POISONING BY ERGOT •# IN ATTEMPTING CRIMINAL ABORTION; WITH REFLECTIONS UPON SOME OF THE CAUSES OE SUDDEN DEATH BY MYDDLETON MICHEL, M. D., LECTURER ON ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY, CHARLESTON, SOUTH-CAROLINA. Extracted from the Charleston Medical Journal and Review, for Sept’r, 1850. CHARLESTON, S. C., PRINTED BY C. CANNING, 29 PINCKNEY STREET. 1850. POISONING BY ERGOT, IN ATTEMPTING C RIM IN AL ABORTION. Felonious attempts at. criminal abortion are sometimes made the subject of judicial investigation, when malice or avarice has destroyed life by substances that popular repute invests with a fancied or real power to expel the child. Abortion is seldom attained but by the use of medicines involving the life of both parent and offspring; and when substances, acknowledged even the most appropriate, have been ignorantly and feloniously administered, the mother, too often, perhaps, has been destroyed, when the only de- sire was to shelter her from harm and secure her from shame. But inasmuch as, in such a case, the intent con- templated is criminal, for the accidental murder of the mother the law holds the defendant responsible ; and medi- cal witnesses are then required to determine the nature of the death, and must of necessity answer the question whe- ther that death was the result of poison. The influence of circumstances in complicating the particulars, may singu- larly embarrass the best directed medico-legal investiga- tion : the pregnancy may not be suspected; the secrecy, perhaps suddenness, of the death may exclude all informa- tion concerning the previous symptoms ; the therapeutical action of the substance suspected to have been adminis- tered may not be well understood, and the morbid changes it induces may be entirely unknown, even if revealed -by a carefully conducted examination after death. These are difficulties which have recently been connected with a most instructive case of murder, occasioned by a criminal attempt to procure abortion, the first of the kind known to have occurred in this, or I believe any of the United States.* The following, without the associated train of circumstan- tial evidence, is the brief history of the case, which, as one of the medical witnesses, I have been requested to de- tail, and which I present with imperfections observable * I have since become acquainted with a similar case, though here the oil of Savin ras used; it occurred in Massachusetts. Vide Amer. Jour. Med. Sc. 1837. V.21,p.345. 4 throughout, and requiring all the indulgence which the reader can extend towards them : On the 2d of May, at one in the afternoon, I was called to a patient of mine, whom I had hitherto regarded of honest and correct deportment, and found her lying dead, in the house of a stranger, who it is now known lived in adultery with her. The only intelligence obtained, was, that as some particulars con- cerning her pecuniary affairs were announced, she placed her hand upon her heart, was suddenly overcome, • lay down and died. No medicines were dis- covered in the room. The deceased was lying on her back upon a bed, without her shoes on, and with no under clothes but her shift; her head and shoulders elevated by pillows, her legs stretched out and separated, and her arms extended on each side of her person. The surface of the body was warm, but presented nothing remarkable, the countenance placid, and the pupils somewhat dilated. Three hours after death, I witnessed great yellowness and lividness of the face, and an abundant froth, of a crimson color, at the mouth and nostrils, re-appear- ing as often as it was wiped away, while the fingers of both hands were of a dark livid hue to the knuckles. As foul play was suspected, (though of this I was not informed) on the next day I was urged by the family to make a post-mortem examination, which was performed reluctantly, and in a hurried manner. On exposing the body, the discoloration was found to be general. A jaun- diced yellow pervaded the entire surface, and large livid blotches existed on the inside of her thighs, over the chest, on the arms and sides of the abdomen. The face was now much swollen and discolored, and the same deep colored f rothy mucus from the nostrils and mouth was in such a quantity as nearly con- cealed it. The abdomen was considerably enlarged, and on being opened al- lowed the escape of a gas of a remarkable fetor, and exhibited the gravid uterus reaching to the umbilicus. The venous congestion of all the abdominal viscera at once attracted my attention. The peritoneum was highly congested; the whole tract of the intestines was covered by a net-work of venous capillaries ; the liver dark, and spleen gorged with blood; the uterus, participating in the general condition of vascular turgescence, was through the distended veins most completely injected, a very dark, blackish appearance; the bladder was of the natural dimension. During the removal of the uterus the common iliac vein and artery were accidentally cut, and the blood which gush- ed into the pelvis was very fluid. The uterus appeared to be the seat of six months gestation,—weighed nearly five pounds; the os uteri presented no marks of violence; the organ was carefully incised, the decidua reflexa and the membranes of the foetus were untouched, and the amniotic liquid was abundant. I satisfied myself that these structures had suffered no actual violence, whatever eke might have been attempted. The fetus, which was a male, I first an- nounced to be five months old, but while arranging it for preservation, I found it had reached the seventh month. It weighs two pounds and a half—was not accurately measured—presents short black hairs on the head; eye-lids not ad- herent ; eye-brows visible ; nails nearly, though not quite, attaining the ends of the fingers; pinna perfectly detached, and well formed ; sexual organs well de- veloped, testicles neither in the scrotum nor inguinal canals ; body slightly cov- ered with an unctuous induitus; and the epidermis peeling off in some places, from prolonged