lit Ambitions of ijrc (Ionflict. the CONDITIONS OF THE CONFLICT. O RATIO N DELIVERED BEFORE |lie jpiical Jiocietj of tie 4omitj of lings, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK, AT ITS FIFTY-SECOND ANNIVERSARY, February 24th, 1874, {j* Alexander Hutchins, M.D. PUBLISHED BY SUBSCRIPTION AT THE SOLICITATION OF COUNCIL OF THP MEDICAL SOCIETY OF THE COUNTY OF KINGS. Nrto Yorfe : GEORGE F. NESBITT & CO., PRINTERS, Cor. Pearl and Pine Streets, 1874. “ Apparently our modern science and humanity have done a great deal to keep off disease, and bring down the average death-rate in favored communi- ties. * * • * In a certain sense all nature is our enemy, and earth, air, water, all elements and creatures, are watching to find our vulnerable point. Now' all true science is the triumph of the human spirit over the tyranny of nature, and all the sciences and arts of health, all safeguards against infection by proper management of watercourses and miasmatic grounds, all preventive measures against the great contagions that ravage the earth, not only save individual lives, but keep evil germs out of the human constitution, and art upon the general vitality of the race.” (The Skeleton in Modern Society.— Uarper’s Magazine, May, 1874). “ Medical studies have now become long and laborious, the physical and chemical sciences being now far more than mere auxiliaries, and forming an important part in the preparation for examinations ; and the student, after his laborious and costly career, finds, on getting into practice, that he has no effective protection from the encroachments of charlatans and parasites.” (Decline of Medical Study in France.—The Union Medicate of Feltruary \7th, quoted by Med. and Surg. Reporter, April 8th, and by Boston Med. and Surg. Journal, April 23d, 1874). CSoi\en- sation as custom has led them to exact for their services. There is no especial pleasure in this examination, nor would it be profit- able to expend time in rehearsing what is so well known. The only points that it is desirable to insist upon are that within these limits are included the major part of the unpleasantness that attaches to the practice of the profession, and that, under the pre- sent condition of things, these results are inevitable. If we understand this, we may be led to something higher, for it will be seen at a glance that these are but contingents and are no constituent part of the profession. They are one’s personal belongings, and they vary with the person, with his idiosyncracy of temperament, with his executive ability, with his power of expression, with his natural diginity of character and deportment. A man of tender sympathies, and consequently of sensitive na- ture, if thrown among associations, coarse, ignorant, and unap- preciative, will be jarred infinitely more than another man whose kindness and good judgment may be equally faithful, but whose emotional nature is less easily aroused. But in the ordinary practice of the profession no man escapes this contact, because necessity or duty, which alone impel any man to put himself among uncongenial surroundings, are both driving him thither perpetually. Each young man is a candidate for public favor and, as a rule, he must commence at the bottom. From the most unpleasant, through all grades up to the most satisfactory sur- roundings, his duty is in spite of the surroundings and ever the same. And, as the tongues of Kumor are as the winds of heaven, his faithfulness to duty is his impelling force upward, and the grinding fact is that he knows it; he must take what comes. So, on the other hand, it is equally apparent how unconducive this practice of the profession is to exercise, in its own behalf, any self-assertion of its dignity. “ On their own merits, modest men are dumb.” The taint of personality follows it all through. The strife for personal salvation from failure, to say nothing of all the ambition for personal aggrandizement and independence, that are the inspi- ration of all labor, is the same old battle of life fought here as everywhere. And it is a thought that ought not to be repressed, but rather should be placed before the sober regard of all who hold faith in the uprightness of humanity, that this strife among medical men with all their opportunities for covert action, develops so little that is mean or sordid. And this self-assertion of dignity is diffi- cult, nay impossible, for the inclusive reason that through so large an extent the profession is the seeker and not the sought. Its ability to perform, it proclaims; its opportunities for per- formance are its sources of revenue. It is properly restrained, its very genius limits it, in the search for these opportunities. In all the formative stages of what is known as reputation (and let it not be lost sight of that the personality is ever prominent) the effort to win over by complacency of manner, no less than by skill in action, is as recognizable as it is needful. So that any self-assertion of the acquisitions, hereditary or original, which are the common treasury of the profession, that cannot, at the moment, be brought down to the test of desired results, would plunge headlong down the abyss between arrogance and absurd- ity. In this apology, let it be recollected that temporizing is out of the question; action must be prompt, and, leaving out of sight the unquestionable fact that inexperience will turn pale no matter how polished its weapons and how multitudinous its unused resources, the problems that are thrust on the novitiate are the same problems