THE ARMY OF THE UNITED STATES HISTORICAL SKETCHES OF STAFF AND LINE WITH PORTRAITS OF GENERALS-IN-CHIEF EDITED BY THEO. F. RODENBOUGFT BVT. BRIGADIER GENERAL U. S. A. AND WILLIAM L. HASKIN MAJOR FIRST ARTILLERY NEW YORK MAYNARD, MERRILL, & CO. 1896 Copyright, 1896, BY MAYNARD, MERRILL, & CO. [Note.—General Orders, No. 197, is the last of the series for 1904.] General Orders, No. 1. WAR DEPARTMENT, Washington, January 1905. 1. In every staff corps and department, regiment, battalion not forming part of a regiment, and independent troop, bat- tery, or company, will be kept a detailed history of the services of the organization. This history will, at all times, be kept as nearly up to date as possible. The chief or commanding officer of the organization will cause the history to be prepared under his immediate super- vision. The historical record thus kept should contain in- formation concerning the original formation, recruitment, changes in organization, increase and decrease in strength, stations of the organization or parts thereof, arrival at and departure therefrom, marches, campaigns, battles, etc. It should give the names of officers and men killed and wounded in action, or who may have specially distinguished themselves, with rewards and decorations received. It should contain as appendices such rosters of officers and noncommissioned officers as may be prepared from time to time. Before books and papers are destroyed under paragraphs 249 and 272, Army Regulations, they should be carefully examined to see that everything of historical value therein has been embodied in the history of the organization. 2. As soon as possible after the end of each calendar year ?hief or commanding officer of every organization required to Keep a history under this order will forward to The Mili- tary Secretary of the Army a copy of so much thereof as re- lates to the past calendar year. 3. The initial installment of this history to be forwarded to The Military Secretary will cover not only the calendar year 1904 but such periods as, with the histories heretofore pub- lished in the Journal of the Military Service Institution, and later in a book entitled “The Army of the United States,” and with such sketches as have been heretofore furnished the War Department, will form a complete narrative history of the organization from its formation to the end of 1904. [953158, M. s. O.] By order of the Secretary of War: ADNA R. CHAFFEE, Lieutenant General, Chief of Staff. Official: F. C. AINSWORTH, The Military Secretary. Lieutenant-General GEORGE WASHINGTON Commanding the Army, 1798-1799. INTRODUCTION. TT is with pleasure that I avail myself of an opportunity to commend this effort of the Military Service Institution to provide an authentic and condensed account of the services of the Army, from the creation of our military establishment to the present day. Each staff-corps and regiment of the line has here its chosen historian and its modest memoir replete with biographical as well as historical data. Its form gives it a unique character of special value as a work of reference. It represents the completion of a series of historical sketches which have appeared from time to time during the last few years in the Journal of the Military Service Institution of the United States, and comprises an amount of gratuitous labor by con- tributors and of public spirit on the part of the publishers that merits public acknowledgment. I have no hesitation in saying that it deserves a place in every public library, and is worthy of preservation by all collectors of military works. NELSON A. MILES, Major-General Commanding the Army. Headquarters of the Army, Washington, D. C., Nov. 15, 1895. CONTENTS. Introduction Maj.-Gen. Nelson A. Miles iii Esprit de Corps Capt. Charles King ix PAGE STAFF CORPS AND DEPARTMENTS. Adjutant General’s Department Gen. J. B. Fry 1 Inspector General’s Department Major J. P. Sanger 12 Judge Advocate General’s Department. .Col. J. W. Clous 33 Quartermaster’s Department Capt. O. F. Long 38 Subsistence Department Gen. J. \V. Barriger 67 Medical Department Major Chas. Smart , 83 Pay Department Col. A. B. Carey 100 Corps of Engineers Gen. H. L. Abbot 111 Ordnance Department Major C. E. Dutton 126 Signal Corps Capt. Wm. A. Glassford 136 THE LINE. First Regiment of Cavalry Capt. R. P. P. Wainwright 153 Second Regiment of Cavalry Major A. F. Bates and Capt E. J. McClernand 173 Third Regiment of Cavalry Capt. Chas. Morton 193 Fourth Regiment of Cavalry Gen. T. F. Rodenbough 211 Fifth Regiment of Cavalry Capt. Eben Swift 221 Sixth Regiment of Cavalry Capt. Wm. H. Carter 232 Seventh Regiment of Cavalry ... .Major E. A. Garlington 251 Eighth Regiment of Cavalry Capt. C. M. O’Connor 268 Ninth Regiment of Cavalry Lieut. Grote Hutcheson 280 Tenth Regiment of Cavalry Capt. John Bigelow, Jr 288 First Regiment of Artillery Major W. L. Haskin 301 Second Regiment of Artillery Lieut. W. A. Simpson 312 VI CONTENTS. Third Regiment of Artillery Lieut. W. F. Birkhimer 328 Fourth Regiment of Artillery Lieut. A. B. Dyer 351 Fifth Regiment of Artillery Lieut J. C. Bush 376 PAGE First Regiment of Infantry Military Service Institution 401 Second Regiment of Infantry Lieut. W. M. Wright 414 Third Regiment of Infantry .Lieut. J. H. McRae 432 Fourth Regiment of Infantry Lieut. J. A. Leyden 452 Fifth Regiment of Infantry Military Service Institution 466 Sixth Regiment of Infantry Lieut. Chas. Bjune 480 Seventh Regiment of Infantry.. Lieut A. B. Johnson 498 Eighth Regiment of Infantry Lieut. R. H. Wilson 511 Ninth Regiment of Infantry Capt. E. B. Robertson 526 Tenth Regiment of Infantry Capt. S. Y. Seyburn 531 Eleventh Regiment of Infantry Major J. H. Patterson and Capt. R. J. C. Irvine 545 Twelfth Regiment of Infantry Lieut. Chas. W. Abbott, Jr 555 Thirteenth Regiment of Infantry Lieut. J. B. Goe 575 Fourteenth Regiment of Infantry Col. T. M. Anderson 5S6 Fifteenth Regiment of Infantry Capt. H. R. Brinkerhoff 610 Sixteenth Regiment of Infantry Capt. W. V. Richards 629 Seventeenth Regiment of Infantry Capt. Chas. St. J. Chubb 634 Eighteenth Regiment of Infantry Lieut. C. H. Cabaniss, Jr 643 Nineteenth Regiment of Infantry Capt. C. C. Hewitt 657 Twentieth Regiment of Infantry Capt.. J. N. Coe 666 Twenty-First Regiment of Infantrj-. .. .Capt. Fred. H. E. Ebstein 673 Twenty-Second Regiment of Infantry. .Capt. O. M. Smith 6S0 Twenty-Third Regiment of Infantry. . .Lieut. J. K. Thompson 692 Twenty-Fourth Regiment of Infantry. .Capt. H. W. Hovev 695 Twenty-Fifth Regiment of Infantry... .Capt. George Andrews 697 APPENDIX. I. Circular of the Publication Committee 703 II. Extract from the Minutes of the Publication Committee 704 III. The First Infantry 704 IV. The Seventh Infantry 704 V. The Fourteenth Infantry 705 VI. Dates of Important Campaigns, etc 706 VII. Table of Losses of Regular Regiments during 1861-65 709 PORTRAITS. GENERAL OFFICERS COMMANDING THE ARMY. FACE PAGE Josiah Harmar, Brevet Brigadier-General . . 1789-91 “ ix Arthur St. Clair, Major-General 1791-92 “ 33 Anthony Wayne, Major-General 1792-96 “ 83 1796-98 “ 1800-12 “ James Wilkinson, Brigadier-General . . George Washington, Lieut.-General .... 1798-99 “ title Alexander Hamilton, Major-General .... 1799-1800 “ 153 Henry Dearborn, Major-General 1812-15 “ 193 Jacob Brown, Major-General ...... 1821-28 “ 251 Alexander Macomb, Major-General .... 1828—±1 “ 301 Winfield Scott, Major-General ...... 1841-61 “ 351 George Brinton McClellan, Major-General. . 1862-62 “ 401 Henry Wager Halleck, Major-General . . . 1862-64 “ 452 Ulysses Simpson Grant, General 1864-69 “ 511 William Tecumseh Sherman, General . . . 1869-83 “ 545 Philip Henry Sheridan, General 1883-88 “ 575 John McAllister Schofield, Lieut.-General . 1888-95 “ 629 Nelson Appleton Miles, Major-General . . . 1895 “ 657 Brevet Brigadier-General JOSIAH HARMAR Commanding the Army, 1789-1791. ESPRIT DE CORPS. Captain CHARLES KING, United States Army. WHAT a cry went up in the British army when the fiat went forth a few years since, depriving those proud old regiments of the line of the designations they had borne for twice a century ! With what sorrow were the old colors, with their blazoned num- bers sent back to “ Horse Guards ” and with what wild wonderment were the new received ! How strange it seems to those who have read and revelled in the history and traditions of that most gallant, if often most misled of armies, to see no more in print of the doings of the 55th, the 88th—dashing old “ Faugh a Ballaghs ”; the 28th, they of the Square at Quatre Bras and Waterloo; the 1st, the 44th, the 9th, 21st and 47th, all old and war-tried foot regiments—and then the Highlanders—the 42d, the blessed old 93d— Colin Campbell’s pets, he who never addressed them except by their nu- merical designation! Where are all the old numbers now ? Gone to be replaced by such clumsy appellations as the South Staffordshire Light In- fantry, the Northumberland Fusiliers, the West Middlesex Sharpshooters, and the “ Horse Guards ” only knows what all. Of course, we know that many a “ corps ” that bore aloft its number on its colors, had none the less some pet name in which it took pride—notably the Highlanders—and by the same token were there not others like the 50th that struggled under sobriquets most undeserved ? But the 88th were “The Connaught Rangers,” the 25th “The Kings Own Borderers,” the 42d the famous “ Black Watch ” ; and then we had the “ Royal Scots,” the “Cameron Highlanders,” the “Sutherland Highlanders,” the “ Buffs,” and so on ad infinitutn, almost, but one must draw the line with the limits of the army. How those fellows must have felt when their old names and numbers were stripped at the whim of a new War Ministry ! Is there any one in our service competent to say ? Of course, with their cavalry, it was different. To be sure, some of the merry old Light Dragoon regiments of the Peninsula and Charley O’Malley days had been transmogrified into hussars, or lancers, but the change was not great. Think of the glorious trio that made up Ponsonby’s Heavy Brigade at Waterloo and then, under gallant Scarlett, whipped ten times their weight at Balaklava—“The Union Brigade” where the rose, the shamrock and thistle charged side by side. The Royals of England, the Inniskillens of Ireland and the Scots’ Greys whose “ terrible grey horses” made Napoleon wince at Waterloo. What soldier would not glory in pointing to the num- ber of his regiment of Heavies, and saying I am of the “ K. D. G’s.”—or the Royals—or the Scots’ Greys ! Then take the beautiful Light Brigade, they whom Lucan launched and Cardigan led to their fruitless sacrifice. The world never saw jauntier ix X HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. horsemen than those fellows of the 8th or nth Hussars, or the 17th Lancers —the “ Death or Glories ” whose snow-white plastrons have gleamed all over the globe. They at any rate preserve their numbers and the concom- itant “ honors.” So, too, in the French—so, too, in the German service. “ These legends and traditions ” attached to regiments that have won a name are handed down from generation to generation, and every youngster joining has to study them up and pass his “ quizzing ” on any and all ma- terial points, or he is no true soldier. Is it not the custom in the Prussian service for one regiment at least—the 1st Guard Fusiliers—to turn out on State occasions in the towering, stately, visorless, high pointed and ornate head-dress—resembling more the mitre of a bishop of the Greek Church than any martial top piece—that was worn by this regiment in the days of Frederick the Great, and doubtless introduced among his impressed Pots- dammers by his royal father? Do they not even now, when on review, march past with the utterly absurd goose-step required of them in 1750? “It keeps up the regimental tradition.” That is ail it is for, say they. But looking about us, it strikes the writer that it is a great deal—a very great deal. What have we in the service of the United States to foster Esprit de Corps?—to preserve regimental tradition ? No distinctive uniform, of course; no “ from-time-immemorial-head- gear ” like the Scots’ Greys or the Coldstreams. No peculiar facings that tell the looker on “ Ah ! there goes the —th. They’re the fellows that held the ‘ Molino,’ ” or “ Look there ! That means he belongs to the Seventh. They lost half their number in one Indian fight years ago.” We have few banners, colors or standards to speak of. Old England brings (she says “ fetches ”) hers reverently home and places them with pomp and prayer and ceremony and presented arms and uncovered heads, high on the inner walls of her grand old churches. We, when ours become downright shabby, get a new set, after six months’ correspondence and the Lord only knows how many endorsements ; but what becomes of the old ones—who can say ? After all who seems to care much, anyhow ? About the only time we ever saw them was when we went to call on Mrs. Colonel and noted them still eking out the feeble frontier ornamentation of the rather cheerless room. They looked a little more in need of dusting, perhaps, but did we ever see them brought forth under escort of “ such a company ’ and re- ceived with wholesale honors? Did we really have a color-bearer selected, with his corporals, “ from those most distinguished for bravery, and for pre- cision under arms and in marching ” ?—And did they have any distinctive badge ? Well—in a few regiments—with “ live ” colonels, yes ; but in most cases, I fear me, no. But we have some regiments, Laus Deo ! in which tradition and legend and fellowship seem to go hand in hand. I love to get a letter from a Sec- ond Cavalryman and see its soldier crest and the motto “ Toujours Pret ” on the envelope. It has its proud story written out in full, and Roden- bough and his comrades have told its glorious past. The divided days of the Seventh are gone forever, please God, and a splendid regiment, one in ESPRIT DE CORPS. xi pride and purpose, has sprung from the thrilling episodes of its early his- tory. Yet who is to gather and edit those scattered records of savage fight, cruel suffering and final triumph. Price, long before they laid him in his grave, put his shoulder to the wheel (and his hand in his pocket) and gave us a compilation of the regimental returns of the Fifth (Cavalry). Wilhelm has done the same for the gallant old Eighth Infantry. Powell told the story of his old love—the Fourth—before promotion took him from it; and even one of those “aggregations of batteries,” the First Artillery, has found its Boswell in Major Haskin. None the less, regimental histories are few and far between. Young officers entering the service to-day, look in vain in the dusty shelves of the regimental library, for some book or pamphlet which will give them an ink- ling of the past service of the command with which their lot is to be cast until they have doubled the years of the life now so full of enthusiasm. Finding nothing, they apply to some graybeard among the field officers or captains. “ Tell me something of the service of the Steenth. Where was it during the war? ” And in nine cases out of ten he will come away disap- pointed. “ I don’t know.” “ I wasn’t with it during the war. The ‘ nth ’ was my regiment then.” Or, “ I was commanding a brigade of volunteers. I don’t know who can tell you, unless you ask old Spigots, yonder. Seems to me he was Regimental Quartermaster in those days.” There is many a reason why our officers have not been to blame in this matter. The reorganization of ’71 resulted in such a shaking up and re- shaking that, as one gallant soldier of the “ old Army ” remarked in answer to a query : “ What regiment do I belong to ? Well, I have been borne on the rolls of four different ones in the last sixty days, and I’m d d if I know which to report to.” The policy adopted by the Government in stationing its troops on the great frontier for years, after the Civil War, is another. Regiments were broken up and scattered broadcast over an entire department, merged with troops of other commands; placed under the orders of field officers of totally different organizations, and such a thing as esprit de corps knocked higher than any kite the famous Gilderoy ever dreamed of. In one four- company post has it not happened that no two of the companies (including cavalry troops) belonged to the same regiment ? Other reasons—indiffer- ence due to long years of knockabout service on part of the seniors and sarcastic rebuffs at the expense of the juniors ; the transfer on promotion of field officers to regiments, in which they found themselves as much at home as a cat in a strange garret; the absence of any distinctive regimental march to be played by the band when half a dozen companies got together on some surprising occasion. All these and others have tended to stifle the growth of the precious vine that thrives with such vigor in the heart of every English or German regiment and, twining its tendrils about every in- dividual in the corps, holds them together in bonds indissoluble. But, things are changing. With every day regiments are brought more and more into garrisons by themselves. Wondrous to tell there are posts where all the ten companies bear the same number over the crossed rifles on their forage caps and where the colors are actually saluted. By regi- xii HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY mental order the Third Infantry never marches in review except to the stirring “ six-eight ” swing of the “ Rifle Regiment,” composed and dedi- cated to them by Sousa. The Seventh Cavalry never parades without “ Comanche ” draped in mourning, and—mirabile dictu, the forage “ ex- pended ” in feeding the gallant old steed, who has never done a stroke of work nor carried a rider since ’76, has not been stopped against somebody by a government hitherto as unalterably opposed to sentiment as Grad- grind himself. It makes one think of Andrew Jackson’s response to the would-be defamers of heroic old Captain C . “ Gets drunk every day of his life, does he ? Well, so he shall, if it’s any comfort to him and, by the Eternal, the United States shall pay for his whiskey.” The old Fifth—the banner infantry regiment in the days when Billy Chapman, “ Beau ” Neill and R. B, Marcy were among its model captains, and best known since as “ Miles’ Mounted Infantry” in the tough Indian campaigns of the seventies, has never lost the touch of the elbow that seemed so utterly lacking in the regiments raised in ’61 and then split up like so much kindling wood in ’66. So, too, “ The Fourth that fought at Tippecanoe ” and the old Sixth. Matters indeed have changed, for at last comes a formulated scheme to foster, promote and preserve the regimental feeling that for years at least was a minus quantity. If ever a scheme was started by the Military Service Institution of the United States that should command the respect and cooperation of every officer who has a pride in his corps and regiment, it is that embodied in General Abbot’s circular of Nov. 10th. The idea of having printed in suc- cessive numbers of the Journal, historical sketches of each regiment in the service, and of the Staff corps that have been so essential to the army in peace or war, is simply an inspiration. Staff Corps and Departments THE ADJUTANT-GENERAL’S DEPARTMENT BREVET MAJOR-GENERAL JAMES B. FRY, U. S. Army. ON the 15th of June 1775, George Washington was elected General and Commander-in-chief. It was resolved (by the Continental Con- gress, June 16th) “ that there be appointed for the American Army two (2) major-generals, with pay $166 per month, eight (8) briga- dier-generals and one (1) adjutant-general, with pay $125 per month." Horatio Gates, Esq., (of Virginia, late major, British army) was chosen adjutant-general June 17th, and it was resolved “that he shall have the rank of brigadier-general.” His commission was signed by President Han- cock, on the 19th of June. On July 17, 1775, Congress resolved “that the convention at New York be desired to recommend to General Schuyler a proper person for a deputy adjutant-general or brigade major for the Army in the New York department.” Subsequently, on September the 14th, Congress resolved “ that Edward Flemming, Esq., be appointed deputy adjutant-general for the Army in New York or Northern department, with the rank of colonel, and that the President make out a commission for him accordingly, and forward the same the first opportunity.” On November 8th, Congress ap- proved General Schuyler’s appointment of Captain David Dimon to be brigade major and ordered him a commission accordingly. Meanwhile the major-generals, on assuming command in separate departments, and the division commanders in the “ Continental ” Army before Boston, had, from the necessity of the case, to designate suitable persons to perform the func- tions of deputy adjutant-general or brigade major. By resolution of July 19th, Congress provided that “ it be left to General Washington, if he thinks fit, to appoint three (3) brigade majors, and commission them accordingly.” The pressure of events, during this year, made it necessary to recognize in the continental or “ regular ” establishment such officers as had been raised with the troops in the several colonies by the provincial conventions, or councils of safety, for limited periods. These resolutions were of similar tenor to the resolutions of November 4th, which directed “the President to sign blank commissions, and that the conventions, or, in their recess, the councils of safety for South Carolina and Georgia, respectively, fill them up with the names of such officers as they may think proper, and return a list thereof to the Congress.” The adjutant-general and deputy adjutants-gen- eral were commissioned to those offices, respectively, as well as many of the earlier appointments of brigade majors. The office of brigade major had come into existence early in the history of the constitutional British 2 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. army. The officer filling it was detailed from the officers of the line, re- ceiving, usually, increased pay and allowances. His functions were similar to those of the acting assistant adjutant-general of the present day. The Army had but one adjutant-general who was at general headquarters. Deputy adjutants-general performed like services at subordinate army headquarters, and corps and wing headquarters. On the 30th of March, 1776, Congress resolved “that each brigadier-general when on command be empowered to appoint a brigade major.” It was resolved, June 17th, that “ General Washington be directed to send General Gates to Canada, and, on September 16th, that “the appointment of all officers, and filling up of all vacancies (excepting general officers) be left to the Government of the several States, * * * that all officers be commissioned by Congress. On the 5th of June, Lieutenant-Colonel Joseph Reed, of Pennsylvania, aide- de-camp to the General-in-chief, was elected adjutant-general. Reed ap- pears to have resigned about January 22, 1777, and Brigadier-General Arthur St. Clair acted as adjutant-general until his promotion to major- general, February 19, 1777, when Colonel George Weedon, of Virginia, performed the duties, although promoted to brigadier-general February 27, 1777- On the 20th of February it was resolved that “ the President (of Congress) write to Major-General Gates and inform him that it is the earnest desire of Congress that he should resume the office of adjutant- general, and that his present rank and pay shall be continued.” General Washington, from Headquarters Morristown, March 10th, also wrote to Gates, then at Philadelphia, to the same effect, but the latter declined, be- ing then in a separate command. On the 26th of March it was “ ordered that the President acquaint General Washington that Congress expects the office of adjutant-general to be filled up by a speedy appointment of a per- son of abilities and unsuspected attachment to these United States, and recommended Colonel William Lee to his consideration for this purpose.” Congress, by Resolution of September 27, 1776, had already given Wash- ington the power, for six months, “ to displace and appoint all officers under the rank of brigadier-general, and to fill up all vacancies in every other department in the A?nerican Army.” General Washington, in a let- ter to Colonel Timothy Pickering, of Salem, Massachusetts (late colonel Essex County Regiment), dated March 30, 1777, offered him the position “vacant by reason of the resignation of Colonel Reed, and the power of appointing a successor resting with me.” When Washington wrote to Pickering, offering him the appointment of adjutant-general, he enclosed a letter to Lee (who had been recommended for the position by Congress) offering it to him—the letter to Lee to be forwarded, in case Pickering should decline. Pickering did decline and sent the letter to Lee, who re- ported at Washington’s headquarters. Pickering, however, subsequently reconsidered the matter, and determined to accept, whereupon Lee yielded his claims. On the 5th of January, 1778, Congress proceeded to the elec- tion of an adjutant-general in the room of Colonel Pickering, who was called to the Board of War by Resolution of November 7, 1777, and the ballots being taken, Colonel Alexander Scammel of the New Hampshire Continental Line was unanimously elected adjutant-general. Pickering, ADJUTANT-GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT. 3 however, continued to perform the duties until January 13, 1778, when Scammel assumed them. On the 17th of May, 1779, it was resolved that “the adjutant-general of the Army of the United States be allowed the same rations as a brigadier-general; that he be permitted to engage two assistants and one clerk.” On the 22d of June it was resolved that “the adjutant-general for the time being be also assistant inspector general.” On the 8th of January, 1781, Brigadier-General Edward Hand of Penn- sylvania was elected adjutant-general to succeed Scammel, who had been appointed colonel of the 1st New Hampshire Regiment Infantry, Conti- nental Line, a position he did not long occupy as he was mortally wounded by a Hessian cavalryman in front of Yorktown, Virginia, September 30, 1781, and died a prisoner of war October 6, 1781. On the 1st of August, 1782, it was resolved that “ the adjutant-general be appointed by Congress from the general officers, colonels, lieutenant-colonels commandant, or lieutenant-colonels in the Army. * * * He shall have two assistants and one clerk to be appointed by himself and approved of by the Com- mander-in-chief. The assistants shall be majors or captains of the Army. * * * That there shall be as many deputy adjutants-general, of the rank of field officers, as there may be separate armies in the United States that consist of one or more divisions, to be appointed occasionally by the com- manding officer of such army, whose names shall be returned to the com- mander-in-chief for his approbation. “ The deputy adjutants-general shall appoint each one assistant, of the rank of major or captain, who shall be approved of by the commanding offi- cer under whom they serve. “ That there be one major of brigade to each brigade in the armies of the United States, whether of cavalry, artillery, or infantry, who shall be ap- pointed by the Commander-in-chief, or commanding officer of a separate army, as occasion may require, upon the recommendation of the adjutant- general or deputy adjutant-general as the case may be. “ These regulations shall take effect on the ist day of January next, and from thenceforth all acts, resolutions, pay and appointments heretofore made in any wise respecting the department of adjutant-general and brigade majors shall cease and are hereby repealed.” On the 31st of December it was resolved that “ Brigadier-General Hand be and is hereby continued in the office of adjutant-general.” He retained the office until almost all of the Revolutionary Army was disbanded on November 5, 1783, in pursu- ance of a proclamation issued by Congress on the 18th of October pre- vious. From the disbandment of the Army, 1783, until the act of March 3, 1791, there was no regular adjutant-general (or brigade major as it was sometimes called), and no authority for the commissioning of such an offi- cer. On October 31, 1784, from headquarters ist American Regiment, Fort Pitt, Ensign Ebenezer Denny, of this regiment (late of ist Pennsylvania Continental Line), was appointed adjutant, he having acted as such from August 12, 1784. On July 31, 1787, Congress appointed lieutenant-colonel HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. 4 commandant, and brevet colonel, Josiah Harmar, of this regiment, a brevet brigadier-general, and placed him on duty as General-in-chief with the emol- uments of his brevet rank, which gave him command not only of his own regiment but of the battalion United States artillery. On the 28th of Oc- tober, 1787, from headquarters Fort Finney, General Harmar appointed Ensign Denny as acting adjutant-general. The act of March 3, 1791, gave the President power to call into service the militia or to enlist volunteers for six months, and to form them into regiments under the denomination of levies, and to appoint the commissioned officers. Governor Arthur St. Clair, of the Western Territory, was appointed major-general March 4, 1791, thereby superseding brevet Brigadier-General Harmar as “ General- in-chief.” Lieutenant Ebenezer Denny, adjutant istU.S. Infantry, was ap- pointed aide-de-camp to Major-General St. Clair, September 30, 1791, in gen- eral orders of that date from headquarters, camp on the Great Miami, near Fort Washington. (This camp was afterwards called Fort Hamilton.) Brevet Major Winthrop Sargent, of Massachusetts (late Corps of Artillery, Conti- nental Line), was secretary of the Western Territory, under Governor St, Clair, and was called into service with the rank of lieutenant-colonel of militia, early in September, 1791, and at Ludlow’s Station announced as act ing adjutant-general. In the disastrous engagement of November 4, 1791 with the Miami Indians, Colonel Sargent was badly wounded—receiving two bullets in his body which he carried until his death. The act ol March 5, 1792, recognized a “ general staff,” in which is found one “ adjutant ” to do also the duty of “ inspector.” President Washington appointed Win- throp Sargent, late acting adjutant-general, “ adjutant ” and “ inspector ” under this act of March 5th, and he was confirmed by the Senate, April 11, 1792, but declined the appointment. Meanwhile, on March 5, 1792, Major- General St. Clair had resigned his commission, and Anthony Wayne 'for- merly brigadier-general, Continental Army) was, on the same day, ap- pointed major-general, and placed as “ General-in-chief” over the United States Army. Capt. Henry de Butts, 4th Sub-Legion, U. S. A. (of Mary- land), the first aide-de-camp to General Wayne, acted as adjutant-general until the office was filled by an officer specially detailed for that duty. Major Michael Rudolph, who had been a captain in the Maryland Line Continen- tal Army, was, while major of dragoons, U. S. A., then nominated and con- firmed as “adjutant” and “inspector,” February 23, 1793, vice Winthrop Sargent, declined. He resigned July 17, 1793, and was succeeded by Major John Mills, 2d Sub-Legion, U. S. A., of Massachusetts, who was confirmed as “adjutant ” and “ inspector,” May 13, 1794, vice Rudolph, resigned. He died in office July 8, 1796. The act approved March 3, 1795, recognized the office of “ adjutant-general ” to do also the duty of inspector, and directed that “ the present military establishment of the United States, composed of a corps of artillerists and engineers and a legion to consist of 4800 non-com- missioned officers, privates and musicians be continued, “ that they be com- pleted,” etc. This is the first mention in the laws of a “ legion.” The legion was the favorite idea of General Henry Knox, then Secretary of War. It was divided into four sub-legions, each of which was to consist of one brigadier or sub-legionary general, with one aide-de-camp, one AD JUT A NT- GENERALS DEPA R TMENT. 5 brigade or sub-legionary major and inspector, one quartermaster and One surgeon. The forces in each sub-legion comprised 1280 non-commissioned officers, musicians and privates, and were to consist of one troop of dragoons, one company of artillery, two battalions of infantry, and one battalion of rifles—each battalion to have four companies. The legionary staff itself was to consist of the major-general or legionary general, two aides-de-camp, one adjutant and inspector, one major commandant of cavalry, one quartermaster, one deputy quartermaster, one surgeon and one chaplain. On NovemDer 1, 1796, pursuant to the act of May 30, 1796, the President arranged and completed out of the legion, four regiments of infantry,and two companies of light dragoons,taking care as far as practicable to arrange two sub-legions back again to their original infantry numbers, the first sub-legion again becoming the 1st regiment United States Infantry—su- pernumerary officers and soldiers were discharged from that date, the officers thus discharged receiving each six months’ pay and subsistence. The act of May 30,1766, directed that “ after the last day of October, 1796, the military establishment shall consist of the corps of artillerists and engineers, two companies of light dragoons, four regiments of infantry of eight com- panies,’' and section 3 of the act directed, amongst other details, that “there shall be one inspector who shall do the duty of adjutant-general.” The general staff authorized by this act was to continue in service only until the following March 4th. From the decease of Adjutant-General Mills, in July, 1796, until the appointment of an inspector under this act, Major Jonathan Haskell, 4th sub-legion, a revolutionary officer, and Captain Edward Butler (Pennsylvania) of the rifle battalion, 4th sub-legion, sub- legionarv major and inspector, were successively detailed by Major General Wayne to perform the functions of adjutant-general to the United States Army. On February 27, 1797, Major Thomas H. Cushing (Massachusetts) of the First United States Infantry (formerly 1st Lieutenant Massachusetts Line Continental Army), was appointed by the President, with consent of the Senate, to be “ inspector.” He by law was also required to do the duty of “adjutant-general.” The act passed March 3, 1797, repealed section 3 of the act of May 30, 1796, regulating the general staff. It made no provision for a major-general vice Wayne deceased—nor for an adjutant-general, but allowed one brigadier-general, who could choose his brigade major, also an inspector from the captains and subalterns in the line. The act of May 22, 1798, amended the act of March 3, 1797, so as to permit the brigadier-general—who was now General-in-chief—to select his brigade major and inspector or either of them from commissioned officers of any grade in the line of the Army. Major Cushing had not relinquished his rank in the infantry upon receiving the commission of inspector. He continued to perform the duties of inspector and adjutant- general, under detail, even after his commission of inspector had by operation of law expired March 3, 1797. The act of May 22, 1798, enabled Brigadier-General James Wilkinson, then General-in-chief, to keep him on duty as “ inspector,” section 2 of this act giving to Major Cush- ing by name, the difference between his major’s and inspector’s pay and allowances while thus serving by appointment of General Wilkinson, from 6 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. March 3, 1797, to May 22, 1798, No other officer represented the Adjutant-General’s Department except the brigade major on immediate duty at Army Headquarters from March 3, 1797. until July 19, 1798, when, under the act of May 28th of that year, Brevet Major William North, of Massachusetts, (formerly aide-de-camp to Major-General Baron Steuben, and afterwards Inspector of the Army in 1784) was appointed adjutant-general, with the rank, pay and emoluments of a brigadier- general. This act (May 28, 1798) authorized “the President alone to appoint, from time to time when he shall judge proper, assistant inspectors to every separate portion of the Army, consisting of one or more divisions, who shall be deputy adjutants-general thereof, respectively, and who shall be taken from the line of the Army,” they receiving extra pay while on such duty. The act of March 3, 1799, provided for the better organization of the troops heretofore authorized, and directed that the adjutant-general of the Army (a brigadier-general) shall be ex-officio assistant inspector- general (the inspector-general at this time was Alexander Hamilton, with the rank of major-general), and that every deputy inspector-general shall be ex-officio deputy adjutant-general, and shall perform the duties of adju- tant-general of the Army to which he shall be annexed. The act of May 14, 1800, provided for the disbandment of the Army, except the first four regi- ments of infantry, the two regiments of artillerists and engineers, the two troops of light dragoons and the general and other staff authorized by the several laws for the establishing and organizing of the aforesaid corps. In pursuance of this act, the inspector-general, adjutant-general, and other officers appointed for the “ Provisional Army ” raised during the continu- ance of differences between the United States and the French Republic were disbanded on the 15th of June, 1800. Brigadier-General Wilkinson again became “ General-in-chief,” in consequence of such disbandment Major Cushing, 1st U. S. Infantry, continuing to be inspector to the Army, and on duty under immediate orders of the Secretary of War. Major Cushing continued to fill the office, by detail, until Congress again made it a distinct office. The act of March 16th, 1802, fixed the military peace estab- lishment at one regiment of artillerists, two regiments of infantry, and a corps of engineers, not to exceed twenty officers and cadets, and, amongst other details, provided for one “ adjutant and inspector of the Army,” to be taken trom the line of field officers. On the 25th of March, President Jefferson sent the following nomination to Congress: * * * “Thomas H. Cushing, Adjutant and Inspector of the Army,” * * * which nomination was confirmed March 26, 1802. Major Cushing became by promotion lieutenant-colonel of the 2d U. S. Infantry, April 1, 1802, and colonel of his regiment September 7,1805, but as the only limitation as to the appointment of an “adjutant and inspector” was that he should be a “ field officer,” Colonel Cushing continued to perform the duties now performed by the adjutant-general of the Army, until April 2, 1807. First Lieu- tenant James Biddle Wilkinson, (of Maryland) 2d U. S. Infantry, was appointed aide-de-camp to his father, the General-in-chief—December 1, 1804,—was promoted to be Captain 2d U. S. Infantry, December. 1808, and ADJUTANT-GENERALS DEPARTMENT. 7 continued to perform the duties of aide-de-camp and of acting assistant adjutant-general to the troops in the field when under immediate command of his father, until his own death, September 7, 1813. There appears to have been no change in the legal authorization for an “ adjutant and in- spector ” until 1812, although during that period there were changes in the incumbents. The act of January nth, amongst other details, provided for five briga- dier-generals, each tc be allowed a brigade major to be taken from the cap- tains and subalterns of the line, and for one adjutant-general with the rank, pay and emoluments of a brigadier-general; the adjutant-general to be allowed one or more assistants, not exceeding three, to be taken from the line of the Army, with the same pay and emoluments as a lieutenant- colonel, but no officer detached to serve in the general staff to thereby lose his rank. On the 15th of March, the Hon. William North, formerly adjutant-general of the Army, was again nominated and confirmed as adju- tant-general, but he declined the office, and on the 6th of July, Colonel Thomas H. Cushing, 2d Infantry, late “ adjutant and inspector,” was ap- pointed and confirmed. Soon afterwards Adjutant-General Cushing was nominated and confirmed a brigadier-general in the Army, to rank from July 2, 1812, which was an earlier rank than that given to him in his com- mission as adjutant-general with the rank of brigadier-general. General Cushing continued, however, to perform the duties of adjutant-general at the seat of government, and contributed greatly by his long experience as head of that department, towards the organization of the large regular and volunteer force called suddenly into existence in consequence of the war with Great Britain. The act of July 6, 1812, directs that “to any army of the United States, other than that in which the adjutant-general shall serve, the President may appoint one deputy adjutant-general who shall be taken from the line, * * * and there shall be to each deputy adjutant-general such number of assistant deputies (not exceeding three to each department) as the pub- lic service may require.” The act of March 3, 1813, organizing the “general staff ” of the Army, provided for an “ Adjutant-General’s Department” to consist of an adjutant and inspector-general, with the rank, pay, and emolu- ments of a brigadier-general; not exceeding eight adjutants-general, each with the rank, pay, and emoluments of a colonel of cavalry; and sixteen assistant adjutants-general, each with the brevet rank, pay, and emoluments of a major of cavalry. The act further authorized the President, when he should deem it expedient, to assign one of the brigadier-generals to the principal Army of the United States, who should, in such case, act as adju- tant and inspector-general, and as chief of the staff of such Army. This was the first mention of the “ Adjutant-General’s Department,’ eo nomine. On March 12, 1813, Brigadier-General Cushing relinquished his junior and now superseded commission of “ adjutant-general,” and was assigned to the command of Military District No. 1, comprising the States of New Hampshire and Massachusetts. On the same day Brigadier-General Zebu- Ion M. Pike, U. S. A., was appointed by President Madison to be “adju- tant and inspector-general ” to the Army commanded by the “ General-in- 8 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. chief,” (Major-General Henry Dearborn) but on April 27, 1813, General Pike was killed in the assault and capture of the British fortifications at York (now Toronto), Upper Canada. From this time until May 19, 1814, the office remained vacant, the act of March 3, 1813, having been construed to the effect that there could be but one adjutant and inspector-general, who must either be an officer appointed and confirmed to that office, or else be a brigadier-general especially designated by the President to perform the functions. The affairs of the office at the War Department were mean- while administered by Colonel A. T. Nicoll, inspector-general, and Major C. K. Gardner, 25th Infantry, assistant adjutant-general, in their branches, respectively, during the remainder of the year 1813. On May 19, 1814, Briga- dier-General William H. Winder, U. S. A., was appointed “adjutant and in- spector-general,” and chief of staff to the Northern Army, but did not retain the office long, as, on July 2d, following, he was assigned to the command of the Tenth Military District, and commanded the American forces in the affair at Bladensburg, and unsuccessful defense of Washington. General A. T. Nicoll, inspector-general, having resigned, June 1, 1814, he was suc- ceeded by Colonel John R. Bell, inspector-general (promoted from assist- ant inspector-general, October 20, 1814), at the War Department. In the adjutant-general’s office, proper, Colonel John De B. Walbach, adjutant- general, administered affairs, under the direction of the Secretary of War, from December 30, 1813, until November 22, 1814, when Daniel Parker, of Massachusetts, chief clerk of the War Department, was nominated and confirmed by the Senate as “ adjutant and inspector-general.” The act of March 3, 1815, reduced and fixed the military peace establishment at 10,000 men, but made no provision for an “ Adjutant-General’s Department.” The act required the President to discharge supernumerary officers on May 1, 1815, or, “as soon as circumstances may permit,” and we find that by execu- tive general orders of May 17, 1815, one adjutant and inspector-general, and two adjutants-general were “ provisionally retained.” Had not President Madison seen fit to retain such officers this act would have virtually abol- ished the department. The act of April 24, 1816, recognized and made permanent in service, these officers, thus provisionally retained, and de- clared that the department should hereafter consist of an adjutant and inspector-general with the rank, pay, and emoluments of a brigadier- general ; an assistant adjutant-general, with the rank of colonel, to each division (of which there were two) ; and an assistant adjutant-general with the rank of major, to each brigade (of which there were four). The de- partment therefore consisted, at this time, of seven officers, and general orders of May 3, 1816, based on the act, publishes their names, etc. The act of March 2, 1821, fixed the military peace establishment at four regiments of artilleiy, of nine companies each; seven of infantry, of ten companies each, and the corps of engineers, and provided for one adjutant- general, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of a colonel of cavalry, and directed that the aides-de-camp to the major-general and the brigadier-gen- erals should, in addition to their other duties, perform the duties of assist- ant adjutant-general. This act, in effect, reduced the department to one commissioned officer. ADJUTANT-GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT. 9 Brigadier-General Henry Atkinson, who, in order to be retained in ser- vice, had consented to be arranged according to his earlier commission of colonel and brevet brigadier-general, was offered by President Monroe the position of “ adjutant-general,” but he elected, on August 13, 1821, to take his former regiment, the 6th Infantry, from which he had the year before been promoted. Colonel James Gadsden, inspector-general, was, thereupon, on the same day (August 13, 1821) appointed adjutant-general. The Senate negatived his confirmation on March 22, 1822, and on the following April 12th, the President renominated him for the office, but the Senate adhered to its original determination. Capt. Charles J. Nourse, 2d Artillery, late “ assistant adjutant-general,” was detailed as “acting adjutant-general ” of the Army, May 8, 1822, and took charge of the office and continued to per- form the functions of adjutant-general until relieved, March 7, 1825, by the appointment of Captain Roger Jones, 3d Artillery (late colonel and adju- tant-general), to be adjutant-general, with his old rank. There appears to have been no change in the legal status of the department from 1821 to 1838, when the act of July 5th of that year, increasing the military estab- lishment, empowered the President to appoint so many assistant adjutants- general, not exceeding two, with brevet rank, pay and emoluments of a major, and not exceeding four with the brevet rank, pay and emoluments of a captain of cavalry, as he might deem necessary, to be taken from the line of the Army, and in addition to their own to perform the duties of as- sistant inspectors-general when the circumstances of the service required ; the transfer of these officers to be without prejudice to their rank and pro- motion in the line, which was to take place in the same manner as if they had not been transferred. This again made the Adjutant-General’s Depart- ment to consist of seven officers. The act of March 3, 1839, to amend an act entitled “ an act regulating the pay and emoluments of brevet officers,” approved April 16, 1818, directs that “the same shall be construed as to in- clude the case of the Adjutant-General of the United States.” This act reads “ The officers of the Army who have brevet commissions shall be entitled to and receive the pay and emoluments of their brevet rank when on duty, and having a command according to their brevet rank and at no other time.” Act approved June 18, 1846, providing for the prosecution of the war between the United States and the Republic of Mexico, empowered the President to appoint as many additional assistant adjutants-general, not ex- ceeding four, as the service may require, with the same rank, pay and emolu- ments, and to be charged with the same duties as those now authorized by law; appointments to continue only as long as the exigencies of the ser- vice might render necessary. Under this act two majors and two captains were appointed. The department, therefore, now consisted of eleven offi- cers. The act of March 3, 1847, making provision for an additional number of general officers, and for other details, directed that there be added to the Adjutant-General’s Department, one assistant adjutant-general, with the rank, pay and emoluments of a lieutenant-colonel of cavalry, and two assist- ant adjutants-general, with the brevet rank, pay and emoluments of a cap- tain of cavalry, to be charged with the same duties as those now existing by law, and the officers so appointed to be discharged at the close of the war 10 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. with Mexico. This brought the strength of the department up to fourteen. The act of July 19, 1848, repealed so much of the act of March 3, 1847, as required the discharge at the close of the war with Mexico * * * of an assistant adjutant-general, with the rank, pay and emoluments of a lieuten- ant-colonel of cavalry, and two assistant adjutants-general, with the rank, pay and emoluments of a captain of cavalry; provided that no vacancy happening under the provisions so repealed be filled up until further au- thorized by law. The act of March 2, 1849, repealed so much of the proviso to the 3d section of the act approved July 19, 1848, as related to officers of the Adjutant-General’s Department, which left the department with an ag- gregate strength of fourteen officers, with authority to make promotions and fill vacancies. This continued to be the strength of the department until 1861. The act of August 3, 1861, providing for the better organization of the Army, directed that “ hereafter the Adjutant-General’s Department shall consist of one adjutant-general, with the rank, pay and emoluments of a brigadier ; one assistant adjutant-general, with the rank, pay and emolu- ments of a colonel of cavalry, and two assistant adjutants-general, with the rank, pay and emoluments each of a lieutenant-colonel of cavalry ; four assistant adjutants-general, with the rank, pay and emoluments of a major of cavalry, and twelve with the rank, pay and emoluments of a captain of cavalry ” (total 20). The act of July 17, 1862, directed that “one colonel, two lieutenant-colonels, and nine majors be added to the department by regular promotion from its present officers, and that the grade of ‘ captain ’ be abolished, and in future that all vacancies in the grade of major be filled by selection from among the captains of the Army”—(total strength of the department, 20). The act of July 28, 1866, directed that “ the adjutant-gene- ral shall hereafter be appointed by selection from the corps to which he be- longs.” The act of March 3,1869, prohibited promotions and appointments in the Adjutant-General's Department, but by act of March 3, 1873, the appoint- ment of one assistant adjutant-general, with the rank of major, was author- ized. Thus the legal strength of the Adjutant-General’s Department at this time was one brigadier-general, two colonels, four lieutenant-colonels, and thirteen majors (twenty in all), but by the act of March 3, 1869, prohibiting promotions and appointments, the department became reduced to one brigadier-general, one colonel, three lieutenant-colonels, and eleven majors (sixteen in all). The act of March 3, 1875, “to reduce and fix the Adjutant- General’s Department,” directed that “ said department shall hereafter con- sist of one adjutant-general, with the rank, pay and emoluments of a brig- adier-general ; two assistant adjutants-general, with the rank, pay and emoluments of colonels; four assistant adjutants-general, with the rank, pay and emoluments of lieutenant-colonels, and ten assistant adjutants-gen- eral, with the rank, pay and emoluments of majors”—(seventeen members in all). This act also repealed so much of the act approved March 3, 1869, as prohibited promotions and appointments in the Adjutant-General's De- partment. The act of February 28, 1887, “to effect a rearrangement of grades of office in the Adjutant-General’s Department of the Army” directed that “ The Adjutant-General’s Department of the Army shall consist of one ADJUTANT-GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT 11 adjutant-general, with the rank, pay and emoluments of a brigadier-gen- eral ; four assistant adjutants-general, with the rank, pay and emoluments of colonel; six assistant adjutants-general; with the rank, pay and emolu- ments of lieutenant-colonel; and six assistant adjutants-general, with the rank, pay and emoluments of major : Provided that the vacancies in the grade of colonel and lieutenant-colonel created by this act shall be filled by the promotion by seniority of the officers now in the Adjutant-General’s Department.” At this date, therefore (May, 1891), the legal strength of the Adjutant- General’s Department is seventeen, and the department is open to promo- tion and appointments on the occurrence of vacancies. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL’S DEPARTMENT. I''HE office of inspector general dates from Dec. 13, 1777, although Lieutenant-Colonel Mottin de la Balme, a French cavalry officer, was appointed by congress July 8, 1777, inspector general of cavalry; and on Aug. 11, M. du Coudray, a French artillery officer, was appointed inspector general of ordnance and military manufactures with the rank of major general. It is not probable that either of these officers performed much service as inspectors, for the entire cavalry force consisted of but four regiments, used chiefly as escorts, messengers and orderlies, while the ordnance and military manufactures were as yet unorganized. De la Balme resigned three months and three days after his appointment, and Du Coudray held his position about one month. He was drowned Sep- tember 15, while attempting to cross the Schuylkill en route to army head- quarters as a volunteer. On October 26, 1777, General Washington assembled a council composed of fourteen general officers which met on the 29th, and among other ques- tions submitted to it, considered the following : “ Will the office of inspector general to our army, for the purpose principally of establishing one uniform set of manoeuvres and manual, be advisable, as the time of the adjutant general seems to be totally engaged with other business ? ” It was ap- parently the intention that each member of the council should submit his views in writing, but only those of General Sullivan on the subject of the inspectorship have been preserved, and in regard to that he wrote : “ Such an officer will answer an exceedingly good purpose, provided a person who is well versed in the manoeuvres has the appointment, and the major and brigadier generals themselves will take more pains to teach their men to move in large bodies, and perform such manoeuvres as the inspector general will recommend. If the person appointed should only be acquainted with the trick of parade of a single company or regiment, and has not extended his ideas to the movements of armies, it will be rather a disadvantage than benefit to the army.” * The final decision of the council, which every member signed, was that “ such an officer was desirable, the manual or regulations to be first agreed upon by the commander-in-chief, or a board of officers appointed for the purpose.” General Conway, one of the members, was born in Ireland, but educated in France and had served many years in the French army. He came over on an engagement with Messrs. Dean and Franklin, who de- scribed him as a soldier of high character and abilities, and one of the most skilful disciplinarians in France. He was commissioned brigadier May 13, 1777, joined the army under Washington who assigned him to the command of a brigade, and participated in the battles of Brandywine and Germantown, and the operations around Philadelphia. He now be- By Major J. P. SANGER, Inspector General, U. S. A. * Original manuscript, State Department. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT. 13 came an aspirant for the position of inspector general, and addressed let- ters to congress proposing a plan of organization. These letters were referred to the board of war, which, on December 12, 1777, reported to congress that they had considered the letters, and that it was expedient to the promotion of discipline and to the reformation of the various abuses which prevailed in the different departments, that an ap- pointment should be made of an inspector general, whose duties should be to determine, with the consent of the commander-in-chief, the instruction, discipline, strength, and condition of all organizations, their accounts, rations, arms and equipment, and the capacity of all officers ; his reports to go to the board of war, and a copy to the majors of regiments, and all com- plaints and grievances to congress.* It was further resolved that two inspectors general be appointed, which resulted in the election of Brigadier General Thomas Conway with the rank of major general: the other was not chosen. Fortunately for the discipline of the army and the conduct of military operations, this plan of administering the inspectorship was not carried out. Its effect was to put the inspector general in direct communication with congress and the board of war. In the hands of Conway, and the board of war as then constituted, such a weapon would have beeen irresistible, and Washington appears to have fully appreciated the danger. On the 2d of January, 1778, he wrote to the president of congress opposing the appoint- ment of Conway and transmitting an extract from the proceedings of the council of generals, in regard to which he wrote: “ The enclosed extract from the proceedings of a council of general officers will show the office of inspector general was a matter not of such modern date as General Conway maintains it to be, and that it was one of the regulations in view to reform the army. “ The foreign officers who had commissions and no commands, and who were of ability, were intended to be recommended to execute it, particularly the Baron d’Arendt with whom the idea originated, and whose capacity seemed to be well ad- mitted.” f The baron was a Prussian officer and colonel of the German regiment, and served as aide-de-camp to Washington. Conway held the office of inspector general until April 28, 1778, when he resigned. Although Washington did not employ Conway as inspector general, he still gave heed to the duties of the office which ever held a high place in his mind. In a letter of January 28, 1778, to the congressional committee, which visited his camp at Valley Forge, to mature a plan for the better adminis- tration of the army, he wrote : “ In an army, like ours, the office of inspector general, principally for the putpose of instituting and carrying into practice an uniform system of manual and manoeuvres, must be extremely useful and advantageous. A number of assistants to this office will be required, as one man would be incapable of superintending the practice of the rules laid down, throughout the army ; and unless this were carefully done, it would be of little avail to establish them. It would be proper, in my opinion, to have one to each *Journals of Congress, t Writings of Washington, Vol. VI. HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. 14 brigade ; the benefits resulting from which would greatly over-balance the considera- tion of expense.” * In the meantime, December i, 1777, Lieutenant-General Baron von Steuben arrived at Portsmouth, N. H., and proceeded to York, Pa., where he ten- dered his services to congress as a volunteer. He commenced his military life when a mere child, as the companion of his father, an engineer officer, and became aide-de-camp to Frederick the Great. Congress conferred on him the rank of captain by brevet, in order to guard against any incon- veniences which might result were he taken prisoner, and he joined the army under Washington at Valley Forge, February 23, 1778. Shortly after his arrival he accepted the appointment of temporary in- spector and entered on his duties. The condition of the army,—without sufficient arms, clothing, rations, medicines, money, organization, instruction or discipline,—was deplorable in all respects. There was no uniformity, while the short terms of enlistment—three, six, and nine months—kept up a continual flow of men, who, as they left for their homes, carried off with them everything serviceable in their possession. These fluctuations de- stroyed the significance of divisions, brigades and regiments, which bore no resemblance to such organizations. It was impossible to obtain correct re- turns of the troops, the arms, supplies, or, in fact, a reliable report of any- thing. Drill regulations of any kind were unknown; each colonel and general had a system of his own ; there was no military code. The interior economy and administration of regiments and companies did not exist; quartermasters obtained supplies and issued them, when their responsibility ceased, while that of the captains was never assumed; hence deficiencies were not known or explained. Officers and men absented themselves at will; desertion was general, and jealousies, bickerings, misunderstandings, insubordination, extravagance, and waste of all kinds prevailed. Unfed, un- paid, insufficiently sheltered, and literally naked, the army presented a picture of inefficiency almost beyond remedy. These conditions naturally suggested to such an experienced officer as Steuben the appropriate remedies, and although many of them were beyond his reach and he labored under the disadvantage of not knowing the English language, he set about his task. To the defects he could not remedy he paid no attention, but devoted himself to completing the organization, instruction and discipline of the troops. To this end he formed a guard for the general-in-chief of 120 men drawn from the line, which he commanded and instructed in person, and which became a school for the inspectors and other officers. The men were completely uniformed, armed and equipped, and their military bearing and general appearance received much attention. Impressed by their intelligence and aptitude, the short time for preparation, the voluntary and transitory character of the service, and the ill success of other foreign officers who had adhered strictly to European methods, Steuben very sensi- bly reversed the old system, and, as he says in his memoirs, instead of “eternal manual exercises,” the purpose of which was not apparent, but which exhausted the patience of the recruits, he practiced them in simple manoeuvres having a palpable object, and in such manner as to make plain ♦Writings of Washington, Vol. VI. THE INSPECTOR GENERALS DEPAR TMENT. 15 the necessity for elementary drill. The good effects of this plan soon be- came manifest, and on March 28, about a month after he had reported to General Washington, the latter issued an order announcing that the Baron had “obligingly undertaken the exercise of the office of inspector general of the army,” and appointed Lieutenant-Colonels Davies, Brooks, Barber and Mr. Ternant, as sub-inspectors. This order was followed by others re- quiring colonels and regimental commanders to review and inspect their regiments weekly, brigadiers their brigades fortnightly, and major generals their divisions. The inspectors were held responsible for the discipline of the troops, and that all instruction conformed strictly to that given by the Baron to the model company, and issued by him with the consent of the general-in-chief. On April 30th, in a letter to congress, Washington explained the ill con- sequences arising from a want of uniformity in discipline and instruction throughout the army, the necessity for a well organized inspectorship, and what had been done up to that time by Steuben. In the month following he submitted a plan under which the business of the office was to form a system of manual and manoeuvres; to prepare all necessary regulations for the government, discipline and arrangement of the army in all its branches ; and to see that they were strictly observed. For this purpose the inspectors were to be considered “ the instructors and censors of the army in everything connected with its discipline and management.” The inspector general to be under the direction of the general-in-chief, his deputies to have charge of the wings or divisions under the major generals commanding, and the in- spectors the brigades. He recommended Steuben for inspector general, also General Cadwallader, “ of a decisive and independent spirit,” Colonel Fleming and the Barons Arendt and Holtzendorf, as assistants. As a result of this correspondence, congress on May 5, 1778, approved the plan and appointed Baron Steuben inspector general with the rank and pay of major general. It was also resolved, “ that there be two ranks of in- spectors under the direction of the inspector general, the first to superintend two or more brigades, and the other to be charged with the inspection of only one brigade.” Steuben soon began to experience difficulties heretofore unknown. As long as he was a volunteer inspector without military authority as such, there was no open opposition to his plan of exercises and inspections, to receiving instructions from him personally, or to his practice of turning out the troops for drill which he did at his volition. His appointment as major general, however, caused much ill feeling among those who were below him in rank, and those of the same grade now objected to the privileges and authority previously exercised by him. Washington also, while fully ap- preciating the benefits to the army that had resulted from his efforts, thought that too much authority might be prejudicial to the inspectorship as well as to discipline, and accordingly issued an order, June 15, 1778, specifying the duties of the inspectors, and requiring all rules and regula- tions to be first approved by him, and then either published in orders or communicated by his direction. All exercises and manoeuvres were to be executed under the immediate 16 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. orders of the several commanders, the inspectors acting as assistants, and the manoeuvres, which the Baron had practiced, were only to take place after orders specially issued, in each case, by the general-in-chief. Thus the extensive powers exercised by Steuben when his office was first established, and which were considered necessary in view of the exigencies of the case, were brought within proper limits, and the safety of the inspec- torship insured. That it would have been overthrown had not Washington placed a wise curb upon the ambition of the inspector general, or had he conceded to him the power of enforcing subordination, there can be little doubt. As stated by Alexander Hamilton, at that time aide-de-camp to Washington, in a letter of June, 1778, to Mr. Duer, a member of congress from New York: “The novelty of the office excited questions about its boundaries ; the extent of its operations alarmed the officers of every rank for their rights. Their jealousies and discontents were rising to a height that threatened to overturn the whole plan.” Steuben continued at Washington’s headquarters where he was most use- ful. In the execution of his duties he met with obstacles which, according to Hamilton, “ were thrown in his way by many of the general officers, incited to it by Lee and Mifflin,” and inasmuch as he had not been able to induce congress to adopt his ideas of the inspectorship, he now insisted on a per- manent command, and seemed determined to leave the service altogether if it were not given him. Provided with a letter from Washington to the presi- dent of congress, the Baron laid his case before that body. But he was not successful and accordingly devoted himself again to his duties as in- spector general. Shortly after his arrival at Valley Forge, congress appointed a commit- tee to confer with him. To this committee he submitted a project in which he discussed the causes which led to the establishment of the inspectorship, and in what manner it could best be made to conform with the genius of the people and the constitution of the army. Reasoning from the relation of the inspectors general of France and Prussia, who were accountable to the king alone, he thought the inspector general should be answerable to the board of war, to which and the com- mander-in-chief, he was to make a report of his inspections. In the event of differences between the commander-in-chief and the inspector general, congress was to decide.* In other words, the inspector general was to be a staff officer of the board of war, and only in a qualified way under the con- trol of the commander-in-chief. This plan was referred to a committee of congress which reported that, after fully considering it and consulting with the Baron, they recommended —in the form of resolutions—that there should be one inspector general with the rank of major general, an assistant inspector general with the rank of brigadier general, sub-inspectors to be colonels and each to have the troops of three or four states, the offices of brigade major and brigade in- spector to be united, and the regulations of the department to be as pro- posed in the plan. The second resolution, among other things, authorized inspectors to have the troops under arms whenever they desired. The journals of Congress. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT. 17 eighth resolution made the inspector general and his assistants subject to the orders of congress, the board of war, and the commander-in-chief. The tenth resolution provided that every officer and soldier who so desired should have the privilege of presenting any complaints to the inspector.* The report was referred to Washington August 20, who, with his usual pen- etration and sagacity, discussed the merits and weak points of the proposed plan and report.f He saw that while it embraced many of the fundamental principles of inspections, it was fatally defective in establishing direct com- munication between the inspector general and the board of war ; in making the inspector general independent of the commander-in-chief and the sub- inspectors independent of the subordinate generals. His letters and ob- servations, together with the report, were received in congress September 15, whereupon it was “ Ordered that the report and observations be referred to the committee of arrangement, and that they be directed to prepare a plan of regulations for the inspectorship, agreeable to the said report and observations. ”J On Thursday, February 18th, thecommittee made its report, whereupon the following plan of organization and management for the department of the inspector general was agreed to : There should be an inspector general, who, in all future appointments, should be taken from the line of major generals, and whose principal duty should be to form a system of regula- tions for drill and manoeuvre, service of guards and detachments, and for camp and garrison duty. Together with his assistants he was to review and inspect the troops and receive such returns as the commander-in-chief or officers in command might direct, reporting all defects and deficiencies to the officers ordering the inspection and to the board of war; all regulations whatsoever to be finally established by congress, but the exigencies of the service requiring it, temporary regulations might be introduced by the in- spector general, with the approval of the commander-in-chief, such regula- tions to be communicated to the army by the adjutant general, and trans- mitted at once to the board of war for the action of congress ; to be as many sub-inspectors as the commander-in-chief or commander of a detachment, in view of the strength and situation of the army, might deem necessary, to be taken from the line of lieutenant-colonels and to receive their instruc- tions relative to the department from the inspector general; one inspector to each brigade to be taken from among the majors and the office to be an- nexed to that of brigade major; that all the officers of the inspectorship having appointments in the line should retain their rights of command, succession, and promotion, but they should not exercise command except on particular occasions and by special assignment of the commander-in- chief ; to be exempt from all duties except those of their office ; the inspec- tor general to be subject to congress and the commander-in-chief only ; and the sub-inspectors to be also subject to the orders of the division and bri- gade commanders on whose staff they were serving.§ * Journals of Congress, t Original Manuscript in State Department. X Journals of ongress. § Journals of Congress. 18 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. From this it appears that the views of Washington had been given due weight, and that the dangers to discipline, as well as those which threatened the inspectorship, had been carefully avoided. On March 25, Steuben submitted to congress a system of drill regulations for the infantry, which, on the 29th, were approved and adopted. In the library of the war department one of the few remaining copies of this book may be seen. It was the first important result of the inspectorship, and was of inestimable benefit to the army. The scope of this sketch will not permit an analysis of these regulations, but it may be remarked that they partook of the Baron’s very practical ideas in regard to the character of the instruction most needed to prepare the troops for the field. Many of the rules prescribed and the customs resulting from them are still observed in the army; others might be revived with benefit to discipline. The regulations having been formally approved, Washington, on April 12, May 4, 12, 22, and June 20, 1779, issued orders making the inspector general and his assistant responsible for their observance. The sub-inspectors when their divisions were detached were to perform the duties of adjutant general, and the new duties of the brigade majors, which were in effect the same as outlined in Steuben’s plan, were defined. In reference to inspections the brigade majors received their instructions from the inspector general, and from the sub-inspectors of the divisions to which they belonged. It was doubtless in pursuance of this idea, of uniting the duties of adjutant general and inspector general that congress on June 22, “ Resolved, That the adjutant general for the time being, be also assistant inspector general.” The organization of the inspectorship being now complete, Washington on July 1, issued an order prescribing a monthly inspection of the whole army, and directing that at these inspections the inspectors be furnished, by all company commanders, with exact returns of the troops and of all govern- ment property since last inspection as well as of that on hand. These returns were consolidated into division returns for the information of the division commanders. “ With what strict scrutiny were the inspections made” re- lates William North: “ I have seen the Baron and his assistants seven long hours inspecting a brigade of three small regiments. Every man not present must be accounted for ; if in camp, sick or well, they were produced or visited ; every musket handled and searched, cart- ridge boxes opened, even the flints and cartridges counted ; knapsacks unslung and every article of clothing spread on the soldier’s blanket, and tested by his little book, whether what he had received from the United States within the year was there, if not, to be accounted for. Hospitals, stores, laboratories, every place and every thing was open to inspection and inspected, and what officer’s mind was at ease if losses or ex- penditures could not, on the day of searching, be fully and fairly accounted for? The inspections were every month, and wonderful was the effect, not only with regard to economy, but in creating a spirit of emulation between different corps. I have known the subalterns of a regiment appropriate one of their two rations to the bettering the appearance of their men, but this was at a later period of the war, when supplies and payments were more ample and more regular.”* On January 12, 1780, congress abolished the mustering department and *Kapp’s Life of Steuben. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT. 19 transferred the duties to the inspector general’s department. The effect of this was to simplify and greatly improve the administration and efficiency of the army. A division of duties so closely united as to be almost identical, among two sets of officers entirely separated by official lines and having a different responsibility, resulted in much friction and confusion and added to the difficulties of command. That the change was in the interest of economy cannot be doubted, and on May 7, Steuben submitted a plan which included the duties of both departments. After considering this plan, Washington on July 14th addressed the following to the president of congress: “ I enclose a plan which, in conjunction with the inspector general, I have framed for the consideration of congress. It is indispensable the department should be put in full activity without loss of time—the speedier the decision the better. A large additional allowance, at least nominally, for the inspectors, is proposed, but it is a very imperfect compensation for the additional trouble, and unless some extra privileges and emoluments attend the office, it will not be undertaken by officers of rank and abilities.” * This plan, expressing the concurrent and deliberate views of Wash- ington and Steuben, should be given in full, but it is so lengthy that only a synopsis is permissible. It provided for an inspector general with the rank of major general, to be taken from the line of major generals, with two aides and two secre- taries ; an assistant inspector general, to be adjutant general of the main army ; an inspector to each division, one to the corps of cavalry, one to the artillery, one to the independent corps, garrisons, and to the militia in service, to be taken, when practicable, from the line of colonels and lieu- tenant colonels, and one to each brigade with the rank of major. The drill regulations and those prescribing discipline, service of guards and detach- ments, camps and garrisons, to be framed and their execution superintended by the inspector general of the army; the assistant inspector general to act as inspector general during the absence of the latter, and to perform the duties of adjutant general; the inspectors and sub-inspectors to act as adjutants general of the divisions and brigades, receiving their instructions in reference to inspection duty from the inspector general and assistant inspector general; the troops to be reviewed and mustered by the inspector general and his assistants monthly, noting the number and condition of the men, their discipline and drill, the state of the arms, equipments, clothing, rations, etc., rejecting all unserviceable recruits, discharging or transferring to the invalid corps all men disabled in the service, and reporting all abuses, neglects and deficiencies to the commander-in-chief, the commander of the organization, and to the board of war. The returns of men and material, as required in Washington’s order of July 1, were continued, as were the other duties and responsibilities. The inspector general in all that related to inspections was subject only to congress, the board of war, and the com- mander-in-chief; all other inspectors to the commanders with whom they served. This plan having been discussed, congress, on September 25, voted that: * Original Manuscript in State Department. 20 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. “ Whereas, the institution of the department hath been found of great utility to the armies of these United States; and experience hath shown that it may be rendered still more useful by an extension of its powers and objects, therefore, “ Resolved, That the former establishment by a resolution of February 18, 1779, and all subsequent resolutions relative thereto, be repealed, and the department here- after have the following form, powers and privileges.” Then follows the plan proposed by Washington and Steuben, with some changes, and Steuben was continued as inspector general, and authorized to appoint all officers necessary to its execution, they being first approved by the commander-in-chief. Considering the short time the inspectorship had been established the plan was as satisfactory as could be expected, but was a disappointment to the Baron. Nevertheless he continued actively at work and devised many remedies for the abuses which prevailed throughout the army. That they were numerous, and that Washington believed in the efficacy of frequent inspections, his correspondence fully proves. On the surrender of Cornwallis, Steuben recommended a reduction in the number of inspectors and proposed some other changes. Accordingly, on January 10, congress authorized one inspector general, to be appointed from the general officers, with one secretary and two aides to be taken from the line; one field officer of the line to be inspector of each separate army, with $80 per month additional pay, and to be allowed to select a captain or subaltern to assist him in the duties of his office, with $10 per month addi- tional pay. The inspectors in the execution of their offices were made sub- ject only to the orders of congress, the secretary of war, the commander- in-chief, or commanding officer of a separate army. The authority and duties of the inspector general and his assistants continued unchanged. With the capitulation of Cornwallis the operations of the main army may be said to have terminated. Attention was now concentrated on the southern army, and every effort made to render it efficient, but with little success. The dishonesty and extortion which had characterized the methods of supplying the troops still continued, and finally engaged the attention of congress, which, on May 7, 1782, provided for the appointment of inspectors of contracts and supplies for the two armies, who were to report any fraud, neglect of duty, or other misconduct by which the public property was wasted or expense unnecessarily incurred. Under these resolutions Colonel Ezekiel Cornell of Rhode Island, was made inspector of contracts for the main army, and Colonel Francis Mentges of the 5th Pennsylvania regiment, the inspector of the southern army. Both of these officers were acting as inspectors of the aforesaid armies respectively. The Peace of Paris was signed January 20, 1783, and a cessation of hos- tilities was proclaimed by Washington to take effect April 19th. On December 23d Washington resigned his commission in the army and retired to private life. The same day he addressed a letter to Steuben, the last he ever wrote as commander-in-chief, in which he said : I wish to make use of this last moment of my public life to signify in the strongest terms, my entire approbation of your conduct, and to express my sense THE INSPECTOR GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT. 21 of the obligations the public is under to you, for your faithful and meritorious ser- vices.” On December 30, 1782, congress passed a resolution complimentary to Steuben, and on March 24, 1784, he sent in his resignation. In accepting it congress passed a resolution of thanks, “ for his great zeal and abilities,” and ordered “that a gold hiked sword be presented to him as a mark of the high sense entertained for his character and services.” Washington had previously written in reply to the Baron’s inquiry, “ whether or no he con- sidered the department of the inspector general necessary to the army, and whether it had been conducted according to his wishes,” as follows: ‘ ‘ I give it as my clear opinion that it has been of the greatest importance for rea- sons too obvious to need enumeration, but more especially for having established one uniform system of manoeuvres and regulations in an army composed of the troops of thirteen States, (each having its local prejudices) and subject to constant deviations and interruptions from the frequent changes it has undergone. It is equally just to declare that the department under your auspices, has been conducted with an intelli- gence, activity and zeal, not less beneficial to the public than honorary to yourself, and that I have abundant reasons to be satisfied with your abilities and attention to the duties of your office during the four years you have been in service.”* Steuben did not return to Europe, but made his home in Oneida County, N. Y., where he died of paralysis, November 28, 1794, at the age of sixty-five years. When the army was disbanded it was divided into a northern and south- ern force. The main body of the northern army was stationed along the Hudson river from Newburg to West Point. On the 19th of March, 1784, Steuben appointed Major William North, his aide-de-camp, inspector of these troops, and the appointment was confirmed by congress April 15, when he was made “inspector to the troops remaining in the service and pay of the United States,” which consisted at the end of April, of 433 in- fantry and 80 artillery. On the 2d of June congress ordered all the troops in service to be mustered out, except 25 privates to guard the stores at Fort Pitt, and 55 at West Point. Under this act General Knox was disbanded and the command of the “ army ” devolved on Captain and Brevet Major Doughty, of the artillery. From this date to July 31, 1787, the army was increased and reduced sev- eral times; at the latter date it consisted of one regiment of infantry and four companies of artillery. On June 25, 1788, it was resolved in congress, “ That the office of inspec- tor of troops in the service of the United States immediately cease, and be discontinued, and that the secretary of war report what mode may be most eligible for having the troops inspected in the future.” In accordance with these instructions he wrote, July 3, 1788, to the president of congress as follows: “ Agreeably to the order of congress of the 25th ultimo, I have the honor to re- port to your Excellency that the recruits at present raising in Connecticut, New Jer- sey and Pennsylvania, will be mustered and inspected previously to their marching by Mr. Stagg, who is employed in this office and is adequate to the business. ♦Writings of Washington. 22 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. “ That I conceive tbe troops on the frontiers maybe mustered and inspected by the majors on oath.” Mr. John Stagg was the chief clerk of the war department, and an ex- officer of the Continental army. He was brigade-major of Conway’s brigade, and of course had performed the duties of inspector. Under these instructions the majors of the regiments acted as inspectors, but Messrs. Stagg and Francis Mentges were inspectors under the secretary of war. The war department was established August 7, and on September 29 congress enacted a law “ to recognize and adapt to the constitution of the United States, the establishment of the troops raised under the resolves of the old congress.” By the act of April 30, 1790, the infantry regiment had three battalions of four companies each ; the artillery battalion four companies; a total of 1216 men. Section 4 authorized an inspector “to inspect said troops.” Owing to Indian hostilities a second regiment of infantry was added March 3, 1791, bringing the authorized aggregate strength of the army to 2232. On March 4, Arthur St. Clair of Pennsylvania was appointed major general, and replaced Harmar in command of the Northwestern Territory. The inspector of this army was Mr. F. Mentges, already mentioned. Owing to the failure of his expedition against the Indians, St. Clair re- signed March 5, 1792, and on the same day congress added three more infantry regiments for a term not to exceed three years. One of these regi- ments was given the unique organization of two battalions of infantry, and one squadron of four troops of light dragoons. Provision was made for a general staff in which there was an “adjutant to do also the duty of inspector, and a brigade-major to act as deputy.” Colonel Winthrop Sargent of Massachusetts, acting assistant adjutant general of St. Clair’s army, was appointed adjutant and inspector but de- clined, assigning as a reason that the office was not attended with sufficient rank. General St. Clair was succeeded by General Wayne, and the army was organized by Washington into a legion and four sub-legions, making the aggregate strength of the whole 5414. The legionary staff included one adjutant and inspector, and that of the sub-legion one brigade-major and inspector. As Colonel Sargent declined his appointment General Wayne appointed Captain Henry de Butts, of the 4th sub-legion, acting adjutant and inspector, March 17. He was relieved by Captain Edward Butler of the 4th sub-legion, who acted until relieved February 23, 1793, by Major Michael Rudolph, of the light dragoons, who was appointed adjutant and inspector of the army. He resigned July x7 1793, and was succeeded by Captain Edward Butler, who held the position until May 13, and was followed by Major John Mills, 2d sub-legion. The act of March 3, 1795, provided for “ an adjutant general to do also the duty of inspector,” and gave additional compensation to the brigade- majors. The act of May 30, 1796, provided for one inspector to do the duty of adjutant general, and terminated the existence of the legion. On February THE INSPECTOR GENERALS DEPARTMENT. 23 27, Major Thomas Cushing, ist infantry, was appointed inspector of the army and performed the duties of adjutant general. The act of March 3, 1797, repealed the foregoing act, and provided for one brigadier general, to choose his brigade-major from the captains of the line. As Major Cushing had not relinquished his rank in the line upon re- ceiving the commission of inspector, he continued to perform the duties of his office by detail. By the act of May 22, 1798, the brigadier general was authorized to choose his brigade-major and inspector from among any of the commissioned officers in the line of the army. About this time our difficulties with France assumed a threatening aspect and congress authorized a provisional army, the organization of which fol- lowed the principles observed towards the end of the Revolution. The troops formed brigades and divisions; the adjutant general was deputy to the inspector general; the duties performed by the inspectors were generally such as devolved on them during the Revolution and since. All inspectors were given additional pay. On July 3d Washington was made commander-in-chief, and on the 18th Alexander Hamilton was appointed inspector general with the rank of major general. In a letter addressed to the secretary of war, July 4, Washington gave his views at length respecting the importance of the general staff to the welfare of the army. Referring to the inspector general he wrote : “ If the inspector general is not an officer of great respectability of character, firm and strict in discharging the duties of the trust reposed in him, or if he be too pliant in his disposition, he will most assuredly be imposed upon, and the efficient strength and condition of the army will not be known to the commander-in-chief; of course he may form his plans upon erroneous calculations and commit fatal mistakes.’’ Hamilton selected as his aides Captain George Izard and Lieutenant Ethan Allen Brown. Jacob Brown, who became a major general in 1812 and commander of the army, was his military secretary. A few days after receiving his commission, July 28, Hamilton entered upon his duties, which far exceeded in their variety and scope those of any other officer of the army. Nothing escaped his attention. He was prac- tically at the head of the war department and chief of staff, both the secre- tary of war and Washington placing unbounded confidence in his abilities, his patriotism and integrity. The scope of this sketch will not allow a re- cital of the many important services rendered by Hamilton and his assistants. On February 4 he was invested with the command of all the troops along the northern lakes and in the Northwest Territory. Among the many objects which he had under consideration was the plan of a military academy, which had also been suggested by Steuben, and had repeatedly received the consideration of the government, but without result. He submitted his plan to Washington who replied unde.'date of Decem- ber 12, 1779, commending the idea but declining to make any observations on the details of the plan. This, the last letter written by the “ Father of his country” before his death, which followed two days later, suggests the reflection that the last 24 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. letter written by him at the close of the Revolution, and just before resign- ing his commission, was addressed to the inspector general of the army, the Baron Steuben. Like Hamilton, Steuben had been appointed to his office at the request of Washington, and both shared in the fullest degree his confidence and affection. As our difficulties with the French Republic now seemed in the way of adjustment, congress, May 14, 1800, reduced the army. On May 13 Hamil- ton had requested leave to resign his commission June 1st, but this was not granted, as it was thought expedient that the larger bodies of troops at dif- ferent stations should be mustered out by him in person. His resignation was finally accepted June 15. He, as well as Steuben, was elected president general of the Society of the Cincinnati. On the resignation of Hamilton, Major Cushing of the 1st infantry, who had been inspector and adjutant general before him, and who was a division inspector of the provisional army, once more resumed the office of inspector of the army. He continued to fill the office by detail until congress rees- tablished it in 1802. The office of adjutant general having been discon- tinued and the reduction of the army completed, the duties which had devolved on him were transferred to the inspector, and the duties of inspec- tion prescribed in orders from the headquarters of the army of August 19, 1800. On November 30 the country was divided into twelve districts, to be commanded by regimental and battalion commanders. Musters and inspec- tions were to be made monthly by the district commanders when the regu- lar inspecting officers could not attend. The order is noteworthy in pre- scribing that “ the muster and inspection of a garrison should not be made by any officer belonging to it.” On the resignation of Hamilton, Brigadier General James Wilkinson became the senior officer of the army and so remained until March 27, 1812. Through all this period he had immediate command of the army, the head- quarters of which were at various points, depending on his movements. The adjutant and inspector of the army accompanied him or not, as might be directed, and performed his duties generally under his orders, although sometimes employed by the secretary of war. The injustice of assigning to an officer detailed from the line, without extra compensation, the arduous duties of adjutant and inspector, induced congress on March 16, 1802, to again establish that office by law, and Major Cushing was appointed to it March 26, and held the position to September 7, 1805. Meanwhile, April 1, 1802, he was promoted lieutenant colonel of his regiment. Under the act of April 12, 1808, the army was increased to 9921 aggre- gate, and two inspectors to be taken from the line were authorized. On April 2, Colonel Cushing was succeeded by Major Abimael Nicoll of the artillery. From the close of the Revolution to the year 1808, the army was sub- jected, as has been shown, to many changes. There were no printed regu- lations other than those prepared by Steuben. Efforts had been made by Hamilton, Pinckney and others, to revise the drill books and to compile THE INSPECTOR GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT. 25 regulations, but their work was not published. The systems which pre- vailed at the close of the Revolution continued, modified by such regula- tions and orders as circumstances suggested. In February, 1810, Colonel Alexander Smyth of the regiment of rifle- men, compiled a system of infantry exercises and manoeuvres, chiefly from French sources, which he was directed to test with the troops in camp near Washington, “ there being,” so says the order, “ no established system for the army of the United States.” Owing to the difficulties growing out of the Napoleonic wars, the refusal of the British to evacuate the posts surrendered by the Treaty of Paris, and the depredations and insults of her cruisers, congress, on December 24, 1811, increased the army. The staff included one inspector general with rank of brigadier general, with two assistants to be taken from the line of lieutenant colonels. On May 4, 1812, the following regulations defining the duties of the in- spector general were issued by the secretary of war : It will be the duty of the inspector general to organize the army ; to superintend and enforce discipline ; to visit and inspect camps, cantonments, quarters, prisons, places of arms and hospitals ; to make stated and unexpected inspections of troops, arms, equipments, clothing, ammunition and horses ; to make inspections, re- turns, and confidential reports relative to the state and discipline of the army ; to designate men and horses unfit for service or the fatigues of war, that the former may be discharged or sent to garrisons and the latter sold ; to examine the books of quarter- masters, paymasters and companies, and ascertain the balances ; and to prescribe forms of returns exhibiting all the wants of the army.” These regulations are a summary of the duties which, since its establish- ment, had gradually devolved upon the department. On May 16 the president was authorized to appoint from the captains and subalterns of the line, one sub-inspector to each brigade with the addi- tional monthly pay of twenty-four dollars. On June 18 war was declared against Great Britain, and on the 26th the army was given a more perfect organization, comprising a general staff, medical staff, ordnance department, quartermaster’s department, corps of engineers, four regiments of artillery, two of dragoons, one of riflemen and 25 of infantry, an aggregate of 35,752. The country was divided into nine military districts, each with a district staff, which included an inspector. General Dearborn was the senior officer and commanding general during the war. By the act of July 6, 1812, the president was authorized to appoint to any army of the United States other than that in which the inspector gen- eral was serving, one deputy inspector general to be taken from the line with increased pay, and such number of assistant deputies as the service might require. On July 6 Colonel Smyth was appointed inspector general, and on July 14 the secretary of war issued instructions merging, temporarily, the offices of adjutant and inspector general with the adjutant general’s department, the duties of both to be performed under the direction of the adjutant gen- eral, to whom Major Nicoll was appointed assistant. Captain William King 26 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. of the 15th infantry was made assistant to the inspector general. In Sep- tember General Smyth was given a brigade in the army along the Niagara River, commanded by Major General Van Rensselaer of the New York militia. On the resignation of that officer after the battle of Queenstown the command passed to General Smyth. The act of March 3, 1813, organizing the general staff, provided that the adjutant general’s and inspector general’s departments should consist of one adjutant and inspector general with the rank of brigadier general; 8 adjutants general and 8 inspectors general with the brevet rank, pay, etc., of colonel; 16 assistant adjutants general and 16 assistant inspectors general with the brevet rank, pay, etc., of majors, to be taken from the line or not as the president might deem expedient. The president was also empowered to assign one of the brigadier generals to the principal army to act as ad- jutant and inspector of such army. As this act discontinued the offices of adjutant general and inspector general, it was held that General Smyth, having no commission in the line, was disbanded and no longer an officer of the army. He sought relief from congress, but was unsuccessful and ceased to be an officer March 3, 1813. The most notable service rendered by him while inspector general was the preparation of regulations for the field service, manoeuvre and conduct of infantry, a copy of which may be seen in the library of the war department. On March 12 Brigadier General Zebulon M. Pike was appointed adjutant and inspector to the army commanded by General Dearborn, but was killed by the explosion of a mine in the attack on the British fortifications at York, Upper Canada, April 13th. From the death of General Pike to May 19, 1814, the office of adjutant and inspector general of the army remained vacant, the affairs of the two branches being in charge of Colonel Nicoll, inspector general, and Major C. K. Gardner, assistant adjutant general, respectively. On May 19 Brigadier General W. H. Winder was appointed adjutant and inspector of the army, and chief of staff to the northern army ; on July 2 he was assigned to the command of the 10th military district. On the reduc- tion of the army in June, 1815, he retired from service and resumed the practice of the law at his home in the city of Baltimore. He died May 24, 1824. Meantime Colonel A. Y. Nicoll, who had been in charge of the inspector’s office in the war department, resigned June 1, 1814, and was succeeded by Colonel John R. Bell, inspector general, who was appointed major and assistant inspector general July 29, 1813. On November 22, 1814, Mr. Daniel Parker, of Massachusetts, the chief clerk of the war department, was ap- pointed adjutant and inspector general of the army. On the reduction of the army in 1815 the 8 inspectors general and 16 assistant inspectors general were discharged and four brigade inspectors, to be taken from the line of the army, substituted. No provision was made for continuing the office of adjutant and inspector general of the army, but under the discretion given the president he retained provisionally one adjutant and inspector general, and other staff officers. In March the ten military districts were replaced by nine military departments, forming a THE INSPECTOR GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT. 27 northern and a southern division, each division and department having an inspector generally selected by its commander. On December 27 the secretary of war suggested to the military com- mittee of the House the expediency of providing by law for the staff ap- pointments provisionally retained by President Madison. This led to the act of April 24, 1816, organizing the general staff, which recognized and made permanent those officers, and provided for one adjutant and inspector general of the army, one inspector general of each division, and an assist- ant inspector general to every brigade to supersede the inspectors author- ized by the act of March 3, 1815, and to be selected from the line of the army or from civil life, with the rank, pay and emoluments, provided by the act of March 3, 1813. Colonels Hayne of the dragoons and Wool of the infantry were announced as inspectors general, and Captains J. M. Davis, Wm, McDonald and G. H. Manigault, of the infantry, Francis S. Belton, formerly of the dragoons but now in civil life, and John Biddle of the artil- lery, as assistant inspectors general. By the act of April 14, 1818, the pay of division inspectors was made equal to the pay of division adjutants general. The administration of in- spectors continued unchanged until October, 1820, when, by orders, all assistant inspectors general were placed under the division commanders acting through the division inspectors. By the act of March 2, 1821, the army was reduced and reorganized. The office of adjutant and inspector general was abolished, and but two in- spectors general, with the rank, pay and emoluments of colonels of cavalry, authorized. Colonels Wool and Gadsden (the latter appointed October 1, 1820, but not confirmed) were continued as inspectors. It was their duty to make a complete annual inspection of the army under the orders of the general commanding, the troops, posts and other establishments, being equitably divided between them. On May 17, 1821, an order was issued by the president substituting an eastern and western department for the two divisions into which the coun- try was divided in 1815. In August Colonel Gadsden was appointed adju- tant general, and in November, Major S. B. Archer of the artillery was appointed to succeed him. In December the inspections were specialized, the infantry being assigned to Colonel Wool, and the artillery, arsenals, foundries and manufactories of arms, to Colonel Archer. This was a departure from the practice previously observed, under which there was no division of inspections according to the previous service of inspectors. During the years 1823 and 1824 additional duties were imposed on in- spectors in reference to returns, reports, accounts, statements and invento- ries of public property, and they were held responsible for all estimates for supplies, which were to be made on consultation with post commander. When not engaged inspecting, they were required to take station at army headquarters. On March 2 the order specializing the inspections was revoked, and the two inspectors were directed to alternate in the annual inspections which were to be made under the orders of the commanding general. No reasons 28 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. for this change are given in the order, which was doubtless issued to more perfectly equalize the duties. The commandant of engineers was made inspector of the military academy. By the act of March 3, 1825, authorizing the sale of unserviceable ord- nance, arms and military supplies, congress designated inspectors general as primarily the proper officers to inspect public property with a view to its elimination from service. By Par. 4 of G. O. 58, series of 1825, such in- spections were to be “ made by an inspector general when practicable.” On December n, 1825, Colonel Archer died and was succeeded, Decem- ber 31, by George Croghan, of Kentucky, formerly lieutenant colonel of the 15th infantry and renowned for the defense of Fort Sandusky, Ohio, in 1813, against the British and Indians. In April, 1829, inspectors general were authorized to discharge soldiers on certificates of disability, a power previously exercised by them. On May 19, 1837, the two great departments were changed into divisions with different limits, and divided into seven geographical departments. To each division one of the inspectors general was assigned as chief of staff, and to perform the duties of adjutant and inspector general. The act of July 5, 1838, having added two assistant adjutants general with brevet rank of major, and four with rank of captain, and required them to perform the duties of assistant inspectors, the two inspectors general were returned to the headquarters of the army, December 13. On June 25 Brevet Brigadier General Wool was appointed full brigadier, and in December, 1839, was succeeded by Major Churchill of the artillery. In May, 1842, the following important addition to the duties of inspec- tors was made by the secretary of war, Mr. John C. Spencer : << * * * n. It is made the duty of the inspectors general, or officers acting as inspectors, carefully to examine and inspect all supplies and materials procured for the construction of forts, or for harbor and river improvements, and all the means ap- plicable thereto, and the number and description of vessels, boats, machinery and in- struments, etc., and they will inquire into all contracts for supplies and materials of all kinds, in the different departments, and whether the articles furnished conform to such contracts, and also into contracts made by the quartermaster’s department for the transportation of troops and stores. The results of these inspections will be forthwith reported as provided in Par. 835.” On August 23, 1842, an act of congress abolished one of the inspectors general, but on January 12, 1846, this act was repealed. During this period both inspectors continued in office, and were, for a time, on duty with the army in Mexico. In August, 1848, G. O. 49 divided the country into two military divisions, the eastern consisting of four departments and the western of five depart- ments. There were in addition two separate departments, Nos. 10 and n, from which, in October, was formed the third, or Pacific division. This ar- rangement of the country continued until October 31, 1853, when seven mil- itary departments were substituted for it. Colonel Croghan died January 8, 1849, and was succeeded, January 26, by Captain James Duncan, 2d artillery, who died July 3, and was followed June 10, 1850, by Major George A. McCall, 3d infantry. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL1 S DEPARTMENT. 29 In May, on the accession of General Scott to the command of the army the inspectors general were ordered to report to him by letter. On October 16, General Churchill was assigned as inspector of the east- ern division; Colonel McCall of the Pacific division ; and Brevet Colonel Samuel S. Cooper, assistant inspector general, to the western division. On December 17 the order was revoked and the inspectors were again attached to army headquarters, but ordered to inspect the three divisions in regular rotation, after which they were to report in person to the commanding gen- eral. Colonel McCall resigned April 29, 1853, and was succeeded by Cap- tain J. K. Mansfield of the Engineers, May 28. No change in the number of inspectors took place between 1842 and 1861, but on March 6, i860, Brevet Colonel Joseph E. Johnston of the 1st cavalry was assigned to duty as acting inspector general of the army accord- ing to his brevet rank. On May 14, 1861, Colonel Mansfield was appointed brigadier general and was succeeded on the same date by Captain and Bre- vet Lieutenant Colonel Henry L. Scott of the 4th infantry. On August 3. 1861, five assistant inspectors general with rank of major, and on August 6 two inspectors general with the rank of colonel, were added by congress. No change in the number of regular inspectors occurred until 1864, but by the act of July 17, 1862, an inspector general with the provisional rank and pay of lieutenant colonel was provided for each army corps. The names of those appointed under the act will be found in G. O. 181 of 1862. No change in the organization of the department occurred during the war. In 1861 Colonel Marcy was appointed brigadier general and chief of staff to the Army of the Potomac, and so served to November, 1862. Colo- nel Sacket was inspector general of that army to 1863, when he was suc- ceeded by Colonel Schriver. Baird, Buford and Totten were general offi- cers commanding troops, while Hardie, Davis, Jones and Van Rensselaer were on duty as inspectors. When not assigned to one of the armies in the field they were under the orders of the secretary of war. Armies, army corps, divisions, brigades, geographical divisions and departments, had in- spectors general, assistant or acting assistant inspectors general, usually selected by the several commanders ; and all parts of the army were subject to frequent inspections. The number of geographical departments increased, until, in 1865, there were 29 departments forming five divisions, and also a number of districts nearly all of which had inspectors. On January 22, 1866, the war department published in G. O. No. 5, regu- lations relating to the inspection service, which prescribed the ordinary subjects of inspection and the general principles to be observed. This order, based on the wide experience of the department up to date, defined the “ ordinary duties of inspection ” to be “the condition as to efficiency, discipline, supplies, etc., of bodies of troops, and the resources, geographical features, lines of communication and supply, the military wants, etc., of any section of the country ; the military status in any field of opera- tions ; the condition and supply of military materials of various classes ; the condi- tion of the administrative or disbursing departments of the service ; the efficiency and conduct of military commanders and agents ; the cause of failure or delay in move- 30 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. merits or operations ; of losses by accidents, disasters, etc., and in general, all matters pertaining to the military art or having interest in a military point of view.” In the ordinary discharge of the duties, the sphere of inquiry was thus made to include every branch of military affairs, being defined and limited only in specific cases by the orders issued. This order and the circular of November 2, 1868, are fundamental, and have been the basis of all subse- quent regulations and orders affecting the department. The act of July 28, 1866, fixed the number of inspectors general with rank of colonel at four; assistant inspectors general with rank of lieutenant colonel at three, and the number with rank of major at two. In October, 1868, all the inspectors and assistant inspectors general were assigned to divisions and departments except Colonel Schriver, who was placed in charge of the bureau and made inspector of the military academy. Selections for acting inspectors were to be made from the grades of field officers who had served not less than ten years. The inspectors of depart- ments were made subordinate to division inspectors, from whom they were to receive instructions relative to the manner of performing their duties. The act approved March 3, 1869, prohibited any new appointments or promotions in the department. In April the stations of inspectors were changed, and Colonel Marcy was assigned as inspector general at army headquarters and Colonel Schriver with the secretary of war. At the same time department commanders were ordered to make inspections of the troops and posts in person when practicable. By an act approved June 8, 1872, the president was authorized to appoint Lieutenant-Colonel Davis to the rank and place he would have had if pro- moted at the time of Colonel Hardie’s appointment. This act increased the number of colonels to five, but provided that there should be no pro- motion to that grade until the number of colonels was reduced to four. In October, 1872, the five inspectors general were assigned to stations, but performed their duties under the orders of the secretary of war and general of the army; the three assistant inspectors general went to the headquarters of the three divisions. Field officers of the line were detailed as department inspectors. In January, 1873, orders were issued excepting from inspection by de- partment or division inspectors, all engineer establishments, officers or agents. The act of March 3, 1873, established the military prison, and re- quired one of the inspectors general to visit and inspect it at least once in three months. In April, 1874, the act providing for the inspection of disbursements was passed. Itembodied a principle, previously recognized by congress, “ that officers detailed for this duty should not be in any way connected with the department or corps making the disbursement.” This act was at first con- strued to require monthly inspections, and imposed most arduous duties on all inspectors, who were made responsible for any defalcation or misappli- cation of the public money or property which ‘‘an active vigilance on their part might have detected.” It is difficult to imagine a more unjust require- ment than this, or one more clearly unintended by the law, which was not designed to prevent frauds or to punish criminals, but to determine the THE INSPECTOR GENERAL'S DEPAR TMENT. 31 necessity, propriety and economy of disbursements, and whether officers complied with the law in keeping their accounts and making their deposits. In June, 1874, inspections of disbursements were ordered to be made bi- monthly. By the act of June 23, 1874, reorganizing the staff of the army, the in- spector general’s department was to consist of one colonel, two lieutenant colonels and two majors, and not to exceed four line officers to act as in- spectors general; and no more appointments were to be made until the number of inspectors general was reduced to five, but no officer then in service was to be reduced in rank or mustered out. This law settled in the affirmative the question as to whether the inspectors general constituted a department, about which there had been some variance of opinion. In April, 1876, the secretary of war directed the inspector general to re- port to the general of the army, and to be under him in all matters relating to military control and discipline. In May a reassignment of the inspectors was made, by which two were ordered to army headquarters and the others to the three divisions. Reports of the inspection of troops and military posts were to be forwarded through regular channels to the inspector gen- eral’s office, and inspectors were ordered to note on such reports the reme- dies applied, and all superior commanders to endorse on them their action, “ for the information of the general of the army.” In July the inspections of disbursements were ordered to be made quarterly, and the annual inspection of national cemeteries required by law was assigned to this department, but in 1879 it was dispensed with unless specially ordered. Congress having declared by the act of June 16, 1874, that the inspectors general constituted a department, and the disproportion between the rank of the senior inspector general, or head of the department, and that of the other chiefs of bureau having been pointed out, the act of December 12, 1878, conferred on the senior inspector general the rank of brigadier general, and fixed the number of colonels at three, lieutenant colonels two, and majors one. In August, 1879, it was ordered by the secretary of war that every post, station and command of the army should thereafter be inspected at least once each year by division and department inspectors under the direction of their respective commanders, and that in addition, post, station and other permanent commanders should make similar inspections, annually, between September 1st and 5th, and forward the reports to the inspector general’s office. This order published a blank form of report which all officers making inspections were required to use. Between May, 1878, and September, 1879, post schools and post ceme- teries were made special subjects of inspection, and inspectors were required to have destroyed in their presence all unserviceable articles having no money value at the place where inspected. By the act of March 3, 1883, it was made the duty of the inspector gen- eral of the army to inspect the Soldier’s Home in person once each year. By the act of February 5, 1885, the department was given its present organization. March 8, 1885, General Sacket died and was succeeded on the nth by 32 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY,. Colonel N. H. Davis, who retired September 23, and was followed by Colo- nel A. Baird. In August, inspections of disbursements were ordered to be made once every four months; in March, 1886, amendments of the regulations were made prescribing the manner of such inspections, and in June the inspec- tion of the military departments of colleges was assigned. The hospital corps having been organized by the act of March 1, 1887, orders were issued in August establishing the rules and regulations affect- ing it, and inspectors general were required to examine into the efficiency of its members and of the company litter bearers. On August 20, 1888, General Baird was retired, and was succeeded by Colonel Roger Jones the same date. General Jones died January 26,1889, and was succeded by Colonel J. C. Breckinridge, January 30, 1889. In January, 1889, the inspection of the supply division of the war depart- ment, and in November the annual inspection of the militia were assigned to the department. Between 1889 and 1894 many other important orders, regulations and decisions have been issued affecting the duties of the department, which culminated in the amendment of paragraph 955 A. R., by G. O. No. 38, of 1890, which was the same in spirit as G. O. No. 84 of 1879, and G. O. No. 17, of 1882, under which the entire military establishment was to be inspected annually, the public works under engineer officers alone excepted. They however were now included, and remained on the list of inspections to July 5th, when, by G. O. No. 45, of 1892, they were again excepted. By G. O. No. 23, the bureau of information was established, and shortly after the inspection of the militia passed under the supervision of the adju- tant general. The last important duty assigned the department, is the annual inspec- tion of the national homes for disabled volunteer soldiers, prescribed by the act of August 18, 1894. Major-General ARTHUR ST. CLAIR Commanding the Army, 1791-1792. JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL’S DEPARTMENT. By Lieut.-Col. J. W. CLOUS, Dep. J. A. General, HISTORY is said to repeat itself. Mr. Clode in his treatise on the military and martial law of England, says that in the English civil war of the 17th century the opposing armies of the king and of the parliament were governed under the same military code. So in 1775 the same thing happened in this country. At that time the “ Ministerial ” Army, as Gage’s and Burgoyne’s forces were called, was governed by the British Mutiny Act and Articles of War. When the Continental Congress raised an army in defense of the liberty of America, that assembly could find no military code better suited to their requirement than the then current British Articles of War, and accordingly on the 30th of June, 1775, they put forth Articles of War (sixty-nine in number) on the model of the English for the government of the Continental army. The adoption of this code was followed on the 29th of July, 1775, by the creation of the office of “Judge Advocate of the Army” to which on the same day William Tudor, a law pupil of John Adams and a leading counsellor of Boston, was elected. The title of Judge Advocate General was attached to this office on August 10, 1776, and the amended Articles of War, adopted on September 20, 1776, by the Revolutionary Congress of the United States provided that “The Judge Advocate General, or some person deputed by him, shall prosecute in the name of the United States of America.” William Tudor, having resigned in 1777, was succeeded by John Lawrance, a distinguished jurist, who had served with the army in the field both as a regimental and as a staff officer. Meanwhile certain deputy judge advocates were appointed for different armies and for the army at large. Colonel Lawrance resigned in 1782, and was succeeded by his principal deputy, Thomas Edwards, who, so far as the records show, was the last incumbent of the office of Judge Advocate General prior to the adoption of the Constitution. Under the Act of March 3, 1797, reorganizing the army, Captain Campbell Smith, 4th Infantry, was appointed to the office of Judge Advocate to the army. He continued to hold the office till it ceased to exist by the force of the Act of March 16, 1802, which also reduced the line of the army to one regiment of artillery and two of infantry. Next, we find that the Act of January n, 1812, provided for the appointment of one Judge Advocate to each division, and the statute of April 24, 1816, “ for reorganizing the general staff” increased this number to three for each division, but by the Act of April 14, 1818, this change Professor of Law, U. S. M. A. 33 34 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. was repealed and the former number restored. Among the eighteen judge-advocates appointed under this act we find the name of Henry Wheaton, the eminent publicist, professor of law, and diplomat, whose work on the “ Elements of International Law ” is to-day one of the standard authorities. By the operation of the Act of March 2, 1821, reducing the military establishment of the United States, the office of the Judge Advocate was discontinued, and remained so until the Act of March 2, 1849, authorized the President to appoint a suitable person as Judge Advocate of the army, to be taken from the captains of the army, Captain John F. Lee of the Ordnance Department was accordingly appointed, and held the office until it was superseded by the legislation of 1862. The Act of July 17, 1862, created the office of Judge Advocate General, with the rank, pay and allowance of a colonel of cavalry, and authorized the appointment of a judge advocate, with the rank and pay of a major of cav- alry, for each army in the field. Under the Act of June 20, 1864, the Bureau of Military Justice was cre- ated, attached to, and made a part of, the War Department, during the con- tinuance of the then existing War of the Rebellion. The Judge Advocate General was made the head of this Bureau and given the rank and pay of a brigadier general. The appointment of an Assistant Judge Advocate Gen- eral with the rank and pay of colonel of cavalry was also authorized. Upon the reorganization of the army under the Act of July 28, 1866, the Bureau of Military Justice with its organization was continued in operation and ten of the judge advocates then in office retained in service and soon after made part of the regular establishment of the army. By the subse- quent Act of April 10, 1869, this number was fixed at eight. Under the Act of June 24, 1874, the office of Assistant Judge Advocate General was discontinued and no appointments in the corps of judge advo- cates were to be made until the number was reduced to four, which was to be the permanent number of the officers of that corps. The Bureau of Military Justice and the Corps of Judge Advocates of the army were by the act of July 5, 1884, consolidated under the title of “Judge Advocate General’s Department,” to consist of one Judge Advocate Gene- ral with the rank, pay and allowances of a brigadier general, one Assistant Judge Advocate General with the rank, pay and allowances of a colonel; three Deputy Judge Advocate Generals, with the rank, pay and allowances of lieutenant colonels ; and three judge advocates, with the rank, pay and al- lowances of majors, and under the same act the Secretary of War is authorized to detail such number of line officers as may be necessary to serve as acting judge advocates of Military Departments, who shall have the rank, pay and allowances of captains of cavalry. This is the present organization of the Judge Advocate General’s Department, and under the authority just quoted there are present five officers of the line serving as acting judge advocates of Departments. These have been specially selected from the first lieutenants of the line, who have studied law and been admitted to the bar. Under the existing statutes the Judge Advocate General is required “ to JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERALS DEPT\ 35 receive, revise and cause to be recorded the proceedings of all courts-mar- tial, courts of inquiry, and military commissions and to perform such other duties as have been performed heretofore by the Judge Advocate General of the army,” and under his direction the “ judge advocates shall perform their duties.” In connection with the duties thus specified the Judge Advo- cate General is required by existing regulations to render reports to the Secretary of War upon such cases tried by military courts as require the action of the President, as well as when applications for clemency or other relief are presented to the President or Secretary of War by persons who have been convicted by military courts. He also prepares and revises charges and renders opinions upon all such questions of military law as may be re- ferred to him for opinion by the Secretary of War or the Commanding Gen- eral of the army. He also assists the latter in the review of cases of courts- martial coming under his cognizance. The “ other duties" of the Judge Advocate General mentioned in the statute consist in the preparation of all sorts of legal papers, and in the ren- dering of opinions upon all questions of law arising in the administration of the War Department referred to him under the interior business regulations established by the Secretary of War. In this connection the Judge Advo- cate General is in effect the law officer of the War Department, holding practically the same relation of advisory counsel to the Secretary of War as is held by the several solicitors or Assistant Attorneys General towards the chiefs of the executive department to which they are attached. The acting judge advocates and judge advocates detailed for duty at Department headquarters are under the immediate command of Depart- ment commanders, and their duties chiefly consist in preparing or revising charges, serving on general courts-martial, examining, revising and report- ing upon the records of military courts received at the headquarters at which they are serving, and generally in assisting their immediate com- manders in the examination of questions of law arising in the administra- tion of their commands. These officers are frequently called upon to ap- pear as counsel for the United States, or for officers or soldiers of the army in the courts of the United States, in habeas corpus and other proceedings as well as before the civil and criminal courts of the States and Territories within the command to which they are attached. It is therefore necessary that they should have a legal education and be members of the bar. Since 1874, one of the judge advocates of the army has been from time to time assigned to duty as Professor of Law of the United States Military Academy, at West Point, New York. In the preparation of the foregoing paper the writer has made free use of the “Sketch of the History and Duties of the Judge Advocate Gen- eral’s Department” prepared by the Judge Advocate General and dated March 1, 1878. This sketch would be incomplete without a reference to the effect produced by the Civil War upon the administration of military justice in the army, the Judge Advocate General’s Department being the agency through which great changes were brought about. It may justly be said that before the War of the Rebellion we had no mil- 36 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. itary jurisprudence. The jurisdiction exercised by military tribunals was withdrawn from public observation, their decisions were buried in the War Department. Writers on military law could draw under ordinary circum- stances few materials from sources similar to those which furnish any writer on constitutional law both information and authority. Scattered into small commands, occupying widely separated stations on a vast frontier, without connection by railroads or telegraphs, with superior headquarters located at a great distance, the greatest portion of our small army served for years preceding the war far removed from civilization, pro- tecting the enterprising pioneer in his search for a new home in the far west. Beyond the reach of civil authority, obliged to maintain discipline among his troops, and in duty bound to give to the settlers within the vicin- age and to the passing immigrant that protection of life and property which is in organized civil communities obtained through the local civil authori- ties, the commanding officer of a frontier station was often forced to resort to the law of necessity for the preservation of discipline within and good order and security without. Arbitrary punishments therefore had often to take the place of trials by courts-martial. Absolute master within, and from without the only power that could be invoked by the civilian for his protec- tion, the commanding officer exercised more power than was ever contem- plated to be conferred by the genius of our institutions upon a military officer in time of peace. Under these conditions thecall to arms sounded in 1861, and the scattered regular forces, when replaced by volunteers, were collected and sent to the front. Many of their officers took high positions in the newly organized volunteer forces. The men comprising these new forces, coming from all walks of life, brought up under the aegis of civil law, under which they could only be tried by their peers and according to the law of the land, did not take kindly to the arbitrary punishments for infractions of discipline, as admin- istered to a great extent in the regular forces. The publicity of these pun- ishments, the influence of the press, and the interest taken by the public at large in the citizen soldiery, as reflected by the members of Congress with a large number of their constituents in the ranks of the army of the Union ; finally led to the abandonment of unauthorized punishments and of punish- ments not in accord with the spirit of public opinion of the times. The importance of the administration of military justice under the mili- tary code and under the laws of war increased in proportion as the field of military operations was extended and new armies were raised. The agency which supervised this branch of staff administration in the army up to the beginning of the Civil War was without an organization capable of expanding and meeting the new demands made upon it. There was but one officer, and his duties had been confined to taking charge of the records of courts- martial. An eminent statesman and able jurist, the Hon. Joseph Holt, was appointed Judge Advocate General by President Lincoln upon the creation of that office by Congress in 1862, and a corps of judge advocates was cre- ated at the same time. Under this legislation and until the close of the war thirty-nine officers were appointed in that corps. They had generally JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL'S DEPT. 37 performed active service in the field as volunteer officers and all of them had a legal education. Previous to their appointment the administration of military justice in the field was almost entirely in the hands of volunteer officers. Among them were judges who had left the bench and lawyers who had abandoned their briefs to take up arms for the cause of the Union. Many of them found their way to places where their legal training made them useful to commanding generals in the discharge of their duties as convening and reviewing officers of courts-martial. As an evidence of the valuable and eminent services of these officers, as well as of those of the corps of judge advocates in their new field, it is only necesary to refer to the scholarly reviews of courts-martial proceedings published in the orders of the various armies. During the great struggle for the supremacy of the Union every line of our military code was brought into practice and when necessary interpreted and construed. Military law is but a part of the law of the land, and there is no distinction between it and other portions of the law in respect to the rules according to which it should be construed, or in respect to the neces- sity of observing established principles in its administration. Besides this, nearly every crime known to the common law was brought within the jurisdiction of military courts. Our military jurisprudence was thus founded during the most critical period of our national history by General Holt with the assistance of his able corps of judge advocates. To one of these—Colonel Winthrop—the army is indebted for a treatise on military law in which for the first time are collected for the benefit of the soldier, the lawyer, the judge and the historian, the precedents, decisions and opinions which have become part of our law military. In substance and form our Articles of War were but little changed during the War of the Rebellion. During the past eight years, however, important improvements have been made in our military code. Previous con- victions are now authorized to be taken into consideration in awarding punishments upon conviction ; enlisted men are furnished with counsel at their request; judge-advocates of courts-martial are excluded from the closed sessions of courts; a code of punishment has been established by the President under authority of an act of Congress ; summary courts have been created; judge advocates and trial officers of summary courts are authorized by law to administer oaths in military cases, etc. Nearly all of these changes had their origin in recommendations emanating from the office of the Judge Advocate General. The duties of judge advocates are inseparable from the military system of every civilized nation. But under the genius of our institutions, officers educated both in military and civil law are necessary adjuncts of our mili- tary administration. Subordination of the military to the civil authorities is an axiom in our government; the military person is amenable to the jurisdiction of the civil courts of the land, both state and national. As an eminent statesman aptly remarked, “this is a government of law, and all authority exercised must find its warrant thereunder.” THE QUARTERMASTER’S DEPARTMENT. TO chronicle properly and systematically the history of the Quarter- master’s Department would be to write a history of the army, of which it forms so important a part, with which it is so intimately associated, and without which it could not exist; for otherwise our army would be but a predatory mob, organized but not supplied ; dependent upon chance for its existence, and for its supplies upon forays, like the forces of the feudal barons of mediaeval times. The supply departments are the mainstay of an army. In their relations the departments of the army are correlative. Upon the efficiency of the one the success of the other is largely dependent. The army, which is the faithful servant of the nation it represents, reflects also the condition of the people, socially and economically. It faithfully por- trays the evolution from the earliest times to the present,—from barbarism to civilization, and keeps pace with the progress of the country. Its labors have been intimately associated with the spread of civilization, and no other agency has been so potent in perfecting the permanency of our republic,— and making its success assured and its power respected—as has been our army. Whether in peace or war its duties have been onerous, but cheerfully borne. Whether dealing with savage foe or foreign invader, success has crowned its efforts. During times of peace the army is dependent for its very existence upon the moods of Congress, and the whims of caprice,—moods as variable as those of the ocean, and whims like those of the breeze. During times of war, the country and Congress depends upon the army for active aid, whether to suppress insurrection, repel invasion, or to fight for actual exist- ence as a free and independent people,—a freedom and independence vouch- safed by our Constitution, a legacy left us by our forefathers, still faithfully guarded. The evolution which has brought our army to its present state of useful- ness, has been dependent upon circumstances and conditions in the history of the country, at its different epochs, and the necessities then existing. As with the army, so with the departments which constitute its staff, and with the several branches of the line,—the cavalry, artillery and infantry ; for from time to time each has been changed in numbers and in organization as cir- cumstances and conditions have changed, and in order that they might the better meet conditions or necessities then existing. The change has not been radical; it has been more in the nature of enlargement and improvement, as necessity demanded. This development has brought the army through various and varied Captain OSCAR F. LONG, A. Q. M., U. S. Army. THE QUARTERMASTER’S DEPARTMENT. 39 vicissitudes to its present state of perfection, and has been necessary to meet the requirements of a modern civilization in a country whose geo- graphical isolation is its protection, and whose military and naval strength, its safeguard. Though essentially a nation of soldiers, in time of peace we do not pre- pare for wrar. On the contrary, from our very isolation we rest in a state of fancied security. Whether in peace or war, the army is mainly dependent upon its supply department, the duties of which are important and multifarious, the obliga- tions great, and the responsibilities enormous. Facts are interesting and figures tedious, but to show the importance of the operations of a great department of supply, they are a necessity, par- ticularly in referring to the work of the Quartermaster’s Department during the War of the Rebellion, when the enormous expenditure, perfect account- ability, and recognized efficiency, are of record as unequalled in military history, ancient or modern. The following is but a brief brochure, containing the more important facts connected with the organization of the Quartermaster’s Department from the War of Independence to the present time, compiled from the most authentic available data. FROM 1775 TO l8l2. The earliest legislation relating to the Quartermaster’s Department is found in the Journals of Congress. The Continental Congress in session at Carpenter’s Hall, Philadelphia, adopted the following resolution June 16, 1775: “ Resolved, That there be one Quartermaster General for the grand army, and one deputy under him for the separate army. * * * That the pay of the Quartermaster General be $80 per month, and that of the deputy $40 per month.” The same Congress, on the 19th of July, 1775, adopted the following resolution : “ Resolved, That the appointment of a Quartermaster General * * * be left to General Washington.” Acting under this authority General Washington appointed Major Thomas Mifflin, of Pennsylvania, Quartermaster General; and writing to the President of Congress on the 21st of September, informed him of the fact, hoping and believing that such appointment would be universally ac- ceptable. Major Mifflin, immediately after his appointment, entered upon his duties in the Quartermaster’s Department. Prior to December 22, 1775, no provision had been made for the rank of the one who filled the position of Quartermaster General of the Army of the United Colonies, but on that date the following resolution was passed by Congress: “ Resolved, That the Quartermaster General have the rank of a colonel in the Army of the United Colonies.” On the 16th of May following, Colonel Mifflin was elected by Congress a brigadier general of the army, whereupon he resigned his office of Quarter- 40 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. master General, and on the 5th of June, 1776, Stephen Moylan was elected to fill the vacancy. The position and duties of Quartermaster General appear to have been distasteful to Colonel Moylan, and having tendered his resignation to Con- gress, that body, on the 1st of October, 1776, resolved that “Brigadier General Mifflin be authorized and requested to resume the said office, and that his rank and pay as brigadier general be still continued to him.” In accordance with this resolution, General Mifflin, on October 1, 1776, again took charge of the affairs of the Quartermaster’s Department. On the 27th of December, 1776, the Congress empowered General Wash- ington to appoint a clothier general for supplying the army. The duties of this office, however, did not at that time pertain to the Quartermaster’s De- partment. On February 19, 1777, General Mifflin was elected a major general by the Continental Congress. On the 8th of October, 1777, he requested leave to resign his commission of major general and office of Quartermaster Gen- eral on account of ill health; and November 7, 1777, the Congress resolved that his resignation of the office of Quartermaster General be accepted, but that his rank and commission of major general be continued to him, with- out the pay annexed to that office, until the further order of the Congress. With a view, however, to temporarily retain his services in the Quarter- master’s Department, the Congress resolved, on the 8th of November, 1777, that he “ be desired,—notwithstanding his resignation of Quartermaster General was accepted,—to continue in the exercise of that office, and that he be invested with full powers to act until another Quartermaster General should be appointed and should enter upon the duties of the office.” It does not appear, however, that he again entered formally upon these duties. The condition of the Quartermaster’s Department at this time, without an ostensible head, and with an organization to a certain extent defective and incomplete, was regarded with much solicitude by General Washington. In this emergency Major General Nathaniel Greene, an able, gallant officer and personal friend of General Washington, was selected by him to all the vacancy, and was elected by Congress on March 2, 1778. That body gave him authority to employ two assistant quartermasters general, who should be acceptable to him, and power to appoint all other officers of his department, and specially provided that General Greene should retain his rank of major general in the army, which he then held. General Greene unwillingly accepted the office. He disliked any ap- pointment which required the keeping and expenditure of public funds, and was unwilling to forego the opportunities which might arise for active service in the regular line of the army. It was only at the earnest entreaty of Washington that he finally consented, stipulating meanwhile that he should not lose his right of command in action. Entering, however, upon his new duties he executed them with great zeal and ability, encountering obstacles of no ordinary kind, and rendering services of the utmost importance to the army. He considered, however, that Congress had not promptly seconded his views in relation to the busi- ness of the department, and he was disinclined to remain at its head. On THE QUARTERMASTER’S DEPARTMENT. 41 the 22d of April, 1779, he wrote to General Washington that he would be happy to obtain the command in the South, if General Lincoln’s physical condition rendered him incapable of continuing in command. General Washington replied April 24, 1779, as follows : ‘ ‘ I am sorry for the difficulties you have to encounter in the department of Quar- termaster, especially as I was in some degree instrumental in bringing you into it. If your judgment points to a resignation of your present office, and inclination leads to the Southward, my wishes shall accompany it.” It does not appear, however, that this point was pressed by General Greene at the time. He rendered active services in the field in 1779 while Quartermaster General. The question having been raised as to his proper command under such circumstances, he wrote to General Washington on the subject, and received a reply dated September 3, 1779, stating that when General Greene accepted office as Quartermaster General and made a reser- vation of his rank, General Washington did not consider that he was to re- tain thereby an actual permanent command. He further wrote : “ The military reason which prevents a Quartermaster General from exercising com- mand in ordinary cases I take to be this, that whatever may be the fact, the presump- tion is that both in action and out of action he has, generally speaking, sufficient employment in the duties of his office, and circumstances alone can decide when these are compatible with actual command.” Congress, on November 25, 1779, Resolved, “ That the department of the Quartermaster General to be for the future under the superintendence and direction of the Board of War.” At this time the attention of Congress had been attracted to the organ- ization of the staff departments as they then existed, and on January 21, 22, and 23, 1780, three commissioners,—Mr. Schuyler, a member of the Conti- nental Congress; General Mifflin, and Colonel Pickering,—-werechosen to make inquiry into the expenses of these departments. In view of this inquiry a draft of a plan of reorganization of the Quarter- master's Department, considered practicable both by General Washington and General Greene, was submitted by the latter to this committee. Great hostility to both of these officers, however, was manifested by cer- tain members of the Congress, especially on the part of those, who it is believed, had organized the movement to place General Gates at the head of the army ; and the plan finally submitted to that body and adopted by it on the 15th July, 1780, following, was found to differ widely from that which had been proposed by them. The new law provided for one Quartermaster General and one Assistant Quartermaster General, to be appointed by the Congress; one Deputy Quartermaster for the main army, and one for each separate army, to be appointed by the Quartermaster General, who was also to appoint, if he deemed it necessary, a deputy for each state, to be approved by the Supreme Executive of the State, said deputies to appoint, in turn, as many assistants as required, and also all store-keepers, contractors, clerks, conductors, artificers, and laborers, found necessary to the service to be appointed by the deputies in their respective districts. The act occupies several pager- 42 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. and enters into the most minute details for the government of the depart- ment. General Greene was greatly dissatisfied with the new law. He consid- ered the number of assistants too small, their salaries too low, and the whole scheme inefficient. Early in August, 1780, he tendered his unconditional resignation as Quartermaster General, requesting Congress to appoint his successor at once without loss of time, and expressing his desire to remain no longer in the department than was necessary to close his accounts and to set fairly in operation the new system as adopted for the future government of the department. August 5, 1780, Congress Resolved, “ That the absolute refusal of Major General Greene to act under the new arrangement of the Quartermaster General’s Department, has made it necessary that the office of Quartermaster General be immediately filled ” ; and on the same day Colonel Timothy Pickering was elected by Congress to fill the vacancy. Thereupon Congress adopted this resolution : Resolved, That Timothy Pickering, Esq., having been appointed Quartermaster General, upon an extraordinary emergency, be continued as a member of the board of war ; but that the exercise of all his powers at the said board, and his pay as a member thereof, be suspended during such time as he shall continue Quartermaster General. That while he holds the office of Quartermaster General he have the rank of colonel and the pay and rations of a brigadier general over and above the pay allowed the Quartermaster General in the late arrangement of the Quartermaster’s Department. Upon assuming the duties of his office Colonel Pickering found many serious difficulties with which to contend. The scarcity of funds, the de- preciation of the currency, and the want of system and harmony in the Quartermaster’s Department under the new organization, seriously inter- fered with the prompt transaction of business. On March 14, 1782, Congress by resolution authorized the appointment of one additional deputy quartermaster for the Southern Army, and on the same day reduced the pay of the Quartermaster General to that of Major General. On October 23, 1782, Congress Resolved, “ That the establishment of the Quartermaster’s Department by resolution of Con- gress of July 15, 1780, be after January 1, 1783, repealed, and the following regula- tions then adopted in its stead. “ Resolved, That there be one Quartermaster General, the present Quartermaster General to be continued in office ; and hereafter as vacancies arise to be appointed by Congress. “ That the Quartermaster General, with the approbation of the Commander-in- Chief, appoint the following officers for the armies of the United States, viz.: “ For the Main Army: One Deputy Quartermaster, one Wagon Master, one Commissary of Forage, one Director and one Sub-Director, of a Company of Arti- ficers. “ For the Southern Army : One Deputy Quartermaster, one Deputy Commissary of Forage, one Deputy Wagon Master, one Director and one Sub-Director of a Com- pany of Artificers, and as many Assistants in the Main and Southern Army to perform the duties of Quartermasters of Brigades, Storekeepers, Clerks and such other duties in the Quartermaster’s Department as the service may require, and also as many Wagon Conductors.” THE QUARTERMASTER'S DEPARTMENT 43 The business of the department was growing less with a constantly decreasing army, and with a view to economy and reduction of expenses, Congress on the 25th July, 1785, resolved that the department of Quarter- master General be considered as ceasing from that date, and that the Sec- retary of War and all others concerned be governed accordingly. By a resolution of Congress, dated September 29, 1785, a commissioner, previously appointed for the settlement of the accounts of the Quarter- master General’s department, was authorized and directed to enter upon a general settlement of the various accounts of Col. Pickering, as Quarter- master General, and of the several deputies serving in the department. On May 8, 1786, Mr. Jonathan Burrill was elected by Congress as Com- missioner to settle the accounts of the Quartermaster’s department at a compensation of $1250 per annum. On October 2, 1788, Congress adopted the report of a Committee appointed to make full inquiry into the proceedings of the Department of War. This Committee remarks on the affairs of the Quartermaster’s Department as follows: “ The Quartermaster’s Department on the frontiers is arranged on principles highly economical and beneficial to the public. Instead of an officer at the head of this department, with his train of attendants, all supplies are furnished by the contractors of provision, who have also, from time to time, contracted with the Secretary of War, to furnish all necessary articles on the frontiers, which shall be required for the troops, on the following principles. “ 1 st. No article to be furnished but by an order in writing from the commanding officer of the troops, or the commanding officer of a separate post, who shall be respon- sible to the Secretary of War, that only such articles shall be ordered as the situation of the troops render indispensably necessary. “ 2d. That for all articles so furnished the original bills of parcels shall be produced by the contractor, which shall be verified upon oath if required. “ 3d. That no charge shall be allowed the contractors which shall be deficient in the vouchers, the nature of which are precisely pointed out. “ 4th. That for all supplies, advances and services rendered in this line, the contrac- tors shall have an allowance made of five per cent, on the settlement of their account, every six months at the Treasury. All necessary articles which are furnished within the state lor the troops, are purchased by the Secretary of War, without any commis- sion or charge theron to the public.” This arrangement existed previously to the resolve of Congress for abol- ishing the Quartermaster General’s Department, July 25, 1785. The Quar- termaster’s Department at this time existed more in name than reality. It had no organization or effective force. On March 4, 1789, the first Congress of the United States convened in Federal Hall, New York City. The army at this time consisted of about 2000 men, and no legislation affecting an increase of this force appears to have been thought necessary by Congress until 1791, when the Indian hos- tilities on the western frontier attracted the special attention of that body. After a careful examination of the subject, it was decided to establish a line of posts sufficient to maintain communication from the Ohio to the Maumee, the intention being to build a strong fort on that river, and to 44 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. leave in it a garrison of a thousand men, large enough to send out detach- ments to keep the neighboring Indians in awe. On the 3d of March an act was passed which authorized raising and adding another regiment to the force at that time in the service, etc. From sections 5 and 6 of this act is taken the following. “ In case the President of the United States should deem the employment of a major general, brigadier general, a quartermaster, and chaplain, or either of them, essential to the public interest, that he be, and he hereby is, empowered, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to appoint the same accordingly. The quartermaster shall be entitled to the same pay, rations, and forage as the lieu- tenant colonel commandant of a regiment.” On the 4th of March, the day following, Major General St. Clair was made commander-in-chief of forces destined for Forts Pitt and Washington and neighboring posts as places of rendezvous, whence to carry out the plan of campaign above referred to ; and on the same day Samuel Hodg- den, of Pennsylvania, having been appointed a quartermaster under the act, by President Washington, was confirmed as such by the Senate. On March 5, 1792, an act was passed making further provision for the protection of the frontier. Under section 7 of this act, fixing the monthly pay, rations and forage to be allowed to officers of the army, the grade of deputy quartermaster was recognized, although it does not appear to have been created by legislation of Congress. This section also provided for the detail of line officers as quartermasters of the regiments being formed, with additional compensation for the extra duty thus performed by them. On March 28th General St. Clair left Philadelphia for Fort Washington, via Fort Pitt, arriving there May 15th following. Quartermaster Hodgden, however, tardily followed his commanding officer and failed to reach Fort Washington until September 10th, although an express had been received by him some time previously from General St. Clair to hasten forward. The little army, numbering about 2000 men, suffered in the meantime and subsequently for the want of the most necessary supplies. The quartermaster’s and other stores forwarded from the east to the troops were found to be deficient in quantity and bad in quality. Boats for the transportation of the troops were not in readiness; horses which were to be furnished by the contractors were not brought forward; the rations of the men were failing, and the green forage for the animals had been touched by the early frost. In short, the extreme deficiencies and de- rangements of the business of the quartermaster and contractor of pro- visions were considered to have been, to a great extent, the cause of the subsequent failure of the expedition. On April 19, 1792, Quartermaster Hodgden was superseded by James O’Hara, of Pennsylvania, the latter being nominated by President Wash- ington and confirmed by the Senate as Quartermaster General, although the law at this time only provided for a “ quartermaster.” In May following, the duties of the Quartermaster’s Department were somewhat reduced by the transfer of the power of purchasing and con- tracting for army supplies to the Treasury Department, as will appear from Section 5 of act approved May 8, 1792, as follows : THE QUARTERMASTER'S DEPARTMENT. 45 “ That all the purchases and contracts for supplying the army with provisions, clothing, supplies in the Quartermaster’s Department, military stores, Indian goods, and all other supplies or other articles for the use of the Department of War, be made by or under the direction of the Treasury Department.” In accordance with the request of the Secretary of the Treasury, in a letter to Congress dated December 2, 1794, it was further enacted, February 23, 1795, that an officer be appointed in the Treasury Department, to be known as the Purveyor of Public Supplies, “ whose duty shall be, under the direction of the Secretary of the Treasury, to conduct the procuring and providing of all arms, military and naval stores, provisions, clothing and generally all supplies requisite for the service of the United States.” The compensation was $2000 per annum. The grade of Quartermaster General, which had been abolished July 25, 1785, appears to have been again recognized in an act of March 3, 1795, for continuing and regulating the military establishment. This act also recognizes a Deputy Quartermaster General and regimental quartermasters. The grade of Quartermaster General, however, does not appear to have been specifically recreated by legislation of Congress until the act of May 30, 1796. At that time an act was passed authorizing, among other general staff officers, a Quartermaster General. The same act provided that the gen- eral staff should continue in service until March 4,1797, and no longer. On June 1, 1796, Lieutenant Colonel O’Hara having resigned, John Wilkins, Jr., of Pennsylvania, was appointed by President Washington and confirmed by the Senate as Quartermaster General under this act. On March 3, 1797, the act of May 30, 1796, was amended to continue the grade of Quartermaster General, that officer to receive the pay and emolu- ments previously authorized by law. During the following year, by reason of the unfriendly demonstrations of France, it was considered necessary to temporarily increase the force of the army to meet any exigency which might arise. Accordingly Congress, by an act of May 28, 1798, authorized the President “in the event of declaration of war against the United States, or of actual invasion of their territory by a foreign power, or of imminent danger of such invasion discovered, to call into active service a provisional army of not exceeding 10,000 men.” Section 7 of this act provided that in case the President should judge the employment of a Quartermaster General essential to the public interest, he was authorized to appoint the same accordingly, subject to the confirma- tion of the Senate. The Quartermaster General was to be entitled to the rank, pay and emoluments of a lieutenant colonel. General Washington had retired to private life and was then residing at Mount Vernon. Just before the close of the session of Congress he was nominated and confirmed Lieutenant General and Commander-in-chief of all the troops to be raised. This command Washington accepted with the ex- press condition that he should not be called into active service until the army was in a situation to require his presence, unless urgency of circum- stances should sooner make it necessary. On December 31, 1798, President John Adams transmitted to Congress 46 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. a special report from the Secretary of War, dated December 24, relative to the reorganization of the army. Congress, taking the entire subject of army reorganization into consid- eration, passed the act of March 3, 1799. Sections 10 and 12 of this act read as follows: Section 10. That there shall be a Quartermaster General of the army of the United States, who shall be entitled to the rank, pay, emoluments, and privileges of a major general. Section 12. That to any army of the United States, other than that in which the Quartermaster General shall serve, there shall be a Deputy Quartermaster General, who shall be a field officer, and who, in addition to his other emoluments, shall be entitled to $50 per month, which shall be in full compensation for his extra services and trav- elling expenses ; but the provisions of this act are not to affect the present Quarter- master General of the army of the United States, who, in case a Quartermaster General shall be appointed by virtue of this act, is to act as Deputy Quartermaster General, and shall hereafter have the rank of lieutenant colonel ; and that to every division of an army there shall be a division quartermaster, who in addition to his other emoluments, shall be entitled to $30 per month, which shall be in full compensation for his extra services and travelling expenses ; and that to every brigade there shall be a brigade quartermaster, who, in addition to his other emoluments, shall be entitled to $24 per month, which shall be in full compensation for his extra services and travelling ex- penses ; each of which officers shall be chosen by the Quartermaster General from among the regimental officers. It was also provided by this act that no regimental officer of higher rank than a captain be appointed a division quartermaster, and that no one of higher rank than first lieutenant be appointed quartermaster of a brigade. The difficulties with France which were at this time apprehended were not to any serious extent realized, hostilities being mainly carried on by the navy, and under the acts of Congress of February 20 and May 14, 1800, en- listments and military appointments under the act of March 2, 1799, were suspended. The appointment of a new Quartermaster General, under the act of March 3, 1799, was not made, and Mr. Wilkins remained in charge of the duties of the station, his position being raised to that of major general, as would ap- pear from a message of President Jefferson to Congress in 1802. By the act of March 16, 1802, fixing the military peace establishment, it was enacted that the army be reduced to one regiment of artillerists and two of infantry, with the necessary officers. Sections 3, 16 and 17 of this act provide for the appointment of paymasters, assistant paymasters, and mili- tary agents, upon whom the duties of the Quartermaster’s Department were thenceforth to devolve. They authorized the appointment of one paymaster of the army, seven paymasters, and two assistants, who, in addition to their other duties, were to havecharge of the clothing of troops ; also the appoint- ment of three military agents, and such number of assistant military agents as might be thought expedient by the President, not exceeding one at each mili- tary post, it being the duty of these agents and assistants to purchase, receive, and forward to their destination all military stores and other articles for the troops in their respective departments, and all goods and annuities for the Indians ; they were to make returns of all property which would come into THE QUARTERMASTER'S DEPARTMENT. 47 their possession to the Department of War. Both paymasters and agents were required to file bonds for the faithful performance of their duties. Under operation of this act John Wilkins, Jr., ceased to be Quartermaster General, and Peter Gansevoort, of New York, for the northern department; William Linnard, of Pennsylvania, for the middle department; and Abraham D. Abrahams, of Georgia, for the southern department, were appointed by President Jefferson as military agents, and confirmed as such by the Senate, April 29, 1802. The next legislation relating to the Quartermaster’s Department is found in the act of April 12, 1808, which granted authority to raise, for a limited time, an additional military force in view of apprehended difficulties with foreign powers. This act provided for two brigade quartermasters and a quartermaster to each of the eight regiments to be raised under it. THE WAR OF 1812-1814. At this time war with Great Britain seemed imminent, as serious com- plications had arisen. It was hoped by diplomacy to avoid the impending calamity, but, as a prudential measure, it had been decided to further in- crease the military force, and by the act of January n, 1812, thirteen new regiments were authorized to be added thereto. On March 28th, following, an act was approved reestablishing the Quartermaster’s Department and re- viving the grade of Quartermaster General. Provision was made for a Quartermaster General and four deputy quarter- masters, to be confirmed by the Senate, and as many assistant deputy quartermasters as the service might require, to be appointed by the Presi- dent alone. The Quartermaster General to have the rank and pay of a brigadier general, and the deputy quartermasters $60.00 per month, five rations and forage for two horses. The assistant deputy quartermasters $40.00 per month, three rations, and forage for one horse. These officers were to purchase military stores, camp equipage and other articles requisite for troops and provide means of transportation. The act also provided for a Commissary General of Purchases with a salary of $3000 per annum, and necessary assistants with compensation derived from commissions on money disbursed, not exceeding, however, $2000 per annum. The Commissary General of Purchases was required to purchase all arms, military stores, clothing—formerly purchased by pay- masters—and all articles of supply. The Deputy Commissaries were, in cases of necessity, to act under the orders of the Quartermaster General in purchasing supplies. The office of purveyor of public supplies, and the offices of the military agents were abolished. Under this act President Madison nominated William Jones, of Penn- sylvania, to be Commissary General of Purchases, and Morgan Lewis, of New York, to be Quartermaster General, and they were confirmed by the Senate on April 3 and 4, 1812, respectively. On the 23d of April, 1812, an act was approved organizing a corps of artificers, to be attached to the Quartermaster General’s Department. This corps was to consist of one superintendent, appointed by the President. 48 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. four assistants, two master masons, two master carpenters, two master blacksmiths, two master boat-builders, two master armorers, two master saddle and harness makers, twenty house carpenters, five ship carpenters, twenty blacksmiths, sixteen boat-builders, sixteen armorers, twelve saddle and harness makers, and twenty-four laborers, to be selected from the pri- vates of the army, or engaged from among citizens by the superintendent. The corps of artificers was to be engaged for three years, unless sooner dis- charged by the President. On May 14th following an act was approved, establishing an ordnance department and creating the grade of Commissary General of Ordnance, which act at once relieved the Commissary General of Purchases of some of the most important duties then devolving upon him. On the 18th of June, 1812, war against Great Britain was declared and on June 26, 1812, an act was approved for the more perfect organization of the army of the United States and providing for the increase of the same. By an act of July 6, of the same year, the President was authorized to increase the number of officers of the Quartermaster’s Department by the appointment of one Deputy Quartermaster General to any army of the United States other than that in which the Quartermaster General was serving, and such number of assistant deputies, not exceeding thirty, as the public service may require. The military force was further increased by act of January 29, 1813. On March 3d following an act was approved providing for the supplies required for the army and for the accountability of persons intrusted with the same. On June 2, 1813, Richard Cutts, of Massachusetts, was nominated by President Madison and confirmed by the Senate as Superintendent General of Military Supplies, under the provisions of the above act. March 3, 1813, an act was also passed “for the better organization of the general staff of the army,” making radical changes in the Quartermaster’s Department. It provided for eight Quartermasters General, eight Deputy Quartermasters General, and thirty-two assistant deputy Quartermasters General; the Quartermaster General attached to the principal army to have the brevet rank and the pay and emoluments of a brigadier general as be- fore ; all other Quartermasters General to have the brevet rank and the pay and emoluments of colonels of infantry, and the deputies and assistant dep- uties to have the brevet rank and the pay and emoluments of majors of cavalry and captains of infantry, respectively; the President to take these officers from the line or not, as he might consider expedient. Section 5 made it the duty of the Secretary of War to prepare a code of regulations for the better government of the staff departments, to be used for the army upon receiving the approval of the President. Under the provisions of this act Robert Swartwout, of New York, was ap- pointed by President Madison as Quartermaster General on March 21, 1813, and designated as chief of the Quartermaster’s Department in place of Gen- eral Lewis, who had on March 2d of that year received the appointment of major general in the army. On the 10th February, 1814, it was enacted that three regiments of rifle- THE QUARTERMASTER'S DEPARTMENT. 49 men be raised, one quartermaster and one quartermaster sergeant being allowed to each. On March 30, 18x4, it was enacted that three regiments of artillery be formed into one corps, and organized into twelve battalions, one quarter- master being authorized to each battalion. That in lieu of two regiments of light dragoons in service, there be organized one regiment * * * with one quartermaster * * * and one quartermaster sergeant. Section 20 of this act prohibited taking quartermasters of any grade from the line of the army. On the 11th of February, 1815, news of the proclamation of peace was brought to New York, causing the greatest joy and enthusiasm throughout the country. February 17th the Senate of the United States ratified the treaty of peace between the United States and Great Britain, which had been concluded at Ghent on December 24, 1814. On the 3d of March following an act was passed by Congress reducing the army, and fixing the military peace establishment at 10,000 men, which provided for one quartermaster and quartermaster sergeant to each regi- ment of artillery and riflemen ; also four brigade quartermasters, to be taken from the subalterns of the line. This act made it the duty of the President to discharge all officers who, by its operation, became supernumerary. Accordingly, on May 17, 1815, orders were issued from the Adjutant and Inspector General’s office announcing that the President had so arranged the general staff as to include one Quartermaster General and two Deputy Quartermaster Generals, provisionally retained, and the four brigade quar- termasters provided for by the law ; all other officers of the Quartermaster’s Department, whose accounts were unsettled, were to be allowed to remain in service during a reasonable period, for the single purpose of rendering and settling them. Robert Swartwout was continued Quartermaster General, with the brevet rank of brigadier general. At this time the United States was divided into two military divisions, viz.: Division of the North and Division of the South, the two Deputy Quartermasters General, provisionally retained, being assigned to these re- spective divisions. On December 27, 1815, William H. Crawford, Secretary of War, in a report to the House of Representatives, referred to the staff officers who had been provisionally retained in the military service, and recommended that in organizing the general staff provision be made, among other officers, for one Quartermaster General, who should be stationed at Washington. This recommendation does not appear to have received favorable considera- tion at that time, but on the 24th of April, 1816, an act was passed reorgan- izing the staff departments. The first section of this act authorized the appointment of one Quar- termaster General, with one Deputy Quartermaster General to each division, and an assistant of each to every brigade ; these latter, by the law, super- seded the brigade quartermasters and inspectors then existing. Section 5 provided that the purchasing department consist of one Corn- FROM 1815 TO 1846. 