Report of Committee OIN Atomic Weights, Published During 1893. F. W. Clarke. [Reprinted from the Journal of the American Chemical Society. Vol. XVI, No. 3. March, 1894.] REPORT OF COnHITTEE ON DETERHINATIONS OF ATO1TIC WEIGHT, PUBLISHED DURING 1893.' By F. W. Clarke. To the Members of the American Chemical Society: YOUR committee, appointed at the last annual meeting, respectfully submits the following report, showing the advances made in our knowledge of atomic weights during 1893. The year has been one of reasonable activity in this branch of investigation, and it is thought that all the work actually pub- lished within its limits is here summarized and recorded. One partial exception possibly may be made to this statement. Mor- ley's work on oxygen, reported orally at the American Associa- tion meeting, and at the Chemical Congress in Chicago, is omitted, for only unofficial abstracts of it have yet appeared in print. That work is of such fundamental importance that it seems best to await its completion, rather than to do it possible injustice by fragmentary notices which might be inexact. In the "Stas Memorial Lecture," by Professor Mallet,2 will be found a remarkably full discussion of the theory or philosophy of atomic weight determinations, which should be carefully read by all students in this domain. Taking the life and work of Stas as text and example, Mallet considers the conditions neces- sary to the fruitful continuation of that work, and throws out many suggestions of great practical value. He particularly ad- vocates the multiplication of interdependent data, in order that errors may be eliminated; and he also recommends the estab- lishment of a special, endowed laboratory, in which a group of trained observers may co-operate towards the attainment of the best results. The individual atomic weight determinations of 1893 are sub- joined. Boron.-W. Ramsay and Emily Aston3 redetermine the atomic weight of boron by two distinct processes, one of them being entirely new. First, with many precautions, they estimate 1 Read at the Baltimore meeting Dec. 28, 1893. 2 J. Chem. Soc., August, 1893. 3 J. Chem. Soc... 63, 207, February, 1893. 2 F. W. CEARKE. DETERMINATIONS the percentage of water in crystallized borax, Na2B4O7, 10 H20; all weights being reduced to vacuum standards. The same reduction is also made in their other scries, but as they carry out the weights to seven decimal places, the corrections applied go farther than is necessary. In the subjoined tables I give the nearest tenth milligramme. Wt. Na2B4O„ ioH2O. IO.3582 Wt. Na2B4O7. 5-4784 Per cent. H2O. 47-1099 At. Wt. B. 11.04 5-3440 2.8247 47-U33 10.97 4-9963 2-6379 47.2026 IO.85 5-7ooo 3.OIOI 47-I9I2 IO.87 5-3143 2.8066 47.1882 10.88 4.9972 2.6392 47-1865 10.885 5-2367 2-7675 47-I524 10-955 Mean atomic weight, 6=10.921, ± 0.010. In the second series of experiments fused borax was distilled with hydrochloric acid and methyl alcohol, and the residual sodium chloride was weighed. Results as follows: Wt. Na2B4OT. Wt. NaCl. At. Wt. BA 4.7684 2-7598 II.OI5 5-2740 3-O578 IO.925 3-2344 I.8727 IO.992 4.0862 2.3713 IO.879 3-497° 2.0266 IO.949 Mean atomic weight, 6=10.952, ± O.OIO. The distillations were conducted in soft glass flasks of about 100 cc. capacity, in which the sodium chloride was dried at about 3500, and finally weighed. It was found, however, that the flasks were somewhat attacked during the process, with lib- eration of silica, consequently some oxygen in the alkali of the glass had been replaced by chlorine, and the weight of the ves- sel increased. Another set of distillations was, therefore, made with flasks of hard combustion tubing, and these were slightly attacked also. Wt. Na2B4O7. Wt. NaCl. At. Wt. B. 5-3118 3-0761 IO.983 4.7806 2.7700 10-955 4-9907 2.8930 10.936 4-723I 2-7360 IO.968 3-3I38 1.9187 IO.992 1 Atomic weights used in Ramsay and Aston's calculations: O=i6, H=i.oo8, Ag=iO7.92, Na=23.05, 01=35.45, and Br=79.95. Mean atomic weight, 11=10.966, ± 0.005. OF ATOMIC WEIGHT. 