Armored Medical Research Laboratory FophT Knox, Kentucky First Partial Report On PROJECT HO. 8 - PRESELECTION TESTS INDORSATION CoPY Action copies have been forwarded to Require* meats Section, AGF for approval and execution* Project No. 8 30 January 1943 ARMORED FORCE MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY Fort Knox, Kentucky Project No. 8 File No. 220.105 January 20, 1943 PARTIAL REPORT NUMBER I ON FRESEIECTION TESTS 1. FfiDJIXT: Preselection Tests. a. Authority - First indorsement, dated November 26, 1942, by Commanding General, Headquarters Armored Force, Fort Knox, Kentucky, file 400.112/6 GNCHD, to letter by Armored Force Medical Research Laboratory dated November 10, 1942. b, Purpose - To determine the need for preselection tests. 2c DISCUSSION: a0 Present selection of Army personnel is that which is achieved by examination procedures at the reception centers. Better initial selection will reduce wastage. In addition, suitable preselection of men in relation to the requirements of their tasks will materially shorten the training period and yield a more efficient unit. To do this, criteria of selection must be estab- lished and the mechanics of the test procedure set up. To prepare the criteria for selection and to apply them the following studies must be carried out: (1) An analysis of the existing situation to determine what the present method of selection achieves—-how well is the personnel selected by it suited to its tasks and, are the unfit screened out? (2) An analysis of certain specialized tasks within the Array to .define the physiological requirements needed to carry them out and an estima- tion of the advantages to be gained from selection of men of superior qualifica- tions for the tasks, (Job analysis) (3) An analysis of the physiological characteristics of personnel known to be exceptionally good at certain tasks to validate the conclusions obtained from a study of the jobs, (4) A study of the feasibility, and the advantage gained by screening out men who cannot fulfill tasks because of physiological limitations. (5) Finally, a study to determine the most practical procedure for carrying out the tests and placing the personnel. The method decided upon must be at least as effective as the process of elimination during training as now practiced, and must be far less time consuming and wasteful. 1 b. The present report deals with item (l) above, namely, the adequacy of the present tecunique of selection. The data were obtained by an analysis of the board proceedings of the 12th Armored Division and from a statistical report of the Classification Section of that division. Detailed data is tabulated in the Appendix., The physical examination records of fillers do not accompany them from the induction centers. It was necessary for the division surgeon to re-examine every man to discover the defects. He did so on hife own initiative to prevent serious loss of time during the training period. This procedure should not be necessary. 3o CONCLUSIONS: a. Of the 13,184 fillers received (supposedly fit for any duty), 1237 were immediately reclassified as unfit for combat duty. bQ These men were reclassified solely on the basis of obvious physical defects (l.li for mental disorders). One-third (33t1/3p) of all defects necessitating reclassification were due to hernia or symptomatic flat feet, both of which are readily demonstrable. £, To this division were also sent $68 men (4*3;») who are illiterate. Of these, $0/0 came from the 4th and 8th Service Commands, do There was a marked difference between the percentage of rejections among men under 35 years of age as compared with men 35 and over. For the former, the percentage was 4.3, whereas for the older group 31«6$ were rejected. e_. Improvement in the quality of basic personnel sent to combat divi- sions is necessary. 4- COMLiKT: Hie inadequacy of the induction centers for selection of men for combat service is apparent. If 9*4$ of fillers for a division are found cn arrival to be unfit for any tasks in a combat division, and another 4»3;-o are wholly illiterate, then the procedure which allowed them to be sent to a combat division is not satisfactory. Loreover, the examination of the fillers at this division was not comprehensive and additional reclassification during the training period is inevitable. Hie re will be much wastage and encumbement of training because of this. It is inescapable that improvement in the quality of basic personnel sent to divisions is necessary if sufficient raw