Flexions of the Uterus And Their Treatment with a Painless Self- Supporting1 Intra-Uterine Stem WITH REPORT OF CASES BY Frank C. Ferguson, M. I). INDIANAPOLIS Formerly Professor of Obstetrics in the Central College of Physicians and Surgeons Read before the Marion County Medical Society April 24, 1894, and before the Indiana State Medical Society May 17, 1894 INDIANAPOLIS SENTINEL PRINTING CO., PRINTERS 1894 Flexions of the Uterus. No disease of a chronic character involving the reproductive organs of woman, is capable of causing more enduring pain and discomfort, of pro- ducing more obstinate retlex disturb- ances, mental and moral obliquities and more persistent chronic invalid- ism than flexions of the uterus. The distressing backaches, tormenting headaches, annoying uterine dis- charges, gastric disturbances, dysmen- orrhea, pelvic and ovarian pain, hys- terical and sometimes epileptic seiz- ures, and a multitude of other minor symptoms conspire to 1 make the patient’s life one linked misery long drawn out. Notwithstanding the marvelous ad- vances made in late years in the treat- ment of diseases peculiar to women, the treatment of flexions of the uterus and the multiform symptoms to which they give rise, has not kept pace with the advances in other departments ot gynecology, so that the average doctor can not treat these distressing cases 3 to-day with any better success than his predecessor of twenty-five years ago. The treatment of flexions has always been one of the most difficult problems confronting the physician. The relation of the uterus to the sur- rounding organs and tissues, its peri- odical function and the atrophy of its walls produced by the distortion, all conspire to perpetuate the difficulty in spite of the various methods here- tofore proposed and practiced for their alleviation* and cure. The treatment of flexions recom- mended by authorities is as varied as their ideas of the pathological signifi- cance of these distortions. Those who regard them as mere sequences of metritis, para-or peri-metritis, devote their main treatment to combating the inflammation and ad- hesions arising therefrom, giving very little attention to the distortion of the organ. Chi the other hand those who look upon the flexion as the fons et origo of the symptons, give too little atten- tion to the accompanying inflamma- tion, believing that if the flexion be corrected all other symptoms will van- ish. Thus on the one hand the phy- 4 sieian forgets that a Hexed uterus, no matter how produced, causes a pro- found disturbance in the pelvic circu- lation by pressure upon arteries, veins, nerves, lymphatics and surrounding organs, and from the very nature of the case must perpetuate the inflam- mation and and the symptoms that flow from it. On the other hand it is forgotten that much can be done to hasten the cure even after the distorted uterus is straightened and anchored in its nor- mal position. The best treatment, therefore, ot these distressing cases, is that which considers both the flexion and the in- flammation as factors in the produc- tion of the symptoms, gives to each the importance which it merits and strives to correct the distortion as well as to cure the inflammation. Divul- sion of the cervix, curettage, and the application ot stimulating solutions, such as carbolic acid and iodine, the use of boroglyceride tampons, due at- tention to the bowels and the proper regulation of the patient’s habits, will do very much to relieve the symptoms and improve the general health. Xev- 5 ertheless if the flexion be not cor- rected and the uterus be not restored to its normal position, the symptoms soon return and another curettement becomes necessary; and so the case drags its slow length along, sometimes better, sometimes worse, but never cured. In the light of my experience during the last two years in the treat- ment of these obstinate cases, I do not hesitate to say that if I were com- pelled to confine my treatment to one or the other of the above methods, I would unhesitatingly choose the latter and, with a Sims’ speculum, a uterine dilator, a Thomas’s Smith pessary and a properly constructed uterine stem, I should accomplish a great deal more for my patients than he who confines himself to the treatment of the co- existing inflammation. Leavifig out of consideration for the present the various surgical operations that have been invented by Dudley, Schiiking and others for the cure of flexions, I think I am warranted, from long personal experience, in the state- ment that a bent uterus cannot be treated more successfully without the use of a splint or stay worn within 6 the uterine cavity than a fractured or distorted limb without immovable dressings. But the greatest obstacle that always confronts the physician in his efforts to permanently straighten the ffexed uterus is, that there has never been invented a uterine splint, except the intra-uterine stem which I have recently perfected, and which I shall show you presently, that is worth the material out of which it is made. The various stem pessaries that have been invented for the purpose of be- ing worn as intra-uterine splints may be divided into two classes: 1. Those which are intended to he used alone. 