that baffle the sage. I imagine that we shall have little difficulty now in finding some solid basis on which to rest the statement, tliat either the profession has an over-weening estimate of its own importance, or else, that there is a very inadequate estimate of its excellency on the part of those whose interests it subserves. In brief, it arro- gates to itself an accurate understanding of the physical struc- ture and functions of man, a growing comprehension of the causes that tend to undermine his integrity, and with that growth an ever increasing ability to check its tendency to decay, and that this growth is based on sound knowledge acquired by liberal investigation. Opposed to this is a faith which has a very com- prehensive constituency, a faith which has been very well sum- marized by a modern English medical w’riter, Dr. James Johnson, and which I quote for three reasons: because it embodies the sneer which is a popular sentiment against legitimate medicine, because men seize so eagerly and with so great gusto upon any ridicule a man may cast on his own calling, no matter how truth- less so long as it is derisive, and because the extract was promi- nently placed in the humorous department of the most widely circulated popular magazine in the country. He says : “I declare my conscientious opinion, founded on long observation and re- jection, that if there was not a single physician, surgeon, apothecary, “ chemist, druggist or drug on the face of the earth, there would be less sick- " ness and less mortality than now obtains. When we reflect that physic is a “ *conjectural art,’ that the best physicians make mistakes, that medicine is “administered by liostsof quacks, that it is swallowed by multitudes of people “ without any professional advice at all, and that the world would be infinitely “more careful of themselves if they were conscious that they had no remedy “ from drugs, these and many other facts will show that the proposition I have “ made is more startling than untrue. But as it is, drugs will be swallowed “ by all classes, rich and poor, with the hope of regaining health and prolong- “ ing life, and also with the expectation of being able to counteract the culpa- “ ble indulgence of the appetites and passions.” If proof is asked for the statement that the public respect for legitimate medicine is not that to which, its practitioners claim, its dignity is entitled, dismissing all special cases, the one promi- nent fact that the public is tolerant of what it styles the different schools and practices of medicine, is answer conclusive. Thus far, in this discussion, I have steadily avoided any direct allusion to the Science and the Art of Medicine; but any proper understanding of the difficulty in question, must bring these terms prominently to the front, for on these the issue pends. Legitimate medicine elaborates the Science and on that bases its Art. All the manifold heresies of medicine with unanimous accord, confess the Art, but deny the Science. That this misconception should be fully grasped is essential before it is possible to make good the pretensions of legitimate medicine. For a proper understanding of the merits of the case, let us accept two definitions, that are of the most general charac- ter and which, from their inclusiveness, can be generally accepted, viz.: defining Science as a systematic arrangement of general principles; and Art as a system of rules designed to facilitate the performance of certain actions. The history of all medical heresy, no less than the history of the popular heresies of to-day, has been unmistakably consistent on two points : first, that it has never made any pretence to a Science, but has begun and ended in its claim to accomplish certain re- sults by certain procedures ; and second, that without exception, the end of its existence has been to promote the pecuniary emolument of its teachers. The implied claim is, therefore, and it is the popular objection, that the body is obnoxious to certain infirmities, that there are certain things to be done to relieve these infirmities, and that the discovery of the means whereby these results are obtained may be, indifferently, accidental or the result of investigation, and that the knowledge of the appro- priate use of these means is the doctrine of medicine. The in- telligent use of means suited to the relief of disease is, unques- tionably, the Art of medicine, and those, who believe that this is the end of the story, are thoroughly consistent when they allege that there are many ways to one end, and that any body of men who claim that they can cure'disease by certain modes and can make good their claim, are entitled to the honorable distinction of a school of medicine. And it follows, legitimately, that so soon as this is admitted, a highway is thrown open for an inter- minable procession of schools. Conjectural or no, if medical Art is all there is of medicine, or to put it again, if medical Art is all that is useful in medicine, then the heresies of medicine have the argument by undeniable concession, and are heresies no longer. Certain wants are to be supplied, the purveyors to these wants are supplying those most interested, and are driving a respectable trade. It must be ad- mitted that there results considerable friction, as the facts show. Individual ingenuity is pitted against collective learning. Ec- centricity no matter how erratic, insolent bravado no matter how blundering, conceit no matter how stupid, so long as a following is obtained, gain the prize of