contact with the amniotic liquid. Not anticipating any further trouble in the matter, and regarding this a case of accidental suicide while attempting abortion, I here ended my examination, without opening either thorax or cranium, which should first have been ex- amined, could I have foreseen what was to have followed. These cadaveric appearances, especially the external signs, were sufficient for me to determine a death by poison : for she had been seen in perfect health on the morning of her death, at 10 o’clock, as well as by myself pn the day previous, and therefore died neither of yellow fever nor high bilious congestive, —the only two kinds of death which I am aware could possibly have determined such external discolorations. Before a jury of inquest, her pregnancy and death by poison I was obliged to announce, when the stomach, secure at both orifices, was submitted for analysis to Prof. Hume. On opening this organ, its 5 mucous membrane was decidedly hypertrophied but not softened, abraded in several spots, intensely congested in a portion of its extent, with the gastric glands considerably enlarged,—a condition of things to which we must again presently advert. It occurred to me while reflecting on the subject, that these combined appear- ances might result from the exhibition of the sulphate of copper, or some medi- cinal fungus, such as ergot, for I had once before witnessed such an appearance of the viscera and the same external lividity,—with much less yellowness, how- ever,—in one who being pregnant died from taking an inordinate quantity of ergot, which had ruptured the uterus. Being then informed by Dr. Hume that he could discover none of the min- eral poisons, nor opium in any shape, I suggested that he should search for ergot, which he was very soon able to detect. This was confirmatory testimony of the most satisfactory character, which the deposition of another witness was destined to strengthen: the apothecary who sold the ergot, testified that the prisoner had purchased some ounces from him, and told him “ it was for a horse which had the hots.” Suspicion resting upon him who purchased the ergot, who occupied the known relation of husband towards the deceased, and in whose house she was found dead; he was arraigned for trial and capitally indicted : 1st, for having feloniously administered, or caused to be administered, a quantity of ergot to provoke abortion on , then a pregnant woman, whereof she died; and 2d, for being an accessory to the fact qf the suicide of , by means of ergot ta- ken to procure abortion. To support this indictment, it was necessary to prove that the defendant had ever administered, or caused to be administered, the ergot in question, or whether being administered, it actually caused her death, beyond a reasonable legal doubt. These doubts were predicated, as might have been expected, upon the incompleteness of the necropsy ; and the benefit of the same, through a wise and humane law, is always given to the prisoner. The judge, therefore, regarded the case as one of suspicion, rather than proof against the prisoner,, who was accordingly acquitted. And now I beg leave to invite the reader’s attention to the considerations by which I maintained that the deceased died poisoned by ergot, that he may judge for himself if the observations be correct or not, and base upon them a pro- fessional opinion. And first, I should remark that the presumed suddenness of the death was against the supposition of poison, since the only agents which would probably act with such fear- ful rapidity, would be hydrocyanic or oxalic acid, neither of which was taken, nor would have produced the de- scribed appearances. The difficulty which the counsel for the defendant very naturally required that I should recon- cile with my opinion of ergot producing death, consisted in the distinction between deadly and slow poisons, and “ whether ergot was not a slow poison.” Any substance is a poison, which, to use the accustomed definition, induces death when taken internally or applied externally, without acting mechanically ; thus, table salt has destroyed life in a few hours, in a case where a young lady was known to have taken half a pound of that substance—brandy is a poison—ergot is undoubtedly a slow poison, the word dead- ly is never attached to it by any one. So also arsenic has never been known to destroy life sooner than two or three hours: is this any reason why it or ergot-may not act under certain circumstances with greater rapidity ? The endeavor here seems to have been to prove ergot very a slow poison, or no more a poison than any other substance to which the term is not attached. This indeed seems too generally to be the entertained opinion. It is affirmed that it has been given in large quantities without producing any ill effects. In a recent and valuable work of Professor Meigs, such an opinion wTill lind a support from the author’s experience, he states that he is “ not au-are of any poisonous power it can exert,”* and cites Dr. Lee’s case of Mrs. R., who, through the space of a month, took seven ounces without injury or abortion. Prof. Meigs refers for a full account of the substance to the work of my friend INI. Cazeaux, but this author speaks very differently of its effects. Re- ferring to the conditions which contraindicate its use, he says it should not be given “ to irritable females, who have been subject to convulsions, either during pregnancy or de- livery, for,” he continues, ergot often produces a state of nervous exacerbation reaching even unto frenzy.” f It is forgotten that ergot is ranked among the narcotico-acrid poisons by every authority, and even among those acquaint- ed with the fact, there appears to be a very inadequate idea of its specific action. It is spoken of as only eventu- ating in the production of gangrene, and we find so high an authority as M. Velpeau observing, “that to apprehend ergotism, its use must be continued for a long time in large doses” J Here no such restriction is imposed upon the administration of the drug as is carefully enjoined by M. Cazeaux, because no ill consequences seem to be appre- hended but the development of gangrene. Need 1 mention that in the determination of a question of this importance, we are not to take cognizance of indi- vidual cases, recorded for the illustration of other purposes, of isolated opinions expressed through misapprehension of the subject, or even the circumstance of no similar case being recorded. Were this otherwise, I could repeat that through the space of a month, 1 iij., and in twenty days, 3x. of the decoction were given, without the induction of la- bor, vomiting, or any other inconvenience ;§ that and 3ij. were administered in five days, twenty hours and twenty-five minutes, without even producing nausea ;|| and * Obsteti-ies, the Science and the Art. C. Meigs, M.D., p. 593. 