ACCOUNT OF THE ASYLUM FOR THE RELIEF OF PERSONS DEPRIVED OF THE USE OF THEIR REASON, NEAR FRANKFOED, PENNSYLVANIA; WITH THE STATISTICS OF THE INSTITUTION FROM ITS FOUNDATION TO THE SIST 12TH MONTH, 1838. BY CHARLES EVANS, M. D., ATTENDING PHYSICIAN TO THE ASYLUM. [EXTRACTED PROM THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OP MEDICAL SCIENCES, FOR MAY, 1839.] PHILADELPHIA: T. K. & P. G. COLLINS, PRINTERS, NO. 1 LODGE ALLEY. * 1839. ACCOUNT OF THE ASYLUM FOR THE RELIEF OF PERSONS DEPRIVED OF THE USE OF THEIR REASON, NEAR FRANKFORD, PENNSYLVANIA. Of all the maladies to which the human system is obnoxious, those which affect the manifestations of mind have undoubtedly the strongest claim upon our sympathy and care. Notwithstanding this is now generally acknow- ledged, yet it is comparatively of but recent lime, that the public sympathy has been effectively demonstrated, by providing adequate and appropriate means for the cure of persons afflicted with those diseases; or for alleviating the distress and securing the comfort of such as may be beyond the reach of remedial aid. All experience has proved, that in the great majority of cases, separation from friends, and seclusion from society, are indispensable to the recovery of the insane; besides which the peace of their families, and the well being of society, demand their restraint; hence, places for their reception have been common in all Christian countries: but until the pre- sent century, these institutions appear to have been conducted, mainly, with a view to the security of their wretched inmates; provision for their medical and moral treatment, being altogether unheeded, or made of very secondary consideration. Left to the conduct of the ignorant, the selfish, and the unfeeling, whose principal aim was to escape trouble and secure their own emolument, the mad-houses (as the English termed them,) embraced more heart-sickening degradation, and more unheeded suffering, than could be 4 Evans’s Account of the Frankford Asylum. found in any other receptacles of human misery. The real state of the houses for the reception and treatment of the insane, in Great Britain was first disclosed to the public by the report of a committee of the House of Commons, published in 1816, Credulity itself is staggered at the recital, of the before unheard of cruelty practised, and misery endured, within the walls of most of those institutions, many of which, the public had been accustomed to regard with pride, as monuments of their liberality and bene- volence. There were, however, a few honourable exceptions, and conspi- cuous among these wTas the Retreat near York, which was projected by the Society of Friends as early as 1793, the same year in which Pinel com- menced his celebrated reform in the Bicetre at Paris. The plan of that Institution originated with a few individuals in the society, who, having acci- dentally become acquainted with the manner in which the insane were habitually treated, resolved to rescue such of their fellow professors as suf- fered under that pre-eminent affliction, from the misery which surrounded them, and to place them in a situation where they would be subjected to a totally different course of management from that pursued in any of the existing establishments. Accordingly grounds were purchased, buildings erected, and in 1796 a considerable number of patients received, and a course of treatment carried out, such as had never before been practised towards the insane, and which gave a rational ground to hope that their cure would be effected, or, at all events, their comfort and welfare secured. The Retreat was soon resorted to by others than Friends,’ and in a short time the success obtained there, demonstrated beyond contradiction, the superior effi- cacy, both in respect of cure and security, of a mild and humane system of treatment in all cases of mental disorder. To the philanthropic members of that religious society, who founded and conducted the Retreat, belongs (toge- ther with Pinel, who made some reformation in the horrible abuses of one of the Paris hospitals,) the credit, whatever it may be, of changing the course of treatment long pursued toward those deprived of the use of their reason, and restoring to them that sympathetic kindness and control which their affliction peculiarly demands. The example thus set was slow in ex- tending its influence, as is evident from the state of the institutions through- out Great Britain, when the investigation before alluded to, took place. That it had, however, a decided effect in awakening the public mind to the im-. portance of a reformation in the insane hospitals, is shown by several parts of the evidence given before the committee of the Flouse of Commons. Dr. Weir, Inspector of Naval Hospitals, stales in his testimony, that “the object of almost every insane institution, whether of a public or private description, had been the security of those pitiable objects; comfort, medi- cal and moral treatment being in great measure overlooked; happily, how- ever, for that class of society, the Quakers’ Retreat at York, has at last Evans’s Account of the Frankford Asylum. 