PAPERS, CHIEFLY ANATOMICAL, PRESENTED AT THE PORTLAND MEETING OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE, AUGUST, 1873. By BURT G. WTT.mr.B_—\r r> PROFESSOR OF COMP. ANATOMV AND ZOOLOGY, CORNELL UNIVERSITY, ITHACA, N. Y. SALEM, MASS. SALEM Pi: ESS, CORN EH OE LIBERTY AND DERBY STREETS. 1874. PAP E R S, CHIEFLY ANATOMICAL, PRESENTED AT THE PORTLAND MEETING OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE, AUG-TJST, 1873. By BURT G. WILDER, M.D., PROFESSOR OF COMP. ANATOMY AND ZOOLOGY, CORNELL UNIVERSITY, ITHACA, N. Y. BULLETIN OF THE CORNELL UNIVERSITY, Vol. I. SCIENCE. No. 3. SALEM, MASS. SALEM PRESS, CORNER OF LIBERTY AND DERBY STREETS. 1874. CONTENTS . The Outer Cerebral fissures of Mammalia, especially the Carnivora, AND THE LIMITS OF THEIR HOMOLOGIES . . . . . .214 Cerebral variation in domestic dogs and its bearing upon scientific PHRENOLOGY .......... 234 Lateral asymmetry in the brains of a double human monster . . 250 The papillary representation of two arms in a double human monster 251 The habits and parasites of epeira riparia . . . . .257 The nets of epeira, nephila and hyptiotes (mithras) . ... 264 The need of a uniform position for anatomical figures ; with a recom- mendation THAT THE HEAD BE ALWAYS TURNED TOWARD THE LEFT . 274 Lateral position of the vent in amphioxus, and in certain batrachian LARVAE ........... 275 Composition of the carpus in dogs ....... 301 Present aspect of the question of intermembral homologies . . 303 Variation in the condition of the sense organs in fcetal pigs of the SAME LITTER . . . . . . . . .303 The pectoral muscles of mammalia ....... 305 VARIATION IN THE PECTORAL MUSCLES OF DOMESTIC DOGS . . . .308 The outer Cerebral Fissures of Mammalia (especially the Carnivora) and the Limits of their Homology. By Burt G. Wilder, of Ithaca, N. Y. Naturally, human brains have been most extensively studied, and chiefly those of adults ; some have compared foetal brains with those of Quadrumana but the existing doubt and disagreement,* with the lack of any generally recognized basis for the determina- tion of fissural homologies, suggest the need of a different method of study; and as the main object of tins and the next paper is to throw doubts upon the value of current opinions respecting brains, it is proper to state the materials upon which my opinions are based. It will be understood therefore that, unless otherwise stated, my present generalizations are based upon these materials only, and are subject to revision when a larger number of speci- mens is at my disposal. Where but a single drawing or diagram was made, it generally represents the outer surface of the left side ; the second usually the right side, or the upper (dorsal) surface ; and the mesial and ventral surfaces were added if their peculiarities required and time permitted. All of these drawings and diagrams were made by myself, and most of them were exhibited at the meeting. The varieties of dogs’ brains will be given in the next paper. On the following page I give a list of original preparations and drawings of mammalian brains made since July, 1871, and forming the basis of this and the following paper. * A good example of this is stated by Ecker who includes the anterior central lobe with the frontal, while Gratiolet and Bischoff include it with the parietal. This note, with some other matter which delay in publication has permitted me to in- sert, should bear date of December, 1873. B. NATURAL HISTORY. SCIENTIFIC NAME. POPULAR NAME. NU IND to c 9 MBER IVIDU 9 Z to O OF AL8. H to to to TOTAL. DRAWINGS. GO s < 3 < to 5 i 6 8 3 i 1 i 1 2 5 5 6 23 29 58 22 3 3 1 1 2 2 2 2 Felis catus, var. domesticus... Domestic Cat ( 5 17 20 42 4 4 1? T 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 3 1 TT , . 1 1 2 1 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 19 4 1 24 2 1 1 5 7 Mule 1 1 jy 7 8 5 20 1 10 8 18 2 1 1 2 2 Capi a segagi v(iv f, . ... 2 1 1 4 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 . . 1 i 1 i * Cynomys Lndovicianus Prairie Dog 1 i 1 1 i , , ., .. 1 i 1 2 3 — Genera, 28; Sp., 32; Yar., 40-45. Total . . 48 88 189 87 45 216 B. NATURAL HISTORY. These specimens form part of a collection to illustrate the neu- rology and embryology of domesticated animals, which Professor Agassiz* authorized me to make for, and at the expense of, the Museum of Comparative Zoology in Cambridge.! It will be seen that the above list of one hundred and eighty- nine individuals includes about twenty-eight genera, represented by about thirty-two species, and about forty-five varieties, the numbers varying according to differing estimate of the taxonomic relations of the individuals. The size of human brains, the expense of their preservation in numbers, the rarity of apes’ brains, and especially of foetal speci- mens, together with the complexity of the fissural pattern which man and Quadrumana have in common with herbivorous mammals, are additional reasons for selecting other subjects. A simpler fis- sural pattern exists with the Carnivora. Among these the wild Canidce (fox, wolf and fennec) occupy a position midway between the Viverridoe and Mustelidce on the one hand, and the domestic dogs, the Felidae, Ursidce and Ilycenidai, on the other. That is, all the main fissures found in Carnivora are present in the fox, but uncomplicated by contortions and by secondary fissures. Method of Preparation.]:—The present paper treats only of those cerebral fissures which are visible from the outer side of a brain properly prepared. Heretofore all brains have been har- * Since this paper was written, he who inspired it has,finished his work in this world. As his student, his assistant and fellow-teacher, I cannot refrain from expressing my sense of bereavement. To me he was not only a great naturalist; hevvas the wisest of teachers and the kindest of friends; whose criticism was a healthy stimulus and his praise a sweet reward. f Those who bear in mind that not a single brain was preserved from an entire menagerie which was suffocated in Boston about thirteen years ago, and that no simi- lar collection exists in this country on account of its great cost in time, alcohol and means of displaying, will appreciate the extent of interest which Prof. Agassiz felt in this special undertaking; and while, as Professor in one institution, I must regret that the result of any of my work should leave it for another, yet as it must be years before my own or any other museum can command the means required for such a special col- lection, I am really grateful for the opportunity of using this material as it came for the instruction of my students, and by this kind of work, avoiding for a season, the outside drudgery in the way of popular writing and lecturing, to which the existing financial condition and policy of the average American University compel its Profes- sors continually to resort, whether ready or not, to the impairment of their powers, and the detriment of the interests of the institution to which they would rather devote all their time, their energies and their enthusiasm. X It may seem that these remarks might be omitted or placed at the end of the paper; but I have become so impressed with the often repeated dictum of Prof. Agassiz that “ the method affects the result,” that I wish to submit mine at the outset. NATURAL HISTORY. 