merit in that constituency. Of course this constituency is subject to great fluctuations. Repu- tations hang on a very brittle thread. The cow doctor was con- sulted in a critical case and though, as he said, he didn’t know much about humans, he’d give a pound of salts to a cow, and he thought a quarter might do for the young woman. It proved a bad case of ne sulor ultra crepidam, for in the style of the modern paragraphists, the mourners noticed a sweet smile on the face of the coqise and the procession did not reach the cemetery till after dark. The darkey’s is a case in point. A southern planter was taken suddenly ill and, as the nearest doctor was a long way off, an old negro, of considerable repute on the plantation, was sum- moned to prescribe. The patient not improving, the doctor was obtained, who asked the darkey what he'd given. “ Gib massa ai m and ros’n.” “ Alum and rosin ! what for? ” “ Why I gibs de al’m for to draw the parts togedder, and de ros'n for to make urn stick.” These are gross illustrations which set forth the principle that underlies all empiricism ; a belief which contends that experience 19 is the one thing needful in medical art, that is, mere experience, without knowledge of principles; an empiricism, older than Pliny or Aristotle, who wrote of it; an empiricism which, all along the upward track of knowledge, has set itself in antago- nism to scientific medicine. It is to be asserted, without fear of successful contradiction, that there is not a single instance to be brought forward from the accumulated archives of the intellectual history of all time, where the professional advocates of these pseudo-schools of medicine have contributed one iota to the mass of human knowledge out- side of the elaboration of their particular pet theory which is their stock in trade. Consistently they aver that the successful practice of medicine does not require it. If this be true and if this be all, the title of a learned profession is a misnomer beyond parallel. Is it possible, in these days of the diffusion of knowledge that one should be driven to argue the inferiority of an Art, whose system of rules has been knocked into shape by hap-hazard ex- perience, to the dignified composure of an Art which has been built up carefully and by slow processes, through successive gen- erations of investigation, whose classified knowledge has unfolded the processes of Nature and moulded the Art in conformity thereto ? Shall the community of intellect confess the conceit a novel one, that truth is a unit and cannot be dissociate, that each science is an analogue to every other, and that the broader the research the safer the guidance ? The truth then is before us, that there is need of a Science of Medicine on which to found the Art. What is the Science on which the Art of Medicine is founded? Medical science is classified knowledge of the structure and O functions of the human body, of its laws of growth and decay, of the influences that affect its integrity, and the laws by which they operate. The element of interference is involved in the etymology of the adjective that defines the science. Medical, medicus, the healer, from Medeor, to heal, cure, apply remedies, and this from the ante-Homeric yedoyai, to provide for, to attend to. Ac- tive interference for purposes of repair is the etymological genius of the 20 Science. The study is inspired by the intent to affect processes by medicines, by agents, by any means whatsoever. The intent to affect is its distinctive character. It is included in that department of Natural History known as Zoology, in its investigation of structure, function and habits. It assumes a fool hold for itself as an independent Science, when that plane of investigation is reached where order is studied for purposes of interference and protection. In common with all other Sciences, it seeks to establish gen- eral principles through the relation of facts. Observation and deduction are the conditions of its growth. Alone of the Sci- ences it seeks to provide for the restoration of order. All other Sciences are tributary to it, not for study of similar- ity and correlation of law, but as their results can be turned to account in the purposes it proposes. Let us state the problem in another form. There is a physical structure of the human body, its several components working ac- cording to certain laws, the purport of which is called function ; that even in the most ideal conception of supply and demand, there is a tendency to the exhaustion of these energies, the com- bination of which is called life, and, as a practical fact, the con- ception of that ideal relation defies statement, for external influ- ences, in myriad form, are working to impair the balance of func- tion. To preserve or restore this balance is the need. The accu- mulated knowledge which is required to satisfy this need, sys- tematically arranged, is Medical Science. It is contended that there can be no Science when the muta- tions are so rapid, and extinction so sure. Of course, this begs the whole question, for if general Science has developed any- thing, it has authoritatively pronounced the universality of change and tendency to extinction of present modes of being. The objection is resolved into one of degree. It is complex be- cause it draws from so many sources to promote its ends. “ Med- icine,” says Whewell, “ in its original and comprehensive sense, as one of the great divisions of human culture, must be consid- ered as taking in the whole of physical Science.” The complex- ity