1849. f Aux femmes tres irritables qui ont deja ete affectees »’.e convulsions, soit pendant la grossesse, soit pendant leurs accouchements antecedents ; ear le seigle ergote cause souvent un etat d’agaoement nerveux qui va quelquefois jusqu’a la fureur. Traite l>e l’Art des Accouehemonts. 2d ed : p. 455, 1846. J II faudrait done pour faire craindre l’ergotisme, cn continuer long-temps l’usage, a des doses considerables. Traite des Accouchements, vol. 2, p. 66. 1835. 2 halesque, Jouru. Hebd. etUnivcr., p. 245, vol. xii. |J. l'aterson, M.D. bond Med. (Jaz., dune,p. 337, 1839, vide alsoAmcr. Journ. Med- So., vol. 25, p. 237, 1839, and Dunglison’s New Remedies, 4th Ed., p. 266,1843. 7 that for amcnorrhcea, Dr. Randall exhibited in decoction si. per diem, for four days consecutively, without the desired, or even any effect ;* and imitating a practice so justly in- veighed against by the prudent and learned Dr. Meigs, I might, fearless of any harm to parent or offspring, and with reckless disregard of every rule, proceed to drive the child through the rigid, undilated and ergotised cervix, before its presentation is fixed, or its position adjusted in the pelvic excavation; and finally, if the sway of prece- dents is always to influence our opinions, then would we have searched in vain for the few cases of poisoning by Savin which chance has recorded. The diversity of cir- cumstances influencing the action of a remedy, the quan- tity and mode of its exhibition, its purity or adulteration, the peculiar idiosyncrasies of the system, are too frequent to enumerate, and often too multiplied and combined to permit of generalization,—we must regard the physiology of its action, wherever that has been foreshadowed by well conducted experiments, and caring little how it has acted, be ready to affirm how it may and will act. Before, therefore, entering upon these particulars, I would observe that I hold it as a fact uncontroverted that the subject of this narrative died poisoned. This truth was written in characters as plain as death itself. The defence, it is true, pleaded that as neither the thorax nor the cranium were opened, there was no certainty that she had not died of rupture of the heart, or apoplexy; but, whatever cogency such objections may, and undoubtedly do possess, in a majority of instances, it is equally true that they may have little or no weight in others. There is a method of reasoning by exclusion, which, though not as accessible to every intelligence as would be actual demon- stration, and therefore not admitted by the law, is never- theless as infallible, when accompanied by a studious ap- preciation of facts. Upon a similar method of investiga- t on is based the entire plan of medical practice, and this process of inquiry alone is afforded for the detection of disease, where often life and death are involved. The absence of any reliable information of the symp- toms in this case, would be regarded as a lamentable point for the divergence of medical testimony, but for such evi- dence as I think points with fidelity to the truth. None with greater circumspection than myself would adduce the particulars of an imperfect post-mortem as evidence of death by poison, nor incautiously maintain that external features, upon which we arc taught no reliance can gen- erally be placed, are to be regarded as proof; but when ♦Dr.i'rost’s Elem. Mat. Med. i>. o27, IS!:.'., 8 those peculiar changes have occurred after death, andean only be ascribed to certain poisons, then they become suf- ficient to countenance an opinion, requiring but the testi- mony of the chemist to give it its full and important weight; therefore, had the above-mentioned objections been in themselves correct, they could haVe proved nothing with respect to this particular case, the necropsic appear- ances of which they could not have explained. There is no error more universally accredited, than that a sudden death must result from apoplexy, yet the highest authorities, and Rochoux among them, disprove the asser- tion. It is, indeed, so rarely the case, and so much more frequently to be imputed to disease of the heart, that ma- ny deny it altogether as a cause of sudden death. Christ- ison observes, that Devergie is the only late author of re- pute who maintains that it may destroy suddenly, sustain- ing his opinion by a case of immediate dissolution with apoplectic symptoms.* That apoplexy does, however, produce rapid death, must be admitted, particularly if the medulla oblongata be the seat of disease, then death may occur instantaneously, f It may be instantaneous when the hemorrhage occurs even in the anterior lobes of the brain,J but the patient generally lingers several hours or even days. Apoplexy does not develope the combined yel- lowness and excessive lividity of the entire body, with the appearances presented in this case by the abdominal vis- cera, particularly the stomach ; and it must be remember- ed, that had the brain been examined and found congested, this would not have been an unequivocal affirmation of death by apoplexy, for it is just what we would expect from a narcotic poison. But it may be argued, that extrava- sation caused the death, and that the apoplectic cell might have been discovered; this would have been strong pre- sumptive evidence, but would it have been proof of a natu- ral death ? Undoubtedly not. Extravasation has repeat- edly occurred from poisoning by opium,§ and what is well worthy of notice, in a death from poisonous fungi, a clot was also met with in the brain.