217 dened while resting upon their base. They become unnaturally flattened, and are then generally figured from above only. Like so many other methods borrowed from anthropotomy, the common manner of extracting the human brain is seldom applicable to those of animals; the skull, as well as the brain, is more useful if ver- tically bisected, and this seems to be the only way of insuring the safety of the olfactory lobes and the appendicular lobule of the cerebellum ; the former are rarely figured of their full size (as, for example, in the cat and cheetah. Trans. Zool. Soc., vol. i, pi. xx), while the very existence of the latter seems often unsuspected even in those animals where, by extracting the brain after bisecting the skull, I have found it of great size. In a future communica- tion, I intend to illustrate this peculiar organ and make some remarks upon its connections, mode of formation, function and zoological significance. It is particularly large in the bear but small or wanting in the lion and in cats ; being often bulbous at its extremity, the utmost care must be exercised to avoid breaking the pedicel, and I have found it easier to effect the dislodgment by throwing air behind it with a small blow-pipe. Figure 1 rep- resents from below the left appendicular lobule (A L) of a Chinese dog ;* it seems to be a protrusion of a portion of one of the horizontal series of convolutions. I am inclined to think that in most cases, the way to preserve the entire brain in its natural form is to bisect it either before or after extraction, and to place each half upon its mesial surface in a flat-bottomed vessel of alcohol. As it rapidly loses weight in alcoholf and gains in water, and as handling out of these fluids is apt to distort it, I would recommend weighing each half of the head before and after extraction ; the difference gives the exact weight of the brain; but as the apparatus which I employ (a sort of adjustable “Mitre-box”) does not as yet enable me to insure bisection on the middle line exactly, I have not felt justified in comparing the two halves of brains together. If both hemispheres are to be preserved entire, the section should go rather to the left than the right of the middle line, in order to leave the mesial sur- face of the right hemisphere uninjured ; but if the right is to be * This and the other figures will be found at the end of next paper. fThe extent of this loss may he seen from the following cases; a brain weighing ,085. lost one-sixth of its weight in eighteen hours, and one-third in four days; a brain weighing ,125. lost one twenty-fifth in sixteen hours and one-half its weight in two months; of course the rapidity of the loss will vary with the size of the brain, the amount and strength of the spirit and the frequency of its renewal. 218 B. NATURAL HISTORY. dissected, then the mesial surface of the left should be saved by carrying the section a little to the right; of course, however, if there is certainty of the saw going just between the two, so much the better. The pia mater should be removed before drawing; this is best accomplished after the brain has shrunken a little in spirit, using a pair of fine forceps and fine curved scissors. If possible, both sides of a brain should be drawn; but if only one, the left; and with all Carnivora (although not with all Her- bivora), all the outer fissures may be seen in such a view; while this is not the case in the view from above, even when the brain is flattened. In drawing, each half should rest upon a slip ruled in square centimetres ;* if the brain is larger than that of a cat, the slip may be pinned upon a sheet of cork, and two or more threads stretched over the brain, coinciding with the lines hidden by it; then the drawing may be made upon another ruled slip, with great accuracy; the mesial, upper and lower surfaces of the brain may be drawn in like manner, though less easily ; and large diagrams may be accurately reproduced, by ruling cloth in squares ten, fif- teen or twenty times the diameter of the original drawing ; the homologous fissures may be uniformly colored as in the diagrams exhibited ; Gratiolet, Owen and Bischoff have colored homologous folds, but it is obvious that the same end is more readily attained by coloring the fissures ; and that alterations are also more prac- ticable. It would certainly be an advantage to possess a cast of the cra- nial cavity for comparison with the brain ; and all comparative measurements and weights should take into account the shrinkage of brains, and their loss of weight.f * [ am happy to state that Mr. Geo. Woolworth Colton, the well known map-maker, and a member of this Association, has offered to prepare ruled paper of a size and quality suited to this and other natural history purposes. It will be noted that the perspective is ignored in drawings made by the above method; each iissiue is represented as if at a point on a line perpendicular to the surface on which the brain rests: a drawing in which this line should be perpendicular to the convex surface of the hemisphere would produce the effect seen in fig. 5, plate la. f When a brain is once thoroughly hardened in alcohol it may be kept in weaker spirit or clear water during examination; it rapidly shrinks still more in the air; I am conducting experiments to show how well and how long, hardened brains can be pre- served in a mixture of equal parts glycerine and water; which does not evaporate like spirit and, by its greater specific gravity, avoids injurious pressure of the specimens upon each other or upon the vessel; the best w'ay of keeping many brains for study is in a wdde tin box two or three inches deep and cased in wood, with a glass cover; if each half of a brain is kept on its mesial surface, no injury can result. B. NATURAL HISTORY. 219 The Cerebral Fissures.