Department of Genetics University of Wiseonsin Madison 6, Wisconsin March 28, 1952 Dr. C. C. Spicer London NW 9, England Dear Dr. Spicer: Your letter of the 24th has just been received. Needless to say, I am gratified at your interest in working with us. In principle, your proposal meets with my enthusiastic approval, and I just wish that we had the facilities that would permit an unqualified concordamce. Unfortunately, we are literally crammed together in our small laboratory, and must give very careful consideration both to our needs and those of a new entrant. However, there should be some allevia-— tion of this pressing condition sometime this fall, so the situation is not entirely hopelsss. Thus, I can see no possibility whatever of your working effectively here during the rest of this academic year. Next September, we will be a little less crowded, but still tight for space, and there wouid also be the contin- gency of some interruption from the remodelling of the laboratories (I hope!d. he most likely period would be, probably, from about March 1 -June 30, 1953. With some advanse preparation, it should be possible to do a good deal in four months. Would this schedule suit you? At any rate. let me know the constraints on your plans so that we can look for common ground. You might be interested to compars notes with your colleague ©. 3. Anderson. There is no dearth of potential problems worth considering. In view of your recent experience, it might be profitable to look at some other sero- logical transductions in our present system involving groups B and D (mre precisely, XiI5-currying Salmonella). “hese sre cf more than horticultural significance, as I think they may shed some light on the genetiv basis of flageller phase variation. The other possibility would be to look for trans~ ductive or other recombinational systems in group C and B. I am a little suspicicus (as they were) that Bruner and Edwards’ anatum-newilngton resulty aay have been transductive. It would not hurt tc prepare for your visit by collecting strains in these groups, and perhaps by stuating to produce auxd- trophic mutants in some of them, with a special look-out for lysogenic types. How about thompson? Or wuld you prefer potsdam in view of your studies on potsdam x typhimrium? iHow's that coming along, by the way?) Well, we can discuss these details later. Sincerely, Joshua Lederberg