December 8, 1953 Dr. Theodore T. Puck Department of Medicine University of Colorado Denver 7 Golorado Dear Ted: In response to your letter of November 24 Esther is preparing to send you the following strains: Group 1 ~~ Kl2, lysogenic and “1485, a lambda sensitive mutant derived directly from it. Group 2 — In order to furnish a more ccherent group of strains the genetic ditferences among which may be more confidently expected to be confined to their status in re. lambda, the following. These are all prototroph cultures. W211? lambda sensitive, Lp® W2115 immne-1, Lp™ W2118 lysogenic, Lp* W219 Ip,* , Lp,” W2120 Lp, ® , Ip.” » immne-2 W2121 double immune, Ip,* ’ Lp,” The detailed comparisons should, we think, be made with the cultures of Group 2 for the reasons indicated. However, st kKl2 and W1485 have been very widely distributed and the latter is/doubt some, but not all, of the strain designated ag "s". Some of our colleagues have been unforgivably sloppy in preserving the strain mumbers and therefore details as to the pedigrees of the cultures that they have been using. As co:erns this sumer, we will be delighted to give careful and sympathetic consideration to any proposals that you will be able to make. ‘“e are, however, in the mecntime considering some alternative plans and you should not, therefore, consider that either you or we have as yet made any binding commitments. Good luck with the strains ve are sending. Page 2 -- Letter to Theo. Puck December 8, 1953 As the result of a casual conversation with one of the bio- chemists from Du Pont I have received from them a rather large sample of a polyelectrolight rather similar to the one you refer- red to in your Cold Spring Harbor mamscript. This one is a di- gathyi derivative of methacrylic acid but otherwise quite similar to your compound. If a preliminary experiment indicates that it works in the same generel way as your material was described to do I will send you a good part of our own sample and whatevercther information would be relevant. You will recall that our interest in this question was concerned with technical rather than funda- mental aspects. I do not know whether the reference that I gave you to alkylating agents as mtagens (during our visit) was very useful. Subsequently, a rather comprehensive review by Ross has appeared in the first volume of Advances in Camcer Research, which will be, I think, of somewhat greater pertinence. : Yours sincerely, Joshua Lederberg /mg