— More attention has been given to the folds (gyri, convolutions, or anfractuosities) than to the fis- sures (furrows or sulci). But, whatever may be the manner of their formation, the latter really represent the location of the augmented gray, ganglionic or dynamic tissue more than the for- mer ; for, as a rule (the only exceptions being the points of oblique junction of two fissures), the contiguous walls of a fissure are nearer together than the two sides of either of the folds which it separates ; a line representing the fissure, therefore, indicates the location of a much larger bulk of gray matter than a line of equal width representing any part of the surface of the fold. Practically too the fissures are by much the easier to describe and designate, and it would be as hard to designate folds without first identifying fissures as to describe the countries of Europe without mentioning its rivers. The sides of a fissure are usually near together and parallel, so that the fissure may be described or figured as a single line of certain direction; but the opposite borders of any one fold are rarely parallel throughout their whole extent. Moreover, the surface, wdiich in one brain forms two folds, with an intervening fissure, may in another be one continuous fold. What shall it be called ? Relatively, at least, the surface of a con- voluted brain is the same as it was before the fissures appeared ; while the fissures are gradually introduced and are to a certain extent capable of identification ; and although they ma}r be wholly due to a vertical elevation of the contiguous folds, yet it is the fissures and not the folds which can be said to increase, to connect, or to remain separate. Granting, then, that folds are the ulti- mate object of our study, fissures are first to be so thoroughly identified in all animals that when one of them or one of the folds is mentioned, there can be no doubt of its being recognized by all. Fissures may be studied in four ways: First: As to their general nature. Second: Singly, as to their special peculiarities. Third: As evidences of zoological affinities. Fourth: As indications of intellectual power. The last view will be considered in the next paper. According to the first view, we may at once separate three of Owen’s fissures from the rest. The rhinal is the line of separation between the olfactory crus or tract and the cerebrum proper. The median or 220 B. NATURAL HISTORY. inter-hemi spheral fissure divides the two cerebral hemispheres ; and although in most Carnivora the true fissures seem to be ar- ranged with some reference to it, and although it has clearly defined borders, yet neither of these features exists with Herbivora. The sylvian fissure marks the location of a kind of mound of cerebral substance, the “Island of Reil,” and its manner of formation is somewhat peculiar, as shown hereafter. Formation of Fissures. — No one doubts that all brains, even the most deeply furrowed, were smooth at an earlier stage of development. This transformation, so far as the result is con- cerned, might be compared with the segmentation of an undivided yolk; but probably the process is more often comparable with the formation of the primitive furrow ; and although they look like clefts or depressions in the brain mass, it is probable that the fissures are the result of a difference in the rapidity of growth of different parts; certain points or lines remaining relatively sta- tionary, and becoming the bottoms of depressions or fissures. Still I cannot rid myself wholly of the idea that shallow fissures, at least, may be formed by direct depression; •and if Ecker is rightly translated he seems to have this view respecting all of them ; “Actual convolutions are formed in these districts only with the further progress of the formation of fissures (p. 14). The formation of the convolutions is, of course, entirely depend- ent on the development of the fissures; and in the region of the temporal lobe, in which the latter are most variable, the convolu- tions are so too” (p. 65). ' But on page fifteen, in contrasting the sylvian with other fissures he says that the latter “originate simply from depressions or folds of the cerebral cortex.” (The italics are mine). Now, as regards the aspect of the cerebral surface in the adult, it makes perhaps no great difference whether we speak of the fis- sures as depressions or the folds as elevations ; and the former is more natural on account of the greater extent of the elevated sur- faces ; so too in conversation it is easier to sajr that the sun rises and sets than that the earth revolves upon its orbit; but in sci- entific language it would seem proper to speak according to the fact rather than the appearance. Undoubtedly one source of confusion is the indiscriminate use of terms signifying the transformations themselves and the condi- tions reached thereby; and we might avoid it by discriminating between appearance and aspect, formation and conformation, development and presence or existence, etc. As a single example of the looseness of our present expressions, on account of lack of definite information, Huxley (Comp. Anat. of Vertebrates, p. 492) enumerates among the distinctive features of the human brain, “the filling up of the occipito tempo- ral fissure,” as compared with that of apes ; in its most literal sense this would imply that something filled a existing fissure ; a little less literally, that the bottom of the fissure grew up to the surface of the adjoining folds, so that a foetal fissure did not exist in the adult; and still again, and this would be a per- fectly legitimate interpretation, it might indicate the fact, that a fissure which exists in apes did not exist in man in any stage ; but even this would be capable of at least two meanings, according as the readers believed, or not, in actual evolution. The formation of fissures seems to proceed very rapidly.* I have traced it in kittens of the same litter, killed at short intervals beginning at birth ; and even allowing for individual and sexual differences, it would appear that during the first week, a change may occur perceptible within six hours ; the most favorable fissure for this purpose is the frontal. The large superficial cerebral vessels often lie in the fissures; but that this is merely a coincidence, and not a cause, is indicated by the frequent departure of these blood-pipes from their trenches ; the slight furrow which marks the course of a large vessel across a fold has generally a more regular form with better defined bor- ders. Where the folds are much contorted as in man and most herbivora, as compared with their simplicity at an earlier stage, one can hardly avoid the conjecture that the folds are formed under pressure, and that the brain behaves much as would a piece of thick cloth crowded into a cavity. Still more suggestive of this idea is the lateral contortion of the median lobe of the cere- bellum in cats; in the newly born kitten (Fig. 2, K), this is ver- tical in direction and presents few folds ; in all but one of the adult cats that I have examined, the median lobe appears, as in Fig. 2, C, laterally contorted ; the progress of these remarkable changes will be fully illustrated on another occasion.f B. NATURAL HISTORY. 221 * As does the yolk segmentation with Turtles (Agassiz, Cont. Nat. Hist. U.S.2,523). fEcker speaks (p. 10) of the “ formation of convolutions as a necessary consequence of certain mechanical processes of the brain and skull,” but it is not clear bow much influence is attributed to the latter by this expression. 