50 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. missary General of Purchases, as before authorized, one deputy commissary to each division, six assistant commissaries of issues, and as many military storekeepers, to be subject to the rules and articles of war in the same man- ner as officers of the army, as the service might require. The salaries of the latter were to be regulated by the Secretary of War according to the duty they were performing, not, however, to exceed the pay and emolu- ments of a captain of infantry. The salaries of the former were fixed by law. Section 7 made it the duty of the President of the United States to prescribe the quantity and kind of clothing to be issued annually to the troops. Section 9 authorized all officers of the general staff to retain the pay and emoluments secured to them by the act of 3d March, 1813. General orders issued from the Adjutant and Inspector General’s office, May 3, 1816, announced that, in conformity with the above act, James R. Mullany, of New York, and George Gibson, of Pennsylvania, had been ap- pointed Quartermasters General of the divisions of the north and south, respectively, with the rank of colonel, to date from April 29, 1816. On the 14th April, 1818, an act was passed further regulating the staff of the army, in accordance with a plan suggested by Mr. Calhoun, Secre- tary of War. Section 3 of this act repealed so much of the act of April 24, 1816, as allowed one Quartermaster General to each division, and provided that the Quartermaster’s Department consist, in addition to the two Deputy Quarter- masters General and the four assistant deputy Quartermasters General, then authorized, of one Quartermaster General, with the rank, pay, and emolu- ments of a brigadier general, and as many assistant deputy Quartermasters General as the President might deem proper, not exceeding, in the whole number, 12. This act also repealed former acts relating to forage, wagon and barrack-masters. President James Monroe, under this act, as will be seen by reference to general orders from the Adjutant and Inspector General’s office, of April 30, 1818, appointed William Cumming, of Georgia, Quartermaster General, to date from April 18, 1818, in lieu of Quartermasters General of divisions. General Cumming declined the appointment conferred upon him, and on the8th May, 1818, Brevet Colonel Thomas S. Jesup, Lieutenant Colonel 3d United States infantry, was appointed Quartermaster General by Presi- dent Monroe to fill the vacancy. Immediately upon the receipt of the notice of this appointment, Colonel Jesup, then at Brownsville, Texas, started for Washington city, and upon the 15th of June, 1818, entered upon the duties of his new position. On the 17th July following he submitted to the Secretary of War a com- prehensive projet of the nature and functions of the Quartermaster’s De- partment and the duties of its officers. This projet, having met with the approval of the Secretary of War, was embodied by Major General Win- field Scott in the code of regulations compiled under the act of March 3, 1813, and published for the information and guidance of the army, in July, 1821. The following is a verbatim copy : THE QUARTERMASTER’S DEPARTMENT. Quartermaster General’s Office, 17th July, 1818. The principal objects of the Quartermaster’s Department are : To insure an ample and efficient system of supply. To give the utmost facility and effect to the move- ments and operations of the Army. And to enforce a strict accountability on the part of all officers and agents charged with monies or supplies. To accomplish these objects, the following regulations are proposed : The Quartermaster General, as chief of the department, will be stationed at Wash- ington, and be allowed one assistant, one clerk, and as many subaltern officers as the duties of his office may require. He will be liable, however, to be ordered to any point where his presence may be necessary, or his services required. He will have the direction of the correspondence of his department, and it shall be his duty to make himself acquainted with the frontiers, both maritime and interior, and with the avenues leading to the contiguous Indian and foreign territories, with the re- sources of the country, and particularly of the districts on the frontier, with the most eligible points for concentrating troops and supplies, whether in relation to offensive or defensive operations, with the military force of different sections of the country. The relative expense of concentrating at particular points, and the relative military advantages of those points. And with the prices of all articles of supply and of transportation. It shall also be his duty to cause barracks and storehouses to be con- structed, to designate the sites for depots, the routes for transportation and communi- cation between different posts and armies, and the course of military roads. It shall be the duty of the Quartermaster General to prescribe a uniform system of returns, reports, statements and estimates for his department, and he shall, under the direction of the Secretary of War, have the entire control of the deputies and as- sistants, and generally of all officers and agents acting in or making disbursements on account of the department, in all that relates to the administrative part of their duties, and to their accountability—the generals or commanding officers having the military control. The deputies or assistants whom the Quartermaster General may assign to the posts of Philadelphia, New York, Pittsburg, Detroit, Saint Louis, and New Orleans, shall not be removed from their stations except by authority of the War Department. Officers of the Quartermaster General’s Department shall not be subject to detail, nor be employed upon any other duties than those of their department, except by order of the Secretary of War, or of a general commanding a division. No officer of the Quartermaster-General’s Department will be permitted to engage, either directly or indirectly, in trade or traffic of any description. All monies for the Quartermaster’s Department will be drawn by the Quartermaster General, and distributed by him to disbursing officers, as the service may require ; the receipts of those officers will be his vouchers, and on producing them, or evidence of the transmission of the money, he shall receive a credit, and the person receiving the money shall be charged. Accounts of subordinate officers of the Quartermaster’s Department, whether of money or of property, will be forwarded quarterly to the Quartermaster General. They will be examined and transmitted, with the remarks of the Quartermaster Gen- eral, to the proper accounting officer. Should vouchers be suspended or disallowed, the accounting officer will return them to the Quartermaster General with his reasons in writing for such suspension or disallowance ; and it shall be the duty of the Quar- termaster General to require from the officer proper vouchers, or the necessary explana- tions. Whenever practicable, the senior quartermaster of each separate army may be re- 52 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. quired to receive and account for all monies received on account of the Quartermaster’s Department for that army. Military departments represent separate armies ; the senior quartermaster, therefore, may, if required, receive and account for all monies for the service of his department. Officers of the Quartermaster’s Department will forward their accounts for settle- ment at the times prescribed ; on failure of which they will be recalled, and their places supplied by others. All officers charged with monies or stores of the Quartermaster’s Department will make, from time to time, such returns, reports, statements, and estimates as the Quar- termaster General may require. No expenditure will be made at permanent posts in time of peace for the erection or repair of barracks and quarters, where the whole sum required to complete the work shall exceed five hundred dollars, unless ordered by the Secretary of War. Whenever any extraordinary expenditure shall be required, particularly if it do not properly belong to the Quartermaster’s Department, it shall be the duty of the officer requiring the same to furnish the quartermaster with duplicate certificates of the necessity of such expenditure. If it be made necessary by the failure of any other de- partment, the fact must be stated. The Quartermaster General may, whenever he shall deem it necessary, cause a thorough inspection to be made of the books and accounts of quartermasters. This inspection shall embrace property as well as money, and shall extend to contracts, to the prices paid for articles purchased, the prices paid for transportation, and gener- ally to every article of supply, and to all objects connected with the department. The books and accounts of the Quartermaster General shall be subject to a similar inspec- tion. Inspecting officers will notice in their reports all orders of commanding officers re- quiring the expenditure of money contrary to regulations. They will state particularly whether supplies be forwarded promptly, and whether proper regard be paid to economy. (Signed) Th. S. Jesup, Quartermaster General. Approved : J. C. Calhoun. The following letter is interesting as showing the scope of the Quarter- master’s Department in those early days : Washington, Dec. 14, 1819. Sir :—In reply to the questions propounded to me this morning, I have the honor to observe, that if it be the intention of the Government, in operating against Florida, to employ the troops of the South Division only, those on the Atlantic may be concen- trated at Amelia Island in fifteen or twenty days, completely equipt for the field. Those in the vicinity of New Orleans or Mobile, may effect a junction in about three weeks, either at Mobile, or at some point within the Territory of Florida, in the vicin- ity of Pensacola. Should the force of the South Division be considered insufficient for the objects contemplated, the light artillery at Boston might be transported to Amelia Island in twenty days, and to Pensacola in a month ; and the Second Regiment at Sackett’s Harbor might be removed, by the way of the city of New York, to Amelia in five weeks, and to Pensacola in forty-six days. If the movement of those troops be determined on, a convoy will be necessary in order to protect them from capture. The Spaniards have probably fifteen hundred men divided between Pensacola, Saint Marks, and Saint Augustine, and they may be reinforced by an equal, if not a greater number, from Cuba ; for if our operations be confined to Florida, every soldier THE QUARTERMASTER'S DEPARTMENT. 53 may be drawn from Cuba for its defense. And the disposable force of Cuba, united with the Seminole Indians, may be thrown upon any point of our line of operations which Spain may select. A reinforcement from Cuba may be prevented by a naval force arriving in the Gulf of Mexico. Accompanying this is a statement in relation to the movement of the light artillery and the 2d Regiment. (Signed) Th. S. Jesup, Quartermaster General. The Hon. John C. Calhoun, Secretary of War. On March 2, 1821, an act of Congress was approved reducing the army and fixing the military peace establishment. Under this act the army was to be composed of four regiments of artillery and seven of infantry, with certain officers of engineers, ordnance, and the staff. Section 7 of this act provided for one Quartermaster General (who under the act of March 28, 1812, received the pay and emoluments of brigadier general), two quartermasters with rank, pay, etc., of majors of cavalry, and ten assistant quartermasters, to be taken from the line and to receive addi- tional compensation, varying from $10 to $20 per month, as the Secretary of War might decide. Section 8 provided that assistant quartermasters and assistant commis- saries shall be subject to duties in both departments under the order of the Secretary of War. Section 9, of this act, provided for two military storekeepers, to be at- tached to the purchasing department. No further legislation of Congress affecting the Quartermaster’s Depart- ment is found until the act of May 18, 1826. Section 1 of this act made it the additional duty of the Quartermaster’s Department to receive from the purchasing department and distribute to the army of the United States all clothing, camp and garrison equipage required for the use of the troops, and required the Quartermaster General, under the direction of the Secretary of War, to prescribe and enforce a system of ac- countability for all clothing and equipage issued to the army. Section 2 made it the duty of every company commander, or other offi- cer who should receive clothing and equipage for the use of his command, or for issue to the troops, to render to the Quartermaster General quarterly returns of such supplies, with vouchers according to the prescribed forms, such returns and vouchers, after due examination by the Quartermaster General, to be transmitted for settlement to the proper officer of the Treas- ury Department. Section 3 provided for the proper care and preservation of clothing and equipage by the officers having it in charge. Sections 4 and 5, in order to enable the Quartermaster’s Department to carry out the provisions of this act, provided for the appointment of two additional quartermasters and 10 assistant quartermasters, to be taken from the line of the army, to have the same rank and pay as authorized for like grades in the act of March 2, 1821. The so-called Black Hawk war and the campaigns in Florida had been 54 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. successfully met without any great increase of the standing army, forces of militia being called out by several of the States from time to time, to resist Indian encroachments and depredations. On May 19, 1836, by direction of the President, General Jesup was assigned to the command of the troops of the United States and of the militia which was called into service from Georgia and Alabama for the suppression of Indian hostilities in the Creek country. By act of July 4, 1836, the President was empowered, during the absence of the Quartermaster General, to assign some other officer of the depart- ment or corps to perform the duties of the Quartermaster General. On January 14, 1837, Major T. Cross, acting Quartermaster General, also strongly urged, in a letter to the Secretary of War, which was transmitted to the Senate, an improved and increased organization for the Quartermas- ter’s Department. At this time the organization of the Quartermaster’s Department consisted of one Quartermaster General, four quartermasters (majors), and twenty assistant quartermasters (taken from the line). Serious questions having again arisen with England, leading to compli- cations on the northeastern frontier, Congress passed the act of July 5, 1838, increasing the military establishment. This act, besides providing a large military force, caused many changes in the various departments of the army. It authorized the addition of two Assistant Quartermasters General, colonels; two Deputy Quartermasters General, lieut.-colonels; and eight assistant quartermasters with the rank of captain. Provision was made that the pay and emoluments of all officers in the Quartermaster’s Department should be the same as allowed similar rank in the dragoons; that all ap- pointments shall be made from the army; that promotion in said depart- ment shall take place as in regiments and corps, and that line officers taken for such appointments shall relinquish their rank therein. By a supplementary act of July 7, 1838, so much of Section 9 of the above act as required assistant quartermasters to be separated from the line was repealed. General Jesup resumed his duties as Quartermaster General August 5, 1839. The threatened conflict with England having been avoided, no further increase of the military force or change in the organization and duties of the Quartermaster’s Department appear to have been made until the act of August 23, 1842, when the office of Commissary General of Purchases, which had been vacant since the death of Callender Irvine, on the 9th of October, 1841, was abolished, and the duties transferred to the Quartermas- ter’s Department. MEXICAN WAR.—MAY, 1846, TO JULY 4, 1848. In May, 1846, war with Mexico was declared, and on the 13th of the same month an act was approved providing for a volunteer force of 50,000 men, and on the 18th of June following an act was approved making cer- tain changes in the military establishment in view of the above action. Provision was made for such additional officers of the Quartermaster’s THE QUARTERMASTER'S DEPARTMENT. 55 Department as the service might require, not exceeding one quartermaster to each brigade, with the rank of major, and one assistant quartermaster, with the rank of captain, for each regiment, to continue in service only so long as their services should be required in connection with the militia and volunteers. Section 7 provided that promotion in the Quartermaster’s Department to the rank of major should thenceforward be made from the captains of the army ; that appointments in the line and in the general staff which con- ferred equal rank in the army should not be held by the same officer at the same time, and that when any officer of the staff who might have been taken from the line had obtained or been entitled to promotion to a grade in his regiment, equal to the commission he might have held in the staff, the said officer should vacate such staff commission, or he might at his option vacate his commission in the line. On February 11, 1847, an act was approved, increasing the force already authorized, by 10 regiments, each regiment being entitled to a regimental quartermaster, who should be allowed $10 per month additional pay, and forage for two horses for such duty. Sections 5 and 10 authorized the President to appoint four quartermas- ters, with the rank of major, and 10 assistant quartermasters, with the rank of captain, to be discharged from the service at the close of the war. This latter clause was repealed by the act of July 19, 1848, which provided, how- ever, that no vacancy which might occur should be filled until authorized by subsequent legislation. On July 4, 1848, the President issued his proclamation promulgating the treaty of peace between the United States and Mexico. One of the results of the Mexican War was the vast accumulation of money and property accounts of the disbursing officers who had been en- gaged in its campaigns. This led to the passage of the act of March 3, 1857, under which all the accounts and vouchers of the disbursing officers of the Quartermaster’s Department were to be audited and settled by the third auditor of the Treasury. The same act (Section 2) provided for adding to the Quartermaster’s Department five military storekeepers, who were re- quired to file the usual bonds, and who, with those previously authorized, were to be allowed in kind, and in kind only, the fuel and quarters of a first lieutenant of the army. June 10, i860, General Jesup died, after a continuous service of forty- two years as chief of the Quartermaster’s Department, and on the 28th of the same month Lieutenant Colonel Joseph E. Johnston, 1st United States cavalry, was appointed by President Buchanan, as Quartermaster General, with the rank of brigadier general. WAR OF THE REBELLION.—FROM APRIL I 5, l86l, TO AUGUST 20, 1866. The organization of the United States Army on January i, 1861, just previous to the outbreak of the Rebellion, provided for 13,024 officers and enlisted men. After the close of the Mexican War and the disbandment of the volunteer forces called out by that war, the regular troops had been gradually decreasing in numbers, and at the beginning of the Rebellion in 56 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. 1861, were scattered by companies and detachments throughout the country. At the commencement of the Rebellion the organization of the Quarter- master’s Department was as follows : One Quartermaster General—brigadier general. Two assistant Quarter- masters General—colonels. Two Deputy Quartermasters General—lieu- tenant colonels. Four quartermasters—majors. Twenty-eight assistant quartermasters—captains, and seven military storekeepers. Total 44. On the 15th April, 1861, President Lincoln issued his proclamation calling for 75,000 men to serve three months. On the 22d April, 1861, General Johnston resigned his charge of the Quartermaster’s Department, for the purpose of entering the Confederate service, and on the 15th May following, Colonel M. C. Meigs, of the nth United States Infantry, formerly captain of engineers, United States Army, was appointed by President Lincoln, Quartermaster General in his stead. General Meigs assumed charge of the department on the 13th June, 1861. On the 3d May, 1861, President Lincoln issued his second proclamation, calling into service 42,034 volunteers to serve three years, if required, and increasing the regular corps by the addition of 22,714 officers and enlisted men. The acts of July 22 and 25, 1861, following soon after, authorized the increase of the volunteers to 500,000 men during the war; each regiment raised to have a quartermaster (a lieutenant) and a quartermaster sergeant, the latter to have the pay and allowances of a sergeant of cavalry ; each brigade was also allowed one assistant quartermaster; the officers and men thus authorized to be placed on the footing as to pay and emoluments of similar corps of the regular army. On the 29th July following, an act was approved, adding to the regular army n regiments for service during the Rebellion; authority being given to reduce the military establishment to 25,000 men within one year after the organized resistance to the authority of the Government ceased, unless otherwise ordered by Congress. This law also provided for regimental and battalion quartermasters and quartermaster sergeants for the new organi- zations. On the 3d August, 1861, an act was passed, “providing for the better organization of the military establishment.” Section 3 provided for adding to the Quartermaster’s Department one colonel, two lieutenant colonels, four majors, and twenty captains, with the rank, pay and allowances of offi- cers of cavalry of like grades. This section also provided that, whenever any captain of the Quartermaster’s Department had served 14 years contin- uously, he should be promoted to be a quartermaster with rank of major. By section 8, of the act of 5th July, 1862, the President was authorized to increase the number of military storekeepers of the Quartermaster’s De- partment to 12, if the exigencies of the service rendered it necessary. At this time there were only 7 military storekeepers provided for. On the 17th July, 1862, Congress authorized the acceptance of the ser- vices of 100,000 additional volunteers for nine months. Section 10 of this act authorized the addition to the staff of the commander of each army THE QUARTERMASTER'S DEPARTMENT. 57 corps of one chief quartermaster with the rank of lieutenant colonel, to be assigned by the President from the army or volunteer force. Appoint- ments under this act were made of volunteer and regular officers of the Quartermaster’s Department; the rank and pay which they thus obtained being temporary, and dependent upon the existence of the corps organiza- tion to which they were assigned as chief quartermasters. On the 25th June, 1864, an act was passed, providing for the examina- tion of certain staff officers, including quartermasters and assistant quarter- masters. Boards consisting of three officers, of whom two at least must be officers of volunteers, were provided to conduct the examinations. Offi- cers not appearing for examination within ninety days after being sum- moned were to be dropped from the rolls, officers not found to possess necessary qualifications to be dismissed with one month’s pay. In accordance with the provisions of this act, the necessary regula- tions were prescribed in general orders from the War Department, and boards were located at different places. The majority of the officers of the regular and volunteer corps were examined, and those found disqual- ified were permitted to resign or were dismissed ; or, in some cases, were simply mustered out of the service, in view of their having served during the war with such ability as they possessed. The requirements of the law that two of the officers constituting each board should be of the volunteer corps, and the subsequent rapid muster-out of the volunteer organization, rendered the examination of all the officers of the depart- ment impracticable, and in accordance with the instruction of the Secre- tary of War, further action under the law was suspended. On the 4th of July, 1864, an act was approved providing for the better organization of the Quartermaster’s Department. This act established in the office of the Quartermaster General, nine divisions, to exist during the Rebellion and one year thereafter ; each division to be placed in charge of a competent officer of the Quartermaster’s Department, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of a colonel, under assignment by the Secretary of War, and to perform the duties thus assigned them under such rules as should be prescribed by the Quartermaster General, with the approval of the War Department. Section 7 of this act specified in general terms the business embraced in each of these divisions, and the special duties of the officers placed in charge, under the direction of the Quartermaster General. Section 3 of this act provides that it shall be the duty of the Quarter- master General to establish depots from time to time, at places convenient to the principal armies in the field, for receiving and distributing the sup- plies necessary for such armies. On the 28th of July, 1866, an act was passed increasing and fixing the peace establishment of the United States, and authorizing thereby 60 regi- ments,—5 of artillery, 10 of cavalry, and 45 of infantry. Section 13 provided that the Quartermaster’s Department of the army thenceforward consist of one Quartermaster General, brigadier general, six assistant Quartermasters General, colonels ; ten deputy Quartermasters General, lieutenant-colonels; fifteen quartermasters, majors, and forty-four assistant quartermasters, captains. The vacancies thereby created in the 58 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. grade of assistant quartermaster, should be filled by selection from among the persons who had rendered meritorious services as assistant quarter- masters of volunteers during two years of the war; but that after the first appointments made under the provisions of this section, as vacancies might occur in the grades of major and captains in that department, no appoint- ments to fill the same should be made until the number of majors be re- duced to 12, and the number of captains to 30, and thereafter the number of officers in each of such grades to conform to said reduced numbers. Section 14 provided for the increase of the number of military store- keepers to 16, if such increase became necessary, and allowed to them the rank, pay and emoluments of a captain of infantry. Section 15 enacted that the act of July 4, 1864, reorganizing the Quar- termaster’s Department, and above referred to, continue in force until Jan- uary 1, 1867, and no longer, and Section 23, that thereafter the Quarter- master General shall be appointed by selection from the corps to which he belongs. Section 23 also provided that no person be appointed to any vacancy created by the act, in the pay, medical, or Quartermaster’s Department until they pass the examination required by the act of June 25, 1864. While actual hostilities with the Confederate forces practically ceased with the surrender of General Lee, April 9, 1865, General J. E. Johnston, April 26, 1865, and General Kirby Smith, June 2, 1865, it was not until Aug- ust 20, 1866, that President Andrew Johnson issued his proclamation de- claring peace established throughout the whole United States. The Quartermaster General reports as follows for the fiscal years from 1861 to 1866, inclusive : The total amount to be accounted for during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1861, was, $ 10,603,033.75 The total amount to be accounted for during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1862, was, $176,348,419.60 The total amount to be accounted for during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1863, was, $375,096,282.27 The total amount to be accounted for during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1964, was, $581,778,567.08 The total amount to be accounted for during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1865, was, $732,295,924.68 The total amount to be accounted for during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1866, was, $571,764,197.87 FROM AUGUST 20, 1866, TO JANUARY I, 1894. By Section 7 of the act of March 2, 1867, the rank, pay, and allowances of military storekeepers were made equal to those of captains of cavalry. On the 1st of January, 1867, the various divisions of the Quartermaster- General's office were abolished, and the officers of the department then assigned to duty in various capacities, with the temporary rank of colonel and major, lost such rank and resumed that held by them previous to such assignment. Section 6 of the act of Congress approved March 3,1869, provides, “That THE QUARTERMASTER'S DEPARTMENT. 59 until otherwise directed by law there thall be no new appointments in the Quartermaster’s Department. On October 11, 1870, the Quartermaster General recommended to the Secretary of War the removal of the restrictions upon appointments to the Quartermaster’s Department. act approved June 3, 1872, it is provided : “ That the President be, and hereby is, authorized to nominate and, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to appoint certain officers of the Quartermaster’s Department to the grade they would have held in said department, respectively, had the vacancies created therein by the act of July twenty-eighth, eighteen hundred and sixty-six, from the rank of major to the rank of colonel, both inclusive, been filled by promotion by seniority : Provided, that no officer shall be deprived of his relative rank or reduced from his present grade by this act, and that the officers whose appoint- ments are herein authorized shall take rank and receive pay only from the date of their confirmation.” act approved June 20, 1874, it was provided : “ That the President be, and he is hereby, authorized to nominate and promote William Myers to be Major and Quartermaster, to date from the eighteenth day of January, eighteen hundred and sixty-seven, to take place on the Army Register next below Major J. G. Chandler : Provided, that no officer in said department shall by this act be reduced from his present rank, nor shall any additional pay or allowance be made to any officers by virtue of this act.” act approved March 3, 1875, it was provided : “ That the Quartermasters Department of the army shall hereafter consist of the Quartermaster General, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of a brigadier general ; four Assistant Quartermasters General, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of col- onels of cavalry ; eight Deputy Quartermasters General, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of lieutenant colonels of cavalry ; fourteen quartermasters, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of majors of cavalry, and thirty assistant quartermasters with the rank, pay, and emoluments of captains of cavalry. Sec. 2. That no more appointments shall be made in the grade of military store- keepers in the Quartermaster’s Department, and this grade shall cease to exist as soon as the same becomes vacant by death, resignation, or otherwise of the present incum- bents. Sec. 3. That no officer now in service shall be reduced in rank or deprived of his commission by reason of any provision of this act. Sec. 4. That no officer shall be promoted or appointed in the Quartermaster’s Department in excess of the organization prescribed by this act, and that so much of Section 6 of the act approved March three, eighteen hundred and sixty-nine, entitled, “An act making appropriations for the support of the army for the year ending June thirtieth, eighteen hundred and seventy., and for other purposes,” as applies to the Quartermaster’s Department be, and the same is hereby repealed.” General Meigs was retired from active service on account of age Feb- ruary 6, 1882. On February 13, 1882, Colonel Daniel H. Rucker, Assistant Quartermaster General, was appointed by President Arthur as Quartermas- ter General. General Rucker assumed the duties of his new office on Feb- ruary 20, 1882, and on the 23d of the same month was himself retired from active service, having reached the limit of age, 64 years. 60 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. President Arthur then appointed Col. Rufus Ingalls, Assistant Quarter- master General, as Quartermaster General, to date from February 23, 1882. General Ingalls assumed the duties of his new office March 16, 1882. By act of Congress approved March 3, 1883, paragraph 4, it is provided that, “ hereafter vacancies occurring in the Quartermaster’s Department * * * may in the discretion of the President be filled from civil life.” On July x, 1883, General Ingalls was retired from active service on account of age, and on the same day President Arthur appointed Colonel S. B. Holabird, Assistant Quartermaster General, as Quartermaster General. Under the act of Congress approved July 5, 1884, it was provided: “ That the Secretary of War is authorized to appoint, on the recommendation of the Quartermaster General, as many post quartermaster sergeants, not to exceed eighty, as he may deem necessary for the interests of the service, said sergeants to be selected by examination from the most competent enlisted men of the army, who have served at least four years, and whose character and education shall fit them to take charge of public property, and to act as clerks and assistants to post and other quartermasters. Said post quartermaster sergeants shall, so far as practicable, per- form the duties of storekeepers and clerks, in lieu of citizen employes. The post quartermaster sergeants shall be subject to the rules and articles of war, and shal receive for their services the same pay and allowances as ordnance sergeants.” Under the provisions of this act eighty post quartermaster sergeants have been appointed and assigned to duty at the several military posts and stations, to assist post quartermasters in the performance of their duties in lieu of civilian clerks. General Holabird, after serving nearly seven years as Quartermaster General, and having reached the age limit, on June 16, 1890, was retired from active service. By the act approved February 12, 1887, which amendssection 1661, R.S., and makes appropriation for arms and equipments for the militia, it is further provided that “ the purchase and manufacture of * * * quarter- master’s stores and camp equipage for the militia, shall be made the same as provided for the regular army.” Congress, by act approved June 20, 1890, provided : “ That the enlisted men known as the artillery detachment at West Point, should be mustered out of the service as artillery-men, and immediately reenlisted as army service men in the Quartermaster’s Department, continuing to perform the same duties, and to have the same pay, allowances, rights and privileges, and subject to the rules, regulations and laws in the same manner as if their service had been continuous in the artillery, and their said service shall be considered and declared to be continuous in the army.” This detachment is composed of 117 men, viz.: 1 first sergeant, 6 ser- geants, 8 corporals, and 102 privates, and consists of clerks, mechanics, laborers, teamsters and overseers, whose duties are mainly taking care of the buildings and grounds at the Military Academy at West Point, New York. On June 26, 1890, President Harrison appointed Lieutenant Colonel Richard N. Batchelder Deputy Quartermaster General, as Quartermaster General. General Batchelder assumed duty July 10, 1890, and is the present occupant of the office. THE QUARTERMASTER’S DEPARTMENT. 61 DUTIES. The Quartermaster’s Department provides the means of transportation by land and water for troops and materials of war for the army. It also provides the means of transportation for ordnance and ordnance stores issued by the United States to the several states and territories, and is charged with the duty of purchasing and transporting the quartermaster’s stores and equipage for the militia. Upon proper requisition it also trans- ports the property of other executive departments. It provides wagons, ambulances, carts, saddles and horse equipments (except for the cavalry), and harness (except for the artillery). It also provides vessels for water transportation, builds wharves, con- structs and repairs roads for military purposes and builds bridges. Pro- vides and distributes clothing, tents and equipage, and band instruments to the army, and clothing and equipage to the militia. Supplies table- ware and mess furniture, fuel, forage, stationery, blank books, lumber, straw for bedding for men and animals, and all materials for camps and for shelter of troops and stores, furniture for barracks, such as bunks, chairs, tables and lockers, heating and cooking stoves, heating and cooking apparatus for use in public barracks and quarters, equipments of bake houses for post bakeries, tools for mechanics and laborers in the Quarter- master’s Department, lights, water supply and sewer systems for all military posts and buildings. It hires, purchases and builds barracks, quarters, storehouses and hospitals, provides by hire or purchase grounds for mil- itary encampments and buildings, supplies periodicals and newspapers to post libraries. Contracts for horses for cavalry and artillery, cares for and maintains the national cemeteries, and prepares and settles accounts for telegraphing on army business. The work in the Quartermaster General’s office, under its present organ- ization, is distributed among the different branches as follows : A. Finance.—This branch has charge of matters relating to the procurement and distribution of funds, the compilation and preparation for Congress of the annual es- timates of funds for the service of the Quartermaster’s Department, and for funds required for the Quartermaster General’s office ; the examination of estimates of funds received from disbursing officers, and the issue of requisitions in favor of such disbursing officers ; the action upon settlements made at the Treasury of claims and ac- counts pertaining to the Quartermaster’s Department; the abstracting of weekly and monthly statements of funds for comparison with the Treasury records, and the con- ducting of the necessary correspondence, and the keeping of the prescribed records and necessary memorandum books connected with the foregoing. B. Money and Property.—The duties of this branch are the administrative exam- ination of the money accounts and returns of quartermaster’s stores rendered by officers serving in the Quartermaster’s Department, before their transmission to the account- ing officers for final action. It also takes action on certificates of deposit of funds pertaining to the appropria- tions for the Quartermaster’s Department, received from sales to officers and soldiers, sales at auction and other sources, and upon boards of survey and inventory and in- spection reports of quartermaster’s stores no longer fit for issue or use. C. Clothing and Equipage.—In this branch returns of clothing and equipage are received, registered, and examined. After examination and the correction of 62 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. errors they are forwarded to the Second Auditor of the Treasury for final settle- ment. D. Transportation.—Through this branch the Quartermaster General exercises supervision over all matters pertaining to the transportation of troops, and supplies for the army, and for the militia, and settles all accounts therefor which, for any rea- sons, legal or technical, cannot be paid by the disbursing quartermasters stationed throughout the country, including the accounts of bond aided Pacific roads, esti- mates for transportation funds, and reports of their expenditure, and replies to all in- quiries of Congress, the Court of Claims, and the accounting officers of the Treasury relative to transportation are prepared in this branch. All matters pertaining to Southern railroads indebted to the United States for railway material purchased by them at the close of the war, are adjusted through this branch. Telegraphing on military business and accounts growing out of such service are supervised through the transportation branch. Transportation for the other executive departments is also provided upon requests of their authorized officers and agents. E. Regtilar Supplies.—This branch has charge of all matters relating to the pro- curement and distribution of supplies, including means of transportation, stoves, and heating apparatus, and repair and maintenance of same, for heating barracks and quar' ers ; of ranges, stoves, and apparatus for cooking ; of fuel and lights for enlisted men, guards, hospitals, storehouses, and offices, and for sales to officers ; of cavalry and artillery horses ; of equipment of bake houses, to carry on post bakeries ; of the necessary furniture, textbooks, paper, and equipment for the post schools ; for the tableware and mess furniture for kitchens and mess halls for enlisted men ; of forage and bedding for the public animals of the Quartermaster’s Department, and for the authorized number of officers’ horses ; of straw for soldiers’ bedding ; of stationery and blank books for the Quartermaster’s Department, certificates for discharged sol- diers, blank forms for the Paymaster’s and Quartermaster’s Departments, and of the necessary correspondence connected with the work of this branch. This branch has also charge of matters relating to all contracts to which the Quar- termaster’s Department is a party. F. Clothing Supplies.—This branch of the office takes action upon all matters pertaining to the purchase and manufacture of clothing and equipage, and of the is- sues of same to the army, and to the militia of the states and territories in conformity with laws and regulations governing the same. G. Barracks and Quarters.—The work of this branch pertains to providing by hire, purchase, or construction, of barracks, quarters, hospitals, store-houses, stables, roads, sidewalks, wharves and bridges, shooting galleries and target ranges, and gen- erally to all structures furnished by the Quartermaster’s Department for the use of the army, including the repairs thereof, and matters relating to post cemeteries, except interments therein, and other miscellaneous duties, among which are the preparation of drawings, specifications, estimates, and studies of various works under the heads enumerated above, and of conducting the necessary correspondence, and keeping the requisite books and records of the transactions pertaining to the work of the branch. H. Inspection.—In this branch cognizance is taken of such matters as relate to the personnel of the officers of the Quartermaster’s Department, their assignment to stations, furnishing official bonds, etc., and to matters which pertain individually to clerks and employes in the office of the Quartermaster General and of the Quartermas ter’s Department at large. All reports, such as the biennial and annual returns of officers of the Quartermaster’s Department, and monthly and semi-monthly pay-rolls of clerks and employes in this office, are prepared therein, and action is taken on all THE QUARTERMASTER’S DEPARTMENT. 63 matters pertaining to the post quartermaster sergeants and the detachment of army service men, Quartermaster’s Department, at West Point. The distribution of books, orders, circulars, and other printed matter intended for the use of officers of the Quartermaster’s Department is made from this branch. I. Records and Files and Miscellaneous Claims.—This branch has the custody of the records and files of the office, from the date of its organization, June 15, 1818, and investigates and takes action upon miscellaneous claims for payment for services ren- dered as mechanics, teamsters, and laborers ; for extra-duty pay to enlisted men em- ployed in the Quartermaster’s Department ; for reimbursement to officers, soldiers, and civilian employes for expenses incurred while travelling on duty or under orders ; for the expenses of burial of officers and soldiers ; for awards for pursuing, appre- hending, and delivering deserters ; for recovery of lost and stolen public animals, and such other claims and accounts as do not specifically pertain to other branches of the office. The branch also has charge of the supply of newspapers and periodicals to military post libraries for the use and benefit of the enlisted men of the army, and of the print- ing and binding for the Quartermaster’s Department, and also all matters relating to claims filed arising under the act of July 4, 1864. K. Reservation.—This branch has charge of title papers to all lands in custody of the War Department for military uses, except such as are designed for permanent fortifications, or for armories, arsenals, and ordnance depots ; and of collecting and compiling information in regard to each reservation. It also has charge of all matters relating to water works and water supply, sewerage, plumbing, structural heating, lighting, fire protection, etc., and of conducting correspondence in connection there- with, National Cetneteries.—This branch has charge of matters pertaining to national cemeteries and the approaches thereto, and the superintendents of same. It exercises a general supervision over the proper disbursement of the funds provided by Congress for the care and maintenance of these cemeteries. Mail and Records.—This branch has charge of all matters pertaining to the keep- ing of the records, and briefing, entering, and indexing of communications received in the office of the Quartermaster General, as well as the typewriting and mailing of let- ters and endorsement. GENERAL DEPOTS. General depots have been established at New York City; Philadelphia and Schuylkill Arsenal, Pennsylvania; Washington, D. C.; Jeffersonville, Indiana ; San Francisco, Cal., and Saint Louis, Mo. These general depots of the Quartermasters’ Department are estab- lished in different sections of the country for the collection, manufacture and preservation of quartermasters’ supplies, until they are required for distribution to the army. They are under the immediate control of the Quartermaster General, and the officers in charge act under his sole direction. At the depots at Philadelphia, Jeffersonville, Ind., and San Francisco, all the clothing for the army is manufactured. By act of Congress approved March 3, 1873, there was established at Rock Island, 111., a prison for the confinement of offenders against the rules, regulations and laws for the government of the army of the United States, MILITARY PRISON. 64 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. and subsequently by act approved May 21, 1874, the military prison was transferred to Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. This prison is governed by a board of five commissioners, consisting of three army officers, and two civilians. The commandant of the prison is an officer of the Quartermaster’s Department. In 1876, the manufacture of boots, shoes, etc., for the army by the con- victs of this prison was first commenced and has continued to the present time. Congress, under existing law of February 27, 1893, limits the amount of the annual appropriation for clothing for the army, that can be expended at the military prison, to $125,000. Another duty attached to the Quartermaster’s Department which re- sulted from the war, is that relating to burial places for the Union dead. The act of Congress approved July 17, 1862, provided that the President of the United States shall have power, whenever in his opinion it shall be expedient, to purchase cemetery grounds, and cause them to be enclosed, to be used as a national cemetery, for the soldiers who shall die in the serv- ice of the country. During the progress of the war, the sites selected for the interment of the Union dead, who were killed in battle or died in hos- pital, were usually those the most conveniently located for the purpose. After the close of the war, Congress by act approved February 22, 1867, provided for the purchase by the United States of sites for national ceme- teries. The work of selecting more suitable sites, securing fee simple titles and collecting and transferring thereto the Union dead, scattered over the length and breadth of the land, was assigned to the Quartermaster’s Depart- ment, and was a labor of great magnitude. This work has been continued under the direction of the Quartermaster’s Department until the present time, when there are 82 national cemeteries located either on military re- servations, or on land purchased for this purpose and owned by the United States, and which contain 331,755 interments. The national cemeteries are entirely distinct and disconnected from the local cemeteries. Congress appropriates annually about $161,880 for the care and main- tenance of these cemeteries, including the pay of the 72 superintendents. Under the fostering care of the Government, the national cemeteries have been made attractive, the graves of the Union dead provided with marble headstones, the grounds ornamented and beautified, thus creating a most fitting national monument to the memory of those who gave up their lives that the Union might be preserved. The regular appropriation for the service of the Quartermaster’s De- partment for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1894, is as follows: AMOUNT DISBURSED. Regular Supplies $2,525,000 Incidental Expenses 650,000 Horses for Cavalry and Artillery 130,000 Barracks and Quarters. 700,000 Transportation of the Army and its Supplies 2,600,000 Clothing and Camp and Garrison Equipage 1,200,000 THE QUARTERMASTER'S DEPARTMENT. 65 Construction and Repair of Hospitals $ 50,000 Shooting Galleries and Ranges 8,000 Quarters for Hospital Stewards 7,000 National Cemeteries 100,000 Pay of Superintendents of National Cemeteries 61,880 Total $8,031,880 ORGANIZATION OF THE ARMY JANUARY I, 1894. The United States, under existing orders, is divided into eight military departments, viz.: Department of the East, Department of the Missouri, Department of the Platte, Department of Dakota, Department of Texas, Department of California, Department of the Colorado, Department of the Columbia. The enlisted strength of the army as authorized by existing laws is lim- ited to 25,000 men. There are, besides the staff departments provided by law: 10 regiments of cavalry, 5 regiments of artillery, 25 regiments of infantry. The organization of the Quartermaster’s Department, as provided for under existing laws, is as follows : i Quartermaster General, brigadier general. 4 Assistant Quartermasters General, colonels. 8 Deputy Quartermasters General, lieutenant colonels.’ 14 quartermasters, majors. 30 assistant quartermasters, captains. 1 military storekeeper, captain. (The last retirement in this grade will occur May 15, 1905, when by operation of the law, the grade will cease to exist.— Act of Congress approved March 3, 1875.) 80 post quartermaster sergeants. 117 army service men, Quartermaster’s Department, are on duty at West Point, New York. In addition to the above there is also an average of 135 officers of the line of the army, who are detailed for duty as acting assistant quarter- masters in the Quartermaster’s Department at the 94 posts and recruiting depots. was organized in 1883. Its object is to examine into the organization of the clerical force of the office, with a view to increase its efficiency ; to re- commend changes, promotions and transfers ; and to prepare and present a ADMINISTRATION BOARD 66 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. schedule of pay for the office force. The officers on duty in the Quarter- master General’s office compose the Administration Board. EQUIPMENT BOARD was organized in 1883. The object of this board of officers is to enable the Quartermaster General to get an authoritative expression of opinion upon current inventions, suggestions, results of improvements, etc., suitable or fit to be introduced into the military service through the Quartermaster’s Department, for the quartering, moving, equipment, supply and outfit of all troops in the United States military service. A record of all proceedings is kept, and reports made to the Quartermaster General. The officers on duty in the Quartermaster General’s office, and the depot quartermaster. Washington, D. C., compose the Equipment Board. THE SUBSISTENCE DEPARTMENT. BYT. BRIG.-GEN. JOHN W. BARRIGER, Assistant Commissary General U. S. Army. THE first legislation relative to subsistence of the Army is found in the resolution of the Continental Congress passed June 16, 1775, creating general and general-staff officers for the Army of the United Colonies, which provided that there should be, among the latter class of officers, “ one commissary-general of stores and provisions.” On the 17th of July, 1775, Congress passed a resolution, upon the recom- mendation of Maj.-Gen. Philip Schuyler, commanding the New York De- partment, authorizing a deputy commissary-general of stores and provisions for that department, and immediately thereafter elected Walter Livingston to fill the office. On the 19th of July, 1775, a dispatch from Gen. Washington, dated Cambridge, July 10, 1775, reporting his assumption of command of the Army, and recommending, among other things, that Joseph Trumbull, of Connecticut, be appointed commissary-general of stores and provisions, was laid before Congress. After the same had been read and considered, the following resolution was passed : “Resolved, That Joseph Trumbull be commissary-general of stores and provisions for the Army of the United Colonies.” On the 29th of April, 1776, Congress, having had under consideration the report of the committee on supplying the troops in Canada, passed a resolution authorizing the appointment of a deputy commissary-general of stores and provisions for the Army of the United Colonies in Canada, and then elected Mr. J. Price to fill the office. In 1777, so much dissatisfaction prevailed with respect to the administra- tion of the officers of the “ Commissary’s Department,” that the matter was made the subject of an investigation by Congress, resulting in the passage of a resolution on the 10th of June, 1777, instituting a new system, upon a different principle, under an elaborate code of regulations. The following extracts from the code, which constituted the resolution, show the principal features of the new system : “Resolved— “ I. That for supplying the army of the United States with provisions, one commissary-general and four deputy commissaries-general of purchases, and one commissary-general and three deputy commissaries-general of issues, be appointed by Congress. “III. That the deputy commissaries-general have authority to appoint as many assistant commissaries to act under them as may from time to time be necessary, and the same to displace at pleasure, making returns 68 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. thereof to the commissaries-general respectively, who shall have full power to limit their numbers, to displace such as they shall think disqualified for their trust, and direct their respective deputy commissaries-general to ap- point others in their stead ; that special care be taken by the officers em- powered as aforesaid, to appoint none but persons of probity, capacity, vigilance, and attachment to the United States, and the cause they are en- gaged in ; and to make returns to the board of war, the commander-in-chief, and the commanders of the respective departments, of the assistant com- missaries by them respectively appointed, their several places of abode, the time of their appointment and dismission, and the post, place, magazine, or district to which they are severally assigned ; and that the deputy commis- saries-general of purchases, and issues, in the same district make similar returns to each other. “IV. That the commissary-general of purchases shall superintend the deputy commissaries-general of purchases, and assign to each a separate district, who shall constantly reside therein, and not make any purchases beyond the limits thereof; and every purchaser employed therein shall also have a certain district assigned him by the respective deputy commissary- general, in which he shall reside, and beyond the limits of which he shall not be permitted to make any purchases, unless by special order of his superior, directing the quantity and quality of provisions so to be purchased beyond his limits, and informing such purchaser of the prices given by the stationed purchaser in the district to which he may be sent. “ VII. That it shall be the duty of the commissary-general of purchases, with the assistance of the deputy commissaries-general, and assistant com- missaries of purchases, to purchase all provisions and other necessaries allowed, or which may be hereafter allowed by Congress to the troops of the United States, and deliver the same to the commissary-general of issues, or his deputies, or assistants, in such quantities, and at such places or magazines, as the commander-in-chief, or the commander of the respective departments, shall direct. “ XX. That the commissary-general of issue shall superintend the respective deputy commissaries-general of issues, and assign to each a sepa- rate district; and have full power to suspend them and appoint others for a time, as already appointed for the commissary-general of purchases.” By a resolution passed on the nth of June, 1777, the next day after the adoption of the new commissariat system, Congress directed that the com- missary-general of purchases should “ keep his office in the place where Congress shall sit, and that he or his clerk constantly attend therein.” On the 18th of June, 1777, Congress proceeded to the election of officers for the new Commissary’s Department, and the ballots having been taken and examined, the following persons were declared elected, viz., Joseph Trumbull, commissary-general of purchases, William Aylett, William Buchanan, Jacob Cuyler and Jeremiah Wadsworth, deputy commissaries- general of purchases; Charles Stewart, commissary-general of issues, and THE SUBSISTENCE DEPARTMENT. 69 William Green Mumford, Matthew Irwin and Elisha Avery, deputy commis- saries-general of issues. An additional deputy commissary-general of purchases and one ad- ditional deputy commissary-general of issues, for supplying the troops in the State of Georgia, were authorized by a resolution of Congress passed August i, 1777. On the 6th of the same month, James Roe and John Bohun Garardeau, were elected to fill the offices, respectively. The resignation of Joseph'Trumbull, commissary-general of purchases, was received by Congress on the 2d of August, 1777, and on the 5th William Buchanan, a deputy commissary-general of purchases, was elected to fill the vacancy. On the 6th of August, Congress proceeded to the election of officers to fill vacancies in the Commissary's Department. Ephraim Blaine was elected a deputy commissary-general of purchases, vice Buchanan, promoted; Archibald Stewart, a deputy commissary-general of issues, vice Hoops, resigned; and James Blicker, a deputy commissary-general of issues, vice Avery, resigned. An additional deputy commissary-general of purchases was, on the same day, authorized for the Eastern Department, and Samuel Gray elected to fill the office. On the nth of August, 1777, Peter Colt was elected a deputy commis- sary-general of purchases, vice Wadsworth, resigned. On the 9th of April, 1778, Jeremiah Wadsworth, who had recently re- signed as a deputy commissary-general of purchases, was elected commis- sary-general of purchases, vice Buchanan, and administered the office until January 1, 1780, when he resigned, and was succeeded by Ephraim Blaine, then a deputy commissary-general of purchases. The laws relating to the purchasing branch of the Commissary’s Depart- ment were further perfected by the following resolution of Congress, passed November 30, 1780: "Resolved, That there be a commissary-general of purchases, whose duty shall be to purchase provisions under the direction of Congress, the com- mander-in-chief, or board of war; to call upon the principal State agents or commissioners for such supplies as their respective legislatures shall make provision for, keep up a regular correspondence with them, to the end that their prospects of furnishing such supplies may be fully known ; of which correspondence he shall keep a fair and correct register, as well as every other official transaction; to direct the quantities and species of provisions to be stored in the magazines of the several States, under the orders of the commander-in-chief, and cause the same to be furnished to the army, as occasion may require; for which purpose he is empowered to call on the quartermaster-general and the deputy quartermasters for the means of transportation; to make monthly returns to the commander-in-chief and the board of war of all persons employed by him, specifying for what time and on what terms ; and of all provisions received in each month, from whom, from what State, and the quantities delivered to the issuing commis- saries, their names, and at what posts ; also of all provisions remaining on hand, at what magazines, and in whose care; the returns to be made up to the last day of each month, and forwarded as soon as may be; to cause all 70 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. of his accounts with the United States to be closed annually, on the ist of January, and laid before the board of treasury for settlement by the ist day of March ensuing.” On the 28th of June, 1781, Congress passed the following order : “ Ordered, That a committee of three be appointed to devise the mode of transferring to the superintendent of finance the business of the several boards and departments to which the institution of his office extends, in or- der that the said boards and departments may be discontinued as soon as the situation of affairs will admit.” On the 10th of July Congress, in pursuance of the object contemplated by the foregoing order, upon the recommendation of the Board of War, passed the following resolution, transferring the duty of procuring all sup- plies for the Army to the superintendent of finance, then the head of the Treasury Department: “ Resolved, That the superintendent of finance be, and he is hereby au- thorized, either by himself or such other person or persons as he shall, from time to time, appoint for that purpose, to procure, on contract, all necessary supplies for the army or armies of the United States, and also for the navy artificers, or prisoners of war, and also the transportation thereof; and all contracts or agreements heretofore made, or which shall be hereafter made, by him, or persons under his authority, for the purpose aforesaid, are hereby declared to be binding on the United States.” Under this resolution the commissariat system of subsisting the army was discontinued and the method of contracts for rations adopted in its stead. The office of superintendent of finance was abolished by an ordinance of Congress passed May 28, 1784. This ordinance created a board of three commissioners, styled the “ Board of Treasury,” to be appointed by Congress, to superintend the Treasury and manage the finances of the United States. All the duties of the superintendent of finance were trans- ferred to this board, including, of course, the furnishing of subsistence, and all other classes, of army supplies, and providing transportation for the same. This duty was, however, rendered almost nominal by the legislation of June 2 and 3, which fixed the strength of the forces to be maintained in the service of the United States at about 800 men, 700 of whom were militia called into service for twelve months, “ for the protection of the northwestern frontiers, and for guarding the public stores.” There was no further legislation touching subsistence of the army until after the reorganization of the Government under the Constitution. Under the provisions of the first section of the act of the ist Congress, entitled “ An Act to establish an Executive Department, to be denominated the Department of War,” approved August 7, 1789, the duty of procuring “ warlike stores ” was entrusted to the Secretary of War, but by Section 5 of the act of May 8, 1792, making alterations in the Treasury and War Departments, the duty of making “all purchases and contracts for supply- ing the army with provisions, clothing, supplies in the quartermaster’s department, military stores, Indian goods, and all other supplies or articles for the use of the Department of War,” was again devolved upon the Treasury Department. THE SUBSISTENCE DEPARTMENT\ 71 An act was passed on the 23d of February, 1795, creating “ in the Depart- ment of the Treasury an officer to be denominated ‘purveyor of public sup- plies,’” whose duties were “under the direction and supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury, to conduct the procuring and providing of all arms, military and naval stores, provisions, Indian goods, and generally, ail articles of supply requisite for the service of the United States.” In 1798, there were serious apprehensions of a war with France, and Congress, apparently conscious of the inherent weakness of a military sys- tem so organized that the War Department did not have control of the pro- curement of its own supplies, restored to it that very essential function, by making the purveyor of public supplies, although an officer of the Treas- ury Department, subject to the orders of the Secretary of War in all matters relating to army supplies, except the auditing and settlement of accounts therefor, which were rendered to the Treasury Department, This restora- tion was effected by Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the act approved July 16, 1798, entitled “ An Act to alter and amend the several acts for the establishment and regulation of the Treasury, War and Navy Departments.” By Section 3 of the act approved March 16, 1802, entitled “An Act fix- ing the Military Peace Establishment of the United States,” it was provided that there should be “three military agents and such number of assistant military agents as the President of the United States shall deem expedient, not exceeding one to each military post; which assistants shall be taken from the line.” It was made the duty of the military agents “ to purchase, receive, and forward to their proper destination, all military stores and other articles for the troops in their respective departments, and all goods and annuities for the Indians, which they may be directed to purchase, or which shall be ordered into their care by the Department of War.” The military agency system proved to be unsatisfactory, but no action was taken by Congress towards its abolishment until 1812. Our relations with Great Britain had then become so much strained that Congress deemed it prudent to commence making preparations for war. An act was passed on the 2d of January of that year authorizing the President to raise a force of Rangers for the protection of the frontiers from invasion by the Indians; On the nth of the same month, an act was passed authorizing an increase in the army of ten regiments of infantry, two regiments of artillery, and one regiment of light dragoons and on the 6th of February another act was passed authorizing the President to accept the services of organized com- panies of volunteers, either of artillery, cavalry, or infantry, not exceeding, in the aggregate, 30,000 men. On the 28th of March, an act was passed abolishing the military agency system of supplying the Army, and substi- tuting therefor a Purchasing Department and a Quartermaster’s Depart- ment. The strained relations with Great Britain, heretofore alluded to, culmi- nated in a formal declaration of war by an act of Congress passed June 18, 1812. The new staff system did not, however, bring with it any change in the mode of subsisting the Army, which was by contracts for rations delivered at the places of issue. This mode of subsisting the Army, although it had 72 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. been in operation since 1781, was now, for the first time, to be subjected to the test of war. It soon proved to be a great failure, as official reports from Gen. Dearborn and other commanders of troops on the Canadian frontier, show that as early as November and December, 1812, they were in dire ex- tremities on account of deficiency of rations, arising from failure of con- tractors to make deliveries according to their contracts. On the 3d of March, 1813, an act was passed with the significant title of “An Act better to provide for the supplies of the Army of the United States, and for the accountability of persons intrusted with the same.” The second section of this act provided that there should be a “ superintendent- general of military supplies,” whose functions were to keep proper accounts of all the military stores and supplies purchased for, and distributed to, the Army of the United States; to prescribe the forms of all returns and ac- counts of such stores and supplies, and to credit and settle the accounts of disbursing officers ; also, to transmit all such orders, and, generally, to per- form all such other duties respecting the general superintendence, purchase, transportation, and safe-keeping of military stores and supplies, and the accountability therefor as might be prescribed by the Secretary of War. Section 8 of this act empowered the President to appoint one or more special commissaries for the purpose of supplying by purchase or contract, and of issuing, or to authorize any officer or officers of the Quartermaster’s Department to supply and issue the whole or any part of the subsistence of the Army, in all cases when, from want of contractors, or from any default on their part, or from any other contingency, such measure might be proper and necessary in order to insure the subsistence of the Army. Notwithstanding this remedial legislation, the trouble about purchasing rations for the troops from the contractors continued. On the 12th of No- vember, 1814, the Committee on Military Affairs of the House of Represen- tatives took up the matter, and, after having had the same under consider- ation, instructed its chairman to address a communication to the Secretary of War, requesting information on the following points, viz.: “ 1. What is the present mode of subsisting the Army? “ 2. If by contracts, what are the defects, if any, and the remedy ? “ 3. Whether any other mode can be adopted, combining, in a greater degree, certainty and promptitude with economy and responsibility? “ 4. Whether the alternative afforded by law of substituting commissaries for contractors has been adopted; and, if yes, what has been the general result ? ” Under date of December 23, 1814, the Acting Secretary of War, Hon. James Monroe, replied, in substance, that, not wishing to rely altogether on his own judgment in answering the inquiries of the committee as to the best mode of subsisting the Army, he had consulted the officers of the greatest experience who were within his reach, on the presumption that he should best promote the views of the committee by collecting all the infor- mation he could on the subject. He submitted, as inclosures to his reply, letters from Gen. Scott, Gen. Gaines and Col. Fenwick, all of whom ex- pressed a decided preference for the system of supply by commissaries to that by contractors. He also stated that he believed that officers generally THE SUBSISTENCE DEPARTMENT. 73 concurred with them in that preference, and that the proposition to estab- lish the commissariat system of subsisting the Army had his unqualified approval. On the next day, January 24, 1814, after the Committee on Military Affairs had presented the report of the Acting Secretary of War to the House of Representatives, Hon. George M. Troup, of Georgia, the chairman of the committee, introduced a bill entitled “ A Bill making provision for subsisting the Army of the United States, by authorizing the appointment of Commissaries of Subsistence,” which was read the first and the second time, and referred to the Committee of the Whole. On the 7th of February the bill, after having been amended in some respects, was passed and sent to the Senate. The bill was taken up in the Senate on the 10th of February, read the first and the second time, and referred to the Committee on Military Affairs. On the nth of February it was reported back to the Senate, with some pro- posed amendments. On the 13th of February the Senate, sitting as in committee of the whole, agreed to the proposed amendments, when the committee rose, and the bill, as amended, was reported back to the Senate and ordered to be engrossed and read the third time, as amended. On the 14th of February the bill was reported as correctly engrossed. On the 15th of February, on motion of Mr. Tait, of Georgia, the further consideration of the bill was postponed until the following Monday. This postponement was, presumably, due to the fact that on that day President Madison sent a message to the Senate transmitting a copy of the treaty of peace between Great Britain and the United States, which had been signed at Ghent on the 24th of December previous. On the 21st of February, the further consideration of the bill was again postponed until the following Monday. The return of peace had materially changed the aspect of our military affairs. The pressure of the necessity for immediate legislation changing the mode of subsisting the Army had been relaxed, and this, with the prox- imity of the end of the session of Congress, seems to have prevented the bill, although in such an advanced stage towards becoming a law, from being taken up according to postponement, or again before the final adjournment on the 4th of March, with which the Congress expired, and with it, of course, this, and all other pending bills. The subject was not again taken up by Congress until a repetition of our former adverse experiences with the contract mode of subsisting the Army brought it into conspicuous prominence. In 1817, the Seminole Indians, of Florida, then a province of Spain, be- gan to make hostile demonstrations on the southern frontier of Georgia, then embraced within the limits of the Division of the South, commanded by Maj.-Gen. Andrew Jackson. The available regular troops were ordered into the field, and, in addition, a brigade of Georgia militia, commanded by Brig.-Gen. Glasscock, was called into the service of the United States. The contractor for furnishing rations in the district covering the theatre of military operations, was duly notified to make deposits of provisions at the places where they would be needed in order to carry out the plan of 74 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. campaign, but he failed to do so with punctuality, and, in consequence, military movements were delayed, and, in December, 1817, and January, 1818, the situation had become well-nigh desperate. On the 21 st of January, 1818, the matter was brought to the attention of the Senate by Mr. Williams, of Tennessee, of the Committee on Military Affairs, who introduced a resolution, which was adopted, requesting the President of the United States “to inform the Senate in what manner the troops in the service of the United States, now operating against the Semi- nole tribe of Indians, have been subsisted, whether by contract or otherwise, and whether they have been furnished regularly with rations.” On the 30th of January, the President, Hon. James Monroe, replied by message, inclosing a report on the subject of the inquiry, from the Secretary of War, Hon. John C. Calhoun, stating that the method of subsisting the troops was by contract; that the Department of War, anticipating an in- creased demand for rations in that quarter, had made early and liberal advances of money to the contractor to enable him to give prompt obedi- ence to the requisitions of the commanding general; that requisitions for deposits, in advance, under the terms of the contract, at the several posts on the frontier of Georgia and in the adjacent territory, had been made; that, according to the last official reports, these requisitions had not been complied with, and that the commandant had detailed officers of the Army to supply the deficiency by purchase. He called attention to inclosed reports from Gen. Gaines, Gen. Glasscock, Col. Brearly, and Lieut.-Col. Arbuckle, showing the extent of the actual failure and the evils appre- hended from an anticipated one. On the 18th of February, Hon. James Barbour, of Virginia, introduced the following resolution in the Senate : “Resolved, That the Committee on Military Affairs be instructed to in- quire into the expediency of changing the mode of supplying the troops of the United States by contract, and substituting one cheaper and more effi- cient, by subjecting the parties who undertake that duty, to military law, in case of delinquency.” On the 20th of February, the Senate resumed consideration of this reso- lution, and adopted it. On the 24th of February, the Senate passed a resolution requesting the President of the United States to furnish the Senate with a copy of the contract under which rations were to be furnished at the several posts on the frontier of Georgia and in the adjoining territory; a statement of the amounts and dates of requisitions and by whom made; the particular in- stances in which the contractor had failed to furnish rations agreeably to his contract; the amount of money advanced by the Government for sup- plies, in consequence of such failures; and the amount of money advanced by the Government to the contractor, at or before the time of said failures. On the nth of March the President replied to the resolution, by mes- sage, transmitting a report from the Secretary of War containing the infor- mation called for. On the 20th of March, Mr. Williams, of Tennessee, from the Com- mittee on Military Affairs, to whom a bill entitled “ A Bill to reduce the THE SUBSISTENCE DEPARTMENT. 75 Staff of the Army,” had previously been referred, reported the same back to the Senate, with an amendment, which was read and, on the 25th of March, adopted. After further amendments of the amendment, in both the Sen- ate and House of Representatives, the bill finally became a law on the 14th of April, under the amended title of “ An Act regulating the Staff of the Army.” The amendments above referred to, constituted Sections 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, of the act as passed, and laid the foundation of the present Subsistence Department. These sections were as follows : “ Section 6. That as soon as the state of existing contracts for the subsistence of the army shall, in the opinion of the President of the United States, permit it, there shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, one commissary-general, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of colonel of ordnance, who shall, before entering on the duties of his office, give bond and security, in such sum as the Presi- dent may direct; and as many assistants, to be taken from the subalterns of the line, as the service may require, who shall receive $20 per month in addition to their pay in the line, and who shall, before entering on the duties of their office, give bond and security, in such sums as the President may direct. “ Section 7. That supplies for the army, unless, in particular and ur- gent cases, the secretary of war should otherwise direct, shall be purchased by contract, to be made by the commissary-general on public notice, to be delivered, on inspection, in the bulk, and at such places as shall be stipu- lated ; which contract shall be made under such regulations as the secretary of war may direct. “Section 8. That the President may make such alterations in the com- ponent parts of the ration as a due regard to the health and comfort of the army and economy may require. “ Section 9. That the commissary-general and his assistants shall not be concerned, directly or indirectly, in the purchase or sale, in trade or commerce, of any article entering into the composition of the ration allowed to the troops in the service of the United States, except on account of the United States, nor shall such officer take and apply to his own use any gain or emolument for negotiating or transacting any business connected with the duties of his office, other than what is or may be allowed by law; and the commissary-general and his assistants shall be subject to martial law. “ Section 10. That all letters to and from the commissary-general, which may relate to his office duties, shall be free from postage : Provided, That the sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth sections of this act shall continue and be in force for the term of five years from the passing of the same, and thence until the end of the next session of Congress, and no longer.” Col. George Gibson, of Pennsylvania, then a quartermaster-general of division, which grade was abolished by Section 3 of the above-mentioned act, was appointed commissary-general of subsistence, on the 18th of April, 1818, and his appointment was announced to the Army in a general order HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. issued on the 30th of April, 1818. The new system of subsisting the Army did not, however, go into operation until the 1st of June, 1819. On the 28th of December, 1820, pursuant to a resolution of the House of Representatives adopted on the 20th of November previous, Mr. Smyth, of Virginia, from the Committee on Military Affairs, reported an elaborate bill to reduce the Army to six thousand men. This bill, after having been debated in both branches of Congress, and sundry amendments made thereto, finally became a law on the 2d of March, 1821, under the title of ‘ An Act to reduce and fix the Military Peace Establishment of the United, States.” By the following section of this act, the organization of the Sub- sistence Department provided for by the act of April 14, 1818, was retained with only slight modifications : “ Section 8. And be it further enacted, That there shall be one commis- sary-general of subsistence ; and there shall be as many assistant commis- saries as the service may require, not exceeding fifty, who shall be taken from the subalterns of the line, and shall, in addition to their pay in the line, receive a sum not less than $10, nor more than $20, per month; and that assistant quartermasters and assistant commissaries of subsistence, shall be subject to duties in both departments, under the orders of the Sec- retary of War.” The foregoing resolution superseded so much of Section 6 of the Act of April 14, 1818, as related to the number and grades of officers in the Sub- sistence Department, and was a permanent enactment. The other pro- visions of Section 6, and Sections 7, 8, 9, and 10, of the Act of April 14, 1818, which were untouched by this legislation, retained their temporary character. President Monroe, in his annual message to Congress, dated December 3, 1822, in referring to the new system of subsisting the Army, made the following suggestion : “ It appearing that so much of the act entitled ‘ An Act regulating the Staff of the Army,’ which passed on the 14th of April, 1818, as relates to the commissariat, will expire in April next, and the practical operation of that department having evinced its great utility, the propriety of its renewal is submitted for your consideration.” On the 17th of December, 1822, Mr. Eustis, of Massachusetts, chairman of the Committee on Military Affairs, introduced a bill in the House of Representatives, to carry into effect the foregoing suggestion, which bill became a law on the 23d of January, 1823, in the following form ; “ An Act to continue the present mode of supplying the Army of the United States. “ Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth sections of the act entitled, ‘ An Act regulating the Staff of the Army,’ passed April fourteenth, eighteen hundred and eighteen, be, and the same are hereby, continued in force for the term of five years, and until the end of the next session of Congress thereafter.” On the 29th of April, 1826, the rank of brigadier-general, by brevet, was conferred on Colonel Gibson, the commissary-general of subsistence, under THE SUBSISTENCE DEPARTMENT. 77 the provisions of Section 4 of the Act of July 6, 1812, “ for ten years’ faith- ful service in one grade.” On the 9th of November, 1827, General Gibson addressed a letter to the Secretary of War, Hon. James Barbour, making the following recommend- ations: “ Presuming that the utility of the present mode of subsisting the army to be sufficiently tested by eight years of successful experiment, I beg leave to suggest the expediency of asking Congress to make the depart- ment permanent. “ I am also induced to request your recommendation for a law authoriz- ing the appointment of two majors to Commissariat Department, whose services are required to enable me more efficiently to conduct its operations.” Secretary Barbour made this letter an enclosure to his annual report for that year, with the following commendatory reference : “ I beg leave, also, to recommend to the favorable consideration of Congress the alterations proposed by the commissary-general of subsistence, in the organization of the Subsistence Department, presuming that the mode of supplying the army by commissariat, whose advantages have been so satisfactorily mani- fested, will be continued by a new act of legislation, the former act being about to expire.” A bill in conformity with the foregoing recommendations was intro- duced in the House of Representatives, on the 2d of January, 1828, by Mr. Hamilton, of South Carolina, chairman of the Committee on Military Affairs. No further action, however, was taken on the bill until the next session of Congress, when it was taken up, and, after having been materially amended, was passed on the 2d of March, 1829, under the title of ‘"An Act to continue the present mode of supplying the Army of the United States.” This act extended for an additional term of five years, and until the end of the next session of Congress thereafter, the provisions of the sixth seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth sections of the Act of April 14, 1818, tempo- rarily establishing the commissariat system of subsisting the army, which had been similarly extended twice previously, and authorized the appoint- ment of two commissaries of subsistence, to be taken from the line of the army, one with the same rank, pay and emoluments as a quartermaster, and the other with the same rank, pay and emoluments as an assistant- quartermaster. The next legislation affecting the Subsistence Department was sug- gested by Hon. Lewis Cass, Secretary of War. In his annual report for 1833, he said: “ The act organizing the Subsistence Department expires by its own limitation on the 2d of March next. It was originally passed in 1818, and has been continued by successive temporary acts till the present time. The reason of this course of legislation is undoubtedly to be found in the fact that the introduction of this system was an experiment, and it was deemed prudent to test its operation before a permanent character was given to it. This has been fully done, and the result is, in every point of view, satisfactory. * * * “ I consider that the time has arrived when the present arrangement 78 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. should be rendered permanent, and I therefore present the subject with that view to your notice,” * * * On the 19th of December, 1833, Hon. Richard M. Johnson, of Kentucky, from the Committee on Military Affairs of the House of Representatives, introduced a bill “to render permanent the present mode of supplying the Army of the United States,” which, after some preliminary action thereon, went over to the next session of Congress, when it was taken up and passed—becoming a law on the 3d of March, 1835. A defect in the organization of the staff departments was brought to the attention of Congress by Hon. Benjamin F. Butler, of New York, Acting Secretary of War, in his annual report, dated December 3, 1836, which he described and commented upon as follows : “ The present system seems to have been formed upon the principle of concentrating the business of these departments at the seat of Government, and of employing therein a very small number of officers commissioned in the staff ; the deficiencies being supplied by selections from the line. This arrangement is very well adapted to a time of profound peace, when officers can be spared from the line without injury to the service : when the posi- tions of the troops are chiefly permanent; and when the changes which occur are made with so much deliberation as to afford ample time for pre- paring adequate means for transportation and supply ; but when large bodies of troops whose numbers and movements may be varied by unfore- seen contingencies, are to be supplied in the field, and at a great distance from the seat of Government, the system is worse than insufficient; it is the parent of confusion and delay. * * * To prevent inconveniences of this sort, it is evident that staff officers of experience and rank must be associ- ated with the commander; and to supply such associates, the staff depart- ments must be enlarged.” On the 8th of December, 1836, Hon. Thomas H. Benton, of Missouri, chairman of the Committee on Military Affairs, introduced a bill in the Senate “ to increase the present Military Establishment of the United States, and for other purposes,” which contained provisions based on the foregoing recommendation. The bill was passed by the Senate on the 16th of February, 1837. It was taken up in the House of Representatives on the 3d of March, but on ac- count of the proximity of the end of the session, was laid over, and not taken up again until the next session of Congress, when it was passed, and became a law on the 5th of July, 1838. By Section 11 of this act, it was provided : “ That there be added to the commissariat of subsistence one assistant commissary-general of subsistence, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of a lieutenant-colonel of cavalry; one commissary of subsistence, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of a quartermaster of the army ; and three com- missaries of subsistence, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of assistant quartermasters.” The expansion of the Subsistence Department to the extent necessary to enable it to meet the requirements of the service in the war with Mexico, in 1846, was provided for by Section 5 of an act entitled “ An Act supplemen- THE SUBSISTENCE DEPARTMENT. 79 tal to an act entitled ‘ An Act providing for the prosecution of the existing war between the United States and the Republic of Mexico,’ and for other purposes,” approved June 18, 1846, which authorized the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to appoint as many additional officers as the service might require, not exceeding one commissary of subsistence with the rank of major for each brigade, and one assistant commissary of sub- sistence with the rank of captain for each regiment—the said additional of- ficers to “ continue in service only so long as their services shall be required in connection with the militia and volunteers.” On the 30th of May, 1848, Bvt. Brig.-Gen. Gibson, commissary-general of subsistence, was appointed a major-general, by brevet, “ for meritorious conduct, particularly in performing his duties in prosecuting the war with Mexico.” On the 4th of January, 1850, Gen. Gibson addressed a letter to the Sec- retary of War, Hon. G. W. Crawford, requesting “ that there be added to the Subsistence Department four commissaries of subsistence with the rank of captain, to be taken from the line of the Army.” In explanation of the necessity for this increase, Gen. Gibson said : “ The addition of Oregon, California, New Mexico and Texas to our ter- ritory compels me to ask for an increase in the number of officers in the Subsistence Department. Each of these commands requires the presence of an officer of the Commissariat, and from no point occupied by my offi- cers can one be spared for these duties.” Gen. Gibson further explained that the necessity for the additional num- ber of officers asked for was of a permanent character. On the 30th of January, the Secretary of War transmitted copies of this letter to both branches of Congress, and recommended it to their favorable consideration. On the 26th of September, an act was passed, entitled “ An Act to increase the commissariat of the United States Army,” authorizing “ That there be added to the subsistence department four commissaries of subsistence, with the rank of captain, to be taken from the line of the army.” The next legislation affecting the Subsistence Department was to facili- tate its expansion to the extent necessary to meet the requirements for an increase in the Army of 500,000 men, provided for by the act entitled “ An Act to authorize the employment of Volunteers to aid in enforcing the Laws and protecting Public Property,” approved July 22, 1861. This act provided that the forces to be raised thereunder should be organized into divisions and brigades; each division to consist of three or more brigades ; each brigade of four or more regiments; and that each brigade, among other general-staff officers, should have “ one commissary of subsistence.” By Section 2 of an act entitled “An Act for the better organization of the Military Establishment,” approved August 3, 1861, the Subsistence De- partment was increased by the addition thereto of “four commissaries of subsistence, each with the rank, pay, and emoluments of a major of cavalry; eight commissaries of subsistence, each with the rank, pay, and emoluments of a captain of cavalry, and to be taken from the line of the army, either the volunteers or the regular army.” 80 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Gen. Gibson died on the 29th of September, 1861, after having served as commissary-general of subsistence forty-three years and five months. Lieut.-Col. Joseph P. Taylor, assistant commissary-general of subsist- ence, was promoted commissary-general of subsistence with the rank of colonel, vice Gibson, deceased. The 10th section of the act of July 17, 1862, entitled “ An Act to amend the Act calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrection, and repel invasion, approved February 28, 1796, and the Act amendatory thereof, and for other purposes,” authorized the President “ to establish and organize army corps, according to his discretion.” The 10th section of the same act prescribed the staff of the commander of an army corps, and allowed to him, among other general staff officers, one commis- sary of subsistence with the rank of lieutenant-colonel, to be assigned by the President from the regular army or the volunteers. By the following act, approved February 9, 1863, the Subsistence De- partment was given a stronger and more symmetrical organization, better adapted to the exigencies of war : “ An act to promote the efficiency of the Commissary Department. “ Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That there be added to the sub- sistence department of the army one brigadier-general, to be selected from the subsistence department, who shall be commissary-general of subsistence, and, by regular promotion, one colonel, one lieutenant-colonel, and two majors; the colonels and lieutenant-colonels to be assistant commissaries- general of subsistence, and that vacancies in the above-mentioned grades shall be filled by regular promotions in said department; and the vacancies created by promotions herein authorized may be filled by selections from the officers of the regular or volunteer force.” Under the provisions of the foregoing act, Col. Joseph P. Taylor, com- missary-general of subsistence, was appointed commissary-general of sub- sistence, with the rank of brigadier-general. On the 29th of June, 1864, Gen. Taylor died, after having served as an officer of the Subsistence Department thirty-five years, and as its chief nearly three years in the most eventful period of its existence. Col. Amos B. Eaton, the senior assistant commissary-general of subsist- ence, was appointed the successor of Gen. Taylor. The War of the Rebellion closed in 1865. The magnitude of the opera- tions of the Subsistence Department during the four years of that war, is indicated by the following table, showing the amount of its disbursements for each year, and the total amount thereof : From July i, 1861, to June 30, 1862 $48,799,521.14 From July 1, 1862, to June 30, 1863 69,537,582.78 From July 1, 1863, to June 30, 1864 98,666,918.50 From July 1, 1864, to June 30, 1865 144,782,969.41 Total $361,786,991.83 When the war closed there were in service of the Subsistence Depart - THE SUBSISTENCE DEPARTMENT. 81 ment the 29 officers constituting the permanent establishment, and 535 com- missaries of volunteers, making a total of 564 officers. In referring to the operations of the Subsistence Department, in his an- nual report for 1865, Hon. Edwin M. Stanton, Secretary of War, said : “ During the war this branch of the service never failed. It answers to the demand, and is ever ready to meet the national call.” The act of July 28, 1866, entitled “ An Act to increase and fix the Mili- tary Peace Establishment of the United States,” contained the following provisions fixing the organization of the Subsistence Department, and en- larging its province. “Section 16. And be itfurther enacted, That the subsistence depart- ment of the army shall hereafter consist of the number of officers now au- thorized by law, viz.: one commissary-general of subsistence, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of a brigadier-general; two assistant commissaries- general of subsistence, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of colonels of cavalry; two assistant commissaries-general of subsistence, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of lieutenant-colonels of cavalry; eight commissa- ries of subsistence, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of majors of cav- alry ; and sixteen commissaries of subsistence, with the rank, pay, and emol- uments of captains of cavalry.” “ Section 23. And be itfurther enacted, That the adjutant-general, quar- termaster-general, commissary-general of subsistence, surgeon-general, pay- master-general, chief of engineers, and chief of ordnance shall hereafter be appointed by selection from the corps to which they belong.” “ Section 25. And be it further enacted, That the office of sutler in the army and at military posts is hereby abolished, and the subsistence depart- ment is hereby authorized and required to furnish such articles as may from time to time be designated by the inspector-general of the army, the same to be sold to officers and enlisted men at cost prices, and if not paid for when purchased a true account thereof shall be kept and the amount due the government shall be deducted by the paymaster at the payment next following such purchase : Provided, That this section shall not go into ef- fect until the first day of July, eighteen hundred and sixty-seven.” Section 16, above quoted, was a codification of all existing laws relating to the personnel of the Subsistence Department, except the provision of Section 8 of the act of March 2, 1821, authorizing not exceeding fifty assist- ant commissaries of subsistence, to be taken from the subalterns of the line, which, therefore, fell under the operation of the repealing clause. By Section 24 of the Army-appropriation act, approved July 15, 1870, it was provided that the pay of an acting assistant commissary of subsistence should be one hundred dollars per annum, in addition to the pay of his rank. The office of acting assistant commissary of subsistence was not au- thorized by a general law, but was maintained under a provision annually re-enacted in the army-appropriation acts. General Eaton, “ having served faithfully more than forty-five years.” was retired from active service, under the provisions of Section 12 of the act of July 17, 1862, by a general order issued on the 16th of February, 1874, to take effect on the 1st of May following. 82 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. General Eaton was granted a leave of absence from the date of the above mentioned order until the date of his retirement, and Col. Alex- ander E. Shiras, the senior assistant commissary-general of subsistence, was designated to perform the duties of commissary-general of subsistence, and ordered to relieve General Eaton. Colonel Shiras performed the duties of commissary-general of subsistence until the date of General Eaton’s retire- ment, and, thereafter, until the removal of the bar to promotions and appointments in the Subsistence Department and other staff corps and departments imposed by Section 6 of the Army-appropriation act of March 3, 1869. By Section 3 of the Act of June 23, 1874, entitled “ An Act to reorganize the several Staff Corps of the Army,” the number of assistant commissaries general of subsistence with the rank of lieutenant-colonel, was increased from two to three, and the number of commissaries of subsistence with the rank of captain, was reduced from sixteen to twelve. Section 8 of the above-mentioned act repealed so much of Section 6 of the Army-appropriation act of March 3, 1869, as prohibited promotions and appointments in the Ordnance, Subsistence and Medical Departments, and Col. Shiras was then appointed commissary-general of subsistence, vice Eaton, retired. Gen. Shiras died on the 14th of April, 1875, and was succeeded by Maj. Robert Macfeely, commissary of subsistence. The office of “ acting assistant commissary of subsistence ” expired with the Army-appropriation act for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1882, and was superseded by the office of “ acting commissary of subsistence,” which was provided for by the Army-appropriation act approved July 5, 18S2, and has since been continued by annual reenactments. Gen. Macfeely served as commissary-general of subsistence until July 1, 1890, when, having reached the age of sixty-four years, he was retired from active service under the operation of the first section of the Act of June 30, 1882. Col. Beekman Du Barry, the senior assistant commissary-general of subsistence, succeeded Gen. Macfeely, and upon his retirement from active service in December, 1892, was succeeded by Col. John P. Hawkins, the present commissary-general of subsistence. M A J O R-GENER AL ANTHONY WAYNE Commanding the Army, 1792-1796. THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT. MAJOR CHARLES SMART, Surgeon U. S. A. THE Medical Department of the United States Army is as old as the United States, for when the patriot shouldered his rifle and sallied forth to see what was happening on the road to Lexington, the doctor hastily replenished his saddlebags and went out to help such of his neighbors as might require his professional assistance ; and by- and-bye, when the patriots became organized into companies and regiments, the doctor stayed with them, having been provided with an official status to warrant him in doing so. This authority came at first from the colonels of regiments, and the surgeons so appointed were authorized to select their own assistants or mates, as they were then called ; but the incompetency of this method to secure an efficient medical service was soon manifest, and the Provincial Congress of Massachusetts Bay took the matter in hand, requiring each candidate for a position in the Medical Department of the Army to be subjected to a close examination by qualified medical men. There was nothing pro forma in these examinations; for it is on record that no less than six of a set of fourteen were rejected on account of failure to come up to the standard. Examination to determine fitness is a recent re- quirement in the United States. The Civil Service Commission belongs to the last decade, and it is only the other day that military officers became subject to examination for promotion ; but medical men were examined for service in the military body away back in 1775, and the system then insti- tuted has never ceased to be the rule. The Provincial Congress discovered also that something more was re- quired for the proper care of soldiers on a campaign than the appointment of a surgeon and his mates. After the fight at Breed’s Hill they found it needful to establish a general hospital for the wounded from many regi- ments—to provide it with supplies irrespective of those at the command of regimental surgeons, and to have medical men in attendance who belonged to no regiment but to the hospital department in general. Thus there be- came established a small corps of staff surgeons. In a short time, as regi- ment after regiment from beyond the limits of Massachusetts joined the army at Cambridge, the necessity for the adoption of some system of organ- ization became manifest. Most of the regiments brought medical officers with them, but few were supplied with the needful stores and medical sup- plies. A bill was adopted providing for a director-general whose duties were to furnish bedding, medicines, and all other necessaries; to pay for the same, superintend the whole and make his report to and receive orders from the commander-in-chief; four surgeons, one apothecary, twenty mates, a clerk, two store-keepers, and a nurse to every ten patients. Congress appointed the director-general, who was authorized to appoint the surgeons, 83 84 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. and these in their turn selected their mates. Shortly after his appoint- ment, the first director-general, Dr. Benjamin Church, was accused of trea- sonable practices. A letter in cipher, giving full information concerning the strength and position of the Continental troops, was attributed to him. The doctor acknowledged its authorship, but claimed that his intention was to impress the enemy with such an idea of our superiority as to prevent an attack at a time when we were out of ammunition. The court found him guilty and referred the case to Congress for punishment. After a confine- ment of some months his health failed and he was set at liberty under bonds to appear for trial when called. He sailed shortly afterwards for the West Indies, and the vessel is supposed to have foundered at sea, for she was never heard of again. Church’s successor, Dr. John Morgan, labored earnestly to keep the army supplied with stores for its sick ; but the difficulty of his task may be appreciated when it is observed that he had to make an appeal to the “ Publick.” In September, 1775, a congressional committee was appointed “to devise ways and means for supplying the army with medicines”; but it did little to overcome the difficulty. Ultimately it was realized that a director-general with the army could not satisfactorily perform the duties of a purveyor in the larger cities, and it was decided to appoint a druggist in Philadelphia “whose business it shall be to receive and deliver all medi- cines, etc.”; but the director-general was not thereby relieved of the duty of seeing that this work was satisfactorily performed. Besides the hospital at Cambridge, one was established at Ticonderoga for General Schuyler’s command, and, in 1776, a third at Williamsburg, Va. The position of surgeon at this time was no sinecure, for small-pox, typhus and typhoid fevers, diarrhoea and dysentery, were rife in the Continental armies. The army at Cambridge in September, 1775, consisted of 19,365 men, of whom 2817, or 14.5 per cent., were sick, present or absent; and in December the number taken sick weekly was from 675 to 1500, one-third of whom had to be sent to the small-pox hospitals. The general hospital system having been extended beyond the one hos- pital originally established at Cambridge, an act was passed allowing one surgeon and five mates to every 5000 men, with such other assistance as might be necessary. Certain of the provisions of this bill aroused a strong feeling on the part of the regimental surgeons against the hospital surgeons. It provided that the former should carry only medicines and instruments, and that when a man became so sick as to require medical stores he should be sent to hospital for treatment. The regimental surgeons claimed that they were thus subordinated too much to their comrades of the hospital. They had less rank and less pay than these, and now their stores and their sick were taken away, leaving them only the trifling ailments of camp to at- tend to. They claimed the right to take care of their own sick, and they were supported in this by a majority of the regimental and company officers; moreover, the hospitals were not prepared to take charge of the large num- ber of cases that would have been turned over to them at this time, and it was feared that an outbreak of typhus would be the result of attempting to overcrowd. A compromise was therefore effected by introducing the sys- THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT. 85 tem of hospital fund which exists in our army to the present time. The rations of the sick were to be commuted by the commissary of subsistence, and needful articles purchased with the money. In this way certain of the sick could be provided with hospital stores and treated in camp, the hospi- tals be relieved and the regimental surgeons in some measure satisfied. At this time the suffering for want of medical supplies in the northern army was attracting general attention. Letters from the troops were filled with complaints. There was not in the army enough of lint to dress the wounds of fifty men, not a dose of cinchona although malarial fevers were of frequent occurrence, nor any bedding, not even straw for the sick, who lay on the bare boards of the hospital floor. The country expected some- thing to be done to remedy this deplorable state of affairs. Director- General Morgan had done all in his power apparently to relieve the necessi- ties of this army. All his surplus stores had been sent to it, but there was delay in their arrival, in fact for some time during their transportation they were to all intents and purposes lost,—neither those who sent them nor those who wanted them being able to hear anything of their where- abouts. Regimental surgeons held the hospital surgeons responsible for this destitution, claiming that everything was kept in hospital for an emer- gency that might not occur, while men were dying by the hundred with their regiments. At this time also it unfortunately happened that a dis- pute arose as to rank between the director of this army, Dr. Stringer, and the director-general. The latter in sending supplies at Stringer’s request had also sent some surgeons, and the appointment of these had been regarded by the director as an infringement of his rights. Accordingly, when Stringer was sent by his commanding general to New York to hurry up supplies, he took the opportunity of going to Philadelphia to represent his grievances to Congress. He contended that he was not subordinate in his directorship, while Morgan, on whom this contention seems to have been forced, held that there was but one General Hospital, though consisting of several divi- sions each under a separate director, and but one head, the director-general. Stringer was supported in his attack on Morgan by the influence of the regimental surgeons, who bore the latter a grudge for building up the gen- eral hospital system at their expense. Meanwhile a congressional committee which had been investigating the condition of the northern army, made its report, and a resolution was adopted that “ Dr. John Morgan, director-gen- eral, and Dr. Samuel Stringer, director of the hospital in the northern army of the United States be, and they are hereby, dismissed from any further ser- vice in said offices.” Congress appeared to consider the contention as to rank, as the root of all the troubles, whereas it really lay deeper and was wholly independent of this ; and in summarily disposing of the case in this manner it did an injustice to the director-general which was in part atoned for later. About a year after his dismissal he succeeded in having a con- gressional inquiry into his conduct of affairs which approved him as able and faithful in the discharge of his duties, and a resolution was passed to that effect; but he was not reinstated. He retired to private life, disappoin- ted, and died not long after. In 1777, after Morgan’s dismissal, the Army Medical Committee of Con- 86 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. gress reported a bill for the establishment of a Medical Department, which had been drawn up by Dr. Wm. Shippen and Dr. Jno. Cochran. This was an elaborate affair, based on the organization of the British service and accepted because it was so, for, as Washington said : “ The number of offi- ders mentioned in the enclosed plan, I presume, are necessary for us, be- cause they are found so in the British hospitals.” Shippen was appointed director-general. The bill provided also for a deputy director-general, a physician-general, a surgeon-general, and an apothecary-general for each of the departments; an assistant deputy director and a commissary for each of the hospitals; senior physicians and surgeons, second surgeons, mates, stewards, matrons and nurses ; also for a physician and surgeon-general for each army, to have control over the regimental surgeons and their mates. This unwieldly establishment, which had been built up gradually through a long series of years in a country where rank and class distinctions had a prominence that was not to be found in the colonies, was accepted as the only solution of a problem which had been proved to be one of infinite dif- ficulty. Experience during the remaining years of the War of the Revolu- tion simplified the organization by removing its functionaries with the high sounding titles; and there seems no reason to doubt that had a little longer time been given, the establishment would have been resolved into a corps of surgeons and assistants taking rank in their grade by seniority and assigned to duty in accordance with their rank. In 1777 most of the hospitals were not only deficient in supplies but crowded with men who were prevented from going to the front merely be- cause they were unprovided with shoes, clothing and blankets. A general complaint was raised, and Dr. Benjamin Rush, physician-general of the hos- pital of the Middle Department, did not hesitate to attribute the destitution of the hospitals to the mismanagement of the director-general. As a par- tial remedy for this state of affairs the deputy director-general of each department was relieved from all other duties except that of purveying; and as the influence of British institutions was still at work in the elabora- tion of the organization, each of these was provided with a deputy to aid him in his work. The deposed director-general, Morgan, joined forces with Rush in endeavoring to throw discredit on Shippen’s work, with the result of bringing him to trial; but the court exonerated him and Congress ap- proved its findings, and in 1780, when the Medical Committee reported a bill to simplify the cumbersome organization, Shippen retained the director-generalship; but he resigned soon after and was succeeded by Cochran. The bill provided for the director-general, a chief physician for the hospitals of each department, and one for each separate army, and a purveyor for the whole. Promotion by seniority was authorized next year,—and the Medical Department was getting into excellent working con- dition when prospects of peace put an end to further progress. Officers were mustered out and furloughed, so that in 1784 the army of the United States consisted merely of some detachments of artillerymen who guarded stores at Fort Pitt and West Point. For some years subsequent to the close of the War of the Revolution the army of the United States consisted of troops enlisted for short periods THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT. 87 of service, with no provision for medical service other than that afforded by regimental medical officers. In 1798 quite a formidable force was raised in anticipation of trouble with France, and on the recommendation of Secretary McHenry, who had been a surgeon during the Revolution, a hospital establishment based on the later experiences of the war, was authorized ; but the war clouds became dissipated and this measure never went into practice. In 1802 a new departure was taken in appointing army medical officers. The army at that time was so small that the few surgeons and mates pro- vided on a regimental basis were wholly incapable of attending to the sick, scattered as they were at various posts along the frontier ; medical officers were therefore appointed to garrisons and posts and not to corps, as here- tofore. The act of March 16th allowed two surgeons and twenty-five mates as the peace or permanent garrison establishment. Additional troops levied in an emergency brought with them their regimental surgeons, and, if the needs of the service required the establishment of general hospitals, hos- pital surgeons of higher grade and rates of pay than the regular garrison surgeons were appointed temporarily. In this manner the Medical Depart- ment was enlarged to meet the necessities of the army in 1812. There was, however, no provision made for a chief of the department until March, 1813, when Dr. James Tilton, who had been a hospital surgeon during the Revolution, was appointed physician and surgeon-general. His management of affairs during the war appears to have given universal sat- isfaction. Many hospitals were established and broken up in the progress of events, but all were well kept, fully provided with necessaries and com- petent for all the work thrown upon them. Some, indeed, as that at Bur- lington, Vermont, under the superintendence of Surgeon Lovell, of the 9th Infantry, appear from the reports to have been model establishments. The regulations of these are extant and it is readily seen that their high charac- ter was due to efficient administration, discipline and cleanliness. During the Revolution Congress kept a special committee in constant session on the organization and needs of the Medical Department. During the War of 1812 the only legislation materially affecting the department was a much needed increase of pay for the regimental medical officers. These two facts alone suffice to indicate the excellence of Dr. Tilton’s administration. He returned to private life in 1815, when Congress fixed the peace establish- ment of the army at 10,000 men with a proportionally reduced staff of medical officers. In 1818 a bill which organized the general staff gave to the Medical De- partment for the first time in its history a permanent chief under the title of “ Surgeon - General.” The “ Director - General ” of the Revolutionary period and the “ Physician and Surgeon-General” of 1813 were temporary appointments to meet the emergencies of the times, but the surgeon-gen- eralcy now authorized, and to which Surgeon Joseph Lovell was promoted on account of his excellent record, was a permanent position on the military staff of the country. The same bill provided two assistant surgeons-gen- eral, one for each of the divisions, but these, from the duties prescribed for them, should rather have been called medical inspectors. Hospital and 88 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. garrison surgeons became consolidated under the title of post surgeons, and as these took rank after the surgeons of regiments, certain of the hospital surgeons who had served in high positions on important occasions had reason to be dissatisfied with the inferior status to which they were con- signed by this arrangement. The Medical Department was fortunate in having so able a man as Dr, Lovell appointed as its chief. He defined the duties of his subordinates, established an excellent system of accountability for property, revised and improved the character of the medical reports rendered, inspired his officers with the idea that as sanitary officers they had greater responsibilities than mere practicing physicians and surgeons, and labored earnestly to have their pay increased and their official status raised in proportion to his views of the importance of their duties. He also established an equitable system of exchange of posts or stations, so that one officer might not be retained unduly at an undesirable station. In 1821 the finishing touches were given to the organization of the department by doing away with the unnecessary positions of assistant sur- geons-general and apothecary-general, and consolidating the regimental surgeons with the general staff, so that the corps consisted simply of one surgeon-general, eight surgeons with the compensation of regimental sur- geons, and forty-five assistant surgeons with the compensation of post sur- geons ; but as this number was insufficient to provide one medical officer to each of the military posts, the system of employing civil physicians on contract was instituted. No great event occurred during the administration of Surgeon-General Lovell; but he kept the department in a high state of efficiency, so that when cholera appeared among the troops during the Black Hawk campaign of 1832, and when the Seminole outbreak took place toward the close of 1835, nothing was lacking for the care, comfort and professional treatment of the sick and wounded. He died in 1836, and a memorial in the Con- gressional Cemetery at Washington, erected by the medical officers of the army, expresses their appreciation of his high qualities of mind and heart. The senior surgeon, Thomas Lawson, then serving with the troops in Florida, succeeded to the surgeon-generalcy. Little of general interest occurred during the next ten years. The most important papers filed during this period were arguments, opinions and decisions on points connected with uniforms, rank and precedence of medi- cal officers and their right to enter into private practice in the vicinity of their stations. At last the concentration of troops on the Rio Grande and the probability of war with Mexico led to radical change in the character of the reports and papers received at the surgeon-general’s office. The needs of the time occasioned an addition of two surgeons and twelve assist- ant surgeons to the medical staff, and ten new regiments were enlisted, each provided with a surgeon and two assistants. These were intended to be merely provisional appointments to be vacated by the incumbents when their services were no longer required at the close of the war. Ultimately, however, not only were the staff appointments made permanent, but ten additional assistants were authorized on account of the increasing THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT. 89 needs of the department after the acquisition of California and New Mexico. During the Mexican War the senior surgeons were assigned as medical directors and in charge of general hospitals; certain of the juniors were on duty at the hospitals and purveying depots and the others in the field as regimental officers with the regular troops ; volunteer surgeons were on duty with their regiments with occasional details for duty in the hospitals. The surgeon-general left his office and took the field with General Scott that he might better superintend the operations of his department. General hospitals were established at New Orleans and Baton Rouge, La., at Point Isabel, Matamoras, Camargo and Monterey, at Vera Cruz, Plan del Rio, Jalapa and other points en rozite to the City of Mexico, and lastly, in that city itself. There was much sickness during the invasion. Diarrhoea, dysentery and remittent fevers were the prominent diseases. These were attributed to exposures on the plateaus immediately after the march across the tierra caliente, where, on account of the heat, the troops, many of them raw, had thrown away their overcoats and blankets, and had not been able to replace them. Moreover, many of the commands had become infected with yellow fever while at Vera Cruz. Nevertheless the hospital service was competent to the care of all cases, and every official report that was rendered commented on the excellent management of the Medical Depart- ment. “ The Medical Staff,” said General Taylor after the battle of Buena Vista, “ under the able direction of Assistant Surgeon Hitchcock, were assiduous in their attentions to the wounded upon the field and in their careful removal to the rear. Both in these respects, and in the subsequent organization and service of the hospitals, the administration of this depart- ment was everything that could be wished.” The surgeon-general gained the rank of brigadier-general by brevet and other medical officers seem to have earned brevets although they did not receive them. Every subordinate commander had something to say in his reports of the ability, energy and courage of the members of the medical staff on duty with his command. The intrepidity with which they exposed themselves on the field gained them special mention after every battle. Some of them, indeed, were over gallant, and exposed themselves outside of the line of their duty. Thus, General Wool noted the gallantry of Assistant Surgeon Prevost, whom he took for a newly arrived staff officer and addressed as captain, making use of him in rallying the flying troops and in bringing up the Mississippi and Tennessee regiments to charge the enemy under most trying circumstances. This was commendable service on the part of this young officer, as the con- ditions were special and urgent and affected the well-being of the whole army; but the same cannot be said of the action of Assistant Surgeon Roberts, who left his wounded to the care of the steward and nurses to take the place of a disabled company officer in the attack on Molino del Rey, and was mortally wounded while leading the company. In encoun- ters with Indians in earlier and later times medical officers have been fre- quently called upon to engage as combatants until the time of general dan- ger was over, because the loss of the field in such a case meant the slaughter of every wounded man ; but the sacrifice of his life by Dr. Roberts seems 90 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. to have been wholly uncalled for by the conditions of the moment. Lastly, at Puebla, when 800 of our troops with 1500 sick in the hospitals were be- sieged for thirty days by Santa Anna, those of the invalids who were able to bear arms were organized by Surgeon Madison Mills and contributed materially to the defense. The war with Mexico was as brilliant a series of victories for the medical staff in overcoming the difficulties of the environ- ment and caring tenderly for their sick and wounded as it was for the in- vading columns of our small army. The additions to the numerical force of the Medical Department during and after the Mexican War proved insufficient for the needs of our scattered army ; but although the surgeon-general repeatedly called attention to his necessities, it was not until 1856 that an increase of four surgeons and eight assistants was authorized. The same bill provided for the enlistment of hospital stewards with the rank, pay and emoluments of sergeants of ord- nance, and gave extra duty pay to the men detailed as cooks and nurses in the post hospitals. Up to this time the steward had been merely a detailed man, and it not unfrequently happened that after a medical officer had spent much time and labor in educating one and instructing him in his special duties, his work would be lost by the return of the man to his com- pany. Extra duty pay had been allowed to hospital attendants from 1819, but a ruling of the Treasury Department had deprived them of it and ren- dered necessary the clause relating to it in this bill. The Utah expedition of 1857 found the Medical Department fully pre- pared for any emergency, but no general hospital was established, as the regimental hospitals sufficed for the care of the sick. Surgeon-General Lawson died of apoplexy in 1861, after a service of forty years, during thirty-four of which he had been chief of the depart- ment. To his earnestness of purpose and untiring energy the medical offi- cers of the army owed much of the recognition which they had obtained from Congress. He was succeeded by Dr. Clement A. Finley, then the senior surgeon on the army list. Just before the death of Surgeon-General Lawson the Civil War had been opened by the attack on Fort Sumter; and from the calls for large bodies of troops issued by the President, and the feeling north and south that a desperate struggle was before the country, it was evident that with- out large reinforcements the Medical Department would be incapable of carrying on successfully its share of the work. At this time it consisted of one surgeon-general with the rank of colonel, thirty surgeons with the rank of major, and eighty-three assistants with the rank of lieutenant for the first five years of their service and that of captain until subsequent promotion. Three of these surgeons and twenty-one assistants resigned “to go South,” and three assistants were dismissed for disloyalty. In August, 1861, ten additional surgeons and twenty assistants were authorized, and a corps of medical cadets was formed, not to exceed fifty in number, to be employed under the direction of medical officers as dressers in hospital. Some of the members of this corps did excellent service, but as a whole it was numer- ically too small to make itself felt as a power for good. The medical staff of the regular establishment was speedily assigned to THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT. 91 duty in connection with the preparations for the coming struggle. Some took charge as medical directors of the corps and armies that were formed, instructing the volunteer officers in the duties of camp, and organizing them by brigades for hospital and battle-field service ; others acted as medi- cal inspectors, aiding the directors in their work of supervision and educa- tion ; some organized general hospitals for the sick that had to be provided for on every move of the army, while others kept these hospitals and the armies in the field supplied with medicines, hospital stores, furniture, bed- ding, and surgical supplies ; the remainder were assigned to field service with the regular regiments and batteries. Each volunteer regiment brought with it a surgeon and an assistant (afterwards two assistants) appointed by the Governor of the State after ex- amination by a State medical board. The efficiency of this service was further guarded by a central board for the reexamination of any regimental medical officer whose professional competency had been called in question. The senior surgeon of each brigade became invested with authority as on the staff of the brigade commander; but as seniority was determined by a few days or weeks at furthest, it often happened that the best man for the position was not rendered available by this method. Congress therefore authorized a corps of brigade surgeons who were examined for position by the board then in session for officers of the regular corps. One hundred and ten of these brigade surgeons were commissioned. In April, 1862, a bill was passed by Congress to meet the pressing needs of the Medical Department. This gave the regular army an addition of ten surgeons, ten assistants, twenty medical cadets and as many hospital stew- ards as the surgeon-general might deem necessary ; and it provided for a temporary increase in the rank of those officers who were holding positions of great responsibility. It gave the surgeon-general the rank, pay and emoluments of a brigadier-general; it provided for an assistant surgeon- general and a medical inspector-general of hospitals, each with the rank, etc., of a colonel of cavalry, and for eight medical inspectors with the rank of lieutenant-colonel. These original vacancies were filled by the President by selection from the army medical officers and the brigade surgeons of the volunteer forces, having regard to qualifications only instead of to seniority or previous rank. At the termination of their service in these positions medical officers of the regular force were to revert to their former status in their own corps with such promotion as they were properly entitled to. About the time of this enactment Surgeon-General Finley was retired at his own request after forty years service and Assistant Surgeon Wm. A. Ham- mond was appointed the first surgeon-general with the rank of brigadier- general. In December following eight more inspectors were added. Their duties were to supervise all that related to the sanitary condition of the army, whether in transports, quarters or camps, as well as the hygiene, police, discipline and efficiency of field and general hospitals; to see that all regulations for protecting the health of the troops, and for the careful treat- ment of the sick and wounded, were duly observed ; to examine into the condition of supplies, and the accuracy of medical, sanitary, statistical, mili- tary and property records and accounts of the Medical Department; to in- 92 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. vestigate the causes of disease and the methods of prevention ; they were required also to be familiar with the regulations of the Subsistence Depart- ment in all that related to the hospitals, and to see that the hospital fund was judiciously applied ; finally, they reported on the efficiency of medical officers, and were authorized to discharge men from service on account of disability. Shortly after this the corps of brigade surgeons was reorganized to give them a position on the general staff similar to that of the army medical officer, and render their services available to the surgeon-general at any point where they might be most needed irrespective of regimental or brigade organizations. They henceforth became known as the “ Corps of Surgeons and Assistant Surgeons of Volunteers ” ; and the appointment of forty surgeons and one hundred and twenty assistants was authorized. Promotion or increased rank is the reward in the military service for duty well performed; but little incentive of this kind was offered to medical officers during the War of the Rebellion. Many who entered as surgeons had no promotion to look forward to; and they saw their comrades of the line, formerly their equals or inferiors in rank, mount upwards step by step while there remained to them nothing but the reward of a good conscience. The sixteen lieutenant-colonelcies held by the medical inspectors offered no chance of promotion to the vast number of those who looked up to them. Surgeon-General Hammond made several efforts to obtain increased rank for the medical directors of armies. That a medical officer on duty as medical director held only the rank of major, although responsible for the work of five or six hundred officers, one-third of whom had a rank equal to his own, seemed an oversight that required only to be pointed out to be im- mediately remedied,—the more so that the corresponding officers of the Adjutant General’s, the Quartermaster’s and Subsistence Departments, were assigned to their duties as colonels; yet the efforts of the surgeon-general were met by a curt refusal on the ground that the skill and efficiency of surgeons were not dependent upon rank and pay. The reply was to the effect that surgical ability was not in question; that the duties of a medical director were purely administrative, and that for the proper performance of such duties rank was essential; but no action was taken upon this subject until towards the close of the war, when Congress recognized the responsi- bilities of these officers by giving the rank of lieutenant-colonel to the director of a corps and of colonel to that of an army. It is seen, therefore, that during this great war the work of the Medical Department was performed by the regular medical officers and the corps of volunteer surgeons and assistant surgeons, both commissioned by the President, and by the large body of regimental medical officers commis- sioned by the Governors of States. In addition to these, civil physicians, known as acting assistant surgeons, were employed under contract, mostly in the wards of the general hospitals established in the vicinity of the na- tional capitol and many of the large cities. Just before the close of the war another class of medical officers was authorized. Regimental surgeons whose regiments had been mustered out on account of the expiration of their terms of service were offered the position of acting staff surgeons as THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT. 93 an inducement for them to continue in service ; and a few were thus led to return, for assignment in the field or base hospitals. The ambulance corps must also be mentioned as a part of the machinery of the Medical Depart- ment. An ambulance service consisting of men specially enlisted and under the command of medical officers was urged by General Hammond, but no action was taken at the time on his suggestion. Somewhat later, however, a corps was organized from detailed men, with lieutenants as brigade and division officers, and a captain on the staff of the commanding general as chief of ambulances of the army corps. These officers were practically acting quartermasters for the Medical Department so far as related to the transportation of the sick and wounded. In 1864 Surgeon-General Hammond was tried by court-martial and dis- missed from the service on account of disorders and neglects in relation to the purchase of blankets, medicines and medical stores of inferior quality. General Hammond contended that the law authorized him not only to in- dicate to medical purveyors what and where they should purchase, but even to send the order himself, particularly under the emergency calls of a great war, and that in none of the specified instances had he been actuated by any motive other than that of performing the important duties of his office with credit to himself and benefit to the invalids who depended on his department for their care and comfort. Nevertheless, the proceedings were approved August 18, 1864, and Medical Inspector-General J. K. Barnes, who had been acting surgeon-general pending the trial, was appointed to the vacancy. It is scarcely needful, so far as General Hammond is con- cerned, to say that this sentence has been annulled and set aside. Fourteen years after it was promulgated he came before Congress for relief. The Senate Military Committee in its report reviewed the case and the history of the times, showing how there came to be a want of cordiality between the Secretary of War and the surgeon-general, and that, in consequence, the weaker went to the wall. The bill which replaced his name on the Army Register was approved March 18, 1878. In the early period of the war the unit of organization for field work was the regimental hospital, but the advantages of consolidation became speedily manifest. When the sick exceeded the capacity of the regimental accommodation, brigade hospitals were established to receive the overflow and obviate the necessity for sending temporarily disabled soldiers to dis- tant general hospitals. After a battle the cooperative work of the surgeons of a brigade was found to give infinitely better results than could be obtained by preserving the individuality of the regimental hospitals. A larger experience of these advantages led to the consolidation of the brig- ade hospitals of a division for administrative purposes into a field hospital for the division. These worked so well in the Western Army, and in the Army of the Potomac during the battle of Antietam, that thereafter orders were published calling for their establishment as soon as an engagement was imminent. A medical officer was assigned to the command of the division hospitals; assistants were detailed to provide food and shelter and keep the records, and the best surgeons of each brigade were assigned to duty at the operating tables. Those officers who were not required for 94 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. special service in the hospital accompanied their commands into action and established dressing stations at convenient points in rear of the line of bat- tle where the wounded were prepared for transportation by the ambulances of the hospital. At the beginning of a campaign a standing order was pro- mulgated by the medical director detailing his medical officers to their various duties in case of an engagement. The chief of the hospital and his assistants were permanent details, sometimes staff instead of regimental surgeons. They remained at all times with the ambulances on the march and in camp. When a line of battle was formed, a suitable site was selected to which the ambulance train brought up the tents and supplies for the establishment of the hospital, and the ambulance officers proceeded to the dressing stations to bring in the wounded. The success of this field hos- pital system was such that in many commands its existence was continued during the period of inactivity in winter quarters, only trivial ailments being treated in camp by the regimental medical officers, whose medical knap- sacks were replenished from time to time from the supplies of the hospital. When established on the battle-field the objects of the division hospital were to give shelter and surgical care, with time and facilities for the per- formance of all needful primary operations. As soon as this work was accomplished the wounded were sent to the base of supplies in ambulance or other available wagons of the Quartermaster, Subsistence or Ordnance Department, and from this they were shipped by rail or steamboat to north- ern cities where ample accommodation and comforts were provided in the magnificent system of general hospitals which had been established. At first the Medical Department labored under considerable disadvan- tage on account of its dependence on the Quartermaster Department for its transportation in the field, and by sea and rail, as well as for its hospital buildings ; but in progress of time these difficulties became smoothed over by the organization of the ambulance corps for the field transportation of the wounded, and the building of special hospitals and hospital steamers which were placed under the orders of the Medical Department. The ex- tent of the provision for the care and treatment of the sick and wounded may be appreciated when it is observed that in December, 1864, there were in the general hospital of the North 118,057 beds, 34,648 of which were un- occupied and ready for the accommodation of those who might be disabled at any time in the progress of events on the theatre of war. During the war there were reported on the monthly reports of medical officers 6,454,834 cases of sickness and injury, 195,627 of which were fatal. Of the diseases, diarrhoea and dysentery, fevers of a typhoid character and pneumonia were the most prevalent and fatal. Medical and hospital supplies for all these cases were provided mainly from the purveying depot in New York City in charge of Surgeon R. S. Satterlee, whose honorable record extended from the Florida and Mexican wars to this important duty during the Civil War. Supplies were also pur- chased in Philadelphia and to some extent in Chicago, St. Louis, Cincin- nati, etc. The expenditures on behalf of the Medical Department in 1861- 1866 amounted to 48 million dollars. The museum and library of the Surgeon-General’s Office, both of which THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT. 95 have now a world-wide reputation, had their beginnings during the war. Surgeon-General Hammond, in a circular in May, 1862, announced the in- tention of establishing an Army Medical Museum, and requested medical officers to collect specimens of morbid anatomy, medical and surgical, which might be regarded as valuable, together with projectiles or foreign bodies removed, and such other matters as might prove of interest in the study of military medicine and surgery. Later circulars gave more specific instructions regarding the collections to be made. For a number of years the museum was installed in the old theatre building in which President Lincoln was assassinated, but recently a handsome and commodious build- ing has been erected in the Smithsonian grounds at Washington, D. C., where are now aggregated over 31,000 specimens, two-thirds of which are anatomical and pathological and the remainder microscopical, with, in the library, nearly 107,000 bound volumes and 166,000 unbound theses and pamphlets. Congress has provided for the publication of an index catalogue of the library, thirteen volumes of which have been published, bringing the work nearly to the end of the letter S. This catalogue, the work of Major John S. Billings, has given a marvellous impetus to medical literature and education in this country, as it places the valuable stores of the library within easy reach of those who are qualified to make use of them. The original intention was to have the library and museum connected with a hospital and medical school for the special training of those intended for the medical service of the army, but since the war the military force of the country has been too small to warrant the support of an institution of this kind. The library and museum have, however, taken a higher position than that originally intended, for they are now regarded as belonging to the medical profession of the country and not to any special school, hospital or section. Another of the notable results of the war is the “ Medical and Surgical History of the War of the Rebellion.” The six large quarto vol- umes of this work were published at various times from 1870 to 1888, when the last was issued. These volumes show that while the work of the Medi- cal Department, in field and hospital, was carefully performed as regards the individual case, the necessary reports and papers were fortunately not forgotten. Some volunteer surgeons who took pride in considering them- selves practical men, because they gave but little care to what they were pleased to term the red-tapeism of the department in calling for reports, have since then learned to appreciate the importance of these reports in their connection with the immense business of the Bureau of Pensions. Secretary Stanton has put on record his testimony to the efficiency of the Medical Department during the war, not only as regards the care and comfort of the sick and wounded, but as to the accomplishment of its im- portant duties without in any instance impeding or delaying the movements of the army. Its casualty list affords proof of the courage and zeal of its members and of their devotion to duty, for 32 were killed in battle or by guerrillas, and 83 were wounded, of whom 10 died in consequence ; 9 were killed by accident; 4 died in rebel prisons, 7 of yellow fever, and 271 of disease incidental to camp life and resulting from exposure. The latter part of the year 1865 was devoted to the breaking up of the 96 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. depots and general hospitals, and next year the Medical Department was again placed on a peace footing with a personnel consisting of a surgeon- general ; an assistant surgeon-general with the rank of colonel; a chief medical purveyor and four assistants, lieutenant-colonels; sixty surgeon- majors, and one hundred and fifty assistants, captains and lieutenants. In 1872 provision was made for a chief medical purveyor with the rank of colonel; but in the meantime all promotions and appointments had been interdicted, so that the reports of the surgeon-general speak in urgent terms of the crippled condition of his department. In 1873 there were 59 vacan- cies, and in the following year, to meet the demands of the service, no less than 187 surgeons had to be employed on contract. At this time Congress authorized the appointment of assistants surgeons, but cut off two of the assistant medical purveyorships and ten of the sixty surgeons, prohibiting promotion until the number became thus reduced ; and in 1876 the number of assistant surgeons was cut down to 125. From the close of the War of the Rebellion the want of higher rank and corresponding increase of pay for the older officers of the corps had received a good deal of attention, and several efforts were made to give these officers a status similar to that provided for the seniors of the other staff corps. These were at last successful in 1876, when, in addition to the existing grades there were authorized four surgeons, colonels, and eight lieutenant- colonels, giving the members of the corps their present rank, viz., 1 brigadier- general, 6 colonels, 10 lieutenant-colonels, fifty majors and 125 captains and lieutenants. For some time after this the department was crippled by the retention on the active list of members who were wholly incapacitated by reason of advanced age. Officers of the other staff corps and of the line were placed on the retired list and their places taken by younger men, but the seniors of the Medical Department were permitted to remain on nominal active service until removed by death. At last the compulsory retirement law of 1882 gave a recognizable and gratifying impetus to what had hitherto been the stagnation of promotion. Among the first removed by this law was Surgeon Jno. M. Cuyler, who had held his position on the active list for forty-eight years. Surgeon-General Joseph K. Barnes was also removed; he did not long survive his retirement, nor did his successor, General Charles H. Crane, continue long in office after him. Both these officers were for nearly twenty years associated in the management of the depart- ment, and their deaths occurred within a few months of each other. General Barnes possessed the full confidence of Secretary Stanton in all matters pertaining to the administration of the department, and to this was due the independent status of general hospitals in time of war, together with the re- moval of hospital transportation, both by sea and land, from any interference by other than medical authority,—two important decisions which tended much to the efficiency of the medical service during the War of the Rebellion. General Robert Murray succeeded General Crane, and after a few years was followed by General John Moore. Dr. J. H. Baxter, who had servedas a surgeon of volunteers during the war, and had entered the regular service THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT. 97 in 1867 as a lieutenant-colonel, filling an original vacancy as assistant medi- cal purveyor, received the appointment on the retirement of General Moore in 1890, but he died suddenly a few weeks after his promotion and was suc- ceeded by the present incumbent, General Charles Sutherland. Some of our medical officers have recently raised a contention for the military title. They may possess their souls in peace. Given the rank, pay and emoluments and the titles will come because there is a need for them. The first object of the army medical officer of to-day is to preserve the health of his command. He is a sanitary officer on the staff of his com- mander, and it is an anomaly to give the same title to the young officer on the staff of a captain in command of a one-company post and to the veteran of forty years experience on the staff of the division commander. Even our older medical officers, who have a fondness for the title of doctor because they have borne it all their lives, begin to recognize that they are colonels in the Medical Department, when seated at their desks revolving some knotty point of policy or administration that has just been respectfully re- ferred for their consideration. Congress has seen the necessity for giving these officers rank, pay and emoluments of colonels, etc., and the same necessity brought into official business and the ordinary intercourse of life will bring them their distinctive titles. Some ultra conservative may per- sist to the end in calling the medical officer “ doctor,” but the ultra conserva- tive will die and the chariot of progress will roll over his bones without being in the least impeded. During the past few years one of the greatest advancements and improve- ments in the practical working of the Medical Department has been effected by the addition of the Hospital Corps to the army. Formerly all the work of the department, including nursing and cooking in hospitals, and litter carrying and ambulance work in the field, was performed by men detailed from the command to which the medical officers were attached. It was difficult to obtain good men for these important duties, for company com- manders oftentimes objected to the details asked for by the surgeons, and even when good men were assigned to hospital duty the frequent changes taking place in the constitution of a command would often remove them from the service of the hospital as soon as they had attained enough of ex- perience to become really useful. The status of these men was fully recog- nized in the army; they received extra pay for their services, and as long ago as 1828, orders were issued exempting them from all military duties, except attendance on weekly inspections and regular musters for pay. The whole system was, however, so objectionable that medical officers frequently urged the establishment of a corps of men for special service in the hospital department. In his annual report for 1862 to the Secretary of War, the surgeon-general suggested the establishment of such a corps. Again in 1885 a similar recommendation was made, and this time with effect, for a bill, ap- proved March 1,1887, provided that the Hospital Corps of the United States Army should consist of hospital stewards, acting hospital stewards and pri- vates, and directed that all necessary hospital services in garrisons, camp or field, including ambulance service, should be performed by its members. The regulations prescribed under the terms of the law provided for the education 98 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. of four men from each company in litter drill and first aid to the wounded. These men, called company bearers, are intended to act in emergencies until relieved by the regular members of the Hospital Corps. Provision was made for the enlistment of intelligent men from civil life into the corps, and for the organization of companies of instruction in which the training of the men in all the details of hospital service as cooks, nurses, attendants, litter- bearers, etc., is perfected under the supervision of the medical officers. Certain of these men are selected for assignment as acting hospital stewards after an examination to determine their proficiency in pharmacy, materia medica and the management of medical and surgical emergencies ; and after a year, at least, of service and a further examination on these subjects, to- gether with minor surgery and the elements of practical sanitation, they are eligible for promotion to the position of hospital steward. The advantage of this organization and training has been demonstrated on several occasions during the past few years. The corps consists at pres- ent of 130 hospital stewards, 100 acting hospital stewards and 600 privates. The hospital stewards of the army were originally appointed to take charge of hospital stores, furniture and supplies for the sick, and to receive and distribute rations at hospitals ; but as no pharmacist was provided for hospi- tals, the duty of making up prescriptions and having general charge of the sick in the absence of the medical officers fell to the lot of the hospital steward, and came by degrees to be regarded as his most important work. The recent law gives him his proper status and a corresponding increase of pay. The perfection of the corps by enlistment of the best material would enable the Medical Department not only to meet all the requirements of its existing service, but to expand with the requirements of an emergency to supply the needs of an army many times the size of that now authorized. If the act which established it be examined it will be found that the corps is intended to be what all military organizations ought to be, a training school for war service ; and its efficiency as such depends, of course, on the ability and energy of the officers and the intelligence and interest of the men. In- telligence is required on the part of the latter not only to understand but to teach; for the system adopted involves transmissions of knowledge from those who have been advanced, to those who have been accepted from the ranks to fill the vacated positions. The acquirement of information bearing on the management of sick and wounded, and the methods of turn- ing such information to practical account when called for by the require- ments of the occasion, are the objectives of the corps ; and their pursuit, as may be readily appreciated, tends as well to prepare the hospital establish- ment for efficient service in the undesired event of war as to perfect it in the discharge of its current work. When every acting hospital steward is qualified to undertake the duties of steward, and the private of the corps in general ready to step into a higher position, the expansion of the corps in an emergency can be effected by recruiting merely for the last mentioned grade. Only in the event of a great war calling for the strength of the States to take the field would the system fail for want of men qualified for the positions; but this will ultimately be met, no doubt, by the assimilation of THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT. 99 the Medical Department of the National Guards to that of the regular forces, so that when each State regiment is mustered into the United States service it will bring with it its quota to the Hospital Corps. In reviewing the history of the Medical Department, it seems to the writer that its officers, and those of the army as a whole, have reason to feel gratified. Having had its beginning as we have seen in the patriotism of the individual medical man, which led him to pack his saddle-bags with need- ful supplies for the care of his friends and neighbors who might come to grief on the road between Boston and Concord, it has evolved through the medium of experience in the Revolutionary War, in that of 1812, in the Mexican War, in campaigns innumerable against hostile Indians, and in the terrible trials of the War of the Rebellion, into a corps of officers whose members are tied down to no specific duties, but are available for assign- ment in an emergency to the duty which each is best qualified to undertake, and whose rank, pay and emoluments increase with their age and experi- ence. The simplest form of organization has been shown by experience to be the best, and this that we now possess is the simplest for medicor-military organization. The Hospital Corps is constituted on similarly simple lines, so that there is needed only the adoption and education of a similar corps by the State forces to enable the country to meet the probable emergencies of the future, so far as the Medical Department of the Army is concerned. THE PAY DEPARTMENT. By COLONEL A. B. CAREY, U. S. ARMY. Pay Department. THE earliest legislation creating a Pay Department, is the resolution of the Continental Congress, in session at Philadelphia, Pa., June 16, 1775, as follows : Resolved, “ That there be one Paymaster General, and a Deputy under him, for the Army, in a separate department; that the pay for the Paymaster General himself be one hundred dollars per month, and for the Deputy Paymaster under him, fifty dollars per month.” James Warren, of Massachusetts, was elected Paymaster-General, by Congress, on July 27, 1775. By resolution of January 9, 1776, the Deputy Paymaster-General was authorized to appoint two Assistant Paymasters, and it was required that all the troops of the Northern Department be paid in person by him or his assistants. Colonel Warren’s resignation was accepted by Congress on the 19th of April 1776, and on the 27th William Palfrey, of Massachusetts, then aide- de-camp to General Washington, was appointed by Congress Paymaster- General of the Army, and on June 12, Ebenezer Hancock was appointed Deputy Paymaster-General for the Eastern Department. Congress on the 9th of July, 1776, resolved: “That Mr. Palfrey, late aide-de-camp of General Washington, have the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel in theContinental Army,” and on the 16th a regimental paymaster for each regiment was provided at a salary of per month, and by resolution of October 10th, regimental paymasters were to have “ the rank of First Lieut- enants and rations as Captains.” Deputy Paymaster-Generals were appointed by Congress for Virginia and Pennsylvania on July 11, 1777, and for Georgiaon August 6th. On the 20th the pay of the Paymaster-General was increased to $150, and that of the Deputy under him to $75 per month. By the resolution of August 28th, the Deputy Paymaster-Generals of the Northern, Eastern and Southern Departments were empowered to appoint assistants when necessary. On May 27, 1778, Congress resolved, “ That the paymaster of a regiment be chosen by the officers of the regiment out of the captains or subalterns, and appointed by warrant issued by the Commander-in-chief, or the com- mander in a separate department.” They were required to take charge of the clothing for the troops, and to distribute the same. By resolution of January 21, 1779, Congress directed that the Paymaster or Deputy Pay- master-General should provide an office near headquarters, and on May 29th, the Paymaster-General was required to keep his office in the place where THE PA Y DEPARTMENT. Congress should, from time to time, hold its sessions. Authority was given for the employment of clerks, directions for keeping regular books ; and, in general terms, the duties of the office were defined. A Deputy Paymaster- General was authorized, by the same resolution, for the army under the im- mediate command of General Washington. On November 12, 1779, Con- gress granted the sum of $20,000 to Paymaster-General William Palfrey, as a further compensation for past services, and allowed the Paymaster-Gen- eral salary at the rate of $14,000 per annum until further order of Con- gress. Colonel Palfrey had filled the office of Paymaster-General since April, 1776. “During this period he had exhibited such proofs of his talents for business, fidelity and devotedness to the cause of his country, that, on the 4th of November, 1780, he was elected Consul General from the United States to France, an office at this time of much consideration, as it involved the duties of making extensive purchases of military and other supplies for the country, and an examination and settlement of all the accounts in which the United States were concerned with public and private agents in Europe, and which had been multiplying and accumulating since the commence- ment of the war. “ He sailed for France, but the vessel in which he took passage was lost at sea, and every one on board was supposed to have perished.”* Colonel Palfrey was succeeded as Paymaster-General by John Pierce, of Connecticut, who was elected to the office by Congress on January 17, 1781. General officers had been empowered by Congress to draw warrants on the Paymaster-General for payment of troops under their command. On a report from the Secretary of War, to whom was referred a plan of the Paymaster-General for the better regulation of the pay of the army, Con- gress, on April 8, 1782, Resolved, ‘ ‘ That as all returns necessary to check the accounts of pay and rations, and to give full information of public issues of clothing and stores, are lodged at the War Office, the Secretary of War is hereby empowered and directed to issue his war- rants on the Paymaster-General, in favor of each regimental paymaster, for the pay and rations which shall appear, on adjustment of their accounts to be due to the regi- ments respectively, and to the head of each department, for the pay and rations due to such department; that the accounts for the pay and rations of each regiment, and of each department in the army, from January 1, 1782, shall be made out at the end of every month, and be transmitted to the War Office for examination and warrants : ‘ ‘ That the manner of making the payments, of keeping the accounts, and the re- turns of the regimental paymasters be regulated by the Secretary of War : “ That the Paymaster-General shall pay on the warrants of the Secretary of War, from such monies as shall be put into his hands for the pay and rations of the troops, and to the orders of the Commander-in-Chief, or officer commanding the Southern army, from such monies as shall be placed in his disposal for contingencies. Resolved, “ That all resolutions heretofore passed empowering general officers to draw warrants on the Paymaster-General, except that empowering the officer com- manding the Southern army, be, and the same are hereby repealed.” * Spark’s Writings of Washington. HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. 102 Resolved, “ That there be one Deputy-Paymaster for the Southern army : “ That there shall be one assistant allowed to the Paymaster-General, who shall do the duties of a clerk : “That the Paymaster-General be, and he is hereby, authorized to appoint his deputy and his assistant: “ That the Paymaster-General immediately give bonds with two sureties, to the Superintendent of Finance, in the sum of $15,000, for the faithful performance of his office.” The Paymaster-General was authorized, on May 16th, to appoint a Deputy-Paymaster to reside with the main army. The Revolutionary army was disbanded on the 3d of November, 1783, in pursuance of a proclamation issued by Congress on the 18th of October previous. On April 1, 1785, Congress resolved that 700 troops were neces- sary for the protection of the north-western frontier, and on April 12, 1785, specified the number which should be furnished by certain States, and pro- vided that a lieutenant should act as Paymaster. The resolve of Congress of the 20th of October, 1786, increased the number to 2040 non-commissioned officers and privates. The army was fixed by the resolve of October 3, 1787, at 1 regiment of Infantry, 8 companies. 1 battalion of Artillery, 4 companies. Paymaster-General John Pierce had been continued in service settling his accounts, and as commissioner for settling the accounts of the army. The two offices were united by resolution of Congress of March 23, 1787, as follows: Resolved, “ That the services and duties of Paymaster-General be, and hereby are, united with those of Commissioner of Army Accounts.” John Pierce died in August, 1788. The first session of the first Congress of the United States was held on the 4th of March, 1789, at New York. The Act of September 29, 1789, recognized the force authorized by the resolve of October 3, 1787, “to be the establishment for the troops in the service of the United States.” The pay and allowances were to be the same as had been established by the resolution of April 12, 1785. The Act of April 30, 1790, directed an increase of the force, and pro- vided a paymaster for the battalion of artillery. After the death of John Pierce in 1788, the duties of the office of Pay- master-General were administered by Joseph Howell, Jr., Commissioner of Army Accounts, until a paymaster for the Army was provided by the Act of May 8, 1792, as follows : Section 3. “ That there be a paymaster to reside near the headquarters of the troops of the United States. That it shall be the duty of the said paymaster, to re- ceive from the treasurer, all the monies which shall be intrusted to him for the purpose of paying the pay, the arrears of pay, subsistence, or forage, due to the troops of the United States. That he shall receive the pay abstracts of the paymasters of the sev- eral regiments or corps, and compare the same with the returns or muster rolls which shall accompany the said pay abstracts. That he shall certify, accurately, to the com- manding officer, the sums due to the respective corps, which shall have been examined THE PA Y DEPARTMENT. as aforesaid, who shall thereon issue his warrant on the said deputy paymaster for the payment accordingly. That copies of all reports to the commanding officer, and the warrants thereon, shall be duly transmitted to the office of the accountant of the War Department, in order to be there examined, and finally adjusted at the Treasury. That the said paymaster shall give bond in the sum of $20,000, with two sufficient sureties, for the faithful discharge of his duty ; and he shall take an oath faithfully to execute the duties of his office. That the compensation to the said paymaster shall be $60 monthly, with the same rations and forage as a major.” Caleb Swan, of Massachusetts, was appointed Paymaster of the Army on May 8, 1792, and continued in the office until the 30th of June, 1808. Act of May 9, 1794, directed the raising of 764 enlisted men, to be incor- porated with the Corps of Artillery, and to be denominated the Corps of Artillerist, and Engineers, of four battalions, with an adjutant and pay- master to each battalion. A Paymaster-General was provided by the act approved May 30, 1796, and it was further provided that paymasters of regiments should be ap- pointed from the subalterns of their respective regiments. The general staff authorized by the act was to continue in service until the 4th of March following, and no longer. Act of May 3, 1797, to amend and repeal in part the previous act, provi- ded for a Paymaster-General. A regiment of Artillerists and Engineers was provided by the act of April 27, 1798, with an Adjutant and Paymaster to each battalion. The act of May 28, 1798, to raise a provisional army, provided for the employment of a Paymaster-General, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, who should have the rank, pay, and emoluments of a Lieuten- ant-Colonel. The act of July 16, 1798, to augment the Army of the United States, pro- vided for the appointment of one Paymaster to each regiment. The act for the better organizing of the troops of the United States, and for other purposes, approved March 3, 1799, provided for one Paymaster to each regiment of cavalry, artillery and infantry. The same act provided for the appointment of Deputy Paymasters, and prescribed the bond to be given by the several regimental paymasters, as follows : Section 15. “That the Paymaster-General of the armies of the United States, shall always quarter at or near the headquarters of the main army, or at such place as the Commander-in-Chief shall deem proper ; and that, to the army on the western frontiers, and to detachments from the main army, intended to act separately for a time, he shall appoint Deputy Paymasters, who shall account to him for the money advanced to them, and shall each give a bond, in the sum of $15,000, with sufficient sureties, for the faithful discharge of their duties respectively, and take an oath faith- fully to execute the duties of their offices; and the several regimental paymasters shall also give bond, in the sum of $5000, with one or more sufficient sureties, and take an oath, as aforesaid, for the faithful discharge of the duties of their offices respectively ; and that the Paymaster-General shall receive $80 per month, with the rations and for- age of a major, in full compensation for his services and travelling expenses; and the deputy, in addition to his pay, and other emoluments, $30 per month, in full compen- sation for his extra services and travelling expenses.” 104 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Act of March 16, 1802, fixing the military peace establishment, provided that from and after June i, 1802, the peace establishment should be com- posed of one regiment of artillerists, two regiments of infantry, and a corps of engineers. Section 3 of this act provides : “ One Paymaster of the Army, seven paymasters, and two assistants, to be attached to such districts as the President of the United States shall direct, to be taken from the line of commissioned officers, who, in addition to their other duties, shall have charge of the clothing of the troops.” With pay as follows: “To the Paymaster of the Army,$120, without any other emolument, except such stationery as may be requisite in his department and the use of the public office now occupied by him ; each Pay- master attached to districts, $30, and each assistant to such Paymaster, $10, in addition to his pay in the line.” Section 13 of this act provides : “ That the said corps shall be paid in such manner that the arrears shall at no time exceed two months, unless the circumstances of the case shall render it unavoidable.” Section 16 : “That the Paymaster shall perform the duties of his office, agreeably to the direction of the President of the United States, for the time being: [and before he enters on the duties of the same, shall give bonds, with good and su fficient sureties, in such sums as the President shall direct, for the faithful discharge of his said office ; and shall take an oath to execute the duties thereof with fidelity ; and it shall, more- over be his duty to appoint from the line, with the approbation of the President of the United States, the several Paymasters to districts and assistants prescribed by this act ; and he is hereby authorized to require the said Paymasters to districts, and assistants, to enter into bonds, with good and sufficient surety, for the faithful discharge of their respective duties].” The Act of March 16, 1802, seems to have done away with regi- mental and battalion paymasters, but the office was again created by the act of April 12, 1808, which provided an additional military force of five regiments of infantry, one of riflemen, one of light artillery, and one of light dragoons, with one paymaster to each regiment, with $10 per month in addition to pay in the line, and $6 for forage when not furnished in kind. Caleb Swan resigned as Paymaster of the Army on the 30th of June, 1808, and was succeeded by Robert Brent, of the District of Columbia. The act of January n, 1812, provided one Paymaster to each of the ten regiments of infantry, two of artillery and one of light dragoons raised by that act. The act of April 29, 1812, provided a Paymaster for the Corps of Engineers, to be taken from the subalterns. This was repealed by the act of July 5, 1838, which provided for transfer of the Paymaster of the Corps of Engineers to the Pay Department of the army. The act May 16, 1812, provided: “ That the President of the United States be, and he hereby is, authorized and empowered to appoint so many district paymasters as, in his judgment, the service may require ; and, if such paymasters are taken from the line of the army, they shall respectively, receive $30 per month, in addition to their pay in the line: Provided, The same shall in no case exceed the pay and emoluments of a major ; and, if not taken from the line, they shall receive the same pay and emoluments as a major of infantry.” THE PA Y DEPARTMENT. 105 Section 2: “ That the President of the United States be, and he hereby is, authorized and empowered to appoint a paymaster to each regiment on the peace establishment, who shall receive the same pay and emoluments as a captain of the regiment to which he belongs: Provided, That all district and regimental paymasters shall be subject to the rules and articles of war, and give such bonds to the United States as the secre- tary of the department of war may direct, for the faithful performance of their duties. And it shall be the duty of the commanding officer, when requested by the paymaster, to furnish a capable non-commissioned officer or soldier to aid him in the discharge of his duty, who, while so employed, shall receive double pay. The act of June 26, 1812, provided that there be one paymaster to each regiment authorized by that act. And the act of July 6, 1812, authorized the President to appoint one Deputy Paymaster-General from the line, to any army, other than that in which the Paymaster of the Army shall serve, with $50 per month in addition to his pay in the line, “ and assistant depu- ties (not exceeding three to each department) as the public service may require, who shall, in like manner, be taken from the line, and who shall, each, be entitled to $30 per month, in addition to his pay and other emolu- ments, which shall be in full compensation for his extra services.” The act of January 29, 1813, provided one paymaster for each regiment raised under that act, and the acts referred to therein ; as does the act of February 10, 1814, entitled “An act to raise three regiments of riflemen.” Section 20 of the act of March 30, 1814, provided “That in no case shall the district paymasters or quartermasters of any grade be taken from the line of the army,” and this act does not provide Regimental or Battalion Paymasters for the organizations created by it. The act of April 18, 1814, fixed the annual salary of the Paymaster of the Army at $2000, and allowed a sum for clerk hire and contingent expenses of office. Also authorized the appointment of Assistant District Paymas- ters, and defined the duties of Paymaster, District and Assistant Dis- trict Paymasters. The act of March 3, 1815, reduced and fixed the military peace estab- lishment at 10,000 men, and provided that there should be one Paymaster to each regiment, to be taken from the subalterns of the line. By this act the office of District and Assistant District Paymaster was abolished, but the act did not affect the office of Paymaster of the Army, or of Deputy Paymaster-General. By Executive General Orders of May 17, 1815, two Deputy Paymasters and two Assistant Deputy Paymasters were provisionally retained. The act of April 24, 1816, organizing the general staff and making fur- ther provision for the Army of the United States, provided for a Pay De- partment as follows: Sections, “ That the pay department shall consist of one paymaster-general of the army, with the annual salary of two thousand five hundred dollars, and that, in addition to regimental paymasters, there be appointed one paymaster to each battalion of the corps of artillery, who, as well as the regimental paymasters, in addition to the regular and punctual payment of their respective regiments or corps, shall discharge the duties of district paymasters within such district as shall, from time to time, be 106 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. assigned them by the paymaster-general, under the direction of the secretary of war. Provided, That regimental and battalion paymasters may be taken either from the sub- alterns of the army, or citizens, and appointed by the President of the United States. Provided, also, That regimental and battalion paymasters shall receive the pay and emoluments of major, and shall be allowed a capable non-commissioned officer as clerk, who, while so employed, shall receive double pay, and the actual expense of transportation while traveling under orders in the discharge of his duty.” Section 4 of this act defines the duties of regimental and battalion paymasters. Section 6 prescribes that good and sufficient bonds shall be given. Robert Brent resigned as Paymaster-General on the 28th of August, 1819, and was succeeded by Nathan Towson, of Maryland. Colonel Tow- son was appointed Colonel, Second Artillery, on the 1st of June, 1821, but his appointment was negatived by the Senate. On the appointment of Colonel Towson to the Artillery, June 1, 1821, Daniel Parker, of Massa- chusetts, then Adjutant and Inspector General of the Army, was appointed Paymaster-General, but was superseded on the 8th of May, 1822, by the re- appointment of Colonel Towson, who continued in office as Paymaster- General of the Army until the date of his death. Section 9 of the act of March 2, 1821, provided “ That there shall be one paymaster general, with the present compensation, and fourteen pay- masters with the pay and emoluments of regimental paymasters.” In the annual report of Paymaster-General B. W. Brice, for 1868, General Towson is referred to as the author of the present organization of the Pay Department and the arrangement of its duties, giving to paymasters the field grade of major, and making it an independent staff corps. In a report dated April 29, 1839, to the Secretary of War he (Towson) gives the following facts in the history of army paymasters : First.