que No ARTHRITIS CONFERENCE Meuhleback Hotel Kansas City, Kansas January 19 - 20, 1975 Workshop Co-Moderators Sunday, Jan. 19 Physician Education Allied Health Education Patient Education Demographic Factors Arthritis a ai Service Deployment Monday, Jan. 20 Program Documentation ‘Special Report Opportunities Care Delivery Initiatives Program Continuity Warren Katz, M.D. Russell T. Schultz, M.D. Marjorie C. Becker, Ph.D. Robert Godfrey, M.D. Frank E, Emery, M.D. William G. Sale, M.D. 0. Lynn Deniston E. L. Angie Hebbeler Gene V. Ball, M.D.. John L. Magness, M.D. Raymond E. H. Partridge, M.D. Donald L. Riggin F. Richard Convery, M.D. Carl H. Eisenbeis, M.D. Ivan F. Duff, M.D. John L. Kline Roy L. Cleere, U.D. C. H. Wilson, Jr., M.D. Ephraim P. Engleman, M.D. Paul D. Ward PHYSICIAN EDUCATION Guides and Instructions Workshop: A-l Room: Music Room Sunday Jan. 19, 1975 Co-Moderators:; Warren Katz, M.D. Russell Tf. Schultz, M.D. Chief of Rheumatology Oklahoma University Medical College of Pennsylvania College of Medicine The Co-Moderators should designate a Recorder of the workshop to record the discussion. Workshop Products: 1. An oral report, not to exceed i5 minutes,at the Plenary session Sunday afternoon, 2. A written report which briefly reflects the salient nature, points emphasized, and perspective of the workshop discussion. This report will be incorporated in the Conference Report, and will also be provided to all attendees Sunday evening as back- ground for the Monday workshops, The written report should be delivered to the staff in the Conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible. Sone dictation facilities will be available there, if needed, Discussion Aids: The workshop discussion (and the resulting report) should strive to describe the subject activities presently underway under the pilot arthritis program, the potentials under the grant initiative, how to realize the potentials, and extensions which should be pursued from the grant program base. The workshop discussion to elicit such information might include: levels and scope of physician education generally undertaken under the pilot arthritis program; salient problems; potential solutions; methods and techniques to strengthen education effect; the potential affect of different education focusses on treatment and care delivery needs; differentiation between short term, and long term education objectives in terms of developing arthritis program; curricula being used under varying circumstances; feasible documentation to record pilot arthritis program phystcian education activities; potential sources of documentation format; recommendations about physician education information collection, and utilization; etc. ALLIED HEALTH EDUCATION Guides and Instructions Workshop: A-~2 ~ Room: Tower 22 Sunday, Jan 19, 1975 Co-Moderators: , Marjorie C, Becker, R.P.T., Ph.D. . Robert Godfrey, M.D. University Hospital Univ. of Kansas School Ann Arbor, Michigan So of Medicine : Kansas City, Kansas The Co-Moderators should designate a Recorder of the workshop to record the discussion, Workshop Products: - 1. An oral report, not to exceed 15 minutes, at the Plenary session Sunday afternoon. 2. A written report which briefly reflects the salient nature points emphasized and perspective of the workshop discussion. This report will be incorporated in the Conference report, and will aloo be pivvided to all acceutces Suiniay cvening ao vack- ground for the Monday workshops. The written report should be delivered to the staff in the conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible. Some dictation -facilities will be available there, if needed. Discussion Aids: The workshop discussion (and the resulting report) should strive to describe the subject activities presently underway under the pilot arthritis program, the potentials under the grant initiative, how to realize the potentials, and extensions which should be pursued from the grant program base. The workshop discussion to elicit such information might include: levels and scope of allied health education generally undertaken under the pjlot arthritis program; salient problems; potential solutions; methods and techniques to strengthen education effect; curricula being utilized under varying circumstances; the potential for allied health education and employment in terms of increased physician flexibility, and improved access to care; needs potential, and sources for criteria and standards; feasible document~ ation to record allied health education accomplish through the pilot arthritis program; sources of documentation format; recommendations about allied health education information collection, and utilization; etc. PATIENT EDUCATION Guides and Instructions Workshop: A-3 Room: Private Dining Room No. 4 Sunday, Jan. 19, 1975 Co-Moderators: Frank E, Emery, M.D. ss Wilddam G. Sale, M.D. University of Texas Medical Vanderbilt University Branch at Galvestor School of Medicine The Co-Moderators should designate a Recorder of the workshop to record the discussion. Workshop Products: 1. An oral report, not to exceed 15 minutes, at the Plenary session Sunday afternoon, : 2, A written report which briefly reflects the salient nature points emphasized and perspective of the workshop discussion. This report will be incorporated in the Conference report, and will also be provided to all attendees Sunday evening as back~ ground for the Monday workshops. The written report should be delivered to the staff in the conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible. Some dictation facilities will be available there, if needed. - Discussion Aids: The workshop discussion (and the resulting report) should strive to describe the subject activities presently underway under the pilot arthritis