OF THE SOCIETY OF 4 1 4 lljum iopathic |llij|skifm$ i of iow^_. Held in Des Moines, May 14th and 15th, 1873, TRANSACTIONS -OF THE FOURTH ANNUAL SESSION -OP THE SOCIETY OE IjonurtJpatlm jj hgmcians of sow A. HELD IN Des .Moines, May lJfth and 15th, 1875. BURLINGTON, IOWA: SNOW. SI KITE A Co., STEAM PRINTERS AND BINDERS, 115 NORTH THIRD STREET. 1878. Society of Homoeopathic Physicians. OF I O W -A. . OFFICERS FOR 1874. G. H. BLAIR, M. D., Fairfield. PRESIDENT. FIRST VICE PRESIDENT. A. O. HUNTER, M. D., Des Moines. SECOND VICE PRESIDENT. I)u. T. A. BENBOW New Providence. G. H. PATC1IEN, M. D., Burlington. SECRETARY AND TREASURER. BUREAUS AND COMMITTEES FOR 1874. R. F. BAKER, M. D., Davenport; W. T. VIRGIN, M. D., Burlington; Board of Censors. S. P. YEOMANS, M. D., Clinton; P. H. WORLEY, M. D., Davenport; P. W. POULSON, M. D., Council Bluffs. W. H. DICKINSON, M. D., Des Moines. Orator. Alternate. W. T. VIRGIN, M. D., Burlington. G. N. SEIDLITZ, M. D., Keokuk; Bureau of Materia Medica. J. E. KING, M. D., Eldora; W. T. VIRGIN, M. D., Burlington. L. E. B. HOLT, M. D., Marshalltown; A. O. HUNTER, M. D., Des Moines; Bureau of Clinical Medicine. Db. T. A. BENBOW, New Providence; R. F. BAKER, M. D., Davenport. S. B. OLNEY, M. D., Fort Dodge; Bureau of Obstetrics and Diseases of Women and Children. P. H. WORLEY, M. D., Davenport; R.W. WATERMAN, M.D., Des Moines. Mrs. R. II. HARRIS, M. D., Grinnell; Bureau of Surgery. W. H. DICKINSON, M. D., Des Moines; E. A. GUILBERT, M. D., Dubuque. C. H. COGSWELL, M. D., Clinton; Bureau of Medical Education. II. P. BUTTON, M. D., Iowa City E. JACKSON, M. D., Epworth. P. J. CONNELLY, M. D„ Des Moines. Medical Electricity. Bureau of Anatomy, Physiology and Hygiene. A. O. HUNTER, M. D., Des Moines; P. W. POULSON, M. D., Council Bluffs. G. II. PATCHEN, M. D., Burlington; Publishing Committee. G. H. PATCHEN, M. D., Burlington; R. F. BAKER, M. D., Davenport; W. H. DICKINSON, M, D., Des Moines; W. T. VIRGIN, M. D., Burlington; E. A. GUILBERT, M. D., Dubuque. Delegates to American Institute of Homoeopathy. W. H. DICKINSON, M. D., Des Moines; G. H. PATCIIEN, M. I)., Burlington, P. H. WORLEY, M. D., Davenport; TRANSACTIONS OF THE FOURTH ANNUAL SESSION OP TUB Society of Homceophthic Physicians o IP I O W .A. . Held in Des Moines, May lJfth and 15tli, 1873. The Society assembled at the Court House at 10.30 A. M., L. E. 13. Holt, M. 1)., of Marshalltown, President, in the chair. Dr. G. H. Patchen, of Burlington, -was unanimously elected Sec- retary for the ensuing year, after which President Holt delivered an eloquent and practical opening address. The Treasurer’s report was read and passed into the hands of the Board of Censors for examination. The following officers were elected for the ensuing year: President—G. H. Blair, M. D., Fairfield. First Vice President—A. O. Hunter, M. D., I)es Moines. Second Vice President—I)r. T. A. Benbow, New Providence. The following physicians were elected to membership: A. Wilson, M. D., of Ames; A. Kunze, M. D., of Davenport; 11. W. Waterman, M. I)., of Des Moines; Mrs. 11. H. Harris, M. I)., of Grinnell. On motion, the paper of Dr. Blair, on Puerperal Convulsions, read before the Society last year, was ordered to be published in the proceedings of the present year. The Society, on motion of Dr. Dickinson, went into committee of the whole on clinical experience. Many interesting cases were related and discussed. FIRST DAY—Morning Session. 6 Dr. Hunter favored the Society with a very interesting case of puerperal convulsions with instrumental delivery. Gelseminum 1st, was the only remedy used; it controlled the spasms perfectly and carried the case to a happy recovery. A very peculiar feature was the disposition of the convulsions to return about a certain hour every afternoou, but the more frequent repetition of Gelse- minum prevented the convulsions. A case of extra uterine pregnancy was related by Dr. Dickin- son. It had been diagnosed by a celebrated physician as a sub- peritoneal fibroid tumor of the uterus. A post mortem revealed a partial decomposed foetus of about seven months, in the right fallopian tube. Many other interesting cases were reported and discussed, after which the Society adjourned till 2 P. M. TRANSACTIONS OF THE HOMCEOPATHIC SOCIETY. Afternoon Session. The Society met pursuant to adjournment, with an increased attendance. The following amendment to Article VII of the Constitution was adopted: “ No physician who is not a graduate, and who has commenced the practice of Homoeopathy since 1870, shall be admitted as a member of this Society.” The Committee on University question was continued another year, with a request to report after the meeting of the Board of Regents in June of the present year. The Secretary read a notice of the death of Dr. W. C. Russell, of Calamus, in February, 1873, an esteemed member of the Society. After a few appropriate remarks concerning the life and charac- ter of the deceased, by Dr. Holt, a committee was appointed to draw up appropriate' resolutions expressing the sentiments of the Society. The resolution to meet annually in Des Moines was by a unan- imous vote rescinded. The next meeting, at the request of Dr. Blair, was decided to be held at Fairfield. The following resolution, by Dr. Benbow, was adopted: TRANSACTIONS OF THE IIOMIEOrATIIIC SOCIETY. Unsolved, That committees of different bureaus, and all persons giving tlieir clinical experience, are requested to give the attenuation of the med- icine used, and the frequency of the dose. The Board of Censors reported favorably on the admission of Win. Wilson, M. D., of Chariton. BUREAU OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. Dr. Benbow read a paper on Capsula Renalis reporting satis- factory progress, of a case of long standing and previous Allo- pathic treatment; was under treatment from February 16th to April 1st with remarkable improvement. The Society listened to verbal reports upon epidemic Cerebro Spinal Meningitis. The experience of the different members showed that there is no specific treatment for the disease, but that a cold application—even pounded ice—to the base of the brain, and warm or hot baths to the body and extremities, produce the most favorable results, at the same time using Gelseminum, Belladonna, Bryonia, Veratrum Vir. internally, according to indi- cations. Electricity—the positive pole to the cerival or dorsal region, the negative to the coccyx—has a very soothing and amel- iorating effect, but is not a specific. BUREAU OF OBSTETRICS. Dr. Worley read an interesting case of amenorrhoea, which was ordered printed. There was considerable discussion on the subject of ligation of the funis. Upon inquiry it was found that many physicians had been practicing non-ligation for the past two years, with no dis- astrous effects. A case of congential Spina Bifida complicated with Scrotal Hernia, was reported by Dr. Holt. The Hernia was reduced and spinal trouble yielded entirely to the continued use of Nux Vom., in the Oth, 12th, 30th, and 200th attenuation successively. The paper was placed in the hands of the publishing committee. BUREAU OP SURGERY. Dr. Blair, chairman, read an exceedingly interesting and instructive paper on syphilis—its history, course and treatment— containing some original and novel ideas. 8 TRANSACTIONS OF THE HOMCEOPATHIC SOCIETY. Also a few reports of improved method of treating various sur- gical diseases, by Professor Danforth, of Hahneman Medical Col- lege, Chicago, which was received with thanks. Dr. Dickinson reported the following cases: 1. Gunshot wound in the abdomen. 2. Removal of fatty tumor from inner angle of upper lid of right eye. 3. Removal of epitheleal cancer from lip. 4. Closing and healing of severe wound across the tongue, by wire sutures. On motion adjourned till 8 o’clock P. M., to listen to the annual oration by S. P. Yeomans, of Clinton. Evening Session. At eight o’clock the Annual Oration was delivered before the Society by Dr. S. P. Yeomans, of Clinton. Owing to the in- inclement weather the attendance was small. The oration was a masterly effort, evincing much ability and careful preparation. By resolution the thanks of the Society were tendered to Dr. Yeomans, and the paper passed into the hands of the publishing committee. SECOND DAY—Morning Session. President Holt in the chair. The first thing in order was the report of Dr. E. A. Guilbert, chairman of the committee on securing the recognition of Homoe- opathy in the Medical Department of the State University. To the President, Officers and Members of the Society of Homoeopathic Phy- sicians of Iowa: Gentlemen—As professional engagements of a pressing character pre- vent my being present at your annual meeting, I forward, as Chairman of the Committee on Homoeopathy in the State University, a brief report of progress. On the 26th of June last I received from Mr. Haddock, Secretary of the Board of Regents, a letter a copy of which I submit: TRANSACTIONS OF TI1K HOMOEOPATHIC SOCIETY. State University, Iowa City, June 24, 1872. E. A. Gnilbcrt, Dubuque, Ioicu: Dear Sir—On (lie 22d inst., on motion of Mr. Wilson, the communica- tion of the Homoeopathic physicians of Iowa was referred by the Board of Regents, to a committee of the Board consisting of Hon. C. W. Slagle, of Fairfield, and W. W. Merritt, of Red Oak, for consideration, who were requested to report to this Board at a subsequent meeting. Very respectfully, WM. J. HADDOCK, Sec’y. I learn from two members of the Board of Regents that the Committee aforesaid will report at the forthcoming June session of the Board of Regents. Of course the nature of that report your Committee are unable to divine, but from the known views of several of the Board of Regents, we have reason to think that the said report will favor according us the recognition we ask, leaving the details as to the ways and means to be determined by further consideration. Speaking for myself, as I shall have no opportunity of ascertaining the views of the remainder of the Com- mittee, I regard it as of great importance that the Society be represented at the June meeting of the Board of Regents. To that end I advise that the Committee be continued, and instructed to be present at Iowa City at the annual meeting of the Board of Regents of the State University. If this is done, I, for one, shall make every effort to be there, prepared to urge our claims to the best of my ability. EDWARD A. GUILBERT, Chairman Committee. On motion the report was received, and the Committee in- structed to confer with the Board of Regents at their meeting in Iowa City, in June, the expenses to be borne by the Society. An interesting case under this head was reported by Dr. Con- nelly, of l)es Moines. I)r. Benbow read some interesting cases, omitted under the proper bureau yesterday, which were placed in the hands of the publishing committe. The retiring President, (Dr. Holt,) after a few remarks, thanking the Society for their earnest arid efficient work and their harmo- nious and courteous bearing during the session, introduced the President elect, Dr. Blair, of Fairfield, to the dignity and respon- sibilities of his chair. On motion the thanks of the Society were tendered Dr. Blair for his able efforts in behalf of the Society during the session; also to the press of the city and the State for so kindly noticing its proceedings. The following Committees and Bureaus were then appointed: BUREAU OF HYDROPATHY. 