1 60:00:04 ~2 00:00:23 3 00:00:14 4 00:00:17 5 00:00:08 SOMEHOW, SOME WAY, SOME TIME: THE REGIONAL MEDICAL PROGRAMS CUTTING SCRIPT, PART 1 (10/20/91) VIDEO BLACK. FADE UP ON PHOTOGRAPHS OF LYNDON JOHNSON SPEAKING TO DEBAKEY COMMISSION MORE STILLS PAN OF COMMISSION MEMBERS IN PHOTOGRAPH DISSOLVE TO TITLE SEQUENCE: SOMEHOW, SOME WAY, SOME TIME--THE REGIONAL MEDICAL PROGRAMS, 1966-1976 AUDIO (Audio recording: 41764.1bj) PRESIDENT JOHNSON: I am firmly convinced that the accumulated brains and determination of this Commission and of the scientific community of the world will, before the end of this decade, come forward with some answers and cures that we need so very much. NARRATOR: (Voiceover) With these unvarnished words, Lyndon Johnson told his Commission on Heart Disease, Cancer and Stroke to get to work. It was April 17, 1964. JOHNSON (Voiceover) : You have among you some of the great doctors, some of the greatest public servants of our time. Somehow, some way, some time, you are going to find the answers and I hope it will be soon. MUSIC UP FULL. .6 DISSOLVE TO MONTAGE OF 00:00:31 19605, GRADUALLY BECOMING MORE FOCUSED ON MEDICAL PRACTICE OF THE 1960S -7 DEBAKEY FOOTAGE FROM 00:00:20 BBC DOCUMENTARY -8 DISSOLVE TO: 00:00:29 MEDIUM SHOT, DEBAKEY NARRATOR (Voiceover): It was the middle of the 1960s--a time of dramatic change and new awareness. The economy was booming, and medical knowledge was burgeoning. But many Americans were aware of a gap in the benefits of medicine--a gap between what was possible and what was widely available. No one was more keenly aware of that fact that was Dr. Michael DeBakey, who was even then world famous for his pioneering work in cardiovascular surgery. DeBakey knew that the benefits of his research were not spreading quickly. DEBAKEY: The gap existed between where the centers were doing this work and out in the periphery, doctors in practice not picking up patients who had these diseases, and referring them for operation. So there was a gap in the knowledge available to treat patients and the patients who were being treated by doctors who did not have that knowledge. -9 00:00:17 -10 00:00:14 11 00:00:17 -12 00:00:14 213 00:00:31 JOHNSON PHOTOS / FOOTAGE JOHNSON WITH DEBAKEY DISSOLVE TO: MEDIUM SHOT OF DEBAKEY COMMISSION MEMBERS, STILLS REPORT NARRATOR (Voiceover) President Lyndon Johnson was concerned about a major statistic--the fact that 71-percent of all Americans who died were killed by heart disease, cancer, or stroke. Johnson asked DeBakey to chair the commission which he hoped would come up with a plan to restructure the American practice of medicine in order to combat those three major killers: DEBAKEY: He asked me how long the thing would take. I said, “About a year." He said, "We've got to do better than that. I want to be able to include a message from this commission in my address in January." NARRATOR (Voiceover) : DeBakey and other commission members began their intense work almost immediately, gathering and analyzing material from all over the country. The report was delivered in December of 1964, in time for January's State of the Union message. (CONTINUED) -13 CONTINUED: 22 .14 DISSOLVE TO LBJ AND 00:00:17 COMMISSION -15 DISSOLVE TO MEDIUM WIDE 00:00:44 SHOT OF LBJ DELIVERING STATE OF UNION MESSAGE A copy was sent to every practicing physician in the United States. PRESIDENT JOHNSON: (Audio: 12964.1bj) Today it is a very high honor and great privilege to receive the results of your study. (E) With these guideposts and with these goals, we will begin this year in the Congress and in the country to make a concerted drive on these three enemies to the health of two-thirds of all Americans. JOHNSON (SOT): Our goal is to match the achievements of our medicine to the afflictions of our people. We already carry on a large program in this country in this country for research and health. In addition, regional medical programs can provide the most advanced diagnosis and treatment for heart disease and cancer and stroke and other major diseases. (CONTINUED) .15 CONTINUED: 23 .16 COVER, STATE OF THE 00:00:20 UNION MESSAGE .17 DISSOLVE TO MEDIUM 00:01:01 SHOT, DEBAKEY New support for medical and dental education will provide the trained people to apply our knowledge. NARRATOR (Voiceover) But the concerted drive on the three enemies had to