222 B. NATURAL HISTORY. Yet while we may recognize a sort of correlation between the existence of fissures and the need of enclosing a certain amount of gray matter within a space which is represented by the cranial cavity, it by no means follows that osseous walls are the imme- diate and direct cause of the convolution ; much less does it follow that the particular direction of the fissures is occasioned by the ridges upon the inner cranial surface with which they coincide. In short, we may regard the size of skull and of brain as concomi- tants of the degree and character of fissuration without attempting, as yet, to assign to them the relation of cause and effect. It may not be proper to compare cerebral fissuration with the primitive formation of the encephalic lobes, but it is certain that this latter takes place independently of cranial circumscription, especially in many fishes where the cranial cavity far exceeds the brain mass ; and it would be interesting to ascertain whether this interspace exists in any of those fishes which, like Elacate, present some cere- bral fissuration. At present the matter must be regarded as un- decided ; and the way to elucidate our own lack of information is to ask ourselves whether, in total absence of cranial walls, any cerebral convolution would be developed in the higher Mammalia. Fissural Homologies.—In order to describe the variations of fissures in different brains, they must first be identified. Although Owen has (Comp. Anat. of Vertebrates, vol. iii, pp. 114 to 143) undertaken to homologize the fissures of the higher mammalia (Gyrencephala) throughout, and has rarely admitted the liability of error (as on p. 117), yet the very completeness of his determi- nations throws doubt upon them in view of the lack of reference to individual peculiarities, and the renunciation of development as a guide to homology ; and it will be safer to keep in view the con- clusion of Gratiolet. (Mem. sur les plis cerebraux de l’homme, p. 10.) “ It is sufficient to compare the brain of an ape with that of a carnivore or ruminant in order to show that in the different mammalian orders, the cerebral folds present very different arrangements. These differences are such that it would be imprudent to establish par- allel divisions and to search for homologies. In fact that search has no certain basis, and we do not hope to accomplish it in a moment.” Criteria of homology.—Having no true structural features, they present, as tests of homology: 1. Position in relation to B. NATURAL HISTORY. 223 internal structure (as the rhinal and sylvian). 2. Position in relation to other fissures so determined. In connection with this latter test, we must ascertain whether anything like transposition is possible; this question will be raised in respect to special fis- sures. Their connections, branches, length, and general direction are probably of less value. Great aid is always to be had by comparison with simpler brains of allied species, or with the brains of young of the same species. The extent of variation in length, direction and connections, which may exist without invalidating their homology, is most readily seen by comparing the corres- ponding fissures upon the two halves of one brain (plate 3, figs. 12, 13) ; it appears that a long fissure may be represented by several short and disconnected ones ; that branches may or may not exist at either end (these branches are almost invariably dichotomous) ; that two fissures wholly separate in the foetus, and in other species ■ may unite either directly or by a branch. Good examples of this are the lateral and coronal fissures, which are perfectly distinct in the foetus/in some adults, and on one side only of others, but which show a tendency to unite ; a marked con- stancy in the location and direction of a branch may, as in this case, indicate the point of union. Finally, with respect to several fissures, we must either deny a homology which would be other- wise unquestioned, or admit that in one species or on one side, its manner of formation may greatly differ. This will be exemplified in connection with the special fissures in this and the following paper ; for example the presylvian, and the ectosylvian. While insisting, however, upon the provisional nature of many of the names which authors have given to the cerebral fissures of mam- mals, it is necessary to adopt some nomenclature in order to be understood, and in the present paper the names given by Owen will be employed with some modifications. Special Fissures. The Sylvian.—This is the most constant of all fissures ; there is no question respecting its existence or its name in all brains which are fissured at all.* Its length, direction, branches and connections vary consider- *0n this account I have not hesitated to mark this Assure ivpon all the Agures, s; hut since there is some doubt respecting the name or the nature of all other Assures, the letters designating them are placed outside of the Agure, in order to allow revision ; most of the Agures are shown white on a dark ground; this will allow futm e alteration in the relative width of Assures in order to indicate their depth or relative constancy. 224 B. NATURAL HISTORY. ably, but, as a rule, in the adult it forms a nearly straight fissure directed dorsad and backward, never reaching the dorsal margin of the hemisphere, and rarely if ever inclining forward, though gener- ally nearly vertical in Herbivora. Its manner of formation is very peculiar, and may be readily traced in new born or foetal kittens and puppies ; in these and also in the foetal wolf (fig. 6), there appears, where in the adult the sylvian is to join the rhinal, a rounded elevation (which is probabty homologous with the Insula or Island of Reil, of bounded above and behind by a shallow trench ; in front this island is apparently continuous with a narrow area of cerebral substance which still more anteriorly broadens into that part which lies just behind the olfactory lobe ; the primitive sylvian fissure is therefore an depressed line whose posterior end joins the rhinal, and whose anterior end is turned upward ; by the gradual projection of the cerebral mass above this line, it overhangs the depressed tract, so that the ven- tral part of the curve reaches the rhinal fissure and coincides with it for a certain distance ; this portion I have ventured to call the basisylvian (Bs) ; by the growth of the mass before and behind the semicircular area now left, and the final approximation of the walls, the Insula is at length wholly concealed, and the semicir- cular trench becomes a single fissure ; strictly speaking therefore, the sylvian is an arched fissure like those which surround it (ecto- sylvian, supersylvian and lateral).* Presylvian (Ps.).