3 As a check upon these results the sodium chloride was dis- solved in water, and after filtration precipitated with silver nitrate. The resulting silver chloride was collected on a Gooch filter, dried at 2000, and weighed. Wt. AgCl. Percent. Cl in NaCl. At. Wt. B. from Cl. 7-5259 60.493 II.071 6-7794 60.515 II.024 7.0801 60.516 II.003 6.6960 60.514 11.039 4.693I 60.479 II.091 Mean atomic weight, 6=11.052, ± 0.010. From all these results, and after discussing the supposable sources of error in them, the authors conclude that the atomic weight of boron is very nearly eleven. Still another determination of the atomic weight of boron, by an entirely independent method, is due to Rimbach.1 Taking advantage of the fact that methyl orange, as an indicator, is un- affected by free boric acid, he titrated solutions of borax with standardized hydrochloric acid, thus measuring the amount of sodium in the salt and thence calculating the value to be ascer- tained. The borax was prepared in platinum vessels from care- fully purified boric acid and sodium carbonate; and the hydro- chloric acid used contained 1.84983 per cent, of absolute HC1, determined gravimetrically as silver chloride. In the following table of results the titrated hydrochloric acid is given by weight in grammes: Wt. borax. Wt. HC1. sol. Per cent. Na.2 At. Wt. B.2 IO.OO2I4 103.1951 12.07081 IO.9646 I5-32772 158.1503 12.07138 10.9598 15.08870 I55-727I 12.07530 IO.9273 IO.1293O 104.5448 12.07517 IO.9298 5-25732 54-257I 12.07435 IO.9361 I5-O4324 I55-23O7 12.07283 IO.9486 15.04761 I55-2959 12.07448 IO.9356 IO.434O9 107.6602 12.07176 IO.957I 5-O47I3 52-0897 12.07480 10.9330 Calculating from the sum of all the weights the atomic weight of boron becomes 10.945, ± 0.003. 1 Ber. d chem. Ges., 26, 164, February, 13, 1893. 2 Calculations made with O=i6, 11=1.0032 (Keiser), Na=23.O575, 0=35.4529, and Ag=io7.9376. 4 F. W. CLARKE. DETERMINATIONS Carbon.-Leduc' has determined the density of carbon mon- oxide, deducing thence the atomic weight of carbon. The globe used held 2.9440 of air. Filled with carbon monoxide the latter weighed 2.8470 2.8468 2.8469 Mean, 2.8469 Hence the density of CO is 0.96702, when air =1, and with 0=15.88, 0=11.913, If O=i6, then 0=12.003. In a very brief note2 Wanklyn announces that he has studied a series of hydrocarbons in which the successive steps rise-not by CH.,= 14-but by | (CHJ = 7. If these observations are sustained, then the atomic weight of carbon becomes-6. Cobalt and Nickel.-Atomic weights determined by Winkler,3 who starts with weighed quantities of metal, electrolytically de- posited. This is then dissolved in a platinum dish in pure hydro- chloric acid, and the chlorides produced are finally dried for sev- eral hours at 1500. In one set of experiments the chlorine in the chlorides is weighed gravimetrically, as silver chloride; in another set it is titrated with a standard solution of silver. In the first case we have the ratio R:2AgCl, in the other, R:Ag.2. Results as follows, for nickel: Wt. Ni. Wt. AgCl. (grav.) At. Wt. Ni. 0.3011 I.462I 58.9102 O.2242 I.0881 58-94l8 O.5166 2.5108 58.8571 O.4879 2.3679 58.9419 O.3827 I.8577 58.9304 0.3603 I-75I7 58.8334 Mean result, Ni=58.9O33. Wt. Ni. Wt. Ag. (vol.) At. Wt. Ni. O.l8l2 0.6621260 58.9253 0.1662 0.6079206 58.8665 0.2129 O.7775252 58.9584 O.2232 0.8162108 58.8811 0.5082 1.8556645 58-9684 0.1453 0.5315040 58.8631 Mean result, Ni=58.9ic>4. 1 Compt. rend., 115, 1072. 2 Phil. Mag., (5) 36, 552, December, 289?. 