wo f a 548 ZI have just returned from a visit from January 26th to March 3lat 4 Co 10 ry srceny to the following cities and towns: Paris, Strasbourg, Zurich, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Uppsala, London, Oxford, Cambridge, Austerdan, Leiden, Bruesela, Liege, Louvain, and again to Paris end London. Most of the persons I talked with were doctors teaching in the medical schoole ~ a few univerelty profes- sors and administrators, a few were businesa men. I talked with no profea- elonal politicians. To inquiries regarding the future of Europe, the replies took always the form of the quiet but earnest question, "Vhat is America going to do? ...-You have the lesdership.... poor Europe ¢an do little.* This was net a retort, It was a request for the basis on which ay inquiries could be anavered. The more discouraged said, "Europe is finished;* the nore optimis- tie said, “Another war will finish Europe.*® Certainly in those countries which the Germens had oceupied, but in some meagure everywhere, tho future is being faced with « long-suffering apprehension, a sort of self~controlled patience and seasoned suffering, that realinded ae that old people weep quietly when tears come at all, Some bits of econversetions I reneaber coavey the atmogphere I en- countered. In Denmark, gomeone said of the Occupation, "We have not found the Germans /polite and so aany of our young men have lost their lives.* In Sweden, "We do not know what the Government has promised to the Russians but it muet be very much.*® I wag shown there a large room in the basesent of & mental hospital bullt in 1943, still vecant, as an air reid shelter against the Russians." In Belgiwn, I saeked a professor's wife whether there was any talk among her friends or relatives of emigration from Belgium. Her reply was, “There ie no talk of anything else." In England, a profesa- wor's wife anid, "My life falle into these divisions: prewar, 1914-18; ae between the wars, 1939-45; and this last postwar period. It's curious but these last years since the war ended seem the longest streteh of all. We thought winning the war would end our troubles but it hasn't." In England, Sweden and Switeerland there was some interest in helping soae of the Geruana; in the other countries there waa no evidence of interest. It seemed to me that everywhere people were simply evoiding the long term view of the future. To contemplate so large a series of uncertainties wes unendurable. Have you ever had to paddle 2 canoe overlosded with children end easential baggage? Your attention was concentrated exclusively on paddling, Cursing was no use. Strength wie to be applied or conserved, aot wasted in telk or speculation or outeries. Too much at hand ~ paddling, vatching the gunwheale, and ocoasionsal swift glances at the sky. In Furope they are sini-~ larly preoccupied with the present. in terms of food and elothing and shelter, there has been marked iaprovesent, But everywhere taxea, repairs, delays and a monotonous struggle with rising prices preoceupy everyone's strength and attention. No one feels out of the woods yet, no one is breathing ecay for there is so much uncer~ tainty ahead. In this quiet preocouzation word coming of the American re~ action to the changes in Czechoslovakia seemed aimply incredible, It seened hystericelly unreal to have a war seare in Europe of all places, And would "they® flight it here agnin? How could we Europeans survive another war? ° *» + *# #*# &© © © Behind these apparently superficial impressions there are a nunaber of factors whose interpretation is in some degree a matter of personal judgnent. Western Europe's present population of upwards of two hundred mil. iion has depended as it grew during the last hundred years upon manufacture 3e in exchange for foodstuffs Laported from abroad. Unless that trade can be re~ established I can see only eaigration as a solution, or the alternative of glow starvation and dying out because of hardship, accompanied by varying degrees und kinds of social breakdown, Men and women of the requisite intelligence and integrity for leader ship in malnteining the traditional forus of nationalistic sovereignty are not avellable because too aany of them were killed in the first world war < and deported to death in Geraany in the second. Besides, the concepte and traditions of national sovereigaty are outworn and ineffective in a world transformed by technologiesl changes in aanufaeture » trangportetion and con- munications. Even the traditional idee of one country making war on another is disconcertingly inapplicable to the present Commmist technique of political infiltration and clase warfare by means of strikes and seizure of police can trol. We Americans would de well to be studying mass peychology ag well aa atomic bombs, for what faith have we ever had in force when pitted against deep conviation? Can we never awaken to realize the illogical and uareasoning power of jealousy and envy, and the strength of a conviction of injustice ~ whether or not that feeling is justified? Wnhat durable wisdom is there in trying to maintain by war, privilege and uppemclase evasion of obligation either here ov in Europe, when war increases the very