INO ea
. LW! 9 O Wen

OUTLINE FOR Khinan), Rats?

REGIONAL MEDICAL PROGRAM DECISION PAPER WA

ADDENDUM #1

SSL {o
AO

~,

N

2

™~

si

NO

 

I. NARRATIVE | Oe ache
. a o : G
A. Description of Program ya. Jo goles
: Kerry

B. Criticisms of Program . . hey an IS ex (end
1 Lacks Coordination OO”KT j on been
| 4. Lbably 'T. je + th wert
2. Brownian Movement pow j

3. No Overall Detectable Strategy
-) | pbracithe)

: ciple { em? with aie mal gpl a Aff x peek P

ta red jai Via, Suc,

Ai

c. Strength of Program

 

7 dope sh . Establishment of workable and new acceptable ,
linkage between.Federal Gov ernment | and th )
drikistionk bA fiat , ge bet f beth i cpt to dead ee Aa beth

professional prov viders

He oy ¢ | sper

we att 2. Productive dialogue has — established

rianibed and among formerly disparete interest

 
    

 

tn most communities as a conseqeence of the
stablis iment of the program.
. Vy ae ee! pee FO tet . 7
“A 3: p s ce oe ?: i Loe Vint Peas 8” nhs ote 4 bs He. C is PAS 7 )
DP. Federal Necdst
TMAP : Kreg? tpl gama,
le, iinplerkentation of quality control through

utilization review, peer review end continuing
-education.

2. Means for conducting pilot experiments, demonstra-
tions and ins stitutional reforms working within
“He syst em,

1) fore oe lite mas for Yolk LAD sonietls
If.

tenes a ete

FA ee ae nae ce se etme :

cisions made by CHP Agencies.

HHO, EMS Ne . .
f oifag ato brn tY

3. Implementing 4 de
4. Promote HEW emphasis, i. e.
S (/, a
6. Wd mts Hered b pelt ok,
ISSUES AND OFTIONS

Issue 1 (a)

Should the Iccal RMP units be programmatically independent?

Completely locally responsive.

 

Option B - Yes, but incentives for working on HEW
priorities.

Option C ~- Most money obligated for HEW priorities
, or criteria with remaining moneys to be

spent on local priorities.