10 transactions of the society of Boakd of Censors—R. F. Baker, Davenport; S. P. Yeomans, Clinton; P. W. Poulson, Council Bluffs; W. T. Virgin, Burling- ton; P H. Worley, Davenport. Orator—W. H. Dickson, Des Moines. Alternate—W. T. Virgin, Burlington. Bureau of Materia Medica—G. N. Siedlitz, Keokuk; J. E. King, Eldora; W T. Virgin, Burlington. Bureau of Clinical Medicine—L. E. B. Holt, Marshalltown; T. A. Benbow, New Providence; A. O. Hunter, Des Moines; R. F. Baker, Davenport. Bureau of Obstetrics and Diseases of Women and Chil- dren—S. B. Olney, Fort Dodge; Mrs. R. H. Harris, Grinnell; P. H. Worley, Davenport; R. W. Watermon, Des Moines. Bureau of Surgery—W. H. Dickinson, Des Moines; E. A. Guilbert, Dubuque. Bureau of Medical Education—C. H. Cogswell, Clinton; H. P. Button, Iowa City, E. Jackson, Epworth. Medical Electricity—P. J. Connelly, Des Moines. Bureau of Anatomy, Physiology and Hygene—A. O. Hun- ter, Des Moines; G. H. Patchen, Burlington; P. W. Poulson. Council Bluffs. Publishing Committee—G. H. Patchen, Burlington; W. H. Dickinson, Des Moines; W. T. Virgin, Burlington; R. F. Baker, Davenport; E. A. Guilbert, Dubuque. Delegates to American Institute of Homuoopathy—W. H. 1 )ickinson, Des Moines; P. H. Worley, Davenport; G. H. Patchen, Burlington. On motion the Society adjourned to meet at Fairfield on the third Wednesday in May, 1874, at 10.30 A. M. G. H. BLAIR, President. G. H. PATCHEN, Secretary. HOMOEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS OF IOWA. 11 OBITUARY WHEREAS, It lias pleased the Master of Life to take from our midst by death our colleague and brother, W. C. RUSSELL, of Calamus, Iowa. Resolved, That this Society tender to the widow and son of the deceased our earnest and heartfelt sympathies in their bereavement, and that recognizing his worth as a man and a Christian, his attain- ments as a physician and his merits as a citizen, we deeply feel his loss to the profession, to the church, and to society. Resoloed, That a copy of these resolutions be sent to the widow of Dr. Russell, and that they be spread upon the minutes of the Society. W. H. DICKINSON, G. H. BLAIR, P. H. WORLEY, Committee. 12 TRANSACTIONS OP THE SOCIETY OP AN ADDRESS; Delivered Before the Society of Homoeopathic Physicians of Iowa, S. F. YEOMANS, Mi. I). “KNOW THYSELF,” Is an admonition that comes to us stamped with the impress of classical authority. Viewed from our stand point, its importance will he appreciated when we reflect that it implies an investigation of the wonderfully complex machinery that makes up the human organism, the dietetic and hygienic laws by which the vigor of health is maintained, and length of years se- cured; also of the agencies that tend to disturb normal conditions; and, last of all, of the curative means by which pain may be relieved. The vast field of enquiry which it requires us to explore has in all ages apalled the masses, and led them to be content to remain in ignorance, leaving to physicians the prerogative of working out these grand problems, deducing results, and enforcing obedience to their requirements by the dictum of scientific authority.' When we reflect upon the disgusting concoctions the sick have been compelled to take—the barbarous treatment to which they have been subjected and the results so far as the health and longevity of the race is concerned, wTe can but wonder at the patient endurance which has been exhibited, nor can we be surprised that from time to time the thoughtful and reflecting would venture to raise the earnest enquiry “ Is this the best that science can do?” “Is there no balm in Gilead, no physician there?”—“Why then is not the health of the daughter of my people recov- ered?” It was this spirit that led the ancient Romans for six hundred years to prohibit the practice of medicine within their empire, and it is a sad commentary upon professional skill that the fact would never be known by the rate of mortality as recorded during this period. Within the last century the same spirit has impelled many of the ablest members of the profession, as well as other gentlemen of culture, carefully to scrutinize medical theories, to put them to the test of close historical reading that results as shown by the ratio of mortality and advanced sci- entific research might be the measure of their value. It is the recorded verdict of those who have thus investigated, that the science of medicine has for two thousand years revolved around a common centre, never in a IIOMfKOrATIIIC FIIYBICIAXS OF IOWA. 13 a single age advancing beyond its circumscribed orbit. While other departments of science and art, political economy, and industrial interests have indicated human progress and mental developement, it can scarcely be claimed that our profession is entitled to the credit of a single progres- sive movement since Esculapius delivered his oracular prescriptions, or Hippocrates bound his disciples by mystical oaths. Careful observation has demonstrated that in acute diseases, recovery is the rule and death the exception, that these are self limited in duration and subject to natural laws, fixed and inexorable. In Typhoid Fever, for in- stance, only 10 per cent, will die with no treatment, and the average dura- tion of the disease will be 14 days; while in Pneumonia 93 per cent will recover, the average illness being from 9 to 11 days. If medicat ion can show no better results than this we had as well “throw physic to the dogs”— expend our money for something more useful and leave Dame Nature to deal with our ailments, unless we can bring to our aid the convenient the- ory, at one time quite generally entertained, that certain forms of disease are salubrious, as indicated by the old couplet— “An ague in the spring Is physic for a king.” If the authority of our own writers is to he credited the pathology of Fever, Inflamation, Pulmonary Consumption, and Rheumatism is no better understood, nor is the established treatment more successful than in the days of the Caesars, Alexander or the Ptolemies. We can today with no more certainty conjecture the force of the heart’s contraction than could John Hunter. We are as profoundly ignorant of the functions of the Spleen and many other organs as was that prince of empirics, Paracelsus. Our ideas of the vis vitae, of calorification, nutrition, or generation are not more clearly defined or philosophical than those entertained in the days of the Druids. Of the influence of catalytic forces in modifying chemical reaction, and changing the property of remedial agents the manipulations of the laboratory have thrown no light. Of the nature and properties of the specific poisons to which most diseases are supposed toowe their origin we have learned nothing of practieal value from 3,000 years labor to discover some means of antidoting their destructive influences. Of the modus operandi of the drugs our patients are expected to take without question, we know no more than the rude and barbarous tribes of ancient times. Addison, one of the profoundest thinkers and keenest observers of the age, says: “ If we look into the profession of physic we shall find a most for- “midable body of men; a sight of them is enough to make a man serious, “for we may lay it down as a maxim that when a nation abounds in physi- cians it grows thin of people. This body of men may be described like “the British army in (’tesar’s time, ‘some of them slay in chariots and “‘some on foot.’” Professor Oliver Wendall Holmes, of Boston, says: “If all the med- “ icine in the world, except wine and opium, were thrown into the sea, it 14 TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY OF “ would be better for men and only worse for the fishes.” He describes the practice of medicine as “ the art of putting large doses of poisonous drugs “of which we know but little into living bodies of which we know less.” Moliere, an eminent French physician, says: “Most people die of their “remedies and not of their diseases.” Dr. Adams, the learned translator of Hippocrates, says; “We cannot “think of the change in professional opinions since the days of John Hun- “ ter without the most painful feelings of distrust in all modes of treatment.” In 1853 M. D’ Feulins published in the Review Medicale, of Paris, sta- tistics of mortality of diseases in 1811 and 1851, from which it is shown that deaths from inflammatory affections had increased at least 54 per cent., from which he infers the decline of medicine during the preceding 40 years. Dr. Forbes, who lias been styled the modern Celsus, says: “In a large “proportion of the cases treated the disease is cured by nature and not by “the physician.” In Paris’ Pharmacologia, esteemed for many years a reputable text book, we find the following on the subject of remedies: “ It is impossible to cast “ our eyes over such multiplied groups without being forcibly struck with “the palpable absurdity of some, the total want of activity in many, and the “uncertain and precarious reputation of all. Nor can we be surprised that “ a portion of mankind has at once arraigned physic as a fallacious art, or “ derided it as a composition of error and fraud.” Simon, a lecturer of wide repute on general pathology, says: “We do “ not possess a complete medical knowledge of any single article of the “ Pharmacopoeia. It is a system of sham therapeutics—a blind empiricism “hostile to every interest of science and humanity.” Bichat, an eminent French teacher of medicine, says: “Materia medica “ is no science at all for a methodical mind, but is a shapeless conglomer. “ ation of inexact minds—of observations often puerile—of illusory reme- “edies—of formulas as oddly conceived as they are fastidiously arranged.” Magendie, who was excelled by no one in the profession, says in a lec- ture to a medical class: “Gentlemen, medicine is a great humbug. I “know it is called a science. Science indeed! It is nothing like science! “ Doctors are mere empirics when they are not charlatans. We are as igno- “ rant as men can be. Who knows anything in the world about medicine? “ Gentlemen, you have done me the honor to come here to attend my lectures, “and I must tell you frankly in the beginning that I know nothing in the “ world about medicine, and I don’t know anybody that does know anything “ about it. I repeat to you that there is no such thing as a medical science. “ Who can tell me how to cure a headache ?