2. Those which require a vaginal support, As commonly constructed, these in- struments are cylindrical in shape and of the same diameter throughout their whole length, and possess the follow- ing defects, which are fatal to their successful use: 1. They make injurious and pain- ful pressure at the internal os, the site of the flexion. * 2. They do not make adequate provision for drainage. Therefore 7 the uterine secretions are liable to be dammed up in the cavity of the uterus, whence they may find their way into the tubes and pelvic peritoneum, pro- ducing salpingitis, pelvic peritonitis, etc. 3. They do not conform in shape to the uterine cavity. 4. They are not self-supporting, i. e., they have to be retained within the uterus by vaginal supports. 5. They do not permit the normal movements of the uterus during in- spiration and expiration. For these and other reasons they are exceedingly dangerous and useless instruments, and their use has been abandoned by the best gynecologists. The makers of these instruments of torture sometimes give them the an- terior curve found in the normal uterus, as in the Wiley hard-rubber drainage tube. Others have made feeble attempts to construct self-re- taining stems, as in Dr. Chamber’s modification of the late Dr. Henry G. Wright’s stem, Clement Godson’s stem by a spring within the tube which projects at appertures near the extremity and within the uterus, and 8 Mr. Lawson Tait’s abomination, with slight projections of rubber to act as a retaining agent. But whatever the form or modification, all possess the common defects of not conforming in shape to the cavity of the uterus, making injurious pressure upon the point of fiexion, producing pain and discomfort, and obstructing drainage. Basing my opinion upon the anat- omy of the uterus and its relations to surrounding organs, I think I am war- ranted in the statement that an instru- ment designed to be worn in the ute- rine cavity should possess the follow- ing characteristics: 1. It must be free from all sharp angles, corners or projections. 2. In shape it should correspond to the general contour of the uterine cavity. 3. It should provide for efficient drainage. 4. It should be self-retaining. 5. It should permit the normal movements of the uterus. 6. It should not easily corrode. 7. It should be as light as possible, consistent with sufficient strength to maintain the uterus in its normal shape. 9 8. It should he capable of being worn during menstruation. Previous to the time of the illustri- ous Dr. Hodge, of Philadelphia, a vast amount of ingenuity, misapplied, was spent in the construction of vaginal pessaries. But that justly celebrated man conceived the idea that these in- struments should he made to conform in shape to the pelvic curves. 11 is in- vention has stood the test of time and experience, because it is based on the common sense principle that a vaginal pessary to be worn with comfort and without pain should not press unduly upon any part. But gynecologists have failed to make practical application of this principle in the construction of intra-uterine stems. If badly fitting shoes makes sore feet, and a badly fit- ting vaginal pessary produces excoria- tions and ulcerations of the vagina, we would naturally expect the same thing or much worse from an intra-uteri ne stem made without regard to the size and shape of the uterine cavity, and possessing all the other bad qualities specified above. Disappointed and disgusted at my repeated failures in the treatment of 10 flexions, some two years ago I con- ceived the idea of making if possible an intra-uterine stem free from danger and at the same time possessing all the good qualities enumerated above. The result of my work is shown in the ac- companying cut. The instrument is made of aluminum. It is therefore ex- ceedingly light, but at the same time possesses sufficient strength. The up- per extremity is triangular in shape, and rests within the triangular cavity of the body of the uterus. PATENT APPLIED FOR. MANUFACTURED AND SOLD BY W.H.ARM STRONG & CO. INDIANAPOLIS. IND. The lower part is spindle-shaped and rests within the spindle-shaped 11 cavity of the cervix. These arc con- nected by a small stem, having cir- cumferential channels to facilitate drainage, which rests within the nar- row internal os. ’The uterus rests upon the two arms which rise upon either side of the cervix and are sur- mounted by nuts fastened on by a screw thread to prevent injury to the cervix or vaginal mucus membrane. The internal and the external os pre- vent the escape of the instrument, while the arms prevent it from ascend- ing too high into the uterus. The introduction of the stem is not difficult. The instruments needed for its introduction are a Sims’s speculum, uterine dilators, a double tenaculum, a sharp curette and an applicator, all made aseptic by previous boiling. The vagina should be irrigated with some good antiseptic. Place the patient in Sims’s position, retract the perineum with Sims’s speculum, catcli the pos- terior lip of the cervix with the te- naculum if it be a retroflexion, the anterior lip if it he an antiflexion, and draw it down within easy reach. Then gently insert the dilators and dilate the cervix to the extent of from one- 12 half to three-quarters of an inch. If the case be complicated with endo- metritis, as nearly all of them are, the uterus should be thoroughly curetted. After bleeding has ceased, which will be considerable in some cases, mop the cavity dry with absorbent cotton, and apply to the