INDIANA UNIVERSITY
BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA

i+}

May 5, 10h7
wey sy 2

Mr. de Lederberr

Osborn Botanical Laboratories
Yale University

New Faven, Connecticut

Dear Lederbers:

Thank you for your coments on the reviews ‘tne paper by Sherman
Ihave not quoted, since,sithouch starting with the richt set-
vw did not ciscuss clearly the importance of the method, whieh in
so led them no where, anvwer. I miecnt, however, add tneir
referenca for sekea of thorourhnesse

As for our experiments on lethel rvtetions in phase, vrour cuess
was almost completely richte I am now plennine en enalvsis of dif-
ferences between wild-types in terrs of the number of renes in which
they differ: as you see, we are apvroachine the populationg ceneticist's
dreame

3yv the wey, do you know of any person who would be interested in
& good fob working with me on this problem next vear, and rossibl:
lonser? The salary would be commensurated to trainin- (some mathenetics
and senoties required) end nartievlerly to »rains.e. JT wish I covld
lend another Ledarberr.

Rest recards,
lira»

S. #. Luria