8 Ztschr. anorg. Chem., 4, 10, 2897. OF . ATOMIC WEIGHT. 5 The following data were obtained for cobalt: Wt. Co. Wt. AgCl. (grav.) At. Wt. Co. 0.3458 I.6596 59.6O44 0.3776 1.8105 59.66O9 0.4493 2.1521 59-7215 0.4488 2.1520 59-6577 0.2856 1.3683 59-7O8I 0.2648 I.2678 59-748O Wt. Co. Wt. Ag. (vol.) t. Wt. Co. 0.177804 O.6418284 59.6495 O.263538 0.9514642 59.6396 0.245124 0.8855780 59-5996 0.I90476 O.6866321 59-73H 0.266706 O.9629146 59-6388 O.263538 0.9503558 59-7O92 Mean result, 00=59.6834. Mean result, 00=59.6613? In the case of the cobalt determinations it is of course con- ceivable that the chloride formed might be contaminated with traces of basic compounds. This question is considered by Winkler in a supplementary communication.2 The weighed, electrolytic cobalt, deposited upon the surface of a platinum dish, was treated with a solution of neutral silver sulphate. Sil- ver was thrown down, and was washed, dried, ignited, and weighed. Thus a direct ratio was measured between silver and cobalt, involving no intervention of cobalt chloride, and conse- quently no error due to basic salts. Results as follows: Wt. Co. Wt. As. At. Wt. Co. O.2549 O.9187 59-7421 0.4069 I.4691 59.6377 The precipitated silver, as a check upon its purity, was dis- solved in nitric acid, reprecipitated with hydrochloric acid as chloride, and filtered off. The filtrate, upon evaporation to dry- ness, gave traces of residue, containing cobalt. The amount of the latter in the first experiment was at most 0.5 milligramme, and in the second not over 0.2 milligramme. Correcting for these amounts the values found for the atomic weight of cobalt become 59.6356 and 59.6164, respectively. These figures fall within the limits of variation of those found in the first paper, 1 All calculations with Ag=io7.66 and 01=35.37 2 Ztschr. anorg. Chem., 4, 462, 1893. 6 F. W. CEARKE. DETERMINATIONS and show that the supposed error, if it existed, could not be large. The author admits, however, that the degree of concordance among his experiments is not so great as could be desired. The main purpose of his work was to show the essential constancy of the values, as opposed to the views of Kriiss concerning the sup- posed composite nature of nickel and cobalt. Molybdenum.-Atomic weight redetermined by Smith and Maas.1 Sodium molybdate was converted into chloride by heat- ing in a current of pure, dry, gaseous hydrochloric acid. Results as follows with weights reduced to vacuum standards: Wt. Na2MoO4. Wt. NaCl. At. Wt. Mo. I.14726 0.65087 96.130 0.89920 0.51023 96.094 0.70534 0.40020 96.108 0.70793 0.40182 96-031 I.26347 O.71695 96.087 I.I52I7 0.65367 96.126 0.90199 0.51188 96.067 0.81692 O.46358 96.077 0.65098 0.36942 96.O73 0.80563 O.45717 96.078 Palladium.-Atomic weight determined by Joly and Reidie' by means of potassium palladio-chloride, K,PdCl4. In the first series of experiments the salt was dried in vacuo at ordinary temperature. It was then electrolyzed in a solution acidulated with hydrochloric acid, both the palladium and the potassium chloride being weighed. The palladium was dried, ignited in a stream of hydrogen, and cooled in an atmosphere of carbon dioxide. Results as follows: In mean, ^10=96.087. At. Wt. Pd. Wt. salt. Wt. Pd. Wt. KC1. From salt : Pd. Pd : 2KCI. 1.0255 O.3919 0.5520 IO5.749 IO5.643 1.2178 0-3937 0.5551 104.881 105.535 1-2518 0.4048 O.5687 104.923 IO5.916 This series was rejected by the authors upon finding that the salt retained water. In one experiment 0.23 per cent, of water was found. Accordingly a second set of determinations was 1 This Journal, 15, 397, July, 1893. Results calculated with O=r6, ^3=23.05, and Cl=35-45- 2 Compt. rend., 116, 147 i8q?. Results calculated with 0=15.96 0=35.37, KC1=74-4o. and H=i. OF ATOMIC WEIGHT. 