W#i * #*«ffliH 5ICW ■MMMMMMMMMM ft 'V-tKX ON THE SUPPOSED INCREASE OF INSANITY, BY £D\frARi7 JARVIS, M. »• Dorchester, Mass. [riprinted from tub '-American journal or insanitt." S^SS^SmSSSEmSSJS £ 14 W 7 h. J ON THE SUPPOSED INCREASE OF INSANITY. Dr. James C. Prichard, in his Treatise on Insanity, page 236, says, "A very general apprehension has exist- ed, both in this country," Great Britain, "and France, that Insanity has increased in prevalence of late years, to an alarming extent, and that the number of lunatics, when compared with the population, is continually on the increase." A very similar apprehension exists in America, and the known facts and the public records seem to confirm it. There are certainly more lunatics in public and pri- vate establishments; they attract more of popular sym- pathy ; they receive more of the care and protection of the government; more and more hospitals are built; and the numbers of the insane seem to increase in a still more rapid ratio. Nevertheless, it is impossible to demonstrate, whether lunacy is increasing, stationary, or diminishing, in pro- portion to the advancement of the population, for want of definite and reliable facts, to show, how many lunatics there are now, and still less to show, how many there have been at any previous period. Wanting these two facts, we cannot mathematically compare the numbers of 6 the insane or their proportions to the whole people at any two distinct periods of time, and thus determine, whether lunacy increases or retrogrades. It is but a recent thing, that any nation has enumerated its insane. And I cannot discover, that any nation has ascertained and reported this twice, and thus offered us data for the comparison. Governments, political economists and statisticians have made accurate enumerations of the whole people. Beside this, they have ascertained their ages, employ- ments and even their property, and many other circum- stances respecting them. But very few have attempted to determine the degree and quantity of vital force among the people, the numbers that come up to, and the num- bers that fall short of, their full development of strength and fulness of health, and enjoy each and all of their days, through their complete term of years. Still less have they enquired into and published to the world the defalcations and depreciations of mental health and power, and shown, how many minds were diseased, and how many were deficient, or idiotic, or demented, in any degree. Several Governments have ordered this investigation, but none have done it thoroughly and completely. Most have been contented with estimates, or with such general enquiries as were answered entirely or in part by esti- mates or conjectures. They have not gone from house to house, making diligent and minute enquiry in every family, to know, whether there were any insane, and how many of these there might be, and what were their form and degree of disease. The Government of the United States, in the decennial enumeration of the people, made this enquiry, in 1840, and again in 1850. But the published report of the first 7 census contains some of the grossest and most palpable errors in regard to the distribution of insanity. There was such a manifest carelessness and inaccuracy in some of the officers or clerks, who had the management of, or who performed the work of that enumeration and its pre- sentation to the public, as to throw a doubt over the state- ments of the whole of that document. The last census, that of 1850, has not yet been pub- lished. We have the census of the insane in Belgium, taken with great apparent accuracy and reliableness ; but as we have no other census of that nation of either a previ- ous or subsequent date, it is impossible to make a com- parison of the numbers. A census of the insane at Norway, was taken, by order of the Government in 1825, and published in 1828, by Dr. Hoist. Esquirol published an analysis of Dr. Hoist's document in the Annales De Hygiene, in 1830. But we have no account of any earlier or later enumeration of the Norwegian lunatics, and consequently have no grounds for determining statistically, whether they have increased or diminished. These are all the nations which are known to have made careful and thorough examinations of the numbers of their lunatics; and as they have done this only once, their single facts give us no ground of comparison, and we are therefore compelled to wait until they shall take and publish another census of their insane before we can determine their comparative condition and progress. The French Government in 1843 published a large folio volume, the " Statistique De La France" respecting the condition of the people of that nation. Seventy pages of this document are devoted to the insane, and their con- dition, numbers, residence, situation, professions, cost of 8 support, causes of disease, and mortality during the seven years from 1835 to 1841 inclusive. This is a State document; it is prepared and published by the Minister of Agriculture and Commerce; it comes with all the authority of the Government; and, without doubt, it contains all the facts that were then known in regard to the lunatics of France. Yet there is an appa- rent want of completeness in its statements. This report gives accounts of the lunatics in hospitals and hospices, in poorhouses, and prisons and all other public and private establishments for their cure or custo- dy. It includes those lunatics who were kept at home with their own friends, or were boarded in other private families, and also those who were wanderers, in vaga- bondage, strolling about the streets of the towns and country. There are eighty-six departments in France. In sixty- seven departments, there were, in 1843, one hundred and nineteen public and private establishments for the insane, leaving nineteen departments without any provision within themselves for this purpose. All of these nineteen de- partments sent their lunatics to others, except three which reported no lunatics in any condition belonging to them during these seven years. Only twenty-one departments are reported to have any lunatics at their houses or in private families, leaving sixty-five departments with all of their insane in public or private establishments especially devoted to them, or in prisons, or in vagabondage. Only twenty five departments are reported to have any vagabond lunatics, wandering or strolling abroad, leaving sixty-one departments, all of whose patients of this sort are at their houses, or in other families, or in some insti- tutions for their cure or custody. 