THE NON-MATERIALISTIC CHARACTER OF THE MIND, The Doctorate Address delivered at the Commencement Exercises of Bennett Medical College, March 23d, 1886. BY / =• V Finley Ellingwood, M. D. THE NON-MATERIALISTIC CHARACTER OF THE MIND. The human mind is constantly endeavoring to solve the many problems of science. The one scientific problem upon which physicians, as students of science, concentrate their attention, is Man. Inasmuch as man, physically, is only one, of all animals, only one of all created things. At first thought our field might seem to be a narrow one. But if we consider man’s superiority, his intricate physical nature and his intellectu- ality; in this his dual nature, we find our subject a most complex one. One which we shall know only imperfectly after a lifetime of study. Our object in the study of man is not alone that we bene- fit science abstractly. It is not because of the pleasure the study affords. It is a worthier object. It is the relief of human suffering. It is the rescue of mankind from impend- ing death. And the superiority of our subject stimulates us to a persistent and continued effort to render perfect as far as possible our knowdedge of this subject. Man, then, is the study of the physician. The reference to man’s dual nature involves two propositions. The first, the possession of a physical nature, the animal, and asso- ciated with this most intimately, in the performance of the vital functions, is that of the second proposition; the possession of a mind a super-physical, super natural ele- ment. The study of the subject matter of the first proposition, is in the study of anatomy and physiology. Anatomy considers the human body as a machine, in itself dead, inert, motionless, composed of elements subject to the chemical law of change. It considers each organ, its form composition and properties, in the mechanical rela- tion it sustains to every other organ. PROP. FINLEY ELLINGWOOD, M. D. 4 On the other hand, physiology studies the machine as influenced by the motor principle life, living, acting, moving; performing its various functions in obedience to physical law perfectly, preserving in itself symmetry of action, harmony, unity. Here we study the phenomena of birth, of growth and development to maturity; then follows decline and death. But, in the progress of this study, we are constantly brought into contact with the principle involved in our second proposition, the animating principle of the machine, a mysterious incomprehensible, intangible something, existing apparently outside of physical law, perfect in its operations, and so far as our observation can detect, possessed of a peculiar independence of operation, the mind of man. Yes, dwelling in this body is the mind, an immaterial, supernatural element, a self-conscious principle. This we must study with its concomitants of will, under- standing, reason, conscience. These are as surely a part of the human being as the bone or muscle or brain. And to the truly educated physician, a knowledge of the intellec- tual in man is as essential as a knowledge of the physical organism. And it is to this component of man’s nature that I more especially desire to direct your thought. It is an incorrect opinion often expressed by the laity, that the effect of the study of the physical man upon the mind of the medical student tends to skepticism; that this study so reveals the perfection of the workings of the human system as to impress the student that the machine acts independently of outside law, that it produces and perpetu- ates its kind, performs with perfectness all the essential functions of the body alone, in itself. There is a tendency in the human mind to one of two extremes of belief, either to the extreme of credulity, or the extreme of skepticism. The tendency of scientific investigation to the skeptical mind, seems to lead to the belief that there is nothing in the universe but matter, matter and its laws, that there is no spiritual or immaterial substance. And that wonderful 5 something we call mind, is but a mode of force, and motion, in matter, and does not exist independently of the body. Carlysle said it was the belief of Cabanis that the brain secreted mind, as the liver does bile. If so, then when the secreting organ is dead, the product is dead also. There is great diversity of belief concerning the relation of the mind to the body, and also concerning the cause of all manifestation. In the perfect study of the human body, and in fact of all matter, whether it be organic or inorganic, the micros- cope has revealed much indeed which has cleared away the mists of doubt and uncertainty which have enveloped science. It has revealed the minute structure of all tissues, the most minute liber, and the multitude of cells of which every fibre is composed. It goes further and shows the perfect structure of the cell, its wall, its contents, the little neuclus and neucleolus. It finds these little cells in all matter, veiy similar in all. It also reveals within each cell, and enveloping the neucleus of the cell, a minute mass of matter, without appar- ent structure, colorless, transparent, jelly-like. In