—or the gout ?—or diseases of the “ heart ? Nobody! Oh! you tell me doctors cure people. I grant you peo- “ple are cured. Gentlemen, nature does a great deal; immagination does “a great deal; doctors do but little when they don’t do harm.” The cause which above all others has served as a check to medical pro- gress may be expressed in the single word intolerance. No class of men, since the world began, have clung with more rigid tenacity to the maxims lIOMUiOPATIIIC rilYSICIANS OF IOWA. 15 of the fathers than those of our profession. They have been clad with a mantle of charity broad enough to enable them to look complacently upon any impropriety that did not involve a departure from established prece- dents. This alone was the unpardonable sin for which no results, however salutary or beneficent, could atone. No argument so overwhelming or proof so conclusive as to outweigh the ingrained sentiment expressed by the Roman satirest: “ Did Marcus say 'twax fact, then fact it is, Sn proof so solid as a word of his.” Neither fame, skill or learning could shield him who suggested an inno- vation or proposed an improvement, from proscription and an edict of excommunication as relentless, unyielding, and as formidable as was ever fulminated from the Roman Vatican for the suppression of heresy. No advance was ever made except through tribulation absolutely apalling, and success was never secured but by the common sense and discernment of the masses who dared to rebel against authority, however arrogant its assump- tions. The guardians of the public health who should have been the most ardent advocates of reformatory movements have always closed their eyes to evidence, however palpable it may have been, like Gallileo’s brother pro- fessor who stubbornly refused to look through the telescope lest he should see Jupiter’s moons and thus be compelled to acknowledge his own theory fallacious. In 1628 John Harvey first published the great fact of the circulation of the blood. Filled with apprehension of the terrible ordeal which he well knew awaited him, he withheld his discovery for eight years in order that he might fortify himself securely at all points against the charge of irreg- ularity, and yet he was subjected to persecution the most vindictive, de- nounced in unmeasured terms as an imposter, and for a time so completely lost his popularity as to be almost without means of subsistence. After heroically breasting the storm of persecution for fourteen years, the French Academy, then the most learned body in the world, issued an authoritative edict declaring that the blood did not circulate through the body, and even thirty years later, in 1672, this astute body of infalliblcs reaffirmed their former decree, and added that Harvey’s alleged discovery was an utter impossibility. Before the time of Ambrose Pare hot irons, boiling oil and pitch were the only means used in arresting hemorrhage in surgical operations. This distinguished surgeon having, it is said, exhausted his supply of these ma- terials upon a certain battle-field, resorted, from necessity, to the ligatur? and simple dressings and to his unbounded surprise found that he had un- wittingly made one of the greatest discoveries of the age. But the practice was so irregular and unscientific that the solous of the profession would not permit him to publish his discovery, and he was so persecuted for inno- vating upon regular medicine tha the w as compelled, for his own safety, to adduce garbled and incorrect statements from the old authors to prove that the discovery w as made by them and not by him. 16 TRANSACTIONS OP THE SOCIETY OP The discoverer of innoculation was persecuted with the most vindictive fury for fifty years. In 1774 the French Academy admitted its advantages after the princes of the royal blood, in opposition to their remonstrances, had been innoculated. No discovery in medicine has been so fraught with blessings to the race as that of vaccination by Jenner. Previous to the adoption of this great prophylactic, one-tenth of the whole human family died from small pox. It is estimated to have prolonged the average duration of human life five years. In England alone there were 36,000 victims to this scourge in a single year, and yet for thirty years the war of the profession against Jenner was unprecedented. No terms of opprobrium were spared that could heap odium upon his head; nor were any means left untried that could tend to his humiliation and ruin. Even to this day fossilized specimens may be found who denounce the practice as quackery. Peruvian bark was first discovered by the Indians of South America, and its introduction into popular practice, without having first received the sanction of the college, raised a storm of indignation against all who dared to use it. It is even recorded that the physician of Oliver Cromwell allowed him to die from ague rather than administer the hated specific. In 1609 the French Academy expelled one of its members for curing his patients with this interdicted drug. In the same year Besmirwas expelled from the faculty of medicine for prescribing antimony. Dr. Greenfield, a member of the Royal College of Physicians and Sur- geons, was committed to Newgate on the complaint of the President of the College for daring to prescribe Cantharides. He published a vindication and the issue, says D’Quincy, ruined the unhappy doctor but taught his persecutors the safety and value of the practice. Until comparatively a recent period the use of sulphur was not esteemed as regular. In 1640 Dr. Van Helmont contracted the itch and suffered many months rather than avail himself of this article. The titillation, however, finally proved too much for his dignity and led to his uncondi- tional surrender to quackery. The introduction of auscultation by the use of the stethoscope, and of percussion by which the condition of vital organs may be determined with almost absolute certainty, has met with the most bitter invective and violent opposition. The production of anesthesia by chloroform, ether, &c., by which the severest operations are made painless, was denounced from Dan to Beersheba 'as an innovation so full of peril that no one having the least regard for human life would think of recommending it. This blind subserviency to the antiquated dogmas of past generations has compelled the profession to retain formulas embracing the most absurd com- binations which are condemned by the common-sense of the age in which we live. The “Theriaca Andromachi ” was said to have been invented by Mitliridates, King of Pontus, and was made up of seventy-two ingredients. According to Galen whoever took a proper quantity in the morning was HOMfKOPATHIC PHYSICIANS OP IOWA. 17 insured from poison during the day; and according to the authority of Celsus, another father in Israel, Mithridates himself was so fortified against all baneful drugs that none would produce any effect when he attempted to destroy himself. Celsus tells us that it originally contained thirty-five simples, but that Andromachus, physician to Nero, added vipers and in- creased the number of ingredients to seventy-five. It is only within a few years that any one has dared propose to strike this compound from the British pharmacopia. Its rejection was moved by the late Dr. Heberden, and upon a division it was found that thirteen members of the college voted to retain it while fourteen favored its rejection. The orthodoxy of the French has been more inflexible, as this preparation is still retained as officinal in the Codex Medicamentaris of Paris. The latter standard au- thority also still retains the absurd formula of Deist for the preparation of an extract of Opium, which directs the decoction to be boiled incessantly for six months. Now before we award to the ancients the prerogative of dictating medi- cal law to all coming ages, it is seemly proper to enquire who the fathers were, and what were their claims to so exalted a privilege? Esculapius outranks all others of whom we have reliable historical knowledge, and is styled par excellence the father of medicine. He was of Grecian birth and ranked among the gods. It was believed that he was removed from earth at the request of Pluto who complained that he per- formed so many cures as to rapidly diminish the number who died. His cures were wrought’in temples, the disciples or priests being bound by a solemn oath to confine the mysteries of the science to a single family. Upon the application of patients for treatment an animal was first offered to the gods, then the prophetic tripod was mounted and the oracular pre scription communicated. These healing temples were multiplied through- out Greece, and at one time there were 100 in the Roman Empire. We know but little of the treatment, but it is presumed to have been orthodox as we are informed that Aristides, the Greek, was ordered by one of these oracles to lose 120 pounds of blood. The unhappy man not having so much in his own body wisely took the liberty of interpreting the prescrip- tion in his own way and parted with no more than he could spare. Hippocrates claimed to be tin* seventeenth lineal descendant of Escu- lapius. He taught that there were but two fluids in the body—but one word to express nerve, ligament, and tendon; but one for an artery, vein or excretory duct; that the cause of disease was to be sought in meteorolog- ical and astronomical changes. The main articles of his materia medica were Hellebore, Coloeynth, Elaterium, Copper, Onions, Garlic, Parsley, Wine, Honey, and Cantharides. His authority was unquestioned for ages. Asclepiades, a Greek physician born B. C. 91 years, ranks among the most distinguished of the medical patriarchs. His arts, says Pliny, were such as every fashionable physician employs—soothing the patient and avoiding everything that can give pain till nature cures him or he sinks under the disease. He taught that the principal cure of a fever was the disease itself; that many diseases could be cured by the sound of the flute. 