|| Consider now the other side of the question. Had no recognizable alterations of structure been detected in the encephalon, would it be a justifiable inference that it was not apoplexy? Indubita- * Devergie relates the case of an elderly gentleman, complaining of headache, he coming pale, hanging down his head and dying suddenly, presenting no morbid lesions, but congestion of the cerebral membranes.—Christisnn on Poisons, Am. Ed, p. 514, 1845. See also Seance de VAcademie de Medicine, du Juin, 12,1838. fOllivier examined a man, who haying walked some distance, sat down, fell oyer and died in Uvo hours. The pons yarolii presented at its centre an apoplectic cell, which ex- tended upwards beneath the quadrigemina, downwards into the olivary and pyramidal tract, tearing and almost completely destroying the oblongata.—Arch. Gen. Med, v. 1, i‘. 275,1833. + Arch. Gen. Med., vol. 27, p. 467, 1831. g Loud. Med. Thys. Journ., Feb. 1816, and Loud. Lancet, 1136 to ’37, p. 271. |ChrUtw>on on Faisons, p. 709, 1815, 9 bly not. For so far as the morbid appearances of the brain are concerned, death might have resulted from sim- ple or nervous apoplexy, noticed by Abercrombie,* Louis,f LobsteinJ of Strasbourg, and others, leaving not the slight- est vestige of morbid action in any part of the body ; though this disease, as we know, seldom terminates in death sooner than five hours; and it should also be stated that even these negative signs often coincide with indispu- table cases of narcotic poisoning.^ The difficulties likely to be raised upon the circumstance of the necropsy, being incomplete, compel me now to pass in review those morbid changes producing instantaneous dissolution, which may invade either the encephalon, lungs, heart, or large blood-vessels, calling to mind the invariable absence in each instance, of the marked characters of poi- soning presented by my patient. I shall just allude to a phenomenon which, though not immediately connected with either of the organs forming the tripod of life, claims attention here, as becoming the source of instant death, and accounting for the apparent absence sometimes of any necropsic indications of the cause of such a termination—I mean the spontaneous de- velopment of a gaseous fluid within the blood, distending the venous half of the heart, interrupting circulation and producing death. The morbid appearances are general paleness and rigidity of the body; brain and membranes healthy; abdominal organs in their normal state; no ab- dominal tympanitis ; the lungs presenting no other morbid alteration, than the mechanical congestion which some- times follows death ;|| the right half of‘*the heart distended, as it were inflated and tympanitic; left heart, empty and normal; cerebral vessels containing air; and the physical characters of the blood unchanged, flfuch is this rare phe- nomenon, bearing every resemblance to the introduction of air into the veins, and as rapidly fatal, which some years since particularly fixed the attention of Ollivier.^I * Patholog. and Pract. Researches on Diseases of the Drain, p. 211. fRecherches Pathologiques. + Arch. Gen, Med., p. 260, rol. 23, 1830, 2d Serie. gin a case examined judicially by Christison, there was neither congestion nor effu- sion.—Christison, idem, p. 563. |l The lungs, after death, are always filled with fluid ia their dependant parts, which become denser and darker than the rest; this, however, is no engorgement following death, ner indicating the position in which the body has lain, as was supposed, but is known from experimental investigation to occur immediately before death. Those who die upon the side, or while sitting, present the engorgement at the side or base of the lur g—the dependant part at the time of death ; notwithstanding the bodies may have lain on the belly for some hotirs. This I mention as important in a medico-legal point of view, as well as exhibiting the predominant influence of physical laws at the decline of the vital powers. Hippocrates was certainly aware of the effects of an admixture of air with the blood, and though he cites no instance of the spontaneous production of such a cause followed by death, says, in his Lib. De Platibus : Syderationes corporis, apoplexie dicte, ex flatibus oriuntur, si multi flatus totum corpus permeant, totus homo attonitus red- ditur, si vero partem aliquant, pars ilia. And further on he continues: cum spiritu oo- yioso per totum corpus universo sanguini permixo, obstructiones multe inultifariasw 10 The supervention of death by the lungs is sometimes as rapid as if the medulla oblongata had been severed. The experiments of Leroy d’Etoilles* demonstrate this fact, had we even no pathological evidence of their correctness. From the exquisite structural delicacy, and important rela- tions and office of these organs, we are readily disposed to infer the instantaneousness of death upon the occurrence in them of spontaneous lesion, as'these must at once in- terrupt the circulation; yet it is subject of surprise that few have devoted any time to the appreciation of this point of pathology, as connected with legal medicine ; Lan- cisi, Dionis, Ollivier d’Angers and Lebert, form the few who dwell at all discursively upon the subject. Now it is deserving of notice that, in the opinion particularly of the two last mentioned authors, with whom we are not willing to join issue, sudden death is more frequently to be imputed to a disturbance of the functions of the lungs, than of the heart, or its blood-vessels. It is matter of notoriety that the ingress of air or any fluid in or about the cells of these organs, whether from without, or developed spontaneously within them, may interrupt, suspend or destroy the respi- ratory function, and with it life. The first of these phe- nomena, and by far the rarest in producing any injury to health, is interlobular emphysema. Emphysema lobulare.