5 convinced the world, how much may be done towards the amelioration of their condition.” From the time the subject was thus brought before the public, the arrangement and economy of asylums for the insane have become the sub- jects of attentive study and experiment, until, under the influence of an enlightened philanthropy, they have been radically changed, so that within the walls of every such institution properly conducted, are congregated, not only the various resources of medical science and art, and every thing calcu- lated to divert the mind from its erroneous associations, and give new vigour to its powers; but also all that needful care, decided control, and well-di- rected kindness, which, owing to perverted feelings, the sufferer rejects, or cannot appreciate while within his own domestic circle, but which are gene- rally accepted with thankfulness from the hands of a stranger, and contri- bute powerfully to lessen his distress and restore his health. In 1812, motives, similar to those which actuated the founders of the Retreat in England, induced a large number of the members of the same society in Pennsylvania, to attempt the establishment of a similar institu- tion. They associated themselves together under the title of “ The Con- tributors to the Asylum for the Relief of Persons deprived of the use of their Reason,” for the purpose (as expressed in their constitution,) of pro- viding for the suitable accommodation of that afflicted class of our (their) fellow members, and professors with us, (them) who are or may be deprived of the use of their reason; as well as the relief of their families and friends.” Subscriptions were opened, and in the course of a comparatively short time, a sufficient amount of funds having been collected, the' institution which I am about to describe was built, and in 1817 opened for the reception of patients. At that time there was no asylum in this country which could serve as a model for an institution of the kind, those existing only answer- ing to show how entirely inappropriate for the accommodation of the insane were the plans upon which they were constructed. The Asylum for the Relief of Persons deprived of the use of their Rea- son, is situated in a healthy and retired part of Oxford township, distant about five miles north from Philadelphia, and one mile westward from Frankford. The whole building, which faces the north, is three hundred and twenty-two feet eight inches in length, being made up as follows: The centre building is sixty feet square and three stories high above the basement; having two wings standing back about eighteen feet from its front, each one hundred feet long by twenty-four feet in depth, and two stories high; terminating in end buildings, which project four feet in ad- vance of each wing, and are thirty-one feet four inches in front, by twenty- eight feet four inches in depth, and three stories high, exclusive of the base- ment. From each of these end buildings, a wing, running south, at right 6 Evans’s Account of the Frankford Asylum. angles with the front, extends twenty-six feet eight inches in length, by twenty-two feet six inches in depth, and corresponding in height with the front wings. The first story of the centre building contains four large rooms, divided from each other by halls running at right angles, one of which leads directly through the building from north to south, and has the staircase in it, while the other opens into each wing. The two front rooms are appropriated, the one as a parlour for the superintendant, the other as an office and re- ceiving room; the two in the rear, which respectively communicate with the wing of the side on which it is situated, are used as day-rooms for the patients. The second story of this building also contains two large rooms, situated with respect to the wings like the two below, and like them appro- priated as day-rooms for the patients, besides which, there are four smaller rooms used by the family of the superintendant. There are four large, and three smaller rooms in the third story. One of the larger is occupied by the resident physician, and one as a sitting room for the convalescent female patients; the apothecary shop is also on this story. The wings each con- tain twenty good-sized rooms for patients, with a lobby or passage ten feet wide, running the whole length in front of them, at the extremity of which is the staircase. The end buildings, or lodges, as they are called, though united to the wings by the front wall, yet have their other walls entirely dis- tinct; and in the lower story, are separated from the wings by a passage five feet wide, leading to the airing