program, the potentials under the grant initiative, how to realize the potentials, and extensions which should be pursued from the grant program base. The workshop discussion to elicit such information might include: levels and scope of patient education being undertaken under the pilot arthritis program; who is providing the education; what problems are encountered; what sources of support are available, or potentially available for patient education activities; how thoroughly are these being utilized; are new methods or technique being employed - what are they; what if any distinctions exist respec- tively with respect to availability, quality, and site of patient education; what is the potential for expanded, quality patient educa~ tion; what documentation of patient education activities in the pilot arthritis program is feasible; etc, DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS Aids and Instructions Workshop: A- 4 Room: Private Dining Room 3 Sunday, January 19, 1975 Co ~ Moderators 0. Lynn Deniston Mrs. E. L. Hebbeler University of Michigan Director Ann ‘Arbor, Michigan Ohio Valley Regional Medical Program The Co-Moderators should designate a Recorder of the workshop to make notes on the discussion. Workshop Products: 1. An oral report, not to exceed 15 minutes, at the Plenary session Sunday afternoon. 2. A written report which briefly reflects the salient nature, points emphasized, and perspective of the workshop discussion. This report will be incorporated in the Conference Report, and will also be pro- vided to all attendees Sunday evening as background for the Monday workshops. The written report should be delivered to the staff in the Conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible. Some dictation facilities will be available there, if needed. Discussion Aids: The workshop discussion (and the resulting report) should include such matters as: need for, and appropriate uses of demographic infor~ “mation; general principles and methods of demographic information accumulation and processing; the extent of demographic information which might be obtained from the pilot arthritis program; available sources of assistance with respect to demographic questions; the impact of demographic factors on the development of arthritis services, and care delivery systems. ARTHRITIS SERVICES Aids and Instructions Workshop: A-5 Room: Junior Ballroom Sunday, January 19, 1975 , Co-Moderators Gene V. Ball, M.D. John L. Magness, M.D. Professor of Medicine Project Director | University of Alabama Medical School Dakota Hospital The Co-Moderators should designate a Recorder of the workshop to record the discussion. Workshop Products: 1. An oral report, not to exceed 15 minutes, at the Plenary session Sunday afternoon. 2. A written report which briefly reflects the salient nature, points emnhasi zed and narenertiva af tha yorlchan dtaruesian, Phin we-ce 7 will also be provided to all attendees Sunday evening as background for the Monday workshops. The written report should be delivered to the staff in the Conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible. Some dictation facilities will be available there, if needed. Discussion Aids: The workshop discussion (and the resulting report) should strive to describe activities presently underway under the pilot arthritis program, potentials of activities receiving grant support, how to realize the potentials, and ways to sustain grant-supported and related progress. The workshop discussion to elicit such information might include: the scope of comprehensive arthritis services; the extent to which comprehensive programs exist, or are being reasonably approached; priority needs, and best’ response which can be made through optimal utilization of existing facilities; a definition of a center of excellence; priority service development needs which are presently susceptible to effective improvement with existing resources, “SERVICE DEPLOYMENT Aids and Instructions Workshop: A-6 ‘ Room: Private Dining Room I Sunday, January 19, 1975 Co-Moderators Raymond E. H. Partridge, M.D. Donald Riggin New England Medical Center Hospital Executive Director Boston, Massachusetts Arkansas Chapter Arthritis Foundation The Co~Moderators should designate a Recorder of the workshop to record the discussion. Workshop Products: 1. An oral report, not to exceed 15 minutes, at the Plenary session Sunday afternoon, 2. A written report which briefly reflects the salient nature, points emphasized, and perspective of the workshop discussion. This report Wiit aiSU ve pruvideu LO ati attendees sunday evening as background for the Monday workshops. The written report should be delivered to the staff in. the Conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible. Some dictation facilities will be available there, if needed. Discussion Aids: The workshop discussion (and resulting report) should include such elements as: the general pattern of existing arthritis services; additions or extensions being provided through the pilot grant program; the general profile of current arthritis service organization and deployment; the impact on service deployment of medical resources, geography, demography, or other factors; effective relationships of central and extension services; circumstances which inhibit effective service deployment, and how they can be overcome; priorities in service deployment; opportunities for service deployment to integrate resources, and improve quality of and access to care. PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION Guides and Instructions Co-Moderators Carl H. Eisenbeis, Jr., M.D. Medical Director St. Margaret Memorial Hospital The Co-Moderators should designate a Record the discussion. Workshop Products: Workshop: B-l Room: Music