poverty that mskee privilege in- tolerable? Commmiga ie at home in adversity. Its appeal is to the disposssased, to the envious, the covetous and unserupulous, but alao to the young, to those whe want to hope and to those who are cynical and disgusted at lethargy or corruption or irresponsibility in high places - or even not so high. 4e Twenty separate parties ef the Fight passionately divided between themselves are no match for a single disciplined group of professional poli~ ticlaens. Great Britain, France, and the United States have made mistakee in the past that now are costing us dearly - Archangel in 1918, Manchuria, Ethiopia, Czechoslovakia. The unexpected price tag of victory over a totelitarian country 1s thet you have to govern it afterward ~ and with what enthusiasm or effective- ness? And, in addition, do not forget the destruction in Europe, the present indebtedness and taxation, the mounting poverty, More war would not settle ail these problemas. It would only aul- tiply and aggravete thea and make even more difficult the most important task of all. This most important task is for us to forego the false security of privilege and the anesthetic comfort of power. We have got to crente the security that comes from justice, and the comfort that comes from hope aad peace. I do not deny that the covetous and deceitful whe put their truat in violence would be stopped by violence. If they were to choose violence as a weapon they would betray what would control their conduct most. But if Com munisn spreads, it is not because it employs physical violence. It spreads because it is patient, devious, flexible and realistic ~ the very guelities we don't poseess. It spreads because it appeals to persons who have not before been dispossessed, disillusioned, discouraged and, especially, envious and indignant. I say especially the envious and indignant because humen beings have borne and can bear an unbelievable amount of suffering and hardship as long as there is universal sharing of misery and even-handed justice in sharing relief or respite from hardship. Jealousy and envy are the uranium and 5. plutorium of human societies; whet they can liberate in destructive energy is not funny. If during the blits in London e completely effective and luxurious air raid shelter had been built and reserved for any group of five hundred persons, even for the key personnel of the Government, British morsle would have been smashed to angry pleces. Privilege end power may override the eabliterment and sense of injustice they produce, but they cannot survive for ever the resultant weakness in the society they corrode. The embittered dis- trust and stubborn sense of injustice among British coal miners have teken years to aceumalate. With what glib promises may trey now be removed? The patient no longer truste the surgeon and least of all the anesthetist who tries to calm hia for another operation, TDontt underrate envy and distrust, Commmiem appeals to the dlepossessed. On evidence at hand they have nothing to lose. They have lost not merely their savings but far more disturbing the chance to earn. To the meretricious hope of sharing the wealth they add the vindictive hone of seeing others suffer sa they have already suffered. Migery loves company ~- with a vengeance. Inflation as a way of increasing the mumbers of the dispossessed is ae infuriating as it ia slick. Why so many of the blg manufacturers in the United States heave chosen big dividends rether than lowering their prices, entirely eludes my comprehension, I say big companies because the larger the targeta the more people can shoot at thea. The suall companies can make the seme mistake and eo take thelr own mean share in ewelling the numbers of those who will listen hopefully to a change in our form of government. Comaunism appeals to the diaillusioned, to those who may aot have logt most or all thelr proserty but who have lost their confidence in the ability but above 21] the honesty of their governuental authorities. They have come to believe that justice i# open to all ~ like the Rites. They have 6. concluded that having a smart lawyer is more important then coming before a good judge; and our rewards financial and otherwise for the judiciary in Aner~ dea cana hardly serve conclusively to disprove their cynicion. A friend of mine who is an expert in Anerlean municipal government belittles the loss of respect for the law during the Prohibition era. He seys that the logs of respegt thet comes froa Amerieans' use of their political friends to tear up parking tickets and summons for breaking traffic rules is far more serious, Hendrik van Loon once fished a fifty cent plece out of his pocket, regarded it pensively, and said to ue, ""In God we Trust! ~ this is the polite equiv. alent of your real national motto, 'I should worry'." Of course if we get away with it we don't give law breaking a second thought, but, I warn you, iosers have long memories. Penalties evaded are goon forgotten, penalties inflicted rankle for years if they are imposed on some people and evaded by others. We are admittedly not a law abiding nation. But getting away with it leaves even smart people with a sense of guilt. This shows long