is increased, not because the relations are more occult than in other organisms, but because the element of repair enters in. The objection fades before the fact that, as a Science, its theories 21 are put at once to tlie crucial test. The Science and the Art are in the same hands, and the Art must be prosecuted to procure the means to develop the Science. “ It does not plant itself on the dogmas of authority, precedent or tradition. Its doctrines are based upon the eternal and immutable laws of Nature, and are estimated by high scientific standards. Precedent and au- thority carry no weight here, except so far as they accord with the principles which science has proven, and has established as reliable guides * * * The old is valued only as it squares with the new. The past is estimated solely by the standard of the present.”—(Dunster.) There can be but one science of one subject. What facts are known relating to one subject must be related to each other. These accumulated facts, with their relations, are the materials for the Science of that subject. If the conception of the unity of Medical Science has been adequately indicated, it must be conceded that Medical Science is something wider and more com- prehensive than has heretofore been confessed, and the imperfect comprehension that has obtained has been an injustice to its dig- nity. Almost its entire literature has been in antagonism to this conception. Not only has the irrational severance of medical and surgical learning endowed each with the appellation of a dis- tinct Science, but the parceling out is the genius of the day, and the Sciences of Medicine have become more and more numerous as industry has been applied to the development of more and more restricted departments. The unity is lost in the prominence of de- tails. As truth has been wrought out, the tendency has been to divide and subdivide, instead of to generalize and unify. The history of histological, anatomical, physiological and pathological studies is unique in the fact that they have been elaborated by medical men, not as side-issues and for intel- lectual gratification, but as directly essential to their need. Dis- sociation of them from the body of Medical Science is a denial of their history in the very face of fact. But it is a violation of intellectual honor to apply this fundamental knowledge to certain departments, and on the basis of operative procedure, to elevate these departments into distinctive Sciences. So far as I am aware, there are but three instances in the entire array of Medical journalism, where this unity is acknowledged by the titles of these journals: one in Europe, one in Asia, and one in America. “The Dublin Journal of Medical Science,” “The Indian Annals of Medical Science,” and “The Half-Yearly Com- pendium of Medical Science.” Outside of these the changes arc rung in every conceivable form on “ Medical Sciences,” “ Medi- cal," “Surgical,” “Medico-Chirurgical,” and the like. But if there be this unity in the Science of Medicine, the moss- grown, ivy-covered wall between Medicine and Surgery, that has defied the ages, must crumble; and with its destruction there shall ensue a breaking down of all barriers, and over the ruins the stately Science of Medicine shall collect itself into the majesty of single-handed strength. If there be this unity, objection can be unqualifiedly made to the abuse of terms in ranking the depart- ments of Medicine as separate Sciences. As sub-divisions of the great Science of Medicine, they are but Arts of Medicine, fulfill- ing certain functions in the application of that Science. The disposition of thought engendered by otherwise regarding them, is inimical to a clear comprehension of the unity of Medical Science. The sweeping away of these barriers will obliterate their fragmentary character and compress them into a body of learning. If further argument were needed, it would seem that the question could be put beyond cavil by taking into account the purpose for which Medical learning exists. The singleness of that purpose must unify the power that would effect it. Except by exhaustive statement, it would be presumptuous to rehearse, before this learned body, the history, progress, resources and acquisitions of Medical Science. In truth, this rehearsal would have but an incidental connection with my purpose. My aim has been solely to point out the fallacy and misconception through which the various forms of medical heresy have warped public sentiment away from a proper understanding of the exact grounds on which legitimate medicine is based, and to furnish the radical argument which shall lead up to the education of the people in a comprehension of the well-grounded claims of Scien- tific Medicine. It ought not, indeed it cannot, admit of question that where there is misconception in a matter of so great importance as the relation of the medical profession to the public whom it serves, 23 that an attempt should be made by those most competent to clear up misunderstanding, and that this attempt should be adhered to until a satisfactory result is arrived at. Error is destructive always, and sows dragon-teeth broadcast to spring up armed men who shall assail truth with the sword. But on this issue the interests of civilization are intense and should be rightly informed, for after all it is the truth that men are seeking for; the professed skeptics are but few. So, on the part of the profession, the duty is not less important. It cannot destroy error by ridicule, and, if it stand still, without raising