take a detour through the political process. Proposal number three, advocating the development of regional medical complexes, turned out to be extremely controversial. DEBAKEY (SOT): It concerned this so-called cooperative arrangement between institutions, creating a regional network across the whole country. (E) In each region, the idea was to have a center of excellence which would have all of the best technology, the best facilities, the best personnel, the best training, and then surround that center of excellence with (CONTINUED) -17 18 00:00:04 -19 00:00:11 -20 00:00:29 CONTINUED: 24 MEDIUM SHOT, PAUL SANAZARO individual diagnostic stations and even station hospitals, so to speak, which would relate to the center of excellence for the more highly technical work. (E) M.D. Anderson is an example of what we had in mind, you see, and is, in that sense, a center of excellence in carrying out the concept. (Copy to be written.) Unfortunately, as you look around the country, you have very few. The reason, of course, is that the legislation never authorized then. SANAZARO SOT: Two bills were introduced with that in mind, one in the Senate, one in the House, and in the course of the summer, various groups from organized medicine made it be known that they could not possibly approve the creation of regional medical complexes if this meant disturbing existing relationships. .21 MEDIUM SHOT WILLIAM 00:00:23 22 00:00:44 RUHE M/S OLSON WILLIAM RUHE: (SOT) Practicing physicians tended to be apprehensive about whether this was going to change the practice of medicine. The American Medical Association was worried about this being a first step toward a nationalized health system. OLSON SOT : I think it was the pressure from the practicing profession that changed it so that the focus really became more heavily placed on education and dissemination of information and co-operation, and the bill that was adopted had a very specific prohibition about not interfering with the private practice of medicine, and that referrals, if any, in connection with demonstration projects would have to be made by referral by a practicing physician. -23 00:00:26 ~24 00:00:53 MS RUHE MEDIUM SHOT, PAUL ROGERS RUHE SOT: The original report spoke, for example of regional medical complexes, complexes not defined, but I think in almost everybody's mind, that evoked the image of large construction efforts, new buildings, new centers assembled in either existing locations or new locations. ROGERS SOT: So the Congress reacted and they cut out any approval for the building of facilities to calm down the concerns that people were going to be sent away. They made the program a cooperative program, where it was not something that someone can come in and direct. You had to get cooperation from people in all of the communities, the medical center, whatever. The only patient care that could be done was in research, in demonstration, but you really couldn't deliver care; it had to be paid for in a traditional way. (CONTINUED) .24 CONTINUED: 27 .25 MEDIUM SHOT, MERLIN 00:00:20 DUVAL .26 LEGISLATION, STILLS OF 00:01:07 LBJI SIGNING 28.a. MEDIUM SHOT, RUHE 28.B LBJ STILLS You could not change that. so that first legislation acceded, really, to the concerns of AMA in those points. MERLIN DUVAL: As a consequence, we moved from actually moving patients to moving information so that you could ultimately close the gap between literally the laboratory bench and the patient who needed information. NARRATOR (Voiceover) So the proposal for regional medical complexes was modified into a program for information exchange--and the Regional Medical Programs were born. RUHE SOT: I think we have to acknowledge that RMP was just another component of the Great Society program in the health field. The idea, of course, was to sell something to the public which would be new and striking and would save many, many lives. (CONTINUED) -26 CONTINUED: 28 -27 00:00:17 20 00:00:34 CARTOONS FROM MARSTON/YORDY ARTICLE FIGURE 3: "THEY WANT TO TELL US WHAT TO DO!" "THEY'RE NOT GOING TO TELL US WHAT TO DO?" "YOU MEAN WE'VE GOT TO DO EVERYTHING FOR EVERYBODY?" 