COMMUNITY BASED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 1. Review Committee; 2. Guides for Review; 3. General Counsel's Opinion of April 14, 1972. COMMUNITY BASED EDUCATION PROGRAMS Special Review Committee: Dr. Perry, Chairman Dr. Hess Mrs. Wyckoff Mr. Hilton Miss Anderson Dr. Popma, Consultant Miss Kerr - Headed by Dr. Veronica Conley, RMPS Staff Il. IIl. IV. REGIONAL MEDICAL PROGRAMS SERVICE GUIDES FOR REVIEW OF COMMUNITY BASED MANPOWER PROGRAM PROPOSALS APPLICATION ESSENTIALS Proposal is requesting funding in excess of $50,000. Proposal has approval of the Regional Advisory Group. Proposal includes review and comment of the appropriate CHP agency, if not, explanation is given. The area to be served is clearly defined and comprises a medical trade area. Names of all institutions and agencies involved. DOCUMENTATION OF NEED A. What.sources of data have been used for planning to determine needs for health services? Do these include: 1. Number and characteristics of the population to be served. 2. Numbers, distribution, and utilization of health manpower providing services. ' 3. Numbers and kinds of institutions, agencies, both private and public, providing health manpower, education and training opportunities; numbers and nature of their training programs. OBJECTIVES A. Objectives are stated in clear and measurable terms. B. Objectives relate to the RMPS concept of the community based manpower programs. PLANNING A. The proposal is not in competition with similar efforts within the same geographical area. B. Identification of the accredited education institutions, health care provider institutions and community health care and planning interests committed to the advancement of the program. LV. PLANNING (continued) Cc. D. Identification of the potential membership of a Coordinating/ Governing Body group. There is a plan for evaluating the developmental process. An implementation scheme has been developed and appropriate sources of funding to support each phase has been identified. -V. ORGANIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT A. The Coordinating/Governing Body has been formed, its function formalized, and an administrative structure planned for management purposes. 1. For established Bodies, by-laws are attached. Such a Coordinating/Governing Body is proposed. 1. Draft by-laws are attached if available. The Coordinating/Governing Body represents a consortium of: s 1. At least one fully accredited institution of higher learning. 2. Principal. health care provider groups or institutions, including appropriate clinical resources. 3. Consumer interests. 4. Health professional societies. Evidence is provided of the degree of commitment of participating educational institutions, health service institutions, and other appropriate groups. VI. OPERATIONAL A. The operational phase of the proposal describes which of the following activities are to be undertaken in the current period. 1. Setting of priorities based upon continuous appraisal of the relationship between community health service needs and production of health manpower. 2. Designing education for both traditional and new health occupations to meet the particular health service needs ef the area. VI. OPERATIONAL (continued) 3. 4/7/72 Provision of basic and continuing education with appropriate clinical experience, and in-service training for health manpower. Providing educational experiences that will develop strong interest and commitment to an interdisciplinary health care delivery approach. Recruitment, training, and placement of local residents in health careers related to manpower needs. Provision for health education and information services for patients and the general public. Studies of current licensure and related manpower issues. Other. 1 oe @™ FROM SUBJECT: Mr. Raymond D. Cotton Office of the General Counsel Executive Director ffice of Assistant Secretary Date: for Health and Scientific Affairs APR1 4 972 | Sidney Edelman Assistant General Counsel for Public Lealth Area Health Education Centers=eSupport under section 910, PHS Act . You informally requested our views with regard to the availe- ability of section 910, PiS Act, as a source of authority for funding so-called Area Health Education Centers (AHEC's). We understand that such funding would in general be on a contract, rather than grant, basis. The purpose of auch centers, as described in the attached undated excerpt from an unidentified document, would be to "provide educational opportunities for students to enter health careers in communities where students do not have ready access to such opportunities, ‘They will prepare Cuese students to provide health services in communities and regions that are underserved so that services appropriate to the health needs of the comunity or region will be available to