Armored Force Medical. Research Laboratory Fort Knox, Kentucky PROJECT NO. 3 - TOXIC GASES IN ARMORED VEHICLES Final Report On Sub-Project No, 3“15 - Determination of the Characteristics and Effects Upon tiie Crew of Gun Fumes from Firing of the Weapons in the M4A4E1 Tank Project No. 3-15 April 29, 1943 ARMORED FORCE MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY Fort Knox, Kentucky Project NOo 3-15 7U9o2-12 GNOML April 29, 19143 1„ PROJECT: No. 3 - Toxic Gases in Armored Vehicles. Final Report on: Sub-Project No. 3-15, Determination of the Characteristics and Effects Upon the Crew of Gun Fumes from Firing of the Weapons in the Tanko a« Authority - Letter, Commanding General, Headquarters Armored Force, Fort Knox, Kentucky, U00.112/6 GNOHD, dated September 2k, 19h2, b0 Purpose - To determine the extent of the hazard from fumes re- leased by"*firing of the weapons in the MliAliEl tank with 103>mra howitzer. 2. DISCUSSION: a. Methods and Conditions of Test. (1) Fire Pattern: (a) 105mm Howitzer: The piece vras fired at the rate of one (1) round every 10 seconds in bursts of 5° Three such bursts were fired at 5 minute intervals. Total, 15 rounds. (b) Machine Guns: The bow machine gun was not fired since the piece and mounting are the same as in other tanks of the Mlj series, previously reported (See Report on Sub-project 3-1, 3-5, February l£, 19U3). Three belts of 100 rounds each were fired from the turret machine gun in a total of 8 minutes. Each belt was expended in approximately two minutes0 (2) Ammunition: 105 mm; ammunition 50-50, shell Ml; machine gun, caliber o30 ball. (3) Tank Operation: Tank buttoned-up and motor running at normal idling speecL Full crew in -tank. Wind, 6 mph quartering lf>0°. (U) Analysis; Air samples were analyzed for carbon monoxide and ammonia; bloods taken from the crew members before and after firing were analyzed for carbon monoxide hemoglobin. Details of the analytical procedures may be found in the report on Sub-projects No. 3-1, 3-5, February 15, 19U3<» Results of the present test are presented in the Appendix. 3, CONCLUSIONS: a• Howitzer: (I) Of the crew, the loader is exposed to the highest carbon monoxide concentration The blood of the loader showed an increase of carbon monoxide hemoglobin during the firing of 15 rounds0 (2) The other turret crew members encounter lower concentrations of carbon monoxide, while exposure of the men in the bow is negligible* (3) Irritation of the eyes and nose was experienced by the loader with ammonia concentrations of 16£ and 290 ppm. (U) There was no accumulation of carbon monoxide or fumes from one burst to another« ($) Under the conditions of these tests atmospheric conditions in the turret were not satisfactory 0 The efficiency of the crew was impaired by the ammonia and other irritating fumes and a definite hazard from*carbon monoxide was presento More effective turret ventilation is neededo bo Turret Machine Gun: (1) The average concentration of carbon monoxide exceeded 0*2% at all turret crew positions during the firing of the turret machine gun0 At the loader's position the concentration was above 0.3*. (2) Although the test lasted only 8 minutes (being terminated then because of danger to the crew) and only 300 rounds were fired, high concentrations of carbon monoxide were found in the blood of the turret crew members, the increase ranging from 11 to 1%% during the test* . (3) Ammonia and other fumes built up to such high levels in the turret during firing that the turret crew members were unable to execute their normal tasks effectively, (U) The serious problem presented by the turret machine gun results from the manner of mounting the gun with its muzzle some distance back of the mantlet. As a result, noxious gases escaping from the muzzle as well as from the breech are drawn into the turret. U. RECOMMENDATIONS; a. 105 ram Howitzer0 (1) That independent exhaust ventilation be provided in the turret for the control of fumes from the 105mm howitzer, (See Report on Control of Gun Fumes in Mil Series Medium Tanks, Sub-Projects No, 3-1, 3-5, Eeb. 15, 19it3)„ (2) That the turret machine gun be mounted in such a manner as to prevent entry of fumes from the gun muzzle into the turret0 Prepared by: Captain Norton Nelson, SnC Captain Steven M. Horvath, SnC Captain Ludwig Eichna, MC Lieutenant Robert Walpole, SnC APPROVED WILLARD MACHLE, Colonel, Medical Corps, Commanding. 