10. NARRATOR VO: President Johnson signed the legislation in October, 1965. PRESIDENT JOHNSON: (Audio: 10665.1b}) Its goal is simple: to speed the miracles of medical research from the laboratory to the bedside. Our method of reaching that goal is simple, too. through grants to establish Regional Medical Programs among our medical schools and clinical research institutes, we will unite our Nation's health resources. NARRATOR (Voiceover) That is not to say that the Nation's health resources were eager to be united. Throughout the winter and spring of 1965 and 1966, health professionals, educators, community health planners, and hundreds of other interested people grappled with the process of planning, organization, and grant applications. -29 00:00:26 ~30 00:00:07 FIGURE 5:"PLANNING TOGETHER WASN'T SO BAD, BUT. . DO WE REALLY HAVE TO WORK TOGETHER?" FADE TO BLACK OR DISSOLVE TO SPECIAL SLATE TO INDICATE END OF PART 1. 11. By June, 1966, activities based on the first grants were up and running. In June of 1967, a report on the progress of Regional Medical Programs concluded that it was too soon to comment on their success or failure, and recommended that they be funded for another five years. el 00:00:04 22 00:00:32 3 00:00:23 SOMEHOW, SOME WAY, SOME TIME: THE REGIONAL MEDICAL PROGRAMS CUTTING SCRIPT: PART 2 (10/20/91) VIDEO GRAPHIC: MAP OF REGIONS NAMES OF REGIONS EMERGE: GREATER DELAWARE VALLEY RMP BI-STATE RMP LAKES AREA RMP INTERMOUNTAIN RMP SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY RMP TRI-STATE RMP TENNESSEE MID-SOUTH RMP MEDIUM SHOT MERLIN DUVAL AUDIO NARRATOR (Voiceover) : One of the first characteristics to become obvious about the Regional Medical Programs was that each one was different. That even showed in the areas each region covered. About half of the 56 RMPs corresponded to political jurisdictions--and about half. And each did not. Some overlapped. had its own concerns. But that was the way it was supposed to work. MERLIN DUVAL: Regional Medical Programs was allowed to look at the way patients and information flowed in the real world. If you looked, for instance, at Kansas City, the question is, do you give it to Kansas City, Missouri, or do you give it to Kansas City, Kansas. .4 M/S STARK 00:00:38 .5 M/S DUVAL 00:00:23 STARK SOT: And what we did there was to organize a liaison committee between both states with the University of Kansas and the University of Missouri, of course, participating, in order to avoid any kind of duplication of effort and to have more cooperation. I think that's one of the principal roles that I found coming out of the Regional Medical Programs, and that is the ability to get these diverse groups and institutions together in a cooperative way. DUVAL SOT: So, Regional Medical Programs was created and permitted money to flow to entities that were not geographic or political jurisdictions. They were watershed jurisdiction. I thought that was an incredible breakthrough for the federal government to take as a step. .6 MONTAGE OF PHOTOS, 00:00:23 LETTERHEADS, ARTICLES .7 FREEZE EGEBERG 00:00:08 .8 RELEASE FREEZE: MEDIUM 00:00:59 SHOT, ROGER EGEBERG NARRATOR (Voiceover): The Regional Medical Programs required the cooperation of segments of the community which were sometimes not accustomed to communicating with each other, much less cooperating. And there was hesitation in many areas about making the attempt. Dr. Roger Egeberg was then Dean of the School of Medicine at the University of Southern California. ROGER EGEBERG: The university was conservative about it, this faculty was, but the executive committee, after I explained it to them, came along. So we were the first people in California to join. There was still some hostility, but Congress had done something terribly important: they had included the medical profession and the hospitals right in the law. So some of the first money to come didn't come to a medical school; it went to the California Medical Association. Wasn't that bright? And next to the California Hospital. (CONTINUED) -8 CONTINUED: 64 .9 STILLS FROM MEETINGS OF 00:00:32 RMP ERA, OR WITH RESEARCH OR OTHER COOPERATION, OR LOGOS OF SOCIETIES .10 MEDIUM SHOT OF KARL 00:01:04 YORDY And they became part of the program. They saw that we didn't have horns or tails, and we started to work together pleasantly. NARRATOR (Voiceover) : In California, and in other regions, the cooperation between the hospitals, the medical schools, and the medical societies was soon augmented by health organizations such as the American Heart