—From 1808 to 1811, before the war, the average annual loss by the defalcation of regimental and battalion paymasters amounted to 1.58 per centum on the amount disbursed, and the annual average expenses for paying the army to 3.10 per centum. Secotid.—From the beginning of the war to 1816, under the same sys- tem, these averages were : defalcations, 2.98 per cent., and the expenses, 4.36. Third.—From the date of the reorganization, in 1821, on the new plan (the present one) to 1825, the average defalcations were 22-100; little more, it will be perceived, than the one-fifth of one per cent., which was finally paid into the Treasury ; expenses for the same period, 2.13. Fourth.—From 1825, after the new system had been well established, not one dollar of defalcation, and the total average expenses reduced to one and one-third per cent. Section 4 of the act of July 14, 1832, provided, ‘‘That it shall be the duty of the district paymasters of the army of the United States, in addi- tion to the payments required to be made by them to the regular troops, to make payment to all other troops in the service of the United States, whenever required thereto by order of the President.” “Section 2 of the act of March 2, 1833, authorized the Secretary of War to allow, and pay, district paymasters a commission, not exceeding THE PA Y DEPARTMENT. 107 one per centum upon the amounts paid by them, respectively, to the miiitia ordered into the service of the United States according to law. The act of July 4, 1836, authorized the appointment of three pay- masters, and provided for the detail of any officer of the army to the duty of Paymaster, when volunteers or militia were called into service. This is replaced in part by section 25 of the act of July 5, 1838, and modified by section 31 of the same act, which prohibits the separating of any officer of the line of the army, employed as Paymaster, from his regi- ment or company. (See R. S. sec. 1224.) Section 24, act of July 5, 1838, provides : “ That hereafter the officers of the pay and medical departments of the army shall receive the pay and emoluments of officers of cavalry of the same grades respectively ac- ording to which they are now paid by existing laws.” Section 25 provides for a temporary expansion of the Pay Department whenever militia or volunteers are called into service, as follows : “ That when volunteers or militia are called into the service of the United States, so that the paymasters authorized by law shall not be deemed sufficient to enable them to pay the troops with proper punctuality, it shall be lawful for the President to ap- point as many additional paymasters as he shall deem necessary, who shall perform the same duty, give the same bond, be subject to the same liability, and receive the same pay and emoluments, as are now provided for paymasters of the army: Provided, however, That the number so appointed shall not exceed one for every two regiments of militia or volunteers : And provided also, That the persons so appointed shall con- tinue in service only so long as their services are required to pay militia and volun- teers.” Under the authority given by the foregoing section of July 5, 1838, the Pay Department was increased during the war with Mexico and the war of the rebellion by the appointment of a number of Additional Paymasters sufficient for the payment of the volunteer force called into the service of the United States, as follows : ADDITIONAL PAYMASTERS. Employed during war with Mexico 17 Accounted for as follows : Died 2 Resigned 2 Discharged (disbanded March 4, 1849) 9 Retained in permanent establishment 4 17 Subsequently appointed in permanent establishment 1 Employed during the war of the rebellion 562 Died 28 Resigned 171 Cashiered 3 Dismissed 14 Honorably mustered out of service 318 Retained in permanent establishment 28 562 Subsequently appointed in permanent establishment 17 108 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Section 9 of the act of July 7, 1838, allowed the Paymaster-General and Surgeon-General of the army the additional rations for every five years’ service, granted by the act of July 5, 1838. The act of June 17, 1846, authorized an increase of three paymasters. The department was again increased by section 12 of the act of March 3, 1847, which authorized the President “ to add to the pay department of the army two deputy paymaster-generals, with the pay and allowances, each, of a deputy quartermaster-general, and ten paymasters, with the pay and allowances, each of a paymaster of the army; and the officers so ap- pointed shall give such bonds as the President shall, from time to time, di- rect : Provided, That the deputy paymaster-generals shall, in addition to paying troops, superintend the payment of armies in the field.” The ten paymasters appointed under this act were to be disbanded on the 4th of March, 1849, under section 3 of the act of July 19, 1848. Section 13 : That the officers of the pay department shall have rank corresponding with the rank to which their pay and allowances are assimilated : Provided, That pay- masters shall not in virtue of such rank be entitled to command in the line or other staff departments of the army : Provided, also, that the right to command in the pay department, between officers having the same rank, shall be in favor of the oldest in service in the department, without regard to the date of commission under which they may be acting at the time.” The last proviso of this section being sequent upon the act of May 15, 1820, which required a reappointment every four years, is obsolete; rank being determined by date of commission or appointment. Section 14. “That all paymasters hereafterto be appointed by the Pres- ident for the volunteer service of the United States shall be nominated to the Senate for confirmation to such office.” The act of August 12, 1848, authorized the Paymaster-General to allow to any Paymaster of the army who had been employed in the payment of volunteers, during the war with Mexico, a commission, not exceeding one- half of one per centum, on all sums disbursed by them to volunteers, pro- vided said commission did not exceed $1000 per annum, from commence- ment to close of the war. The act approved March 2, 1849, provided “ That the pay department of the army shall consist of a paymaster-general, who shall have the rank of colonel, and the same pay and allowances as are at present pro- vided by law for such officers, and the same tenure of office as the heads of other dis- bursing departments of the army; two deputy paymasters-general, with the same rank, pay and allowances as are now provided by law for such officers, and the same tenure of office as officers of like grade in other disbursing departments of the army ; and twenty-five paymasters, with the same rank, pay, and allowances as are now pro- vided by law for such officers, and the same tenure of office as officers of like grade in other disbursing departments of the army. That it shall be the duty of all disbursing officers of the pay department to renew their bonds, or furnish additional security, at least once in four years, or as much oftener as the President may direct. “ That the officers of the Pay Department, provided for by the first section of this act, shall consist of the paymaster-general, the two deputy paymasters-general now in commission, the fifteen paymasters who were in service under the acts in force at the THE PA V DEPARTMENT. commencement of the war with Mexico, and ten paymasters to be selected from the additional paymasters now in service, and the thirteen paymasters authorized by the acts of the 17th of June, 1846, and the 3d of March, 1847.” There does not appear to have been any further legislation relative to the Pay Department, and the organization, as provided by the above act, continued until 1866. Colonel Nathan Towson died at Washington, D. C., on the 20th of July, 1854, and was succeeded as Paymaster-General, by the promotion of Colonel Benjamin F. Larned, of Massachusetts, then Deputy Paymaster-General, who continued in office to the date of his death, at Washington, D. C., September 6, 1862. Colonel Timothy P. Andrews, of the District of Columbia, then Deputy Paymaster-General, was promoted to be Paymaster-General, on Septem- ber 6, 1862, and continued in the office until he was retired, on his own ap- plication, after forty or more consecutive years of service, in conformity with Section 15 of the act of August 3, 1861. Colonel Andrews was suc- ceeded by Benjamin W. Brice, of Virginia, then a Major and Paymaster, fifth in rank in the Pay Corps, who was appointed Paymaster-General, November 29, 1864, with the rank of Colonel, to July 28, 1866, and Briga- dier-General since that date. The statistics of the Pay Department show that during the war of the rebellion, in which it disbursed $1,100,000,000, the defalcations and losses of all kinds were less than one-tenth of one per cent., and the cost of pay- ing the troops, including expenses, defalcations and losses of all kinds, falls short of three-fourths of one per cent, on the amount disbursed ; that chiefly within the three months of June, July and August, 1865, $270,000,- 000 were paid to 800,000 individual men by the small regular force of the Pay Department and the additional force employed under the act of July 5, 1838, which drew from General Brice the following in his annual report for 1865: “ No similar work of like magnitude, regarding its immensity both as to men and money and the small limit of time in which it has been performed, has, it is believed, any parallel in the history of armies * * *, ” and vindicates the language used by him : “ No system can be devised which, equal to the present one, can be made to combine the advantages of prompt payment, the safety of the public money, and an accurate and prompt accountability, with the least possible liability to embezzlement or corrupt defalcation.” Section 18 of the Act of July 28, 1866, provided “That the pay depart- ment of the army shall hereafter consist of one paymaster-general, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of a brigadier-general; two assistant paymas- ters-general, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of colonels of cavalry; two deputy paymasters-general, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of lieutenant-colonels of cavalry; and sixty paymasters, with the rank, pay, and emoluments of majors of cavalry, to be selected from persons who have served as additional paymasters.” Section 23 provides that the Paymaster-General shall be appointed by selection from the Corps to which he belongs. Section 6 of the act of March 3, 1869, prohibited new appointments and 110 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. promotions in the Pay Department, but was so far modified by the act of June 4, 1872, as to authorize the President to “ appoint a Paymaster-Gen- eral, with the rank, pay and emoluments of a colonel, to date from the time the appointee assumed the duties of the office, to fill the vacancy now existing. General Brice at his own request was retired from active service on January 1, 1872, in conformity with Section 12 of the act of July 17, 1862. Benjamin Alvord, of Vermont, then a Major and Paymaster, fourth in rank in the Pay Corps was selected and appointed Paymaster-General of the army, with the rank of Colonel, from January 1, 1872. The act of March 2, and Joint Resolution of March 3, 1875, established the number of paymasters at fifty and authorized the appointment of maj- ors ; and by the act of July 22, 1876, the rank of paymaster-general was made brigadier-general, under the authority of which General Alvord was appointed brigadier-general. The act of March 3, 1877, repealed so much of the act of March 3, 1869, as prohibited promotions in the Pay Department. General Alvord was retired on June 8, 1880, at his own request, having served over forty years (Sec. 1243 R. S.); and Nathan W. Brown, of New York, the senior colonel, was selected and appointed Paymaster-General same date, and retired on the 6th of February, 1882, under the provisions of Sec. 1244 R. S. William B. Rochester, of New York, then a major and paymaster, tenth in rank in the pay corps, was selected and appointed paymaster-general on February 17, 1882. The act of July 5, 1884, making appropriations for the support of the army for the year ending June 30, 1885, provides: that hereafter any pay- master of the rank of major who has served twenty years in the United States Army as a commissioned officer may, upon his own application or by direction of the President, be placed upon the retired list of the army, until the pay department shall be reduced to thirty-five members, as follows: one paymaster-general, with the rank of brigadier-general; two assistant paymasters-general, with the rank of colonel; three deputy pay- masters-general, with the rank of lieutenant-colonel, and twenty-nine pay- masters, with the rank of major ; and no more appointments of paymasters shall be made in the pay department until the number shall be reduced below twenty-nine majors, and thereafter the number of officers in the pay department shall not exceed thirty-five. General Rochester was retired by operation of law February 15, 1890 (act of June 30, 1882), and on March 10, 1890, William Smith, lieutenant- colonel and deputy paymaster-general, was selected and appointed pay- master-general. Brigadier-General JAMES WILKINSON Commanding the Army, 1796-1798, 1800-1812. THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS. By Brevet Brigadier-General HENRY L. ABBOT, U. S. Army, Colonel, Corps of Engineers. THE earliest records relative to what is now known as the Corps of Engineers must be sought among the incomplete documents which have come down to us from the period of the Revolution. The Journals of the Continental Congress indicate the gradual devel- opment of this arm of service under the peculiar conditions then existing. Thus, on June 16, 1775, the day before the battle of Bunker Hill, one chief engineer and two assistants were authorized “ at the grand army,” and one chief engineer and two assistants “ in a separate department.” These officers were commissioned in the grades of colonel and captain respect- ively. On January 16, 1776, it was resolved “ That if General Washington think proper Col. R. Gridley be continued chief engineer in the army at Cambridge.” On December 27,1776, General Washington was authorized, for a period of six months, “ to raise and collect * * * a corps of engineers and to establish their pay.” The records are silent as to what action, if any, was taken on this resolution. On July 8, 1777, it was resolved “ That the treaty made by the Commis- sioners in France on the 13th day of February last, be confirmed as far as it respects the chevalier du Portail, monsieur de la Radiere, and monsieur du Gouvion ; the first to be a colonel, the second a lieutenant-colonel, and the third a major of engineers.” These officers were from the Royal Corps of Engineers in the French army, who with other educated military en- gineers had been drawn to this country by the war. From the lack of trained engineers in the native continental establishment, their assistance was highly appreciated ; and for many years this foreign influence prepon- derated in the service. Although the subject had previously attracted official attention, the first formal establishment of a Corps of Engineers by resolution of Congress dates from March 11,1779. Among other provisions are the following: “ That the engineers in the service of the United States shall be formed in a corps and styled the Corps of Engineers, and shall take rank and enjoy the same rights, honors and privileges with the other troops in the Con- tinental establishment. That a Commandant of the Corps of Engineers shall be appointed by Congress, to whom their orders or those of the Com- mander-in-Chief shall be addressed, and such Commandant shall render to the Commander-in-Chief, and to the Board of War, an account of every matter relative to his department.” On the nth of May following, Briga- dier-General du Portail was appointed Commandant of the Corps of En- gineers. Ill 112 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. The services of this revolutionary corps, including its companies of sappers and miners to which reference will soon be made, were important and honorable; numbers of its officers were brevetted by Congress, and its chief, on November 16, 1781, was promoted to the grade of major-general, “ in consideration of his meritorious services, and particularly of his dis- tinguished conduct in the siege of York, in the State of Virginia.” The names of one brigadier-general, six colonels, eight lieutenant-colonels, three majors and ten captains are preserved on the records, and unques- tionably the list is incomplete. In November, 1783, the corps was dis- banded. The next need for the services of military engineers occurred at the period of threatened European complications during the administration of Washington. On March 20, 1794, Congress authorized the President to fortify certain harbors on the coast, and there being no engineers in service he appointed temporarily several foreign born gentlemen, a number of whom had served in the war, to direct the work. On May 9, 1794. Con- gress passed an act raising for a term of three years (subsequently ex- tended) a corps of artillerists and engineers, to be incorporated with the Corps of Artillery then in service. The new organization was stationed at West Point, and preliminary steps were then taken for forming a military school there. By the Act of April 27, 1798, a second regiment of artillerists and engineers was authorized, on the same footing as the earlier corps. On July 16, 1798, four “teachers of the arts and sciences” were authorized for the instruction of this organization ; which was only discontinued by the Act of March 16, 1802, fixing the new military establishment. This latter act authorized the President to organize and establish a Corps of Engineers, not to exceed 1 colonel, 1 lieutenant-colonel, 2 majors, 4 cap- tains, 4 first lieutenants, 4 second lieutenants, and 4 cadets. It was pro- vided that the said corps “shall be stationed at West Point, in the State of New York, and shall constitute a Military Academy; and the engineers, assistant engineers, and cadets of said corps, shall be subject at all times to do duty in such places and on such service as the President of the United States shall direct.” This was the germ of the present Corps of Engineers. Most of the officers were soon dispersed along the coast on various military duties, but the superintendence and the responsibility for the successful operation of the Academy remained with the Corps until July 13, 1866, when the institution passed to the army at large, having attained a standard of excellence which needs no eulogy here. In the earlier period of its organization the duties now pertaining to the Corps of Engineers were divided between two different branches, sometimes under a common head and at other times separately commanded. Space will be saved by considering this subdivision here. Although a somewhat similar organization existed in the revolutionary war, no officers with the special functions of topographical engineers were provided for our armies until the early part of the war of 1812, when con- gress by Act of March 3, 1813, authorized as part of the General Staff, 8 to- pographical engineers with the brevet rank, pay and emoluments of majors of cavalry, and 8 assistants with the brevet rank, pay and emoluments of THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS. 113 captains of infantry. The law authorized these officers to be appointed, or transferred from the line without prejudice to their rank and promotion therein, but the full number seems never to have been selected ; and at the conclusion of peace all but two majors were mustered out of service under the requirements of the Act of March 3, 1815. By Act of April 24, 1816, however, the Corps was reestablished, three topographical engineers and two assistants (still attached to the General Staff) being provided for each division of the army. This staff assignment continued until, by general order dated July 2, x818, the officers were “arranged to the Engineer’s De- partment, and * * * made subject to the orders of the chief and com- manding engineers.” In the August following a separate topographical bureau was established in the War Department, under the immediate direc- tion of the Secretary of War and the chief engineer. The work of this branch of the Engineer Department soon increased, calling for an average detail of about twenty-five officers of the line of the army and the employ- ment, under the Act of April 30, 1824, of a still larger number of civil en- gineers. On June 21, 1831, the topographical bureau was constituted by the Secretary of War a distinct bureau of the War Department; and by Act of July 5, 1838, an independent Corps of Topographical Engineers was cre- ated by Congress. By the Regulations of 1841, issued shortly after this separation, the engineering duties of the War Department were divided between the Corps of Engineers and the Corps of Topographical Engineers upon the following basis : “ The duties of the Engineer Corps comprise reconnoitring and survey- ing for military purposes, the selection of sites, and formation of plans, pro- jects, and estimates for military defenses of every kind; the construction and repair of fortifications and defensible works of every description, whether temporary or permanent, the planning, laying out, and superin- tending all military works, defensive or offensive, of troops in the field, camp, or cantonment; the planning and construction of military bridges; the planning, laying out, and superintending military trenches, parallels, saps, mines, and other works of military attack and siege; the planning and executing such works of river or harbor improvement, including sea-walls, breakwaters, and light-houses, as may be assigned to it by law, or by the President of the United States; the general direction and management of disbursements for the above works, including purchases of sites and mate- rials, hiring workmen, and making contracts for supplies of materials or workmanship ; the collection, arrangement, and preservation of all reports, memoirs, estimates, plans, drawings, and models, relating to the several duties above enumerated ; and the superintendence and inspection of the Military Academy. “ The duties of the [Topographical Engineer] Corps shall consist, in sur- veys for the defense of the frontier, inland and Atlantic, and of positions for fortifications ; in reconnoissances of the country through which an army has to pass, or in which it has to operate ; in the examination of all routes of communication by land or by water, both for supplies and military move- ments ; in the construction of military roads and permanent bridges con- 114 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U, S. ARMY. nected with them, and, in the absence of an officer or officers of the Corps of Engineers, of military bridges, and of field-works, for the defense of encamp- ments, fords, ferries, and bridges. For which purposes, officers of the Corps of Topographical Engineers shall always accompany armies in the field.” In the Regulations of 1857 and in subsequent editions, the duties of the two corps were defined jointly under a common heading, being practically a summation of those comprised in the Regulations of 1841 for both. In time of peace this modification of the Regulations introduced no change and no confusion, the Corps of Engineers retaining charge of the works for per- manent defenses and of certain other public constructions, and the Corps of Topographical Engineers of the survey of the lakes, the exploration of the Western wilderness, and the demarcation of State and International boun- daries,—while officers of both corps served upon works of river and harbor improvement, and upon the Coast Survey, the Light-house establishment and other special duties. At the outbreak of the Civil War however, it was soon discovered that engineer duties with armies in the field admitted of no advantageous division between different organizations. The officers were few in number, and the work was so onerous that practical consolidation on the staffs of commanding generals very soon resulted. Legal union, however, was desired by the officers themselves ; and a petition to this effect, prepared by a joint committee representing both corps, was urgently favored by General McClellan, General Halleckand General Banks, and was approved by Mr. Stanton, the Secretary of War. A bill uniting the two corps was passed by the House of Representatives in 1862 and was favor- ably reported in the Senate, but received no action. Finally by Act of March 3, 1863, it was provided : “That the Corps of Topographical Engi- neers, as a distinct branch of the army, is hereby abolished, and from and after the passage of the Act, is merged into the Corps of Engineers which shall have the following organization: * * * That the general officer provided by the first section of this act shall be selected from the Corps of Engineers as therein established ; and that officers of all lower grades shall take rank according to their respective dates of commission in the existing corps of engineers or corps of topographical engineers.” The Corps of Engineers, as thus established, and as at present consti- tuted, becomes therefore the heir to the honorable record of both the origi- nal corps. The same Act of March 3, 1863, also inaugurated the present system of examinations for promotion in the army by providing that no engineer officer below the grade of field officer shall thereafter be promoted before having passed a satisfactory examination before a board of three engineers senior to him in rank ; a like provision was also inserted for the Ordnance Department. The Engineer Department.—Another organization should not be over- looked in tracing the history of the development of the service. The “ Engineer Department ” was established by order of the President shortly after the war of 1812, as a separate command with geographical limits co- extensive with those of the United States and embracing the Corps of Engi- neers, and such officers of topographical engineers and other arms of service THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS. 115 as might be attached thereto, and the Military Academy. Thus the chief engineer in early days exercised the functions of a department commander, being allowed an aide-de-camp, convening courts-martial, assigning officers to stations, granting leave of absence, and placing officers on “ waiting orders.” The headquarters which had been first established in New York, were transferred to Washington by order of the President on April 3, 1818. While this organization has nominally ceased to exist, its most essential functions are still vested in the chief of engineers as commandant of the Corps of Engineers. The Board of Engineers.—On November 16, 1816, a “Board of Engi- neers for Fortifications ” was constituted by the War Department to perform the following duties: “ It shall be the duties of the officers of this board to examine, in con- junction, all those positions where permanent works are or maybe proposed to be erected. They shall select the proper sites for, and form the plans of all new works. Where fortifications have been commenced or are finished, they shall report how far the sites for such fortifications have been judici- ously selected, or whether or not the works are adequate to the defense of the prospective positions, and they shall propose such alterations or addi- tions to them as may be deemed necessary. * * * “ The report and plans adopted by the board, shall be submitted with accurate estimates * * * to the chief of the corps. “ The original reports and plans agreed upon by the board, as well as those reported by any member of it, shall be submitted by the Chief of the Corps of Engineers, with such remarks as he may deem proper, to the Secretary of War, for final adoption, and they shall be deposited in the secret bureau of the Department of War.” Under the Act of April 30,1824, inaugurating works of internal improve- ment, a similar “ Board of Engineers for Internal Improvement ” was organized and continued until about the date of the segregation of the topographical engineers into a distinct bureau of the War Department; after which these functions seem to have devolved on special boards of greater or less permanency until, by authority of the Secretary of War, in an order issued on September 2, 1879, the functions of the “Board of Engineers for Fortifications,” which had continued unchanged since 1816, were extended to include such works of river and harbor improvement, and other matters as may be referred to it by the chief of engineers. This organization, now officially designated “ The Board of Engineers,” continues to the present date. Engineer Troops.—In view of the persistent efforts which have been made to class the engineer arm of service with the staff of the army, it should be noted that the Continental Congress established three companies of sappers and miners before it definitely constituted the Corps of Engi- neers. The dates of the resolutions effecting these objects are May 27, 1778, and March 11, 1779, respectively. Each of these three companies consisted of 1 captain, 3 lieutenants, 4 sergeants, 4 corporals and 60 pri- vates. It appears that subsequently another company was added ; for by the resolution of February 7, 1780, four captains were commissioned by 116 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. name. The duties assigned were the following: “ These companies to be instructed in the fabrication of field works, as far as relates to the manual and mechanical part. Their business shall be to instruct the fatigue par- ties to do their duty with celerity and exactness, to repair injuries done to the works by the enemy’s fire, and to prosecute works in the face of it. The commissioned officers to be skilled in the necessary branches of mathe- matics ; the non-commissioned officers to write a good hand.” These companies of sappers and miners were assigned to the command of Brigadier-General du Portail, the first commandant of the Corps of Engineers, and served throughout the war, being disbanded with that corps in November, 1783. It is interesting to note that David Bushnell, “ the father of submarine mining ” was appointed to this body of troops on the recommendation of Governor Trumbull of Connecticut; he signed one of the last returns (now on file in the archives of the Department of State) at West Point on June 4, 1783, as “ Captain Commanding.” The two regiments of Artillerists and Engineers, formed before the reor- ganization of the army in 1802, each contained 992 enlisted men; of the privates 672 were designated sappers and miners and 160 artificers; the re- maining 160 were non-commissioned officers and musicians. After the reorganization of 1802 a few enlisted engineer soldiers [one artificer and eighteen privates] were authorized to be enlisted by Section 3, Act of February 28, 1803. By the Act of April 29, 1812, it was enacted that there be attached to the Corps of Engineers “either from the troops now in service or by new enlistments, as the President of the United States may direct, 4 sergeants, 4 corporals, 1 teacher of music, 4 musicians, 19 artificers, and 62 men, which non-commissioned officers, musicians, artifi- cers, and men, together with the artificers and men already belonging to the Corps of Engineers, shall be formed into a company to be styled a com- pany of bombardiers, sappers and miners, and be officered from the Corps of Engineers, according as the commanding officer of that corps may, with the approbation of the President of the United States, direct.” From the 9th of June, 1814, this company served along the Niagara frontier, especially at Fort Erie and in the sortie from that work. It was disbanded by the Act of March 2, 1821, fixing the peace establishment of the United States, which retained no engineer troops. At the outbreak of the Mexican war, Congress, by the Act of May 16, 1846, created a company of engineer soldiers which were “ entitled to the same provisions, allowances and benefits in every respect as are allowed to the other troops constituting the present peace establishment.” It was to “ compose a part of the Corps of Engineers, and be officered by officers of that corps as at present organized.” Its functions included “ all the duties of sappers, miners and pontoniers ” ; and it was also to “ aid in giving prac- tical instructions in these branches at the Military Academy.” The en- listed organization comprised 10 sergeants, 10 corporals, 2 musicians, and 78 privates. This company joined the column of General Taylor on October 11, 1846, but was soon transferred to that of General Scott, where it took a gallant and distinguished part in all the battles from Vera Cruz to the City of Mexico. THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS. 117 In 1853 a detachment of 25 men assisted on the survey of the Northern Pacific railroad ; in 1858 the company took part in the Utah expedition; in 1858, 1859 and i860 a detachment of 30 men served with the troops in Oregon and Washington territory, taking part in the Wallen expedition to Salt Lake, the joint occupation of San Juan Island, and performing other important services. In the feverish excitement preceding the Civil War the company was ordered to Washington to guard public property, and at the inauguration of President Lincoln it was selected to form his immediate body guard when proceeding to the Capitol. It formed part of the second relief expedition to Fort Pickens, sailing from New York on April 8, and after spending the summer at that fort, putting the works in a state of defense, returned to Washington in October 1861. By the Acts of August 3 and August 6,1861, three additional companies of engineer soldiers and 1 company of topographical engineer soldiers were added to the military establishment. They were to have “the same pay and rations, clothing, and other allowances, and to be entitled to the same bene- fits in every respect as the company created by the Act for the organization of a company of sappers and miners and pontoniers, approved May 15, 1846.” The old company and each of the new companies was to be composed of 10 sergeants, 10 corporals, 2 musicians, 64 privates of the first class, and 64 privates of the second class,—in all 150 men. During the war no legal battalion organization existed, although the companies were so organized in orders ; but by the Act of July 28, 1866, this defect was remedied by the addition of a sergeant-major and a quartermaster-sergeant, and the recog- nition of the detail of officers of engineers to act as adjutant and quarter- master, the battalion thus comprising a total of 752 enlisted men,—its pres- ent legally authorized strength. These engineer companies after the return from Fort Pickens served throughout the Civil War with the Army of the Potomac. Space is lacking to detail their important and gallant services. The battalion was attached to the headquarters of the army, under orders of the chief engineer, and be- sides its special duties was often placed in the line of battle. Its officers were habitually detached, as needed, to serve temporarily on the staffs of generals commanding army corps and divisions. Its colors were officially authorized to bear the names of the following engagements : Vera Cruz, Mexico, 9 and 28 March, 1847; Cerro Gordo, 17 and 18 April, 1847; Contreras and Churubusco, 19 and 20 August, 1847; Molino del Rey, 8 September, 1847 ; Chapultepec and City of Mexico, 13 and 14 September, 1847; Yorktown, Va., 4 May, 1862; Fair Oaks, 31 May, 1862; Mechanics- ville, 26 June, 1862; Gaines’s Mill, 27 June, 1862; White Oak Swamp, 28 June, 1862; Malvern Hill, 1 July, 1862; Antietam, Md., 17 September, 1862; Fredericksburg, Va., 13 December, 1862; Chancellorsville, 4 May, 1863; Franklin Crossing, 5 June, 1863 ; Kelly’s Ford and Rappahannock Station, 7 November, 1863 ; Wilderness, 5 and 6 May, 1864 ; Po River, 8 May, 1864; North Anna, 23 May, 1864; Cool Arbor, 3 June, 1864; Siege of Petersburg, June, 1864 to April, 1865. Immediately after the close of the war the headquarters of the battalion 118 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. weie established at Willet’s Point, New York harbor, where has been gradually developed the present engineer school of application. All officers on assignment to the Corps of Engineers are attached for two or three years to one of the companies to acquire practical experience with troops, and to supplement their course of instruction in engineering received at the Mili- tary Academy. The captains commanding the companies under the super- vision of the battalion commander act as instructors. The school was in- formally organized by General Humphreys on August 8, 1866, shortly after his appointment as Chief of Engineers; and it received the official recognition of the War Department on February 28, 1885. One company of the battalion is usually stationed at West Point to aid in giving practical instructions in its special duties to the cadets of the Mili- tary Academy. For several years after the Civil War two companies were posted, one at San Francisco and the other at Jefferson Barracks, Mo., to be available for any military duty pertaining to their arm of service. When, under the changed conditions of the Indian problem, these detachments became unnecessary, they were discontinued. Three times since the Civil War the Battalion of Engineers has been called upon, by order of the President, to join its comrades of the line of the army in aiding the civil authority to enforce the law. The first occa- sion was the suppression of illicit distilleries near the Brooklyn Navy Yard in December, 1869. The second was on similar duty in Brooklyn, in No- vember, 1870, together with the occupation of the Army building to be in readiness to suppress anticipated rioting in New York City at the election of that month. The third was to aid in putting down the railroad riots in the summer of 1877 ; and it so happened that the only regular soldier who was wounded in this service was a private of Company A, Battalion of En- gineers. Small detachments have repeatedly been made to assist officers of the Corps in reconnaissances, surveys, and other professional duties ; and the battalion has frequently paraded with other troops on National occasions. One important duty of the engineer troops in times of peace has always been to aid in perfecting the materiel pertaining to their arm of service in war. This has been done with marked success. The bridge equipage has- tily organized for the Mexican war had proved unsatisfactory, and in 1858 experiments were begun to determine the best composition of trains for our service. These studies included trials with and the improvement of samples of those used in the European armies most experienced in the art of military bridge making. The materiel, except a few iron boats, was all fabricated by Company A at West Point, and the investigation was con- ducted in so thorough and systematic a manner by Lieut. Duane (since Chief of the Corps) that at the outbreak of war in 1861 every need of our armies operating in a theatre much obstructed by great rivers was perfectly met. After the Civil War similar duties were devolved upon the Battalion of Engineers in the development of a system of submarine mines for the defense of our harbors and rivers; and the materiel and methods now offi- cially determined and established by the Chief of Engineers with the approval of the Secretary of War, have resulted from these studies. The duty of employing these weapons in war was on July 1, 1871, added to the THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS. 119 other military duties of engineer troops by Congress. The school of sub- marine mining forms a branch of the Engineer School of Application at Willet’s Point; all officers of the Corps of Engineers are required, and officers of other arms of the service are allowed upon application to take this special course. War Record of the Corps of Engmeers.—Beside the military duties as- signed to engineer troops, there are important professional functions which devolve upon engineer officers serving on the staff of generals commanding armies in the field ; and in our service the command of volunteer troops, as well, has often devolved on officers of the Corps. In every war with a civilized power since the earliest history of our country these duties have been performed by them in a manner to merit and receive distinguished commendation ; and in all these wars their blood has been shed on the field of honor. That this is no exaggeration is shown by the following list of officers who have been killed or mortally wounded in battle since the organization of the present Corps in 1802. All were graduates of the Mil- itary Academy : Capt. and Bvt. Lieut.-Col. E. D. Wood, Sept. 17, 1814, Sortie from Fort Erie, U. C. Capt. W. G. Williams, Sept. 21, 1846, Monterey, Mexico. 1st. Lieut, and Bvt. Captain W. H. Warner, Sept. 26, 1849, by Indians near Pitt River, Cal. Captain J.W. Gunnison, Oct. 26, 1853, by Indians near Sevier Lake, Utah. Maj.-Gen. I. I. Stevens, U. S. V., Sept. 1, 1862, Chantilly, Va. Brig.-Gen. J. K. F. Mansfield, U. S. A., Sept. 18, 1862, Antietam, Md. 1st. Lieut, and Bvt. Col. J. L. K. Smith, Oct. 12, 1862, Corinth, Miss. 1st. Lieut, and Bvt. Major O. G. Wagner, April 21, 1863, Siege of York- town, Va. Major and Bvt. Major-Gen. A. W. Whipple, May 7, 1863, Chancellors- ville, Va. Captain and Bvt. Col. C. E. Cross, June 5, 1863, Franklin’s Crossing of Rappahannock River, Va. 1st Lieut, and Bvt. Col. P. H. O’Rorke, July 2, 1863, Gettysburg, Pa. Captain and Bvt. Col. H. S. Putnam, July 18,1863, Assault of Fort Wag- ner, S. C. Captain and Bvt. Col. A. H. Dutton, June 5, 1864, Bermuda Hundred, Va. Major and Bvt. Brig.-Gen. J. St. C. Morton, June 17, 1864, Petersburg, Va. Brig.-Gen. U. S. A., J. B. McPherson, July 22, 1864, Atlanta, Ga. 1st Lieut, and Bvt. Maj. J. R. Meigs, Oct. 3, 1864, Harrisonburg, Va. 1st Lieut. Jacob E. Blake, Topographical Engineers, deserves to be men- tioned in this list, although his death resulted from the accidental discharge of his own pistol on the field of Palo Alto after an act of the most con- spicuous gallantry performed in the sight of both armies. Very many of the officers of the Corps have been wounded in battle, some several times, but the list is too long for the space allotted to this paper. 120 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. During the war with Mexico 19 officers of the Corps of Engineers and 24 officers of the Corps of Topographical Engineers served actively in the field. One of them, Captain Williams, was killed, and sixteen wounds were divided among the others. Among those of this little band who subse- quently, in the Civil War, reached high rank and distinction may be men- tioned in order of seniority in their respective corps : Generals Mansfield, Robert E. Lee, Barnard, Beauregard, Isaac I. Stevens, Halleck, Tower, G. W. Smith, McClellan, Foster, Joseph E. Johnston, Emory, Fremont, Meade, Pope, Franklin, and T. J. Wood. During the Civil War the officers of both Corps with few exceptions served with the armies in the field. Some were attached to the battalion, others were on the staffs of army and division commanders, and many held volunteer commissions in command of troops. This latter list would have been much larger at the beginning of the war had not the ground been taken at the War Department that their services in their own arm were too important to be spared in volunteer grades lower than that of brigadier- general. It is a matter of record that 33 officers who either held or had held com- missions in the Corps of Engineers, were appointed during this war general officers in command of troops. Of these, 3 became major-generals, and 3 brigadier-generals in the regular army; 15 were major-generals, and 1? were brigadier-generals of volunteers; 8 of the 33 commanded armies; and 10, army corps. At least 8 general officers in the Confederate armies had been officers of our Corps of Engineers, and among them were General Robert E. Lee and General Joseph E. Johnston. Peace Record of the Corps of Engineers.—The limits of this paper forbid any attempt at details. The subject can hardly be covered more concisely than by the following extract from a letter of General Humphreys when Chief of Engineers, addressed to the Secretary of War in response to a cir- cular of September 4, 1876, inviting suggestions upon the subjects before a commission for the reform and reorganization of the army. This paper, which is reproduced nearly verbatim in Hamersly’s Army Register for 100 years, contains historical sketches of the two Corps compiled by Lieutenant- Colonel Casey, now Chief of Engineers. It involved much research and has been freely used in preparing the foregoing pages. General Humphreys writes : “ From the earliest period, the several organizations of engineers which we have had in our service, have invariably and exclusively made the sur- veys for, and the plans of, our sea-coast defenses, whether of a temporary character which were built up to 1818, or of the permanent character which have been since that time projected, and have superintended their con- struction and the disbursement of the funds appropriated by Congress for the same. “ Up to about 1831, its officers were to a great degree the repositors in this country, of that knowledge which was requisite for the purpose of mak- ing accurate surveys. The location and construction of the roads, canals, and bridges built for the development of the resources of the country, and the accurate methods of surveying, geodetic, topographic, and hydro- THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS. 12 I graphic, now in use, are in a great measure due to the talents and labors of its officers. “Almost all the great routes of internal communication in the interests of commerce and speedy transit, now in existence in the country, were first ex- plored, located, and projected by officers of this Corps. The files of the bureau of the Corps in Washington, and the Congressional documents, are rich in reports upon the works of this character, that have been examined into under authority of law, by the Corps of Engineers. “ In the matter of the improvement of rivers and harbors, in the interest of commerce, the Corps of Engineers has had almost the exclusive control, and the information on this subject contained in reports of its officers, from the early years of this century to the present time, now filed in the Bureau of the Corps, is a monument to its labors and a most valuable collection of precedents to be used in the future prosecution of such works. “ The surveys, examinations, and constructions which have been made by officers of the Corps, have not been confined to such matters as are solely in charge of the War Department. From time to time the State Depart- ment, the Navy Department, the Treasury Department, and the Interior Department have employed its officers in the running of boundary lines, and the surveys for the maps necessary to be used in delicate diplomatic nego- tiations ; in the surveys for, and the constructions of, dock-yards ; the sur- veys for canal routes across the Isthmus of Panama; upon astronomical observations in the interest of science ; in the surveys of the coasts, the planning and construction of light-houses and other fixed aids to navigation ; the planning and construction of public buildings, of custom houses, post- offices, marine hospitals, etc.; and especially in the construction of the Capitol, the General Post Office, and the Washington Aqueduct in this city. “ Scarcely a branch of engineering, whether military or civil can be men- tioned, that has not been improved and expanded by the study and labors of the officers of this Corps. “ It is difficult to enumerate all the duties which may have been, or which can be devolved on the Corps of Engineers in time of peace. As the duties generally are such as require familiarity with the sciences and arts, any duty which the Government needs performed which involves the application of this character of learning and comes within the professional training of the several members of the Corps, maybe devolved by the President upon them.” The labors of the Corps of Engineers have been largely increased by the Act of August ii, 1888, which imposes upon the Secretary of War thedutyof establishing harbor lines when in his judgment they are essential for the pre- servation and protection of harbors ; also by the Acts of September 19, 1890, and of July 13, 1892, which contain important provisions relative to bridges, dumping, wrecks, and other obstructions to navigation. Present Organization of the Corps of Engineers.—The headquarters of the Corps are now in Washington, where under the direction of the Secre- tary of War the engineer department, including its bureau, is commanded by its chief. His office is subdivided into five divisions. In general terms, the first includes fortification ; the second, engineer troops and depots, with Corps orders, returns and personnel; the third, civil works of improve- 122 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. ment; the fourth, appropriations and disbursements; the fifth, surveys, maps and claims. Officers of the Corps, usually three in number, are detailed to take charge of these divisions. A permanent board of engineers of not less than three members, usually high in rank, plans and revises projects of permanent fortification and works of river and harbor improvement, and considers such other matters as may be referred to it by the Chief. The latter submits all important re- ports, with his views thereon, to the Secretary of War without whose sanc- tion no important work is.undertaken. The geographical limits of the United States are divided into districts usually about fifty in number, the military and civil engineerings works in each of which are in charge of an officer of experience in the corps. These officers execute the works, disburse the funds, and submit such projects and estimates as may be ordered. Such of these districts as are in charge of officers below the grade of lieut.-colonelare grouped in divisions, the number and extent of which are determined by the Chief of Engineers. At present there are five, each in charge of a Colonel of the Corps. Division engineers exercise care and over- sight over the works in progress, inspect them at least once a year, and counsel, advise, and in case of emergency direct the district officers in matters pertaining to the engineering features of their works, reporting such action, promptly to the Chief of the Corps. All papers connected with engineering project, plan and construction within his division pass through the office of the division engineer. The engineering works of all districts are inspected annually by the chief of engineers or by the division engineers. Officers of the Corps are detached under the Treasury Department to act as light-house engineers in each of the sixteen districts into which the country is divided; and others are detailed to serve as members and as engineer secretary of the Light-house Board. Under the Act of June 11,1878, an officer of the Corps, with two Engineer officers as assistants, is detailed as one of the three commissioners for the Government of the District of Columbia. Other officers are detached for service in connection with the Military Academy, and on special duties such, for example, as the demarcation of State and International boundaries. The battalion is officered by details from the Corps, and other officers may be detached to serve on the staffs of generals commanding depart- ments. From the above it will be seen that the duties of our Corps of Engineers combine the functions of the Corps du Genie, and of the Ponts et Chaussees in the French service ; and in time of war include many of the functions of the Etat Major. That these duties are performed by an aggregate of 109 officers, not including the additional 2d lieutenants authorized by Act of May 17, 1886, sufficiently demonstrates the onerous nature of the services exacted from the Corps. It may be added in conclusion that the term “ staff corps ” sometimes erroneously applied has always been repudiated by officers of the Corps of Engineers as a designation not in accordance with our statute law or THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS. with the practice of other armies. The Corps forms no part of the staff of the army, for it in no case furnishes the means necessary for its subsistence, comfort, mobility, and action to any greater degree than does the artillery or cavalry. In most services it is termed a special arm, and in all services it is assigned a place in the line of battle. With us the honor of the right of the line is conceded by the regulations. This fact from the very derivation of the term is sufficient to justify the claim that the Corps belongs to “the line ” of the army and that its officers are properly so classed except when specially detailed for staff duty. In view of the general misapprehension prevailing as to the old 63d Article of War, now expunged from the list, some reference to its history and true import seems appropriate. The article was enacted by the Act of April 10, 1806, and read as follows: “ The functions of the engineers being generally confined to the most elevated branch of military science, they are not to assume, nor are they sub- ject to be ordered on, any duty beyond the line of their immediate profes- sion, except by the special order of the President of the United States ; but they are to receive every mark of respect to which their rank in the army may entitle them respectively, and are liable to be transferred, at the discre- tion of the President, from one corps to another, regard being paid to rank.” This enactment was the outcome of a dispute which in 1803 arose be- tween Colonel Williams, Commandant of the Corps of Engineers, and Captain Izard of the Artillery, whose company was stationed at West Point, upon a question connected with the command of the post. The matter was referred to the Secretary of War, then Hon. H. Dear- born, who decided “ that no officer, cadet, or soldier of the Corps of Engi- neers was subject to the orders of any officer of any other corps, but to the orders of the President only, or when in actual service to the orders of the commanding general, and that no officer of engineers should, under any circumstances, command any officer or troops, of any other corps, except by the special orders of the President.” This decision limiting command of engineer officers being in contraven- tion of the then Articles of War, published by order of Congress on Sep- tember 2, 1776, was received with great mortification and dissatisfaction by the officers of the Corps of Engineers, who felt themselves justly aggrieved thereby. No reply being received to a memorial on the subject addressed to the President, Mr. Jefferson, the whole Corps determined to resign their commissions ; and Colonel Williams and Major Wadsworth, the only field officers then in the Corps, did actually resign. As it was apparent that the military pride and sense of justice of the officers was severely wounded, the Secretary of War sanctioned a corre- spondence between General Wilkinson, the commanding general of the army, and Colonel Williams, inviting him to return to the command of the Corps, accompanied with a project of a General Order containing the prin- ciples, and substantially the expressions, subsequently embodied in the 63d article above quoted. Upon this basis the difficulty was settled. The arti- cle was in truth a compromise, accepted but never favored by the Corps of Engineers. 124 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY,. This article did, however, contrary to the usage of other nations, deprive engineer officers of the right of succession in command by virtue of sen- iority of commission, when different corps of the army joined to do duty together. Foreseeing the trouble which might arise in consequence, Con- gress wisely enacted in the organic acts raising the engineer troops now in service, the provision that these organizations “ shall be entitled to the same provisions, allowances and benefits in every respect as are allowed to other troops constituting the present military peace establishment.” This legislation has settled the old standing controversy as to right of command in actual service with troops. The Battalion of Engineers has often served with other troops both of the army and navy, and always upon the basis thus laid down; which, moreover, was officially recognized by General Sheridan when commanding the army. In an indorsement dated July 7, 1885, he wrote: “When engineers are on duty with organized bodies of troops of their own corps, they are or should be considered, as line officers, and when a command of engineer troops happens to join or do duty with the troops of other corps, the engineer officers should be entitled to com- mand, or to be commanded, according to seniority of rank. “ Paragraph 9 of the present Army Regulations, fixes the position in lines, of the different corps, including engineers on all occasions of pa- rade and ceremony, and I believe it to be for the interest of the service, generally, that the engineer troops should in our service, as in that of other nations, be considered as of the line of the army,—an arm of service. * * * “ In 1861, a battalion of engineer troops was formed, and with a strength varying from 200 to 750 enlisted men, has been continued in the permanent establishment. The Battalion of Engineers, comprising the companies stationed at Willet’s Point and one company of engineer soldiers stationed at West Point, having an aggregate strength of 466 officers and men, is one of the most efficient bodies of troops in our service.” In the early part of its history the Chief of the Corps took an active part in the operation of armies in the field. The latest example was in the case of General Totten, who personally directed the duties of his arm of service in the siege of Vera Cruz. In one instance, that of General Alexander Macomb, the Chief of the Corps was promoted to the command of the army with the rank of Major-General. The limited space allotted to this paper has precluded, for the most part, the mention of individual members of the Corps, although many of them have played an important part in the history of the country. The list on the following page of the successive commanders, however, should find a place: THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS. 125 CHIEFS OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 1774 TO 1893. Name. Rank. Title. Date of Appointment. Where Appointed From. Richard Gridley Colonel Chief Engineer £ < June , 1775 Mass. Rufus Putnam £ 4 Aug. 5, 1776 Lewis du Portail “ ££ July 22, 1777 France Lewis du Portail Brig. Gen. £ £ Nov. 17, 1777 £ £ Lewis du Portail Maj. Gen. a Nov. 16, 1781 £ £ Stephen Rochefontaine Lt.-Col. Comdr. Corps of Artillerists and Engineers Feb. 26, 1795 Henry Burbeck Comdr. ist Regt. Corps Artillerists and Engineers May 7, 1798 Mass. Jonathan Williams * ‘ Principal Engineer July 8, 1802 Penn. Jonathan Williams Chief Engineer April 19, 1805 Jonathan Williams Colonel Feb. 23, 1808 Joseph G. Swift “ Tuly 31, 1812 Mass. Walker K. Armistead a ££ Nov. 12, 1818 Va. Alexander Macomb “ June 1, 1821 New York Charles Gratiot “ ££ May 28, 1828 Mo. Ter. Joseph G. Totten £ < “ Dec. 7, 1838 Conn. J. J. Abert “ Chief T op. Engineer £ < a July 7, 1838 D. C. Stephen H. Long 44 Sept. 9, 1861 New Hamp. Joseph G. Totten Brig. Gen. Chief Engineer Mar. 3. 1863 Conn. Richard Delafield £ £ April 22, 1864 New York Richard Delafield 44 Chief of Engineers July 13, 1866 £ £ Andrew A. Humphreys 44 £ £ Aug. 8, 1866 Penn. Horatic G. Wright 4 4 £ 6 June 30, 1879 Conn. John Newton 44 “ Mar. 6, 1884 Va. James C. Duane “ 4 £ Oct. 11, 1886 New York Thomas L. Casey 4 ‘ ii July 6, 1888 R. T. THE ORDNANCE DEPARTMENT. THE Ordnance Department was organized as a distinct branch of our military establishment by an act of Congress approved May 14, 1812. The duty of providing military stores for the army and militia had devolved prior to that time upon a purveyor of public supplies acting under the direction of the Secretary of War. Everything except small arms was purchased, mainly by contract, and the Secretary personally supervised the contracts. The examination of accounts now performed in the staff bureau was made in the office of an accountant of the War Depart- ment. The duties of supplying ordnance material vested in the Secretary himself. When an addition of 6000 men was made to the army in 1808 these duties became excessive and burdensome to the Secretary, but no relief was granted until the war with Great Britain was impending, when bills were passed establishing a Quartermaster and an Ordnance Department. An act of May 14, 1812, provided for a Commissary General of Ordnance, an assis- tant commissary general, four deputy commissaries, and as many assistant deputy commissaries as the President might think necessary not exceeding eight. An act approved February 5,1815, “ For the better regulation of the Ord- nance Department,” provided a body of officers, consisting of one colonel, one lieutenant colonel, two majors, ten captains, and ten of each of first, second and third lieutenants. As this act, so far as relates to the Department itself, independently of its personnel, is regarded as its organic law, and, with only minor modifications by more recent acts, is still in force, it may be well to indicate briefly its most important features. It authorized the chief officer of the new department, “ under the direction of the Secretary for the De- partment of War,” to enlist artisans and laborers ; to direct the inspection and proof of all cannon and small arms ; to direct the construction of gun carriages, equipments, implements, and ammunition ; to make estimates and contracts for, and purchases of ordnance supplies and stores, and to issue them to the army ; to exact from armories and arsenals quarterly re- turns of property and to receive from all responsible officers reports of damages to ordnance material; to establish ordnance depots; to prepare regulations for the government of the Ordnance Department and forms of returns and reports. The public armories and arsenals were placed under his direction, and the duty of arming and equipping the militia from the permanent appropriation of $200,000 per annum provided by the law of April 23, 1808, devolved upon the new department. The colonel and chief of the new corps was Decius Wadsworth and the lieutenant colonel was George Bomford, both officers of ability and distinc- Major C. E. DUTTON, Ordnance Dept., U. S. A THE ORDNANCE DEPARTMENT\ 127 tion. Little is known of the state of this service in the six years following the war with England beyond what appears in the routine records. These records suffice to show that great improvements were effected in modes of administration and a system introduced for securing promptness, efficiency, economy and responsibility to a degree which was before unknown and which in its main features has lasted down to the present time. Whoever reads the Ordnance regulations of 1818 will be surprised to see how little rather than how much they differ from those now in force. In the reduction of the army in 1821, the Ordnance Corps ceased to exist, the majority of its officers being re-commissioned in the artillery. But the Ordnance Department remained. Its duties were performed by officers de- tailed from the artillery. Bomford, who had been the lieutenant colonel of the corps and was made lieutenant colonel of the 1st Artillery, became the head of the Department. The law provided for four supernumerary captains of artillery who should be available for ordnance duty, and these were so assigned. Their details were practically permanent, though not necessarily so ; their continuance depending upon the pleasure of the Secretary of War. All other officers whose services might be required were to be detailed for the term of one year from the artillery. Whatever may be the merits, under favorable conditions, of an ordnance service performed by officers detailed from the line, it is now apparent that they could not be realized under the law of 1821. The periods of detail were much too short to enable them to become proficient, and the little ex- perience they might have gained was lost to the Ordnance service by the return of the officers to their regiments. Then, as now, the duties required men of special and long experience, and once secured they could not be easily spared. The service degenerated, and after the retirement of Mr. Calhoun in 1825 his successors urged with increasing pressure the reestab- lishment of the Ordnance Corps. In 1832 Congress yielded and passed the bill. It provides for one colonel, one lieutenant colonel, two majors and ten captains, to be selected from the artillery. Bomford was made chief of the corps. He was a man of vigor and great intelligence, a capable organ- izer and well qualified to renovate and build up an important administra- tive bureau. He brought to his new office certain qualifications which are most essential to it; above all, the faculty of impressing himself strongly upon public men in Congress and at the head of administrations. His social standing and connections were eminent; his address impressive, yet pleas- ing. His official papers in particular were models of reserve force, lucid ar- gument, and fluent style. The personnel of the new corps was carefully se- lected. All of them had excellent records. Three of them, Lieut. Colonel George Talcott, Major H. K. Craig, and Captain R. L. Baker, had been su- pernumerary captains of artillery during the consolidation period, serving continuously in the Ordnance. One name, however, was conspicuous by its absence. Captain William Wade, who had been one of the supernumerary captains, had served as an Ordnance officer since 1812, and with conspicu- ous merit. In the natural course of appointments it was expected that he would be made the second major; but the place was given to Captain and Brevet Lieutenant Colonel William J. Worth. Wade, though offered a cap- 128 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. taincy, considered himself overslaughed, and resigned from the army.* If he was wronged, he secured a noble revenge. For the time came when the department was in urgent need of just such services as Wade was, of all men, most capable of rendering. He gave them loyally, with lasting honor to himself, and with great advantage to the government. Among the cap- tains, the first place in respect to ability must be conceded to Alfred Mor- decai. He rose rapidly by force of merit to a fame less brilliant, but not less solid than Rodman's. His memory is entitled in a peculiar degree to the care of army historians, for his work was such as appeals to technical and professional men rather than to the multitude. His contributions came, not in the shape of a few large nuggets, but in a steady stream of gold dust sustained for many years and far outweighing the nuggets in the end. The value of his work consisted in its accuracy, its systematic character, and its immediate utility, and still more in the subtle, potent way in which the spirit of it pervaded almost insensibly the entire corps, Mordecai was not the only one whose merit was greater than his popular fame. Of some of them I knew too little to speak, and all had gone from the corps when I entered it. But I well remember the accounts of them given by those who had served under them and whose own conduct was the best illustration of the discipline and training they had learned to emu- late. Their abilities were chiefly executive. They may perhaps be gauged by the generally admitted fact that the armories and principal arsenals be- came the model workshops of the country. The field open to the new corps was a broad one. The stagnation of the preceding decade had pervaded the entire army, and most of all the Ord- nance service. It had caused, not indeed retrogression, but a lack of pro- gress. The Indian wars of the thirties once more awakened the interest of Congress in the army and the army’s interest in itself. The equipment of the new regiment of dragoons, the renovation of the field-guns and their mounting, the improvement of cast iron with a view to heavier calibres in the fortresses, the important changes in their carriages, experiments with breech-loading small arms, all engaged attention. Although progress was made, the full fruition of that progress did not become manifest until ten to sixteen years later, for the problems were difficult and the general state of the arts and sciences was not at that time such as to render a very rapid progress possible. By an act approved July 5, 1838, the President was authorized to add to the Ordnance Department two majors and to transfer to it from the artil- lery ten first lieutenants and ten second lieutenants. A supplementary act approved two days later, July 7, 1838, limited the number of lieutenants to be transferred to twelve. Among the new names of the corps we find those of Captains Maynadier and Thornton and Lieutenants Whitely, John F. Lee, Hagner, Wainwright, and Dyer, all of whom rose to distinction in after years. Worth was appointed colonel of the 8th Infantry, Ripley was pro- * Worth’s commission as captain of artillery was senior to Wade’s, but I think he had never before served in the Ordnance. In 1838 he was appointed colonel of the newly organized 8th In- fantry and his career in the Mexican War, where he served in his brevet rank of major general, is familiar history. THE ORDNANCE DEPARTMENT. 129 moted to be major, and Lomax was transferred and reappointed major from the artillery. In 1841 were added the names of Gorgas and Rodman, in 1842 those of Laidley and Benton. The decade from 1840 to 1850 was a most creditable one. The propor- tion of very able men in the corps was such as could be equalled by very few organizations in any army. In 1841 the Ordnance Board was estab- lished,—a feature of the department which still exists, though its functions are in a large measure superseded by the Board of Ordnance and Fortifica- tion. It has been a very serviceable institution. It has always been com- posed of ordnance officers of great experience and ability. The mixed boards which preceded it had yielded comparatively small results, owing to want of harmony of views among the members. The new board being more homogeneous accomplished more every year than its predecessors had accomplished in three or four. The first work before it was systema- tizing the armament of the country, including, so far as practicable, the entire range of ordnance material, making complete the equipment of every arm of the service in all details, preparing working drawings of every part in such manner that they could be made of exact record and regula- tion. It was also advisory to the Chief of Ordnance on all matters referred to it concerning improvements in material and as to experiments upon new devices or inventions. Its systematic work lasted eight years, at the end of which time (1849) it may be said that we had, in theory at least, a true sys- tem of ordance material and the means of creating any amount of it that Congress might deem it fitting to appropriate the money for. The equip- ment of light batteries was completed in 1842, and their performance in the Mexican War is well known. Material for siege trains had received full con- sideration by 1845, and at the outbreak of that war an effective siege train was assembled by Huger assisted by Hagner, and took a highly creditable part in the operations of General Scott’s army from Vera Cruz to the City of Mexico. The mounting of guns in casemate and barbette was com- pletely revised, the cast-iron carriages which had been preferred since 1820 being virtually condemned in 1839, and timber carriages were again adopted.* The armories at Springfield and Harper’s Ferry since their first estab- lishment in 1798 had been under the immediate charge of civil superinten- dents. Though placed under the nominal control of the Ordnance De- partment by the law of 1815, it seems to have been held that the executive management of the affairs of the armories was vested by law in the super- intendents. Although some highly objectionable features of the manage- ment had grown up and were well known, no decisive measures were taken by the Secretary of War to correct them until 1842. By an act approved August 23, 1842, the offices of civil superintendents were abolished and the duties were imposed upon officers of the Ordnance Corps. Craig was put in command at Harper’s Ferry, and Ripley at Springfieid. The same act provided for the employment by the Ordnance Bureau of a competent person to superintend the manufacture of iron cannon. This * Lieut Birkhimer's •' History of the Artillery ” gives a goo'd summary of the changes in heavy gun carriages, page 254. 130 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. was no doubt intended for the recall of Wade to his proper sphere. Since his resignation in 1832 he had been in the employ of the Fort Pitt Foundry at Pittsburg, and as a result of many costly experiments had made great progress in obtaining large iron castings of increased strength and reliability. This was of much importance in view of the desire to obtain guns of greatly increased power. About 1830 Bomford had designed a class of large guns for firing shells to which he gave the grotesque name of “ Co- lumbiads.” At first they were 50 and ioo-pounders, but owing to the un- certain character of the metal it was deemed inexpedient to procure more than sufficed for a trial of them. In 1843 shell guns (columbiads) of 8 and 10-inch calibre were undertaken with some degree of success. The metal was of excellent quality, but it had become plain that its advantages could not be fully realized until advances were made in the knowledge of gun- powder and in controlling its action. Experiments upon gunpowder were begun by Mordecai at the Washington Arsenal in 1843. As models of scientific method in research they will always rank high. The results lie at the foundation of those remarkable improvements in the use and control of that agent which came in after years. Their completion rendered possible a considerable advance in the power of heavy artillery. In 1842 Talcott became the real Chief of Ordnance, and after Bomford’s death in 1848 was promoted to be colonel. During the Mexican War there were added to the corps by the act of March 3, 1847, two captains and six lieutenants. Among the new names, appear those of Charles P. Stone (1845) and Jesse L. Reno (1846), Julian McAllister (1847), and S. V. Benet (1849), all of whom attained distinction in after years. Great as had been the advances from 1840 to 1850, those from 1850 to i860 were greater still. But it will be impossible to do more here than to allude to the most important. First in importance was the adoption of the rifled musket in place of the smooth-bore. The invention of the sub-calibre expanding bullet was the turning point. Prior to that, the rifle was the inferior arm in the main line of battle, and its utility had been limited to special corps of troops. The new bullet made it superior for all purposes, and in 1855 the rifle was adopted in all the armies.of the world as the in- fantry arm. It was in the early part of this decade that Rodman’s experi- ments were mostly conducted on metals, resulting in the establishment of the principle of initial tensions in the construction of cannon. His exper- iments on gunpowder, establishing the control of its combustion and carry- ing that control further than had ever before been contemplated soon followed. Of all methods of applying the principle of initial tensions, Rodman’s was the crudest and least satisfactory. But the demonstration cf the principle itself, remains as the most important contribution to the art of gun construction which has ever been made, and established his fame as effectively as the twitching of the frog’s legs established the fame of Volta. Little if any less important was the control of the action of gun- powder. But Rodman’s contribution in this line, while entitling him to high honor, must be shared by others. This decade 1850-1860 was remarkable for the extraordinary number of devices for breech-loading arms, as well as for attempts to introduce rifled THE ORDNANCE DEPARTMENT. cannon. The results were at best very imperfect, though important ad- vances and some partial successes were attained. The introduction of breech-loading arms as a finality took place immediately after the war, and was determined by a great invention which in the period was little thought of though it was foreshadowed. This will be spoken of further on. The cavalry, however, accepted the Sharp’s carbine in 1857, after a stubborn resistance to all breech-loading arms, beginning with the organization of the 1st Dragoons in 1833. Of the many forms of breech-loading arms, Sharp’s model was doubtless the best, but the ammunition was from its nature very perishable. Perhaps no better indication of the character of the progress of that decade can be found than in two inventions, Rodman’s pressure gauge, and Benton’s electro-chronograph. The first (with the crusher improvement) is indispensable in interior ballistics; the second was an important addition to the many devices which are equally indispensable in exterior ballistics. They effected a revolution in scientific methods of investigating the more difficult problems of gunnery. In this decade also began the transitions from ancient to modern artil- lery. It proceeded by slow and difficult steps. The establishment of the principle of initial tensions and the control of gunpowder were two great achievements. But before they could be so utilized as to secure the enor- mously improved results which were afterwards reached, collateral advances along other lines were necessary. The enlarged chamber leading to the principle of variable “ density of loading” was a third advance. The devel- opment of the art of making large masses of steel suitable for guns was the fourth, and the longest delayed, as well as the most costly. In 1851 Talcott was succeeded by Craig. Between 1850 and 1859 the corps received Crispin, Balch, Shunk, Treadwell, Baylor, O. O. Howard, Strong, Horace Porter, and Edson. Soon after the war Balch and Porter resigned ; the others (except Major General Howard) are all dead. The seven senior officers of the corps now on the active list entered it in 1861. The outbreak of the Civil War found the Ordnance Department in a trying situation. It had been its policy since its organization to accumu- late as large a store of the durable munitions of war as its appropriations permitted. But the change from smooth-bore to rifle in 1855 had rendered the old muskets obsolete. Such rifles as had been procured since that year had been mostly distributed to the army and militia, and nearly all of the remainder had been sent by Secretary Floyd to the Southern States in an- ticipation of secession. The first Secretary under Mr. Lincoln took the matter of providing arms to volunteers in chief part into his own hands, and sent agents to Europe to purchase whatever arms could be found. Meantime, measures were taken to enlarge the capacity of Springfield Armory, and contracts were made with private armories to furnish with the greatest practicable haste large supplies of muskets of the Springfield pat- tern. This required time, and the first volunteer troops were in many cases armed with indifferent weapons derived largely from Europe, and of several widely distinct patterns. All other supplies were forthcoming in abundance about as fast as the troops were ready to receive them, and from the begin- 132 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. ning to the end of the war there was no lack of small arms, artillery ammu- nition, or equipments. Much of the contract work and material was of inferior quality in comparison with the outputs of the Arsenal, but this was due in a great measure to the fact that the Government had accumulations of good raw materials and specially-trained workmen, while contractors found it difficult and sometimes impossible to secure them. The efficiency of a well-trained corps of officers was signally displayed in the promptness, accuracy and good judgment with which all demands upon it were met, and in the judicious economy with which its material was managed and husbanded. But at the outbreak of the war, the corps lost some of its best officers. Mordecai resigned, but did not give his great abilities to the South. Gorgas became Chief of Ordnance to the Confederacy, and displayed the highest ability in that office. Bell, Huger, John F. Lee, and Welcker, resigned and entered the Confederate service. Strong became a brigadier, and after- wards a major general of volunteers, and was killed in the attack on Fort Wagner. Reno (Jesse L.) also became a major general of volunteers and died most gallantly at South Mountain. The distinguished career of Oliver O. Howard, who was a first lieutenant of Ordnance at the beginning of the war, can only be alluded to here. The need of more Ordnance officers was obvious, and the act of August 3, 1861, provided that “there shall be added to the Ordnance Department * * * one Chief of Ordnance, with the rank, pay and emoluments of the Quartermaster General of the army, one colonel, one lieutenant colonel, and six second lieutenants, the field officers to be appointed by selection from the officers of the army, and the second lieutenants from the graduates of the Military Academy, by transfers from the engineers, or the topographi- cal engineers, or the artillery.” The office of Chief of Ordnance, with the rank of brigadier general being thus an original vacancy, was filled by the promotion of Ripley over the head of Craig. The field officers were selected from the Ordnance Corps in accordance with seniority. As thus organ- ized, the corps numbered (January i, 1862), one brigadier general, two colonels, two lieutenant colonels, four majors, twelve captains, twelve first lieutenants, eight second lieutenants, twelve storekeepers, and four vacan- cies in the lowest grade. The act of March 3, 1863, provided for the addition of one lieutenant colonel, two majors, eight captains, and eight first lieutenants, to be ap- pointed by promotion, and the vacancies at the foot of the list to be filled by transfers from regiments or other corps of the army. It also provided “ that no officer of the Ordnance Department below the rank of a field offi- cer shall be promoted to a higher grade, nor shall any officer of the army be commissioned as an Ordnance officer, until he shall have passed a satis- factory examination before a board of not less than three Ordnance officers senior to him in rank.” It also provided that this organization should con- tinue only during the Rebellion, and that thereafter the officers promoted should have the rank they would have had if the act had not passed, and the number should be reduced to the organization of August 3, 1861. By the act of July 28, 1866, the number of officers authorized by the act of THE ORDNANCE DEPARTMENT. 133 March 3, 1863, was made permanent, but with the following grades: one brigadier general, three colonels, four lieutenant colonels, ten majors, twenty captains, sixteen first lieutenants, ten second lieutenants, and thir- teen Ordnance storekeepers. In June, 1863, Craig, and in September following, Ripley, were retired after more than forty-five years of active service, and George D. Ramsey was appointed Chief of Ordnance. He was the senior officer of the corps at the time of Ripley’s retirement, having entered the artillery in 1820 and transferred to the Ordnance as a captain in 1835. In September, 1864, Ramsey was retired, and Major A. B. Dyer, then commanding the Spring- field Armory, was appointed Chief. The close of the war was followed by dark days for the Ordnance. Dis- appointed contractors and inventors whose hopes had not been realized, were embittered against the bureau and carried their grievances into Con- gress, A joint committee v'-as appointed to investigate their complaints, and the procedure, it is gratifying to know, has not often been paralleled in Congressional committees. Its report (drafted by the most bitter and most unreasonable of the complainants) reflected severely upon General Dyer, who at once asked for a court-martial. It was refused, and he then asked for a court of inquiry, which was granted. The inquiry of the court was long and thorough, and not only exonerated him, but held him up as an example worthy of the imitation of all army officers. Probably the worst effect of the investigation by the Congressional committee was the encouragement it afforded to similar attacks, and though this appears to have been the only personal one, the Ordnance Department found to its great embarrassment that similar influences were ever present to poison the minds of Committees against all its projects for the improvement of heavy ordnance, and to impose upon it heavy burdens of proof against other projects which it could in no way recommend. These influences were maintained through many years. They created a feeling of distrust towards the Depart- ment and its officers for which there was no real ground. They caused Committees to give precedence to and vote large sums for, the trial of costly devices whose failure was assured in advance, and every attempt in the true path of improvement was hampered or kept waiting indefinitely. The year 1866 marks a revolution in the armament of the infantry. To say that it marks the change from the muzzle-loading to the breech-loading musket does not accurately nor logically express its real significance. Breech-loading arms, both great and small, have been experimented with for at least three, and perhaps four, centuries. The period from 1840 to 1857 abounded in devices for breech loading which became more numerous every year. It is a common idea that the aversion to them on the part of all officers was founded in mere conservatism, or even prejudice. But the truth was otherwise. All things considered, the breech-loaders were inferior to muzzle-loaders, and the superiority of the former was established only when the centre fire metallic cartridge was perfected. The ordinary notion is that powder and ball are mere accessories to the gun ; that the gun is the all-important and substantive thing, while the cartridge is a minor incident. So all-pervading has this idea been in times past, that even the most expert 134 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. have been not only influenced by it, but sometimes governed by it. The truth is the opposite. The cartridge is primary and antecedent, the gun secondary and consequent. Before the metallic cartridge was perfected, breech-loading arms were all of varying degrees of badness ; afterwards they were all of varying degrees of goodness. At no time since, has there been a year in which it was not possible to select half a dozen or more designs of breech-loaders, such that if we were to assign ioo as a figure of merit for the best, the corresponding figure for the poorest would be at least 90 and per- haps 95. Under the old system, the ball, the powder and the priming were separate and separately handled ; under the new system, they formed one piece. The gun with its breech mechanism follows as a logical sequence. We may now perceive why progress with breech-loading arms was so slow, prior to the war, and why “ science moved but slowly, slowly, creeping on from point to point.” All inventive thought was concentrated on the gun as the primary factor. But when the centre fire metallic cartridge was developed—presto ! “ Science ” had put on its seven-leagued boots. The change to the breech-loader took place at a bound. These remarks are offered as a general answer to the frequent criticism that Ordnance officers were slow to adopt improved arms, and that they were behind other nations in this respect. If our army was later than others in receiving breech-loaders, it was the first to have the metallic cartridge, and other armies only got bad muskets and worse ammunition by being too previous. The metallic cartridge it seems to me is the greatest military invention since the discovery of gunpowder. It is, however, an evolution rather than an invention, embodying a slow accretion of the ideas of many workers and inventors. The earliest patent I am aware of on the centre-fire form is that of Morse, though his design is crude. It was, however, worked up to a thoroughly effective form and with many changes at the Frankford Arsenal. With the developed form came the necessity of providing machinery for manufacturing it rapidly and cheaply. This, too, was accomplished at the same arsenal during the commands of Benet and Treadwell. The designer of this machinery was Jabez H. Gill, a master mechanic at Frankford, who was much aided by Robert Bolton, the foreman of the cartridge factory. Achievements such as theirs, if attained outside of the government service, would have made their names illustrious. The development of the Springfield rifle, with the swinging breech-block, quickly followed. Though some minor improvements have been made from time to time, its essential features have lasted to the present. While foreign armies have changed their arms repeatedly, and while our own Ordnance Department has repeatedly offered competing arms which seemed from the tests of the proving ground to be better, the infantry have clung to the Springfield arm with a tenacity for which Ordnance officers sometimes find it difficult to account. In the change to the magazine system, the policy of the Department has been the same as in the sixties; it is comprised in the old proverb : “ Be sure you are right and then go ahead.” In this second change, something more than a device for the more rapid loading and dis- charge of cartridges was required, and that was a cartridge of reduced size and THE ORDNANCE DEPARTMENT. 135 weight, without any reduction, but rather with an increase of power. Until the cartridge was greatly improved the change was at best of very doubtful advantage. The act of March 8, 1869 (Army Appropriations bill), stopped all promo- tions and appointments in the staff corps until further legislation. The act of June 23, 1874, reopened promotions and gave to the corps its present organization. The grade of second lieutenant of Ordnance was abolished, and also Ordnance storekeepers, but without affecting the status of the storekeepers then in service. All vacancies in the grade of first lieutenant were to be filled by transfer from the line, and all promotions and appoint- ments to be subject to a satisfactory examination before a board of Ord- nance officers. These provisions have been of great value and importance to the corps, and are in a large measure due to the efforts of the lamented Lyford. They have secured a class of officers to whom the professional reputation of the corps may be entrusted for many years to come with the entire confi- dence of the army and the country. There might seem to be one drawback, as it has thus far had the effect of taking from the artillery some of its brightest and most capable lieutenants; but that corps is so abundantly supplied with splendid material of that kind that it will hardly feel the drain. In May, 1874, General Dyer, after a long illness, passed away, and in the following month, S. V. Benet, then a major in the corps, wras appointed Chief of Ordnance, which position he held until his retirement in 1891. Since the close of the war, the corps has suffered the severest visitations of death. The complete list of those who have died in active service since the war is, Wainwright, Rodman, Benton, Crispin, Shunk, Todd, Tread- well, Baylor, Edson, Bradford, Hill, Buel, Lyford, Edie, Chaffee, C. F. Rock- well, McKee, Ramsay, Jr., Michaelis, Prince, Poland, Clifford, Wright, Star- ring, Wier, Medcalfe. If death loves a shining mark, he seldom missed it when he aimed at the Ordnance Corps. If the average efficiency of their successors shall be as great as theirs, more could not reasonably be asked nor expected. The names of those who have passed in the same time to the retired list and thence to their graves will also serve to recall the early history of the corps in whose achievements they bore a highly honorable part. The assemblage of names is a strong one: Craig, Ripley, Ramsay, Maynadier, Thornton, Hagner, Laidley, McAllister. Of the corps which antedates the Mexican War, there is but one survivor, Colonel and Brevet Brigadier General R. H. K. Whiteley, whom the older officers of the present corps recall, not only with profound respect and admiration, but with affec- tion. He and his contemporaries just mentioned, present themselves to our recollection as models to be imitated in respect to industry, fidelity, discipline, devotion to duty in the military relation, and dignified courtesy in the private one. The recency of General Benet’s command would make it from a military point of view indecorous for me to do more than to respectfully offer my congratulations upon the high efficiency of the corps and of the department, at the term of his administration. THE SIGNAL CORPS. LIEUT. W. A. GLASSFORD Signal Corps, U. S. A. THE genesis of military signaling is written in the labors of Myer. What from the most ancient times other commanders had dimly comprehended, Napoleon first saw clearly enough to crystalize into his maxim, “ Le secret de la guerre est dans le secret de communica- tions.'' What the great captain of modern warfare recognized but could not attain was the problem whose solution fell to Albert James Myer of the Medical Department, United States Army. In all campaigns from the re- motest times the maintenance of communication by transient signals had presented itself to commanders as of paramount importance, but in practice it had eluded them. When simple the signal was inefficient, when efficient it was so unwieldy as to be impracticable ; the flashing shield at Sunium and the fingers of Chappe’s semaphore were alike in their unavailability upon the field of battle. The waving flag and torch of Myer were the first con- tribution to the solution of the problem which were efficient without cum- bersome machinery, and while so simple as to be easily extemporized from any chance materials were yet capable of performing every service which they could be called upon to render. From the flag and torch of the enthusiastic inventor to a highly devel- oped corps of the general staff is a long step. To show how it was taken, to present some of the more striking features of this growth, rapid in the heat of battle, to sketch the plan on which the Signal Corps was built, this chapter of the history of the war has been written from study of the com- piled Official Records of the Union and Confederate armies. In the beginning, the corps was enfolded in the enthusiasm and deter- mination of Myer. In fact there was no corps, but there was Myer. A chief without a corps, it was his consuming ambition to surround himself with a staff of trained assistants; he succeeded in his ambition in 1863, but such were the animosities excited by his success that he was removed from the command of the corps he had created and in 1864 was out of the Army. Yet such was the influence he was still able to exert that he prevented the confirmation of Colonel Fisher twice appointed to succeed him. It is with the period between these two phases of signal service that most of this sketch has to do. Dr. Myer entered the Army in 1854 as an assistant surgeon. His active interest in sign language, already displayed in his graduating thesis, was manifested at once by its development into a system of signal communica- tion, for in 1856 he drafted a memorandum of his device. This, however- SIGNAL CORPS. 137 attracted little or no attention at the War Department, and not before 185b was the inventor successful in bringing his plans before a military board duly authorized to consider them. Yet another two years of exertions, strenuous though unrecorded, passed by before Congress created the posi- tion of signal officer of the Army. On June 27, i860, Myer was gazetted Major and Signal Officer, the first known to history, and the first acknowl- edgment that the Napoleonic maxim was worthy a place in practical military science. Within a fortnight he was despatched to the plains. It is interesting to note who ordered the duty and to whom this inventor of the latest feature of military art was sent. It was Floyd who wrote the order, it was Faunt- leroy of the First Dragoons who commanded the Department of New Mex- ico to which the signal officer was assigned ; within a year they were both under arms in the Rebellion, and the signal officers of the Confederacy were conveying messages on Myer’s system in the very front of Washington be- fore the National Army had fairly realized that it had a signal officer. Fortuitous as this coincidence may be, Major Myer on reaching his distant post was ordered to participate in the Navajo campaign in Colonel Canby’s command. Here again the senior officer designated for a course of signal instruction and to act as assistant in the field was among those who joined Floyd and Fauntleroy. This expedition in the severest rigors of mid-winter upon the mountains of New Mexico proved a test which showed the new signal system to be capable of all that was claimed for it. The test which proved the system satisfactory must also be regarded as a test of the author. The examination of what he did in this campaign gives a clue to his suc- cesses as well as his failures in the graver war which followed, and the test is a more than fair one, since it is judging him by his own standard. Myer was an enthusiast, but his enthusiasm was often expended on trivi- alities. Strong on details he was weak on great principles. Having founded his system of signal communication upon a code of three elements he failed to grasp the induction which should have led him higher. He was diligent in repeating the same three elements in all sorts of guises having developed the system for the eye he devised codes to appeal to the other senses of touch, hearing and even of smell. He multiplied instance upon instance and repeated needlessly the demonstration of that which was already proved. In connection with the torch he was minute in measuring the diameter of the flame-shade and its linear distance below the wick. He attributed the failure of his dial signal-telegraph train to the fact that curi- ous soldiers cut the trailing insulated wire to see what it was made of; he could not be brought to see the inherent inefficiency of an apparatus which could not be made to work over ten miles of wire, even if uncut, because wrong in principle. It is essential to a proper comprehension of the corps in the early chap- ters of the war to understand these traits of the man who called the corps into being. How he did it, how he induced the creation of a staff corps, how he was himself overpowered in the very success, these are matters which appear in the Rebellion records, here a piece and there a piece with many gaps which demand close attention to fill them up. 138 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. When in 1861, war unexpectedly broke out Major Myer was prompt to suggest the practical value of signals to the Army, and on this account he was called from the west, since the patriotic zeal at headquarters would neglect no chance that gave even the faintest promise of assistance. In Washing- ton there was haste to meet the emergency so suddenly thrust upon the Army not yet recovered from the paralysis of wholesale resignations. Little was known of the new military device and Myer found officials too busy to give much attention to his plans. Lights appeared on the Virginia hills by night and waving flags by day, a device of the enemy. Incomprehensible to all others and menacing, these things were clear to Myer, who renewed his efforts under this stimulus and succeeded in gaining the official ear. A course of signal instruction was initiated on June io, 1861, at Fort Monroe, where eleven subaltern officers detailed from the forces near that post were hastily instructed in signal duties. This course continued but a few weeks and came to a sudden close when Major Myer was ordered to the Depart- ment of Northeast Virginia, and called upon to establish communication without being allowed a single trained assistant. Blunder as it was, yet it was fruitful in results, since nothing short of the spectacle of the Signal Officer of the Army idle upon the field of Bull Run, could avail to show those charged with the conduct of affairs, that the individual signal officer is valu- able only as a part of perfected machinery. However, rudely acquired, this knowledge led to the establishment on August 30, 1861, of the Signal Camp of Instruction on Red Hill, Georgetown, D. C., a permanent institution where under the diligent charge of Lieut. Samuel T. Cushing, who was as- sociated with Major Myer in the Navajo campaign, signal parties were in- structed and equipped to attend each army that took the field. Established under these circumstances, the activity of the Signal Corps during the war can best be studied in connection with the great military operations of the campaigns which it so materially assisted. Reference to the general maps of the war will show the Confederacy to have held posses- sion of the interior lines of communication, a decided advantage, the want of which imposed upon the Federal commander grave inconvenience and considerable hazard, in that it enforced upon him the necessity of attack by widely disconnected armies operating in regions equally separated. Com- paring all the campaigns it may in a broad way be said that the Federal at- tack was directed midway between the four cardinal points. Hasty move- ments began the attack upon the northeast where the valleys of Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania were the theatres of the hardest fighting. In the southeast, the coast of Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas formed another point of attack. Louisiana and the lower Mississippi were the scene of the southwestern attack. The assault upon the northwest moved along the great military lines of the Tennessee and the Cumberland. Any study of the growth of the corps during the war will involve the necessity of tracing its history in each of these approaches to the heart of the Confederacy. This method of examination of the materials at hand, while sacrificing unity of time, yet in its stead renders it possible to present in clear terms the independent but co-ordinate development of four bodies of signal officers, each in its own field. This in due course of time made it possible for Major SIGNAL CORPS. 139 Myer, as with intent to bring about a uniform degree of signal efficiency throughout the armies, to embody in a single centralized corps these organiza- tions which were practically as independent of him as of one another. The period comprehended within the scope of the more detailed part of this paper, is that during which the system of regimental signal officers obtained, which was concluded in 1863 by the act creating the Signal Corps to con- tinue during the Rebellion. However successful the system of signals proved itself, it must be seen that the plan of detailing regimental officers crudely instructed broke down completely under the strain of actual cam- paign. One of the most distinct lessons of the war is this which appears unmistakably in every report. Recurring to the four columns of inquiry a brief presentation will be made of the development of signals in each up to the period noted. This happens most opportunely to correspond with the limit of the Rebellion records thus far published, beyond which it is not deemed advisable to push a detailed inquiry in which the chances of error are considerable. Instruction at the Georgetown camp had been but a few weeks under way when the Signal Officer was called on to detail officers for an expedition then fitting out at Annapolis for an unknown destination. This was the be- ginning of the operations on the southeast at the close of 1861, and the ex- pedition was that commanded by General Thomas W. Sherman against Port Royal in which the signal officers were efficient in maintaining com- munication and won for the signal system in a particular degree the commen- dation of the Navy. Early im862 signal officers accompanied General Burn- side’s Roanoke expedition and secured a foothold upon the coast of North Carolina. Thereafter, during 1862 and 1863 the Signal Corps was present at the operations in the two Carolinas with ever growing efficiency. It must suffice to indicate in broad outline the growth in the southeast quarter up to the time when the corps was placed upon a solid basis, which corre- sponds closely with the engineering successes before Charleston. The be- ginning was small at Port Royal; at Roanoke the signal officers did no signal duty at all and won mention by volunteer service as aides. From this hum- ble start the progress in the next eighteen months though slow was steady, and as the novel service won, little by little, the confidence of commanding generals, it was stimulated to greater efficiency. The result attained is appar- ent in the reports of the chief acting signal officer of the Department of the South which detailed the events just prior to and including the fall of Fort Wagner and Battery Gregg, the approaches to Charleston. It is shown plainly in his record of events ; but more prominently yet in the attitude which he seems to have felt justified in assuming toward officers his super- iors in lineal rank, and in the freedom with which he called upon the other staff corps to render him assistance in erecting the ingeniously constructed signal towers which overlooked Charleston harbor and roads. The scanty record of signal operations in the southeast presents one difficulty,—lack of material; the record in the northeast, being voluminous, presents another and even harder difficulty, that of selection and condensa- tion. Major Myer, who was designated Chief Signal Officer of the Army of the Potomac, published in 1864 his report of its two-year-old signal opera- 140 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. tions, written with less reference to its military value than to its political bear- ing upon legislation then under consideration in Congress. From these rec- ords, diffuse in details and silent as to essentials, it is a hard task to arrive at the methods by which the Signal Officer proposed to utilize the military results of his actions, in firmly establishing his own position which as yet had not emerged from the insecurity which must attach to any experiment. On this northeastern approach there was some signaling done in 1861 ; the officers instructed at Fort Monroe put their lessons into practice, but they contributed little to the success of these early engagements. But in 1862 the Signal Corps, after its full winter’s training at Georgetown, was as eager to press on to Richmond as any portion of that luckless army. Myer moved with his corps ; he saw what each man did and made a note of it; nothing escaped his attention and few events but were made to contribute to the greater glory of the new arm of the service. He diligently recorded that on the voyage down the Potomac the Signal Corps prevented marine disaster; at Yorktown it became in the person of its officers, prominent by reason of the incessant waving of their flags, the target for artillery practice ; it served at intervals in the Seven Days Battles, and that the service was in- terrupted was the fault, not of the system, but of the battle clouds of smoke ; it changed its base to the James and directed the gunboat fire at Malvern ; it fell back with the rear guard from Richmond with the great army to which it was attached. At every step, after the corps had done anything noteworthy, Myer insured the future of his system by securing a letter to that effect from the general or flag officer who had seen it done. Another Signal Corps at the same time was operating with Pope’s army at Cedar Mountain and Second Bull Run as it had done in the early spring with Banks at Strasburg and Winchester, but its history is obscure, since its successful work was not heralded by Myer’s reports until the Army of the Potomac moved north in September. Then came the operations about Frederick, Md., the engagements at South Mountain and Antietam, in all which the corps was efficient in its proper function. With these northern battles the signal operations assume a status of more real value and are better recognized by commanders; Fredericksburg brings the corps promi- nently to the dangerous front, Chancellorsville shows Hooker making in- telligent use of this body of trained officers both to observe and to com- municate, and at Gettysburg the Signal Corps is acknowledged as firmly fixed in the military household by Meade’s circular before the battle, in which he calls upon this as upon all other staff corps to aid him in the im- pending engagement. First appearing as an idle spectator at Bull Run, later summoned to the council of war at Gettysburg, these two facts tersely illustrate the two years’ growth of the signal system on this front. In the southwest the signal officers, like the son of Achilles, came late to the war. When Farragut ran Forts Jackson and St. Philip no signal men were with him, nor did they come until the first assault was over and New Orleans was occupied by the Federal forces. It was not indeed until 1863 that the Signal Corps made its mark in this field of the war. Having had just enough duty in small skirmishes to bring it into efficiency, it in vested Vicksburg and Port Hudson with Grant and Banks; from its towers SIGNAL CORPS. 141 and treetops it covered the beleaguered towns with vigilance ever alert; it saw every movement in time and gave warning to the besiegers, for whom it was not only eyes but tongue as well. The beginning of the war on the northwest was most distinctly marked by the failure of signal operations, not so much by reason of any ineffici- ency of the system, as through the chapter of accidents which so greatly re- tarded military operations upon that approach. The first signal party was sent to General Halleck at St. Louis late in March of 1862, but the use of this new military art was not fairly appreciated, and the detachment was soon dissolved. At Shiloh, Grant’s army had no signal officers; Buell’s had, but almost the sole mention of their activity is that they were ordered back to duty with their companies. At Perryville the record shows that the sig- nal system was in operation, but by a strange mischance it did not succeed in conveying to Buell the knowledge that a battle was in progress. But an improvement was noticeable when on the last day of 1862 Rosecrans fought the battle of Stone’s River, and found his signal officers to be relied upon in the discharge of their proper duties. Thenceforward the progress was distinct, the service was growing in efficiency and in reputation, and in each regard an improvement may be noted after Franklin, Tullahoma, Chicka- mauga, Lookout Mountain, Missionary Ridge and Knoxville. In. a year and a half the Signal Corps had, from a position in which it was treated with indifference, advanced in this army also to the burden of grave respon- sibilities, in which it proved itself deserving of the reliance placed upon it. On the Confederate side signal officers were no less active, although the close details of their operations exist only in fragmentary reports. It has been already remarked that the Confederate army made earlier use of signals than the Union forces, and that the sight of their flags and flames on the Virginia hills served to hasten consideration of Major Myer’s plans. The Richmond Congress early recognized the value of this service and drafted a measure which authorized the creation of a Signal Corps of con- sistent and comprehensive efficiency. Under this act the Signal Corps of the Provisional Army of the Confederacy was instituted and placed in charge of Major Norris. The plan was excellent but when it came to put- ting it into operation it would seem that of the two duties of the signal officer, observation and communication, which the model signal officer of the future must combine, Norris, not being actuated by the inventor’s enthusiasm, de- voted his attention to the former. The reports of Norris’ bureau which have survived are in the majority of cases the details of scouting exploits within the Federal lines ; the system seems to have grown into a matter of high-class spying in which the commission and uniform were expressly de- signed to serve as a cloak to the operations and to enable the operator, if captured, to offer a specious plea against the customary penalty of spying. To perform the legitimate duties of signal communication there grew up another body, the Independent Signal Corps under Major Milligan, which operated in Virginia and North Carolina, and probably enjoyed a still wider field. In the four fields of war in which the signal officers prosecuted their op- erations the work in this formative period was done by acting signal officers, 142 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. that is, subalterns of volunteer regiments detached for this special service. To understand their position attention should be directed upon the enact- ments and orders which authorized their employment on this duty. The act of 21st June i860 created the position of Signal Officer and announced rather than defined his duties. In 1861 the commanding generals of the several departments to which in succession Major Myer was assigned, de- tailed junior officers to be instructed in signal duty; thus originated the school at Monroe, the experimental stations along the upper Potomac, and the permanent camp at Georgetown, all being authorized by orders and confirmed upon an essential point by the act of 22d February, 1862, which settled upon officers so detailed the pay of cavalry officers of the same grade. Thus the Signal Officer obtained his first corps. There was about this corps, as in all new projects brought about by the personal efforts of any enthusiast, an element of uncertainty, it was of a temporary nature, officers detailed might be recalled to the line by the order of their regimental commanders or by their own wish, above all there was no appropriation directly made for the service rendered. One remedy was applied, the order of the War Department that acting signal officers should not be relieved from that duty except by order of the Adjutant-General of the Army. This was palliative, it secured the corps against rapid depletion, but it did not remove the causes which led to such depletion, nor did it secure the corps a permanent status. It still presented the anomaly of but one Signal Officer in the Army and all the work of signal communication performed by acting signal officers. To remove this anomaly, to acquire a permanent status with an eye to inevitable retrenchments of the peace-foot- ing in the future, engaged the best efforts of the Signal Officer. This system of regimental officers detailed for signal duty had the most fair trial, it was tested by the exigencies of actual campaigning and this test was continued for two years ; in this length of time its merits, if it had any, should have been made overwhelmingly manifest, its faults should have suggested their correction. But the two years experiment showed the faults too deep-seated for correction short of radical reconstruction, the merits expected were uni- formly absent. Every battle, every movement of troops showed defects, and proved them to be inherent in any corps of signal officers which de- pended for its existence upon regimental details. Yet, following his plan of utilizing every method which might popularize his system, he succeeded in having a course of signals prescribed at the Military Academy in July, 1863, and added to the instruction in visual signals a course of lectures on tele- graphic communication, and to aid that purpose sent to West Point a train with the Beardslee instruments. Myer’s system was a novelty in military practice ; there had been no opportunity to exhibit its utility to the army in general; New Mexico was far away and in 1861 men had other things to occupy their minds than waving flags in a fruitless Indian campaign ; worst of all not a line about the duties of the Signal Officer was found in any text of the art of war, and not yet had the lesson been learned that war well made makes its own art. The unknown system was nowhere welcomed, at best it was tolerated, in many cases it had to encounter the dogged resistance of rigid formalists. SIGNAL CORPS. 143 Time and the event had not yet proved its superiority in its twofold sphere; the scout for observation and the orderly for communication were yet su- preme. Like Napoleon, who rejected Fulton’s project to transport the French army across the channel by steam power, few could sufficiently project the new arm of the service into the future to give Myer support in his efforts. Where improvements in the methods of observation and com- munication failed to affect the result, it was necessary to seek still further modes of usefulness in which the Signal Officer might be free from old traditions. It must be recognized that Myer was diligent in grasping at every means that might even remotely assist him, and characteristically pertinacious in returning to his purpose with unabated vigor after each re- buff. The chance of the times and the events incidental to the hasty mobiliza- tion of great bodies of raw levies, zealous as they were unskilled, offered the first opportunity. The disasters of Big Bethel and Glasgow, where troops fired deadly volleys into the ranks of their own comrades, sadly showed the inability of new volunteers in the peril of panic to know friend from foe. While the feeling of horror was still fresh, Major Myer came forward with a system of countersign signals which should prevent similar deplorable catastrophes. The system was adopted and promulgated in general orders. Regimental commanders were to have their adjutants and color sergeants instructed to wave by day the regimental colors in certain fashions and to burn colored fires by night. There were then two hundred and fifty organi- zations in the single Army of the Potomac, and they were all instructed dur- ing the winter of 1861 ; but the time and labor were spent in vain. The system never gained a foothold, and properly lapsed as better training in the duties of the soldier removed the causes which had operated to bring it forward. A second attempt to attain, first, prominence, and next, permanence, brought the Signal Officer in contact, not this time with apathy and indif- ference of commanding officers, but with the lively opposition of a civil bureau of the War Department already well established and decidedly in- disposed to yield to the pretensions of Major Myer. This was the attempt to secure control of the telegraph upon the field and in its relation with the army. The attitude which the civilian operators assumed, seems to have been prompted not so much by the belief they professed in the essentially civil nature of their calling as by their personal objection to Myer, who had not served an operator’s apprenticeship, and who did not have that peculiar touch by which an operator comes into electric sympathy with his fellows in the profession. Governed in this by sentiment rather than by reason they made a mis- take ; the mistake they then made they have since acknowledged, and have pleaded it in support of legislation sought in their behalf. The men who were most strenuous in opposition to military control of the telegraph, are now on record as supporting just that control and discipline in campaign. It must be admitted that Myer was personally unsuited for telegraph duty; moreover, it must be admitted that had he been suited for that duty history would have been different. Similarly of the few nations which attempted to 144 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. perform military telegraph work by force of civilians, all have realized the practical impossibility of the attempt. Every nation except France has trans- ferred the service to the army, and even in France the transfer will soon be brought about inasmuch as schools for the instruction of officers and men have been established. The creating act of i860 explicitly authorized the Signal Officer to have charge of all signal duty and all apparatus connected therewith. This language was General Butler’s sufficient authority for assigning Myer to the charge of the recently constructed line of the U. S. Military Telegraph in south- eastern Virginia. The order was distasteful to the regularly appointed superintendent of the line, who believed himself to be accountable only to the War Department. But communication with Washington wras practi- cable only by letter, and disobedience to Butler’s order would have been quickly visited with heavy penalties ; on this account the operators made temporary submission. The Signal Officer’s tour of duty as telegraph officer was brief, and he was sharply reminded by the Secretary of War that elec- tric telegraphy was not in his province. This was the first skirmish of a bitter contest. Myer now made a formal demand upon the War Department to be given control of the entire system of military telegraphs under the terms of his commission, but it was at once apparent that he would not be allowed to interfere with the electric operators. His attention was accordingly directed upon some portable system of telegraphy operated upon other principles than the Morse system, and even in his early plans he seems to have ap- preciated the important differences between the flying telegraph and the semi-permanent lines. Having discovered what he sought in a magnetic dial apparatus, the Signal Officer in August, 1861, laid before the Secretary of War a plan for signal telegraph trains which should not interfere with existing interests, and yet, by a clause judiciously inserted to the effect that a proper proportion of the officers and men should be selected electric tele- graphists employed for the war, it was carefully devised to secure Major Myer a permanent corps in the place of the acting signal officers, and, by securing a sufficiency of Morse operators attracted by actual commissions or the prospect of winning them, to place him in a position to make a more effectual demand for the control of the military telegraph. This was met by an authorization to purchase a small telegraph train to communicate with points which could not be reached by signals, and fixing upon the Signal Officer the responsibility of determining the necessity for such a train. Major Myer hesitated to act underthis authorization, which was silent as to any appropriation. In March, 1862, the Beardslee or magnetic instru- ment had not been brought into condition to use, and the question of an electric train was beset with difficulties when the Signal Officer was ordered to take the field with no definite arrangements concluded. Under these circumstances little could be done with this branch of the equipment in the Peninsular campaign, and what little was attempted was touched upon very lightly by Major Myer in his personal report, although this is the first mention in all history of the telegraph on the battle-field. It was not until the close of the year 1862, at Fredericksburg, that any definite SIGNAL CORPS. 145 attempt was made to bring into special prominence the telegraph train of the Signal Corps. This dial telegraph was maintained in intermittent operation, and for the most part was favorably reported by the officers in charge. In May, 1863, at Chancellorsville, the field telegraph of the Signal Corps was in operation. Practical test demonstrated the line to be insufficiently insulated and incapable of working except for short stretches, while the instrument was slow and particularly sensitive to atmospheric disturbances. But the gravest difficulty was that it here came into direct and disastrous competition with the electric military telegraph of the War Department, and offered itself to the critical judgment of such men as Eckert, Stager and Bates, who were in a position to pass upon it the criticism of technical experts. Under the influence of sundry successes achieved in the summer cam- paigns, the last month of 1862 saw the appropriation of funds sufficient to construct several of these telegraph trains. The same causes contributed to produce a result of greater importance than the supply of field telegraph trains. This was the permanent organization of the Signal Corps. The authorization to construct signal telegraph trains was, in its very nature, a solace to Major Myer for refusing him control of the U. S. Military Telegraph to which he claimed title. He had been in conflict with Secretary Stanton and had been worsted. There could have been no better recom- mendation to the sympathies of the Congress of that time. Avoiding any chance of reference to the more purely military committees, which would be to a certain extent under the influence of the powerful secretary, the legisla- tion was accomplished in the Sundry Civil Bill which became law on the 3d of March, 1863. Thus was the Signal Corps built and equipped with a systematic organization. At the head of the corps there was a chief signal officer, a colonel, who should be Signal Officer of the Army, there was a lieutenant-colonel and two majors, there was one captain and eight lieutenants for each army corps, and for each officer there was allowed a sergeant and six privates. The corps was authorized for the duration of the Rebellion, and appointments were to be made on the recommendation of examining boards. In accordance with the report of the first of these boards Major Myer was nominated Chief Signal Officer and given a recess appointment. Later in the same year the Judge Advocate General wrote an opinion establishing the status of the corps as of the establishment of the regular army. The realization of Myer’s ambi- tion had yielded to his persistence, he had secured a higher rank and his corps would be permanently established as soon as the examining boards had completed their work in the several military departments. But Colonel Myer in the moment of success had to learn that the War Secretary could not be trifled with in safety. Once again the Chief Signal Officer sought to obtain a certain control of electric telegraphs, and to that end advertised his willingness to give commissions to telegraph operators. Thereupon the blow fell. On the 10th of November, 1863, Colonel Myer was relieved from command of the Signal Corps and ordered to the Missis- sippi. He turned the bureau over to Major Nicodemus, who was later pro- moted to the lieutenant-colonelcy, and, most important of all, the Secretary of War ordered that the telegraph trains be put in charge of the Superin- 146 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. tendent of the Military Telegraph, Colonel Anson Stager. Thus was the Signal Corps built; but when the cap-stone had been laid in place the edifice passed away from him who built it. Myer was not only banished to a re- mote military division, but the Senate failed to confirm his appointment ; the President revoked it, and the first Signal Officer, the inventor of the art, was no longer in the Army. It is to study the growth of a staff corps from a single officer to a highly organized body, rather than to make a record of the deeds of the signal offi- cers or a roster which should give them the credit they earned, that this paper has been written. In pursuing this line of research it has been necessary to pay strict regard to the operations of the Signal Officer of the Army and to weigh his official acts as presented directly in the official records of the re- bellion, and as reflected in the services which his subordinates rendered in obedience to his orders. A study of the later period of signal operations will afford an opportunity to return to, and present in detail a narrative of events which cannot fail of interest. This chapter is of necessity drawn closely about the personality of the first Signal Officer, for it was in and through that personality that the Signal Corps came into being. Freed from the guiding touch of its inventor and foremost advocate, the Signal Corps nevertheless maintained a steadfast activity during the war and grew in favor, as it conscientiously discharged its invaluable duties. Major Nicodemus, temporarily placed in charge, had control until the end of 1864, when he too was visited with punishment. He had published his re- port for that year without having gone through the formality of submitting it to the Secretary of War, and for that offense was dismissed the service on the ostensible ground that he had aided the enemy by divulging valuable in- formation. His innocence of any wrong intent was made manifest soon afterwards, and, it perhaps becoming apparent by what influences he had been hampered, he was reinstated in his regiment of the regulars. He was succeeded in the Signal Bureau by Colonel B. F. Fisher, who was given a recess appointment as Signal Officer of the Army, and when that lapsed, through failure to receive confirmation at the instigation of Myer’s friends, was at once reappointed on the same terms. While affairs of the Bureau at Washington were thus kept in a perman- ently unsettled condition, the corps in the field was winning fame. At Alla- toona its services were so distinguished as to win brevets or actual promo- tion for all who participated in the battle. When Farragut overcame the fort, the torpedo and the ram, the defenses of Mobile, he sent his army signal officers below and bade them assist the surgeon in the cockpit, for they had been assigned to him only for the purpose of opening communication with the army after the naval victory had been won. But he could not keep them there, the needs of battle overtaxing the naval signal system, forced him to summon them to give him aid. They found their proper station on deck, and aloft as the fight grew fiercer. The admiral ceased to look upon his signal officers as idlers ; in his moment of greatest need, when the Lack- awanna having once through accident collided with the flagship and was re- turning to the disastrous charge, the admiral called to Lieut. Kinney who had been detailed to his vessel," Can you say ‘ For God’s sake ’ by signal ? ” Then SIGNAL CORPS. 147 followed the hasty and historic message to the Lackawanna, “ For God’s sake get out of our way.” As the armies closed in on the vanquished enemy the Signal Corps closed in with them until there were no foes to fight; then it was mustered out and absorbed in the body of citizenship, proud to have been pioneers in a new military art whose value none will now dispute. By way of a conclusion, which is at the same time a commentary upon the methods employed in building the Signal Corps, reference may be not improperly made to a sketch, hastily outlined, that was designed to establish for the Confederacy a signal corps founded on ideas of making it a body efficient in proportion to its purely scientific character, an ideal which has indeed been reached in the present Signal Corps of the Army, but reached only after many years of painstaking endeavor. In a memorandum submit- ted to General Beauregard in November, 1862, Joseph Manigault, signal officer of the department of South Carolina, outlined the plan for securing to his corps the management of telegraph lines of the army. Incidentally he referred to the education, the reliability and the scientific training of the signal men as fitting them to become a bureau for the transmission of mili- tary information ; and since they would necessarily have a certain electrical equipment, that they were in a position to assume charge of electric mines and the management of the electric light, and, in short, might properly be- come the electrical corps of the army. If Myer fell short of these broadly philosophical plans for a Signal Corps, which should conquer all opposition by the very weight of its scientific at- tainments practically applied to the exigencies of actual warfare, it is not that those ideas were yet in the future. It is shown that practical experi- ence had suggested those ideas to one signal officer ; that the same, and even greater, practical experience did not suggest those ideas to another is not the fault of the ideas nor the fault of experience. But had the case been reversed, had the ideas of Manigault found a welcome in the mind of Myer, it is probable that this chapter of the building of the Signal Corps had been written in far different form, and the history of the corps in the later times would show far more done, far less that had to be undone. It is pertinent to add that to Myer fell the construction of a second sig- nal corps. The act of July 28,1866, fixing the military peace establishment enacted that there should be one chief signal officer with the rank of col- onel, but it made no provision for a corps other than by a limited detail of six officers and not to exceed one hundred men from the engineer battalion. The lessons of experience were left unheeded,—it was as though the war had never been. The conditions were of the utmost similarity, with the sole exception that the absence of the war rendered it feasible to formulate a comprehensive policy and elaborate its details in a wise and thoughtful manner. But Myer did not choose to study the record of history. The first step in his construction of the first corps was paralleled by his first act in the construction of the second corps; he again organized his corps by de- tails of acting signal officers and thereby exceeded the provisions of the act, which limited his choice to engineers ; two years of war had proved the de- fects of such a system to be beyond remedy, a quarter of a century of peace has barely sufficed to effect its removal from the corps of to-day. The parallel 148 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. may be pursued still further. It has been shown that Myer, failing to secure immediately for his first signal corps the dignity which its intrinsic merits would have won for it in due time, sought to win consideration by assuming duties foreign to its legitimate province, and thereby destroyed that which he wished to secure. A similar method marked his plans for the develop- ment of the second corps, for his own language declares this unmistakable purpose “ the main question is not how to curtail the corps but how to enlarge its scope and consequent usefulness to the varied industries of the nation ” To the legitimate duties of military signaling he added the utterly foreign concerns of the meteorologist, with a result well known. The military side of the corps found its chief activity in the system of military telegraph lines, which was extended along the frontier and which has been maintained to the present. This telegraph system was designed to secure necessary com- munication where the commercial lines were not available, and its lines have been withdrawn when private enterprise, finding its.advantage in the coun- try thus opened, has removed the pioneer burden from the government. In 1878 the act of June 20th made provision for the appointment of two second lieutenants chosen from the sergeants of the corps, recognizing their ser- vices by the promise of a military career. In 1880 the Signal Corps was ad- vanced to equality of consideration with the other staff corps, and its chief was given the rank of brigadier-general. This comparative review is timely. The present Signal Corps stands to-day at the point where the Signal Corps of the Civil War, its predecessor, began to crystallize into a recognized aux- iliary of modern war and gained that glory of which it may well be proud. Two years of battle brought to that a permanent organization and a single- ness of purpose in the prosecution of its proper duties and of those alone ; twenty-five years of peace have brought this to a point where extraneous occupations have been renounced and defective constitution rectified. As the two formative years of the first corps, despite their faulty methods, were filled with military activity, so in this formative quarter century of the pres- ent corps, military duties have been prosecuted despite the foreign occupa- tions which Myer grasped. Under the earnest endeavors of signal officers the crude device of the flag and torch have developed into the ingenious yet simple mechanism of the heliograph and the flash lantern ; the defective machinery of the early dial telegraph has given place to the portable field telegraph, and the telephone and the Morse key have been advanced to the skirmish line. All signal duties have been studied, some have been prac- tised to a perfection reached by no other army, and in this the heliograph system stands preeminent. The Indian campaigns in which the Signal Corps has participated exhibit this fact most forcibly. In the Apache wars in Arizona the signal detachments from their stations on the mountain tops have discerned the most stealthy movements of the enemy and have flashed the news to headquarters or moving bodies of cavalry, enabling the troops to change instantly their direction of march to conform to that of the enemy or to be massed where danger threatened, and even to meet the Indians with their own favorite manoeuvre of the ambuscade. With equal distinct- ness these campaigns have shown the weakness of the system of regimental instruction and details, for in the Geronimo campaign it was found neces- SIGNAL CORPS. 149 sary to call upon the Chief Signal Officer to assign technically trained mem- bers of the corps to render the duty which proved too great for the un- skilled. Despite the continued record of failure of the system, both in the Civil War and in the several Indian wars, the War Department has shown a disposition to maintain the same fallacious idea, and to this is due the repetition of the successive failures of the system of regimental instruction and details. If the lesson is not drawn sufficiently clear in our own military history, the same principles appear in the policy of foreign armies which have bor- rowed the art of signaling from us. No matter how much the foreign sys- tems may vary among themselves they are all copied from the Signal Corps of this army with that imitation which is always the sincerest flattery. They have adopted the code, the cipher, the train, though modifying them to suit their own needs ; but one feature they have uniformly not copied and that is the regimental detail. Even where their signal services have not been dignified by a separate corps organization, they have at least formed a dis- tinct division of some corps already in existence, such as the engineers, and the practical exigencies of war have in general served to make them inde- pendent in all but name. The permanent Signal Corps is now built on a foundation substantiated by the double test of war and peace, and it is in a position to relieve for the second time the line of the army from the burden of drill and study in the purely technical and special duties of signal communication. It is now possible to progress to a development of the legitimate activities of the sig- nal officer, to observe and to communicate; in war to watch the forces of the enemy and to keep the army advised of hostile movements ; in peace to watch those whom the chance of a day may make enemies, to study what preparations they are making and what advantages they hold, and to keep the army advised of these matters ; in short so to utilize its energies that as in the field the army will rely upon its signal officers for information, so in peace the army will confidently turn to its Signal Corps for its military in- telligence. the Cavalry Major-General ALEXANDER HAMILTON Commanding the Army, 1799-1800. THE FIRST REGIMENT OF CAVALRY.* Capt. R. P. PAGE WAIN WRIGHT, ist U. S. Cavalry. THE “ United States Regiment of Dragoons ” was organized by Act ot Congress approved March 2, 1833, becoming the “First Regiment of Dragoons” when the Second Dragoons were raised in 1836. Its designation was changed to “ First Regiment of Cavalry ” by the Act of August 3, 1861. The first order announcing appointments in the regiment was dated March 5, 1833, and gave the names of the colonel, lieu- tenant-colonel, major, four captains and four lieutenants, stating that the organization of the regiment would be perfected by the selection of officers from the “ Battalion of Rangers.” Headquarters were established at Jef- ferson Barracks. The organization of the regiment does not appear to have been com- pleted until June, 1834, the regimental return for that month naming the following officers: Colonel Henry Dodge. Lieutenant-Colonel Stephen W. Kearny. Major Richard B. Mason. Captains Clifton Wharton, E. V. Sumner, Eustace Trenor, David Hun- ter, Lemuel Ford, Nathan Boone, J. B. Browne, Jesse Bean, Matthew Dun- can and David Perkins. First Lieutenants P. St. G. Cooke, S. W. Moore, A. Van Buren, J. F. Izard, Jefferson Davis, L. P. Lupton, Thomas Swords, T. B. Wheelock, J. W. Hamilton (adjutant), B. D. Moore, and C. F. M. Noland. Second Lieutenants James Allen, T. H. Holmes, J. H. K. Burgwin, J. S. Van Derveer, J. W. Shaumburg, Enoch Steen, James Clyman, J. L. Watson, and B. A. Terrett. Brevet Second Lieutenants William Eustis, G. W. McClure, L. B. Nor- throp, G. P. Kingsbury, J. M. Bowman, Asbury Ury, A. G. Edwards and T. J. McKean. Lieutenant Jefferson Davis was the first adjutant but resigned the staff position February 4, 1834, and was assigned to Company A. In October, 1833, the five companies first organized were sent under Colonel Dodge to winter in the vicinity of Fort Gibson, Arkansas Territory, where they remained until June, 1834. In June, 1834, the regiment was sent on the “ Pawnee Expedition,” dur- ing which, although it ended in September of the same year, one fourth of the officers and men of the command died of fevers. On the 6th of August, Colonel Dodge writes to Lieutenant-Colonel Kearny : “ I have on my sick report 36 men, four of whom have to be carried in litters. My horses are all much jaded, and would be unable to return by the mouth of the Wishi- taw and reach their point of destination this winter season. This has been * An abridgment of Capt. Wainwright’s “ History of the ist U. S. Cavalry.” 15 3 154 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. a hard campaign on all; we have been for the last fifteen days living almost on meat alone. The state of the health of this detachment of the regiment makes it absolutely necessary that I should arrive at Fort Gibson as early as possible, as well as the difficulty of providing grain for the horses. I am well aware you are placed in a most unpleasant situation, encumbered as you must be with sick men, baggage and horses, and regret exceedingly that it is not in my power to help you.” For the winter, Headquarters with Companies A, C, D and G, were sent to Fort Leavenworth; Companies B, H and I, Colonel Kearny, command- ing, into the Indian country on the right bank of the Mississippi, near the mouth of the Des Moines River; and Companies E, F and K, Major Mason commanding, to Fort Gibson. Throughout the summer of 1835 all the companies of the regiment were kept in the field. The object appears to have been exploration chiefly, for no conflicts with the Indians took place. The regiment performed its duty thoroughly, as was shown by the letter of commendation sent by General E. P. Gaines, commanding West Department, to the regimental commander upon receipt of his report of operations. Many letters written and orders issued about this time are of great inter- est and some are very amusing from the force of language used, showing great difference in military correspondence then and now ; the court-martial orders are especially interesting on account of the peculiar sentences im- posed. During the year 1836 the general disposition of the regiment remained unchanged. The companies were employed in scouting among the Indians, especially along the Missouri frontier, a portion of the regiment going to Nacogdoches, Texas, for the purpose of keeping off white trespassers from the Indian country, and preserving peace between whites and Indians and among the Indians themselves; also in building wagon roads and bridges. During the winter the companies returned to their stations—Forts Leaven- worth, Gibson and Des Moines. Colonel Dodge resigned July 4, 1836, and was appointed Governor of Wisconsin. He was succeeded by Colonel Kearny. Major Mason was pro- moted vice Kearny, and Captain Clifton Wharton vice Mason. The regiment was not engaged in the Florida war of this year, but Colonel Kearny, being called upon subsequently, reports, March 16, 1844;— “ The only officers of the Regiment of Dragoons who died of wounds received or diseases contracted during the late contest with the Florida Indians are 1st Lieutenants J. F. Izard and T. B. Wheelock,” and that no enlisted men of the regiment served there. The circumstances attending the death of Lieutenant Izard are interest- ing. Being bn his way from the east in January, 1836, to join his regiment, he heard at Memphis of Dade’s massacre. He at once offered his services to General Gaines as a volunteer for the expedition then being organized in New Orleans for Florida, was appointed brigade major of the light brigade organized at Tampa Bay composed of the 2d Artillery, 4th Infantry and the Louisiana Volunteers, and had also the command of the advanced guard assigned him which he retained until he was shot. THE FIRST REGIMENT OF CA VALR Y. 155 On the 26th of February, 1836, the light brigade left Fort King for Ouithlacoochee, during the passage of which stream an attack by the Indians was anticipated. On the following day the place where General Clinch had his battle of December 25 was reached. Here a sharp skirmish took place and some men were lost. Having learned of a better ford below it was de- cided to take it. Izard, coming with his advanced guard to the bank of the river, posted his guard and went down the river alone to look for the ford. While wading in the stream he was struck by a bullet in the inner corner of the left eye, the ball passing out near the right temple. He fell, but called out while falling, “ Lie still, men, and maintain your positions.” He never spoke afterwards and died on the 5th of March. First Lieutenant T. B. Wheelock left New York for Florida with a detach- ment of recruits in February, 1836. He distinguished himself with a portion of these recruits on the 10th of June at Fort Micanopy, and died at that post on the x 5th of that month of a fever contracted during his service in Florida. During the year 1837 the regiment was not called upon for any especially hard service. The usual scouting parties were sent out from time to time, and there were several changes of station, so that in June six companies were at Leavenworth and four at Fort Gibson. The following extract from an order issued by General Gaines, com- manding the Western Division, shows the high state of discipline prevailing in the regiment at this time. “The First Regiment of Light Dragoons at Fort Leavenworth, recently inspected by the Commanding General, was found to be in a state of police and discipline reflecting the highest credit on Colonel Kearny—the ex- emplary commandant,—his captains and other officers, non-commissioned officers and soldiers, whose high health and vigilance, with the excellent condition of the horses, affords conclusive evidence of their talents, industry and steady habits.” In March, 1837, a regimental order designated the color of the horses of each company as follows:—A and K, black; B, F and H, sorrel; C, D, E and I, bay; and G, iron gray. In October, 1837, and again in March, 1838, serious difficulties were re- ported between the settlers and the Osage Indians, and companies of the regiment were at once sent to the disturbed regions. On the second occasion the rapidity of Colonel Kearny’s movements and the sudden appearance of 200 dragoons in their midst appear to have had a very quieting effect on the Indians, for after his return to Leavenworth Colonel Kearny reports no further danger of trouble with the Osages. In April, 1839, the post of Fort Wayne, on the northwestern frontier of Arkansas, was established for the purpose of keeping the Cherokees in sub- jection, and by the end of October Companies E, F, G and K, were stationed there. In this same month Colonel Kearny, with Companies A, B, C, H and I, scouting, visited the post, but in November returned to Fort Leavenworth having marched about 550 miles. Except that Companies A, C and D, under Major Wharton, were sent to Fort Gibson in December for temporary duty, nothing of any moment oc- curred to the regiment during the remainder of the year. 156 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Twice in March and once in September, 1840, the regiment was called upon to overawe the Indians, and the end of that year found the Head- quarters with Companies E, F, H, I and K, at Leavenworth; C, D and G, at Fort Gibson; A at Fort Wayne, and B at Fort Crawford. During the period 1841-45 there is little of interest to record regarding the movements of the regiments. There was the usual detached service for companies, and changes between Leavenworth, Gibson, Wayne, Craw- ford and Fort Towson—on the northeastern boundary of Texas. The records show no engagements or excessive marches, except that in April, 1842, on account of some disturbance among the Cherokees, Colonel Kearny marched his command of five companies to Fort Gibson from Leavenworth, and then made a forced march of 57 miles to Fort Wayne in one day. The records do not show that these Indian disturbances amounted to anything; the Indians made no attacks on the troops and but few on the settlers; still it is fair to presume that the activity of Colonel Kearny and his dragoons held them in subjection, and by their timely arrival at points where trouble was imminent, overawed the savages and prevented bloody wars. On May 18, 1845, Colonel Kearny with Companies A, C, F, G and K, left Leavenworth for an expedition to South Pass in the Rocky Mountains. The command reached Fort Laramie on the north fork of the Platte, June 14 ; marched to South Pass and returned to Laramie by July 13 ; thence via Bent’s Fort on the Arkansas to Fort Leavenworth, where it arrived August 24, having made a march of 2000 miles in less than 100 days. In the order issued to his command after his return from this expedition Colonel Kearny says : “ In the length of the march, the rapidity of the movement and the unimportant sacrifices made, the expedition is supposed to be wholly unprecedented; and it is with pride and pleasure that the Colonel ascribes the result to the habitual good conduct, efficiency, and attention to duty on the part of the officers and soldiers of the command.” At the end of the year Companies C, F, G and K, were at Leavenworth; A at Fort Scott; B at Fort Atkinson ; D at Camp Boone, near Beatties Prairie ; E and H in camp near Evansville, Ark.; and I at Fort Des Moines. The Headquarters of the regiment were at St. Louis, where they remained until April 23, 1846, when they were returned to Fort Leavenworth. Colonel Kearny was promoted brigadier general June 30, 1846, and was succeeded by Colonel Mason. Major Wharton was promoted vice Lieu- tenant Colonel Mason, and Captain Trenor vice Wharton. Very soon after the commencement of hostilities between the United States and Mexico, preparations were begun for the invasion of Mexican territory at various points. One expedition was to advance from the Mis- souri River west to Mexico, Santa Fe being its objective point. It was im- mediately determined, however, to push on with this column and occupy Upper California. General Kearny was placed in command of this “Army of the West,” which consisted of Companies B, C, G, I and K, 1st Dragoons, two companies of artillery, two of infantry and nine companies of Missouri volunteer cavalry under command of Colonel A. W. Doniphan, in all about 1800 men. This command was concentrated at Bent’s Fort on the Arkan- sas, from which point it marched for Santa Fe, August 1, 1846. THE FIRST REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 157 Some show of resistance to Kearny’s advance was made by the Mexican governor of New Mexico, but Las Vegas was occupied on the 14th, and Santa Fe on the 18th of August without a conflict, the Mexicans retreat- ing upon Kearny’s approach. Leaving Colonel Doniphan in command at Santa Fe, General Kearny took up the march for California September 26, and encamped about 40 miles from San Diego December 5, where he was met by a small party of volunteers under Captain Gillespie, sent out from San Diego by Commodore Stockton to give information of the enemy, of whom there were supposed to be six or seven hundred opposed to Kearny’s advance. On the morning of the 6th Kearny’s command met and defeated at San Pasqual, about 40 miles from San Diego, a body of Mexicans under General Andres Pico. Kearny had at this time about 300 men, composed of Com- panies B and C, xst Dragoons, and volunteers. The action was severe, the 1st Dragoons losing three officers,—Captains Moore and Johnston and Lieu- tenant Hammond,—and 14 men killed; and about all the dragoons were wounded, principally with lance thrusts. General Kearny himself received two wounds, Lieutenant Warren of the Topographical Engineers, three; and Captain Gillespie of the volunteers, three. Kearny was compelled to remain at San Barnardino until the nth on account of wounds, but reached and occupied San Diego December 12. General Wilcox in his History of the Mexican War says: “ At dawn of day the enemy, already in the saddle, were seen at San Pasqual. Captain Johnston charged them with the advanced guard, followed and supported by the Dragoons, and they gave way. Captain Moore led off rapidly in pur- suit accompanied by the Dragoons (mounted on horses), and followed, though slowly, by those on tired mules. The enemy, well mounted and superb horsemen, after falling back half a mile, halted, and seeing an inter- val between Captain Moore with the advance and the Dragoons coming to his support, rallied their whole force and charged with lances. Moore held his ground for some minutes but was forced back, when those in the rear coming up, the enemy were in turn driven back and fled not to rally again. Kearny occupied the field and encamped upon it. “ But few of Moore’s men escaped without wounds. Captain Johnston was shot dead at the commencement of the action ; Captain Moore was lanced and killed just before the final retreat of the Mexicans; Lieutenant Hammond was also lanced, surviving the wound but a few minutes; two sergeants, two corporals, and 10 men of the 1st Dragoons, one private of Volunteers, and a citizen engaged with the engineers were killed.” * General Kearny with a force consisting of Company C, 1st Dragoons, (60 dismounted men) under Captain Turner, sailors and marines with a bat- tery of artillery, and California volunteers, left San Diego for Los Angeles December 29. He reached and occupied Los Angeles January 10, 1847. The enemy under Governor Flores was encountered at the crossing of the Rio San Gabriel January 8, and on the plains of the Meza on the 9th, on * In explanation of the remark “ mounted on horses,” it may be stated that, with a few excep- tions, the Dragoons were mounted on tired mules which had been ridden from Santa Fe, more than a thousand miles. 158 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. both of which occasions he was routed with some loss. The loss to the Americans was one soldier killed, and two officers,—Rowan of the navy and Captain Gillespie,—and 11 privates wounded. With the loss of Los Angeles all resistance to the occupation of this portion of California ceased. General Kearny had left Companies G and I at Albuquerque under Cap- tain J. H. K. Burgwin. When Colonel Sterling Price (the successor of Colonel Doniphan in command at Santa Fe) learned of the seizure and murder at Fernando de Taos of Governor Bent and five others by the Mexi- cans (Jan. 20), he moved out against them with a force of about 350 dis- mounted men and easily defeated them, Jan. 24, at Canada. Captain Burgwin, with Company G, 1st Dragoons, also dismounted, joined him on the 28th, and the Mexicans, numbering about 500, were again encountered on the 29th in a canon leading to Embudo, from which position they were driven out by Burgwin with a force of 180 men of Price’s regiment and Company G. He entered Embudo the same day. On the 31st, having united his force, Price moved towards the Pueblo de Taos, which he attacked February 3, but on account of its strength and the stubborn resistance offered, and more especially for the reason that the ammunition for the artillery had not come up, the attack failed. It was renewed on the following morning when Captain Burgwin, with his com- pany of Dragoons and McMillan’s of Price’s regiment, charged, crossed the walls, and attacked the church, which, with other large buildings within the walls, was occupied by a large force of the enemy and was stubbornly de- fended. While gallantly leading a small party against the door of the church Burgwin received a mortal wound from which he died on the 7th. Company G sustained a loss in this engagement of one officer and 23 men killed. The Mexicans lost 153 killed and many wounded. During the year 1847 regimental headquarters were still at Leavenworth and Companies A and E were with Taylor in Mexico. Company B was re- organized at Jefferson Barracks in May and sent to Albuquerque, N. M., being engaged while en route with Comanche Indians at Grand Prairie, Arkansas, June 26, losing five men killed and six wounded. Company F escorted General Scott from Vera Cruz to the City of Mexico and was present at the battles at and near that city. From November 1 to December 20 it was engaged on escort duty between the city and Vera Cruz. Companies D and K, as well as F, saw service on Scott’s line in Mexico, and in 1848 the three companies returned to the United States and were stationed at various points on the northwestern frontier. During the year 1849 the regiment lost three men killed and two wounded (one mortally) in Indian skirmishes, the particulars of which are not obtainable. Brevet Brigadier General Mason, Colonel 1st Dragoons, died at Jefferson Barracks, July 25, 1850, and was succeeded by Colonel Thomas L, Fauntle- roy, promoted from the Second Dragoons. For the next three years there is no record of any important engage- ment, march or duty, performed by the regiment; in fact, very little atten- tion was given to recording really important fights. THE FIRST REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 159 On March 30, 1854, Lieutenant J. W. Davidson, with Company I and 16 men of Company F, had a sharp fight with Apache Indians about 16 miles south of Taos, in which 14 men of Company I and 8 of E were killed, and Lieutenant Davidson and 14 men wounded. The Indian camp was sur- prised and captured, the Indians escaping, but while plundering the camp the troops were in turn surprised by the Indians, who returned and took Davidson at such disadvantage that the command narrowly escaped annihilation. Regimental headquarters were transferred to Fort Union, N. M., in July, 1854, and throughout the following year the companies in New Mex- ico were almost constantly on the move. Colonel Fauntleroy made three expeditions against the Utahs and Apaches, and Companies I and K went with Colonel Miles against the Mescalero Apaches. Meantime Companies C and E took part in the Rogue River war in Oregon, in which, at the bat- tle of “ Hungry Hill,” the troops were compelled to retire with a loss of 26 killed and wounded, after fighting a day and a half. The headquarters of the regiment were established at Fort Tejon, Cali- fornia, in December, 1856, with Companies H and I. At this time Com- panies B, D, G and K were at Camp Moore, N. M.; Cat Fort Yamhill, Oregon ; E at Fort Walla Walla, Wash.; F at San Diego, Cal.; and A en route to Benicia Barracks, California. From this time until the year 1861 scoutings and skirmishes with the Indians were almost incessant, and portions of the regiment were always found where the fighting was going on. Four companies were present with Chandler’s expedition against the Navajos and Apaches in March and April, 1856. In 1856 two companies took part in numerous Indian skirmishes in Oregon and Washington; one was with Wright’s expedition to the Walla Walla country in April, and to the Yakima country in June ; later in the year it was out with Colonel Steptoe. In May, 1858, Companies C, E and H formed part of Steptoe’s expedi- tion northward to the British line which, on the 17th of May, met a force of about 800 Spokane and other hostile Indians and was driven back. In August of the same year Companies C, E, H and I were with Wright’s column, which administered a severe thrashing, September 1, to the Indians who had fought Steptoe. Company D was in the field in Arizona in 1858, and E in Oregon in 1859- Colonel Fauntleroy resigned May 13, 1861, and was succeeded by Colonel B. S. Beall. By the Act of August 3 of this year the designation of the regiment was changed to “ First Regiment of Cavalry.” During the months of November and December the regiment, excepting Companies D and G, was transferred from the Pacific coast to Washington, D. C., arriving at Camp Sprague, near that city, by the end of January, 1862. At this time Companies D and G were at Camp San Christoval, N. M. They had abandoned and destroyed Forts Breckenridge and Buchanan and had taken station at Fort Craig. In January, 1862, they were General Canby’s escort. Company D was engaged in a skirmish with rebels near 160 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Fort Craig, February 19, 1862, and the two companies took part in the bat tie of Valverde, February 21. Company D took part in the engagements at Pigeon’s Ranch, March 30; Albuquerque, April 25 ; and Peralto, April 27, 1862. In June, 1863, the two companies were broken up, the officers and non- commissioned officers being transferred to Carlisle Barracks, where the companies were reorganized, joining the regiment at Camp Buford, Md., in October, 1863. Colonel Beall was retired February 15, 1862, and was succeeded by Col- onel George A. H. Blake, Major Wm. N. Grier of the Second succeeding him as lieutenant colonel of the First. The regiment, now under the command of Colonel Grier, was attached to the 2d Brigade, Cavalry Reserve, Army of the Potomac, Colonel Blake commanding the brigade. It will be impossible to give in detail the part taken by the regiment in all the battles and engagements in which it participated during the Rebel- lion. Only the names of battles are given, with the casualties and such short descriptions as may seem of interest. At Williamsburg, May 4, 1862, a portion of the enemy’s cavalry was re- pulsed by a brilliant charge of a squadron of the regiment commanded by Captain B. F. Davis. A rebel standard was captured; 13 casualties. At Gaines’ Mill, June 27, Lieutenant Robert Allen was dangerously wounded casualties, 26. The regiment was present at Malvern Hill, July 1 ; Kelly’s Ford, March 17, 1863 (loss ten men) ; and Stoneman’s Raid in April and May. At the battle of Beverly Ford, June 9, 1863, the gallant Captain B. F. Davis was killed while in command of the 8th N. Y. Cavalry. At Upper- ville, June 23, the regiment met the “ Jeff Davis ” Legion and the 1st and 2d North Carolina regiments in a charge. The regiment suffered severely, Lieutenants Fisher and Moulton being wounded and captured, and 51 men killed, wounded and missing, a large proportion of the wounded being dis- abled by the sabre. At Gettysburg, July 1 and 3, Lieutenant Trimble was wounded, and the loss was 15 men. The regiment lost two men at Williamsport and on July 6 charged the enemy on the pike road to within half a mile of Funkstown, capturing an officer and 13 men, and driving the enemy within their lines. The regiment was engaged near Boonsboro, July 7, 8 and 9, losing 14 men. At Brandy Station, August 1, it repulsed the enemy in four charges, losing 11 men. With the Reserve Brigade it was then ordered to Washington to remount and equip. Camp Buford was established, where the brigade re- mained about a month when it was again ordered to the front. The First Cavalry was engaged at Manassas Junction and at Catlett’s Station, November 5 ; Culpeper, November 8 ; Stephensburg, November 26, and Mine River. A cantonment having been established at Mitchell’s Station the regiment was employed during the winter doing picket duty along the line of the Rapidan. A reconnoissance to the left of the enemy’s line was made, February 6, 1864, by the 1st Division, Cavalry Corps, the First Cavalry leading the ad- vance. Sharp skirmishes took place near the crossing of Robinson River THE FIRST REGIMENT OF CA VALR V. 161 at Hume’s Ford on the 6th and 7th. On the 6th the regiment charged the enemy, driving him from the ford and capturing four prisoners, and con- tinued the pursuit to within two miles of Barnett’s Ford on the Rapidan. On the morning of the 7th the regiment, again in the advance, encountered the enemy in force at the ford. One squadron,—Gand M Companies under Capt. Fielner,—made a charge to gain possession of the ford, but was met by a heavy fire from infantry in strong position on the opposite side of the river and was recalled with loss of two men and six horses wounded. On the 27th General Custer started on his raid to Charlottesville, and on the 28th, the First Cavalry being in the advance, the enemy were encountered in their camp near Charlottesville from which they were driven and the camp partially destroyed. On the return march the Rosanna bridge was destroyed by the pioneers of the regiment under Lieutenant Ogden. On March 1st, shortly after leaving Standardsville, the enemy charged the 5th Cavalry, which regiment, supported by the First, returned the charge, cap- turing 25 rebels and killing or wounding several of them. On General Sheridan’s taking command of the Cavalry Corps the First Cavalry, commanded by Captain N. B. Sweitzer, was attached to Merritt’s Reserve or Regular Brigade, Torbert’s Division, and in the preparation for the Wilderness campaign the regiment was employed in picketing the Rap- idan, taking part in the battles of Todd’s Tavern, May 7, and Spottsyl- vania Court House, May 8, during the first of which six out of the 16 officers on duty with the regiment,—Captain Sumner and Lieutenants Hall, Hoyer, Pennock, Ward and Carr,—were wounded. During the two days fighting ten men were killed. The regiment accompanied Sheridan on his raid around Richmond and took part in the following engagements; Beaver Dam Station, May 10; Yellow Tavern, May 11 : Meadow Bridge, May 12; Mechanicsville, May 12; Tunstall’s Station, May 14; Hawe’s Shop, May 28; and Old Church, May 30. At the battle of Cold Harbor, June 1, Captain Samuel McKee was mor- tally wounded and died on the 3d. Lieutenant Pennock was shot through both eyes, two men were killed and four wounded. The regiment accom- panied General Sheridan on the Trevillian raid, and was present at the bat- tle of Trevillian Station, June 11 and 12, on which days it suffered severely, losing Lieutenants Ogden and Nichols killed, and Captain Dunkelberger wounded. Three men were killed and 29 wounded or missing. The regi- ment was engaged in daily skirmishing during the return march to White House Landing, and was engaged with the enemy at that point on June 17, at the Chickahominy River on the 18th, and at the battle of Darby’s Farm, June 28. At the battle of Deep Bottom, July 28, where the Regular Bri- gade, fighting on foot, routed a brigade of Confederate cavalry, a battle flag was captured by the First Cavalry. On July 31, the 1st Division marched to City Point, embarked the next day, and was transported to Washington to assist in repelling the threat- ened attack of General Early. The regiment disembarked at Giesboro Point with its division, August 3, and went into camp near Washington. On August 5th the movement to Harper’s Ferry was taken up, the 1st 162 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Division being ordered to the Shenandoah Valley under Sheridan. Har- per's Ferry was reached on the 8th and the division moved out on the Hall- town road and camped. General Sheridan having formed his cavalry into a corps under General Torbert, General Merritt succeeded to the command of the division, and Colonel Alfred Gibbs to that of the brigade. On August loth a reconnoissance was made by the Reserve Brigade in the direction of Winchester, and the enemy’s cavalry was engaged and routed. From this day until the close of Sheridan’s operations in the valley, the regiment was engaged in almost daily fighting, and took part in all the important battles except Fisher’s Hill, where it was otherwise employed as will be seen hereafter. The enemy’s cavalry was engaged, August n, and driven several miles towards Newtown, but our cavalry became opposed to a heavy force of in- fantry and the entire First Division was put in on foot. The ist Cavalry charged across an open plowed field and drove the enemy from the timber beyond, but were in turn repulsed by a heavy flank fire and compelled to take refuge behind rail barricades, which they held until dark in spite of persistent and repeated efforts of the enemy to dislodge them. Lieutenant Harris was wounded in this affair. On August 13, Lieutenant J. S. Walker, the commissary of the regiment was killed by Mosby’s guerrillas near Charleston, Va., while going to Harper’s Ferry in the discharge of his duties. About this time also the regimental trains of the Reserve Brigade were captured and destroyed by Mosby. These trains contained the regimental and company records and the personal effects of officers. Several of the wagons belonging to the regiment were saved and with them some of the records. From August 16th until the 20th, the First Cavalry was employed, together with the whole of the ist Divis- ion, in the destruction of all wheat and forage, and the seizure of all horses, cattle, sheep and hogs, accessible in the valley. The ist Division was engaged with Early’s infantry near Charleston on the 21 st, and on the 25th the ist and 3d Divisions marched in the direction of Leetown, near which place a strong force of the enemy’s infantry was en- countered and defeated with the loss of many prisoners. On the 28th the Division marched again in the direction of Leetown, the Reserve Brigade leading, with the First Cavalry in advance. The Rebel cavalry was found in force beyond Leetown and a severe fight followed. Two squadrons of the First were? deployed to the left and right of the pike and a third held in reserve. The deployed squadrons were driven back and the reserve squadron was moved into the pike in columns of fours and in that forma- tion charged with the sabre. The enemy’s cavalry, a full brigade, charged with the pistol, and, just before the two bodies met, slackened speed to de- liver their fire, when Hoyer's squadron struck them at full charging gait and sent them flying to the rear. Our loss was ten or twelve men wounded with the pistol and the gallant Hoyer killed. He was shot through the body while leading the charge and died in an hour. The command of the squadron then fell to Lieutenant Moses Harris, and at about this time Captain E. M. Baker succeeded Captain Sweitzer in command of the regiment. From the 5th of September until the 19th the First was employed on THE FIRST REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 163 picket duty along the Opequan and in harassing the enemy,—an arduous duty, with constant skirmishing and attendant casualties. Colonel C. R. Lowell, 2d Mass. Cavalry, “ The bravest of the brave,” now succeeded to the command of the Reserve Brigade, and the period of his command is de- scribed as the most brilliant in its history. The First took part in the memorable charge of the Reserve Brigade at the battle of Winchester, September 19, and, in conjunction with the 2d Cavalry, captured two stands of colors and some 200 prisoners. The cas- ualties of the regiment were 37 killed, wounded and missing, including Lieutenant McGregor wounded. The battle of Fisher’s Hill was fought and won September 22, 1864. On this day General Torbert, having been ordered to proceed with Merritt’s and Devin’s Divisions through the Luray Valley to fall upon Early’s retreating army at New Market, in the event of his defeat at Fisher’s Hill, found the forces of the rebel General Wickham strongly entrenched near Milford. Torbert’s failure to dislodge Wickham and Sheridan’s disappointment over the failure of his plan to capture the whole of Early’s army are matters of history. On the morning of the 23d the ambulance train was attacked by some of Mosby’s guerrillas near Front Royal, who were then chased by the First and Second Cavalry and a number killed and ten or twelve captured. Lieuten- ant McMasters of the Second was cruelly murdered, after capture, by the guerrillas, in retaliation for which several of those captured were hung. Learning on the 23d of the victory at Fisher’s Hill, Torbert returned with his command to Milford during the night, and finding the enemy’s strong position abandoned pushed on until the enemy’s cavalry was encoun- tered near Luray early on the morning of the 24th and signally routed, nar- rowly escaping destruction. The First Cavalry took part in this engage- ment, and, September 28, in the action at Waynesboro, in which it met with a loss of 18 killed, wounded and missing. General Sheridan having decided to withdraw his army to a defensible position nearer to his base of supplies in the northern end of the valley, commenced the retrograde movement on the 6th of October. General Ros- ser becoming emboldened by Sheridan’s apparent retreat, took the initia- tive and so annoyed Sheridan that he determined to punish him, and the memorable battle of Tom’s Brook, or “ Woodstock Races,” took place on the 9th. The entire management of the affair was given to General Tor- bet, and how well he redeemed himself for his failure in the Luray Valley by the ignominious rout of Rosser and Lomax is well known. The 1st Cavalry led the advance of the Reserve Brigade during the charge on the pike against Lomax’s cavalry, from Tom’s Brook to Edinborough—18 miles. The chase was continued by the 2d Brigade to Mount Jackson, 8 miles fur- ther on. The First Cavalry captured 4 guns, 4 wagons, and a number of prisoners, with a loss of two men “ missing in action.” It is related that some of the guns here captured were quite new, and had been marked “ For General P. H. Sheridan, care of Jubal Early.” The First Cavalry played an important part in the battle of Cedar Creek, October 19, 1864. After the surprise and defeat of Wright in the morning 164 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. a position was taken about one mile north of Middletown, which was held by the divisions of Merritt and Custer until Sheridan came up with that portion of his army which he had met flying to the rear, a defeated and de- moralized mob. The First Cavalry was formed, one squadron to the left, the other to the right, of the Valley pike, dismounted, behind stone walls, the third squadron being held in reserve. This position was held with the greatest difficulty, the advanced squadron, commanded by Harris, being subjected to an enfilading fire. The personal example however, of the brigade, regimental, and squadron commanders, kept the men up to their places until the return of the Sixth Corps when the squadrons were mounted and joined in the pursuit of Early’s beaten forces, which was continued on the 21st and 22d as far as Mount Jackson. The regiment now returned to Middletown and during the fall and win- ter was engaged in numerous skirmishes and took part in Merritt's raid to the Loudon Valley and Torbert’s raid to Gordonsville. In December the regiment was assigned to duty at the headquarters of the Cavalry Corps in Winchester. On the 27th of February, 1865, General Sheridan commenced his last expedition through the Shenandoah Valley, having for his object the de- struction of the Va. Central R. R, and the James River Canal, and the cap- ture of Lynchburg. Sheridan took only the Cavalry Corps and a portion of his artillery. The regiment was present with the Reserve Brigade and took part in the battle of Waynesboro, March 2, where the remnant of Early’s army was captured. It was also engaged in many skirmishes during the march from Charlottesville to White House Landing while destroying locks and the embankment of the James River Canal, railroads and rebel supplies, and arrived at White House Landing March 17, taking part in the engagement of that day. On the 27th of March Captain Baker was relieved from command of the regiment by Captain R. S. C. Lord. The First Cavalry was present and took part in all the battles and daily skirmishes of the Cavalry Corps until the close of the war. On March 30th it was in the engagement on White Oak Road; March 31, at Dinwiddie Court House; April 1, at Five Forks. Here the regiment made a brilliant charge on an entrenched position of the enemy, which was carried and 200 prisoners captured. April 2, in the engagement near Southside R. R.; April 6, at the battle of Sailor’s Creek; and April 9, at Appomatox,—the surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia. After the surrender the regi- ment returned to Petersburg where it remained in camp until April 24, when it marched with the Cavalry Corps towards North Carolina for the proposed junction with Sherman. On the surrender of Johnston’s army the Corps returned to Petersburg and, the regiment, escorting General Sheridan, left for Washington May 8, arriving May 16, and taking part in the “ Great Review.” In the same month the regiment was ordered to Louisiana, arriving at New Orleans May 31 and remaining in that city or its immediate vicinity until December 29 when it embarked for California via the Isthmus of Pan- ama. It took post at the Presidio of San Francisco January 22, Com- THE FIRST REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 165 panies A, G and K going February 5 to Drum Barracks, where Companies C, D and E, followed them February 17, Company L going to Sacramento. In June of the same year regimental headquarters went to Fort Vancouver, W. T., and the several companies had been distributed through Oregon, Washington Territory, Idaho, California, Nevada and Arizona, no two being at the same station. Owing to the vast extent of country guarded by the regiment its ser- vice for many years following was very arduous. Scouting for Indians and escort duty of various kinds were incessant. Hardly a regimental return fails to record some expedition or report some Indian fight. It will be impossible within the limits to which this sketch is confined to give more than their dates and localities.