Compliments of the Author. HOMCEOPATHIC MEDICAL EDUCATION, BY W. E. LEONARD, A.8., M.D. (Professor of Materia Medica and Therapeutics, Homoeopathic College, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.) Reprinted from the Hahnemannian Monthly, May, 1891. Homoeopathic Medical Education. BY W. E. LEONARD, A.8., M.D. (Professor of Materia Mediea and Therapeutics, Homoeopathic College, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.) Last September, the Medical Times and Register, of Philadel- phia, in its so-called student’s number, issued a tabulated summary of the announcements of the medical colleges of Canada and the United States, including one hundred and twelve in all, but none homoeopathic. A comparative table of the thirteen homoeopathic institutions is here given, according to the exact arrangement in the above journal, in order to show that our colleges are up to, and even ahead of the others, in their standards, and for the purpose of pointing out any possible weak points in our curricula. By comparison with the old-school table, it will be seen that, whereas only two of our col- leges require simply an examination for admission—which may or may not mean more than the teacher’s certificate—of the old-school colleges sixteen require no examination whatever, or one-seventh of the whole number. The example of the college that requires, at least a high-school diploma, is worthy of further emulation, as is, indeed, practically suggested by the last Intercollegiate Committee of the American Institute of Homoeopathy. No homoeopathic college falls below the minimum of a twenty-four weeks’ (six months’) term, while of the old-school thirty-nine, or more than one-third have a shorter term, ranging from twenty weeks upwards. But two homoeopathic colleges have ungraded courses, whereas fifty- three, or nearly one-half of the old-school colleges are not graded, having practically but two short years of study. It will be seen at a glance, that all homoeopathic colleges teach the seven fundamental sciences of medicine, even pathology, of which we are constantly accused of knowing nothing. On anatomy we are more thorough than the old-school colleges, but four of our 2 colleges devoting but one year to that study, according to their printed graduation requirements, viz., less than one-fourth, whereas, one-sixth of old-school colleges require but one year, and fourteen others leave the time spent at dissection undeterminate. Our college announcements ought certainly to be more specific in their statements concerning so important a branch, since a two years’ dissection course is commonly recognized as none too long for its proper mastery. Out of the thirteen colleges, eight (8) require clinical work for graduation, whereas, nearly two-thirds of the old-school colleges are lacking in that requirement. Fees are about the same as those of the old school. More than half our colleges offer hospital positions to their grad- uates, whereas, only a little more than one-third of the others do so. Bacteriology is by no means thought essential to a homoeopathic medical education; only two colleges offering it, being those whose fundamental branches are taught by old-school professors in State universities. By way of criticism, it seems that we should show a larger pro- portion of colleges teaching, at least the rudiments, of homoeo- pathic pharmacy, in order that our graduates may be able to intelli- gently explain the radical differences in our preparation of drugs, and, if necessary, write an intelligible prescription for a homoeopathic drug. It is very noticeable that our old-school competitors see no occasion to tabulate instruction in what we place at the very head of our curricula, viz., Materia Medica and Theory and Practice. Probably, it is taken for granted; yet, instruction in that line is lamentably meagre in many old-school colleges, if their announcements do not lie. As to post-graduate instruction, the action of the New York Post- graduate School, last year, excluding all homoeopathic graduates, while a brilliant example of bigotry and ingratitude, for our prac- titioners helped them to become large schools, has brought about the establishment of at least three homoeopathic schools of that class— Cleveland, Chicago (two) ; and Philadelphia has offered such a ho- moeopathic course for at least three years. In connection with Table No. 11., it is instructive to note the fol- lowing figures for ten years, as taken from the same authority, being the number of homoeopathic matriculants and graduates in these ten years: 3 Matriculants Graduates.... 1234 412 1 1880-1. 1251 395 1881-2. 1238 445 1882-3. 1162 412 1883-4. 1032 338 1884-5. CO O --T Cl 1885-6. 1064 352 1886-7. 1091 386 1887-8. 1101 375 1888-9. 1173 386 1889-90. ' 11,411 3,878 Totals. CO Per- centage. Compare this with the corresponding table of old-school grad- uates and matriculants in the same period: r—1 1 O CO GO rH CO GO 1882-3. i CO CO CO 1884-5. o 1 >o 88 rH 1886-7. 