June 17, 1954

Mr. Francis Bello
Science Editor
PORTUNE magazines
Rockefeller Center
New York a, N.Y.

Dear Mr. Bello:

Thank you for your letters of May 6 and June 14 and for the "small"
memento sent with the latter. I have been amised to find how surprisingly
many people read Fortune that I would not hava thought to be likely
prospects.

May I say that I thought you did a good job with the linited mterial
at hand. I would not be convinced of the rigor of any conclusions from
such a small sample, and have some doubts as to the representative quality
of the samples, but these are not criticisms of your reportorial achievment.
There are always too many possible interpretations for any factual findings
that do, after long labor, achieve statistical significance to make such
labors seem mich more science than art. The same cah be said of such a
momamental effort as the Kinsey reports, which are still grossly inadequate
from a statdstical viewpoint. But I de not think your article was in
any way pretentious, and as it was fairly clear that your subjective
igpressiorns were in the forefront, one can hardly erlticize them or fear
any untoward misundeystandings.

' To answer ons line of your first letter, I was neither surprised nor
relieved (nor disappointed) at the use you expbicitly made of our inter-
view; privately, I might wonder if you did get any sort of coherent
insight or impression of scientists! attitude about science. I might be
disappointed if you did not find as much individuality as in other
features of their personalities.

If you fini yourself in these parts again, drop by for lunch or a
glass of beer. . 4
jour sincerely, f
/ . i “ “ ;

‘ i
{
i
vo
Je

7 doshua Lederber g
i ! f