* 1866. Headwaters Malheur River, Ore., July 18-20-22, Company I. Eleven Indians killed and many wounded. Loss, one man killed. Near Camp Watson, Ore., September 2. Company I. One Indian killed and many wo- men, children and animals captured. Expedition from Owhyee River in September. Company M. Many Indians killed. Loss, one wounded. Expedition from Fort Bidwell, Cal., October 22-29. Company A. Four- teen Indians killed, three women, four children, and entire camp captured. Loss, one wounded. Expedition from Fort McDowell, A. T., September 22-October 3. Company E and detachment of C. Fifteen Indians killed and 10 captured. Scout from Camp Watson, Ore., October 8-24. Company I. Three warriors killed, and 8, with all the women, children, stock and provisions captured. Sierra Anchas, November 17. Company E. Six warriors killed and 5 captured. Scout from Camp Watson, Ore., November 16-24. Lieutenant and ten men of Company I. Three Indians killed. Crook’s expedition against Owhyee River Indians. Battle of December 26. Company F. Thirty warriors killed. Loss of company, one killed and one wounded. Scout from Camp Wallen, A. T., December 9-15. Part of Company G. Three Apaches killed. Scout from Camp Watson, Ore., December 1-7. Twenty men of Company I. Fourteen Indians killed and 5, with 28 head of stock, captured. 1867. Scout from Fort McDowell, January 7-9, and again January 27-31. Company E. Forks of Malheur River, Ore., January 9. Company F. Thirty Indians and 43 head of stock captured. Stein’s Mountain, I. T.f January 29. Company M. Band of 90 warriors attacked ; 60 killed and 27 captured. Escort consisting of one officer and 21 men of Company E attacked by Indians in Arizona, February 23. Loss, one man wounded. Scout from Camp Independence, Cal., March 7-13. Twelve men of Com- pany D. Twelve warriors killed or wounded. Dunder and Blitzen Creek, Nev. Horses and pack mules of Company H stampeded by Indians. The company was put afoot. Scout from Camp Watson, Ore., in May. Eleven * It is my desire to publish a more complete history of the First Cavalry, and I will be only too thankful to receive data, descriptions of engagements, personal anecdotes, etc. I can assure contributors careful perusal of their papers with proper entry, and that they will be given fuil credit for any information furnished. R. P. P. W. 166 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S ARMY. men of Company I. One Indian killed and 3 captured. Scout from Camp Wallen, A. T., June 9-24. Company G. Three Indians killed. Malheur River, Ore., July 7 and 19. Company I. Four warriors killed and 22 cap- tured. Silver River, Ore., September 6 and 16. Company A. Twenty-four Indians killed and 19 captured. Loss, two men wounded. Crook’s expe- dition against hostiles of Oregon and northern California, August 23-Oc- tober 5. Companies F, H and M. Company H in fight at “ Infernal Caverns,” near Pitt River, September 26 to 28. Indians completely routed. Loss of company, Lieutenant Madigan and four men killed and four men wounded. Scout from Camp Wallen, A. T., in December. Company G. One Indian killed and 4 captured. Dunder and Blitzen Creek, Ore., March 14. Company H. Band of In- dians exterminated. Lieutenant Parnell and one man wounded. Malheur River, Ore., April 5. Company F. Thirty-two Indians killed and 2 cap- tured. Skirmish with Indians in Arizona, May 1. One man of Company C wounded. Scout from Camp Lyon, I. T., May 26-31. Eight men of Company M. Thirty-four Indians killed. Scout from Camp Harney, Ore. Fight on May 31 in which five Indians were killed and the remainder sur- rendered. Loss, one man wounded. Near Camp Reno, A. T., June 16. Four men of Company E killed while escorting mail. Morgan’s Ranch, A. T., July 21. One man of Company K killed. Scout from Fort Reno, A. T.,in July. Company E. One Indian killed ; loss, one man wounded. 1868. 1869. Scout from Camp Lowell, January 13. Company G. One Indian killed, and one wounded. Expedition against Arivaypa Apaches, February 2. Detachments of Companies G and K. Eight Indians killed and 8 captured. Expedition against Apaches in March. Company G. Three Indian camps of 105 huts destroyed. Fight at Mount Turnbull, A. T., April 29. Companies G and K. Twenty-eight Indians killed and 8 captured. Fight with Indians in Arizona, May 11. Seven men of Company G. One man wounded. Scout from Camp Grant, May 22. Company K. Four Indians killed. Fights on Rio Pinto, June 2 and 4. Company E. Twenty- two Indians killed and 4 captured. Scout from Camp Bowie, June 30. Company G. Four Indians captured. Expedition to White Mountains of Arizona, July and August. Company L and detachment of K. Fifteen Indians killed and 8 captured. Pursuit of marauders of Cochise’s band, October 8. Company G. Twelve Indians killed and stolen stock recovered. Fight with Cochise’s band in Chiricahua Mountains, October 20. Company G. Twenty Indians killed and others wounded. One man killed and 1 wounded. Skirmish with Cochise’s band, October 31. Companies C, G and L. Two Indians killed. Scout from Camp McDowell, A. T., Decem- ber 9-11. Twenty men of Company E. Entire band of 11 Mojave Apaches killed. 1870. Skirmish with Cochise’s band, January 27. Company G. Thirteen Indians killed and two captured. Attack on rancheria in Tonto Valley, A, THE FIRST REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 167 T., May 25. Company E. Twenty-one Indians killed and 12 captured. Scout from Camp Grant, June 1-9. Company K. Thirty-seven Indians killed. Skirmish in the Penal Mountains, A. T., August 1. Twenty-five men of Company K. Six Indians killed. Loss, one man killed. Penal Mountains, October 29. Company C. Four Indians killed. Loss, two men wounded. 1871. Penal Mountains, January i. Company G. Nine Indians killed. Scout from Camp Apache, A. T., February 16-27. Companies L and M. Ranch- eria of San Carlos Apaches attacked, capturing horses and destroying food and camp equipage. Scout from Fort Whipple, A. T., September 30. Com- pany A. Seventeen warriors killed. Fight at Bad Rock Mountains, Decem- ber 11, 1872. Detachments from Companies L and M. Fourteen Indians killed and many wounded. Attack on Apache rancheria, December 13, 1872. Detachments of Companies L and M. Eleven Indians killed and 6 captured. Scouts from Camp Verde, A. T., December 23, 1872; January 4, 1873; February 1-16, 1873; and February 18; March 7, 1873. Company I. Eight Indians killed, 3 squaws and 2 children captured. Engagement with Apaches May 6, 1873. Company A. Four Indians killed. Regimental Headquarters were transferred from Fort Vancouver to Camp Warner, Ore., in May, 1870, and thence to Benicia Barracks in October of the same year. Just two months later,—December 15, 1870,—Colonel Blake was retired fr'om active service on his own application, and Colonel A. C. Gillem of the 1 ith Infantry was transferred to the First Cavalry in his stead. The Modoc Indians were a small tribe living in northern California near Tule Lake and Lost River. Through the intercession of interested civilians orders were issued for their removal to the Klamath Indian Reservation. They went on the reservation, but, on account of ill treatment left it, and the War Department was then directed to carry out the orders. The In- dians at once commenced hostilities and one of the most protracted and obstinate Indian wars of later years followed. Company B left Fort Klamath, Ore., November 28, 1872, for the purpose of arresting “ Captain Jack” and the leaders of his band of Modocs, and at daylight on the 29th surprised the Indians in their camp near Lost River, Ore. They refused to surrender and an engagement followed in which 8 Indians were killed and many wounded, and the camp, squaws, and property were captured. The company lost 2 men killed and 6 wounded, 2 of them mortally. The company then went into camp at Crowley’s Ranch on Lost River opposite the Indian camp. Company G from Fort Bidwell took station December 13, at Land’s Ranch, Tule Lake, near the Indian stronghold. The Indians attacked this camp, December 21, and were repulsed, but not until 2 men and 5 horses had been killed. Company B now joined Company G and the two com- panies marched against the Indians, January 16, 1873, in conjunction with General Wheaton’s column, with which was also serving at this time Com- pany F and a detachment of Company H. The Indians attacked Com- panies B and G the same afternoon, but were repulsed, the companies losing 168 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. 3 men wounded. The general engagement took place January 17, and lasted from 7.30 A. M. to 9.30 p. m., when the troops retired, going finally into camp at Applegate’s Ranch, Clear Lake, Ore. The regiment lost two men killed and two officers,—Captain Perry and Lieutenant Kyle,—and 8 men wounded, one mortally. The Indians attacked a wagon train January 22, driving away the escort, but Captain Bernard, 1st Cavalry, came up with reinforcements and the Indians were repulsed, losing one killed and many wounded. Company K from Fort Halleck, Nev., joined the battalion February 18, which now consisted of Companies B, F, G and K, under Captain Biddle, who was soon succeeded by Captain Bernard. Colonel Gillem, 1st Cavalry, was commanding the expedition, and Company H joined the column Feb- ruary 10. During the night of April 14 the companies of the 1st Cavalry moved with the rest of the command to invest the Modoc stronghold, and in the “Second battle of the Lava Beds,” April 15, 16 and 17, drove the Indians out of their position and into the rocks and mountains. The 1st Cavalry lost 2 men killed and 2 wounded. On April 26 Companies B and F went to the scene of the “ Thomas massacre ” and brought off a number of the wounded and dead. The same companies were attacked by Indians May 10, at Sorass Lake, Cal., but repulsed them with the loss of one warrior killed and 2 wounded. The command lost one killed and 6 wounded, 2 of them mortally. On May 17 Companies B, G and K, with a battery (serving as cavalry) of the 4th Artillery, all under Major John Green, came upon a band of Mo- docs which they drove five miles, killing one and capturing several squaws and children. The troops followed the trail and on May 22, 70 Indians— men, women and children—surrendered. “ Boston Charlie ” was captured May 29, and on the 31st “ Sconchin,” “ Scarfaced Charlie,” and 27 other Indians surrendered. Companies F and H were sent from Applegate’s Ranch May 31 to follow up those of the Modocs who had eluded Green’s command, and found them June 1st, when the whole party surrendered. With the capture of “ Captain Jack,” the Modoc war ended, and by the end of June the compan- ies which had been engaged in it had returned to their proper stations. The companies left in Arizona were moved north, and by the end of October, 1873, headquarters with Companies A and D were at Benicia Bar- racks ; B at Fort Klamath ; C at Camp McDermitt, Nev.; E at Fort Lap- wai, I. T.; F, L and M at Fort Walla Walla, W. T. ; G at Camp Bidwell, Cal.; H and K at Camp Harney, Ore.; and I at Camp Halleck, Nev. Colonel Gillem died at his residence in Nashville, Tenn., December 2, 1875, and was succeeded by Colonel Cuvier Grover, promoted from the 3d Cavalry. On June 15, 1877, Companies F and H, under Captain Perry, were or- dered to proceed to Camas Prairie to the assistance of the settlers of Mount Idaho, I. T., who were threatened by the Nez Perce Indians under Chief Joseph. Learning that the Indians were crossing Salmon River and could be taken at a disadvantage, the march was given that direction and Chief THE FIRST REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 169 Joseph’s camp was found and taken by surprise, but the Indians quickly rallied and repulsed the troops with severe loss, Lieutenant E. W. Theller, 2ist Infantry (attached), and 33 men being killed and two wounded. All the companies of the regiment, except M at Colville and A at Camp Harney watching the Piutes, were now ordered into the field against the Nez Perces. Companies E and L joined General Howard’s command June 21, and on July 1 surprised and attacked the camp of “ Looking Glass ” on the Clear- water, I. T. The village was entirely destroyed, several Indians killed and about a thousand ponies captured. On July 2 the same command attempted to form a junction with Company F, which was on its way from Lapwai. On the 3d the Indians ambushed the advanced guard, consisting of Lieu- tenant S. M. Rains, ten men of the battalion and two civilian scouts, killing them all, and were then found to be in such force and so strongly posted that it was considered imprudent to attack them. The junction with Com- pany F was effected, however, on July 4, and the same afternoon the In- dians attacked, the fight lasting until sunset. The battalion (E, F and L) joined General Howard at Grangerville, July 8. Company H had joined July 2, and the battalion was commanded by Captain David Perry. On the nth of July General Howard crossed the Clearwater with his whole command and moved down that stream with Company H in the ad- vance. The Indian camp was discovered and at once attacked, the fight lasting two days and ending with the retreat of the Indians. Company B joined in time to take part in the fight on the 12th. The regiment lost 3 men killed and 4 wounded. The battalion made a reconnoissance July 18, on the Lo-Lo trail, and the Indian scouts accompanying it were ambushed and met with consider- able loss. One Nez Perce was killed. Major Sanford’s battalion, consisting of Companies C, D, I and K, joined General Howard on the Clearwater, July 28, and the expedition across the Lo-Lo trail began on the 30th. Companies B, C, I and K, under Major Sanford, accompanied it, and Companies D, E, G and L, with other troops under Major Green, constituted the “ Reserve Column ” which remained at Camas Prairie until August 5, when it moved near to Mount Idaho, and established a permanent camp called Camp Howard. Companies F and H were stationed at Fort Lapwai. General Howard’s trying and “ stern ” march across the Lo-Lo trail, and the final surrender of Chief Joseph to General Miles at Bear Paw Moun- tains are matters of history. In the Indian attack at Camas Creek August 20, Companies B and L were engaged, losing one man killed and one wounded. At Judith Basin the battalion was detached from General How- ard’s command and directed to return, and all the companies had reached their stations by the end of November. Company K and a detachment of C, attached to General Sturgis’ com- mand, took part in the engagement with the Nez Perces at Canyon Creek, M. T., September 13, 1877. At the outbreak of the Bannock war in May, 1878, Company G was the first body of troops to reach the scene of hostilities, and Captain Bernard 170 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. reported that the Indians numbered from 300 to 500. They were moving towards Stein’s Mountain, Ore. The whole of the First Cavalry was at once ordered into the field and Colonel Grover sent to Fort Boise to take charge of operations there. Companies D, I and K, were with him. Companies F and L joined Company G on the Owyhee, June 17, and the three companies reached Camp Harney on the 21st, where they were joined by Company A. These four companies were designated the “ Left Column ” by General Howard. On the morning of June 23 the Left Column struck the main camp of the hostiles on Silver Creek, and drove the Indians out of it and on to a cut- bank, made by the creek, which had been prepared for defense. The action lasted into the night and in the morning it was found that the Indians had gone. Many Indians were killed and the camp was destroyed. The bat- talion lost 2 killed and 3 wounded. Company K joined the battalion June 27, and on the 28th the cavalry cut loose from the foot troops and pushed forward on the trail of the Indians. The fertile John Day Valley was saved in great part by this vigorous pursuit, and on July 5th General Howard overtook the command, arriving with it at Pilot Rock on the 7th. Here ic was joined by Companies E and H. The Indian camp was located and at sunrise on July 8 Captain Bernard moved his battalion to the attack. The Indians, about 300 in number, occupied the crest of the high and steep hills near Birch Creek, and were at once attacked. Captain Bernard giving the first example of fighting cavalry on foot without separating the men from the horses. All the companies, except A with the pack train, were deployed and used in the engagement, and the Indians were driven from three successive positions and finally four or five miles further into the mountains. Four men were wounded, one mortally, and probably 20 horses were killed. The enemy’s loss could not be told ; their women, chil- dren and best horses were sent off, seemingly towards the Grande Ronde, before the action began. Lieutenant C. E. S. Wood, A. D. C., says: “ The entire fight was closely watched by the general commanding, who desires to express his opinion that no troops ever behaved better or in a more soldierly manner than did the officers and men engaged in this encounter.” The command camped for the night among the rough canons adjacent to the battle-field. Captain Bernard was now directed to take his command, except Com- pany K, to Fort Walla Walla to refit. Company K was sent to join the infantry column and with it moved to the Umatilla Agency, near which the hostiles were reported to be. Here the Indians made an attack July 13. In the ensuing fight Company K held the right of the line and took part in the final charge by which the Indians were driven off the field and for three miles into the hills. At the request of the Indian Agent the command moved back to the agency that night, but two days later seven dead Indians were counted upon the battle-field. Companies A, E, F, G, H and I, now under Lieutenant-Colonel J. W. Forsyth, 1st Cavalry, left Fort Walla Walla July 13—the day of the fight at Umatilla Agency—in search of the Indians, who were found to be travel- ling in the direction of John Day River. On the 20th Forsyth’s scouts were THE FIRST REGIMENT OF CA VALR Y. 171 ambushed, which caused a halt and deployment of the command, but when the line moved forward the Indians had gone. On the 22d the battalion reached “ Burnt Meadows,” where it was joined by Companies D and I, under Major Sanford, and on the 27th it went into camp at Malheur Agency to await supplies. The hostiles had now split up into many small parties which were followed up and nearly all ultimately captured. During the months of September and October the companies were sent to their permanent stations, and the return for November 30 shows Compa- nies A and E at Camp Harney, Ore.; B, D, F, K and M, at Fort Walla Walla, W. T.; C at Camp Bidwell, Cal.; G at Fort Boise, I. T.; H at Fort Colville, W. T.; I at Camp Halleck, Nev., and L at Fort Klamath, Ore. In the year 1881 Companies C, G, I and M were sent to Arizona, and on October 2, Company G, with other troops, was in action near Cedar Springs with Apaches. The hostiles fought with great boldness and desperation and the fight lasted until 9 P. M., when the Indians escaped. Company G had two men wounded and 12 horses killed. On the 4th of October Companies G and I had a* running fight near South Pass of the Dragoon Mountains, in which the hostiles were followed into Sonora, Mexico. In October, 1881, the “ Companies ” began to be designated “ Troops ” on the Regimental Return. Troop G returned to Fort McDermott, November 9; Troop I to Camp Halleck, December 27 ; Troop M to the Presidio of San Francisco, January 20, 1882; and Troop C to Fort Bidwell, April 16. In June, 1884, the regiment was transferred to the Department of Da- cota, after a tour of nearly 30 years on the Pacific coast, during the greater part of which time its stations were remote from civilization and its duties of a most arduous and thankless character. Headquarters and Troops D, G I, K and M, went to Fort Custer; A, C and F went to Fort Maginnis; E to Fort Ellis ; H and L to Fort Assinni- boine; and B to Fort Keogh. Colonel Grover died at Atlantic City, N. J., June 5, 1885, and was suc- ceeded by Colonel N. A. M. Dudley, promoted from the 9th Cavalry. Conflict with the “Crows ” came in the fall of 1887, and on the morning of November 4, Colonel Dudley left Fort Custer with Troops A, B, D, E, G and K, and Company B, 3d Infantry, with a section of Hotchkiss guns, to arrest “Sword Bearer” and the Indians who had fired into the agency buildings on the night of September 30. On the 5th a demand was made upon the Indians for the surrender of these men, and they were given an hour and a half to comply with the de- mand. At the end of that time the battalion of the 1st Cavalry, with Moy- lan’s troop of the 7th Cavalry on the right, moved out in front of camp. At the same time a great commotion was observed in the Indian camp, and “Sword Bearer” and another chief dashed out leading from 120 to 150 warriors equipped for battle. The Indians charged but were repulsed and fell back into the timber along the river where they had dug many rifle pits from which they now kept up a constant fire. This fire was returned, and “ Sword Bearer ” was seen to fall, when all fighting quickly ceased. All HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. 172 the Indians whose surrender had been demanded and who had not been killed were at once brought in and delivered to the Department Com- mander, who sent them to Fort Snelling. The cavalry battalion returned to Fort Custer on the 13th. Colonel Dudley was retired from active service August 20, 1889, and was succeeded by Colonel J. S. Brisbin, promoted from the 9th Cavalry. On the 31st of December of that year Headquarters and Troops B, D, E, G and M, were at Fort Custer ; A and L at Fort Maginnis ; C, F and H at Fort As- sinniboine; I at Fort Leavenworth ; and K at Camp Sheridan, Wyoming. In April, 1890, the Cheyennes assumed a threatening attitude and their agent called upon the commanding officer of Fort Custer for protection, who sent Major Carrol with Troops B, D and M to the Tongue River Agency where they established Camp Crook. In September a white boy was mur- dered by “Head Chief ” and “Young Mule,” and every attempt to arrest the murderers failed. On the nth they sent word that they would attack the agency and on the 12th made their appearance on a hill commanding the agency buildings where they opened fire upon them. They were soon dislodged and killed. The regiment took part in the operations against the hostile Sioux in the winter of 1890-91, but was not brought into actual contact with them. In December, 1890, word having been received that a troop of cavalry was surrounded by hostile Indians at or near Cave Hills, Montana, Troop A made one of the most remarkable marches on record in going to its relief. It marched 186 miles, 95 of which were made in 25 hours, and 170 in hours. The report which caused such tremendous exertion proved to be without foundation. On the 22d of April, 1891, Colonel Brisbin was transferred to the 8th Cavalry with Colonel A. K. Arnold who had been the lieutenant colonel and now became the colonel of the First. In 1892 the regiment was transferred to the Department of Arizona, re- lieving the 10th Cavalry. Headquarters and Troops C, E, F, H and K, go- ing to Fort Grant, A T.; B and I to Fort Bayard, N. M.; D to Fort Apache, A. T.; and G to San Carlos. Troop A was at Fort Meyers, Va., and was not moved. Since its arrival in Arizona the regiment has not been engaged in any serious Indian difficulties, although the several troops have been kept in practice in field work by that ever active and elusive “ Kid,” who has been responsible for more movements of troops than any Indian ever known.* * In the preparation of this paper I have confined myself almost entirely to the regimental rec- ords, but have received much valuable information from General P. St. George Cooke, Colonel A. K. Arnold, Major Moses Harris, Captain T. T. Knox, Captain F. A. Edwards, Lieutenant A. L. Mills and Lieutenant W. S. Scott, to all of whom I am very grateful. R. P. P. W. THE SECOND REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. I. (1836-65.) MAJOR ALFRED E. BATES,* Pay Department. REGIMENTS, like individuals, have characteristics peculiar to them- selves. One is famous for the smart, soldierly appearance of its officers and men on all occasions and under the most trying cir- cumstances. You cannot tell how they do it, but they always seem to be ready for dress parade and inspection. They are known as “ The Dandy Regiment,” or “ The Band-box Brigade,” an epithet which becomes complimentary because it is associated with their well-earned reputation for gallantry. Another becomes famous for its marching qualities and for gen- erations maintains its reputation for measuring greater distances in less time than any other. Then in every service there are “ The Slow and Heavies,” who, somewhat late in getting into action, never get out, as they are alike unmoved by shot or shell or joke. Nor should we omit the regiment with the Milesian quality of never enjoying life save when in a row with some one. It may not be out of place to note here that different branches of service bring out different traits of character. We are accustomed to think of the steady foot-soldier; the scientific artillerist; and, as for the cavalryman, perhaps his conventional qualities are best defined by Professor Mahan in his “ Outposts ” when he says : “ The Hussar ! that epitome of military im- pudence of the tavern, who should possess these qualities, in a sublimated form, on the field of battle.” I am sure that no one who has served with the cavalry of ante-bellum days, can read this definition of the Hussar without believing that the Professor must have known the old 2d Dragoons when he wrote it. As individuals and as a regiment, it was that “ epitome of military impudence ” whether in the parlor, in the tavern, or on the field of battle. Mounted on his well-groomed horse, equipments in perfect order, sitting as if he would be out of place anywhere else, cap a little on one side, with a twinkle in his eye, and the suspicion of a smile about his mouth, our Dragoon reported himself ready to go to , or any place you might lead him. “ Like master, like man.” And we must go back to the early years of the regiment if we would find the reason why. After the settlement of our troubles with Great Britain in 1815, our little army was reduced and re- organized so that we had but four regiments of artillery and seven of infantry scattered along the sea-board from Maine to Florida, along the *See also—“ From Everglade to Canon,” by Gen. T. F. Rodenbough. New York, 1875. 174 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Canadian border and the Great Lakes, and occupying a few scattered posts along the western frontier which was at that time far to the east of the Mis- sissippi River. The stream of emigration having commenced, the pioneers rushed to take possession of the rich lands acquired from Spain in the South, and by the Louisiana purchase in the South and West. These lands were occupied by tribes of Indians, who objected to the intrusion and made manifest their objection by killing the intruders. It was the old trouble— begun with our first settlement on the Atlantic Coast and not quite ended yet. It was the duty of the Army then, as it has been ever since, to drive back the native and hold the country for the occupation of the white man ; for this purpose mounted troops were necessary and, in 1833, Congress authorized the organization of the 1st Dragoons, and in May, 1836, added another regiment which was called the Second Dragoons. The companies of this regiment were organized in New York, Baltimore and St. Louis, and the personnel both of officers and men was representative of the whole country. Soon after the passage of the act authorizing the organization of the Second Dragoons, the following appointments were announced : COLONEL LIEUTENANT-COLONEL Wharton Rector. DAVID E. TWIGGS. MAJOR Thomas T. Fauntleroy. 1. William Gordon, 2. John Dougherty, 3. John F. Lane, 4. James Ashby, 5. Jonathan L. Bean, CAPTAINS 6. Stinson H. Anderson, 7. William W. Tompkins, 8. Henry W. Fowler, 9. Benjamin L. Beall, 10. Edward S. Winder. FIRST LIEUTENANTS 1. Thornton Grimsley, 2. Theophilus Holmes, 3. Horatio Groome, 4. Thomas S. Bryant, 5. John Graham, 6. Townshend Dade, 7. Erasmus D. Bullock, 8. Marshal S. Howe, 9. Charles Spalding, 10. James W. Hamilton. SECOND LIEUTENANTS 1. William Gilpin, 2. William H. Ward, 3. George Forsyth, 4. Croghan Ker, 5. John H. P. O’Neale, 6. John W. S. McNeil, 7. Zebulon M. P. Maury, 8. Seth Thornton, 9. Charles E. Kingsbury, 10, Charles A. May. Wharton Rector declined the appointment of Lieutenant-Colonel, and Major William S. Harney, Paymaster, was promoted to the vacancy. First Lieutenant Lloyd J. Beall was announced as Adjutant. David E. Twiggs of Georgia, the first Colonel, unquestionably gave a tone to the regiment, which, subsequently accentuated by Harney and Cooke, gave point to the answer to many a query, “ Oh, that's a Second Dragoon.” He was somewhat of a martinet but in all things a soldier. The key-note to his discipline was this : on duty, no excuse, no relaxation, no THE SECOND REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 175 explanation for failure; off duty, anything for amusement, and especial en- couragement given to manly sports. The best rider, the best jumper, the best boxer, the cleanest soldier—had a claim for clemency from the com- manding officer that often saved the soldier from deserved punishment for excessive dissipation. Associated with its first Colonel were some subor- dinate officers who also did much to encourage this spirit in the regiment. Among these none were more prominent than Captain Beall, familiarly known to the army as “ Old Ben Beall,” of whom at the close of the Florida War General Worth officially reported that he “ has met the enemy in this contest, oftener, perhaps, than any other officer—is brave and generous.” The foe overcome, the tedious trail retraced, horses and men cared for, and where was the man who made social history more racy or gave entertain- ment more varied than “ Old Ben ” ? Besides these individual influences operating upon the newly organized regiment, there was the kind of service on which it was engaged. Immedi- ately after its organization, the assembled troops started on their journey to the Everglades of Florida. There in those deadly swamps, surrounded by a wily and often invisible foe, the “ Second ” received its first training in endurance. Theirs not the grand privilege of doing and dying for their country, with banners flying, bugles sounding, and comrades cheering, while boot to boot they rode upon the enemy. There was nought of glory here, nor correspondents of pictorial papers ready to make them immortal. There was but the lonely swamp ; the small detachment guided by the more or less friendly savage; the fearful strain of physical endurance ; the sharp, short, unrecorded fight; the return, the struggle with, and perhaps death by fever. The history of one scout is the history of many until at last the foe is conquered or killed, and what is left of the Regiment moves off to other fields—no longer a new regiment, but a proud, saucy, devil-may-care lot of troopers, thoroughly cemented together by blows and blood and ready to give and take wherever an enemy of their country is found. The result of the service in Florida was satisfactory to the Government, and cost the regiment two officers and twenty non-commissioned officers, musicians and privates killed in action, and five officers and one hundred and ninety-two non-commissioned officers, musicians and privates, who died from diseases incident to service. Among those who at the close of the Florida War had become prominently identified with the regiment, was the late General Harney, its first lieutenant-colonel. He had gone with it to Florida and there, under his direction, the regiment had done some of its most noteworthy service, against the Seminoles; as it did in after years in the West against Mexicans and the Indians of the Plains. General Harney was a very picturesque soldier. Standing something over six feet in height, he was a veritable Apollo in form, and a giant in strength, excelling nearly all of his contemporaries in all qualities pertaining to physical manhood. As he subsequently succeeded to the colonelcy of the regiment, perhaps his influence and characteristics were more deeply impressed upon it than were those of his predecessor. Harney was thoroughly a dragoon. He would have admitted, doubtless, that there was a necessity for artillery and artil- lerymen in an army, and even infantry could be employed to advantage in 176 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. rough country, but it was the “ dragoon bold ” who discovered the enemy, charged the enemy, captured or killed the enemy, and only after the action was over and the enemy turned over to the infantry guard, would he rest from a well-earned victory. From Florida to Mexico, with but a little breathing spell in Mississippi and Texas, our brave dragoons carry their fluttering guidons. On the Rio Grande (April 25, 1846) they met for the first time a civilized foe, and as they meet they dazzle the country with the brilliancy of their deeds. The fields of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma are fought, and the names of May and Graham and Sacket and others of the 2d Dragoons become familiar household words all over the country. The reputation gained upon those fields was but the beginning of a series of successes with the noble Army of Occupation under Taylor, and after- wards under the old hero Scott, from Vera Cruz to the City of Mexico. Harney was one of the most conspicuous figures in Mexico. Sumner, one of the heroes of a later and greater struggle, won golden laurels for him- self, which he was to wear until in ripe old age he died in harness. The other survivors of the Florida swamps gave fresh examples of their prowess. The captains and lieutenants found their names in either General Order, list of casualties or of brevets. Inge fell at Resaca, Stevens at Matamoras, Hill at Puebla and gallant Seth Thornton met a soldier’s death under the walls of the Mexican capital—marking in his own person the opening and the closing actions of the campaign. The romantic “ War with Mexico” ended, the 2d Dragoons (1848) came back to take its place again facing the Indians. The poor red-skin devil had been driven from point to point, cheated in treaty after treaty, moved from one reservation to another, until there was no hostile element left east of the Mississippi River, and our line of outposts extended from the Red River of the North to Galveston on the Gulf. East of this line the defense- less settler was coming on faster and faster, and west of it were thousands of savages determined to dispute any farther aggression upon their terri- tory. The few rude posts called “ forts,” located far apart along this line of more than two thousand miles in length, were garrisoned by a few regi- ments of troops, one of which was the 2d Dragoons. Between 1848 and 1861, they rode back and forth along this dreary route. To-day pursuing the swift Apache and Comanche over the hot,, arid, staked plains of Texas or New Mexico ; then, as quickly as horses could carry them, rushing off to the frozen fields of Nebraska to struggle through an Arctic winter, fighting the powerful Sioux of the North. Standing between hostile political camps of their countrymen in Kansas, they preserve the peace because neither faction dare attack or oppose them, while both sides are obliged to acknowledge their impartiality and patriotism. During these days another great cavalryman has taken his place at the head of the regiment. Philip St. George Cooke has taken command. If in the swamps of Florida, the fields of Mexico or the plains of Texas, there has been little time to devote to the finer points of drill, the defect is remedied now. On the prairies of Kansas, with new mount and splendid equipment, Colonel Cooke gives a new impetus to the military detail of the regiment. He cannot add to its esprit de corps. There have grown upon THE SECOND REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 177 it no excrescences for his keen knife to lop off, but he can and does give them a grand drilling, the like of which they have never had before. For the first time in many years, from four to six companies of the regiment were together at Fort Riley in 1856-57, without a war of some kind to en- gage their attention. There was no nonsense about the old soldier who had them in charge, and the young officers joining there, learned lessons they found invaluable, and which a few years later, upon the fields of Virginia, enabled them to add fresh laurels to the regimental wreath. A few short years of pleasant garrison life in Kansas, and (1856) “once more, my men, into the saddle and show the world what you can endure and live.” ’Tis the Mormon, that religious barnacle upon the western civiliza- tion of the nineteenth century that demands your attention now. Secure in the fastness of the Rockies, in the valley which he has reclaimed and converted from a wilderness to a garden, their prophet, priest and king de- fies the power of the Government, and practically proclaims his independ- ence. It is unnecessary for the soldiers to analyze too closely the history of the Mormon War. Whether it was, in whole or part, a move in the great game of conspiracy then being played ; whether it was a shrewd effort on the part of Brigham Young to get a market for the agricultural products of the Mormons; whether he actually supposed that his position was strong enough to enable him to defy the Government; or whether it was a part of all of these causes, matters not to the Dragoon. .“ His not to reason why,” and he did not attempt it. In the month of August, 1857, the regiment started on its march over- land for Utah. The route was long and weary, but that did not matter. They were used to that, but when the early snows fell upon them at South Pass and the mercury went down into the bulb of the thermometer to keep from freezing, and the starved horses laid down to die on the trail, the light-hearted Dragoon, like Mark Tapley at Eden, began to think there might be some credit in being jolly. Jolly he was not always, but the survivors of that terrible winter all testify to the invariable cheerfulness and pluck of the soldiers ; on foot, half starved and more than half frozen, they struggled on as far as Fort Bridger, and, there, passed a winter of suffering. The casualties reported from 1840 to the outbreak of the Civil War were: Killed, 4 officers and 47 men ; wounded, 8 officers and 84 men. Then was reached the climax in the life and history of the regiment. Those gallant, simple-minded soldiers were called upon to meet a question of divided duty. Heretofore they have ridden and fought, worked and starved with but one thought, one aim—Duty. Had you asked the officer if the cause was just, he might have said, “ I do not know, here are my orders.” Had you said to the soldier, “ You would not fire on your own people, would you ? ” he would probably have answered with the old artilleryman in Pittsburg in ’77, “ I don’t know sir, that depends upon the Captain.” Now, however, the Captain is troubled. If from the South, he has been taught to believe that the Union is a voluntary compact on the part of each State, from which it may withdraw. If this State withdraws or secedes, as a citizen of the State he will owe his allegiance to her and not to the Union with which she has severed her connection. On the other hand, he has fol- 178 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. lowed the dear old flag from Florida to Utah, sprinkling it with his blood in many a combat, and how can he ever fight against it ? How he hopes and prays that his State will not go; that he will not be obliged to make the choice. But the time comes and he must choose. As he reads and re-reads the letters from the dear ones at home, urging him to come to their protec- tion, and looks at his brothers-in-arms from whom they want protection, who will condemn him whichever way he goes? We have his history for years before and we have all known him for years since. Little more need be said. On the Confederate side “ Dick ” Anderson and Hardee became lieutenant-generals; Pegram, Sibley, Robertson, Geo. Anderson, Arm- strong, Stuart and Field were major generals. The crisis has come and passed, and another year (1862) finds the regi- ment in Virginia, a grand old Virginian still its colonel. The vacancies are filled and the regiment is ready once more to enter the lists. In a sketch like this it is impossible to follow in detail its history through such a period as that from ’61 to ’65. However, it seems proper to take notice of the per- sonnel at the commencement of, what an ancient dragoon always called, “ our late lamented circus.” The regiment in 1861 was twenty-five years old, and its officers had received their training in its school. Whatever they became as soldiers in the great war, then commencing, they owed to that training. Many were detached from the organization at the commence- ment of hostilities. Cooke was made a brigadier-general in the regular establishment; Wood, Palmer, Davidson and Pleasanton were starred and as- signed to command volunteer troops ; while Buford, who was perhaps more than any other a typical 2d Dragoon, first commanded the Regular Brigade and afterward the First Cavalry Division of the Army of the Potomac. One feels inclined to stop at this period, and enter into detail. There is so much of brilliancy in every day life, from the time when Hooker organized the cav- alry, until when our horsemen with characteristic impudence hold the way against Lee’s retreating army at Appomatox, that a “ sketch” seems inap- propriate. The scholars of that 2d Dragoon school are now operating on the great war theatre, where history is being made. Some have gone far to the front, like Buford, and Merritt, and Sanders, but they have at their el- bows such lieutenants as “Jake ” Gordon, Rodenbough, Leoser, Harrison, Blanchard and Dave Gordon, as well as those splendid fellows whose mili- tary cradle was a dragoon saddle, like Ball, Mix, Wells, Spaulding, Dewees and Quirk, whose feats on the field of Beverly Ford, alone, should immor- talize them. While these old soldiers are still with the regiment, there is hardly an army in the country which has not a brigade, division or corps commanded by some one of those detached. Pleasanton, Graham, Buford and Merritt in the Army of the Potomac, Wood and Davidson in the West, Palmer in North Carolina, while “ Doc ” Sanders is the hero of the day at Knoxville, where he lost his life. The regiment paid fearfully for its share in the struggle for the Nation ; its Roll of Honor is long. Buford, Sanders, McQueston, Canfield, Lawless, McMasters, Selden—all dead on the field of battle. Others survived the War and dropped off one by one, leaving but few of that gallant band remaining. Of them, Harrison—popular, brave, conscientious—is now a citizen in that peaceful city, Philadelphia ; Roden- THE SECOND REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 179 bough, who made much history for the regiment then, now uses the arm left from that glorious charge at the Opequan, in preserving it; and Leoser, “ the cool captain,” whose iron frame shows little evidence of war wounds and prisons, is now residing in New York. Space does not permit one to follow individuals farther. The list of combats from 1861 to 1865 shows what the regiment accomplished. Always in front, under Pleasanton, Bu- ford or Merritt, with Stoneman or the brilliant Sheridan, from Bull Run to the Appomatox, there was hardly an affair of any importance at which it was not represented. Its losses during the War were : Killed, 5 officers and 60 men : wounded, 20 officers and 206 men. II. (1866-91.) How well the work prior to the close of the Civil War was done, is set forth in the preceding pages. The period there treated furnishes the most glorious pages in our history, but the duty performed was not more arduous than that which has since devolved upon the regiment. The roster of the officers has been changed since the regiment partici- pated in those stirring campaigns of the Army of the Potomac, and now but one of those gallant men remains with us—Lieut.-Col. D. S. Gordon, who has served continuously in the Second Cavalry since his appointment as a second lieutenant, April 26, 1861. Within a month after reaching Leavenworth, November, 1865, we find troops marching for the (then) frontier posts of Riley, Kearny, Hays, Lyon, Harker, Dodge, Larned and Wallace. They found the winter of 1865 and ’66 one of hard work, not so much as soldiers, as mechanics and laborers, for at several of their new stations it was necessary to construct huts to pro- tect themselves from the severity of the winter. This work was continued into the following summer, except when interrupted by scouting between the Smoky Hill and Arkansas rivers. Having succeeded in making them- selves fairly comfortable, the regiment was ordered in September to march across the country, and report to its old colonel, then General, Philip St. George Cooke, commanding the Department of the Platte. The several troops were scattered about at Forts Laramie, McPherson, Phil. Kearny, Casper, Sanders and Sedgwick, and from these stations main- tained an almost constant warfare with the Indians. On December 9, 1866, Lieutenant Bingham, commanding Troop C, met his death in a skirmish near Phil. Kearny, and twelve days later 27 men of the same troop, with 3 officers and 49 men of the 18th Infantry, were killed in what is known as the “ Phil. Kearny Massacre.” Had the Indians re- ceived the chastisement they deserved for this bloody deed, it would have been in the end a kindness. Going unavenged, it only created in the minds of the Sioux a false idea of their power which ultimately cost them dearly. Gordon, with Troop D, did some very hard scouting and escort duty around Kearny, for the Indians may be said to have held that post and C. F. Smith in a state of siege. CAPTAIN EDWARD J. McCLERNAND, Second Cavalry. 180 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. During the summer of 1867 Lieutenant Kidder, a gallant young officer, and ten men of Troop M, were killed while bearing dispatches to General Custer. A brief extract from a report by Captain John Mix of a scout made by his troop,—M,—in March, 1867, will depict the almost insurmountable difficulties under which this struggle with the savages was carried on. He says : “ We left the Republican March 1, in a cold wind and made thirty miles. The next morning a fearful storm of wind and snow was raging. It was only by the most violent exercise the men could keep from freezing. To add to our difficulties we struck a snow-drift which lasted all day, with snow from two to five feet deep. The crust cut the horses cruelly, and left a trail of blood behind us. We could not see twenty feet in front of us. At 3 o’clock p. M., the men and animals were unable to move another mile, and selecting the best shelter that the wind-swept plain afforded, we camped without forage for our horses, and with one wagon tongue, which I had on my company wagon, for fuel.” No one who has not marched in one of those terrible storms common to the northern plains can appreciate the suffering endured by Captain Mix and his men. The Second did its share of such work, and Captains Green, Gordon, Noyes, Mix, Dewees, Thompson, Wells, Spaulding, Egan, and Bates, and their lieutenants, deserve credit for their constant display of those qualities so characteristic of the true soldier. In the spring of 1869 one battalion (F, G, H and L) under Lieutenant- Colonel Brackett, was transferred to Montana, where it remained for fifteen years and came to be known as the “ Montana Battalion.” During the fol- lowing January this battalion, commanded by Major E. M. Baker, by the severe chastisement it gave the Piegans, rendered a service to the people of the territory which they have never forgotten. How well this blow was de- livered, let the following extract of an order published by General Sheridan tell: “ The Lieutenant-General commanding this military district takes pleas- ure in announcing to his command the complete success of a detachment of the 2d Cavalry and 13th Infantry, under command of Brevet Colonel E. M. Baker of the 2d Cavalry, against a band of Piegan Indians in Montana. These Indians, whose proximity to the British line has furnished them an easy and safe protection against attack, have hitherto murdered and stolen with comparative impunity, in defiance and contempt of the authority of the Government. After having been repeatedly warned, they have at last re- ceived a carefully prepared and well-merited blow in the middle of winter, with the thermometer below zero, and when experience had led them to be- lieve they could not be reached the blow fell. 174 Indians were killed, 300 horses were captured, and the village and property of the band totally de- stroyed. The Lieutenant-General cannot commend too highly the spirit and conduct of the troops and their commander ; the difficulties and hard- ships they experienced in the inclemency of the weather; and as one of the results of this severe but necessary and well-merited punishment of these Indians, he congratulates the citizens of Montana upon the prospect of fu- ture security.” The officers who accompanied Baker on his memorable march were Captains Ball, Thompson and Norton, and Lieutenants MacAdams, Ham- ilton, Swigert, Batchelder and Doane. Colonel Baker was severely criticised by part of the eastern press, but was rewarded by the love of the families THE SECOND REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 181 immediately concerned, whose knowledge of the situation constituted them the better judges. The following extracts from G. O. 21, series of 1870, Department of the Platte, show what the troops of the regiment in that Department were doing : “ The Commanding General announces the following creditable encoun- ters of troops in this Department with hostile Indians, as having taken place during the last month. To the officers and soldiers mentioned he extends his acknowledgments for personal gallantry and valuable services. “ At 5 o’clock, A. M., on the fourth day of May, 1870, Brevet Major D. S. Gordon with his company,* D, 2d Cavalry, near Atlantic City, discovered and charged a body of Indians in possession of stolen stock, recovering all the animals, killing two Indians, wounding one, and dispersing the balance. Later in the day, with 1st Lieutenant C. B. Stambaugh, 2d Cavalry, and ten men, he encountered and fought for an hour and a half a party of from sixty to seventy Indians, killing five and wounding several. His loss was Lieutenant Stambaugh killed, and Sergeant Brown seriously wounded.” The same order speaks of a gallant action on the part of Sergeant Patrick Leonard and four men of Troop C, who, while marching along the Little Blue, Neb., were suddenly surrounded and fired upon by a party of fifty Indians. Private Hubbard and two horses were wounded at the first volley, whereupon the sergeant killed these animals and formed a breast- work of them. After a desperate struggle, in which the horses were all killed, the red devils were driven off and Sergeant Leonard, taking a set- tler’s family of two women and a child under his charge, returned to the settlements. It is such conduct as this, often repeated, that has shown many a hero among our enlisted men. The survey for the Northern Pacific Railroad was commenced along the Yellowstone in the summer of 1871, and Ball and Tyler, with their troops,—H and L,—were sent from Fort Ellis as an escort to the surveyors. In the latter part of November the party started to return, hoping to reach Ellis before winter set in, but in this they failed. A brief description of a storm that overtook these troops will serve to show what the “ Montana Battalion ” had to undergo in winter campaigns. One day in the last part of the month the relief party met the returning escort a few miles west of the great bend of the Yellowstone. It was about 2 o’clock in the afternoon, and both commands started for Ellis, intending to camp in a cottonwood grove in plain sight about fiv miles ahead. After marching about half-way a blizzard struck the command, driving the coarse snow, as hard and cutting as grains of sand, into the faces of the men. Each officer was called upon to take his turn in leading the column, as the drifting snow quickly closed the eyes of any one peering into the storm. The weather grew suddenly colder, and after two hours of this struggle it was learned that the command had been travelling in a circle. The sensa- tion produced by such a discovery can only be appreciated by one who has been lost on the boundless prairie in the midst of one of these terrible storms. Many men became numb from fatigue and cold, and a few threw themselves from their saddles and had to be lifted back and forced to fol- *At this perio it was customary to speak of a troop as a company. 182 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. low. It was impossible to care for the pack mules, and all efforts to drive these animals along were abandoned. Some men cried and begged to be allowed to lie down and die, while others wandered from the column and were brought back by those who kept their heads. Cries that feet, hands, and parts of the face were freezing, were heard on all sides. The weary horses seemed unable to continue the unequal struggle, and were unmerci- fully spurred to keep them to their work. The confusion was naturally great, and for a time it looked as if all discipline would be lost and the com- mand scattered in every direction over the vast prairie. There was no hope save in continuing the march, and those who retained their senses fairly drove the others before them. After five hours of this terrible battle with the elements, the column accidentally stumbled on the very grove it had been seeking. Only those in front could see the trees, but Trumpeter Page of Troop G, (afterward killed under General Gibbon at the Big Hole) brave fellow that he was, seized his trumpet and sounded the “ rally.” Never did a call sound sweeter; it meant life. The thermometer marked 40° below zero, and 53 men had their extremities frozen, many of them seriously. In the following summer the same battalion, with four companies of the 7th Infantry, all under Major Baker, escorted the surveyors of the Northern Pacific down the Yellowstone. On August 13 camp was pitched on the left bank of the river, and within a slough fringed with trees and brush. Pickets had been posted along the slough, and the wagons, perhaps a hun- dred in number, were parked in the form of an ellipse into which the mules, left out to graze, might be driven in case of attack. The night was intensely dark, but about three in the morning the pickets discovered several Indians inside the lines trying to turn the mules in a convenient direction to start them into a run for the hills. At first, due to the darkness, the Indians did not distinguish the herders as white men, and the latter quietly guided the head of the herd into the corral, so that when the rush came the animals ran in among the wagons and were secured. At this time a few shots were exchanged between the guards and the enemy, and cries of “ Indians, here they come ! ” were heard as the officers and men were awakened and sprang to arms. At first the confusion was very great as it was almost impossible to distinguish friend from foe, and many, even Thompson, who was officer of the day, thought the pickets were firing at an imaginary enemy. This belief was quickly dissipated by a volley from the Indians, and by their devilish yells and war-whoops. The darkness, however, prevented them from taking full advantage of the surprise given the troops, and their main body was sent flying from the willows at the lower end of camp by a well- directed volley fired by the infantry. The savages, now dashing about on their ponies immediately in front of the line formed by the troops, kept up a most unearthly and diabolical screaming. As it grew lighter they were driven to the surrounding bluffs, and soon after withdrew. Ball was ordered out to observe them, but only learned that their retreat was down the valley. Baker’s loss was two killed and five wounded, while the Indians afterward admitted the loss of eleven killed and wounded, and stated they had 1100 warriors present, composed of Sioux, Cheyennes, and Arapahoes. Baker’s THE SECOND REGIMENT OF CAVALRl. 183 number was about 400, and while the small loss on either side was un- doubtedly due to darkness, yet the result obtained and the relative numbers engaged are significant in showing that a comparatively small body of troops did defend themselves against a greatly superior force of Indians. As the same Indians had previously shown themselves to be formidable warriors, and repeated this evidence some four years later, we may justly infer that on the occasion just described, the battalions of the 7th Infantry and 2d Cavalry proved themselves to be well versed in the tactics of this peculiar warfare. The survey was renewed at 10 o’clock the same morning, and continued about 40 miles down the valley. Game, in those days, was very plentiful along the Yellowstone and Musselshell rivers, and a great many buffalo, elk and deer, were seen and killed. In March, 1874, Colonel Smith, 14th Infantry, with six troops of the 2d and two of the 3d Cavalry, and eight companies of infantry under Captain Lazelle, left Laramie and pushed rapidly on to the Red Cloud Agency, in- tending to punish the Sioux there for their many crimes, and notably for their recent murder of Lieutenant Robinson. Much was expected of this expedition, and had not the “ peace policy ” been permitted to interfere just when the blow was ready to fall, these Indians would have received a sound thrashing, and much, if not all, of the trouble that afterward occurred, might, and probably would, have been avoided. As it was, they were cowed into a sullen submission. However, the Indians in the Department of the Platte did not entirely escape punishment during 1874, for Captain A. E. Bates, with Troop B, 2d Cavalry, and about 200 Shoshones under Lieutenant Young, 4th Infantry, surprised a band of Arapahoes near Snake Mountain early on the morning of July 4, and won a decided victory. Twenty-five Arapahoes are known to have been killed, and it is believed one hundred were wounded ; 200 ponies also fell into the hands of the victors. The Indian allies behaved very badly, and rendered little, if any, assistance. This was probably as complete a victory as was ever gained by a single troop in the whole course of our Indian wars. Lieutenant Young, one of the wounded, and Lieu- tenant F. U. Robinson, of Bates’ Troop, were especially commended for gallantry. The haughty spirit of the Sioux, Cheyennes and Arapahoes, was destined to be shattered in the years from 1876 to 1879. Many regiments assisted in this work, performed deeds of valor and suffered hardships, but it stands to the credit of the 2d Cavalry that while it was first to take the field in 1876, it was also in at the death in 1879. In February, 1876, a number of adventurous spirits, who had entered the Yellowstone valley in search of wealth without any definite idea of how it was to be obtained, found themselves besieged in a hastily built stockade near the mouth of the Big Horn. The battalion at Ellis went promptly to their assistance and by a month’s hard marching, in the midst of snow and cold, succeeded in saving the lives of these men. It is believed this was the first movement made against the Sioux in 1876, antedating as it did by sev- eral weeks Colonel Reynolds’ campaign on Powder River, in which Troops A, B, E, I and K participated. Reynolds struck the Indians under Chief Crazy Horse March 17, and Egan, with Troop K, made a successful charge 184 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. through the village, which was temporarily held. Noyes succeeded in cap- turing a large number of ponies, but on the return march of the main com- mand these were retaken by the enemy. Scarcely had the Ellis battalion returned to its station when it was called upon to join in that memorable campaign in which, without winning a single engagement, if we except the rather indecisive affair at Slim Buttes, our forces broke the backbone of the Indian resistance in the north. In this de- termined effort to subdue the hostiles, who were known to camp along the lower Yellowstone and its tributaries, the Government sent troops from the Platte under General Crook, and from Dakota under General Terry, in whose column was General Custer with the 7th Cavalry. With General Crook were Troops A, B, D, E and I, 2d Cavalry, and the officers of the regiment who accompanied him on his long and persistent pursuit were Captains Noyes, Dewees and Wells, and Lieutenants Rawolle, Swigert, Pearson, Kingsbury, Sibley and Huntington. The “ Montana Battalion ” served under General Gibbon, who commanded such of General Terry’s troops as came from the west. This column, which also included six companies of the 7th Infantry, left Ellis about the 1st of April and moved down the Yellowstone valley. It was necessary to cross and recross the river several times, and probably no one ever forded this stream without hoping he would never be called upon to repeat the task. On one of these occasions Lieutenant Schofield’s horse lost his footing, and both man and horse disappeared beneath the rapidly moving waters. It seemed that both must be lost, but finally the horse re- gained his footing and men rushed in to the rider’s rescue. Schofield, who served against the Sioux for years, was never nearer death than on that occasion. A courier overtook the command near the Big Horn River with orders to halt, as Crook and Custer would not be able to take the field for several weeks; whereupon General Gibbon established a camp near the mouth of the river just named. While lying here, Troops H and F, Ball and Roe com- manding, were ordered on a reconnoissance through the valleys of the Big Horn and Little Big Horn, with a view to discovering, if possible, the where- abouts of the hostiles. This reconnoissance lasted a week, and while the Indian village was not found, it proved to be a very trying march. As a pre- caution against surprise, two of the four officers and one troop stood guard day and night. It so happened that one of Ball’s camps was made on the identical spot where, a few weeks later, Custer fought his last fight. On June 21, while the battalion was lying in the camp just mentioned, Custer’s long line of cavalry was descried winding across the hills on the opposite bank, and the same day the steamboat Far West arrived with General Terry and staflf on board. There were now in the field three columns,—Crook’s, Custer’s and Gibbon’s. The former had fought a drawn battle with the Sioux a few days before, a fact wholly unknown to General Terry’s command, and had fallen back to his wagons to await reinforce- ments. It had been learned that the Indian trail led from the Rosebud toward the Little Big Horn River, and General Custer was ordered to follow it, while General Gibbon was to return up the valley of the Yellowstone and cross the river a few miles below the mouth of the Big Horn, and then push THE SECOND REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 185 for the Little Big Horn to get below the Indians on that stream, while Custer struck them from above. Gibbon had the longest and roughest route. Custer sent a battery of Gatling guns across to him for fear they would de- lay his march. The Department Commander—General Terry,—accompanied the Montana Column. These troops crossed the Yellowstone on the 24th, by means of the Far West, and the next day moved a few miles up Tullock’s Fork, then turned to the right and ascended the ridge between that stream and the Big Horn. After a tiresome march the Big Horn was reached. General Terry gave the cavalry a short rest, and then pushed on with it, leaving the infantry to follow. The next morning, after a short march, Lieutenant Bradley, 7th Infantry, chief of scouts, discovered on the opposite bank of the Big Horn two Crow Indians, who, with others, had been de- tached from Gibbon’s command as guides for Custer. These scouts repor- ted that Custer had been badly beaten the day before. While halting here the infantry came up, and the united command moved on and soon reached the Little Big Horn, at which General Terry seemed much relieved, saying,— “ Well, I have kept my word with Custer. I promised him to be here to- day.” The command halted for a little time on reaching the river. While here a courier was dispatched to Custer’s supposed position, but was driven back by the Indians. The march was resumed and continued twelve or thirteen miles up the valley, when, about 6 o’clock in the evening, a few Indians were seen hovering around the head of the column and several shots were fired at Troop F, under Roe, which had been thrown out to cover the right flank. To the left and front, on the hills across the river, were seen objects supposed to be buffalo lying down. As twilight advanced there ap- peared on the right and front what seemed to be a long line of cavalry, but night came on before anything definite could be learned of the objects seen, or of Custer’s fate. It was evident, however, he had not won a victory. About half past eight, the infantry having marched between 29 and 30 miles, both battalions were ordered into camp. Gibbon’s command, including the artillery, numbered a little over 400 men, but it was kept well in hand, and was capable of making an excellent fight. Making an early start the next morning, June 27, the command had proceeded but a mile or two, when it reached a large bottom containing signs of having been occupied by an extensive Indian camp a few hours previously. The fate of Custer was now more puzzling than ever, but soon a message was received from the chief of scouts saying he had counted 196 dead cavalrymen. The objects seen the day before looking like buffalo lying down, were really dead comrades and their horses. Soon two horsemen were seen dashing down the valley. They were offi- cers,—Wallace and Hare, if the writer’s memory is not at fault,—sent by Reno to tell of their desperate fight, and how the Indians seemed deter- mined upon their extermination, until Gibbon’s column appeared on the bluffs the day before. “ Where is Custer? ” was then asked. They replied : “The last we saw of him he was going down that high bluff towards the lower end of the village. We do not know where he is now.” They were told, “AVe have found him.” The line of Reno’s retreat to the hills, from his first position in the val- 186 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. ley, presented a sickening sight, the dead being horribly mutilated, while on the part of the field where Custer fell the mutilation was comparatively slight. The burial of the dead, which was of necessity in many instances more of a pretense than reality, having been accomplished, the care and trans- portation of the wounded demanded attention. Hand litters were first made and their inefficiency demonstrated, when the fertile genius of Lieut. G. C. Doane, 2d Cavalry, evolved a mule litter, and upon these the wounded were carried very comfortably. These unfortunates having been finally placed on a boat in the Big Horn, Gibbon's command, increased by what was left of the 7th Cavalry, returned to the north side of the Yellowstone to await reinforcements. Let us now turn to the troops under Gen. Crook, and see how they, particularly those of the 2d Cavalry, fared in this savage contest with the Sioux. On June 17, Crook found himself on the Rosebud, searching for the village which he felt confident was not far off. About half past eight in the morning, while the Indian allies were out scouting and the remainder of the command lying in the valley with horses unsaddled, the wily Sioux suddenly appeared, and about the first intimation the troops had of their presence was the panic-stricken return of the scouts, immediately followed by the enemy’s fire. The attack was probably a surprise, pure and simple, but both commander and men were too experienced in Indian warfare to be thrown into confusion, and soon presented a bold front to the enemy. The Sioux came on with a rush, numbering perhaps not less than 2500 war- riors.* After the first attack was repulsed the enemy rallied, and skirmish- ing continued for some time, during which the heaviest loss fell on the 3d Cavalry, of which ten troops were present, and Captain Guy V. Henry of that regiment was wounded. As the day wore on Gen. Crook became rest- ive because of the indecisive nature of the action, and ordered Mill’s battalion of the Third, supported by Noyes’ battalion of five troops of the Second, to move down the creek, through a canon, to attack the village supposed to be about ten miles distant. The movement was being executed when it became necessary to recall these battalions to the assistance of the troops under Colonel Royall, who was hard pressed. As the command be- came once more united, the Sioux drew off in the direction of their village, and the combat ended. Gen. Crook’s loss, including that of his allies, was 10 killed and 35 wounded. The Sioux left 13 dead on the field, and, it is believed, carried some off. While lying in camp on Goose Creek, Gen. Crook decided to send out a scouting party to locate, if possible, the Indian village. Lieutenant Sibley of the 2d Cavalry was selected to command, and given 25 men picked from the five troops of the regiment. In his party were also two scouts,—Gruard and Pourier,—in whom the general had much confidence, and Mr. Finerty, a correspondent of the Chicago Times. This little detachment, well sup- plied with ammunition, left camp on the afternoon of July 6, and by 2 o’clock the next morning, after having marched forty miles, halted a short distance from the Little Big Horn. After a brief rest Sibley was again in *“ War-Path and Bivouac.” Finerty. THE SECOND REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 187 his saddle, advancing cautiously, as the scouts, who were familiar with the life and camping grounds of the Sioux, believed the village was near by. These keen-eyed men of the plains soon discovered a formidable war party, whereupon Sibley moved his little band toward the mountains, intending to cross them if possible, and hoping that the Sioux, who seldom took to the rough mountain trails, would not follow. The savages, however, found his trail and pursued like bloodhounds. “ Men,” said Sibley, “ the Indians have discovered us, and we will have to do some fighting. If we can make an honorable escape, all together, we will do it. If retreat should prove impossible, let no man surrender. Die in your tracks.” “ All right, sir,” was the soldierly reply. The retreat was continued until some time in the afternoon, and as they had not been overtaken the little band of heroes began to think they had escaped the threatened danger, but it was just at such moments the wily Sioux was wont to pounce upon his prey, and sud- denly, as if coming out of the ground, the enemy appeared and poured in a ringing volley. Hastily taking shelter in the edge of some adjacent woods, Sibley dismounted his men, and ordering some of them to fire on the Indians to check their advance, secured his horses after several of them had been wounded. The trees and fallen timber made admirable breast- works, and behind these our heroes fought, and held at bay many times their numbers. The struggle seemed hopeless, and but for the strategy employed would have proved so. As the numbers of the enemy were con- stantly swelled by reinforcements, Sibley despaired of saving his horses, and leaving them tied to trees where they could be seen indistinctly by the savages, he cautioned his men to go to their saddle-bags for all their ammu- nition, and, after firing a couple of scattering volleys, to follow him on foot into the thick woods and among the rocks, where a horseman could not pursue. How this little band pressed on for two days through fallen tim- ber, over rocks and across mountains, without food or sufficient clothing to protect them from the cold at night, would make a thrilling story if space permitted the recital. Suffice it to say that a short time after leaving their horses they heard a heavy volley, followed by war-whoops, and they knew the Indians had made their final rush on the abandoned position. After almost incredible vigilance and marching, they reached Crook’s camp on the morning of July 9, and the oldest and most experienced officers in the command concurred in saying their escape from such a perilous situation was without parallel in the annals of Indian warfare. The death of Capt. Lewis Thompson, who had been an officer of the regiment since February, 1862, occurred in one of General Gibbon’s camps on the Yellowstone during July. Thompson was a most agreeable compan- ion ; bright, witty, well read, and as a soldier brave to the verge of rashness. He was taken prisoner at the battle of Gettysburg, and the hardships and privations accompanying his confinement of fifteen months in Southern prisons, so shattered his health that he never fully recovered it. Upon his death, which was greatly regretted throughout the regiment, the com- mand of his Troop,—L,—devolved upon Lieut. S. T. Hamilton, who had been a member of the expedition from the start. In the latter part of July Terry sent three scouts to find Crook. They 188 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. returned in a few days and reported his location on Goose Creek. On August 8, Terry’s command, 1700 strong, started up the valley of the Rosebud, and two days later met Crook’s forces marching down. The latter officer had 25 troops of cavalry and ten companies of infantry. Thus in the two com- mands there were 36 troops of cavalry. However, rapid movements were not the order of the day, and the united commands moved slowly over to Tongue River and thence down the Powder to its mouth. The distance marched was 120 miles, and seven days were consumed in making it. When finished no one knew where the Indians were. The horses were under sad- dle the greater part of the daylight of each day, to average 17 miles in 24 hours. Such marching is most trying on cavalry, as it breaks the animals down to no purpose. Much of Crook’s cavalry was in bad condition when he met Terry, although he had been encamped for weeks in a fine grazing country, but by the time the mouth of the Powder was reached many horses in each column were hors de combat. When the two commands united on the Rosebud, the “ Montana Battal- ion ” met the five troops of the regiment under Noyes, after a separation of seven years. How they mingled and gossiped can only be appreciated by brother soldiers who have been long separated. The writer recalls how Ra- wolle, in particular, in the quiet but decided manner peculiar to him, told of their marches and contests. At the mouth of the Powder the commands separated; Gen. Crook go- ing in the direction of the Little Missouri, while Gen. Terry crossed the Yellowstone and moved over toward the Big Dry, at the Dry Forks of the Missouri. These movements again divided the battalions of the Second ; the one under Crook entering on that long and wearisome march, during which such battle was to be had with hunger. Besides the officers of the regiment previously mentioned as serving un- der Crook, Lieut. W. P. Clark joined that general at Powder River, and in the skirmish which subsequently took place at Slim Buttes, distinguished himself, as he always did when opportunity offered. In the early spring of 1877 the “Montana Battalion” again took the field, and reported to Gen. Miles at Tongue River. This officer attacked Lame Deer’s camp of the Minneconjou Sioux, May 7, on Little Muddy Creek, a tributary of the Rosebud. He had with him the battalion of the Second under Ball, two companies of the Fifth, and five of the 22d In- fantry. A part of the infantry rode captured ponies. The village was taken with a rush, Lieut. E. W. Casey, 22d Infantry, and Lieut. L. H. Jerome, 2d Cavalry, charging directly upon and through it. Both of these officers were mentioned for gallantry. The Indians retired to the surrounding bluffs and made an obstinate resistance, and during this part of the engagement Lieut. A. H. Fuller of Tyler’s Troop (F) was wounded. Among the wounded was also Private D. L. Brainard, Troop L, who afterward won such distinction under Greely in the north, and who is now a lieutenant in the regiment. The Indians left 14 dead on the field, and 500 ponies, together with 51 lodges, and their contents fell into the hands of the victors. Lame Deer is believed to have fallen by the hand of Captain Wheelan. After this engage- ment the battalion of the Second, excepting Troop L, was kept busy during THE SECOND REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 189 the summer and early fall scouting along the Yellowstone, Tongue, Powder and Little Missouri rivers, and that the manner in which the duty was per- formed was satisfactory, the following letter, addressed to Captain Tyler by General Miles’ adjutant, will show : “ In relieving the Battalion 2d Cavalry, the commanding officer is pleased to acknowledge its valuable service during the spring and summer operations against hostile Indians. Equally on the most fatiguing and labo- rious march in pursuit of fleeing Indians, as in action, you have displayed those qualities most commendable to the American soldier, and you will please convey to the officers and men of the battalion his sincere apprecia- tion of the same, and express to them his regrets at being obliged to part with a command whose faithful performance of all duties he could so truly rely upon.” Chief Joseph, of the Nez Perces, may properly be termed the Indian Xen- ophon. His long retreat in 1877 through Idaho and Montana, pursued as he was by various columns of troops, is worthy of record in the annals of war. General Howard followed him with great persistence, but in vain. Norwood with his troop (L), brought him to stand at Camas Prairie, but being greatly overmatched in numbers, and not receiving the support he expected, was unable to detain the Indian chief long enough for General Howard to come up. The Troop made a gallant fight and reflected much credit upon the regiment. Gen. Gibbon, with part of the 7th Infantry, dealt Joseph a staggering blow on the bloody field of the Big Hole, and General Sturgis, with some of the 7th Cavalry, fought him on the Yellow- stone, but all in vain, for the Indian general continued his headlong flight, and had he not stopped to procure buffalo meat when the close proximity of the British line gave him a feeling of security, his retreat would have been crowned with success. This halt enabled Miles with three troops of the 7th Cavalry, several companies of his own regiment, and Troops F, G and H of the Second, to strike the Nez Perces on Sept. 30 near the Bear Paw Mountains, and, after a desperate fight followed by a siege lasting until Oct. 6, to capture the greater part of the tribe. Thus it was that twice in this memorable campaign the Second Cavalry was represented, and upon two far distant fields. In the latter engagement Lieut. Jerome, Troop H, was made a prisoner and held for 24 hours, at the end of which time he was exchanged for Chief Joseph. After the engagement at the Bear Paw, Tyler’s battalion was ordered as an escort to the American members of the “ Sitting Bull Commission,” and escorted them to the British line. With this duty completed the battalion returned to Fort Ellis, having been in the field continuously for eight months, and having marched about 2500 miles. In the fall of this year the headquarters of the regiment, and the eight troops stationed in the Platte, were transferred to the Department of Dakota, and stationed at Custer and Keogh, with headquarters at the former post. In March, 1879, Innis N. Palmer, who had succeeded T. J. Wood as colonel of the regiment in June, 1878, retired, and was followed by Colonel J. W. Davidson. In the summer of 1879 Gen. Miles made an expedition against the northern Sioux along Milk River. On July 17, Lieut. W. P. Clark, with Troop C, under Hoppin; a company of the 5th Infantry 190 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. (mounted) under Borden ; and a number of Indian scouts, was ordered forward as an advance guard. He came unexpectedly upon the hostiles, and, with his usual dash, rushed boldly at them, at the same time sending a courier back to notify the main column. At first the enemy gave way, but soon rallied and surrounded Clark. Miles pushed rapidly forward with re- inforcements, consisting of six troops of the Second, commanded by Majors Baker and Gordon, and several companies of the 5th Infantry mounted on ponies. Rice, of the latter regiment, was present with two pieces of artillery, and these, with the broken hills which the column had to cross, somewhat delayed the progress of the main body for a time, but the soldiers, realizing the importance of the guns, would quickly pull them out of a ravine, no matter how deep. A second courier arrived, his pony pant- ing and covered with foam, bearing a message from Clark saying he was nearly surrounded and asking for speedy help. The main body had now fortunately reached smooth ground, and it went forward at a gallop, with Gordon’s battalion deployed as skirmishers, and Baker’s and the mounted infantry in column some two hundred yards in rear. Seeing Miles advance the Sioux gave way, but kept up a running fight with Clark, who followed close upon their heels. The command presented a beautiful sight as it galloped forward over the green and gently rolling hills, pursuing a swarm of gayly blanketed Indians. This pursuit was kept up for about fifteen miles, and no one who witnessed that day’s work will ever forget the ex- citement of the chase. The artillery moved with the skirmish line, and in the latter part of the race fired several shots. The enemy succeeded in reaching and crossing Milk River, and escaped under cover of the night. In March, 1880, the restive spirit of the Sioux induced some of the more venturesome to hover around Forts Keogh and Custer, and gave Huggins, Cook and Brett, with Troops C and E, and a number of Cheyenne scouts under the last named officer, an opportunity to distinguish themselves by making a very rapid pursuit from Tullock’s Fork to O’Fallon’s Creek, where they overtook the Indians, and, after a sharp fight, captured the camp, several prisoners and over 100 ponies, with a loss to the troops of only one killed. Lieut. Kislingbury, nth Infantry, who lost his life on the Greely expedition, also accompanied this command. Gen. Miles was so favorably impressed with the energy and good judgment shown in this affair, that more than ten years later he invited attention to it a second time, and recommended that Huggins and Brett, the only surviving officers, be breveted therefor. During the next four years the regiment was kept busy marching back and forth to overawe the Indians, but their haughty spirit had been hum- bled and they were easily held in subjection. The last action in Montana in which any part of the regiment participated was between Troop L, under Norwood, and a band of Cree Indians, near Wild Horse Lake, in which the Indians were defeated with the loss of several warriors. This was in the spring of 1883. Thus we see that in Montana the battles of the Second commenced with the terrible thrashing given the Piegans in January, 1870, and ended in April, 1883, near Wild Horse Lake. In these thirteen years of toil and THE SECOND REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. strife, in the very heart of the most hostile Indian country on this continent, the Second alone saw the beginning and end of the conflict. It was seldom its engagements were indecisive; victory generally alighted on its guidons, defeat never. Surely this was not all luck. The lessons gathered in the everglades of Florida and on the plains before the Civil War, and trans- mitted from one generation of officers to another, bore their legitimate fruit and it was good. In the early summer of 1884 the regiment was transferred to the Division of the Pacific, with headquarters at Walla Walla. Nine troops went to the Department of the Columbia and three into California. Before leaving Montana the following letter was addressed to the regimental commander, General John P. Hatch, who became colonel in 1881: Headquarters Department of Dakota, • Fort Snelling, Minn., June 16, 1884. General:—I cannot suffer the 2d Cavalry to leave this Department, for another sphere of duty, without expressing to you and to your officers and men my sense of the value of the services which it has rendered while it has been under my command, and my respect and admiration for its char- acter. It is now fifteen years since a portion of the regiment came into this Department; it is seven years since the whole of it reported to me. Dur- ing all these years it has been constantly called upon for duty in the field, often for service in active campaigns against hostile Indians; and in all this service, whether in field or garrison, it has displayed soldierly qualities of the highest order, gallantry in action, patience under hardship, subordina- tion to authority, and a quiet, unassuming devotion to duty worthy of the highest praise, and worthy also of the splendid history which it had made for itself in the past. I beg you to accept for yourself, and for your officers and men, my most hearty good wishes for your and their prosperity and happiness, and also the expression of my belief that no regiment in the service has ever won a more honorable reputation than that which is deservedly borne by the Second Cavalry, Sincerely yours, (Signed) Alfred H. Terry, Brigadier-General, Commanding. The service required of the regiment in the Department of California and Columbia was simple. Several long marches were made, but no serious difficulties arose with the Indians. During the year 1885, Lieut. H. T. Allen, 2d Cavalry, made an extensive and important exploration in Alaska. His report added very materially to our previous knowledge of that distant territory. In May, 1885, Chief Joseph and his followers, who were sent to the In- dian Territory after their capture, were permitted to return to Washington Territory not far from their former home. It fell to the lot of Lieut. Carle- ton, with Troop L, to escort these people to the district assigned them. It was this troop that fought these Indians so valiantly at Camas Prairie in the summer of 1877, and now, eight years later, we find it escorting them as a guard against their white neighbors who threatened them. While enjoying the comforts of that charming station, the Presidio of San Francisco, Troops A and K were, in December, 1885, suddenly called upon to depart for Arizona to assist in the pursuit of Geronimo and his 192 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. band. The sands and cacti of that territory were indeed a change from the handsome roads and well kept lawns of the Presidio, but the troopers and their officers,—MacAdams, Doane, Robinson and Brett,—took kindly to their old life in bivouac, and rendered valuable services in the cam- paign against the Apache, in whose country they remained about nine months. In his annual report the department commander, Gen. Miles, in speaking of a pursuit made by Lieut. Brett, says that officer displayed great energy and determination. While in the Department of the Columbia General N. B. Sweitzer, who had been a major in the regiment, succeeded General Hatch as colonel, and was in turn followed by Colonel D. B. Clendenin. In June, 1890, the regiment exchanged with the 4th Cavalry, and took station in Arizona, with the headquarters and two troops at Lowell, and the other troops at Huachuca, Bowie, San Carlos and Whipple Barracks. That summer the order was issued from the War Department discontinuing two troops and two companies in each regiment of cavalry and infantry. In this way Troops L and M ceased to exist, except “ on paper.” L has since been reorganized as an Indian Troop, and let us hope the day is not far distant when the guidon of Troop M will again take its place in the column. Soon after reaching Arizona we find Fowler, Winn, Brainard, Sargent, Nance, Lewis, Michie, and others, in the field in pursuit of the ubiquitous Kid and his followers. Lieut. Michie, especially, performed most arduous service, and was complimented therefor by the division commander. In January, 1891, the headquarters and three troops were ordered to Fort Wingate, N. M., where they now (February, 1892,) are, and Troop G,— Wheelan’s—took station at Fort Stanton at the same time. The Moqui Indians, who have lived quietly in their pueblos for centuries, were finally so exasperated by having their children taken away to be sent to school, that they were on the verge of open rebellion in June, 1891, and threatened to kill Brett, who, with a small detachment, had occasion to visit one of their villages,—Orabi. This officer with great good judgment managed to extricate himself and men, and then asked for reinforcements. Major Jackson, commanding the battalion at Wingate, promptly sent two troops to the rescue, accompanied by Lieut. Wallace with two Hotchkiss guns. Major McLellan, with two troops of the 10th Cavalry, wras also ordered out. When this force arrived before the village, the Moquis quietly surrendered. With this little affair the campaigns of the Second have, for the present, come to an end. How long this peace will last none can say, but in the future, as it has been in the past, it is confidently believed the Second Cavalry,—old Second Dragoons,—will be true to its motto, “ Toujourspret." Since the Civil War the regiment has lost three officers and sixty en- listed men killed in action, with one officer and thirty-eight men wounded. Shining through the storms of fifty-six winters, the smoke of one hun- dred and seventeen combats and the dust of countless weary marches, appears the glorious roster of those men of the Second Cavalry who have shed their blood or lost their lives in service; a grand aggregate of forty- eight commissioned officers, and seven hundred and eight enlisted men. Major-General HENRY DEARBORN Commanding the Army, 1812-1815. THE THIRD REGIMENT OF CAVALRY* Captain CHARLES MORTON, Third U. S. Cavalry. THE Third Regiment of Cavalry was organized by an act of Congress approved May 19, 1846, as the Regiment of Mounted Riflemen ; and its present designation is in consequence of the act approved August 3, 1861, classifying all the mounted regiments as cavalry, and the subsequent numbering of them in the chronological order of their original organization. The act provided for one colonel, one lieutenant colonel, one major, and one lieutenant for adjutant; a sergeant-major, quartermaster-sergeant, chief musician, two chief buglers; ten companies, each to consist of one captain, one first and one second lieutenant, four sergeants, four corporals, two buglers, one blacksmith, one farrier, and 64 privates. The pay was that for dragoons, but, through error or design, was the same mounted or dismounted,—by interpretation. The bill appropriated $75,000 for mounting and equipping, and $3000 for each station established along the Oregon route. But, best of all for the regiment’s future esprit and the good of the service, it was accorded lineal promotion from bottom to top, and distinctive uniform, arms, equipments and ornaments; and the officers recruited the material they were to fashion and command, and could enlist only “young men of the country” especially fitted for the ser- vice anticipated. The senior officers were political appointments, made with some atten- tion to equitable geographical distribution over the south and west. They were announced at once, to rank from May 27, 1846. Persifor F. Smith of Louisiana, a lawyer by profession, a gentleman of culture and ability, and destined to prove a skillful and successful general, was appointed colonel. John C. Fremont, lieutenant of topographical engineers, essaying the conquest of California, was appointed lieutenant colonel, resigning March 15, 1848, before he joined. The story of his life is current history. George S. Burbridge of Kentucky, a country merchant and politician without martial taste or ambition, and in poor health, was made major. He saw no active service, resigning January 8,1848, while on prolonged sick leave. The captains were Wm. W. Loring, Winslow F. Sanderson, Samuel H. Walker, Henry C. Pope, George B. Crittenden, Stevens T. Mason, John S. Simonson, Jacob B. Backenstos, Bela M. Hughes and Stephen S. Tucker. Hughes declined and the appointment was tendered Charles F. Ruff of Missouri, a late lieutenant of the First Dragoons, then serving in New Mexico as a lieutenant colonel of Doniphan’s regiment, who accepted, * An Abridgment of Captain Morton’s “ Historical Sketch of the Third Cavalry.” 193 194 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. taking rank from July 7th. Walker was a Virginian and Texas ranger who had distinguished himself by carrying the message to the beleaguered troops in Fort Brown to hold out, passing through the Mexican lines and returning. The first lieutenants were Benjamin S. Roberts, Thomas Ewell, Andrew Porter, Michael E. Van Buren, Llewellyn Jones, Noah Newton, Thomas Duncan, Wm. W. Taylor, Andrew J. Lindsay, John G. Walker and Spear S. Tipton. Jones was the first adjutant. Tipton was captain of an Indiana volunteer company and son of Senator Tipton, who was an ensign and commanded a company at Tippecanoe after all the other officers had fallen, and later married the daughter of the dead captain, Spear Spencer. The second lieutenants were Thomas Claiborne, Thomas G. Rhett, Charles L. Denman, Washington L. Elliott, Thomas Davis, George McLane, Robert M. Morris, Llewellyn Raguet, Francis S. K. Russell, and Julian May. The following brevet second lieutenants were assigned on the 17th of July; Daniel M. Frost, George W. Hawkins, John P. Hatch, Gordon Granger, Dabney H. Maury, Innis N. Palmer, James Stuart, Alfred Gibbs, and George H. Gordon. Consistent with army administration by politicians, men of experience or educated for the profession were placed in the lower grades. An old army surgeon said that under the Sumner regime companies would go to drill with full complements of officers, and return under command of brevet second lieutenants, all the seniors having been relieved in the order of rank by the stern old major for inefficiency, and for this reason it was chaffed for a time as the “ Kangaroo Regiment.” Another who served with it later said, “ The officers were all gentlemen, brave and generous to a fault, strict disciplinarians, and looked well after the wants of their men, but the most cantankerous lot I ever met.” Companies C and F were recruited in the mountain regions of Penn- sylvania, Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina, with depot at Fort McHenry; the others in Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Missouri, with the depot at Jefferson Barracks commanded by Colonel Bonneville, where the regiment was organized in October, excepting Com- pany I, which, owing to the absence of Captain Ruff, was not formed until the first of the following April, at New Orleans. There is much evidence extant as to the superior material of which the regiment was made. It was armed with the hunting rifle, persistently called the “yawger.” The barrel was too large for the shank of the bayonet fur- nished, and the latter was used for a time with a wooden plug that fitted into the bore,—another source of chaff for army wags. Company black- smiths eventually overcame this difficulty by swelling the shanks. Notwithstanding that the law had presumably fixed the nature of the service of the regiment, and recruiting officers had been sincere in their representations, the administration found no impediment in the way of or- dering it to Mexico early in November, a mandate greeted with cheers immediately after the dress-parade at which it was read. Indeed, Companies Cand F reached Point Isabel, Texas, October 5, thence went to Monterey and later to Tampico, joining at Lobos Island. Soon after horses and equipments THE THIRD REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. were received, the regiment left, November and December, in detachments of one or two companies on steamers for New Orleans, all experiencing delay there in getting transportation for Point Isabel. The horses were placed on schooners with lumber sheds erected for shelter. It was a par- ticularly stormy season and most of them were lost in the gales encoun- tered in crossing the Gulf, while the remainder were transferred to the Second Dragoons, sadly in need of them,—another source of chaff, “dis- mounted riflemen.” Disappointing as was this loss of horses, it proved a blessing by saving the regiment from being left behind to escort trains for Taylor’s army and chase guerrillas in the chaparral, and permitting it in- stead to participate in the campaign where it won such renown. Major Burbridge left the regiment at New Orleans, and Major Sumner was assigned December 12th, to command. Some companies arrived at Point Isabel and went to Camp Page the last of December, the others in January. In the meantime General Scott, arriving, took D and probably another company to Camargo as escort. The regiment embarked, February 20, 1846, for Lobos Island, arriving two days later. Here it met Companies C and F, and was first joined by Colonel Smith. March 3d it sailed, and on the 9th landed at Sacrificios Island and led in the investment of Vera Cruz, Private Timothy Cunningham of Com- pany A, who was killed on the nth by a cannon ball, being the first of the regiment to lose his life in action ; Waller and Niell of B being wounded the same day. Company C only was mounted until I joined at Jalapa, though men from others were attached much of the time. Colonel Smith commanded the First Brigade, Twiggs’ Division, and Major Sumner the regiment. There uTas continuous annoyance from the rear during the siege and almost daily skirmishes; on the 23d a brilliant affair at Puente del Medio, C, D and E. Among the wounded of D was Sergeant Wm. B. Lane, who rose to be major of the regiment and brevet colonel, of whom much might be said, and of his good wife who has told so charmingly in her little book, “ A Soldier’s Wife,” of female life in the regiment. Here too “ Benny ” Roberts, commanding C, attracted attention to the superior material in him that was to make an enviable record as a mounted officer. The regiment started, April 8th, from its camp at Vegara on that memorable expedition of conquest of which history recounts none more daring in conception, nor brilliant and thorough in successful execution. Detachments were with Captain Johnson in the affair of the 12th, and on the 15th Roberts commanded the squadron reconnoissance that found the possible route to turn the “Gibraltar ” of Mexico—Cerro Gordo—which proved its downfall, but only after the fierce battles of the 17th and 18th, which cost the regiment in its terrific assaults the lives of Mason, Ewell, Davis and ten men; and the wounding of Sumner, McLane, Maury, Gibbs, Gordon and 66 men, many of whom died. Company A had an officer (Ewell) and two men killed, and 19 men wounded. General Scott expressed his admiration of the “style of execution” of the assaults, and said Ewell fell sword in hand within the works. In fact the General knelt by his side, took his hand, and soothed his expiring moments 196 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. with kind words of praise. Mason’s leg was swept away by a cannon ball. Maury won a brevet, as did several others, and a handsome sword. After “embarrassing” their general with prisoners and trophies of vic- tory, they pursued the enemy to Encerro, and on the 19th to the Mexican Saratoga,—Jalapa. The Castle of Perote, “ second only to San Juan d’Ulloa,” fell at noon, the 22d, and on sped Worth to Puebla. The supply departments, unequal to the valor of our troops, cause vexatious delays and failure to follow up further these splendid victories over a demoralized enemy, and give time for disease to make fearful inroads in the ranks, and the foe to reorganize and fortify a naturally strong defensive country, and to swarm the highways in desperate, barbarous, guerrilla warfare. Ruff, with I, mounted, arrives May 20, and also Walker with hundreds of recruits. The latter is sent with C to Perote, and the former on the roads; and Roberts is placed in command of a battalion of “ irregulars,” all to wage war against the relentless, partisan “ rancheros.” It was hard riding nearly all the time, encounters almost daily. Space allows mention of but one or two. Near La Hoya, June 20, thirty riflemen engage and defeat 500 Mexi- cans, eliciting high praise of Walker from Colonel Wyncoop, commanding, and in turn from Walker of Denman, Claiborne and men. July 30, Ruff’s squadron defeats a largely superior force at San Juan de los Llanos, killing 40 and wounding 50; winning praise from Smith and Scott, and brevets for Ruff and John G. Walker. The War Department has given this date wrongly. The rifle being clumsy to handle mounted, necessitated firing one round and then riding the enemy down with the sabre,—a custom that soon in- fused the officers and men with the conviction that they were irresistible; an idea that is not yet quite extinct. The regiment left Puebla with the advance, August 7th, and reached Ayotla the nth, making a reconnoissance of the impregnable fortified stronghold, El Penon, on the 12th and 13th, eliciting again the praise of General Scott. The turning of Lake Chaleo making the exposed rear “the post of honor,” the riflemen were assigned to it, stood off the enemy in overwhelming numbers, and when San Antonio thwarted further progress were rushed to the front to open the way across the fiedregal to Contreras, the 19th. Here General Smith displayed generalship and won success worthy of the genius of Napoleon ; and General Shields showed the good sense and moral courage of Logan at Nashville, that made him “ the hero of three wars,” and senator from as many states; winning a splendid victory over a ten times superior force partly fortified, when defeat would have been dire disaster to the whole army. Yea more, he made possible four sweeping victories in a single day,—August 20, 1847,—the greatest field day as yet for our army. Roberts with A, and Porter with F, open the fray on the 19th, but all were soon engaged, and the horrible execution of their rifles appalls the news- paper men and demoralizes the enemy. Smith is everywhere and leads a part of the rifles to save Magruder’s battery. D is thus split and Sergeant THE THIRD REGIMENT OF CA VALR Y. 197 Lane leads a segment, which is given to Van Buren at night, to head and fall wounded in the day-break assault. Alfred Gibbs gathers a few madcap volunteer riflemen, hastily mounts them on captured animals and sweeps with impetuosity upon the rear of the fleeing columns until paralyzed with captures; and the regiment rushes on to Churubusco. Poor Ruff ! Once placed in arrest for bringing on an engagement and summoned before his indignant commander-in-chief, could only explain “ 'Twas fight or run, and I’d be ‘ blanked ’ if I’d run.” He was, the 20th, at another “ post of honor,” San Augustine, with I and the no less gallant J. G. Walker, chafing over the din and roar of battles, and pining to be in the armed tornado of Harney’s dragoons who were careering among the flying hordes, and under a terrific fire, rattling their sabres at the gates of the Mexican capital. But they too have their day. With Sumner at Molino del Rey, September 7th, they charge under a heavy fire, encounter an impassable ra- vine which they turn, and defeat a vastly superior force of “ the finest cav- alry in the world,” we are told. I’s ranks are sadly decimated, and Walker carried to his grave in 1893 the marks of the wound he caught. Neither Walker’s nor Van Buren’s hurt could keep either from taking a gallant part in the fall of Chapultepec, the struggle along the aqueduct and assault of the garitas, the 13th ; and triumphant entry into the city, the 14th. The newspapers tell us that when the marines faltered in the assault of Cha- pultepec through loss of officers, Morris of the Rifles reminded them that he was a son of his naval father, and led them on to victory. Roberts was detailed to head and “Jimmy” Stuart to accompany the Chapultepec storming party from the First Brigade. General Twiggs gave the former a flag, now in the Department of State in Washington, saying he wanted it to be the first planted upon the rocky fortress. If not actually “ planted,” the request was doubly kept, for, turning from that bloody vic- tory it was carried by Sergeant Manly of F through the stubborn fight along the aqueduct, and was one of the first, if not the first, on the ramparts of the city at the Belem garita, where Loring left an arm, and Backenstos, Tucker, Palmer, and even Walker again, of the officers were wounded. And the next day comes the crowning glory of the war. Roberts is di- rected to, and Sergeant Manly actually does, raise the same flag over the National Palace, while Porter displays the Riflemen’s flag from the balcony. General Scott riding by the regiment about this time, halts, takes off his hat and bowing low says: “ Brave Rifles ! Veterans ! You have been baptized in fire and blood and have come out steel.” Words are cheap, but apprecia- tion sinks deep in the hearts of soldiers. Manly dies of his wounds in a few days, as indeed do many others. Street-fighting and assassinations occur for a time, and the regiment is put on provost duty in the city. Loring and Van Buren have to go to the States with their wounds, but the fame of the regiment precedes them and the ladies of New Orleans present a $225 flag “ To that gallant regiment which from its landing at Vera Cruz to its entry into the famed ‘ City of the Montezumas’ has been foremost in every battle, sustaining by the valor and sacrifices of its officers and men the flag of our beloved country.” The regiment still has the flag, and reveres its associations. 198 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. The Mexican army escaping from the city made stupendous efforts to destroy all communications, laid siege to Puebla, where several of the regi- ment fell, and Rhett won a brevet. Captain Walker at Perote had organ- ized the convalescents into the “ diarrhoea brigade,” as it was called, and with “ C ” was kept on the jump. October 9th he had a fierce encounter at Huamantla with a much superior force, and fell gallantly with many of his men, eliciting loud praise from General Lane for his bravery and effi- ciency, and lamented by all who knew him. His death promoted Van Buren captain. General Smith was governor of the city. Police duty, hard riding after guerrillas, and occasional encounters, characterized the rest of the ser- vice in Mexico. Notable among the latter were the fights at Metamora.* November 23d; Galaxara, the 24th, 1847; and Santa Fe, January 4, 1848. The regiment left Vera Cruz on the ship Tyrone, July 7, 1848, reaching New Orleans the 17th and leaving the same day on the Aleck Scott, arriving at Jefferson Barracks the 24th, having had some men die and others drowned on the trip. Approximately the regiment lost in Mexico four officers and 40 men killed ; 13 officers and 180 men wounded, many of the latter dying and could be properly rated as killed ; one officer and 202 men died; 141 men were discharged for disability, largely from wounds; 17 desertions, many of which were undoubtedly assassinations; and three men dishonorably discharged, one of whom was drummed out. This showing should refute the averment that strict discipline causes desertions, and its study will show the superior loyalty of native material. From the men were promoted to be commis- sioned officers :—Addison, Bootes, Coleman, Davis, Demerest, Dryer, Hand, Irvine, Lane, Underwood, Wingate, and perhaps others. Colonel John Green was a rifleman in Mexico, but was promoted later. A. F. Suter was the surgeon until his death, December 17, 1847. It was not a chaplain regi- ment. The appointment as lieutenant in the regiment of the celebrated “ Kit ” Carson, in 1847, was not confirmed by the Senate. Loring was now the lieutenant-colonel, vice Fremont, and as General Smith was kept constantly away commanding divisions or departments until his promotion to brigadier general, December 30, 1856, he com- manded the regiment till 1861, from which fact many think he was the first colonel. The incidents of the long, weary march of 2500 miles to Oregon, begin- ning May 10, 1849, through a country without roads and often without wood, water or grass, and compared to which the loud boasted modern ones sink into insignificance, would more than fill the limits of this sketch. Cholera raged in the stream of emigrants allured by visions of gold to the new Eldo- rado in California, and fabulous stories were inflaming the minds and turn- ing the heads of the soldiers. Unlimited wealth could be picked up for the trouble ! The death rate was appalling. Excepting Fort Kearney and the fur trading station, Laramie, there was not a house between Leavenworth and the Columbia. On reaching the latter the horses were too much worn down to march, and the mules to haul loads over the Cascade Range. Men were THE THIRD REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 199 dismounted and the horses driven by details at easy stages. An enormous raft was constructed and the baggage put aboard to float down, while the command marched on foot. The detachment on the raft let it get into the terrific current of the rapids, it became unmanageable and was dashed to pieces against the boulders. All but one were drowned and the entire cargo was lost. It was a sad plight in this region, but not unmixed, for the officers’ returns were nicely balanced to date, and calumny says that for years after things would turn up lost on that raft. Quarters for the winter were found in Oregon City, about the only town in the region. Loring soon looks up a site and locates Columbia Barracks, now Fort Vancouver, leaves a natural tree for a fine flagstaff, and by actual experiment places the officers’ quarters so far apart that a crying baby can- not be heard in the next. There was hard work, much detached service, some hanging of Indians by Governor Lane, the comrade general in Mexico, and disagreeable service, but not much fighting. In 1851 the regiment returned to the States, the horses and all the men but about seven non-commissioned officers to each company being trans- ferred to the First Dragoons. In April Lieutenants Walker and Stuart were sent overland to California with the horses and some of the men transferred. En route they had a fight on June 18 with Rogue River Indians, and in the charge “ Little Jimmy” Stuart, the pride of the regiment and one who had won two brevets at Chapultepec, was killed. Traditions of his brave and noble character live in the regiment to this day. The regiment left Vancouver May 8, and proceeding by water via Sa- vanna, Havana and New Orleans reached Jefferson Barracks July 16, to re- cruit and organize for the third time at the same place within five years. Recruits came streaming in and the companies were soon filled, and in December, 1851, and January, 1852, the regiment, except A and K, was transferred to Texas. Then commenced over four years of hard field service in this land of cactus, chaparral and magnificent distances. The Comanche and Lapin Indians that had kept this country terrorized for two centuries would not yield their sway. Approaching stealthily in great numbers, they would scatter in numerous small parties and simultaneously attack many widely separate unsuspecting localities, and from each leave a trail of blood. These outrages were generally committed as far as possible from the troops, but sometimes, with consummate daring, under their very noses. Captain Bourke tells of a later expedition, in which companies of the regiment took part, in over 20,000 words; Doctor McKee of another in a little less; how hopeless the task here. The companies simply made with their trails a spider-web of the map of that great empire state. The highways were so vexed with these savage pests that everything had to have an escort, and even companies had to march way down to Corpus Christi to meet their recruits and get their meagre supplies and clothing. We left A and K at Leavenworth. They were kept constantly on the move in the country between Laramie and Leavenworth until January, 1854, when they also were transferred to Texas, reaching Fort Inge Feb- 200 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. ruary 27. Lieutenant (now General) Carr, one of this command, was wounded October 3, this same year, in an engagement with Mescalero Apaches, way out near Fort Davis. Captain Van Buren commanded and Levi H. Holden was medical officer on the last trip to Laramie. Some 40 men of A, with Lieutenants Morris and Baker, were not along, but were an escort to Captain Gunnison, Topographical Engineers, and went to southern Utah, where three men were killed, with the captain, October 26, near Lake Sevier. These enormous marches in a season, on plains fare, though not so hard as scouting, are worthy of study by modern readers and writers of magazine articles on long marches; and by those who are ignorant of the work per- formed by our army, and think nothing that is not from a foreign service is of any value. No nation has enjoyed a better practical school for an army than our own. Before the Carr affair, Van Buren went out with A from Inge, July 4, after a band that had run him in that day from fishing in the beautiful Leona. He followed them many days through the almost impenetrable jungle of chaparral along the Nueces, which he crossed and recrossed many times, when on the nth he struck them, and in the charge had an arrow put through him from which he died on the 20th. Thus fell another hero of the Mexican War. Jerome N. Bonaparte and Crosby joined in 1852; Bowen, Chambliss, and Edson, 1853; Davant Wright and J. E. B. Stuart, 1854; McNally, Treacy, Dubois and Averell, 1855; William H. jackson and Enos, 1856. All were from West Point except McNally and Treacy who came from the ranks. In 1856 the Indian troubles in New Mexico, which then included Ari- zona, demanded more troops, and the regiment was ordered there, being relieved by the Second (now Fifth) Cavalry. At Camp Crawford, near Fort Fillmore, orders were received assigning the companies to Forts Craig, Stanton, Thorn, Fillmore, Bliss and Marcy, and Las Lunas, and Cantonment Burgwin. Some of the companies marched fifteen hundred miles in this change. The enormous territory over which the regiment was scattered, the predatory disposition of the Indians, and the entirely inadequate force of troops, kept the companies of the regiment on the keen jump until it left for the States to take part in the Civil War. The country from Denver to Las Nogales, and from Texas to Utah, was within the sphere of its opera- tions, and it was required to restrain and subdue hostile Indians outnum- bering it fifty to one. It would take a volume to give any definite notion of its field work, or even of the scouts and expeditions upon which the enemy was met and defeated with more or less loss in killed and wounded. Captain Gibbs came near losing his life from a dangerous wound, March 9, 1857, in the Mimbres mountains. Two larger expeditions were made the same year against the Coyotero and Gila Apaches, each having several encounters with losses. Colonel Loring, with K and detachments from other companies, left Fort Union, April 8, 1858, and joined the Utah ex- pedition, in which he commanded a battalion, marching past where Denver now is and old Fort Bridger, returning to Union, September 14th, direct THE THIRD REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 201 from Salt Lake. In the meantime A, C, F, H and I, were participating in the Navajo war, of which Colonel Lane has told us something, and it is hoped that General Averell will tell us more in his forthcoming book. The latter was wounded October 9, and in this chronic warfare brave Cap- tain McLane fell at the head of I, in an engagement at Cold Spring, near the southern base of Black Rock, October 13, i860. Just before the charge he handed his flask to a comrade whom he had challenged and said, “ Let’s take a drink ; it may be our last together.” While the companies were scattered at these remote stations and camps, weeks behind the news of current affairs, and one-third of our people had plunged into secession believing it right, another third declaring coercion wrong, and but the other third taking the stand that saved the Union, the impotency of the administration seemingly acquiescing in the claimed right of secession; some of the officers imbibed the epidemic political heresy of “State’s Rights,’’and at no little sacrifice, cast their lots with the seceded States, breaking close, tender and cherished ties of comradeship, and severing their connection with a service they revered and had honored. This is no apol- ogy for disloyalty to this Union, but a statement of circumstances that his- torical fairness demands. The rank and file remained loyal to a man. Those who quit at this juncture were Loring, Crittenden, Lindsay, Walker, Claiborne, Maury, Baker, W. H. Jackson, “Joe ” Wheeler, McNeill, Kerr, Henry and Watts. The last three had never joined for duty, and were of the regiment only on paper. The companies of the regiment operating against the Mescalero Apaches were particularly active in the winter and spring of 1861, the head- quarters of the regiment being in the field most of the time. McNally with detachments of B and F had a stubborn fight at Mesilla, July 25, 1861, with the new enemy in rebellion, sustaining considerable' loss, McNally being seriously wounded. The abandonment of Fort Fillmore at midnight of the 26th by Major Lynde, district and post commander, and his surrender at San Augustin Springs the next day, caught not only McNally but Gibbs, who had just met them escorting a train. So two officers and 88 men of B, F and I, were made paroled prisoners through treason, or the enervating mental effects of long blind obedience in intervals of peace, when officers are charged with responsibilities but entrusted with little discretionary au- thority. It was mutiny to disobey a traitor or an imbecile. These paroled prisoners were all put in F and sent to Fort Wayne, Mich- igan, to serve until exchanged, but they soon dwindled down to nothing by discharge, desertion and death. Many, however, turned up in the ranks again. The changes made Simonson, colonel; Ruff, lieutenant colonel, and Roberts and Duncan, majors. Notwithstanding two more “ troops,” as they were now called, were given the regiment, the promotion and detail of officers so reduced their number for duty, and the lack of recruits the enlisted strength, that A, B and H had all their men transferred to other troops in August, and the regiment became only a battalion. Roberts was in command. Late in September, Morris, with C, G and K, engaged and defeated a rebel force of Texans near Fort Thorn; E was way out near Fort Wise cov- 202 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. ering that country; I was drilling as a light battery, and carried off the honors at Val Verde, February 21, 1862, where McRae fell with many of his men,—C, D, G and K also participating. C and K had an engagement with Indians in Comanche Canon, March 3d, Lieutenant Wall among the wounded ; and C and E engaged the rebels at Apache Canon the 26th, and Pigeon’s Ranch the 28th, Major Duncan being wounded at Apache Canon. G and K struck the retreating rebels again near Albuquerque, April 9th, and again near Peralto the 15th, D, E and I participating, Morris in com- mand owing to Duncan’s wound. From the causes mentioned the men of D and E were transferred, May 15, 1862, to the four remaining troops which were to constitute the regi- ment until the following March. A rebel force demanded the surrender of K, May 21, but got a fight and was driven off. “Jerry” Russell, acting second lieutenant, in command of a detachment of C, had a fight with Indians, June 18, in Canon Ladrone. In consequence of the retirement of Colonel Simonson, September 16, 1861, Marshall S. Howe was promoted colonel of the regiment under the new system, which, however, did not repeal the law which made promotion lineal in the regiment. But appeal and protest were alike in vain. He joined July 10, 1862, and in September the four troops were concentrated at Fort Union, and on the 30th started for Jefferson Barracks, where they arrived November 23d after a march of 1280 miles. In December, 1862, the four troops— C, G, I and K—were transferred to Memphis, Tenn., where they were joined by B and F, which had been filled at Columbus and had just joined after a raid up the Tennessee River. The regiment was first attached to the 16th, and then to the 15th Corps, and on October 8, 1863, left Memphis for Corinth, Miss., thence to Cherokee, Ala., near which C, F, G and I had an engagement October 21; G and K on the 24th. Leaving Cherokee with Osterhaus’ Division, the regiment had three distinct engagements the same day, October 26, near Tuscumbia. Novem- ber 13, it started for Chattanooga in advance of Sherman’s army, went to Dercherd and returned to Fayetteville, and then accompanied the column to Bridgeport, arriving the 15th, thence to Chattanooga the 23d ; Mission- ary Ridge, 26th, and Cleveland, the 30th. It went on the expedition to Knoxville, via Athens, Louden and Marysville. Leaving Knoxville Decem- ber 6, it pursued the enemy’s trains over the Smoky Mountains beyond Murphy, N. C., returning via Tallisco Plains, Charleston, Cleveland, Chat- tanooga and Bridgeport to Huntsville, Ala., December 29th, where it re- mained on duty until March, 1864, when it proceeded by rail to St. Louis, Mo., arriving at Camp Davidson the 7th, to leave May 20th on steamers for Duvall’s Bluffs, where it arrived the 26th, left June 4th and reached Little Rock the 9th. Captain Howland commanded the regiment from the departure of Col- onel Howe in May, 1863, until his return, July 20, 1865, all the field offi- cers—Stoneman, Roberts, Duncan, Newby and Garrard, as well as the rank- ing captains being absent, most of them as general officers of volunteers. The duty in Arkansas was principally to prevent the organization of commands and to suppress guerrilla bands, escort trains, et cetera. The THE THIRD REGIMENT OF CA VALR Y. 203 large territory covered necessitated constant scouting in small detachments, which involved hard riding, much risk, but no engagements of magnitude to attract attention, while Sheridan was winning glory for his cavalry with probably no harder work. The enemy would make no stand without having presumably a great advantage, and they were superior to the Indians and practised about the same tactics. Lieut. George Harrington was killed in action at Memphis, August 21, 1864. Captain Howland, with 150 men, was ambushed by a much superior force near Benton, September 4th, and his command badly demoralized for a time, but rallied to find no enemy. Though eleven men were lost, this first reverse in the history of the regiment was treated with some levity, and the officers interested ever heard from their fellows of “ the Benton Races.” November 8, Lieutenant Wilson’s picket station was surprised with an attack from these prowlers and lost some men and horses. Tarlton and Campbell with forty dismounted men had an engagement until dark, January 14, 1865, with a force in position near Dardanelles, but at daybreak found it had vanished. Though the Rebellion was on its last legs, a party attacked Carroll’s patrol January 22d, not far from Little Rock. Such was their persistence and daring. In January, 1866, A, D, E, H, L and M, were manned at Carlisle Bar- racks and sent to Little Rock, where they were mounted and stationed at various posts in the State. While E was en route, near the mouth of the Arkansas, the 28th, the boilers of the steamer Miami burst, killing 13, wounding nine, and probably drowning 12 who were missing. In April, 1866, the regiment was ordered to New Mexico again. Its service in the States was probably the easiest it had ever experienced in the same period of time, though during the war it had no doubt marched many times the number of miles marched by any other regiment. The troops concentrated at Camp Reynolds near Fort Smith, and marched from that place in three columns of four troops each, June 7th, 8th and 9th, making a new route to Fort Union, which it reached August 12th and 14th. From thence headquarters and B went to Fort Craig, A to Bascom, C to Wingate, D to Marcy, E and I to Sumner, G to Stevens, H to Stanton, K to Selden, L to Albuquerque, and M to Bayard, F remaining at Union. Then commenced and continued until the spring of 1870 constant, active field work, usually with handfuls of men, escorting trains and survey- ing parties, guarding highways and protecting flocks and people from the incursions of, and following up and punishing Comanches, Kiowas, Apaches, Utes and Navajos. The changes in the list of officers were too numerous, and movements of troops too complicated to give them space, or even a full list of engage- ments. W. N. Greer became colonel in 1866, retiring in December, 1870, and giving place to J. J. Reynolds. The following engagements only can be mentioned:—Alexander and G, with Utes, October 3, 1866. Detach- ments of G and I near Fort Sumner, with Navajos, July 9, 1867. D with Mescaleros, near Guadaloupe Mountains, October 18; and K, same date, and again near Fort Sumner, November 20, 1867. Detachment of G and I, 204 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. under Adjutant Monahan at Apache Springs, in June, 1868. Detachment of E in Mimbres Mountains, October 8th. The Canadian River expedition against the Comanches in the winter of 1868-69 > and engagement on Christ- mas Day at Elm Creek, I. T. Detachment of B from Bayard in May, 1869. Detachment of K near San Augustin Springs, May 7. F and H with Mes- caleros in San Augustin Pass, August 15th. F, with Mescaleros in Guada- loupe Mountains in November; and again Christmas Day in Canon San- guinara, where Lieutenant Yeaton received his death-wound ; and again, December 30th, on Delaware Creek. In January, 1870, a plot of the Utes and Jicarilla Apaches at the Ute agency, Maxwell’s ranch, to massacre the officers and men of A was detected ; the Indians were surrounded and “ Cor- ocante” made chief of the Utes. The orders for the regiment to go to Arizona sent the headquarters with D and I to Fort Halleck, Nevada, marching via Denver to Cheyenne. Troops B, E, F, H and K, serving at the southern posts, assembled on the Mimbres for the march, leaving March 2, 1870. Captain Bourke has given, in his “ On the Frontier with Crook,” an account of the march of this column, stations taken by different troops, and of their busy work, no more arduous than that of the northern column, composed of A, C, G, L and M. The first three left Fort Union, March 8, picking up the other two at, and leaving Wingate, April 1st; marching up one and down another Rio Puerco, past Muddy Springs, Sunset Crossing, Hell Canon, Cosnino Caves, Bear Springs to Prescott, and thence to different stations, A, C and G to Camp Rawlins where they arrived the 23d,—soon to change. Indian signal smokes had been seen all along the latter part of the march, and it soon seemed that all the tribes had united in one tremendous effort to terrorize and make Arizona uninhabitable for the whites. Active operations began at once, but the troops were thinly scattered and inade- quate in numbers. Wagons could not traverse this land of volcanic rocks, towering mountains and almost bottomless cafions; and there were no public pack trains, no reliable maps, and the Indian fastnesses were inacces- sible and unknown. Hard as was the incessant field dutyit was little worse than the equally bad fare and miserable life in tents, jacals, and dug-outs of the hot and dusty camps. So hard were the officers worked that the regi- mental records show but a moiety of what transpired,—nothing of the splendid work and fights of the energetic Graham and some others. Gen- eral Stoneman said in his official report for the part of the year 1870-71 in which he commanded the Department of Arizona, that of thirty-odd ex- peditions sent against predatory Indians, twenty-five had engaged and defeated hostiles. Yet so far was this from civilization it was hardly known or noticed by the outside world. Small as was the force and miserably supplied, the expense of the De- partment wras appalling at Army and Division headquarters, and the man- dates for retrenchments were crippling. The territorial press frothed at the mouth and its clamor relieved General Stoneman and brought in May, 1871, Lieutenant-Colonel George Crook as commander, assigned on his brevet rank as major general. Regimental headquarters reached Camp Verde, April 8, 1871, from THE THIRD REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 205 Nevada, General Grover commanding; D and I, McDowell, during the spring. In the fall General Reynolds was relieved from command in Texas, and the incongruity of placing him under General Crook took the regiment to the Department of the Platte in the winter of 1871-72, marching to Yuma, transferring equipage and horses to the Fifth Cavalry, and proceeding by water around Cape San Lucas to Benicia, thence by rail to Wyoming and western Nebraska. The engagements in Arizona were as follows:—B, near San Carlos, April 30, 1870; E, Chiquito Creek, May 25, East Fork of Verde, June 15, and Rio Verde, next day ; A, Indian Springs, June 24 ; F, Pinal Mountains, June 25, Apache Mountains, August 1, Pinalito Mountains, October 6, and Turnbull Mountains, December 14; H, Pinal Mountains in December; Detachments of A, E and G, night of January 7-8, 1871; A, canon of Mazatzal Mountains, January 10 ; F, three in February ; E and G in Pinal Mountains in February; K, Peloncilla Mountains in March and Gila Mountains the 25th ; B, near Date Creek, April 1 ; F, Sierra Ancha, April 4, and Apache Mountains the nth and 12th; K, Dragoon Mountains, April 16 ; F, Whetstone Mountains, May 5, and Guachaca Mountains, June 1st and 10th ; A and detachments of E and G, two on East Fork of the Verde, June 8, and canon of Mazatzal Mountains and Wild Rye Creek, the 9th; M, a number in the Sierra Anchas in June; Detachment of K, Horseshoe canon, October 24. The foregoing by no means complete list is given place as the incom- parable service of the regiment in Arizona has been belittled; indeed its splendid fighting record from the first has been criticised,—from reasons to be surmised. This partial showing of the conspicuous work of F, shows also, somewhat the character of its commander,—Lieutenant Howard B. Cushing,—who fell in the affair of May 5, 1871. He was a brother of the immortal Cushing who blew up the Albermarle, and of the no less gallant Alonzo H., who fell at Gettysburg. Limits forbid an account of the wanton massacre by Tucson “ toughs ” of Indian women and children at Camp Grant in 1871, over which the local press involved Lieutenant Whitman in trouble, honoring him with so much abuse that Herbert H. Bancroft dignifies it with a place in his history. The last detachment of the regiment rather rejoiced in shaking the hot Arizona dust from their feet as they stepped on the steamers at Yuma, January 11, 1872. In the Department of the Platte the troops were first stationed at Forts Sanders, Russell and McPherson, and Sidney Barracks, which they reached early in March after being snow-bound in the Rockies en route. Active work commenced before the end of the month and continued for ten years ; at first only in summer, with stations on the railroad in winter, but soon the severe weather of that rigorous climate was no bar to the field duty the year around. Besides protecting the frontiers of Nebraska, Kansas and Colorado, the regiment guarded the enormous reservation of the Sioux, Cheyennes and other tribes. The stations were located between them, and their rela- tives and allies in the Indian Territory, between whom there was a constant intercourse by skulking and freebooting bands that gave much annoyance 206 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. A at Sydney, and later E and G, were between those great tribes and the buffalo country,—a game which the Sioux believed to be their God-given her- itage, and which they would hunt with or without leave. The young braves were constantly making their raids upon the cattle herds and ranches of the settlers and friendly tribes. These serious annoyances kept the regiment on the go over the broad barren expanses of country where wagons could not be used. There were none of the fine pack-trains since introduced, and scouting was attended by more dangers from cold and exposure than from the Sioux, though they were far better armed than any Indians encountered before. The chronic state of semi-war was fatal from hardships and exposure, principally, until the commencement of 1876, when operations commenced on a scale so much larger, that only the most important events can be noticed here. General Crook took command of the Department in the spring of 1875, and for ten years the service of the regiment was connected with his. The Sioux claimed that all the outrages were committed by the northern Chey- ennes and Minneconjous, and were charged up to them by the whites. In a measure this was true, but the Sioux were no angels. It was determined to bring the former down to the Sioux agency for control. They would not come by invitation and it was determined to make a winter campaign against them. Five troops of the regiment, five of the Second, and two companies of the Fourth Infantry, concentrated at Fort Fetterman, which post it left, March 1, 1876, under the doubled-headed command of Generals Reynolds and Crook. The expedition furnished material for a longer narrative than all this. Let it answer, that after many weeks marching from Cheyenne, past the Big Horn Mountains almost to the Yellowstone, and return, having many night attacks by the enemy, on the 17th it attacked and destroyed Crazy-Horse’s village of 105 lodges. Hardly an officer or man escaped serious frost bites or frozen limbs, and the command was incumbered with many sick and injured, without transportation for them other than that improvised. An unfortunate controversy that followed this really successful and splendid victory perverted the facts, which may sometime be published in the interest of truthful history. The campaign that followed in the summer involved another return to the Big Horn Country, and embraced the gallant feat of the 9th of June, when Mills’ battallion plunged into and crossed the swollen Tongue under fire, and charged and routed a large force which had attacked the whole command. Then the battle of the Rosebud on the 17th, defeating the united forces of the Sioux, which, one week later, defeated and almost de- stroyed General Custer’s command on the Little Big Horn, which latter sad event struck the country with such awe as to smother all consideration of the former, though it was probably the greatest Indian battle in our history —some 1400 soldiers and friendly Indians, against some 5000 hostiles. The brunt of the battle fell upon D, F, I and L, of the Third, which lost some ten killed and forty-odd wounded. Captain Henry among the latter. Mr. Finnerty in his “Bivouac and Camp Fire ” has given a conscien- tious, though not entirely correct, account of the summer campaign and THE THIRD REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 207 large long-drawn-out expedition to the Yellowstone and return by Heart River and the Black Hills, known as the “Starvation March,” where the troops were for many rainy days reduced to horse-meat alone for subsist- ence in their long muddy march; and the fight at Slim Buttes, September 9, by a battalion of the Third under Mills and Crawford, where Schwatka made his gallant charge through the village of 35 lodges of American Horse and Roman Nose, Von Luettwitz lost a leg and many men were killed and wounded. The Mackenzie expedition in the autumn of 1876, and its fight with Dull Knife, in which H and K participated, has been treated exhaustively by the Journal. Omitting the numerous small encounters with Indians and road- agents, the campaigns that followed found the regiment, or part of it, wher- ever there was anything to be done, until the Sioux were once more in hand. Brief notice must be taken of the Cheyenne outbreak in the Indian Ter- ritory in 1878, which put all the troops throughout the West upon the qui vtve. Trains of cars were held in readiness at every station occupied by troops along the railways, and a battle was fought in western Kansas, where Colonel Lewis was killed ; but the Cheyennes got away. New troops were switched on behind them at every point where their presence was ascer- tained, but they eluded every effort and made their way to the Sioux country. The regiment was on an expedition to the Little Missouri country and camped on the Belle Fourche, when it was notified and ordered to push for the Sioux agencies, and below them, to head the renegades off; which it did by forced marches. After floundering in the sand-hills for days, freezing from absence of wood and suffering for water, B and D, under Johnson and Thompson, finally captured the band October 23d, and took it into Camp Robinson, having a revolt, however, on Chadron Creek which required the aid of other troops and a part of the Seventh to suppress. The Indians de- clared they would die to a man before they would return to the Indian Ter- ritory, and they kept their word. Securing arms and ammunition by the connivance, no doubt, of friendly (?) Indians, they revolted the night of January 9, 1879, shot down the sentinels and made their escape. The troops during intensely cold weather had a series of engagements, ten men killed and five wounded, before the last hostile Cheyenne was killed—the 22d—Captain Wessells being shot in the face in the last charge. In the summer of 1879 the Utes murdered their agent—Meeker—treated his wife and daughter worse as captives, and slaughtered the agency em- ployes. E of the Third and a troop of the Fifth, with some infantry, were dispatched to the scene in all haste. In the battle which followed, Septem- ber 29th, Major Thornburg was killed, and gallant old Captain Lawson with E won proud laurels in averting outright disaster. They were complimented by a resolution of the Wyoming Legislature, but otherwise received faint praise, though the troop lost about fifty per cent, in killed and wounded, and held the camp until relieved. General Reynolds retired June 25, 1877, and was succeeded as colonel by Thomas C. Devin, who died April 4, 1878 ; Washington L. Elliott, who retired March 20, 1879; Albert G. Brackett, retired February 18, 1891, to be 208 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. succeeded by Albert P. Morrow, who retired August 16, 1892, promoting Anson Mills, the present colonel. The troops of the regiment were scattered as usual at different posts in the Department, A and M at McKinney, 200 miles from the railroad, when the Warm Spring Chiricahuas broke out, at San Carlos, Arizona, in the spring of 1882. And although the regiment had served a tour in Ari- zona while others nearer had not, it was ordered there by telegraph. Making forced marches to the railway stations, some of the troops getting snow-bound en route, they were dropped in a few days’ time through thir- teen degrees of latitude and down some five thousand feet of altitude into a climate where they had to gasp for breath. The older officers found a transformation scene from the Arizona of ten years before. Now there were comfortable posts fairly supplied, and railroads and telegraph lines that connected them with the outer world. The utter loneliness and painful stillness were gone, but the lofty moun- tains and yawning canons and their old enemy, less savage and numerous, were still there. Active work commenced at once, with unacclimated men and horses that were soon worn out, principally in chasing false reports from the dis- tracted population. The hostiles had crossed into Mexico before the regi- ment arrived (in May), but they left their usual trail of blood and thousands of turbulent Apaches behind. The last soon murdered the chief of Indian police at San Carlos Agency, committed other outrages, and broke for the mountain fastnesses. The major portion of the regiment had a long stern chase, and in time participated in the hardest fought engagement on Ari- zona soil,—Chevelon’s Fork, July 17, 1882,—the Apaches receiving a lesson which has kept that particular band docile and manageable ever since. Twenty warriors were killed, without counting other casualties. Among our wounded were Lieutenants Converse and Morgan. A part of the Sixth Cavalry was there and did its full share, but the Third made the longest marches. General Crook took command of the Department soon after, and in Sep- tember placed Captain Crawford in charge of the Indians. The valuable service rendered by the captain, and by Lieutenants Davis, West, Dugan and Gatewood, in handling and controlling the thousands of Indians in Arizona, can never be estimated. The theme properly treated would make no small acquisition to history. In the spring of 1883 Captain Crawford was on the border after Geronimo and band. The outrages committed by the Chiricahaus from across the line were laid at the door of the reservation Indians, and excited the young braves to skylark, or chafe under restraint. Crawford formulated a plan which General Crook allowed him to execute. He attempted it with bis scouts, but the protocol allowed troops to cross the boundary line only while in hot pursuit of hostiles. The murder of Judge McComas furnished this plea, and the capture of “ Peaches ” by Davis, a key to the Chiricahua stronghold. General Crook rushed down with some troops of the Third and Sixth, and crossed before the order from Washington prohibiting it reached him,—on a slow horse. THE THIRD REGIMENT OF CA VALR Y. 209 Crawford, Mackey and Gatewood, pushed ahead into the Apache fast- nesses in the Sierra Madre, and, May 15, defeated them in their very strong- holds. Accounts of this expedition err : General Crook learned of this fight only a day or two after. The Chiricahuas soon sued for peace, and Geron- imo came in and surrendered to Crawford, and all were placed under the immediate charge of Davis. To give the Tenth a change, the Third was treated to a genuine surprise in 1885, by an order to go to Texas. It concentrated at Bowie Station, April 13, for the march which involved a thousand miles for some of the troops, and it may be said, for the benefit of some of the numerous writers of magazine articles on marching cavalry, that not a public animal was lost on the trip. Before some of the troops had reached their station, the Chiricahuas had taken advantage of the departure of the troops whose officers knew them individually, their traits, habits, and trails, and the arrival of new troops with worn-out horses, to break out and leave another trail of blood. Lieutenant Davis had been left with these Indians, and im- mediately after the oubreak Captain Crawford was ordered back to the scene of the trouble, and the troops of the regiment were ordered out to patrol the upper Rio Grande, to protect the Texas frontier, and to render such aid as possible to the troops in Arizona operating against the wily foe. But while performing this duty, trouble commenced in the Indian Terri- tory, and these same troops were hurried to the nearest railroad station and embarked without further preparation for the new field of operations, from which some of them did not return for nearly two years—marching 1500 miles. In the meantime the officers of the regiment in Arizona had been constantly in the field following and fighting the hostiles, and Captain Crawford had a last hard fight with them on January 10, 1886, at Nacori in Sonora, Mexico. He captured their camp, baggage, women and children. The bucks had escaped only with their arms into the ravines at dark, but had promised, through the squaws, to come in next morning and sur- render. The morning brought an attack, which was at first supposed to be by Geronimo and his warriors, but which proved a lawless band of Mexi- cans, who suspended their fire for a time, and then, during the parley, treacherously fired a volley that sent a bullet through the brain of Captain Crawford. But this was soon avenged by a contest that killed the com- mander and two officers, routing the entire command. Subsequently they pleaded a mistake, and Lieutenant Maus, accepting the excuse in good faith, ventured within their lines, and gave them a note conceding the sad mistake. Thereupon he was made a prisoner and held until he gave some pack-mules as a ransom. Our Government subsequently demanded recom- pense for the mules, but, notwithstanding the second act of treachery, the loss of Captain Crawford, who had given his energy and health and finally yielded his life to the service, was not sufficient to arouse the Department of State to any decided action. Fort Crawford was named in honor of the noble captain, as were Ewell, McLane and McRae for the gallant fellows who fell before him. The request to call the post at Eagle Pass Fort Yeaton did not bear fruit. During the last tour in Texas the cavalry was degraded into mounted 210 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. infantry. Its most onerous duty was the consumption of contractor’s forage and trying to keep cool, until the local press gave Garza sufficient notoriety to secure some lawless adherents who created trouble in 1891-93. This was known as the “ Tin Horn War,” from the sensational dispatches furnished the press. It involved much hard riding, however; several skirmishes and some losses, but most of the blood spilt resulted from thorns of the chapar- ral. Captain Hardie, with G, did much effective work and carried off the honors, where all were working hard. In the summer of 1893 the regiment was ordered to Fort Riley and posts in Oklahoma where it now serves, somewhat degenerate in the art of war but ready to respond to the first trumpet call for warriors, and will feel proud of any regiment in our service that has in the same period marched more miles, had more fighting, lost more officers and men without disaster, or which excels it in any of the essentials of real soldiering, and will cheer- fully grant it the palm, and if in a foreign service, will yield gracefully to its claims to superior excellence. THE FOURTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY.* Compiled in the office of the Military Service Lnstitution. IN the annual report of the Secretary of War (the Hon. Jefferson Davis), for the year 1855, it was stated that “The four additional regiments authorized by the act of March 3, 1855, have been recruited and organ- ized. Seven companies of the First Cavalry have recently returned from an expedition into the Sioux country and the regiment will winter at Fort Leavenworth, where it will be in position for ulterior operations in the spring.” When the two regiments of cavalry were authorized to be formed in 1855 it was with the understanding that all the field-officers and one-half of the company officers should be taken from the army, while the other half of the company officers should be taken from civil life. The military fitness of those selected for the First (now Fourth) Cavalry is indicated by the high commands to which many of them rose, as follows : Colonel: Edwin V. Sumner (Major General U. S. V. commanding corps). Lieut. Col. : Joseph E. Johnston (Quartermaster General U. S. A. ; General C. S. A.). Majors: William H. Emory (Major General U. S. V. commanding corps); John Sedgwick (Major General U. S. V. commanding corps). Captains : Delos B. Sacket (Inspector General U. S. A.); Thomas J. Wood (Major General U. S. V.) ; George B. McClellan (Major General, commanding U. S. Army and Army of Potomac) ; Samuel D. Sturgis (Brigadier General U. S. V.) ; William D. de Saussure (Colonel C. S. A.) ; William S. Walker (Colonel C. S. A.) ; George T. An- derson (Brigadier General C. S. A.); Roberts. Garnett (Brigadier General C. S. . killed in action). First Lieuts. : William N. R. Beale (Brigadier General C. S. A.); George H. Steuart (Brigadier General C. S. A.); James McIntosh (Brigadier General C. S. A., killed in action) ; Robert Ransom (Major General C. S. A.) ; Eugene A. Carr (Brigadier Gen- eral U. S. A.) ; Alfred Iverson (Brigadier General C. S. A.) ; Frank Wheaton (Briga- dier General U. S. A.). Second Lieuts. : David S. Stanley (Major General U. S. V. ; Brigadier General U. S. A.); James E. B. Stuart (Major General C. S. A., mortally wounded) ; Elmer Otis (Colonel U. S. A.) ; James B. McIntyre (Major and Brevet Colonel U. S. A.); Eugene W. Crittenden (Major U. S. A. ) ; Albert B. Colburn (Lieut. Colonel Staff U. S. A.) ; Francis L. Vinton (Brigadier General U. S. V.) ; George D. Bayard (Brigadier General U. S. V., killed in action) ; L. L. Lomax (Major General C. S. A.) ; Joseph H. Taylor (Lieut. Colonel Staff U. S. A.). “In August, 1855, the regiment which had been organized at Jefferson Barracks was ordered to Fort Leavenworth. About the middle of Septem- ber it was engaged in an Indian expedition in which no fighting occurred, but which kept the troops in the field until the fourth of November. * The writer is under obligations to Col. E. B. Beaumont, U. S A , (retired) for valuable in- formation. HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. 212 Daring the following year the First Cavalry was engaged in the work of keeping the peace between the political factions in Kansas who were struggling with the delicate question of slavery. The first important Indian affair in which the new regiment participated occurred on the North fork of the Solomon River, within the limits of what is now Norton County, Kansas. From a letter* written by one of its officers who was there wounded—afterward the famous cavalryman Major General J. E. B. Stuart—we quote as follows: Camp on Solomon's Fork, July 30, 1857. Yesterday after seventeen days’ march from Camp Buchanan, we overtook about three hundred Cheyenne warriors drawn up in line of battle, and marching boldly and steadily. We fronted into line as soon as possible (the six companies of cavalry) the infantry being too far behind to take any part in the action, also Bayard’s battery, which the colonel stopped three or four miles back as unable to keep up. It was my intention and I believe that of most of the company commanders, to oive a carbine volley and then charge with drawn pistols, and use the sabre as a aernier resort; but much to my surprise the colonel ordered “Draw sabres! Charge!” when the Indians were within gunshot. We set up a terrific yell, which scattered the Cheyenne : in disorderly flight, and we kept up the charge in pursuit. I led off Co. G right after their main body ; but very few of the company horses were fleet enough, after the march, beside my own brave Dan, to keep in reach of the Indians mounted on fresh ponies. My part of the chase led toward the right and front, and in that direction companies G, H and D, were, in a short time, mixed together in the pursuit, so that Stanley, McIntyre, McIntosh, Lomax and myself were, for the greater part of the time, near each other, and frequently side by side. As long as Dan held out I was foremost; but after a chase of five miles he failed, and I had to mount the horse of a private. When I overtook the rear of the enemy I found Lomax in imminent danger from an Indian, who was on foot and in the act of shooting him. I rushed to the rescue, and succeeded in wounding the Indian in his thigh. He fired at me in return with an Allen’s revolver but missed. About this time I observed Stanley and McIntyre close by. The former said: “Wait! I’ll fetch him. ’ ’ He dismounted to aim deliberately, but in dismounting accidentally discharged his last load. Upon him the Indian now advanced with his revolver pointed. I could not stand that; but drawing my sabre rushed upon the monster and inflicted a severe wound upon his head. At the same moment he fired his last barrel within a foot of me the ball taking effect in the centre of the breast, but, by the mercy of God, glancing to the left, lodging near my left nipple, but so far inside that it cannot be felt. I was able to dismount and lie down, before which the Indian, having discharged his last load, was dispatched by McIntyre and a man of Co. D. From the fall of 1857 until the summer of i860 six companies of the First Cavalry were stationed at Fort Riley under the command of Major John Sedgwick. In 1861 the regiment, like all others of the army, changed to a certain extent the personnel of its officers. Some of its most experienced soldiers resigned but their places were taken by young and ardent supporters of the Union cause who, under the eyes of those officers who remained in the service of the Government, rapidly developed into efficient subalterns. The operations of the regiment during the first year of the war were desultory in their character. On the 18th of March Lt. Col. Emory com- manding was ordered to proceed to Fort Washita and establish his head- of Stuart’s Cavalry, H. B. McClellan, A. M., New York, 1SS5. THE FOURTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 213 quarters. April 17 he was directed to proceed “with all the troops in the Indian country west of Arkansas to Fort Leavenworth ” and reached there May 31. About the same time Captain Sturgis evacuated Fort Smith and marched to Washita. Two companies were ordered (May 29) from Fort Wise to Fort Kearney to hold in check the Indians in that section and Lt. Col. Sedgwick was sent to Leavenworth. On the 22 June, Gen. McClellan, operating in West Vir- ginia, applied for that part of the regiment stationed at Fort Leavenworth. Capt. Colburn with Companies A and E participated in the battle of Bull Run, and was favorably mentioned by the division commander, Col. Heintzleman. Companies B, C, D and L were at the same time serving under Major Sturgis in Missouri. On the 27th of July a skirmish took place near Forsyth, Mo., in which Capt. Stanley, 1st Cavalry, with his troop, had the advance and lost two men wounded and four horses killed (includ- ing his own, shot under him). The same officer was conspicuous in an affair at Dug Springs, Mo., Aug. 2 when, as part of a detachment of troops under Gen. Lyon, his squadron made several charges cutting the enemy’s line and completing his discomfiture. Capt. Stanley’s loss was four killed and six wounded out of a total engaged of forty-two : Sergeants Coates and Sullivan were mentioned for gallantry. In the annual report of the Secretary of War (Dec. 4, 1854), occurred this paragraph : “ The cavalry force of our Army being all required for active service of the same kind, there appears no propriety in making a permanent distinction in the designation and arma- ment of the several regiments. It is therefore proposed to place all the regiments of cav- alry on the same footing in these respects, and to leave it in the power of the Executive to arm and equip them in such manner as may be required by the nature of the service in which they may be employed.” It is worth noting that this recommendation of the subsequent Presi- dent of the Southern Confederacy was not acted upon until in the early part of President Lincoln’s administration when (Aug. 3, 1861), an order was issued renumbering the mounted force and naming the subject of this sketch the Fourth Cavalry. At the historic affair of Springfield, Mo., known as Wilson’s Creek (Aug. 10), where the lamented Lyon fell, the regiment was represented by Captain Carr’s company and one company under Lieut. Canfield, 2d Drags.*—serving in different brigades. In the official reports Lieut. Can- field is honorably mentioned ; the casualties consisted of one wounded and three missing in D, and four missing in I. The small regular cavalry force engaged shared in whatever of credit could be obtained from “ the mixture of glory, disgrace and disaster,” reported by Major Schofield of Gen. Lyon’s Staff as a prominent feature of this engagement. On the 19th Dec., 1861, a spirited skirmish, in which B, C, D, (being part of an expedition under Gen. Pope to cut Price’s communications) behaved very gallantly, occurred on the Blackwater River, Mo. Gen. Pope reported that in attempting to carry a bridge held by a strong force of the enemy: * Afterward Captain 2d Cav. Killed at Beverly Ford, Va., June 9, 1863. 214 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. “The two companies of the 4th regular cavalry being in the advance under the com- mand respectively of Lieuts. Amory and Gordon were designated for that service and were supported by the five companies of the First Iowa. Lieut. Gordon led the charge in person with the utmost gallantry and vigor, carried the bridge in fine style and immediately formed his company on the opposite side. He was promptly followed by the other companies. The force of the enemy posted at the bridge retreated precipitately over a narrow open space into the woods. The two companies formed in line at once, advanced upon the enemy and were received with a heavy volley of small arms. One man was killed and eight wounded by this discharge, with one exception all belonging to Co. D ; Lieut. Gordon himself received several balls through his cap.”* When McClellan in April, 1862, began his Peninsular Campaign, two companies (A and E) of the Fourth Cavalry (4 officers and 104 men) under Captain McIntyre constituted his personal escort; the remainder of the regiment being on duty in the West. On the 27th August, Gen. Mc- Clellan reported that he had loaned his “ personal escort (a squadron 4th Cav.) to Burnside to scout down the Rappahannock.” In October, 1862, this squadron joined the regimental headquarters in Tennessee. In Nov. 1862, Cos. F and H were stationed at Fort Laramie, Neb. At Pittsburg Landing (Shiloh) Tenn., April 6, 1862, Company I was present, losing one enlisted man and five horses killed and five men wounded ; this company (together with B, C, D, G, K) was also present at Corinth, Miss., 9-14 May; a detachment under Lieut. Gordon took part in an affair near Farmington, Miss.; no casualties. In the organization of the Army of the Mississippi, April 30,1862, Capt. E. W. Crittenden commanded a part of the regiment, “ unattached.” During the Stone River campaign (1862-63) the regiment commanded by Capt. Elmer Otis served under Gen. Stanley who said in his report of the operations near Murfreesborough that “The Fourth U. S. Cavalry behaved very handsomely.” The casualties comprised three enlisted men killed and Capt. Eli Long and nine men wounded ; twelve men missing. Capt. Otis in his official report + states that “ from prisoners taken (of whom there were over one hundred) by the regiment I have learned that the 4th U. S. Cav- alry charged at this time an entire brigade of cavalry and routed them to such an extent that they disappeared from the field altogether.” Other de- tails are given as follows : “ Of the officers engaged it is almost impossible to particularize, they all did so well. Capt. Eli Long led his company with the greatest gallantry and was wounded by a ball through his left arm. Lieuts. Mauck, Kelly, Lee, and Healy could not have done bet- ter. It was a matter of surprise to me, considering the ground passed over to find Dr. Comfort so soon on the field with his ambulance caring for the wounded ; he was in time to capture a prisoner himself. First Sergt. Martin Murphy led Co. G and commanded it with great gallantry. He reportshaving counted eleven dead of the enemy on the ground over which his company charged. Sergt. Major John G. Webster behaved gallantly, taking one lieutenant mounted on a fine mare. First Sergt. James McAlpin led Co. K after Capt. Long was wounded. First Sergt. John D. Lan (B) captured a captain and received his sword. No one could have acted more bravely than First Sergt. Charles McMasters. j; *See Lieut. Amory’s Report, War Records VIII., 40. t War Records XX., part I., 648. t Afterward Lieut. 2d U. S. Cavalry, killed at Front Roval, Va., in 1864. THE FOURTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 215 First Sergt. Christian Haefling, in charge of courier line near headquarters, proceeded in the thickest of the fire and recovered the effects of Colonel Garesche on his body, killed in this day’s fight. * * “ Private Snow (L) orderly to Gen. Rosecrans was ordered, Jan. 2, to pick up fif- teen stragglers, take them to the front and turn them over to some commissioned officer. Failing to find an officer he put them into line and fought them himself, telling them the first one who attempted to run he would shoot. Private Snow reports they fought bravely.” At the battle of Franklin, April io, 1863, the regiment under Capt. Mc- Intyre greatly distinguished itself, charging and capturing a battery of six guns and some three hundred prisoners. A large force of the enemy sub- sequently attacked our troops and after an hour’s fight McIntyre was obliged to abandon the guns, having spiked them and broken up the car- riages. Gen. Stanley in his report of the battle said : “ From the circum- stances the Fourth Cavalry did the most gallant service. Two gallant officers, old soldiers, were dangerously wounded—Lieuts. Healy and Sim- son, the former it is feared mortally.” Capt. McIntyre gives a full account* of this fight for which there is unfortunately not space here. The regiment was also in action at Middleton, Tenn., 20 and 23 May, ’63 (B, D, E, G, I, K, M); Shelbyville, Tenn., 27 and 30 June, '63 (B, C, D, G, I, L, M); Ring- gold, Ga., 18 Sept., ’63 (A, B, C, I, M) ; Chickamauga Creek, Ga., 18 and 25 Sept., ’63 (B, C, D, E, F, G, I, L) ; Okalona, Miss., 22 Feb., ’64 (A, B, F, G, FI, I, K, L, M ) ; Tallahatchie River, Tenn., 22 Feb., ’64 (A, H, M) ; Dallas, Ga., 26 and 28 May, ’64 (A, B, C, E, F, I, M) and Lovejoy’s Station, Ga., 20 Aug., ’64. In the latter part of October, 1864, the 4th Cavalry was relieved from duty with a brigade and ordered to Cavalry Corps Headquarters. The regiment was very much reduced in strength, numbering about 175 men. It marched to Nashville and took part in that battle on the 14th and 15th of December and in the pursuit of Hood. On the 24th of December a portion of the regiment, led by the brave Lieut. Joseph Hedges, charged into a battery of three guns driving them off the field and finally capturing them after a pursuit of a mile. The Corps Commander (Gen.Wilson) says of this incident:! “ Late in the evening, apparently exhausted with a rapid marching, the enemy took up a strong position in the open field about a mile north of the West Harpeth. It was then so dark from fog and approaching night that the men of Hatch’s division who had be- come somewhat intermingled with the sullen and taciturn Confederate stragglers, began to doubt that the ranks which were now looming up in their front were really those of the enemy’s rear-guard. The momentary hesitation caused by this doubt gave Forrest an op- portunity to straighten his lines and to push his single remaining battery in position so as to sweep the turnpike. Hatch on the left and Knipe on the right were at once ordered to charge the enemy’s flanks, while the Fourth Regular Cavalry, under Lieut. Hedges, was directed straight against his centre. Seeing what was about to burst upon him, the battery commander opened with canister at short range, but had hardly emptied his guns before the storm broke upon him. Forrest did his best to hold his ground, but it was impossible. Hedges rode headlong over the battery and captured a part of his guns. * * * “ Lieut. Hedges, outstripping his men, was captured three different times, but throw- * War Records XXIII., part I, 231. t “ Battles and Leaders of the Civil War.” 216 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. ing his hat away and raising the cry, ‘ The Yankees are coming, run for your lives,’ suc- ceeded in getting away. ’ ’ Gen. Wilson’s staff headed by Col. E. B. Beaumont charged with the Fourth Cavalry in this affair. It participated in the campaign of Selma and in the march to Macon. At Selma (April 2, 1865) it was again distinguished by a mounted charge on the enemy’s earthworks. This was repulsed with loss, but a second charge, dismounted, resulted in carrying the works. “ The enemy rallied behind a second line of works where they were charged by a small mounted battalion of the Fourth Cavalry. The charge was broken up by a railroad cut and some fences close to the works. The regiment lost many horses ; a few men killed and some wounded. Lieut. Webster was shot in the arm and Lieut. O’Connell had his horse shot under him, and was supposed to be killed. This charge failed; but the same battalion dismounted and sup- ported by the 17th Indiana and 3d Ohio and a section of the Chicago Board of Trade Battery charged again and the line was gallantly carried. As we approached the works we had the satisfaction of seeing the bulky form of O’Connell rise from behind his dead horse, where he had been lying to avoid the enemy’s fire. He was bruised but unwounded.” * About,the time of the capture of Selma, it lost a dashing young officer, Lieut. Elbridge G. Roys, who while in command of a party of scouts was surprised by Forrest’s body guard and he and several men were killed and many were wounded. After the capture of Macon, Georgia, the regiment remained there until late in November when it was ordered to Texas where ten companies were concentrated at San Antonio and two companies were sent to the Rio Grande. In the fall of 1866 the companies occupied the posts of Verde, Fredericksburg and Macon. In 1867 old Fort Chadbourne was reoccupied by four companies of the 4th Cavalry. In May, 1873, it was concentrated at Forts Clark and Duncan and under Ranald S. Mackenzie made a march into Old Mexico, surprising a Kickapoo village 40 miles in the interior, near Rey Molino. This affair was the result of an arrangement, with the tacit approval of the authorities on both sides of the Rio Grande, to permit troops in hot pursuit of Indian marauders to follow them across the line. The troops engaged consisted of A, B, C, E, I, M, and a detachment of Seminole scouts under Lieut. Bullitt. The Rio Grande was forded at night and the Kickapoo camp was surprised soon after daylight: the camp was burned and 200 horses and forty squaws and children were captured—the heads of families being absent on a raid. In August, 1874, eight companies of the Fourth Cavalry, commanded by Captains McLaughlin, Beaumont, Gunther, Boehm, Wirt, Heyl, left Fort McKavett and proceeded via Fort Concho, Texas, the North Concho River, to a point on the First Fork of the Brazos close to the Staked Plains. Here a supply camp was established on September 2 and left under the command of Col. Thomas Anderson while the cavalry and an escort of the 8th Infantry for the wagon train scouted the heads of the Brazos, Pecos and Red rivers. On the night of the 26th of September hostile Indians attacked the camp of the 2d battalion under Capt. Beaumont and was driven off THE FOURTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 217 without loss to the command, and on the following day an attempt to bring hem into action failed. Col. Mackenzie was present with the battalion, and directed operations. On September 27 the command marched all night and at daybreak sur- prised several small camps of Ouajada Comanches in the Paladuro Canon of the Red River, burning numerous teepees and capturing over 1600 head of horses and mules. About midnight during the march, a broad trail was struck which was followed until daylight, when it led into a steep canon some six or seven hundred feet deep. It was necessary to dismount and lead the horses as it was impossible to ride. Half way down, a sleeping Indian was awakened by the noise of the command, and springing upon a pony gave a piercing yell of alarm which was echoed at the bottom of the narrow valley where the Indians could be seen rushing out of their lodges and trying to throw some of their effects on their ponies, but they were too late to save anything. The squaws and children rushed into the side ravines among the rocks and brushes while the companies led by Captains Beau- mont and Boehm pushed rapidly up the canon expecting to meet a heavy resistance every moment. The canon was almost choked with horses and it was difficult to get ahead of them, but the two companies finally succeeded in forcing their way through the frightened herd and turned it back. Lieut. Dorst, who had command of the advance skirmishers, drove the Indians before him and kept the way clear for the two companies, and when ordered to return brought with him a hundred horses picked up in a side canon. Gen. Mackenzie ordered the command twice to halt, but Capt. Beaumont, being in advance, sent word back that it was injudicious to halt when the enemy were in full flight and as many horses would be lost. The second order to halt was received when the bulk of the horses had been secured. Capt. Boehm made his way through the brush and foot hills with remark- able rapidity and had his company well in hand. The horses were slowly driven down the canon, when the foe commenced firing from the south side of the canon, but after wounding a couple of horses and a trumpeter of Capt. Gunther’s troop were silenced by twenty men of A troop led by Lieut. Dorst, who with great fatigue climbed the almost perpendicular north face of the canon and opened fire. The lodges were burned con- taining large supplies of dried buffalo meat, robes and kettles, and the horses and mules driven back up the trail of the plain. After a rest the whole command moved back to the wagon train where it arrived at mid- night and, putting the animals into the corral formed by the wagons, took a well earned sleep. Next day some twelve hundred of the animals were shot as it was impossible to hold them together to drive two hundred miles ot Fort Griffin, the nearest post. This band of Indians was on foot and rapidly travelled to Fort Sill, willing to sue for peace at any price. The command remained in the field until late in December, and during that period visited heretofore unknown districts of the Staked Plains, and upon one occasion surprised a camp of Indians, capturing a dozen squaws and children and about one hundred and sixty horses. The command proceeded to Fort Griffin, arriving there December 27, 1874, having been nine days in making a march of only one hundred miles. The wagons had to be pulled 218 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. out of the mud by dismounted men. The Regiment took posts in the In- dian Territory in 1875. On Nov. 25, 1876, an expedition under Gen. Mackenzie, comprising B D, E, F and M troops 4th Cavalry, while scouting on the Powder River came upon Dull Knife’s band of Cheyennes. The commanding officer’s report is as follows: “ About 12 o’clock M. on the 24th inst. while marching in a southwesterly direction toward the Sioux Pass of the Big Horn Mountains I was met by five of the seven Indian scouts who had been sent out the evening before who reported that they had discovered the main camp of the Cheyennes at a point in the mountains fifteen or twenty miles distant. The command was halted until near sunset and then moved toward the village intending to reach it at or before daylight. Owing to the nature of the country which was very rough, and in some cases difficult to pass with cavalry the command did not reach the vil- lage until about half an hour after daylight. The surprise was however, almost if not quite complete. The village, consisting of 173 lodges and their entire contents, was de- stroyed. About 500 ponies were taken and 25 Indians killed whose bodies fell into our hands, but from reports which I have no reason to doubt I believe a much larger number were killed. Our loss was one officer and five men killed and twenty-five soldiers and one Shoshone Indian wounded. Lieut. McKinney, 4th Cavalry, who was killed in this affair, was one of the most gallant officers and honorable men that I have ever known.” In March, 1880, E, K, L, M and D were at Fort Garland, Colorado, pre- paring for an expedition into the Uncompaghre Ute country. On May 19, 1880, the five companies under Maj. E. B. Beaumont left Garland and pro- ceeded via Alamoso, Saquache for the Cochetopa Pass, and crossing the Rocky Mountains there arrived at Los Pinos Agency on the Uncompaghre River May 31. Gen. R. S. Mackenzie commanded the expedition which consisted of a battation of the 19th Infantry and one of the 4th Cavalry. Commissioners were present negotiating with Ouray the Uncompaghre Ute Chief for the removal of his band from that country to a reservation on the Green River. While negotiations were in progress the 4th Cavalry scouted the Grand River and Grand Mesa country. In the fall the troops returned to their stations in Kansas. In May, 1881, Companies A, B, D, K and L returned to the Uncompaghre country and moved the Uncompaghre Utes to their new reservation. The Apaches having broken out in Arizona Gen. Mackenzie was ordered there with a portion of his regiment which was finally concentrated in posts in New Mexico with headquarters at Santa Fe. Gen. Geo. A. Forsyth, lieutenant-colonel of the regiment, took post at Fort Cummings from whence he scouted into Arizona and had a spirited fight in the Stein’s Peak range, Lost Canon. In June, 1884, the 4th Cavalry was ordered to Arizona where the com- panies took post at Huachuca, Bowie, Lowell and McDowell. During ’85 and ’86 several detachments of the 4th Cavalry were in the field operating against the Chiricahua Apaches. In May, 1885, a party of about fifty of the Chiricahua Indian prisoners escaped from the White Mountain Reserve in Arizona, headed by Geronimo and Natchez, and entered upon a career of murder and robbery unparalleled in the history of Indian raids. Gen. Miles organized a well-equipped force under Capt. H. W. Lawton, 4th Cavalry. This command with great energy THE FOURTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 219 and persistence kept on the trail, overtook the band in the mountains, cap- turing nineteen horses and all the enemy’s supplies and finally, in Septem- ber, rounded up the hostiles and brought about their surrender. Gen. Miles reported that Capt. Lawton “ In this remarkable pursuit followed the hostiles from one range of mountains to an- other, over the highest peaks, often 9000 and 10,000 feet above the level of the sea and frequently in the depths of the canons where the heat in July and August was of tropical intensity. A portion of the command leading on the trail were without rations for five days, three days being the longest continuous period. They subsisted on two or three deer killed by the’scouts and mule meat without salt.” Among others entrusted with important duty was Captain Wirt Davis, 4th Cavalry, who crossed into Mexico in July, making a forced march in pursuit of Geronimo. That officer together with Lieuts. Elliott, Walsh and Benson were highly praised in the annual report of the Department Com- mander. The operations of the regiment during the year cover a vast territory. Capt. Hatfield’s troop returning from a successful scout, while passing through a deep and narrow canon, embarrassed with captured property, was attacked by the hostiles and a sharp fight ensued. “ There were several cases of conspicuous bravery displayed in this fight; the action of Sergeant Sam- uel H. Craig was most heroic and very worthy of praise. First Sergeant Samuel Adams, and Citizen Packer George Bowman exposed their lives in attempting to rescue John H. Conradi of the troop, who lay seriously wounded on the ground, but still using his rifle to good effect. This act of bravery and heroism would have been richly rewarded had not this unfor- tunate soldier received a mortal wound as he was being borne from the field by his devoted comrades. * ” The service of the regiment during the next three years was uneventful. During the fall of 1889 a camp of instruction was established near Fort Grant, Arizona, where twelve troops of cavalry, four of infantry, and a de- tachment of the hospital corps were assembled under Col. Compton, and for a month were exercised in all field manoeuvres. On the night of Oct., 8 Mexican desperadoes fired upon a detachment of Troop I, while encamped at Mescal Springs, mortally wounding two enlisted men. In May, 1890, the regiment was transferred from Arizona to the Depart- ments of California and Columbia with headquarters at Fort Walla Walla, Washington. In Oct. 1891, Troop C changed station to Fort Bidwell, Cal. In Feb. 1892, Troops I and K were assigned to duty in the National Yosemite and Sequoia Parks respectively. During the forty years of its official existence the Fourth Cavalry has had seven colonels—men of distinction in their profession : Edwin V. Sumner (3 March ’55-16 March ’61), who moulded the regiment after the old dragoon pattern and became one of the great generals of the Army of the Potomac; Robert E. Lee (16 March ’61-25 April ’61), afterward the famous Confederate chieftain; John Sedgwick (25 April ’61-9 May ’64), the able Union soldier who gave up his life at the head of his corps in the Wilderness; Lawrence * Annual Report, 1886, Gen. Miles. 