BACTERIA AND THEIR INFLUENCE UPON THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF SEPTIC COMPLICATIONS OF WOUNDS. A1 BY L. A. STIMSON, M. I)., NEW YORK. WOOD PRIZE ESSAY OF THE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF BELLEVUE HOSPITAL MEDICAL COLLEGE, 1875. |REPRINTED FROM THE NEW YORK MEDICAL JOURNAL. AUGUST.\ 1S75.] NEW YORK: D. APPLETON AND COMPANY, 5 4 9 & 5 5 1 BROADWAY. 1875. THE POPULAR SCIENCE MONTHLY, (Established May, 1872,) Conducted by Prof. E. L. YOUMANS. The Popular Science Monthly was started to promote the diffusion of valuable sci- entific knowledge, in a readable and attractive form, among all classes of the community, and has thus far met a want supplied by no other periodical in the United States. The great feature of the magazine is, that its contents are not what science was ten or more years since, but what it is to-day, fresh from the study, the laboratory, and the experiment: clothed in the language of the authors, inventors, and scientists themselves, which comprise the leading minds of England, France, Germany, and the United States. Among popular articles, covering the whole range of Natural Science, we have the latest thoughts and words of Herbert Spencer, and Professors Huxley, Tyndall, and R. A. Proctor. Since the start, it has proved a gratifying success to every friend of scientific progress and universal education; and those who believed that science could not be made any thing but dry study are disappointed. The press all over the land is warmly commending it. We subjoin a few encomiums from those recently given: “ That there is a place for The Popular Science Monthly, no one can doubt who has watched the steady increase of interest in scientific investigation manifested in this country, not only by a select class, but by the entire community.”—New York Times. “A journal which promises to be of eminent value to the cause of popular education in this country.”—New York Tribune. “It is, beyond comparison, the best attempt at journalism of the kind ever made in this country.” —Home Journal. “The initial number is admirably constituted.” —Evening Mail. “We think it is not too much to say that this is the best first number of any magazine ever pub- lished in America.”—Yew York World. “ It is just what is wanted by the curious and progressive mind of this country, and ought to be widely circulated.”—New York 'Evening Post. “ It is the first successful attempt in this country to popularize science in the pages of a monthly.”— N. Y. School Journal. “Not the less entertaining because it is instruc- tive.”—Philadelphia Age. “ The Monthly has more than fulfilled all the promises which the publishers made in the pro- spectus of publication.”—Niagara Falls Gazette. “ It places before American readers what the ablest men of science throughout the world write about their meditations, speculations, and discov- eries.”—Providence Journal. . “ This is a highly-auspicious beginning of a use- ful and much-needed enterprise in the way of pub- lication, for which the public owe a special debt of obligation to Messrs. D. Appleton & Co.”—Boston Gazette. “ This new enterprise appeals to all who are in- terested in the laudable effort of diffusing that in- formation which is best calculated to expand the mind and improve the conditions and enhance the worth of life.”—Golden Age. “dust the publication needed at the present day.”—Montreal Gazette. ' •• This new magazine, in our estimation, has more merit than the whole brood which have preceded it.”—Oswego Press. “ In our opinion, the right idea has been happily hit in the plan of this new monthly.”—Buffalo Courier. “This is one of the very best periodicals of its kind published in the world. Its corps of contribu- tors comprise many of the ablest minds known to science and literature. It is doing a great and noble work in popularizing science, promoting the growth of reason, and leveling the battlements of old su- perstitions reared in the childhood of our race be- fore it was capable of reasoning.”—The American Medical Journal, St. Louis, Mo. “This magazine is worth its weight in gold, for its service in educating the people.”—Th£ American Journal of Education. St. Louis, Mo. “This'monthly enables us to utilize at least sev- eral years more of life than it would be possible were we obliged to wait its publication in book-form at the hands of some compiler.”