7 made in which the palladio-chloride was dried in vacuo at ioo°. Wt. salt. Wt. Pd. Wt. KC1. At. Wt. Pd. Salt : Pd. Pd : 2KCI. I-3635 O.4422 O.6186 105-374 106.368 3.0628 0-9944 I-3929 105-545 106.229 I-4845 O.4816 O.6782 105.405 105.694 r-7995 O.5838 0.8206 105.427 105.861 The mean of the values found from the ratio K2PdCl4 : Pd is 105.438. If O=i6, this becomes Pd= 105.702. With 0 = 15.88 we get 104.910. The KC1 values were rejected. Still another set of determinations was based upon the reduc- tion of the double chloride in a steam of hydrogen, the data being in other respects like the foregoing. Results as follows : At. Wt. Pd. Wt. salt. Wt. Pd. Wt. KC1. Salt: Pd. Pd : KC1 2.4481 0-7949 I.Il68 105.560 IO5.9I I 1.8250 0.5930 O.8360 IO5.671 105.656 It is noticeable that these values, in the set K2PdCl4 : Pd, run higher than in the eloctrolytic series. Inasmuch as the latter experiments were made in presence of free hydrochloric acid, it would seem possible that chlorine may have been liberated, pre- venting complete precipitation of the palladium, and so slightly lowering the apparent atomic weight of the latter. At all events the resuts obtained are not sharply concordant, and are, there- fore, inconclusive. Barium.-An elaborate memoir upon the atomic weight of barium, by Richards,1 makes a notable change in the value of that constant. Barium bromide was the compound investigated, and the procedure consisted in titrating its solution with solu- tions containing known quantities of silver. In many of the ex- periments the silver bromide thrown down during titration was collected and weighed. From the weights of Ag and of AgBr found, the ratio Ag : Br may be computed as a check on the accuracy of the work. Full details are given concerning purity of materials, pro- cesses, weighings, etc., for which the original memoir must be consulted. The final results are stated in the following col- ums : First, BaBr2 corresponding to 100 parts Ag. Second, 1 Proc. Amer. Acad., 28, 1. Presented Jan. n, 1893. 8 F. W. CLARKE. DETERMINATIONS BaBr2 corresponding to 174.080 parts AgBr. Third, percent- age of Ag in AgBr. Exp. I. 11. ill. I ... 137.746 I37-783 57-46o 2 ••• I37-736 i37-76o 57-455 3 I37-723 4 ••• I37-732 5 ••• 137-735 137-739 57-447 6 ••• I37-748 I37-748 57-445 7 ••• 137-747 8 ... 137.740 137-747 57-448 9 ••• 137.755 I37-748 57-442 IO ••• I37-738 I37-752 57-451 ii ... 137-747 I37-772 57455 12 I37-726 14 ••• 137-75° 137-745 57-443 15 ••• I37-756 137-754 57-445 16. ••• I37-73I 17 ••• I37-748 18 137-745 19 ••• 137-759 I37-758 57-445 Mean, omitting i and 2... ••• 137-745 137-747 57-448 Stas found • • •• 57445 The last column, by its agreement with Stas' measurements, serves to confirm the other two, from which the atomic weight of barium is easily computed. From the ratio Ag2:BaBr2, when Ag=io7.93 and Br=79-955, Ba=i37-426. From the ratio 2AgBr:BaBr.„ Ba=i37.43i. The value 137.43 then must replace the lower value commonly held hitherto. The new results appear to be thoroughly estab- lished and unimpeachable. Thallium.-Lepierre1 has redetermined the atomic weight of this metal by several distinct methods. First, by the electrolysis of thallous sulphate in presence of an excess of ammonium oxa- late, weighing first the sulphate and then the metal obtained. The latter was dried and weighed in an atmosphere of hydrogen. The corrected weights and results are as follows: Wt. T12SO4. Wt. Tl2. At. Wt. Tl.(0=15.96), 1-8935 1-5327 203.52 2-7243 2.2055 203.67 2.8lI2 2.2759 203.69 1 Bull. Soc. Chim.. (3) 9, 166, March 20, 1893. OF ATOMIC WEIGHT. 