18 TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY OF He recommended the trumpet for the cure of Sciatica. We are told by Zimmerman that this practice prevails in Chili; that the physicians blow around the beds of their patients to drive away disease. He says they think their knowledge is complete when they are skilful blowers. Medi- cine men among the Indians retain the same method in the practice of their art. We need not go to heathendom to find doctors well skilled in this direction. Celsus is awarded a position among the most eminent old-time profes- sional worthies. Of his remedies that have come down to us by regular succession are the warm blood of a recently slain gladiator—a certain por- tion of human flesh, with many others equally disgusting. Of all the medical law makers of antiquity none were more distinguished, had a wider or more enduring fame than Galen. Of the many works attributed to his fertile brain, eiglity-three are esteemed genuine. He taught that there were four distinct humors—blood, phlegm, yellow and black bile—and three distinct kinds of auras, gases or spirits—natural, vital and animal. A modern author of acknowledged repute says: “The “hypothesis of Galen, respecting the virtues and operation of medicines is “a web of philosophical fiction which was never surpassed in absurdity.” Dr. Paily calls it the preposterous system that for more than thirteen cen- turies gave universal laws in medicine to Europe, Africa and part of Asia. Dr. Cullen says his theory is false and inapplicable. Paracelsus was unquestionably a charlatan, and yet his claims to emi- nence cannot well be denied, as he was regular and strictly orthodox. He was the first professor of chemistry, and introduced the use of mercury— ever since esteemed the very Sampson of Allopathic remedies in all ages and countries. He adopted the wildest theories of the alchemists, and ostentatiously claimed to have discovered the long sought elixir that would cure all diseases and give immortal life and health, He was compelled to flee from place to place to avoid the vengeance of his dupes, and finally died a drunken vagabond with a bottle of his Catliolicon in his pocket, These are but a few of the most prominent great professional lights to whom we trace our antiquity, and at whose shrines we are to worship with all the ardor of Eastern devotion, under the pains and penalties of excom- munication as medical heretics and infidels. We claim to have found a better curative system than that of our fathers, and we have chosen to rebel against authority however ancient or imposing may be its demands. Voluntarily assuming the consequences of our temerity we appeal to the common sense and sober reason of mankind for the value of the sentiments we maintain. Our well known motto, “ Similia Similibus Curantur,” expresses the chief peculiarity of our system. We claim that drugs which in the healthy person produce morbid conditions will in diminished doses remove like conditions when they present them- selves in disease. HOMlKOPATillC PHYSICIANS OF IOWA. 19 Tliis is not a proposition based upon any preconceived theory, nor is its verity dependent upon any analogical process of reasoning. It is one the truth or falsity of which is susceptible of demonstrative proof by the sim- plest and most conclusive tests so easy of application as to be within reach of any honest enquirer after truth. It would serve no good purpose to attempt to explain how or why this result is attained. It is one of those mysterious and inexplicable phe- nomena with which we are so often confronted when we attempt to inves- tigate the laws of our being. We are content to know the fact, though we may not be able to explain the rationale of the process. We may, however, very properly take our bearings and see how far we have departed from the orthodox faith and whether after all there may not be some question as to our heresy. Dr. Jones says: “Mercury causes congestion of the liver, and jaundice, “and in small doses it will cure the same diseases.” Ca/.enaw, in his work on the skin, says: “Eczema is often produced by “ mercury, and it may be cured by the same drug in small doses.” Pereira, in his Materia Medina, says: “Arsenic will both cause and “cure convulsions, fevers, and diseases of the skin.” The same fact is re- peated in Christison and Griffith’s dispensatory. Twedie says: “Belladonna produces an eruption similar to that of “scarlatina,” and Dr. Gardner says “it is an incomparable remedy in this “disease.” I)r. Dixon says the most marked case of ague he ever saw was caused by Quinine. It is needless to say that this remedy is esteemed a specific for ague. He also says that silver causes shivering and fainting sensations, and that it will remove like symptoms when due to other causes. Dr. Richardson says, “ Kreosote will cause or cure vomiting according to “ the dose.” Dr. Earlinger says: “It is well known that an obstinate diarrhoea is “among the remote effects of Opium, and yet this is the chief remedy for “the cure of this affection.” Leppelletier says: “Tartar emetic will produce dyspepsia and engorge- “ment of the lungs if given in health, and will in small doses remove these “conditions and induce resolution in this disease.” These are not the views of merely exceptional men in the profession but are facts of universal recognition. Neither is the acknowledgment of the homoeopathic law limited to the remedial action of the articles mentioned. None will presume to question that Alum, Muriate of Ammonia, Rhubarb and many other drugs will purge in large doses and constipate the bowels in small; that Ipecac will vomit or arrest vomiting according to the dose given; that Gentian and Nux Vomica in large doses debilitate the stomach and impair digestion, while in small doses they act as a tonic in dyspeptic subjects; that Sanguinaria, Quinine, and Opium may be stimulant or sedative according as we graduate the dose. 20 TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY OF The most severe paroxysms of congestive fever can scarce he distinguished from the poisonous effects of Opium, and yet the very highest Allopathic- authorities pronounce this the most reliable remedy. Prof. Bell advocates its use in the strongest manner. “What,” says he, “it will be exclaimed by “ some, Give Opium, a narcotic, in a state of apparent apoplexy or stupor ‘‘which may be said to resemble narcotism?” These examples, familiar to the practitioners of every school, will suf- fice to show how the regulars, with all their boasted reverence for the teach- ings of the fathers, have been inadvertantly compelled, by the logic of events, to gravitate towards our law of cure, or rather, if you choose so to regard it, how small the angle of the line of divergance that has led us away from the ancient faith. To these concessions which with our allopathic friends are mere incidents having no significance with reference to any general principles, we supplement our own experiments made with a view to determine the fact whether they are not indices pointing to a law estab- lishing the relation between all other drug symptoms in the healthy, and curative remedies in disease. It is not too much to say that the men who have prosecuted this investigation were fully qualified for the task assumed, nor that they were animated by a desire to reach the truth. No test could be less liable to the charge of unfairness. It was conducted in strict accord- ance with the inductive system of the Baconian school of philosophy. Deductions were left to the development of facts and not predicated upon preconceived theories. Most of the leading remedies of the old school and many others of whose virtues we had no knowledge, were taken in vara- riable doses by persons in full health and all the symptoms produced, care- fully noted from day to day, and hour by hour. The reports of these collected and collated constitute our materia medica and become valuable as evidences only as by treating the sick it is found that symptoms and morbid condi- tions respond to the remedies which are proven to produce corresponding results in health. Every case of disease that has come under our manage- ment has afforded us an additional opportunity to test the great princi- ple upon which we believe the law of drug action depends. While we may admit that we have not always succeeded to our entire satisfaction, we affirm that our failures have arisen from an inability always to determine with absolute certainty the remedy that most nearly covers the totality of the symptoms and not from a want of adaptability of our therapeutical law to any given case that may occur. We claim that the experience of three- fourths of a century has been a most triumphant vindication of the views of Hahnemann. That under the most violent opposition, and in the face of proscription and intolerance, we have compelled an honorable recogni- tion, and extorted from an incredulous public the confession that we merit a full share of confidence as members of the healing art. Our infinitesimal doses have subjected us to the most unmeasured ridi- cule. We might dispose of this point summarily by the averment that our system does not, nor never has assumed to fix the liomcepathic dose. It has always been esteemed the prerogative of the practitioner to select such HOMOCOPATIIIC PHYSICIANS OF IOWA. 21 potency as his own experience determined to be most effective. Neverthe- less we are free to admit that we do not measure the value of medicine by the quantity given. Neither do we deny that we claim that our most sat- isfactory results are frequently attained by medicine carried to a degree of attenuation that some might deem extravagant. It is safe to assume that it is quite as difficult for the allopathists to explain upon any rational theory how massive doses operate to remove disease, or how it is that they are able now to carry supplies in the vest pocket which twenty-five years since re- quired a huge pair of saddle-bags as it is for us to make clear the modus operandi of our prescriptions. We submit that if the researches of twenty- five centuries have not enabled them to comprehend the rationale of drug action according to their method of appreciation that we ought surely to be allow ed a single century for investigation and to be exempt from the charge of ignorance even though we may not be able to give a lucid reason for all the facts we may w itness. In reflecting upon the immediate causes of dis- ease no one can avoid the conclusion that morbific agents exert their influ- ence in a condition of the most extreme tenuity. A healthy, vigorous man journeys through a malarious region and is attacked with an inter- mittent fever that