all living tissues the same, whether found in frog, or bird, or beast, or man, or bone, or brain, in all plant life the same. Beyond this minute mass of matter the microscope has no power, it makes no revelation. This, then, is said to be the fundamental mass of germinal matter. Scientists have called these little masses protoplasm, more recentl}1' bioplasm, and most wonderful powers they attribute to them. They find that each mass seems to be possessed of active life; it grows and changes its form; it throws out processes and projections in all directions. Then each of them breaks in two, and each half possesses all the proper- ties of the original mass, and soon appears like the original, and in turn breaks up and subdivides, and creates others continually. These little primative masses (bioplasm) rapidly absorb all nutrient matter of whatever character it be, and by the addition of the nutrient matter, grow and develop the cell. Then cell is added to cell, and cell to cell, until every fibre 6 and muscle and nerve is formed; until in the plant every fibre and twig and leaf is formed. But instantaneously, at the moment of absorption of the nutrient matter, by a pro- cess which no human science can imitate or explain, each little bioplast seems to change this inert, not living matter into living tissue, transfers to this material of growth that wonderful principle of life. Here the power of the microscope, or of the most acute human observation ends. How it does it, or why it does it, or by what process it does it, we cannot possibly know. This change takes place within the bioplasm; some scien- tists claim that is done by the bioplasm, that it is the work of the bioplasm. Others, however, believe it to be done in the bioplasm by an outside power acting through this little mass of germinal matter. Here, then, in this apparent production of life is an evident effect. Can such an effect occur without a cause? The theory of evolution claims that one of these little masses was orginally, ages ago, the only substance contain- ing life. That it subdivided and produced others; that these by a process of development, gradually created a higher grade of life, and this developing gradually produced higher life, until in time the lower grades of animal life were produced. Then, gradually, in succeeding ages, measuring time by the millions of years, still higher and higher forms were developed until the ape was reached. And by slow and steady process, from this superior creation, man was ultimately evolved. Haeckle, that most interesting of German writers, eluci- dates in an attractive manner, with apparently forcible arguments, this theory of evolution. And from his first pages the reader is captivated with the beautiful structure which gradually unfolds to the intellectual vision. He is almost convinced from the first that that, which is so per- fect in its every part, must be perfect in its completeness. The author begins with things in nature as we now find them completed, perfect in structure and in obedience to law. He considers all matter as matter, all law as an evolution of force. He claims that organization occurred because of 7 necessity. That life is the remit of organization. He con- considers the organization and structure of all things specifically, relatively and comparatively. He considers them in their entirety, then in their parts, then in the minute structure of every part until he gets back to that primitive mass of germinal matter, the bioplasm. Here he has arrived at, to him, the origin of things. His structure now being completed, perfect, he must reveal to us the foundation on which this perfect structure, this theory of evolution, rests. He informs us that the foundation is composed of matter, and that it is in every way a perfect foundation; as perfect, as complete, as beau- tiful as the structure which it supports. If we witness, in the preparation for a building, a mass- ive well constructed foundation, dug deep and laid upon the rock, we instinctively conceive a proportionately mass- ive and perfect structure to be erected thereupon. If we behold the turrets ai:d spires of a beautiful and costly structure, we immediately believe the structure exists; we have a tangible evidence of it; we know it, and to exist we know that it must rest upon a correspondingly massive, firm, and secure foundation. It is absolutely in- consistent with any known physical or mechanical law that it should be otherwise. What foundation then must this scientist give us for this apparently perfect structure ? “ In the bioplasm,” he says, “ there is life. It has pro- duced life; man cannot produce it, 1 his is the first cause. Life is the result of the organization of the bioplasm. The first bioplast produced another bioplast, and these, others; these developed each a cell, then cell was added to cell, and cell to cell, until tissue, and fibre, and stem, and leaf, and twig, and branch, was formed in the plant. Until fibrilla, and fibre, and muscle, and nerve, and bone, and brain were formed in the animal.” Yes, but what has formed the first bioplast? we ask. Di