9 Secondly, a weighed quantity of crystallized thallic oxide was converted by means of sulphurous acid into thallous sulphate, which was then subjected to electrolysis as in the preceding series. The results are subjoined. Wt. T12O3. Wt. Tl2. At. Wt. Tl. 3.2216 2.8829 203.76 2.5417 2.2742 203.53 In the third series of experiments a definite quantity of thal- lous salt was fused in a polished silver crucible with ten times its weight of absolutely pure caustic potash. Thallic oxide was thus formed, which was washed with water and alcohol under various precautions, dried at ioo°, and finally weighed in the original crucible. At. Wt. Tl. 3.1012 T12SO4 gave 2.8056 T12OS 203.57 2.3478 " " 2.1239 " 203.44 2.7591 TINO., " 2.3649 " 203.73 Finally, crystallized thallic oxide was reduced in a stream of hydrogen, and the water so formed was collected and weighed. Wt. T12O3. wt. h2o. At. Wt. Tl. 2.7873 0.3301 203.54 3.9871 0.4716 203.82 4.0213 0.4761 203.00 The mean of the eleven figures given for thallium is 203.57, but stated by the author as 203.62. If 0-16 this becomes Tl-204.08 ; and with 0=15.88, T1=2O2.55. It will be observed that the values found in the individual experiments vary among themselves through a range of over eight-tenths of a unit, and that, therefore, the final mean result is entitled to little consid- eration. M. Lepierre is evidently unfamiliar with the deter- minations of his predecessors; for, quite ignoring the admirable work of Crookes, he speaks of the currently accepted value for Tl as resting without proof upon the calculations of Meyer and Seubert. He also neglects to state whether his weighings were reduced to vacuum standards, and he gives no evidence bearing upon the absolute purity and definiteness of the several com- pounds weighed. The metallic thallium which served as a starting point for the investigations, seems to have been carefully purified. The Composition of water by Volume.-The volume ratio be- 10 f. w. clarke, determinations tween H and O in water, which controls the atomic weight of oxygen as deduced from its density, has been redetermined by Scott.1 The report published is only in abstract, but the sub- joined values for the ratio, H2: O, are given. 2.0020 2.0024 2.0026 2.0030 2.0022 2.0025 2.0029 2.0023 2.0028 2.0017 2.0022 2.0028 Mean, 2.00245, ± 0.00007. Combining this mean with the density ratio, O :H:: 15.882 :1 / gives for the atomic weight of oxygen the value 15.862. Scott gives mean results of several other series of experiments, but only this one in detail. The hydrogen was obtained from palladium hydride, and the oxygen from silver oxide. With only an abstract available, the work done cannot be critically compared with Morley's. The Density of the Principal Gases.-These data, as determined by Lord Rayleigh,3 having important bearing upon atomic weights, fall properly within the scope of this report. Full de- tails are given as to the apparatus used, and all corrections are applied ; such, for instance, as for the difference in volume of the glass globes when filled or exhausted, for the value of grav- ity at the laboratory in latitude 5i°47", etc., etc. The final results are as follows, with air as unity. H 0.06960 N 0.97209 0 1-10535 The weights in grammes per liter are : 1 Proc. Roy. Soc.t 53, 130. Read March 23,1893. 2 Rayleigh. 3 Proc. Roy. Soc., 53, 134. Received March 4, 1893. OF ATOMIC WEIGHT 11 H 0.09001 N 1.25718 O M2952 Air 1.29327 Two of these constants have also been remeasured by Leduc;1 who gives the following weights for one liter each: Air 1.29315 N 1.2570 Miscellaneous Notes.