—Of this disease, the accounts by Lacnnec, as among the earliest, are.also among the best. It differs from vesicular in being developed suddenly during violent muscular exertion; moral emotion, or rather the instant suppression of passion, has given rise to it. A vi- olei t inspiration fills every cell to the utmost, the rima glottidis closes, and an equally violent expiratory effort ruptures the structures, driving the air into the interlobular spaces, sometimes flP%m thence through the areolar tissue of the mediastinum, along that of the neck, and thus into the sub-cutaneous cellular tissue of the entire body. Not- withstanding the strictures of Meriadec Laennec, who endorses his illustrious namesake’s remark, that he had never seen any one die of this affection ,f several genuine circa venas contingunt: cum igitur in crassiores et sanguine abundates venas copiosus aer prorupit, progressusque immoretur, sanguinis pirtransitus prohibetur atque liic quidem sistitu , ibi vero tardius permeat, alibi autem citius. Morgagni however attri- butes a death to this cause, having found air in the blood-vessels; but the abdomen was tympanitic, gangrene seems to hare been present, and it might have been due to commencing putrefaction.—Morgagni,De Sed: et Caus: Mtrborvm Lib. I. 1ip. 1'. jj IS. In the same chapter Morgagni relates three other instances on the authority of Pechlin, Groetz andHuyscb; the last two are particularly interesting. Ollivier eiles three ex- amples,—a child, convalescent from scarlet fever; a robust man, hitherto in perfect health; and a young girl 22 years old. These all died suddenly, revealing in the two first examples, general emphysematous infiltration of the cellular tin ue soon after death.—Diet, de Med. V. 2 p. 65, and Arch- Gen. V. 1, p. 43, 1838. Ilichat opened the body of one who died suddenly, and detected blood, frothy and full of air in che vessels of the head and neck, hut in this ease, the air entered the jugular vein during a surgical operation. Kech. pliys. sur la vie et ia Mort. (Euv. Comp. V. 2, p. 273. 1832. * Itecherches cxperimentalcs sur l’Asphyxic; Paris, 1829. t Traite de L’Auscultation Mediate, 4th P.d. 1837. Vol. 1. p. 413 11 and authentic cases are recorded. Morgagni not only ob- serves, non omnes circa nostri initium sceculi repentinas mov- ies ab apoplexia fuisse, sed plures etiam a. syncope, quasdam a suffocatione,* but relates an interesting case, which has all the appearance of being a death from emphysema. It is shortly as follows :—A sportsman, habitually short-breath- ed, returning from divine worship, partook of some food, was compelled to lie down, and scarcely had he time to call his wife, before he expired. The integuments were pale and cachetic n appearance, the abdominal organs healthy, the lungs inordinately distended with air, scarcely any effusion in the pericardium, the heart flaccid but very large.f As death in this instance was imputed by Mor- gagni o disease of the heart, I have thought proper to cite the entire case in the note, as most worthy of the rea- der’s attention. Piedagnel selects from among many others of the same hind, two cases occurring in 1820, at the hospital St. An- toine, in which the lungs were the only organs diseased, being emphysematous and crepitous.J Another instance, signally exemplifying the influence of excitement, and the suppression of passion over the development of this affec- tion, is related by Ollivier: a man slapped another, who, prevented from resenting it, turned away to recover his composure, fell upon his face and died. Death was owing to the spontaneous production of emphysema in both lungs.§ Again, Pillore cites three deaths from this disease; two were old men, one G9, the other 70. The necropsy dis- closed no other cause for the death but an emphysematous condition of the lungs.|| Breschet notices a case of the same kind belonging to Magendie.Tl Devergie recites two instances in which the affection was manifestly due to a preternatural exacerbation of nervous excitement—these were observed by M. M. Jadelet and Roger: a female, lively and exceedingly fond of singing, retired with her lover to bed, after a hearty supper; symptoms of suffoca- tion suddenly overwhelmed her during sexual embrace, and she died after a short, but violent agony ; pulmonary * Loco. cit. Lib. 1; Ep. 2, No: 4. t Venator, qui erat quasi assidue brevispirus; liac enim voce uti juvat; cum dies jam octo se minus valere, diceret, sed destomaeho dumtaxat quereretur, tandem, cum Sacris iuterfuisset, paucumque cibum sub meridiem sumpsisset, coactus se in lcctulum recli- nare, uxore vix advocata, vivere desiit. Cadavcris cute, quae crat cachecticis colore similis. tenuissimaque Adiposa membrana incisis, mox Venter et Thorax aperti sunt. In illo saua omnia. In hoc vero pulmones are erant maxime turgidi, et undique cum.vicinis partibus, si modo supremas excipias, conncxi, et propemodum connati, magna ut vi opus frucrit qua acostis, a diaphragmate, a mediastino avellerentur. Intra pericardium hu- inoris erme nihil, cor vero liaccidum, sed perquam magnum.—Loco: cit: Lib. 2, Ep. srviii. No. 14. J llecherches anatomiques et physiologiques sur i’cmphyseme du poumon. Paris, 1829, p. 12. $ Arch. Gen. Med. 1833. Vol. 1, p. 229, 2d serie. II These Maladies Observecs al’hopital dcs Souveaux—nes, et a l’hospice dc la vieillcese 1834. If Diet, dcs Sci. Med. 12 emphysema with serous congestion, and froth in the tra- chea and bronchi®, disclosed the cause of death. A cart, in the second case, passed over the thigh and calf of a man, fracturing the femur, the chest sustaining no injury, but on dissection, the lungs were found generally emphys- ematous.