after as & succes and passionate interest in lew and order against those who dian't get avay with it, whoa we so airily call “disgruntled.” The Europeans who dida't know how the other half lived are finding out how the other half hates, Comauniom eppeals to the discournged. You begin to think of alter- natives when you can't even hope, It is no good to point out that even if the present is bad, Comaunism would be worce. If the present gets bad enough people will take « chance on a change being worse. I've seen plenty of people change doctors - for the worae, And they don't feel guilty if the loved one dies when the change has been meade. Hopeless people get hard- hearted, Does all this confuse you? Bo you want me to go in for nice clear cut unaabiguous statements about what impressed ue most in Europe or on ay Ve return? Well, wheat has impressed me the moet hag been the American passion for over~simplified statexents, for Yes or No, for Idesl or Atrocious, for Black om White, for Now or Never, We even prefer to have our thinking simple. I would not be surprised if my stating the varied appeals which Communiaa peesesses scemuc like a suspicious sort of procedure, But I cannot believe that the situation in Furope ie simple, nor that 1+ would be useful or even honest to suumarize it in simple terms. And to resolve the difficulties there by war or by the telk of war eceme to me an over~simplification. Two more points. Don't be surprised if the Buropesns are slow to recover. There is something in their situation we do not comprehend. We have not had it here within the uomory of the living. I refer to the loss of their leaders, first in 1914-14 and again (in the occupied countries) in 1959-45. Let me give you some exemples from ay own imovledge. In an Oxford University Club of the year 1914 numbering twenty young men, three survived the First World War. Of seven honors graduates in 1906 at the University of Grenchle, one survived the Firat World War. That gives an iden of the losses of 1914-16. In 1943, the Germans prepared a list of French men and women whoae characters and abilities made them leaders in their villages, towne and elties; 280,000 persons on that list were deported and only 28,000 ever returned to Fronce ~ snd they im all too many instences broken by prison terture and fear. A similar tell laid on « city asy the size of Cleveland and ite suburbs would mean tvelve thousend persons reuoved from the leader ship of that clty. That is a bewildering kind of logr, and repeated tvice in thirty years it verges on extinction of strength and even the plans to recover, What kind of lesdership do you expect under auch a handicap? Let us mot be critical if they ask quietly, "Whet will the Americans do?" 8. They look to us. In England during the war, the children, I was told, would look hurriedly to their parents when a bomb exploded. They dida!t look at the bomb, but to their parentat feces, to learn how to interpret the explo- gion. If their parents showed no fear, the children stayed calm. But if the parent's face showed fear, the children were terrified, for they knew they were not strong, I think I need not say more. The major task withia our reach is the example we set to the envious, the dispossesed, the disillusioned, and the discouraged. And so inevitably comes your question, "Well, whet do you see as the solution, if it is not war, or waiting for war to be waged upen us"? In terms of defense I think the construction of airplanes end the training of their crews deserves attention, So does the education of expert technologists. Universal military training without the psychological stimulus of war will produce either a fascist state or disaffection where il. is least wanted. I do not believe that with 10,000,000 dezd and hundreds of cities and towns destroyed the Kussians want to wage war. They wont the extension of idees but I am convinced that if any western European governments or our own govern- ment tallies the welfare of the createst number of its citizens as its greatest concern, Communism cannot extend. The Russians heave never known prosperity for the mass of its people. Until a government has leerned now to survive prosperity it has not met the severest test of cll. I believs that if the Russians were to secure general prosperity it would break intarneally the strength of Communism. Russia invaded has triumphed; Russia the invader has resulted in revolution. It is when pieces of gold are within resch that bands of thieves fall upon each other. There's honor among thieves until they get the booty. Then envy, jealousy and embitterment begin. The odd thing about my view is that I reelly believe in self-control and whet is known as the Christian ethic - not at all beceuse it enjoined upon us an ideal but because it is the only thing that worke in the long run. I don't believe the Russians have begun to meet the real sO difficulties, so if prosperity should come to them it will corrupt them and destroy them. You can't crush ideas with force alone. If this talk seems to have dealt with ideas it is because ideas, especially self-control and good will, are the only corrective I can see to the spread of Communism. ALAN GREGG APRIL 7, 1948