Association and the American Cancer Society, and by members of the general public. For some establishments the adjustment was easy--for others it was not. KARL YORDY: Schools that had strong traditions of reaching out to the community and really viewed themselves as playing a role with the broader community found this new role rather comfortable and found it, in fact, one that was able to facilitate a lot of the things which they'd been thinking about anyway. (CONTINUED) 10 -1l1 00:00:20 ~12 00:00:29 CONTINUED: 65 STILLS OF EARLY REMOTE READING OF EKGs MEDIUM SHOT, KARL YORDY I'm thinking here of schools like the University of Washington in Seattle, the University of Missouri, universities that often were state universities and had a tradition of reaching out. The more elite, private medical schools, I think, had a harder time sort of figuring out how this fit into their own sense of their mission and role. NARRATOR (Voiceover) : It is difficult to generalize about the accomplishments of the RMPs, since they all addressed different needs and had different goals. But some remarkable accomplishments stand out--some that changed American medical care forever. KARL YORDY: There was an effort, for instance, out of the Missouri RMP, one of the first operation RMPs, that set up a (CONTINUED) -12 CONTINUED: 66 -13 MEDIUM SHOT, VERNON 00:00:28 WILSON -14 MEDIUM SHOT, PAUL 00:00:41 SANAZARO DISSOLVE TO CORONARY ICU communication link between a group of physicians, cardiologists, in Springfield, Missouri, and the medical center in Columbia, that would permit the remote reading of EKGs, a capacity that's now routine in medical care. VERNON WILSON: Utah dealt with getting that information to a four-state area, and very successfully they dealt with that. They did what Missouri and Alabama did so well, they formed a telephone bank and people could call in for information. PAUL SANAZARO: I thought, to me, I don't know if it's exciting, but important, the most important thing that RMP did was to put in place, which is still in place, in the United States intensive care units for heart disease patients, the coronary care units, and the training of personnel for that, and specialized equipment for that. (CONTINUED) -14 .15 STILLS OF EARLY REMOTE 00:00:43 -16 MEDIUM SHOT, CHARLES 00:00:47 CONTINUED: 67 READING OF EKGS FLAGLE That probably was its greatest technical contribution to patient care, and that's very exciting that that happened. It came along at just the right time. NARRATOR (Voiceover): RMPs not only spurred development of remote EKG readings and coronary care units, but also rapid strides in vascular surgery and in the development of regional trauma centers. But one of the greatest contributions of Regional Medical Programs was perhaps the newfound cooperation between different segments of society, and the realization that regional planning could yield worthwhile results. FLAGLE (SOT): There was strong cooperation between the University of Maryland and Johns Hopkins, and there was also a great involvement of such things as the media, the heart associations. (CONTINUED) -16 CONTINUED: 68 .17 MEDIUM SHOT, KISSICK , 00:00:26 -18 MEDIUM SHOT, ARTHUR 00:00:29 RIKLI I would call it an unprecedented--I was about to say conglomeration, but it really wasn't that. It was a well-orchestrated program and it resulted in the creation of the Maryland High Blood Pressure Commission, which is still in existence and still operating for purposes of implementing some of the results of that five-year study of coordination. SOT KISSICK: An unknown and little-appreciated dimension of RMP in Connecticut was CUPIDS, Connecticut Utilization Patient Information Data Systems. CUPIDS enabled them to analyze the utilization of services at all thirty-five Connecticut hospitals, and brought forth diagnostic-related groups. ARTHUR RIKLI: I think the Regional Medical Programs (CONTINUED) -18 CONTINUED: 69 -19 MEDIUM SHOT, MERLIN 00:00:29 DUVAL .20 MONTAGE OF STILLS FROM 00:00:26 REGIONAL MEDICAL PROGRAMS, HANDSHAKES, EKG READINGS, MEETINGS, PATIENT CARE, LIBRARIES, TRAUMA CENTERS, ETC. really built an active bridge between the medical school and the providers of health care, not only in their immediate area, but out in the rural areas, as well. so the Regional Medical Program still has that benefit in most of the