* Finally, Prus has observed as many as eight cases at the Bicetre and Salpetriere.f Jn one of the three kinds of cedema of the lungs, recog- nized by Andral, the serous infiltration occurs so rapidly, as to induce symptoms like those of oedema of the glottis, and speedy death. Lebert believes that such a circum- stance might prove instantly fatal. He, however, I think, attaches undue importance to the case recorded by Andral. J Those laboring under pulmouary affections, do sometimes suddenly expire when neither brain, heart nor lungs offers any appreciable explanation of such an event. But these instances, seemingly dependent upon a nervous spasm of the glottis and bronchial ramifications, are almost invaria- bly sequels to diseases of a spasmodic character, such as asthma, hooping cough,—and though in one instance, An- dral saw life extinguished in twenty-four hours, the patient previously in perfect good health, with the exception of an ulcer on the leg,§ yet there will be little danger of such * Annales D’Hygiene. Avril, 1841. t Bulletin de l’Acad. Roy. de Med. May 24, 1842. There will he little reason, we hope, to apprehend the reader’s remaining in doubt, whether emphysema can produce sudden death. M. Prus mentions the importance of this determination to the medical jurist, stating that a person was found dead on the highway, no lesion existed but pul- monary emphysema; the physician judicially examined, was undecided as to the suffi- ciency of the cause to produce death, and conferring with a friend in Paris, learned that the question even there was not yet determined. Lamnec, M. Lasnnec and Louis affirm that pulmonary emphysema is never fatal. Ferrus seems also to believe that wc must look t» a nervous lesion, in such cases, for the cause of death; but on such a principle every spontaneous lesion and sudden death may be ultimately referred to disorder of the ner- vous system; besides, emphysema does not always require this condition for its develop- ment; no such cause obtained in Morgagni’s case of the sportsman, already mentioned, nor in many others which occurred at Bicetre and Salpetriere among the old. Emphy- sema is regarded as always coexistent with other affections, such as disease of the heart, which latter produces the death, but this is by no means proved. Neither Roehoux nor Royer Collard subscribes to this opinion; the latter inquired particularly of the physi- cians of the hospitals of Paris, who all denied any decided relations between these dis- eases. The array of authorities is considerable which hold that emphysema can, and has destroyed life, suddenly; these are Van Swieten, Magendie, Breschet, Picdagnel, Andral, Leroy d’Etoilles, Ollivier, Devergie, Bouvier, Prus, Poisseuille, Ilochoux, Floyer, Storck, and Lebert. Mr. Bouillaud never has seen the most apparently dangerous attacks prove mortal, but refers such an event, when it does happen, to traumatic emphysema; and in- deed, we believe that this opinion will at once reconcile all conflicting sentiment, and al- low of our ranking even Lmnnec and Louis among our list, as from the causes which produce the disease, we cannot fail to recognise a" traumatic lesion as the result, as when, for example, it follows moral excitement, violent efforts, &c., ■■. cit- Exp. vi. p, 3.3. $ Vide Exp. VII % Exp. IX 25 The ergot in substance, and even the infusion or decoc- tion, as we have seen, are all able to give rise under cir- cumstances not always easy of explanation, to a cohort of symptoms and changes, which sooner or later usher in death. Experiments with the oil of ergot, supposed itself to be either the vehicle or the active principle of the grain, is poisonous to a high degree. If any additional evidence is required of the pernicious effects of ergot, this may be found in numerous experi- ments instituted upon perfectly healthy individuals ; refe- rences may be made to those of J. C. Lorinser,* which are quite satisfactory, so far as they go. The distinguished and far-famed Professor Dunglisonf caused experiments of the kind to be performed by Drs. Cottmann and McKee, then resident physicians of the Philadelphia Hospital, which clearly establish the narcotic properties of ergot. And still more recently, Dr. Germain SeeJ and Dr. Hardy|| have justified, by further experiments, these conclusions regarding the sedative property of ergot, the latter re- marking that even the pulsations of the fcetal heart are also diminished. De Gravina,§ another experimenter upon this substance, tried the effects upon himself; he only took twenty-four grains, which in three quarters of an hour, produced vertigo, nausea, and attempts to vomit, excessive epigastric pain, great oppression at the head, the pulse fell from 65 to 54, and respiration decreased considerably per minute. These sedative effects are not to be regarded as the primary, but secondary action of ergot—this substance, as we have already said, is a narcotico-acrid poison, and narcosis is more frequently its secondary and final result. What we have now said, furnishes ample and sufficient proof of the powerful energies of this agent upon the ani- mal economy, and whatever theory of its physiological ac- tion we adopt, it will be able, perhaps, to explain them. The first point of importance which we take occasion to mention, is the rapidity with which the special effects of ergot are manifested. Dr. HardyTI examined into this question, and the accuracy of the assertion that only a few minutes—six or seven, and rarely fifteen—are required for the development of its action upon the uterus, will be confirmed by the experience of those who have availed themselves of it. We cannot stop here to inquire at length, whether this immediate supervention of its effects is proof sufficient that it acts upon the sentient extremities. * Bust’sIieportorium, and Arch. Gen. Med. 182S, V.T.3, p. 440. f Amer. Med. Intelligencer, Sept. 2,1839, p. 161. j These, Sur les proprietes du Seigle ergote. fDublin Journ. May 1-45. § Br. For. Med. Bey. 1830, V. 10, p, 6i5. V Loc. cit. 26 of tlie nerves of the stomach, or those spent upon the in- ner tunic of the blood-vessels, which would seem to be the ease, as time sufficient for its absorption scarcely inter- venes, or whether