Room Monday, January 20, 1975 F. Richard Convery University Hospital San Diego, California er of the workshop to record 1. "An oral report of about 15 minutes at the Monday afternoon Plenary session which outlines the works wan fawn na positions . or pugpeYY WU ewer - Program Documentation . hop discussion, and presents or recommendations regarding 2. Awritten report briefly presenting the salient nature, points emphasized... and perspective of the workshop discussion, including recommendations to the Plenary mee ting. The written (or dictated) workshop report should be delivered to the staff in the conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possibie, but in any case, before the Co-Moderators depart. The workshop report will be incorporated into a Conference Report. Discussion Aids: Can the pilot arthritis program be documented? How? By what recommended process, and sc problems, or opportunities present wit documentation; selected subject documentati program elements for which special efforts s documentation? How should documented in How can program assessments be made, an hedule? By whom? What h respect to overall, summary, on? What are the main hould be made toward formation be reported? d reported? By whom? SPECIAL REPORT OPPORTUNITIES Guides and Instructions Workshop: B-2 Room: Colonial Ballroom Monday, January 20, 1975 Co-Moderators Ivan F. Duff, M.D. John Kline Professor of Internal Medicine , Executive Director University Hospital N. C. Chapter Ann Arbor, Michigan Arthritis Foundation Workshop Products: 1. An oral report of about 15 minutes at the Monday afternoon Plenary session which outlines the workshop discussion, and presents or suggests conference positions, or recommendations regarding Program Documentation. A written report briefly presenting the salient nature, points WupilasiscG, ala perspecuve ol wie Worksnop aiscussion, Including recommendations to the Plenary: meeting. The written (or dictated) workshop report should be delivered to the staff in the conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible, but in any case, before the Co-Moderators depart. The workshop report will be incorporated into a Conference Report. Discussion Aids: (NOTE: the workshop on Program Documentation will address problems, opportunities, and elements of documenting the overall pilot arthritis grant program.) What are the special studies being conducted under grant support-which should be reported? Who should do this? How? How will the information be disseminated? What are the study elements which should generally be assessed, and reported in all, or most instances? What special reports might be developed from other grant program areas? How can such reporting be organized? Who should doit? How? CARE DELIVERY INITIATIVES ‘N Guides and Instructions Workshop: B-3 Room: Private Dining Room 4 Monday, January 20, 1975 Co-Moderators Roy L. Cleere, M.D., M.P.H. C.H. Wilson, M.D. Administrator Grady School of Medicine Regional Arthritis Program Atlanta, Georgia Denver, Colorado Workshop Products: 1. An oral report of about 15 minutes at the Monday afternoon Plenary session which outlines the workshop discussion, and presents or suggests conference positions, or recommendations regarding Program Documentation. 2. Awritten report briefly presenting the salient nature, points emphasized, and perspective of the workshop discussion, including recommendations to the Plenary meeting. The written (or dictated) workshop report should be delivered to the staff in the conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible, but in any case, before the Co-Moderators depart. The workshop report will be incorporated into a Conference Report. Discussion Aids: What has been the prevailing pattern of arthritis. care delivery? What are the strengths /weaknesses inherent in the pre- vailing patterns? What is the impact of the grant program on the patterns? What are the most promising efforts being made with respect to care extension, quality, and patient access to care? What other potential benefits might be realized? What can be done to sustain the most beneficial care delivery developments under- way? How? By whom? PROGRAM CONTINUITY Guides and Instructions Workshop: B-4_ Room: Tower 22 Monday, January 20, 1975 Co-~-Moderators Ephraim P. Engleman, M.D. Paul D. Ward San Mateo, California Executive Director California Committee on Regional Medical Programs Workshop Products: 1, An oral report of about 15 minutes at the Monday afternoon Plenary session which outlines the workshop discussion, and presents or suggests conference positions, or recommendations regarding Program Documentation. A written report briefly presenting the salient nature, points emphasized, and perspective of the workshop discussion, including 1 CCUiiinCuUativite w tie L louse y wiETLiLip ‘Lis Woe AULGia (ua diciatedy workshop report should be delivered to the staff in the conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible, but in any case, before the Co-Moderators depart. The workshop report will be incorporated into a Conference Report. Discussion Aids: What funding sources are now being utilized to support arthritis programs? What are the differences in the programs being supported by different funds? Which of these funding sources will continue? Which will terminate? What new funding sources may emerge? What kinds of program activities can earn revenue? Which Cand how) can these be broadened, or be more effectively pursued? Are arthritis program emphases being shaped for optimal attraction of all available sources of support? How can this be improved? How should arthritis programs gear up for future funding opportunities? How will optimal provider (delivery) program factors be assured in the context of "gearing up"?