97.1 98,3 1689 a Dig 98,0 100.0 100.1 100.0 100.1 87 117 120 114 U7 96.4 96,1 1722 § I nr 98,3 100.3 lOOol 100.0 99.9 87 102 120 n? 120 96.8 96.5 1678 Mam 98.6 100.9 101.1 101.3 101.4 96 120 n? 123 129 96,4 97-3 1624 d H Mar 97-9 100.4 100,5 99.9 100.3 105 114 n? 120 120 96.9 96,9 1525 Mcb 98.6 100.0 100.5 100.5 100.6 99 123 126 120 106 96.4 98.6 1300 Mol 98.0 100.4 100.3 100.3 100.3 102 114 U4 108 in 97-4 98.1 1271 Moo 97-7 100,6 100,6 100.6 100.3 96 123 120 in 117 98.3 98.2 1452 S peb 98.2 100.7 100,8 100.5 100.3 105 117 U4 114 126 97-4 97-9 1788 Ibo 98.3 101.0 100.7 100.6 100.4 99 120 105 in n? 97.6 98.7 1624 l Wes 98.4 100.0 100.1 100.1 100.0 102 117 108 n4 114 96.8 96.0 1792 s AVG, 98.3 100.$ 100.5 100.5 100.4 98 117 n7 ns 117 97-0 97-5 1645 Abb 98.3 100.1 100.4 100,3 10C.4 87 108 U7 108 105 96,8 95,6 2158 Aur 98.8 100.2 100.4 100.2 100.2 102 117 108 108 n? 97<>3 96,8 1400 Dig 98.0 100.3 100.6 100.3 100.0 99 114 126 n? 114 96,3 96,3 1755 _3 Irw 97.9 99,7 99.6 99.7 99.6 96 120 n7 114 123 97.1 97-0 1393 H Mam 99-1 101.5 ica.4 101.6 101.7 99 120 120 114 123 97-0 97.0 1872 Mar 98o0 100.6 100.8 100.5 100.2 99 120 n? m 120 96.9 98.0 1665 Q 8 Mcb 99.1 100.4 100.6 ica.i 101.1 102 120 126 126 129 96.8 98.5 1359 M ■< Mol 98,3 100.2 100.0 99.9 99.8 102 111 n? 114 114 97.9 98-4 1472 8C Moo 98.1 100.9 100.7 100.7 100.6 102 123 123 126 U7 97.4 96.9 1436 es Peb 98.1 100.4 100.1 100,0 100.0 96 120 n7 n? n4 97.6 96,1 2058 g o Hio 98.6 100.4 100.4 100.4 100.4 96 in 120 120 123 96.6 98.4 1471 pr, Wes 98.6 100.3 100.0 100.1 99-9 114 120 126 123 120 97-2 97.0 1865 AYG. 98-4 100.4 100.4 100,4 100.3 99 U7 120 n? 1IB 97-1 97.2 1659 Hie Physiologic Responses of Working Men Clothed in Flameproofed and Standard Herringbone Twill D.B, 120°F - W.B. 86°F - R.H. 26% TABLE I TAHLE I 8 1 M RECTAL TEMPERATURE °F PULSE RAIE/km. SKIN TEMP. (ATgoWtg.) °P WEIGHT L0S£ (Sweat) * 0 1 Hours 2 3 4 0 1 Hours 2 3 4 Init. 4 Hr. Gm/Hr. Abb 15X ~J97F 99.1 99.^ 9$o9 1C* 99 93 96 WPT 94.1 “1313 m Aur 98.6 99.7 99.6 99.5 99.6 90 93 90 99 93 95.0 94.0 597 H-4 O PM M Dig 98.0 99.3 99.5 99.4 99.6 90 90 90 96 93 93.6 94.3 970 I nr 98.7 99.6 99.5 99.6 99.6 102 99 99 93 96 93.6 93.8 ?6B s Mcb 99.1 100,0 100.3 100.5 100.8 11? 99 99 111 117 93.8 95.1 655 d Mam 98,7 100o5 100.5 100.6 100,5 117 120 117 11? 114 94.7 94.7 761 M tH £ Mar 98.4 98.9 99.6 99.4 99.6 96 96 99 99 96 94.6 94.0 652 Mol 98.A 99.6 99,6 99.9 100o0 93 99 93 84 84 95,2 94.5 6?0 M Moo 98ol 99.8 99.9 99.9 100,2 8? 93 87 34 87 94.3 94.0 802 Peb 98.1 99.5 99.6 99.6 99.7 102 102 99 102 108 93.2 94.7 639 Bio 98o7 99.6 99.5 99.4 99.5 96 90 8? a? 93 93.6 94.4 715 l Wes 96o3 99.5 99.7 99.7 99.7 105 106 105 93 93 94.1 93 oO 89 8 1 AVG, 9805 99.6 99.8 99.8 99.9 98 99 97 96 98 94.1 94.2 789 Abb 98.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 100o2 90 105 99 99 99 92.7 94.0 1513 Aur 96.5 99.7 99.9 99.6 99.7 90 96 96 99 96 95.1 94,8 623 Dig 98,0 99.3 99.9 99.4 99.6 99 105 102 102 99 92.3 94.1 994 g I nr Mcb 98,3 99.4 99.3 - ILLKE33 - 99.5 99.5 84 96 99 99 99 94.0 93.2 691 9* &#» Mam 99,6 100.5 100.9 lOloO 101.1 111 117 117 120 120 94.8 94.8 910 Mar 98,6 99.7 99.9 100.1 99.9 105 105 96 96 99 95.1 94.0 705 Mol 96.3 99.5 99.6 99.6 99.8 93 90 96 99 96 94.9 93.8 621 O 9 g Moo 97.6 100.1 100.2 100,1 100,0 8? 99 102 99 99 94.2 94.8 810 P4 m Oh O is Peb 98.6 99,8 100,0 100.1 100,1 99 H4 105 102 105 94.5 94.4 792 Bio 99.1 99.8 99.5 99.7 99.8 96 102 93 93 93 93.8 94.3 762 < CQ Wes 98.5 99.7 100.0 99.7 99.4 96 99 105 105 105 95.2 93.1 857 ' AVG o 98.5 99.8 99.9 99.9 99.9 95 102 101 ICQ. ICQ. 94.2 94.1 843 Hie Physiologic Responses of Working l-en Clothed in Fla»eproofed and Standard Herringbone Twill D.B. BS°F - W.B. 8U°F - R.H. 85% TABLE II TABLE II New herringbone twill uniforms before (left) and after (right) four hears of wear at 120®P, - S6°P. ARMORED MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY Project No. T-$ FORT KNOX. ICY. Photograph #1 New "Banflame" flameproofed herringbone twill uniform before (left) and after (right) four hours of wear at 120°”. - 8fc°F. ARMORED MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY Project No. T-5 FORT KNOX. KY. Photograph j/2