a hand in its own defense, it must suffer. “ When bad men combine,” says Burke, “the good must associate, else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice, in a contemptible struggle.” It is easy to see how the unrest of the profession should increase in the face of the triumph of medical heresy, and it is not difficult to forecast how probably, in view of the dependence of the Arts of Medicine on popular favor, disaffection might grow and the legitimate Arts of Medicine be sacrificed to the emergen- cies of life. It is, then, of the utmost importance, for the preserva- tion of its own integrity, that the profession should be alive to the demands of the age, and secure itself beyond peradventure of inroad by bringing the public mind, face to face, with the cath- olicity, the stupendous progress, the multiform investigation and acknowledged achievements of Medical Science Do not misunderstand me for an instant. I make no convplaint touching the position of medical men as individuals in their greater or less success. As things run, men get their deserts in this world. There is nothing so successful as success, in which is involved the truth that opportunities must not only be im- proved, they must be created. The unsuccessful man, conscious of some power that ought to lead to results, must reckon himself deficient in some qualities whereby that power can be utilized. Men are ordinarily ambitious of their own fortune, and if there be one who feels that there is an inadequate recognition of his merits, he must call himself to account for his failure. It is discreditable to depreciate any success honorably achieved, and while every- thing is fair in love and war, the savoir faire, no matter where applied, conditions the royal road. lie who sits down to await the advent of fame, will be found sitting when his last trump 24 summons him into obscurity. All the latent energies in the uni- verse are worthless till called into action. And the application is pertinent. We are conscious of so much power which is our com- mon acquisition, that jealousy will crop out at times, and the airy forms of slander will, to our honor, be it said, rarely, attack fair fame. Medical men must meet the world as men meet it every- where. Each can, by the force of his own character, gain for himself a respect independent of his calling. But the Science which the profession has elaborated, and from which it draws its resources, it must maintain. The very structure of our Science defies its prostration before mere purposes of gain; but it has rights which truth gives it, and which, for truth’s sake, must be maintained. It must be set on the hill-top that all may see it, before its power can be recognized. It will certainly hold good in the opinion of medical men, that the statement of Johnson, above quoted, is not temperate; and it is difficult to understand how the statement could have been de- liberately made. Such wholesale assertions arc pretty generally ill-judged, and this is no exception to the rule. The statement is smart and specious, but incorrect. It does not aver that drugs are altogether worthless for good and invariably do harm, but it asserts that if they could be banished, inen would l>e better off. But the fact is that they are here, and the fact is they are useful. It avers also that as they are abused, they ought not to lx; used at all. It is difficult to seriously discuss a reform that would abolish things because things can be abused. Then should Mr. Bergh say that, as cruelty to horses not only damages the horse, but degrades the moral sense of the driver, therefore horses should be abolished. Now horses are a definite quantity, and could be swept from existence, if men should so agree ; but nothing short of a general annihilation of things could abolish drugs. Now some men know, and most everybody believes, that drugs are useful, and it is highly probable that the prema- ture pippin has driven the objector himself, at some time, to his paregoric. Of course he should have ascertained the maturity of his pippin, but then accidents will hapj>en, and drugs will re- pair damages Excess is a contingent of all growth : no vice, no virtue; no right, no wrong. Wisdom shows itself in the proper use of things ; unwisdom, which is either recklessness or ignorance, declares itself in their abuse. There is no moral char- acter in things, and the moral character of the individual is not affected, one way or another, by things which are at rest. So as long as drugs are in the world, and a proper education can turn them to useful account, it is a trifle foolhardy to assert that that education were better stifled, because those who do not and can- not possess it, damage themselves by drugs. But the statement avers that Physicians sometimes make mis- takes. I do not pretend to deny it Fatalities not unfrequently occur from ignorance or carelessness, which bring reproach on the profession. But, in a majority of instances, it may safely be asserted that such errors will be found to have their source in the inadequacy of preparation, which may be objected against most all professions, or in other causes inseparable from human im- perfection. Certainly if medical men and Medical Science are to be thus adjudged to indiscriminate slaughter, it is time some one should arouse out of slumber. For the more general a belief in the cor- rectness of such statements, the greater the indignities that would be heaped on the mass of men whose lives are pledged to its sup- port, and the more widespread the