communities and regions where they were set up originally. MERLIN DUVAL: I do think that this is, in its own way, a watershed event. It's a watershed event because it brought a type of early partnership into the providing elements of America's health care system and the federal government. Until that time, they did not have that kind of relationship. NARRATOR (Voiceover) In spite of their accomplishments, the Regional Medical Programs did not have long to live. Some of the reasons they went away were due to politics, to changing times and shifting priorities. (CONTINUED) 10. .20 CONTINUED: 70 But the strength of the RMPs, their adaptation to their regions, would also prove to be a major weakness. -21 FADE TO BLACK OR TO 00:00:05 SPECIAL SLATE: END OF PART 2. -l 00:00:04 22 00:00:41 3 00:00:14 SOMEHOW, SOME WAY, SOME TIME: THE REGIONAL MEDICAL PROGRAMS SHOOTING SCRIPT: PART 3 (10/20/91) VIDEO 1970S TELEGRAPH WORKING SUPERS EMERGE: "NO GRANT FUNDS ARE INCLUDED IN THE PRESIDENT'S REQUEST FOR RMP IN FISCAL YEAR 1974" "ALL OF FISCAL YEAR 1973 GRANT AWARDS WILL TERMINATE ON JUNE 30, 1973" ", . .DO NOT ENTER INTO ANY NEW CONTRACTS. . ." ", . .WE NEED TO PROCEED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF PHASEOUT PREPARATIONS. . ." NIXON INAUGURATION (CLARK STOCK) AUDIO Natural Sound (:05) The telegram sent out to all coordinators of the Regional Medical Programs on February 1, 1973, marked the beginning of the end of the Regional Medical Programs. Although the Regional Medical Programs had received their highest level of funding ever in Fiscal Year 1973, they had been completely cut out of the budget for Fiscal Year 1974, and Dr. Harold Margulies, who was then director of RMPs, was ordering them to begin shutting down. What happened? Part of the answer to that question is that the times had changed. Richard Nixon was now president; the programs of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society were being dismantled. 4 00:00:20 5 00:00:14 6 00:00:11 7 00:00:11 8 00:00:38 MEDIUM SHOT, KARL YORDY VIETNAM STOCK (BE THERE, BE COUNTED STOCK) M/S MARSTON STILLS OF CASPAR WEINBERGER KARL YORDY: I think that the hope and the vision for the program really were starting to disappear shortly after Nixon became president. It was sort of a holding action, sort of a fighting the frontiers at that point. ROBERT MARSTON: (Voiceover) The Vietnam War had raised the issue of guns and butter, and funds suddenly became very restricted at the federal level. Then, finally, I think, Regional Medical Programs, as a part of the Great Society programs, was caught up in a rejection of such programs. NARRATOR (Voiceover) Caspar Weinberger, as head of the Office of Management and Budget, had been one of the RMPs harshest critics. JOHN ZAPP: OMB was certainly a harsh critic of RMP at that time, but that was not uncommon. They were basically a harsh critic of most of the categorical programs. (CONTINUED) -8 CONTINUED: 85 MEDIUM SHOT, JOHN ZAPP .9 MORE OLD STILLS OF 00:00:35 WEINBERGER, TESTIFYING AT CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES, WORKING IN OFFICE, ETC. -10 00:00:44 Maybe that was one of the problems that RMP was suffering at that time within the administration. They just didn't seem to be able to withstand the constant requirements for justification that OMB was throwing at the secretary's office on the re-authorization for each year. NARRATOR (Voiceover) : When Caspar Weinberger became Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare in 1972, his attitude toward the RMPs could hardly be expected to change--and it didn't. When Congress wanted to extend the life of the RMPs for a year--from June 30th, 1973, to June 30th, 1974, Weinberger took the unusual step of lobbying against it. Congress passed the extension overwhelmingly. Nevertheless, the RMPs were doomed. EGEBERG (SOT): I think they were assassinated. Now you can kill people by ripping them open, you can kill them by a bop on the head, or you can kill them by choking. (CONTINUED) -10 -il 00:00:08 ~12 00:00:44 CONTINUED: 86 FREEZE, JOHN ZAPP RELEASE FREEZE: SHOT, JOHN ZAPP MEDIUM This was from way up above. I think it began with Caspar Weinberger, who had a feeling that Regional Medical Programs was just another program that was going to drain money out of the Treasury, and it would be better to cancel them