may cling to him for months. Another may, for a few days, inhale the atmosphere of the tropics and become the victim of yellow fever. One may receive a letter from a friend a thousand miles distant, and while reading its contents be infected with the small pox contagion that in some mysterious way has clung to the paper. The obstetrician may go from a patient suffering from puerperal fever, may thoroughly fumigate his person and apparel, and ten or twenty days hence communicate the disease to another patient. The farmer may visit his market town while the cholera is prevailing there, spend an hour, return home in good health and fall a victim to the disease in less than twenty-four hours. The physician may visit a case of Scarlatina, travel a hundred miles in his round of visits and then by simply pausing to shake the hand of some favored child communi- cate the seeds of disease or death. In all these examples, and hundreds of others might be adduced, there is a specific material cause so infinitesimally minute that the chemist, though he may detect the thousandth part of a grain of Arsenic, Iodine, or Strychnine, cannot w ith all his reagents, discover a trace of it. A scale, though so nicely graduated as to determine the weight of the smallest fraction of matter, cannot weigh it. Neither can a glass though its magnifying power may bring to view' an atom inconceivably small determine its existence, and yet possessing a virulence sufficient to permeate every fibre of the system, to disturb the functions of every organ, the action and relation of every cell and molecule—to send the seething blood through its vessels—to produce the most intense agony, reducing the strong to the helplessness of infancy, the most intellectual to imbecility, and leading multiplied thousands to untimely graves. If, in the full vigor of health, with the conservative powers of nature the rig medirat) i.v naturae, in full force, causes so minute, so apiwrently insignificant thus impress the hu- man organism, what does reason and common sense teach us to expect w hen impossibility is intensified by disease? 22 TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY OF In health we may without inconvenience direct the eye to a light of great intensity, hut let inflammation attack this sensitive organ and a single ray will produce the most unsufferablc agony. Darken the room, bandage the eye, produce Egyptian darkness and yet the obscuration of the sun by an intervening cloud will be readily discerned. The burly Teuton may tax his gastric powers with half a gallon of lager beer and a pound of cheese with- out realizing that he has a stomach, but let acute inflammation seize this organ and a teaspoonfnll of the blandest fluid will be instantly rejected. In inflammation of the brain the softest notes and sweetest music may produce convulsions. If the result of disease is thus to increase sensibility to all external im- pressions, is it not absurd and preposterous to expect to calm the storm and restore the excited organs to their normal condition by massive doses that i n robust health must of necessity produce the most serious derangement of the animal economy ? Is it not an attempt to extinguish fire by casting on additional fuel ? Does it not commend itself to one who will give the sub- ject a moment’s reflection as at variance with every principle of reason, science or philosophy? Let us turn our attention once more to our allopathic friends and see if we cannot glean something from their voluminous annals that will fortify us in our convictions of the efficacy of minute doses. In 1847 Dr. Hunt published a volume on the treatment of skin diseases. On page 14 of this work he says: “ One quarter of a drop of Fowler’s solution, three times a “day, has in a few weeks effected a permanent cure of an exceedingly “ troublesome disease.” The British and Foreign Review accepts the case as genuine and remarks that each dose contains only the 480th of a grain of Arsenic. They tell us that the active principle of Ipecacuanha is emetine which constitutes only 14 to 1G per cent, of the crude drug, and one-twelfth and even one-sixteenth of a grain of the latter is conceded to be strictly an orthodox dose. This would equal about one-hundredtli of a grain of emetine. There are but few practitioners who have not witnessed examples of dys- pepsia, hemorrhage and other symptoms of the most alarming character resulting from simply removing the cork from a bottle of Ipecac in a close room. In Paine’s Institutes of Medicine we are told that in certain conditions here is nothing comparable with Calomel in doses of one-sixteenth to one- twentieth of a grain once in 4 to 12 hours. It is well known that crude Mercury has no medicinal effect, yet mixed with simple conserve of roses and thoroughly triturated so as to divide and break up the globules pre- cisely as we treat our remedies, the result is Blue Mass, a compound of the highest rank in allopathic esteem. In 1810 two vessels received on board several tons of crude Mercury saved from the wreck of a ship near Cadiz. In three weeks the whole crew of 200 men were mercurialized; two died, and all the animals, including a canary bird, rats, mice, even cock- roaches were destroyed. Here was an article wholly inert and insoluble, yet capable of exhaling a vapor which when attenuated by mixture with atmospheric moisture became a virulent poison. HOMOEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS OF IOWA. Dr. Paine says: “I have seen in my own family the most formidable “cases of remittent fever, when hope of recovery had been abandoned, “yield to less than a single grain of Quinine divided into sixteen doses.” Dr. Trumbull says one-hundredth part of a grain of Aconite made into an ointment and applied to the skin has produced a sensation of heat, pricking and numbness which continued a whole day. Pereira and Sigmond tell us that a dilatation of the pupils may he pro_ duced by only approximating the leaves of Hyosciamus or Belladonna to the eyes. Paine says violent erysipelatous inflammation over the whole surface of the body is often induced by approaching within a few yards of a certain species of Rhus. Paris in his Pharmaeologia says the matter of febrile contagion is in- creased in activity by moisture of the atmosphere. Plague is most common in Egypt alter the inundation of the Nile, and he seems to have caught a glimpse of the true principle of attenuation, as he adds: “I am well sat- “ isfled that the regulation of a dose of medicine is more important than it “ is generally supposed to he. Substances perfectly inert and useless in one “dose may prove in another active and valuable. Medicinal substances,” he adds, “are more readily absorbed in small than large doses,” and that “ extreme pulverization assists the operation of all substances whose active “principles are not easily soluble.” Dr. Murray says: “Unpleasant symptoms have been experienced by “ merely keeping Aconite for some time in the hand.” The Lobelia Longi flora spreads such deleterious exhalations around it that asthmatic oppression of the chest is felt on approaching within many feet of it. Darwin thus alludes to it: “ And fell Lobelia's suffocating breath. Loads tiie dark pinions of the gale with death." Dr. Routh, in a tract designed to oppose Homoeopathy, frankly admits that small doses, especially in large dilution, will often times act very sat- isfactorily. He says: “I have seen this repeatedly.” It is believed that the efficacy of Cod Liver Oil, so extensively used in pulmonary disease, is largely due to the 40,000th part of Iodine which it con- tains. The various Mineral Springs of the world which enjoy so wide a reputation as health restorers owe their virtues to various saline compounds so largely diluted and so minute in quantity as to require the most skilful chemical analysis to detect their presence. Mr. Liston, certainly the peer of the most eminent surgeons of Europe, after a fair trial of our leading remedies under the direction of a Ilomoeo- pathist, has had the candor to express in a published letter his entire satis- faction with the results obtained. He even expresses the regret that the TRANSACTIONS OP THE SOCIETY OP power of Aconite was not known to him earlier, as he was convinced that it would have prolonged the life of his father whose death had been has- tened, in his opinion, by ill-judged copious venesection. With these statements, which are only a sample of an unlimited supply at command from the same sonrce, we are content to rest our case, leaving our allopathic friends to the full enjoyment of all the merriment they can derive from our Liliputian doses. Theorize and speculate as we may with regard to scientific abstractions we shall fail thus to satisfy the practical demands of an enquiring public. There is an argument in results as indicated by facts and figures, that will outweigh all the learned theories that science can present. To the sick the dogmas of antiquity and the disputations of doctors sink into insignifi- cance in comparison with the absorbing question, What are my chances for recovery ? In most of the larger cities of Europe and America, we have had for several years, in active operation public hospitals and dispensaries. These are mostly established by authority, and are under the surveillance of in- spectors who carefully note results and make official reports of the same. These reports have the same claims to public confidence as those which emul- ate from Allopathic institutions of like character, and by comparison therewith the respective merits of the two systems of practice may be fairly judged. Few cities in the world have more perfect hospital regula- tions than Vienna. Both systems of practice are recognized by law, and each is granted the same privileges and subjected to the same require- ments. From their official published reports we find the rate of mortality as follows: From Pleurisy, in Allopathic Hospitals, 13 per cent.; in Homce- pothic Hospitals 3 per cent. From Peritonitis, 13 per cent, in Allopathic and 4 per cent, in Homoepathic Hospitals. From Dysentery, the former lost 22 per cent, and the latter 3 per cent. From Fever, the Allopathic mortal- ity was 6 per cent, against 2 per cent, under our treatment. Without enter- ing into details, we may present as aggregate results in the hospitals of London, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Liverpool, Vienna, and Leipsic, as given upon the authority of Dr. Routh, an Allopathic Physician, as follows: In Allopathic Hospitals, mortality 10 5 per cent. In Homoeopathic Hospitals, mortality 4.4 per cent. In New York City during a period of five years the rate of hospital mor- tality as shown by authentic reports was under Allopathic treatment 14.36 per cent, while under Homoeopathic treatment it was only a fraction over 7 per cent. The Cholera statistics of Vienna in 1836 show the rate of mortality under Homoeopathic treatment to have been S3 per cent., against 66 per cent, under Allopathic. In the same disease in Edinburgh, in 1849, our school lost only 25 per cent, while the mortality under other treatment was 66 per cent. Cholera reports from Liverpool and all other places are equally favorable to our system. IIOMtEOI'ATHIC PHYSICIANS OP IOWA. 25 In St. Margarite’s hospital of Paris, 100 beds were appropriated to a physician of our school. An attempt was made, by petition, to induce the authorities to annul the privilege thus granted, which they declined to do and stated as a reason therefor that during the years 1840-1850-1851, as shown by legal evidence before them, the rate of mortality under Homoeo- pathic treatment was 3 per cent, less than under any other system of prac- tice. These are matters of public record having the verity of official documents. They may he known, read and scrutinized by all men.