220 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. P. Graham (9 May ’64-15 Dec. ’70), one of the heroes of Resacade la Palma; Ranald S. Mackenzie (15 Dec. ’70-1 Nov. ’82), the brilliant young cavalry- man and scourge of the border Indians; William B. Royall (1 Nov. ’82-10 Oct. ’87), scarred veteran of two wars and innumerable conflicts with sava- ges ; and Charles E. Compton (19 Oct. 1887) the present head of the regi- ment— a fine type of the volunteer and regular service. Behind these leaders have ridden, boot to boot, for thousands of miles over trackless deserts, through dangerous canons, up the faces of frowning cliffs and across rivers broad and deep, dusty columns of fearless horsemen ; many have left their bones bleaching on the burning sands of Texas, in the glare of an Arizona sun or resting in more or less “ hospitable graves ” in Kansas, Virginia, and Georgia. The deeds of these brave American cavaliers deserve to be chronicled at greater length than is practicable here ; in these peaceful days there is no nobler professional task to whichone of itsyounger officers can devote him- self than to fully record the achievements of the regiment to which he has the privilege and honor to belong. THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. FIRST LIEUT. EBEN SWIFT, U. S. A. Fifth Cavalry. WHEN Mr. Jefferson Davis, the war secretary in 1855, had secured the adoption of his pet scheme for the organization of two new mounted regiments, he set out at once to make them worthy of his patronage. Much opposition had been encountered from the class of politicians who are inimical to a regular army, who pretended to fear many plans for conquest abroad or reward for favorites at home, so that, among other compromises, about half of the new appointments were made from civil life. Among the officers of the Army, great rivalry existed for the new places, on account of the prospective increase in rank. Mr. Davis then displayed that fine judgment in the selection of men, which has been said to be the first requisite of greatness, and which afterwards enabled him to place the fate of the Southern Confederacy in the best hands from the early days of the war. Out of twenty officers who joined our regiment from the Regular Army in 1855, those who obtained the grade of general officer in the Rebellion were, Sidney Johnston, Robert E. Lee, Hardee, Emory, George H. Thomas, Van Dorn, Kirby Smith, Oakes, Innis Palmer, Stoneman, “Shanks” Evans, R. W. Johnson, Field,Gerrard, Cosby and Hood. Four of them commanded great armies in the field, and many of the others had large independent commands. Lowe was recommended by Grant, Thomas and Rosecrans, but he was pursued to the end by an enmity which prevented his passing the grade of colonel. Van Camp, whose early promise was as great as the best, was killed at the head of a charge on an Indian village. Among those who entered from civil life, Chambliss, Harrison, Royall and others, were worthy of high commands, but were disabled early in the war; O’Hara was the gifted author of the “ Bivouac of the Dead ; ” Jenifer became a general officer in the armies of the South and was the in- ventor of the celebrated saddle which bears his name. Later came Fitzhugh Lee and Major, soon to be distinguished Confederate generals; and, in the first days of the war, Custer and McIntosh joined, fought themselves to captaincies, and were then detached to volunteer commands, where great honors awaited them. Another of the lieutenants of 1861 was General Richard Byrnes, who was killed in command of the Irish Brigade at Cold Harbor. The beginnings of the regiment were in other ways worthy of its thor- oughbred personnel. The very best horses were obtained, and the result was the only really excellent mount that the regiment has ever had. The average price was one hundred and fifty dollars, which would be more than equivalent to double that amount at this time. The purchase was made 222 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. mostly in Kentucky, by officers designated by a regimental order, and after six years of the hardest kind of service most of these horses were left behind with deep sorrow when General Twiggs surrendered to the State of Texas. There is not much of interest to recall in the way of arms and equip- ment. Several , patterns of carbine were in use, with Colt’s revolvers and the inevitable sabre. The carbine was discarded in the early part of the war, but had to be resumed of course, and is now, with the revolver, replaced by a more efficient arm. The “beautiful white weapon” has remained unchanged, and history fails to record the size of its grave-yard, even in the hands of the cavaliers of the Fifth. Changes in equipment have not been radical, and not all of them have been approved by the best experience. For instance, what fate should pursue the snaffle-rein, to drive it out of use, while we keep the carbine-sling after thirty-five years ? There was the close fitting jacket, trimmed with yellow braid; the silken sash; the black hat, looped with an eagle at the side, with trail- ing plumes of ostrich feathers. Brass scales for the shoulder, to turn the sabre strokes of the enemy, were provided, but only used for full dress. There were no boots or gauntlets. The first drills were conducted by Major Hardee, the author of the tac- tics of that day, and the early discipline soon felt the master hands of such men as Johnston, Lee and Thomas, assisted by as good a lot of soldiers as ever spurred steed in fight or foray. There were rollicking times too, and bouts where eager subs would have drained the brimming Council Cup of Rothenberg without a sigh. They tell of many a run after hounds or over the track, and of “ Bumble ” and “ Eagle ” and other famous racers, backed by the the light riders of the old regiment, who always carried its colors to the fore. And there was once a game in which a certain lieutenant waged a thousand dollars and did not hold a pair. He afterwards led the forlorn hope of an expiring cause, and the incident was cited in solemn council, to show that such a man would surely fight on the morrow. A very poor ranch, such as you may run across now in some distant sagebrush Eden of the now frontier, built of stone or logs chinked with mud, with a clay floor and an earthen roof, formed a palatial residence. To such a home the ladies of the old army followed their lords, and counted themselves happy when it was no worse. In those early Texas days most of the time was passed under canvas, with a certainty of constant scouting and a change of station at least once a year. Articles which we regard as neces- sities, even ice and potatoes, were unheard of luxuries at many posts, and scurvy was a well-known word in hospital records. The houses of the few married men formed charming social resorts which helped to keep alive the graces and refinements of civilization. Many a jolly party met within the narrow quarters, and the Thanksgiving turkey was none the less enjoyed when the guests had to sit on the family beds in order to arrange themselves at table. General Johnston’s quarters at Fort Mason consisted of one small room for himself and family. The early service was well calculated to test the metal of officers and men. In the preceding year General Scott had reported that, in Texas, THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 223 Indian hostilites had been more destructive than at other points. Long be- fore the regiment left, the hostiles had been driven far into the interior, and they had been harried in their own hunting grounds and villages. Called to patrol a frontier extending from the Red River in the north, to Fort McIn- tosh on the Rio Grande, it scouted far into New Mexico, fought in Indian Territory, and defeated Mexican or Indian marauders in old Mexico. Forty well contested engagements were fought with Lipan, Apache, Kiowa or Comanche Indians, and with Mexican guerillas. All who know how hard it is to catch an Indian on the war-path, will appreciate the hard riding, the winter cold, the summer thirst, the quarries trailed but never flushed, the wakeful nights, the heavy days, involved in that brief record. There was no disaster. The most successful engagements were fought by an expedition to the Wichita Mountains in the winter of 1858-59, under Major Earl Van Dorn. In the two combats of this command over a hundred warriors were left dead on the field; the villages and ponies were captured. Van Camp, already distinguished in several engagements, was killed at the head of his troop. Van Dorn, Kirby Smith and Fitzhugh Lee, were wounded ; six enlisted men were killed, and twenty wounded. One of Van Dorn’s wounds was at first supposed to be mortal; he was shot at close range by an arrow which went entirely through his body. On the first occasion four troops, after a forced march of ninety miles in thirty-six hours, came upon Buffalo Hump’s Comanche camp, consisting of a hundred and twenty lodges, and between four and five hundred Indians. It was a little after daylight, and a complete surprise. The cavalry was formed in line of troops, in columns of twos, guide right, and so they dashed into the village, which lay among some rough ravines well filled with thick reeds and underbrush. The Indians rallied and fought desperately hand to hand. It was several hours before they were completely dislodged and then they fled, followed by the troops. On the second occasion, after much ineffectual scouting, a part of the same band was attacked again some months after, with like result. For these and other actions high praise was given. The pride of the Comanches was broken. During the great Rebellion the regiment was engaged before the first de- feat, and after the last triumph of the Federal forces. At Bull Run a bat- talion was with the last organized troops who opposed the Confederates ; it served as rear-guard to Centerville and bivouacked on the ground where it lay before the battle. It helped to stop the last advance of Lee’s army, and it had killed and wounded at Appomatox on April 9, 1865. There were one hundred and twenty-five battles and minor actions in which loss in killed, wounded and missing, was suffered by one or the other combatant. The cavalry received little encouragement in the early part of the war. It suffered from the well-known ignorance, in high places, of the fit manage- ment and proper use of the arm. The war was nearly half over when Mr. Lincoln asked General McClellan “what the horses did to fatigue any- thing,” and about the same time the celebrated remark about “dead cavalry- men ” was attributed to General Hooker, but never made. As a matter of fact the Fifth Cavalry performed some of its best service in those days, when 224 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. the arm was outnumbered and overworked. The brilliant dash at Fairfax, the capture of two companies of unbroken infantry by Harrison’s troop at Hanover Court House, Custer at New Bridge, McIntosh at Sycamore Church, afforded a few of the examples of successful use of efficient cavalry in those early days. With battle records far exceeding that of the infantry, it was not called upon to suffer the terrible losses of foot troops in single engage- ments. The opportunities for mounted action were few. When dismounted, it was not its duty to fight desperately in attack or defense. But while the infantry had its season of rest the cavalry was constantly exposed, and suf- fered a large percentage of loss in almost daily fighting and scouting. Many were captured as a matter of course, from the isolated nature of its duties, but capture meant neither defeat nor dishonor; it generally showed that the trooper had ventured and risked too much. A regular regiment, during the war, was under many disadvantages. Its field-officers, and many others, were commanding volunteers and serving on important duty elsewhere. The Fifth Cavalry, with the exception of a few months, was commanded by captains and lieutenants. The command of the regiment changed thirty-four times, and, curiously enough, it frequently served under men who had been in its ranks not very long before. It was often difficult to get one officer to a squadron. Casualties among general officers and those on detached service were slight, so that promotion was comparatively slow. In the matter of recruits, as the States, and many of the towns and counties, offered large bounties, the volunteer regiments were more easily kept up to their standard. There were ladies’ aid societies, congressmen and newspapers, always watching the home organizations, mindful of their comfort, caring for their wounded, and praising their deeds. The regulars were deprived of these advantages. There was many a tough tussle of outposts and advance and rear guards, where the cost was not counted and the road unexplored. As Private Mulvaney would have stated the case, the word was “ hit first and frequent.” The roster was greatly changed by the war. In place of the fire-eating Southerners and hard-riding Northerners of a few years before, we find that all the junior officers were now promotions from the ranks, the best of the sergeants and privates who had learned their trade so well in the good school of border war. There were English, Irish, Germans and Americans among them, and they were a brave, stiff-backed set, who got all the law and the prophets out of the blue book and the tactics. They kept up much of the old style and rigidity of discipline and formed an excellent model for the volunteer cavalry. At the battle of Gaines’ Mill on June 27, 1862, the regiment performed its most distinguished service. On that day, it will be remembered, the Confederate Army, reinforced by the corps of Stonewall Jackson from Northern Virginia, made four desperate attacks upon the Federal left under Fitz John Porter, who was occupying an open plateau, with temporary in- trenchments, east of Powhite creek, his left protected by the marshes of the Chickahominy bottom. The sluggish creek flowed through deep banks, concealed by heavy timber; the high ground of the plateau was free of ob- stacles and suitable for cavalry over a strip varying from four hundred to THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 225 one thousand yards in width ; and in the breaks of the plateau, in rear of the extreme left of our line, were massed the weak cavalry brigades of Philip St. George Cooke. In front of the cavalry, the batteries of the reserve artillery were stationed. It was after seven o’clock in the afternoon ; the sun had sunk below the horizon, the heavy smoke of battle was hanging thicker over the field, and the last attack of the enemy had been made and won. Only the cavalry and a part of the artillery remained on this part of the field. A brigade of Texans, broken by their long advance, under the lead of the hardest fighter in all the Southern armies, came running on with wild yells, and they were a hundred yards from the guns. It was then that the cavalry commander ordered Captain Charles J. Whiting, with his regiment, to the charge. No one had blundered; it was the supreme moment for cavalry, the oppor- tunity that comes so seldom on the modern field of war, the test of disci- pline, hardihood, and nerve. Right well was-the task performed. The two hundred and twenty troopers of the Fifth Cavalry struck Longstreet’s vet- erans square in the face. Whiting, his horse killed under him, fell stunned, at the feet of the Fourth Texas Infantry. Chambliss was torn almost to pieces with six wounds. Sweet was killed. Only one of the other officers was unwounded. In all, the loss in killed, wounded and missing, was fifty- eight, and twenty-four horses were known to have been killed. Unsup- ported and almost without officers, the troopers were stopped by the woods of the creek bottom, returned, reformed, and were soon after opposed to the enemy in covering the retreat of the Federal Army. Two days later the same troops were engaged at Savage Station. The guns which were in condition to retire were saved. The facts of that charge speak for them- selves. No action was ever more worthy a poet’s genius ; no cavalry charge was ever ridden better or against more hopeless odds of numbers. In other lands every survivor of Balaklava has been pensioned and decorated. The German nation will always delight over the record of its cavalry at Vion- ville and Mars-la-Tour, and the great Chancellor was never so proud as when he embraced the sons who rode in the ranks on that day. The memory of the sacrifice of French cavalry at Sedan is still a balm for many wounds. But while Cardigan, Bredow and Gallifet, each in his own land, received every honor, it is strange to relate that Whiting was dismissed for alleged dis- loyalty a few months after Gaines’ Mill, reinstated after the war, and mus- tered out of service at the consolidation in 1870. The action of the cavalry received the censure of the Commander-in-Chief and was made the reason for the removal of General Cooke from command. It is not worth while to argue the points of the controversy. The curious searcher after facts will find them in the abundant writings of both Federals and Confederates. This battle gave a strange instance of the fortune of war. Hood had served as a lieutenant under Whiting in the regiment before the war. Now, at the head of a Confederate brigade, he received the charge of his former comrades. After the fight, finding Chambliss so desperately wounded on the field, he saw that his old friend had every care and attention. Such en- counters were frequent. It was Fitzhugh Lee’s own regiment of Virginia cavalry that overwhelmed Royall’s outpost at Old Church, captured part of 226 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. his old troop and wounded a couple of officers. The Rebellion records show that Confederate commanders took some pride in reporting to the Commander-in-Chief that they had encountered his old regiment. Several years of reconstruction duty, in small detachments, over almost every Southern State, varied by an occasional scrap with guerillas, and much destruction of moon-shine whiskey, were followed, in the fall of 1868, by orders to the frontier of Nebraska and Kansas. The rapid settlement of these States following the war, and the energetic construction of the Pacific railroads, had rallied the savages of the plains to the defense of their hunt- ing grounds. What the Comanches had been to Texas, these Cheyennes and Sioux are in the north. They are without fear, without faith, and with- out mercy, and warriors from immemorial tradition. Killing and stealing form alike their best ideas of earthly honor or of heavenly bliss. In their fight against the whites they have ever displayed a superb courage, which attracts our admiration but does not command our sympathy. It is folly to suppose that contact with white people has made them any more inhuman in their tastes than they have been for ages past. A quick concentration united most of the regiment under General Eugene A. Carr, the senior major, in western Kansas. Then for over a year there was s’currying over trails hot and cold, along the frontier from the Canadian River in Texas to the Niobrara in Nebraska. The hostiles were often encountered, with varying success, and they were given one crushing defeat. They frequently attacked the troops, and no man’s picket- pin was safe from their raids. The most terrible marauder of the lot was Tall Bull of the Cheyennes, and with him were joined the Sioux of Pawnee Killer and Whistler. Against them the efforts of the troops were mainly directed. In July, 1869, General Carr finally succeeded in locating these bands and determining the general direction in which they were travelling. He then marched one hundred and fifty miles in four days, passed around the hostile flank, and by a rapid countermarch approached their village at Summit Springs, Colorado, from an unexpected direction. As the troops moved out of a ravine, formed somewhat as they were at the Wichita vil- lage, the eighty-four lodges of the enemy could be seen twelve hundred yards away, and herds of horses peacefully cropping the grass of the slopes beyond. The charge was sounded and away they went like devils of dust over the dry open plain. The attack was so sudden, so terrible and so un- expected that the Indians had no time for defense. Their camp and ponies and many of the women and children were captured. Tall Bull and sixty of his warriors were killed. In the village lay the body of Mrs. Alderdice, a white woman captured in the Kansas settlements some months before. The squaws had found time in the hurry of their flight, to beat out her brains with rocks, and to strangle her babe who lay near by. Not far off was Mrs. Weichel, another white woman, shot through the body, but still living. These poor creatures who had seen their husbands butch- ered, their homes destroyed and themselves subjected to every human misery, were now struck down while the shouts of their deliverers were ringing in their ears. Mrs. Weichel finally recovered and married the hos- pital steward of the expedition, who had tended her through her sufferings. THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. In these campaigns William F. Cody acted as chief guide and scout, and first distinguished himself. For this battle the regiment received the congratulations of the various military commanders and the thanks of the Legislature of Nebraska. It ended Indian terrorism in two States for many years. The regiment occupied stations in Wyoming and Nebraska, and, after more scouting and some fighting, was ordered to distant service be- yond the great divide. And now the scene changes swiftly over rail and water, from high rolling prairie, of buffalo grass, cactus, sage bush, where the buffalo, antelope and prairie dog have their home, to Arizona. There a high plateau and a low plain had been jammed together in some monstrous battle of nature an I left a ragged mass of mountain and canon in wild confusion. There is no rougher bit of country on the continent. Here the Apache made his den, centuries ago, and from here he raided the more peaceful peoples of upland and lowland, far and near. Secure in a stronghold that seemed impregna- ble, he turned his hand against every other living thing and grew more and more like an animal in his wants and desires. The presence of a few troops had encouraged small settlements, but outside the half dozen large towns and a few posts no man’s life or property was safe. The rascality of the savages was encouraged by the attempts of philanthropists to make a peace- ful solution of the problem, while the godless Apache laughed at the fool of a white man, fattened his squaws and pappooses at the agencies and sought pastime in getting drunk on tizwin, and killing greasers or white men and stealing their stock. So things went on from the days of Cortez, and the Lord only knows how long before, until General George Crook, lieutenant- colonel of infantry, went to command the Department of Arizona. He ob- tained permission to compel the Indians to stay on their reserves, and, when they left, to follow and kill them. To do this, troops were put at the agencies, the Indians were counted at stated times and they were hired to track and pursue each other. The Fifth Cavalry arrived in time and was so disposed as to be the general’s most important instrument in accomplish- ing his work. In September, 1872, he reported a list of fifty-four outrages committed in a year, not by any means a complete list, but only such as he was willing to vouch for. One of these affairs affords a fair sample of the lot. Lieutenant Reid T. Stewart, while travelling on a buck-board with a soldier driver was ambushed in Davidson’s Canon and Killed. The driver was pursued, captured and tortured to death with lances and knives, —a fate which Stewart himself probably escaped by being killed at the first fire. Shortly after this affair General Crook’s campaign commenced in earnest. Bodies of troops swept over the infested district as with a broom. Major Mason with three troops jumped four rancherias at Muchos Canons in the Santa Maria mountains and killed forty warriors. Major Brown with three troops, struck the chief Apache stronghold at the caves in Salt River Canon and killed fifty-seven warriors. Troop “ A ” with another command fought two engagements at Turrit Mountain, where thirty-six bucks were slain. Lieutenant Michler with “ K ” Troop corralled a war party on Tonto Creek and killed seventeen warriors. There were many smaller 228 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. engagements and on the 7th of April, the department commander announced the first peace to the Territory of Arizona. Twenty-five hundred hostiles returned to their reserves, not concealing their hatred of the whites, but confessing their terror of the troops. The real force of Apache resistance was indeed broken but there were many bands of defiant renegades to be punished. In May, Lieutenant Almy lost his life at San Carlos as a result of an extensive conspiracy there, and probably two-thirds of the fighting and scouting was yet to come. In October, General Crook was promoted a brigadier-general for his services in these campaigns. Unfortunately the Chiricahuas were exempt from his jurisdiction just as their turn came to receive their lesson, and thus the bloody wars of some years afterwards were not prevented. Out of ninety-seven affairs of the Fifth Cavalry in Arizona there are only at my hand official statements of losses on thirty-three occasions : In these there were five hundred and ninety-nine Indian war- riors killed, and many hundred captured, and of necessity these figures could only give the minimum loss sustained. These results were reached by the hardest kind of work. “ The officers and men worked day and night, and with our Indian allies, would crawl upon their hands and knees for long distances over terrible canons and precipices where the slightest miss-step would have resulted in instant death, in order that when daylight came they might attack their enemy and secure the advantage of surprise so indispen- sable in this kind of warfare. In almost every instance they did this with most complete success, almost invariably surprising the Indians and never giving them a chance to rally. There is hardly a space of ten miles square, in the country operated over, that has not some terrible lava-bed, or preci- pitous canon with fortified caves, which the Indians could have held against all odds and with terrible loss of life had the enemy been approached in day- light, and assailed when they were on the alert.” General Schofield thanked the troops officially for their “ extraordinary service,” and General William T. Sherman said that “ the services of the Fifth Cavalry in Arizona were unequalled by that of any cavalry regiment during the War of the Rebellion.” Then came the overland march to Kansas in 1875, and brief service there, which though fairly active, afforded no prospect of any serious work, until the great Sioux war in the north assumed alarming proportions. Early in 1876 it became evident that the troops in the field were not strong enough to cope with the hostiles. In the light of subsequent events this may have been owing to the fact that the troops of two departments were in the field under two generals instead of one. At any rate the regiment soon found itself, still led by General Carr, moved rapidly to the north, to serve again in the Department of the Platte, which it had left such a short time before. Gen. William H. Emory had just been retired, and on the first day of July, on the South Cheyenne River, the regiment hailed its new colonel, Gen. Wesley Merritt, its former brigade and division commander in famous Virginia days. Then up and away to the fight on the War Bonnet, and the chase of the surprised Cheyennes into their agency, and the hurried march to join Crook’s command on Goose Creek. No need to tell again of such recent and oft-told events as those which follow,—of the meet on the Rose- THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF CA VALRY. 229 bud, Custer's trail, the fight at Slim Buttes, the “ mud march,” “ six months without a dime,” rations of Indian pony and putrid dried buffalo. In the year most of the troops marched over two thousand miles ; ninety-three of our horses died of exhaustion and starvation between Heart River and the Belle Fourche during one week in September. General Crook’s tired bat- talions reached civilization again, after many privations, and although they did not destroy the enemy, they caused him to break and scatter, so that he never again made a formidable resistance. Gordon’s battalion returned dur- ing the winter from the fight with Cheyennes at Bates Creek, and soon Sitting Bull was across the border, Crazy Horse was dead, and Dull Knife’s hard fighting band was destroyed. General Crook had secured peace for his Department. Short work of tailor and barber, with drills, feed and grooming, soon made another smart regiment. Several active seasons followed, with sum- mers and winters in Idaho after Bannocks; in the Sand Hills of Nebraska after Cheyennes ; on the Stinking Water trying to hit a last blow at the Nez Perce’s; along the flanks of the Big Horns, patrolling the old hunting grounds of the Sioux ; at Omaha and Chicago during the railway riots. These occupations, mingled with well remembered days of song and dance at Fort D. A. Russell, took up the time until the winter of 1879. One frosty morning of October, news came that Major Thornburgh’s command, consisting mostly of our own people, had been roughly handled by Utes in Colorado. It takes little time to put well-equipped troops in the field, so in a few hours a command of cavalry and infantry had made the journey by rail, and were at Rawlins, Wyoming, with all details complete, ready to push on to the relief of the besieged troops and the agency beyond. The Utes were a powerful tribe, divided among several agencies in Col- orado and Utah. They had been at peace with the whites for many years, but were known to be proud and warlike. If the entire nation had joined in this uprising, and gathered recruits, as Indians always do, among the am- bitious youth of all other tribes, there was prospect of some heavy work. A month later over three thousand men were in the field against these Indians. The first troops that gathered at Rawlins, consisted of four troops of cavalry and several companies of infantry,—in all about three hundred and fifty men—while the besieged force amounted to nearly half that number. To have waited under such circumstances, until more of the hurrying troops had arrived, would have been fairly prudent, and justified by all recent ex- perience. On the other hand was the pressing danger of the troops on Milk Creek, with one-third of their number killed and wounded, and the only surgeon wounded. No doubts disturbed the serene mind of the officer in command. With entire singleness of purpose, and no thought except for the immediate danger of the besieged troops, he gathered together such force as he could, packed his infantry in some country wagons, and plunged into the one hundred and sixty odd miles of mountain and wilderness that lay between the railroad and the scene of the recent disaster. The march was made in two days and a part of a third, and considering circumstances of time, distance, and good condition of men and horses at the end, it was a remarkable instance of the forced march of a well-conducted command. 230 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. It was an exciting ride, the last night particularly, as we forged on through the mountains, expecting every moment to find our slaughtered comrades or to hear the crack of the rifles of Utes in our way. Now the road ran along the edge of a precipice whose black shadows concealed many hundred feet of chasm, where some of the huddling pack-mules slipped and were never seen again ; it widens out a little where naked bodies of dead team- sters are shining in the moonlight; two brothers met there, one riding with our advance, the other lying in the trail, with one stiff arm raised as if to grasp your horse’s bridle as he jumped aside. Then on until mountains are past, and the guide tells us each moment that we are near the spot. That guide’s indecision is exasperating, but at last we get there. There is a challenge and a bugle call, and General Merritt and his headquarter party ride for the rifle-pits at a dead run. Small time for hand-shakings then, for although the Indians have made no attack, the morning sun soon rises and shows them about a mile away, massing as if to defend the entrance to Yellow Jacket Pass, where they had driven Thornburgh back before. There was skirmishing in the morning and the Indians hurried away, leaving the troops to find their dead and care for the wounded. The agency was a short march beyond ; on the road were more swollen and distorted bodies of dead civilians, and seven more at the agency, with pigs and fowls and carrion birds feeding on their flesh. The Indians showed their contempt of Meeker’s ideas about planting corn, by driving a wooden peg down his throat, ap- parently while he was alive, and by dragging him, with a chain around his neck, up and down in front of his house. The women were carried away. After all this, and the massacre of some more of our own people, it may well be believed that the command was in a frame of mind to start on a Ute hunting trip, and submitted with bad grace to the suspension of hostilities ordered at the request of the Interior Department. The troops went back to White River, and dug holes in the ground and lay there, until Ute Jack, wearing poor old Cherry’s spike-tailed coat, with Colorao and Johnson, and their precious gang, went to Washington and talked pleasantly of how they had ravished the women and butchered the men, and the Ute war of 1879 was ended. That was the last Indian campaign, although there have been several big scares, notably in Indian Territory, in 1885, when the Cheyennes became excited over the murder of an Indian by a white man, and were quieted by the good management of General Sheridan. The season of rest from Indian wars afforded opportunity for instruction of larger bodies of troops than are ordinarily collected in our country. In the fall of 1888, Colonel James F. Wade organized a camp of instruction for the regiment at Camp Rockwell, and again in 1889 at Camp Schofield the same plan was pursued on a larger scale. Two regiments of cavalry, three batteries of light artillery, and sufficient infantry to represent a brigade, in a hypothetical military situation, went into camp upon Chilocco Creek in the Cherokee Strip. The formations for attacks and defense, the dispositions for security and information, and the operations of hostile contact, were practised in accord with proper military principles. After about three weeks of most instructive work the troops departed for their posts. THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 231 Here and there the record shows a feat of surpassing valor, as when First Sergeant John W. Spangler killed six Indians in a single encounter. He won the honorable mention of his department commander, and died a cap- tain of cavalry. Another hero, less fortunate, because he fought on the wrong side, was a nameless Comanche Indian. To cover the flight of his squaws and pappooses and friends, he dismounted in the way of the charg- ing troops, and like Horatius of old he held them at bay. He wounded Major George H. Thomas and five enlisted men, one mortally, before he fell, pierced by a score of wounds. Perhaps his conquered race may keep his memory still in song and story, but the annals of the victor do not even give his name. Brief mention only may be made of the way John B. Hood showed the stuff he was made of, in the very first revolver charge fighting four times his number of savages, and killing more of them than he had men in his command; how Harrison, with thirty men, charged a brigade of cavalry to save his pickets ; how the Greys went through Fairfax. Not all of war is made up of death and suffering ; where the good sol- dier rides there are acts of mercy found, and deeds worthy of any day of chivalry. We might tell the story of a trooper who once saved an Indian baby from the wild destruction of an Apache rancheria by Indian allies, shared his blanket at night with the mewling little savage, and carried it many hard miles by day until he could turn it over to its own tribe. Again, did Ash ride out and draw the fire of a brigade so that he might tell a straight story of their numbers ? That was war too, but the delighted yells of the enemy when each man of them had fired and missed gave a dash of kindness to war’s grim visage after all. Or again, when a village was taken, rich with plunder of the wide border, did not the soft-hearted cavalrymen get together nine hundred dollars that were found there, and give them to the wretched white woman whom the Indians had left for dead ? The history of our regiment is the plain story of an average cavalry reg- iment in our army for thirty-five years. It has wandered much, and in many scenes of civil strife, riot, and border war its guidons have been found. Its graves mark the spots where civilization has advanced and where dis- union has been made impossible. No argument, save its simple record, is needed to expose the fallacy of the speeches of Senators Houston, Benton, Doolittle and others, which contain a fair sample of the views of the enemies of the Regulai Army. Recent years have been years of peace, but the regiment’s arms have not been “rusted in a vile repose.” Least glorious and most disagreeable of all its duty has been that of enforcing the laws in the Indian country, guarding an empire of land against our poor and needy citizens who have ever tres- passed on that forbidden ground. This duty has been gently and well per- formed. The soldier is nowhere more respected than in the land of home- seekers and boomers. To him all men have turned in days of disorganiza- tion and danger, and on the opening of Oklahoma, where much corruption was supposed to exist, no scandal attached to the United States troops. Perhaps this fact may deserve a place beside more gaudy laurels won zX Wichita Village, at Gaines’ Mill, or at Summit Springs. THE SIXTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. Captain WILLIAM H. CARTER, 6th U. S. Cavalry. THE Sixth Regiment of Cavalry was organized as the Third Cavalry, under the President’s proclamation of May 3, 1861 ; and the proc- lamation was confirmed by Act of Congress, July 29, 1861. It was provided that its officers should take rank from May 14, 1861. The headquarters were ordered established at Pittsburg, Pa., and the following officers were appointed to constitute the commissioned force of the new regiment: Colonel David Hunter, Lieutenant-Colonel William H. Emory, Majors D. H. Rucker and E. H. Wright. Captains I. N. Moore, A. V. Kautz, A. W. Evans, Wm. S. Abert, D. McM. Gregg, J. H. Taylor, J. I. Gregg, John Savage, G. C. Cram, C. R. Lowell, J. S. Brisbin, and H. B. Hayes. First Lieutenants J. K. Mizner, W. W. Averill, H. M. Enos, I. W. Claflin, S. H. Brown, B. T. Hutchins, H. T. McLean, Tattnall Paulding, Frederick Dodge, J. B. Johnson, J. F. Wade, M. H. Leavenworth. Second Lieutenants J. W. Spangler, Peter McGrath, Hugh McQuade, and C. B. McLellan. Major Rucker having declined, Major J. H. Carleton was appointed second major, to date from September 7, and Major L. A. Williams was on the same date appointed the junior major. Captain Moore having declined, Captain William P. Sanders was appointed. The designation of the regiment was changed to “ Sixth Cavalry,” Aug- ust 10, 1861, the Mounted Rifles becoming the Third Cavalry. The regiment was recruited principally in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and western New York, under the supervision of Lieut.-Col. Emory, and on October 12, 1861, Companies B, D, E, F, G, H, I and K having been or- ganized, the regiment was transferred to the camp of instruction east of the Capitol at Washington. The organization of Company A was com- pleted October 15; a sufficient number of recruits arrived during the month to complete the organization of Company M ; and on the 1st of November the band of fifteen members joined, and the instruction of the regiment was begun. Company C was organized December 23, 1861, thus completing the organization of all but one company, and on December 31 the regiment was ready for the field with 34 officers and 950 men. Winter quarters were abandoned on March 10, 1862, when the regiment crossed Long Bridge and marched to Fairfax C. H., where it was assigned to General P. St. G. Cooke’s command, and after making a reconnoissance to Centreville, Manassas and Bull Run, was embarked March 27, at Alex- andria, for Fort Monroe, which it reached on the 30th. THE SIXTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 233 The regiment, except one squadron, was equipped with sabres and pistols as light cavalry, and marched in advance of the Army of the Potomac to the position before Yorktown, where it remained until the evacuation. The regiment participated in the Peninsula campaign as part of General Stoneman’s command. It opened and participated in the battle of Wil- liamsburg, after pursuing the through Yorktown. Here it under- took a feat of arms seldom or never attempted by cavalry, mounted, and which was probably brought about by a misconception of orders, or faulty information regarding the garrison and works attacked. The daring counter-charge of Captain Sanders was the salvation of the rear of the command. The following extract is taken from the report of the regi- mental commander: “ I was ordered to make a detour through the woods and take a battery on the enemy’s extreme left flank. I accordingly proceeded with the Sixth Cavalry through the woods indicated, and after going about half a mile at a trot, debouched upon an open but undulating ground in front of the enemy’s line of fortifications. The ground was very heavy, and between the woods and the field works there was a deep ravine only passable by file. The ravine was about equi-distant from the woods and the works. It was passed and the regiment formed about one hundred yards from the fortifications. Lieutenant Madden with a platoon was sent to reconnoitre the gorge. This was during the time its occupants were engaged with Gibson’s battery in front. Lieutenant Madden reported that the ditch and rampart would have to be surmounted before we could effect an entrance, and also that infantry was approach- ing on the near side of a wood which skirted the back of the fort. I saw three regi- ments advancing in line ; our position was critical, equally exposed to the guns of the fort and the advancing infantry. I determined to retire. Four of the squadrons and a portion of the fifth had already passed the ravine (it was belly deep to the horses in mud), when two squadrons of rebel cavalry rushed from the barracks in rear of the fort, and endeavored to cut off Captain Sanders’ company. Captain Sandeis wheeled his company about, charged and repelled the enemy with great gallantry. I cannot speak too highly of the officers and men on this occasion. Though every one felt that few would survive if the guns of the fort were turned upon us, not one showed the slightest concern. Captain Sanders showed great prudence and bravery in the timely manner in which he met the enemy, though taken at a disadvantage by superior numbers. I regret to report that Lieutenant McLellan was wounded in the leg by a shell while engaged.” The regiment formed part of the advanced guard of the Army of the Potomac, and was engaged May 9, 1862, in the action at Slatersville under General Stoneman, where Sanders again distinguished himself by repeatedly charging superior forces of the enemy’s cavalry. May 11, the regiment again became sharply engaged at New Kent C. H. May 24 it was in action at Mechanicsville, and two days later in the battle of Hanover Court House, the regiment camping on the battle-field until the morning of the 28th, when orders were received to burn the railroad bridge on the South Anna, near Wickham’s farm. Colonel Wickham was laid up with a sabre wound received in the action with Sanders, and was captured and paroled. The destruction of the bridge and consequent railroad com- munication was accomplished during the day by a platoon under Lieu- tenant Kerin supported by the regiment. At 12 o’clock the same night 234 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Lieutenant Kerin successfully destroyed the county bridge, about 200 yards above the railroad bridge. Captain Cram destroyed a bridge which had been fired by Rush’s Lancers on the 27th, but which they had failed to destroy because withdrawn pre- maturely. Orders arrived during the night to destroy the Virginia Central R. R. bridge over the North Anna, which was accomplished by Captain Abert’s squadron, supported by Captain Kautz’s. June 13, 1862, General j. E. B. Stuart having succeeded in getting to the rear of the Federal army with a considerable force of cavalry, the Sixth was ordered in pursuit with part of the Fifth. Some active reconnoissance work took place, and Stuart’s rear guard was found on the road to the White House. Orders being received to hold the position then occupied, the regi- ment halted until General Cooke arrived with his command. This raid made Stuart famous, and gave the opposing cavalries a lesson their leaders never forgot. During the move from the Chickahominy to the James, the regiment retired by the way of York River. There was an accumulation of stores at White House landing which it was desired to move, and it became necessary to check the rebel cavalrymen who were pushing in close pursuit of the retiring columns. The Sixth was placed with a platoon of artillery at the crossing of Black Creek, which it successfully defended against several attempts to force a passage. After dark, June 26, the stores having been removed or destroyed, the regiment retired to Williamsburg, marching all night. It remained about Yorktown, Hampton and vicinity until July 7, when it was embarked at Fort Monroe for Harrison’s Landing, where the army had arrived after the seven days’ fight. Company L was organized and arrived at camp July 13, completing the regimental organization. August 4, 1862, the regiment marched to Malvern Hill as part of Pleasanton’s Brigade, and on the next day had a sharp engagement, losing four killed and a number wounded. During the evacuation of Harrison’s Landing, August 18, it formed the rear guard to Charles City Court House. The regiment embarked on transports at Yorktown, August 31, and landed at Alexandria, Va., September 2, 1862. For the next three months it was almost constantly in contact with the enemy, meeting him at Falls Church, Sugar Loaf Mountain, Middletown, Charleston, Va., the expedition to Leesburg, Waterford, Charleston again, Hillsboro, Philamont, Uniontown, Uppei ville, Barber’s Cross roads, Amosvilleand the Rappahannock, the reg- iment reaching Belle Plain, November 24, where it remained until Decem- ber 12, when it marched to the vicinity of Fredericksburg. The army was now crossing the Rappahannock below the town, and a pontoon bridge having been thrown over, a squadron was crossed, and made a reconnoissance towards the enemy’s works, developing their infantry line and receiving the fire of a battery, with a loss of two men and eight horses wounded. The squadron was withdrawn and the result reported to General Burnside. The regiment was put in camp near Falmouth, December 13, 1862, where it remained until April 13, 1863. The regiment was greatly hampered in its early service by the want of THE SIXTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 235 proper arms for the kind of warfare it was dealing with. It was not until three days after the battle of Antietam that carbines were issued at Sharps- burg to all the men, and in the midst of an active campaign it was impossi- ble to undertake any systematic instruction with the new arms. After four months of camp life near Falmouth, notwithstanding strenuous efforts to procure horses, the regiment resumed active work with nearly 300 men in the dismounted camp. The regiment participated in the “ Stoneman Raid ” to the rear of the rebel army, which ended May 9, after swimming the Rappahannock. A picket detail under Lieutenants Carpenter and Wade reported on the 4th of May to General Buford, and accompanied him on his forced march to Gordonsville. During the raid Lieutenant Tupper with a detachment of ten men on a foraging expedition, captured the chief quartermaster of Stuart’s cavalry in sight of one of their squadrons. It is doubtful if any service during the year was accompanied with greater hardships than were endured by men and horses during these few days from May 1st to 9th, 1863. The rain falling incessantly, swelled the streams and rendered the roads impassable. Four days later the regiment encamped at Hartwood Church, and the regimental commander, assistant surgeon, and two men, were captured while passing from camp to General Buford’s headquarters, a mile and a half distant. On the 8th of June the regiment arrived near Beverly Ford on the Rappahannock, and crossed next day, participating in that famous cavalry combat with a loss of four officers and 63 men, killed and wounded and cap- tured, out of 254 engaged. The regiment charged, losing Lieutenant Mad- den by a shell, and while reforming, the adjutant—Lieutenant Kerin—was captured. The regiment then supported Elder’s horse-battery for several hours, part of the time under severe fire. It was then moved with the Second Cavalry to the extreme right, where severe loss occurred in charg- ing the enemy to resist a flank attack. Lieutenant Ward was killed and Lieutenant Stoll badly wounded, both commanding squadrons. The latter was fired upon after he fell, and his men who tried to bear him away were shot down. This was one of the most severe cavalry actions of the war, and a loss of one-fourth its members is ample evidence of the courage and tenacity with which the Sixth fought until the line was withdrawn, and then the regiment was the last to withdraw and formed the rear-guard, where Lieutenant Tupper was specially mentioned for the skilful and deliberate manner with which he withdrew his squadron, the extreme rear guard, checking the enemy at every step as he retired. While on the road to Snicker’s Gap, the regiment had a brisk skirmish, June 17, near Benton’s Mill; and again on the 21st, having joined General Gregg’s command, it was engaged with the enemy, nearly all the cavalry of both armies fighting all day between Middleburg and Upperville. In the charge near the latter place Lieutenant McQuiston and five men were wounded. The regiment marched by way of Aldie and Leesburg to the Potomac, which was crossed at Edward's Ferry; thence to Foint of Rocks and Emmitsburg, arriving July 2, 1863. 236 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. On July 3d, General Merritt ordered the regiment to Fairfield, Pa., on the road leading to Gettysburg from the northwest, to capture a wagon train, the rest of the brigade moving towards Gettysburg by way of Farm- ington. Fairfield was reached at noon, where two troops were detached to proceed along the base of the mountain, the regiment keeping the road to Gettysburg. About a mile from Fairfield the enemy’s pickets were encoun- tered and driven back to their supports, when another squadron was added to the skirmish line, and the enemy—the 7th Virginia—was driven back to the forks of the road from which their main body could be seen, consisting of about four regiments of cavalry. The regiment was close enough to hear the command “ Draw Sabres ” of the enemy, as they were formed for the charge. The two squadrons were in between post and rail fences, and could not form line or join those in the fields before they were charged by the rebel brigades under Generals Robertson and Jones. Caught in such a trap the men remained firm, firing and inflicting severe loss on the advanc- ing column, until literally ridden down. Some escaped to the fields and made for the town, but the rebels were there first and Lieutenant Balder, who was ordered to surrender, called on the few men near him to follow and had nearly cut his way out when he fell mortally wounded. The squad- ron which was on the road near the mountain was also overpowered and hurled back to the town. It was very unfortunate that the scattered squadrons were not withdrawn instantly from the front of such superior forces for more favorable ground. The regiment paid dearly for the error, losing, besides Lieutenant Balder killed, Major Starr and Lieutenants Tucker, Wood, and Chaffee, wounded; Captain Cram, Lieutenants Bould and Paulding, and Surgeons Forwood and Notson captured. The loss of men was 232 killed, wounded and cap- tured, out of a total of less than 400. The fight made at Fairfield by this small regiment against two of the crack brigades of Stuart’s cavalry, which were endeavoring to get around the flank of our army to attack the trains, was one of the most gallant in its his- tory and was really a part of the battle of Gettysburg. The efforts of these brigades were frustrated and their entire strength neutralized for the day, by the fierce onslaught of the small squadrons. The regiment was cut to pieces, but it fought so well that the squadrons were regarded as the ad- vance of a large body of troops. The senior officer of these brigades was adversely criticised for allowing his command to be delayed by such an in- ferior force. Had the regiment not made the desperate stand, the two brigades of Virginians might have accomplished incalculable injury in the Federal rear, before cufficient force could have been gathered in their front. The small portion which escaped retreated to Emmitsburg, joined the brigade the next day, proceeded to Frederick City, Md., July 5, and to South Mountain and Williamsport, July 6, participating in the engagement there with the loss of one sergeant. While making a reconnoissance to Funkstown, July 7, the regiment became heavily engaged with superior numbers, and lost Captain Claflin severely wounded and 85 men killed, wounded and missing. The regiment remained in contact with the enemy and was engaged, July 8 and 9, near Boonsboro, and again engaged near Funkstown, July 10. THE SIXTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 237 The regiment had now lost all but three or four officers and a few men, and was ordered to report at Cavalry Corps Headquarters, and marched via Warrenton Junction to Germantown, arriving there August 8, 1863. The service of the regiment during the period between the action at Bev- erly Ford and the last affair at Funkstown was one of incessant marching and fighting, and although nearly decimated by the casualties of action, the brave little band hung on to Lee’s army with a courageous tenacity, which remains to-day as one of the most cherished historical incidents of the regiment’s existence. The regiment did not leave Germantown until September 12, and next day crossed the Rappahannock and engaged in the fight at Brandy Station, driving the enemy through Culpeper. Here it remained for a month, when the rebels attacked and forced a retreat towards the Rappahannock. When near Brandy Station the regiment was ordered into position on the left of the road, and when the skirmish line on its left retired, it was in an exposed position which was promptly seen by the enemy, who attempted a flank attack with a column of cavalry. In withdrawing around a piece of thick pine woods where the corps skirmish line was placed, the regiment was fired into by the 1st New York (Harris’) Cavalry, killing a sergeant and wounding Lieutenant Chaffee, Surgeon Forwood and three men. On the 14th the regiment reached Centreville, and while reconnoitring the enemy’s position Lieutenant Nolan was wounded. The regiment remained near Brandy Station during the winter in huts constructed by themselves. The regiment left winter quarters May 4, 1864, and reconnoitred Ger- mania Ford, Mine Run, and U. S. Ford, returning to Chancellorsville in time to go with General Sheridan to Todd’s Tavern, where, May 7, the cavalry corps were heavily engaged with cavalry and infantry. The next day was spent in preparations for the raid towards Richmond which commenced May 9,1864. The regiment marched on the Fredericks- burg and Richmond Pike, crossing the North Anna after dark. The clouds of dust having attracked the attention of the enemy, they arrived during the night and opened on the corps headquarters at daylight with a battery, the regiment being near by and receiving a few shells without casualties. The march was resumed, the rebels continuing in pursuit and frequently attacking the rear guard. Reaching Beaver Dam Station, a train contain- ing prisoners captured at the Wilderness was seized about 9 o’clock on the morning of the 10th, and destroyed with a large amount of muskets and small arms. The march was resumed and at 11 o’clock A. M., May 11, the enemy was encountered in front'of Yellow Tavern, and a severe engage- ment took place resulting in the defeat of the rebels and the death of their gallant and famous leader—J. E. B. Stuart. Crossing the Chickahominy at Meadow Bridge, May 12, the march con- tinued towards Richmond until the outer works were reached, when the column turned to the left towards Mechanicsville Bridge. A shell placed in the road exploded as the regiment passed, killing one horse. The enemy now opened fire on the column, and the direction of the march was changed towards Mechanicsville. The enemy was in position on the road and fought stubbornly for two hours before he was driven away and a passage 238 HISTORICAL SKETCHES Cl. S. ARMY. over the river secured. Mechanicsville was reached at dark and the regi- ment went on picket. Bottom’s Bridge was destroyed May 13, and the day following the regi- ment was detached to Fort Monroe with orders for supplies to be sent to White House Landing. A march of fifty miles to Williamsburg was made the first day, and on the 15th Fort Monroe was reached, where the regiment remained until the 21st when it rejoined the cavalry corps at White House Landing, and proceeded to join the Army of the Potomac at Milford Sta- tion, May 24, 1864. May 26, marched to Hanover town, crossing the Pamunkey at that point on a pontoon bridge next day, and on the 28th came upon the enemy and attacked him near Salem Church. Reached New Castle Ferry on the 29th and Old Church on the 30th, where the enemy was again engaged. Returning, the regiment reached Trevillian Station, June 10, and partici- pated in the battle of that name, June 11. The Cavalry Corps marched to White House Landing, leaving the Sixth at the crossing of the Mattapony to await the arrival of detachments and take up the pontoon bridge, which was done and the corps rejoined on June 19. The next ten days was spent in marching, and on the 29th the enemy was again encountered near Dabney's Mill and a skirmish took place. The regiment crossed the James, August 1, and engaged in the action of Deep Bottom. General Sheridan having been assigned to command the Middle Mili- tary Division, embracing the Shenandoah Valley, Troop L was ordered to duty as his escort, and the regiment embarked for Washington, and thence marched via Harper’s Ferry and rejoined the Cavalry Corps near Berrys- ville, August 20, 1864. September 19,1864, the regiment left Berryville at 3 o’clock A. M., towards Winchester, and at noon, as General Sheridan’s escort, became engaged in the battle of that name. On the next day pursued the enemy to Strasburg and engaged in the fight of Fisher’s Hill, driving the enemy all night and ar- riving at Woodstock next morning, where the day was spent in picking up stragglers and prisoners. The march up the Valley was resumed September 22, and at 10 o’clock A. M., the enemy was found posted on the south bank of the Shenandoah to dispute the crossing. The rebels were dislodged and the regiment proceeded to New Market and thence to Harrisonburg, where it remained. October 7, the regiment marched down the Valley, and remained on the north side of Cedar Creek until October 19, when the battle of that name was fought. The rebels drove the regiment from its camp, but it was retaken before night and reoccupied. Captain Lowell was killed while leading the Regular Brigade to the charge in this action. December 6, 1864, the regiment marched to Stephenson’s Station, and formed part of General Merritt’s command on his raid in Loudon Valley; and on ..he 19th it went with General Torbert’s command on the raid to Gordonsville. ReturningDecember31.it went into winter camp at Kerns- town. February 27, 1865, the camp was broken up and the regiment proceeded THE SIXTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 239 with the Cavalry Corps under General Sheridan, up the Valley through Strasburg, Woodstock and New Market, and arrived at Staunton, March 5 ; thence to the James River, and joined the Army of the Potomac near Petersburg, March 27, 1865. March 29, proceeded to Dinwiddie Court House. Here the Cavalry Corps engaged the enemy on the 30th, and drove them into their works at Five Forks, holding the position for three hours against repeated attacks and until the ammunition was exhausted. The enemy got in on the right flank of the regiment under cover of dense woods, and when the line was withdrawn for ammunition the rebels charged the flank capturing Lieutenant Nolan and 18 men. On March 31, their infantry having come up. the enemy attacked and drove the Cavalry Corps back to Dinwiddie. Next morning the regiment occupied the extreme right in the memorable battle of Five Forks, and connected with the 5th Corps, when it came into action during the afternoon, the regiment wheeling to the left and resting the right on the enemy’s works. About 3 P. M., an ad- vance was ordered which never ceased until sunset, when the battle was won. The Cavalry Corps went in pursuit, April 2, and came up with the rebels and engaged them at 3 P. M., but they retreated. The pursuit was continued incessantly and with great loss to the enemy until April 6, when they were compelled to make a stand to save their trains. The Cavalry Corps pressed hard on their flank and awaited a favorable opportunity to capture the trains. Their infantry was forced to form, enabling the 6th Corps to arrive during the delay. The 3d Cavalry Division was now ordered to charge, the other two divisions supporting, and this, the battle of Sailor’s Creek, re- sulted in the capture of about 10,000 rebels. During this action the regi- ment was ordered to take possession of some log huts. It is recorded in the regimental archives that the few men now left in the ranks hesitated, believing it was sure death ; but Lieutenant McLellan, a veteran of the Old Army, faced them and said, “ Men, let us die like soldiers.” Every one of the little band rushed for the huts under a shower of bullets, and gained the cover with a loss of but three men wounded. The pursuit was pressed until 9 p. M. While trying to force a passage across the creek after dark, a shell burst in the midst of the little remnant bearingso bravely the standard of the Sixth, and wounded three, one of whom died next day. The march was resumed on the 7th, and on the 8th a rapid march was made to Ap- pomatox Station where a charge was made resulting in important cap- tures. April 9, 1865, the rebels made a desperate attack upon the cavalry at Clover Hill, but the arrival of infantry supports about 9 A. M., relieved the cavalry, which immediately proceeded at a gallop to the enemy’s left with a view of charging upon that flank. On nearing the rebel lines a flag of truce was met requesting a cessation of hostilities as it had been decided to surrender. The surrender was announced at 4 P. M. The cavalry was at once started for Petersburg and thence, after the grand review in Washington before the President, into camp at Frederick, Md., to reorganize and equip for duty on the distant frontier, where it was destined to pass the next quarter of a century. The salient features of the regiment’s history, during this most eventful 240 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. period of our nation’s existence, have now been traced from the date of its first service in the Peninsula campaign, until formed for the last charge at Appomatox. The history of the regiment is that of the Regular Brigade, than which none brighter appears upon the records of the Army of the Potomac. The regiment was fortunate at the beginning of its career in having General Emory present as its lieutenant-colonel to organize it. The talent and courage of the squadron leaders, who so materially aided in establish- ing a reputation for the regiment, caused the early loss of these officers, who were soon selected for higher commands. Brave Sanders, a Southerner and West Pointer who remained loyal, was promoted to brigadier-general and was killed at the siege of Knoxville, Tenn. Lowell was killed while leading the brigade to the charge, he being then colonel of volunteers serving in the same brigade with his own Sixth. There were many officers of the regi- ment holding high commands, like Generals Hunter, Emory, Carleton, Kautz, the Greggs, Sanders and others, who rendered good service commen- surate with the increased rank held by them, but the records contain many applications for and references to younger officers who were constantly de- tached for staff, recruiting and similar duties, who might have carved more enduring names for themselves in command of such excellent men as com- posed the ranks of the Sixth Cavalry. Subsequent to the close of hostilities, the Adjutant-General’s office not having given proper credit to the regiment for its services in battle, General Sheridan sent to the War Department the following communication, which is cherished as a manly and characteristic action on the part of that great leader “ I take this occasion to strongly urge that justice be done the Sixth Cavalry, and that the battles as given in the within order issued by me * * * be credited to this regiment on the next Army Register, so that its record, or so much of it as is permitted in the Army Register, may be in a measure correct and complete. In the following battles the Sixth Cavalry fought under my personal supervision, viz.: Wilderness, Todd’s Tavern, Furnaces, Spottsylvania Court House, Yellow Tavern, Meadow Bridge, Winchester, Fisher’s Hill, Cedar Creek, Five Forks, Dinwiddie C. H., Clover Hill, Sailor’s Creek and Appomatox Court House.” The records of casualties during the Rebellion show seven officers killed, 53 men killed in action and 53 other deaths; 122 wounded in action, and 17 by accident; 438 missing, most of these being captured at Fairfield and in other charges,—making a total of 689 enlisted men. The regiment participated in the following actions during the war : 1862. Williamsburg, May 4. Slatersville, May 9. New Kent C. H., May 11. New Bridge, May 20. Mechanicsville, May 24. Hanover C. H., May 27. Ashland, June 16. Black Creek, June 26. Charlestown, September 28. Hillsboro, September 29. Waterford, October 1. Charlestown, October 8. Philamont, November 1. Uniontown, November 2. Upperville, November 3. Barber’s Cross Roads, Nov. 5. THE SIXTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 241 Malvern Hill, August 5. Falls Church, September 5. Sugar Loaf Mountain, Md., Sept. 13. Petersville, Md., Sept. 15. Amosville, November 7 and 8. Sulphur Springs, November 17. Fredericksburg, December 12. 1863. Beverly Ford, June 9. Benton’s Mill, June 17. Middleburg, June 21. Upperville, June 21. Fairfield (Gettysburg), Pa., July 3. Williamsport, Md., July 6. Funkstown, Md., July 7. Boonesboro, Md., July 8 and 9. Funkstown, Md., July 7. Brandy Station, September 13. Culpeper, October 11. Brandy Station, October 11. Robertson’s Tavern, Nov. 27. Mine Run, November 28 and 29. 1864. Wilderness, May 5 and 6. Todd’s Tavern, May 7. Spottsylvania C. H., May 9. Yellow Tavern, May 11. Meadow Bridge, May 12. Salem Church, May 28. Old Church, May 30. Trevillian Station, June u-12. Dabney’s Mill, June 29. Deep Bottom, August 1. Berryville, August 16. Winchester, September 19. Fisher’s Hill, September 20. Cedar Creek, October 19. 1865. Five Forks, March 30. Dinwiddie C. H., March 31. Five Forks, April 1. Sailor’s Creek, April 6. Appomatox Station, April 8. Clover Hill, April 9. In October, 1865, the regiment left its camp near Frederick, Md., and proceeded via New York and New Orleans, to Austin, Texas, where camp was established November 29. The headquarters remained at Austin until August 24, 1868, when station was changed to Fort Richardson, Texas. The troops were distributed about the Department of Texas, at Forts Rich- ardson, Belknap and Griffin, and Camps Austin, Sherman, Buffalo Springs and Sulphur Springs. During the period from 1865 to 1871, while the regiment was stationed in Texas, the duties falling to the officers and men were of the most danger- ous and varied kinds. After the close of the Rebellion the country was overrun with desperadoes and outlaws who were even worse than the hostile Comanches, and the officers and men were continually called upon to guard the courts of justice, to assist revenue officers, aid in executing convicted criminals, supervise elections, pursue outlaws and murderers, and in general to institute lawful proceedings where anarchy reigned. Many soldiers were assassinated for their devotion to law and order, and nothing but incessant vigilance and unflinching courage, prevented the guerrilla community from running the border counties of the State. The records for this period are very unsatisfactory, and important actions, in the light of to-day, are entirely omitted and remain only as traditions from the generation of war service men, who have almost entirely passed away from the regiment. 242 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Parts of the regiment were engaged with Indians at Buffalo Springs, July 21, 1867; Fort Belknap, Texas, August 30, 1867 ; in the field, October x7, 1867; and at Paint Creek, Texas, March 5, 1868. The desperadoes spoken of above, organized into bands of outlaws in many parts of Texas about this time, one of the most notorious being Lee’s band. On March 7, 1868, Corporal Henhold, Troop D, left Sherman, Texas, with 13 enlisted men and some citizen guides, to break up this band. The pursuit carried the detachment to Read Creek swamp, where the band was effectually broken up by killing two and capturing five of their number. One troop marched more than a thousand miles in pursuit of outlaws dur- ing the last three months of 1868. While scouting from Fort Richardson, Texas, in July, 1870, Captain McLel- lan with two officers, an A. A. surgeon, and detachments from Troops A, C, D, H, K and L, 6th Cavalry, came in contact with a war party of 250 warriors, and fought them on July 12 for about five hours. Captain McLellan’s force numbered only 53 enlisted men, of whom two were killed and nine wounded. Eight horses were killed and 21 wounded. The Indians almost surrounded the command, fighting bravely at close range. Their loss was reported as 15 killed and many more wounded. Other Indian engagements took place May 30, 1870; near Little Wichita River, October 5, and October 6, 1870; and on November 12, 1870. During the early part of 1871 the regiment was ordered from Texas to the Department of the Missouri. The headquarters and troops which had assembled at Fort Richardson, Texas, left the post March 20, 1871, for Fort Sill, I. T., and soon after arrival began active scouting, which continued without intermission until the campaign of 1874-75 so completely paralyzed the hostile Indians, that they were compelled to abandon their belligerent attitude and flee from their familiar hiding places xn the Pan Handle, to seek the protection of the agencies. A few of the troops were assigned to garrison in the Department, but most of the regiment eventually went into camp near Fort Hayes, Kansas, from which place the country in the vicinity of the Saline, Solomon and Republican rivers was kept thoroughly pat- trolled with scouting parties. As it soon became evident that desultory scouting, and chasing war parties which had a good start, were equally unprofitable, expeditions were organized in Texas, New Mexico and Kansas, to pursue the Indians even to the canons of the Tule and the bare, waterless plains of the Pan Handle. Two troops which had been sent to Mississippi and Louisiana for recon- struction duty in January, 1872, returned in 1873, much to their gratifica- tion, and participated in the Indian scouting and subsequent campaign. The regiment took part in the operations against the Cheyennes, Kiowas and Comanches in 1874, under Colonel N. A. Miles. This expedition was organized at Fort Dodge, Kansas, in August, two battalions of four troops each, under Majors Compton and Biddle, representing the Sixth. As the command advanced the Indians retreated to the south, concen- trating near Red River, Texas. They were rapidly pursued and were over- taken near the mouth of the Tule, where an engagement took place August 3°, 1874, with about 600 warriors. The hostiles occupied a line of bluffs, THE SIXTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 243 and, notwithstanding the Indians displayed their usual dash and courage in the first attack, the command was rapidly deployed, the Indians charged and were driven over the bluffs, thence through deep and precipitous canons, past their burning villages and out on to the Staked Plains. The regiment was commended in orders for its dash and intrepidity in this engagement. Two parties were sent from the battle-field to Camp Supply, I. T., with dispatches, one of which was under the charge of Sergeant Z. T. Woodall, of Troop I, 6th Cavalry. This one was attacked by Indians and the follow- ing extract from a letter, written by General Miles, tells the story of its re- markable fight. “ From early morning till dark, outnumbered twenty-five to one, under an almost constant fire and at such short range that they sometimes used their pistols, retaining the last charge to prevent capture and torture, this little party of five defended their lives and the person of their dying comrade, without food and their only drink the rain water that collected in a pool mingled with their own blood. There is no doubt that they killed more than double their number, besides those that were wounded. The Indians abandoned the attack at dark on the 12th. The simple recital of their deeds and the mention of the odds against which they fought, how the wounded defended the dying, and the dying aided the wounded by exposure to fresh wounds after the power of action was gone, these alone present a scene of cool courage, heroism and self-sacrifice, which duty as well as inclination prompt us to recognize, but which we cannot fitly honor.” Lieutenant Frank West with 20 men was sent with Captain Lyman, 5th Infantry, and his company, from camp with a wagon train to meet the out- coming train and bring supplies to the front. The train was found Septem- ber 7, when the detachment was increased by seven men coming out to join the regiment. The stores were transferred in a violent storm, and the return march begun, when the Indians appeared and killed and scalped a teamster who had wandered off a short distance. The train was followed, and on the 9th the attack of the Indians, about 250 in number, commenced. The train was corralled a mile or more north of the Washita River for the ensuing fight, which lasted four days. The train had just emerged from a ravine when the Indians charged the rear fiercely, riding to within about 100 yards and shooting down Lieutenant Lewis and Sergeant Armour, 5th Infantry. A scout was sent through to Camp Supply, being chased on the way, and returned with Troop K, 6th Cavalry, with medical assistance for the wounded, who had endured great suffering during the four days fight- ing and exposure without food or water. On November 8, 1874, Troop D (Lieut. Overton), with Company D, 5th Infantry, all under Lieutenant Baldwin, fought a band of Indians from 9 A. M., until 2 p. M., near the headwaters of McLellan’s fork of Red River. Major Compton with Troop H went to the assistance of these troops but the fighting had ceased before he arrived. Two captive white girls, Julia and Adelaide Germain, were rescued during this engagement. Their parents and an older brother and sister were killed near the Smoky Hill River, and these two girls with two other sisters were carried into captivity. Horse thieves took advantage of the unsettled condition of affairs to ply their nefarious trade, and Lieutenant Hanna with ten men of Troop B was 244 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. sent from Fort Dodge on November 4th in pursuit of a band. It was over- taken on the 9th and in the fight which lasted two hours, Private Skelton was wounded, Lieutenant Hanna’s horse killed, two thieves wounded and twelve horses and mules recovered. On December 1st, Captain Chaffee made a night march to surprise a party of Indians reported to be on a branch of the North fork of Red River, but the Indians received warning and decamped in great haste. First Ser- geant Ryan, Troop I, with a detachment, pursued and overtook them at daylight, December 2, attacked and routed them, capturing their ponies, about 70 in number, which were mostly saddled and packed. The campaign was continued far into the winter, the last movement on the Staked Plains being executed in intensely cold w’eather, the thermometer registering at times 25 degrees below zero, and “Northers” prevailing al- most incessantly. The Indians were fought in nine engagements, and were so harassed during this campaign that they were unable to commit their usual depredations. After continuous pursuit they went into the agencies and surrendered in a greatly impoverished condition, and have never re- gained their old war spirit. Peace prevailed until spring, but on April 6, 1875, Troop M was engaged near the Cheyenne Agency from 3 p. M. until dark with about x 50 Cheyennes. Nine Indians were killed, four soldiers wounded, and nine troop horses killed or wounded. A party of Cheyennes broke north, and having been seen crossing the railroad, Lieutenant Austin Henely with 40 men of Troop H, went by rail to Fort Wallace, Kansas, and left there April 19, 1875, to strike the trail southeast of the post. He pursued rapidly until April 23, when he overtook the band at Sappa Creek, Kansas. The Indians made a stand and they were fought at close quarters to the bitter end. Twenty-seven Indians were killed; 134 ponies, with all their camp property and arms were captured. Sergeant Papier and Private Theims, of Troop H, were killed. After a brief space of active scouting again, the regiment proceeded to relieve the Fifth Cavalry in Arizona, the order having been issued the pre- ceding year and suspended on account of the Indian troubles. The first half of the regiment, with the headquarters and band, assembled during the early part of May, and marched under the command of Captain McLellan from Fort Lyon, Colorado. The 5th Cavalry moved from Arizona at the same time, and the two commands met at Santa Fe, N. M., where horses were exchanged and old acquaintance renewed. As soon as these troops had reached their respective Departments, the remaining troops of the out- going regiments were relieved, and a similar meeting and exchange of horses was made at Fort Union, N. M. Upon arrival in the Department of Arizona, the troops were widely scat- tered. Headquarters and Troop B went to Camp Lowell; A and D to Camp Apache ; C, G and M, to Camp Grant; E and I to Camp Verde ; H to Camp Bowie; L to Camp San Carlos; K to Camp McDowell, and F to Fort Whipple. The troops marched an average of 1064 miles from their old stations to the new. Comparative quiet reigned in Arizona during the summer while the regi- THE SIXTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 245 ment was marching in, but it was not long before marauding bands of Apaches commenced their usual deviltry, which continued at intervals dur- ing all the years the regiment was stationed there. On January 9, 1876, Troops A and D, while in garrison at Camp Apache, were engaged with the White Mountain Apaches for three hours. For some fancied wrong the Indians got into the rocks and timber and opened fire on the post. One Indian was killed, five captured, and the others driven away. During the summer of 1876, while the great Sioux war was progressing in the north, the entire regiment was called to the field to put down the Chiricahua Apaches, and later to assist in removing them to San Carlos Agency. Before the arrival of the regiment at the scene of operations sev- eral parties were sent out to stop the numerous raids. Lieutenant Henely went from Camp Bowie with a detachment and had an engagement April 10, 1876, and subsequently assisted about 200 friendly Chiricahuas to the agency adjoining the post in Apache Pass. The regiment arrived and during June was sent around the Indian reservation to drive in the Indians, but many of the worst had fled to the rocky fastnesses of the Mexican mountain peaks, and remained a thorn in the side of the army and the settlers for more than ten years. Such Indians as were willing were moved to San Carlos Agency, the troops sent back to their stations, and soon the dangerous country was filled with daring prospectors seeking the fine mines located thereon. Many of these hardy miners have paid with their lives for the privilege of prospecting that section. Encounters with the Indians occurred August 15, and October 4, 1876, and January 9, 1877, and they became so daring in Southern Arizona that another company of scouts was organized under Lieutenant John A. Rucker than whom no officer in the army was better fitted for the work before him. In command of a detachment of Troops H and L, and his scouts, he over- took and defeated a band of Chiricahua Indians in the Leitendorf Moun- tains, N. M., on January 9, 1877. Ten Indians were killed and one boy cap- tured, and from the evidences left behind a number of Indians are believed to have been injured. The entire herd, arms and ammunition were cap- tured, together with a large amount of stolen goods and about $1200 in Mexican silver. The hostile strength was estimated at fifty warriors. May 29, 1877, Lieutenant West with a detachment was attacked near Camp Bowie, Arizona. About the 20th of August, several parties of renegades crossed the Mexi- can border at various places and, coming together by preconcerted arrange- ment, proceeded to the San Carlos reservation. Lieutenant Hanna started on a trail near Camp Huachuca, and when near Camp Bowie learned that another party had killed the mail rider east of Bowie. Rucker joined Hanna, and the two companies of scouts and cavalry detachments followed the trail which constantly grew larger. The renegades led them through a very rough country where some of the men became nearly insane for want of water. The trail turned into the San Carlos reservation and the commands stopped at Camp Thomas to telegraph for orders before going on the reser- vation. Before an answer came the renegades had succeeded in creating 246 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. an outbreak. The Warm Spring Indians broke away from San Carlos, and were pursued by Captain Tupper with Troop G and detachments from B, H, L and M,—Lieutenants Hanna and Rucker with their companies of scouts joined him. The runaways were overtaken, and in a scattered and running fight on September 9 and 10, 12 Indians were killed and 13 wounded. Other encounters took place December 13 and 18, 1877, and January 7 and April 5, 1878. The department commander finally decided to put a stop to the inces- sant raiding of small parties from Mexico, and Lieutenants Rucker and Car- ter with their companies of scouts were ordered to establish a supply camp near the border and to remain there patrolling. Lieutenant Henely joined the camp with a company of scouts, and a few days later the regiment was horrified by the news of his death by drowning, and that of Rucker while trying to save his friend and classmate, at their camp, by a sudden rush of waters resulting from a cloud burst. Henely was being carried away by the torrent, when Rucker boldly plunged his horse in the stream to save him, but the raging waters carried him down also. The loss of these officers, especially of Rucker, who was better known to the border people than any other officer of the regiment, was universally lamented. Indian fights in which the regiment was represented took place Septem- ber 17 and from September 20 to 30, 1878 ; September 29 and October 27, 1879; and April 7, 1880. Captain C. B. McLellan with Troop L, Lieutenant Touey’s detachment, Troop C, and Gatewood’s scouts, while on a scout in New Mexico came upon a battalion of the 9th Cavalry engaged with Victoria’s Apaches at a serious disadvantage, and succeeded in dislodging the Indians and relieving the 9th. This fight occurred April 9, 1880, in the San Andreas Mountains. During the few weeks succeeding this event, Victoria raided incessantly, and on May 7, 1880, attempted to get in to San Carlos with 50 warriors, but was met by Capt. Adam Kramer with part of his troop (E) and Lieutenant Blockson with part of his scouts, on Ash Creek, where a fight ensued, result- ing in driving Victoria away, but with the loss of an old and valuable non- commissioned officer,—Sergeant Griffin of Troop E,—killed, and one scout wounded. Several commands went after Victoria but he escaped and laid waste New Mexico to such an extent that nearly all the regiment was en- gaged during the summer in constant scouting, ending in an expedition to Sonora and Chihuahua, under General Carr, which was participated in by most of the regiment and several companies of scouts. Victoria was driven into the hands of a Mexican column in October and his band almost de- stroyed. During September this band of Indians captured the overland stage near Fort Cummings, N. M., and killed the occupants, including the young son of Captain Madden, who was coming out from an eastern college to spend his vacation with the regiment. During August, 1881, the White Mountain Apaches, hitherto very friendly, began to show signs of disaffection, brought about by the mach- inations of a medicine man named Nackaydetklinne, and General Carr was ordered to arrest him. He marched from Fort Apache with Troops D and E. and Company A, Indian Scouts, to Cibicu Creek, and arrested the fanatic THE SIXTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 247 in the midst of his people, who were informed that having refused obedi- ence to the agent, it was necessary to take their medicine man to the fort, and that his family would be permitted to accompany him but that any attempt at rescue would be resisted. The battalion marched about a mile down the creek, and while preparing to bivouac there was some excitement amongst the scouts and other Indians who had followed the rear guard to camp, and though every effort was made to prevent a conflict, the Indians, including the mutinous scouts, fired on the troops and a hand-to-hand con- flict ensued. The Indians were driven from the immediate vicinity, not- withstanding their numerical strength was about twice that of the soldiers, but continued for several hours to fire from the surrounding hills. The battalion lost Captain Hentig and six men killed, two wounded, and 42 horses ; the medicine man was killed. The next day the command returned to Fort Apache in time to save that post, which was attacked September 1st. At the same time all the roads were scoured by war parties, and the mail rider, three soldiers and a number of citizens were killed. This out- break involved the whole regiment in a short campaign which compelled the White Mountain Apaches to surrender at the agencies. The withdrawal of troops from the Mexican border to participate in driving in these Indians, left the way open and the Chiricahuas broke from the reservation and fled south. They were rapidly pursued by two troops and overtaken near Cedar Springs, Arizona, and fought for more than five hours, with a loss of one sergeant killed and three privates wounded. The Indians fled from the strong position held by them during the night, and eventually reached Mexico. The ensuing year was one of much hard scouting with but little reward, until April, 1882. The Chiricahaus then made one of their periodical breaks from the reservation, and started for their old haunts in Mexico. Two troops started from Fort Thomas in pursuit, and on the second day, April 20, Lieutenant Sands with a few men overtook the Indians and ex- changed a few shots. Captain Tupper, with Troops G and M, and Indian scouts, caught up with the band near the Mexican line, and fought, April 28, about 150 Indians who had taken refuge in the rocks, killing 17 In- dians and 15 horses and mules, and capturing 75 horses and mules, with a loss of one trooper killed and two wounded. The troops had to withdraw at night to obtain water, and the Indians fled southward. The command crossed into Mexico, and the flight of the Indians having been discovered by a regiment of Mexican infantry on the march, an ambuscade was quickly prepared and when the Indians found themselves entrapped, a hand-to-hand conflict ensued resulting in the annihilation of the savages. During July, 1882, another outbreak occurred from the San Carlos Agency, the band going north murdering settlers instead of following the usual route to Mexico. Active pursuit resulted in overtaking the Indians, some troops of the 3d Cavalry, and E, I and K, 6th Cavalry, coming to- gether from different posts on the hot trail just as the Indians were sighted. The fight occurred at the Big Dry Wash of Chevelon’s Fork, A. T., and re- sulted in the capture of 60 horses and mules, 50 saddles, and much camp property. Sixteen Indians were killed and many wounded. 248 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. During the remainder of 1882 and 1883, the regiment was scouting al- most incessantly because of the raids from Mexico by small parties of Chiri- cahuas. During March, 1883, General Crook took Troop I under Captain Chaffee, on his famous expedition to the Sierra Madres in Mexico, return- ing in July, having marched 900 miles, and bringing in the head chiefs and about 400 hostiles. The regiment was relieved from duty in Arizona during June, 1884, and exchanged stations, marching, with the Fourth Cavalry in New Mexico, two troops going to Colorado. During the nine years’ service in Arizona the hardest work was the in- cessant detachment duty, which was necessary to such an extent that troops rarely if ever took the field over 35 strong. The average marching of troop, as shown by the returns for nine years, was 6419 miles. The greatest num- ber of miles marched was 8514 by Troop A. These marches are of organ- izations and of course do not include the long trips with mails, paymasters, Indian scout companies, etc. Scouting for Apaches has always been at- tended with more labors and difficulties than honors or successes. The command of the companies of Indian scouts usually devolved upon the young lieutenants of the regiment, and while developing self-reliance, coolness and woodcraft, the incessant exposure resulted disastrously to many of them. Two of these young officers deserve special mention—Lieutenant John A. Rucker, whose station was always “ In the field,” and who during his service with scouts followed nearly every hostile trail between the Gila River and the Sierra Madres in Mexico within a few hours after it was made, and who finally laid down his young life in a seething mountain torrent in which no being could live for a moment, in an unsuccessful effort to save the life of his friend and classmate, Henely. The other,—Lieutenant Charles B. Gatewood,—who entered upon ser- vice with the Apaches within a few months after joining the regiment. He saw much service during the Victoria and other Apache outbreaks, taking part in several engagements in New Mexico. He was commended later by the Major-General commanding the Army, for his conduct in the surprise and defeat of Chato and Bonito, and the rescue of five captives near the headwaters of the Bavispe River, in the Sierra Madres, Sonora, Mexico. An act which has made him known throughout the army and the country gen- erally, and which Ned Casey probably had in mind when he was so foully murdered by the Sioux, is thus mentioned in the recent general order of the War Department commending him “ For bravery in boldly and alone riding into Geronimo s camp of hostile Apache Indians in Arizona, and de- manding their surrender.” Upon arrival in New Mexico, the headquarters were located at Fort Bayard, some troops going to Forts Wingate, Stanton, Cummings, N. M., and Lewis, Colorado. Captain H. P. Perrine, with Troops B and F which went to Colorado, took the field from Fort Lewis in pursuit of hostile Utes, and engaged them, July 15, 1885, at Wormington Canon. One packer and one volunteer were killed. The regiment settled down to garrison life, building quarters, putting in THE SIXTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 249 water works, and improving the posts generally, which continued until the spring of 1885, when nearly all the troops were hurried to the field in May, to head off their old enemies, the Arizona Apaches, who broke away from Fort Apache and fled towards Mexico. Active but unsuccessful efforts were made to overhaul these renegades before they reached Mexico. Troop A followed the Indians about 500 miles into Mexico. The troops were placed in camp at the various water holes along the border, and patrols were kept out watching all the border country for hundreds of miles. This lonely and very disagreeable duty of watching for “ signs,” continued for more than a year, and the fact that very few Indians succeeded in getting back into the settled country, indicates great vigilance. The troops returned to their posts during June and July of 1886, but made frequent scouts subsequently after these same renegades. Aside from frequent scouts on the Navajo reservation and vicinity to keep peace between citizens and Indians, the troops were not called into the field for any large operations until danger threatened among the far away Sioux in 1890. The scattered condition of the army at that time necessi- tated the gathering of troops from almost every department, and included the Sixth Cavalry, which was transferred by rail from New Mexico to South Dakota, arriving at Rapid City, December 9, 1890. On January 1st the regiment was camped near the mouth of Wounded Knee Creek, and the pickets reported firing early in the afternoon, several miles away on White River. Troop K of the third battalion had not yet joined, and, suspecting that the Indians had attacked it, “ boots and sad- dles ” was sounded, and Major Tupper with his two remaining troops, F and I, proceeded at a gallop through the snow, guided only by the sound of the firing which came to the ears of the advanced guard. Arriving on the bluffs overlooking White River, Troop K, under Captain Kerr, was seen with train corralled and the attacking Indians in full view. Although the horses were blown with their run for four or five miles in the snow, the skirmish line was formed at a charge and the line pushed rapidly across the half frozen river between K Troop and the Indians, who, notwithstanding their taunt- ing cries of “ come on,” gave way all along their line, and retreated in the direction of the main village. Some of these Indians who had crawled up close to K Troop, were cut off, but by abandoning their ponies they managed to crawl away between the lines under a heavy fire, and succeeded in reaching the bluffs, where they were subsequently found wounded and were killed by the scouts. The result of this attack was particularly gratifying, because the Indians were seeking revenge for their losses at General Forsyth’s hands, and found Gen- eral Carr’s troops so fully prepared to give it to them that they returned to the hostile village and acknowledged defeat and a loss of nine warriors. The other troops directed to take part in this affair arrived under General Carr so promptly on the flank of the Indians that if they had made a stand for a few minutes their escape would have been a very difficult matter. This was the only fight participated in by the regiment during the cam- paign. Soon afterward the Indians formally surrendered and half the regi- ment remained with them at Pine Ridge Agency until February. While 250 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. en route to their new posts in the vicinity of the Indian reservations, the men and horses suffered greatly from exposure in very severe weather. The regiment is now, as it has been ever since the Rebellion, “ standing to horse ” near an Indian reservation ready to participate in quelling dis- turbances after the Indian Bureau fails. In following a cavalry regiment for thirty years by means of its retained records, the trail is often found dim and rough, sometimes completely oblit- erated. It would be impossible in so brief a sketch to name all the heroes and heroic deeds that these years have developed. The names of the offi- cers participating in actions even, cannot be given because so many records have been lost in battle and flood. To illustrate the difficulties surrounding this labor it is only necessary to quote from one morning report where the naive remark is duly entered, that “the company clerk was captured yes- terday with the muster roll in his saddle pocket.” Many incidents of great interest have been brought to light through the kindly offices of the Sixth Cavalry Association, an organization of veterans who followed the fortunes of the regiment during the war, and who still meet annually to keep alive the friendships and memories of those eventful days. This sketch is confined as nearly as possible to things historical, but the search for facts has developed a perfect mine of interesting incidents and regimental tales which have no place here. The pressure of other duties has made it impossible for the writer to do full justice to the subject, and it was only the fear that it would be entirely neglected by those more com- petent that caused the preparation of this imperfect narrative. Major-General JACOB BROWN Commanding the Army, 1821-1828. THE SEVENTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. By Major E. A. GARLINGTON, Inspector General, U. S. A. RECRUITS for a regiment of cavalry were concentrated at Fort Riley, Kansas, in August, 1866, The work of organization was in- augurated by Major John W. Davidson, 2d Cavalry, on the 10th September, and completed by Colonel Smith, on the 22d December. The new regiment was first designated in orders as the “ Eighth Cavalry,” but the figure eight subsequently gave place to the cabalistic number— seven. Andrew J. Smith, a veteran of the Mexican War, who had been a dis- tinguished cavalry leader in the Army of the West during the Civil War, was promoted colonel of the new regiment. The first lieutenant colonel was that picturesque cavalryman, George A. Custer, who had been one of Sheridan’s most trusted division commanders. The senior major was a soldier of the old school—Alfred Gibbs; the other majors were Wickliffe Cooper and Joel H. Elliott, both young officers of great promise, and with distinguished war records. Among the captains were, William Thompson, Frederick W. Benteen, Myles W. Keogh, Robert M. West, “ Mike ” Sheridan, Louis McLane Ham- ilton and Albert Barnitz. The roster of lieutenants also showed many well-known names, among them : “ Tom ” Custer, brother of the general; W. W. Cooke, H. J. Nowlan, A. E. Smith, “Tom” Weir, Owen Hale, “ Sam ” Robbins, Myles Moylan, Tames M. Bell and Henry Jackson. The regiment remained in Kansas four years and six months, and duri ng that period performed every kind of duty that could fall to the lot of a trooper, and went through an experience scarcely realizeable to a young soldier of the present day. Its scouts, marches and expeditions, extended from the Missouri River to the Rocky Mountains; from the Staked Plains of Texas to the Platte River. The summer’s sun found it plodding over the arid, dusty plains as escort to commissioners, surveyors and what not, or dashing along in eager pursuit on a fresh Indian trail, and dealing vigorous strokes upon this sav- age enemy; the winter’s snow served as a winding sheet to many of its gal- lant dead. The theatre of its operations was the scene of many well con- tested conflicts with its treacherous foe. Two seasons it fought the unseen but virulent enemy—Asiatic cholera. It subsisted for months on food unfit for human consumption, and as a consequence scurvy frequently prevailed among the men, weakening them to such a degree as to invite the more deadly disease—cholera. This varied and trying service developed officers of determination and 251 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. 252 endurance, of daring and skill; and at the same time eliminated the “ dead- wood ” which it discovered. The regiment, or fractions of it, demonstrated its esprit on over forty occasions in contest with the Sioux, Cheyennes, Kiowas, Comanches, Apaches, Arapahoes and Dog Soldiers. These began with a skirmish near Fort Lyon, Colorado, on the 13th April, 1867, and practically ended with the battle on the Washita in the Indian Territory on the 27th November, 1868,—although there were several smaller affairs along the Saline and Solomon during the summer of 1869. Exclusive of the battle of the Washita the losses sustained in action were: killed, 11 ; wounded, 13 ; mortally wounded, 4; captured, 1 ; lost, one ; six men were drowned in the performance of duty and fifty-one died of cholera. The fight on the Washita was perhaps the most vigorously contested, and the most decisive battle ever fought with Indians up to that period, or even since. Eight hundred troopers, and over double that number of In- dians were engaged in that encounter. In addition to Black Kettle’s village, which was captured and totally de- stroyed, there were within five miles of the scene of the battle over six hun- dred tepees standing along the Washita River during the fight. Custer, under the cover of night, succeeded in surrounding the village, and as the morning dawned, lighting up the snow-covered valley, a signal— a single shot—rang out clear and distinct in the cold crisp air; the band struck up a stirring regimental air—“ Garry Owen ”—and the fight was on. Into the village the gallant troopers, cheering lustily, charged from all sides, each vying with his comrade to be first at the death. The fight raged furiously until about three o’clock in the afternoon. How the regiment acquitted itself is shown in the following order; Headquarters Department of the Missouri. In the Field. Depot on the North Canadian, at the Junction of Beaver Creek, Indian Territory, November 29, 1868. General Field Orders No. 6 : The Major General Commanding announces to this Command the defeat, by the Seventh Regiment of Cavalry, of a large force of Cheyenne Indians, under the celebrated Chief. Black Kettle, reinforced by the Arapahoes under Little Raven, and the Kiowas under Satanta, on the morning of the 27th instant, on the Washita River, near the Antelope Hills, Indian Ter- ritory, resulting in a loss to the savages of one hundred and three warriors killed, including Black Kettle, the capture of fifty-three squaws and chil- dren, eight hundred and seventy-five ponies, eleven hundred and twenty- three buffalo robes and skins, five hundred and thirty-five pounds of powder, one thousand and fifty pounds of lead, four thousand arrows, seven hundred pounds of tobacco, besides rifles, pistols, saddles, bows, lariats and immense quantities of dried meat and other winter provisions, the complete destruction of their village, and almost total annihilation of this Indian band. The loss of the Seventh Cavalry was two officers killed, Major Joel H. Elliott and Captain Louis McL. Hamilton, and nineteen enlisted men; three officers wounded, Brevet Lieutenant Colonel T. W. Custer, Brevet THE SE VENTH REGIMENT OF CA VA LR Y. 253 Lieutenant Colonel Albert Barnitz (badly) and Second Lieutenant T. J. March (slightly) and eleven enlisted men. The energy and rapidity shown during one of the heaviest snow storms that has visited this section of country, with the temperature below freez- ing, and the gallantry and bravery displayed resulting in such signal suc- cess, reflect the highest credit upon both the officers and men of the Seventh Cavalry; and the Major General Commanding, while regretting the loss of such gallant officers as Major Elliott and Captain Hamilton, who fell while gallantly leading their men, desires to express his thanks to the officers and men engaged in the battle of the Washita, and his special congratulations are extended to their distinguished commander, Brevet Major General George A. Custer, for the efficient and gallant service ren- dered, which have characterized the opening of the campaign against hostile Indians south of the Arkansas. By command of Major General P. H. Sheridan, (Signed) J. Schuyler Crosby, Brevet Lieutenant Colonel, A. D. C. Acting Assistant Adjutant General. The Secretary of War also sent the following telegram which was trans- mitted to the Regimental Commander : Washington City, December 2, 1868. Lieutenant General Sherman, St. Louis, Mo. : I congratulate you, Sheridan and Custer, on the splendid success with which your campaign is begun. Ask Sheridan to send forward the names of officers and men deserving of special mention. (Signed) John M. Schofield, Secretary of War. General Custer reported that it was impracticable to comply with the request contained in the closing sentence “ for the gratifying reason that every officer and man belonging to the expedition has performed his full part in rendering the movement against the hostile tribes a complete suc- cess.” General Sheridan’s order, issued upon the receipt of Custer’s despatch written immediately after the battle, understates the loss ; two officers and twenty-five men were killed, and three officers and twelve men wounded. Two white boys were rescued from the savages. During the engagement a bloodthirsty squaw was seen to murder a bright lad of about ten years by disemboweling him with a knife. In Satanta’s abandoned village the bodies of a young white woman and a child were found cruelly mutilated. A subsequent visit to the battle-field, and investigation among the pris- oners and other Indians who were in the fight, disclosed a much greater Indian loss than was first reported. They acknowledged that one hundred and forty warriors were killed, and the number wounded must have swelled the aggregate loss to nearly four hundred. General Sheridan, who was at Camp Supply, with his characteristic dis- position to drive home a preliminary success, ordered Custer, now rein- 254 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. forced by the 19th Kansas Volunteer Cavalry, making a total force of about fourteen hundred men, to resume his operations against the hostiles, hoping by the aid of the biting frost of an unusually cold winter to force them to sue for peace and to return to their reservation. The limit of this sketch makes it impossible to follow the operations of Custer’s column ; they are full of interest, and of incidents which go to prove his own wonderful energy, daring, pluck and resourcefulness, as well as the esprit, courage, and staying qualities of his officers and men. There was no more fighting Indians; but fighting cold, hunger and obstacles with which nature barred the routes of travel, was even more wearing and destructive to the efficiency of the command. On the march from Supply to Fort Cobb the regiment lost one hundred and twenty-eight horses; the “ 19th Kansas ” one hundred and forty-eight. Through the capture of Satanta and Lone Wolf, head chiefs of the Kiowas, and a threat to hang them at sunset on a certain day, that tribe was forced to come in and camp on the reservation near Fort Cobb. By the extraordinary efforts of Custer with a detachment of two officers and fifty five men, and a march of three hundred and fifty miles, the Arapa- hoes were located and brought back to their reservation, where they have remained at peace with the whites. The Cheyennes now alone remained obdurate to the peaceful efforts of the Government. They were finally located in Northern Texas. By a well conceived and successfully executed stratagem Custer captured three of the principal chiefs of the tribe, and by the exercise of great patience and forbearance, Mrs. Morgan and Miss White, two white captives held by them, were delivered to Custer ; and an agree- ment entered into on the part of the Indians to return to their reservation, and on the part of Custer to restore to their people the three chiefs and the women and children caDtured at the Washita. The Indians complied with their part of the contract; and the Government, as far as it was able, fulfilled its stipulation. With the return of the Cheyennes to their reservation the work of the expedition south of the Arkansas was done. The regiment was withdrawn and the “ 19th Kansas” mustered out of the service. The extreme severity of this winter’s campaign will be appreciated when it is remembered that Custer left Camp Supply on the 7th December 1868, with fourteen hundred cavalry, and now, on the 5th March, 1869, his mounted effective strength was reduced to six hundred and fifty men. General Sheridan in a letter to Custer said : “ I am very much rejoiced at the success of your expedition, and feel proud of our winter’s operations and of the officers and men who have borne its privations and hardships so manfully. * * * Give my kind regards to the officers and say how happy I should be to see them should any of them come this way on leave.” Colonel Smith resigned in the spring of 1869, and was succeeded by Brevet Major General S. D. Sturgis, promoted from Lieutenant Colonel 6th Cavalry. In March, 1871, the regiment was relieved from duty in the Department of the Missouri. THE SE VENTH REGIMENT OF CA VALRY. 25 5 Headquarters Department of the Missouri. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, March 8, 1871. General Orders No. 4. Orders transferring the 7th Cavalry from this Department having been received from Headquarters of the Army, the Commanding General deems it his duty to express to the officers and soldiers of the regiment his high appreciation of their soldierly qualities and of the conspicuous services per- formed by them in this department. The regiment carries with it a noble record of faithful services and gallant deeds. During the four years which it has been in this Department it has experienced all of the hardships, dangers and vicissitudes attendant upon military operations on our wild frontier. It has made many long and toilsome marches exposed to the severest storms of winter, and has gone for days in that inclement season without shelter and almost without food for man or animal. It has been engaged in many bloody combats with the Indians in which its valor has been thoroughly tried and proved. It has met all dangers and privations with firmness and intrepidity and has been distinguished through- out for steady discipline and efficient performance of duty. The present soldierly condition and high state of discipline of the regi- ment give assurance that in the new field to which it is ordered it will be distinguished for the same high qualities which have so justly earned for it its brilliant reputation in this command. With sincere regret the Commanding General sees this regiment leave this Department. It is needless to say that it will carry with it his hearty good wishes and his confident hope that its future will be as successful as its past history. It will be long remembered in the Department as a model of soldierly discipline and efficiency. By command of Brigadier General Pope : (Signed) W. G. Mitchell, Brevet Colonel, U. S. A. Acting Assistant Adjutant General. The scene now shifts to the Department of the South, where we find the regiment scattered through seven States, serving as a sort of adjunct to the Department of Justice, acting as posse comitatus for United States Marshals. This constabulary duty continued for two years, when orders were issued transferring the regiment to Texas. The restless and threat- ening attitude of the Sioux in the Department of Dakota made it neces- sary to send cavalry there, and upon the application of General Sheridan the “ Seventh’s ” destination was changed to the Northern Department. April, 1873, found all the regiment, except the colonel, his staff and two troops, at Yankton, Dakota. General Sturgis was assigned to station at St. Paul, Minnesota, and Major Reno, with one squadron, was detailed for eScort duty with the in- ternational commission locating the boundary line between the United States and the British possessions; this squadron remained on this duty until the autumn of 1874. 256 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. While detained at Yankton, waiting for wagon transportation, and for the ice to run out of the river, the regiment was introduced to a genuine Dakota blizzard, the worst it experienced during its fourteen years service in the Territory. On the ioth June the regiment reached Fort Rice, and Custer reported to General D. S. Stanley for duty with the expedition then fitted out for the Yellowstone. This expedition was “designed for the pro- tection of engineering surveyors of the Northern Pacific Railway,” and consisted of about fifteen hundred men and two guns. The column left Fort Rice on the 24th June. On the 4th August Custer, who had according to his usual custom gone ahead of the main column with one squadron (ninety men), was attacked at a point on the north bank of the Yellowstone River about four miles above the present site of Fort Keogh, Montana, by three hundred Indians. The Indians, well armed with breech-loading rifles, fought with great stubbornness for three hours and a half. The ammunition of the troops was about exhausted when by a well directed mounted charge the Indians were driven from the field. One trooper was wounded ; the loss among the Indians was heavy, for the troops fought dismounted and under cover, while the Indians charged gallantly within very short range. The same day the Regimental Sutler, the Veterinary Surgeon and one private were killed by a small party of Indians, while trying to join Custer from the main column. The trail of a large village was discovered on the 8th, and Custer was detached with his cavalry and a company of Scouts under Lieutenant D. H. Brush, 17th Infantry, to follow and strike the In- dians. The pursuit was begun as soon as night fell and prosecuted with great vigor. On the morning of the nth the Indians attacked Custer while in camp on the Yellowstone, about opposite the mouth of the Big Horn River. A spirited engagement ensued. Lieutenant Braden, who held a prominent point on the left flank with a small detachment while Custer made his dis- positions, was charged by one hundred warriers, the Indians riding to within thirty yards of his dismounted line. He was shot through the thigh bone, but with the most wonderful exhibition of cool nerve maintained his posi- tion, and repulsed the daring savages. On the bluffs south of the river, old men, squaws, and children were seen in large numbers, evidently waiting in fiendish anticipation the time for their brutal part in the drama; but their dusky braves could not face the vigorous charge of the “pony-soldiers.” They broke in complete rout, the cavalry pursuing them for eight miles, when they escaped by crossing the Yellowstone. The regiment lost in this engagement one officer, Lieutenant Charles Braden, and two enlisted men wounded; and one enlisted man killed. Several officers had horses shot under them. The Indian loss was estimated by Custer to be forty killed and wounded on the north side, while several were known to have been knocked over on the south bank. There were nine hundred Indians engaged in the attack; -this number was afterward verified by the Indians who were present. THE SEVENTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 257 General Custer in his official report of the fight says : “ I desire to bear testimony to the good conduct of every man connected with my command, including officers, men and scouts. Where all did so well no special men- tion can be made.” No Indians were seen during the remainder of the season. The expe- dition continued the march as far as the Mussel Shell River, whence it re- turned to Fort A. Lincoln. General Sheridan in his annual report for 1873 recommended the estab- lishment of a large military post near the base of the Black Hills in order “to secure a strong foothold in the heart of the Sioux country, and thereby exercise a controlling influence over these warlike people.” Pursuant to his directions an expedition was organized at Fort A. Lincoln in June, 1874, for the purpose of reconnoitring the route from that post to Bear Butte, in the Black Hills, and exploring the country south, southeast, and south- west of that point. Custer was detailed to command the expeditionary force, which consisted of ten troops of the 7th Cavalry, two companies of infantry and a detachment of scouts; and was directed to return to Fort A. Lincoln, within sixty days. Colonels G. A. Forsyth and Fred Grant of Sheridan’s staff accompanied the command ; also Captain William Ludlow, C. E., as Engineer Officer. Leaving Fort A. Lincoln in July we find the expedition at Custer Park —near the present site of Custer City, S. D.,—on the last day of the month. There was a well equipped scientific party with the expedition, and much valuable information gathered as to the geology, zoology, paleontology of the region explored ; but the presence of precious metals in large quantity appears to have been doubted. In September, 1874, six troops and Major Lewis Merrill were ordered to the Department of the Gulf. The troops were assigned to stations at dif- ferent points in Louisiana and Alabama, where they remained, performing constabulary duty until the spring of 1876. During the summer of 1875 the troops in the Department of Dakota were in the field removing “ prospectors” from the Black Hills. In the winter of 1875-76 Tom Custer captured at the Standing Rock Agency, Rain-in-the-Face, a noted Sioux chief, who was the principal actor in the murder of the sutler and the veterinary surgeon in August, 1873. He escaped from the guard house at Fort A. Lincoln and is reputed to have killed Tom Custer in the massacre on the Little Big Horn. In the spring of 1876 the troops of the regiment in the South were re- called, and the entire regiment, Custer commanding, concentrated at Fort A. Lincoln for duty with Terry’s column in the general movement about to be inaugurated against the Great Sioux Nation. The column left Fort A. Lincoln on the 17th May, and the first signs of Indians, the trail of a large body, were discovered on the Rosebud River about the 15th June by Reno, while on a scout. On the 22d June, Custer with the entire regiment, was detached to follow this trail. By rapid marches, day and night, half-past ten o’clock on the morning of the 25th June found the regiment about to begin the ascent of the divide between the Rosebud and the Little Big Horn rivers. 258 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Early the same morning the hostile camp had been located by the scouts in the valley of the Little Big Horn. It was Custer’s intention to remain concealed until night, and then make his dispositions to attack the Indian village at dawn on the 26th ; but shortly after halting he received information which assured him that his presence was known to the hostiles. To prevent their escape he determined to march at once to the attack. Custer divided his regiment into three squadrons; one, of five troops, he commanded himself, the other two, of three troops each, were commanded by Reno and Benteen respectively. Reno had the advance, and he was ordered “to move forward at as rapid a gait as he thought prudent, and charge the village afterwards, and the whole outfit would support him.” He directed Benteen to move off to the left and south until he could see the valley of the Little Big Horn—to attack anything he found, and to send him word. When about three-quarters of a mile from the Little Big Horn Custer swung off the trail to his right, evidently intending to support Reno’s attack by striking the Indians in flank. It was now about one o'clock in the afternoon. Reno moved forward and crossed the river without molestation, delaying twenty minutes to water. He continued his advance down the valley under a desultory fire for two miles, when he was brought to a stand by a large mounted force of Indians. Instead of charging as ordered, he dismounted his squadron to fight on foot. The left was held by the Ree scouts who fled at the first real attack; the line, thus uncovered, fell back to the timber. This position was fairly well protected. Up to this period one man had been wounded. The second position was probably held twenty minutes, when Reno ordered the squadron to “ mount and get to the hills.” As soon as the retreat commenced the Indians swarmed around the right flank and forced the column towards the river; the ford over which Reno came could not be reached, but a pony trail was found crossing about a mile and a half below and leading up a narrow ravine to the bluffs on the right bank of the river. The banks were precipitous, and the outlet narrow, but under the impulse of showering lead the ascent was made and the high bluff gained. In this retreat two officers, twenty-eight enlisted men and one scout were killed, seven enlisted men wounded, and one officer (Lieutenant DeRudio) and eighteen enlisted men and scouts missing.* As near as the time can be fixed, it was now about two o’clock. Benteen was unable to execute his orders by reason of the broken country, and was forced back to the trail of the main column. Soon after reaching the trail, a trumpeter from Custer’s squadron delivered to him the follow- ing despatch : “ Benteen, come on. Big village. Be quick. Bring packs. Sgd: Cooke. P. S.—Bring packs.” He took the gallop and reached Reno on the bluffs about half-past two o’clock. Very soon after Benteen’s arrival the Indians withdrew from the attack. A large number of mounted warriors were seen in the valley, and suddenly all of them moved down the stream. From the most authentic information received from Indians who * Fourteen of these men reached the bluffs about three hours after Reno ; DeRudio and three men came in during the night of the 26th. THE SEVENTH REGIMENT OF CA VALRY. 259 were present at the memorable struggle, it appears that Custer after leaving Reno’s trail followed down the general course of the river, but behind the bluffs, for about five miles, evidently looking for a favorable outlet in the hills through v/hich he could strike the village. By the time he reached his farthest point Reno had been driven to the bluffs, and his own presence was discovered. The Indians evidently thought Reno’s squadron after reaching the high ground had left a detachment of observation there and had gone down the river under cover of the bluffs, and formed a junction with Custer’s column, for all authorities seem to agree that no considerable force remained in front of Reno after about three o’clock. It was near this hour when Custer was discovered. Three thousand warriors, armed with the best magazine rifles, gathered in the ravines and coolies and burst upon Custer’s intrepid band. Of course it was but a question of time; encumbered with the led horses ; provided with an inferior arm ; the Indians not only twelve to one, but each of these twelve firing at close quarters five shots to every soldier’s one, the end was soon reached. At five o’clock Reno made an effort to join Custer but it was too late. The warriors were free to drive Reno back to his former position, and to besiege him with vigor until darkness shrouded the bloody scene. But it brought short rest for the command. New dispositions were made ; the wounded were made as comfortable as possible. Every available man with such instrument as he could find was put to digging holes, or rude sort of intrenchments. In the direction of the Indian village the horizon was aglow with reflected light. With the dawn of day came the whirr of bullets, and all day, the 26th, the Indians vainly sought to dislodge the troops; at seven o’clock that evening they gave up the attack and moved off toward the Big Horn mountains. On the morning of the 27th General Terry, with Gibbon’s column, arrived on the battle-field and discovered Custer’s fate. The scene of the fight was visited the next day, and it presented a most heartrending spectacle. The bodies of the dead were horribly mutilated, except that of General Custer. The dead were found by troops, with little piles of empty cartridge shells beside each man—mute testimony of the cohesion and discipline which existed in the brave band until the end. Near lay his two brothers, his nephew and his adjutant. Custer took into the fight eleven officers and one hundred and ninety- one enlisted men ; all were killed. The officers were: Lieutenant Colonel George A. Custer; Captain Myles W. Keogh, commanding Troop I ; Cap- tain George W. Yates, commanding Troop F ; Captain Thomas W. Custer, commanding Troop C ; First Lieutenant William W. Cooke, Regimental Adjutant; First Lieutenant Algernon E. Smith, commanding Troop E; First Lieutenant James E. Porter, with Troop I; Second Lieutenant Henry M. Harrington, with Troop C; Second Lieutenant James G. Sturgis, with Troop E ; Second Lieutenant William Van W. Reilly, with Troop F. The following accompanied the command and were killed with Custer; 260 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Second Lieutenant John G. Crittenden, 20th Infantry, attached to Troop L ; Acting Assistant Surgeon J. M. DeWolf; Mr. Boston Custer and Mr. Artie Read, civilians, brother and nephew of General Custer; Scout Charley Reynolds, and Curley—a negro. With Reno two officers of the Seventh Cavalry were killed—First Lieu- tenant Donald McIntosh, commanding Troop G ; Second Lieutenant Benja- min H. Hodgson, Squadron Adjutant—and forty-six enlisted men. Those attached to the command and killed were Acting Assistant Surgeon G. E. Lord, Scout Bloody Knife—a Ree Indian. Forty-four enlisted men were wounded. The wounded were sent by steamboat to Fort A. Lincoln, and from that point, on the 7th July, 1876, news of the terrible disaster flashed across the wires to the East. More troops were at once ordered to the Yellowstone. Upon their arrival offensive operations were resumed. But appalled by their own acts of savage brutality, and fearing summary punishment by the Government, the Indians resorted to the old and effective trick of disper- sion, and set the troops to fruitless marches and countermarches for the rest of the summer. The Seventh Cavalry was relieved from duty in the field in the latter part of September, and returned to Fort A. Lincoln. The en- listed strength of the regiment was increased to twelve hundred men. On the 20th October General Sturgis with eight troops crossed the Mis- souri River and proceeded to the Cheyenne Agency to disarm the Indians at that Agency and to capture their pony herds ; Reno with four troops, marched to the Standing Rock Agency to perform the same duty there. A large number of broken, obsolete and worthless guns, a few service- able arms, and about two thousand ponies were secured. Upon the completion of these movements the troops were assigned to stations for the winter. The regiment, except Troop C, was concentrated at Fort A. Lincoln on the 30th April, 1877, and the next day started again for the Yellowstone country, to report to General N. A. Miles, commanding the District. At this time Sitting Bull and his contingent were known to be north of the “line,” and thought to be contemplating an expedition into the United States, in connection with a hostile movement of the Indians belonging to the agencies on the upper and lower Missouri. The regiment was so placed as to scout the divide between the Yellow- stone and Mussel Shell, and furnished one troop (B) to an infantry com- mand performing a like duty south of the Yellowstone. A little later, another troop (E) was detached for duty under Lieutenant G. C. Doane, 2d Cavalry, with a large force of Crow Indians which he was endeavoring to utilize in scouting operations in the upper Yellowstone country. In August Miles was apprised of the escape of the Nez Perce Indians from Howard, and that the direction of their march indicated that they were making for his territory. He ordered Sturgis to proceed with six troops, three hundred and seventy-eight men and one Napoleon gun, towards Judith Basin to endeavor to place his command where he could intercept Chief Joseph and crush him ; at the same time directing him to hold hiscommand in condition and THE SEVENTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 261 in position to concentrate at the mouth of the Rosebud by the 15th Septem- ber for operations against Sitting Bull. Now came a month of hard and continuous marching,* and during the afternoon of the 13th September Sturgis overtook the Nez Perces just as they were entering the canon of Canon Creek, Montana. A brisk engagement followed in which the command lost three enlisted men killed, Captain Thomas H. French and ten enlisted men wounded. The Indians lost sixteen killed and a large number of ponies were captured. The Indians stubbornly held all direct approaches to the Canon, and it was necessary to flank it, which, owing to the extremely rough country, took time, and darkness set in before a “ clean up ” could be made. At dawn the following day the pursuit was resumed. During the day five Indians were killed and many ponies captured, but the Indians could not be brought to stand owing to the exhausted condition of the cavalry horses,—ninety- three were killed and abandoned on the march. The command had been on half rations for several days ; the supplies now gave out completely. A courier had been sent to General Miles on the morning of the 13th inform- ing him of the direction of Joseph’s march. When Sturgis became con- vinced that he could not overtake the Indians before they reached the Mis- souri River he decided to delay his march. It was reasonably certain that Chief Joseph would at least diminish the rate of his march as soon as the troops ceased pushing him, and thus Miles would have a better opportunity to place his command in position. By a happy combination of skill and luck he was able to seize the opportunity, and on the 30th September, at a point a little northeast of the Bear Paw Mountains in Montana, his Cheyenne scouts discovered the Indian village. The Indian camp had been most admirably selected for defense; it lay in the valley of Snake Creek and was traversed by deep coolies in such a manner as to afford concealment, and give protection from fire from what direction soever the position was approached. In the banks of these coolies and ravines a most skillful system of rifle-pits was constructed. South of the village, the direction from which the attack was made, ran a high perpendicular bank over which it was impossible to take cavalry, and which was lined with the Nez Perces warriors completely concealed from view. When the troops sighted the village it seemed accessible from all sides, except perhaps the east. Hale was ordered to charge the village with his squadron of the Seventh Cavalry (Troops A, D and K). The gallant troopers burying their spurs into their horses’flanks, rushed forward to the attack. The Indians held their fire until the squadron was within point blank range when they saluted it with a murderous volley; but on they charged to within twenty yards of the Indian line. In the charge Troop K (Hale) had wheeled to the right to attack a body of Indians which enfiladed the attack- ing line. Moylan, commanding A and D, when he discovered the perpen- dicular bank, saw that it was impossible to descend it, wheeled his troops about, withdrew, and formed on the right of the 5th Infantry, some two or * Lieutenant E. B. Fuller, with a detachment of five men, marched without a change of horses three hundred and fifty miles in five days. 262 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. three hundred yards in the rear. During this movement the fire was very heavy, but the Indians were so close that they shot too high. Up to this time the loss in Troops A and D was three killed and four wounded. While moving to the rear, Captain Godfrey, marching in rear of his troop, had his horse shot under him. Hale also charged up to an impassable ravine, withdrew about two hun- dred yards and dismounted his troop to fight on foot in a somewhat isolated position on the right. For some time almost the entire Indian force was concentrated on him, inflicting severe loss. Troops A and D dismounted and advanced to his assistance at double time under a galling cross-fire, sustaining a heavy loss. In this advance, Godfrey, who had remained mounted, was wounded and taken from the field. After Moylan placed his line in position and was in the act of reporting to Hale, he was shot through the thigh. Soon after Hale himself was killed while encouraging the inex- perienced young soldiers of his command. Biddle had been killed in the first charge. There was now but one officer, Lieutenant Eckerson, for duty with the three troops. All the First Sergeants were killed, also several sergeants and corporals. The squadron of the Seventh Cavalry now occupied the high ground east of the village. Lieutenant Romeyn, 5th Infantry, in command of Troops A and D, 7th Cavalry and Company G, 5th Infantry, was ordered to charge simultaneously with Lieutenant Carter, and Company I, 5th Infantry, from the southwest end and endeavor to cut the Indians off from their water supply. The rifle pits were reached, but the Indians drove the force back. Romeyn was shot through the lungs. This practically ended the, fighting for the day, and during the night the troops were posted around the Indian village and threw up such intrenchments as they could with the tools at hand. The 12-pounder arrived on the evening of the 1st October and by bury- ing the trail in the ground, and using very light charges of powder some shells were dropped in among the Indians, inflicting great loss. Miles had several parleys with Joseph, and finally, on the 4th October, he surrendered his people—four hundred and eighteen in all—of which eighty-seven were men. One hundred and four escaped to Canada. In this engagement Miles’ losses were: two officers and twenty-two en- listed men killed; four officers and thirty-eight enlisted men wounded, of which the Seventh Cavalry lost two officers and nineteen enlisted men killed, and two officers and twenty-seven enlisted men wounded, a total loss of fifty- one out of one hundred and eight men engaged—very nearly fifty per cent. Miles’ command numbered during the first two days, three hundred and twenty-three men and thirty Cheyennes, it was afterwards increased by forty men of Brotherton’s Company of the 5th Infantry. Sturgis reached the Missouri at Carroll on the 1st October, and the same day received orders from Miles to move forward rapidly and cautiously— that he had Joseph surrounded. On the 4th, when within two hours’ march of the battle-field, he received orders to halt—that the surrender was complete. The uncertainty of Sitting Bull’s intentions and movements kept the THE SEVENTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 263 forces in the field well into the winter, and the troops did not all arrive at their stations until January, 1878. After a few months of rest and recuperation a permanent camp was es- tablished at Bear Butte, in the Black Hills, all the regiment, under Sturgis, being present except Troop F, which remained at Fort Totten. In September the Cheyenne Indians left their reservation in'the Indian Territory crossed the States of Kansas and Nebraska, committing depreda- tions along their route of march. They evaded all pursuers and were appa- rently heading for the great agencies in Dakota. The possible introduction of an openly hostile element into any of these great camps was viewed with great apprehension by the military authorities, and stringent orders were issued to prevent it. The new agency for Red Cloud was at this time being established at White Clay Creek. Under telegraphic orders the camp at Bear Butte was broken up, and the command, under Tilford, moved with as much dispatch as possible to a point near this Agency to observe it, and in conjunction with other troops, to keep out the Cheyennes, capturing them if possible. When the Chey- ennes found that their scheme of joining the Sioux was frustrated, and that the gateways to the North was held by troops, they broke up into small parties so that they might sneak through the line. One band did escape around the western end of the Black Hills. Another was captured by a squadron of the 3d Cavalry under Captain J. B. Johnson. This band, when in the first camp after surrender, experienced a change of heart and posi- tively refused to accompany Johnson any further. They burrowed in the ground, and otherwise constructed a most skillful system of defense. Two troops of the Seventh Cavalry and a piece of artillery went to the assistance of Johnson. When the Indians saw the resources and preparations of the troops for immediate action, they concluded to come out of their holes and to go with their captors. In November the regiment was relieved from duty in the field, and after detaching two troops to establish a cantonment on the present site of Fort Meade, S. D., returned to its former station. The next summer regimental headquarters and six troops garrisoned the new post of Fort Meade, Dakota. Aside from maintaining camps of observation on the Little Missouri River during the summer, escort duty in the construction of the Northern Pacific and Great Northern railroads, scouts and expeditions for special purposes, the service in the Department of Dakota after 1878 was confined to garrison work. Among the scouts may be mentioned the capture by Lieutenant Bell of a band of Canadian half-breeds in the autumn of 1883. Troop F was present and participated in the capture of the remnants of Sitting Bull’s and Gaul’s camps at Poplar River Agency, during the winter of 1880-81. On the nth June, 1886, Colonel Samuel D. Sturgis, Brevet Major Gen- eral, U. S. A., retired from the service, having reached the age of sixty-four years. General James W. Forsyth, Lieutenant Colonel 1st Cavalry, suc- ceeded to the Colonelcy. Troop A participated in the affair which terminated with the killing of 264 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. “ Sword Bearer” at the Crow Agency, Montana, on the 5th November, 1887. Regimental headquarters and one squadron were transferred to the De- partment of the Missouri during the summer of 1887. Upon General Forsyth devolved the duty of establishing the School of Practical Application for Cavalry and Light Artillery located at Fort Riley, Kansas. The next year the remaining squadrons followed the first, one taking station at Fort Riley, the other at Fort Sill, Indian Territory. In 1888, 1889, and 1890 that portion of the regiment at Fort Riley attended Grand Army reunions or Militia encampments at Lawrence and Topeka, Kansas. The troops stationed at Fort Sill did their share of duty on the “ cattle trail ” leading through the Territory. In the autumn of 1889, the regiment, except Troop E, was united for the last time at the field manoeuvres of that year on Chilocco Creek, Indian Territory. In September, 1890, Troops L and M were skeletonized, and the officers and men merged into other or- ganizations. The year 1890 is memorable for the Sioux outbreak after a peace of more than ten years. The history of this disturbance of the friendly rela- tions which had existed for so long a period is full of interest, but only a passing reference can be made to it. Religious fervor, including the belief in the advent of a Messiah, the resurrection of the dead, the return of the buffalo and the departure of the white man from the Indian country, seized the savage mind ; and its manifestations in the ghost dance and other cere- monies gave rise to the belief on the part of agents and others that the entire Indian nation meditated war. Whether this belief was correct or not has never been definitely decided. In November the agent at Pine Ridge, South Dakota, not equal to the emergency which presented itself, deserted his post of duty, reported his Indians on the eve of war and called for military protection. Immediately orders were issued for the concentration of a large force at Pine Ridge, under Brigadier General John R. Brooke. The headquarters and eight troops of the regiment formed a part of this force. At the same time troops were placed at strategical points north of this agency in the Department of Dakota. One of these commands was located on the Chey- enne River in observation of Big Foot’s band, and of other Indians camped in that city. Nothing of a hostile character occurred at Pine Ridge Agency for sev- eral weeks after the arrival of the troops. The time was spent in negotia- ting with a camp of Brules and malcontents from Pine Ridge, which had been established upon the approach of troops in the Bad Lands north of White River. This was called the hostile camp. These negotiations, which looked to bringing these Indians into the agency, were progressing with a fair prospect of success until the news of the killing of Sitting Bull near Standing Rock was received, when they were to some extent interrupted. They were, however, resumed until broken off by an actual collision be- tween the Indians and troops. Big Foot was a bad Indian, a disturbing element. In his camp the followers of Sitting Bull, who escaped when he was killed, found an asylum. There were also other renegades from the Missouri River agencies. On the night of the 22d December he escaped THE SEVENTH REGIMENT OF CA VALRY. 265 with his village from the troops that were supposed to hold him. The Major General commanding the Division, then at Rapid City, South Da- kota, informed General Brooke of the escape, of the desperate character of .he Indians, and impressed upon him the necessity of capturing, disarming and holding them under close guard. On the 26th December, Forsyth, under orders from Brooke, sent Whit- side's squadron, and two Hotchkiss guns under Lieutenant H. L. Haw- thorne, 2d Artillery, to the Wounded Knee Post Office, the purpose being to capture Big Foot’s band if he should come that way. Brooke informed Whitside on the 27th that Big Foot must be in his front, and directed him to “ find him, to move on him at once and with rapidity, to capture him, and if he fought to destroy him.” Whitside did capture him on the 28th, without a fight, about six miles from Wounded Knee Post Office. The Indians were conducted to the camp which had been left standing on the Wounded Knee. They were assembled, counted, and rations issued to three hundred and fifty persons ; one hundred and twenty bucks, the rest women and children. Whitside reported his successful capture and requested reinforcements, that the disarmament, which was to be consummated on the morrow, be ac- complished without bloodshed. In response to his request Forsyth arrived during the night of the 28th with Regimental Headquarters and the second squadron ; two Hotchkiss guns under Captain A. Capron, 1st Artillery; and Lieutenant Taylor, 9th Cavalry, with his troop of scouts, to which was attached Lieutenant Pres- ton, 9th Cavalry. Forsyth’s instructions were to “disarm the Indians where they were camped, to, under no circumstances allow any of them to escape, and to destroy them if they resisted; ” and as soon as the disarmament was completed to leave Whitside in charge and return at once to the agency. Early the next morning Monday, the 29th of December, Forsyth made his dispositions to disarm the Indians, peaceably if possible, by force if necessary. The bucks were invited into council between their own village and the camp ; nearly all of them, one hundred and six, came wrapped in blankets. Big Foot remained in his tent. General Forsyth, kindly and pleasantly, yet firmly, demanded the sur- render of their arms. While the negotiations were progressing, a young buck fired into the soldiers. The others threw aside their blankets which concealed their weapons, and poured a murderous fire into the troops, which had been posted between them and their village, following it up as rapidly as their repeating rifles could belch forth the lead. The fight raged on the flat about one hour before it was cleared entirely of Indians. Here Captain George D. Wallace, commanding Troop K, and twenty-one enlisted men, including one hospital steward, were killed ; Lieutenant Ernest A. Garling- ton was shot through the right elbow ; Lieutenant John C. Gresham re- received an abrasion on the nose from a passing bullet; Captain Charles A. Varnum had his pipe knocked from his mouth by a bullet; Captain John Van R. Hoff, Assistant Surgeon, received several bullets through his clothing, and twenty-one enlisted men were wounded. Father Craft, a 266 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Catholic priest, who was present using his good offices to persuade the Indians to submit to the demands made of them by General Forsyth, re- ceived a vicious stab in the back which penetrated his lung. Scout Wells had his nose nearly cut off. Lieutenant John Kinzie, 2d Infantry, who was present as a spectator, was shot through the foot. Some of the Indians, many of them wounded, escaped to a ridge of hills lying just west of camp, and secreted themselves in stump holes and inacces- sible ravines. It was while attempting to dislodge a party which was doing considerable execution that Lieutenant H. L. Hawthorne, 2d Artillery, re- ceived a very severe wound. The fighting in the hills was done by Troops C, D, E and G, which were mounted at the beginning of the engagement. They lost four -men killed and four wounded ; Lieutenant Donaldson was struck by a bullet with sufficient force to penetrate his leather belt and his clothing. There were many acts of individual bravery and gallantry, but every man showed himself a soldier—with the nerve born of disciplined courage. Although a very small percentage of the enlisted men had ever been under fire before—sixty recruits having joined at Pine Ridge—and the at- tack was sudden, there was no undue excitement. Each man obeyed orders, stood his ground, and shot to hit, and proved himself worthy of the num- ber he wore upon his cap. One hundred and forty-six Indians were subse- quently buried on the field ; and there was undoubted evidence that many bodies had been removed ; thirty-three Indians, nearly all wounded, were captured. The “ hostiles ” reported seven Indians as having escaped to their camp—all wounded except one. The fight was over about three o’clock in the afternoon. In view of the possible effect of this fight upon the other Indians, and for the better care and protection of his wounded, Forsyth moved his com- mand to the agency, arriving there about eleven o’clock at night. At six o’clock on the morning of the 30th he was called to go to the assistance of Major Henry’s wagon train which had been attacked near the agency. One hour after his return to camp he was ordered to go the Drexel Mission, four miles from the agency which was reported attacked by the hostiles. It proved to be a false alarm. When about to return, Little Bat, a scout, reported that he had heard the “ firing of big guns ” down the White Clay. Knowing that troops were located in that direction on the other side of the supposed position of the hostile camp, Forsyth determined to make a reconnaissance in force down the stream, to either confirm or demonstrate the error of the report. To guard against emergencies he sent couriers to General Brooke and Colonel Henry, asking that the latter join him at once. The scouts, under Lieutenant Preston, 9th Cavalry, developed a small force which was pushed back by the advance guard. The number of Indians rapidly increased until the hills were full of them—at least three or four hundred opposed the advance of the troops. Forsyth’s instructions did not contemplate a general engagement which he knew would be precipitated if he pushed matters, and as soon as he became convinced that there was no heavy firing down the White Clay he decided to withdraw. THE SEVENTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 267 He was in the act of withdrawing his troops when Henry’s squadron of the 9th Cavalry arrived, having promptly responded to Forsyth’s request. These troops were placed in position, under Forsyth’s direction, and assisted in the completion of the movement. The loss in this engagement was one enlisted man killed ; Lieutenant James D. Mann, and six enlisted men wounded. Lieutenant Mann died of his wound, at Fort Riley, Kansas, on the 15th January, 1891. The loss among the Indians is unknown. On the 30th December, 1890, the Major General commanding the army telegraphed to the Major General commanding the forces at Pine Ridge, asking him to thank the “ Brave Seventh Cavalry for their splendid con- duct.” In the latter part of January the Indian problem at Pine Ridge was set- tled to the satisfaction of the Major General commanding. The prompt and drastic punishment awarded treachery at Wounded Knee contributed in no small measure towards bringing the hostile Indians to a realizing sense of their obligation to comply with the demands of the Government. The troops were relieved and sent to their stations. The train carrying the secdnd squadron of the Seventh Cavalry, and Capron’s battery of the 1st Artillery, collided with a passenger train, run- ning at full speed, when within a short distance of Fort Riley. The wreck was complete; the escapes from death and injury miraculous. A sergeant of artillery and a private of cavalry were killed, and Captain E. S. Godfrey, 7th Cavalry, sustained a painful and permanent injury. During the year 1891, Troop L was reorganized as an Indian troop by 1st Lieutenant H. L. Scott, and is now stationed at Fort Sill, Indian Territory. Lieutenant Scott is an expert in all that pertains to Indians, and through his familiarity with their character, and his ability to deal with them without the aid of an interpreter he has attained the most satisfactory results. Troop F was transferred to the Department of the East in the spring of 1892, and to the Department of Texas in 1894. Troops C, D and G, left Fort Riley on the 24th December, 1892, for Texas, to engage in the move- ment looking to the capture of the Mexican Revolutionist, Garza, and his followers in Texas. After a winter in the chapparral they took permanent station in that Department. Three monuments have been erected to mark the great events in the regi- ment’s history; one on the battle-field of the Washita, a homely pile of stone placed by Lieutenant H. L. Scott, 7th Cavalry; one on the Little Big Horn, built by the Government; and another at Fort Riley, Kansas, erected by the members of the Seventh Cavalry and of the Medical Department, stationed at Fort Riley. Colonel Forsyth was promoted Brigadier General 9th November, 1894, and was succeeded by Colonel E. V. Sumner. THE EIGHTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. LIEUT. CHARLES M. O’CONNOR, U. S. A. Adjutant Eighth Cavalry. THE Eighth Cavalry, organized in 1866, isoneof the four cavalry regi- ments by which the military peace establishment was increased under an Act of Congress of July 28th of that year. By G. O. No. 92, A. G. O., 1866, the field officers who had ac- cepted appointments were Colonel John I. Gregg, Lieut.-Colonel Thomas C. Devin, Majors William Gamble and William R. Price. Colonel Gregg joined for duty at Camp Whipple, Arizona, in December, 1866, assuming command of the regiment and the District of Prescott, Arizona,—Lieut.- Colonel Devin and Major Price in January 1867,—Major Gamble never joined. The first troop, A, was organized at the Presidio of San Francisco, September 19, 1866, 1st Lieut. James H. Lord, 2d Artillery, being assigned to command. Troop B, 85 men, at the same place October 23, 1866; 2d Lieut. S. A. Porter, 14th Infantry, assigned to command. Troops C, D, E, F, G and H, 49 and 50 men each, at Angel Island, California, October 27, 1866, with officers assigned to command as follows : C, 1st Lieut. R. I. Eskridge, 14th Infantry; D, 1st Lieut. O. I. Converse, 14th Infantry; E, 1st Lieut. I. FI. Gallagher, 14th Infantry; F, 1st Lieut. C. B. Western, 14th Infantry; G, 2d Lieut. C. Gillott, 2d Artillery; H, 2d Lieut. Louis R. Stille, 14th Infantry. Troop I, 84 men, was organized at the Presidio of San Francisco, November 12, 1866, 2d Lieut. J. E. Eastman, 2d Artillery, assigned to com- mand. “Troop K, 85 men at the Presidio, December 1, 1866, 2d Lieut.Green- leaf Cilley, 1st Cavalry, assigned to command. These troops were composed chiefly of men enlisted on the Pacific Coast, and included many of the class styled “Forty-niners”; men who had passed months or years in the mines and were typical specimens of the rov- ing order of citizens. Many of them were wild characters wrho enlisted in the same spirit of adventure which led them to the frontier, and who could not generally adapt themselves to the restraints of a military life. Many desertions occurred ; the percentage to the end of the year 1867, being 41.8. Troops L. and M. were organized February 1, 1867, at Angel Island, California; Captain E. V. Sumner and 1st Lieut. W. R. Parnell, 1st Cav- alry, being assigned to command respectively. The early part of the year 1867, found the troops at stations which they were to occupy for some time, viz.: EIGHTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 269 Headquarters, Camp Whipple, A. T., Colonel John I. Gregg, 8th Cav- alry, commanding regiment and District of Prescott, A. T. Troop A, Camp Winfield Scott, Nevada; Captain Murray Davis, 8th Cavalry, commanding. Troop B, Camp Cadiz, California ; ist Lieut. Charles Hobart, 8th Cav- alry, commanding, a detachment of 20 men being stationed at Rock Springs. Troop C, Fort Vancouver, Washington Territory; Captain William Kelly, 8th Cavalry, commanding. Troop D, Fort Walla Walla, Washington Territory; ist Lieut. O. J. Converse, 14th Infantry, commanding. Troop E, Fort Lapwai, Idaho ; ist Lieut. J. H. Gallagher, 14th Infantry, commanding, Troop F, Camp Logan, Oregon ; ist Lieut. C. B. Western, 14th Infantry, commanding. Troop G, Camp Reading, California; Captain R. H. Chapin, 8th Cav- alry, commanding. Troop H, Benicia Barracks, California; 2d Lieut. William K. Owen, 32d Infantry, commanding. Troop I, Benicia Barracks, California; 2d Lieut. J. E. Eastman, 2d Artillery, commanding. Troop K, Benicia Barracks, California; 2d Lieut. Greenleaf Cilley, ist Cavalry, commanding. Troop L, Benicia Barracks, California; Captain E. V. Sumner, ist Cav- alry, commanding. Troop M, Benicia Barracks, California; ist Lieut. W. R. Parnell, ist Cavalry, commanding. During the year 1867, Troop B, I, K and L, had been sent to posts in Arizona, and the troops of the regiment remained separated at posts in Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, California, and Arizona, until 1870, when ordered to New Mexico. The officers assigned to the regiment were all veterans of the War of the Rebellion, and came to duty with the experience which that involved. During December, 1867, and January, 1868, the headquarters was en route from Camp Whipple, Arizona, to Churchhill Barracks, Nevada, which be- came the headquarters of the District of Nevada, Colonel Gregg command- ing. In May, headquarters was moved to Camp Halleck, Nevada, where it remained till May 5, 1870, when it was moved to Fort Union, New Mexico, by rail, via Cheyenne and St. Louis, Mo. The several troops took stations at Forts Union, Craig, Selden, Wingate, Bascom, Stanton, in New Mexico, and Fort Garland, in Colorado Territory. The duties during this period were of almost continuous field service by troops or detachments, scouting after Indian depredators, furnishing guards, escorts, etc. Some of the details of service performed will be given under the headings of the different troops. The regiment remained in New Mexico, then far beyond railroad com- munications, performing the same duties till July, 1875, when it marched to Texas by battalion, headquarters taking station at Fort Clark, Texas, January 8, 1876. During the period between 1875 and 1888, the regiment 270 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. remained in Texas, troops at different times being stationed at posts and camps from Fort Brown, near the mouth of the Rio Grande, to Fort Han- cock, near El Paso. In May of the latter year the regiment was concen- trated at Fort Concho, Texas, and made a march to Dakota, arriving at Fort Meade, Regimental Headquarters, September 3d, having made a continuous march of 1800 miles, while some of the troops in reaching their stations marched over 2000 miles. To give a complete account of the scouts and marches of each troop, which would be necessary to a full his- tory of the regiment, would be a mere repetition of details, so that only the most important will be noted. Troop A.—Lieutenant Lafferty with 14 men, while scouting country in vicinity of Camp Winfield Scott, Nevada, engaged a band of Indians on January 17, 1867, at Eden Valley, Nevada, killing two and destroying their rancheria and a large quantity of provisions. One enlisted man was wounded. The same party on February nth encountered at Independence Valley another band of Indians, killing six. On the 29th of April, 1868, Lieut. Pendleton Hunter, with Sergeant Kelly and Privates Reed and Ward, while in pursuit of Indian horse thieves, were attacked in a canon on the east side of Paradise Valley, Nevada, by seventeen Indians. All their horses were killed; Lieutenant Hunter was shot through the thigh and wrist, and Sergeant Kelly and Private Ward was so severely wounded that they died soon after. Lieu- tenant Hunter, with a detachment of 14 men, on the 30th of October, 1870, captured 9 Indians and 4 ponies in the Guadaloupe Mountains, Arizona. Captain Wells and Lieutenant Sprole, with a detachment of 9 men, sur- prised an Indian camp, capturing 18 bucks, squaws, and pappooses; 14 ponies, 2 guns, a large quantity of bows, arrows and camp equipage, and destroying their wicky-ups. On November 30, 1877, Captain Wells and Lieutenant Phelps, with Companies A and K, under command of Captain Young, crossed the Rio Grande River and engaged a band of Mascalero Apaches in the Sierra Carmel Mountains, Mexico, under Chief Alsota. Two Indians were killed and three wounded, and their camp equipage was destroyed. Twenty-two horses, five mules and one burro were captured. Sergeant Wilson, Troop K, was wounded. The ten years from 1877 to 1887 were spent at stations along the Rio Grande River at Forts Clark, Duncan, McIntosh and Ringgold Barracks, with frequent scouts after cattle thieves and smugglers. In 1887 the troop marched to Fort Davis, Texas, and in the summer of 1888 to Fort Meade, Dakota. Troop B.—The troop, in conjunction with Troop I, 8th Cavalry, en- gaged a band of Apaches on the 16th and 17th of April, 1867, in the Black Mountains of Arizona; in which encounter George W. Drummond, saddler, was killed. Several Indians were killed and •wounded. Lieutenants Carrick, Somerby and Curtis, with Troop B and detach- ment of Troop L, engaged a band of Hualapais Indians on May 18, 1868, on the Rio Solinas, Arizona, killing six and destroying their provisions and rancheria. On the 22d of August, 1868, the troop, under command of EIGHTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 271 Lieutenant Somerby, while scouting in the vicinity of Santa Maria River, Arizona, encountered a band of Indians, killing two and capturing one. Lieutenant Somerby, with a detachment of 17 men, encountered a band of Hualapais Indians, September 9, 1868, killing 2 and capturing 4 squaws. On the following day he surprised a party of 10 Indians, killing 4 bucks and capturing 3 squaws. A large quantity of provis- ions and camp equipage was destroyed. On the nth, the same de- tachment, attacked a band of Hualapais Indians, killing 5 and destroying a quantity of provisions and camp equipage. On the 13th, with 10 men, Lieutenant Somerby surprised a band of Tonto Apaches near the mouth of the Dragoon Fork of the Verde River, killed 2 Indians, and captured a rifle and provisions. Private Charles Gardner was wounded. On the 9th of November, 1868, a detachment of Troop B with detach- ment of Troop L, under Lieutenant Wells, attacked a band of Apaches, killing 11 warriors and destroying a large quantity of stores. Captain Wade, while scouting with the troop in the “ Bill William ” Mountains, encountered a band of Indians, killed 2, wounded 1, and de- stroyed 20 lodges with a large quantity of stores. The troop, under command of Lieutenant Somerby, on the 25th of August, 1869, surprised a band of 40 Indians on Date Creek and succeeded in killing 9 and wounding 7. On the 5th of September they captured and killed 3 Indians. Troop C.—On the 5th of April, 1868, while scouting on the middle fork of the Malheur River, Oregon, Captain Kelly, with 48 men of the troop, charged an Indian camp of 4 lodges, killing 12 warriors, capturing 3 head of cattle, and 1 horse, and destroying 5000 pounds of dried beef. On the nth of June the troop, in conjunction with troop F, brought in 138 surrendered Indians. The troop, under command of Captain Kelly (Lieutenant McCleave and 57 men), while scouting in the vicinity of Camp McDowell, Arizona, on June 3, 1869, surprised and destroyed an Indian rancheria, and the following day, overtaking the Indians, killed several, captured some horses and mules, and destroyed a large number of bows and arrows. On the 6th of July, 1869, Lieutenant McCleave, with a detachment of 17 men at Hacquahalla, was attacked by a large body of Indians. After a severe engagement the Indi- ans were driven back with a loss of seven of their number killed and ten wounded. Private James Howell was mortally wounded. A short time previous to the attack 3 Indians were discovered on the trail leadingtothe above water and were killed. Captain Kelly with 21 men, in pursuit of some Indians who had stolen horses and mules from citizens at Silver City, overtook the marauders in the Chiricahua Mountains on February 12, 1871, a severe engagement en- sued, and the command succeeded in killing 14 Indians and capturing and destroying a large quantity of provisions. The stolen stock (except what was killed during the fight) was recovered. Captain Kelly and his men were specially commended by the depart- ment commander (General Pope) in General Orders, for “ the gallantry and perseverance displayed by them in the recent pursuit and encounter with 272 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. a band of Apaches who had stolen a number of horses and mules from citi- zens in the vicinity of Silver City, New Mexico.” Captain Chilson, with io men, left Fort Selden on June 9, 1873, and after four days and four nights riding, overtook and engaged a party of Indian marauders who had committed depredations at Sheddo Ranch, killing 3, and capturing 12 horses and 1 mule. Corporal Frank Bratling was killed in this engagement. The department commander in General Orders thanked Captain Chilson and his men for the soldierly manner in which they had acquitted themselves. The detachment returned on the 16th. having marched 350 miles in seven days and four hours. Special mention was made by Captain Chilson of 1st Sergeant I. L. Morris, Sergeant L. S. Lytle, Corporal Frank Bratling (killed), blacksmith John Sheerin, and Pri- vate Henry Wills. Their names were forwarded to the War Department with recommendations that medals of honor be conferred upon them. On October 1st, Captain Chilson with his troop struck a party of Indi- ans, killing 3, and capturing large quantities of supplies. In 1874, Troop C, with Troops K and L, formed part of an expedition under Major Price, 8th Cavalry. On the 12th of September while march- ing through the breaks of the Llano Estacado, Texas, the command was furiously attacked by a large body of Indians. The Indians opened the fight by charging in line from the top of a mesa upon which they had taken position, and firing heavy volleys into the command. They were met by a counter-charge from the troops and driven from hill to hill for six miles. The fight lasted three hours when, darkness coming on and the Indians scattering, the troops were withdrawn. Casualties among the Indians un- known. The U. S. troops suffered no loss. In passing over the ground during the following month, it was found that the number of Indians (Kiowas and Cheyennes) must have been great, as 329 sets of lodge poles, five or more in a bunch, 25 saddles, many pans, kettles, and skin lodges, sacks of salt, paints, and articles valuable to Indi- ans, were found and destroyed. Twenty-seven ponies were found dead on the ground, and at a distance from the scene of the fight a number of Indian graves were found. When the site of their camp, some 12 miles north, was reached, 294 additional bundles of lodge poles were found and destroyed, besides much other property that had been abandoned. This would indi- cate that there were about 460 warriors engaged in the fight. Lieutenant Farnsworth, commanding Troop H, with the wagon train, several days after the occurrence struck their trail far to the north of the Wichita, finding quantities of abandoned property and ponies. This was evidently the same party of warriors which had previously delayed a wagon train under Cap- tain Lyman for four days. Warned of the approach of Major Price’s com- mand they had selected a good position and made the attack with confi- dence, but were driven off with serious losses in men, animals and property. The condition of the command at this time, being entirely out of rations and forage, subsisting upon a limited supply of buffalo meat, and having been marching continuously since the 20th of August, accounts for there having been no further pursuit. The troop under command of Captain Hartwell, in conjunction with EIGHTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 273 Troops H, K and L, forming the command under Major Price, on Novem- ber 29, 1874, had a skirmish on Muster Creek, Texas. A number of In- dians were killed and wounded, and a considerable amount of Indian equipage was captured and destroyed. On the 14th of October the troop pursued a band of Indians in the Wichita Mountains, pressing them so close as to cause them to abandon all their camp equipage which was afterwards destroyed. From 1875 to 1879 the troop was stationed at posts and camps on the lower Rio Grande River in Texas, and from 1879 to 1885 at Forts Clarke and Duncan, and at camps on the Nueces and Pecos Rivers, Texas. In June, 1885, it left San Antonio, Texas, and took part in the campaign against Geronimo’s band of Chiricahua Apaches in New Mexico, returning to San Antonio in October, 1886. On December 9, 1885, the troop, under Lieutenant Fountain, attacked a body of these Indians at Lillies Ranch in the Mogollon Mountains, New Mexico, as they were burning the ranch ; killed 2 Indians, captured 16 horses and 1 mule, and destroyed all their provisions and blankets. Dark- ness permitted the Indians to escape. On the 19th the troop, under Lieutenant Fountain, was attacked by Chiricahua Apaches ambushed on a hill near Little Dry Creek. The fight lasted fifteen minutes, when the Indians were dislodged and scattered, making their escape in a rocky canon. Several Indians were killed and wounded. In this fight 1st Lieut. J. C. Maddox, Assistant Surgeon U. S. A., Wagoner Frank Hutton, Privates George Gibson and Harry Mc- Millan were instantly killed ; Blacksmith Daniel Collins was mortally wounded, dying two hours later, and Corporal Wallace McFarland was wounded. Three horses were killed and several wounded. In 1887 the troop marched from San Antonio to Fort Davis, Texas, and the following year to Fort Meade, South Dakota. Troop D.—Captain Bassford in command of troop while scouting near Keeny’s Ranch on Malheur River, Oregon, in February, 1868, surprised an Indian camp, capturing all their horses and destroying the camp. A detachment under Sergeant New attacked a party of Indians on Owyhee River, Oregon, March 26, 1868, killing one Indian. In an engagement near Red Creek, A. T., September 23, 1869, 18 In- dians were killed and a number wounded. Lieutenant Weeks, with a detachment of 18 men, captured 200 head of cattle near Hubbard Cross Roads on the staked plains, New Mexico, on July 9, 1870, and on the 10th of August, 1870, captured a pack train loaded with contraband goods, destroying the goods, and capturing two Indians. Captain Randlett with 40 men, scouting south of Canadian River, on the Texas border, on the 28th of May, 1871, captured a train en route to the Comanche Indians. Twenty-three animals loaded with whiskey, powder, lead, etc., with 10 men and 2 Indians, were captured. On the same day 506 head of cattle and 26 burros were captured. The prisoners and stock were turned over to the commanding officer of Fort Bascom, and the stores destroyed. Lieutenant Wilkinson with 6 men, en route to Tulerosa River, were HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. 274 attacked by armed Mexicans, 25 in number. One Mexican was killed and 3 wounded. On the 17th of November, 1875, Captain Randlett, Lieutenant Wilkinson and 44 men pursued a band of Mexican cattle thieves and struck them at Las Cuevas, Texas, 18 miles below Ringgold Barracks, just as they reached the Rio Grande River. Some of the cattle were captured on the Texas side and two of the thieves were killed, the remainder escaping to Mexico. Captain McNally, with a troop of State Rangers, arrived on the scene dur- ing the day and under cover of darkness crossed the river by means of a small boat and attacked the Mexicans at a ranch some 3 miles from the river, killing 4 of them. The Mexicans, however, gathered in such large numbers, that the Rangers retreated to the cover of the banks of the river, where they were protected by the U. S. troops firing over their heads. In this fire the leader of the Mexicans was killed. The Mexicans made a second attack during the day but were repulsed, when the State troops re- crossed the river. On the following day the command was reinforced by troops from Fort Brown and Ringgold Barracks under Major Alexander. A flag of truce was sent over by the Mexicans and an agreement entered into by which they were to surrender the cattle and thieves, if possible, at Ringgold Barracks. With this understanding the troops were withdrawn, and the cattle were afterwards received at Ringgold Barracks and returned to the owners. From 1875 to 1887 the troop was stationed at posts and camps near the Rio Grande River in Texas. In the latter year it took station at Fort Davis, Texas, and in 1888 marched to Fort Meade, S. D. Troop E.—In December, 1868, a detachment of 30 men of Troops Eand K, under command of Major Price, surprised a large rancheria consisting of 20 lodges near Walker Springs, A. T., killing 3 Indians, wounding several, capturing some squaws and children, and destroying their provisions and camp equipage. Three days later another rancheria was surprised by the same command. Eight Indians were killed and 14 captured. A large quantity of supplies was destroyed. In 1869 a detachment of Troops E and K under Captain Young, left Camp Whipple on January 19th. While scouting in Juniper Mountains, 5 rancherias, located in a deep and large canon, were destroyed. While encamped in this canon the camp was at 4 A. M. attacked by Indians. The horses had been fastened to a strong picket line and were soon in hand, but the burros of the pack train, being hobbled, were stampeded and secured by the Indians. Corporal Parker, Troop K was severely wounded. At daybreak the trails of the Indians, with the burros which had been taken off by twos and threes in different directions, were followed by detachments and many of them recovered. The detachment left in camp was surrounded and harassed by another party of Indians all day. This command returned to its post, Camp Whipple, on the 18th of February, having suffered greatly through the in- clemency of the weather, and from the difficult country through which it was necessary to travel. It rained or snowed every day except five during the month. Lieutenant Carrick, with detachment of 23 men of Troops E, F and K, EIGHTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 275 between the Aqua Frio and Rio Verde, near Toll Gate, A. T., encountered a band of Indians on the 25th of August, 1869, and engaged them, killing 6, wounding several, capturing 1, and destroying a large amount of property. On the 26th a rancheria was surprised and 2 Indians killed. This detach- ment was attacked by a party of about 100 Indians, seven miles from Toll Gate. Private Eberhard was killed. Two Indians were killed and the re- mainder, after a severe fight, were driven off and scattered. On September 2, 1874, Captain Kauffman with 11 men captured 2 horses and 13 mules from Apaches at Ojo Caliente, N. M. From 1875 to 1888, the troop was stationed on the lower Rio Grande in Texas, at Forts Clark and Duncan. It marched from the latter post in May, joined the regiment at Fort Concho, marched with it to Fort Meade, and thence to Fort Buford, N. D., a distance of over 2000 miles. Troop F.—A detachment of 13 men while scouting, March 19, 1867, on the Selvies River, Oregon, had an engagement with Indians, killing 6, and wounding the chief, and capturing 32 horses and a large amount of dried beef, etc. Lieutenant Jerome, with 21 men (in conjunction with Troops E and K), under Major Price, destroyed 15 wicky-ups, killing 3 warriors and captured a horse and rifle. The same detachment was attacked by a large body of Indians near Toll Gate. Private Kline was wounded. Two Indians were killed. Lieutenants Carrick and Jerome with 42 men under Major Price came upon and surprised a band of Indians on the Santa Maria River on June 26, 1869, killing 4, and destroying 200 wicky-ups and large quantities of supplies. During the month of May, 1871, Lieutenant Caraher with 52 men pur- sued, and captured near Kiowa Springs, N. M., 21 Indians, 1 Mexican, 700 head of cattle, 12 horses and 49 burros. Lieutenant Hennisee, in June, 1871, captured a large herd of cattle in the same vicinity. Detachments of the troop participated in several skirmishes with Indian marauders along the Rio Grande River, Texas, in 1876, destroying several Indian camps and a large amount of property. In 1877, Lieutenant Phelps with 10 men (in conjunction with Lieutenant Bullis, in command of Seminole Scouts) on the 26th of September, crossed the Rio Grande River, and attacked a band of Lipan and Apache Indians, capturing 5, together with 12 horses and 2 mules. In 1888, the troop marched with the regiment to Dakota. Troop G.—In 1867, a detachment under Sergeant Stickney, from August to December, had several skirmishes with Indians and captured and de- stroyed a large amount of property. On May 1, 1868, a detachment had an engagement near Hoag’s Bluffs, Oregon, in which Private Arnshedt was severely wounded. A number of the Indians were killed and wounded. Lieutenant Lafferty with a detachment of 25 men (in conjunction with Troop G, 1st Cavalry, Captain Bernard) encountered a large band of hos- tiles at Chiricahua Pass, A. T., October 20, 1869. Lieutenant Lafferty was very seriously wounded and Sergeant Stevensand Private Fuller were killed. 