all and come out with a big program, which I think medicine became worried about, might be socialized medicine or health insurance for all. NARRATOR (Voiceover): The RMPs had other political problems, too. JOHN ZAPP: They had a base that probably provided them with the weakest constituency in the secretary's office and within the administration. That was basically a medical school base, where the perception, if you will, was that an awful lot of money just seemed to be going to the faculties in the different health science centers. (CONTINUED) -12 CONTINUED: 87 -13 WIDE SHOT, CAPITOL 00:00:14 -14 MEDIUM SHOT, PAUL 00:00:52 ROGERS That was a perception that was very difficult for the program administrators to overcome because, rightly or wrongly, there was a lot of faculty support built into RMPs around the country. NARRATOR (Voiceover: The legislative mandate for RMPs had changed. Congress had made the choice between keeping the focus for RMPs or broadening their purpose. PAUL ROGERS: I think they were for broadening, as I recall. They thought it should be broadened, as long as we had the facilities, and that network of people working together, we thought it should be applied to increase health care generally, although, as we've talked about, the first emphasis was categorical on those three diseases. But that began to change from those who did not like the program, who said, "Oh, you've lost the purpose." Well, we really didn't because we were improving health care for people. .15 MEDIUM SHOT, EDMUND EDMUND PELLEGRINO: 00:01:01 PELLEGRINO I want to go on the record of saying that many of the regions did very good things with this program. They carried out many of the ideas, but there were so many goals and objectives. It's perfectly all right to have variety in the regions, but the important thing that mustn't be missed is that the network that brings it about was utterly confused at times, not knowing where it was going. So that when we looked at programs, we would have such a variety, we didn't hve solid criteria that we could use to judge them, and it was a little bit unfair, as a matter of fact, because, as you say, different parts of the country had different requirements. -16 ZOOM IN DOOR OF HEARING NARRATOR (Voiceover) : 00:00:11 ROOM, 2218 RHOB Money was tight. A program without a specific focus had a hard time competing for it. .17 MEDIUM SHOT, JOHN ZAPP JOHN ZAPP: 00:00:35 I think one of the things that led to the demise of the Regional Medical Programs was the competition from other more identifiable programs within the Public Health Service and HEW that it had to compete with. RMP had to compete with Emergency Services, Migrant Health, Rural Health, Indian Health. It had to compete for dollars with the entities and the Food and Drug Administration. .18 CONGRESS OR CAPITOL NARRATOR (Voiceover) : 00:00:25 SHOT That did not mean that RMPs died easily. Congress had voted overwhelmingly to extend the life of the RMPs, and they still had supporters on Paul Rogers' subcommittee: -19 MEDIUM SHOT, PAUL PAUL ROGERS: 00:00:35 ROGERS I remember in the testimony, they sent John Zapp, who was then, as I recall, the legislative deputy assistant secretary. The Secretary for Health would not come, nor would the Secretary. (CONTINUED) 19 -20 00:00:26 ~2l 00:00:11 22 00:00:38 CONTINUED: 90 MEDIUM SHOT, JOHN ZAPP HEARINGS STILLS, CAPITOL SHOT MEDIUM SHOT, ROGER EGEBERG They let the messenger, who had to give the bad news that they were cutting this program, come before Congress, and our committee gave him really a pretty rough time, on both sides of the aisle. JOHN ZAPP: I get to deliver the messages, good and bad, although sometimes others in the department got to deliver more good messages. A very combative time between the administration and the health committees, so most of them were relatively contentious types of. hearings. NARRATOR (Voiceover) : But in spite of Congressional support, members of the administration were still determined to see the RMPs die. ROGER EGEBERG: Well, I think Caspar Weinberger sort of worked up a particular antipathy to this because it was so hard to kill it. (CONTINUED) -22 CONTINUED: 91 -23 WEINBERGER, LAWSUIT 00:00:32 PAPERS .24 MEDIUM SHOT, JOHN ZAPP 00:00:17 He tried to choke it by taking the funds and impounding the funds in the middle of the