indeed it must pass into the circulatory stream before it can exert its influence. It is very likely, if I may express an opinion when such discrepancy of sentiment exists, that it acts in both ways. That it enters the circulation is probable, for we know that narcotics do. Prof. Dunglison* saw a new-born infant completely nar- cotized, the mother having taken morphia previous to its birth ; Kamsbothamf also witnessed just such a case when opium had been taken, and Barbier d’AmiensJ found that a child at the breast was similarly influenced, whose mother had taken the wine of opium. Wright’s experi- ments lead me to believe that the young in utero are some- times affected without the ergot having materially influ- enced the parent. But ilamsbotham|| has presented us with four instances in which the foetus died a few hours after birth, by convulsions; and we have seen that Dr. Hardy observed its effects upon the foetal heart. It most undoubtedly enters the circulation when the general econ- omy is so infected as to fall into a state of marasmus and gangrene, but the speedy revelation of its power, when it sometimes overwhelms the nervous centres, or again in- duces a preternatural exacerbation of nervous irritability, evinced by convulsions, spasms and aberration of the in- tellectual faculties, is equally well explained by its sudden agency upon the nerves of the inner coats of the vessels. Whatever we assume as the truth, one fact is positive, • which is its influence upon the cerebro-spinal axis; this is declared by the abnormal feeling in the limbs and rest of the frame, by the cephalagia, dilation of the pupils, and convulsions. These disturbances are not always present when the ergot has passed into the circulation, and when they do occur, they are not always in dependence upon the perturbations in the circulatory system. The ergot, affecting the spinal chord and brain, is in my opinion the true expression of its mode of action and sup- posed specilic agency upon the uterus, which power ma- ny agree that it displays through the medium of the ner- vous and not the arterial system, but their explanation of the phenomenon differs. Dr. Wright suggests that the er- got’s sedative action upon the system, by a general rather than a local impression, “ favors the disposition of the uterus to expel its contents.” Though it is true that de- * Dunglison’a Gen. Therap. and Mat.Med. 4th Ed, 18{0, V, l,p. 341, ■f Process of Parturition, p. 488. 1 Dunglis n’s Op. (.'it, jj Rams hotham Op ; Cit: Appendix. 27 pression of the system often solicits the energies of a dis- tended or excited organ—such as the stomach or the rec- tum—and in this way, perhaps, the uterus ; yet were this theory correct, the parturient power of ergot could only be adventitiously displayed, would always require to be pre- ceded by marked evidence of depression, and could not be depended upon as invariable in its effects. I am rather in- clined to confess that in its operation upon the spinal mar- row, it may resemble strychnine in exciting the reflex ac- tion of that centre, which, transmitted to the spinal nerves in this manner, produces the apparently special influence upon the uterus ; and this, I reluctantly admit, is restricted to that organ, but believe it to extend to others under the dependance of the chord ; much might be advanced in support of such an opinion. In Dr. Wright’s sixth exper- iment, he says : “the sphincter ani contracted powerfully, and there was every appearance of severe tenesmus.”* Barbier d’Amiensf exhibited the advantages of ergot in paraplegia, and as regards its efficacy in affections of the bladder and rectum, when these organs have been paral- yzed, we may mention the following authorities: Stein- beck, X Petrequin,|| Houston,§ Hargrave,H Allier,** Guer- rant,ft and more especially P. S. Pagan,JJ who in an in- teresting memoir has subjected the question to experimen- tal tests of a very satisfactory character. In all these in- stances, decided effects were produced upon tlm pelvic viscera, and calculi were even expelled the bladder during micturition, amidst hypogastric pain, formication, and dis- turbance of sight. There seems to be unequivocal proof of this mode of action upon the spinal chord, and attention is directed to the circumstance, that when consorted with the rapidity of its effects, and the natural proclivity which idiosyncrasy may awaken, either for the development of convulsions or narcosis, a more adequate appreciation may be entertained of the power of this drug. Now the application of all these principles and facts to the case before us, exhibits not only the possibility, but the probability that ergot, either in infusion, decoction or pow- der, poisoned the patient. She was a fit subject for the occurrence of such fatal results: previously afflicted in two attacks with well-marked opisthotonos and empros- thotonos, and nervous depression of the vital energies, it is natural to infer that though enjoying good health, in a con- •Loc.cit. r. 62, p. 323. t Rer. Med., 1839. t Lancet, 1843, v. I, p 631. il Bulletin de Therapeutique, Mars 1842. 3 Lancet, 1S44, v. 1, p. 700. Idem. ** Med. Chirur. Rey. July, 1839. Jour, de Med. et do Chir., Nov. 1839. jj Memoirc sur l’ergot; eon action therap.et son emploi modicale. Aix., 1841, 28 stitution so readily impressed and so easily overcome, an over-dose, as we have seen in the above cases and experi- ments, might at once develop strong convulsions, and the resiliency of the powers of life be subdued, and a fatal ter- mination secured by adscititious symptoms ot narcosis, sus- pending and extinguishing existence. The yellowness of the integuments and the mottled state of the body—the congestion of the capillaries of the head and neck, and to a certainty of the brain itself—the great development of gas, and the fetor accompanying it, are all particularly characteristic of ergot. The gas, by distending the abdo- men and driving the diaphragm into the thoracic cavity, indirectly compressed the lungs, the bronchial tubes of