whole cavity equal parts of tincture of iodine and carbolic acid. The instrument, which should be about one-quarter of an inch shorter than the uterine cavity, previously meas- ured, is then introduced, and the operation is complete. The patient should remain in the recumbent posi- tion for two or three hours, at the ex- piration of which time the internal and the external os will have con- tracted sufficiently to prevent the escape of the instrument. As a rule, an anesthetic is unnecessary; but if the patient be very nervous or hys- terical, or the parts extremely tender, it is proper to give an anesthetic. The stem should be worn indefinitely, months if necessary. It does not in- terfere with menstruation nor prevent sexual intercourse, and in suitable cases gives no pain or discomfort. If the case is a retroflexion, the uterus must 13 lie brought forward to the position of ante version, and a Thomas’s Smith pes- sary suitably adjusted. This should be removed, cleansed and re-adjusted at least once each month. After three or four months it may be removed permanently. The patient is instructed to return at stated intervals for examination, and to use once each day a vaginal injec- tion of hot water medicated with some astringent or antiseptic, if there are indications for their use. No other local treatment is required. If the case is a retroflexion the stem should be curved forward sufficiently to some- what exaggerate the normal anti-cur- vature of the uterus. The exaggera- tion of this curve, in cases of retroflex- ion, is a point of great importance, inasmuch as the uterus will require much less support from behind to maintain it in the position of antiver- sion, and is much less likely to fall backward again when the vaginal sup- port is removed. The lower part of the instrument, where the arms pro- ject, should be bent forward somewhat in order to prevent too much friction against the posterior lip of the cervix. 14 When properly adjusted the lower spi- ral should set squarely within the cen- ter of the external os, the arms pro- jecting upward along the side of the cervix. Many of these cases will give a history of years of suffering. They are broken down in general health; they are weak, nervous,, irritable, hys- terical and sometimes almost on the verge of insanity. Such cases need, in addition to curettement and the stem, a general supervision of their habits. They need tonics, electricity, massage,, cheerful company, outdoor exercise, good food and refreshing sleep. There can he no question that in some cases the uterus will be found more or less immobile from adhesions; but judging from my experience, they are not so frequent as claimed by many authorities. Within the last three years I have had under my treatment more than thirty cases, and out of the whole number I found but one case of well marked adhesions, and this was complicated with cancer of the rectum. Two of these had been diagnosed as adherent by other gynecologists, who proposed the operation of hysteropexy for their relief. In both cases I sue- 15 ceeded, without difficulty, in raising the uterus out of its abnormal position. Both have been cured. One year ago I delivered one of twins, and she is now pregnant again. The other is passing through the menopause, and her opportunities for exercising the maternal function are at an end. It should not lie forgotten that a uterus which for years has been crowded down in the hollow of the sacrum, may be so tirmly fixed that seemingly it is adherent when no adhesions ex- ist. If in any case adhesions are found to exist, they must be got rid of before we can hope to restore the uterus to its normal position. But the consid- eration and treatment of adhesions and other pelvic complications is not called for in this paper, and I shall therefore pass them without further notice. Laceration of the cervix is another complication sometimes accompanying flexion of the uterus; and if from its extent and condition we are satisfied that it stands in a causative relation to the flexion or the associated symp- toms, trachelorrhapy should be per- formed before the stem is introduced. 16 If the cervix is greatly hypertro- phied or very much elongated, or the perineum lacerated, the proper plastic operations should be done before in- troducing the stem. Anteflexion, as a rule, is congenital in its character. But to this there are a few exceptions. When congenital the flexion is usually associated with a more or less infantile condition of the uterus. These cases usually men- struate scantily and suffer great men- strual pain. In such cases the intro- duction of the stem is all that is nec- essary. It relieves at once the painful menstruation, increases the flow and stimulates the development of the uterus to its normal size. Acquired anteflexion is usually associated with endometritis. These cases need the curette, followed by the introduction of the stem. 