3 Incl. #1 - Appendix 1 #2 - Tables 1, 2, & 3 #3 - Fig. 1, v 2 APPENDIX 1 Results lo 105mm Howitzer: The problem of gun fumes from the howitzer is of the same order of magnitude as from the 75mm gun in the standard MiiAli tank, in spite of the fact that a greater quantity of toxic gas is produced by the larger piece (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Offsetting the higher CO production is an increased air movement through the turret resulting from the less tightly fitting gun mount0 Evidence of better ventilation is seen in the more rapid clearance rate in the MiiAliElj 12 seconds (Table 1) as compared with 50 seconds in standard MliAli. The greater work entailed in loading the heavier ammunition makes the situation of the loader somewhat more serious in the case of the subject tank than when operating the 75mm piece. The increased lung ventilation resulting from the higher work rate leads to more rapid accumulation of carbon monoxide in the bloodo Thus, in a 15 minute exposure the CO hemoglobin increased to Hi. (Table 3) whereas in the standard MliAli the blood concentration was only 22% after 30 minute exposure to approximately the same atmospheric concentra- tion of COo 2. Turret Machine Gun: Conditions were so severe during firing of the turret machine gun that the trial was stopped after only 300 rounds had been fired* It is estimated from the blood concentrations of carbon monoxide (Table 3) that had the standard test (1000 rds) been completed serious carbon monoxide poisoning, and possibly unconsciousness, would have resulted. The high blood carbon monoxide content reflects the extreme atmospheric concentrations to which the crew were exposed (Table 2 and Figure 2) The highly hazardous situation presented by this weapon results from the trapping of muzzle fumes directly behind the mantlet and subsequent collection in the turret* The gun muzzle is practically within the turret; the barrel terminates some distance behind the mantlet and the turret opening through which it passes is large. Thus, a considerable portion of the muzzle fumes are drawn into the turret with the inflowing air. It is doubtful if the difficulty can be corrected by increased ventilation. The gun should be remounted so as to extend through the mantlet or a large enough opening provided in the shield to insure outward escape of the muzzle gases. Incl. //I TABLE 1 CONCENTRATIONS OF CARBON MONOXIDE AND ANMONIA From Howitzer - Peak Concentrations at End of Burst Carbon Monoxide, Percent Ammonia, p.p.ra After 2nd Burst 0.1*33 290 After 3rd Burst Oo277 165 Aver. Concentration by Cont. Sampling Loader 0.110 Commander 0.06Ii Gunner 0.037 Clearance Rate after 2nd burst (Time for Cone* to decrease 5>0$) 12 seconds TABLE 2 CONCENTRATIONS OF CARBON MONOXIDE AND AMMONIA From Turret Machine Gun Peak Concentrations at End of Belt Carbon Monoxide, Ammonia, Percent p.p.m During 1st Belt 0.ij66 180 During 3**d Belt 0.376 110 Aver. Concentration by Cont, Sampling Loader 0.336 Commander 0.2 Uh Gunner Oo2l8 Tncl. f2 TABLE 3 CARBON MONOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS IN BLOOD OF ORE?/ MEMBERS gEii;--; - CRM MEMBER CO Hemoglobin as % of Total Pigment Before Exposure After Exposure Increase 10£ am Howitzer * Loader 1.9 16.5 1U.6 Commander 1.1 3.0 1.9 Gunner 0.0 5.0 5.0 Driver 3.U U.o 0.6 Asst. Driver U.2 JU.8 0.6 Turret Mo G• Loader 0.2 15.3 15.1 Commander 0.9 13.2 12.3 Gunner 0o2 11.6 n.i* Driver — 5o0 ** Asst. Driver ** 1.8 — ♦ 1$ Minute Exposure *-* 8 Minute Exposure Fig. I CARBON MONOXIDE CONCENTRATION FROM 105 MM HOWITZER Fig. 2 CARBON MONOXIDE CONCENTRATION FROM THE TURRET MACHINE GUN LEGEND PEAK CONG. DIE AWAY CONG CONG. BY MS A AVG. CONG. RDS. FIRED .LOADER COMMANDER CARBON MONOXIDE PERCENT CARBON MONOXIDE PERCENT GUNNEK MINUTES MINUTES Fig. I Fig. 2 ina. #3