-Richards and Rogers, in a paper upon the occlusion of gases by metallic oxides,2 show that when the oxides of copper, nickel, zinc, and magnesium are prepared by the ignition of the nitrates, they retain appreciable quantities of gaseous impurities, such as nitrogen and oxygen, especially the former. The oxides of cadmium, mercury, lead, and bismuth, similarly prepared, contained no gaseous occlusion, excepting a mere trace in the case of cadmium. This observation reveals a possible serious source of error in several determinations of atomic weight, particularly in the cases of zinc and magnesium. In consequence of this fact, the atomic weight of zinc is now under reinvestigation in the Harvard laboratory, the compounds selected for study being the chloride and bromide. In the study of the rare earths, rough determinations of atomic weight are of great importance in the identification of material. Commonly they are made by the sulphate method, which is familiar to all chemists. Gibbs,3 however, in a study of these substances, makes use of the oxalates. By ignition, the oxide is left and can be weighed, while the proportion of oxalic acid is easily determinable by titration with permanganate solution. In some cases the oxalates were ignited with weighed quantities of pure sodium tungstate, the increase in weight representing R2O3. From the ratio between R2O3 and C2O3 the molecular weight of the oxide is easily calculated, and agrees well with determinations made by the sulphate process. Hinrichs, in a series of communications published in the Coinptes Rendu s' attempts to show that Stas' determinations 1 Compt. rend., 117, 1072. 2 Proc. Amer. Acad., 28, 200. Presented May 10, 1893. 8 Am. Chern. J., 15, 546, November, 1893. 4 On the KC1O3 work, in 115, 1074. On the lead determinations, in 116, 431. 12 F. W. CLARKE. DETERMINATIONS of atomic weights are vitiated by systematic errors, depending upon the quantities of material weighed. According to him the larger the weight of the substance employed the larger the error; and he constructs curves to represent his views graphically. His mathematical procedure, however, his "method of limits," is not clear, and it savors somewhat of assuming Proutian values in advance, and then regarding variations from them as errors for which corrections should be applied. At all events he fails to point out, on the basis of experimental evidence, how the sup- posed errors were produced, and he does not show that they could have been of sufficient magnitude to account for the divergencies to be explained. If Stas' work is to be set aside, it can be by experimental researches only. In a third1 paper the same author gives his mathematical pro- cess in some detail, and still later he discusses Dumas' experi- ments relative to the atomic weight of oxygen,2 seeking to show that it is exactly sixteen. Very recently he has also discussed the determinations of the same constant made by Keiser, Cooke and Richards, Morley, and Dittmar and Henderson, reaching the conclusion that the ratio H:O=i:i6 rigorously.3 He ob- jects especially to the use of averages as fallacious, but does not fully establish the legitimacy of his conclusions. In another journal4 Hinrichs criticizes Richards' researches upon the atomic weight of copper. After showing that several published determinations of the electrolytic ratio between silver and copper agree quite well with the ratio 108 : 63.5, he takes up in particular Richards' analyses of copper sulphate, and points out that a part of the data correspond with the even values O=i6, S-32, and Cu-63.5. The other work of Richards he dismisses as erroneous, but neglects to show wherein the errors lie. In still another paper6 Hinrichs proposes to abandon gases like O and H as bases for atomic weight determinations, and to 1 Compt. rend., 116, 695. 2 Conipt, rend., 116, 753. 8 Compt. rend., 117, 663. •4 Chern. News, 68, 171, October, 6, 1893. 5 Conipt, rend., 117, 1075. OF ATOMIC WEIGHT. 