year, saying, "You can't spend any more money. Save it till the next year," and then using that for the next year instead of giving them any new money. That's choking them. That's cutting down their funds. NARRATOR (Voiceover): That was also something the Regional Medical Programs thought Secretary Weinberger had no right to do, since Congress had clearly appropriated the money to be spent by the RMPs. So the National Association of Regional Medical Programs sued to have the money released--sued, and won. On February 7, 1974, the courts ordered the money released. Reluctantly, the White House complied. JOHN ZAPP: I don't think it was any great surprise about the suit. I think they were quite prepared for it. I don't think they thought they were going to lose, but they were prepared to have the suit. .25 ANIMATION: MAP WITH 00:00:17 RMPS. RMPS DISAPPEAR. .26 MEDIUM SHOT, VERNON 00:00:20 WILSON .27 M/S OLSON 00:00:43 10. NARRATOR (Voiceover) : The RMPs had won the suit, but it didn't matter. The money released in February of 1974 was for the budget year ending in June, and there were no further appropriations. VERNON WILSON: The suit at the end, you know, that's — my only knowledge of a suit of that kind in order to keep legislation in existence. It had the end results you should expect; it just prolonged the agony, that's all. OLSON (SOT): Here was a huge bureaucracy that you had to deal with, and you had all kids of talented people in the programs. The kind of understanding and support that would have been necessary to make the program effective just wasn't there, so it was a sense of trying to keep faith with the people who had joined the program and yet you didn't have the sense that at the top level there was any conviction that they wanted it to succeed. .28 M/S RUHE 00:00:29 -29 00:00:08 30 00:00:05 MORE CLOSEDOWN SHOTS O RMPS , FADE TO BLACK OR DISSOLVE TO SLATE: END OF PART 3 11. RUHE (SOT): It's disappointing that these things did not endure. I don't know how long they did endure after RMP quit. I had the impression that some of this cooperation and collaboration did continue for a few years, at least, but as long as the people who were engaged in initial arrangement were still there, maybe still living, still active. NARRATOR (Voiceover) : The RMPs wound down and dwindled; in 1976, independent RMP operations ended. SOMEHOW, SOME WAY, SOME TIME: THE REGIONAL MEDICAL PROGRAMS SHOOTING SCRIPT: PART 4 (10/20/91) -1 VIDEO: 00:00:41 MONTAGE: MODERN MEDICAL FACILITIES-~EXTERIORS, PEOPLE RECEIVING TREATMENT, PROCESSING MEDICAL INSURANCE CLAIMS -2 MEDIUM SHOT, EDMUND 00:00:55 PELLEGRINO AUDIO: Music up and under Times have changed. Since the Regional Medical Programs ceased operations, medical knowledge has burgeoned--and so has the cost for medical care. In the mid-1960s, the cost of medical care was less than 5% of the GNP--today it's 15%. Is it relevant to consider programs along the lines of the RMPs? Some people think the time has come--if not to revive RMPs, at least to consider something similar. EDMUND PELLEGRINO: I think it was probably ahead of its time. I think the time will come again when we must reinvent it, because I think regionalization is part of--by the way, that's one of the other defects I would like to add. It was not part of a comprehensive program for national health care, which we urgently need. (CONTINUED) 1.2 -3 00:00:29 4 00:00:23 CONTINUED: 95 MEDIUM SHOT, PAUL SANAZARO ROBERT MARSTON, MEDIUM SHOT 1 I think if it could be placed within that context, then the mechanism of cooperative arrangements on a regional basis would really have a tremendous use in improving the health care of the American people, which was the aim in the first place. PAUL SANAZARO: It anticipated the present. In the literature today, you are reading about regionalizing, highly technical services that require large volume, highly skilled personnel, and special support facilities. So we will see regionalization, but unfortunately maybe some 20 years after RMP was on the scene. ROBERT MARSTON: I think this idea of cooperative arrangements is difficult for a government such as ours, and it's uneven in terms of its receptivity. It does allow people to look at the elephant and see what it is that they want to see. -5 MEDIUM SHOT, ROGER 00:00:38 EGEBERG .6 M/S KISSICK 00:00:26 -7 M/S