1887-8. 1888-9. 1889-90. 1 Totals. Per- centage. Matriculants 9,750 10,195 10,057 10,059 9,245 9,532 10,116 10,854 11,981 13,044 104,833 32. Graduates.... 3,175 3,730 3,298 3,274 3,078 3,202 3,050 3,219 3,657 3,876 33,559 The difference of two per cent, here noted in the proportion of old-school and homoeopathic matriculants and graduates is to be accounted for simply from the greater number entering old-school medicine with various motives, and not from the general higher scholarship afforded by these schools. A further study of the old-school tables, noted in the beginning, shows these surprising facts, viz. : Thirty-five colleges require no instruction in Physiology as part of their printed curriculum; twen- ty-seven do not require a knowledge of surgery ; nine do not teach hygiene, nor eight others medical jurisprudence! It is but fair to state, the last figures include the elective schools of Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, and Clark University, of Worcester, Mass. Homoeopathy need not be ashamed of these comparisons. They seem to me especially opportune at this time, when various legisla- tures throughout the country are being importuned to pass restrictive medical laws, giving the old school complete jurisdiction over medical practice. The profession and the people should know just what man- ner of medical men seek to throttle professional progress; men who many of them, graduated from colleges whose standards of educa- tion were by no means up to those of the present at the time of their graduation, ten to thirty years ago. It would do great good to our cause if these figures were published in all our journals, and given to the press for the enlightenment of those interested. Of course, instruction in Materia Medica and Therapeutics and 4 y-* CD lO - o o oo —7 05 cn 45. CD to | Number. 1 of Cincinnati, 0. Boston Univ., Sch. of Med. Univ. of Mich., Ho. Dept., Ann Arbor, Chicago Hom.M.C., Chicago, 111. Iowa State Univ, Ho.Dept.Iowa City. Hahn. Hosp. Col. of San Francisco. Univ. of Minn., Col.ofH.M.&S., Minneapolis. Horn. Hosp. Col., Cleveland, 0. Horn. M.Col. of Mo., St. Louis, Mo. Hahn. Med. Col., Chicago, 111. New York Ho. M.C., N. Y. City. N. Y. M. C. & Hosp. for Women, N. Y. Pulte Med. Col. Hahn. Med. Col., Philadelphia, Pa. Name & Location of College. GO CO 00 -1 -7 05 Ol CO "-7 to C5 CO 05 o Cn O Cn GO 45! 0 45- 00 Organized. OO oc CO CO oo GO CO GO oo 00 00 CO 00 Age. g T. C. T. C. H. S. D. T. C, T. C. p H p w X t-3 p T. C. w M H3 p T. C. *Educa- tional. cequire- ments. tion P P 2 CO 05 to 4^ to 4^ to CO 4x 05 CO 05 to 45. O 05 to 45- to 45- to 45- to 45- S Weeks in RegT’r Term CO CO 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CD CO Terms in Full Course. kJ D SP O c rJ? o o rn rn rn rn P £ • V* M 05 f r to CO :4- co 6 -7 : p >o 2 05 GO rd Cn 2 to 0 Term Begins. Homoeopathic College Announcements for 1889-91 (in Order of Establishment). * The lowest requirement is given. “ T. C.” means Teacher’s Certificate; “ H. S. I)/’ High-School Diploma, f These Universities have two scales of fees—the lesser for residents of their own Stales, the larger for outsiders X Indicates that students are required to attend course. Table No. I. 5 the Theory and Practice of Medicine, is given in all colleges, but lectures upon the “ Philosophy of Homoeopathy,” or Hahnemann’s “ Organon,” are mentioned in the announcements of only four, viz., Missouri, Pulte, Michigan, and Illinois, which is not in accordance with the resolution of request of the American Institute in 1886. No. Name. Matriculants. Graduates. Proportion For 10 Years. 1 Hahnemann M. C., Philadelphia, Pa. 203 64 34.1 2 Cleveland M. C. and Hospital 103 35 30.7 3 Homoeo. M. C. of Missouri 47 24 38.1 4 Hahnemann M. C., Chicago 243 96 43. 5 New-York Homoeo. M. C 122 38 31.5 (G years.) 6 N. Y. Coll, and Hospital for Women.. 36 15 31.5 7 Pulte M. C., Cincinnati, Ohio 61 16 38.5 8 Boston Univ., School of Med 94 27 27. 9 Univ. of Michigan, Homoeo. Dept 71 21 26.5 10 Chicago Homoeopathic M. C 114 34 33.1 11 Iowa State Univ., Homoeo. Dept 32 10 32.2 (7 years.) 12 Hahn. Hosp. Coll., of San Francisco.. 39 4 40 (2 years.) 13 Univ. of Minn., Col. of Horn., M. & S. 8 2 23.8 Total 1173 386 Average for each College 90.2 29.6 Table 11. Proportion of Matriculants to Graduates in 1890 33.9. The colleges recentty organized at Kansas City (1888), Baltimore (1890), Cleveland (1890), are not here included because not yet, re- cognized by the American Institute of Homoeopathy. The foregoing table shows the number of matriculants (or stu- dents in actual attendance, according to their announcements) during the session of 1889-90; also the graduates for 1890, and the per- centage of matriculants to graduates for the past ten years (where obtainable). Authority—Report (1890) Illinois State Board of Health.