disaffection from their ranks. On the other hand, if Medical Science was held in adequate esteem, confessedly, it would be authority in its own department, and its votaries would be inspired to greater effort to elevate its rank, and though subject ever to criticism in the exercise of their calling, that criticism would be on a higher plane, and would not trench, in any degree equal to the present, on the dignity and self-respect of the individual. The Science itself would protect the scientific body. With this confession of the authority of Medical Science, would slink into oblivion the pestilential host of nostrums, not sooner than the distortions, untruthful ness, ignorance and dis- honesty of the pseudo-schools of medicine which prey on the prejudices and fears of men ; or if ignorance and credulity must exist, so long as the world stands, these corruptions of the truth would be driven to their boon companionship, excluded from corrupting intelligence. And, still further, the dignity of Medical Science, once recog- nized, would give authority to its mission as guardian of the public safety, and individual intelligence would be better placed in the following of advice as to its own interests. How is this estimate to be enforced ? Granting that there should be a unanimous concession as to the necessity of bringing Medical Science prominently to the front, so that its to be ranked among the Sciences could be made good in the popular estimation, and so that it should receive the homage of respect to which, as a Science of the first rank, it is entitled, difficulties without number marshal themselves forward to contest the wis- dom of the several modes by which this scheme could be carried into effect. It is impossible to reject or gloss over these difficul- ties. In the first place, the scheme itself is revolutionary. From remoter periods than when the Priests of Isis held the pre- rogative of medical mysteries, and dealt them out for oboloi and drachmae, up through the Dark Ages of Rosicrucian Arts, Necro- mancy and the Witches’ Caldron, even to these better days, the serenity of medical learning has held itself aloof, in self-con- templating and dictatorial dignity, from the vain and babbling world. And this self-imposed dignity, if it has provoked the sneer of heresy, was well-grounded in one fact at least, that there were mysteries, and that these mysteries could not be trifled with with impunity, and on them impious and unhallowed hands should not be laid. Rut I protest now, as the argument I have thus far endeavored to make good is naught if not a protest, against this confusion of Medical Arts with Medical Science. The Arts require tools, and demand a special education for their use ; but the principles on which these Arts are based, are eternal truths, and are, therefore, the property of mankind, as they are its heritage. But again, another class of difficulties, swarming up from the first named, cluster around the general objection that the profes- sion would be destroyed by the general diffusion of the knowl- edge which is its capital in business. There is the aroma of antiquity exhaling from this likewise. One of our own craft has told the story of how, many a century since, one Demetrius cried out to his fellow-workman, and set the City of Ephesus in an uproar against the overthrow of the worship of Diana, as that “thereby their craft vras in danger of being set at naught.'’ There is a general demerit in the objection. For the respect 27 which is inspired in the unlearned for intellectual power, enhances the authority with which that power enforces itself, even though there be utter inability to grasp the sources of that power; and though the cultivated may investigate the general principles of all Science, yet the special education required for the practical application of these principles, forbid any general participation therein. Faith in the efficiency of the “Jack at all trades,” decreases with the diffusion of intelligence. And, on the other hand, no decent political economy would stand in the way of any progress, that would do away with any need, for the purpose of sustaining the labor that supplied that need. When Medical Science has risen to her completeness, and public sentiment is obedient to her authority, old age will have asserted his legitimacy, the nosology will have dwindled, and the medical profession, as it now is, will be an institution of the past. If the special duties of the profession be, by this means, diverted into other channels, what boots it? Civilization, which is progress, will crush the imbecile that flings himself afront her chariot wheels. But how is this estimate to be enforced ? By three modes, which, held as supplements one to the other, are to be combined as one force. By the profession bringing Medical Science out from its seclusion into the conditions created by the demand for Popular Science: by the profession forcing on the public consid- eration the lessons it alone is competent to teach ; and by the pro- fession throwing about itself such safe-guards as shall secure its ranks against occupation save by those who, by the gifts of char- acter, industry, intelligence, and culture, are fitted for the high places of this calling. From metropolitan centres to the outskirts of civilization, there is this demand for Popular Science. Great audiences throng the lecture-halls to listen in wonder to its startling revelations; jour- nals are devoted to its exposition; it has its columns in the papers that penetrate to the remotest wilds. The