—The anterior and ascending (dorsad) extrem- ity of the primitive sylvian seems to correspond with the “ascending *From a translation (Cerebral Convolutions of Man) which has just come into my hands, I find that Ecker of Freiburg, four years ago, observed the formation of the sylvian fissure, and that some of his conclusions upon this and other points are nearly like my own. I am sure that Ecker will be only glad that another has reached similar results from different materials, for he employed human brains exclusively, while I have purposely discarded them for the simpler brains of Carnivora. Certainly he and all other honorable scientific men would accept the collections and drawings made by me as evidence of my entire independence in the work; but for the satisfaction of others, including the writer of an editorial in “ The New York Evening Post ” for Aug- 30, which directly charges me with unacknowledged borrowing from Ecker, I am com- pelled to state that to-day, Sept. 8, 1873, for the first time, have I learned the contents of Ecker’s work. Moreover, while not questioning the correctness of Ecker’s statement that in man “ the whole hemisphere curves itself in an arch, concave below, around the place of en. trance of the cerebral peduncle ” (p. 15), it is proper to say that the brains of kittens and puppies examined by me do not confirm it; nor is it easy to see how so long a fissure as that of the bear could be formed in that way; it is evident that for the elucidation of this and many other points, we need a very extended series of observations upon the developing brain of many animals. B. NATURAL HISTORY. 225 branch” (Ecker, fig. 1, S") in its manner of formation, and in its relation to the sylvian; but the intervening space in all brains I have examined is so much larger than the “operculum” of anthropotomy that I hesitate to affirm it before observing its forma- tion in many intermediate species. Moreover, in a lion (fig. 18), there is a small fissure between the sylvian and what I take to be the presylvian, which in some respects more nearly resembles the “ascending branch” in man ; while in a bear (fig. 10) and raccoon (fig. 11) there is a similar one in front of the presylvian, which may be only a continuation of the slight upward curve at this point which the rhinal presents in many dogs. I would suggest the name presylvian, at least for the fissure already described in Car- nivora. It is evidently the same which Flower refers to as super- orbital (Anat. of Proteles; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1869, p. 479), but there seem good reasons for regarding it as ideally, at least, a dismem- berment of the sylvian. I say ideally, for although generally so in fact, yet occasionally there is no connection whatever, and that which would in respect to position be called presylvian is an isolated fissure. This is the case on both sides of a raccoon (fig. 11),* and on the left of an impure tan terrier clog; of the right of this brain I have no drawing, but think the union is as usual. This is certainly a point which should be clearly under- stood before we can be sure of the value of our determination; at present I am not prepared to explain it. It will be noted also that in most dogs and in the lion, the presylvian is not only very long, but apparently double, as if a special and independent fissure had become connected with its dorsal end; whether this is the case can probably be decided by sections, for there is reason to think that an independent fissure is always deepest at its middle where it may generally be supposed to commence ; and if the fissure in question is shallower at the point of suspected junction we majr fairly conclude that it is really a compound fissure. FRONTALf (F.). This fissure is very characteristic of Carnivora, being absent, so far as I know, only in Paradoxurus figured by Gervais. (Nouv. Arch, du Museum, tome vi, pi. 9, fig. 2.) *But in another specimen the connection seems to exist as usual, fl have adopted Owen’s name as applied originally to the brain of cat and cheetah; but am not sure that it is homologous with that so called by him in the human brain. Flower has called it crucial. P. Z. S., p. 479. A. A. A. S. VOL. XXII. B. (15) 226 B. NATURAL HISTORY. The frontal appears from without as a cleft in the mesial mar- gin ; in kittens it begins as a mere shallow depression which rapidly deepens and narrows ; it is nearly as much a mesial as an outer fissure, and in some cases joins one of the mesial fissures so as to appear a continuation of it; as seen from above the fi’ontal extends outward and sometimes forward (as in fox). As a whole I have seen it take a backward course, only in a black bear, both sides, and a skye terrier, right side, although when curved, its outer end may turn slightly backward. It rarely branches, or if so but very slightly as on the right of a St. Bernard (524) ; in some cases, as in right of bull terrier (514) ; an apparent bifurcation is merely the union with it of a small secondary fissure. But even such junction is very rare ; on right of bear (502, fig. 10), it joins another at right angles, but on left a considerable space intervenes. Supersylvian (Ss.). Next in independence, in constancy, and in order of formation seems to come that semicircular fissure which Owen calls supersylvian; perhaps it should precede the frontal in the above respects, but like so many other points, my present ma- terial does not enable me to determine this. I am quite certain, however, that Owen’s table (C. A. V., iii, p. 136) does not in all respects (as its author admits) represent the relative rank of all the cerebral fissures. It generally divides the surface of the hem- isphere into two subequal portions; its usual relation to the other fissures is seen in the fox (fig. 3) and the foetal wolf (fig. 6). In this, it forms a nearly regular curve with no branches or connections ; and whichever we may conclude to be its representa- tive, in the young terrier (fig. 7) it would appear to begin as a longitudinal groove about midway of its final extent and nearly over the sylvian. This is also the case in cats ; but in most brains its hinder end either branches or joins some small fissure, while, as a rule, its anterior end bifurcates, the longer arm reaching forward and ventral often with a slight dorsal turn at the extremity, while the shorter points obliquely forward and dorsal and often enters the lateral fissure just outside (as in hyaena, fig. 9). This little branch so closely resembles the one which is given off at the junc- tion of the lateral and coronal in nearly all cases as to suggest that it is, like it, due to a union of two independent fissures ; but of this there is no evidence. The fact that a similar branch some- B. NATURAL HISTORY. 