yards. Immediately over this passage, is the staircase leading from the second to the third story of the lodge. The rooms, both in the body of the lodges and their wings, are on the west side, with an entry six feet wide running in the rear of them on the east side; these entries are lighted by a window at each end, the wall on the side next the wings being unbroken and of extraordinary thickness. This sepa- ration of the two lodges from the rest of the building, is for the purpose of preventing the transmission of sound, and is found effectually to prevent the convalescent and quiet patients, who are kept in the wings, from being in- jured or annoyed by the noise of the violent and unruly ones, who are con- fined to the lodges. The first story of the lodges contains the bath rooms, a day room and two rooms for patients; the other rooms in the different stories, for the accommodation of the patients and their care-takers, are about twelve feet square. In the centre building are the refectory, kitchen, ironing-room, and store- room; rooms for cooking, washing, w^UJ OOh-OOO-^fOOOO Men. CO lO fO to iO — >— •-» >-* W O CTO c iMO O <) o O Women. CO i03 CO iO l“* r—1 ►— -— — ■—* W^COiQOtnOiHH0 ■Single. *0 IO «SD •— lO H- »— 0»^MC5MtnQbOtfJ^I05 Married. tl I-* rf». 00 OS CD O iO o cs w Widows. '-‘OOrfi.OOOi-'MH-'O Widowers.. Whole number of admissions, - - - - - 634 “ Men, ----- 331 “ Women, - 303 “ Single, ----- 326 “ Married, ----- 234 “ Widowers, - - - - 17 “ Widows, 57 Of these there were below 20 years of age, - - 28 From 20 to 30 years, - - 187 “ 30 to 40 “ - - 141 “ 40 to 50 “ - - 126 “ 50 to 60 “ - - 83 “ 60 to 70 “ 48 “ 70 to 80 “ 15 “ 80 to 90 “ - - 5 “ 90 to 100 “ - - 1 634 Of these 634 admissions, 127 were re-admissions granted to 81 individuals, and leaving 507 persons who have been under care. The following table shows the duration of the disease at the time of ad- mission of these 507 cases, and the results of treatment. 12 Evans’s Account of the Frankford Asylum. Duration. IS’umber. Restored. P, HH 3 § Improved. Stationary Remaining Died. Less than 1 year, 261 152 26 27 18 4 34 From 1 to 2 years, 57 18 8 8 9 7 7 From 2 to 3 years, 36 17 3 3 4 5 4 From 3 to 5 years, 45 14 7 6 9 3 6 From 5 to 10 years, 47 13 7 3 8 11 5 Over 10 years, 61 0 7 5 22 13 14 Aggregate, ,507 214 52 52 70 43 70 The proportion of cures in these cases is 42.21 in every hundred; but if we deduct the sixty-one cases, which at the time of admission had been deranged over ten years (and which included twenty who either were idiots, or had been imbecile from puberty), five cases complicated with epilepsy, and five which entered the institution with the paralysis peculiar to the insane, it leaves 436 cases, properly subject to treatment, and the cures are in the proportion of 49 in every hundred. The per centage of cures in cases of less than a year’s duration, taking the whole twenty-two years is 58.23. Within the last six years, it has been 66. Nearly all of this class, discharged as “ much improved,” were almost well; but either pecuniary considerations, or the anxiety of their friends, oc- casioned their removal as soon as the disease was so far overcome as to render their perfect restoration probable; and in many instances information was afterwards received of their perfect recovery. Of the seventy deaths, six occurred within a week of the time of their admission; nine within two weeks; seven within three weeks; and three within four weeks; these were mostly cases of acute inflammation of the brain, or its meninges, many of them being brought to the Asylum after all hope of relieving them at home was abandoned. Ten died between a month and a year’s residence, and the remainder varying from one year to twenty. Of the eighty-one patients re-admitted, there wmre discharged Restored, 3G Much Improved, 4 Improved, - 6 Stationary, - - - -- -- 7 Died, - 17 Remaining in the House, - - - - 11 Twenty-two returned a third time; of whom there were discharged—Re-> stored, 14. Improved, 3. Stationary, 3. Died, 3—and one remains in Evans’s Account of the Frankford Asylum. 13 the house. The other re-admissions, were of three individuals, who being liable to periodical insanity, have been accustomed to resort to the Asylum at the commencement of an attack, and to remain there until again restored to the use of their reason. The following table exhibits the ages of the persons re-admitted, and the duration of the attack at the time of their first admission. Age. No. Duration of Disease. No. Below 20 years, 2 Less than 1 year, 3y From 20—30 24 From 1 to 2 years, 7 From 30—40 21 From 2 to 3 years, 7 From 40—50 15 From 3 to 5 years, 7 From 50—60 10 From 5 to 10 years, 10 From 60—70 4 Above 10 years, 11 From 70—80 4 From 80—90 1 81 81 Forty-one of the eighty-one had been originally discharged cured. The interval between the discharge and re-admission, was as follows. Less than three months, 17 of whom 