'No vaginal support is necessary. Now one word as to the use of vaginal pessaries as the only support to maintain a flexed uterus in its normal situation. I am very much surprised to find in some of our latest text-books cuts of ring pessaries, horse-shoe pessaries, and other pessa- ries having the shape of nothing in 17 the heavens or the earth, designed and recommended for the purpose, of straightening the flexed uterus and maintaining it in its normal position. I wish to say that no vaginal pessary, of whatever shape or size, is capable of maintaining a sharply flexed uterus in its normal shape and position, un- less the distortion lie first, corrected by a surgical operation or by a stem worn within the uterine cavity. The retro- Hcxed uterus will invariably straddle the bar of the instrument, which, pressing upon the point of flexion, will in time complicate the case by produc- ing inflammation and ulceration at this point, and possibly setting up a pelvic inflammation. But if the retroflexed uterus be permanently straightened by other means, a properly adjusted re- troversion pessary worn for a few months is of the greatest service. In other words, a retroflexed uterus must he converted into a retroverted one be- fore it can he held In its normal posi- tion by retroversion pessary. In conclusion I beg leave to report the following eases: Mrs. I)., aged 32, mother of three children, the youngest aged four years, consulted 18 me in January, 1800. Since the birth of her last child she had suffered from menorrhagia, mettrorrhagia, dysmen- orrlia, constant backache, violent head- aches and leucorrhea. She was an- emic, greatly emaciated and hysterical. Indigestion, insomnia and loss of all interest in her affairs completed the picture of chronic invalidism. The ilterus was prolapsed, sharply retro- flexed, the os gaping widely and dis- charging a tenacious mucous tinged with blood. The sound entered three and a quarter inches. Since the birth of her last child she had had three miscarriages at the second or third month of gestation. During the fol- lowing fifteen months the uterus was divulsed and curetted several times, followed by boroglyceride tampons, hot douches and such other local and general treatment as was indicated. Although the physician who preceded me in the case had diagnosed adhe- sions and proposed a laparotomy, 1 succeeded without much difficulty in restoring the uterus to its normal po- sition, but found it impossible to main- tain it there by a retroversion pessary on account of its persistent straddling 19 of the bar of the instrument. Tn the course of three or four months the pa- tient made much improvement, but invariably grew worse when the treat- ment was suspended. In March, 1891, I again euretted the uterus, introduced my stem and adjusted a retroversion pessary. From this time her improvement was rapid and permanent. The retroversion pes- sary was permanently removed three months afterward. In six months the stem was removed, the patient having completely regained her health. Tn November, 1892, I delivered her of twins at full term, and 1 was recently engaged to attend her in another labor which is expected to take place some time in July. Case II. Mrs. S., aged 40, mother of several children, consulted me in January, 1891. This was the most distressing case of pruritis valvac that lias ever come under my notice. It made its appearance soon after the birth of her last child six years previ- ously, and had continued with occa- sional remissions in its severity up to the time that I was asked to take charge of the case. The skin cover- 20 ing the lower part of the abdomen, the vulva and the inside of the thighs was in a chronic state of inflammation, and a plentiful crop of small boils were scattered over the surface. The con- stant itching and burning, always ag- gravated at night, rendered sleep well nigh impossible. Constant pain and loss of rest had made her a physical wreck. Examination revealed a sharply retroflexed uterus, apparently bound down by adhesions, the os gap- ing widely, from which issued a yel- lowish, acrid discharge. I dilated and curetted the uterus, and once each week treated the endometrium with equal parts of carbolic acid, iodine and glycerine. Boroglyceride tampons, hot douches with gentle efforts to re- store the uterus to its normal position completed the local treatment. Under this treatment the patient improved somewhat, but not until I succeeded in restoring the uterus to its normal position and holding it there with the aid of my intra-uterine stem did her improvement become permanent. She then, without further treatment ex- cept daily hot douches, rapidly re- gained her health. She has been per- 21 fectly well for over two years, still wears the stem and will not permit its removal. As it gives her no discom- fort whatever I am content to let it remain. Case III and IV. Miss T. and Miss W. These cases were so alike in symptoms that I reported them to- gether. Both were natives of Illinois and unmarried. One aged 22, the other 24. Both had suffered intensely during their menstrual periods since the first menstruation at the age of 15. One had anteflexion, the other retroflexion. Both had epileptic seiz- ures with each menstruation. One was admitted into my Sanitarium in September last, the other in Decem- ber. I divulsed the cervix in each case and introduced my stem. Neither one has since had a painful menstrua- tion, and the epileptic seizures have vanished. Case V. Miss D., aged 25, living in an adjoining county, consulted me in August, 1893. She had suffered from the most intense dysmenorrhea since her first menstruation at the age of 15, frequently having to take her bed at the onset of menstruation and 22 remain there during the How. She had been under the care of various physicians, but had failed to get