227 times leaves the ectosylvian, as in fox (figs. 3 and 4), suggests a like constitution for this latter fissure, or else a serial arrangement of cerebral foldings which is not as yet accounted for upon any theory of correlation between mind and brain. In a lion (fig. 18) the Ss is irregular, with branches and junc- tions with other fissures. In a bear (fig. 10) and raccoon (fig. 11) we have a peculiar arrangement, the explanation of which I for- bear to suggest until I see foetal brains of these species. The weasel presents only two fissures where most Carnivora have three, and it is not easy to say which they are; a similar doubt is ad- mitted by Owen (C. A. V., iii, p. 117) in comparing the brain of Coati (Nasua) with that of the stoat; and I ask no better evi- dence of the fact that our knowledge of the zoological value of fissures is as yet incomplete than the comparison between my fig- ure of the weasel’s brain (fig. 8) and Ow’en’s figure of the stoat’s ; for the animals are similar species of closely allied genera, if not, indeed, members of the same genus (Allen, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., No. 8, p. 167), or varieties of the same species (Gray, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1865) ; yet my figure shows two fissures outside of the syl- vian, while Owen’s has but one which he calls supersylvian. Lateral (L.). This is usually a curved furrow which divides the space between the mesial border and the super sylvian into two nearly equal parts.* The name was given by Owen, probably in reference to its approximate parallelism with the mesial border, which is often quite striking, as in the lion and hyaena; but its anterior extremity is inclined to connect with another fissure, the coronal, so constantly and so smoothly that but for occasional ex- ceptions and observations of foetal brains, one would incline to regard the whole as a single fissure with a branch, mesiad, resem- bling that of the supersylvian; but a careful comparison indicates that the lateral generally bifurcates anteriorly, and that the ventral arm is joined by the coronal; occasionally they miss connection, as on left side of terrier (fig. 12), shepherd (512), and of another small dog (540), on right of pointer-shepherd (fig. 14), and on both sides of skye terrier (503) and young tan terrier (534), on *This division of the cerebral snrface into subequal areas by the fissures will be mentioned in the next paper; of course, as the hemisphere is convex, no figure can represent the true relative distances of the fissures unless the surface is projected upon a plane (as is done with a fox’s brain, fig. 5); it would appear, however, upon a series of transverse sections, which I hope to show upon another occasion. 228 B. NATURAL HISTORY. left side of lion, and in cats generally ; the weasel has no coronal; the bear and raccoon are peculiar in this as in other respects. In the young terrier (fig. 7) the lateral is very short and the union has not taken place. The Coronal (C) may be passed over with what has been said in connection with the lateral. But there are two secondary fissures which are associated with the hinder end of the lateral; one of them, which generally occurs in cats, has been called medilateral by Owen ; it lies mesiad of and usually behind the lateral and often joins it, but seems to be an independent fissure. When there is any fissure mesiad of the lateral in dogs, it lies farther forward, and is generally interrupted, so that I am not certain of the homology; but in some cats (fig. 15) the true medi- lateral seems to coexist with an anterior fissure mesiad of the lat- eral; while in some dogs, greyhound (fig. 16), the lateral' is prolonged backward, as if by a medilateral, while a separate fis- sure, apparently a true Ml, lies between it and the mesial border, and another, El, lies outside between it and the super sylvian. This last, which has not so far as I know received a name, may be called the ectolateral. Flower evidently alludes to its constancy i*n Canidce (P. Z. S., p. 482), as occasioning the bifurcation of the posterior limb of the third gyrus (the value of his general- ization will be discussed farther on). Ectosylvian (Es.). This fissure is in some respects the most pe- culiar of all, for it presents differences not only of adult condition, but also of manner of formation, which lead us to doubt the value of this character. Its simplest, and what may be regarded as its normal, aspect is presented in the young terrier and foetal wolf, and in the adult fox, where it forms a curved line of greater or less ex- tent between the sylvian and the super sylvian (it is probably want- ing in the weasel, fig. 8) ; this regular form occurs also in some dogs, as a setter (10) (left side), and St. Bernard (524) (right), where, however, there are two or more small offshoots from the convexity, like the single and apparently normal anterior one of the fox ; but while the above instances would suggest that the ectosylvian is a simple arched fissure commencing at a point just above the tip of the sylvian, and increasing at both ends, many others would incline us to describe it as composed of three independent pieces, one in front, and one behind the sylvian, and the third connecting those above it; as, for example, in the terrier (fig. 25). B. NATURAL HISTORY. 229 And that this is a not impossible view of its formation is shown by the fact that in several dogs, as right terrier (511) (fig. 13), and left greyhound (fig. 16) and St. Bernard, this top piece is apparently wanting altogether, leaving the front and hind posts of the door unconnected. This is apparently the normal con- dition of things in all Felidae (fig. 17), although the ends may branch, and, even as in lion, join other fissures. In many dogs, as the Pomeranian (fig. 20), the posterior upright may be in great part wanting, or abbreviated and joined with the sylvian; finally, in Hyaena (fig. 9), the anterior upright seems to be transferred behind the sylvian; but this involves a very grave general question of homology which there is no means of solving at present. It will be understood that the foregoing are by no means offered as full accounts of the outer fissures, even with respect to my present materials ; but rather as hints for monographic work upon them when a larger number of specimens or accurate drawings shall be available. Let me suggest in this connection, however, that to be useful, the original drawings should be made by the anat- omist, and that the transfers should be made under his eye ; an abbreviation or extension of a fissure, which would appear trifling to the most conscientious artist, might involve a contradiction of important generalizations respecting its connections. But before any final work can be done in respect to fissures, we need a complete account of the brain of some one mammal, giving its appearance from all sides, sections and dissections of all parts, and demonstrations of the relations wdiich may exist between the fissural pattern and the internal structure; then a full series of figures representing*all the stages of development, both of the brain as a whole and of its parts; on some accounts the fox would be the most useful species, but as it is not to be had in large numbers, and as dogs are ineligible as a standard, from the breed differences as well as from the usual complexity of the fis- sural pattern, w*e shall probably find the cat most available for this purpose ; such a work would form a fitting continuation of Straus-Durckheim’s magnificent monograph of the Osteology and Myology of that animal.