— The Writing Teacher and Business Advertiser, New York. The Popular Science Monthly is published in a large octavo, handsomely printed on clear type, and, when the subjects admit, fully illustrated. Each number contains 128 pages. Terms: $3 per Annum, or Fifty Cents per Number. Postage free to all Subscribers in the United States, from January 1, 1875. A new volume of the Popular Science begins with the numbers for May and Novem- ber each year. Subscriptions may commence from any date. Back numbers supplied. 7lead'll, l ols. I., II., III., IV., V., and VI., of The Popular Science Month— liembracing the Numbers from 1 to 36 (May, 1ST2, to April, 18T5). 6 vols., Svo. Cloth. *3.50 per vot Half Morocco, $6.50 per vol. ’ 1 ’ ’ 1 For Sale, Binding Cases for Vols. I., II,, III., IV., V., and VI., of The Copular Science Monthly. These covers are prepared expressly for binding the volumes of Tiik Popular Monthly as they appear, and will be sent to Subscribers on receipt of price. Any binder can atta.cn the covers at a trifling* expense. Price, 50 cents each. AGENTS WANTED. Ar>rRESS D. APPLETON $• CO., Publishers, 549 & 551 Broadway, New York. Fig. 1. Coccos: a, gliacoccos ; b, free micrococcos ; c. streptococcos (of Billroth), “ vibrio d, spirillum, from putrefying organic solution. Fig. 2. a. Germinative spores opening; b. the contained coccos lengthening into bacteria : c, scission of bacteria and escape of one joint as act ually observed (Billroth). Fig. 3. Ascococeos: a, with thin wall, one is broken ; b. husks (Billroth). Fig. 4. a, Ordinary bacteria as seen with a power of about 200 diameters ; b. the same after addition of tincture of fuchsine. Fig. 5. Development of Ascoooccos parvu* (green mould), under a leakin'; faucet (Billroth). BACTERIA AND THEIK INFLUENCE UPON THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF SEPTIC COMPLICATIONS OF WOUNDS. BY L. A. STIMSON, M. D., NEW YORK. WOOD PRIZE ESSAY OF THE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF BELLEVUE HOSPITAL MEDICAL COLLEGE, 1875. |REPRINTED FROM THE NEW YORK MEDICAL JOURNAL, AUGUST, 1875.] NEW YORK: D. APPLETON AND COMPANY, 549 & 551 BROADWAY. 1875. BACTERIA AND THEIR INFLUENCE UPON THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF SEPTIC COMPLICATIONS OF WOUNDS. “ II s’agit ici de la penetration de substances coagulables d’origine ani- male ou v6g6tale en voie de putrefaction, de principes resultant de leur decomposition isomerique qui sont entrain6s par la vapeur d’eau en sus- pension dans l’atmospbere. . . . ”—Ohaki.es Robin, p. 239. Living organisms, microscopical in size, of the simplest, most elementary nature, and moving freely in different liquids, have been known to observers for nearly two hundred years. Scientific classification and description were long impossible on account of the meagre facilities furnished by the microscopes of the last century, but during the last fifty years the means of observation have been so much improved, and the number of observers has been so great, that the advance in our knowl- edge of microscopical organisms compares favorably with that in other branches in science. This advance has been greatly stimulated by a tendency to see in low vegetable organisms the exciting cause of many diseases, and the supporters of the theory of “Animate Pathology” have increased, by their attempts to classify these organisms according to their sup- posed pathological qualities, a confusion in the nomenclature which has existed almost from the beginning, and is none the less to be regretted, although it is easily explained by the great difficulties in the way of accurate observation, study, and description. To-day we are all familiar with the names bacteria and vibrio, and associate with them small microscopical bodies, round, oval, or rod-like and jointed, varying in length from 0.0005 mm. to 0.01 mm., and found especially in putrefying vegetable and animal infusions. The term bacteria is in gen- eral use in France and Germany to indicate all organisms of 4 this kind ; the term vibrio has performed the same service in England, bnt is now giving way to the former. When the words are used in a narrower sense, bacteria denotes stiff, rod-like bodies, single or jointed, montionless or endowed with an os- cillating movement in place ; while vibrio is applied to those which have an undulating, sinuous motion, and move rapidly across the field of the microscope. All these forms are now almost universally considered to be vegetables, and placed among the algae, in the family Oscillatoria.1 The earliest recorded observations of any of the varieties were made in 1684, by Leeuwenhoek (“ Anat. et Contemp.,” p. 38, quoted by Dujardin). He found in his dejections dur- ing a slight illness microscopical bodies, which