276 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Private Elwood was severely wounded. The number of Indians killed and wounded was supposed to be large. On the 27th of January, 1870, a detachment (in conjunction with a de- tachment of Troop G, 'i st Cavalry) engaged with Apaches in the Dragoon Mountains, A. T., killing 13 and capturing 1 Indian and 12 horses. The Indian supplies were all destroyed. In the Oscura Mountains, N. M., in 1875, the troop, Captain Fechet com- manding, surprised a large camp of Apaches, routing them, and capturing 300 buffalo robes, 51 horses, 70 saddles, 3 mules, and a large quantity of powder and lead and camp equipage. From 1875 to 1888, the troop was stationed at camps and posts in Texas, marching from Camp Pena Colorado, Texas, to Fort Yates, Dakota, in the latter year. Troop H.—Lieutenant Farnsworth with 28 men while scouting as a de- tachment from the command of Major Price in 1874, engaged about 100 well-mounted Cheyennes on McClellan’s Creek, Texas. The fight lasted from 1.30 P. M. till dark. The Indian loss was 4 killed and 10 wounded, as well as many ponies killed. The detachment lost Privates William Den- sham and Rufus Hibbard, killed. Corporal Thomas J. Thompson, Black- smith Henry Fields, Privates Hermann Fehrand George Robinson wounded. His ammunition being exhausted, Lieutenant Farnsworth retreated under cover of darkness. Major Price, who visited the scene of the fight soon afterwards, says in his report, “ There were evidences of an encampment of at least 150 Indians on both sides of the stream. I followed the entire course of Captain Farnsworth’s fight for eight miles, and considered it a stubbornly contested and desperate fight. I make no estimate of the number of Indians killed. The troops and Indians were at all times in close bullet range of each other and I know that there are cool, daring men in the troop, and good shots. The body of Private Hibbard was found and buried.” (The troop was engaged in a skirmish on Muster Creek as noted in the history of troop C.) From 1875 to 1879 the troop was in camps or at posts along the lower Rio Grande. In 1884, it took station at San Antonio, Texas. In 1885 and 1886 it served in New Mexico in campaign against the Apaches. In 1887 it marched to Fort Davis, thence in 1888 to Fort Keogh, Montana. Troop I.—On the 16th day of April, 1867, the troop under Captain Fechet and in conjunction with Troop B, had an engagement with hostile Apaches in the Black Mountains, A. T. No casualties were reported. On the 18th of the same month, in an engagement near the Rio Verde, 1 man was killed. The Indians lost a number killed and wounded. The troop under Captain Fechet, near Camp Grant, A. T., had an en- gagement with Indians on the 21st of April, 1868, killing 2; and on the 1st of May the same command attacked a band of Indians, killing 6 and wound- ing 4. The troop under command of Major Alexander, while scouting in the Tonto Creek Valley, came upon, and engaged a band of Apaches, killing 1 and capturing 1 Indian and all their stock. On September 6, 1868, the same command pursued a party of Indians EIGHTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 277 who had stolen Government property, overtook them, killed i, recovered the stolen property, and destroyed a large quantity of bows, arrows, etc. In 1869 the troop and detachments travelled in execution of escort, scouting duties, etc., an aggregate of 8000 miles, which indicates the arduous service performed in that desolate country. In 1873 a detachment of 20 men under Lieut. William Stephenson pur- sued a party of Indian thieves, overtook them, killing one and recovering the stolen stock. From 1875 to 1888 the troop was stationed at camps and posts on the lower Rio Grande in Texas, marching to Fort Meade, Dakota, in the latter year. Troop K.—Captain S. B. M. Young, with two commissioned officers (Lieuts. J. D. Stevenson and A. A. Reese, 8th Cavalry) and 42 enlisted men, left Camp Mojave, January 9, 1868. On the 13th, one-half the command, under Lieutenant Stevenson with Lieutenant Reese, was instructed to scout on the west slope of the Cerbert Range for 15 or 20 miles, thence across the range to Fortification Springs, down the eastern slope to Three Buttes and towards Peacock Springs. With the remainder of his command, Captain Young attempted to cross the range at Difficult Pass, but could not get the animals up on account of the ice and snow. They marched north to O’Leary’s Pass, camping in a wash on the eastern slope, having marched 25 miles. The command had been obliged to walk the most of the day through several inches of snow which melted during the day and froze at night. At 3 P. M. a snow storm set in, lasting till 11.30 p. M. About mid- night a guide came into camp and reported a camp of Indians within six miles. At 3 o’clock A. M. on the 14th, camp was broken, a cold break- fast eaten and, leaving 3 men to guard the pack train, the command set out exploring every canon with dismounted men. At daylight Indian signs were discovered and at 8 o’clock it became evident that the Indians were in the vicinity and apparently unaware of the presence of the troops. Their camp was finally located in Difficult Canon, and, leaving 4 men to hold the horses at the mouth of the canon, Captain Young proceeded with 14 men to attack a rancheria of 11 wicky-ups, which developed a force of upwards of 100 Indians. The Indians took to the rocks about 10 yards from their houses. Here they fought desperately, being armed with about 40 breech- loading and 20 muzzle-loading arms. After a hard fight of one hour and, a half, 2 men having been seriously wounded, and more Indians appearing on both flanks, the command was successfully withdrawn to the horses, bringing every man out. Sixteen dead Indians were counted and several wounded. At one mile distant from the scene of this action the wounds of the two men were dressed. Coffee was made and the command proceeded to Beal’s Springs, arriving at 10 P. M. At 2 o’clock A. M., a courier from Lieutenant Stevenson, brought in word that his detachment had had an engagement, and that he had been seriously wounded. Lieutenant Stevenson’s detachment discovered a large body of Indians (60 or 70) on the 15th, well armed, and posted on a high ledge of rocks. Lieutenant Stevenson was wounded in three places at their first fire. He directed his men to seek shelter in the rocks and a desperate 278 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. fight was kept up till dark, when the command slowly withdrew. Several Indians were killed and wounded. By the 16th, the wounded had been sent in to the post and Lieutenant Reese had joined with 19 men. The in- terim had been spent in scouting the vicinity dismounted, giving the ani- mals a much needed rest after the rough marching over the foot-hills in mud, rain and snow. On the 17th the united command marched by way of Hualapais Valley, and on the 18th reached Difficult Canon, finding that the Indians had buried their dead and horses. The command returned to Camp Mojave on the 20th January, having averaged 25 miles per day for 10 days, marching through snow, rain and mud, over a mountainous country, besides spending much time in scouting dismounted. Those familiar with the nature of the ground in the mountainous regions of Arizona will thoroughly appreciate the difficulties of the scouting and Indian fighting encountered on these expeditions, which in the last instance recorded, is but a fair sample of many of the others more briefly referred to. It is either snow, rain and mud in winter ; or burning heat and no water in summer. On the nth of December, 1868, a detachment of 10 men under Major Price had two engagements with Indians near Willow Grove, killing 8, wounding several, and destroying their camps and supplies. Sergeant Curtin C. Miller was killed. In the same month a detachment of 30 men of Troops E and K under Major Price, surprised a rancheria of 20 lodges; killed n Indians, captured several and destroyed their supplies. On June 7, 1869, Captain Young, with 19 men, engaged a party of hostile Indians at Mammoth Canon in the Santa Maria Range, killing 3 Indians and destroying a large amount of supplies. In August, 1869, Lieutenant Carrick, commanding a scouting party of Troops E, F and K, had several encounters with Indians, killing 8, captur- ing several, and destroying their camps and supplies. In November, 1869, detachments under Lieutenants Stevenson and Pullman captured and destroyed a quantity of Indian property. The troop formed a part of the command under Major Price in 1874, and par- ticipated in the engagements heretofore recorded. The troop in 1885 and 1886, under Captain Sprole, took part in the Geronimo campaign in New Mexico. In 1888 it marched with the regiment to Fort Meade, S. D., thence to Fort Buford, N. D. Troop L.—October 6, 1867, the troop under command of Lieutenant Wells had an engagement with Indians in the vicinity of Trout Creek, A. T., killing 7 and destroying their property. On the 25th a detachment under Lieutenant Wells had a skirmish near Truxell Springs, killing 1 Indian. A detachment of 9 men under Lieutenant Hasson, 14th Infantry, with a detachment 1st Cavalry, had a severe engagement on the 3d of Novem- ber, 1867, near Willow Grove, killing 32 Indians and destroying their property. Thirty men under Lieutenant Wells, scouting near Toll Gate, A. T., EIGHTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 279 surprised a band of Indians on the 7th of November, killing 3 Indians and capturing 2 horses. A detachment under Lieutenant Wells, on the 13th of August, 1868, engaged a party of Indians near Walnut Grove, killing several and destroy- ing their camp supplies. On November 9th a detachment of Troops B and L, under Lieutenant Wells, attacked a band of Indians, killing 15 and wounding 7 ; and on the nth surprised a band, killing 6 and capturing 4. Privates E. R. Aston and William Cubberly were slightly wounded. A detachment of 4 men, under Sergeant Rowalt, in pursuit of a band of 17 Kiowas, overtook them February 26, 1873, and engaged them, killing 5 and wounding 3. The gallant action of this little party was commended by the department commander in G. O. No. 5, Dep’t Mo., Series of 1873. In 1874 the troop under Captain Morris formed a part of the command of Major Price, participating in fights on the Rio Negro, Muster Creek, etc. In 1888 it marched from Fort Hancock, Texas, to Fort Keogh, Montana. Troop M.—Until 1870 the troop was stationed in Nevada, the greater part of the time at Fort McDermitt, furnishing escorts and guards and making frequent scouts. From 1870 to 1875, while stationed in New Mexico, much of the time was spent in field duty. In 1875 the troop marched from Fort Union, New Mexico, to Ringgold Barracks, Texas. Until 1881 it occupied camps and posts in Texas, from Fort Brown to Fort Clarke. From 1881 to 1885 it was at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. In 1886 and 1887 it was at Fort Brown, and in 1888 marched to Fort Meade, S. D. The foregoing brief notices of a few of the scouts and expeditions par- ticipated in by the different troops of the regiment are confined to those only where certain results were accomplished in the way of dispersing bands of Indians by actual contact with them. Numerous hard marches through the mountains and deserts of Arizona, exposed to the extremes of heat and cold, thirst and hunger, were made by troops and detachments when, though the results were not so apparent, the work was equally diffi- cult. Some of the officers and men who experienced the trials and hard- ships of those comparatively early days in Arizona are still in the regiment,, THE NINTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. By Lieutenant GROTE HUTCHESON, Adjutant gTH U. S. Cavalry. '"I ''HE subject of this sketch first came into existence by virtue of an act of Congress entitled “ An Act to increase and fix the military peace establishment of the United States,” approved July 28, 1866. To the six regular cavalry regiments then in service, this Act added four additional ones, “two of which shall be composed of colored men, having the same organization as is now provided by law for cavalry regiments.” The organization of the colored regiments was modified in a few particulars, notably, by including a regimental chaplain, whose duties were enlarged to include the instruction of the enlisted men. Up to this time all chaplains had been appointed in the army, designated to posts, and known as post chaplains. The original vacancies in the grades of first and second lieutenant were to be filled by selection from among the officers and soldiers of volunteer cavalry; two-thirds of the original vacancies in the higher grades by selec- tion from among the officers of volunteer cavalry; and one-third from among officers of the regular army. It was further provided that to be eligible for selection, an active service of two years in the field during the War of the Rebellion was necessary ; also that applicants should have been distinguished for capacity and good conduct. Another enactment considerably affecting the composition of the reg- iment, and which, because its requirements have been so enlarged by re- cent legislation as to embrace nearly the entire commissioned force of the regular army, may be deemed of particular interest, is that referring to the examination of officers prior to appointment. It directed that no person should be commissioned in any of the regiments authorized by the Act, until he had passed a satisfactory examination before a board to be com- posed of officers of the arm of the service in which the applicant was to serve. This board was to be convened by the Secretary of War, and was to inquire into the service rendered during the war by the applicant, as well as into his capacity and qualifications for a commission in the regular forces. Appointments were to be made without reference to previous rank but solely by a consideration of present qualifications and past meritorious services. On August 3, 1866, Major General Philip H. Sheridan, then command- ing the Military Division of the Gulf, at New Orleans, Louisiana, was author- ized to raise, among others, one regiment of colored cavalry to be desig- nated the 9th Regiment of U. S. Cavalry, which was to be enlisted within the limits of his own command. Men serving in volunteer colored regi- ments who desired to enlist in regular regiments were authorized to be dis- charged from the volunteer organizations. This class of men was desired THE NINTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 281 and many took advantage of the opportunity to join the regular service, and later proved of some value as non-commissioned officers. The mustering officer at New Orleans was directed to take temporary charge of the recruiting, and shortly afterwards it was transferred to Major Francis Moore, 65th U. S. Colored Infantry. The men obtained by Major Moore formed the nucleus of the enlisted strength, and were principally obtained from New Orleans and its vicinity. A little later in the autumn recruiting was established in Kentucky, and all the men for the new regi- ment were obtained from that State and Louisiana. The horses were ob- tained at St. Louis, and proved to be an excellent mount. About the middle of September all recruits were assembled in New Or- leans, and preparations made for organization. Empty cotton presses were used as barracks and the ration was cooked over open fires. In the latter part of September an epidemic of cholera caused the camp to be moved to Greenville, and later, for other reasons, it was moved to Carrollton, both of which places are suburbs of New Orleans. During the winter of 1866-67, every effort was made to bring about an efficient state of drill, discipline and organization. The orders regarding stables and the performance of that duty were especially strict. Few of- ficers had as yet joined, and the number on duty with the regiment was so small, that a scheme of squadron organization was resorted to so that at least one officer might be present with each squadron for every drill or other duty. The entire enlisted strength was woefully ignorant, entirely helpless, and though willing enough to learn, was difficult to teach. By assiduous labor and constant drilling much headway was made, however, and by the end of March, 1867, a change of station was determined upon. The middle of this month found the regiment with nearly its full strength, the return at that time showing a total of 885 enlisted men, or an average of over 70 to a troop. The regiment, now practically organized yet still far from being in any- thing approaching a perfected state, was ordered to proceed to San Antonio, where it arrived early in April and formed a camp of instruction. Troops L and M, however, proceeded direct to take station at Brownsville, Texas, near the mouth of the Rio Grande, where they remained several years. This command was under 1st Lieutenant J. M. Hamilton (now a major of the 1st Cavalry), then an officer in the 9th U. S. Colored Infantry, he being one of a number of volunteer officers who had been temporarily continued in their volunteer commissions for the purpose of assisting in the organi- zation of the new regiments until the arrival of the regularly appointed officers. Upon these officers much heavy work fell during the winter of 1866-67, as the regular officers arrived slowly until after the camp at San Antonio was established, when they began to report rapidly. The camp near San Antonio was continued for some three months, and the time spent there was profitably employed in completing and perfecting the organization and drill, already well under way from the efforts of the preceding winter. The officers of the regiment were now nearly all ap- pointed, and during the summer of 1867 they were as follows: Colonel Edward Hatch. 282 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Lieutenant-Colonel Wesley Merritt. Majors James F. Wade, George A. Forsyth, and Albert P. Morrow. Chaplain John C. Jocobi. Captains J. S. Brisbin, Wm. Bayard, G. A. Purington, J. M. Bacon, G. H. Gamble, Henry Carroll, A. E. Hooker, W. T. Frohock, J. C. De Gress, T. A. Boice, F. S. Dodge, and E. M. Heyl. First Lieutenants Michael Cooney, I. F. Moffatt, J. G. Birney, Charles Parker, J. L. Humfreville, Francis Moore, F. W. Smith, L. H. Rucker, Byron Dawson, J. S. Loud, Patrick Cusack, F. S. Davidson, D. H. Cortelyou, G. B. Bosworth, and W. B. Brunton. Second Lieutenants I. W. Trask, F. R. Vincent, I. M. Starr, F. P. Gross, E. D. Dimmick, W. W. Tyler, G. W. Budd, T. C. Barden, and J. C. Edgar. It is difficult now a-days fully to appreciate all the work and labor de- volving upon the officers in those early days. The men knew nothing, and the non-commissioned officers but little more. From the very circum- stances of their preceding life it could not be otherwise. They had no independence, no self-reliance, not a thought except for the present, and were filled with superstition. To make soldiers of such material was, at that time, considered more of an experiment than as a fixed principle. The Government depended upon the officers of those early days to solve the problem of the colored soldier. The colonel of the regiment was Edward Hatch; a young man full of energy and enthusiasm. He went right manfully to work, determined to succeed, and in this he was ably seconded by his officers. They were all equally enthusiastic in proving the wisdom of the experiment of colored soldiers, and in forcing the issue to a successful solution were compelled, not only to attend to the duties that naturally attach to the office of a troop commander and his lieutenants, but, in the endeavor to make fin- ished individual soldiers of the negro and to feel that the troop, taken as a unit, was an independent fighting force, well drilled, well clothed, well fed, suitably armed and equipped, and thoroughly able to take care of itself in garrison or campaign, they were forced to enter into the minutest details of military administration, and personally to assume nearly all the duties of the non-commissioned officer. For some years the latter, from lack of education, were such only in name, and the process of moulding them into a responsible and self-reliant class was a slow one. Troop officers were in fact squad commanders, and it took both time and patience to teach the men how to care for themselves. The amount of writing devolving upon officers during the earlier years of the regiment is not to be passed over lightly. Fully to appreciate this, it must be borne in mind that the enlisted men were totally uneducated; few indeed could read and scarcely any were able to write even their own names. It is related that but one man in the entire regiment was found able to write sufficiently well to act as sergeant-major. It was not an un- common thing for a captain to assist his first sergeant in calling the roll, and every record, from the morning report to the monthly return, was pre- pared by an officer. In time the simpler reports were mastered, but it is only in later years that troop clerks are found, and even now considerable THE NINTH REGIMENT OF CA VALRY. 283 difficulty is experienced at times in finding reliable men of sufficient edu- cation to conduct properly the routine clerical work pertaining to a troop. Early in June the regiment was ordered into western and southwestern Texas to assist in opening up once more that vast territory, extending from Fort Clark to El Paso, and from the Rio Grande to the Concho. By this time the regiment was deemed sufficiently well organized, equipped and disciplined, to be sent to the extreme frontier, and capable of undergoing the long and trying march into the wild and unsettled country that lay before it. The regiment was distributed as follows: Headquarters and Troops A, B, E and K, General Hatch commanding, at Fort Stockton ; Troops C, D, F, G, H and I, Lieutenant Colonel Merritt commanding, at Fort Davis. Troops L and M had previously been sent to Brownsville. The principal duty of the command in western Texas was to open up and protect the mail and stage route from San Antonio to El Paso; to establish law and order in the country contiguous to the Rio Grande fron- tier, which had been sadly interfered with by Mexicans as well as Indians during the Civil War ; to prevent marauding by Indians and to capture and confine to their reservations all roving bands ; in fact, to help pave the way for the western advance of civilization, and to add their part in the great work of opening to settlement the vast resources of the great West. Having landed the regiment in this far away part of the country, a word or two of every-day garrison life during those early days, when the nearest railroad was six hundred miles distant, may be of interest. In many respects the every-day life of the men in garrison was similar to that of the present time. There was the same drill, stables and parade; the amount and kind of fatigue bore a strong resemblance to that of to-day ; there were logging teams for the saw-mill and special details for the garden; men mixing mud for adobes and burnishing brasses for orderly ; but guard duty, though no more tedious than now, was spiced with an element of danger which added zest to the duty. Strict orders prohibited all persons from leaving the im- mediate limits of a garrison, except in small parties, and they were enjoined always to carry their carbines. Heavy herd guards were detailed, and look- outs were posted on high ground during grazing hours. The appliances for the personal comfort of the soldiers were few, and should the improvements now surrounding them be suddenly exchanged for what they had then, there would be such a skurrying off of recruits that I doubt if the whole State of Kentucky could furnish satisfactory material to fill the depleted ranks. Ashen slats on bunk irons and a bedsack filled with straw made a very good bed for its fortunate possessor, while the less favored ones were often at their wits’ end to improvise a comfortable rest- ing place out of two blankets. Sheets, pillows, white shirts, linen collars and barrack shoes, were not dreamed of, and bath tubs were unknown, for the water system was limited to a huge tank on wheels, with eight mules and a surly driver. The stomachs of the men, even more than their bodies, were subject to a Spartan simplicity, and the numerous delicacies now supplied them could not then be found on officers’ tables. The commissary kept only the com- 284 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. ponent parts of the regular ration, and the pound of fresh vegetables was not a part of it. The banishment from the gentler influences of settled communities and separation from the varied society of large cities was keenly felt by officers, and the exiles’ life they were forced to lead caused a few to give up in dis- gust and resign; but the majority continued in service, fighting bravely against the hardships surrounding them. Of luxuries they had none, of comforts, few ; but the canvas homes and outdoor life furnished good diges- tions and hearty appetites for the limited bills of fare presented at the mess. Nearly all were bachelors, with the careless habits this class of army officers are noted for, though the presence of an occasional lady served to check in part the familiarity engendered by lack of privacy and constant association, —serious objections to any long continued camp. Horse-back riding on pleasant days was almost the only outdoor amuse- ment, but the danger from Indians so contracted the safety limits, that all ground was soon visited, and only the hope of a shot at a stray wolf or coyote, or the rare advent of some visitor to be entertained, kept up inter- est in this kind of outing. A great event was the distribution of the mail, and whether weekly, semi-weekly, or daily, the hour of its arrival was looked forward to by all, and, as the cloud of dust in the distance heralded its ap- proach, the entire garrison, from the commanding officer to the latest re- cruit, hastened to the post office where they formed an eager crowd, anxious for the latest news from the States, or in happy anticipation of the expected letter from sweetheart, wife or mother. The regiment remained in Texas for eight years, spending the greater portion of the time in the field, patrolling the vast stretches of prairie in innumerable scouts after depredating Indians, and gradually freeing the country from this scourge of settlers. There is not space to describe minutely even the more important of these expeditions, and I shall only summarize the following: 1867. October 1, near Howard’s Wells, Texas, two men killed while escorting the mail; December 5, Eagle Springs, Texas, one man killed ; December 26, Camp Lancaster, Texas, Troop K persistently attacked for two days by a large force of Indians who were finally driven off, three men killed. January, Fort Quitman, Troop F attacked sixteen times by a large band; August, Fort Quitman, Troop H attacked, Indians driven off without loss; September 12, Horsehead Hills, Texas, Lieutenant Cusack with 60 men sur- prised a large party of Indians, killing 25 and capturing all their horses, ponies and supplies. But one man was wounded in this affair, which was reported as a very brilliant and successful coup against the wandering bands. 1868. 1869. June 5, Johnson’s River, Texas, Troop L, no loss ; June 7, on Pecos River, Texas, 32 men of Troop G under Captain Bacon; September 15, on the Brazos River, Troops F and M under Captain Carroll, had a skirmish, and THE NINTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 285 again on the 20th and 21st, the same command being augmented by detach- ments from Troops B and M, engaged the same band of Indians ; October 28 and 29, Troops B, E, F, G, L and M had a running fight of 40 miles at the head waters of the Brazos River, killing a number of Indians. This is the affair to which the late General Sherman so often referred with his quiz- zical inquiry as to which way Bacon ran ; November 29, head of Llanos River, Texas, Troops L and M under Captain E. M. Heyl had a desperate fight and this officer was seriously wounded; December 25, five men of Troop E defeated a band of 20 Indians which attempted to surprise the mail coach. 1870. January 6, Guadaloupe Mountains, Texas, Troop H ; January 11, Lower Pecos River, Troop L; January 16, Troop G and detachment of L, under Captain Bacon, surprised an entire village, capturing 83 head of stock and all supplies ; January 21, a command of Troops C, D, I and K, under Cap- tain Dodge engaged in a skirmish in the Guadaloupe Mountains; April 3, 15 men of Troop H, under a non commissioned officer, ran into some In- dians near San Martin’s Springs, killing one ; April 25, Crow Springs, Texas, 50 men from Troops C and K, under Major Morrow, captured 30 horses and the supplies of a village ; May 19 and 20, at Kickapoo Springs, Texas, Ser- geant Emanuel Stance with five men of Troop F, surprised and attacked a small village, wounding four Indians and capturing two white boy prisoners and 15 horses; May 29, Bosaler Canon, Texas, Troop I. 1872. I have only mentioned the affairs in which an actual engagement took place. The many scouts, long marches, the weeks and months spent in campaign are omitted, but during the eight years of duty in Texas, as well as afterwards and until the regiment was sent to the Department of the Platte, more time was spent in campaign than in garrison, and the troops covered thousands of square miles of territory. In the latter part of 1875 the regiment was transferred into New Mexico, with headquarters at Santa Fe, and the troops scattered all over that terri- tory and even beyond. The general duty was about the same as in Texas, and during the time the regiment remained there, various troops and de- tachments were employed in capturing and returning to their reservations innumerable roving bands of the wily and treacherous Apache tribes, the more important of which were those headed by Nana and Victoria. During the five years spent in this section the more important affairs were as follows: April 20, Howard’s Wells, Troops A and H, Lieutenant Vincent killed. 1876. April 15, in the Florida Mountains, Troop F, one Indian killed and 11 horses captured ; September 2, in the Cuchillo Negro Mountains, detach- ment of Troops C and E, under Lieutenant Wright, small camp captured and number of lodges destroyed. 1877. January 23, Florida Mountains, nine men under Lieutenant Wright killed 286 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. 5 Indians and captured 6 horses; January 28, Sierra Boca Grande Moun- tains, Mexico, detachments of Troops C and A captured a small camp. August 6, Dog Canon, N. M„ Troop H was engaged. 1878. 1879. January 15, Troop A under Lieutenant Day, was engaged and captured a number of horses and mules ; March 8, Ojo Caliente, Troop I; May 28, in the Black Range, Troops C and I under Captain Beyer captured a camp and 16 horses, losing one man killed and 2 wounded ; September 4, Ojo Cali- ente, four men were killed ; September 8, West Las Animas River, 24 men of Troop G under Lieutenant Hugo were engaged losing one man ; Septem- ber 18, Las Animas River, Troops A, B and C, one man killed and 2 wounded ; September 29 and 30, on the Cuchillo Negro River, parts of Troops B, C, E and L, under Major Morrow, 2 men killed ; October 2 and 3, at Milk River, Colorado, Troop D went to the relief of Thornburg’s com- mand and succeeded in reaching it, losing all its horses; October 27, in the Guzman Mountains, Mexico, Troops B, C, G and H, under Major Morrow were engaged, losing one man and one scout. January 12, on the Rio Percho, Troops B, C, D, F, H and M, under Major Morrow, were again engaged, losing one man ; January 17, in the San Mateo Mountains, Troops B, C, F, H and M, under Major Morrow, were again en- gaged, losing one officer (Lieutenant French) killed, and one man wounded ; January 30, in Caballo Mountains, detachment of Troops B and M, under Captain Rucker, loss 3 men wounded; February 3, in the San Andreas Mountains, Troops B, C, F, H and M, under Major Morrow, were engaged, losing 4 men wounded ; February 28, and again on April 5, in the San An- dreas Mountains, Lieutenant Coniine with Troop A was engaged, losing one man and one citizen wounded ; April 6, in the same mountains, Troops A, D, F and G, under Captain Carroll, were engaged, Captain Carroll and 6 men being severely wounded ; April 7, Major Morrow with Troops H and L continued this affair; May 14, near old Fort Tolerosa, Sergeant Jordan with 25 men repulsed a force of more than a hundred Indians under Vic- toria ; June 5, Cook’s Canon, Troop L, loss 2 men; May, in the San Fran- cisco Mountains, Troop C and detachment scouts, 2 men killed and one wounded; June 11 and 12, near Fort Cummings, Troop B; September 1, in the Sacramento Mountains, 11 men of Troop G, 2 men wounded. 1880. 1881. In February and again in April, a detachment under Lieutenant Maney, 15th Infantry, was engaged in southern New Mexico, one man wounded; July 25 at White Sands, July 26 in the San Andreas, and August 3 at Santa Minica, 20 men of Troop L were engaged. In August there were a number of engagements ;—In Carizo Canon, 19 men of Troop K, under Captain Parker, 2 men killed ; in the San Mateo Mountains, detachments of Troops B and H, under Lieutenant Taylor ; in THE NINTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 287 Cuchillo Negro Mountains, Troop I, Lieutenant Valois, 2 men wounded; in Cavilare Pass, detachment of Troops B and H, Lieutenant Smith, 3 men and one citizen killed, 3 men wounded. October 4, in the Dragoon Mountains, Troops F and H, 3 men wounded. November 5, Crow Agency, Montana, Troops D and H. 1887. 1890. December 30, Troop D, under Captain Loud, was attacked while escort- ing a wagon train near Pine Ridge Agency, South Dakota, losing one man killed. Later in the same day Troops D, F, I and K, under Major Henry, were engaged near the Drexel Mission, S. D„ no casualties. In June, 1881, the regiment was moved from New Mexico to Kansas and Indian Territory, where it remained until 1885. Most of these years were spent in garrison, though the intruders upon the Oklahoma Territory which at that time was not open for settlement, kept a number of troops busy mov- ing over that country and patrolling the northern portion of Indian Terri- tory and southern Kansas. In the summer of 1885 the regiment was moved to the Department of the Platte, where it has since remained enjoying a well-earned rest after the many scouts and campaigns of the preceding eighteen years. The only campaign worthy of mention is that of 1890-91, during the uprising of the Sioux, when the regiment was the first in the field in November, and the last to leave late in the following March, after spending the winter, the latter part of which was terrible in its severity, under canvas. At present (February, 1895) the regiment is commanded by Colonel James Biddle and eight troops garrison the post of Fort Robinson, Neb. Troops B and F, under Major Randlett, are at Fort Duchesne, Utah ; while Troops L and M are continued with a skeleton organization. Every effort is made to keep the regiment in a high state of efficiency, and with nearly all its officers present for duty,—with the ranks filled to the authorized strength,—with an excellent and ample mount,—the Ninth Cavalry stands ready to-day for any service it may be called upon to per- form, filled with a just pride in its past achievements and anxious again to seek “ the bubble reputation even in the cannon’s mouth.” THE TENTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. By LIEUTENANT JOHN BIGELOW, Jr., U. S. A., R. Q. M. Tenth Cavalry, C~''' ECTION 3 of an “Act to increase and fix the military peace estab- lishment of the United States,” approved on the 28th day of July, 1866, provides “ That to the six regiments of cavalry now in service, there shall be added four regiments, two which shall be composed of colored men. * * * ” The six regiments referred to as already in service were composed of white men. The colored regiments were to be organized on the general plan of the white regiments, modified in a few particulars. They were each to have a regimental chaplain whose duty should include the instruction of enlisted men in the common English branches. Up to that time all chaplains had been appointed not in regiments but in the Army. The colored regiments were also given two veterinary surgeons each, whereas the white regiments had but one. Another enactment which more or less affected the composition of these additional cavalry regiments, both white and colored, and which is deemed of peculiar interest, was the following : “ That no person shall be commissioned in any of the regiments author- ized by this act until he shall have passed a satisfactory examination before a board to be composed of officers of that arm of the service in which the applicant is to serve, to be convened under the direction of the Secretary of War, which shall inquire into the services rendered during the War, capa- city and qualifications of the applicant; and every such appointment when made, shall be without regard to previous rank, but with sole regard to qualifications and meritorious services.” The six white regiments already in the service were numbered consecu- tively from 1 to 6; the two new white regiments were numbered 7 and 8; the two colored regiments 9 and 10. It was as the 10th regiment of cav- alry that the regiment now bearing that designation came into the service and made for itself the record which is the subject of this sketch. General orders No. 92, A. G. O., dated November 23, but expressly of effect from September 21, announces the numerical designation, the field officers (so far as they have accepted) and the stations or headquarters of the new regiments of cavalry, also of certain new regiments of infantry forming under the same act. Congress having created the 10th Cavalry in law, the first step towards its creation in fact was taken, it seems, by Lieutenant-General Sherman, commanding the Military Division of the Mississippi, in an order from his headquarters dated St. Louis, Missouri, August 9, 1866, which read as follows: TENTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 289 G. O. No. 6. I. Commanders of military departments within this division in which colored troops are serving, will proceed at once to enlist men for two regiments of colored regulars, under the Act of Congress approved July 28, 1866, entitled “ An Act to increase and fix the military peace establishment of the United States one of cavalry, to be entitled the 10th Regiment United States Cavalry, and one of infantry to be entitled the 38th Regiment United States Infantry. II. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, is hereby named as the headquarters and rendez- vous of the 10th Cavalry, and Jefferson Barracks, Missouri, the headquarters and rendezvous of the 38th Infantry. III. Commanding-generals of the Departments of the Missouri, Arkansas, and Platte, will detail one or more officers of the Regular Army, who will proceed to can- vass the regiments of colored troops now serving in their respective departments, and enlist men for the new regiments above named, the cavalry for five years and the infantry for three years. The men so enlisted will be discharged from their present obligation and grouped into companies under officers to be selected by the colonels or regimental commanders hereafter to be appointed, but will be retained for the present at or near their present station. The number of privates allowed to a company is sixty-four. The men of existing colored regiments not willing to enlist in the new organizations will, for the present, be consolidated into companies under the direction of their immediate commanders, and held to service until the new army is sufficiently organized to replace them. IV. The field officers of these regiments will, on arrival at these headquarters, proceed to the posts herein named and organize their new regiments according to law and regulations, but will not withdraw the new companies from their present stations without consent of department commanders, or orders from these headquarters. V. Blanks will at once be sent from these headquarters, to which all reports will be made until the regular field officers are announced and recruitment organized under them. By order, etc. The first regimental return was rendered on the 30th of September, 1866. It showed the aggregate strength of the regiment, present and absent, to consist of two officers,—Colonel Benjamin H. Grierson, and Lieutenant-Colonel Charles C. Walcutt,—and gave the number of recruits required as 1092. Colonel Grierson was reported present with the regi- ment, and Colonel Walcutt absent on regimental recruiting rervice. The first commander of the 10th Cavalry is doubtless known personally as well as by reputation to most of the readers of this sketch. His raid through Mississippi in 1863 is the historic operation on which his reputation chiefly rests. It has placed him among the foremost cavalry leaders of the the War, and seems destined, as it becomes better known and more justly appreciated, to add honor and distinction to his name. Lieutenant-Colonel Walcutt never joined the regiment, and resigned shortly after his appoint- ment. The recruiting for the regiment was in the main regimental, that is, by officers of the regiment detailed to recruit for it. At the end of the year 1866, the 10th Cavalry consisted of two field officers, one company officer, and 64 unassigned recruits. It was still without a staff or a single organized com- pany. For seven months of the new year the headquarters of the regi- ment remained at Fort Leavenworth. The work of filling up the regiment went on but continued to make slow progress. This was due in the main to HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. two causes,—the want of clerical assistance at recruiting stations, and the high standard fixed for the recruits by the regimental commander. Recruit- ing officers were not allowed to hire clerks and had extreme difficulty in securing any among their recruits or the members of their recruiting par- ties. With a view to securing an intelligent set of men for the ranks the colonel had Captain Louis H. Carpenter, who was recruiting at Louisville, Kentucky, ordered to Philadelphia, Pa., to open a recruiting station there. Writing to Captain Carpenter, the colonel says, after referring to the cap- tain’s knowledge of Philadelphia: “ I requested you to be sent there to recruit colored men sufficiently educated to fill the positions of non- commissioned officers, clerks and mechanics in the regiment. You will use the greatest care in your selection of recruits. Although sent to recruit men for the positions specified above, you will also enlist all superior men you can who will do credit to the regiment.” During its last month at Fort Leavenworth the regiment lost heavily from disease, caused in the main by a cholera epidemic. From a death- rate which did not average one a month for the preceding ten months, the loss by death during the month of July, 1867, rose to 23. On the 6th of August, 1867, the headquarters of the regiment left Fort Leavenworth for Fort Riley, Kansas, where they were established on the 7th. Let us take a general look at the regiment as it existed just prior to this change. We find the field and staff still incomplete, being composed as follows: Colonel, B. H. Grierson; Lieutenant-Colonel, J. W. Davidson; Majors, J. W. Forsyth and M. H. Kidd; Chaplain, W. M. Grimes; Adju- tant, H. E. Alvord. The regiment now comprises eight troops. Their designation, date of organization, original composition and color of horses are as below : Troop A.—Color, bay. Organized February 18, 1867. Captain Nicholas Nolan ; Lieutenants G. W. Graham and G. F. Raulston. Troop B.—Color, bay. Organized April 1, 1867. Captain J. B. Vande Wiele ; Lieutenants J. D. Myrick and J. W. Myers. Troop C.—Color, bay. Organized May 15, 1867. Captain Edward Byrne ; Lieu- tenants T. C. Lebo and T. J. Spencer. Troop D.—Color, bay. Organized June 1, 1867. Captain J. W. Walsh ; Lieu- tenants Robert Gray and R. H. Pratt. Troop E.—Color, bay. Organized June 15, 1867. Captain G. T. Robinson ; Lieutenant J. T. Morrison. Troop F.—Color, gray. Organized June 21, 1867. Captain G. A. Armes ; Lieu- tenants P. L. Lee and J. A. Bodamer. Troop G.—Color, bay. Organized July 5, 1867. Captain H. T. Davis; Lieu- tenants W. B. Kennedy and M. J. Amick. Troop H. —Color, black. Organized July 21, 1867. Captain L. H. Carpenter; Lieutenants T. J. Spencer and L. H. Orleman. These troops are posted at Fort Hays, Fort Harker, and other points along the Smokey River, Kansas, on the line of the Kansas Pacific Railroad, then in course of construction. They had been put in the field for the protection of the railroad as fast as they were organized. The strength of the regiment, present and absent, amounts to 25 officers and 702 enlisted men. TENTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 291 The first engagement in which any part of the regiment participated oc- curred a few days before the regimental headquarters left Fort Leavenworth. Troop I, under Captain Armes, numbering 34 men and two officers, fought a party of 300 Indians near Saline River, 40 miles northeast of Fort Hays. The engagement lasted six hours and resulted in the troops being forced to retreat with the loss of Sergeant W. Christy, killed, and Captain Armes, wounded. On the twenty-first of the same month Captain Armes had another fight, the second on record in the regiment. Forty men of his troop, together with 90 men of the 18th Kansas Volunteers, engaged about 500 In- dians northeast of Fort Hays. The losses in this fight were one soldier killed and scalped, and 13 wounded ; fifteen men of the volunteers and two guides wounded, twelve horses killed and three wounded. Troops I, K, L and M, were organized from the new headquarters at Fort Riley as here indicated : Troop I.—Color, bay. Organized August 15, 1867. Captain G. W. Graham; Lieutenant Silas Pepoon. Troop K.—Color, bay. Organized September 1, 1867. Captain C. G. Cox ; Lieutenants R. G. Smither and B. F. Bell. Troop Z.—Color, sorrel. Organized September 21, 1867. Captain R. Gray ; Lieutenant C. E. Nordstrom. Troop M.—Color, mixed.* Organized October 15, 1867. Captain H. E. Alvord ; Lieutenants P. L. Lee and W. R. Harmon. In September, 1867, the field officers were increased in number to their full complement by the appointment of Major J. E. Yard. In the same month the position of regimental quartermaster was taken by Lieutenant W. H. Beck. Thus were filled the last of the original vacancies in the field and staff. The headquarters remained at Fort Riley until April 17, 1868. The troops were about evenly distributed between Kansas and Indian Territory and were employed in the perfection of their drill and discipline, and in the protection of the Union Pacific Railroad and exposed settlements. The only engagement of this period took place about 45 miles west of Fort Hays. Sergeant Davis and nine men of Troop G were attacked by fifty or sixty Cheyennes. They drove the Indians off in confusion losing one private wounded. From Fort Riley the headquarters of the regiment went to Fort Gibson, I. T. At this time General Sheridan was in the field directing military operations. The Indians had brought on a war by their characteristic rest- lessness and deviltry. They were attached to agencies to which they came in from time to time for supplies, but they were not confined to any reserva- tions. General Sheridan determined to put them and keep them on reser- vations, or, if that could not be done, to show them that winter weather would not give them either rest or impunity. The consequence was the winter campaign of 1867-68, which resulted in the destruction of Black Kettle’s band of Cheyennes, the worst lot of Indians in the territory. The * Troop M got all the horses that would not match any other troop and was called the “ calico ” troop. 292 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. ioth Cavalry was in the field and came in for a good share of hard marching and fighting. On the 15th of September, 1868, Troop I, Captain Graham, was attacked by about 100 Indians. It fought until dark, losing ten horses killed and captured, and killing seven Indians. On the 17th of this month Lieut.-Colonel G. A. Forsyth, A. D. C. to Gen- eral Sheridan, with a party of white scouts, was attacked and “ corralled ” by a force of about 700 Indians on an island in the Republican River. Two of Forsyth’s scouts stole through the Indian lines and brought word of the perilous situation of the command to Fort Wallace. Parties were soon on the way to its relief. First and last the following troops were started towards it from different points. Captain Bankhead with about 100 men of the 5th Infantry, Captain Carpenter with Troop H and Captain Baldwin with Troop I, of the ioth Cavalry, and two troops of the 2d Cavalry under Major Brisbin. Captain Carpenter’s troop was the first of these commands to arrive upon the scene. It found Forsyth’s command out of rations, living on horse-flesh without salt or pepper. All its officers had been killed or wounded. Every horse and mule, too, had been killed. Forsyth, who had been twice wounded, was lying in a square hole scooped out in the sand, within a few feet of a line of dead horses which half encircled the hole and impregnated the air with a terrible stench. Captain Carpenter immediately pitched a number of tents in a suitable place near by, had the wounded men carried to them, and the rest removed to a more salubrious air. Twenty- six hours later Captain Bankhead arrived bringing with him the two troops of the 2d Cavalry. • On the 14th of the following month, two weeks after he had returned to Fort Wallace with the wounded of Forsyth’s command, Captain Carpenter was ordered to take his own troop and I Troop of the ioth Cavalry and escort Major Carr, of the 5th Cavalry, to his command, supposed to be on Beaver Creek. On the march he was attacked by a force of about 500 Indians. After proceeding, regardless of the enemy’s firing and yelling, far enough to gain a suitable position, he halted his command, had the wagons corralled close together and rushed his men inside at a gallop. He had them dismount, tie their horses to the wagons, and form on the outside around the corral. Then followed a volley of Spencers which drove the Indians back as though they were thrown from a cannon. A number of warriors, showing more bravery than the others, undertook to stand their ground. Nearly all of these, together with their ponies, were killed. Three dead warriors lay within fifty yards of the wagons. The Indians were so demoralized by these results that they did not renew the attack and the troops accomplished their march without further molestation. They were back at Fort Wallace on the 21st, having travelled 23omiles in about seven days. For their gallantry in the fight, which took place on Beaver Creek, the officers and men were thanked by General Sheridan in a general field order, and Captain Carpenter was breveted Colonel. Regimental headquarters remained at Fort Gibson until March 31, 1869, when they were moved to Camp Wichita, I. T., where they arrived on the TENTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 293 12th of April. Camp Wichita, an old Indian village, was selected by Gen- eral Sheridan as a site for a military post and the ioth Cavalry was ordered there to establish and build it. Some time in the following month of August the post was given the name of Fort Sill, by which name it will be desig- nated in these pages. The military duty of the regiment was now that of an army of occupa- tion, to hold the country from which the Indians had been expelled and to keep the Indians within the bounds assigned them. It gave rise to frequent scouting for trespassers and marauders and occasional reconnoissance and demonstration in considerable force. More than once the garrison of Fort Sill had to apprehend an attack upon the post. On the i ith of June Camp Supply was alarmed by a party of Comanches charging through it, shooting and yelling, with the object of stampeding the horses on the picket line, and they succeeded in stampeding a few. These were pursued by Troops A, F, H, I and K, ioth Cavalry, and Companies B, E and F, 3d Infantry, commanded by Lieut.-Colonel Nelson, 3d Infantry. The Indians turned on their pursuers and attacked them, wounding three soldiers and killing two horses. Six Indians were killed and ten wounded. During the 22d and 23d of August the Wichita Agency was subjected to a fierce attack by the Kiowa and Naconee Indians. The Agency was defended by Troops C, E, H and L, ioth Cavalry, commanded by Lieut.- Colonel Davidson. The main object of the attack, as expressed in the vigorous language of the hostiles, was to “ wipe out ” the buildings and settlement. Attempts were made to do so by setting fire to the prairie at different points, but the tireless and well-directed efforts of the defenders succeeded in extinguishing the flames and saving the buildings. Repeated assaults were made by the Indians in numbers ranging from 50 to 500, at different points of the line, all of which were repulsed with the infliction of heavy losses and great disorder upon the assailants. The decisive feature of the engagement was a charge made by Captain Carpenter’s troop. His men routed a body of over 150 warriors, who were about to take up a com- manding position in rear of the troops. The loss of the troops was only four men wounded. That of the Indians was quite large, but owing to their well-known custom of carrying off their dead and wounded could not be definitely ascertained. From Fort Sill the regimental headquarters moved back to Fort Gibson. They left Fort Sill on the 5th of June, 1872. During the three years and two months of their stay at that station a majority of the regiment—for a time there were eleven troops—was constantly at headquarters. The monthly rate of desertion fell from 7 to 3 ; the rate of discharge by court- martial from 2.5 to 1.5. In fact, the deportment of the regiment attested the advantage to discipline of large commands and varied and interesting occupation for the troops. Among the stations other than Fort Sill, held by troops of the ioth Cavalry, were Forts Dodge, Gibson and Arbuckle, Camp Supply and Cheyenne Agency. Having remained at Fort Gibson until April 23, 1873 the regimental headquarters then returned to Fort Sill. In the meantime there had been a few skirmishes unattended by any casualties. HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. 294 A movement of troops was now under way looking to a transfer of the regiment to the Department of Texas, and the end of April found Troops E, I and L at Fort Richardson, Texas; and Troops C, D and F en route, the two former for Fort Griffin, the latter for Fort Concho, Texas. The headquarters were reestablished at Fort Sill on the 4th of May, 1873, and remained there until the 27th of March, 1875. During this time the regi- ment continued serving partly in Texas and partly in the Indian Territory. The troops that were serving in the Indian Territory took part in the cam- paign of 1874-75 against the Kiowas and Comanches. This campaign was but a continuation of the campaign of 1867-68, and, like the latter, was directed by General Sheridan. There were four columns in the field ope- rating separately under the following commanders : Lieut.-Colonel Neill, 6th Cavalry ; Colonel N. A. Miles, 5th Infantry ; Lieut.-Colonel Davidson, 10th Cavalry ; Colonel R. S. Mackenzie, 4th Cavalry. The first capture of the campaign was made by a portion of Davidson’s column. On the 25th of October, 1874, Troops B and M, 10th Cavalry, and one company of the nth Infantry, under command of Major Schofield, while in pursuit of Indians near Elk Creek, pressed them so hard that the whole band surrendered. They numbered 68 warriors, 276 squaws and children, and about 1500 ponies. These prisoners, and others taken subse- quently, were put in camp at Fort Sill, the more dangerous bucks being closely confined. At the close of the campaign the ringleaders were sent to Fort Marion, Florida, under charge of Captain Pratt. This officer never returned to the regiment. He is now justly distinguished for his work as an educator of Indians, especially in the superintendence of the Carlisle Indian School. On the 6th of April, 1875, Black Horse, one of the Cheyenne ringleaders who was billeted for Fort Marion, broke from his guard at Cheyenne Agency and ran towards the camp of his people near by. He pursued by Captain Bennett, 5th Infantry, with the guard, who fired upon Black Horse and killed him. Several shots passed beyond him and wounded some people in the camp. After firing a volley of bullets and arrows at the guard, about one-half of the Cheyenne tribe abandoned their camp and fled to a group of sand-hills on the south side of the Canadian River opposite the Cheyenne Agency. They wrere followed by a company of the 5th In- fantry, a troop of the 6th Cavalry, and Troops D and M of the 10th Cavalry, all under command of Lieut.-Colonel Neill, 6th Cavalry. Being well armed and well posted, the Indians held their ground until nightfall and then stole away. The troops took up the trail and followed it about ten days, at the end of which time it was covered up by rains. Troops from other posts were ordered to assist in the pursuit and eventually most of the fugi- tives gave themselves up. In the fight at the Agency the Indians lost eight killed. The 10th Cavalry lost 12 men wounded, one mortally. When moved for the second time from Fort Sill the regimental head- quarters were transferred to Fort Concho, Texas, where they were estab- lished on the 17th of April, 1875. The 1st of May found the troops of the regiment located in Texas and Indian Territory as follows : TENTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 295 Troops A, F, G, I and L, at Fort Concho ; B and E at Fort Griffin; C and K at Fort McKavett; H at Fort Davis; D and M in the field at Buffalo Springs, I. T. During the month of May, troops D and M moved from the Indian Territory, the former to Fort Concho, the latter to Fort Stockton. In the course of the next two years the disposition of the troops was modified so as to scatter the regiment over the length and breadth of West- ern Texas. Its headquarters, however, were destined to remain at Fort Concho for more than seven years. During this period the regiment con- tinued with some variation its past experience in Indian fighting. Its cam- paigning consisted mainly in pursuing small bands of marauding Apaches. This carried the troops,—now across the border into the unknown territory of the “ Gringo’’-hating Mexicans,—now over the scorching wastes of the Staked Plains,—now up and down the rocky fastnesses of the Guadalupe Mountains and the bad lands bordering the upper Rio Grande. The following are a few instances of this kind of service : In July, 1876, Troops B, E and K crossed into Mexico as part of a col- umn commanded by Lieut.-Colonel Shafter, 24th Infantry. A detachment of this command, made up of twenty picked men of Troop B under Lieuten- ant Evans, and twenty Seminole scouts, all under command of Lieutenant Bullis, 24th Infantry, made a march of no miles in twenty-five hours and thereby succeeded in surprising a camp of twenty-three lodges of hostile Lipans and Kickapoos near Saragossa, Mexico. They killed ten Indians and captured four, and also captured about 100 horses. They then made a bonfire of the camp material and with their prisoners and captured stock rejoined the main column as fast as their jaded horses would carry them. On the 10th of July, 1877, Troop A left Fort Concho under command of Captain Nolan for a scout on the Staked Plains. The command got lost, and, as a consequence, Captain Nolan, Lieutenant Cooper, Sergeant Jack- son and about ten privates were ninety-six hours without water. Four of the men died. Other parties were from twenty-four to thirty-eight hours without water. The command was found and brought back to Fort Concho by a party sent out from there to search for it. In 1880 the regiment was engaged in what is known as the Victoria campaign, a series of operations direct against the Mescalero Apache chief Victoria, who, with his whole band, had escaped from the military authori- ties in New Mexico. On the 30th of July Colonel Grierson, with a party of only six men, was attacked by this band between Quitman and Eagle Springs. Lieutenant Finley with fifteen men of Troop G came up, engaged the Indians, and held them in check until the arrival of Captains Viele and Nolan with Troops C and A. In an engagement, which lasted four hours, seven Indians were killed and a number wounded. On the side of the troops one soldier was killed and Lieutenant Colladay wounded. The hos- tiles were driven off and pursued to the Rio Grande. In the course of the pursuit a running fight of at least fifteen miles was maintained near the Alamo by a detachment under Corporal Asa Weaver of Troop H. Private Tockes, Troop C, was killed. His horse went to bucking and then ran directly into the Indians. When last seen alive this devoted trooper had dropped his reins, drawn his carbine, and was firing to right and left. His 296 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. skeleton was found months afterwards. For his gallant conduct in this affair Corporal Weaver was promoted to a sergeant on the ground. The same day Captain Lebo, with Troop K, followed an Indian trail to the top of the Sierra Diabola, captured Victoria’s supply camp of twenty-five head of cattle, and a large quantity of beef and other provisions on pack animals. The decisive blow of the campaign was struck a few days later by Colo- nel Grierson. Being on the trail of Victoria, heading northward through the Carriso Mountains, Grierson switched off to his right, and, by a forced march of sixty-five miles, swung around the flank of the unsuspecting Apaches and struck them in front, forcing them southward across the fron- tier. Victoria never went raiding again on American soil. He was subse- quently killed by the Mexican troops near Lake Guzman, Mexico. In July, 1882, regimental headquarters were moved from Fort Concho to Fort Davis, where they remained until March 30, 1885. During this time the regiment saw little active field service. In the spring of 1885 the regiment moved from the Department of Texas to the Department of Arizona, marching along the Southern Pacific Rail- road. When the column took up its march from Fort Davis it comprised eleven troops and the band. At Camp Rice it was joined by Troop I, and from this point to Bowie Station, Arizona, the twelve troops continued together. They had never been together before and never have been since. At Bowie the troops separated to go to their several stations. The head- quarters went to Fort Apache, where they arrived on the 20th of May. The Geronimo campaign had just commenced, and on the 19th of May a battalion formed of Troops D, E, H and K, under Major Van Vliet, was sent out from Fort Grant in search of hostiles. They marched to Fort Bayard, N. M., and through the Mogollon Mountains, but saw nothing of them. The greater part of the regiment was in the field during the whole campaign. Several of the officers, anxious to be where there was most to be done, had themselves detached from their troops to do duty with Indian scouts at the front. Thus, Lieutenant Shipp was with Captain Crawford in Mexico when that officer was killed. Lieutenant Finley accompanied Captain Lawton in his long, hard chase of Geronimo, which led to his sur- render. Lieutenant Clarke patrolled the Mexican border. The latter especially distinguished himself in an engagement which Troop K, under command of Captain Lebo, had with Geronimo’s band in the Pineto Mountains in Mexico. His conduct on this occasion has recently won for him a medal of honor. After Geronimo had surrendered to Captain Lawton, a remnant of his band under Chief Mangus, who was still defying the Government of the United States, was run down in handsome style by Troop H, under the command of Captain Cooper. Such instances of distinguished service are the more creditable as the opportunities therefor were extremely rare. To the greater part of the regiment the Geronimo campaign was a dismal succession of inglorious days devoted to the guarding of water-holes, mountain passes, etc. In 1887 part of the regiment was in the field in search of “the Kid,” a former follower of Geronimo, who had never been caught, and has not been TENTH REGIMENT OF CAVALRY. 297 yet. Lieutenant Carter P. Johnson especially distinguished himself by the skill, energy and perseverance with which he pursued this Indian. On the 15th of April, 1890, the regiment lost the colonel who had com- manded it from its organization by his promotion to a brigadier-general. The vacancy was filled by the promotion of Lieut.-Colonel J. K. Mizner, 8th Cavalry, who is the present chief of the regiment. Regimental head- quarters were moved by Colonel Mizner to Fort Grant, where they now (1891) are. Cbe Artillery ALEXANDER MACOMB M A J O R-GeNER AL Commanding the Army, 1828-1841. THE FIRST REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY* Major WILLIAM L. HASKIN, ist U. S. Artillery. INTRODUCTION. THE first Congress of the United States under the Constitution (March, 1789) found already in existence a “Frontier Corps” of infantry 700 strong, and a battalion of four companies of artillery. According to Heitman’s “ Historical Register of the U. S. Army,” one of these companies (Doughty’s) was retained in service from the Revolutionary army: one (Douglass’) was raised under Resolve of Con- gress of date June 3, 1784 ; and two were organized under Resolve of Con- gress of date October 20, 1786, when the four companies were organized into a battalion under Major John Doughty. This battalion was represented at the battle on the Miami, October 19 and 22, 1790. When the “ Legion of the United States ” was organized in December, 1792, one of these companies was attached to each of its sub-legions, and a major-commandant of artillery (Henry Burbeck) was on the staff of General Anthony Wayne, commanding the Legion. This legionary organization ceased in 1796. In 1794 a “Corps of Artillerists and Engineers ” was organized, which included the four companies of artillery then in service and had sixteen companies in four battalions, with a lieutenant-colonel commandant and four majors. In 1798 an additional regiment of “ Artillerists and Engineers ” was authorized with 12 companies, increased in 1799 to 16 companies. In 1802 there was a reduction of the army. The Engineers were sepa- rated from the Artillery and the latter formed into one regiment of 20 com- panies with a colonel (Henry Burbeck), lieutenant-colonel, and four majors. This was the first First Artillery. In 1808 a regiment of ten companies called the “ Light Artillery ” was formed, but it was light artillery only in name, almost all of its service being performed as infantry. * In 1812 two regiments of artillery were added to the army, each having 20 companies; but barely two years later the three artillery regiments were merged into a “Corps of Artillery,” with six lieutenant-colonels, six majors, and 48 companies in twelve battalions. The Light Artillery regiment was not affected by this change. During the War of 1812 the Artillery of the army was represented in the following engagements :— Battle of Maguago, Mich., Aug. 9, 1812 (1st Art). * See “ The History of the First Regiment of Artillery,” by Brevet Major Wm. L. Haskin. Fort Preble, Me,, 1879. pp. 668. 3oi 302 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Attack on Queenstown Heights, U. Can,, Oct. 13,1812 (L. A. and 2d Art). Capture of York (now Toronto), U. C.. April 27, 1813 (L. A. and 3d Art). Fort Meigs, Ohio, May 5, 1813 (L. A). Fort George, U. C., May 27, 1813 (L. A., 2d Art. and 3d Art). Action at Stony Creek, U. C., June 6, 1813 (L. A. and 2d Art). Battle of Chrystler’s Fields, U. C., Nov. 11, 1813 (L. A., 2d Art. and 3d Art). Defense of Fort Oswego, N. Y., May 5 and 6, 1814 (L. A. and 3d Art). Battle of Chippeway, U. C., July 5, 1814 (Corps of Art). Battle of Niagara Falls, U. C., July 25, 1814 (Corps of Art). Battle of Plattsburg, N. Y„ Sept. 11, 1814 (L. A. and Corps of Art). Defense of Fort McHenry, Md., Sept. 13, 1814 (Corps of Art). Defense of Fort Erie, U. C., Aug. 15, 1814 (Corps of Art). Battle of New Orleans, La., Dec. 23 and 28, 1814, and Jan. 8, 1815 (Corps of Art). At the close of the War of 1812 the army was reduced and the Corps of Artillery retained only 32 companies, in eight battalions; but the Light Artillery again escaped reduction. In 1821 the army was again reduced, and an entire change of organiza- tion was effected by consolidating the Light Artillery, the Ordnance, and the Corps of Artillery into four regiments of artillery, having nine com- panies and ten captains each, the additional captain performing ordnance duty. One company in each regiment was to be a light battery, but until 1836 it was so only in name. With the following modifications these are the organizations now in ex- istence known as the First, Second, Third and Fourth regiments of Artil- lery. At first each regiment had a colonel, lieutenant-colonel and one major. A major was added to each by the Act of February 11, 1847, and still another major to each by the Act of July 28, 1866. In 1832 the Ordnance was separated from the Artillery, the ordnance captains joining the new corps, but artillery lieutenants doing the subordi- nate work of the ordnance under four-year details. This continued until the Act of July 5, 1838, completed the severance. This last named Act added Company K, and the Act of March 3, 1847, added Companies L and M to each regiment. The Artillery has been united with the Engineers, the Ordnance, and the Light Artillery. It has had a battalion, regimental, and corps organiza- tion ; during the Civil War it was even without organization—into any higher unit than the single battery. It would seem that the entire round of experiments had been tried. The present organization into regiments has lasted far longer than any other and appears to have sustained the test of prolonged trial, in peace at least, fairly well. It bids fair to continue in- definitely, for it is impossible to obtain any degree of unanimity among artillery officers as to what should take its place. THE FIRST REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY was organized under the Act of March 2, 1821, by the assignment to it of officers already commissioned in the Ordnance Department, Light Artillery THE FIRST REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 303 regiment, or Corps of Artillery. Its ranks were filled by the transfer of whole companies from the Light Artillery, or the Corps of Artillery. Company A came from the L. A. and was first organized as a company in 1812. Company B also dated from 1812 and had been Company D, Second Bat- talion, C. of A. Companies C and D, dating from 1815, came from the L. A. Company E had been Company N, Second Battalion, C. of A., organized in 1812. Company F had been Company B, Fourth Battalion, C. of A., and dated from 1812. Companies G and H came from the L. A. ; G dating from 1812 and H from 1808. Company I had been Company A, Second Battalion, C. of A., and was first organized as a company in 1798. Of the 47 officers of the regiment, 13—including Colonel Porter—came from the L. A.; 23—including Major Walbach—from the C. of A.; 8—in- cluding Lieutenant-Colonel Bomford—from the Ordnance ; and three— Captains Wm. J. Worth and Henry Whiting, and Lieutenant W. S. Harney —from the Infantry. Harney remained in the regiment less than two years, but Worth belonged to it until he entered the Ordnance in 1832, and Whiting until he became a quartermaster in 1835. Companies A, B, E, F, G and H had taken an active part in the War of 1812, and brought with them into the regiment a record of gallant service already performed. There is little of interest in the history of a regiment in time of peace, and the long period of fifteen years which elapsed before the breaking out of the Florida War was almost uneventful. The regiment was at first stationed at the posts in New York Harbor and on the New England coast, but after a service there of six years it was sent to the more southerly posts between Annapolis, Md., and Charleston, S. C., where it remained, though with many interchanges of station by the several companies, until January, 1836, when eight companies reached Florida, fol- lowed in October of the same year by the ninth. The Florida War brought little glory to any who took part in it, the difficulty being, not to fight the enemy, but to find him. “A barren war- fare, marches without battles, scoutings by day, alarms by night; continual little annoyances, so trifling as to be beneath narration, yet in their fre- quency and troublesomeness as bad on the spirits as a defeat and reducing the duty list as much as a battle. The climate was an enemy more success- ful than the Seminoles, and its victims counted not by single files, but by platoons if not battalions.” For two years the regiment performed its share of this work, taking part in eleven more or less important engagements with the Indians. The following named officers were present with the regiment during its service in Florida and by their gallantry in action and fidelity to duty—in this case a thankless duty bringing no other reward than the consciousness of duty well done—reflected credit upon the regiment:—Colonel Eustis, 304 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Majors Wn. Gates and B. K. Pierce; Captains R. M. Kirby, Giles Porter, David Van Ness, Justin Dimick, Lemuel Gates and D. D. Tompkins ; and Lieutenants Geo. Nauman, Francis Taylor, J. R. Irwin, J. H. Prentiss, Geo. Watson, E. A. Capron, D. E. Hale, John F. Lee, Alfred Herbert, Wm. H. Betts, P. V. Hagner, M. J. Burke, J. S. Hatheway and Wm. H. Fowler. In 1838 the regiment was sent to the northern frontier of the U. S. in New York and Vermont, and shortly after reaching its new stations a com- pany was added to each of the regiments of artillery. The additional com- pany of the First was mounted and became Battery K. Although Company A had been the designated light battery since 1821 it had never had a horse attached to it, but had performed the same duties, and in the same way, as the other companies had. In 1840 the regiment was moved to the boundary line between Maine and New Brunswick. At this time war with Great Britain was threatened, the chief cause for the dispute being the location of the bound- ary line between the United States and British territory, but it was fortunately averted. The regiment remained on this line, however, unti1 just before the outbreak of the Mexican War, when four companies went to Texas and six to Florida. In the campaign of 1846-47 on Taylor’s line in Texas and northern Mex- ico, Companies B, C, D, E and Battery K, took an active part, the regi- ment being represented by one or more of its companies in the battles of Palo Alto, Resaca de la Palma, Monterey and Buena Vista. The campaign of 1847 in central Mexico under General Scott brought the greater part of the regiment under fire, and Companies B, D, F, G, H and Batteries I and K, some or all of them, took part in the siege of Vera Cruz and the battles or skirmishes of Cerro Gordo, La Hoya, Oka Lake, Contreras, Churubusco, Chapultepec and City of Mexico. Company I wras made a light battery after the battle of Cerro Gordo. There was then no retired list, and the field officers of the regiment were so infirm or so far advanced in years as to be wholly unable to undergo the fatigues of active service. From this it resulted that, after Vera Cruz and Cerro Gordo had been fought, the senior captain present—Brevet Major Justin Dimick—commanded the battalion. The campaign was one of the most brilliant recorded in history. More recent military operations on a very much larger scale have dimmed the memory of its successes, but the military student will always admire the extreme audacity which prompted it, and the manner in which the troops —the whole army—cooperated to make it a success. The First Artillery received the commendation of its brigade and di- vision commanders for each and every action in which it was present, and its losses—21 per cent, of its whole strength in killed and wounded—attest its military zeal and fidelity to duty. The battle of Churubusco was espe- cially fatal, for it cost the regiment the lives of Capt. E. A. Capron, Capf. M. J. Burke, Lieut. J. F. Irons, and Lieut. Satterlee Hoffman. Lieutenants Martin and Boynton were among the wounded, and the total loss in officers and men was 45 out of a total of less than 300. THE FIRST REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 305 The following named officers of the First were present during the Mex- ican War, in one or both campaigns : Majors Levi Whiting and Thos. Childs. Captains Justin Dimick, L. B. Webster, Geo. Nauman, Francis Taylor, J. H. Winder, J. B. Magruder, E. A. Capron, M. J. Burke and J. S. Hath- eway. Lieutenants J. L. Donaldson, W.W. Mackall, B. H. Hill, Wm.H. French, Jos. Hooker, Henry C. Wayne, Irvin McDowell, J. A. Haskin, H. D. Grafton, J. B. Ricketts, S. K. Dawson, J. G. Martin, J. F. Irons, J. M. Brannan, Isaac Bowen, Seth Williams, Abner Doubleday, J. P. Johnstone, Henry Coppee, E. C. Boynton, T. J. Jackson, Truman Seymour, Satterlee Hoffman, J. B. Gibson and A. P. Hill. Many of these names will be very familiar to all who have read the his- tory of a later and greater war, as well as to the students of this foreign war in which these men were such prominent actors. At this date (No- vember, 1894), Professor Henry Coppee, of Lehigh University, is the sole survivor of all of “ Ours” who took part in the War, and he was among those who entered the City of Mexico with Scott’s victorious army. Upon the evacuation of Mexico in 1848 the First Artillery was stationed upon the Atlantic coast from New York to Fort Washington, Md., with the exception of Companies L and M, which were sent to Oregon. In the fol- lowing year, however, four companies went into the interior of Florida, and in 1850 four additional companies went to the Gulf States and Battery I to California. Companies L and M were in Oregon but four years when they were transferred to the Atlantic coast, reorganized, and sent to Florida. Service in that State was found to consist, as usual, of fruitless marches and countermarches, scouts in this direction and in that, and in years of service scarcely an event worthy of record. Filibusters in Louisiana and Texas in 1851 made some slight break in the monotony of garrison life for several of the companies, and in 1856 the Indians were fought, once in Florida and several times in Texas. In 1859 the outlaw band of Cortinas attacked and then blockaded Brownsville, Texas, but was in turn attacked, beaten, and broken up by a force including three companies of the First Artillery. With the closing months of i860 the regiment completed its tenth year of continuous service in the Southern States. During this long period no foot company of the regiment (except the Oregon companies) had been stationed farther north than Fort Monroe, and the regiment had never had less than four companies in the Gulf States, while the usual number was eight. The detail for the Artillery School took two companies northward, and the companies in Florida were occasionally sent to Charleston to recuperate, but the regiment—generally—had been a stranger to the northern climate for ten long years. In January, 1861, Companies A and C were at Fort Monroe ; B at Key West Barracks ; D at Baton Rouge Barracks, La.; E and H at Fort Sum- ter, S. C.; F, L and Battery K at Eagle Pass (Fort Duncan), Texas; G at Barrancas Barracks, Fla.; Battery I at Leavenworth, Kansas, and M at Brownsville, Texas. HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. 306 The excitement throughout the South at this time in regard to the secession of the States bid fair to lead to violent seizure of Government property, and made it necessary for individual commanders to judge for themselves in many cases as to the proper course to pursue for the protec- tion of the public property under their charge or the preservation of their commands. In the exercise of this judgment Major Robert Anderson had just trans- ferred his command—Companies E and H—from Fort Moultrie to Fort Sumter; Company B, in January, occupied Fort Taylor; and Company G, also in January, moved from Fort Barrancas to Fort Pickens. Company D, at Baton Rouge Barracks, La., 500 miles from any possibility of support was forced to leave for the North in January ; and the garrison of Eagle Pass—Companies F and L and Battery K—just escaped being included in Twigg’s surrender by marching to Brownsville, where, with Company M, it embarked for loyal territory in March. On the 1st of April, 1861. but five posts within the limits of the seceded States were still occupied by United States troops. These were Fort Mon- roe, Va.; Fort Sumter, S. C.; Fort Taylor, Key West, Fla.; Fort Jefferson, Tortugas, Fla.; and Fort Pickens, Pensacola Harbor, Fla. Of these the four last named were garrisoned wholly or in great part by the First Artillery, and Company C was among the troops composing the garrison of Fort Monroe. The story of Sumter has been told again and again. It fell to the lot of the First Artillery to fire the first shot in defense of the flag, and that shot had a result such as the wisest Southerner could not have foretold. Few Northerners even could foresee that it announced the beginning of the end of human slavery in North America. At an early period of the war it became evident that the companies of the regular artillery were all or nearly all to serve as light batteries. No explicit orders to that effect appear to have been issued, but company after company was mounted until the twelve companies of the regiment had all been equipped either as mounted or as horse artillery. The practice of uniting the batteries by twos to man single batteries began early in the war and continued till the end. Until May, 1864, Batteries E, G, H, I and K, served with the Army of the Potomac; B, C, D and M, on the southern Atlantic coast; and A, F and L, in Florida and Louisiana; but in the latter part of 1864 all were in Virginia. It is not possible within the limits to which this sketch must be confined to give any adequate account of the 98 battles, sieges, combats, actions, skirmishes or affairs, in which the regiment was represented during the Civil War. Batteries were present in all the chief engagements in Virginia, Maryland, Florida, Louisiana, and the coast of South Carolina. They were at Antietam, Appomatox, Bull Run, Cedar Creek, Chancellorsville, Cold Harbor, Drury’s Bluff, Fair Oaks, Fisher’s Hill, Fort Bisland, Fort Pickens, Fort Sumter, Fredericksburg, Gettysburg, Glendale, Irish Bend, Mansura, Olustu, Petersburg, Pleasant Hill, Port Hudson, Trevillian Station, Win- chester and Williamsburg. THE FIRST REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 307 Two batteries, one of the First and one of the Fifth, were in the very vortex and crisis of the battle of Bull Run ; a battery of the First was in action nearly all day not far from “ Deadman’s Lane ” at Antietam ; in the line of thirty pieces which finally checked the victorious Confederates on our right at Chancellorsville were six belonging to the First; the “ Crest of the Rebellion ” at Gettysburg found two batteries of the First in the line against which it broke ; when the last obstacle to the free navigation of the Mississippi was overcome at Port Hudson, three batteries of the First Artil- lery could claim their fair share of credit for the achievement; and when Early was sent “ whirling through Winchester ” two batteries of the First were there to assist him along. On the 12th of April, 1861, a First Artillery garrison opened the war, and on the 9th of April, 1865, a battery of the regiment fired the last can- non-shot at the principal army of the Confederacy and almost the last shot of the war. 'The flag of the United States which was first lowered to the Confederate forces in Charleston Harbor, was, almost exactly four years later, raised in the capital of that Confederacy by an officer of the First Artillery. The number of officers, then or formerly of the regiment, who were made general officers during the Civil War is so considerable as to merit notice. On the Union side these were : Daniel Tyler. Geo. D. Ramsay. Jacob Ammen. Montgomery C. Meigs Israel Vogdes. Wm. H. French. Joseph Hooker. Irvin McDowell. Joseph A. Haski.n. James B. Ricketts. John M. Brannan. Seth Williams. Abner Doubleday. Truman Seymour. James B. Fry. Jefferson C. Davis. Absalom Baird. Adam J. Slemmer. Alvan C. Gillem. Henry W. Slocum. John M. Schofield. John W. Turner. Robert Anderson. Erasmus D. Keyes. Richard H. Jackson. Edmund Kirby. Judson Kilpatrick. Lewis G. Arnold. On the Confederate side they were: J. B. Magruder. H. C. Wayne. J. G. Martin. Samuel Jones. T. T. Jackson (StonewalD. A. P. Hill. Daniel Leadbetter. J. E. Slaughter. A. R. Lawton. F. A. Shoup. I. R. Trimble, W. W. Mackall. The theory upon which our army is said to be maintained,—for the purpose of providing trained officers for higher rank in the militia or vol- unteers,—would seem to have been justified in the case of this particular regiment, since it was able to furnish 40 general officers when called upon for that purpose. 308 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Between December, 1861, and the ist of January, 1865, sixty-eight offi- cers are named upon the regimental return, and 38 of these were, for a part of their service at least, on detached duty. This number includes those serving with increased rank in the volunteers. When the number absent on account of wounds or from sickness is taken into account it becomes more easy to comprehend why it was, that during the Civil War it was very seldom the case that one-half of the officers belonging to the regiment were actually serving with it. Up to the date of the battle of Gettysburg the average number present was twenty; but from that time till the close of the war the average was only thirteen, and there were at no time so many as twenty officers with their batteries. From the battle of Bull Run to the surrender at Appo- matox the average number present was only 16.57, yet the regimental re- turns for that period show a total of 19 killed and wounded, and—what is a little remarkable—deaths from disease. The average strength of the regiment in enlisted men for this period was 770. Of these 54 were killed, 216 wounded, 71 missing, and 91 died of dis- ease; making the total loss 432. In Fox’s “Regimental Losses of the American Civil War ” a list of the light batteries (regular and volunteer) which suffered the heaviest losses is given on page 463. Sixty-two bat- teries are named and among them are Battery M, at Olustee; I, at Bull Run and again at Gettysburg; H, at Chancellorsville; and A, at Port Hud- son. During the Civil War the headquarters of the regiment never took the field. For several months in 1861 there was actually no regimental com- mander, The sergeant-major probably received and filed the company monthly returns, but no regimental orders were issued nor any other busi- ness transacted such as properly pertains to the office of a regimental com- mander. Colonel Erving was retired in October, 1861, and was succeeded by Colonel Justin Dimick with station at Fort Warren, Boston Harbor. In November he named Lieutenant Dimick as the regimental adjutant but in the July following the adjutant applied for field service and from that time until the close of the war there was no officer actually serving as adjutant of the regiment. There had been no regimental quartermaster since June, i860, and none was appointed till June, 1876. Colonel Dimick nominally commanded the regiment until the close of the year 1863, when Captain Wm. Silvey, the senior officer in the regiment not holding higher rank in the volunteer service, was directed to relieve him. He acted as regimental commander, with station at Concord, N. H., until January, 1866. Almost at the very beginning of the Civil War, therefore, the regimental organization simply went to pieces. All the field officers held higher volun- teer rank or were superannuated, and there was no regimental staff. The sole duty left to the nominal regimental commander was to consolidate the monthly returns of the individual batteries. Captains appointed and mus- tered their own non-commissioned officers without any reference to him, and he exercised no control of any kind over his companies. Yet the artillery, without exception, did exceedingly well during the war and contributed largely toward the final result. THE FIRST REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 309 The natural inference is, that the regimental organization is wholly superfluous when artillery is called upon to fulfil the principal end and ob- ject of its existence, though very good and even necessary during peace times, to provide for the systematic conduct of affairs and to furnish pro- motion to the officers of the arm. Whether organized in regiments or as a corps, the actual result, so far as regimental or corps control is concerned, would undoubtedly have been the same, with the resulting inference that, for actual service, no organization higher than the single battery is neces- sary. It is simply impossible that this can be true. The practice which obtained from the very outbreak of the war of using the single battery as the highest organization of light artillery was vicious in theory and in practice. The highest authority we have upon artillery has stated this fact, and our practice in the later years of the war,—the result of experience in the field,—proved that the battalion of batteries, under a responsible head and with still higher grades of authority to con- trol battalions, would give results wholly impossible of attainment with divided commands. Had the colonel of a regiment of artillery taken the field as the chief of artillery for a corps, with his field officers in their proper places as chiefs of battalions, to serve with divisions or directly under the corps com- mander as occasion might demand, can any one doubt for a minute the increased efficiency of that regiment as a fighting machine? In actual practice the field officers of the regular artillery were all given volunteer rank to command infantry, and no field officers for volunteer batteries (the exceptions were very few in number) were commissioned ; and when it was found by experience that artillery gained power in a geo- metrical ratio by concentration, captains were taken from their batteries to act as the field officers which must be had, but never, to the very end, was the point conceded that light artillery, fully as much any other arm, must have its field officers actually with it in the field. The necessity for experienced officers to command volunteers was unde- niable, and the gain to the whole service by depriving the artillery of its legitimate leaders was greater, perhaps, than the loss to the artillery itself ; but there is something radically wrong in the system which brings about such a crippling of one arm. The senior officers remaining should have been given at least temporary rank in the higher grades of their own arm to command artillery, and had this been done, we have the assertion of the artillery officer best qualified by experience to express an opinion) that the efficiency of our arm great as it was, would thereby have been increased from one-third to one- half. Whether the organization of the arm should be regimental or corps is a subject upon which there will always be wide divergencies of opinion ; but the assertion that artillery should be so organized that when it goes into active service it shall have its complete hierarchy of command present with it, will find not one artillerist in opposition. This can be secured under either form of organization. 310 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. With the close of the Civil War the companies of the regiment, except- ing the two which were light batteries before the war, were promptly dis- mounted and stationed upon the Atlantic seaboard from Maine to New York Harbor. The light batteries went to Texas. The field officers rejoined and the regimental staff was again established, so that the regular routine of garrison life was soon in operation as smoothly as though it had never been interrupted. The artillery had had a double line of first lieutenants ever since 1821, but about this time the President was authorized to give it, in his discre- tion, a double line of second lieutenants as well. He availed himself of this right to some extent, the number of second lieutenants in the regiment in- creasing from 12 in 1866, to 22 in 1870. This was the greatest number on any annual register, and from this time it diminished until the register for 1874 showed but 7 in all. Since 1876, however, there have been two second lieutenants for a light battery and one for each foot battery. The second lieutenants appointed in the years from 1867 to 1870 are those who are now, —more than 23 years later,—patiently awaiting their captaincies, and even now with no immediate prospect of attaining them. The regular monotony of garrison life in the years following the war was relieved from time to time by occurrences of more or less importance in- volving the movement of companies. The Fenians required the presence of almost the whole of the regiment upon the northern boundary of New York in 1866 and again in 1870. Light Battery K was brought out to overawe a mob in New Orleans in 1866. A large part of the regiment was called out on four different occasions, in 1869, 1870, and 1871, to protect internal revenue officers in their pursuit of illicit whisky in the slums of Brooklyn and large details were made, with ever increasing frequency, for funeral escort duty for the veterans of the war. In November of 1872 the regiment left its northern stations for those on the Atlantic and Gulf coast from Charleston, S. C., to Pensacola Harbor, Fla. Here it served three years, suffering each summer from yellow fever, but in 1875 the welcome order of relief came and b)f the 1st of January, 1876—the Centennial year—the regiment was stationed along the New Eng- land coast from Fort Adams, R. I., to Fort Preble, Me. This was the year of the disputed Presidential election and in November every battery of the regiment left its station for duty in some one of the disturbed districts. One of them went from Maine to Florida, and all went into the Southern States. The mere presence of the troops was all that was required. They were never called upon to act, but it was several months before the batteries were finally allowed to return to their posts. The labor riots of 1877 also took the whole regiment out, this time into Pennsylvania ; but there was never occasion for firing a shot. The appear- ance of the troops sufficed to overawe the rioters. Late in the year 1881 the regiment left New England for the Pacific coast where the batteries occupied Fort Canby and the posts in San Fran- cisco Harbor for more than eight uneventful years. In May, 1890, it was brought back to the Atlantic coast and stationed at THE FIRST REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 311 its present (November, 1894) posts, with nine batteries and one light bat- tery in New York Harbor, one battery at Fort Monroe, and one at Fort Sheridan, 111. (first at Fort Riley, Kas.) Since the last change of stations there has been but one event in its history of any importance, when at Wounded Knee, an opportunity was given Light Batterv E to render gallant service which it took advantage of to the fullest extent. THE SECOND REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. By Lieut. W. A. SIMPSON, Adjutant 2d U. S. Artillery. THE Second Artillery was, with the First, Third, and Fourth, organ- ized by an Act of Congress dated March 21, 1821. Each regiment was to have one colonel, one lieutenant-colonel, one major,'one supernumerary captain (for ordnance duty), one adjutant, one ser- geant-major, and nine companies. Each company was to have a captain, two first lieutenants, two second lieutenants, and fifty-seven enlisted men. One company was to be designated and equipped as light artillery, but for many years it was such only in name. The list of organizations (given in the Army Register) from which these regiments were formed is misleading, as some of the organizations mentioned had been out of existence for years. The four regiments were formed from the Corps of Artillery, the Regiment of Light Artillery, and the Ordnance, the Second being taken mainly from the Corps of Artillery. All ordnance duty was to be done by the artillery. There was a second regiment of artillery during the War of 1812, of which Winfield Scott was lieutenant-colonel and then colonel. After the war it was merged into the Corps of Artillery. The names of battles of that war are borne on the regimental colors to-day, a few of the officers of the new Second had belonged to the old, and some of the companies may have belonged to both regiments, a fact I am unable to establish ; but as a whole the Second Artillery of 1812 was a different organization from the Second Artillery of 1821. The assignment of companies, stations, and former organizations is given in the following table : Company. Captain. Former Organization. Station. Headquarters. “A” Fanning. 2 B. N. D * Ft. McHenry, Md. West Point, N. Y. “ B” Gates. i B. N. D. Watervliet Arsenal. “C” Roach. 3 B. N. D. Ft. Mifflin, Pa. “ D” Heileman. i B. N. D. Ft. Niagara, N. Y. “ E ” Nourse. Made up of recruits. Pittsburg Arsenal. “F” Belton. 3 B. N. D. Ft. McHenry, Md. “ G ” Zantzinger. 4 B. N. D. Plattsburg, N. Y. “H” Mountfort. 4 B. N. D. Detroit, Mich. “I” Legate. i B. N. D. Mackinac, Mich. * B. N. D. stands for Battalion, Northern Division. The new field officers were : N. Towson, colonel; James House, lieu- tenant-colonel ; J. Hindman, major. Colonel Towson had distinguished himself greatly, while a captain of the Second Artillery, in the War of 1812. At the time of his nomination to be colonel, however, he was paymaster- general, then a civil officer. The senate refused to confirm him as colonel THE SECOND REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 313 on the ground that selections of officers for the new regiments should be confined to the army. The disagreement between the executive and the senate in this case lasted through three administrations, and was finally settled in 1832 by the nomination and confirmation of the then senior lieutenant-colonel of artillery, William Lindsay. This officer had been major and afterwards lieutenant-colonel of the Second Artillery in the War of 1812. The regiment was thus without a colonel for ten years. In 1824 headquarters were removed to Governor’s Island, and the greater part of the regiment was brought to New York Harbor. In the same year ten companies of artillery (two each of the 1st and 3d, three each of the 2d and 4th) were to be assembled at Fort Monroe and organ- ized as a regiment under the name of “ The Artillery Corps for Instruc- tion. ’ D, G and H were the companies of the 2d Artillery designated for this detail. These companies were to be relieved by others at regular in- tervals. In the autumn of 1827 the regiment was ordered South, exchanging with the 1st Artillery. The new stations were at first Augusta Arsenal and Savannah, Georgia ; Fort Marion, Florida ; Forts Pike and St. Philip, Louisiana. In the order making the change it was stated that this was to be regarded as the beginning of a system of periodical changes. The southern tour was a long and active one. The stations of the companies were frequently changed on account of sickness, and for service in the Cherokee and Creek country, embracing portions of Georgia, Alabama, and Tennessee. About this time, too, the relations between the general gov- ernment and the States of South Carolina and Alabama were somewhat strained. The recent tariff legislation was very unpopular in the South and “ nullification ” feeling, especially in the former State, ran high. So serious did things look that, in the latter part of 1832, Major Heileman, 2d Artillery, commanding in Charleston Harbor, was cautioned from Washington to be on the alert and hold the forts belonging to the United States against any force that might be brought against them. Seven additional companies, of the 1st, 3d, and 4th Artillery, were ordered to Charleston Harbor, and Gen- eral Scott arrived to command in person and see that the laws of the United States were enforced. Happily, no collision occurred. A terrible fire break- ing out in Charleston, General Scott ordered 400 men to the city, without arms, to assist in subduing the fire, They arrived just in time to relieve the exhausted citizens at the pumps. This action did much towards allay- ing the bitter feeling of the time. In 1832 the Ordnance was separated from the Artillery. In the autumn of 1833 the action of the United States marshal in removing white settlers from lands ceded to the United States by the Creeks having aroused oppo- sition on the part of the authorities of Alabama, a strong force of United States troops under Colonel D. E. Twiggs was sent to Fort Mitchell, on the eastern border of that State, to support him. The 2d Artillery was repre- sented by A, B and C companies. The legislature passed laws giving State courts jurisdiction in this territory, and the State officers served writs on United States officers, the State courts adjudging them guilty of contempt in refusing to obey the writs. The Governor of Alabama went so far as to HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. threaten to raise an army of State troops and drive the Federal troops from the State. This, however, was not done, and the Federal and State forces did not me to blows. These events show the extent to which the doctrine of States’ rights was believed in at the time. According to the treaty made with the Seminole Indians, their removal to the West was to begin January i, 1836. The actions of the Seminoles as that date approached led the authorities to suspect that the Indians would not act in good faith, and measures were taken to increase the military force in Florida and compel the Seminoles to fulfill their treaty obligations. Of the 2d Artillery, A, B, C and G companies were sent to Fort Brooke, Tampa Bay. H was there already. D was at St. Augustine, and F at Fort King, in the heart of the Indian country, about midway between St. Augustine and Fort Brooke. This being an important point, Major Dade, 4th In- fantry, with C, 2d Artillery, and B, 3d Artillery, was ordered to march there from Fort Brooke. The command left Fort Brooke December 23. On the morning of December 28, as they were marching along a lake, they were attacked by Indians from the woods on the other side of the road. A mo- ment before they were surprised Major Dade had said to his command, “ We have now got through all danger; keep good heart and when we get to Fort King, I’ll give you three days for Christmas.” The fight lasted several hours, every officer and all but two of the men being killed. The officers of the 2d killed were Captain Gardiner, 2d Lieutenant Basinger, and Brevet 2d Lieutenant Henderson. The same day a detachment of the same band of Indians, under Osceola, came upon General Thompson, Indian agent, and Lieutenant Constantine Smith, 2d Artillery, who were out walk- ing near Fort King, killed them both, and then attacked the fort, hoping to find the garrison (F, 2d Artillery) unprepared. The attack was unsuccessful. December 29 General Clinch, who had not yet learned of the Dade mas- sacre, had a fight with the Indians on the Withlacoochee River. His force was made up of detachments of the 1st, 2d and 3d Artillery. The Indians were defeated. D and F of the 2d took part in this action, losing one man killed and twelve wounded. On February 27 there was another fight on the Withlacoochee in which A, B, D, F, G and H were engaged. Early in 1836 General Scott took command in Florida. His plan was to form three columns ; one to operate from Volusia, on the St. John’s River; one from Fort King or Fort Drane, and one from Fort Brooke. The latter was commanded by Colonel Lindsay, 2d Artillery. Of the 2d, A, B, G and H were in Colonel Lindsay’s column. C, D, E and F were in eastern and central Florida, and were generally scattered at small posts. I was not sent to Florida until December, 1837. June 9, 1836, the Indians attacked Micanopy, commanded by Major Heileman, 2d Artillery. The attack was repulsed and the Indians driven two miles. D and E took part in the affair. Major Heileman, who was breveted lieutenant-colonel for his con- duct in this action, died a few days later from the effects of over-exertion in the battle. In August, 1836, the regiment was ordered, as soon as its services could be dispensed with, to the New England coast, with headquarters at Fort Wolcott, R. I. (now the navy Torpedo Station). Headquarters were estab- THE SECOND REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 315 lishsd at Fort Wolcott, remained there a few months, and then were re- turned to Florida, but the rest of the order was never carried out. Detach- ments of E and F were in the battle of Big Wahoo Swamp, November 21, 1836. February 28, 1837, the Indians attacked Camp Monroe, on Lake Mon- roe. but were defeated. In this action one sergeant and three privates of C were wounded and Captain Mellon was killed. C company, wiped out in the Dade massacre, had just been reorganized, and Mellon promoted to its com- mand. September 11, 1837, a battalion of mixed troops, commanded by Lieutenant Peyton, 2d Artillery, surprised and captured two camps of Indians near Mosquito Inlet. This meagre statement gives no idea of the hardships incident to serv- ice in this war. “ The theatre of operations was a wilderness and every hammock and swamp a citadel for the enemy.” The heat the greater part of the year was so intense that the troops could not make even ordinary marches. The men had often nothing but winter clothing. The water was bad, the food poor. No guides could be had and transportation was very difficult. General Jesup says, in his official report: “This is a service which no man would seek with any other view than the mere performance of duty. Distinction or increase of reputation is out of the question. The difficulties are such that the best concerted plans may result in absolute failure, and the best established reputation be lost without fault. If I have, at any time, said aught in disparagement of the operations of others in Florida, knowing the country as I now know it, I consider myself bound, as a man of honor, solemnly to retract it.” In a little over two years 9 officers and 103 men of the 2d Artillery were killed in action, or died of wounds received or disease contracted in Florida. Many brevets were conferred on officers of the regiment for services in this war. The roster of lieutenants of the regiment in 1836-38 shows, among others, the names of John Sedg- wick, C. F. Smith, E. D. Townsend, Henry L. Kendrick, A. A. Humphreys, James Duncan, Lewis G. Arnold, Edmund Schriver, Robert Allen, and Horace Brooks. In the spring of 1838, after eleven years’ service in the South, the regi- ment was put on the march for the Cherokee country in Alabama and Tennessee. A small part of the regiment went up the Mississippi and Ten- nessee rivers by boat, but the greater part was brought together on Black Creek, East Florida. The route was thence'by water to St. Mary’s, Savan- nah, and Augusta, and thence on foot to Ross Landing (where Chattanooga now stands), on the Tennessee River. The Cherokees were to be moved West, and, as trouble with them was anticipated, a large force of regulars, of which the 2d formed a part, was collected in their country. The whole regiment was encamped at Ross Landing, and remained there while the Indians were being collected and sent West. About this time the “ Patriot War ” was raging in Canada, and as the “ Patriots ” had the sympathy of a large number of Americans along the border, troops were needed in that region to enforce neutrality and prevent aid and reinforcements going to the revolutionists from the American side. Accordingly, as soon as its duties in the Cherokee country were completed, the regiment was, in July, ordered to the Niagara frontier. On its march through Kentucky, it 316 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. camped at Lexington on ground owned by Henry Clay, who did all in his power for the comfort of the command. On reaching the Ohio River the regiment went by boat to Portsmouth, Ohio, and thence across the state by canal to Cleveland. Here the regiment separated, a battalion under Major Payne going to Detroit, while the rest of the regiment went down Lake Erie to Buffalo, where headquarters were established. fen 1838, another company, K, was added to the regiment, C. F. Smith becoming its first captain. Colonel Lindsay died September 15, and James Bankhead became colonel. Though some changes were made from time to time, eight companies were at headquarters during most of the time the regiment was on the Niagara frontier. As there was no fighting, the atten- tion of the officers was devoted to bringing the regiment up to as high a standard as possible. There was great rivalry between the companies, and the spirit of emulation was still further increased by the presence over the border of some crack British regiments, whose officers worked in har- mony with ours in defeating the schemes of the would-be liberators of Canada. In 1839 Secretary of War Poinsett ordered the establishment of a camp of instruction at Trenton, New Jersey ; one company of each artil- lery regiment to be sent there and equipped as a battery of light artillery. A of the 2d was selected and went there under command of Lieut, (after- wards Captain) James Duncan, who made it so famous in the war with Mexico. Three months later it returned to Buffalo as a light battery. In August, 1841, the regiment left Buffalo by canal, headquarters and B, D and G going to Fort Columbus, A to Fort Hamilton, E to Fort Lafayette, F and I to Fort Adams, and C, H and K to Fort Mon- roe. These stations were occupied with but little change until the Mexican War. A (Duncan) left New York Harbor in August, 1845, and C (McKenzie), I (Lowd) and K (C. F. Smith), left in September for Corpus Christi. Join- ing General Taylor’s army, they marched with it on Matamoras. I was assigned to Fort Brown, took part in its defense, and was left in garrison there. C and K, as a part of the artillery battalion, and A were engaged at Palo Alto (May 8) and Resaca de la Palma (May 9). Duncan by his bril- liant advance and attack, without orders, on the Mexican right at Palo Alto, did much towards winning the battle and was specially mentioned by Gen- eral Taylor. G (De Hart) and H (Swartwout) left New York in June and joined Tay- lor’s army on the Rio Grande. On the march up the river, C was left at Camargo and H at Reynosa. A, C, G and K formed part of Worth’s Divi- sion and with it took an important part in the taking of Monterey (Septem- ber 20-23), Captain C. F. Smith commanding the storming party that led the attack on Federation Hill. When Taylor’s army, previous to the battle of Buena Vista, was reduced to strengthen General Scott, all our com- panies in Mexico were brought to the sea-board. The rest of the regiment left New York for Mexico, and in March, 1847, the whole regiment, except E, which was sent to Fort Brown, was assembled before Vera Cruz. On the organization of the Army of Invasion the regiment was assigned to Worth’s regular division. The reduction of Vera Cruz was largely the work THE SECOND REGIMEN T OF A R TILLER V. 317 of the artillery, Col. Bankhead, the senior field officer, acting as chief of artillery, in command of the batteries. The regiment took part in all the battles of the campaign, figuring most prominently and suffering the heaviest losses at Churubusco, Molino del Rey, and City of Mexico. Col. Bankhead going on detached service, the Lieut.-Colonel (Erving) being Superintendent of recruiting, and the Major (Monroe) being chief of artillery of Gen. Taylor’s army, the regiment started on the advance under command of Capt. McKenzie. Major Galt, promoted to the 2d when a new major was added to each artillery regi- ment, arrived and took command before the battle of Churubusco. Capt. C. F. Smith, on leaving Vera Cruz, was given command of a battalion of light troops, consisting of K (his own) and I of the 2d and one company each of the 5th and 8th Infantry. This command he exercised with dis- tinction throughout the campaign. B (Kendrick) was left at Puebla as part of the garrison, which successfully withstood a siege of 28 days by a vastly superior force. The conduct of Capt. Kendrick during this siege was spoken of by his commanding officer in the highest terms. At Molino Del Rey Lieut. Armstrong was killed, Lieutenants Daniels and Shackelford were mortally wounded, and all the lieutenants of Duncan’s battery (H. J. Hunt, Wm. Hays, and H. F. Clarke) were slightly wounded. At Chapultepec Capt. Horace Brooks commanded one of the siege bat- teries erected to prepare the assault. Capt. McKenzie led a storming party of volunteers from Worth’s division and after the enemy fled from Chapul- tepec, took part in the pursuit up the causeway and in the action at the Garita San Cosme. In this action Capt. Brooks commanded what was left of the regiment and, jointly with a detachment of the4th Infantry under Lieut. U. S. Grant, attacked and carried, after an obstinate resistance, a strong breast-work, turned the enemy’s right, and pursued him from house to house. During this action it became necessary to advance a piece of ar- tillery along the causeway, which was swept by the enemy’s fire, against a breast-work. Lieut. Hunt, of Duncan’s battery, was ordered to execute this duty. Advancing at full speed for 150 yards, with a loss of more than half his men, he accomplished his object and engaged the enemy muzzle to muzzle. Gen. Worth says, in his official report, “ It has never been my for- tune to witness a more brilliant exhibition of courage and conduct.” Throughout the campaign Duncan’s battery (A) was splendidly handled and made a brilliant record. The foot companies, though necessarily less con- spicuous, contributed their full share to the fame achieved by the American armies in Mexico. Even the band took part in the fighting. They were trained as soldiers and served in the ranks with muskets in every battle, re- suming their musical instruments in camp and garrison. In December, 1847, two new companies (L and M) were added to each artillery regiment, too late, however, to take any part in the war. M was made a light battery. The regiment was now so reduced in numbers that C, G, K and L, were broken up temporarily and the personnel distributed among the other companies. In June, 1848, the regiment began its home- ward journey. It was sent first to Fort Columbus, and was then distributed as follows : Headquarters, C and G to Fort Monroe ; A, Fort McHenry ; B 318 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. and D, Bedlow’s Island ; E, Fort Johnston, N. C.; F and I, Fort Moultrie; H, Fort Macon; K, St. Augustine; L, Augusta Arsenal; M (which had been dismounted), Savannah. They were not allowed to rest long. In November, 1848, B and D were sent to St. Louis, thence, marching from Leavenworth, to New Mexico, where they remained until the autumn of 1857. B was stationed at Santa Fe and afterwards at Fort Defiance, which post was commanded for some years by Capt. Kendrick, who showed marked ability in his management of the Indians. D was stationed successively at Santa Fe, and Forts Union, Massachusetts, and Stanton. Both companies were out frequently after Indians and on exploring expeditions. D was in Loring’s Gila expedition against the Apaches in 1857. In 1849, E, F, H, K, L and M were sent to Florida, this time to the region between the Indian and the Kissimmee rivers, where they were actively engaged in scouting and building roads. About the latter work the department commander, Twiggs, was very par- ticular. He required the roads to be made in the most careful manner, and afterwards refused to allow brick and lime to be hauled over them, although greatly needed at an interior post, for fear of cutting them up. In Novem- ber, 1850, four companies were sent up to Charleston on account of seces- sion excitement, and returned to Florida early in 1852. “ M ” (Hunt) was again made a light battery in 1853, and was sent from Charleston by water to Fort Smith, Ark., thence overland to Fort Washita where it took station. In November of the same year headquarters went to Pensacola (afterwards to Fort Brooke) and all the reigiment except the light batteries, the companies in New Mexico, and H (which went to Baton Rouge), was again in Florida. Major Munroe commanded in the Peninsula and Major Harvey Brown along the Caloosahatchie River. For the next three years the theatre of operations was mainly in southwestern Florida, between Charlotte Harbor, and Lake Okeechobee and the Everglades. The troops were again at their old work of building roads and scouting. In *855-56 the Indians became troublesome and there was considerable fight- ing. December 20, 1855, detachments of E, G, I, K and L had a fight near Billy’s Town. On the same day Lieut, (afterwards Major-General) Hartsuff and a reconnoitring party were attacked by the Seminoles in the Big Cypress Swamp, and Hartsuff was badly wounded. January 18, 1856, C and L were engaged near Fort Deynaud and March 29 E had a fight at Chocaliska Key. April 7, 1856, a detachment of 3 officers and 108 men of the 1st and 2d Artillery, under Capt. Lewis G. Arnold, 2d Artil- lery, was attacked by a large body of Seminoles in the Big Cypress Swamp. The Indians were repeatedly charged and driven from the strong positions they successively held. August 2, 1856, E had another fight with the Indians at Punta Rasa. The regiment suffered from yellow fever during this southern tour. In 1852 it broke out at Castle Pinckney, Charleston Harbor, and Capt. Roland and several men of M died. In 1854 yellow fever appeared at Baton Rouge and carried off Lieutenants Mebane and Burns (the only officers present) and the 1st Sergeant of H. It appeared there again the following year. Colonel Bankhead died at Baltimore, November 11, 1856. Mathew M. THE SECOND REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 319 Payne, formerly major of the regiment, became our next colonel, but he was Governor of the Soldiers’ Home and never joined. On the resigna- tion of Colonel Payne in 1861, John L. Gardner became colonel. He never joined, and was retired within a few months after his promotion, so the command of the regiment for nearly five years devolved upon the Lieut.- Colonel, Justin Dimick, who was also, for much of that time, in command of the Artillery School at Fort Monroe. In December, 1856, the regiment began to move North, headquarters going to Fort Hamilton, then in May, 1857, to Fort Monroe, and in No- vember back to Fort Hamilton. C and L went to Fort Independence, E to Fort Ontario, F and I to Fort Monroe, G to Fort Lafayette, H and K to Fort Hamilton. B, D and M, on their arrival from the West went, B and M to Fort Monroe, and D to Fort Hamilton. Hardly were they settled in their new stations when several of the companies were ordered West, where most of them remained until 1861. A, E, F, H and M were occupied prin- cipally in Kansas, during the troublous ante bellum times in that State, with Leavenworth as a base. Headquarters were established at that post for a few months in 1859, going to Fort Monroe in November. It is worthy of note that one company (F) was sent to Lecompton in 1857 in search of a fugitive slave. The two light batteries started in May, 1858, to march from Leavenworth to Utah. They got some distance beyond Fort Kearney when, the Mormon troubles being over, they were recalled and returned to Leavenworth. During a part or all of the period from 1857 to the breaking out of the war, G, I and L were at one or the other of the northwestern posts, Brady, Snelling, Mackinac, Ridgely, and Ripley. E and H went out there before going to Kansas. During the John Brown excitement in 1859 B and a part of L, under Captain Carlisle, were sent from Fort Monroe to Harper’s Ferry for temporary duty. In pursuance of the seeming policy of the War Department, not to pro- tect the national property in the South, but to guard it sufficiently to pre- vent its seizure by hot-headed secessionists before the plans of the leaders were ripe, D, E and F were, in i860, sent respectively to the arsenals at Fayetteville, N. C., Augusta, Ga., and Little Rock, Ark. In due course of time the Southern States passed their ordinances of secession and each of the arsenals mentioned was given up to the State authorities, whose demands were supported by such a show of force that armed resistance was out of the question. Receipts for the public property were given and the officers and men were allowed to make their way, by certain specified routes, out of the South. Light Battery M (Hunt) was, in April, i860, sent from Kansas to Fort Brown, Texas, and was part of the force that Twiggs tried some months later to turn over to the South. They had to leave their horses, but succeeded in getting out of the State by way of the Gulf with their guns, in spite of extraordinary efforts on the part of the Texans to get possession of them. On the breaking out of the war Captains A. Elzey and S. S. Anderson, 1st Lieutenants A. Merchant, J. A. de Lagnel, and A. L. Long, and 2d Lieu- tenants J. P. Jones, W. Butler, and St. C. Dearing resigned and took part in the rebellion. Colonel Payne, who was a Virginian, also resigned in 1861. 320 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. In November W. W. Morris was promoted colonel and headquarters were moved to Fort McHenry, where they remained throughout the war. There was an unusual number of staff officers appointed from the 2d in 1861, and under the laws then in force they retained their regimental commissions. In December, 1861, for instance, there were nine officers of the Adjutant- General's, Quartermaster’s and Subsistence Departments on the list of ist lieutenants. Other officers were absent from their batteries exercising higher commands in the artillery service or in the volunteers. Add to these the number absent from ordinary causes and it will be seen that officers available for duty with their batteries in the field were very scarce. Bat- teries were generally commanded by lieutenants and sometimes not an offi- cer belonging to a battery was present with it. In the early days of the regiment it served as infantry ; occasionally, in the Florida War, serving light field pieces. In the Mexican War the foot batteries served as infantry, and at Vera Cruz and Chapultepec served siege artillery. In the Civil War all the batteries in active service were mounted, and all those serving continuously with the Army of the Potomac became horse batteries. The armament at the beginning of the war was far from uniform, E Battery, for instance, at the first Bull Run having two 13 pdrs., two 12’s, and two 6’s. During the winter of 1861-62 the artillery of the Army of the Potomac was thoroughly organized by Gen. W. F. Barry, and when the army started for the Peninsula, the armament of each battery was uniform. In 1864 the horse batteries were reduced to 4 guns each, two 3-inch and two Napoleons. The successive Chiefs of Artillery of the Army of the Potomac, W. F. Barry and H. J. Hunt, had been officers of the 2d until 1861. The first commander of the Horse Artillery Brigade, Wm. Hays, his successor, J. M. Robertson, and the first commander of the 2d Horse Artillery Brigade, J. C. Tidball, were all captains of the 2d. When all the horse artillery of the Army of the Potomac was, in 1864, consolidated into one brigade, the command was given to Capt. Robertson. This brigade organization was, however, apparently only for administrative purposes, batteries being de- tached for duty with divisions or brigades of cavalry, the whole brigade never acting together as a fighting unit under command of its chief. As there was no semblance of regimental organization, except on paper, during the war, it will be necessary to take each battery separately, and although their services were conspicuous, as shown by reports of commanding gen- erals, the space allowed for this sketch permits little more than a mere enumeration of the battles in which they took part. These sketches follow in order. “ A ” battery was the first to reach Washington, arriving in January, 1861. It formed a part of the expedition for the relief of Fort Pickens in April, but returned in time to take part in the first Bull Run. In Septem- ber it was made a horse battery, the first in this country. In the spring of 1862 it went to the Peninsula, forming, with B and L (Robertson), and M. (Benson) of the 2d and C (Gibson) of the 3d, the famous Horse Artillery Brigade. At Yorktown during the siege it was in pursuit with Stoneman’s cavalry after the evacuation, and was engaged at Williamsburg, New Bridge, THE SECOND REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY,. 321 and Mechanicsville. It covered the withdrawal of the army from the left bank of the Chickahominy, being engaged at Gaines’ Mill. It was engaged at Malvern Hill, July i, and at Westover, July 3. While at Harrison’s Landing a corporal died, and permission to fire the usual salute being re- fused, it occurred to Capt. Tidball to have “ taps ” sounded instead ; whence the origin of this custom. The battery was with the rear guard on the withdrawal from the Peninsula. In the Maryland campaign it was in the advance with Pleasanton’s cavalry, and was engaged at Boonsboro, An- tietam, and Shepherdstown. It was with the cavalry in advance during the movement into Virginia, and was engaged at Piedmont, November 3, and Amissville, November 10. The battery was out with Averell’s cavalry in April, 1863, and was engaged at Rapidan Station, May 1, and with Pleasan- ton at Upperville, June 20. It went to Gettysburg with Buford’s cavalry, at which battle it fired the first shot, and after that battle was engaged at Williamsport, July 4, Boonsboro, July 8 and 9, and Funkstown, July 10. The battery, during September, was in action at Culpeper, Raccoon Ford, and Robinson River. In the campaign of 1864 the battery was engaged at Cold Harbor, Bottom’s Bridge, Trevilian Station, and St. Mary’s Church. While with the army before Petersburg it was several times detached on expedi- tions with the cavalry, being engaged at Deep Bottom, July 28, Lee’s Mill, July 31, Deep Run, August 16, Vaughn Plank Road, September 29, Boyd- ton Plank Road, October 27, Stoney Creek, December i,and on the Weldon Railroad, December 7-11. The battery was engaged at Dinwiddie C. II., March 31, Farmville, April 7, and Appomatox, April 9. After Lee’s sur- render it started for North Carolina with Sheridan, returning when John- ston’s surrender was known. The battery was commanded by Capt. Tidball until June, 1863 ; by Lieut. Calef at Gettysburg; by Lieut. Clarke until June, 1864; by Lieut. Dennison until February, 1865 ; then, until after the surrender, by Lieut. Lord. B Battery left Fort Monroe in August, 1861, on the Hatteras expedition, and took part in the capture of Forts Hatteras and Clark. Reaching Wash- ington in September, it was consolidated with L Battery, and early in 1862 was made a horse battery. The battery went with the army to the Penin- sula. In front of Yorktown during the siege, it was with Stoneman’s cav- alry in pursuit after the evacuation. In this campaign the battery was engaged at Williamsburg, Slatersville, New Bridge, Mechanicsville, Gaines’ Mill, and Malvern Hill. In the Maryland campaign the battery was with the advance on leaving Washington, and was engaged near South Mountain, at Antietam, and at Shepherdstown. The battery was in action at Hall- town, October 3, and at Warrentown, November 6, and was opposite Fred- ericksburg, but not engaged, during the battle. The battery took part in Stoneman’s raid in the spring of 1863, and was engaged at Beverly Ford June 9. It was under fire at Gettysburg, but was not engaged. It was en- gaged at Funkstown, July 9, Falling Waters, July 14, Chester Gap, July 22, Culpeper, August 1, Brandy Station, August 4, Morton’s Ford, October 12, Brandy Station, October 13, Oak Hill, October 15, and Bealton Station October 26. In the campaign of 1864 the battery was in the battle of Todd’s Tavern and took part in Sheridan’s raids in May and June fighting at 322 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Yellow Tavern, Hanovertown, and Trevilian Station. It was also engaged at Deep Bottom, July 28. The battery went to the Valley in August, 1864, and was engaged at Newtown, Front Royal, Shepherdstown, Winchester, Milford, Waynesboro, Bridgewater, Cabin Hill, and Cedar Creek. It win- tered at Pleasant Valley and remained there until it left for Washington after Lee’s surrender. The combined battery was commanded by Capt. Robertson until October, 1862; by Lieut. Vincent until June, 1863; by Lieut. Heaton until August, 1864; thereafter by Lieut. Peirce. C Battery went to Dry Tortugas in January, 1861, and to Fort Pickens in September. It was in action on Santa Rosa Island, October 9, and in the bombardment of Fort Pickens, November 21 and 22, and January 1, 1862. It went to Pensacola in May and to New Orleans in September. In December it was made a light battery and was sent to Baton Rouge. The battery took part in the Southern Louisiana expedition in April, 1863, and was engaged at Irish Bend, April 14. It took part in the siege of Port Hudson. After serving at various posts in the Department of the Gulf, but not actively engaged, it reached Washington in August, 1864, and remained in that vicinity until the close of the war. The battery was commanded by Capt. L. G. Arnold until March, 1862, thereafter by Lieut. J. I. Rodgers. D Battery, after being obliged to leave Fayetteville Arsenal, reached Washington, was made a light battery, and participated in the first Bull Run. In the Peninsular campaign it took part in the capture of West Point, and was in the battles of Gaines’ Mill, Glendale, and Malvern Hill. In the Maryland campaign it was engaged at Burkettsville and Antietam. It was in the battles of Fredericksburg in December, and Salem Church in May, 1863. At Gettysburg it was under fire but not engaged. After this battle it was detached from the 6th Corps, of which it had until now formed a part, made a horse battery, and assigned to Robertson’s Horse Artillery Brigade. During the fall of 1863 it was actively employed with the cavalry, being in action at Raccoon Ford and Robinson River in September, Mor- ton’s Ford and Liberty in October, and Muddy Run in November. In the campaign of 1864 the battery was engaged at Todd’s Tavern, and partici- pated in Sheridan’s raids in May and June, being engaged at Yellow Tavern, Matadequin Creek, and Trevilian Station. In August, 1864, the battery went to the Valley with Sheridan. It was in action in September at Milford and Luray. Returning to Pleasant Valley, it remained there until the end of the war. The battery was commanded at the first Bull Run by Capt. Arnold, 5th Artillery; in the Peninsula by Lieut. Upton, 5th Artillery; thereafter by Lieut. Williston. E Battery reached Washington from Augusta Arsenal in February, 1861, was made a light battery, and took part in the first Bull Run. It went with the army to the Peninsula, and having heavy guns (six 20-pdrs.) garrisoned a battery at the siege of Yorktown. During the campaign it was in action at New Bridge, Golding’s Farm, Turkey Bend, and Malvern Hill. It was then attached to the 9th Corps, and was engaged at the second Bull Run and Chantilly. In the Maryland campaign it was in the battles of South Mountain and Antietam. On the march through Virginia it was engaged at Warrenton Springs, November 18, and at Fredericksburg occupied the right THE SECOND REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 323 of the artillery line on the north bank. The battery was sent West in April, 1863, and took part in the sieges of Vicksburg and Jackson, Mississippi. It was sent back to Kentucky in September, and to Knoxville in October. The battery was engaged in the operations around Knoxville in November and took a conspicuous part in the successful defense, against a greatly su- perior force, of Fort Sanders, which terminated the siege. The battery came East with Burnside in April, 1864, and was in the battle of the Wilder- ness, after which the battery was sent to Washington, and was not again in active service during the war. The battery was commanded until August, 1862, by Capt. Carlisle, and during the rest of its active service by Lieut. Benjamin. F Battery, after being obliged to give up Little Rock, went to St. Louis, was made alight battery, and took part in the capture of Camp Jackson and in the operations in Missouri under Lyon and Pope. It was engaged at Booneville, June 3, and Wilson’s Creek, August 10, 1861, and in the cap- ture of New Madrid, March, 1862. The battery crossed the Mississippi in April and was engaged at Farmington and in the operations around Corinth in May. It took part in the advance on Iuka in September but was not en- gaged, and in the battle of Corinth, October 4. The battery was engaged at Town Creek, Alabama, in April, 1863, and was then sent to Memphis, where it remained until October. The battery took part in the Atlanta campaign, being engaged at Resaca, Dallas, Kenesaw Mountain, and Ruff’s Mills. During the battle on the Chattahoochee, July 22, the battery was ordered to another part of the line. In obeying the order, and while moving unsupported through a wood, the entire battery, the officers, and part of the men were captured. The remnant of the battery served a 4 1-2 inch siege gun in the siege of Atlanta. The battery was reorganized and sent back to Nashville, being in position during the battle. The battery was stationed thereafter at Nashville, Bridgeport, and Chattanooga until August, 1865. It was commanded by Capt. Totten in the first part of 1861, by Capt. Molinard fora few months in 1863, by Lieut. Murray from July, 1863, until July, 1864, and the rest of the time by officers not belonging to the regiment. G Battery reached Washington from Mackinac in May, 1861, was made a light battery, and took part in the first Bull Run. In the Peninsular cam- paign it was attached to the 3d Corps and was in the battles of Glendale and Malvern Hill. It went into Maryland with Couch’s Division but was not actively engaged. After Antietam the battery was attached to the 6th Corps and was in the battle of Fredericksburg in December, and in the bat- tles of Fredericksburg and Salem Church, May 3 and 4, 1863. It was in action on the Rappahannock, June 15. The battery reached Gettysburg with the 6th Corps, July 2, but was not actively engaged. After this battle it was made a horse battery and assigned to Tidball’s Horse Artillery Bri- gade. Crossing the Potomac, it was actively employed with the cavalry in Virginia in the fall of 1863, being engaged near Culpeper, September 13, and near the same place November 8. In the latter action, Lieut. J, H. Butler, commanding the battery, received a wound, necessitating amputation of the leg. The battery was in action at Burnett’s Ford, February 7, 1864, and at Cold Harbor, May 31 and June 1. In June the battery was dismounted and 324 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. sent to Washington, having no more active service during the war. The battery was commanded at the first Bull Run by Lieut. O. D. Greene; until March, 1862, by Capt. Thompson ; until November, 1863, by Lieut. Butler; and thereafter, until dismounted, by Lieut. Dennison. H Battery reached Washington from Leavenworth in February, 1861, and arrived at Fort Pickens in April. It was in action on Santa Rosa Island, October 9, and in bombarding enemy’s works November 22, 1861, and January 1. 1862. The battery remained at Pickens and Barrancas until May, 1864, when it went North, and was thereafter stationed, with the ex- ception of two months in New York Harbor, at Fort McHenry until the regiment left for California. The battery was commanded during most of the war by Capt. Larned. I Battery arrived at Fort McHenry from Fort Ridgeley in April, 1861, and remained thereuntil May, 1864, when it went to Washington. It was engaged in the defenses of Washington July 11, 12, and 13, 1864. In April, 1865, the battery went to Alabama, as infantry, and to Chattanooga in June, returning East in August. The battery was commanded by various offi- cers, generally by the regimental adjutant K Batter}' arrived in Washington from Plattsburgh in February, 1861, and went from there to Fort Pickens in April. The battery was engaged in the bombardment of November 22, 23, and 24, 1861, and January 1, 1862. The battery remained there until May, 1864, when it went to Fort Hamilton. It went to Fort McHenry in August, and remained there and at Fort Federal Hill, Baltimore, until the regiment went to California. The battery was commanded by Capt. Allen until 1863, then by Capt. Smalley. H, I and K batteries had no service as light batteries during the Re- bellion. L Battery went from Fort Monroe to Washington in September, 1861, and was consolidated with B Battery, already mentioned. M Battery, after getting out of Texas, went to New York and thence to Fort Pickens, whence it returned and took part, as a light battery, in the first Bull Run. It was made a horse battery in November and took part in the Peninsular campaign. After the evacuation of Yorktown, the battery went in pursuit with the cavalry, being engaged at Williamsburg and Han- over Court House, It was engaged at Malvern Hill, July 1 and August 5, Captain Benson being mortally wounded in the latter battle. In the Mary- land campaign the battery was in advance with the cavalry and was en- gaged near South Mountain and at Antietam. It was in pursuit after the battle, fighting at Martinsburg, October 1, and at Nolan’s Ford, October 12, after making a march of 80 miles in a little over 24 hours. Crossing the Potomac, it was engaged with the cavalry during November at Purcellville, Philomont, Upperville, Barbee’s Cross Roads and Amissville. At Freder- icksburg the battery was in reserve. The battery took part in Stoneman’s raid in the spring of 1863, and was engaged at Beverly Ford, June 9. In the Gettysburg campaign the battery was engaged at Hunterstown and Hanover, and on the right at Gettysburg, July 3. After the battle the bat- tery was in pursuit, fighting at Monterey, Smithsburg, Williamsport, Boons- boro, Hagerstown, and Falling Waters, and at Battle Mountain, Va., July THE SECOND REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 325 24. It was engaged at James City, Brandy Station, and Buckland Mills in October, and at Raccoon and Morton’s Fords in November. In the cam- paign of 1864 the battery was engaged at Craig’s Meeting House, May 5, and at Todd’s Tavern, and took part in Sheridan’s raids in May and June, being engaged at Meadow Bridge, Strawberry Hill and Trevilian Station. The battery went to the Valley in August, and was engaged at Summit Point and Kearneysville in August, at the Opequan in September, and at Lacy’s Springs in December. The battery wintered at Pleasant Valley. One section remained there until the close of the war. The rifle section (Lieut. Woodruff) left in February with Sheridan to join the Army of the Potomac, and was engaged at Waynesboro, Dinwiddie Court House, Five Forks, Namozine Church, Sailor’s Creek, and Appomatox. The battery was commanded at the first Bull Run, by Maj. Hunt, in the Peninsula by Capt. Benson until mortally wounded in August, until September by Lieut. Hains, until September, 1864, by Lieut. Pennington, and thereafter by Lieut. Woodruff. The following officers of the regiment were killed during the war: 1st Lieut. John T. Greble at Big Bethel, June 10, 1861. 2d Lieut. Presley O. Craig at the first Bull Run. 1st Lieut. Guilford D. Bailey, Chief of Artillery of Casey’s division, at Fair Oaks, May 31, 1862. Capt. Henry Benson died August 11 of wound received August 5, 1862, at Malvern Hill. 2d Lieut. Samuel D. Southworth at Cedar Creek, October 19, 1864. 2d Lieut. Thomas Burns at Hatcher’s Run, October 28, 1864. 1st Lieut Albert M. Murray, captured near Atlanta, July 22, 1864, died in a rebel prison three weeks later. The regiment was assembled at Fort McHenry in August, 1865, and sailed from there for California via the Isthmus, under command of General W. H. French, the lieutenant-colonel. Arriving at San Francisco in Sep- tember the batteries were at first distributed among the posts in the harhor, with headquarters at the Presidio. In October two batteries (C and L) were sent to the mouth of the Columbia and one (I) to San Juan Island, which, pending the settlement of the boundary question, was occupied jointly by the United States and Great Britain. General Morris died at Fort McHenry, December 11, 1865, and W. F. Barry became colonel. General Barry remained on detached service in the East and when the Artillery School was started again he was assigned to its command, which he retained until 1877, General French meanwhile com- manding the regiment. On the purchase of Alaska from Russia, United States troops were sent there, and during part of the Pacific Coast tour of the regiment portions of it garrisoned Sitka, Kodiak, Tongass, Wrangell, and Kenai, beside furnish- ing detachments to enforce the seal fishery regulations on St. Paul’s and St. George’s Islands in Behring Sea. Batteries C, E, F, G, H and I had Alaska service. In July, 1868, Battery F, Lieut. McGilvray, while seeking a suit- able site for a post on Cook’s Inlet was shipwrecked. All the property and records, but no lives, were lost. Battery K was sent to Fort Monroe in November, 1867. In the spring of 1869 an order was issued dismounting Battery M and sending Battery A to Fort Riley, where a light artillery 326 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. school was ordered established. Indian troubles prevented the plans for the school from being carried out, the batteries were called upon to go into the field as cavalry, and in May, 1871, the battery was sent back to the Presidio. Late in 1872 the regiment (except C and H, which followed in January, 1873) came East. Headquarters and A, C and H went to Fort McHenry ; B to Fort Foote; and the other batteries to posts in North Carolina. De- tachments were sent out from time to time, principally from F, at Morgan- ton, after moonshiners. In July, 1876, after the Custer massacre, C, G and H were sent to Indian Territory and I, to Fort Dodge, Kansas. In September D, L and M were sent to into South Carolina for duty in connection with the approaching election. The unsettled state of affairs arising from this election resulted in bringing to Washington the batteries that had gone West, and later the batteries from the Carolinas, except M, which was left at Fort Johns- ton. Batteries A, C, D, G, I and L took part in the inauguration of Presi- dent Hayes. The whole regiment was out during the labor riots of 1877. Batteries C, D, E, F. G, H, I and L, and a detachment of A, all under command of Gen- eral French, arrived at Martinsburg on the morning of July 19, and were occupied for the next month along the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, open- ing the road for traffic and protecting property. A was on duty at Camden Station, Baltimore, for a few days in July. B, K and M were sent out on the Pennsylvania Railroad and were for some time at Pittsburgh. In August, the troubles on the railroads being over, most of the regiment was brought together at Fort McHenry, whence a battalion, consisting of E, F, G and L, was sent, the last of August, to reestablish the post of Carlisle Barracks. After remaining there three weeks, disturbances having occurred in the coal regions, they were sent to Wilkesbarre, where they were joined by Battery C from McHenry. There were also in camp there most of the 22d Infantry, five batteries of the 5th Artillery, and Sinclair’s light battery of the 3d. In October all the batteries of the regiment were again at their regular stations. In December, trouble with Mexico being thought probable, the four Carlisle batteries were sent to San Antonio, Texas. In January, 1878, L wras made a light battery, F was afterwards made a machine-gun battery, and horses and Gatlings, but not a full equipment, were temporarily issued to E and G. In May Battery F, part with guns and horses and part as infantry, and a platoon of Battery L went to Fort Clark, and in June accompanied General Mackenzie on his expedition into Mexico. Battery I having been sent from Fort Foote to Fort Ontario, the regiment was now scattered literally from the Canadian to the Mexican border. General Barry died at Fort McHenry, July 18, 1879, and Lieut.-Colonel Romeyn B. Ayres, 3d Artillery, became colonel. In October, 1880, Battery L was dismounted and after several changes arrived at Fort McHenry. Battery F was designated a regular light bat- tery in November, and after some changes of station finally settled at Leavenworth. E and Gwent to Fort Brown in December, 1879, and a year later to Arkansas. In January, 1881, headquarters went to Washington THE SECOND REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. Barracks, where one or more batteries had been stationed since 1877. This became a five-battery post, and three batteries were left at McHenry, Forts Foote, Ontario, and Johnston, no longer being garrisoned by the regiment. After the shooting of President Garfield in July, 1881, the regiment fur- nished guards at the White House until after the removal of the President to Elberon in September, and at the jail until after the execution of Guiteau. In September a detachment under Lieut. Weaver accompanied the Presi- dent’s remains to Ohio. In June, 1885, the regiment was ordered South, exchanging with the 3d. Headquarters, G and L went to St. Augustine, and B and H to Fort Bar- rancas, Florida ; C and D to Mt. Vernon Barracks, Alabama ; I and M to Jackson Barracks, Louisiana ; A joined E at Little Rock Barracks, Arkan- sas. In the summer of 1888 yellow fever was prevalent in the South and the garrisons of St. Augustine and Barrancas went into camp near Hunts- ville, Alabama. K and M from Jackson Barracks (Battery I having re- placed K at Fort Monroe) were sent in September to Fort Wadsworth, New York Harbor, by sea, and were replaced in December by Battery E from Little Rock. General Ayres died December 4, 1888, in the village of Fort Hamilton and Lieut.-Colonel John Mendenhall, 4th Artillery, became colonel. In May, 1889, the regiment came to the New England coast, exchanging with the 4th. Headquarters, C, G and H went to Fort Adams; E to Fort Preble ; B and D to Fort Warren ; L to Fort Trumbull. A went from Lit- tle Rock to Fort Riley, marching through Arkansas and Indian Territory. In May, 1890, K and M were transferred from Wadsworth to Fort Schuyler, and in November, 1891, Light Battery F changed from Leavenworth to Fort Riley. In April, 1892, the Schuyler garrison was changed, K and L, and H and M, interchanging stations. Colonel Mendenhall died at Fort Adams July 1,1892, and Lieut.-Colonel Richard Lodor, 1st Artillery, became colonel. The whole regiment, since its organization in 1821, has been together but twice,—in 1838 and in 1865, and then only for a short time, and it is to be regretted that there is no prospect of its soon being together again. At present, besides furnishing garrisons for five posts, it has batteries at two other posts, and the same has been true for the past eight years. THE THIRD REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. LIEUT. WM. E. BIRKHIMER, Adjutant 3D U. S. Artillery. X. ORGANIZATION. THE history of the Third United States Artillery dates from the reor- ganization of the army pursuant to Act of Congress, March 2, 1821. This act reduced the military establishment, and fixed the line at four regiments of artillery and seven of infantry. It marks an im- portant epoch in the history of the army. It is true that, prior to this, there had periodically existed in the United States army a third regiment of artillery. There was one during the Revolu- tion ; it was organized originally in 1775 by Colonel Richard Gridley, of Mass- achusetts, a half-pay British officer, the command soon passing to Henry Knox and finally to John Crane. Although numbered third it was in fact the oldest of the four continental artillery regiments. It began its career before and lasted longer than any other. Crane ranked all the other artillery colonels and, when the artillery was consolidated in 1783, he was given command by General Washington. Excepting one company, the revolutionary artillery : was soon after disbanded. The reorganizing Act c. March 16, 1802, provided for one regiment of artillerists. The Act of January 11, 1812, authorized two regiments of artil- lery. The primary object was to utilize these regiments as sea-coast defend- ers ; a light artillery regiment, to move with armies in the field, having been authorized, for a limited time, by the Act of April 12, 1808. The three sea- coast regiments were, in so far as promotions and other details of service were concerned, kept as distinct as though they had belonged to three dif- ferent arms ; nevertheless, officially, they were designated the first, second and third regiments of artillery. Alexander Macomb, afterwards General-in- chief of the army, was colonel of the Third Regiment, which enjoyed a brief, though highly distinguished career, serving, like its revolutionary predeces- sor, from first to last in the face of the enemy. But the heavy artillery, in the War of 1812, principally did duty as infantry, taking its place in the works on the sea-coast or in line of battle on the field, as occasion de- manded. Pursuant to Act March 30, 1814, this arm was reorganized into a so-called corps, and here the new Third Artillery disappeared. It thus will be seen that, if the hiatuses from 1783 to 1812, and from 1814 to 1821 be bridged, the Third Artillery legally may trace its history to 1775, when the Colonial army first confronted the British at Boston. The regi- ment does not, however, claim the right to do this. It does not seek thus to span two such periods in an hypothetical existence. But should the hal- cyon days come in which the War Department sanctions uniting the pre- historic with the present, the regiment’s genealogical tree will be found planted near the source of the stream. THE THIRD REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY• 329 The army had been reduced in 1815, after the war with Great Britain, to 10,000 men, and the Act of 1821 still further reduced it to 5600 enlisted. The reorganization consequent upon the latter reduction was based upon no well considered military principle. Alleged economic reasons alone prompted the measure. The new artillery, however, had some features worthy of notice. The Ordnance Department—previously a corps of me- chanics—was now merged in that arm, and a supernumerary captain attached to each artillery regiment also, assisted by detailed artillery lieuten- ants, was to perform ordnance duty. It was further provided that one com- pany in each artillery regiment should be designated and equipped as light artillery. Although the language of the law was mandatory, this feature long remained a dead letter on the statute-book. The companies so desig- nated continued to carry muskets and serve as infantry or sea-coast artillery for many years ; their only distinction being some slight differences of uni- form, and the fact that their field-music consisted of bugles instead of the fife and drum. In later years, under the able and enlightened administra- tion of Secretary of War Poinsett, this provision of the law was given ef- fect, and, as the event has proved, to the imperishable glory not only of the artillery but of the army. Prior to the reorganization of 1821 the artillery embraced the light regi- ment and the corps ; the former of 10 companies, the latter of 32 arranged to 8 equal battalions, in all 42 companies—3860 enlisted men. The four new artillery regiments numbered 36 companies—9 each—a total reduction of 6 companies, but of 1872 enlisted men—nearly 50 per cent. Before this re- duction there were in the artillery 1 colonel, 10 other field, and 190 company officers—or 1 officer to 19.2 men ; afterwards, 4 colonels, 8 other field, and 190 company officers, or 1 officer to 10.1 men. Here, for the first time, the skeleton regular peace establishment plan—many officers and few men, to expand in time of war—was put in operation ; a veritable military ignis fatuus which, as to the regular army, in practice, has never materialized. After the reduction of 1815 the 8 artillery-corps battalions—4 companies to each—were arranged with strict impartiality to the geographical military divisions. In each division the artillery companies were lettered from A to Q inclusive, excluding J ; 4 companies, numbered from 1 to 4 inclusive, constituting a battalion. The companies of the disbanded artillery or- ganizations which were arranged to form the present Third Artillery pursu- ant to the Act of 1821 were as follows: Letters of 3d. Former designation. A... .E 3d Battalion Northern Division. B ... .B 2d Battalion Southern Division. C ... .F 3d Battalion Northern Division. D. .. .K 2d Battalion Southern Division. E I Lt. Art. and Q xst. Bat. So. Div. Letters of 3d. Former designation. F ... .E 1st Battalion Southern Division. Gj. .. .P 2d Battalion Southern Division. H F Light Artillery. I O 2d Battalion Southern Division. The staff embraced i colonel, lieutenant-colonel, major, adjutant, ser- geant-major and quartermaster-sergeant each, the adjutant being a company- officer. This organization remained intact until the Act of April 5, 1832, took away the supernumerary captain for ordnance duty, while organizing 330 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. the Ordnance Department anew, although artillery lieutenants continued to be detailable under the Act of 1821 for duty therein. There was here perpetuated in the artillery, as a permanent part of its organization, a feature that always did and always will prove a curse, namely, giving each company a double-row of both first and second lieu- tenants. This as to first lieutenants has remained unchanged, as to second leutenants it now is simply authorized. No army is wisely organized which does not, by the ordinary casualties of service, furnish the officers a reasonable chance of promotion. The corps as organized in 1814 had the same fault. In both cases it was expected that the extra lieutenants would be available for ordnance or other kindred duties directly in the line of the artilleryman. The trouble was and has continued to be that, when the ordnance depart- ment was reorganized in 1832 and 1838, these extra lieutenants were not placed therein and cut off from the regimental organizations. It was a fundamental error to unite the light and heavy artillery as was done in 1821. The duties of these two branches of the arm are so dissimi- lar that, to be most efficiently performed, their organizations must be radi- cally different. It would naturally result that, in a regiment with three field officers to nine companies, and four lieutenants to each captain, promotion, unless stimulated by a bloody war or sickly season, would soon come to a stand- still. Fora time after 1821 stagnation in promotion was even worse in the lower branches of the artillery than it is now. In greater or less degree the same stagnation affected the other arms of service, but not to the same ex- tent as the artillery. To such a pitch did the evil attain that in January, 1836, sixty-nine graduates were attached to the army as brevet second lieutenants. Plainly the supply was greater than the demand. As a natural result of this state of affairs again, officers began to turn from a profession which furnished so little hope of advancement. During the same year 117 officers resigned, and seven others, including a lieutenant-colonel, declined commis- sions. Among those who left the Third Artillery at this time was Lieuten- ant George G. Meade, the future victor at Gettysburg. This extraordinary exodus of the best young officers in service attracted the serious attention of Congress. It was seen that the attempt to main- tain a cheap army, when all avenues to promotion were practically closed to officers of subordinate grades, was a failure. So-called economy had over- reached itself. About this time the Florida war was precipitated and for years dragged its slow length along amidst miasmic swamps more fatal than the weapons of the concealed and savage foe. Regimental officers were all required in the field, where death by the enemy’s bullet or sickness greatly and rapidly depleted their numbers. The occasion was considered propitious for a general rectification all along the line ! this was particularly the case with the staff, which then, as since, found the hey-day of their happiness when the regiments were fighting the enemy in the field, and which staff, by Act of July 5, 1838, was very largely augmented. The artillery was at the same time increased by one company—K—in each regiment, while the num- ber of privates per company was temporarily increased by 16, bringing the number up to 58, and the number of company second lieutenants reduced to THE THIRD REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 331 one, the surplus officers being absorbed gradually either in the new staff or in their regiments. But in truth the great number of resignations, together with the Florida war, had so reduced the army that there were very few to be thus absorbed. The increase of 16 men per company was only for the Florida war, which virtually terminated in 1842, when, by Act of August 23d, that year, the number of privates was reduced to the same number, and the artificers to one less per company, than fixed by the Act of March 2, 1821. The Mexican War, soon after precipitated, wrought a very considerable, and, contrary to expectation at the time, permanent change in the organi- zation of the artillery. The expansive idea for the regular army was now attempted to be acted upon, and the President, by Act May 13, 1846, was authorized to increase the number of privates to 100 in each company and at discretion reduce it again to 64; the Act February 11, 1847, added a second major and a quartermaster, the Act March 3, 1847, gave two principal musicians and one principal teamster to each regiment, two teamsters to each company, two additional companies to each artillery regi- ment, authorized the equipping another company in each as light artillery, and gave all the latter mounted pay. These acts were therefore important for the artillery. All this was not without reason; and the immediate reason was the approved fighting qualities of the artillery on the Rio Grande and in Mexico. The country wanted more troops of that kind. The increase was, however, intended to be temporary only, except the addi- tional two companies. The extra majors were wanted for recruiting duty. The regimental quartermaster, and the teamsters, regimental and company, were authorized upon the recommendation of the Quartermaster-General, after reports by General Taylor of the inefficiency of that department in the field. The quartermaster, not being an extra officer, was not affected by the clause providing for disbandment after the war; the majors were retained permanently, and the principal musicians temporarily, by Act July 19, 1848, but the teamsters disappeared with the war. The only other act, prior to the Civil War, affecting the artillery, was that of June 17, 1850, which fixed the number of privates in a light company at 64, but authorized the President to increase the number of privates in any company under certain circumstances, to 74 at the expense of other com- panies. The organization of the Third Artillery, like that of all the four old regi- ments, remained unchanged until after the War of the Rebellion, when by Act of July 28, 1866, it was given, with slight modification, the same organi- zation as the Fifth Artillery, organized by Act July 29,1861. The effect was to increase the number of majors by one, to make the adjutant, the quarter- master and commissary extra lieutenants, increase the regimental non-com- missioned staff by 1 commissary sergeant, 2 principal musicians and 1 hospital steward, and the battery by 1 sergeant, 4 corporals and a number of privates to raise the whole number to not exceed 122 at the discretion of the President, who was also authorized to add to each battery x first and 1 second lieutenant, 2 sergeants and 4 corporals—battery being the new legal designation for the old company. The Act of March 3, 1869, added a chief musician, while that of 332 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. July 15. 1870, abolished the grade of regimental commissary sergeant and hospital steward, and reduced the number of corporals per battery to four. Under the operation of these laws, therefore, the maximum organization of a regiment of artillery at this time is: 1 colonel, 1 lieut-colonel, 3 majors, 1 adjutant, 1 quartermaster and commissary, 1 sergeant-major, 1 quarter- master-sergeant, 1 chief musician, 2 principal musicians, and 12 batteries, each battery 1 captain, 2 first and 2 second lieutenants, 1st sergeant, 1 quarter- master-sergeant, 8 sergeants, 4 corporals, 2 musicians, 2 artificers, 1 wagoner, and not to exceed 122 privates. Such remains the organization of the artil- lery regiments to-day. The vicious feature is the retention of 4 lieutenants to 1 captain. This is simply annihilation to the ambition of younger officers, who in consequence labor under disadvantages which do not, to anything like an equal degree, affect any other part of the army. The Fifth was organized as a light artillery regiment. But its organiza- tion was a mistake, if it was to be maintained after peace, as, though the act authorizing it did not so contemplate, was actually the case. From 1821 and before then, this excessive number of subaltern artillery officers relatively to others, has proved detrimental in the matter of promotion ; and yet no other branch of service, tested by the demands of actual warfare, has furn- ished a greater number of distinguished commanders. II. PERSONNEL. The officers arranged to the Third Artillery in 1821, were a distinguished body of men. Colonel W. K. Armistead, a soldier of twenty years service, was transferred from the position of chief of Engineers to make way for Macomb, razeed from brigadier. The other field officers, Mitchell and Bankhead, were veterans of the War of 1812 ; the former soon resigned, serving afterwards in Congress ; the latter, as colonel of the Second Artillery, lived to distinguish himself again in the war with Mexico. Of the captains, Roger Jones, Samuel B. Archer and Felix Ansart had been brevetted for gallant conduct in battle. The former was afterwards for many years Adjutant-General, and Archer Inspector-General of the army. Captain Henry Knox Craig became chief of ordnance, while 1st Lieutenant John A. Dix, the distinguished Union general, and 2d Lieutenant Samuel Ringgold, who subsequently commanded and fought with the first company of horse artillery equipped in the United States Army, were among the sub- alterns. It would be an interesting and grateful task to trace the honorable careers of officers whose names from time to time have graced the rolls of the Third Artillery. Space, however, will permit us here to recall but a few. The oldest living graduate, Mr. Wm. C. Young of New York City, whose labors have done so much to develop the railroad system of the country, was a 2d lieutenant in 1823 ; George S. Greene, the gallant old soldier who, though threescore years of age, left the position of chief engineer Croton Water Works, when the Civil War broke out, and served with highest honors as colonel and general officer, joined the Third Artillery as lieutenant in 1823; Robert P. Par- rott, so well and favorably known to the world through his invaluable services to the Union cause by a new system of ordnance, was a lieutenant from 1S24 THE THIRD REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 333 to 1836; so also from 1825 to 1832, was Benjamin Huger, subsequently a major-general in the Confederate service ; Albert E. Church, the honored West Point Professor of Mathematics, served from 1828 to 1838; Robert Anderson, the hero of Ft. Sumter, was an officer of the regiment for thirty- two years, from 1825 to 1857 ; Erasmus D. Keyes, afterwards a major-general of volunteers, from 1832 to 1858; George G. Meade from his entry into ser- vice until he resigned as before mentioned. Thomas W. Sherman contin- uously from 1836 to 1861, and again from 1863 to 1870 as colonel; Braxton Bragg, afterwards lieutenant-general in the Confederate service, from 1837 to 1856; William T. Sherman from 1840 to 1850; Stewart Van Vliet from 1840 to 1847 ; Jubal A. Early, the Confederate lieutenant-general, from 1837 until he resigned ; George H. Thomasfrom i84oto 1855 ; John F. Reynolds, who was killed while commanding his corps on the first day at Gettysburg, from 1841 to 1861 ; E. O. C. Ord from 183910 1861 ; Samuel G. Field, after- wards a Confederate major-general, from 1843 to 1848 ; A. E. Burnside from 1847 to 1853 ; Romeyn B. Ayres from 1847 to 1861, and as lieutenant-colonel from 1870 to 1879; Beekman Du Barry, subsequently commissary general, from 1850 to 1861 ; Henry J. Hunt, the distinguished chief of artillery, Army of the Potomac, was lieutenant-colonel of the regiment from 1863 to 1869, and George W. Getty colonel from 1870 to 1883 ; besides many others, whose services with the regiment, though rendered in less conspicuous sta- tions, have, as hereafter will more fully appear, been none the less faithful or honorable. The Army Register for 1866, the first issued after the close of the Civil War, sets forth the proud record of the Third Artillery. The lieutenant-general, 2 major-, and 1 brigadier-generals of the 17 general officers of the fighting part of the army—nearly one-fourth—served their novitiate and received their first practical lessons in the military art in the commis- sioned ranks of the regiment. Moreover, not one of these generals was a mere political appointment. Not one of them was made a general officer for what he was expected to do, but for what he had done. III. SERVICES. From 1821 to 1827 the Third Artillery occupied the central Atlantic sta- tions from Annapolis, Md., to Charleston, S. C. This was a season of quiet. The arm was not, however, professionally inactive. In 1824 “the artil- lery corps of instruction ” was established at Fortress Monroe, Va.,—the forerunner of the present school there—and maintained until broken up by the demands of the Florida War for troops. In 1827 the stations of the Third were changed to the New England coast, headquarters, Ft. Independence, Massachusetts. Existence was tran- quil, duties merely routine. The early thirties, however, brought more ex- citement. In 1831, B, E, H, took station at Fortress Monroe, whence, next year, B and H were sent to Charleston, S. C., to put down the nullification- ists; proceeding thence to the disturbed Seminole and Creek Indian dis- tricts of Florida and Alabama. When the Florida War broke out C and I were also in the hostile country. This was precipitated by a tragic event— familiarly known as Dade’s massacre. On December 28, 1835, Brevet Major and Captain Francis L. Dade, 4th Infantry, with one company of the Second 334 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. and B of the Third, was ambushed near the crossing of the Withlacoochee River, Florida, and all but 4 privates killed, one of whom belonged to B. Captain Upton S. Fraser, 2d Lieut. R. R. Mudge, Brevet 2d Lieut. John L. Keais, and thirty-one enlisted men of the Third fell on the field. Upon receipt of this intelligence, the steps of the whole regiment were at once bent towards the theatre of hostilities—where A, D, E, F, G arrived in June, 1836. Meanwhile the companies in Florida were actively engaged. On December 31, 1835, C, H were with General Clinch when he defeated the Seminoles near Withlacoochee ford. On March 29, 1836, C, H, I, part of the force under General Clinch, were again engaged near the Withlacoo- chee. The same companies met the Indians again on June 9 and 19, 1836, the former near Macinope, the latter between that place and Ft. Drane. Later in the year, A, C, H, I encountered the Indians at Ft. Drane, August 21st; on the Withlacoochee River, October 13th ; and in the Wahoo swamp, on November2i, 1836. At this time the other companies of the regiment, ex- cept B, were in Alabama assisting to overawe the Creeks. B, after its an- nihilation, was reorganized in Massachusetts, and joined the regiment in the field in January, 1837, being engaged with the enemy at Camp Munroe, Fla., February 8th, following. During 1837 all the companies were actively employed against the enemy, driving them from one fastness to another, yet rarely seeing them. The service was distressing beyond description. It was almost impossible to bring the Indians to bay except they wished it. Besides, the bullets of a concealed savage foe were less destructive to life than the reptiles abound- ing and diseases contracted under a vertical sun in the almost boundless and impenetrable swamps. The year 1837 was the season of General Jes- up’s advent upon the theatre of operations. It were tedious and unprofitable to follow the companies of the Third in all their wanderings through the everglades. Suffice it to say they were constantly on the move, drawing tighter the cordon about the Indians who gradually were being made pris- oners or exterminated. All the companies were in the field, traversing the hostile district in every direction. In May, 1837, C was mounted, and with B, 4th Artillery, performed the duty of scouts until the 12th of the following December when the horses were turned in. The termination of this year was signalized by an event of great interest to the regiment. For the first time since its organization all the compa- nies were united ; they were mustered together December 31, 1837, at Fort Christmas, Florida. The next day the regiment, under Lieut.-Colonel Gates, marched, in Brevet Brigadier Eustis’ brigade, against the hostiles, who were defeated, January 24th, at the Locheehatchie. The Indians were now coming in rap- idly. But the Cherokees, in the northern part of Georgia, were now to be removed west of the Mississippi, and troops were needed to start them. Accordingly, in April, 1838, A, F, H, I, under Lieut.