* Taxonomic Value of the Fissural Pattern. Upon this point Gratiolet speaks as follows (op. cit. p. iii) :— *It is one of the tasks which I wish to accomplish, hut trust this will not deter others from undertaking it. 230 B. NATURAL HISTORY. “Iii like manner there is a particular type of cerebral folding in the makis, the bears, the cats, the dogs, etc.; in short, in all the families of mammalia (d’animaux). Each of these lias its own character, its norm, and in each of these groups the species can be easily combined according to the sole consideration of cerebral folds.” Gervais* concludes that we may recognize order, family, genus and even species by the brain (Nouvelles Archives clu Museum, 7, vi, p. 152). Flower says {op. cit. p. 480) : “For working out all the modifications of the brain convolutions of the Carnivora, a larger number of specimens would be required than are at present accessible; but the series in the museum of the College of Surgeons is sufficiently extensive to show that they will furnish important indications of affinity, and that these indica- tions correspond remarkably with the evidence afforded by the cranium, digestive and reproductive organs.” While admitting the probability that such a family norm of fis- suration does exist and may hereafter be designated, yet the care- ful study of an amount of material greater in some respects, at least, than previous writers seem to have had, only makes me urge the importance of Gratiolet’s remark, that “ the value of any con- clusions respecting ideal unities has a necessary condition, that of resting upon a sufficient number of exact observations” {op. cit., p. iii). The need of this may be seen by an examination of Flower’s generalization, respecting the very groups which we can best illus- trate {op. cit. p. 482). “The dogs (Cynoidea — Canidce) are very uniform in their cerebral characters having always four distinct and regular gyri surrounding the fissure of Sylvius, which is short and approaching a vertical direction. The first and second arched gyri have the anterior and posterior limbs equal, the third has the posterior limb broad and bifurcated.”f “All the other Carnivora have only three arched gyri on the outer surface, the first or lower one of the dogs being either wanting or concealed beneath the second within the fissure of sylvians. In the hyaena.its hinder limb is partly exposed.” “In the Arctoidce {—Ursidai, Procyonidce, Mustelidce, Ailuridcc, * But although this author figures the brains of eighteen species of Carnivora (and casts of the cranial cavities of these and other species) he seems to ignore the existence of individual differences, and gives hut a single brain for each species and none what- ever from dogs (excepting casts). | By what I have called the ectosylvian fissure. B. NATURAL HISTORY. 231 Lutra and Enhydra), the fissure of Sylvius is rather long and slopes backwards; the inferior gyrus has the limbs long, corresponding with the length of the sylvian fissure ; the anterior rather narrower than the posterior (especially with the true bears) ; the middle gyrus is moderate and equal-limbed ; the upper one large, very broad in front and distinctly marked off from the second poste- riorly, as far as near the lower border of the temporal lobe ; except in the smaller members of the genus Mustela where the sulcus sep- arating the superior from the middle gyrus is less produced pos- teriorly than in others of the group. In Galictis vittata, however, the brain is quite a miniature of that of a bear; but the middle convolution is united with the upper one at its superior anterior angle.” “ In the JEluroidea (including all other Carnivora excepting the Pinnepedia), the sylvian fissure is moderate and nearer to the ver- tical than in the last group. The gyrus which immediately sur- rounds it is wide, especially the posterior limb which is generally twice the width of the anterior and is divided by a vertical fissure,* well marked in the cats and hyaenas. In the cats the anterior limb is also partially divided. In the civet both limbs are simple, the second gyrus is moderate and simple. The superior gyrus is wide in front but small posteriorly, the sulcus which separates it from the second not extending quite to the hinder apex of the hemisphere (the suricate agrees with the hyaenas rather than with the civets in the general character of its brain convolutions).” Of the Arctoidea, Prof. Flower may have had more material than I, but in the absence of exact enumeration, his characterization of the fissural pattern seems to me insufficient at least; if by dogs, Prof. Flower includes only the feral Canidce, his generalization may be not far from correct; although the backward slant of the sylvian, in both my own and Gervais’ drawings, is generally greater than in hyaena and weasel, and equal to that of cat and lion. But if the domestic dogs are included the definition would not apply to many of them; for the bifurcation of the third gyrus is often so complete as to constitute two equal gyri, as on left of terrier (fig. 12), and the outer or fourth gyrus may be likewise bifurcated, as in left of greyhound (fig. 16), while the first and second gyri are, as a rule, rendered irregular by the peculiarities of the ectosylvian ; moreover, the generalization respecting all other * Which I believe to be the hinder upright of the ectosylvian. 232 B. NATURAL HISTORY. Carnivora involves a denial of the homology of the complete ectosylvian of the fox with the incomplete one of the cat, yet this last is very nearly like those on the left of the terrier (fig. 12) and greyhound (fig. 16).