foo, PoP pos ge — 4 aaa + i | * : : i : , ! | . 1 : : ; i i | ~L , 1017 i wee Reheeen ween eee neler ente cee oe bod. Abb - { ~ pod \ CBthb bp A ohh. pact | — ~ : hi is np eo 3 y & O@ |... eS it Sc aie ap 2 id tA ) 1 | I B MS LN. “108 ST LO 04 I! WO) D NO! hog a Gibb /dven_i(Robeel and __Griffi e “ape 1 L fetal ‘pf Proe| o Af 29 £02. 65) Jol. (03 lo7; 28. 2g Wl 65) 72, MO. 70 1 BI 83), 8d a pe 84d. iG to v Griffith a Hence zy3T , Le 2 ON D or 2 OT T OD and 32-2. FT ve . DA, P OAL . i -_ common Uo , z . Since @/s) is £ ct both equations it may — J de removed to give two new equations whose solutions will : themselves be proportional to the ‘solutions of the two equations obtained by the maximisation process. | ~ Now fT =" A S6q-%)" + 2AM, Sloe IOG-) t AL S0n-B)* es ) we 7 -:. 6 So on LA, Slu-tiee 2A Slo, OGY [Pt = 2A,$§ Bog TOMY] £29. S6,,-%) apg D> 4 ay Xi ~ ' OAc ~ . . _ . ., Thus the equations of estimation become ie . oe Do Ay $ Oya)" + AL Sbq-% 04-7) n = dy a es : Ay SLoq-%-%] + Av S00~4) ed, a mre which are of the familiar multiple regression type and may be solved in the same way as multiple regression equations. Putting 1 and 0, and O and 1 respectively for d, and dy ——a, gives two pairs of equations whose solutions are Cu Cin ———- Cc c xy —_—_ ‘from which|] ), 7s deity d, jl 2 fees . att : oe - . . 5 . _— “ “ap 4 “ 13 4 1 + ' \ i L A iy I 2 3] © 107. 30) BF7 0 £6 ae ee a) ‘C4 je Nay ety |e) hy, Bt age Zito os tan?