8 had been discharged cured. Between three and six months, 9 of whom 2 do. “ six months and 1 year, 14 do. 11 do. “ 1 and 2 years, - 11 do. 8 do. “ 2 and 3 years, - 8 do. 2 do. “ 3 and 5 years, - 7 do. 4 do. “ 5 and 10 years, 13 do. 5 do. Over 10 years, - 2 do. 1 do. In some of the cases where this interval was so short as to be within three months, the second indisposition should no doubt be considered as a relapse; the organs not having been restored to perfect soundness after the original attack. But when we recollect how prone an organ which has once been diseased, and especially the brain, is, to resume the morbid action upon the occurrence of even a trivial cause, and also that that organ is liable to be affected not only by the causes which produce disease in other parts of the system, but likewise by the moral feelings and emotions of the mind; it is not to be wondered at, that a recurrence of disease should often be witnessed where persons are taken from the seclusion and regular habits of an Asylum, and ushered into the cares and excitement of society, as soon as healthy action is believed to have been restored. It is a difficult 14 Evans’s Account of the Franlford Asylum. matter to convince a patient, or his friends, that prudence dictates his stay should be prolonged for a considerable time after he is apparently well, yet it cannot be doubted, that where such a course is pursued, the security of health is greatly increased. As has been before observed, the Asylum was originally intended for the accommodation of those in membership or profession with the Society of Friends alone; and it continued thus exclusive, until the year 1834, when the contributors withdrew the restriction, and opened the institution for the benefit of all, with the proviso, that “ in no case should a member or pro- fessor be excluded.” An accurate record of the place of nativity of each patient, and whether member or not, has been kept from the opening of the institution. By this it appears that the average number of the members of the General Meeting of Friends held annually in Philadelphia, which were under care (including idiots) during the first ten years in which the Asylum was opened, was thirty-one. That meeting includes the greater part of Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware, and during those ten years was composed of between twenty and twenty-three thousand members; which, taking the medium, twenty-one thousand five hundred, which I believe is nearly correct, gives the proportion of one in every six hundred ninety-three and a half. In 1827, a large body seceded from that meeting, and its numbers are not now so accurately known; the ratio, however, has not increased. Dr. Burroughs in his Commentaries, gives currency to the opinion that insanity occurs in a greater proportion among the members of the Society of Friends, than the population generally, and assigns as a reason, their intermarriage with each other. This however would be entirely insufficient to account for the greater prevalence of the disease among them, if such were really the case, as in Great Britain, from whence he draws his data, there are nearly if not quite twenty-five thousand members; a number so large as to do away the probability of its being attributable to hereditary taint. As the records of the two institutions for the insane, belonging to the So- ciety, show that intemperance and want, so productive of mental derange- ment among others, cannot be assigned as the causes of it, in more than one case in every hundred and fifty occurring in the members of that society, and as they are known to be exempted, at least equally with others, from the sources of anxiety which disturb the social state; there wmuld appear to be no other causes for the disproportion of diseases affecting the manifesta- tions of mind, did it really exist, than either defective cerebral organization, or some peculiarity in their religious principles or practices. The former, no one will believe to be the case, and religious mania, as it is commonly but improperly called, is a form of the disorder which so rarely occurs among them, that as a community they may be said to be almost exempt from it. Evans’s Account of the Frankford Asylum. 15 The true reason of the apparent disparity in the proportional number of hose afflicted with derangement in that society, and the community at large, lies in the very defective statistical information obtained of the latter rela- tive to a disease which the ignorance and prejudices of the people lead them to conceal, and upon which incorrect data, a false estimate has heretofore been made. While in the Society of Friends, an accurate knowledge of all the members, liberal provision for the support of their poor, and institutions for its cure under their own care and government, bring nearly every case of idiocy or insanity which occurs among them, under notice.