which, with the trachea, were filled with a bloody froth, and probably also with the substances regurgitating from the stomach, as the frothy mucus revealed the same odor and color of the liquid found in the latter organ, and in this manner this colored substance was subsequently forced through the nostrils and mouth. The particular mode of death contributed to increase the congested state of the ab- dominal viscera, and although all this may have been the effects of a single dose, yet we have reason to suspect that it may have resulted from the repeated use of ergot, which possesses, 1 believe, a cumulative action, and this leads me to a reconsideration of the condition in which we found the stomach. It is true that Dr. Hume considered this organ as indicating an intense degree of disease, and gangrenous in certain parts; that its mucous membrane exhibited a most unusual appearance is positive; as we have already stated, it was intensely congested in many parts, hypertrophied and abraded; I may add, that the rugae on its surface was raised in elevations, black and re* sembling melanosis, and of a hue somewhat darker than that of the contained liquid. At first I also thought that this was sufficient to establish the existence of true gangrene, but since 1 have experimented, as I have already mention- ed to my friend, I must be allowed to dissent from my pre- viously expressed opinion. The portion which, upon washing the stomach, fell as detritus to the bottom of the vessel, was not sphacelus nor gangrene, but a simple dis- organization after death, which is in itself equally express- ive of the action of ergot—a substance, according to Bon- voisin, highly conducive to putrefaction. The actual con- dition of the viscera was unquestionably due to the action of ergot, the presence ol which in the contained liquid was clearly demonstrated,* but I believe it to have been * The tests used for its detection were precisely tho6e employed by Christison on a simi- lar occasion, in which ergot was detected amidst the presence of several other substances —such as saein, contharides, etc-, criminally usod to procure abortion. 29 the sojourn of the colored and highly irritating poison in contact with the mucous surface, which produced all these phenomena. We must remember that many writers, hut especially Dr. Yelloly, maintain that often a high degree of vascular repletion, amounting to a dark color, is noticed where perfect health has shown that no disease existed; the actual contact of a colored irritant may tinge, and even corrode the heart after death, by chemical action ; corrosion takes place rapidly, but ulceration, which is a vital act, requires time. The only means by which we may determine, then, whether violent inflammation exist- ed previous to death, which unmistaken symptoms alono would settle, is the detection of the indications of inflam- matory action, redness, adhesion, production of pus, pseudo- membranes or their plastic materials in process of forma- tion. But here there was no such evidence. The long protracted contact of the liquid in the cul-de-sac of the stomach produced the softening, for after death even the gastric juice may sometimes act chemically upon part; such was the opinion of Hunter, supported by many other writers—Carswell, Adams, Allan Burns,* and " ~eger,f though the latter believes that diseased action is generally necessary to elaborate gastric juice so endowed with acetic acid as to become corrosive. Putrefactive infiltration, or a blackish extravasation, gave rise to this appearance of sphacelus. Of this I con- vinced myself, by suspending the stomach for a time in di- luted alcohol, and transferring it gradually to the pure li- quid. The cleansing which it thus underwent divested it of its blackness, leaving a marked blush over one part of its surface, and one or more small abrasions. These I term abrasions, for they cannot be considered as ulcers, as there exists no inflammatory circles around them. The disap- pearance, by these means, of such singular traces of dis- ease, is a point of great interest to the medical jurist, for it shows that in this, like in other tissues of the body, we may detect such extravasations as occur before, from those pro- duced after death. Simple imbibition in the tissues disap- pears, but any change of a vital character becomes incor- porated in, and identified with, the texture of the part— alcohol having no effect upon it; this I have frequently noticed in preparing anatomical specimens. But here, though no sphacelus nor gangrene can be admitted, yet there certainly exists disease—the lining membrane is hy- pertrophied, and there is a well marked blush upon its sur- face in some parts. This suggests, that if she had not ta- * Vide Carswell’s Rechercbcs sur la dissolution chlmiq.u9 cu digestion des parols ds 1’estomac apres la mort, etc., etc. f Journal d’Hufeland. 18ll—1813- 30 ken erg i before, some other medicine of an abortive char- acter must have been used ; but I incline to the be- lief that ergot was given during this time, and that proba- bly the attack under which she labored, a few weeks pre- vious to her death, was some of the transient symptoms of ergotism. The singular burning experienced in the limbs, and the extreme-prostration of her are to be no- ticed with particular interest in this connection. We therefore conclude, that from the powers of ergot and from all' the circumstances of this interesting case, this unhappy woman was a victim to the poisonous pro- perties of a medicine, operating upon a constitution whose liabilities guarantied the most fearful consequences. To these, indeed, must he referred those many difficulties which so often perplex the physician ; for, in the language of another, we hold that “ idiosyncrasj', as arising in most cases from inappreciable causes, is the most absolute and inevitable difficulty in medical evidence, since no accumu- lation of instances, such as might suffice for the removal of all other doubts, can secure us wholly against this source of error.”