-Colonel Gates, fol- lowed, May 7th, by D, C, E, G, under Brevet Major McClintock, 4th Artil- lery, and later by B, marched across the peninsula from Fort Jupiter to Tampa Bay, and proceeded via New Orleans and Tuscumbia, Ala., to Chattanooga, Tenn., where the regiment was again, and, so far as known, for THE THIRD REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 335 the last time united ; for, although K was authorized at this time, it was not yet organized. Here the Third remained, camped on the sites of subse- quent famous battle-fields, until the Cherokees started west, when it re- turned, piecemeal, via Augusta, Georgia, to the theatre of active opera- tions in Florida. On November 19, 1838, C was broken up, the men transferred to other companies, and the lieutenants ordered to Carlisle, Pa., where the company, as will hereafter be narrated, was being reorganized as horse-artillery. To keep up the equilibrium in Florida, however, K, the newly authorized company, joined December 24, 1838. During the remaining years of the Florida War, 1839, ’40, ’41, ’42, there was no relaxation in the arduous nature of the services required of the regiment, which was scattered all over the northern part of the peninsula, building roads and posts, following and skirmishing with the Indians. The latter, while ordinarily small affairs, judged by casualties alone, were generally brought about only after great suffering on the part of the troops, to whom the in- numerable annoying and venomous insects of the swamps rendered existence intolerable. To fight the Indian was a relief, for it had at least the charm of excitement. But they had learned by dear experience that they were no match for the whites in the long run, and therefore avoided the latter ex- cept when fortuitous circumstances gave them every advantage. Never- theless, the Third had frequent passages at arms with them in the campaign of 1839 under Brevt. Brigadier-General Z. Taylor ; again on July 26, at New River inlet, November 1, on the Picolata road, December 3-24 in fihe Ever- glades, all in 1840; and at the latter place, January 7, 1841. The campaign of 1840, carried on through the tropical heat of summer, was particularly trying. The war may be said to have ended August, 1842. The Indians, origi- nally 7000 strong, excepting 300, 95 of whom were warriors, were killed or ex- pelled, and those excepted were compelled to live within certain prescribed limits. Eleven officers of the Third died in Florida during that war ; of these three fell in action, and one died of wounds; 45 enlisted-men were killed by the Indians, and 113 died of disease. Nearly every officer of the Third was in the field. Ten were brevetted for gallantry in specific actions. The war being over, the Third, in 1842, occupied the stations from Smith- ville, N. C., to St. Augustine, Fla., where it remained until the Mexican War. The re-organizing act of March 2, 1821, provided, as before mentioned, that in each regiment of artillery, one company should be designated and equipped as light artillery. In 1838 the initiatory steps were taken to carry this provision into effect. Brevt. Major Samuel Ringgold, captain 3d Artil- lery, was selected by Secretary Poinsett for this work. Hitherto the great objection to carrying the law into execution was the attendant expense. But now a number of horses rendered surplus, after some of the south- ern Indians had been removed, were available for the purpose of mounting C company as horse artillery in which role it served until after the Mexican War. Companies of the other artillery regiments were also soon afterwards mounted, but as field artillery. In Ringgold’s company the drivers were armed with the sabre ; all other enlisted men with sabre and pistol. In the field companies, the mounted men were armed in the same way, but the can- 336 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. noneers each with musketoon and artillery sabre, which must have proved extremely inconvenient. The Mexican War soon brought every officer of the Third into the field again. As during the Florida War, headquarters moved into the enemy’s country. The action of the Congress and President of the United States in 1845, regarding the annexation of Texas, precipitated hostilities. A, C, E, I, with other troops, were sent that year to Corpus Christi, Texas, forming General Z. Taylor’s army of occupation. A, C, I, were present when the opening gun of the war was fired at Palo Alto, May 8, 1846. Ringgold, while skillfully fighting his guns, was mortally wounded by a cannon-shot, dying on the 10th of the same month. He was one of the most accomplished officers of the regiment, and the beau-ideal horse artilleryman. The command of Cthen devolved upon 1st Lieutenant Randolph Ridgely who retained it until after the capture of Monterey. A and I formed part of the artillery foot-battalion both at Palo Alto and the next day at Resaca de la Palma. Lieut. Churchill of the Third commanded two heavy 18-pounder guns from this time until after the army crossed the Rio Grande. In his report of the battle of Palo Alto General Taylor states : “ Our artillery, consisting of two 18-pounders and two light batteries (C, Third, A, Second) was the arm chiefly engaged, and to the excellent man- ner in which it was manoeuvred and served is our success mainly due.” E during this time was at Ft. Brown forming part of the garrison which, for 160 hours stood off and finally repulsed an overwhelming besieging force. Shortly afterwards it was mounted as light artillery, Braxton Bragg com- manding, with George H. Thomas and John F. Reynolds as assistants. What a trio that was ! the first the victor at Chickamauga; the second at Nashville; the third the incomparable commander of the first Army Corps who fell in the fore-front at Gettysburg ! Under the Act of May 13, 1846, authorizing 100 privates per company, many companies in the field were broken up, the men transferred, and an officer sent home to recruit. This happened to I, July 7, 1846, whose cap- tain, Martin Burke, was dispatched to North Carolina to reorganize the company, which he did and then rejoined the army at Perote on General Scott’s line of operations. The place of I in the foot-battalion was filled by B which arrived at Mier, Mexico, July 31, 1846, officered by Capt. Vinton, Lieuts. Van Vliet, Joseph Stewart and Francis J. Thomas. In the movement on Monterey, A and B were part of the foot-artillery battalion, 1st Brigade, Worth’s Division ; C, marching with the dragoons, formed part of the 3d Brigade, Twiggs’ Division. In the attack upon that place, as is well known, the army was divided. Worth, making a detour to his right attacked from the west: Twiggs, Butler and Quitman from the east. Both C and E moved with Twiggs’ column. The gallantry of these two light companies was never surpassed. Impression upon the substantial earth-works and heavily built houses of the town they could make little ; but whenever the enemy showed themselves in the open they were at once assailed by the light artillery in such manner as to cause them soon to seek shelter. The part taken by A and B, while not so brilliant, contributed however in no less degree to the success of our arms. They formed part THE THIRD REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 337 of the storming column sent against Lomade Federacion ; Captain John R. Vinton commanding the artillery battalion, Van Vliet, B., and Lt. Francis Taylor, A. The brave fighting of the troops was conspicuous, and was con- tinued the next day, September 22, when the Bishop’s Palace was taken, and thence from house to house into the centre of the city, which then capitu- lated. Soon after this event both Worth and Twiggs’ regular, and Butler’s and Quitman’s volunteer commands joined General Scott’s army destined to the southern line of operations, Vera Cruz—City of Mexico. C and E alone of the Third were left to General Taylor, their commanders having been meanwhile changed. Ridgely was accidentally killed October 27, 1846, at Monterey, and Bragg was, November 7th, transferred to C ; Capt. Thomas W. Sherman, who, promoted May 28, 1846, to E, had been arbitra- rily kept out of its command by General Taylor, now was assigned to his proper position, joining his company February 14, 1847, just in time to take part in the fighting at Buena Vista. The American army being thus divided, and Taylor left with only about 4000 men, Santa Anna, whether by instinct or accident, determined to act upon the correct military principle and beat the widely separated parts in detail. Hence resulted the battle of Buena Vista, which shed an unfad- ing lustre on the American arms. On our left, the volunteers at first fled ingloriously. The torrent of defeat was stemmed by the light artillery, O’Brien of the 4th Artillery losing his pieces, his horses being killed and the infantry supports gone. This was the supreme moment. Santa Anna launched his reserves on our centre, at first with irresistible force. Every- thing gave back before the enemy’s masses. But E was there, and, although compelled to recede, did so only by the recoil of its splendidly served guns. Bragg, with C; had gone to the left to assist righting matters ; but, seeing the movement against the centre, hurried as fast as his jaded horses could travel to meet it. What followed is best described in the language of Gen- eral Taylor’s report: “ Captain Bragg, who had just arrived from the left, was ordered into battery. Without infantry to support him, and at the im- minent risk of losing his guns, he came rapidly into action, the Mexican lines being but a few yards from the muzzles of his pieces. The first dis- charge of canister caused the enemy to hesitate, the second and third drove him back in disorder and saved the day.” Bragg stated that he expended 250 rounds of ammunition per gun that day. In his official report General Wool stated that, “ without our artillery, we could not have maintained our position a single hour.” There has always been an amiable tradition in the army since Buena Vista that General Taylor, when Bragg came up at the interesting moment above referred to, remarked “A little more grape, Captain Bragg.” This has been echoed in popular histories of the war, until the incident has ob- tained general credence. Now the spirit of the supposititious occurrence is above criticism ; it has the true ring of the battle-field. Artillerymen have, therefore, permitted it to pass unchallenged, not knowing but that it might have occurred, and not wishing to spoil a good story ; at the same time, as they knew very well that Bragg carried no grape in his ammunition chests, 338 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. they doubted its truth, yet with a conscious look of commiseration, patronizingly put the whole thing down as doubtless the not unnatural mistake of an infantry general. Fair play, however, demands that this re- flection on old “Rough and Ready’s” technical knowledge be removed. Bragg himself has furnished the evidence that the incident, as narrated, never transpired. Afterwards when he was lieutenant general, his atten- tion was called to it, and he said that he remembered the circumstance perfectly; but that General Taylor, far from wasting any time on imaginary grape, called out in clarion tones, “ Captain, give them hell. ” The transi- tion was doubtless made by some one more piously than truthfully inclined. We tender, as seems fitting in this year of jubilee and “historical sketches” this the amende honorable to our infantry brethren, craving pardon for hav- ing given countenance to an insinuation, which we all felt was probably unjust, against the accuracy of the professional language of one of the best and truest soldiers they have ever produced ; one under whom every ar- tilleryman loved and was proud to serve; one whose indomitable will and honesty of character triumphed over every obstacle, turning, as at Buena Vista, seeming disaster into glorious victory ! One more word aside : When the Mexican reserves pierced our lines just before Bragg “ saved the day ” there fell, gallantly fighting at the head of his regiment, Col. William R. McKee of the 2d Kentucky. An educated soldier, his was an exalted and noble spirit! A fitting sire of that other accomplished officer, Major George W. McKee, whose death the army and a host of devoted friends recently have been called upon to mourn. Stricken down in the prime of intellectual vigor, in Major McKee the army saw pass away one of its brightest ornaments and most useful members, one upon whom nature had showered her choicest gifts; possessed at once of every attribute which renders man respected, admired, beloved. We will now follow the companies of the Third on other theatres of operation. Before General Scott left the Losbos Islands he had designated H as a mounted company. It served as such during the war, commanded first by Captain Wall and then by Steptoe. A, B and G arrived at Vera Cruz in time to take part in the siege, March 9-28, 1847, being joined April 11, by K. Colonel Gates with headquarters were, with D, tempo- rarily established at Tampico, an important port of entry, and the capital of a district held under military government with Gates as governor. D re- mained at Tampico and vicinity during the whole war, being equipped part of the time as horse artillery. F, in which W. T. Sherman was a subaltern, was at Monterey, Upper California. I was being recruited, and L and M not yet organized. At Vera Cruz Captain John R. Vinton was killed in the trenches by one of the first shots from the enemy. It was one of those singular cases in which death results from the close proximity of a projectile in its flight. His clothes were not even disarranged. The projectile, afterwards recovered unexploded, now rests upon his grave at Providence, R. I. It was a Paix- han shell, and, when the fuse was drawn, was found to contain 320 leaden bullets. In the death of Captain Vinton the Third lost another of its most valuable officers. THE THIRD REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 339 In organizing the army for the advance upon the City of Mexico A, B, G, K, formed a battalion under command of Lieut-Col. Belton, 3d Artillery, in the 1st (Garland’s) brigade, Worth’s division, and here the battalion remained during the war, except, that, at Perote, A was stopped, and I, under Captain Burke took its place. In the advance H was assigned to Patter- son’s volunteer, division, and it served with the volunteers until the army left Mexico. Vera Cruz was an affair wholly of engineering and siege artillery. The next battle, at Cerro Gordo, was one, on our side, almost wholly of in- fantry. Unfortunately, moreover, Worth’s division, which had done most of the work at Vera Cruz, did not get into position at Cerro Gordo until there was little for it to do. By one of those accidents which sometimes happens, Worth, while going into action, was halted to permit Pillow to file in front of him into position on the extreme left. As a result, when Worth reached the Cerro Gordo hill he found the enemy already fleeing from it, and could therefore only join in the unsatisfactory duty of facilita- ting that flight. H, however, was more fortunate. The armament of the company consisted of four 12-pdr. brass guns and two 24-pdr. howitzers. The battle was fought on the 18th of April 1847. During the night of the 17th, Steptoe and Lt. H. Brown, 3d Artillery, after immense toil, in which they were assisted by the infantry, placed the two 24-pdr. howitzers on the hill Atalaya 900 yards from the Cerro Gordo, the stronghold of the Mexi- cans, and from which next day, during the assault, they were served with great effect upon the enemy. For his conduct here Steptoe was brevetted major. From this time on the Third took part in all the battles except Contreras on Scott’s line of operations. That battle was fought by Twiggs’ division. There was no fighting of consequence after Cerro Gordo until the Ameri- can army was within sight of the Capital. The army advanced from Puebla August 7, 1847. B, G, I, K, formed the foot battalion of the Third. Cap- tain Wall of H was left sick at Puebla, where, August 13th he died, and the company then was commanded by Steptoe, being attached to Quitman’s volunteer division. The officers present were : Lt. Col. Belton, command- ing battalion ; B, Lieuts. Farry and Lendrum ; G, Capt. Anderson, Lieut. Shields; I, Capt. Burke, Lieut. Ayres ; K, Lieut. R. W. Johnston ; Light Company H, Capt. Steptoe, Lieuts. Judd, H. Brown, Francis J. Thoms, and Welch. Brevet Major R. D. A. Wade was also present, sick,* not com- manding his company, K, but acting as field officer. While Twiggs’ division was assaulting the enemy’s lines at Contreras, August 20, 1847, Worth’s division, on the right, moved against Cherubusco and the fortified village of San Antonio. Here the Third, particularly K, in its advance as a forlorn hope against the latter place, had an opportunity to render conspicuous service. San Antonio being taken, K remained tempo- rarily to garrison it, while the other companies pressed on to assail and cap- ture Cherubusco. Seven men of the Third were killed, and Lieut -Colonel Belton and twenty-seven men wounded. H was not in the battle ; it was back in San Augustine with Quitman, protecting the supply depots, and the army from attack in rear by the enemy’s cavalry. 340 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. The fruitless armistice which followed this event having been terminated, the battle of Molino del Rey was fought September 8, 1847. Here the brave Farry and Ayres fell. Farry, with fifty men of the Third joined the storming party directed against the fortified centre of the Mexican position at the Casa Mata. The attack was successful, but 12 of the 14 officers of the party fell in the assault. The battalion of the Third entered el Molino on the right of our line, and here, while gallantly leading his men, Lt. Ayres was killed, while Captain Anderson and Lieut. George P. Andrews were wounded. H was not present. The battle was fought by Worth’s division, to which it was not attached. Chepultepec alone remained to be fought. Molino was preparatory thereto. At Chepultepec all the Third with the army were engaged. H was placed on September nth on the right, to threaten an attack on the San Antonio and Candelaria gates of the city. It remained there constantly employed until the evening of the 13th when it rejoined Quitman who, in the general battle, had stormed the Belen gate, but without artillery support, could not advance further against the fire from the Citadel 300 yards away. Steptoe, by greatest industry placed in a well constructed bat- tery some heavier guns, but at dawn of day a white flag bespoke the enemy’s surrender. H then moved in, being the first light company to enter the City of Mexico. Meanwhile, the foot-battalion had not been idle. Details were assisting to construct the batteries to play on the fortifications of Che- pultepec. Lieut. R. W. Johnston with a party of the Third were told off to the storming party. The remnants of the Second and Third Artillery, under Lt. Col. Belton, were temporarily formed into 4 companies, Shields and Lendrum commanding those from the Third. They moved with Worth’s division along the causeway, driving the enemy, until, at San Cosmo garita, night put an end to the conflict. Next morning Santa Anna had fled the Capital. The war was practically ended. The light companies of the Third had a few brushes with the enemy besides those mentioned, but the heavy fight- ing has been narrated. And it was heavy fighting. The strength of the positions occupied by the enemy was remarkable. The nearest approxima- tion in this century to the style of fighting our army there did was exhibited by Wellington’s war against fortified places in the Spanish Peninsula. The City of Mexico was ours September 14, 1847. But before this, D, under Capt. F. O. Wyse had a most creditable affair at the Callabosa River, D at this time was equipped as horse artillery. A, equipped as field artillery, was present at Huamantla, October 9, 1847, at Atlixco, October 19th, and at Matamoras, near Puebla, November 23, 1847. These were among the last of Santa Anna’s guerilla efforts. The light company—A— won high encomiums for its conduct. The army evacuated the City of Mexico June 12, 1848, Worth’s division being the last to leave. L and M saw no fighting in that war. They left New York City for the scene of hostilities October 12, 1847, were wrecked and put in to Charleston, S. C., November 5, left Fort Moultrie December 17, and arrived at the Mexican capital early in 1848, where also was estab- lished regimental headquarters. Colonel Gates remained Governor of Tam- THE THIRD REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY- 341 pico, and Captain Martin Burke temporarily commanded the regiment. At this time the companies of the Third were distributed : A, Perote ; B, G, H, I, K, L, M, City of Mexico; C, E, Walnut Springs near Monterey, Mex.; F in California; D, Tampico. C, D, were equipped as horse artillery; A, E, H, as field artillery; the rest marched as infantry. The companies of the Third on Scott’s line all left Vera Cruz July 16, 1848. The regiment, except C, E, F, was concentrated at Fortress Monroe, and thence distributed to the New England stations which it had left thir- teen years before for the Florida War. E left Ft. Brown, Texas, October 26, 1848, for Fort Trumbull, Connecticut. C, under Lt. Judd, marched via Chihuahua to Santa Fe, N. M., where the guns were soon stored, and the company, equipped as cavalry, served two years against the Indians, eventually joining Bragg, with the few men whose terms of service had not expired, at Jefferson Barracks, Missouri, in 1850. F still held the fort at Monterey, California. Soon the Seminoles who had been left in Florida became restive. Ac- cordingly in September, 1849, B, under Geo. H. Thomas; D, under Wyse; H, Steptoe ; L, under Austine, embarked for Palatka, Fla., near the scene of disturbance. Here they remained, marching through the swamps, until order was restored, when they returned to their stations in 1850. The regiment now looked forward to the enjoyment for a time at least of a quiet life. But this hope was short-lived. In the nature of things it could not long be indulged. We had acquired a vast and unsettled territory by conquest; it was inhabited by savages or semi-savages. The army was needed to keep them in subjection. Before narrating, however, the part acted by the Third in this field of duty, it will be best hurriedly to glance at the experiences of the light com- panies from the close of the Mexican until the breaking out of the War of the Rebellion in 1861. During this time the light artillery was the sport of the War Department. On the plea of retrenchment, the number of light artillery companies in the army was reduced to four, including C, Third, in September, 1848. April, 1849, four additional companies were authorized; but, in the Third, instead of E, B was selected and ordered to West Point, where Shover, its captain, was instructor of artillery. Captain T. W. Sher- man had again to fight for his rights. But he triumphed ; the order was modified, and E, not B, was mounted. The termination of this controversy was supposed, at the time, to establish the legal principle “ once a light company, always a light company ” ; for the contention then was, and the War Department apparently conceded the point, that when the President had designated two companies in each artillery regiment as light artillery, under the Acts of March 2, 1821, and March 3, 1847, he thereby fixed their legal status as that of light companies until the law should be changed. This is not the place to argue regarding the correctness of the proposition ; more recent practices have not been in accordance therewith. However, in 1851 E was dismounted again; in 1853, Congress having appropriated money expressly for the purpose, it was remounted, took station in Minne- sota, where, excepting some expeditions over the Western Territories, it remained until 1861. C, after being remounted at Jefferson Barracks, 1850, 342 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. served at Forts Gibson and Washita, Indian Territory, where the expense of maintaining it was enormous, and where, as a school of instruction, it was almost valueless. In 1856 it was dismounted, and, with three others, one company each from the respective artillery regiments, stationed at Fortress Monroe, Va., to reestablish the artillery school of practice; in 1858 it was remounted, ordered to Salt Lake to take over the light artillery armament which the Ordnance Department was masquerading with, and went thence in 1859 to Fort Vancouver, Washington Territory, where it remained until 1861. In October, 1848, M, under Lieut. Geo. P. Andrews, sailed for California around the Horn, to join F. The movement of the regiment, though con- templated, was deferred. But our recently conquered subjects were rest- less, and had to be kept in order. With this object in view, B and L were sent early in April, 1853, to Texas, where they remained until early in 1854. This was for them a most fortunate circumstance, as they thus missed one of the direst calamities that has ever befallen our army on the seas. How this was, we will now proceed to state. Pursuant to General Or- ders No. 2, H. Q. Army, September 26, 1853, Headquarters and the band with A, D, G, H, I, K, and large detachments of recruits for B and L, em- barked December 21st, that year, for California, via Cape Horn, in the commodious steamer San Francisco. The vessel was new, its machinery excellent, and it was believed to be seaworthy. There were about 600 souls on board, including 500 belonging to or connected with the regiment. On the 22d the vessel was at sea. The 23d ended with a fresh breeze and cloudy weather. By that time the weather was very threatening. An ominous calm prevailed. At 9 p. M. that night the wind came up with terrific force out of the northwest. The sea rolled mountains high. The ship, spite of all efforts of her skillful and devoted crew, soon became unmanageable. By 1.30 A. M. of the 24th she was entirely at the mercy of the waves, her machinery being disabled, and sails blown away. At 9 A. M., 24th, a huge wave struck her, stripping everything from the upper deck, including the saloon, in which, in addition to the regular passengers, a large number of soldiers had taken refuge. It was estimated that 175 souls perished at this time, including about 150 soldiers and Major Washington, Captain Francis Taylor, Captain Field and Lieutenant Smith, together with Mrs. Taylor and Colonel Gates’ son. Nothing could exceed the terror of the situation. Fortunately there were men on board who were fit to command. The officers of the vessel, and of the army, and Lieut. F. K. Murray of the Navy, set an example of heroism. The men, except a few dastardly souls, nobly seconded their ef- forts. To add to the horrors of the storm a leak was sprung, and only by intelligent, systematic, incessant and prolonged exertions was the vessel kept afloat. On the 25th the brig Napoleon was spoken but sailed away. The arrival of this vessel at Boston gave the authorities their first knowl- edge of the disaster. On the 26th, in latitude 38° 20', longitude 69°, another vessel was sighted, but lost in the night. The men now began to die from exposure and exhaustion. On the 28th the bark Kilby of Boston stood by the wreck, and, the weather moderating on the 29th somewhat, ran a haw- ser and took off 108 passengers. That night the storm freshened, the haw- THE THIRD REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 343 ser parted, the San Francisco drifted out of sight, and the Kilby, after a vain search for days, sailed for New York. At 9.30 A. M., December 31st, the British ship Three Bells of Glasgow was spoken and lay to. The storm, however, was unabated. No communication, except by signals, could be had. On January 3, 1854, the Three Bells was joined by the Antarctic of Liverpool. On the 4th and 5th all survivors were tranferred to these two vessels. The Antarctic carried hers—142—to Liverpool. The Three Bells hers to New York. On January 12th the Kilby transferred most of her pas- sengers to the Packet Lucy Thompson, bound to New York, making, herself, for Poston. Thus ended this appalling event. The ship was never seen or heard of more. A Court of Inquiry, of which General Scott was President, was instituted to examine into the circumstances of this wreck, and as a result, whether justly or unjustly, Colonel Gates was relieved from command of the regiment which he did not resume until November, 1861. Nothing daunted, the Third was soon again en route, this time by the Isthmus. April 5, 1854, headquarters with B and L, embarked at New York on the steamer Illinois, arriving, L at the Presidio, and B and headquarters at Benicia, California, May 5th following. The band, with D, G, I, K, were not so fortunate. They embarked on the steamer Falcon, and very nearly repeated the experience of the San Francisco. The vessel, though disabled in a storm, managed to make Hampton Roads, where the troops landed at Fortress Monroe. In May, 1854, the steamer Illinois picked them up, and they finally, after many tribulations, reached the California stations. H and A marched overland, via Salt Lake, Utah, where they wintered 1854-55, ar- riving, July 25, 1855, at Benicia. From 1854 to 1861 the Third was actively employed in marching and scouting over the Pacific Coast throughout its length and breadth. There was not an Indian tribe from the Rockies to the Pacific Ocean whom they did not visit. They became veritable foot-cavalry, In this school some of the best soldiers of the War of the Rebellion were developed. Scarcely had D landed at Benicia when it was sent on an expedition against the Indians of Pitt and McCloud rivers. L marched against the Umatillas, and both B and L, under command of Major G. R. Rains, 4th Infantry, against the Yakimas in October and November, 1855. During the same year D was engaged against the Klamath and M against' the Puget Sound Indians. In the action at Hungry Hill, Oct. 31-Nov. 1, 1855, Lieut. H. G. Gibson, since colonel of the regiment, commanding D, was wounded. In the winter of 1855-56 the Rogue Rivers went on the war-path. B and H formed part of the command sent against them. E. O. C. Ord commanded the former, John F. Reynolds the latter. Ord attacked a party of hostiles at their village, Mackanootney, Oregon, March 26, 1856, routing them and burning their town. On April 28th, following, he met and defeated them again. Reynolds was fighting the same enemy elsewhere. In June, 1856, the Indians sued for peace. General Scott in orders from army headquar- ters complimented these officers and their commands for their gallant con- duct in this war. In the same order the services of M under Keyes on Puget Sound, and L under Piper at the cascades of the Columbia were men- 344 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. tioned with commendation. It was at the latter affair that Lieut. P. H. Sheridan so distinguished himself. E also, under its indefatigable captain T. W. Sherman was doing good service. The Indians at the Yellow Medi- cine Agency began to manifest an ugly disposition. Sherman took their breath away by appearing among them with his battery, thus, in the lan- guage of the General Order before mentioned (14, H. Q. A., 1857) “by his promptness, judgment and firmness preserving the country from a war with the tribes of the Sioux nation.” The Pacific Slope Indians, having been severely punished all around in 1856, remained quiet during the next year. Not so, however, in 1858. May 17, that year, Steptoe, now a major 9th Infantry, was surprised by Indians at Tohotsnimme 40 miles north of Snake River on the road between the present towns of Almota and Colfax, Washington. The uprising was entirely un- expected, but the news spread, and the neighboring tribes flew to arms. Safety to the frontier settlements required the chastisement of the Indians. Accordingly an expedition was fitted out for this purpose under Colonel Wright, 9th Infantry. The Third composed the major part of the troops, and they were rapidly concentrated. A, from Yuma; B, Rogue River; D, San Diego ; G. San Bernardino ; K, Ft. Miller : M, the Presidio, were united at Fort Walla Walla. The Indians were vastly more numerous than the troops, but the latter were armed with rifle-muskets, just then issued to the army, the former with smooth-bores. The superiority of the rifle was at once strikingly manifest. The Indians, waiting until their smooth-bores were effective, found themselves mowed down by troops whom their own projectiles could not reach. They were signally defeated at Four Lakes, September 1, Spokane Plains September 5, and Spokane River, September 8, 1858. Nine hundred ponies were shot in one spot, on the Spokane River, which to this day is marked by their whitened bones. The principal chiefs were captured and hanged, and the tribes so humbled that they have never gone on the war-path since. In general orders from headquarters of the army, General Scott testified his appreciation of the services of the regiment in this campaign in most eulogistic terms. The defeats of 1858 had the effect of keeping the Indians quiet in 1859. But the dispute over the boundary-line, and who should own San Juan Island seemed likely to precipitate war with Great Britain. Accordingly, August 8, 1859, A, B, D, G, left Ft. Vancouver and joined other troops at Camp Pickett on the southern, while the British troops occupied the north- ern end. In this position the forces of the two countries glared at each other for years ; but as there was no fear of immediate hostilities after Gen- eral Scott arranged for joint-occupation, the companies mentioned returned to Ft. Vancouver in December, 1859. Early in i860, Indian hostilities broke out in another quarter. A party of prospectors, headed by a Mr. Meredith, were massacred near Pyramid Lake, then in Utah, but now Nevada. Young Winnamucca was the leading spirit in this affair. An expedition was at once fitted out to punish the -Indians involved. D, under Lieutenant Joseph Stewart, and a detachment of I, under Lieutenant H. G. Gibson, formed part of this force. The Indians were at- tacked and defeated near Truckee River, Carson Valley, June 2, i860, several THE THIRD REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 345 soldiers and many Indians being killed and wounded. On July, 9, same year, A, B, M, left Ft. Vancouver, W. T,, to scout through the Snake River coun- try, returning in September. In August they met and routed the Indians at Harney Lake, Oregon. L, during the same year left Fort Umpqua to scout through the Klamath country, the theatre of the Modoc war of 1873, so often traversed by the Third during its tour on the Coast. This practically ended the campaigning of the Third on the Pacific. Events soon called for its presence elsewhere. Meantime, to replace C, Co K, (Capt. Ord) left Ft. Vancouver, after the Spokane campaign of 1858, arriving at the Artillery School of Practice, January 1,1859 ; and as, by War Depart- ment orders in 1858, two instead of one company from each artillery regi- ment were to be stationed there, F, then at Ft. Yuma, was sent to Fortress Monroe also arriving September 28, 1859. Here they remained, being only called out during the John Brown disturbance at Harper’s Ferry, until they joined the army at Washington as light artillery in 1861. In August, i860, J. F. Reynolds was appointed Commandant of Cadets, West Point, and, in October, Captain E. O. C. Ord transferred to light company C. When the War of the Rebellion was precipitated, the Government was extremely anxious about the temper of the States on the Pacific Coast, par- ticularly California. This led at once to energetic measures to secure the safety of San Francisco. All the companies of the Third on the Coast, ex- cept D, were at once concentrated in that harbor. Much, however, as they were needed there, they were needed in the east more. Accordingly, Octo- ber 14, 1861, headquarters with H, G, L, M, and C, the horses and guns being turned in, embarked for New York via the Isthmus. This left A, B, I, at San Francisco and D at Ft. Vancouver, the latter proceeding in February, 1862, from Camp Pickett, San Juan Island, to Alcatraz Island, San Fran- cisco Harbor. Here B and D remained during the whole war. I came east in 1864 and was equipped as a light battery. A, similarly equipped, joined Colonel Carlton’s column which marched in 1862 from California across the deserts to Tucson, Arizona, to secure that Territory from usurping rebel authority. This task having been successfully accomplished, it marched with other Union troops into New Mexico where it served as a light battery until 1865 when it was transported to Boston Harbor. While in New Mexico the light battery saw exceedingly hard service. It was marching much of the time, when not as artillery, against the Indians as cavalry. No company of the regiment saw harder service during the war than A. And it was of a nature precisely like that of horse company C, in the same section of coun- try, from 1848 to 1850. We now turn to the companies on the great theatre of war. E came in from Fort Ridgley, Minn., in May, 1861, and was present at Blackburn’s Ford, July 18, and again at the first Bull Run July 21, 1861. Lieutenant L. Lorain was wounded at the former. The company was attached to W. T. Sherman’s (1st) brigade of Tyler’s (3d) division. In the battle of the 21st it attacked, with Sherman, at the centre; but as Bull Run was not there fordable, it had to content itself with engaging the enemy at long range. It assisted, with other batteries, to cover the retreat of the army. In 346 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. these engagements it lost several men killed and wounded. During the re- treat the battery lost 3 caissons and its baggage wagons, these having been sent ahead, when the horses were cut out and ridden away by the cowardly fugitives fleeing from the battle-field. Soon after this E started on an expedition to the South-Atlantic coast, and, as its services thereafter during the war were in a theatre distinct from the other companies of the regiment, they will be mentioned here. Its old and honored captain, T. W. Sherman, had been regularly promoted major, April 27, 1861, appointed Lieut.-Colonel of the new 5th Artillery May 14, and brigadier general of volunteers May 17, 1861. He was now to command the land forces of the joint expedition against Port Royal, South Carolina. From this time until January 1864, E served in the Department of the South, along the coast of South Carolina and Florida. It had six guns, and these were often divided up, a section (2 guns) going hither and thither in the petty warfare constantly carried on among the islands of the coast. It was engaged, June 10, 1862, at Secessionville, S. C.. at Pocotaligo, Oct. 22, where hard fighting was done. In the latter affair Lieutenant Gittings was wounded. The battery was attached to the 2d brigade of Wright’s (2d) division. It joined in the assault and repulse at Fort Wagner, S. C., July 18, 1863, under Myrick, and engaged in the siege of that place July 18th to Sep- tember 7th, 1863. On February 20, 1864, it was present at the sanguinary battle at Olustee, Fla., in the army commanded by General Truman Sey- mour, and suffered great loss. All the officers, Capt. Hamilton, Lieut. Myrick, and two volunteers attached were wounded ; 11 men were killed, 18 wounded and 6 missing—a loss as great as that of Senarmont’s famous battery at Friedland. This terminated the services of E in the south. Pursuant to General Grant’s plan to concentrate all the available forces to move against the Army of Northern Virginia, it left the Department of the South in April, 1864, under command of Lieut. J. P. Sanger, 1st Artillery, with the 10th Army Corps, and was assigned to duty with the Army of the James, being part of the artillery brigade of the 3d division. It was present at all the battles in which that “ bottled up” army was engaged, on the 7, 16, 19, 20, April, 1864, afterwards in the intrenched lines at Bermuda Hundred, and on both sides of the James River, and in the works before Petersburg from August to September. Lt. Myrick was again commanding. It was present at Laurel Hill, Va., October 7, 1864, when the 10th Corps repelled Longstreet. It was present at both the attacks on Fort Fisher, North Carolina. After the successful issue of the second attack it marched with the army against Wilmington, N. C., having several skirmishes with the enemy. In March, 1865, E with the 10th Corps joined W. T. Sherman’s army, engaging in the pursuit of J. E. Johnston, until the final surrender of the rebel armies. When McClellan’s army moved to the Peninsula in 1862, the other light batteries of the Third were attached to the artillery reserve. H, however, after being some time equipped as light artillery, was broken up just before the army started, and sent out to San Francisco under Captain Joseph Stewart to recruit. Captain John Edwards had transferred to M from B with George P. Andrews. This left C, E, F, G, K, L, M, on the Atlantic THE THIRD REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY- 347 Coast. The artillery reserve was, however, not a reserve as that term gener- ally is understood. The idea was not to retain its batteries necessarily in the hands of its commander until their guns could be launched against the enemy at the supreme moment. It is true that they might be so used. But, aside from this use, it was expected that the reserve was to be a source of artillery supply whence the divisions could draw batteries for their needs, to be returned when this temporary service had been rendered. From the first, consolidation of companies was necessary, because of the difficulties of recruiting for the regular army, and the demand for regular officers for other duties. The companies of the Third which marched with McClellan were (C-G) consolidated, equipped as horse-artillery, under H. G. Gibson, (F-K) under Capt. Livingston, and (L-M) under Capt. Edwards, the two latter consolidated companies as field artillery. (C-G) was soon de- tached with Stoneman’s cavalry, and (L-M) with Sykes’ brigade of regulars. The first was hotly engaged at Williamsburg, Va., May 4, 1862, 2d Lieut. W. De Wolf being mortally wounded, and the battery losing one piece, several caissons, and seventeen horses. When the army made the flank march from the Chickahominy to James River, (C-G) was cut off with Stoneman’s com- mand toward the old base of supplies at the White House, and, after its destruction, rejoined the army via Gloucester Point. (L-M) was engaged at Newbridge June 19, Mechanicsville June 26, and Gaines’ Mill June 27, 1862. At Mechanicsville it was attached to Griffin’s brigade, McCall’s divi- sion, on the extreme left. At Gaines’ Mill it was on the right, about 500 yards in front of the line, where it fought with great gallantry, and, it truth- fully can be said, under great disadvantages ; for at that early day, the neces- sity for concentrating artillery fire was not understood by subordinate infantry generals. Nevertheless, both our own and the enemy’s general officers praised the conduct of the artillery on that day. (L-M) lost one section, Lieut. Hayden, its commander, being wounded, and the horses all killed. During the change of base to the James River (L-M) fought at Tur- key Bend June 28-29, at Turkey Bridge June 30, and side by side with (F-K) at Malvern Hill June 30-July 1, 1862, during which all its lieutenants were wounded. At Malvern Hill the artillery acted a decisive part. The enemy attributed their repulse to our superiority in that arm. The Union artil- lery that day illustrated the truth of the maxim that artillery, under favor- able circumstances, can defend itself against a frontal attack. The Third was not present at the second Bull Run. When the army after that disaster moved into Maryland, (C-G) was with Pleasanton’s cavalry, and (L-M) with the 9th Army Corps, though unattached. On the 13th and also at South Mountain on September 14th, the former rendered excel- lent service, as it did also at Antietam, where, with the other horse batteries, it filled the gap in the centre of the main line of battle between Hancock's division and Burnside’s corps. Soon after this, by War Department orders, G was formally broken up and the officers and men attached to C. For two years G remained a paper company only. At Fredericksburg (December 11-15, 1862), C was attached to the Cavalry brigade, left grand division of the army. Livingston, captain (F-K), com- 348 HIS TO RICA L SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. manded the artillery 3d Corps, to the first division of which this battery (F-K), under Lieut. Turnbull was attached. When the Union army crossed the Rappahannock to the attack, it was stationed to cover the crossing, at the middle bridge. After the repulse of the right grand division it moved to the left and joined in the battle with its proper command ; (L-M) crossed the river with General Sumner, but the jammed condition of the streets and character of the country prevented its coming into action. In March, 1863, the 9th Corps was sent west, (L-M) accompanying it. The corps arrived at Vicksburg in season to take part in the siege of that place, and afterwards, July 10-16 in the siege of Jackson, Miss. From this time until March 16, 1864, (L-M) operated in the west. On May 24, that year, it again rejoined the Army of the Potomac. All this time it formed part of the artillery of the 9th Corps. It took part meanwhile in Burnside’s cam- paign in east Tennessee, in 1863. It was engaged at Philadelphia, Tenn., October 16, Campbell Station, Tenn., November 16, was in position in the trenches during the siege of Knoxville, November 17-December 5, in pur- suit of Longstreet’s army at Blain’s cross-roads, Tenn., December 17, 1863, and again at Strawberry Plains, Tenn., January 21, 1864. Its next fighting was in the Wilderness, under General Grant, from May 5th to 14th, 1864, whence it was sent back to the defences of Washington. When Hooker made his march around the left flank of Lee’s army, before the battle of Chancellorsville, C, under Lieut. Meinell, was left with the force which was intended to cross below Fredericksburg and hold the enemy in his works. It thus missed the battle. (F-K), under Turnbull, was more fortu- nate. On the 2d of May it rendered the Union cause most opportune ser- vice. It was still attached to the 1st division 3d Army Corps. When the nth Corps was routed, a battery of 22 guns was hastily thrown together at Hazel Grove, on ground dominating the enemy’s advance. (F-K) was of this battery, the fire from which, at short range, hurled back the victorious enemy discomfited. Of this struggle General H. J. Hunt, chief of artillery of the army, remarked in his official report: “ When the enemy, flushed with success, appeared before this battery, they were met with a storm of canister first checking and then driving them back from whence they had emerged at three hundred yards distance. It was a desperate combat be- tween artillery and infantry, in which the former repulsed the latter, flushed as they were with a great success, which they were following up when checked by this battery.” At Gettysburg, July 1-3, 1863, (F-K) again acted a distinguished part, losing Lt. Manning Livingston and 8 enlisted men killed, 14 wounded, 1 miss- ing and 45 horses killed. It was on the Emmittsburg road supporting Humphreys’ division when Sickles’ corps was attacked at Peach Orchard. This was about 3.30 p. M. July 2d. Here Captain D. R. Ransom while placing (F-K) in position was wounded. When Sickles’ corps fell back, (F-K) was rescued with only the greatest difficulty. It was in the thickest of the fight when A. P. Hill took Birney’s division in flank. Humphreys speaks in highest terms of the performance of the battery that day. When Lee moved from in front of Hooker on the offensive campaign which terminated at Gettysburg, C was with Gregg’s cavalry guarding the THE THIRD REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 349 Union right flank. It was in the engagements at Brandy Station June 8, Aldie June 17, Middleburg June 18-19, Upperville June 21st. Detached with General Huey’s brigade it marched for York, Penn., in which general direction the rebel army seemed bent. It was upon this service when the battle of Gettysburg was fought. Being recalled, it arrived near the battle- field just in time to harass the retreating enemy. In doing this it was en- gaged at Smithburg, Maryland, July 5 ; Williamsport, Md., July 6 ; Boons- borough, Md., July 8; Antietam and Funkstown, Md., July 10 and 11 ; near Port Royal, Va., September 1st; at Brandy Station, Culpepper and Rapid- an River, September 12-14, at Madison Court-house and Robertson’s ford September 22-23, 1863. C was early in the field in 1864. It accompanied Kilpatrick in his raid to Richmond, being engaged at Mechanicsville, Va., March ist,and stopped long enough in passing to throw 150 shells into the works guarding the enemy’s capital. Soon after this (C-F-K), consolidated, became one battery, serving with the cavalry. Under Sheridan it was actively employed. It accompanied him in his raid on Richmond, May 9-24, 1864, passing the right of the enemy’s army, defeating his cavalry, rejoining General Grant June 24, near Chesterfield, Va. During the flank march to the James River, the battery was engaged at Hanover Court House, May 31 ; Ashland, June 1, Bethesda Church, June 3, and in the works at the White House, June 20, 1864. The next service of (C-F-K) was with Sheridan in the Shenandoah Valley. It was attached to the horse artillery brigade, commanded by Captain L. L. Livingston. Engaged near Winchester, August 11, on road to Front Royal, August 16, at Woolperth’s cross-road and Sheperdstown, August 25, and Smithfield, August 29, 1864. The character of these affairs presaged the nature of the fighting that was to follow. Each commander, but particu- larly Early, seemed anxious to test the capacity and mettle of his opponent. In the battle of Cedar Creek, October 19, 1864, (C-K-F) was present. After this it was engaged with others of Sheridan’s troops in sweeping the Shenandoah Valley of the enemy, the engagement at Mount Jackson, Va., being the severest in which the battery took part. This practically closed the fighting of the battery during the war. That winter it went into quarters at Pleasant Valley, Maryland, and the next spring moved to the vicinity of Washington City. When the 9th Army Corps came east in March, 1864, it was increased, before joining the Army of the Potomac, by several regiments and batteries, and among the others, G, equipped as field artillery. This battery accom- panied the corps to the Wilderness where it partook in all the fighting of the latter until May 14. As is well known the country was not favorable for the manoeuvre of light artillery, and consequently General Grant sent a large part back to the defences of Washington, and among others G. (L-M) arrived at the same time. Later they were joined by I. They remained in a condition of preparedness for active service; but, from this time on, ex- cept when Early made his attempt on Washington in July, 1864, nothing seriously demanding their attention occurred. Thus it will be seen that B and D alone were not at some time equipped 350 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. as light artillery with the armies in the field. They remained at San Francisco harbor, where their services were deemed to be of more importance than they could be elsewhere. And when we reflect upon the absolute necessity that existed for preventing that city from falling into the enemy’s possession, through their cruisers, it must be conceded that these companies best served their country as garrison artillery in the city’s defences. C, as has been seen, was equipped as horse artillery during the Mexican War, so that B remains the only organization in the Third which at some time has not been equipped as light artillery. Here terminates the “ historical sketch ” of the Third, for the pages of the Journal of the Military Service Institution. It would be in- teresting to pursue the subject to later periods; yet subsequent events can scarcely be spoken of as “ historical,” but what is of determinative importance in the matter, we have already occupied to the full the limits permitted us in the Journal’s pages. The Third Artillery stands on its record. It has ever done its whole duty. Neither the regiment nor any of its officers has ever intrigued to impose that duty on another. Major-General WINFIELD SCOTT Commanding the Army, 1841-1861. THE FOURTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. By FIRST LIEUT. ALEXANDER B. DYER. Fourth Artillery. IN obedience to the resolution of the House of Representatives, May u, 1820, Mr. Calhoun, then Secretary of War, submitted to the House on the 12th of the following December a plan for the reorganization and reduction of the Army. Since the reorganization of the artillery, in 1814, this arm of the Service had consisted of a regiment of light artillery and the corps of artillery. The views of Mr. Calhoun, in so far as they related to the artillery, were adopted by Congress ; and in accordance with the act of March 2, 1821, the first four regiments now in service were organized from the regiment of light artillery, the corps of artillery, and the ordnance. Each regiment was to consist of one colonel, one lieutenant-colonel, one major, one adjutant, one supernumerary captain to perform ordnance duty, one sergeant-major, one quartermaster-sergeant, and nine companies ; and each company was to consist of one captain, two first lieutenants, two second lieutenants, and fifty-five enlisted men. One company was to be equipped as light artillery ; and A company was designated as the light company for many years, but continued on foot to the contrary notwithstanding. The general order of May 17, 1821, from the adjutant and inspector-general’s office contains the names of the officers of the 4th Artillery, their assignment to companies, and their stations. John R. Fenwick, lieutenant-colonel of the regiment of light artillery, was made colonel of the “ Fourth,” with headquarters at Pensacola ; and the companies were assigned to the stations on the Florida and Gulf coasts, ex- tending from Saint Augustine to New Orleans. The following table indi- cates the organizations from which the companies of the regiment were taken: Companies and Captains Fourth U. S. A rtillery. Old Organization. Captains of old Organiza- tions. A. (Bell’s) Co. K. Light Artillery. Bell. B. (Humphrey’s) Co. C, 3d B., S. D * Humphrey. C. (Burd’s) Co. D, 4th B., S. D. (and part of L). Fanning. D. (Pierce’s) Co. G, 3d B., S. D. Root. E. (Payne’s) Co. M, 1st B., S. D. Payne. F.f (Hayden’s) Co. A, 3d B., S. D. Sands. G. (Hobart’s) Co. E, Light Artillery. Hobart. H. (Irving’s) Co. I, 1st B., S. D. (and part of E). Mason. I. (Sands) Co. M, 4th B., S. D. Biddle. *B., S. D. in the table stands for “ Battalion, Southern Division.” f Organized by Alexander Hamilton in 1776. 351 352 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. It will be seen from this table that the companies were then serving in the South with the exception of A and G ; which were sent South from Boston. Some of the lieutenants were afterwards exchanged to other regiments, so that the student of the personnel of the Fourth Artillery will have to con- sult the War Department order of August 16, 1821. Under the order of the War Department, dated April 15, 1824, estab- lishing the Artillery Corps of Instruction at Fortress Monroe, Colonel Fen- wick was ordered to that post in command of the new school, with Lieuten- ant-Colonel Eustis of the 4th Artillery as the second in command. Compa- nies C, Dand I were selected from the regiment as its quota to the Corps of Instruction. In April, 1826, regimental headquarters returned to the South, Lieuten- ant-Colonel Eustis being left in command at Fortress Monroe. Two of the companies of the regiment were changed at the same time. Soon after its organization the regiment suffered severely from the ravages of yellow fever, and the records for several years indicate great mortality. The southern stations were regarded as unhealthy, and in 1827 General Jacob Brown ordered a general transfer of regiments “as the commencement of a sys- tem promising to the artillery generally the advantage of a biennial ex- change, and the garrisons of the sickly stations in particular (on the south- ern frontier) the hope of periodical relief.” The headquarters of the regiment were ordered to Fort Columbus, with the companies distributed to stations at Forts McHenry, Delaware, Colum- bus, Monroe, and at West Point. The total expense for moving all the regiments was $15,680, an outlay that must have astonished Congress, as the House called for the reasons for such an expenditure. In his letter of reply General Brown says: * * * “ It will be only necessary to state the fact that one of our regiments, lately relieved from the Gulf Frontier, has constantly furnished garrisons for the dreary and sickly posts in that quar- ter since the organization of the Army in 1821. The number of deaths among the officers of that regiment within this period, six years, has amounted to sixteen, being four times greater than the average number in all the other regiments of artillery.” He should have added that the regiment lost two hundred and twenty enlisted men by death during that tour. During the next few years there were changes of station between com- panies of the regiment, and at the opening of the year 1829, regimental headquarters were transferred to Philadelphia. This was the beginning of the practice of separating the headquarters from the companies, and was continued, at times, for many years. The Black Hawk War, in 1832, necessitating the concentration of more troops in the West, in June of that year Brevet-Major Payne (captain of E com- pany) was ordered to proceed to Chicago with E, F and H companies of the regiment; and at the same time five companies from Fortress Monroe were ordered West. This battalion included C and G companies of the regiment, and was under the command of Major Crane, of the 4th Artillery. Lieut.-Colonel Eustis, 4th Artillery, commanding Fortress Monroe, was ordered to the frontier to take command of all the artillery. FOURTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 353 These troops formed part of Scott’s forces ; and instead of arriving in time to fight the Indians, they were, while en route, assailed by a more dreadful foe ; for on the passage up the lakes the cholera broke out among them. After terrible sufferings the depleted battalions arrived at Chicago in August, and finally reached Rock River; but too late for active hostilities. The artillery troops returned to their stations that fall, excepting com- panies E and H, which remained at Fort Gratiot until May, 1834, when E took station at Fort Trumbull and H at Fort Hamilton. The political aspect of affairs in South Carolina demanded the attention of the Government, and some troops were sent to that section ; companies B, C and G taking station at Fort Moultrie for a few months in 1832-33. Regimental bands had been merely existing; but in 1832 the regiments of artillery were given “ a sergeant to act as master of the band, and one corporal or private in addition to the ten men ” allowed to act as musicians. In the winter of 1833-34, companies A, B and C were part of the forces under Colonel Twiggs, in Alabama. The necessity for troops having passed, they returned to Fortress Monroe in March. Regimental headquarters moved temporarily to Fort Hamilton, but in November, 1835, were estab- lished at Fort McHenry. The annual return of the regiment for that year contains the following pertinent remark : *‘ It is the opinion of the colonel that were the regiment concentrated under the command of its own officers, its discipline as well as its instruction might be improved and the number of desertions might be diminished, and a higher spirit of pride and emula- tion created.” The Seminole War in Florida, began in the fall of 1835, and that winter and spring the Creek Indians, in Georgia and Alabama, also gave trouble ; so that in May, 1836, seven companies of the regiment were ordered to Fort Mitchell, Alabama. Companies B, D, E, F, G, H and I, reached Fort Mitchell in June, and General Fenwick was ordered to command all the troops concentrated there; but being in poor health he soon after returned to Fort McHenry. During that summer the companies were constantly engaged in marching through the swamps on service against the Indians: and when no longer required in the Creek Country, were transferred to Florida. Companies A and C had been sent to Florida the preceding July, so that the entire regi- ment was concentrated in the Seminole Country that fall. Company C, under Lieutenant Picked, was, August 21, 1836, in the fight at Fort Drane, where it had four men severely wounded. The same com- pany, and part of A, were with Governor Call, October 13, 1836, when he was opposed by the Indians in attempting to cross the Withlachoochee River, and Companies A, C, D, E, F, G and H, were with his second expe- dition and participated in the battle of Wahoo Swamp, November 21, 1836, where one sergeant of H Company was killed. General Jesup relieved Gov- ernor Call and opened his campaign in January, 1837, with Companies B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I, forming part of his command. E Company, under Lieutenant Brent, was engaged at A-ha-pop-ka Lake, January 23d, and 354 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. again at Hatchee-Lustee, four days later, as were other companies of Hen- derson’s Brigade, Company I losing one man killed. Lieutenant-Colonel Fanning and Lieutenant Thomas were engaged in the defense of Fort Mellen, February 8, 1837. The war seemed over in the spring and the regiment was ordered to New York harbor, excepting D and I Companies, which were to take station at Fort Mifflin. But the flight of the Indians under Osceola, in June, renewed hostilities, and many months elapsed before the regiment left Florida. That summer, B Company was mounted and did duty as light artillery during active operations. A, B, D and H Companies were in Taylor’s fight at Lake Okecho-bee, in December, 1837, when the Indians were routed, and B, D and H Companies were in the fight at Locha-hat-chee, January 24, 1838. Companies D and G were part of Bankhead’s forces when he made an ex- pedition into the “ Everglades,” in March, and fought so successfully the band of Arpieka. Company I under Lieutenant Soley, was engaged at Tuscawilla Pond, April 29, 1838, losing one private killed. At the close of the campaign, the regiment was ordered to the Cherokee Country, western North Carolina, and after assisting in the removal of the Cherokee Indians came north to Fort Columbus, New York. Its period of rest was short, for in September it was ordered back to Florida for service. The act of July 5, 1838, added K Company to the regiment. It was organized at Governor’s Island, July 24th, and went to Florida in October. The same act cut off one second lieutenant from each company, but more than compensated therefor by the addition of sixteen privates. The regiment remained in Florida until April, 1839, and was constantly engaged in scouting and in building roads and forts. The only action we find reported was the successful defense of Fort Maitland, in May, 1839, by a detachment of ten men under the command of Lance Sergeant Thomas Baldwin, a corporal of D Company. May 27, 1839, the entire regiment was at Fort Columbus, and was sent from there to the Grand Camp of Instruction held at Trenton that summer, at which B Company was mounted as a light battery September 27th, re- ceiving its horses from the Dragoons. On the breaking up of the encamp- ment, the regiment was ordered to the Lake Frontier and the headquarters and seven companies took station at Detroit, A and K at Fort Gratiot, and G, at Cleveland, Ohio. H Company was subsequently sent to Fort Macki- nac. During the summer of 1840, Companies C, F and I, under Captain Galt, and a detachment of Light Company B, acting as cavalry, under Lieu- tenant Soley, were engaged in guarding the emigrants passing through the Indian Country, and collecting the Pottawattomie Indians for emigration. The companies exchanged stations at different times, and in August, 1841, regimental headquarters were removed to Buffalo, N. Y., with companies as far east as Madison Barracks. March 19, 1842, General Fenwick, who had been in bad health for a long time, died at Marseilles, France, and John De B. Walbach, then seventy-eight years of age, became colonel of the regi- ment. In May, the regiment was ordered from the northern frontier to the seaboard. Headquarters and all the companies, excepting B, arrived at FOURTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 355 Fort Columbus in June and July, only to be again transferred, for the order had already been issued for headquarters and six companies to take station at Fortress Monroe, with two companies at Fort Washington, one at Fort McHenry, and one at Fort Severn. Some change in the order must have been made, for eight companies went to Fortress Monroe and none to Fort Washington. The “light companies” of the Third and Fourth Artillery regiments were to garrison Fort McHenry. The Act of August 23, 1842, reduced the strength of each company by seventeen men, so that in order to keep the light batteries efficient they were reduced to four guns ; and under orders 17, of 1844, two companies of each regiment were to be associated together for instruction in light artillery. Light Company B was then at Carlisle, Penn., and Company K was sent there to join it in November, and they remained together until the following September. Space will not permit us to give more than a brief sketch of what the regiment did in the Mexican War. In the fall of 1845 Lieutenant-Colonel M. M. Payne, 4th Artillery, and companies D, G, E and I, of the regi- ment, were sent to join the “ Army of Occupation ” at Corpus Christi. G Company took from Fortress Monroe the materiel for a light bat- tery, and the other companies were armed with flint-lock muskets ; but ex- pected to have the new percussion muskets sent to them in Texas. Lieu- tenant-Colonel Payne was appointed inspector-general of the army of occupation, G Company was relieved of the field guns, and all four compa- nies were assigned to Child’s artillery battalion. In the battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma, May 8th and 9th, 1846, the companies above mentioned did their share of the work, Lieutenant-Colonel Payne being wounded and eight enlisted men killed and wounded. Major Gardner, with F and H companies, joined Taylor’s army in July ; and in September Light Company B arrived at San Antonio and joined Wool’s forces. E com- pany was broken up in July, and A and K companies left Fortress Monroe in October for the seat of war. During the year, A, D, F, G, H, I and K companies were armed with the percussion musket, “ which have so far proved a very efficient weapon, far superior to the flint,” says the report of the regimental commander for the year 1846. When Taylor moved from Camargo and from there on Monterey, D, G, H and I companies, with Harvey Brown acting major of the battalion, formed part of Child’s battalion of the first brigade, second division, F company having been left at Fort Polk. Early on the morning of September 21, 1846, the battalion of the 4th Artillery was engaged near Monterey, and at noon of that day G and H companies were selected as part of the command to storm the batteries on Federacion Hill. Early the next morning G and I companies were part of the storming party to carry the works that crowned the Independencia Hill (which was finally accomplished with the bayonet) and afterwards the Bishop’s palace. Worth’s columns of attack on the morning of the 23d contained the four companies of the 4th Artillery, and they bore off full honors in the fighting that ensued before the capitulation of the city, with a loss of twelve men killed and wounded. First Sergeant Hazzard of I 356 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY company was one of the nine soldiers mentioned in the official dispatches as having been highly distinguished. We now turn to Light Company B at the battle of Buena Vista, in February, 1847. It had, besides its four 6-pdr. guns and two 12-pdr. howitzers, two 4-pounder Mexican guns that had been added after its arrival at San Antonio, and its personnel was in- creased by volunteers from the 1st and 2d Illinois regiments. In this bat- tle, B company greatly distinguished itself; Captain Washington, with part of the battery, protecting the right flank of the army, while Lieutenant O’Brien, with the remaining guns, covered himself with glory on the plain. On the 22d O’Brien was so hard pressed that, for lack of horses and can- noneers, he was forced to abandon one of the 4-pounders; and the following day, though wounded himself, and all his cannoneers excepting a few, dis- abled or killed, this gallant officer fought his guns a I'outrance, winning the highest praise from his foe,* who was held in check by those guns, that were “ lost without dishonor,” until the batteries of Sherman and Bragg came up, and Bragg “saved the day.” B battery may well feel proud of its work at Buena Vista, for it is unexcelled. It lost two officers and twenty-four men in killed and wounded. When General Scott began his campaign that culminated in the capture of the City of Mexico, regimental headquarters, Major J. L. Gardner, com- manding, with companies A, D, F, G and H belonged to Twigg’s division of his army. Company K was left in garrison at Carmago and I at Fort Polk. The Fourth Artillery participated in the various duties of artillery and infantry in the trenches and on picket at the siege of Vera Cruz. Then moving with Riley’s brigade of the division it was engaged at Cerro Gordo April 17th and 18th, 1847, entered Jalapa two days later, and was there joined by E company the following week. In May they all went to Puebla and were there joined by C company. This company left Vera Cruz as light artillery, but was immediately dismounted on reaching Perote, and joined the battalion of the regiment. G company was designated in gen- eral orders of July 16th, as the additional light battery of the regiment, but was not mounted until after the battle of Contreras. In the battle of Contreras, August 19th and 20th, Riley’s brigade, with the Fourth Artillery leading, pushed into the village of San Geronimo on the 19th, and when the next morning the storming columns were formed to attack Valencia’s troops at Contreras, the column on the right consisted of the Fourth Artillery and part of the Second Infantry, the Fourth Artillery being in front in double column. As the victorious troops were pushing forward, the color sergeant of the regiment (Sergeant Goodwin) was killed, and gallant Lieut. Calvin Benjamin, seizing the colors of the Fourth Artil- lery, bore them the first into the works. G was the first company to enter, and “ recovered with glory ” the very guns that O’Brien had fought and lost at Buena Vista. After the battle the regiment collected around the guns with the great- est feeling of pride and exultation, and received the hearty congratulations of its companions in arms. General Scott, arriving, joined in the cheers, congratulated the regiment on having recaptured the guns that “were lost * See letter of General Ferres to Don P. Barrasmonda. FOURTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 357 by it on the field of Buena Vista without dishonor and recovered with glory,” and also promised that, with an appropriate inscription to its honor, they should be given to the regiment in perpetual token of its achievement. Alas! they now rest in the niches of the Administration Building at the Military Academy. “ Remember this, and show yourselves men : bring it again to mind, O ye transgressors.” These guns were at once given to Drum, and they formed part of the armament of his company, which was regularly mounted that day. The regiment lost in the battle one officer and thirty-seven men killed and wounded. At Molino del Rey, September 8th, Battery G did tremendous work. The other companies of the regiment were with the threatening force in front of the south side of the city, and on the morning of September 12th were in the demonstration against the Garita de Candelaria; and on the afternoon of the following day were detached for the purpose of making a diversion on the Piedad Causeway. Battery G was engaged at the storming of Chapultepec, September 12th ; and when volunteers were called for that afternoon to storm the heights the Fourth Artillery soon made up its quota (consisting of Lieuts. D. H. Hill and G. A. DeRussy and twenty-seven men from C, E, F and H companies), which formed part of Casey’s storming party the following day, while Battery G worked hard at covering the movement by its fire. After that G Battery fought along the Belen Cause- way up to the very gate of the city, losing so many men that additional cannoneers were twice furnished by the South Carolina Regiment. Capt. Simon H. Drum, Lieut. Calvin Benjamin and four men killed, and Lieut. FitzJohn Porter and twenty men wounded, attest the hot position of the battery in that fight; and General Quitman truly says in his report: “ The losses sustained by Captain Drum’s heroic little band of artillerists from the Fourth Artillery evince their exposure during the day. I do them, officers and men, but justice when I add that no encomium upon their conduct and skill would be misplaced.” The storming party of the regiment at Chapultepec had not gotten off without loss, six men having been wounded. The following day the regi- ment entered the city. On the very night the gates of the City of Mexico were opened the siege of Puebla (where we left A Company) began, and continued for thirty-two days, A Company being actively engaged at vari- ous times during the siege. The Act of February 11, 1847, gave the regiment another major and a regimental quartermaster; while that of March 3d added L and M Compa- nies. M Company was organized at Fortress Monroe, July 28th, and L Company at Fort Columbus, N.Y. H., November 12, 1847. Both of these companies joined the regiment in Mexico the following December. In the war with Mexico the regiment lost two officers killed and four wounded, and one hundred and twenty-four enlisted men killed and wounded. When the regiment left Mexico for Fortress Monroe, in the summer of 1848, Light Battery B and Company K were ordered to remain on the line of the Rio Grande. G Company turned in its horses at New Orleans, but 358 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. took its guns to Fortress Monroe, where it was regularly dismounted in ac- cordance with the Circular of September 30, 1848, A. G. O. Under the Act of July 14, 1848, the companies were reduced to forty-two enlisted men. In October the regiment was ordered to Florida, and headquarters were estab- lished at Fort Pickens, but moved to Pensacola in the following spring. General Orders 22 of 1849 mounted an additional battery in each regi- ment. G, of the Fourth, having been designated for that duty, was sent from Fort Pickens to Jefferson Barracks ; and after being there mounted proceeded to Leavenworth and engaged in field duty. It did not remain mounted very long, for in March, 1851, all the light batteries' were dis- mounted excepting Taylor’s of the First, and Bragg’s of the Third Artillery. While in Florida the companies were kept constantly at work moving through the country. The orders of October 8, 1850, sent the regiment North with headquarters at Fort Columbus, the companies being distributed to that post and Forts Lafayette, Hamilton, Mifflin and Washington. A, C, H and M Companies did not remain long at their new stations, for in June, 1851, they were sent to the coasts of North and South Carolina, only to be sent North again the following June, when headquarters were ordered to Fort Hamilton and a number of the companies to stations on the Lakes, as far as Fort Mackinac. In 1853 some of the companies again changed station, C and I Companies going to Fort Independence, Massachusetts, while D and M, less fortunate, were sent to the Rio Grande. General Walbach established regimental head- quarters at Baltimore, October 1, 1853, the regimental quartermaster and band remaining at Fort Hamilton. In May, 1855, G Battery was ordered to prepare for the field as a mountain-howitzer battery, and was so exercised on two oc- casions ; but after firing a few rounds of ammunition at practice, the materiel was so much injured by the cracking of axles, etc., that the scheme had to be abandoned. The battery subsequently joined in the Sioux expedition, mounted on the battery horses and armed with long range rifles, and Sep- tember 3, 1855, was engaged under Captain Howe in the battle of Blue Water against the Brule Indians, being the only one of the four mounted companies that attacked the enemy on the heights on foot, losing two men in the fight but killing and capturing a number of the Indians. October 10th, it encountered a band of Indians and captured five, and subsequently took station at Fort Laramie. The first part of the following year it operated as cavalry under Cooke, but in August it proceeded to Fort Leavenworth, resumed its guns and par- ticipated in the Kansas troubles. It was dismounted under G. O. 9 of 1856, which permitted only one battery to each regiment, and was sent to Fort- ress Monroe in December to form part of the artillery school. In the fall of 1856, the regiment was again sent to Florida, the field and staff arriving at Fort Brooke, December 13th. All the companies, except- ing B and G were that winter in Florida, having been drawn from Fort Mackinac on the north and Fort Brown on the south, “ in order to carry on a vigorous campaign against the Seminoles, who have within the year given evidences of their hostility.” Light Battery B had already been sent from Texas to Jefferson Bar- FOURTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 359 racks, and in March, 1857 joined at Fort Leavenworth to form part of Har- ney’s Utah expedition. It there received the horses of G Company, recently dismounted, its own having been turned in at New Orleans. The regiment was very actively engaged in hunting Indians while in Florida, and suffered great hardships in some of its expeditons through the swamps. The only casualty reported was the wounding of Pvt. King of M Company, in an engagement at Big Cypress, March 13, 1857. General Walbach died June 10, 1857, at the advanced age of ninety-three years, and Francis S. Belton was made colonel of the regiment. The oper- ations in Florida were prosecuted with good promise of a successful termi- nation of the campaign, but the War Department concluding that its servi- ces were needed in Kansas, all the regiment was sent to that Territory in the fall of the year 1857, and soon after distributed through Utah and Nebraska. The field staff and band and Companies A and I took station at Fort Laramie, in August, 1858; Company C and Light Battery B went to Salt Lake, D and E to Platte Ridge, F, H and K to Fort Kearney, and L and M to Cheyenne Pass. The following summer headquarters and companies E, H, I, L and M were sent to Fort Randall, Dakota, A, to Salt Lake, and F and K to Fort Ridgely, Minn. The privates of D Company were transferred to other com- panies of the regiment, and the officers and non-commissioned officers pro- ceeded to Fortress Monroe, where the company was reorganized and took station. During the trouble at Harper’s Ferry, in the fall of 1859, G and part of D Company were sent to that place and remained there several weeks in November. In i860, the companies in Utah were kept busy pro- tecting the parties of emigrants going West, and keeping open the mail routes. Light Battery B, operating as cavalry, marched during that sum- mer 2000 miles over a barren and desert country, and though the Indians were continually hostile, the roads were kept open. The battery had a suc- cessful fight against 200 Indians at Eagan’s Canyon, August, n, i860, losing three men wounded (one mortally). August 10th, Sergeant Bishop, com- manding a small detachment of the battery, was attacked and forced to withdraw to Deep Creek, where in a fight with a party of Indians, Septem- ber 6th, he was wounded. All the companies on the plains were kept busy scouting that summer. L Company was sent from Fort Randall to Fortress Monroe that year, exchanging with Company G. In the War of the Rebellion the active service of the batteries (the term by which we shall hereafter designate the units of the regiment) was so continuous and they were so separated that it is simply impossible, in a short magazine article, to attempt more than a general indication of the work performed by them. The outbreak of the War soon brought the regi- ment in from the plains. Regimental headquarters took station at Fort McHenry, but were subsequently sent to Fort Washington. Colonel Belton was retired August 28, 1861, and Charles S. Merchant became colonel of the regiment. He was retired August 1, 1863, and Horace Brooks was made colonel. We will now give, in alphabetical order, the services of the batteries during the War. 360 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Battery A.—Batteries A and C were united at Washington, D. C., in October, 1861, made a light battery (4 10-pdr. Parrotts) and attached to Sumner’s Division in December. In March, 1862, its armament was changed to 6 12-pdr. guns, and it was assigned to Richardson’s Division of the Second Corps. It was first engaged with the enemy at Rappahannock Station April 28, 1862, being with Howard’s Brigade; and in the ensuing campaign against Richmond it did its full share of hard work. It fought well at Fair Oaks June 1 st; and, forming part of the rear guard of the Army, was heavily en- gaged at Allen’s Farm and Savage Station June 29th, and at White Oak Swamp June 30th (Capt. G. W. Hazzard of C being mortally, and Lieut. A. Morris slightly wounded), and was in reserve at Malvern Hill the follow- ing day. With Sumner on the right flank of the Army at Antietam it fought des- perately, and in the language of its corps commander, rendered “ distin- guished service.” It was next engaged at Charlestown, W. Va., October 16, 1862. Two days later the batteries (A-C) were separated at Harper's Ferry. A Battery obtained seventy men from the 4th Ohio, proceeded to Washington to refit, obtained 6 3-in. rifles, and rejoined the Second Corps. It was near the right of Hays’ Division of Artillery when Fredericks- burg was bombarded, and afterwards crossed the river and was in the fight of December 14th. It afterwards formed part of the artillery reserve of the Second Corps; and though present and occupying several positions at Chancellorsville, it was not regularly engaged. After that it became part of the artillery brigade of the Second Corps, and was engaged with the enemy at Haymarket May 28, 1863. On the afternoon of July 2, 1863, it was put in position just on the right of Webb’s Brigade of the Second Division, and fought hard and well; and when, the following afternoon, this point became the objective of the op- posing forces, and Pickett’s men pushed forward to the stone wall, Battery A of the Fourth Artillery, just in rear of the wall, though hard hit itself, poured withering fire into the advancing ranks. The battery may well be f>roud of its magnificent record in the battle of Gettysburg, and Lieut. Alonzo H. Cushing, killed in Pickett’s charge, has left a name for gallantry that cannot be excelled. Cushing and Milne (1st R. I. A. attached) killed, Canby wounded, thirty- eight men killed and wounded, three limbers blown up, carriages and guns broken and injured, and sixty-five horses killed and wounded bear witness to the fact that A Battery was engaged at Gettysburg. What remained of it was attached after the battle to I Battery of the 1st Artillery, but was separated from it July 16th, made a horse battery (2 3-in. rifles and 2 12- pdr. Napoleons), assigned to the First Brigade of Horse Artillery, and re- mained with it until dismounted in June, 1864. Its service while a horse battery was with the cavalry, and it fought at Sulphur Springs September nth and 12th, at Bristoe Station October 14th, and at Parker’s Store November 29, 1863. In Grant’s Wilderness campaign, in the spring of 1864, it was engaged FOURTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 361 at Todd’s Tavern May 5th, at Tiney Woods May 6th, again at Todd’s Tav- ern May 7th, and at Pine Run May 8th. Starting on Sheridan’s raid May 9th, it fought at Ground Squirrel Church May 10th, before Richmond May nth, at Mechanicsville May 12th, and at Salem Church and Harrison’s Store May 28th. It reached Harri- son’s Landing June 3d, and was there dismounted. It was sent the next day to Washington, equipped as a light battery, and remained in the de- fenses of Washington from that time until the close of the War. Battery B.—B Battery was a light battery throughout the War. It was armed with six 12-pdrs. until May, 1864, when two of the guns were turned in, and it thereafter served as a four-gun battery. It reached Wash- ington in October, 1861, obtained its new armament, and was assigned to M’Dowell’s Division the following month. When Pope’s army was organ- ized in June, 1862, it was assigned to the 4th (Gibbon’s) Brigade of the 1st (King’s) Division of the 3d (M’Dowell's) Corps. It was first opposed to the enemy at Orange Court House July 26, 1862, was under fire at Cedar Mountain August I7th-i9th, engaged in the defense of the Rappahannock at Rappahannock Station August 2ist-23d, in action at Sulphur Springs August 25th-26th, fought hard at Gainesville August 28th, and at the second battle of Bull Run August 29th-30th. When McClellan resumed command of the Army King’s Division was assigned to the 1st (Hooker’s) Corps. The battery, still with Gibbon, fought gallantly at South Mountain September 14th, and in the battle of Antietam September 17th, when Hooker was directed to turn the left flank of the enemy, B Battery was in the thickest of the fight, and though sub- jected to a murderous fire at short range dealt desperate and effective blows in return. Lieut. J. B. Campbell wounded, thirty-nine men and thirty-three horses killed and wounded are indicative of the position of the battery in that battle. At Fredericksburg, with Doubleday’s Division of the 1st Corps, it crossed the river and was engaged in the battle from the 13th to the 15th of December, 1862, and won the highest encomiums from its corps commander, John F. Reynolds. After the battle it became part of the artillery brigade of its division. It was engaged at Fitzhugh’s Cross- ing April 26, 1863, and was next under fire at Chancellorsville May 4th, 5th and 6th. After that the artillery of the corps was consolidated and it became part of the artillery brigade of the 1st Corps. It went into action at Gettysburg on the afternoon of July 1st, and was severely engaged, barely escaping capture, and finally fell back to Cemetery Hill. The next day it was hard at work under a very heavy fire, and continuing in position, had the same experience July 3d. Lieuts. James Stewart and James Davison (5th Art. attached) wounded, and thirty-two men and thirty-two horses killed, wounded and missing, one caisson blown up, three broken down, and two guns placed hors de combat are indicative of the positions occupied by “ Jock ” Stewart’s Battery on the field of Gettysburg. The battery was em gaged at Funkstown July nth, at Warrenton July 23d; and at Haymarket October 19th, and Mine Run Nov. 30th it was in position. It fought in the Wilderness in May, 1864, being engaged at Spottsyl- 362 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. vania Court House May 12th, Po River May 20th, North Anna May 23d, and Tolopotomy Creek May 25th. It was in position June i-4th at Bethesda Church, losing heavily in the fighting on the third and fourth days. In position at White House June 15th, and engaged all day in the fighting before Petersburg on June 18th, and remained in that vicinity the rest of the year. It was engaged in a fight at Hatchers Run October 28, 1864, fought well at Gravelly Run March 29, 1865, where Lieut. John Mitchell was wounded, and ended its fighting in the Civil War at Quaker Road March 30, 1865. Its war record is magnificent, excelled by none, and only equalled by that of Battery K. Battery C.—C Battery had to its record, when separated from Battery A in October, 1862, the various engagements indicated in the record given above of Battery A. Its captain, G. W. Hazzard, was mortally wounded at White Oak Swamp. When A and C batteries were separated, the horses, guns and equipments were turned over to C Battery, which remained with Hancock’s division of the Second Corps. It crossed the river with the Irish Brigade December 12, 1862, was placed in position opposite Marye’s Heights the following day, and during the battle of Fredericksburg, when the infantry struggled so hard to carry the Heights, C Battery did all that it could to assist its sister arm. It next fought at Chancellorsville May 2-3, 1863, where part of the battery was with Hancock and Geary, and when the Third Corps was forced back on Sunday morning the half of C Battery at the Salient Angle, subjected to a terrific fire, poured canister into the enemy not sixty yards distant. The struggle was desperate, Lieutenant O’Donohoe (attached) was killed, and the intrepid Field voluntarily re- mained with Geary and did good work long after he had been ordered out of action. The battery was afterwards assigned to Ransom’s (First Regular) Brig- ade of the Reserve Artillery. It was sent forward July 2d to the line of battle at Gettysburg, just to the left of the Second Corps, and on that and the following day was well fought by Evan Thomas, losing Lieut. John M’Gilvray wounded, and seventeen men and twenty-nine horses killed and wounded. In August it was reduced to a four-gun battery (12-pdr. Na- poleons), and during October operated with the Third Division of the Sixth Corps. It was regularly assigned to that corps October 16th, and fought at Mine Run November 30, 1863. It was united with E Battery as a horse battery April 11, 1864 (2 3-in., 2 12-pdrs.) and they remained so united until after the close of the War. This united battery was at once assigned to the first brigade of horse artillery, and during the spring campaign of 1864 was attached to the third division (Wilson’s) of the cavalry corps, and was engaged at Craig’s Chapel and Todd’s Tavern May 5th; at Spottsylvania Court House May 8th ; and, participating in Sheridan’s raid, fought at Meadow Bridge May 12th, and at Mechanicsville, May 14th, losing five men and twenty-two horses. Contin- uing with the cavalry corps it was engaged at White Oak Swamp June 3d, also at Riddell’s House the same day. Starting on Wilson’s raid June 22d, it fought at Nottoway Court House June 23d, Roanoke Station June 25th, Stoney Creek Station June 28th, and June 29th at Ream’s Station, where FOURTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 363 Wilson ran into the Confederate infantry, and after some severe fighting the battery was captured. The guns were spiked, the carriages destroyed, and the men mounted on the battery horses with pistols and sabres picked up on the road, fought their way out, and rejoined the horse artillery brigade the fol- lowing day, after having lost several men wounded and eighteen captured. It was at once re-equipped as a horse battery, receiving the same armament as before. It went with Wilson’s cavalry division to operate under Sheridan in the Shenandoah, and was engaged at Winchester August 17th ; Summit Point August 21st; Kernsville August 25th Berryville September 5th; after which it joined the reserve at Pleasant Valley. October 25th, with a bri- gade of the 19th Corps, it was successful in repulsing the attempt of Mosby to capture the paymaster’s train at Bunker Hill, and joining Sheri- idan the following day was assigned to the second brigade of the first cav- alry division. The half battery of rifled guns formed part of Sheridan’s command; when he made his raid that began February 27, 1865, and this part of the battery did good work in the fights that occurred at Waynesboro March 2d ; Dinwiddie Court House March 31st; Five Forks April 1st; Scott’s Cross Roads, Sutherland Station, and Brown’s Cross Roads April 2d; Nelson’s Farm and Sailor’s Creek April 6th ; Appomattox April 8th; and on the fol- lowing day formed part of the fighting line that barred Lee’s way and forced the surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia. Battery D.—D Battery was mounted as a light battery in February, 1862. (6 i2-pdre guns) and remained a light battery throughout the War. A de- tachment of it was at Big Bethel June 10th, and at Fort Hatteras August 28, 1861. The battery formed part of Wool’s force for the capture of Norfolk in May, 1862, and the following September was sent to Suffolk, where it re- mained with the troops under General Peck, forming part of the first divi- sion of the 7th Corps ; and was sent on various expeditions while serving in that vicinity. The right section (platoon is the name now given to what was then designated a section), under Lieutenant Whitney, was engaged at Franklin, Va., October 4th, and the entire battery having marched 50 miles in 30 hours, was in action at the same place October 31st. It was next engaged when General Corcoran had his fight at Deserted House January 29, 1863 and again the same afternoon, ten miles from Suffolk, losing in the latter fight eleven men killed and wounded. April 24th the left section was in action at Edenton Road under General Peck, and from April 10th to May 30th, the battery was engaged in the siege of Suffolk. It was also in action May 24th while engaged under General Corcoran in destroying the Petersburg R. R. It fought at Franklin, Va., June 18th, and at Windsor June 22d, being part of the first division of the 7th Corps. When the 18th Corps was organized in April, 1864, to play its part in Grant’s campaign against Richmond, the battery belonged to the artillery brigade of the Second (Weitzel’s) Divi- sion, and moved to Bermuda Hundred in May. The right and left sections were, with the first division of the 18th Corps, engaged against the enemy at Point of Rocks May 7th, and the right section had several men wounded 364 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. in the fight near Petersburg May 9th. The centre and leit sections were heavily engaged with severe loss at Fort Darling May 14th, the entire battery at the same place two days later, and in front of Petersburg June 15th, 16th and 17th. The left and centre sections were engaged at Deep Bottom July 26th. The battery forming part of the artillery brigade of the 10th Corps partici- pated in the siege of Petersburg, being daily engaged from August 26th to September 24th, 1864, and also fought at Laurel Hill September 29th, and at New Market Road October 7th of that year. It remained in front of Petersburg until December, when it is reported as in front of Richmond, where it remained until April 3d, when it marched through the city that had been so long the capital of the Confederacy. Battery E.—Battery E, armed with 6 10-pdr. Parrott’s, was mounted as a light battery at Camp Monroe, Ohio, in August, 1861, and joined Rose- crans’ army in West Virginia. In December it was sent to General Kelly at Romney, and a section was with Dunning in his little fight near Blue Gap, January 7,1863. The battery now belonged to Landers’ Division, which afterwards became the second (Shields’) division of the 5th (Banks’) Corps in the organization of March, 1862. Four guns of the battery were in the skirmishes at Middletown and Cedar Creek March 18th, and the entire bat- tery, with Kimball’s Brigade, fought at the battle of Winchester March 23d, and was in the skirmish at Mount Jackson April 17, 1862. May 1st, Shields’ Division was transferred to M’Dowell’s department. One section of the battery was engaged at Front Royal May 31st, and June 9th the entire battery was heavily engaged at Port Republic where, after a desperate resistance, it lost three guns and two caissons. One of the guns it had the satisfaction of recapturing during the battle. The lost guns were not re- placed ; but in July the battery was made a horse battery, retaining its four Parrott guns. When the 1st, 2d and 3d Corps were organized in June, 1862, the battery remained with M’Dowell, being reported as unattached ; but in August it was assigned to Reno’s Division of the 9th Corps, and was en- gaged in the defense of the Rappahannock August i5-26th. Temporarily attached to Hooker’s Division it was engaged at Broad Run August 27th. Then rejoining Reno it fought at the battle of Second Bull Run August 29th and 30th, where it “ behaved nobly,” and was in action at Chantilly September 1st. In the reorganization of the Army it became part of Sturgis’ (2d) Division of the 9th Corps, and did good fighting at South Mountain September 14th. It participated in the battle of Antietam September 17th, where Lieut. E. L. Baker was killed, and Capt. J. C. Clark was four times wounded. The battery being without officers, General Hunt selected Lieut. Geo. W. Dickenson, 4th Artillery, to reorganize the battery after the battle and prepare it for field service. Temporarily with Hancock’s Division, it was in the fight at Charlestown, W. Va., October 16, 1862. It formed part of the grand battery opposite Fredericksburg, then crossed the river with its division (Sturgis’) on the morning of December 12th, and was heavily engaged on the following day, when it was subjected to a terrific fire. In less than twenty minutes “ the gallant Dickenson fell gloriously at his post,” while twelve of the cannoneers were killed and wounded, and all the men were twice driven from their guns. FOURTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 365 In March, 1863, it was assigned to the first brigade of horse artillery. After Fredericksburg “ Sam ” Elder was placed in command of the battery and retained it until the following November when he joined his own regi- ment. It fought at Kelly’s Ford April 14, 1863, while on Stoneman’s Raid, and after returning from the raid the Parrott guns were turned in and replaced by four 3-inch rifles. The battery was next engaged at Beverly Ford June 14th, with Buford, and next with Kilpatrick’s division at Han- over June 30th ; in the Battle of Gettysburg July 1st, 2d and 3d ; at Smithsburg July 5th; at Hagerstown July 6th; at Boonsboro July 8th ; at Funkstown July 10th; again at Hagerstown July nth; at Port Conway September 3d ; at Brandy Station October 10th and 1 ith ; at Buckland Mills October 13th ; fought again the next day, and again near Buckland’s Mills October 19th. October 27th and 28th it was in action while engaged in guarding Raccoon Ford, and in December went into winter quarters with its brigade of horse artillery. A new armament of 3-inch guns was obtained in March, 1864, but on the nth of April C and E batteries were consoli- dated and made a horse battery (two 3-inch rifles and two 12-pounder guns) and the war record of E battery from that time on has already been given in the record of Battery C. Battery F.—Battery F arrived in Washington from the West on the 18th of April, 1861, after having had a number of its men injured from stones, etc., thrown by the mob while passing through Baltimore. It was sent to Carlisle in June and there equipped as a light battery (four 6-pounder guns and two 12-pounder howitzers) and formed part of Patter- son’s command, the sections being distributed to the different brigades. The battery was first engaged at Falling Waters July 2d, 1861; July 8th it is reported as attached to Stone’s brigade. In the organization of the Army, October 15, 1861, it was assigned to Banks’ division, of which it then formed part, and was engaged for several days in December in defending dams Nos. 4 and 5. In the reorganization of March, 1862, it was assigned to to the First (Williams’) Division of the Fifth (Banks’) Corps. One section was in action at Newton May 24th, and the entire battery fought in the battle of Winchester the following day. In June, 1862, the armament was changed to six 12-pounder Napo- leon guns. When Pope’s army was formed Banks’ corps became the Sec- ond Corps. At Cedar Mountain the battery fought hard and Weil, suffer- ing severely and losing, by an accident, one gun in the retreat. After Pope’s campaign Banks’ corps was made the 12th Corps (General Mans- field’s) which, after Antietam, became Slocum’s. The battery was, in the reorganization, taken from the division to form part of the artillery brig- ade of the corps, and was held in reserve at Antietam and not engaged during the battle. It was at Chancellorsville that it covered itself with glory, being engaged May 1st, 2d and 3d. Lieut. E. D. Muhlenberg, with his guns at the angle near Geary, did work of which the battery may well feel proud, for with “courage, coolness and indomitable bravery—he contended against the fearful odds before him until every gunner was killed or wounded at his post, seven horses killed and his ammunition exhausted.” Lieutenant F. 6. 366 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Crosby, a most gallant and efficient officer of the battery, was killed on the 3d. We next find the battery engaged at Gettysburg, when July 2d it was in action near Culp’s Hill, and on the following day, placed about the centre of the line of the 12th Corps, it rendered valuable service by its work against the enemy. That ended the fighting of F Battery for the War. It went West with the 12th Corps that fall, and in the spring of 1864 was sent to Nashville to form part of the first division of the reserve artillery of the Army of the Cumberland. In October, 1864, it was dismounted, the privates assigned to M Battery, and the officers and non-commissioned officers sent east to recruit. It was not remounted nor did it again rejoin the forces in the field. Battery G.—Early in June, 1861, Battery G was equipped as a light 6attery (4 6-pdr. guns and 2 12-pdr. howitzers) at Cincinnati, and joined McClellan in West Virginia, being present at the fight at Rich Mountain July nth. On the 25th of July it was assigned to the Third (McCook’s) Brigade by Rosecrans, and subsequently joining the First (Reynolds’) Bri- gade, it fought well at Green Briar River October 3d, losing six men killed and wounded. In December it joined the Army of the Potomac as part of the reserve artillery, and received a new armament of 6 12-pdr. Na- poleon guns. It participated in the Peninsular campaign, being actively engaged in the siege of Yorktown. After that it was attached to the Second (Slocum’s) Division of the Second (Franklin’s) Corps, and a month later joined Getty’s Brigade of Reserve Artillery. June 28, 1862, it joined Naglee (of Peck’s Division of the Fourth Corps), who was left behind to hold Jackson in check, and was that afternoon engaged in the fight at Bottom’s Bridge. It was on the line of battle and slightly engaged on several occasions during the retreat, serving with Peck, and also Smith’s Division of the Sixth Corps, after which it returned to the artillery reserve. It next appeared with Sykes’ Division at Antietam, and while the battle was going on was sent to Burnside ; but it practically did nothing in that battle. At Fredericksburg it belonged to the right centre division of the reserve artdlery, was placed just to the left of the Lacy House December 10th, and the next day was engaged and did well in covering the crossing of the troops. It was next in action near Falmouth May 3-4, 1863, and the month after was assigned to the Artillery Brigade of the Eleventh Corps. July 1st, with the First (Barlow’s) Division of its Corps, it was severely engaged at Gettysburg, losing its commander, Lieut. Bayard Wilkeson, “ an officer of great gallantry.” That night it was placed in position on Cemetery Hill, where, under Lieut. E. A. Bancroft, it did heavy fighting July 2d and 3d, losing thirteen men and twenty-four horses killed and wounded. It participated in the movements of the Army of the Potomac until that fall, when it was sent West with its corps; fought at Chattanooga October 22d, 23d and 24th, and engaged in the pursuit of the enemy on the 26th and 27th. The materiel of the battery was turned over in February, 1864, to the First Ohio, the officers and men of the battery being sent to Nashville, where in April four guns (4 12-pdr. Napoleons) were given to it, and in June FOURTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 367 a full complement of horses was obtained. The battery was dismounted in the following October, the privates transferred to Battery I, and the officers and non-commissioned officers sent to New York to recruit. Its field ser- vice in the War of the Rebellion was over, but in February, 1865, it was re- mounted as a light battery at Washington, D. C. Battery H.—H and M Batteries arrived at Louisville, Ky., in January, 1862, from the West, February 1st they were united, mounted as a light battery (2 3-in. and 2 12-pdrs.), and assigned to Crittenden’s Division, that formed part of Buell’s command. At the battle of Shiloh, April 7th, this battery went into action near the left of Nelson’s line and did magnificent work, and later in the day, with the 14th Brigade, it added lustre to its record. In the reorganization in May, 1862, it was assigned to Nelson’s Division and was engaged in the siege of Corinth; and while in the trenches at that place received two more guns (3-in. rifles). It moved out of the trenches with the 22d Brigade on the 28th of May and seized the bridge at Bridge Creek, where it had a heavy fight. One section was with Jackson’s Cavalry, when he had his fight at Tus- cumbia Creek, May 31st. June 2d the armament was again increased by the addition of 2 12-pdr. howitzers. The battery was at the battle of Perry- ville, October 8th, but not engaged. When Rosecrans assumed command in October, 1862, it was attached to the Third (Grose’s) Brigade of the First (Smith’s) Division of Crittenden’s Corps, and at the battle of Stone River, December 29 and 31, 1862, and January 2, 1863, it was heavily engaged. A few days after that battle the batteries were separated, H retaining the four 12-pdr. howitzers and M the 3-in. rifles. H Battery remained with Grose’s Brigade and fought at Chickamauga, September 19th and 20th, where Lieu- tenant Robert Floyd (3d Art. attached) was mortally wounded, twenty men and twenty-five horses killed and wounded, and one gun lost. In this bat- tle the battery, under Lieutenant H. C. Cushing, did magnificent fighting and fully earned the high praise bestowed on it. February 24 and 25, 1864, it was engaged against the enemy at Buzzard’s Roost Gap. The following month it was relieved from duty with Grose’s Brigade, sent to Nashville to form part of the reserve artillery, and was there dismounted in October, 1864, the privates being transferred to Battery I, and the officers and non-commissioned officers sent east to recruit. It was then sent to Washington where it was remounted as a light battery, in March, 1865, but its war service was over. Battery I.—In June, 1861, Battery I joined McClellan’s headquarters in West Virginia, and was present at Rich Mountain, July nth-i2th. July 22d, it was mounted as a light battery (4 mountain howitzers) and three days later was assigned by Rosecrans to the Second Brigade. That fall, with different brigades, it was engaged in several minor actions, viz.: Carni- fex Ferry September 13th ; New F.iver November 5th ; again at New River November nth, and the following day used two 10-pdr. Parrott's (recently added to its armament) at the same place. Leaving its howitzers in West Virginia, the battery joined Buell’s forces in Kentucky in December, there received 4 6-pdrs. (two of which belonged to the 4th Michigan) and was as- 368 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. signed to Thomas’ Division, which subsequently became T. W. Sherman’s. The battery was engaged in the siege of Corinth, in May, 1862, and joined in the pursuit of the enemy after the evacuation of the town. In August it was regularly assigned to the Third (Steedman’s) Brigade of the Third (Thomas’) Division, which was then under command of General Schoeppe and participated in the manoeuvres against Bragg. After that the section of the 4th Michigan was relieved and the armament of the battery became 2 6-pdr. guns and 2 10-pdr. Parrott’s. The Third Division passed into Gilbert’s Corps, and was engaged near Springfield, October 4th, and at Perryville, October 8, 1862. When Rose- crans took command and reorganized the army the battery became part of the Third (Steedman’s) Brigade of the First (S. S. Fry’s) Division of the Fourteenth (Rosecrans’) Corps, October 24, 1862. In February, 1863, its ar- mament was changed to 4 12-pdr. guns. It skirmished with the Confederate Cavalry near Chapel Hill March 3d, and near Harpeth River March 8th, and was sent several times during that month to the Harpeth River to prevent the enemy from crossing. It participated in the Tullahoma campaign, and on the morning of September 19, 1863, opened fire at Chickamauga, where it was heavily engaged on that and the following day, losing Lieutenant N. Redmond wounded, twenty-three men and nineteen horses killed and wounded, one limber blown up and the battery wagon captured. This was the heaviest and most brilliant work of the battery in the War, and the clear judgment of Lieutenant F. G. Smith, in holding it at Snodgrass Hill, after Negley’s withdrawal, which subsequently became the key point for the ar- tillery that turned the tide of battle, enhances the value of the work well done. While at Chattanooga the battery, with the other troops, suffered for lack of supplies and most of the horses died of starvation while standing at the picket line ; so that when it moved out in November it had only some thirty nearly starved horses and a few mules to draw the guns and caissons. At the battle of Chattanooga, November 23, 1863, it was put on duty with the Second (Sheridan’s) Division of the Fourth Corps and was engaged near Bushy Knob on that and the following day. It joined, with its own division, in the pursuit on the 26th, but the horses were in such poor con- dition that it had to be sent back to Chattanooga, where it was dismounted in March, 1864, and sent to Nashville to form part of the garrison artillery. In October it was filled up by the transfer of the privates from G and H Batteries, obtained the four 12-pdr. guns from H Battery, and was regularly mounted as a horse battery. It was assigned to Johnson’s Division of Cav- alry, and in the following month to Wilson’s command of Cavalry. It was engaged against the enemy at Charlotte’s Pike December 15, 1864, and at Pulaski ten days later, where, owing to the loss of seventeen horses and lack of support, one gun was lost. When Wilson prepared for his raid through Alabama in the spring of 1865, the battery under Lieut. G. B. Rodney, with eight horses to each of its four 12-pdr. Napoleons, formed part of Upton’s Division. It skirmished with the enemy at Jasper March 26th, fought near Montevallo March 31st, 369 FOURTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. was present at Ebenezer Church April ist, engaged at Selma April 2d ; and April 16th did its last fighting in the War at Columbia. Battery K. — In August, 1861, Battery K was sent to Washington, mounted as a light battery (2 20-pdr. Parrott’s and 2 12-pdr. howitzers), and in the organization in October was assigned to the Reserve Artillery. In December its armament was changed to 6 12-pdr. Napoleon guns. It remained a light battery throughout the War, retaining its six guns until May, 1864, when two of them were turned in, under the order reducing the batteries to four guns each. It participated in the Peninsular campaign, being engaged at Yorktown April 28, 1862. June 2d it was assigned to the Third (Heintzelman’s) Corps, and fought at Fair Oaks June 25th, at Ropers’ Church June 30th, at Malvern Hill July ist, and again at the same place August 6th. It did not reach Second Bull Run in time to participate in the battle, but was en- gaged at Chantilly September ist. When Burnside took command of the Army it was assigned to the Second (Sickles’) Division of the Third (Hooker’s) Corps, having been pre- viously part of the reserve artillery of the corps. It was engaged in the bombardment of Fredericksburg December nth and 12th, forming part of Tompkins’ Division of Artillery; then joining Franklin’s troops on the following day, it did excellent service against the right flank of the enemy. May 3d it fought at Chancellorsville, losing Lieut. I. Arnold (Ord. Dept, attached), wounded, and 44 men and 59 horses killed and wounded. It was in this battle, on the height at Fairview, at the extreme left of the crest, while under the most terrific fire, that K Battery won the admiration of all who beheld it, and its record at Chancellorsville under Lieut. F. W. Seeley, that prince of battery commanders, must always form one of the brightest pages in the history of our light artillery. Its work may be equalled but it cannot be surpassed. After the battle it became part of the corps artillery, was assigned to Humphreys' Division of the 3d Corps for the battle of Gettysburg, and July 2d and 3d did work that, in the language of that magnificent soldier, Humphreys, “excited my admiration as well as that of every officer who beheld it.” Lieutenant Seeley was severely wounded and 24 men and 28 horses were killed, wounded and missing. The Battery was next engaged at Union Mills October 18th, and at Mine Run November 30, 1863. In April, 1864, when several of the Army corps were consolidated, the Battery was assigned to the artillery brigade of the 2d Corps, and during the suc- ceeding campaigns of the War, under command of Lieut. J. W. Roder, its hard fighting added to the magnificent reputation it had already acquired. In the Wilderness campaign it was engaged at Spottsylvania Heights May 10th, 12th, 16th and 18th ; near North Anna May 23d, 24th, 25th and 26th ; at Sheridan’s Farm May 30th and 31st, at Cold Harbor June 3d, 4th, 5th and 12th ; near Petersburg June 16th, 17th, 19th, 20th and 26th; at Deep Bottom August 16th, and Boydton Plank Road October 27, 1864. The right section was engaged at Hatcher’s Run, February 7, 8, 1865. and the Battery participating with its corps in the final campaign against Lee, was in action near Hatcher’s Run March 22d, in the vicinity of Fort 370 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Cummings March 25th, at Hatcher’s Run April 1st and 2d, at Sailor’s Creek April 6th, and had the satisfaction of being at Appomattox Court House on the 9th of April when the Army of Northern Virginia laid down its arms. Battery L.—Battery L was mounted as a light battery at Fortress Monroe, in July, 1861 (6 12-pdr. Napoleons), and remained so mounted throughout the War. Its first engagement was March 8, 1862, when, from its position at Newport News, it was in action against the famous Merrimac. It was sent to Suffolk in July to form part of General Mansfield’s force, and remained in that vicinity until the organization of the Army of the James, when it joined that army and participated in its operations. When the 7th Corps was formed, in September, 1862, the Battery became part of Peck’s Division of that Corps. It was attached to Ferry’s Brigade in the operations that fall, and fought at Blackwater October 26th, and at Joiner’s Ford December 13th of that year. Getty’s Division of the 9th Corps became the 2d Division of the 7th Corps in March, 1863, and the battery was attached to it. It participated in the siege of Suffolk, which lasted from April 10th until May 3d, and also fought near Suffolk May 3d ; near Franklin May 16th, and was again in action a few days later, when it assisted in the destruction of the Peters- burg railroad. In July, 1863, it was sent with Spear’s Brigade of Cavalay on a raid into North Carolina, and was engaged against the enemy’s entrenched position near Jackson, on the 28th of that month; after which it proceeded to Winston and embarked for Portsmouth, Va. About this time the 7th Corps was discontinued and the battery was sent to York- town in October to form part of General Wistar’s command, which in the reorganization of April, 1864, passed into the 2d Division of the 18th Corps, the Battery becoming part of the artillery brigade of its division. A few weeks after, all the batteries of the corps were formed into a brigade of corps artillery. The Battery moved to Bermuda Hundred with Butler’s forces and under General Heckman, was engaged at Valley Farm, May 6, 1864, and at Walt- hall Junction the following day. It fought within two miles of Petersburg, May 10th, at Proctor’s Creek May 13th, and on the following day was en- gaged for five hours against an entrenched battery. When Grant detached four divisions from the Tenth and Eighteenth Corps at Bermuda Hundred, the latter part of May, 1864, and brought them around by steamer to White House to operate with the Army of the Potomac, L Battery accompanied Heckman’s division. While engaged in this movement Lieut. J. S. Hunt (who had relieved Captain R. V. W. Howard of command of the battery the previous September) fell from the steamer the night of May 28th and was drowned. Lieut. H. B. Beecher then took command of the Battery and re- tained it until the close of the War. The Battery participated in the fight- ing at Gaines’ Farm June 1st, when an attempt was made to force the passage of the Chickahominy, and two days later fought in the battle of Cold Harbor, where Lieut. S. L. Hubbard (2d Mass. Vols. attached) was wounded and 5 men and 14 horses were killed and wounded. • FOURTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 371 After serving on picket duty on alternate days from the 5th to the 12th of June, it returned to the Army of the James and was engaged in the siege of Petersburg from June 17th until August 28th, in which Lieutenant Beecher and the Battery were highly distinguished. It was in the trenches from the 22d to the 30th of June, from the 1st to the nth of August (when it was partially engaged day and night), and again from the 14th to the 27th of the same month—during which operations it suffered some loss in both men and horses. August 28th it crossed the Chickahominy, moved to Hatcher’s Run, went •immediately on picket duty, and was engaged in the trenches before Richmond until the 5th of the following February, when it was relieved from its position and moved to Signal Hill. When the Twen- ty-fourth Corps was organized the previous December from troops of the Tenth and Eighteenth Corps, the Battery became part of the artillery brig- ade of that corps and served with it in the operations around Richmond. Battery M.—The story of M Battery in the Civil War, until after the Battle of Stone River, has already been told in the sketch of H Battery. Batteries H and M were separated immediately after that battle, M Battery retaining the four 3-in. guns, and at the same time increasing its armament by the addition of two 24-pdr. howitzers. It still remained Grose’s Brigade, which became the Third Brigade of the Second Division of the Twenty-first Corps on the 9th of January, 1863. Moving with its brigade the battery experienced all the discomforts of the Tullahoma cam- paign ; and after that, at the battle of Chickamauga September 19 and 20, 1863, under Lieut. F. D. L. Russell, it fought in a distinguished manner, losing 8 men and 13 horses killed and wounded. When the Fourth Corps was recreated September 28, 1863, the Battery passed into it with Palmer’s Division and became part of the Artillery Brigade of the First Division of the Fourth Corps. It remained at Chattanooga until November, and was then sent with the First (Cruft’s) Brigade to guard the railroad bridge at Bridgeport, Alabama. By the following March it had become so reduced in horses that it was dismounted (turning in its guns and horses at Blue Springs, Tenn., March 19, 1864) and sent back to Nashville to refit. It there received four 12-pdr. guns March 30th, and the necessary horses in May, and again became a light battery. In June it marched to Decatur; but soon after returning to Nashville by rail, it was assigned to the First Division of the Reserve Artillery of the Army of the Cumberland. In October its enlisted strength was increased by the transfer to it of the pri- vates of F Battery of the regiment. Half of the battery was attached to Croxton’s Brigade of Cavalry in October to operate along the Tennessee River, and was severely engaged near Pulaski October 22d, again on October 29th, when Croxton was driven back by Hood, and at Shoal Creek November 4th. The half batteries were reunited at Columbia the latter part of November. The battery was now attached to the artillery brigade of the Fourth Corps, and in Schofield’s operations in that vicinity it was placed in position on several occasions. It was heavily engaged at the battle of Franklin November 30th, losing 9 men and a number of horses. It fought in the battle of Nashville December 15th and 16th, and after- 372 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. wards accompanied the artillery brigade in pursuit of the enemy. It then went into winter quarters at Pulaski, where it remained until the latter part of January, 1865. Then proceeding to Huntsville it turned in its horses and moved to Bridgeport with its guns, where it took station in Fort Number One as part of the post artillery. The following June while at Chattanooga it was mounted as a horse bat- tery, but the War was over and it was soon after permanently dismounted. Almost all of the field officers and captains, and some of the lieutenants were detached from the regiment and given higher, commands during the War, E. O. C. Ord, A. P. Howe, Gustavus A. DeRussy and John Gibbon winning fame as commanders of high rank; while Charles H. Morgan, on the general staff of the Second Corps, proved himself to be a man of the most distinguished military attainments combined with indomitable en- ergy. Morgan was promoted major under the Act of 1866, giving an addi- tional major to each regiment. By the fall of 1865 most of the batteries had been dismounted and the regiment was again performing garrison duty. Headquarters were at Fort M’Henry with batteries at that post, Forts Delaware, Washington, Foote, Monroe, Whipple, and in Washington City. * D Battery had been sent with its corps to Texas, but returned North and took station at Washington in February, 1866. B and K Batteries having made the most brilliant records in the War, were recommended by the colonel of the regiment to be retained as the two light batteries of the regiment. But the captain and one or more lieutenants of K being absent on detached service, this recommendation was not approved at the War Department in regard to that battery, and G, which had been one of the mounted batteries before the War, was retained as a light battery in its stead. Light Battery B was sent to Leavenworth and G took station at Detroit. The organization of alight battery under Orders No. 151, Series 1865, was 74 privates, 73 horses, 56 sabres (the drivers not being armed), and 8 revolvers for chiefs of pieces and caissons. One battery of each regiment was to be armed with 4 3-in. rifles and the other with 4 12-pdr. Napoleon guns. The regiment retained its stations until November, 1872, the batteries occasionally interchanging, and a number of them doing reconstruction duty in North Carolina from 1870-72. G Battery was dismounted in February, 1869, under the order allowing but one light battery to each regiment, and was sent to North Carolina for duty in that section. Light Battery B was in the field against the Cheyenne Indians in 1867, and in the campaign against the Indians in 1870, and joined at regimental headquarters in 1871. When the regiment exchanged with the 2d Artillery in the fall of 1872, headquarters were established at the Presidio of San Francisco with batter- ies at the various posts in the harbor, two at the mouth of the Columbia River, and two at Sitka, Alaska. The batteries at the mouth of the river and in Alaska were changed every two years, D, E, F, G, H, K and M serving at the mouth of the river FOURTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 373 and A, C, D, F, G, L and a detachment of M in Alaska during tour of the regiment on the Pacific Coast. The Modoc War called a number of the batteries into the field a few weeks after their arrival on the Pacific Coast, A, B, E, G, K and M participating in that campaign which proved so disas- trous to the regiment and the Army. B Battery, mounted on the battery horses, acted as cavalry, while A, E, K and M formed part of Green’s command on the south side of Tule Lake. When the movement was made, in the middle of April, 1873, to close in on the Indians occupying the stronghold in the lava beds A Battery used the Coehorn mortars, while E, K and M acted as infantry; and all four were handsomely engaged in the fighting that occurred on April 15th, 16th and 17th, suffering a loss of ten men killed and wounded; and a detach- ment of M Battery was engaged April 20th, with the loss of one man. On April 26th occurred the unfortunate affair in which, after desperate fighting, Capt. Evan Thomas and Lieuts. Albion Howe, Arthur Cranston and George M. Harris were killed and twenty-one men of the regiment were killed and wounded. B Battery was in reserve in the fight at Sorass Lake May 10th, and turning in its horses the following day went into the lava beds to the stronghold. Then remounting on the 17th, it started with Green’s Battalion in pursuit of the fleeing Indians, had a fight with the Cottonwood Band near Fairchild’s ranch, and surprised Captain Jack at Willow Creek. The pursuit was continued the following day, during which a number of Indians were captured. In the campaign of 1876 against the Sioux Indians, Batteries C, F, H and K formed a battalion under Capt. J. B. Campbell of F Battery. They left their stations in August, 1876, and did not return until the following January. The battalion reported to General Mackenzie at Camp Robinson, encamped at Red Cloud Indian Agency, and was kept under arms when Mackenzie disarmed the Agency Sioux. When Crook organized his Powder River Expedition in November, the Battalion of the Fourth Artillery formed a part of Col. Richard I. Dodge’s command ; and during the subsequent operations the discomforts of a winter campaign were fully experienced, the thermometer on one occasion falling to forty degrees be- low zero. January 10, 1877, General Brooks was retired and Joseph C. Roberts became the colonel of the regiment. He had entered the regiment as a brevet second lieutenant in 1835, and had risen through the various grades without ever having been out of it. General Roberts was retired July 2, 1877, and William H. French became colonel. The Nez Perces, under Chief Joseph, broke out in hostilities in June, 1877, and the Fourth Artillery was again called on for field service, A, B, C, D, E, G, L and M Batteries going into the field. E Battery was with Howard at the crossing of the Salmon River, where the Indians were driven back after a brisk skirmish on the afternoon of June 28th. A, D, G and M Batteries joined Howard the next day. Following the Indians, the column next struck them at the Clearwater July 1 ith, and at one o’clock that after- noon Lieut. H. G. Otis of E Battery was at work against them with his howitzer. The fighting was very heavy, and in the spirited countercharge 374 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. against the enemy at 3.30 that afternoon A and E Batteries participated, Capt. E. A. Bancroft of A receiving a bullet through the lungs about this time. A little later in the day Captain M. P. Miller, of E, led a second charge near the centre, which gained the ridge in front. At daylight the following day, in order to get possession of the spring, Captains Miller (Battery E) and Perry (1st Cav.), with Otis’ howitzer, supported by Rodney’s (D) Battery, were sent to secure it. That afternoon Miller’s battalion of the regiment (A, D, E, G and M batteries) made a handsome charge, which, after stubborn resistance, broke the enemy’s lines. In this fight A Battery lost one officer and five men; E Battery, five men, and G Battery one man, killed and wounded. Just as the Indians were crossing the river the following day the troops came up with them, and some firing ensued. C and L Batteries were sent from San Francisco, and joined Miller’s battalion on the 26th of July. Organizing a column, consisting of Batteries A, C, D, E, G, L and M of the 4th Artillery, the 21st Infantry and the 1st Cavalry, Howard pushed on over the “ Lolo Trail,” constantly pressing the Indians, who were finally captured by General Miles. The battalion was not again engaged after crossing the Clearwater, but September 12th Lieu- tenant Otis, with his men in charge of the howitzer, was sent forward with Sturgis’ command, and was engaged September 13th in the fight at Canyon Creek. In October the battalion came down the Missouri River by steam- boat to Omaha, and from there the batteries returned to their stations by rail. B Battery, equipped as cavalry, had proceeded by rail to Winne- mucca, and marched from there to Fayette Lake, Idaho, but was recalled to San Francisco on account of the labor riots which occurred that summer. This cause in the east had taken I Battery from Fortress Monroe to assist in their suppression, and it served at Baltimore, Pittsburg and Cumberland during the troubles. In July, 1878, headquarters were sent to Angel Island, and most of the batteries were ordered into the field against the Bannock Indians. A, B, D, E, the greater part of F, G, H, K and M serving in that campaign. B was equipped as cavalry, and D and G mounted at Grande Ronde Valley the latter part of July formed part of Miles' battalion of mounted riflemen. D and G Batteries were engaged against the Piute In- dians at Umatilla Agency, July 13th; and July 31st, Private J. H. Fisher, with three other privates of B Battery, had a handsome little fight with a party of Bannock Indians at Perry Munday’s Ferry, and succeeded in defending the station and rescuing the mail stage, the driver of which had been badly wounded. Regimental headquarters returned to the Presidio in March, 1880. Gen- eral French retired July 1st of that year, and was succeeded by Emory Upton, whose sad death on March 15, 1881, made John M. Brannan colonel of the regiment. In October, 1881, C, H and L Batteries were sent to Arizona to take part in the “ Apache campaign,” but were recalled a few weeks after their arrival, as the regiment was ordered east to take the stations of the 1st Artillery on the New England coast. The following extract from a tele- FOURTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 375 gram to the Adjutant-General of the Army from the Headquarters of the Division of the Pacific is indicative of the esteem in which the regiment was held: Presidio of San Francisco, November 20th. To the Adjutant General, Washington, D. C. In the absence of the Division Commander I say, what I am sure he would have me say for him upon the departure of this regiment, that it has, while in this Division, added to its already splendid reputation, by soldierly efficiency in the field in four campaigns, by continuous exemplary conduct in garrison, and especially by the con- spicuous attainments and affability of its officers. Kelton, A. A. G. The record of the regiment in the campaigns against the Indians was an excellent one, and while all did well Captain Marcus P. Miller, of E Bat- tery, made a most distinguished reputation. The regiment remained on the New England coast, with headquarters at Fort Adams, R. I., until May, 1889, when it was sent to the southern stations with headquarters and four batteries at Atlanta, Georgia ; two bat- teries at Saint Augustine, Florida; two at Barrancas, and one at New Or- leans, La. Light Battery B still remains at Fort Adams, and Light Battery F (mounted August 15, 1882), after serving at Fort Snelling, Minn., from the fall of 1882 until May, 1889, is now at Fort Riley, Kansas. When General Brannan was retired April 19, 1882, Albion P. Howe suc- ceeded to the colonelcy. He was retired June 30, 1882, and Gustavus A. DeRussy was made colonel of the regiment. This officer transferred with General George W. Getty, colonel of the Third Artillery, July 17, 1882. Generals Brannan, DeRussy and Getty never assumed command of the regiment. Getty, commanding the Artillery School at Fortress Monroe, was retired October 2, 1883, and Clermont L. Best, was promoted colonel of the Fourth Artillery. He took command of the regiment and retained it until retired April 25, 1888, when Henry W. Closson was promoted to the colonelcy. THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY* First Lieut. JAMES C. BUSH, 5TH U. S. Artillery. ON May 4th, 1861, in conformity with the proclamation of the Presi- dent, a new regiment of 12 batteries was added to the artillery arm of service and became known as the Fifth of the series.* Congress confirmed this act of the President, July 12th (ap- proved July 29) of the same year, but all appointments dated from May 14th. Differing in organization from the older regiments, the new one com- prised only field batteries, being in this regard the first entire regiment so equipped in the Regular Army. But it must not be inferred that the Fifth was designated by law as a light artillery regiment. “ Nowhere in the act of July 29th do the words ‘field or light artillery’ occur, nevertheless, the batteries received the personnel belonging to field-artillery only. This, to- gether with the other fact of the mounting, equipping and sending out as field artillery all the batteries, does not leave in doubt that Congress in- tended the Fifth to be a field artillery regiment.” Though formed only the previous May, we find one battery (Griffin’s, D) in the thick of the fight at the first battle of Bull Run, July 21. Orders No. 3, Headquarters Military Academy, Jan. 7, 1861, directed Lieut. Griffin, Tactical Department, to form a light battery of four pieces, with six horses to the piece. Enough men to make the command 70 strong were transferred from the dragoon and artillery detachments. On Jan. 31, 1861, the command left West Point for Washington where it remained till July 4th when it was assigned as Battery D, 5th Artillery. Captain Griffin, who had been promoted, and transferred to the Fifth, retained command of the battery he had formed. This same day, July 4, the battery proceeded to Arlington, and thence by short marches to Fairfax and the battle-field of Bull Run, where, with Rickett’s battery of the First, it found itself posted opposite the enemy’s left. The withering fire poured in by these two soon silenced the opposing batteries and caused the enemy’s lines to fall back, pursued by our infantry. Later, in the afternoon, both batteries advanced, in the final attack, to a position previously occupied by the Confederates, when they were suddenly charged from an adjoining wood by a body of infantry and cavalry supposed at first to be Federals. The supports—entirely raw troops—gave way; every cannoneer was cut down, a large number of horses were killed, and notwithstanding the efforts of the officers to rally the supports, most of the guns were captured and the batteries placed hors de combat. Battery D lost during the day 27 men killed and wounded, out of an ef- fective of 95, and 55 horses. * Condensed from Lieut. Bush’s History of the Fifth Artillery. THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLER Y. 377 Captain Griffin received especial mention for the handsome manner in which he had handled his battery, and Lieut. Ames for gallantry. At “Camp Greble,” near Harrisburg, Pa., a depot of instruction was es- tablished in June, Lt.-Col. T. W. Sherman, 5th Artillery, commanding. Here recruits were received and drilled and batteries fitted out for the field, the State of Pennsylvania furnishing most of the recruits.* Bvt. Brig.-Gen. Harvey Brown, Colonel 5th Artillery, after successfully sustaining the siege of Fort Pickens with his troops, came north and as- sumed command of the regiment, broke up Camp Greble and transferred the headquarters to Fort Hamilton, N. Y. Harbor, in April, 1862. Here the colonel and headquarters remained till General Brown’s retirement, August 1, 1863. Colonel H. S. Burton, who practically succeeded him, was in the field and commanded the Artillery Reserve, Army of the Potomac, during the Wilderness campaign, until the breaking up of the Reserve, May 16, ’64. In the latter part of July he took station with the regimental headquarters at Fort Richmond, New York Harbor. Lt.-Col. T. W. Sherman and Major Thomas Williams, Fifth Artillery, after successively commanding Camp Greble, were made general officers of volunteers, and never served with the regiment in the field. 1st Lieuts. Henry A. DuPont and J. B. Rawles were respectively the first regimental adjutant and quartermaster. II. Early in April McClellan’s army disembarked at Fort Monroe, and a few days later was brought to a stand before the intrenchments of York- town. In the advance towards Richmond, after the evacuation of Yorktown, the seven batteries, A, C, D, F, I, K, M, sustained their part in various engage- ments, notably F at Williamsburg and D in Porter’s flank movement to Hanover Court House. It would be impracticable within the space allowed, to write any adequate account of the part performed by different batteries of the Fifth during the battles, sieges and engagements, 108 in number, of this and other campaigns of the war. We can give only an outline of the general movements, with a brief reference to actions in which certain batteries particularly distin- guished themselves. Three kinds of field pieces composed the armament, 12-pdr. Napoleons, 10-pdr. Parrott rifles and 3-inch ordnance rifles. Most of our batteries received one kind of gun, but at the opening of this campaign two of them (A, F) had four 10-pdr. Parrotts and two Napoleons assigned to each or- ganization. Four batteries of the Fifth (C, D, I, K) assisted in the heavy artillery fire which met A .P. Hill’s attack (June 26) at Mechanicsville, in Lee’s effort to force a passage towards McClellan’s right. * Regimental orders No. i, dated Harrisburg, Penn., July 4,1861, Lieut. Col. T. W. Sherman, 5th Artillery, commanding, assigned the captains as follows : A, George W. Getty; B, James A. Hardie ; C, Truman Seymour; D, Charles Griffin ; E, Samuel F. Chalfin; F, Romeyn B. Ayres ; G, Richard Arnold ; H, William R. Terrill ; I, Stephen H. Weed ; K, John R. Smead ; L, Henry V. DeHart and M, James McKnight. Transfers, April, 186 £: Seymour from C to E, Chalfin from E to L, DeHart from I. to C. HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. After a severe struggle the enemy retired with heavy loss, the artillery taking a conspicuous part in achieving the result. The position at Beaver Dam Creek had its right flank so far in the air as to be easily enveloped by Jackson's force. The Federals fell back to the high ground at Gaines’Mill, where Lee attacked them next day with 124 regiments and 120 guns against Porter’s force of 49 regiments and 96 guns. “ As the battle progressed, the batteries in reserve were thrown forward and took the best position available. The extreme simplicity of the battle favored this, and enabled battery commanders (Smead and Kingsbury among others) to supplement by their own judgment what was lacking in the proper organization and command of the artillery.” Just before sunset—the last charge of the Confederates—80 guns were concentrated, virtually in one battery, covering the withdrawal of the re- tiring infantry. “These opened successively as our troops withdrew from in front of their fire, and checked in some places, and in others drove back the advancing enemy.” In this last position Battery D remained till after dark, when it was withdrawn and ordered towards Malvern. “Two regular batteries (Weed’s I, and Tidball’s of the Second), almost entirely unsupported, were posted on the extreme right flank, and by their united and well sustained fire were enabled to repel three powerful assaults and prevent Jackson from enveloping and crushing in that flank. Jackson in his report says that he brought up parts of four battalions of batteries, in all about 30 pieces, to break this flank. The two batteries referred to with- stood a good portion of the firing of these pieces.” General Sykes in his report states : “ It is not too much to say that the enemy’s attack on my right flank was frustrated mainly by the services of Captains Weed and Tidball.” On the extreme left the enemy gained a strip of woods towards dusk and forced the line, coming through in great numbers. General Cooke, fearful for the safety of three batteries, DeHart’s, Easton’s and Kerns’, which had played an important part during the day at that point, ordered a charge of his cavalry. A volley of musketry broke the charge and sent the troopers and many riderless horses in utter rout to the rear through the batteries. Before the latter could recover from the confusion thus pro- duced, the enemy were upon them. “ Captain De Hart’s battery (C) did its best service, keeping its ground and delivering its fire steadily against the advancing enemy. Officers and men displayed the greatest gallantry, but no efforts could repel the rush of a now successful foe, under whose fire rider and horse went down and guns lay immovable upon the field.” Captain De Hart was wounded at this time, and died not long after at Fort Hamilton, N. Y. Captains Smead, Weed, De Hart and Lieut. Kingsbury received high praise “ for the superb manner in which their guns were handled.” Thence to the James, every day was a fight, and our batteries struggled along with the rest, the horses held ever ready to move at a moment’s notice. Having repulsed the enemy at points where he had endeavored to break THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 379 the retreating column, the Federals assembled their army and made a final stand on Malvern Hill the morning of July 1. Porter’s corps and Couch’s division occupied the left and upon them the brunt of fighting fell. Here were posted our batteries (A, D, I, K). “ Brigade after brigade formed under cover of the woods, and started at a run to cross the open space and charge the batteries, but the heavy fire of our guns, and the steady volleys of the infantry, sent them reeling back to shelter.” During one of these assaults Battery D so shattered a regiment charg- ing upon it, that the infantry bolted, leaving their colors which were after- wards awarded to the battery. “ Just as the sun was setting, the enemy made his last and most deter- mined assault, which fell entirely upon Porter. It seemed as though he must give way to the overwhelming pressure.” But at this critical moment Colonel H. J. Hunt pushed forward the batteries of the Artillery Reserve (A and I) and an almost continuous battery of about 60 guns was opened on the enemy, crushing him back into the woods from which he did not again return. Ames’ battery remained on the firing line, in a particularly exposed posi- tion on the extreme left, during the entire day, and fired 1392 rounds of ammunition. 1st Lieut. Adelbert Ames and his subalterns, James Gillis and George W. Crabb, received particular mention for gallantry and skill both at Malvern Hill and Gaines’ Mill (Golding’s). The Federals retired to their base, Harrison’s Landing, whither our other batteries (C, F, M.) had already gone. III. Lee soon set on foot a new campaign towards the old battle-ground of Bull Run, in which quarter an army had been created under General Pope. Thither too the Army of the Potomac was gradually transferred. After some preliminary manoeuvring, the opposing forces met in action near Manassas, Va., August 29-30. Battery C took part in the fight of the 28th, C and D in that of the 29th and C, D, I, K, in that of the 30th. “Despite hard blows, the Federals were forced back all along the line. Had not a successful stand been made by a hurriedly assembled force massed on the Henry house hill, the afternoon of the 30th, the disaster would have been fatal to the Army of Virginia.” On the hill all our batteries took position. As the broken columns fell back, Meade’s and Seymour’s brigades of Reynold's division, and their three batteries (Ransom’s, C), were thrown in to resist the advancing enemy. “The brigades and Ransom’s battery after hard fighting moved to the Henry house, which position they most gallantly maintained for two hours,” when they were ordered toward Centreville. Hazlett distinguished himself in the desperate endeavor of Warren’s brigade to protect the left of Sykes’ division against an attack of greatly superior numbers, just before retiring to the Henry house. Battery D had been ordered to an important position in support of an attack of our infantry, when Hazlett suddenly found that all the troops on HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. 380 his left had been withdrawn, not even leaving pickets. He applied to Gen- eral Warren on his right for support and received it. Not long after, the Confederates discovered this exposed flank and attacked. “The enemy poured upon this little command a mass of infantry which enveloped and almost destroyed it, completely piercing our line,” writes General Sykes. “ It became necessary to change our ground. This the brigades accomplished under a severe artillery fire. Weed’s, Smead’s and Randol’s batteries moving with and near them. After an interval, the re- mains of my command united on the plateau where my artillery joined me.” Captain Smead was unfortunately killed in bringing off his guns, and the command devolved upon Lieut. Van Reed who retired the battery to the Henry house and, later, conducted it to Washington. “ Weed was in action throughout the day, and strengthened the reputa- tion he had already acquired ” (Sykes’ report). Hazlett remained on the hill, firing, after his division had left, till ordered away by General Hooker. IV. No sooner had the broken members of Pope’s army been gathered within the defenses of Washington, than McClellan, reinstated, found it necessary to move up the left bank of the Potomac to encounter his old foe on the soil of Maryland. He first met Lee (Sept. 14) at the passes of South Mountain, through which the latter was withdrawing from Frederick to a strong position on the Sharpsburg ridge, extending across a bend of the Potomac, behind An- tietam creek. Batteries C and F participated in the fight of the 16th and A, C. D, F. I, K in the main one of Sept. 17th, Antietam. Battery A (Lieut. Charles P. Muhlenberg) was attached to Rodman’s division, IX. Corps, Burnside’s, and took position near bridge No. 3 on the left. In the afternoon, after shelling the opposite bank during the day, Muhlenberg crossed over with his division in the attack upon the Con- federate right. Weed, Hazlett and Van Reed took position at the centre, near bridge No. 2, with Porter’s corps. The batteries of Weed and Van Reed were among those that did such effective work against Jackson’s right near the Dunker church. Of these Jackson says: “The Federal batteries, so posted on the opposite side of the Antietam as to enfilade my line, opened a severe and damaging fire.” Ayres (F) was in the thick of the fight in his old division (Smith’s, VI. Corps), while Ransom (C) remained with the Pennsylvania Reserves, now Meade’s division of the I. Corps, Hooker’s, on the right, where the severest fighting took place. “At about 10 o’clock,” wrote Lieut. Gansevoort, who actually commanded Battery C during the day, “ General Hooker ordered our battery to the ex- treme front, and took it there himself. We passed through a wood, then over a ploughed field into a pasture. “ The infantry on our right fled, and also on our left. As we came in, a battery on our left retired, and we were left alone without support. The rebels were coming down upon us, and we would have retired to save our THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 381 pieces; but many of the horses were killed and it was impossible. We therefore continued firing; and, after a short time, the horses of the caissons came up with the caisson limbers, containing fresh ammunition. The en- emy after a while retired, and with the last horses we also retired, having accomplished our mission, but with great loss.” General Meade in his report says :—“ I cannot close this report without calling your attention to the skill and good judgment, combined with cool- ness, with which Captain Ransom, his officers (Lieutenants Weir and Gan- sevoort) and men, served his battery. I consider this one of the most critical periods of the morning, and that to Captain Ransom’s battery is due the credit of repulsing the enemy.” Smith’s division also attacked on the right and with it Ayres' battery (F). Captain Ayres says:—“ My own battery was brought upon the line under heavy fire at about 11:30 o’clock A. M. From this time it was mostly under the command of First Lieut. L. Martin, my duties (chief of artillery) calling me to other points on the field. “ The splendid services of the battery of Lieutenant Martin, 5th Artillery, posted near my right,” reported General Irwin, “ attracted the admiration of all who saw it in action. For several hours it engaged the enemy at short range and with deadly effect. In this action I felt a particular inter- est in Lieut. Martin’s battery, for to its fire the safety of my brigade may be largely imputed. Had he not checked the heavy fire from the batteries of the enemy, they would have destroyed the greater part of my command.” V. The Confederates retired into Virginia, whither the Northern army fol- lowed, and by the end of November, 1862, our batteries found themselves at Falmouth, opposite Fredericksburg. Batteries A, C, D, F, I and K took part in the battle of December 13. The artillery, except one battery for each division, was withdrawn from the corps and temporarily attached to the Artillery Reserve, and all arranged in.four divisions posted in positions favorable for the purpose. Battery K (Lieut. D. H. Kinzie) alone of the Fifth, remained permanently with the Reserve and served in the second of these divisions. Battery D (Hazlett) fought in the first, and Battery A (Gilliss) was temporarily attached to the third division on December 11, and aided in covering the crossing of the troops. On the 13th it crossed the river and remained in Fredericksburg during the fight as also did Battery I (Lieut. M. F. Watson). Batteries F (Lieut. Leonard Martin) and C (Captain Ransom) crossed the river and did gallant service in the attack of Franklin’s Grand Division against the Confederate right. Lieut. Martin received mention for the gallant style in which he com- manded his battery. VI. The dreary winter wore away in the cantonment at Falmouth, and in April the defeated army, now recuperated, moved by its right flank across the river to Chancellorsville, again facing Fredericksburg. General Hooker, who had assumed command, prefaced this movement by a feint under Sedgwick, below Fredericksburg, while he cleverly stole a march by the upper Rappahannock to the left flank of Lee’s army. 382 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. With his wonted boldness, Lee divided his force, and sent Jackson around his adversary’s right to take him in reverse and thus cut him off from the U. S. Ford. In the battle that followed, (May 2, 3, 4) the Fifth was represented by Batteries C, D, F, I and K. On May 1, Battery K of the reserve moved to the north side of the river, covering Banks Ford, where it remained during the fight. Meanwhile Hooker weakened his right and thus enabled Jackson to complete his manoeuvre and crush the XI. Corps (May 2). On the morrow, by dint of massed blows, Lee fairly drove the Federal army into a corner. The batteries, as a rule, stuck closely to their divisions and were posted without regard to concert of action and often where they were entirely useless. “ The woods seemed full of batteries.” Battery D (Hazlett) formed one of a group of batteries on a knoll at the left of the line. The favorable position of these batteries undoubtedly de- terred any attack upon them. Battery C (Ransom) (April 28) marched with its division a few miles be- low Fredericksburg where it became engaged with the enemy while covering the crossing of the troops, and lost a few horses. On the 30th it crossed the river, and thence marched to Chancellorsville where it took position (May 3) in a group of batteries on the front and right of the array. Battery I (Watson) after the action of May 1, took position near the Chancellor House and on the 3d formed one of a group of batteries collected by Captain Weed. “ The Federal troops were forced back to the new line, the centre oc- cupying the open space on which stood the White House, which line also had a salient, the apex of which, pointing in the direction of the Chancellor House, was about three-fourths of a mile in rear. “ General Meade (V. Corps) directed Captain Weed, his chief of artillery, to collect all the batteries that he could and place them in position in this salient. Thus armed with proper authority, that energetic officer soon had 56 pieces in a commanding position looking in the two most exposed direc- tions.” During this and the following day the enemy made attacks upon Weed’s batteries, but they were never driven home, and the line held its ground till the whole army retired. Weed’s services on this occasion obtained for him promotion to a briga- dier generalcy. Battery F (Martin) crossed the Rappahannock in Sedgwick’s command (May 2), after covering the crossing of his division (Howe’s). The next morning it took positions so as to reach the heights held by the Confeder- ates and rendered efficient service in keeping down their fire. The battery accompanied the infantry in its assault against a position where Burnside had lost 13,000 men only a short time before, and, moving with the firing line, arrived on the crest but a few seconds after its capture. Early next morning, May 4, the enemy made a determined attack against Howe’s division, which was successfully repulsed by Martin’s battery and a portion of Neill’s brigade. But in the afternoon Lee turned all his avail- able force against Sedgwick, who had been ordered to rejoin the main army. Our battery kept up a sharp enfilading fire, changing position as the enemy THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 383 advanced, and withdrew only when its ammunition was exhausted and the enemy within a few yards of its guns. The Confederates retired with the growing darkness, and during the night Sedgwick withdrew across Bank’s Ford. “ Great credit is again due our artillery,” writes General Howe, “ for their services in repelling the attack. In the action at Guest’s farm the section under Lieut. Simon, 5th Artillery, and Captain Rigby’s battery were largely instrumental in breaking the attack of the enemy’s left, and the artillery on our left, under Captain Martin, 5th Artillery, was used with great effect in checking the advance of the enemy on that point, and afterwards, in connection with Lieut. Butler’s battery (2d Artillery), in wholly breaking the attack.” Battery L (Chalfin) had been stationed since its organization just out- side of Baltimore, Md., from whence it took part in the effort to head off Stuart’s raid (Sept. 1862), and in May ’63 joined General Milroy’s division in the Valley under command of Lieut. W. F. Randolph. VII. Now supervened another rest in the thrice occupied Falmouth camp, while Lee planned a second raid into the Northern States. Still grasping with his right the old defenses at Fredericksburg, he covertly advanced his left, under Ewell, to Culpeper and thence into the Shenandoah Valley. Ewell pushed rapidly up the valley and trapped Milroy at Winchester from whom he captured some 4000 prisoners and much material, among which figured the equipment of Battery L and most of its personnel. Battery L, after participating with credit in certain minor affairs, was ordered by General Milroy on the 14th, to occupy, without adequate support, an isolated, unfinished outwork dominated by a mountain to the west, within range. Here the battery remained till late in the afternoon, when the enemy opened upon it with plunging fire from 16 guns which he had succeeded in getting into position on the mountain. Many of the men and most of the horses were shortly killed or wounded, and caissons and limbers blown up. The battery was so disabled inside of ten minutes that it became impossible to remove the guns. Suddenly the enemy charged with five regiments which had been massed behind a neighboring ridge in front. The timber had been only partially cut away and troops could approach unseen to within 100 yards. Nothing inside the work could stop this onslaught, but our men stood by their guns till the enemy had planted his colors on the parapet. Not till then did Randolph order his men to fall back. Lieut. Spooner with 18 men escaped. Lieut. Randolph was carried, wounded, into the town and fell into the hands of the Confederates. As soon as Hooker discovered the nature of Lee’s movements, he started his army for the Potomac and concentrated it at Frederick, Md.; here Meade succeeded him in command. The opposing forces met at Gettys- burg where Batteries C, D, F, I, K, sustained their part in the battle of July 2, 3, 4. The XII. Corps arrived on the field at sundown July 1, and took position on the extreme right, resting on Culp’s Hill. Its artillery brigade (K) was held in reserve on account of the unfavorable nature of the ground till the 384 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. afternoon of the 2d, when space was found for one section of Battery K. The enemy opened immediately upon this section and a spirited duel re- sulted in the silencing of the Confederate guns. The conduct of Lieut. Van Reed, who commanded his section, was mentioned with praise in General Hunt's report. The next day the entire battery occupied a trying position opposite the centre of its corps and rendered efficient service in repelling the attack on that part of the line. Sickles had moved his corps to the front, into a peach orchard near Little Round Top, so as to form an angle not only with itself but with the rest of the line. After Longstreet s attack had developed and Sickles was being forced back to the main line, Battery C was placed in position on the right front of his corps. “I opened with solid shot and spherical case,” says Weir, “and as the enemy continued to advance, with canister. Soon it was reported that we were out of canister. The enemy being within a few rods of us, I limbered up, and was about to retire when a regiment of their infantry appeared on my left and rear and opened fire. I endeavored to get my guns off the field, but lost three of them, as some of the drivers and horses were disabled while limbering up. The guns were subsequently re- covered and during the afternoon of July 3, Weir’s battery, among others, was placed in position in front of the advancing enemy—Pickett’s charge. “ I was conducted to General Webb’s line, ” states Weir, “ and came into battery under a heavy fire. I opened at once with canister. After a time our infantry charged and the enemy were driven back.” Captain Ransom and Lieut. H. H. Baldwin were wounded. While Battery I was awaiting orders during Longstreet’s attack of the 2d, it was seized upon by a staff officer of General Sickles and placed in po- sition with the III. Corps. Lieut. Watson was soon wounded and the command devolved upon Lieut. MacConnell, who writes :— “ The battery was without support of any kind. The enemy appeared shortly after taking position. As they approached the battery poured in canister until our men and horses were shot down or disabled to such an extent that the guns had to be abandoned.” “ They were, however, recaptured by the bravery and determination of Lieut. Samuel Peeples, 5th Artillery, who, having procured the services of the Garibaldi Guard, took a musket and led the charge himself, driving the enemy from the guns, and, retaking everything that had been lost, con- veyed it safely to the rear.” Lieut. Peeples was commended for “ heroic conduct ” and First Sergeant Lemuel Smith for gallantry. When General Warren discovered the attempt to take Little Round Top on the afternoon of July 2d, he hurriedly obtained Vincent’s brigade, V. Corps, to protect the summit. “ The contest here became furious and the rocks alive with musketry. Hazlett’s battery (D), supported by O’Rorke’s regiment of Weed’s brigade, THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 385 was sent to the support of Vincent. Hazlett’s guns were dragged by hand, with great labor, through the rocks and bushes to the crest of the moun- tain, from which position they opened a damaging fire upon the flank of the enemy.” “ Night closed the fight. The key of the battle-field was in our possession intact; but Vincent, Weed and Hazlett, chiefs lamented throughout the corps and army, had sealed with their lives the spot intrusted to their keeping, and on which so much depended.” (Sykes.) Weed had been hit by a sharpshooter who was picking off our officers, and Hazlett was struck while leaning over his friend. The six rifle guns of Battery D took part, under Rittenhonse, in the can- nonade of July 3, enfilading Pickett’s lines, and by their steady and accurate fire caused the charge to “ drift ” in the opposite direction. Later, with the rest of the army, the batteries followed Lee back into Virginia where the opposing forces again faced each other near Culpeper. From here Lee dispatched Longstreet to assist Bragg in the impending battle of Chickamauga. Upon learning this the War Department de- tached the XI. and XII. Corps (Battery K)to reinforce Rosecrans, but the troops arrived too late for the fight. Battery K, Captain Bainbridge, was attached to Geary’s division, XII. Corps, Army of the Cumberland. It was relieved from duty with Geary’s division about the middle of March, 1864, and became part of the Artillery Reserve, Army of the Cum- berland. After minor services it was assigned, about the first of November, to the garrison artillery of Chattanooga, Tenn., where it remained till the end of the war. VIII. Battery H, after partial recruitment in Pennsylvania under direction of Captain William R. Terrill, was transferred to Carthage, near Cincinnati, Ohio, where three officers and 141 men reported present for duty the last day of October. In obedience to telegraphic instructions Terrill went to Munfordville, just north of Bowling Green, where the battery remained till the middle of February, 1862. During the campaign which opened the following spring, it was attached to Rousseau s brigade of the 2d Division, McCook’s, General Buell’s Army of the Ohio. When Fort Donelson fell, the battery marched to Nashville, and on April 6, found itself at Savannah on the Tennessee River, not far from Pittsburg Landing, to which place General Grant had transferred his army. General Halleck, who now commanded the department, had ordered General Buell with about 37,000 men, across country, to join the army at Pittsburg Land- ing, and our battery had, of course, accompanied its brigade. After waiting in a drenching rain all night, Terrill’s battery embarked by daylight, and immediately after lanaing, “ hurried to the field, where it was ordered into action on the left with Nelson’s division, the advance one, against which the greater numbers of the enemy pressed heavily. “ I advanced the centre and left sections onto the skirmish line, where the fire was most galling,” writes Captain Terrill. “ I was compelled to this in order 386 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. to gain a crest of a ridge from which to fire upon batteries that had opened on our skirmishers. After silencing the enemy’s fire they seemed to receive fresh troops, for with vociferous cheers they now charged alongthe whole line. The infantry with us gave way before the storm of musket-balls, shot and shell, which was truly awful. Lieut. Ludlow’s section was immediately sent to the rear to protect the withdrawal of Lieut. Smyser’s. One of Lieut. Ludlow’s caissons had to be abandoned, all the horses having been killed, but we recovered it later in the day. “ I served one of Lieut. Smyser’s pieces, and he the other. We fixed prolonges and fired retiring. The enemy charged us, but were staggered by our discharges of canister, whilst Lieutenants Guenther and Ludlow on our left poured spherical case into them. We checked their advance three times, retiring as they charged upon us. For a time Lieut. Smyser and Corporal Roberson served the fifth piece alone.” By 3:30 P. M. all was quiet in front of Nelson’s division, but seeing McCook’s command sharply pressed, Terrill called for a detail of men from a neighboring regiment, and advancing his battery, opened upon the guns that were doing so much mischief to McCook’s force. “ Soon McCook’s whole line advanced with a cheer and drove the enemy before them, and the day was ours.” General Nelson writes:—“Captain Terrill’s battery was a host in itself. It consists of four 12-pdr. brass guns and two Parrott rifles. Its fire was terrific. It was handled superbly. Wherever Captain Terrill turned his battery silence followed on the part of the enemy. “Captain Terrill, his officers and soldiers, won for themselves this 7th of April both the admiration and thanks of the 4th Division.” He received a brigadier-generalcy for this action, and was mortally wounded at Perryville while at the head of his brigade, aged 29. Lieut. Guenther assumed command about the middle of June and soon marched with the brigade when Buell moved eastward to repair the railroad, protect Nashville and threaten Bragg. By a sudden manoeuvre the latter stole a march around Buell’s left and made straight for Louisville. Thoroughly alarmed, Buell swung his left in pursuit and finally came upon a portion of the Confederate force, under Hardee, at Perryville, Oct. 8. Half of Buell’s army, including the 2d Division, had advanced beyond to Frankfort. Here parts of the battery went into action on the 6th, and again, three days later, at Chesser’s store, where “ a section of Guenther’s battery was handled with the usual vigor and skill of that accomplished of- ficer.” Bragg retreated to Chattanooga and Buell concentrated at Nashville, where he was relieved by General Rosecrans, the last of October. This general made many changes in his army, one of which resulted in transfer- ring our battery to the 3d Division, Rousseau’s, XIV. Corps, Thomas’. In the 3d Division it joined the regular brigade commanded by Lieut.-Col. Shepherd, 18th U. S. Infantry. Towards the middle of November, Bragg advanced to Murfreesboro, Tenn., and in the last days of the year Rosecrans moved against his posi- tion. After some skirmishing, the armies confronted each other north of the town at Stone River, Dec. 31. THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 387 Rosecrans planned to throw Crittenden across the river upon the oppos- ing right, but scarcely had he crossed the river and launched Crittenden’s columns, than he was forced to recall them to the assistance of his already routed right-wing. To counteract the enemy’s assault upon McCook, General Thomas ordered the regular brigade and one other to form in a cedar thicket, facing west, in support of Sheridan. The latter was compelled to fall back about 11 A. M., and this forced Thomas out of the thicket into open ground. “ General Rousseau’s two batteries found it impossible to operate in the cedar thicket. This Lieut. Guenther pointed out to General Thomas, a veteran artillerist, and he directed the two to take position in an open field where they would be of service in case the line should be forced back. This had most important results for when the line did fall back shortly, these two batteries not only repulsed the enemy but formed a nucleus upon which other batteries and troops formed, until the line proved impregnable.” “ As the enemy emerged from the woods in great force, shouting and cheering, the batteries of Guenther and Loomis, double-shotted with can- ister, opened upon them. Four deliberate and fiercely sustained assaults were made upon our position and repulsed.” (Rousseau.) It was during one of these charges that the battery captured the flag of an Arkansas regiment advancing upon it. Guenther gives Lieutenants Ludlow and Fessenden “honorable mention for coolness, gallantry and judgment ” in this series of engagements. “ Of the batteries of Guenther and Loomis I cannot say too much,” re- ports General Rousseau. “ Both these men deserve to be promoted and ought to be at once. Without them we could not have held our position in the centre.” Bragg retreated from Murfreesboro as a consequence of this battle and it was occupied by our troops. Here the battery remained in camp until the last days of June, 1863, when it marched to Hoover’s Gap under Thomas and engaged the enemy in the manoeuvre which turned Bragg’s right and caused him to retire from his well-fortified position at Shelbyville. About two weeks later Lieut. Guenther received orders to join Bat- tery I, then reorganizing at Washington, and 1st Lieut. H. M. Burnham took charge. The position which Rosecrans finally assumed, in front of the town of Chattanooga, faced Chickamauga creek, and here on September 19-20, was fought one of the most severely contested battles of the war. The assault fell upon Thomas, who commanded this part of the line. The fighting was stubborn, and during the day he was thrust back, but by nightfall regained his old position. On the first day Baird’s division, which included the regular brigade and Battery H, took position at daylight facing towards Reed’s bridge over the creek. Here the battery went into position, but shortly advanced with King’s brigade and came upon the enemy in a dense wood. While hotly engaged, King was forced to change front to meet an attack from masses of the enemy suddenly approaching on his right. Only one regiment and the battery had time to get into the new position before the blow fell and scat- tered the entire brigade and the next one to the rear. Lieut. Fessenden, who, upon the fall of the other two officers, succeeded HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. to the command of the battery, says : “ During the morning, after an all night march, we were ordered forward by General King. The battery was hardly in position before the troops on the right gave way and it was ex- posed to a most terrific fire of musketry from front and flank. General King ordered us to limber to the rear, but it was impossible to execute the order, since many of the cannoneers were either killed or wounded, and the horses shot at the limbers. At the first fire, Lieut. Burnham fell mortally wounded; Lieut. Ludlow was also wounded and fell into the enemy’s hands, and myself slightly wounded in the side. The battery was taken by the enemy, after firing sixteen rounds of canister.” Our troops rallied and recaptured the battery and also took one gun of the Confederates. Lieut. Fessenden, though wounded, kept the field and brought off the pieces, without their caissons, however, as these had to be abandoned through lack of horses. “ I take this occasion to speak in the highest terms of the officers of Battery H, 5th Artillery, 1st Lieut. H. M. Burnham and 2d Lieutenants Is- rael Ludlow and J. A. Fessenden,” reports General King. “The officers of this battery, finding it impossible to retire, remained with their pieces, firing, until they were forcibly taken from them by the enemy.” The departments of the Ohio and the Cumberland were now united under Grant, General Thomas being in command of the Army of the Cum- berland. How to drive Bragg’s army from his front was the immediate problem before General Grant. Sherman’s part of the task was to capture the Ridge, Hooker’s to patrol Lookout Valley, while Thomas concentrated in Chattanooga Valley to hold the enemy there in force. (Nov. 23-24-25, 1863.) On the 25th, Thomas was ordered to attack all along his front. His troops assailed the field-works, and capturing them, advanced up the Ridge and overran the works at the summit. Having been supplied with horses from General Sherman’s artillery, the battery moved to the front the morning of November 24th under Cap- tain Guenther, who had rejoined at Chattanooga on October 31. “ During the day I was joined by Captain Guenther’s battery,” says Sher- idan, who commanded the 2d Division, IV. Corps, “which I placed on Bushy Knob. On the next morning I directed Colonel Harker to drive in the en- emy’s pickets from my front. Guenther’s battery was moved to a position ,n front of Harker's centre. In the afternoon, the signal being given, the division advanced under a most terrible tornado of shot and shell, and passed over the first line of pits. Believing the Ridge could be carried, orders were given, and obeyed with a cheer.” “In my special mentions,” reports General Sheridan, “ must be included Captain Guenther, commanding a battery temporarily assigned to me, to whom I am indebted for valuable services rendered.” The battery encamped at Chattanooga until March 25, 1864, when it left for Nashville, where it remained till the last day of August. 