re- lief. Her general health was fairly good, but she was often annoyed by leucorrhea, backache, excruciating headaches, vesical irritation and ova- rian pain. Examination revealed a sharply antetlexed uterus, and a thick tenacious discharge from the cervix. On August 30th I divulsed and curet- ted the uterus and introduced my stem. Menstruation came on in a few days without pain or other inconvenience. She has continued to menstruate pain- lessly, and all other distressing symp- toms have vanished. She has been wearing the stem nearly nine months with perfect comfort. I examined her May 10th, 1894. The stem gives her no pain whatever, and the uterus was in its normal position. Case YI. Mrs. S., aged 23, married three years. Had suffered from in- tense dysmenorrhea since her first men- struation at the age of fourteen. I saw her in consultation with Hr. Martha J. Smith, Sept. 18, 1893. In addition to the dysmenorrhea she was subject to violent headaches, pain in the right 23 ovarian region, leucorrhea, menorrha- gia, vesical irritation, backache, con- stipation and dyspepsia, besides many other ailments of a minor nature. She had never been pregnant. Digital examination revealed an anteflexed uterus. The sound entered two inches and a half, giving her considerable pain. I divulsed, curetted, and applied equal parts tincture of iodine and car- bolic acid to the endometrium and in- troduced the stem. The next menstru- ation was painless. On October 13th, she came to my office complaining of paroxysms of pain located in the sub- umbilical region. The pain was ex- cruciating, making its appearance each evening and lasting for three or four hours, when it would cease, only to appear again the following evening. Presure upon the abdomen revealed a considerable degree of tenderness. Digital examination of the uterus and upward pressure upon the stem re- vealed no tenderness whatever. She was ordered a brisk cathartic and told to report in two or three days. How- ever, the pain reappeared the next day, and kept recurring for several days in spite of treatment. Finally I removed 24 the stem, thinking that it might be the cause of the pain. But the following day the pain recurred as usual. On the day following I discovered an impac- tion of the colon. This was relieved by a thorough irrigation with hot wa- ter. The evacuations were enormous, and the pain did not recur. On No- vember 18tli, the patient having had another painful menstruation, I again introduced the stem. She has not had a painful menstruation since, and all other symptoms have disappeared. She has worn the stem six months, and feels so perfectly comfortable that she does not care to have it removed. I examined her on May 10th, and found the uterus in its normal position and the stem giving her not the least an- noyance. Case VII. Mrs. N., aged 32, mar- ried and the mother of two children, the younger born eight years ago, con- sulted me in September, 1892. She had not been well since the birth of her last child. She was emaciated, nervous and hysterical. Suffered from violent headaches and backaches, a con- stant dragging sensation in the pelvic region, dysmenorrhea, constipation, 25 gastric disturbance, difficult locomo- tion and insomnia. In short, she was a confirmed invalid. Had been for eight years under the treatment of the best physicians in this and other cities. Examination revealed a subinvoluted andretrohexed uterus apparently hound down by adhesions. At the second visit, however, I succeeded in lifting the uterus from its abnormal position, curetted and introduced the stem. The uterus was brought forward to the po- sition of anteversion and a retroversion pessary adjusted. I should say that every physician who preceded me in the case had attempted to hold the uterus in its normal position by a re- troversion pessary, but they invariably gave her so much pain that she could not tolerate them. The reason is plain; the uterus straddled the bar of the in- strument, making painful and injuri- ous pressure upon the point of flexion. However, after straightening the organ with the stem, she wore the retrover- sion pessary with perfect comfort; menstruation was painless and her im- provement was rapid. Six months afterward I removed the retroversion pessary permanently. The uterus now 26 remained permanently in its normal position. I removed the stem one year after its introduction. I exam- ined the patient a few days ago. The uterus has its normal conformation and position. The patient is well. But this paper has already grown too long, and the report of other cases that have come under my treat- ment would he a mere repetition of the preceding. Suffice it to say that during the last two or three years I have treated thirty-two cases of flex- ion without a single failure. But please understand that I do not claim that this stem is applicable to all cases. I do claim, however, that it is applicable to all cases in which there exists no serious pelvic disease outside the uterus; that it will in many cases obviate the necessity of Alexander’s operation for shortening the round ligaments, and the opening of the abdomen to suture the fundus uteri to the abdominal wall, and all other operations for straightening the flexed uterus. And finally that it will cure almost every case of painful menstruation where the cause lies within the uterus. 139 North Meridian St. 27