* Other discrepancies might be pointed out, if it were possible to present, in this paper, figures of all the brains which I have pre- pared ; but so long as Prof. Flower makes no reference to the dif- ferences of individuals of the same species, to variations of age and sex, or to differences between the right and left sides of the same brain, I shall be obliged to doubt the value of the general- izations. Lateral Variation. I wish it had been possible to offer here drawings of both sides of all the brains of the feral, as well as domestic Carnivora. I do not recall a case in which this lateral variation has amounted to the total absence of a main fissure upon one side ; it consists rather in a difference of length, depth, branches and connection, or of nearness to other fissures ; the minor fissures, however, present very great lateral variations as to presence and location. Since most of the examples given are from domesticated dogs, I do not wish to lay too much stress upon the fact of lateral variation, but in no work have I seen both sides of an animal’s brain figured or described ; and since no two brains of different species can be so nearly related as the two halves of the same brain, it is evident that a careful study of lateral variation will furnish a test of the value of the differences observed among brains (see plate 3). Lateral Compensation. Lateral variation is often compensa- tory. For instance, a long fissure of one side may be repre- sented by several short ones upon the other, the aggregate length being equal to the single one; a straight fissure may represent a curved one ; or a single one may have as counterpart a shorter one with a branch ; in one case, the total length of a bifurcated sylvian fissure is just that of the longer but undivided fissure of the oppo- site side. * The foregoing certainly raises the question whether we can rightly look for tax- onomic assistance among the organs of domesticated animals: hut meantime it seems proper to include our canine varieties in any generalization respecting the group of Cynoidea. B. NATURAL HISTORY. 233 The functional significance of this will be alluded to in the next paper. Conclusion. The foregoing is far from a satisfactory view of the subject; but it is all I can offer at present. My chief object has been to point out the defects of our methods of preparing and drawing brains, and the insufficiency of material for making any generalization respecting that mammalian order whose brains are most readily obtained and whose fissural pattern is comparatively simple. With a single specimen or figure of the brain of Felis, Canis, Hyaena, Ursus, Mustela, one might make generalizations as to specific, generic and family fissural patterns which would be quite as true to nature as many which are annually published upon this or other departments of Comparative Anatomy, but they might be controverted by other specimens or even by the other halves of the same. The greater complexity, both from secondary fissures and from contortions of the primary fissures, which pre- vails with the brains of most Herbivora, is an a fortiori argument against making the attempt to determine their fissural patterns before the Carnivora are disposed of. After a pretty careful study of the specimens and works at my command, I feel justified in asserting that we cannot as yet characterize the fissural pattern of any mammalian order, family, genus or even species without the risk that the next specimen will invalidate our conclusion ; that our studies in this direction should be based upon the careful comparison of accurate drawings of a much larger number of spec- imens than now exist in any museum; that nearly allied forms of Carnivora should be compared ; and that the most satisfactory results are obtainable from large series of foetal and jmung brains of the same species, and, if possible, family and sex, in order to eliminate minor differences. Addendum on the Lion’s Brain. The kindness of Mr. Lee Powell* has just enabled me to prepare the brain of a young African lion, seven and one-half months old; the left hem- isphere is here figured (fig. 19) for comparison with the Asiatic. The most striking difference is in the great development of the temporal lobe (the postsylvian region), which not only projects laterally more than in the other, but also forward over the region * Of Robinson’s Circus and Menagerie, Utica, N. Y. 234 B. NATURAL HISTORY. just in front, so as partly to cover it and make the ventral portion of the sylvian coincide with the ventral branch of the ectosylvian, (Es) ; the frontal region is less prominent, and the outline of the cerebellum is quite different. In the Asiatic lion the left coronal is wholly independent; likewise the right coronal of the Af- rican ; but the right of the former joins the lateral, which is the usual arrangement, while the left of the latter joins the supersyl- vian in a similar fashion. Other differences might be pointed out both between the two brains and the two halves of each; but it seems to me that these alone are enough to make us hesitate from basing a diagram of the fissural pattern of this species upon any such number of specimens as are likely7- to be found in any museum ; while the same peculiarities present almost insuperable obstacles to a recognition of particular folds as organs of special mental faculties separated by certain fissures. [The figures illustrating this paper are given in the plates, be- tween pages 248 and 249, and their explanation will be found on page 249.] Cerebral Variation in Domestic Dogs, and its Bearing upon Scientific Phrenology. By Burt G. Wilder, of Ithaca, N. Y. The following observations are based upon the careful study of thirty-two dogs’ brains, representing fifteen to twenty breeds. There were four of the same family, a mother and three children of different ages ; two others nearly related to them, and two pair of brothers of different ages; the others are not known to be re- lated ; most of them are supposed to be of pure breeds.* *The figures referred to in this paper are included with those of the preceding paper in the plates placed between pages 248 and 219. B. NATURAL HISTORY. 235 LIST or DOGS’ BKAINS PREPARED AND DRAWN BY ME, AND FORMING THE MATERIAL UPON WHICH THIS PAPER IS BASED. M.C.Z.* Weight Weight GO o'o5 Fig. No. Breed. Age. Sex Body, in grams.t ot Brain. ’-w pC T3 Kb « 1 Pomeranian or Spitz. adult. $ 8,837. ,068 .007 20 3 “ I children of 5 weeks. ? 1,316. ,047 .035 21 | No. 1, by the 2 “ }• same father, 4j “ $ 1,006. ,041 , .040 22 1 bnt of 2 sepa- 4 “ j rate litters. 54 hrs. a ,132. ,008 .060 23 215 a "1 later children ! of mother of 3 days. $ ,213. ,010 .047 24 216 u {father above J mentioned. 3 days. ? ,217. ,011 .044 25 Eng. rat terrier (small at birth. $ ,092. ,005 .054 blk. and tan). 522 Eng, rat terrier brother 24 hours. cT ,081. ,008 .099 of above. Spaniel J pure. at birth. ? ,221 ,007 .030 511 Eng. blk. and tan ter- 6 mos. ? 1,320. ,038 .028 12,13 rier(small). 512 Shepherd. young. a 1,952. ,055 .028 540 Shep. cur (pt. terrier ?) 6 weeks. ? 2,228. ,058 .021 • 541 Mexican (Chihuahua). 17 years 8 mos. a 2,436. ,050 .020 6 Eng. terrier) 9 mos. a 5,300. ,074 .014 > brothers. 25 7 “ ) 3£ yrs. a 5,300. ,069 .013 526 Italian greyhound. 1 yr. a 6,074. ,067 .011 8 Ital. greyh’nd impure. adult. a 4,367. ,065 .010 520 Spaniel (large impure). adult. a 6,158. ,082 .010 536 Chinese (hairless). 9 mos. a 7,026. ,074 .010 1 503 / Skye terrier. 15 yrs. a 7,800. ,072 . .009 578 Hound. 20 yrs. a 22,450. ,108 .005 9 Setter (large). 12 yrs. a 25,400. ,106 .004 Newfoundland. adult. a 38,345. ,120 .003 26 13 Bull and cur. 12 yrs. •