CHILE AND SPAIN. THE WHOLE QUESTION OFFICIALLY STATED. Part 1.—THE QUESTION SETTLED. Part 2.—THE QUESTION REOPENED. NEW YORK! 1865. ££W§ X « « SYNOPSIS OF DOCUMENTS. PART 1. The Question Settled. No. 1.—Spain's formal complaint against Chile, as presented by the Spanish Representative, Mr. Tavira, on the 13th May, 1865. 2.—Reply of the Chilian Government, May 16th, 1865. 3.—Acknowledgment of the receipt of this reply by Mr. Tavira, and statement that the explanations contained therein are satisfactory and '' dissipate, in his judgment, all the motives for complaint which his Government had entertained." 4.—Acknowledgment of the receipt of this reply by the Chilian Minister. PART 2. The Question Reopened. No. 1.—First note of Admiral Pareja, in which he reopens the whole ques- tion, disavows the previous action of the Spanish Minister, adds to the previous demands of Spain, and peremptorily requires full satis- faction within four days, under threat of the immediate rupture of diplomatic relations and a resort to force. 2.—Copy of the powers under which Admiral Pareja acts. 3.—Reply of th~e Chilian Minister of Foreign Affairs, in which he repeats the full explanations before given to Mr. Tavira, but pro- tests against the character of Admiral Pareja's demand, and repels his threat to resort to force. 4. —Admiral Pareja's final dispatch to the Chilian Government, in which he announces that he shall resort to force if his demands are not complied with within 48 hours. 5.—Final protest of the Chilian Government iv No. 6.—First note from the Diplomatic Corps to Admiral Pareja, protesting against the resort to force without an endeavor to settle the diffi- culties by negotiation. 7.—Telegraphic dispatoh from the American Minister, the Dean of the Diplomatic Corps, to Admiral Pareja, asking him, in the name of that body, to postpone a resort to hostilities until their note could be received. 8.—Reply of Admiral Pareja acquiescing in the above request. 9.—Admiral Pareja's first reply to the note of the Diplomatic Corps. » 10.—Second note from the Diplomatic Corps to Admiral Pareja, in which they renew their protest against a resort to hostilities by Spain without an attempt to settle the pending difficulties by negotiation, and claim that Spain has no right to reopen the past questions, but is bound by the acts of the Minister who had accepted the ex- planations of Chile as satisfactory, and in which they also state that it was impossible for Chile to admit demands made in a threatening tone and accompanied by a peremptory ultimatum. 11.—Telegraphic dispatch from the Dean of the Diplomatic Corps asking a further postponement of hostilities until their second note could ' be received. 12.—Reply of Admiral Pareja, announcing that hostilities had already begun. 13.—Communication from the Chilian Minister of Foreign Affairs, to the Representative of the United States, acknowledging the receipt of copies which had been transmitted to him, of the notes of the Diplomatic Corps to Admiral Pareja. 14.—Unanimous petition from the entire foreign commercial body of Val- paraiso, addressed to the Diplomatic Corps, asking for the presence of the naval forces of their respective powers, and containing the following words: " We beg, in the strongest manner, to express our conviction that measures of so high-handed injustice [as those of the Spanish Admiral], undertaken without warning, are con- trary to the rights and duties of the representatives of civilized ^ nations," and, "We would simply say that the consequences of Admiral Pareja's measures, if persisted in, will bring utter ruin upon many of our number and those whom we represent." This petition or protest is signed by fifty-^ree of the largest foreign comniercial houses of Valparaiso. PART I. THE QUESTION SETTLED. No. 1. The Claims of Spain as First Presented by the Spanish Minister. Legation of Spain in Chile, 13th May, 1865. Your Excellency : The unpleasant events which occurred in this place about the first of May of the past year, by reason of the Hispano-Peruvian question, obliged me, as the Minister Resident of Her Majesty near your Government, to transmit to you the notes dated 4th, 13th, 2;d and 28th May, 8th June, 4th July, 21st and 27th September, 6th and 26th October, 12th, 23d and 24th November, 7th and 15th December. Your Excellency addressed to me in reply those dated 14th, 15th, 28th and 31st of May, 4th and 7th of July, 24th and 29th of September, 4th .and 24th of October, 7th, 8th, 19th, 28th and and 29th November, and 14th of December, of all of which I gave opportune information to Her Majesty's Government. The pacific snid friendly solution of the Hi?pano-Peruvian question has occurred to justify what I always told Your Excel- lency, that it was an isolated fact. If your Government did not accord to this the assent due to it, if the press erected imagin- ary phantasms to have the pleasure of combatting them, and misled public opinion, and Your Excellency did not think proper to impose on it the wholesome correction which you 6 might within the bounds of law, I will not for that fail to con- gratulate myself for having fulfilled my duty. The word cor- rection I have used generally in the notes of wliicli I have made mention, and I nave arrived at the persuasion that you did not give to it the true and genuine meaning, because were it not so, I should not know how to account for it that Your Excellency could not interfere with the extravagancies of the press and of public opinion, without infringing any law, having at your clis- 1 posal the official newspaper, the parliamentary tribunal,