9 Fifty-four departments are stated to have all of their lunatics in some public or private institutions, and none at their homes, or in any private families, or in vaga- bondage. So important a department as the Seine, which includes the city of Paris, and about a million inhabitants, reports no lunatics at their houses, or in any private families, or as strollers in the streets, while there are stated to be 2,407 in the public and private institutions. The department of Bouches de Rhone, including the city of Marseilles, according to this report, has all of its insane in public and private institutions. Eleven departments had no lunatics in either place, or class of places, on the 1st of January, 1841, according to this document. There seem to be remarkable omissions and imperfec- tions in this report. That eleven departments should have no insane among their population at any moment— that fifty-four departments, including so large cities as Paris and Marseilles, should have none at their homes, or boarding in other private families, or strolling abroad during these seven years, is too improbable to be believed. The best that can be said of these reports, is that they contain the record of all the insane that were then heard of; and we must not infer from the blanks, that no luna- tics existed, but that none were reported. < These explanations must be considered in estimating the value of the following table, which is taken from the 369th page of the " Statistique De La France :"-^- b 10 Year. Population. Number of Lunatics. Number of Lunatics in 100,000 People. 1835............. 33,540,910 33,540,910 33,540,910 33,540,910 33,540,910 33,540,910 34,213,929 14,486 15,314 15,870 16,892 18,113 18,716 19,738 43 46 47 50 54 56 1836....................... 1837....................... 1838....................... 1839....................... 1840....................... 1841....................... 58 1 Here is shown an apparent increase of insanity in France, during these seven years. Yet as this document has the appearance of a collection of partial enquiries and estimates from the several departments, rather than the results of careful investigations in all the districts, and towns, and families, this table is to be taken rather as a probable than a certain account of the progress of lunacy in that country. The British Metropolitan Commission of Lunacy, in 1844, made a most valuable report as to the lunatics and lunatic establishments in Great Britain and Ireland. So far as their report relates to hospitals and to all sorts of public and private institutions for the insane and to the patients contained in them, and to the pauper lunatics in poorhouses and elsewhere and to the private self-sustain- ing lunatics who were under commission, it is doubtless correct, for it is based on record and observation. They report 20,893 lunatics, of every sort and in every condition in England and Wales; 16,821 of these are pau- pers, and 4.072 are private or self-supporting patients.— All of these private or self-supporting patients are in asy- lums or hospitals, or licensed houses especially devoted to them, except two hundred and eighty-two who were under commission. No mention is made of any pay pa- tient who is not in some institution, or under commission, none of any retained at their houses, or boarded else- where in private families, and supported by their own property or by that of their friends. 11 Without doubt, these are all the pauper lunatics, wherever they may be. It is very certain, that here are all the pay-patients who were under commission. But it is not probable, that there were no others,—none supported by their own or their friend's property out of hospitals or licensed houses, and not under commission. Nor is it probable, that there were only two hundred and eighty- two pay or private lunatic-patients in all England and Wales, out of public and private establishments especially devoted to them. We must therefore conclude, that this is an imperfect census of the insane of England and Wales, especially when the commissioners themselves say, on page 182 of their report, that "of patients who have been under pri- vate care, for shorter periods than one year, no return is required, so that a large class of insane persons, under certificate exists, in respect to whose number there are no materials for calculation." Again they say, " as regards those of whom return ought to be made, it is believed, that in a very small proportion of instances is the law complied with." " We have not taken the class last mentioned, [certificated single patients] into the account, in our estimate of the present numbers of the insane.— Even if these returns were complete and all certificated single patients were comprised in them, there would still remain a considerable class of insane persons of all ranks of life, under the care of guardians or relatives, without certificate, of whose probable number we have no means of forming an estimate." We have then no enumeration nor any complete esti- mate of the insane in even England and Wales. Still less have we two enumerations taken at different times by which we may make any comparison. n The marshals of the United States enumerated and reported 627 self-sustaining, and 644 pauper lunatics in the State of Massachusetts, in 1840. The government of that State, in the year 1847, appointed a large and respect- able commission to ascertain the number of the insane in the Commonwealth at that time. Instead of going them- selves or sending suitable agents to every house to learn the sanity of its inmates, these commissioners sent circulars to the mayors and aldermen of the several cities, and to the selectmen of the several towns asking them to obtain and give this information. These public authorities, in their answers to the commissioners, gave them such knowledge as they possessed in regard to these matters. They returned the names of all the insane persons they Jsnew. These municipal officers could return the num- bers of the pauper lunatics in their respective towns and cities for they were subjects of public record; but they have no more knowledge of the domestic condition of pri- vate families than any other men of their respectability and range of acquaintance. Consequently this commis- sion, through this mode of enquiry ascertained and re- ported