PELLEGRINO 00:00:14 ROGER EGEBERG: I think that if they were brought back, appropriately nurtured, and not given too much money--I don't think it should be a very expensive program--that they would help the basic problem we have now, and that is of getting all these people--hospitals, practitioners, the societies and so forth and their organizations--talking together. It seems to me that if you can get people talking together, you've made a big step towards solving a problem. KISSICK (SOT): I think we had the right concept, but we didn't understand the culture. (E) I think that now that we have a quarter-century under our belt since Regional Medical Programs, that all we've got to get is Congress to enact them all over again, and this time around we'll do a better job. PELLEGRINO (SOT): I think they're going to have to be reinvented, because regionalization of health care services in something I think we really must have. -8 MEDIUM SHOT, MICHAEL 00:00:20 DEBAKEY .9 MEDIUM SHOT, WILSON 00:00:41 .10 MODERN MEDICAL PRACTICE 00:00:17 MICHAEL DEBAKEY: I think to meet the needs of the population for good medical care, we're going to have to set up something like this. (E) There is, I think a need to reconsider something along these lines in the development of a health policy. WILSON (SOT): I think that Mike DeBakey was absolutely correct in his initial instinct to establish complexes, but I think they will have to come after the national health insurance is invoked. (E) I would say another ten to fifteen years the House will have changed enough and the Senate will change its patterns, and it will probably come in that order, and I think some Regional Medical Program-type activity then will become, perforce, a necessary part of the system. NARRATOR (Voiceover) : The RMPs were not perfect. However, they did accomplish one very important thing they were set up to do--and that is closing the gap between new medical knowledge and the practice of medicine. -11 MEDIUM SHOT, DEBAKEY 00:00:38 «12 00:00:17 ~13 00:00:52 CONGRESSIONAL HEARING DISSOLVE TO: MEDIUM SHOT, JOHN ZAPP MICHAEL DEBAKEY: I think the gap has been reduced and contracted considerably, because information now is more readily available and actually gets out to doctors more quickly than it has in the past, to some extent because of the National Library of Medicine and what it has done. No question about that. You take MEDLARS and other means of communication and information availability for doctors, this has made a tremendous difference. NARRATOR (Voiceover): There are other lessons to be learned from the rise and fall of the RMPs. JOHN ZAPP: What's the trick in making it work? I think the trick in making it work is to have an effective constituency behind any program. If you take a look at the programs that have had real (CONTINUED) 13 14 00:00:29 CONTINUED: 99 DISSOLVE OUT TO MEDIUM SHOT, PAUL ROGERS problems, it's been the ones that have lacked, whether it's public assistance programs that have had the terrible problems through the years because of the lack of organized constituency. I think RMP suffered from that. PAUL ROGERS: I think there is building--and very significantly--a demand for some cost controls in the health care system because it's just grown so dramatically. Cost controls. I think people generally are supportive of doing something on access and I think they generally demand, and will continue to demand, quality. So lI think that the whole effort to make changes in our health care system is being supported more and more. I think it's growing very rapidly, and I think you will see significant changes in the delivery of health care service in this country. -15 00:00:29 16 00:00:19 -17 00:00:04 MORE MODERN MEDICINE--TRAUMA UNIT, ICU, COMPUTERIZED INFORMATION SYSTEMS DISSOLVE TO ANIMATION: PHOTO OF LBJ RIGHT FRAME, REVEAL TEXT: "SOMEHOW, SOME WAY, SOME TIME, YOU ARE GOING TO FIND THE ANSWERS, AND I HOPE IT WILL BE SOON." REVEAL: JOHNSON SIGNATURE FADE TO BLACK. NARRATOR (Voiceover): The Regional Medical Programs accomplished only part of what they set out to do, and it may be that they were simply ahead of their time. But many of the ideas behind them have endured, and it may be that somehow, some way, some time, they will provide the blueprint for the future of American medicine. MUSIC UP FULL. Music up and out