best ascertained facts and the very idealities of speculation alike prostrate the knowledge-hungry listeners spell-bound in reverence at the investigations that have dared and conquered. But what of all that has been thus far ventured, even with the glamour of Tyn- dall’s fame and the enterprise of Proctor, can compare in exact- ness of investigation, thoroughness of research, completeness of results, and the startling character of the processes evolved, with many and many a score of the achievements of Medical Science, which are the every-day, familiar facts of the profession ? Con- ceive the Doctrine of the Circulation put before the Academy foot-lights, with all the appliances of demonstration, with dia- grams and models and manikins, microscopic and chemical analy- sis, vivisection and the calcium light Display from the canvass, in the weird darkness of the room, the torrent of the blood rush- ing in impetuous force down through gradually diminishing and ramifying canals; follow it through the dim mysteries of its wonderful mutations, till it re-collects its turbid and more sluggish stream on the upward and widening grade: resurrect it by con- tact with the all-pervading energizer of being, till, flushed and instinct with life, it plunges again into the maelstrom that shall hurl it on its ceaseless round! Where, in comparison with the disjointed and fragmentary phenomena of light and heat; where the dreamy visions that fill up the infinite abysses that separate the frigid isolation of astronomical facts, is this one, wonderful, exact, complete, conclusive, incarnate demonstration of infinite wisdom and power! Penetrate, again, down to the very genesis of being, and build up, by lbstological synthesis, from protoplasm, through cell and fibre and organ and including frame, till the warm flush suffuses the Apollo. Convert the gross elements of material substance into chords that quicken into the most subtle sensa- tions, whose central source trespasses on the Infinite. Follow out the display of the myriad results of Medical Science, by im- pressing the truth that they are not the accidents of pleasurable investigation, but have been wrought out through long generations of laborious endeavor, forever inspired by the hope to make more successful the applications of that Science; that hosts of men stand ready, at any moment, tp be eloquent expositors of its latest refinements, and the demands for Popular Science are met. Whatever there is of regard and reverence for scientific truth any- where, must be given to Medical Science, as in the first rank for elaborateness and utility. Coupled with this, let the profession, through its organizations, general or local, oppose itself to the recklessness and ignorance that unsteady and shorten life, and in its own department preach to the people the sermons of right living, of which self-denial is the unvarying theme. There is a recklessness that baffles all in- struction ; but, in the main, men are only too willing to abide by competent teaching, and the competency of the profession to un- fold the problems affecting the general or the individual weal, ought not to be a matter in dispute. The demand for knowledge assumes the best it can get as the best of all. On the other hand, if the profession possess this knowledge, it ought to be made manifest. The test of duty is the only test that can stand. If it possess facilities that can stay disorder, it is criminal to all humanity if it does not use them. The late meeting of the State Society proved that the profession is alive to the issue In a dis- cussion on drainage, men from all parts of the State urged, with intense earnestness, that preventible causes of disease should be studied for purposes of removal ; that legislation could effect nothing, unless the instruction of the people preceded the legis- lation. General Yiele said it was his experience that a medical practitioner, wherever found, was a missionary domestic, civil and religious, and as such it was his duty to initiate reform.” Dr. Agnew urged medical men, on their daily rounds, to force this knowledge on the consideration of men. Dr. Moore insisted that “ as a body we must seek to enlighten the community, so as to secure general laws,” and again, “ we must inaugurate schemes that shall command general professional assent and press and press them on the attention of the people.” Not separated from these two, but upholding both in the pub- lic regard, stands foremost the unquestionable duty the profession owes to its own dignity in guarding well the entrance to its treas- ures. If the personnel be staunch and true, if it be well in- structed and intelligent, if it be studious and liberal, if it be high-minded and loyal, it shall win its way. There need be, then, no fear that the estimate the profession puts upon itself, and that in which it is held in the public regard, shall be widely separate. An honorable profession, upholding a Science distin- guished for its devotion to the public welfare, must be impregna- bly fortified in the esteem of men_ I have no word of plea for the men among us who have de- voted their lives to the cultivation of the special departments of our Science, who are shielded thereby from the complications that beset the profession at large ; no plea have I for the mag- nates of our profession who, by their excellent gifts and wisely- applied industry, are exalted to be our teachers, and are reposing with the laurels of well-earned victory. They are our pride, and for them I have but congratulation