- To them we invite attention, and challenge investigation, and are willing to abide the verdict that common intelligence may award. And now, as we again meet at our annual convocation and survey the field we have abundant reason to rejoice and take fresh courage for the conflict which must continue during the period of our labors. We have achieved vastly more than could have been expected during the few years of our history. Our numbers, influence and patronage have multipled at a rate which may well astonish our foes as well as ourselves. We are not only honored by an occasional nod of recognition by the dignified wor- shipers of antiquity, but we have absolutely compelled them to so modify their therapeutical ideas as to promise speedily to vie with us in the minute ness of their doses. We have almost banished from existence that relic of barbarism, the lancet. The world may well say of the profession as Robert Emmett, the great Irish orator, said to the judges who condemned him: “If all the innocent blood which you have shed was collected in one vast “pool your lordships might swim in it.” Rut let us be thankful that we may truthfully appropriate the language of Macbeth to the ghost of the murdered Banquo “ Shake not your gory locks at me, Thou cana’t not say I did it,” In all important reformations success and progress arc mainly dependant upon incessant toil and arduous labor. We have yet much to learn. Every case submitted to our c are and skill becomes a subject for profound study. The ever varying shades of symptoms that disease presents will, if care- fully studied, lead to investigations and results that will continually add to our knowledge and usefulness and tend to the success of our principles. There is still another qualification that is imperatively required if we would acquit ourselves as true reformers and worthy members of the med- ical profession. I remember hearing Prof. Ludlam say to his class that in a certain condition of impending Puerperal Convulsions by simply catch- ing the eye of your patient and holding it by a steady gaze you may safely tide her over the most imminent peril; but, he added, a condition precedent to the exercise of this mental or psychological power is a moral status upon the part of the practitioner that will command the confidence and esteem of the pure and virtuous. It may well be questioned whether this moral fitness is not quite as essen- tial to the successful treatment of other forms of disease. The readiest converts and the most ardent friends of our system are found in the higher 26 TRANSACTIOXS OF THE SOCIETY OF stratum of society, among the intelligent, cultivated, refined and virtuous, and it is well to remember that the laws of chemical affinity are not more fixed than those of social affinity. To gain position and hold a place in these higher circles we must merit it by possessing the qualities which entitle us to claim it. If we are gross, vulgar, intemperate or licentious, we must expect to sink to a level with that class whose habits and vices are congenial to our tastes, and it is well to he prepared for the failure which must inevitably result. If on the other hand we are true to the teachings of pure morality and the principles of our school we shall succeed, and instead of the long predicted period when our Allopathic friends shall hold a joyful post mortem over our remains we shall witness them as with elongated faces they will fall into a funeral procession and with mournful cadence join in the refrain— “ Pity the sorrows of a poor old man, Whose trembling limbs have borne him to your door— Whose days are dwindled to the shortest span— Oh, give relief, and heaven will bless your store.” HOMEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS OF IOWA. 27 BUREAU OF SURGERY. G. H. BLAIR, M, D,, Fairfield, Chairman. SYPHILIS, by GEO. H. BLAIR, M. 1). Periodic literature, the text books of our schools, and even special treatises upon the subject are, unfortunately, deficient, not only in the pro- per considerations of the distinctive diagnostic signs of Syphilis, but, if one may judge from following the treatment prescribed, they lack also in the means recommended for its medical and surgical conduct. Of the causes of these unfortunate errors and omissions it were perhaps idle to speak. The want of practical experience of many writers, and hence their xecundfin artem statements and precepts; the fear of unpopu- larity in urging a treatment at variance with the views of the high-potency advocates—those gentlemen who profess such a holy horror for the knife and the cautery and who shudder at the mention of a palpable drug—and the general disinclination to handle so foul a theme, have each probably had their influence in producing this result. But there is no one grand division of disease—in this instance incorrectly so-called—thus ranking it with Psora and Scrofula, and frequently confounding it with each, which merits, in a higher degree, our closest investigation. In justification of the production of this paper, permit me to remark, that my experience in the treatment of this disease has been quite extensive. The control of a Seaman’s Hospital, wherein it is safe to say that nine- tenths of those who were admitted either were suffering, or had at some previous period been afflicted with Syphilis; and years of management of* the Protestant Orphan Asylums of Columbus and Cleveland, in which, for the most part, the unfortunate little inmates were picked up from that class of community who would in all probability transmit to their offspring any hereditary taint, together with a large* private practice connected with this disease, (a thing we are not apt to boast of!) leads me to assume that I am at least deserving of a hearing, and that the conclusions arrived at are worthy your careful consideration. One more preliminary digression,which seems not inappropriate just here. For a quarter of a century I have been a believer in, and practiced strictly in 28 TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY OF accordance with the law of Similia. While using both the very low and the extreme high potencies as the exigencies of the case may seem to require, I recognize no man’s right to dictate any limited degree of strength of their administration. A knowledge of the Materia Medica, with a clear appreciation of the importance of observing aggravations in disease, will enable one to disregard, in a great measure, the various hypotheses and theories advanced by either extreme of combative dilutionists. Farther on I offer a suggestion which may afford you something of a clue to the selection of potencies—a suggestion occurring from the often-observedefficacy aris- ing from its adoption and application. Just a word more and I will enter upon the subject. Perhaps this paper might properly have been limited to the treatment of Syphilis alone; but I have thought proper to enlarge its scope sufficient to briefly, but it is hoped intelligibly, characterize some of the more important forms of Syphilis; to express some well considered opinions regarding its infection and trans- missibility; to notice some of its complications, and demonstrate the vast superiority of our remedial agencies over those of the Old School. Of the history of Syphilis we have very imperfect and uncertain infor- mation of its early prevalence, nor are we acquainted with the precise nature of its inception and formation. There are those who see traces of the disease in Scriptural references. Avicenna and Yalesca describe a disease probably identical with it as prevailing during the latter part of the 14tli century; many date its origin coeval and connected with the dis- covery of America, &c., &c. Since the time of Columbus, we have been able to trace its course in modified forms with some degree of clearness— sometimes raging as a virulent contagion, the breath of, or even contact with, those affected, being sufficient for its production. You will remember that one of the counts in the indictments against Cardinal Wolsey, was that he infected the King of France by means of his breath alone. In the early Franco-Italian wars, in the war of tbe Crusades and in the intercourse of the Spaniards with the Sandwich Islanders may be seen instances of its infectious poisoning. The nature of the original disease has, however, become changed and modified, or rather certain phases of the original poison have set up an independent condition of a pathological nature capable of propagating itself. This latter observation is one of much moment and should be care- fully considered, for whereas true Syphilis is a disease of the gravest char- acter, its off-shoots are comparatively harmless and easily amenable to treat- ment. A mistake in the diagnosis may be productive of the most serious consequences. This assertion, involving the question of the hereditary nature of the affection will be briefly alluded to hereafter. The time for the development of chancre—the first invariable evidence of pox—varies greatly; it has been detected as early as the second day after coitus, and on the other hand, has been delayed apparently for months. Usually, however, we may look for its appearance between the fifth and tenth days, no premonitory symptoms presenting prior to its development. A slight itching is at first experienced, followed, or accompanied, by small HOMEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS OF IOWA. 29 pimples filled with matter. These soon assume the form of an ulcer, pos- sessing peculiar appearances and characteristics, according to the nature of the poison; a fact to be speedily determined would we feel easy respecting the treatment to be pursued. The most important diagnostic signs for the determination of true Hunterian chancre are: its appearance, as a rule singly, rarely more than one appearing, although two, or even three may exist in exceptional cases; the surface of the sore is regular and disposed to be circular; the centre assumes a grayish tint; the edges slope inwardly; the bottom has a smooth, lardaceous appearance; the formation of pus is slow and quantity scant; and more important than all, there is a hard, rigid, circumscribed base and the edges of the ulcer may often be observed to be indurated also. Fortunately, this form of Syphilis is comparatively rare, probably not comprising more than one-sixth of the whole number of cases occurring. This, likely, is due to the sliglit secretion from the ulcer; but from what- ever cause, certain it is, the virulence of its contagion is much less than that of chancroid. Now, this is the chancre to be quickly detected and speedily removed by the surgeon, especially since the absence of pain and irritation and the tar- diness of its formation, unluckily too often prevent its discovery until the constitutional taint becomes inevitable. The simple chancre, or chancroid, possesses well defined characteristics, which, if uncomplicated, render its detection quite easy. Its edges are perpendicular and serrated; the floor of the ulcer is uneven and honey- combed, as it were, with a grayish exudation therefrom profuse in quantity; the areola of the ulcer is, besides being much less regularly circumscribed, darker in color, and the edges and the base instead of being hard and indurated have a peculiar elastic feeling on pressure, the nature of which can only be understood by those who are experienced. Simple chancre gener- ally appears in groups, seldom singly, and is accompanied with much pain and tenderness. It is not deemed necessary to sub-divide these ulcers into the various forms adopted by writers who enter minutely into the consideration of this subject. The two varieties just described constitute, in fact, the source of all others; and hence the phagedenic, the sloughing, and, indeed, all the other described sores of venereal origin are but modifications or complica- tions with other vitiated conditions arising from the two forms. Indeed, to be precisely correct, we may attribute the remote source of all forms of Syphilitic ulcer to true chancre alone, since the distinctions are of compar- atively recent date. liicord has stated that, for the first five or six days of its existence, chan- cre may be always considered a strictly local affection, and the opinion is undoubtedly correct. Hence, local treatment should be resorted to, with a certainty, if promptly and energetically applied, that no secondary results will follow. Were we absolutely certain of the nature of the primary sore we might possibly leave it to take care of itself, if a simple one; but since it frequently is complicated in its nature, and occasionally might deceive 30 TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY OF the most skillful diagnostician, it were best to use an indiscriminate treat- ment in all forms of chancre. For this purpose, in the case of an individ- ual of largely scrofulous or strumous diathesis, one in whom the lymphatics are easily agitated and irritated, the use of the knife is earnestly advised- complete extirpation of the ulcer, including the additional surrounding tissue to a breadth at least equal to the diameter of the surface of the ulcer, unless there should exist an abnormal hemorrhagic tendency, when cau- terization should be preferred. In the ordinary forms of ulcer the remedies to be employed for their removal are—relatively to their importance— Nitric Acid, Nitrate of Silver, Paste of Sulph. Acid and Charcoal, and Caustic Potash, always bearing in mind the importance of a thorough and deep application, one sufficient to penetrate to the sub-cellular mucous tissue, which is the base of the chancre. The highly lauded Vienna Paste lias proved in my hands very unsatisfactory, for the reason that, forming a crust over the top of the ulcer does not allow a knowledge of the extent to which it has penetrated; and if we wait for its removal and successive applications, too much time is lost for purposes of safety. One thing, how- ever, mnst especially be borne in mind: That no energetic treatment for the speedy destruction of the ulcer should be resorted to after well-defined indura- tion is present, as this is a certain indication that the disease has already become constitutional. The lesson to be impressed is this: Whether the sore be either chancre or chancroid, its quick removal may prevent secondary results, and in any event can prove of no disadvantage. Those who through ignorance, for it can be called nothing else, oppose local treatment, not only* protract the disease, but endanger the health and the lives of their patients. After the reproductive process commences, evidenced by granulations, exudation of healthy un-inoculable pus, simple dressings of lint, saturated with pure water are sufficient, unless, indeed, the progress should seem somewhat indolent, when a weak solution of some stimulating application, as the Sulphates of Copper or Zinc, may be used with advantage. As before remarked, the primary indication or early stage of chancre, needs but a local treatment, but lest a possible mistake in diagnosis may occur, an anticipatory or preventive means may be properly encouraged, inasmuch as under no circumstances can any bad result follow under our system of medication. A low regimen, frequent bathing, entire freedom from sexual excitement and the administration of the proper remedies, should not be neglected. In individuals of scrofulous diatheses Hepar. Sulph., Cal. Carb., Silicia, or Sepia may be given; but in the majority of cases the different preparations of Merc., particularly the Iodide and Bin- iodide will prove of most value. More will be said of the different phases of ulcer when we come to treat of remedies and the indications for their use. We come now to consider the more serious aspects of this often-times frightful disease as manifest in its second or constitutional stage. If not controlled in its first or inceptive period within the limited time suggested— say five or six days—the poison becomes absorbed by the lymphatics—not HOMOEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS OF IOWA. 31 by the veins as formerly supposed—and is first evidenced by the formation of Pubo. This manifestation may proceed from either the true or the simple chancre; indeed may result from gonorrhoea or other irritating causes; but when appearing in connection with, or following a primary sore, their nature is, of course, easily determined. In men, the inguinal gland, if from inoculation of the Penit, is the ordinary seat of bubo. In women, as frequently, it may be found situated between the labiae and the thighs, or round ligaments. But wherever manifesting themselves or whatever the point of inoculation, the treatment should be the same—always taking into consideration, however, the character of the virus from which they spring. Considering then, that the bubo arising from simple chancre or chancroid, as our modern writers term it, is the termination and ultimatum of the disease, it were better perhaps, if possible, to disperse it before sup- puration takes place, inasmuch as no further ill consequences will ensue. For this purpose pencillings with Iodine Tinct. or the application of Iodine ointment, together with the administration of the same remedy internally, in dilution, will ordinarily suffice, provided always that its application is early. If, however, the abcess progresses to an extent where fluctuation may be distinctly felt, our object should be to promote suppuration as speedily as possible, until the point of safely using the lancet is reached. Silicia, Hep. Sulph., or Apis, claim a consideration here, together with the use of warm emollient poultices. But if the progress of the bubo be par- ticularly slow, with much swelling, involving the surrounding parts, it will be advisable to give outlet to the deep seated and scanty pus, by means of Caustic Potash. Particularly if there be reason to suspect ramifications into cellular and sub-cellular tissue, will this prove the most available, as well as most satisfactory means of evacuation. Pressure, under these cir- cumstances, by means of adhesive straps, is also an advisable auxiliary in expediting a cure. In my estimation it is neither desirable nor proper to attempt the sup- pression of bubo where a consecutive of the true chancre. On the contrary, every endeavor should be made to hasten its consummation, that the virus may have in part a means of escape, without expending its full force throughout the general circulation, The means to be employed are identi- cal with those employed for promoting suppuration in the other form of bubo; but whereas in chancroid abscess a speedy effort should be made to heal the wound, if languid and indolent, we should on the other hand pro- bably favor the long discharge of pus in the bubo arising from true chancre. In this connection it may be mentioned that the pus of either variety of bubo is inoculable, each transmitting its own peculiar virus, and hence care should be exercised in its contact. Space in a paper of this character will not allow of a more extended al- lusion to chancre and bubo. To the treatment recommended exceptions will, no doubt, be taken by some ultra practitioners who denounce local treatment for anything; and also by those deluded beings who regard chancre as but the external manifestation of a constitutional taint; but the actual practical observation of a few hundred of these cases will, I appre- 32 TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY OF hend, soon modify their opinions. Besides, no man should be conceded the right to criticise whose experience in the treatment of the disease under consideration has been closely limited. We come now to the consideration of the graver stage of the affection, wherein the general constitution has become poisoned, and technically termed Lues Venerea. Most authors have divided this into & Secondary and Tertiary stage—the latter of which should more properly be called the Mercurial stage, inasmuch as I undertake to say that