material, for preselection tests that will place men, is to be had. Present practice is based on the assumption that because large numbers are dealt with, a sufficient number of efficient com- bat personnel will be found to carry' out the function of the division properly, despite the losses through initial reclassification and rejection, and the weed- ing-out during training. This practice is dangerous in that it wastes time and effort in training, it delays the procedure of organizing the division, and moreover permits the passing on of responsibility for proper examination of men by trie reception center to the division surgeon, ' a. This situation can be corrected in several ways: (l) The Ground Force Command may request that the induction centers (Service of Supply) properly carry out the function of classifying men.* All Arms and Services will benefit therefrom. 2 (2) The Ground Force Command may set uj classification centers with proper billeting areas for studying its quota of men before allocating them to the various units under its jurisdiction. In such an area special test procedures necessary for the selection of men- for any Arm or Service might be carried out. Artillery men. Tank Corps men. Reconnaissance men. Signal men, etc., could be selected for the divisions at such a center. All men whose physiological capacities would make it impossible to do such special jobs could be placed in less demanding circumstances. Such a procedure requires that the special needs of every Am or Service be determined and tests for them devised. This job will be materially simplified if the Service of Supply does its prelimi- nary selection job at induction*centers thoroughly, and then sends zhe physical and mental data with the’inductee to the Ground Force Classification Center'for its further use. Some duplication of effort by the two commands is desirable if all unfit personnel are to be weeded' out before combat training begins, (3) If all the various Arms and Services under the Ground Force Command are not yet ready to decide upon their own needs, more specialized classification cen ers for the Armored Force cr the Signal Corps or any other group, may be set up. Their function would be to select from their total allot- ment of fillers, men for the special jobs within that unit and to distribute them to their combat divisions accordingly0 (4) Amplify the present Division Classification Center to include tests which will most adequately place men in jobs they can learn quickly' and do well. The present assumption that most of military work is sufficiently similar to some civilian occupations, that civilian experience may be used as a criterion for classification is unsodnd. Furthermore, with a large number of the present inductees falling into the 18-19 age group, there is no work experience upon which to judge the capacities of these men, and the present system falls down completely, (5) All of these alternatives require that the classification units be thoroughly trained to do this jobc Also, they should be under the direction of a research group who will continuously study the problems of the classification units and will validate the procedures used by analysis of the experience of men selected by them. 5, RTCOldLSIDAT IDAS: <5, That no new man over 34 years of age be accepted by subsequently acti- vated combat divisions. This limit may be changed by other considerations at a later date, but setting it at this limit now will eliminate a very considerable amount of wasted time in divisions tc be activated in the near future 0 b. That all available information on the causes of reclassification and CDD’s from other Armored divisions as they are activated be made available to the Armored Force Medical Research Laboratory for analysis. 1 Incl. Appendix A Prepared by; Major Wm. F. Ashe, MC Tec. Paul Bohemian Division Surgeon, 12th AD APPROVED WILLARD MACHLE ’ * Lieut. Colo, Medical Corps, demanding. 3 appendix a The attached sheets contain the detailed data from 'which this report was written. ORIGIN BY SSRVICS CCI3&AND OF 1237 KEN rECOIUGNDKD FOR KiSCL ASS IF IG AT ION OR C. D. D. (13,184 Fillers Received by 12th Armored Division) Service Command No. Men Received No. Men Rejected Percent Rejected From Each Service Command 1 499 57 11 o4 2 2542 261 10.3 3 , 1595 132 s.3 4 407 32 7.9 5 1949 162 8.6 6 2262 194 9.7 7 • 1764 171 10.9 8 792 86 9.6 9 1374 130 Area Not Ee- ported 12 TOTAL 13,184 1237 9.4 -n!