those who need them. ‘The centers will recruit students, offer educational and training programs for initial entry into health occupations, for retraining of health personnel and for continuing education so that those in the health occupations and professions may retain and prove their competence to provide safe and effective health services needed in the area." The prinary goal of ANEC's is described as being "eo provide educational opportunity for individuals who vould othervise tend to be excluded from training or education in the health field." if: os ir, Raymond Me Cotton 7 2 { . . We think that section 910 contains certain restrictions which may limit its utility as a vehicle for supporting in full training activities of the scope of those described above, Section 910(a) (4) authorizes the Secretary to make grants and contracts for "development of training specifically related to the prevention, diaznosis, or treatment of any of the diseases taserced to in paragrann (2) {heart disease, cancer, stroke, kidney Giscase, or other related diseases], or to the rehabilitation of persons suffering from any of such clseases3 a and for continuing programs of such training were shortage of trained personnel would othervise limit application of knowledge end skills important to the control of any of such diseases” (Euphasie added). The scope of section 910(a)(4) is thus limited in the most™ specific terns to the Title iA diseases. While the scope and ture of the training for the stated purposes is essentlally fer determination by tha Service in the exercise of sound ptofessional judguent, the operation of the proposed AHEC' gs would, it appears, cover the full range of haaltherelated training, and vould not apparently be "snacifically related" to the specified diseases or purposas a8 required by the statute. Section 910(c} contains no such catezorical disease linitation. It does, however, limit the training authority of the Secretary to those activities which are "designed to navimize the utilization of manpower in the delivery of health services." This language is obviously somewhat anbiguous. The legislative history of P.L. 91°515 (uhich added the provision) is, moreover, of little help in determining what was intended by it. Oa its face, however, we suggest that gection 910(c} vas not intended to serve as authority for the training of entire new cadres of health and allied health professional personnel; rather, the language "maximize the utilization of manpower" seeas to contemplate making more effective and improving the skills of available health personnel. This mignt, for example, include training to expand the responsibilities and skills of certain types of health personnel, or to enable physicians to nake more extensive use ity Mr. Raymond D. Cotton | 3 of allicd health professionals, or to enable health aduinistratore to utilize personnel more effectently2/ Tt would not, in our view, include recruitment end training of students for ‘EnitLal entry into health occupations." In this rezard, ve might point out that Congress has recently enacted the Comprehensive Mealth Manpover Training Act of 1971 (P.L. 92¢157) and the turse Training Act of 1971 G@.L, 9298155). Those Act amended Title VII and VIIL, respectively of the PHS Act, considerably broadening and increasing Federal support of training for health professions and nursing personnel. In addition, Part GC of Title VIZ contains a rember of sinilar programs for the production of allied health professions persomel. The existence of that lesislation, which appears to provide specific authority for all of the types of activity contemplated for Allic's, would in our view cast furcher doubt on the availability of section 910 for support of any training programs not clearly authorized thereby. We emphasize that the conclusions expressed above are intended to apply only to Alm0's of the typd deseribed in the attached docuncat, and may not apply with equal force to ANEC's of more limited scope. For example, a training program whosesole purpose 4s to “naxinize the utilization of manpower" in health services delivery, and which does not involve the training of students for initigl entry into health occupations, would clearly be supportable under section 910(c). _ his will confirm our earlier advice given to you in the form of a draft memorandum dated March 3, 1972. Attachment. 1/ in this connection we note that the Senate Appropriations . Comaittea in its report on the 1972 Appropriation Act (?.L. 92=- 80, in discussing the availability of medical corpsment in HEDIEC and LEDEX programs, urged their training as physician assistants “through the Regional Medical Program and the NIH health manpower program." (Emphasis supplied.) ee 8. Rept. 92-316, Pe 6. Prepared by: GH DNYOUNG, gmb, 4/13/72 cc: Dr. Margulies Dr. Pahl |