1st. Lieut. E. D. Spooner assumed command the latter part of September. On the 29th, the battery proceeded by rail to Tullahoma, Tenn., from whence it participated in the movements against the cavalry leader For- rest, during October, returning to its camp at Nashville the last day of the THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 389 month. The next day the few horses remaining fit for duty were turned in at the depot. In April, 1865, Battery H was transferred to Fort Richmond, N. Y. H., and there remained till the close of the war. In November, 1863, Meade crossed the river and routed Lee from Rappa- hannock Station (Batteries D and F), and forced him to retire behind the Rapidan. Here the two armies remained until the opening of the Wilder- ness campaign the following spring. In accordance with the general plan of this campaign the Army of the Potomac (Batteries C-I, D, E, M) and the IX. Corps moved by the overland route on the east of Richmond ; the Army of the James (Battery A) moved up the James River; Sigel (Battery B), Crook (Battery B) and later Sheri- dan with both these forces, and the VI. Corps (Batteries B, L, M) operated by way of the Shenandoah Valley. So dense was the undergrowth over the country called the Wilderness that artillery became of far less than its normal value. To fire down a road or across a clearing was about all it could do—concert of action almost dis- appeared. It is impracticable, therefore, to give more than the barest mention of the services of our batteries from May 4 to June 16.. Battle of the Wilderness, May 5-9, 1864. Battery C-I was present in position on the 5th, but not engaged. On the 6th it was on the firing line at the time the 3d and 4th Divisions, II. Corps, were driven back into their entrenchments. Battery D was engaged at times during the afternoon of the 5th against bodies of the enemy passing near the Lacy House. Again on the 6th it was in position, but not engaged* Battery M was present but not engaged. Battle of Spottsylvania, May 8-21. Battery C-I was engaged during the attack of the V. Corps, May 10, and again in the afternoon. On May 12, it engaged the enemy during the attack of the VI. Corps— one of the bloodiest fights of this campaign. When Hancock had forced the salient, called Bloody Angle,—the key of Lee’s position—and had reached the second line, he met stern resistance. “ After the capture of the Confederate works,” relates Sergeant W. E. Lines, “ we were put in position near the small pine trees so much spoken of, and fired a few rounds of solid shot. While we were waiting, General Wright rode up to Lieut. Gillis and desired a section. Lieut. Metcalf came over to our section and gave the command, and away we went up the hill past our infantry, into position.” “ At this moment,” writes an eye-witness, “ and while the open ground in rear of the Confederate works was crowded with their troops, a section of Battery C, 5th U. S. Artillery, under Lieut. Richard Metcalf, was brought into action and increased the carnage by opening at short range with double canister. This staggered the apparently exultant enemy. In the maze of the moment these guns were run up by hand close to the famous Angle and fired again and again, and they were only abandoned when all the driv- IX. 390 HISTORICAL SKETCHES V. S. ARMY. ers and cannoneers had fallen, In a few moments the two brass pieces of the 5th Artillery, cut and hacked by the bullets of both antagonists, lay un- worked with their muzzles projecting over the enemy’s works.” [“ Battles and Leaders.”] “ This is the only recorded instance in the history of the war of a bat- tery charging on breastworks.” Metcalf’s double-canister cleared his own front and undoubtedly con- tributed to the success gained. “This battery was gallantly served throughout the day.” (Hancock.) Battery D was in position near the Court House on the 9th, and engaged batteries of the enemy which had opened against the right of our line. On the 10th it opened on troops across the Po during the attack of the II. Corps. On the 14th it again took position beyond the bridge over the Ny, not far from the Beverly House, and on the 18th it formed one of a group of batteries pushed forward to the advanced works and which became engaged in a sharp artillery duel during the II. Corps advance, and con- tinued in action throughout day. Battery M went into position the morning of the 12th, opened fire and continued in action throughout the day, expending 910 rounds. It was again engaged the 21st upon the movement of the army from the Court House. Battle of North Anna, May 23-26. Battery C-I was in position during May 26, but was not engaged other than in covering the recrossing of the troops. Battery D took position on the north bank of the river and assisted in silencing the enemy’s guns during the attack of the V. Corps on the 23d. Battle of Cold Harbor, May 31-June 12. Battery C-I was engaged in General Mott’s brigade at Totopotomy Creek against works 300 yards in front, on the 31st. On June 3d and 4th it was in position but not in action. On the 8th it was engaged in Birney’s division at Barker’s Mill and again on the 12th. Battery D was engaged the 29th, and took part in a sharp contest near Bethesda Church on May 30th, and was again in position near the pike road and severely engaged under a heavy fire on June 1. During the night it advanced with the main line and took position in a group of four batteries near the pike road on the left of the V. Corps. Here it was “ exposed next day to the fire of a large portion of the enemy’s lines and to an ugly cross- fire from a detached work” within short range. The sharpshooters were able to work up to within 200 yards and subjected the battery to a trying ordeal, but it remained on the line hotly engaged throughout the day. The next morning, June 3d, during the assault of the II., VI. and XVIII. Corps, this group was pushed forward by battery with the line of battle, “gaining ground under a galling fire of artillery and musketry at considerable loss, the enemy’s batteries being posted under cover. On the 6th of May, Battery A disem’marked at Bermuda Hundred, south side of the James,and joined the 1st Division, XVIII. Corps. It participa- ted in the demonstration towards Richmond and was sharply engaged, under Lieut. Beecher, 4th Artillery, in the repulse of the enemy’s attack near Drewry’s Bluff. On the 27, the corps sailed via Fort Monroe to White THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 391 House, Va. From this point it joined the Army of the Potomac in time for the battle of Cold Harbor, and took part in the fights both of the 1 stand 3d of June, under command of Lieut. Theodore K. Gibbs, 1st Artillery, who writes the following: “ On the 1st of June our corps was ordered to attack the enemy’s position, and Captain Elder, chief of artillery, directed the battery to move up to the head of column. The enemy was forming and throwing up works, and the battery opened fire which it kept up till our line, then forming in rear, was ready to charge. The corps passed us and we followed up the movement until a knoll was reached which had quite a depression in front. Here we halted and again opened fire over the heads of our men and continued it until they commenced to ascend the other side of the valley. On the morning of the 3d a section of the battery was ordered to a very exposed position near the IX. Corps under a heavy fire. We threw up a small earthwork and remained in action all day.” Here Lieut. Gibbs was severely wounded and was carried to the rear. Gradually moving successive corps from the right, Grant extended his left towards the James which the army reached and crossed about the middle of June. Battery F, Lieut. Martin, joined the XVIII. Corps early in July, and our guns were gradually moved up into earthworks, from which they frequently opened as the investing lines drew closer. Batteries A, C-I, D, E, F and M are credited with the siege of Peters- burg, June and July, 1864. X. General Hunter’s retreat from Lynchburg offered an excellent chance against Washington, which General Early quickly seized. The VI. Corps (Battery M) was hurried to the threatened point, leaving certain batteries behind in the trenches, among them E. The forces cooperating with the Army of the Potomac from the Valley, consisting of Crook’s Kanawha Army and Sigel’s troops, were under command of the latter officer. Sigel moved southward about May i, but suddenly met the Confed- erates at New Market, Va., where Battery B was engaged, and suffered a defeat which caused him to retire to the line of Cedar Creek, where he was superseded by General Hunter. This general again moved up the valley and defeated the enemy at Piedmont (Battery B again). Generals Crook and Averell now joined him, and the command, about 18,000 strong, reached Lynchburg a few days later, which place General Hunter assaulted, but unsuccessfully. Here the battery was busily occupied the entire day under Captain DuPont, Chief of Artillery. General Hunter retired, followed by Early, who forced his way into Maryland, resorting to the old game of threatening Washington, but the VI. and XIX. Corps interposed in time. General Early retired into the Shenandoah Valley, where, after some preliminary manoeuvring, the opposing armies met September 19, when Sheridan advanced against Early’s right at Winchester. The VI. Corps, Getty’s division leading, advanced through the Berry- ville gorge, and turning to the left, formed the left of the line. McKnight’s and Cowan’s batteries were posted just in rear of Getty’s right brigade, 392 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. “ and advancing and firing as the lines advanced, rendered most important service.” (Getty.) General Crook’s force arrived on the field some time past mid-day and formed on the right, but the blocking of the gorge road delayed DuPont and his batteries till 3 P. M., when they advanced on the right of the corps and took part in the attack on the Confederate left. Averell’s division with Battery L advanced along a converging line at the extreme right, driving the enemy before them. Sheridan pursued Early up the Valley to Mt. Jackson, where Averell attacked with Battery L and aided in driving him from this third position. The Federal army now returned and went into camp, echeloned on ground overlooking Cedar Creek, in the angle between it and the Shenan- doah River. In mid-October Early, reinforced, planned a surprise for our army in its new position. Under cover of a dark night and foggy dawn, Gordon suddenly attacked the left and drove it to the rear in confused retreat. Battery B and one other occupied a work to the left front of its corps, on a ridge overlooking Cedar Creek and near the point of first attack. While harnessing its teams, just at daybreak, amidst a heavy fire, the battery, under Lieut. Brewerton’s command, turned its guns on the enemy, and continued firing canister till they were within a few yards of the muz- zles. Abandoning his limbers, Brewerton ran his guns down the hill by hand to the caissons, unlimbered these, and limbering up his pieces he succeeded in saving five guns and his train, notwithstanding the utter confusion and loss of horses and men. While endeavoring to extricate his last gun, which had gotten jammed among some trees, Lieut. Brewerton was captured and Lieut. Southworth, 2d Artillery, the only other officer present, was killed. Fighting its way, Battery B rejoined the brigade, refitted, and after taking up certain positions in aid of efforts to reform the line, “ galloped forward to the firing line as this advanced and did most admirable execution till dark ” under Lieut. Holman, 5th Artillery, who was absent at the time of first attack. First Lieut. H. F. Brewerton and First Sergeant J. A. Webb were com- mended for coolness and gallantry, and Captain Du Pont, Chief of Artil- lery, received “ particular mention ” for “ conspicuous gallantry and valu- able services.” (Crook.) So rapidly did all this happen that Battery M (McKnight) first went into action just in front of its own camp. Lieut. H. M. Baldwin took charge of two guns and Sergeant Yoder a third, and endeavored to remove them. Only two horses each remained to the limbers, and the two belonging to the third gun being killed, that one went with the others to the enemy who now captured Lieut. Baldwin. The remaining guns were the last to leave the field. “ The guns under command of Captain McKnight were admirably han- dled and rapidly fired, although under heavy and close musketry fire of the enemy,” reports General J. W. Keifer. Moore’s cavalry brigade, with Battery L, guarded the Buckton Ford, some THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 393 distance to the left, at early dawn, October 19. They reached the field about 9 A. M. during the hottest part of the fight. Changing its position in the rapid phases of the battle, Battery L ren- dered gallant and effective service till the utter rout of the enemy late in the afternoon. The brigade and battery were attached to General Mer- ritt’s command. At a critical period the guns of the horse artillery brigade were the only ones on the field, the others having been captured or driven to the rear disabled. “The Horse Artillery, Batteries K-L, 1st Artillery; B-L, 2d Artillery; L, 5th Artillery, Lieut. Wier, and Martin’s battery, 6th New York, rendered invaluable services on this day, as for five or six hours the only artillery used was that of the cavalry, and nobly did they do their duty, having but about two rounds per piece left after the engagement.” (Torbert.) The VI. Corps, minus Battery M, returned to the Petersburg lines, and our batteries, B, L and M gradually withdrew; B to Cumberland, Md.; L to Fort Reno, D. C. and M to Fort Sumner, Md., where they re- mained till the latter part of 1865. XI. On the Petersburg line General Warren moved by a detour to the rear August 18, and struck the Weldon Railroad at Globe Tavern. On ad- vancing up the road towards Petersburg he was met by a considerable force which attacked him. As the line fell back Battery D, now under com- mand of Lieut. Van Reed, opened fire, with others of the V. Corps, and si- lenced the enemy’s guns after a sharp fight, aiding materially in repelling the assault. “Lieut. Van Reed served his battery with distinction on the 21st, the principal service being on that day.” (Ayres.) Before settling down to winter-quarters, General Grant desired to deal one more blow, in hope that some permanent gain might be made with which to close the year. The force consisted of the bulk of three corps. Parke assaulted in front, near Hatcher’s Run, while Warren, on his left, tried to turn the enemy’s right. Both failed of their purpose, upon which General Meade ordered Hancock to halt on the Boydton Road till Warren could cooperate with him. But before these two corps could join, Lee thrust Hill’s corps into the gap. The assault fell on Hancock’s flank and came near ending unpleasantly, when Egan’s division changed front, and after hard fighting, compelled Hill to withdraw. Lieut. Beck, commanding C-I, reported to General Egan and moved out westwardly with the 2d Division to where the Boydton Road crossed. General Egan having advanced his line to the north, up the Boydton Road, Lieut. Metcalf was ordered to a position on a ridge to the right, near Hatcher’s Run, where he opened on the enemy deploying to his front. Our line again advanced to the neighborhood of the Burgess Tavern, about 300 yards to the left front of Metcalf’s position. Here General Egan ordered another section placed, and it went into action under a heavy fire from a battery on the left of the road. Soon another battery opened to the right, enfilading the section, which however kept up a vigorous fire. The centre 394 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. section now came up at a gallop and opened at right angles to the first. Two more guns immediately opened from the right and with the others en- veloped Beck’s two sections in a hail of flying fragments, much of which, how- ever, flew wild through poor practice. Lieut. Metcalf replied with his guns and a lively fight ensued, but the enemy could not drive Beck from his position. “ At about 3 P. M. the enemy commenced a furious assault on our right, which swept away Lieut. Metcalf’s section, after killing nearly all the horses and severely wounding the lieutenant, whom they captured. The charge of Egan’s division forced them to retire and our infantry hauled off the guns.” Beck’s guns had immediately advanced and opened upon the point of woods through which the enemy had broken, and aided in repulsing the attack. Here it remained till 8 P. M. During the afternoon the battery had expended about 700 rounds and had lost 1 officer killed, 1 captured, 14 men killed or wounded, and 4 missing, out of an effective of 77. “ Lieut. Beck is mentioned for the gallant manner in which he main- tained his position against a greatly superior force of the enemy’s artillery.” (Hancock.) XII. Battery G remained at Fort Hamilton, N. Y., after its organization till December 18, 1862, when it proceeded south by sea under sealed orders, which being opened while off Mobile, disclosed its destination to be New Orleans, La. The officers were Captain Richard Arnold, 1st Lieut. J. B. Rawles and 2d Lieut. E. R. Craft. Captain Arnold was made Chief of Artillery, Department of the Gulf, upon reaching New Orleans, and soon after, received a commission as brigadier general of volunteers. He did not again serve with the regiment till some time in 1866, when he assumed command of this same battery at Little Rock, Ark. The following March it moved to Baton Rouge, and from thence partici- pated in the campaign and siege of Port Hudson, the spring and summer of 1863, culminating in the surrender of that stronghold. After the first assault at Port Hudson a second was tried, both of which the artillery supported and in which our battery was hotly engaged. Regu- lar approaches were then resorted to ; Battery G moved up into an earth- work on the line of investment, where it was almost always under fire, and from which more or less firing continued till the surrender, July 8. It re- mained in camp at Port Hudson, assisting in rebuilding the fortifications and on other active duty, until the fall, when it returned to New Orleans and there wintered. It was now made a horse-battery, with four 12-pdr Napoleon guns and a strength of 156 men who elected to join the battery from various organiza- tions serving in the department. It became thoroughly re-equipped and drilled, ready for the campaign up the Red River. There was more or less skirmishing with the enemy’s horse and out- posts along the entire Red River route; and near Mansfield, at Sabine Cross Roads, the vanguard met the enemy in force. THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 395 Our battery had been assigned to General A. L. Lee’s cavalry division and was engaged, more or less, daily in skirmishing and fighting in the ad- vance guard, against the gathering forces of the enemy; until Lee’s cavalry, supported by a brigade of infantry, attacked the Confederates at St. Pat- rick’s Bayou, drove them from the position and pursued to Sabine Cross Roads. Here the enemy was found in large force. Soon they attacked and drove the Federals to Pleasant Grove, where they sustained a check. The next day they attacked General Banks' command at Pleasant Hill and were driven off with loss. The battery had been divided, Lieut. Rawles taking one section and Lieut. Homer Baldwin the other. The sections were constantly engaged at different parts of the field with the cavalry brigades to which they were attached. On the final retirement of the expedition they united, and again found themselves encamped near New Orleans, from which point our battery proceeded to the vicinity of Mobile, Ala., and took part in the siege of Fort Morgan, after turning in the light battery equipment at the depot. Battery G appeared upon the scene August 16, 1864, and was at once set to work laying platforms, building magazines, and preparing a battery for two 10-inch mortars. This battery occupied a site about 900 yards from Fort Morgan. Lieut. Rawles commenced firing at 5 o’clock A. M. the 22d, throwing a shell from each mortar every 15 minutes. This was kept up during the day and night with slight variations in rapidity. About 7:30 a. m. the 23d, a white flag appeared, the firing ceased, and at 2 p. M. our troops took possession. Shortly after this the battery returned to New Orleans and embarked for New York, where it remained at Fort Hamilton until November 1, when it took passage for City Point, Va. In the Army of the Potomac it was consolidated with Battery D and assigned to the V. Corps, Lieut. Rawles still in command. XIII. As the spring of ’65 opened General Lee accumulated a supply of rations at Amelia Court House, west of Richmond. In order to retire, as he de- sired, by the south side of the Appomattox River, Lee must drive Grant from his hold on the Boydton road. This led to a series of sharp encounters, one of which included the attack on Fort Stedman, near the centre, a movement undertaken by Gen- eral Lee as a cover for operations by his right. Battery No. 9 on the right of Fort Stedman was occupied by Battery C-I, which had been temporarily detached with the IX. Corps. Our men were at once at their posts on hearing the firing “ and when the advancing enemy were distinguishable in the dusk, opened upon them so hotly as to check and cause them to seek shelter in a depression of the ground, where they were held under canister fire till 7 a. m., when an officer escaping from this position informed Captain Stone that if he would not fire upon them, there were between 200 and 300 of the enemy who would come in. This arrangement was promptly effected.” Battery C-I remained in Forts No. 9 and McGilvery on the IX. Corps 396 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. line. At about midnight of April i, Stone opened fire in the bombard- ment ordered, and continued with varying rapidity till 3:30 A. M. of the 3d, when he requested of Colonel Ely, commanding the infantry brigade, that if he advanced he would at least take a section of the battery with him. This he promised to do. Soon the order came, and cutting through the parapet, the section advanced as rapidly as possible and arrived inside the city by 4:15 A. M. It was probably the first artillery unit to enter the town. Stone claims that no other artillery had entered the town when he arrived. The VI. Corps proceeded to Sailor’s Creek April 6. Battery E having been assigned to the 3d Division, VI. Corps, “accom- panied the division in all its marches and participated in all engagements.” In the afternoon of the 6th, the battery was ordered by General Seymour (5th Artillery) to a position commanding the enemy’s lines “and fired with all its guns till the works were carried.” The corps continued the pursuit till, on April 9, it halted at Clover Hill where Lee’s army surrendered. On March 30, the V. Corps pushed forward to the crossing of the Boydton and Quaker roads, Rawles’sand Vose’s batteries being placed at the junction. In the afternoon the enemy made an assault at this point, but met with repulse, “the two batteries doing efficient service.” The troops made a rapid march on the 9th and soon came in sight of our lines engaged with the enemy. In December, 1864, the X. and the XVIII. Corps were discontinued, and the XXIV. and XXV. Corps organized from the troops composing the Army of the James. The former of these two corps, the XXIV., included our batteries A and F. On March 27, two of its divisions withdrew from the north side of the James, and marching all night, took position behind the II. Corps on the left, leaving the 3d Division (Battery F) to keep the lines. Battery F, Lieut. Beecher, broke camp on the New Market road, April 3, and marched with its division directly to Richmond. Battery A joined Foster’s division, the first, and reaching Hatcher’s Run, March 29, took position in front of the interior lines of the Petersburg defenses, April 2, during the assault on Fort Gregg, “one of the most des- perate of the war.” “ While the Army of the Potomac followed in the track of the enemy, the Army of the James and the cavalry advanced on their left and endeavored to head them off. “ General Lee succeeded in crossing the Appomattox, but upon arriving at the Court House found Sheridan’s cavalry in his front, and the Army of the James on his left, while the Army of the Potomac followed hard upon his rear. “General Foster’s division entered the field and opened fire on the enemy who had gained the hill near Appomattox Court House. Lee, surprised at finding a division of infantry in front of him, at first gave ground but seeing only a division, he attacked with the evident intention of cutting it off.” The appearance of other troops fast coming up, however, soon proved the futility of such an attempt, and the white flag put an end to further hostilities. THE FIFTH REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY. 397 Battery A had been assigned a position opposite the enemy’s extreme right, and there engaged, thus dividing with Battery B, 1st Artillery, the honor of being one of the last two batteries engaged against the Army of Northern Virginia. The II., V., VI. and IX. Corps, with batteries C-I, D-G and E, after vari- ous services of a minor character, proceeded to Washington and took part in the final review. The XXIV. Corps remained in Richmond and its vicinity. Battery A was to be found at Lynchburg, Va., in October, ’65, while F remained at Richmond three years later. If losses are any indication of hard fighting, the Fifth can claim a high place in such a category. Of all the regular regiments, infantry, cavalry, and artillery, the four having the greatest average loss per unit of organ- ization are the Thirteenth Infantry, 23.2 ; the Seventeenth Infantry, 20.6; the Twelfth Infantry, 20, and the Fifth Artillery, 20. The total loss of the Fifth is considerably larger than that of any other artillery regiment, and there are only five larger among all those of the Regular Army. Burnham’s battery, H, lost 44 at Chickamauga; Watson’s, I, 22 at Gettysburg; McKnight’s, M, 23 at Cedar Creek ; Griffin’s, D, 27 at Bull Run ; Metcalf’s section of C-I, 23 at the Salient, and DeHart’s, C, 19 at Gaines Mill. All the field officers originally commissioned in the regiment, besides most of the captains, became at one period or another either brigadier or major generals of volunteers. The fame of Generals Harvey Brown, T. W. Sherman, Barry, Getty, Griffin, Hunt, Hayes, Terrill, Ayres, Upton, Weed, Ames, Arnold and Williams, all officers of the same regiment, illumine the brilliant record which the Fifth Artillery earned during the War of the Re- bellion. XIV. After the war, the regimental headquarters removed from Fort Rich- mond, N. Y. H., to Fort Monroe, Va., Oct. 25, ’65, and there remained till June 10, ’67, when it proceeded to Columbia, S. C. On Feb. 8, 1868, it went to Richmond, Va., and on Nov. 7 to Fort Jefferson, Fla. Most of our batteries were withdrawn from the field the latter part of October, 1865, and occupied stations at Fort Macon, N. C.; Charleston, S. C.; Key West, Fort Jefferson and Barrancas, Fla. With the exception of Batteries F and G they turned in their horses and guns and became foot- batteries. The regiment turned northward early in 1869 and took stations along the New England coast, from Fort Trumbull, Ct., to Fort Sullivan, Me., with headquarters at Fort Adams, R. I., excepting Battery G, which went to Plattsburg, N. Y., and Battery X, which in October, ’73. abandoned Fort Sullivan for Madison Barracks, N. Y. Bvt. Major General Henry J. Hunt, who had been promoted from major of the Fifth to lieut.-col. of the 3d Artillery, returned to the regiment as colonel, April 4, 1869, and assumed command about the middle of May. During May, 1870, the Fenians made their attempted invasion of Can- ada, and A, B, E, H, I, G, L, M, left their stations and proceeded to the 398 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. scene of disturbance in northern New York and Vermont, returning early in June. In the fall of 1875 the Fifth visited its old stations in the South, the headquarters going to Charleston, S. C., and later to McPherson Barracks, Ga. The batteries took post at Charleston, S. C., St. Augustine, Key West and Barrancas, Fla., and Savannah, Ga. When the headquarters moved to Atlanta, certain batteries that had garrisoned Savannah and Charleston took station at McPherson Barracks. The railroad and coal strikes of 1877 took Batteries B, C, D, E, I and M to various towns in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Maryland to aid in suppressing violence and protecting property. During November, 1881, the regiment turned northward again and gar- risoned the forts in New York Harbor with headquarters at Fort Hamilton. General Hunt, who has left such a brilliant and enduring record as Chief of Artillery, Army of the Potomac, retired September 14, 1883, after being colonel for a little over fourteen years. He was succeeded by Colonel John Hamilton, the father of the present system of sea-coast target practice which was originated and developed to a certain point by the officers of the Fifth Artillery, under his direction. Battery D, Captain Rawles, became a light-battery August 15, 1882, with station at Fort Omaha, Neb., from September 11, and later, Fort Douglas. As the spring of 1890 approached, it became evident that another move- ment lay in store for the Fifth, and soon it could be found on “ our western- most frontier ” garrisoning the posts in San Francisco Harbor, and Fort Canby, Wash., with headquarters at the Presidio of San Francisco. Colonel Alexander Piper had assumed command of the regiment, Au- gust 10, 1887, but did not accompany it to the West, and retired not long after parting with it. The railroad disturbances of 1894 took Battery B from Fort Canby for a time and it was engaged in guarding railroad property and in furnishing escorts for trains from Hope, Idaho, to Missoula, Montana and Sprague, Washington. General Graham and staff with Batteries A, E, H, K and L proceeded to Sacramento, Cal., July 10, under orders from department headquarters, for the purpose of removing obstructions to the mails and to execute any or- ders of the U. S. Courts for the protection of property and to prevent in terference of inter-state commerce. Order having been satisfactorily restored, the batteries returned to their stations, Sept. 3, 1894. Here they now remain doing the round of garrison work under the orders of Bvt. Brigadier General William M. Graham, Col- onel 5th Artillery, the intrepid commander of Battery K, 1st Artillery, at Antietam and of Horse-Battery K at Gettysburg. Che Infantry GEORGE BRINTON McCLELLAN Major-General Commanding the Army, 1861-1862. THE FIRST REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. Compiled in the Office of the Military Service Institution. THE original First Infantry was first organized under Resolve of Con- gress of date June 3, 1784, to serve twelve months, and was con- tinued by subsequent Resolves until it was recognized by the Act of September 29, 1789, as the "Regiment of Infantry ” in the service of the United States. The Act of April 30, 1790, more fully completed its organization and when a second regiment was formed under the Act of March 3, 1791, the older organization became the “First Regiment of Infantry.”* Brevet Brigadier General Josiah Harmar was the first "lieutenant colo- nel commandant” of the regiment and commanded it until his resignation in 1792. He was also " General in Chief of the Army,” and in that capa- city conducted the expedition against the Miami Indians in Ohio in Sep- tember and October, 1790. His regiment was with him, Captain John Armstrong and a detachment of 30 men taking part in the engagement on the Miami River, October 19; and a detachment of 60 men under Major Wyllys being engaged, October 22, near the same place. In this action Major Wyllys was killed. Arthur St. CJair, who had been a major general in the Revolutionary Army was appointed "General in Chief” in March, 1791, superseding Harmar. St. Clair in his turn proceeded against the Miamis, and was even more thoroughly defeated than Harmar had been, suffering a loss in killed and wounded of nearly 900 out of his total strength of 1400. The battle took place near the sources of the Maumee of the Lakes, and the fugitive army did not halt until safely within the palisades of Fort Jefferson, 29 miles to the rear, where the First Infantry, about 300 strong, was found in garrison. The Act of March 5, 1792, gave the army a new organization, with the title of "Legion of the United States.” The Legion provided for a total strength of 5120 officers and men and was divided into four “ sub-legions,” each of which was composed of one troop of dragoons, one company of artil- lery, two battalions of infantry and one of riflemen, each battalion hav- ing four companies. The First Infantry was merged into the First Sub- legion. The Legion participated in the Battle of the Maumee Rapids under General Wayne, August 20, 1794, in which the Indians were utterly defeated and disheartened. The First Sub-legion was at this time commanded by Lieutenant Colonel J. F. Hamtranck, and among the officers mentioned by General Wayne in his report of the battle as deserving special mention, * See page 40 of the “Historical Register of the U. S. Army,” F. B. Heitman, Washington, 1890. Also, Appendix—"First Infantry—A Correction.” 401 402 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U S. ARMY. were Colonel Hamtranck, Captain Prior, and Lieutenant W. H. Harrison (afterwards President of the U. S.) all of the First Sub-legion. The Act of May 30, 1796, discontinued the Legion, and the line of the military establishment was made to consist of the “Artillerists and Engi- neers,” two companies of dragoons, and four regiments of infantry, the First Sub-legion resuming its old designation of the “ First Regiment of Infantry. ” Colonel Flamtranck was continued as the lieutenant-colonel commandant of the regiment until the reorganization of 1802, when he became its first full colonel. He died April n, 1803, while commandant of Detroit and its dependencies. Colonel Hamtranck had the faculty of inspiring men with confidence, and although he was a rigid disciplinarian, was beloved by his men, for he was kind hearted, generous and brave. The officers under his command placed a stone upon his grave, which is in the grounds attached to St. Anne’s Orphan Asylum at Detroit, as a “grateful tribute to his merit and his worth.” In the year 1803, the Government determined to explore the newly acquired territory, known as the Louisiana purchase, as far as the course and sources of the Missouri River are concerned, and to determine upon the feasible water communication to the Pacific Ocean. To accomplish these purposes, the Lewis and Clarke expedition was organized by the President. Captain Meriwether Lewis, the head of this expedition, was an officer of the regiment, and at the time secretary to the President, Thomas Jefferson. The party proceeded in boats from St. Louis, examining the country along the Missouri river to its sources, thence through the Rocky Mountains and down the Columbia River to the Pacific Ocean. The expedition set out on May 14th, 1804, and reached St. Louis on its return, September 23, 1806. In 1807, Captain Lewis was appointed Governor of Louisiana, and by his firm but just conduct, soon harmonized the various factions which at one time threatened serious trouble in the territory. Captain Lewis inherited hypochondria, and whilst suffering under a temporary derangement of mind, he put an end to his life, while en route from St. Louis to Washing- ton, in September, 1809. For many years following General Wayne’s victory the Indians appear to have given little or no trouble, and the regiment remained in garrison at Detroit and vicinity until the outbreak of the War of 1812. On the 25th of July, 1812, the first blood of the War of 1812 was shed in a skirmish not far from Detroit, and in August General Hull sent an ex- pedition from that place to open communication with the River Raisin and to escort an expected supply train into Detroit. Among the troops so sent were two, detachments of the First Infantry, commanded by Lieutenant D. Stansbury and Ensign R. A. McCabe. The enemy was met at Maguaga, August 9, and defeated, yet the troops were recalled to Detroit without acomplishing anything farther, and on the 16th of the same month were included in Hull’s disgraceful surrender of the troops under his command. Heald’s Company of the First Infantry was at this time stationed at Fort Dearborn (now Chicago), and Captain Heald had received orders from General Hull to evacuate his station, distribute the government THE FIRST REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 403 property among the Indians, and proceed to Detroit. He obeyed orders but had hardly begun his march (August 15) when he was attacked by ten times his force of Indians, and after two-thirds of his men had been killed or wounded was forced to surrender. Later in the year (September 5 to 8) the Indians attacked Fort Madison, a short distance from the present city of St. Louis. Lieutenants Hamilton and Vasques of the First Infantry with a small detachment of the regiment garrisoned the fort, and after a gallant defense drove the enemy away. A general “ Return of the Army” of date July 1, 1814, reports the First Infantry, 214 strong, as under orders to join the “Division of the Right,” which garrisoned the Lake frontier from Buffalo to Sacketts Harbor, and it is probable that the detachment of 99 men under Captain John Campbell, First Infantry, which was attacked by the Sac and Fox Indians while in boats near the mouth of Rock River on the Mississippi, was moving in obedience to these instructions. The detachment lost 36 in killed and wounded. The regiment joined General Brown’s army on the Niagara River on the day of the battle of Niagara, July 25, 1814, and during the action was not attached to either brigade. At this time it was commanded by Lieutenant- Colonel R. C. Nicholas, as its colonel — Jacob Kingsbury — was the in- spector general of the military department in which it was serving. The regiment took part also in the siege of Fort Erie,—August 1 to September 17, 1814. The war had no sooner come to an end than the army was reduced (Act of March 3, 1815) to a total of 10,000 men, to consist of artillery, infantry and riflemen, in such proportions as the President should judge proper. He fixed the proportion by the order of May 17, 1815, at one regiment of light artillery, the Corps of Artillery (32 companies), 8 regiments of infantry and one of riflemen. Special pains appear to have been taken in this reorgan- ization to prevent any continuance in the new organizations of the regi- mental traditions of the old, for not a single regiment of infantry retained its original number. The First Infantry of the preceding pages became a part of the new Third Infantry, while the old Second, Third, Seventh and Forty-fourth, were united to form the new First Infantry. The old Fourth went into the new Fifth; the Fifth into the Eighth ; the Sixth into the Second, and the Eighth into the Seventh. The present First Regiment of Infantry was organized pursuant to Act of March 3, 1815, and General Orders of date May 17,1815, from the Second, Third, Seventh and Forty-fourth Regiments of Infantry, and was assigned to duty in the Division of the South with headquarters at Pass Christiana, La. Not one officer of the old First Infantry was assigned to it nor were any from the old Second or Seventh, although the reorganization order would seem to require it. Seventeen officers of the 3d and 44th Regiments which had so recently greatly distinguished themselves at the battle of New Orleans, were so assigned, and the remainder were apparently selected from the army at large. Brigadier General Daniel Bissell was retained in the army with reduced 404 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. rank, being made colonel of the First with the brevet of brigadier-general. Lieutenant Colonel George Croghan, who afterwards became the inspector general of the army, was made the lieutenant-colonel; and Brevet Lieuten- ant Colonel Thomas K. Jesup, who was afterwards quartermaster general was the major. The Act of March 2, 1821, again reduced the army, the ordnance and artillery being consolidated into four regiments, the number of infantry regiments reduced to seven, and the rifle regiment being disbanded. General Bissell left the service and was succeeded by Colonel Talbot Chambers. Lieutenant Colonel Croghan had resigned in 1817 and had had several successors; Lieutenant Colonel Z. Taylor was now assigned to the regiment. Major Jesup had been promoted in 1817 to the Third and had been succeeded by Major R. Whartenby, who now retained his place as major of the regiment. Many changes also took place in the lower grades. The headquarters of the First Infantry were established at Baton Rouge, La., and appear to have remained in Louisiana until 1828, when the regi- ment relieved the Fifth at Fort Crawford (Prairie du Chien), Fort Snelling, and Fort Winnebago (Green Bay). In 1831 the garrison of Fort Winnebago was moved to Fort Armstrong (Rock Island, 111.). The Black Hawk War of 1832 took place in the region garrisoned by the First, and Companies A, B, G and K were with General Atkinson at the battle of the Bad Axe, August 2, 1832. In this action Major Bliss com- manded the battalion, and Colonel Taylor, who was now the colonel of the regiment, the brigade to which it was attached. In 1837 the regiment was transferred to Florida and, with the exception of Company C, was present at the battle of Okeechobee, December 25, 1837. On this occasion Colonel Taylor commanded the entire force engaged, and Lieutenant Colonel Davenport the regiment, which was held in reserve until the action was nearly over. In this report Colonel Taylor says: “To Lieutenant Colonel Davenport and the officers of the 1st Infantry I feel under many obligations for the manner in which they have under all occasions discharged their duty ; and although held in reserve and not brought into battle till near its close, yet their eagerness to engage and the promptness and good order in which they entered the hammock when the order was given for them to do so, is the best evidence that they would have sustained their own characters, as well as that of the regiment, had it been their fortune to have been placed in the hottest of the battle.” Colonel Taylor was brevetted brigadier general for this action, and on the 15th of May, 1838, succeeded General Jesup in the command of the army of Florida. The regiment now was kept almost continually on the move, until the arrival in Florida in May, 1839, of General Macomb, who held a great council with the Indians, and was led to believe that he had concluded a treaty of peace with them ; yet on the 23d day of July follow- ing they treacherously attacked Colonel Harney’s command of 28 men at Charlotte’s Harbor, killing more than half of them. Hostilities were resumed but the Indians avoided any direct conflict with the troops, and kept them, as formerly, constantly scouting, almost always without tangible result. Early in 1840 General Taylor requested to be relieved from duty in THE FIRST REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 405 Florida, and his request was granted to take effect on the ist of May. The regiment was still in Florida in November of that year, but early in the summer of 1841 returned to its old stations,—Forts Winnebago, Snelling, Crawford and Atkinson,—in the northwest. General Taylor was given higher command from this time forward and his immediate connection with the regiment ceased, so that when Lieutenant Colonel Davenport was promoted to the Sixth in 1842 and was desirous of remaining with the First, a mutual transfer was arranged and Colonel Davenport became the colonel of the First in July, 1843. In regimental headquarters were moved to Jefferson Barracks, and the regiment garrisoned that station and Fort Scott, Mo. During the Mexican War a part of the regiment continued to garrison these stations and Fort Snelling, but Companies C, E, G and K, under Lieutenant Colonel Henry Wilson, joined General Taylor in Northern Mexico and did gallant service at the capture of Monterey. In this battle Colonel Wilson commanded a brigade and Captain Abercrombie the bat- talion, which suffered a loss of 43 officers and men killed or wounded. Lieutenant Territt was killed, Lieutenant Dilworth mortally wounded, and Captains Abercrombie and Lamotte were wounded. When General Taylor sent all his regulars to join General Scott early in the year 1847, this battalion went with them and was present at the siege of Vera Cruz (March 9 to 28, 1847), and was afterwards designated as the garrison of the City and Castle, where it remained until the end of the war. It was then stationed upon the line of the Rio Grande where it remained for many years. On the 31st of January, 1850, Colonel Davenport resigned from the army and was succeeded by Brevet Major General Bennett Riley, who was then commanding the military department of Upper California. Gen- eral Riley died June 9, 1853, and was succeeded by Colonel Joseph Plymp- ton. In January, 1850, the regiment garrisoned Forts Merrill, McIntosh, Duncan and Ringgold Barracks, and early in this year the Indians became very troublesome, murdering settlers and stealing stock, and many attempts were made to punish them. Captain King of the First, commanding at Fort McIntosh, sent Lieuten- ant Hudson, with a detachment of Company G in pursuit of Indian horse thieves, April 3, 1850. They encountered a party of Indians on the 7th and had a severe fight in which one soldier was killed and Lieutenant Hudson and three men were wounded. Captain Plummer of the First, commanding at Fort Merrill, sent out Lieutenant Underwood with a sergeant and 12 men June 8, 1850, to open a direct road between that post and Laredo. He met and exchanged shots with Indians on the 8th, and on the 12th had a fight with them in which he was wounded and seven of his men were killed or wounded. From this time until the year 1856 there appears to have been little of interest in the history of the regiment. In September, 1856, a scouting party from Fort Clark, which included Captain Gilbert and 18 men of Company B, surprised three parties of In- 406 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. dians near the junction of the Rio Grande and Pecos rivers, killing four and wounding four of them. In July, 1857, the Indians, numbering from 80 to 100, attacked a mail escort from the 8th Infantry, and a wood party consisting of a sergeant and six men of the 1st Infantry, at a place called the “ Ripples.” A detachment of 40 men of the 1st Infantry at Fort Lancaster under Lieutenants Haskell and Sherburne, with 40 men of the Eighth from Fort Davis, was sent out against them. The men were placed in the wagons and the column was given the appearance of a provision train. The ruse was successful and the Indians, supposed to be Mescalero Apaches, attacked the train, July 24, 1857, and were driven off with loss. Lieutenant J. E. Powell, 1st Infantry, left Fort Arbuckle February 23 1859, with a detachment composed of men from Companies D and E, 1st Cavalry, and E, 1st Infantry, in pursuit of Comanche Indians. He met and defeated them the next day, killing five, with a loss of three men wounded, one mortally. On May 7, i860, Sergeant T. G. Dennin, Company K, 1st Infantry, in command of the escort to a train going to Fort Lancaster, was attacked by 40 or 50 mounted Indians, who were repulsed. The sergeant and party were commended for their courage and cool judgment. Colonel Plympton died June 5, i860, and was succeeded by Colonel Carlos A. Waite, who, on the 1st of January, 1861, had his headquarters with a part of his regiment at Fort Chadbourne, Texas. The other companies were then at Fort Lancaster, Camp Cooper and Camp Verde, in Texas, and at Forts Cobb and Arbuckle in the Choctaw Nation. Texas seceded from the Union February 1, 1861, and appointed commis- sioners to confer with General Twiggs in regard to the surrender of all Government property and the removal of all U. S. troops from the State. General Twiggs was relieved from the command of the Department of Texas January 28, and was succeeded by Colonel Waite, who found every- thing military in a chaotic condition and devoted his whole energy to getting his troops safely out of the State and back into loyal territory. But five com- panies of his own regiment were in Texas,—A, G, H, I and K,—the remainder being in the Indian Territory. The Texas companies were ordered to ren- dezvous with other troops of the Department at Green Lake, 20 miles from Indianola, and succeeded in reaching that place. Companies A, H and I got safely away, but the non-commissioned staff and band, with Companies G and K, were captured April 25, on transports, at Saluria, Texas, by the Texan forces. They were immediately paroled, engaging not to serve against the Confederates until exchanged, and sailed on the schooner Horace, reaching New York May 31. The first transport that got safely away was ordered to leave two com- panies of the First at Key West, and probably did so, for a Return of the Department of Florida of date December, 1861, reports a part of the regi- ment at Fort Taylor. These companies were relieved early in 1862 and in April of that year Companies A, H and I, had joined the other compa- nies of the regiment in the West. Company G was reorganized in 1861, and in October of that year formed THE FIRST REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 407 a part of the city guard of Washington, D. C. It was still in Washington in May, 1862, but for Pope’s campaign in Northern Virginia (August 16 to September 2, 1862) it was attached to the 6th Infantry battalion, and with it formed a part of the 2d Brigade, 2d Division, 5th Corps. At the Second battle of Bull Run it was under the command of Captain Marston and lost eleven men killed and wounded. On the night of September 16-17 at Antietam the battalion was on picket duty, and on the 20th took part in the action near Shepherdstown. At the battle of Fredericksburg Company G was attached to the 2d In- fantry battalion and with it crossed the river December 13, and on the 14th was under fire all day within short range of the enemy’s line. It recrossed the river on the 16th. This company remained with the 2d Infantry in the Army of the Poto- mac until after January 31, 1863. The five companies of the regiment in the Indian Territory at the out- break of the war,—B, C, D, E and F,—marched to Fort Leavenworth, reaching that post May 31, 1861, under the command of Lieutenant Colonel W. H. Emory, who had been directed (April 17) to collect all the troops in the Indian Territory and take them to that station. On the 24th of July, 1861, the organization of General Nathaniel Lyon’s army at Springfield, Mo., was announced, and Captain Plummer’s battal- ion, consisting of Companies B, C and D, 1st Infantry, and a company of recruits for the Mounted Rifles (3d Cavalry), formed a part of its third brigade. This battalion was present at the battle of Wilson’s Creek, Mo., August 10, 1861, losing 80 officers and men killed, wounded and missing. It was in the advance from the first, and in the battle was on the left of the line. The conflict lasted six hours almost without interruption and left the Union forces in full possession of the field. Captains Plummer, Gilbert and Hus- ton, and Lieutenant Wood were mentioned for gallantry, the two first being wounded. At the siege of New Madrid, March 3 to 14, 1862, Companies A, B, C, D, H and I, 1st Infantry, were present and were not assigned to any division, but were detailed, March 4, as a support to the artillery. Companies A and H, under Captain Mower, manned a siege battery, and the men of this com- mand were the first to enter the enemy’s works, March 14, 1862. Immediately after the capture of New Madrid the Union forces were pushed down the right bank of the Mississippi and batteries were con- structed, the lowest being on Ruddle’s Point nearly opposite Tiptonville, through which latter place all the enemy’s supplies for Island No. 10 were received. On the 17th of March, five of the enemy’s gunboats “ advanced against the battery,—which consisted of two 24-pdr. siege-guns and two 10-pdr. Parrotts, manned by a detachment of the 1st Infantry (Company I), under Lieutenant Kinzie Bates. * * * The gunboats ran up to within 300 yards and a furious cannonade was kept up for an hour and a half, when they were repulsed with the loss of one gunboat sunk, several badly damaged, and many men shot down at their guns by our sharpshooters from the rifle-pits. Our loss was one man killed. 408 HIS TO RICA L SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. From that time no attempt was made against the battery and all communication from below with the forces near Island No. 10, was cut off.” Although their line of communication was cut the Confederates held their position until April 8, when they surrendered. The final attack by the Union forces on the 7th was supported by a battery of 32-pounders under Capt Williams, 1st Infantry, which had been erected a few days earlier opposite Watson’s Landing. Later in the same month Companies A, B, C, D, H and I were at Ham- burg, Miss., under Captain George A. Williams, and on the 24th the bat- talion was detailed to man the heavy siege artillery, consisting of two 20- pounder Parrotts, four 30-pounder Parrotts, and four 24-pounder siege guns. With the exception of the 20-pounders, which were attached to the reserve, the heavy batteries were directed to remain temporarily at Hamburg and to place the guns in position to protect the storehouses there. On the 13th of May the battalion was before Corinth with its siege train, and on the 15th the 60th Illinois Volunteers were detailed to support its guns. On the 29th the 20-pounders and 30-pounders opened fire, doing consider- able execution, and on the 30th the enemy evacuated the place. The works were at once occupied by the Union forces and the First Infantry battalion with other troops took station there. When the five companies came in from the Indian Territory they were stationed at Fort Leavenworth and Brevet Major W. E. Prince, captain of Company E, 1st Infantry, commanded that post for many months. This company under Lieut. Offiey was sent with other troops, August 12-14, on a reconnoissance to Independence, Mo., but did not come into contact with the enemy. It was also sent August 17-27, 1862, with an expedition to Kansas City, which place was reported in danger of an attack. The company manned a light battery on this occasion and was commanded by Lieutenant C. S. Bowman, 4th Cavalry. The expedition moved August 17 and after re- pairing the fortifications of Kansas City, moved on in search of the enemy, who was finally found in an almost impenetrable forest about fifteen miles from Independence, Mo. Colonel Burris, who commanded the column, reports: * ‘ I then moved with my command in a westerly direction toward the nearest point to where water could be obtained, when soon the enemy was seen emerging from the woods, marching south, and crossing our line of march at right angles, directly in our rear. We quickly took position on an eminence near the Hickory Grove with the bat- tery, supported by the infantry in the centre and a battalion of cavalry on either flank. The enemy (some 1000 or 1200 yards distant) formed line of battle, but after a few well directed shots from Bowman’s battery their line was broken, they were thrown into confusion, and their march to the south resumed. Following them up with small detachments of cavalry they were soon discovered to be in full retreat.” In October and November, 1862, Companies E and F were at Fort Scott, Kansas, very much reduced in numbers; and in February, 1863, Company E was at Fort Leavenworth. Companies A, B, C, D, H and I, at Corinth were still in charge of the heavy artillery in position for the defense of that place when the Confed- THE FIRST REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 409 erates attacked it, October 3 and 4, 1862. Company C under Lieutenant Robinett manned Battery Robinett; Companies D and I, Battery Williams, and Companies A, B, and H, Battery Phillips. Captain G. A. Williams, was in command of all the siege artillery, and reports as follows: “ About 3.30 A. M. October 4, the enemy opened on our forts and their supports with artillery. Battery Robinett returned the fire immediately. * * * I opened with three 30-pounder Parrott guns, immediately followed by Battery Phillips with an 8-inch howitzer which enfiladed the rebel battery. * * * The rebel artillery was silenced in less than thirty minutes, and they retired leaving one gun and a caisson on the field. About 9.30 or 10 A. M., the enemy were observed in the woods north of the town forming in line, and they soon made their appearance charging towards the town. As soon as our troops were out of the line of fire of my battery we opened upon them with two 30-pounder Parrott guns and one 8-inch howitzer which enfiladed their line * * * and continued our fire until the enemy were repulsed and had regained the woods. “ During the time the enemy were being repulsed from the town my attention was drawn to the left side of the battery by the firing from Battery Robinett, where I saw a column advancing to storm it. After advancing a short distance they were repulsed, but immediately reformed and, storming the work, gained the ditch. They then re- formed, and, restorming, carried the ditch and the outside of the work, the supports having fallen a short distance to the rear in slight disorder. “ The men of the First U. S. Infantry, after having been driven from their guns (They manned the siege guns) resorted to their muskets and were firing from the inside of their embrasures at the enemy on the outside, a distance of about ten feet interven- ing ; but the rebels having gained the top of the work, our men fell back into the angle of the fort as they had been directed to do in such an emergency. Two shells were thrown from Battery Williams into Battery Robinett, one bursting on top of it and the other near the right edge. In the meanwhile the nth Mo. Vols. (in reserve) changed front, and, aided by the 43d and 63d Ohio Vols. with the 27th Ohio Vols. on their right, gallantly stormed up to the right and left of the battery, driving the enemy before them. The battery could not open on the retreating enemy, for its commander, —Lieutenant Robinett,—was wounded, and 13 of the 26 men that manned it were either killed or wounded.” General Stanley says concerning this part of the conflict:— “At the same instant the nth Missouri and the 27th Ohio rushed upon the enemy at a run without firing, and the hill was cleared in an instant, the enemy leaving the ditch and grounds covered with his dead and wounded. Many threw down their arms and called for quarter. The old soldiers of the First Infantry quit their cannon and picked up their old trusty muskets and prevented the enemy crossing the parapet with the bayonet. The enemy was repulsed and the fight was over.” On the day after the battle—October 5—the battalion with other troops, was assigned as the garrison of Corinth and remained there until General Grant ordered it to Memphis, January 22, 1863. At this time Major Maurice Maloney was in command. During February, 1863, the battalion, still consisting of Companies A, B, C, D, H and I, under Major Maloney, moved from Corinth to Memphis and, later, to the vicinity of Vicksburg. It was nominally a part of the 1st Brig- de, 14th Division, 13th Corps, but was actually in charge of a siege train throughout the siege of Vicksburg and never served with its brigade. 410 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY On the 22d of March, General McClernand was directed to forward at once to the Yazoo Pass expedition four 30-pdr. Parrotts, with not less than 80 men of the 1st Infantry, to be under the command of Captain G. A. Williams, 1st Infantry; but as General Grant wrote on the same day that “It is now clearly demonstrated that a further force, in by way of Yazoo Pass, can be of no service,” it is probable that this order did not go into effect. Captain E. D. Phillips of the First reports, under date of April 22, 1863, from “ Camp at Millikens Bend, La.,” that on the 17th April he had opened fire upon the court-house and railroad depot in Vicksburg with two 30-pdr. Parrotts placed in a casemate battery opposite the town, and had continued the firing with increasing accuracy until the night of the 20th, when, in obedience to instructions, he had embarked his detachment, guns, ammunition, etc., on a transport and had reached the camp of the First In- fantry on the date of the report. At the time of the first assault upon Vicksburg (May 22), Captain Offley with a detachment of the regiment was in charge of a sunken battery con- taining two 30-pdr. Parrotts, situated on that part of the line occupied by the 3d Division, 17th Corps, afterwards known as Battery Logan ; while Major Maloney, with the remainder, was opposite the point assaulted by the 2d Brigade, 14th Division, and the 2d Brigade, 10th Division. General McClernand reports concerning this assault that “ A portion of the 1st U. S. Infantry, under Major Maloney, serving as heavy artillery added to their previous renown. Neither officers nor men could have been more zealous and active. Being in the centre, they covered in considerable part the advance of Benton’s and Lawler’s brigades and materially promoted their partial success.” This battery was on an elevation about 600 yards distant from the salient of the enemy’s line which was assaulted, and commanded a fine view of all the movements in its front. General Grant afterwards frequently visited one of the batteries served by the battalion during the siege, to watch the effect of its fire and that of the other batteries in sight. His favorite seat was on a certain log which soon became known as his and was always reserved for him. On the 17th of June the 30-pdr. Parrotts were moved to a redoubt far advanced in the sap, where they were established under the command of Lieutenant Branagan, 1st Infantry, while Captain Offley was given two 9-in. Dahlgrens in Battery Logan. On the 25th of June, at 4.30 o’clock in the afternoon, a mine was sprung under one of the enemy’s works and the 45th Illinois Volunteers charged into the gap thus made. Hand grenades were freely used on both sides in this fight, Private William Lazarus of Company I, 1st Infantry, being de- tailed on the Union side to throw them. After throwing about twenty he was mortally wounded, when three men were detailed from the same com- mand to continue the work. The regiment added greatly to its reputation for gallantry and efficient service during the siege and, though always on duty at the front, met with little loss. THE FIRST REGIMENT OF INFANTR Y. 411 With the successful termination of the siege (July 4,1863), the besieging army was at once made use of in other directions, and the First Infantry finally went to New Orleans where it became the provost guard and was quartered in Odd Fellows’ Hall, opposite Lafayette Park. Here it was joined by its colonel—R. C. Buchanan—who had been promoted to the regiment from the 4th Infantry, February 8, 1864, by the retirement of Colonel Waite. In December, 1865, however, Colonel Buchanan left the regiment on detached service and was succeeded in command by Lieutenant Colonel W. H. Wood. At the close of the war the regiment went to Jackson Barracks, where it remained till 1869, actively engaged in the stirring events of early recon- struction times, in which it rendered efficient service. In the early spring of 1869 it was transferred to the department of the Lakes, with headquarters and five companies at Fort Wayne, two companies at Fort Porter, two at Fort Brady and one at Fort Mackinac. In April of this year the regiment was consolidated with the 43d In- fantry, under the Act of March 3, 1869. The 43d was a Veteran Reserve regiment, and many of the officers received into the First by the consolida- tion had been disabled through wounds received or disease contracted dur- ing the war. One effect of the consolidation was that Lieutenant Colonel Pinkney Lugenbeel succeeded Lieutenant Colonel Wood. On the 15th of December, 1870, Colonel Buchanan was retired from ac- tive service and was succeeded by Colonel Thomas G. Pitcher (late 44th Infantry) from the unassigned list. In May, 1872, Companies I and K were sent to Houghton, Mich., to quell a riot which had developed among the miners of the Calumet and Hecla copper mine. The mere presence of the troops was sufficient to prevent the destruction of property of great value and the proposed flooding of the mine. The regiment served in the Department of the Lakes until July, 1874, when it was transferred to the Department of Dakota, exchanging stations with the 22d Infantry. The headquarters and six companies took station at Fort Randall; A and B companies were sent to Fort Hale ; while F and H garrisoned Fort Sully. On July 6, 1875, a detachmentof eleven men of CompanyG, 1st Infantry, under Sergeant Danvers, who had been sent to the Ponca Agency to pro- tect the Poncas against an anticipated raid of the Sioux, had a fight with the latter in which several Indians were killed or wounded. The detach- ment loaded an old cannon with pieces of iron, and with this improvised ammunition repulsed three assaults after which the attacking party with- drew. In consequence of the Custer Massacre (August, 1876), Companies G and K were sent to Standing Rock Agency, now Fort Yates. Here some of the officers and the few men remaining from the war period, renewed an experience gained during the war,—the building of log huts for occupancy during the winter. In May, 1877, Companies B, G, H and K, were sent to the cantonment on Tongue River, Montana, and during the summer these companies 412 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. thoroughly explored the country between the Yellowstone, Tongue, Powder, and Little Missouri rivers and the Black Hills, and formed a part of the command which drove the remnant of Lame Deer’s band into the agency, for which service it received the thanks of General Sheridan. It was owing to the long and continued marches made by these companies that General Miles did not take the battalion with him when he left Tongue River to head off the Nez Perces. Lieutenant Maus, ist Infantry, was, however, selected by General Miles to accompany him and was with the scouts when the Indian camp was discovered. He rendered most valuable service in the series of fights which resulted in the surrender of Chief Joseph and his band. Colonel Pitcher was retired from active service June 28, 1878. The Act of June 17, 1878, had prohibited all promotion above the grade of captain, and in consequence the First Infantry was without a colonel until the re- striction was removed in the spring of 1879, when Lieutenant Colonel W. R. Shafter of the 24th Infantry was promoted to the First to date trom March 4, 1879. Companies F and K formed a part of the garrison of Fort Meade, Da- kota, while that post was building in the fall and winter of 1878. Officers and their families, and the men, lived in tents until well into the winter, and whenever the thermometer dropped below — 30°, as it frequently did, the experience, to say the least, was not pleasing. In June, 1880, the regiment was sent to the Department of Texas, and, during the summer of that year, the companies, with the exception of C and F at Ringgold and B at San Antonio, were engaged in opening up a wagon road and the country between the mouth of the Pecos River and theChenati Mountains. Upon the completion of this duty the companies took station at Fort McKavett, and a few months later at Fort Davis and sub-posts. The Indian outbreak in Arizona in the spring of 1882 caused the regi- ment to be sent to that Department, where it remained until July, 1886, the companies garrisoning Forts Grant, McDowell, Bowie, Huachuca, Lowell, Verde, Thomas, Apache, and Whipple Barracks. During this period the companies did garrison duty, detachments being frequently sent out to guard water-holes. Several of the officers, notably Lieutenants Maus, Pettit and Faison, rendered valuable service in the field during the Geronimo campaign. In July, 1886, the regiment was transferred to the department of Cali- fornia, where it is at present (January, 1895) serving. The Indian troubles in Nebraska and South Dakota took the regiment to those States in Decem- ber, 1890. Companies A, B, C, D, E, G and H, formed a part of the com- mand which was employed in the field until the early spring in guarding the Pine Ridge Agency and aiding to avert what threatened to be one of the most serious conflicts in which the Sioux have at any time been con- cerned. The band of the regiment accompanied the command from Cali- fornia, and was the means of giving much pleasure to the officers and men of the different organizations located in its vicinity. It was the only band present at the review of all the troops under General Miles’ command,— THE FIRST REGIMENT OF INFANTR Y. 413 some three thousand or more,—which was held before their departure from the agency. First Lieutenant John S. Mason, Jr., died in camp at Pine Ridge Agency, February 13, 1891. Upon being relieved from this duty the companies of the regiment re- turned to their stations in the Department of California early in March, 1891. The regiment has had numerous summer camps of instruction, fre- quently joining with the National Guard of the State in this duty. The camps have been located at Santa Cruz, Santa Barbara and Monterey. The recent railroad strikes took the regiment into the field. Owing to the bitter feeling prevailing in California against the Southern Pacific Rail- road company, the strike in that State early developed a serious phase which was intensified by the failure of the National Guard to respond properly to the demands made upon it by the State authorities. Under these condi- tions the services of the regular troops were peculiarly valuable, and much useful information can be derived from a study of the arrangements made for the journey of the headquarters and five companies of the regiment from Oakland to Los Angeles when escorting the first train through after the inauguration of the strike. Companies of the regiment have been stationed at Alcatraz, the Presidio and Gaston, and they now form the garrisons of Angel Island and Benicia Barracks and San Diego. The following officers and enlisted men of the regiment have been men- tioned in orders from the War Department for distinguished service. Captain Marion P. Maus, General Orders No. 39, 1891, “ For gallantry in action against Geronimo’s band of hostile Apache Indians, near the Aros River, Mexico, January 10, 1886, and in the encounter with Chihuahua troops on the following day (nth) and for the marked skill and ability with which, after the death of its commanding officer, he conducted the expedi- tion back to the United States.” General Orders No. 41, 1891. “May, 1885, and eleven months follow- ing,” for services in the field in Arizona and Sonora. Captain Thomas H. Barry, Private George Klinhaus and George Wilken- sen, Company A, and Frank Hennessy (now out of service) Company B, General Orders No. 70, 1893, “ For meritorious conduct in saving a sailor from drowning in San Francisco Bay, California, October 2, 1892.” Lieutenant Samson L. Faison, General Orders No. 41, 1891, “ May, 1885, and eleven months following,” for services in the field in Arizona and Sonora. Lieutenants Lewis H. Strother and Sydney A. Cloman, General Orders No. 100, 1891, the former, for highly efficient services while conducting a band of Cheyenne Indians from Pine Ridge, South Dakota, to Fort Keogh, Montana; and the latter," For the excellent judgment and discretion with which he executed the instructions of Major General Miles in the arrest, at White Clay Creek, South Dakota, of the Indian Plenty Horses.” THE SECOND REGIMENT OF INFANTRY* By Lieutenant W. M. WRIGHT, Adjutant 2d U. S. Infantry. THE history of the regiment covers such a long period and the records from 1791 to 1815 are so cloudy and incomplete that it is not deemed practicable to give a detailed account of the events of that time. Besides, there is grave doubt as to whether we have the right to claim the record of the original Second Infantry, that regiment having been consolidated with the First Infantry in the reorganization of March 3, 1815. This sketch will, therefore, be divided into two parts, the first extending from 1791 to 1815, and the second from 1815 to the present date. FIRST PART. The Act of March 3, 1791, added to the army the Second Regiment of Infantry, with the same organization as the regiment then in service, viz.:— a lieutenant-colonel commandant, two majors, eight captains, eight lieuten- ants, eight ensigns, one surgeon, two surgeon’s mates, and eight companies of about 100 men each. Colonel James Wilkinson of the Revolutionary Army, who afterwards became general-in-chief, accepted the position of colonel commandant. In the fall of this year the regiment was ordered to take the field against the Miami Indians and proceeded to Fort Washington, now Cincinnati, arriving there the middle of September. About the end of October the army under Governor St. Clair commenced a campaign against Little Tur- tle, chief of the Miamis. On the 4th of November, 1791, about 60 miles from Fort Washington, the Indians, 1500 strong, surprised the troops and put them to flight with great slaughter. The American army numbered 2000, and of these 38 officers and 555 men were killed or missing, and 21 officers and 224 men were wounded, many of whom died. It being impos- sible for the campaign to continue, the army returned to Fort Washington for the winter. In May, 1792, the “Legion” became the military organization of the United States and the Second Infantry was called the Second Sub-legion. Under this title it formed a part of General Anthony Wayne’s army till May, 1796, and in 1794 was with the command which defeated the Miami Indians so signally at the junction of the Au Glaize and Maumee rivers. On the 1st of November, 1796, pursuant to the act of May 30 of that year, the Legion was discontinued and the Second Sub-legion became again the Second Regiment of Infantry. For nine years the regiment remained in the Northwest, and in 1805, under Colonel Thomas Butler, was stationed in the South with headquarters at New Orleans. In September, 1814, the regiment was made famous by the gallant defense of Fort Bowyer (now Fort Morgan), Alabama, against overwhelming odds of British and Indians. * An abridgment of Lieut. W. M. Wright’s History of 2d U. S. Infantry. THE SECOND REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 415 Major Lawrence, “as brave a spirit as ever stood in his country’s defense,’’ was in command of the post and of 120 of the Second Infantry. He was brevetted for gallantry in this action, and Captains Chamberlain, Brown- low and Bradley, with Lieutenants Villard, Sturgis, Conway, H. Saunders, T. R. Saunders, Brooks, Davis and C. Saunders, were all mentioned by General Jackson in dispatches. Captain John M. Davis of the regiment was made a brevet major for gallantry at the siege of New Orleans. The regiment went North in the spring of 1815 and was consolidated with the First Infantry by the Act of March 3d of that year, and here the chronicle of the original Second Infantry comes to an end. SECOND PART. A new Second Infantry was now formed in accordance with the Act quoted above, by the consolidation of the 6th, 16th, 22d, 23d, and 32d Regi- ments of Infantry, so it would appear that the date of organization of the present regiment would be that of the Sixth Infantry,—namely, April 3, 1808. On the regimental roster for 1815 we find Hugh Brady as colonel, and Henry Leavenworth and Ninian Pinkney as major and lieutenant- colonel respectively. Colonel Brady entered the service as an ensign of infantry in 1792, was mustered out as captain in June, 1800, colonel 22d Infantry in July, 1812, transferred to the Second Infantry in May, 1815, and was from that time continuously in the service as colonel of the regiment until his death in 1851, at which time he had been a colonel for 39 years, and the colonel of the Second Infantry for 36 years. Immediately after its organization the regiment was stationed at Sack- etts Harbor and Plattsburg, N. Y., and remained, with the exception of a few company moves, at these stations until January, 1822, when the entire regiment was concentrated at Sacketts Harbor. In June, 1822, Colonel Brady, with regimental headquarters and Companies A, B, D, I and K, em- barked at Buffalo on the steamboat Superior en route to Sault Ste. Marie, where they built a cantonment which was named after the colonel of the regiment which post is still known as Fort Brady. Late in the year regi- mental headquarters returned to Sacketts Harbor. From this time until the outbreak of the Black Hawk War in 1832, the record is almost uneventful. The regiment usually occupied two or more of the stations upon the Northern Frontier,—Forts Brady, Howard, Mack- inac, Gratiot or Niagara ; Madison Barracks, Detroit or Houlton (where a part of the regiment built Hancock Barracks), with frequent interchanges of stations among the companies. In June, 1832, Companies A, B, D, G, H and I formed a part of the force destined for General Scott’s command, then organizing at Chicago for the Black Hawk War, which had been going on for some time with a large bal- ance of killed and wounded against the government. Asiatic cholera broke out while the troops were at Detroit and their sufferings were terrible. As soon as the epidemic had somewhat abated the command moved and in August was at Rock River, in what is now the State of Illinois. In October, 1832, the battalion returned from the Black Hawk War, and 416 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. the companies were at first stationed at Forts Dearborn, Mackinac and Ni- agara, but in May, 1834, Companies A, B, G and I, were at Fort Brady; C, E, F and K, at Hancock Barracks ; and D and H at Fort Gratiot. In the spring of 1836 the Creek Indians commenced to show signs of hostility, which resulted in sending Companies F and K in May to Fort Mitchell, Ala., near the Creek Agency. As soon as they arrived Captain Dearborn with his command was ordered to escort a party of emigrating Creek Indians to their destination at Irvington, Ala., and in September, General Jesup ordered these two companies to proceed to Lounds County, Ga., for the protection of that and adjoining counties against the depreda- tions of the Indians. Companies A, D, G and H were sent to Tampa Bay, Fla., from their northern stations the next year, arriving September 21 ; and in September 1838, regimental headquarters and the four companies then at Hancock Barracks were also sent there. The entire regiment was now concentrated in Florida and all the companies were most actively engaged in this most arduous duty until the close of hostilities in the spring of 1842. It would be tedious to chronicle the different stations of the regiment, for it was on the move daily, fighting and building posts and roads. Some idea may be formed of the labors of the troops from the fact that over 90 forts and stock- ades, and 480 miles of road were built by the army in Florida. In March, 1839, Captain Russell was proceeding in an open boat on the Miami River to Fort Dallas with a portion of his company (I), while the other part was marching by land, when his boat was fired upon by the In- dians who were concealed on the shore. Not a man was touched by the first fire, and Captain Russell at once ordered the men to row for the shore and attack the enemy. Being in the bow of the boat he was the first to land and had given but a few brief orders when he was pierced by five Indian bullets, one of which passed through his brain killing him instantly. His subaltern, Lieutenant Woodruff, continued the fight and brought his captain’s body to Fort Dallas. Captain Russell was a most popular and efficient officer, and his death was mourned by the entire army. Lieutenant-Colonel Cummings, for many years in command of the regi- ment, was promoted to the 4th Infantry, December 1, 1839, and Major Bennett Riley, 4th Infantry, became lieutenant-colonel of the Second. At the end of the year regimental headquarters were at Picolata under Major Loomis, and the regiment was scattered from one end of the territory to the other. Lieutenant-Colonel Riley assumed command of the regiment in April, 1840, and headquarters were moved to Fort No. 12. In May, Lieutenant Martin, with three men of the regiment, en route from Wakahosta to Micanopy, was attacked by Indians, receiving three wounds. Two of his men were killed and the other brought the alarm to the post. Lieutenant Sanderson, 7th Infantry, started to the rescue but was ambushed and killed with five of his men. In 1841 Lieutenants Anderson, McKinstry, and Davidson, led an expe- dition to the St.Johns. For two days and nights they crept towards the Indian camp, which contained 57 of Aluck’s band. With a force of but 24 men they routed the Indians and, but for the treachery of their guide, THE SECOND REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 417 would have avenged in characters never to be effaced the monstrous cruel- ties practised upon the defenceless inhabitants of Florida. All of the above-named officers were mentioned in orders by Colonel Worth, com- manding in Florida, and in dispatches to the Major General commanding the Army. In March Lieutenant Alburtis was in command at Fort Russell, near Pilatka. His post was attacked and nearly captured by Halleck Tustenug- gee, but Alburtis made a brilliant counter-attack and drove him off with heavy loss. The Second lost half a dozen men killed and wounded. Early in 1842 the Seminole War began to show signs of coming to an end and the Second was engaged in keeping the enemy on the move and, in doing so had several fights, losing a few men. The troops engaged in this duty were under Major Plympton. On the 25th of January with 80 men of the regiment he gallantly encountered Halleck Tustenuggee on the head of the Hawk River, which runs into Druin’s Lake east of St.Johns. A well contested fight ensued which lasted 45 minutes. The enemy re- treated, leaving two warriors wounded on the field, one of whom died. One soldier was killed and two wounded. The evidence of blood on several trails leading from the battle ground was a guarantee that some of the Indians had suffered from bullet or buckshot. In May of this year the regiment embarked on transports at Pilatka and reached New York early in June, en route to their old stations along the lakes. Headquarters, with Companies C, D, F and K, were stationed at Buffalo Barracks, now Fort Porter ; A at Fort Niagara ; B, E and I, at Madison Barracks; G at Fort Ontario, and H at Plattsburg. There was no change until 1845, when headquarters and F went to Detroit Barracks, and C, D, E and K, were moved from their Lake Erie stations to Mackinac, Gratiot, Brady and Wilkins, respectively. Texas was annexed in March, 1845, and in April of the next year diplomatic relations were broken off and war declared with Mexico. Gen- eral Zachary Taylor, of Florida fame, fought and won the battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma in May, and in July was on his way to Monterey, at which point the gallant Second was ordered to join him. Major G. W. Allen and Lieutenant J. S. Woods, 2d Infantry, were in both these fights. Lieutenant Woods was afterwards killed at the battle of Monterey while serving with the 4th Infantry. Headquarters, with Companies D, E, F and K, rendezvoused at New- port Barracks, Ky., August 12, 1846, and reached General Taylor’s base ot supplies at Camargo on the Rio Grande River, September 20. Companies A, B, G, H and I, met at Fort Columbus, N. Y. Harbor, em- barked September 2d, and reached Camargo October 13. The entire regiment, except C Company which had been left at Macki- nac for some unknown reason, was now concentrated at Camargo under Lieutenant-Colonel Bennett Riley, but arrived too late to take part in the gallant attack and capture of the city of Monterey. The regiment joined Twiggs’ Brigade at Montemorelos, December 17, which, with Patterson’s Brigade, was about to start for Victoria as a corps of observation. They were recalled to Monterey on account of an expected 418 HIS TO RICA L SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. attack by Santa Anna at Saltillo, but this rumor proved unfounded, and on Christmas day, 1846, the regiment was again on the road to Victoria, ar- riving there after several skirmishes with the enemy along the road. The regimentleft Victoria January 14, 1847, and arrived at Tampico on the 25th, sailing for Lobos Island late in February. On March 2d the fleet of transports and vessels of war weighed anchor at Lobos Island and within a week the entire force landed, without the loss of a single man, on the beach of Sacrificios, a few miles south of Vera Cruz. The investment of Vera Cruz began at once. Twiggs’ Brigade occupied the extreme left of the American line. While it was moving into position, Lieutenant William Alburtis, a young officer of the regiment who served with great distinction during the Seminole War, was killed by a cannon ball from one of the Mexican batteries. Lieutenant D. Davidson was wounded at the same time. On the 13th of March the investment of the place was com- plete. This had not been accomplished except by the heaviest labor on the part of the troops. The Second Infantry, being on the extreme left, had to carry and haul all impedimenta and rations over the sand hills and through “ intervening forests and chapperal” as no transportation had yet arrived from the depot at Brazos. Vera Cruz and the Castle of San Juan d’Ulloa surrendered March 28th, after a siege of 15 days. The troops rested until April 8, when, all preparations for a forward movement having been made the army commenced its march to the City of Mexico, the Second being in the leading division under Twiggs. Santa Anna, with the remnants of his army which had been so thoroughly whipped by General Taylor at Buena Vista seven weeks before, was reported to be at Jalapa. After a most fatiguing march the regiment arrived at Plan del Rio on the nth, where it encamped to await the arrival of the rear troops. The pass of Cerro Gordo was at the far end of the valley, and here Santa Anna had taken up a very strong position to oppose the further ad- vance of the Americans. His line crossed the National Road, on which Scott must pass, some three or four miles from Plan del Rio. On the 17th Twiggs’ Division was ordered forward on the National Road, and after some heavy skirmishing captured a fortified hill called the Alataya. Lieutenant C. E. Jarvis, 2d Infantry, was wounded in this engagement and several men of the regiment killed and wounded. On the 18th Twiggs was ordered to move forward before daylight and take up his position across the National Road in the enemy’s rear so as to to cutoff a retreat to Jalapa. “ After the artillery had been engaged sometime, he ordered Riley’s Brigade [Lieutenant-Colonel Bennett Riley, commanding brigade and Second In fantry] to move forward through the valley passing to the right of the Tele- grafo Hill, turn to the left of the Mexican line and seize the Jalapa road in rear.” (Wilcox, p. 287.) During this movement the regiment advanced under heavy fire from the Telegrafo, and Captain G. W. Patten, 2d Infantry, was shot through the hand by a grape shot. The enemy appeared in force on the sides of the mountain along the base of which the brigade must pass, and opened an annoying fire on its left flank. Riley detached two companies of the Second, one under Captain J. W. Penrose and one under Lieutenant N. H. Davis, THE SECOND REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 419 who engaged the enemy in greatly superior numbers, obliging the brigade to form line to the left to assist them. Riley was soon in the enemy’s left rear, and General Twiggs ordered the rest of his division to move forward from the crest of the Alataya and storm the position which was done in gallant style. “General Twiggs’ order to Harney to charge was well timed. Santa Anna had directed a part of his forces on the Telegrafo to oppose Riley, who (hard fighter that he was) met and drove them back just as Harney’s men carried the works on the crest.” (Wilcox, p. 289.) In this fight Lieu- tenant Nathaniel Lyon, 2d Infantry, with his company captured three guns. The Mexicans were defeated overwhelmingly all along the line, and Santa Anna and the Mexican army were not heard of again until Scott was within a few miles of Mexico. On the 19th of April the regiment entered Jalapa, remaining until the end of May, when it set out for Puebla. The marching was delightful, the road level, the country sterile with slight exceptions and the air crisp. The troops remained at Puebla some time, awaiting reinforcements and supplies which the War Department seemed utterly unable to furnish. Company C joined the regiment July 7, 1847. The army commenced its march from Puebla, August 7, and the Second was, as usual, with the advanced troops. They arrived and camped at Ayotla on the nth remaining, there until the 16th. On the 19th they moved to St. Augustin and immediately advanced to attack the enemy under General Valencia who had drawn up his division for battle at Contreras. In the two days’ battle of that name they had the same duty assigned them as at Cerro Gordo, viz.—that of turning the enemy’s position ; but this time the position was turned and the work carried without the assist- ance of a frontal attack. “ The brigade moved on until the advanced regiment reached a ravine on the right of San Geronimo. * * * Riley now passed through the village and Captain Wessells’ company was detached to cover a reconnoissance made by Captain Canby, A. A. G., and Lieutenant Tower in the direction of Valencia’s camp. Further to the right, Captain Silas Casey’s company engaged a body of lancers, supposed to be the Guana- huato Regiment, and repulsed them with a loss of both men and horses. Several of Casey’s men were wounded. A Mexican cavalry force threatening Wessells, he attacked, drove it off, and was then ordered to hold his position and observe and report any movement of the enemy from his intrenchments.” (Wilcox, p. 365.) The Second was now some distance in advance of the rest of the brigade and in danger of being cut off, so the 7th Infantry was ordered up to its support. While they were coming up the enemy threatened a charge on the Second, but the regiment was thrown into square to receive it and nothing more than a demonstration was made. The regiment returned to San Geronimo where it remained during the night. Early on the morning of the 20th they moved out of the village. Riley’s Brigade was in advance and led off by the flank. The night was so dark and the ground so difficult that it was not until near daylight that its rear cleared the village. At this time Riley’s Brigade consisted of the 2d Infantry, 7th Infantry, and the 4th Artillery acting as infantry. 420 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. “ The troops were moved to the attack in a deep ravine around the left and rear of the enemy. After moving several hundred yards to a slope leading to a high point of the ridge, they came up out of the ravine and found that the enemy had just dis- covered the movement and was turning his guns and disposing his infantry for resis- tance.” (Ripley.) The leading divisions of the brigade were deployed as skirmishers and the regiment soon became hotly engaged with the enemy who served two guns upon it with rapidity and received the shock with a noisy, rolling dis- charge of musketry. Their aim, however, was inaccurate and but little loss was sustained. The advance was not interrupted for an instant, for the troops, having delivered their fire, rushed down with loud shouts in a vigor- ous charge, and entered the intrenchments almost in a a body. The mass of Mexicans yielding before Riley’s vigorous charge, gave way and fled headlong down the road in the direction of San Angel. In this engagement Captain Wessells and Lieutenants Lovell, Tilden and Gardner were wounded, and several enlisted men were killed. “ The battle of Con- treras was fought and won a little after sunrise on the 20th of August, 1847.” (Wilcox, p. 400.) The pursuit was taken up immediately through the village of San An- tonio and on to the village of Churubusco, where Santa Anna had taken up a strong position along the near bank of the stream. “ South of the stream, some hundred yards, lay the scattered houses of the village of Churubusco. One of the most westerly of these was a massive stone convent which had been prepared for defense. It was surrounded by a field work, having embrasures and platforms for many cannon, and was the right point of the Mexican line.” (Ripley.) Here for the second time, in this day of its greatest glory, the regiment stood gallantly to its work and did the heaviest fighting done by any troops that day. Under Captain Morris it attacked the right of the Mexicans on the west side of the convent, the 7th Infantry being ordered to its support. The regiment advanced through a cornfield, and as it passed out of this into an open space in front of the convent, a volley of musketry killed Lieutenant Thomas Easley, a company commander, and killed or wounded twelve men with him. Captain J. R. Smith, struggling forward under the severest fire, was twice badly wounded, and 14 men with him were struck down at the same time. The Mexicans, elated by the effects of their terrible fire, moved out of the convent for a counter-attack, but it was repulsed by the Second U. S. Infantry. An attempt was made to advance and carry the work, but it was not successful, and the battle raged with renewed fury. Captain Thompson Morris, commanding the 2d Infantry, states (referring to the sorties of the Mexicans) that a column of several hundred passed out of the front gate of the convent and, under cover of the standing corn, advanced towards the left of his regiment, but was driven back; that a second effort was made and checked, and that subsequent sallies met the same fate. (Wilcox, p. 389.) Finally the Mexican left was driven in, but still the convent held out and was not taken until the colors of the Second Infantry were planted in its rear. The battle of Churubusco was now won but the fighting had been very severe and the losses correspondingly heavy. Our regimental losses THE SECOND REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 421 were as follows:—Captain J. W. Anderson, killed ; Captain J. R. Smith, twice wounded; Lieutenant Julius Hayden, severely wounded ; Lieutenant Christopher Lovell, twice wounded; Lieutenant Thomas Easley, killed; Lieutenant W. M. Gardner, wounded the second time in one day; and Lieutenant T. W. Sweeney, severely wounded. Seventeen officers of the regiment were present on August 20th, and before sunset seven were either killed or hors de combat, and about forty men either killed or wounded at Churubusco alone. The night of the 20th was spent in bivouac on the ground so dearly won, and on the 21st the regiment marched to Coyoacan, near the City of Mexico, where it remained during the armistice. It took post, September 7, in the Hacienda Nalvarte.on the extreme right of the American line, and remained in this position with the rest of the brigade, threatening the enemy’s left during the fierce fight at Molino del Rey, but was ordered up in the afternoon to assist in the capture of the place, arriving too late to be of any assistance. The regiment advanced to Piedad on the 9th Sep- tember. A question now arose as to whether it would be most advantageous to cannonade and capture the Citadel of Chapultepec at the west of our line, or to operate on the line of the San Antonio gate on the east. The western or Chapultepec line having been chosen, the Second was left at Piedad to assist in the demonstration on the San Antonio gate. It remained in this position, skirmishing frequently with the enemy, until it entered the City of Mexico on the 14th of September, 1847. Although the Second was not engaged at Chapultepec on the 13th, the storming party from General Quitman’s position was largely composed of the regiment and was led by Captain Silas Casey, 2d Infantry. “ A detail from Twiggs’ Division consisting of 250 men and 13 officers, Captain Silas Casey, 2d Infantry, commanding, was ordered to report to General Quitman early on the morning of the 13th as the storming party of the right of the line.” At 8 o’clock a. M. on the 13th, Lieutenant C. M. Wilcox was ordered by General Quitman to go at once to Captain Casey and give the order to advance. “On reaching the storming party the order was given to Captain Casey who formed his line in a few seconds and gave the order ‘ forward.’ They moved down the road towards Chapultepec at a double-quick, and for 600 yards were exposed to a raking fire from the Castle, but were partially concealed from view and protected from the fire of the batteries near the road by several adobe houses to the left of it, and by rows of maguey growing along the edge of the ditch. Beyond the houses showers of grape came from the guns of the batteries on the left of the road, passing among and over the men, causing a few casualties, and the hostile musketry opened, knocking over a few men. * * * Two hundred yards beyond the adobe houses the road made a slight bend to the left; 200 yards beyond this were the two Mexican batteries ; and in advance of the bend a short distance was a ditch, eight or ten feet deep and nine or twelve feet wide. Here the stormers were brought to a halt, as the ditch could not be passed.” (Wilcox, pp. 459-60.) “ But the troops held their ground and pressed on, until, finally, the castle above having been taken, they entered the Mexican barricade with a portion of the Rifle Regiment.” (Ripley.) 422 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Captain Casey and Lieutenants Lyon and Steele were wounded in this action. After the march into the City of Mexico on the 14th, the regiment was engaged most of the day in street fighting. The war was now over but the regiment remained in the City until the 17th of December, on which day it marched to Tacubaya and went into camp until March 27, 1848, when it left for home, reaching Fort Hamilton, N. Y. Harbor, in September. Three months later the entire regiment was on board transports bound for California via Rio Janeiro, Cape Horn and Valparaiso. Lieutenant-Colonel Bennett Riley, 2d Infantry, was promoted colonel of the First Infantry in January, 1850. He was a most gallant officer and com- manded the Second throughout the Seminole and Mexican wars. In 1843 he presented the regiment with a drum-major’s baton. On the silver knob is engraved the date of presentation with his name and the regimental motto “ Noli me tangere.” This baton has been carried ever since at the head of the regiment and is the most valuable regimental relic we have. Colonel Riley was brevetted colonel for Chakotta, Florida ; brigadier gen- eral for Cerro Gordo, and major general for Contreras. He died in 1853. The regiment remained in California until late in 1853, occupying sta- tions from Goose Lake, Oregon, on the north, to Yuma, Arizona, on the south, and scouting over the entire country as far as the eastern slope of the Sierra Nevadas. The companies were stationed but a few months in any one place and all their moves were made by marching, with the exception of a few trips on transports up and down the coast. After the return of the regiment to New York it moved west to Carlisle Barracks and thence down the Ohio and up the Missouri to Fort Leavenworth, where it arrived in June and July, 1854. For the next six years, or until the commencement of the war, the com- panies were stationed along the Missouri River and as far west as Forts Kearny and Laramie. Among the posts occupied were Ridgeley, Pierre, Abercrombie, Randall and Miller. In 1851 Colonel Brady was succeeded by Colonel E. A. Hitchcock, who resigned in 1855 and Colonel Francis Lee took command of the regiment. Colonel Lee died in January, 1859, and was in turn succeeded by Colonel D. S. Miles, who was killed at Harper’s Ferry. In January, 1861, the regiment was stationed as follows : Headquarters and Companies E and F at Fort Kearny; A, D and I, at Fort Abercrombie; C and K at Fort Ripley ; Gand H at Fort Riley; and B at Fort Scott. In February, Company B (Captain Lyon) was transferred to St. Louis Arsenal. It was engaged (June 17) in the action fought at Booneville, Mo. Headquarters and Companies C and K reached Washington from the west in July and were engaged at the battle of Bull Run, July 21, but suf- fered small loss. These companies were with Major Sykes’ regulars, who, “aided by Sherman’s Brigade, made a steady and handsome withdrawal, protecting the rear of the routed forces and enabling many to escape by the Stone Bridge.” Companies A, D and I, joined regimental headquarters at Georgetown in August. During July, Companies B and E were in the field in Missouri, and on THE SECOND REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 423 August 2d were engaged with the enemy at Dry Springs, Mo. In this fight Company E was commanded by ist Sergeant G. H. McLoughlin, and B by i st Sergeant Griffin. Captain Steele, 2d Infantry, was in command and makes the following statement in his report: “ About 5 o’clock p. M., Sergeant McLoughlin’s line of skirmishers was attacked on the left and front by a large body of cavalry, some 200 or more of whom were on foot and about the same number mounted. Sergeant McLoughlin gallantly repulsed the first attack but was soon overwhelmed with numbers and obliged to retreat upon the reserve, and all fell back into the road, where I came to their support with the other two companies of my battalion. (W. R., Vol. III., page 49.) One man of E Company was wounded. The rebels were finally routed with heavy loss. In this action B Company was in support of the volunteer troops. At the battle of Wilson’s Creek, where 3700 men attacked 23,000 Con- federates after a fatiguing night march, and fought them successfully over six hours, the same companies of the Second played their usual r61e of brave and unflinching devotion to duty and the cause. The action commenced at daylight on the 10th August, 1861, General Lyon commanding the Union forces, with the battalion of the Second, a battery, and some volunteers in reserve. Early in this engagement, while General Lyon was leading his horse along the line in rear of Captain Tot- ten’s battery and endeavoring to rally our troops, which were at this time in considerable disorder, his horse was killed and he received a wound in the leg and one in the head. The General mounted another horse, and swinging his hat in the air, called to the troops nearest him to follow, but in a short time a fatal ball lodged in his breast and he was carried from the field a corpse. Thus gloriously fell as brave a soldier as ever drew sword, a man whose honesty of purpose was proverbial, a noble patriot, and one who held his life as nothing when his country demanded it of him. The Union forces were now all but beaten, but just at this time the ene- my was observed to be about to renew his efforts, and at once commenced along the entire line the fiercest and most bloody engagement of the day. Not the slightest disposition to give way was manifested at any point. Cap- tain Steele’s battalion was some yards in front of the line and in imminent danger of being overwhelmed with superior numbers, the contending lines being almost muzzle to muzzle. The volunteers rallied, and attacking the enemy’s right flank poured in a murderous fire. From this time a perfect rout took place throughout the rebel front, and it was evident that Totten’s battery and Steele’s little battalion were safe.* At 11.30 a. M. the Union forces withdrew unmolested to Springfield, about 12 miles distant. In this action the regiment lost Captain Nathaniel Lyon, killed, and 39 killed or wounded of the 98 men present for duty that morning. In December Companies B and E were sent to Washington where the regiment (except Company H, at Fort Lamed, Kansas) was concentrated under the command of Captain A. Sully. It remained there on provost * See report of Major S. D. Sturgis, W. R., Vol. I, page 64, et seq. 424 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. duty until it moved to Fortress Monroe in March, 1862, with Sykes’ Brigade of regulars at the opening of the Peninsular Campaign. From the time of its arrival at Fortress Monroe to June 27th, the regiment moved up the Pen- insula to the Chickahominy, skirmishing with the enemy and in reserve during the heavier engagements. The following are extracts from an account of the regiment at Gaines’ Mill, written by Major F. E. Lacey who was the first sergeant of Company I in this the first heavy fight of the regiment in the Civil War. Bright and early on the morning of the 26th camp was broken, everything packed up, and we moved to Mechanicsville to support McCall’s Pennsylvanians who were at that point. Early on the morning of the 27th our line is formed in a sunken road near the old mill which gives the battle its Union name. A grave, a fatal blunder is here made. All the entrenching tools are sent to the rear. We are here between three and four hours before the action commences,—ample time to construct works which would have cost the enemy dearly to approach. About 11 o’clock A. M., the Con- federate skirmishers come slowly and cautiously into view, followed by artillery. Dur- ing this time the infantry is taking position in a strip of timber immediately in our front. The first gun is fired by the rebels ; a little later a shot from the enemy kills four of our men. A shell from one of our guns blows up a caisson in a Confederate battery just opposite to us. Tne artillery duel lasts about half an hour. Soon after it ends the enemy’s infantry comes out of the woods to attack us. As they are forming line the Second opens fire on them and sends them reeling to the timber. A fresh regiment takes its place and meets the same fate. Two musicians of I Company— mere boys—go out under a heavy fire and bring in some wounded men, Their names are Robert Nelson and Bartly Scanlan. A body of Confederates now comes out of the timber ; the Second springs at them with cold steel and drives them back to the woods. Here Brinley was killed and Jordan severely wounded—shot through the knee— two gallant officers, a great loss to the regiment. The intrepid bearer of the National colors,—Sergeant Thomas Madigan of A Company, a veteran of the Mexi- can War,—received a wound from which he died a few days later. The brave old fellow had participated in every battle in which the regiment was engaged in the war with Mexico. The next to take his place,—Corporal Konsmiller, a fine young German,—was shot through the head and killed. We are now in a critical position, fighting in open ground, the foe in the woods. The enemy repeatedly tries to break our line, but fails ; the old Second never wavers but stands like an iron wall. The left wing of the corps having been driven back a considerable distance, we fall back and form in an old peach orchard. This position is held until nearly sunset. Resistance now seems to be in vain, our ranks are fear- fully thinned, so we fall back in line of battle with colors flying. We soon come to a bunch of timber and are halted ; the left wing does not hear the command and con- tinues its march through the woods. The reason for the halt is explained. A crip- pled battery is left behind us, the enemy is near at hand, the right wing is asked to save the battery and responds with a hearty cheer, and at the same time dashes to the front led by Lieutenant Parker, 2d Infantry, one of General Sykes’ aides. The bat- tery is passed, the wing halts within thirty yards of the advancing enemy, opens fire and brings them to a stand. Lieutenant Drum greatly distinguishes himself. Now the fearless Parker receives a volley : he sways in his saddle and falls from his horse dead. The guns are saved ; but at what a cost ! We lose more men in this last charge than at any time during the day. The remnant falls back and at dark is THE SECOND REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 425 united with the left wing and the battle of Gaines’ Mill, after eight hours of hard fighting, is ended. We kept the enemy in check five hours against overwhelming odds, losing 138 men in killed, wounded and missing. The strength of the battalion going into ac- tion was 446 aggregate. Sergeant Lacey was severely wounded in this fight and became an officer about a month later. In the change of base to Harrison’s Landing the regiment formed a por- tion of the rear guard and took part in the action at Malvern Hill, suffering no loss. It was in camp at Harrison’s Landing until August 14 when it left to join Pope’s army in front of Washington, arriving in time to take an important part in the second battle of Bull Run. The regiment left its camp on the Gainesville road early on the morning of August 30, and moved in the direction of Bull Run Creek, and was formed in line of battle on the left bank of the creek between 8 and 9 o’clock A. M., remaining in that position until about 3.30 P. M., when orders were received to fall back and take position on the right bank of the creek in the timber, near the crest of the ridge. It remained here some fifteen or twenty minutes before the enemy opened his fire, which was intensely severe and continued so for about three-quarters of an hour, when it was ordered to fall back to the timber across the road. Both officers and men conducted themselves, without a single exception, in the coolest and most determined manner, although casualties were very numerous. (W. R., Vol. XII, Part 2, page 499.) In this engagement Lieutenant Wm. Kidd was killed and Lieutenants Ellinwood and Markley wounded. 71 men were killed, wounded or missing. The regiment left camp at Centerville September 2, and marched to Antietam Creek, near the village of Sharpsburg, Md., where it arrived September 15 and went into position, remaining there two days exposed to the enemy’s artillery and sharpshooters. On the 17th it crossed the creek and went into action in support of Tidball’s battery which was hard pressed by the enemy. Lieutenant J. S. Poland, who was in command of the regi- ment in this fight, makes the following statement in his report:— “Lieutenant McKee, commanding Companies I and A, 2d Infantry, while de- ploying to the front was severely wounded and compelled to leave the field. The command of these companies devolved upon 1st Sergeant F. E. Lacey, commanding Company I, 2d Infantry, who handled them well. In advancing to the fence at which our line was to rest, the skirmishers were obliged to pass over a ridge completely commanded by the enemy’s sharpshooters and battery posted to the left of the corn- field in front of the right of my line. When we appeared above the crest the enemy opened with a heavy fire of case shot and canister. The line did not waver but rapidly moved to the fence. The right advanced beyond, however, before I could convey the order to them to halt at the fence, and by a well directed fire compelled the enemy’s cannoneers to leave their guns. * * * Lieutenant McLoughlin and Sergeant Lacey commanded the companies on the right. Sergeant Lacey was soon after wounded and unwillingly compelled to leave the field. Our position was held until all the ammunition had been expended on the left and nearly all on the right.” In a very short time the regiment was relieved by the 17th Michigan and the 1st Battalion of the 14th U. S. Infantry. 426 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. The regiment camped on the battle-field, and on the 29th crossed the Potomac at the ford below Shepherdstown, W. Va., in pursuit of the enemy, and moved about a mile beyond the river where they were discov- ered in force. The regiment skirmished all day, but had no casualties and recrossed the river that night. In this fight 1st Sergeant Daniel W. Burke, of B Company, distinguished himself by returning and spiking a piece of artillery in the face of the enemy’s sharpshooters. The colonel of the regiment, Dixon S. Miles, was mortally wounded by a piece of shell at Harper’s Ferry during September and died shortly after- wards. Sidney Burbank succeeded him as colonel of the Second. The regiment camped at Sharpsburg, obtaining a much needed rest and reequipment, until October 28, when it started for Fredericksburg, Va, arriving there about a month later. At 2.15 p. M., on the 13th of December, 1862, the regiment left its bivouac near Falmouth and formed under cover of the Phillips house and close to the ponton bridge. It crossed the river shortly after and went into position on the left of the road on the south side of the village. “ At 5 P. M., the battalion was ordered to move to the crest of the hill, 100 yards in advance of its former position, to protect the withdrawal of a battery. During this forward movement the battery was withdrawn and the battalion halted in rear of a ditch, the banks of which afforded good cover.” At 10 p. m., they advanced to within about 80 yards of the stone wall occupied by the enemy. “ On the morning of the 14th the enemy opened a murderous fire, driving in our pickets. The battalion was ordered to lie down behind a slight elevation of ground (about one foot), giving some protection, where it was obliged to remain until dark, under a terrific fire, the plane of which passed not more than a foot over the ground on which they lay.” “ To move even was sure to draw the fire of the enemy’s sharpshooters, who were posted in the adjacent houses and in tree tops, and whose fire we were unable to re- turn. Thus the troops remained twelve long hours unable to eat, drink or attend to the calls of nature, for so relentless was the enemy that not even a wounded man or our stretcher-carriers were exempted from their fire.” “Never did discipline shine more resplendently, never was the reputation of a regiment more nobly, more incontrovertably confirmed than that of the Second : never could a battalion more signally gain the title of brave and excellent soldiers than on that ever-to-be-remembered Sabbath of December 14, 1862.” (W. R., Vol. XXI., pages 426-27.) The regiment remained in Fredericksburg until the morning of the 16th, when it returned to its old camp near Potomac Creek. Sixteen men were wounded in this battle and three missing. The regiment spent the winter of 1862-63 its camp at Falmouth, and no movement of consequence was made until late in April when the Chan- cellorsville campaign commenced. The following are extracts from an account written by Patrick Breen, who was a corporal in the color guard of the regiment during this battle, and afterwards 1st sergeant of C Company and Ordnance sergeant, U. S. A. He is now retired and living at Vin cennes, Ind. On May 1st, advancing in open country in line of battle, Captain Salem S. Marsh THE SECOND REGIMENT OE INFANTRY. 427 commanding, the regiment halted on the right of the Sixth Infantry in the centre of a field. It was on the right of the entire 5th Corps. Not more than five minutes had elapsed after halting in line before a volley of musketry was poured into our ranks by the unseen enemy, who had been hidden from view by the heavy timber not more than 200 yards in our front. After the first fire was delivered by the enemy we commenced to peg away at the rebels in the timber. In a few minutes the regiment, with the brigade, fell back about 25 yards and opened again on the enemy. The fire of the regiment had a telling effect on the rebels as they could be seen limping off the field every minute. The regiment remained in its new position but a short time when it was discovered that the rebels were moving around our flank. Captain Marsh, ever on the alert, was quick to discover the intentions of the enemy and immediately thwarted the move by changing front to the half-right, at the same time maintaining his position in line with the brigade. Shortly after this a rebel bullet struck him in the forehead, killing him instantly. The command now devolved on Captain S. A. McKee. During the short time that Captain Marsh was in command of the regiment, he endeared himself to the very hearts of his men by his bearing as a soldier and an officer, and his gentlemanly manner at all times, no matter what the occasion. After we attained the timber to the right of the turnpike and were supported by Hancock’s Division, the rebels gradually advanced, very cautiously, and we did not open fire on them until within short range, and then with such effect that they very soon retired from the contest, leaving their dead and badly wounded in our hands. Thus ended the day for the Second Infantry at the battle of Chancellorsville. We laid all the next day behind improvised breast works, rudely thrown up with whatever im- plements were at hand at the time ; even the bayonet was brought into use in this en- trenching business. The regiment remained in the entrenchments until the evening of the 3d, and the retreat of the army having commenced that evening in a drenching rain, the morning of the 4th found the 2d Division, 5th Corps, the last troops crossing the river, covering the retreat of the Army of the Potomac, and the 2d Infantry was with it. Company H from Fort Larned, Kansas, joined the regiment at Benson’s Mills, Va., June 13, 1863. The regiment left Frederick June 29, and made long, rapid and fatiguing marches to the field of Gettysburg, where it arrived about 8 A. M. July 2, and went into position on the right of the 5th Corps. Twenty men of the regiment were thrown forward as skirmishers into a body of woods, beyond which and to the right could be seen the enemy’s pickets. After a skirmish of nearly two hours, during which there was considerable firing and some casualties, the line was marched by a flank movement to the left and rear about two miles, where it rested until about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, at which time it moved in the direction of the heavy cannonading on the extreme left of the Union line of battle. As it advanced the rapidity of the firing increased and staff officers rode up rapidly to hurry the command to the front, which was done at a double-time. As soon as the brigade reached the vicinity of Round Top, it formed line to the right, with the 2d Infantrv on the right of the line, and advanced at a double-quick down a steep hill and across a marsh fifty yards wide and ankle deep with mire. During this movement the regiment suffered from a severe fire of sharp- shooters from the right, left, and front. The marsh being passed, the Second moved rapidly forward and drove a body of the enemy’s sharpshooters from 428 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. a rocky and exposed elevation, pursuing them into the woods beyond. Here it halted and took shelter behind a low stone wall and remained inactive while column after column of Union infantry moved across and perpen- dicular to its front. After these troops had passed, the regiment was ordered forward beyond the wall with instructions to wheel to the left in a rye field. The wheel was about half completed when the enemy was ob- served to be moving rapidly to outflank the right, so the Second halted and opened a rapid and continuous fire, which was sharply returned. Major A. T. Lee, 2d Infantry, commanding the regiment, was wounded at this time, but gallantly retained command until the loss of blood com- pelled him to retire just at the close of the battle, Captain McKee succeed- ing him. The enemy continued to grow stronger on the right flank and the regiment was ordered to retire. The word was scarcely given when three lines of the enemy, elevated one above another on a slope to the right, poured in a most destructive fire, almost decimating the regiment and cutting off the color staff, causing the colors to fall into the hands of the color bearer. Under a most withering fire from the sharpshooters on the left and a column of the enemy’s infantry on the right and rear, overwhelmed with a perfect storm of shot and shell, the regiment fell back slowly, re- crossed the stone wall, the rocky elevation and the marsh in as good order as the formation of the ground would admit, and returned to its original position on the crest of the hill. On June 30 the returns show 13 officers and 224 men present for duty. The regiment was only engaged from about 5.30 p. M. until about dark, and in this short time lost Lieutenant Goodrich and seven men killed, and Major Lee and Lieutenants McLoughlin, Burke and Lacey, with 53 men, wounded. On the third and last day of Gettysburg the regiment was in reserve, and although held in readiness was not engaged again during the battle. The regiment left the battle-field July 5, and having taken part inarecon- noissance near Manassas July 23, reached Warrenton on the 29th, having marched 320 miles since the 1st of June. In August and September the regiment went to New York for the draft riots, and after the return to Virginia in September took part in the Mine Run campaign, but without coming into contact with the enemy. The end of the year 1863 found the regiment encamped at Catlett’s Station, Va. The only event worthy of note which occurred during the next three months was the death of Captain McKee of the regiment, who was killed by guerrillas while riding from one camp to another. In the reorganization incident to the coming of General Grant in the spring of 1864, the Second was placed in the 1st Brigade, 1st Division, 5th Corps. It set out from Rappahannock Station for the Wilderness cam- paign at sunrise on May 1st, and encamped that night at Brandy Station. Crossing the Rapidan at Germannia Ford at noon on the following day, the regiment found itself on the road leading to Mine Run and was ordered forward to attack, driving the enemy some distance back on the pike. It was severely engaged all the afternoon and returned that night to its orig- inal position. Early on the morning of the next day it was placed on picket THE SECOND REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 429 and remained on that duty until two o’clock on the morning of the 8th, when it rejoined the rest of the brigade at Laurel Hill and was engaged there all day. From this time until the end or the month it was one continuous round of marching, fighting, picket duty, and entrenchment building. On the ist of May there were io officers and 181 men present for duty, and during this campaign the loss out of this small number was five officers wounded and 45 men killed, wounded and missing. June i, 1864, the day before the battle of Cold Harbor, the Second In- fantry practically ended its career in the Civil War. The commissioned and enlisted strength had reached such a low figure—less than 100 men— that in accordance with the request of the regimental commander the re- maining enlisted men were transferred to C Company, and that company was given a full complement of officers, non-commissioned officers and men. After the battle of Cold Harbor,—where this company lost 8 men killed and wounded, and two officers and 19 men captured,—it went on duty as provost guard of the 2d Division, 5th Corps. Regimental headquarters were established at Newport Barracks, Ky., late in June, and immediate steps were taken to recruit the regiment. In December, 1864, its total enlisted strength was 405. At this time Head- quarters and Companies A, B, , E, G, I and K, were at Newport Barracks Ky.; C at Elmira, N. Y.; F at Sandusky, Ohio ; and H at Trenton, N. }. In the fall of 1865 the entire regiment (except H Company, at Jefferson- ville, Ind.) was concentrated at Crittenden Barracks. In spite of the ex- traordinary efforts to bring the regiment up to a proper numerical strength it still lacked 314 men in January, 1866, but in July several detachments came out from Fort Columbus, so that at the end of the month only 13 men were required. The regiment remained in Kentucky, with the exception that a few com- panies were temporarily stationed in West Virginia, until April, 1869, when it moved south to Georgia. In accordance with the Act of Congress approved March 3, 1869, the consolidation of the Second Infantry with the Sixteenth took place at At- lanta, Ga., in April and May of that year. By this consolidation Colonel Burbank was succeeded by Colonel S. W. Crawford. Two days after the consolidation the regiment left Atlanta and took station as follows: Head- quarters and Companies B, D and I at Huntsville, Ala.; A, F and K at Mobile, Ala.; C and E at Montgomery, Ala.; and G and H at Atlanta. Headquarters were moved from Huntsville to Mobile in January, 1872. In February, 1872, Colonel Crawford retired, promoting Colonel Wallen. During the same year regimental headquarters left Mobile on account of the prevalence of yellow fever and took station at Mount Vernon Barracks until December when they were transferred to McPherson Barracks. While at this station Colonel Wallen was retired and Lieutenant-Colonel Charles Woods, 5th Infantry, was promoted to the Second, only to be re- tired eight months later. He was succeeded in December, 1874, by Lieu- tenant-Colonel Frank Wheaton, 21st Infantry, who joined the regiment at Atlanta and remained constantly in command until April 25, 1892, when he 430 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. was appointed a brigadier general and took command of the Department of Texas. In October, 1876, several companies were ordered to various points in the South during the excitement attending the presidential election of that year. This delicate duty having been satisfactorily performed the com- panies returned to their proper stations and for the first time since the Civil War the entire regiment was together at Atlanta in April, 1877. In February of this year Lieutenant McIntyre was brutally murdered in Gelnier County, Ga., while on duty with and guarding two U. S. deputy marshals and revenue officers engaged in arresting illicit distillers. The party, consisting of Lieutenant McIntyre, one corporal and two deputies, were in the house of one Jones, seated and talking quietly, when an armed mob of 25 or 30 supposed illicit distillers surrounded the house, burst open the front door, and with insults and imprecations commenced a rapid dis- charge of fire-arms at the four men and several women and children in the room. After a desperate fight of five or more minutes, Lieutenant McIn- tyre fell dead at the front door, shot through the heart. He was much beloved in the regiment and had served continuously and creditably in the field during the war. The regiment had now been in the South since leav- ing the field at Cold Harbor in June, 1864. During this time the companies had been constantly moving from point to point, sometimes by rail or boat and again by marching. Their duty was most arduous and disagreeable,— acting as posses for U. S. marshals, enforcing the election laws and the laws attendant on the reconstruction, breaking up illicit distilleries, etc., etc. The following were some of their stations:—Guyandotte, W. Va., Jackson- ville, Ala., Summerville, Ga., Columbia, S. C., Tuscaloosa, Spartanburg, Chattanooga, Asheville, Tallahassee, St. Augustine and Aiken. The Nez Perces Indians were on the warpath in the spring and summer of 1877, and the regiment was ordered to Idaho and Washington Territory to take part in the campaign. It left Atlanta July 13, and proceeded by rail and boat to Lewiston, Idaho, where it arrived after a journey of 16 days. Soon after arriving, the regiment marched to Spokane Falls to head off the Indians who were reported as moving in that direction. The troops were on the move all that summer and fall, but in December had settled down for the winter at the following stations :—Headquarters and Companies A, B, D, F and G, at Fort Lapwai, I. T.; E at Fort Colville, W. T.; C and K at Mount Idaho; and H and I at Spokane Falls, W. T. In March and April, 1878, Companies A, G, H and I, Lieutenant-Colonel H. C. Merriam commanding, established Camp Cceur d’Alene, I. T., at the source of the Spokane River on Cceur d’Alene Lake, and soon after com- menced the construction of the most beautifully situated post in the country —Fort Sherman. In the spring of this year the Bannock Indians left their reservation, and a portion of the regiment was out until late in the fall and aided materially in bringing them to terms. Company C did harder work in this campaign than any other organization in the regiment, marching over 1630 miles. The following June saw this company in the field again. This time they were after a marauding band of Indians known as the “ Sheep-eaters.” THE SECOND REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 431 While passing through a deep canon near Big Creek, I. T., on July 27, they were ambushed and had two men wounded. Two days later they struck the Indians again and had a slight skirmish but no casualties, and on August 29 they lost one man killed in action near the same place. Regimental Headquarters moved from Fort Lapwai to Fort Cceur d’Alene in August, and Companies D, E and F, marched to Lake Chelan, W. T., and established the camp since immortalized by the regimental ballad, “ When Camp Chelan was new.” January, 1880, found the regiment stationed as follows:—Headquarters and Companies A, B and G, at Fort Coeur d’Alene, I. T.; C and H at Fort Colville, W. T.; D, E and I, at Camp Chelan, W. T.; F at Fort Harney, Ore., and K at Camp Howard, I. T. In October the companies at Chelan, including Company F, which arrived there in August, moved to the junction of the Spokane and Columbia rivers and commenced the construction of the post now known as Fort Spokane. During the remainder of the regiment’s sojourn in the Northwest, little of note occurred to break the monotony of frontier garrison life. Boise Barracks, I. T., Fort Klamath, Ore., and Fort Townsend, W. T., were garri- soned by companies of the regiment before they came East in 1886 to Fort Omaha, Neb., where they are stationed at the present date (March, 1895). The regiment was engaged in the Sioux Campaign of 1890-91 at Pine Ridge, and was under fire at the defense of the agency at that place. The present colonel, John C. Bates, was promoted to the regiment from the 20th Infantry in April, 1892, when General Wheaton was promoted brigadier general. THE THIRD REGIMENT OF INFANTRY* Lieutenant J. H. McRAE, 3D U. S. Infantry. THE Third United States Infantry first came into being under the Act of March 5, 1792, an act for making farther and more effectual pro- visions for the protection of the frontiers of the United States, and which, among other things, provided for the raising of three additional regiments of infantry, also for the completion of the battalion of artillery and two regiments of infantry already in the service. Under the provisions of Section 3 of the above named act, the Third Infantry was, by direction of President Washington, organized as the infantry of the Third Sub-legion. In the reorganization of the army, November 1, 1796, under the Act of May 30, 1796, the infantry of the Third Sub-legion became the Third Regi- ment of Infantry, with Lieutenant-Colonel Henry Gaither as its first commandant. From its organization till 1800 the regiment was stationed along the northwestern frontier. It accompanied General Anthony Wayne in his successful campaign against the Indians in 1794, during which the entire regiment was engaged in action against hostile Indians at Fort Recovery, Ohio, June 30, and again at the rapids of the Miami of Lake Erie, August 20, Lieutenant Robert Craig being killed in the former engagement. In 1800 the regiment was transferred to the Mississippi Territory with head- quarters at Fort Adams. Under the Act of March 16, 1802, the regiment was discharged on the first of the following June, and it remained out of service until its reorgan- ization under the act of April 12, 1808, with Edward Pasteur as its first colonel. Colonel Pasteur resigned January 1, 1810, and was succeeded by Colonel William Dent Beall, promoted from the 5th Infantry. On the 24th of April, 1812, Joseph Constant of the Fifth Infantry became colonel of the Third by transfer. He resigned August 15, 1813, and was succeeded by Colonel Gilbert C. Russell. From its reorganization till the War of 1812, the regiment was stationed at various posts throughout the southern Atlantic States, from which States it had been recruited. During the War of 1812 it was in the seventh Mili- tary District, the headquarters of which were at New Orleans. It partici- pated in the campaign against the Creek Indians, which commenced with the massacre at Fort Mimms, August 30, 1813, followed by a general uprising of the Indians along the southwestern frontier, and ended with the bloody battle of Emucfau, or Horse Shoe Bend, March 25, 1814, where Jackson first distinguished himself as a military commander, and where the power of the great Creek nation was broken forever. * An abridgment of Lieut. J. H. McRae’s History of the 3d Infantry.” THE THIRD REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 433 A part of the regiment was with Jackson at the capture of Pensacola, Florida, November 7, 1814, and a part was with him later when the brilliant victory of New Orleans was won. In the reorganization of the army under the Act of March 3, 1815, the Third was consolidated with the 2d, 7th, and 44th, to form the First Regi- ment of Infantry; and a new Third was formed by the consolidation of the 1st, 17th, 24th, 28th, and 30th regiments. The Third Infantry, there- fore, includes the oldest organization in the United States Army,—the original First Infantry, which was organized under a resolve of Congress of June 3, 1784. Colonel John Miller of the 17th was retained as colonel of the Third, Colonel Russell being honorably discharged. Lieutenant-Colo- nel Matthew Arbuckle, 3d Infantry, remained as lieutenant-colonel under the new organization, and Major Charles K. Gardner, the author of the designation of companies by the first letters of the alphabet, became major of the regiment. Major Gardner was succeeded the following year by Major Zachary Taylor, who was reinstated as major of the Third Infantry, having been honorably discharged at the time of the reorganization. He was promoted to the 4th Infantry April 20, 1819. For the next eleven years the regiment was stationed along the Great Lakes and vicinity, garrisoning at different times the posts of Detroit, Mackinac, Forts Howard, Dearborn, Knox, Harrison, Wayne, Crawford, etc. The headquarters were at Detroit from 1815 till 1821, when they were transferred to Fort Howard, remaining at the latter place until the summer of 1826. Upon the resignation of Colonel Miller, February 10, 1818, Lieutenant- Colonel Joseph Lee Smith, 3d Infantry, became colonel of the regiment, and remained in command until the reorganization of the army in June, 1821, when he was honorably discharged and Colonel Ninian Pinkney became colonel of the Third in his place. In 1826 the regiment was transferred to Missouri, and in September was at “ Camp Miller,” where it assisted in the construction of a new post which subsequently was named Jefferson Barracks. In the spring of 1827 Colonel Leavenworth (who had succeeded Colonel Pinkney upon the death of the latter in December, 1825), with Companies B, D, E and H, selected the present site of Fort Leavenworth, and in April of the following year the en- tire regiment, except Companies C and G at Fort Armstrong, was concen- trated at Cantonment Leavenworth, but in the spring of 1829 returned to Jefferson Barracks. Companies E and K, under Captain Lewis, left Jefferson Barracks No- vember 26, and arrived at camp on Black Creek, Choctaw Nation, Decem- ber 31. Companies A, C, G and I, forming the first battalion, under Major S. W. Kearny, left Jefferson Barracks, December 14, 1830, for service in the Choctaw Nation, and arrived at Natchitoches, on the Red River, where it went into camp, on the 31st. In November, 1831, this battalion took station at Cantonment Towson, Choctaw Nation, near the southeast corner of what is now the Indian Territory. In September of that year the field and staff, with Companies B, D, F and H, were transferred from Jefferson Bar- racks to Cantonment Jesup, La., where the headquarters of the regiment 434 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. were established and remained, except for a few short intervals, until or- dered to Florida in the fall of 1840. General Orders of February 12, 1834, placed Colonel Leavenworth in command of the Left Wing, Western Department, and while on an expedi- tion in what is now the Indian Territory, he died at “ Cross Timbers,” 120 miles west of Fort Towson, on the 21st of July following. He was succeeded by Colonel James Many, who joined at Fort Jesup and assumed command of the regiment January 3, 1835. Colonel Many re- mained colonel of the regiment, though unqualified by age and physical dis- ability for active service, until his death, February 3, 1852, when he was suc- ceeded by Colonel Thomas Staniford, promoted from the Eighth. Colonel Staniford never joined, and upon his death just three years later, he was succeeded by Colonel Benjamin L. E. Bonneville, whose adventures are made famous by Irving, promoted from the Fourth Infantry. Colonel Bon- neville joined the following December and assumed command of the regi- ment, which he retained until his retirement, September 9, 1861. In the spring of 1837 Companies B and E, under Brevet Major Belknap, were detached from the garrison of Fort Jesup to the Sabine River for the purpose of opening it up to steamboat navigation from Cook’s Ferry to its mouth, a distance of about 300 miles. The two companies first formed a camp for the purpose of building boats by which means to descend and im- prove the course of the river, opposite Sabine Town, Texas. Starting on the downward course September 23, when the river was about at its lowest, the work of removing snags and overhanging trees was commenced and pro- gressed from day to day until the “ Raft,” or great jam of logs, was encoun- tered nearly half way from Cook’s Ferry to the head of Sabine Bay. This was an almost solid mass of surface and sunken timber completely blocking the river from bank to bank. The work of cutting out a practicable chan- nel through the obstructing mass was finally effected through the incessant labor of two weeks, and upon arriving at the mouth of the river the com- mand crossed Sabine Bay to a point on the Louisiana side, where it arrived and went into camp November 27. The companies remained there until the following summer when they returned to Fort Jesup. Having been ordered to join the army in Florida the entire regiment was, during the month of October, 1840, en route to Fort Brooke, Tampa Bay, via New Orleans, and by November 20 was concentrated at Fort Brooke, Major Wilson commanding, Colonel Many being on sick leave and Lieutenant-Colonel Vose on detached service as superintendent of the gen- eral recruiting service. For the next two and a half years the regiment bore its full share of the hardships and arduous duties incident to the Florida War. From Fort Brooke the companies were dispersed to numerous detached posts and camps throughout middle and west Florida and along the Georgia border, constantly engaged the year round, patrolling and scouting the surround- ing country and swamps in search of, and to protect settlers against, small bands of marauding Indians. Major Wilson commanded the regiment and the Western District until relieved by Colonel Vose, November 22, 1841, who continued in command until March 29 of the following year, when. THE THIRD REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 435 having been promoted to the 4th Infantry, he was in turn relieved by Major Wilson. The latter having been promoted to the First Infantry, was re- lieved in command July 25, 1842, by Captain Clark, the senior officer pres- ent. Lieutenant-Colonel Hitchcock joined and assumed command of Fort Stansbury and the Western District on the 12th, and of the regiment on the 29th of October, which command he retained during the remainder of the war. After the pacification of August 14, 1842, the troops remaining in Florida (the Third and Eighth Regiments of Infantry and six companiesof the Fourth) were concentrated, detached camps being drawn in and a num- ber of posts abandoned. The headquarters of the Third were at Fort Stansbury, 12 miles from Tallahassee. The aggregate strength of the regi- ment at this time was 690 men. Three companies were stationed at Can- tonment Morgan, Horse Key; and one company each at Forts Pleasants, Robert Gamble, Hamilton, Stansbury, Ocilla, and Brooke. Although General Worth’s order of August 14 announced that hostili- ties with the Indians had ceased, yet they were to be carefully watched by the military, and those who violated their treaty agreements to be secured if possible and removed to their new home in Arkansas. Tiger Tail, the most noted chief remaining in Florida, and who had been the principal in- strument in protracting the war three years, disregarding his promise to move south to the allotted reservation, was surprised and captured in his camp by Lieutenant T. Jordan, 3d Infantry, with a detachment of 20 men. A band of Creeks under the chief Pascoffer, on the Ocklockonnee River, was causing much apprehension along the border of West Florida. Lieutenant-Colonel Hitchcock, commanding Third Infantry, stationed at Fort Stansbury, was ordered to besiege the country by land and water, with boats, mounted men and footmen. These operations, characterized by great skill and energy on Colonel Hitchcock’s part, seconded by the zealous ex- ertions of the officers of the regiment, resulted in the surrender of Pascof- fer and his band of 51 souls (29 warriors) January 9, 1843. By this capture middle and west Florida were relieved entirely of Indians, and the whole territory of the most inveterate of her foes. Peace being at last restored to Florida, the regular force remaining in the Territory was reduced to one regiment—the Eighth Infantry, and the Third was sent to Jefferson Barracks, where it arrived and reestablished the regimental headquarters on the 22d of April, 1843. During the regiment’s service in Florida it had lost three men killed, and three officers and 65 men who died of disease. In the summer of 1843 the eight companies of the regiment stationed at Jefferson Barracks (K and I having been detached to Fort Leavenworth shortly after the return of the regiment from Florida) and eight companies of the Fourth, were formed into a school for brigade drill under Colonel Kearny, and so thoroughly were they drilled and disciplined during the summer and fall of 1843, and the winter of 1843 44, that they gained a repu- tation throughout the service which placed them in the forefront of the army. In the spring of 1844 the entire regiment was transferred to Camp Wil- 436 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. kins, near Fort Jesup, and with the Fourth Infantry at Camp Salubrity and seven companies of the Second Dragoons at Fort Jesup, became the “ Army of Observation ” under General Zachary Taylor. During the summer of 1845 the regiment was transferred to Corpus Christi, Texas, where it arrived in the early part of August, and with the 4th, 5th, 7th, and 8th Regiments of Infantry, seven companies of the Second Dragoons, four batteries of light artillery, and one regiment of heavy artillery serving as infantry,— about 3000 in all,—became the “ Army of Observation of Texas,” still under the command of General Taylor. The regiment remained in camp at Corpus Christi until March 11, 1846, when, as part of the Third Brigade, it took up the march for the Rio Grande with Captain Lewis N. Morris in command. Lieutenant-Colonel Hitchcock was absent sick, and did not afterwards serve with the regiment during the war, but was on General Scott’s staff as inspector general of the army, during the campaign from Vera Cruz to the City of Mexico. Arriv- ing at the Rio Grande on the 29th at a point directly opposite the city of Matamoras, the regiment went into camp, where it furnished its daily quota of officers and men for duty in the construction of the field work after- wards called Fort Brown. On the 1st of May, the work being sufficiently advanced, the command- ing general made a movement towards the coast for the purpose of estab- lishing a base of supplies. The Third Infantry, forming a part of the com- mand, arrived at Point Isabel on the 2d, and remained there until the afternoon of the 7th, at which time the army commenced its march for its former position opposite Matamoras. The regiment was engaged in the actions of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma on the 8th and 9th of May, in the latter warmly, but it fortunately escaped with but little loss, the ser- geant major and one private being killed, and one officer and six enlisted men wounded. The regiment, with one company of the Second Dragoons and one battery of artillery, was ordered to pursue the enemy after Resaca de la Palma, which it did with vigor, halting only on the bank of the Rio Grande, where it bivouacked for the night and where it remained until the nth when it moved to the old camp opposite Matamoras. Major Lear joined from sick leave on the 16th and assumed command of the regiment. Crossing the river on the 18th the regiment remained in camp near Matamoras until the movement upon Monterey commenced in July. While in camp at Matamoras Companies A, B, E and G, having the smallest number of officers present, were temporarily broken up, the pri- vates being transferred toother companies and the officers, non-commis- sioned officers and musicians sent on recruiting service. Company A was afterwards reorganized at Vera Cruz, when D was broken up and the men transferred to A. Companies B, D and E, were reorganized and joined the headquarters of the regiment at Puebla in August, 1847. Company G was reorganized at Governor’s Island the following year and joined at Puebla on the regiment’s return march from the City of Mexico. In thelatter part of July the Third, brigaded with the Fourth with Colonel Garland as brigade commander, commenced the advance into the interior. Marching first to Camargo, thence to Monterey, it was warmly engaged in THE THIRD REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 437 the actions which ensued on the 21st, 22d, and 23d of September. On the 21st the regiment formed part of the assaulting column upon the eastern defenses of the city, which were gallantly carried, with a loss, however, to the regiment of six of its most gallant and valuable officers and 16 men killed ; and one officer (Captain Bainbridge) and 29 men wounded,—a total loss of 52 out of an effective strength of 14 officers and 248 men. The following named officers were killed : Captains L. N. Morris, P. N. Barbour, and G. P. Field, and Lieutenants D. S. Irwin and Robert Hazlitt. The last named was killed while fearlessly exposing himself in attempting to place his mor- tally wounded commanding officer under cover. Major Lear died October 31 of the wounds then received. Upon the death of Major Lear the com- mand of the regiment devolved upon Captain Bainbridge, who, upon his promotion to the 7th Infantry in the following February, was succeeded by Captain E. B. Alexander who retained the command until the close of the war. After the surrender of Monterey on the 24th September the regiment was encamped at Walnut Springs, about four miles from the city, where it remained until the 13th of December, when it, together with most of the regular troops under General Taylor, took up the line of march for Tampico, en route to Vera Cruz. At Tampico the troops embarked for the general rendezvous at Lobos Island, thence to Vera Cruz, where they landed March 9, 1847, and the regiment took part in the siege of the place which followed. After the capture of Vera Cruz, General Scott’s army was detained a month awaiting transportation, and then began that brilliant and wonderful march to the City of Mexico, during which there was not even a skirmish in which our troops were not victorious, and always against greatly superior numbers (sometimes three to one) posted in strong works and natural de- fenses. The Third Infantry was still in Smith’s Brigade, Twiggs’Division, which was the first to leave VeraCruz, taking up the line of march April 8, 1847. The enemy was first discovered strongly posted on the heights of Cerro Gordo, the first high spur of mountain met with on the national road from Vera Cruz to the City of Mexico. In the battle of April 18, the regiment was commanded by Captain Alexander, and with the 7th Infantry and 1st Artillery, under Colonel Harney, 2d Dragoons (General Smith being sick), formed the assaulting column to carry the heights of Telegrafo, the key- point of the enemy’s position, which was crowned with artillery and strengthened with palisades and breastworks. This strong and important position was carried by a brilliant charge—the Seventh on the right, the Third on the left, and the First Artillery in rear as support. General Scott makes special mention of this charge in his report of the battle. After explaining the great importance of carrying the position and naming the troops detached for the purpose, he says : “ The style of execution, which I had the pleasure to witness, was most brilliant and decisive. The brigade ascended the long and difficult slope of Cerro Gordo, without shelter and under tremendous fire of artillery and musketry, with the utmost steadiness, reaching the breastworks drove the enemy from them planted the colors of the First Artillery, Third and 438 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Seventh Infantry, the enemy’s flag still flying, and after some minutes of sharp firing finished the conquest with the bayonet. It is a most pleasing duty to say that the highest praise is due to Harney, Childs, Plympton, Loring, Alexander, their gallant officers and men, for this brilliant service, independent of the great results which followed.” The Telegrafo being captured there was but a feeble and brief resistance offered at other points. Our army gained a most complete and decisive victory. The Third formed part of the pursuing column, which so hotly pressed the retreating army that nearly the whole of it was dispersed and disorganized. The losses of the regiment in this battle were 9 men killed or mortally wounded; and two officers (Lieutenants Ward and Bee) and 24 men wounded. The victorious army now moved on to Jalapa and from there to Puebla. As the time of about 4000 of General Scott’s volunteers had expired, the army was delayed here until August before sufficient reinforcements were received to warrant an advance. The onward movement from Puebla com- menced August 7, with Twiggs’ Division, to which the Third still belongeo, again in advance, it being a rule with General Scott that one of the two regular divisions should always be in front. From Puebla to the City of Mexico is about 160 miles, and the army, having crossed the Rio Frio Mountains without opposition, descended into the basin in which the city is situated and arrived at Ayotla August 11, at which place and along Lake Chaleo, the army was concentrated preparatory to an advance upon the City of Mexico. The Third Infantry, still under Captain Alexander and in Smith’s Brigade,—which was temporarily commanded by Major Dimick, 1st Artil- lery, General Smith being in command of all the forces which made the attack,—was warmly engaged and took a gallant and important part in the battle of August 19th and 20th, the first of those remarkable battles around and in view of the City of Mexico, and which resulted in the capture on the morning of the 20th of the important position of El Pedregal, or Con- treras. On the afternoon of the same day—August 20—the most severe of all the battles fought in the basin of Mexico took place at the hamlet of Churubusco, which contained a fortified convent and a strong field work at the head of the bridge over which the causeway to the capital passed. Im- mediately after the victory of Contreras General Scott moved his little army, confident of another victory, against these strong works held by at least three times his numbers, the whole remaining force of Mexico being assembled in or in supporting distance of them, with the determination to make a last desperate stand to save their beloved capital. To Twiggs’ Division was given the capture of the citadel of the works, the strongly fortified convent, and in the assault which followed the ever gallant “ Buff Sticks”* played the most conspicuous part. That part is best told in Gen- eral Scott’s own words. In his report of the battle he says : * A designation by which the regiment was universally known on account of its clean, sol- dierly appearance at all times. “ Finally, twenty minutes after the tete de pont had been carried by THE THIRD REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. Worth and Pillow, and at the end of a desperate conflict of two hours and a half, the church or convent—the citadel of the strong line of defense along the rivulet of Churubusco—yielded to Twiggs’ Division and threw out on all sides signals of surrender. The white flags, however, were not exhibited until the moment when the Third Infantry, under Captain Alexander, had cleared the way by fire and bayonet and had entered the work. Captains J. M. Smith and O. L. Shepherd, both of that regiment, with their com- panies had the glory of leading the assault. The former received the sur- render and Captain Alexander instantly hung out from the balcony the colors of the gallant Third.” The following extract is from the report of the Mexican officer in command : “ The first to present himself upon the parapet was the valiant Captain James M. Smith of the Third Infantry, who gave an example of valor to many following him ; and no less magnanimous than daring, scarcely had he ascertained that now, on our part, no resistance was made, than he showed a white flag.” The losses of the regiment at Contreras and Churubusco were six men killed ; one missing; and three officers (Captains Craig and Chandler, and Lieutenant Buell) and 26 men wounded. After their defeats at Contreras and Churubusco, and after losing in killed and prisoners a number equal to our entire army, and treble as much ordnance as our army had in its siege train and field batteries, the enemy fell back to the very gates of the city. Pending negotiations for peace between the two governments an armistice was agreed upon, which went into effect August 23, and our army went into cantonment in the neighboring villages along the slopes of the mountains to the south of the city. The Mexicans were so enraged by the ultimatum given by our government on the 2d of September, that they immediately commenced to strengthen their defenses, in violation of the terms of truce, whereupon General Scott declared the armistice at an end and commenced preparations to enter the capital, result- ing in the battles of Molino del Rey, Chapultepec, and Mexico, on the 8th, 13th and 14th days of September, respectively. General Smith’s Brigade having been left at San Angel as a reserve and as a guard to the general depot, the Third did not participate in the capture of Molino del Rey, but was actively and gallantly engaged in the other battles. On the 12th Companies D and I were detached to support the battery engaged in bombarding the Mexican fortifications at the Garita Ninio, Perdido. On the same evening a selected party of three officers and 57 men was detached to form a part of the storming party of regular troops against the fortress of Chapultepec. On the morning of the 13th the main body of the regiment (Companies D and I having not yet joined) moved forward to support the attack upon that strong fortress, Smith’s Brigade having reinforced Quitman’s Division and forming the right of the column. Chapultepec was carried about 9,30 A. M. on the 13th, and the regiment then pushed forward in pursuit of the retreating army, and participated in the taking of the different batteries along the Belen causeway leading into the city, particularly at the Garita de Belen, or southwest gate of the city, which 440 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. was taken with considerable loss, the troops being under both direct and flank fire from the strong fortress, called the Citadel, just within the gate, and from behind the stone pillarsand arches of the aqueduct along the road. Here the regiment, Companies D and I having joined late in the afternoon, remained during the night. Worth’s Division had pursued the enemy along the San Cosme causeway and had also entered the city by the San Cosme gate. These victories of the 13th of September closed the active operations of the war. Early on the morning of the 14th, the Third, which had so signally distinguished itself during this war, was among the first (Quitman’s Division) who marched into the grand plaza of the city and hoisted the Stars and Stripes over the “ Halls of the Montezumas.”* General Santa Anna had evacuated the city during the night, but before doing so had liberated some 2000 convicts, who, joined by about as many others—deserters and populace—caused considerable annoyance and casu- alty to the army when it entered the city, by firing upon it from housetops, etc. The Third was engaged during the greater part of the 14th in sup- pressing this outbreak, with severe loss to the regiment. The losses of the regiment on the 13th and 14th of September were 12 killed or mortally wounded, and 48 wounded. During the whole war the regiment lost 52 (including six officers) killed, and 140 (including seven officers) wounded.! The war was now over, but following the excitement of the recent battles and the capture of the city, irregular diet, etc., many men of the regiment fell sick and died. The returns show that from April till Decem- ber, 1847, there were 120 deaths in the regiment from disease. The army remained in and around the City of Mexico until the follow- ing June, when the treaty of peace having been ratified by the United States Senate, the evacuation commenced. The Third Infantry left the city on the morning of the 5th, and arrived at Vera Cruz July 3. Left Vera Cruz on the 9th on the ship Masconomo, and arrived at Camp Jefferson Davis, East Pascagoula, Miss., July 21, 1848. In October and November Headquarters and Companies A, B, C, E, I and K, were transferred to Texas, taking station at Camp Salado, four miles from San Antonio; and Companies D, F, G and H, to Jefferson Barracks, where they remained until the following April when they were sent to Fort Leavenworth. During the winter of 1848-49, while the Texas battalion under Brevet Major Van Horne was encamped on the Salado River, at about 1 o’clock on a quiet starlit morning the sentinel over the storehouse suddenly found him- self walking in water. He gave the alarm and in an instant the hitherto peaceful camp was in a furore of excitement and terror, for as men, women and children tumbled out of bed, they found themselves in water. When * There is a drum-major’s baton now in possession of the regiment, presented to it by its old brigade commander, General Persifor F. Smith, the wooden portion of which is part of the flagstaff of the capitol building, or national palace, of Mexico, and the metal portion is made of Mexican silver. f Of the officers serving with the Third Infantry during the Mexican War, six afterwards be- came major generals of volunteers during the Civil War, and one a major general and one a brigadier general in the C. S. A. THE THIRD REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 441 the sun arose that morning the insignificant rill of the night before had be- come a sea of raging waters, in some places two or more miles in width. Every vestige of the camp was completely swept away by the force of the torrent, but such had been the promptness, efficiency and discipline of all concerned that only one life was lost, that of a non-commissioned officer of the regimental staff, supposed to have been drowned in his sleep. His body was never recovered. The regiment lost everything,—clothing, bag- gage, personal effects, private papers, etc., while the Government lost arms, ammunition, quartermaster and subsistence stores, everything except the horses and mules which had saved themselves and helped to save the women and children. The force of the flood was so great, that, with the ex- ception of one armchest full of muskets found lodged in a drift in the Cibolo River, some 50 miles below the camp, nothing was ever recovered. During the month of May, 1849, there were 35 deaths from cholera in the companies at Camp Salado and n in the battalion at Fort Leaven- worth. On the 1st of June, 1849, the six companies in Texas under Major Van Horne were sent to El Paso del Norte, arriving at camp five miles below El Paso September 8, a distance of about 670 miles. Companies D, F, G and H, under Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel Alexander (who was also commanding the regiment), left Fort Leavenworth about the middle of May for Santa Fe, where they arrived July 22. The entire regiment was now in New Mex- ico, headquarters and three companies being at Santa Fe ; two companies at the post opposite El Paso ; and the others scattered along the Rio Grande as far north as Taos, N. M. The regiment remained in New Mexico until i860, and the returns show the different companies to have been almost continuously on the march (while not engaged in building new posts) changing stations, escorting trains over hundreds of miles of trackless wilderness infested with hostile Indians, on exploring expeditions, scouts, and campaigns against Indians. The following is a list of the engagements with Indians, and some of the more important expeditions in which portions of the regiment took part during this time : August 16 to September 26; expedition against Navajo Indians; Compa- nies D, F, G and H. October 17 to November 12; expedition against Apache Indians ; Company E. 1849. 1852. February 6 ; engagement with Apaches near Fort Webster ; Company K ; three men killed. February 19 to March 31 ; expedition against Apaches on Gila River; Company B. June 6; Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel L. S. Craig was shot and killed by two deserters from Fort Yuma, while in command of the International Boundary Line Survey escort, of which his company (A) formed part. 1854. April 6 to June 15 ; expedition against the Jicarilla Apaches; Company G. April 14 to May 11 ; scout into the White Mountains against Mescalero Apaches ; Company C. June 18 to August 15 ; expedition against Mescalero 442 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. Apaches near head of RioYula; Companies A, E and I. June 30, Lieu- tenant J. E. Maxwell killed in action with Jicarilla Apaches near Moro River, 40 miles south of Fort Union, while in command of a detachment of the Second Dragoons. 1856. March ; expedition against Gila and Mogollan Apaches; Companies B and I, which marched between 500 and 600 miles during the month and en- gaged the enemy at Sierra Almagre on the 21st, and near Rio Meimbris on the 29th. March 20 ; engagement with Apaches, Fort Thorn ; detachments of D, F and I. 1857. January 31 to February 5 ; expedition to Canon Medera against Apaches; Company I. April to September; expedition against the Gila and Mogollon Apaches, under Colonel Bonneville; Companies B, C, I and K and detach- ment of E, with following engagements : May 24, Canon de los Muertos Carneros, B and detachment E ; June 2, Mogollon Mountains, C and detachment F; June 27, Gila River with Coyotero Apaches, C and detachments of F and K; one officer and three men wounded with arrows. 1858. January 1 to February xi; scout against Kiowa Indians in neighborhood of Manzana ; Company F. March to September; Mormon expedition into Utah ; Companies A, E and F. May 30 ; engagement with Navajo Indians at Ewell’s hay camp near Fort Defiance; detachments of B and G. Sep- tember, October and November; campaign against Navajos; engagements: September 19 to 24, Canon de Chelly, Company G; September 25, Laguna Negra, Company B; October 1, Bear Springs, Company B; October 10, Ranchos de los Anagones, Company G; November 9, near Fort De- fiance, Company F. 1859. January 27 to February 5 ; scouts into the Pueblo Indian country near Zuni; Company B. July 18 to August 17; scout to Moqui villages and region south and west of Fort Defiance; Company K. August and Sep- tember ; scouts into the Navajo country; Companies C, D, E and K. No- vember I to 12; campaign against Tuni-Cha Navajos; Companies B, C and G. November 14; engagement with Tuni-Cha Navajo Indians near Fort Defiance ; detachments of B, C, E and G. i860. January 17 ; engagement with Navajos near Fort Defiance; detachments of B, C, E and G. January 18 to 22 ; engagements with Navajos near Fort Defiance and Sixteen Mile Pond ; detachments of B, C, E, F and G. Feb- ruary 8; engagement with Navajos near Fort Defiance; detachments of B, C, E and G. April 5; engagement with Navajos near Fort Defiance; detachment of B. April 30; attack on Fort Defiance by Navajos;* Com- panies B, C and E. * For full account see “ Reminiscences of Fort Defiance, N. M., i860,” published in No. 13, Vol. 4, Journal of the Military Service Institution. THE THIRD REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 443 During the summer and fall of i860 the regiment was transferred from the Department of New Mexico to that of Texas, where the companies were distributed as follows:—Headquarters and Companies B, D, G, H and K, at Fort Clark, Colonel Bonneville commanding; Companies A, C and E, at Ringgold Barracks, Lieutenant-Colonel Electus Backus commanding; Com- panies F and I at Fort McIntosh, Major C. C. Sibley commanding. These were the stations of the different companies at the close of the year i860. As the mighty war clouds which hovered over the country were then fast lowering, the regular troops stationed in Texas were ordered to evacu- ate that State by way of the coast. Headquarters and Companies B, D, G, H and K, under Brevet Major O. L. Shepherd (Colonel Bonneville on leave), left Fort Clark March 19, 1861, and arrived at Indianola on the 7th of April. The line of march took them through the city of San Antonio, just before reaching which instructions were received from Colonel Waite (who had relieved General Twiggs of the command of the Department), that, as there was some excitement among the citizens of the place, it would be well if the command marched around the city. “ However, the old regiment was not in the habit of sneaking around by the by-ways when the main road was open, and Major Shepherd called a council of the officers ; the matter was laid before them, and without a dis- senting voice it was determined that the trunks and boxes should be opened and full dress uniform gotten out and put on, band instruments unpacked, and the regimental flags removed from their cases; and that we should march through San Antonio with everything that we possessed flying, blowing and beating; so that for awhile everything was in confusion, and the leeward side of every wagon in the train became an extemporized dressing-room.” Thus they entered and passed through the town with “ colors flying, band playing, and every man and officer as fine as brass and bullion could make him.” * At Indianola the command embarked for New York Harbor, where it arrived April 25. Companies C and E had embarked for Fort Hamilton, N.Y. Harbor, the month before. From there they were sent to Fort Pickens, Florida, where they arrived April 16, and participated in the following engagements before joining the headquarters of the regiment the ensuing year : Santa Rosa Island, October 9; bombardment of Fort Pickens, November 22 and 23; Fort Barrancas, January 1 ; and Fort Pickens, May 9 to 12. The companies lost two men killed and seven wounded. Companies A, F and I, less fortunate, were compelled to surrender to an overwhelming force of Confederates under Colonel Van Dorn, at Mata- gorda Bay, near Indianola, April 26, the men and officers being paroled until such time as they could be exchanged. They rejoined the headquar- ters of the regiment the following year, every enlisted man being reported “ present or accounted for,” although many had received tempting offers of commissions in the Confederate service. The headquarters and battalion of five companies left Fort Hamilton ♦Major Bell on the evacuation of Texas by the Third Infantry. 444 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. for Washington May 9, and in the early part of June the battalion was or- dered to reinforce General Patterson’s command. It went by rail to Car- lisle, Pa., and marched to and forded the Potomac near Williamsport, making part of one day’s march toward the enemy, when it was recalled to Washington, making a forced march while returning which rivalled—at least in the amount of fatigue it imposed—the famous retreat from Bull Run, the command being on their feet and marching for twenty hours out of twenty-four. On the 4th of July the battalion was transferred from Washington to Arlington Heights where it remained until the 16th, when, with two com- panies of the Second and one of the Eighth Infantry, all formed into one battalion under Major George Sykes, it took its place in the column start- ing out on that short and memorable campaign ending in the disastrous battle of Bull Run. This “small but incomparable body of infantry,” the only regular infantry in the column, formed part of the First Brigade (Por- ter’s), Second Division (Hunter’s). It is impossible in the limits of this sketch to give more than the briefest outline of the part taken by the regiment in this campaign or in any of the campaigns and battles which followed, but it is not necessary to do more, as that part is a portion of the written history of our country. Its gallant conduct in this, the first great battle of the war, its unflinching steadfast- ness and perfect order in covering the flight of the panic stricken army, was but a presage of that which was to distinguish it throughout the war. The regiment lost in this battle five men killed, 26 missing, and four wounded ; also two officers wounded and taken prisoners. After the battle of Bull Run the battalion returned to Washington and there formed part of the Provost Guard. A few days after its return it was reviewed by President Lincoln accompanied by General McDowell. “In their passage down the line they drew rein in front of the colors, when the general, turning to Mr. Lincoln, said, * Mr. President, there are the men who saved your army at Bull Run.’ The President, looking up and down the line, replied, ‘ I’ve heard of them.’ ” During the winter of 1861-62 the battalion of the regiment, brigaded with the Tenth Infantry, remained encamped at Franklin Square. Two of the paroled companies (F and I) having been exchanged, joined during the winter from Fort Hamilton. Companies C and E joined from Florida the following June in time to participate in the seven day’s fight on the Penin- sula. Company A did not join until the following fall when the whole regiment was once more united. In March, 1862, the Third left Washington for Fortress Monroe to join McClellan’s army previous to its advance to Yorktown. It was commanded by Major N. B. Rossell (Colonel Charles F. Smith, who had succeeded Colonel Bonneville upon his retirement in September, 1861, being on detached service as major general of volunteers) and formed part of the Regular Brigade, commanded by General Sykes. The regiment participated in the siege of Yorktown and in the Seven Days’ Fight, taking a very con- spicuous and gallant part in the battle of Gaines’ Mill, June 27, when its commanding officer and six men were killed, 19 men wounded, and 19 miss- THE THIRD REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 445 ing; and of Malvern Hill, June 30 and July 2, in which Lieutenant McGuire and four men were killed, 11 men wounded and 9 missing. Upon the death of Major Rossell the command of the regiment devolved upon Captain John D. Wilkins, who retained it until the following spring. Colonel Smith died April 25,1862, and Colonel William Hoffman, promoted from the Eighth Infantry, became colonel of the regiment and remained such until the consolidation in 1869. He did not serve with the regiment, however, during the war, being on detached service as commissary general of prisoners. From the Peninsula the regiment, with its division (now become Sykes’ Division of Regulars) was transferred to the Army of Virginia under General Pope—joining in time to participate in the second battle of Bull Run, in which no regiment played a more prominent role than the 3d Infantry. It arrived on the old battle-field about 7 o’clock on the morning of the 30th. A short time afterwards its brigade was formed in line of battle in front of the Dogan House, and the regiment ordered forward, as skirmishers, to occupy the crest of the hill in their front, their left resting on the Alex- andria and Warrenton turnpike. It remained in this position about three hours when orders were received to advance the line. This was promptly and gallantly done, driving the enemy from some houses in front of their left—several men of the regiment being killed and wounded here. But it was later in the day that the regiment and brigade was to conspicuously dis- tinguish themselves—when the division to which they belonged was to make a charge and cover a retreat destined to become historical for the stead- fastness and intrepidity of the participants in it. It “ saved the army,” and drew, on the field of battle, from General MacDowell, the memorable excla- mation, “ God bless the regulars ! ” The regiment’s losses in this battle were two officers and fourteen men wounded and thirty-one men missing, total fifty-two. At Antietam the division was held in reserve at least most of the time, and did not, therefore, take as prominent a part as usual in the battle. It left Middletown on the morning of the 15th of September, crossed South Moun- tain, and reaching the east bank of Antietam River, took position behind some hills on the left of the turnpike leading direct to Sharpsburg. The Third Infantry was at once thrown out as skirmishers and occupied the crest of the river bank to the right and left of the bridge. It remained in this position all night and until relieved by the 4th Infantry, about 10 o’clock next morning. During the 16th and 17th, it remained in reserve, although exposed to a heavy fire from the enemy’s artillery. On the 19th the regi- ment moved forward, with its division, in pursuit of the retreating enemy, passed through Sharpsburg, and on the 20th bivouacked near the Potoma:.. opposite Blackford’s Fort. Skirmishers were here thrown out in front of each brigade and a desultory fire maintained with those of the enemy on the Virginia side. At the battle of FrederiCKStmrg, wmcn came next, the division of regu- lars first acted as support to the attack on Marye’s Hill, it left its bivouac at Falmouth on the afternoon of the 13th, and moved towards the upper pontoon bridge, the 3d leading the advance. The moment the head of the 446 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. column showed itself, the enemy opened fire upon it with shot and shell, and, while awaiting an opportunity to cross, the regiment lost three men wounded—one mortally. After effecting a crossing, the regiment, de- positing their knapsacks in the street, moved hurriedly towards the scene of action, arriving at the southern edge of the city at the moment the attack on the enemy’s outworks was repulsed, and encountering part of the fire of the enemy, by which several men were wounded. The regiment was then ordered to the right and took position in the cemetery. About midnight it advanced out on the plank road, relieved a portion of Humphries’ Division, and with the 4th Infantry took position behind a tannery. Skirmishers were thrown out some three hundred yards to the right. At daybreak the enemy’s pickets and sharpshooters opened a brisk fire upon them, from their in- trenchments, but a stone’s throw away, when they were withdrawn, but not until some were killed and several wounded. They still remained under constant front and enfilading fire from the enemy, within one hundred yards, securely sheltered behind stone walls and rifle pits, and, as General Sykes said in his report of the battle, “ could offer no resistance only the moral effect of that hardihood and bravery which would not yield one foot of the line they were required to protect. No better test of the qualities of troops could be shown than that displayed by these brigades. Patience, endurance, discipline and courage were conspicuous.” About 11 A. M., the 3d and 4th effected an entrance into the tannery with their bayonets, through the brick walls. They soon after loopholed the walls and from these and the windows they succeeded in driving the enemy from the houses and rifle-pits on the right, relieving the brigade, in great measure, from the fire of the sharpshooters during the remainder of the day. At 12 o’clock that night the regiment was relieved, having held the position 24 hours, and proceeded to the city and bivouacked near St. George’s Church. During the evening of the 15th it changed position three times. Toward morning it was placed in front and nearest the enemy, where it remained until the whole army had crossed safely to the northern banks of the Rap- pahannock, when it received orders to fallback, being the last to recross the river. The losses in this battle were three men killed and 12 wounded. Shortly after this, while in camp at Henry House, the regiment was re- organized. Its strength present having been reduced to 12 officers and 408 enlisted men, Companies A, D, E and H were broken up, the men trans- ferred and the officers attached to other companies. It remained a six com- pany organization until the close of the war. The regiment took part in Burnside’s famous “ Mud March,” and, later, in the battles of Dowall’s Tavern and Chancellorsville. In the latter it moved with the attacking column and participated in the engagements of May 1st. On the 2d, 3d, 4th and 5th, it held its position in the line of bat- tle. It also assisted here in driving back to the field of battle some of the fugitives of the Eleventh Corps. The losses in this battle were four men wounded and four missing. Gettysburg came next. As part of the First Brigade of Regulars it ar- rived on the battle-field early in the morning of July 2, having on the three consecutive days previous marched over 62 miles. It first acted as reserve THE THIRD REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 447 for the right and centre, but during the afternoon was hastily sent to the left, where it participated in the fierce fighting around the Round Tops and near Devil’s Den, where the slaughter of the regular infantry was so fearful. But they “once more justified their old reputation ; not a single man left the ranks, and they allowed themselves to be decimated without flinching. Eleven hundred combatants only out of an effective force of 2000 are left standing.” Captain Freedly, who commanded the regiment, was so seriously wounded in the knee that he never rejoined the regiment and was ul- timately retired. Lieutenants Butler, Parker and Morton were wounded, 8 men were killed, 61 wounded, six mortally, and two were missing, making a total loss of 75 out of an effective strength of less than 300. The remnants of the regiment, now under Captain Lay, remained in line of battle all day during the 3d. On the 4th it was sent out on reconnois- sance and had a brisk skirmish with the enemy, after which it returned to its station below Little Round Top, but was immediately sent out again on the front line of pickets. It remained on picket that night and until the pursuit of the enemy commenced the next day. During the summer of 1863 the regiment was sent to New York, where it arrived August 21, to assist in suppressing the Draft Riots. Leaving New York September 14 it again took the field and participated in the op- erations which led up to, and was engaged in, the battle of Rappahan- nock Station, November 7, one man being wounded. It took part in the Mine Run campaign, November 26 to December 2, after which it was again sent to New York Harbor where it remained, stationed at Forts Richmond, Hamilton and Columbus, until October, 1864, when it was transferred to Washington and stationed at Camp Relief in the northern outskirts of the city. In February, 1865, the regiment, with a total strength present of only 11 officers and 212 men, was again sent to the Army of the Potomac. It joined at Petersburg, and was stationed from that time until the end of the war at General Meade’s headquarters, participating in all the subsequent engage- ments of the Army of the Potomac until the final surrender of Lee’s army at Appomattox. Thus ended the war, the Third having borne a meritorious part in 21 battles and sieges, losing in killed, wounded and missing a total of 267 men,—a number equal to its average strength present during the war. In the celebrated race between Sherman and Meade after the surrender of the Confederate armies, when both strove to reach the city of Washington the first, the Third marched (by odometer) miles in three days, and this a greater part of the time in rain and mud. In the grand review of the armies before President Lincoln, the Third, as part of the Provost Guard, was the lead- ing infantry regiment of the column. On the 4th of J uly the regiment, with the 10th Infantry, was ordered in haste to General Wright’s headquarters, a few miles away, to quell the threatened mutiny in the Provisional Corps, or proposed “Corps of Observation.” It remained on duty there until the 27th, when it was transferred to the barracks at Washington Arsenal. In the fall the regiment was transferred by rail to St. Louis, where it ar- rived October 29. Here Companies A, D, E and H, were reorganized De- cember 19, 595 recruits having been received. 448 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. In the spring of 1866 the regiment, now commanded by Colonel (bvt. M. G.) Hoffman who had joined during the winter, left St. Louis for Kansas and the Indian Territory, where it remained for the next eight years. The following is a chronological list of engagements of portions of the regiment with hostile Indians during this time 1867. May 23 ; Big Timbers, Kan.; detachment of E. June 11 ; near Big Tim- bers, Kan.; detachment of E. June 15 ; Big Timbers, Kan.; detachment of E. July 3; near Goose Creek, Colo.; detachment of E. September 22; Pawnee Fork Bluff, Kan.; detachment of A. 1868. September 2 ; Little Coon Creek, Kan.; detachments of A, F and H, September 11 to 15 ; Sand Hills, I. T. ; Company F. September 30; Big Bend, Kan.; Company D. October 1 ; attack on Fort Zara, Kan.; Com- pany D. October 1 ; between Forts Larned and Dodge, Kan.; Company E. October 3 ; Crow Creek, Kan.; detachment of D. October 26 ; near Fort Dodge, Kan.; Company E. November 19 ; near Fort Dodge, Kan.; Com- panies A and H. May 31; Bear Creek, Kan.; detachments of B and F. June 11 ; Camp Supply, I. T. ; Companies B, E and F. 1870. 1871. July 2 ; Fort Larned, Kan.; Companies C and E. 1874. June 19; Buffalo Creek, L T.; detachment of D, June 21; Buffalo Creek, I. T.; detachment of A. June 24; Lear Creek Redoubt, Kan.; de- tachment of A. In the reduction of the army in 1869, one-half of the 37th Infantry (Com- panies A, C, E, F and I) was consolidated with the Third, adding to the al- ready long list of battles on her colors, those of Shiloh, Murfreesboro, Chickamauga, Missionary Ridge, Resaca, New Hope Church, Kennesaw Mountain, Atlanta and Jonesboro. Colonel (bvt. M. G.) G. W. Getty and Lieutenant-Colonel (bvt. B. G.) John R. Brooke, both of the 37th, were transferred to the Third in place of Colonel (bvt. M. G.) Hoffman and Lieutenant-Colonel (bvt. B. G.) Alfred Sully, placed on the unassigned list. General Getty was transferred to the 3d Artillery, December 31, 1870, never having joined the regiment, and Colonel Floyd-Jones was transierred to the Third from the unassigned list. He joined at Fort Dodge, Kansas, the following June and retained command of the regiment until his retirement in 1879. In the early part of the summer of 1874 the regiment was transferred from Kansas to Holly Springs, Miss., where it was concentrated by the middle of July. It remained there in camp until the following September, when the headquarters and four companies took station at Jackson Bar- racks, La. Other companies were quartered in the city of New Orleans, THE THIRD REGIMENT OF INFANTRY. 449 and the remainder distributed to various points throughout the State. The regiment remained in the Department of the Gulf on duty in connection with the enforcement of the Civil Rights bill until July, 1877, when it was ordered to Pennsylvania in connection with the riots of that year. Por- tions of it were on duty at Indianapolis, Ind.; Newport Barracks, Ky.; and at Pittsburg, Scranton, and Wilkesbarre, Pa. « By September 3, 1877, the entire regiment was concentrated at Wilkes- barre preparatory to a change of station to Montana. The headquarters and six companies were to go to Helena, and four companies with the lieu- tenant-colonel to Fort Missoula. The regiment left Wilkesbarre Septem- ber 21 and arrived at Corrinne, Utah, on the 28th. From Corrinne the commands marched to their new stations, arriving on the 7th and 14th of November, respectively, and immediately went to work building quarters. In the spring of 1878 the headquarters and six companies left Helena for the Milk River country, General Brooke,—who was in command of the regiment and also the District of Montana (Colonel Floyd-Jones on leave), —having been ordered to select a site for a new post in that region. The present site of Fort Assinniboine having been selected, the command camped at the Marias River July 23, and remained there until fall, when the headquarters went to Fort Shaw and took station, and the companies were distributed to various points in Montana. Company A took station at Fort Benton and Companies C and E at Fort Shaw. Companies F and G proceeded to Fort Belknap, thence 65 miles east following the course of the Milk River, where they captured 7 lodges of British half-breeds who had been causing trouble, and escorted them into Fort Belknap after hav- ing burnt their houses. The companies then took station at Fort Shaw. Company K was stationed at Fort Logan. During the summer of this year various scouting parties were sent out from the Missoula garrison to watch the different trails and mountain passes for bands of hostile Indians, but with one exception they did not come into contact with any. Lieutenant Wallace with a mounted detach- ment of 13 men of Companies B, H and I, one guide, and two other citi- zens, overtook a band of Nez Perces, July 14, on the Middle Fork of Clear- water River, attacking them and, in a battle of two hours, killing 6 and wounding 3 Indians, and capturing 31 and killing 23 of the animals in their possession. No casualties to detachment. In obedience to instructions from the district commander to “ scout the country thoroughly for lurking bands of hostile Indians and road agents,” a number of parties were sent out from the different posts garrisoned by the regiment during the spring of 1879, but, except in two cases, without noteworthy result. Sergeant A. Cecil of Company A, with seven men,—part of a mounted detachment on a scout from Fort Logan in the direction of the Mussel Shell,—had. a skirmish with a band of 8 hostile Sioux Indians, April 17, near Careless Creek, killing the entire party. Lieutenant Kraus with a detachment of 18 men of Company A, while returning from Fort Benton from patrolling the Missouri River, having with him 9 horses which had been recaptured from the River Crows, was 450 HISTORICAL SKETCHES U. S. ARMY. attacked while in camp on Eagle Creek, Mont., May 4, about 11 o’clock p. M. Twelve horses and one mule belonging to the Government and 8 of the recaptured horses were stampeded and lost. Various military telegraph lines, connecting the different posts in the territory, were constructed by the regiment during the year. The retirement of Colonel Floyd-Jones, March 20, 1879, promoted Lieu- tenant-Colonel (Bvt. B. G.) L. P. Bradley, 9th Infantry, to the Third, and Lieutenant-Colonel Brooke of the Third to the 13th. General Bradley never joined, and on June 14th transferred with General Brooke, who remained colonel of the regiment and commanded it until he was promoted brigadier general April 24,1888. In the spring of 1879, Company E left Fort Shaw and took station at Fort Ellis, where it was joined the following summer by Company C. These two companies remained at this post until its abandonment in the fall of 1886, when they took station at Fort Custer. In the summer of 1880 Company K was sent to the new post of Fort Maginnis, and in 1881 Companies A and K were sent to Fort Shaw. Dur- ing the summer and fall of 1882-83 two or more companies from Fort Shaw were kept in the field observing the Indians at the Blackfeet Agency and protecting the settlements from the incursions of hostile Indians from the north. Three companies were also sent out from Fort Missoula in the summer of 1883, to assist in arresting renegade Indians on the Flathead reservation. At the time of the threatened outbreak of the Crow Indians under