and rejoicing. But I plead for the general practitioner, that he shall be such a well-instructed and honorable member of a learned and cultured profession, that the honor and respect which it has acquired may belong to him, as an integral part thereof. And I plead, from the very depths of earnestness, for the younger brother, that he may be protected from the annoyances that baffle enterprise and stifle enthusiasm ; that the profession which has given him rank at the outset may be daily bettered by his judicious conduct ; that he may be so protected by the organizations that promote unity of purpose, diffusion of knowledge and combination of effort, and that are our common safeguard against the assaults of misrepresenta- tion and calumny, that the temptations to defection cannot suc- cessfully assail him, and that his life’s purpose, in whatever emer- gencies of trial, may never swerve. When these results shall have been achieved, when Medical Science shall have asserted itself among the elaborated systems of contemporaneous investigation, when its exponents shall have the regard due to their ministry, there shall have preceded de- cades of labor among the votaries of that Science informed with the sentiment which belongs to the genius of all the higher forms of labor, viz. : faithfulness to one's calling, that the calling may he dignified, so that those who pursue it thereafter may labor on a higher plane. Shall I enforce this by authority ? From Jurisprudence. Says Bacon : “ I hold every man a debtor to his profession, from the 'which, as men of course do seek to receive countenance and profit, so ought they, of duty to endeavor themselves, by way of amends, to be or help and ornament thereunto. This is per- formed, in some degree, by the honest and liberal practice of a profession: when men shall carry a respect, not to descend into any course that is corrupt and unworthy thereof, and preserve themselves free from the abuse wherewith the same profession is noted to be infected. But much more is this performed if a man be able to visit and strengthen the roots and foundations of the Science itself, thereby not only growing it in reputation and dig- nity, but also amplifying it in perfection and sustenance.” From Philosophy. Says Fichte: “Genius is nothing more than the effort of the idea to assume a definite form. The idea has in itself neither body nor sub- stance, but only shapes itself an embodiment out of the scientific materials which environ it in time, of which Industry is the sole purveyor.” From Statesmanship. Says Burke: “ The road to eminence and power from obscure condition is not to be made too easy, nor a thing too much of course. If rare merit be the rarest of all things, it ought to pass through proba- tion. The temple of honor ought to be seated on an eminence. If it be open through virtue, let it be remembered that virtue is never tried but by some difficulty and much struggle.” From Art. Says Sir Joshua Reynolds : “ Excellence is never granted to man save as a reward of labor. It argues no small strength of mind to persevere in habits of industry without the pleasure of perceiving those advances, which, like the hands of a clock, whilst they make hourly approaches to their point, yet proceed so slowly as to escape observation.” From Ethics. Says Edwards: “If we are but fixed and devoted to our business, bent on high and holy ends, we shall find means to them on every side and at every moment, and even obstacles and opposition will but make us like the fabled spectre ships, which sail the fastest in the very teeth of the wind.” From Song. Says Grimwald : “ In working well, if travail you sustain, Into the mind shall light pass the pain, But of the deed the glory shall remain.” Says the Marquis of Montrose : “ He either fears his fate too much, Or his deserts too small; Who dares not put it to the touch, To gain or lose it all.” 32 Says Longfellow: ** Lives of great men all remind us, We can make our lives sublime, And, departing, leave behind us, Footprints on the sands of time.” Says Macaulay: “ When the goodman mends his armour ; And trims his helmet’s plume, When the goodwife’s shuttle merrily, Goes flashing through the loom ; With weeping and with laughter, Still is the story told, Ilow well Horatiua kept the bridge, In the brave days of old.” “ And how can man die better, Than facing fearful odds, For the ashes of his fathers And the temples of his Gods." Let us stand by our profession, uphold, defend and make good its claims among ourselves and among all peoples. Let us, whose thought and sustenance issue from and abound in the sup- port of man's physical power and integrity, first believe ourselves that the full evolvement of the principles to which we have given our lives, is to result in the finer and more fruitful development of the race, and then teach it on every hand that the physiologi- cal purity of the people is the working basis for the highest ma- terial and moral standards. Let us teach it to the younger brethren, that it may be handed down a heritage from one gen- eration to another till the victory is won ; and though we are in the struggle, and see but glimmerings of the light, the sure things of this Science will prevail, and her votaries shall yet en- joy the radiancy of her millenial noon. " Blest, and thrice blest, the Roman, Who sees Rome’s brightest day, And views that grand, victorious pomp Wind down the Sacred Way, And through the bellowing Forum, And ’round the Suppliant’s Grove, Up to the everlasting gates Of Capitolian Jove.”