13 adopt carbon (diamond) = 12 as the fundamental standard, on the ground that it can be exactly weighed. Oxygen and cal- cium are combined with this as substandards, becoming sixteen and forty respectively. Replies to Hinrichs' criticism of Stas have been published by Spring' and by Van der Plaats.2 Both writers object to the pro- cesses of extrapolation of which Hinrichs makes use, and Van der Plaats shows by tabulation of data that the systematic errors alleged to exist in Stas' experiments are not there. Only for- tuitous errors occur, and these are of insignificant magnitude. Furthermore, the ratios determined by Stas are so numerous, so varied, and so concordant in their final results that the pre- sumption in their favor is overwhelming. In the same paper, indeed, as its main object, Van der Plaats gives the results of a recalculation of Stas' twenty-one ratios by the method of least squares. He does not, however, give his equa- tions nor explain the special form of the method which he used. The results are stated in two tables, one, (A), computed upon the supposition that each ratio is entitled to weight inversely pro- portional to the square of its mean error; the other, (B), regard- ing all as of equal weight. O=i6 is the base of the system. A B Ag . 107.9244 ± 0.0136. I07.9202. Cl • 35 4565 ± 0.0049. 354516. Br • 79-9548 ± O.OIOI. 79-9497- I ■ 126.8494 ± 0.0166. 126.8445. s ■ 32.0590 ± 0.0085. 32.0576. K - 39.1403 ± 0.0059. 39-I4I4- Na ■ 23.0443 ± 0.0043. 23-0453- Li 7.0235 ± 0.0051. 7.0273. Pb 206.9308 ± 0.0404. 206.9089. N 14.0519 ± 0.0078. 14.0421. NHt 18.0740 ± 0.0034. 18.0760. Hence H= . ■ • 1.0055 ± 0.0021. 1.0085. Another contribution to the Hinrichsian literature is furnished by E. Vogel,3 who criticizes Stas at considerable length. His 1 Chem. Ztg., 17, 242, February, 22, zip?. 2 Compt. rend., 116, 1362. s Bull. Acad. Bruxelles, (3), 26, 469. 14 F. W. CLARKE. DETERMINATIONS paper is preceded by adverse reports from W. Spring and I,- Henry. In conclusion I submit a table of atomic weights revised to January 1, 1894. Oxygen=i6 is taken as the base of the sys- tem, but for provisional reasons only. Before long, with im- proved determinations, it may be practicable to return to the more philosophical H=i, when the entire system can be trans- formed once for all into something like permanent shape. A premature transformation of this kind, however, would only work confusion, without corresponding benefit. Name. Atomic Weight. Aluminum.... 27. Antimony .... 120. Arsenic 75- Barium 137-43 Bismuth 208.9 Boron 11. Bromine 79-95 Cadmium IT2. Caesium 132.9 Calcium 40. Carbon 12. Cerium 140.2 Chlorine 35-45 Chromium 52-1 Cobalt 59- Columbium - • • • 94- Copper 63.6 Erbium 166.3 Fluorine 19- Gadolinium. • • ■ 156.1 Gallium 69. Germanium - • • ■ 72-3 Glucinum 9- Gold 197-3 Hydrogen 1.008 Indium II3-7 Iodine 126.85 Iridium I93-1 Iron 56. Lanthanum - - - • 13^-2 Lead 206.95 Lithium 7.02 Magnesium - - - - 24.3 Manganese - • • • 55- Mercury 200. Molybdenum - - 96. Name. Atomic Weight. Neodymium. • .. .... 140.5 Nickel 58.7 Nitrogen 14.03 Osmium .... 190.8 Oxygen .... l6. Palladium .... I06.6 Phosphorus• • • • .... 31. Platinum 195- Potassium 39.II Praseodymium • •••• 143-5 Rhodium 103. Rubidium 85.5 Ruthenium .... 101.6 Samarium .... 150. Scandium 44- Selenium .... 79. Silicon 28.4 Silver •••• 107.92 Sodium .... 23.05 Strontium .... 87.6 Sulphur .... 32.06 Tantalum .... 182.6 Tellurium •••• 125. Terbium .... 163. Thallium .... 204.18 Thorium .... 232.6 Thulium .... 170.7 Tin .... 119. Titanium .... 48. Tungsten .... 184. Uranium .... 239.6 Vanadium .... 51.4 Ytterbium •• •• 173- Yttrium .... 89.1 Zinc •••• 65.3 Zirconium OF ATOMIC WEIGHT. 15 Discussion.-Dr. Wiley. By our organization we are able to present to American chemists the latest and most accurate num- bers for atomic weights. It is a matter for congratulation that this has been accomplished by the American Chemical Society.