from his de- scription were supposed by Ehrenberg and Dujardin to be identical with their “vibrio rugula” and “ vibrio bacillus,” two of the largest varieties. In Leeuwenhoek’s “ Select Works,” translated by Samuel Hoole, London, 1800, a descrip- tion and drawings are given of similar bodies found in the mat- ter picked from between his teeth, and in vinegar. In the eigh- teenth century Muller classified the forms then known, and in 1838 Ehrenberg (Infusionsthierchen) made the first com- plete list. This was slightly modified three years later by Du- jardin (“ Ilistoire des Zoophytes,” 1841), and has since been constantly used as a standard of comparison, verification, and reference. As may be inferred from the titles of their wrorks, both these authors supposed these organisms to be animals, and, therefore, did not include in their lists some well-known vegetable forms which we now place there, and which were described by Kiitzing (“ Phycologia Generalis,” 1843) among the algae in the family Palmellcey and have been recently placed by Bastian (“ Beginnings of Life,” 1872) among the amoebae. I refer to the ascococcos of Billroth and some of the zoogloea forms of Cohn. The third classification was made by Cohn in 1873 (“ Beitrage zur Biologie der Pflanzen,” vol. ii.), and 1 During the last few months, Robin says, the opinion has turned in favor of placing them among the mushrooms, of which they have to be con- sidered a new, hitherto unclassified species. The arguments in favor of this view are the general lack of color in the spores and their growth in wa- ter. The cocci then would be the spores, and the bacteria the mycelium or the “ filaments.” 5 the fourth by Billroth in 1874 (“ Ueber Coceobacteria Sep- tica,” Elirenberg’s classification is as follows: He places all the forms in one family, Vibrionida, the fourth family of the class Polygastrica. He divides this family into five groups or species, and ten varieties: Species I., Bacterium: Variety 1. Bf triloculare; 2. B. en- chelys; 3. B. punctum. Species II., Vibrio: Variety 4, V. lineola ; 5. V. tremu- lans; 6. V. subtilis; 7. V. rugula; 8. V. prolifer; 9. V. bacillus. Species III., Spirochceta: Variety 10, S. plicatilis. Species IV., Spirillum: Variety 11. S, tenue; 12. S. un- dula; 13, S. volutans. Species V,, Spirodiscus : Variety 14. S. fulvus. He described the first species as a stiff-jointed rod, in cate- nam filiformen rigidulam aliens, the second as a flexible ser- pent-like chain, anguis instar fiexuosam, the third as a flexi- ble, the fourth as a stiff filiform spiral or tortuous chain, the fifth coiled on itself in the form of a disk. Those small round or oval forms now described as micrococcus he placed in the family of monads, Monas. Dujardin cut out Species V. because it had been seen only once by Ehrenberg, during a journey into Siberia, and incom- pletely observed, added Species IV. to Species III., and re- duced the number of varieties to ten, throwing out B. trilo- culare and B. enchelys, consolidating some and dividing up others. Cohn groups all under one name, and divides as follows: Bacteria.—Tribus I.,Sphoerobacteria (Ball bacteria): Va- riety 1, Micrococcus. Tribus II., Microbacteria (Rod bacteria): Variety 2, Bacterium, subdivided into B. termo and B. lineola. Tribus III., Desmobacteria (Thread bacteria): Variety 3, Bacillus ; Variety 4, Vibrio. Tribus IV., Spirobacteria (Spiral bacteria): Variety 5, Spirillum (of Ehrenberg); Variety 6, Spirochsete (of Ehren- berg), Billroth makes no claim to a complete botanical classifiea- 6 tion. He deals principally with the forms which are found in animal infusions, and in the body during disease or after death. But, while he does not attempt to describe all the va- rieties, he gives a complete history of those which he has ob- served, tracing the whole cycle of their development, and showing so close a genetic relationship between them that it seems probable future investigation will show the others to be included in it. He considers all the forms combinations of spherical and cylindrical bodies, representing only different periods of development. His nomenclature and classificaticn being based upon this opinion, he groups all under the name coccobacteria (/co/ckos, a berry, and ftaKTypia, a little rod), and gives to the different forms names which are compounds of these two with words denoting the number, size, and arrange- ment of the component parts; micro-, meso-, and mega-, signi- fying small, medium, and large; mono- and diplo-, single and double; strepto-, in chains; glia- (yXla, glue), in groups ; asco-, in bags ; and petalo-, in plates. This classification is simple and clear, for each name has the great advantage of describ- ing accurately the form to which it is applied. A detailed description of all the varieties is not needed here. The terms bacteria and vibrio have been already explained ; there remain two others, bacteridia (French, bacteridies; German, bacteridien) and 7nicrococcu8 1 or microzyma, which are constantly met with in recent pathological works. The for- mer was applied by Davaine to long immovable forms of bac- teria found by him in the blood of animals affected with an- thrax; they belong in Variety 3, bacillus, of Cohn, while the latter is applied to the innumerable round or oval forms found in the tissues, secretions, or blood, of persons suffering from septic diseases, and in putrefying liquids. Natural History of Bacteria.—Bacteria are cells lacking chlorophyl, of spherical, oblong, or cylindrical form, which multiply by scission and vegetate either singly or in groups (Cohn, loc. cit., page 136). They possess a cell-wall and col- orless nitrogenized Contents, protoplasm, which refracts the 1 Micrococcus, first employed by Ilallier and adopted by Cohn, but with a different signification, makes the plural micrococci. Micrococcos, as used by Billroth, has no plural. i light more strongly than water, is contractile, and by its con- tractility occasions the movements of the plants. The exist- ence of the cell-wall can be sometimes made out with the aid of high powers, and may be easily demonstrated by its resist- ance to caustic potash and ammonia (Cohn). Both Billroth and Cohn testify that there is no genetic rela- tionship between bacteria and any of the yeast-plants, including saccharomyces, the alcoholic ferment, or indeed any of the fungi and moulds. Billroth says (loo. cit., page 49) that wherever any luxuriant yeast vegetation except oidiurn lactis is growing rapidly, the elements of coccobacteria septica do not flourish. Cohn claims that the resemblance between the alcoholic fer- ment and the torula form of sphaerobacteria (mesococcos of Billroth) is merely an external one, and that all reliable ob- servations controvert the opinion held by Hallier, Kars ten, Huxley, and others, that these two belong in one and the same circle of development. As to the absence of genetic relationship between bacteria and fungi, his views are sup- ported also by Burdon-Sanderson (Appendix to Thirteenth Report of Medical Officer of the Privy Council), and are founded partly on these two facts, that Pasteur’s liquid ex- posed to the air developed mould (penicillium, etc.) and no bac- teria, and when impregnated with a drop of water containing bacteria and placed in a tube corked with cotton it developed bacteria and no mould. They are also distinguished from the typical fungus by the absence of mycelium, and for this rea- son were classified by Xaegeli as schizomycetes. Development.—It is not necessary to discuss the possible origin of these organisms by spontaneous generation. Al- though that view is held by some, it is so manifestly incom- patible with the observations of the authors above mentioned and the complete developmental history as described by Bill- roth, that it needs only to be mentioned here. Billroth was the first to discover the nature of the germi- native spores (Dauersporen), although they were described and figured by Cohn. These germinative spores, which are glis- tening, dark-bordered globules, develop in their interior masses of coccos which are set free by the bursting of the envelope, but are maintained in contact with it for some time by the 8 presence of gliai a mucous or gelatinous substance which is supposed by Billroth to be secreted from the wall of the coc- cos, and by Cohn to be the result of the softening of that walL This description can be easily verified ; I have found, in pu- trid animal infusions exposed to the air during three weeks in summery these spores in all conditions, from those forming within bacteria, as will be described hereafter* to the empty shell. The coccos may multiply by lengthening and scission, or they may lengthen into bacteria and gradually free themselves from the enveloping glia by their own active motions, so that the external portion of the masses enveloping the germina- tive spores is seen to be formed almost entirely of bacteria in active motion. This scission ordinarily occurs in one direc- tion only, the two pieces are held together by the glia, and each divides again and again, forming longer or shorter rosary- like chains, streptococcos (