NEW
FILE
BEGINS
oc # /€3

B&B INFORMATION & IMAGE MANAGEMENT
300 Pawoce GQereaer’s BOULEVARD
UPPER MARLEDRD, MARYLAND 20772 ° UBA © (3D1) 249-2311D

 
|
RMP SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY

| - RM COI

JULY/AUGUST 1074 Dev

“Wy

tt
a

Application - This application requests $870,329 for support of $259,851
of core staff (to be reconsidered), $73,735 for 3 feasibility studies and
$677,918 for thirteen projects. Since June Council recommended $309,000
(100,000 below review committee) the region has requested reconsideration

for its program staff support.
Of the 13 projects submitted for support:

. six are new ($192,474 or 28.3%)
. three are ongoing ($263,955 or 38.9%) , .
. four are revised-projects, $221,484 or 37%

About 47% of the project dollars are assumed at increasing the availability
of services for the medically underserved.

A follow-up letter addressing two CHP negative comments will be forthcoming.

I

E0/7/15/74

JULY COMMITTEE RECOMVENRATION

 

Criticue: ta

—on

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“WoTsT90G
UOT ALLE TTY

LSINDIY
WLOL

iAd-WSO

LSANOZY
LISULAGNI

“€sanuse

LIANG SUIL LNINGdnOD

: : So ; : - SO YA 90d

' , VZINAOD ¥L/90 . . soe
NOY Ad SLNINUdHO) ‘
ONIS AUNT GULS 1NOTy

dwOD

' .
° ;
000‘ Ree” 909* 122" 084 *9OrT | GeTESLS ~ SWLOL NOISSY TOT mt sens smanns en go ~-"SLNSNOdWOD aD
eee eee seas aoe ee - wee of ne ~~ - - Aemiles Wecette eae ee Ce em ees meee wee ene cee ewe ees ee ener
L99°HT L99*%T LEST — ORSFET - W3LSAS a3 HLTH NN3d IWSANSDHLBON = THO
_ 2ag° tl (L9981T  —— S6TSE. the B HATLYOSNOD oa HLTH VINVAIASNN3d Wins? OS OVO
70-7. o00%e9 == D00*ET = OOF OG oe ee NVI HLTH 93Y AIG ONILVLITIOVS | 4002
o00'S 0049 __ OOE*T 0004s —— . _ SISATVNY Viva INaILvd LNYINEHY = =—TOOD
999 °90€ (—2268S79— BHB*LZT Cs HAT BOY a SAVLS WYEODNd = =OCOD

GN
NwgL!

~ “AVA ‘anosns

yh AVA

 
 

RMP _ SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY.

RM 00059 __

May Ja UNE 197A RENT EW

°

Requast: $721,606

Committee Recommendation: $400,000

Overall assessment by individual reviewers: Below average

-
Critique: The Committee expressed concern over the lack of planning for
present and Future activities.

I

The application appeared | to be essentially a rebuilding of their budget.

The request was primarily for staff support and a request to fill 10
vacant positions, plus support for 2 projects. Committee recommended
$250,000 in program staff support, $60,000, for grantee costs and $95,000
for ongoing projects. This would in effect give SVRMP some room for
expansion as well as keep the remaining 14 positions. Further hiring
should cease until a definite program can be identified.

Committee recommended a site visit to this region prior to Council
meeting or if this could not be arranged, to have key representation
of the program visit DRMP to provide additional .information regarding
future plans for the program.

JULY/AUGUST REVIEW

Estimated request as of May 1974: $705 , 860

E0/5/27/74
NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL 7 June 13-14, 1974

 

pe _——— ae .

Council recommended that the Susquehanna Valley RMP application be
funded at the level of $300,000 rather sthan $400,000. A sptrited
exchange took place between Council reviewers and DRMP staff who had
met with the SVRMP RAG chairman, Grantee official and Coordinator

which resulted in Council upping its initial recommendation by $100,000.

TTT aoe

-DRMP FUNDING: DECISION = - - 9338, 000
; £0/7/3/74