iy eC
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

MEMORANDUM a PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE

TO

FROM

SUBJECT:

Chief, South Central Operations

HEALTH RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION
TERRORS ERAT
BUREAU OF HEALTH RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT

DATE: March 25, 1974

Ney B.0,0.e0

Acting Chief, Operations & Development

Arthritis Funding

In response to your inquiries, Dr. Pahl had the following to say:

1.)

2.)
4

( \ ‘ \ woned'y
a . vy. (2.00 is ae me Ne he aN a. «Mon h adhe ee.

abe. rv Laci Poeidane Cu u A 2. ) Kat ROL

a s

The ad hoc review committee will make two kinds of recommendations
on each application:

a.) approval, based on merit;
b.) recommendation for funding from "Center" earmark.

It is entirely possible that a specific project may be approved
on merit, but not recommended for funding as a center. In this
situation, an RMP could request funding under its regular applica-
tion.

If, however, a project is not approved on merit, an RMP may neither
request funds nor rebudget funds into it.

An RMP may include requests for arthritis activities as part of
its regular application. These will not be reviewed by the ad hoc
review group.

Sarah J. Silsbee 2,

vale

 

(

co ~o OS GO Raunt ant X

Co eth ene

wane “er fics _ o's ) . | de. diss wel

if

: |
ve D a oa SEE. S, yan Kyo ! ia

 

we Ce