-;D raRCSKTAGEE DISTRIBUTION OF DEPOTS BY AGE (Among 1237 out of 13,164 Fillers Received by 12th Armored Division) Age Group No. of Defects Per Cent of Total No, of Defects 18-19 1 0.1 20-24 268 17o9 25-29 155 10.3 30-34 12? 8,5 35-39 195 12.9 40-44 631 42.0 4 5-up 91 6.1' Age not Reported * 33 2.2 TOTAL 1501 100 % Total Number of Defects 1501 / Total Number of Men Represented 1237 Average No. or defects per man lo21 PERCENTAGE OF ILLITERATES AMONG 13.184 FILLERS RECEIVED DY 12TH ARMORED DIVISION % SERVICE COMMAND ORIGIN NO. RECEIVED NO, ILLITERATE PERCENTAGE 1st Service Command 499 14 2.805 2nd Service Command 2542 44 • 1.731 3rd Service Command 1595 38 2,383 4th Service Command 407 77 18.918 5th Service Command 1949 50 2.565 6th Service Command 2262 118 5.216 7th Service Command 1764 36 2.040 8th Service Command 792 170 21.464 9th Service Command 1374 21 1.528 TOTAL 13184 568 4.308 DISTRIBUTION BYAGE OF 1237 MSN RECOl&ENDED FOE RECLASSIFICATION OR CoD.D. (Out of 13,104 Fillers Received by 12th Armored Division) Men Received Men Rejected AGS GROUP Number Percent Number percent Rejected in Sach Group 18-19 256 1.8 T X 0*4 20-24 7600 54 oO 228 3o0 25-29 2118 15.0 126 5o9 30-34 1304 9.2 101 7.7 35-39 1216 8,6 159 13.1 40-44 1164 G.3 517 44.4 45-Up 140 1.0 73 52.1 Age not Reported 300 2,1 32 10.7 TOTAL 13,184 100.0 1237 9o4 SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL DEFECTS Among the 1237 Een Recommended for Reclassification or C.D.D, PHYSICAL DEFECT DUMBER PEE CENT OF TOTAL NO. OF DEFECTS General Ihysical Condition 300 20 o0 (Stamina, Agility, Obesity, Underweight) Feet Defective 270 I80O Hernia 230 15.3 Gardio-Vascular Disorders 197 X3ol Teeth, Defective 107 7.1 Secondary Results of Old Injuries 106 7.1 Hearing, Defective 55 3.6 Varicose Veins 55 3.6 Miscellaneous Diseases 46 3.1 Vision, Defective 42 2.8 Skeletal and Muscular Disorders 36 2.5 Genito-U rinary Dis o rders 19 1.3 Mental Disorders 17 1.1 General Body Deformities 15 ioO Skin Diseases 6 0.4 TOTAL Box. 100 % AGE DISTRIBUTION AND HIYSICAL DEFATS OF 1237 KEK REQUIRING RECLASSIFICATION AGE GROUP PHYSICAL DEFECT 18-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-Up Age Not Rep. Total . % BODY DEFORMITIES GENERAL 0 4 3 0 3 5 0 0 15 1.0 CARDIO-VASCULAR Arterial Hyper- tension 0 6 7 7 5 20 V. 3 0 48 Low Cardiac Reserve 0 S 4 1 7 26 5 1 52 Tachycardia 0 9 2 2 4 13 3 0 33 Valvular Heart Disease 1 21 c. s 2 3 17 0 3 52 Other 0 4 . .A 1 0 1 2 0 12 Total-Cardio- Vascular 1 48 22 —13— 19 _ 77 13 - 4 197 . 13-.1- FEET Pes Planus 0 45 19 12 35 73 7 2 193 Pes Cavus 0 2 3 6 8 19 0 1 39 Other 0 2 3. 4 7 17 3 0 28 Total - Feet 0 49 25 22 50 109 12 3 2?0 PHYSICAL CQK- OPTION lack of Physical Stamina & Agility 0 3 1 5 13 157 18 5 2C2 Obesity 0 9 7 . 3 10 35 a 2 74 Underweight o- 5 5 3 4 5 i 1 24 Total - Gen. Phys, Condition ’ 0 17 13 11 27 12Z_ 27 a 300 20 oO GENITO-URINARY DISORDERS 0 5 3 4 1 4 1 i 19 1.3 HEARING Defective 0 0 a 3 6 4 12 2 0 35 Diseases of ear, etc. 0 7 2 2 1 4 . 2 2 20 Total - Hearing 0 5- a AL 16 4 2 -lA. (Cono*d) (Continued from Page 7) PHYSICAL DEFECT 18-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-Up Age Not Rep Total % HERNIA Inguinal Other 1 0 0 48 1 24 3. 22 2 24 5 82 4 11 0 3 1 214 16 Total - Hernia 0 49 ... 27 24 29 86 11 4 230 15-3 INJURY. SECONDARY RESULT OF Contusions 0 1 0 1 4 6 1 0 13 Dislocations 0 2 6- 2 2 6 0 0 18 Fractures 0 9 12 5 9 7 2 3 47 Other 0 8 8 2 5 _ 3 1 1 28 Total. - Injuries Secondary Results 0 20 26 10 20 22 4 4 106 7.1 MENTAL Mental Deficiency, Undo 0 0 2 5 1 0 1 0 0 9 Fsychoneurosis Total - Mental 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 2 8 0 6 5 1 2 1 0 2 _ 17 U NOT CLASSIFIED Asthma 0 5 2 2 1 1 1 0 12 Neurocircula bory Asthenia 0 5 1 1 3 1 2 0 13 Other 0 6 : 5_ 1 4_ 4 0 1 21 Total - Not Classified 0 16 8 4 8 6 3 1 _ .44... SKELETAL and MUSCULAR DISORDERS Arthritis 0 -> 2 0 0 1 4 3 0 10 Atrophy of Muscles 0 1 3 i 0 0 C 0 5 Rheumatic Fever 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 Other 0 6 0 __5 1 3 0 1 16 Total - Skeletal . Muscular 0 J3 J 6 2 i 3 2 2*5 (Cent’d) (Continued from Page 8) PHYSICAL DEFECT 18-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40—44 45-up Age Not Rep* Total % SKIN DISEASES 0 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 6 0o4 TEETH i Defective Dentition 0 4 2 9 10 72 10 0 107 7.1 VARICOSE VEINS 0 4 8 10 12 19 2 0 55 3.6 VISION Defective 0 13 2 3 4 8 1 1 32 Diseases of the Eye 0 1 3. 2 2 1 0 1 10 Total - Vision 0 14 5 3. 6 9 1 2 42 2o8 TOTAL - ALL DEFECTS 1 268 155 127 195 631 91 33 1501 100 PER CENT OF TOTAL NO. OF DEFECTS 0.1 17.9 10.3 8.5 12.9 42.0 6.1 2o2 100