nearly every symptom connected with it, is either the direct result ot mercurial poisoning alone, or its complication with, or aggravation of the original disease. Out of the multitude of cases passing under my immediate observation, I have yet to see one unconnected with a system thoroughly saturated with Mercury, even affected with periosteal inflammation which might not have arisen from other than a Syphilitic cause; nor under an enlightened Homoeo- pathic treatment exclusively, have I met with a single instance of nodes, caries, or necrosis. Usually, secondary symptoms develope themselves in from three to six weeks, although there are both earlier and later exceptions. As a general rule, no manifestations of an unusual character, except the light febrile dis- turbance which frequently attends all abscesses, as well as bubo, are the precursors of its existence. In my own experience the throat has given the earliest indication of the general taint, though perhaps the skin is as often the index. The throat, tonsils and fauces take on but little of the soreness and inflammation which commonly precede the formation of an ulcer— indeed the full development of ulcer being sometimes the first observable si gn of any affection of the parts. Generally, however, the tonsils assume a pale or dark appearance; there is a slight exudation of mucous over the surface, the center of which grows rapidly darker, and terminates in an ulceration, the secretion from which is of a peculiarly sticky character. In some instances of a virulent nature, sloughing takes place and even gan- grene, occasionally, though rarely, may follow; hut this seldom results unless complicated with scrofula, struma, and more often with Mercury. Follow- ing the throat affection or coincident with it, eruptions of the skin make their appearance, and in so many and diverse forms as to almost defy des- cription without means of ocular demonstration. However, for the sake of partial completeness, some of the more prominent manifestations will be mentioned, leaving a more diversified description to be embraced in the symptoms which call for the appropriately selected drug remedies. Ordinarily the skin, especially in the neighborhood of the penis and vulva; between the thighs and nates; under the arm-pits, and in other pro- tected parts becomes affected with small mucous papules. They are of a copper caste, slightly elevated and usually granulated. Over the general surface of the body, but more particularly the chest and forehead, they assume the appearance of small, hard lumps, exuding a secretion which dries quickly, is easily rubbed off, and is again reformed. They are gen- erally circular in form, small in size, and as a rule, terminate without seri- ous painful annoyance, although they occasionally ulcerate, and sometimes HOMOEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS OF IOWA. 33 degenerate even to slouching. They are known under the name of mucous tubercles. In the milder forms of constitutional taint, roseola pemphigus, herpes and the lesser manifestations of exanthema and erythema develope them- selves, and nothing but a knowledge of the history of the case would lead to a suspicion of their venereal origin. In fact it is questionable whether they be the direct or indirect results of syphilitic virus. Of the various forms of lichen, lepra, psoriasis and even of vesicular eruptions, it were impossible to speak at length in this article. Aside from the actual knowledge of the early history of the case, perhaps the most prominent indication for a suspicion of the true nature of the dis- ease is the almost universal presence of the copper color attending. Even Hahnemann attached so much importance to this peculiar coloring, that he regarded its disappearance as a diagnostic sign of a speedy, if not already radical cure. Allopecia, induration of the testicles and pulmonary Syphilis are conditions of so questionable a nature as being the direct result of specific virus, as not to merit present consideration. As before remarked, the so-called tertiary stage, being the effect of Mercurial abuse, wtll also be ignored in the examination of Syphilis proper; but the complications evolved will he considered when we make our selection of remedies. The question of the hereditary transmissibility of Syphilis is a debatable one, as is also the extent of its contagion or infection. Time was, perhaps— indeed the fact is indisputable—when the disease was terribly infectious; but it has become so modified and lessened in its virulence and so much more readily yields to treatment, that we need not apprehend a return to this manner of its propagation. Instances have occurred under my own obser- vation, which to the superficial observer would seem to have been developed without innoculation; but a thorough history of the patient has invariably revealed the fact that it was simply a latent virus reproducing the old man- ifestations of a previous period, or that innoculation had taken plaae in some unusual manner. Of its hereditary nature I am inclined to be exceedingly skeptical. That dyscrasias of various kinds and indeed any ill-conditioned and impover- ished condition of the system is apt to impress fcetal life and hence be noticeable in the child, is certain; but that a genuine Syphilis with its un- doubted and undeniable characteristics is transmitted from mother to child I unhesitatingly deny. The mere fact that exanthemata, pemphigus, and other suspicious skin eruptions and even nodes are found in the infant without previous chancre, amounts to nothing. They may each be the pro- duct of scrofula, and some of them may even be diseases of foetal life. There is much more reason to suspect that the inoculation of the child by the mother during labor is the secret of any well marked case of Syphilis in the child. A strong point favoring this assertion is the fact, well attested by most of those conversant with the subject, that pox if not developed in the infant within the first six months of existence, may not be expected thereafter to develope itself. Of the asserted instances of nurses having been contaminated from suckling children in whom Syphilis was trans- 34 TB ANSACTIONS OP THE SOCIETY OP mitted, they should be regarded with great distrust. Neither the blood, the milk, the semen, nor in fact any natural secretion of the body is inocula- ble. Physicians of large experience in venereal disease know only too well the beastly proclivities of men, aye, and even women, of low degree, when under the influence of wine and sexual passion, to always attribute the ap- pearance of a primal chancre in the mouth or upon the mammary glands to the lips of the innocent infant. It is unfortunate that the great reverence entertained for the founder of our school, should have led so many of his disciples to adopt his errors in common with his truths. The idea of chancre being but the external man. ifestation of a constitutional taint, is so easily demonstrable of fallacy that it seems really preposterous. Indeed it is perfectly safe to guarantee abso. lute immunity from constitutional affection, provided we can be thoroughly satisfied that it receives our attention within four or five days of the appear- ance of the primary sore. But, unfortunately the chancre is sometimes con- cealed in the urethra and within the folds of the vagina, and being thus unrecognizable is absorbed before a suspicion of its existence is enter- tained. Hence, from this cause alone, has probably arisen the theory of blood contamination before the appearance of chancre. Directly at variance with the doctrine that Syphilis is hereditary, and, paradoxical as it may seem, authors who sustain this view, at the same time contend that by prophylactic means it can be speedily and thoroughly exterminated, thus rendering our mode of treatment a subject to be placed among the “ Lost Arts.” And this observation, giving rise to reflection upon the means to promote so desirable an end naturally suggests the propriety of licensing houses of prostitution, or rather permitting their establishment under proper restrictions—for licensing implies payment, and no community should attempt to benefit itself by, or even receive the “ wages of sin.” I approach this subject tenderly, lest offence be given to the namby-pamby sentimentalism which so eminently characterizes the age. But certain it is, that so long as human beings remain as at present constituted, just so long will unlawful sexual commerce prevail. No moral suasion, no legal enactments can prevent it. Dating at least from the time of King David, we have had continuous evidence of the truth of this asser- tion. How then to prevent the physical evils arising therefrom becomes a question of great importance, and one to which the medical philanthropist should turn his attention. If, (a little word we are too often compelled to use,) if our judges, our law-makers, our constabulary, and to bring up the rear, our doctors, were wise, honest and efficient; if a thorough supervision, a thorough examination, and a thorough enforcement of sanitary measures, could be accomplished there are strong reasons for permitting the estab- lishment of these houses under strict requirements, at least until venereal disease became obliterated—“a consummation devoutly to be wished.” But this is, in some sort, another digression, so I pass on to my subject proper. . How long does it take to cure Lues Venerea? This question is one often anxiously asked, and its answer depends up the form which the disease assumes, which tissues are involved, and especially whether it be present H0MO50PATIIIC PHYSICIANS OF IOWA. 35 alone, or whether it be complicated with scrofula or mercurial poisoning. Ordinarily it is as amenable to treatment as any of the diseases of a chronic nature. In referring to the records of the U. S. Marine Hospital, at Cleve- land, O., while under my charge, I find that the average number of days treatment was 50. For the treatment of the primary sore days were sutllcient—and this includes time of convalescence, or in other words the period from the entrance to the exit of the patient. In private practice, owing to the fact of not having so complete control of the patient, I admit my success has hardly equalled this result, although from the data now at my command, the time employed has not averaged more than twenty additional days. Included in this estimate are several cases in which the Syphilitic affection had been complicated with other diseases. Under favorable cir- cumstances, and without mercurial combinations—or, what amounts to the same thing, when the p