'PouUi^S \§- ^y l .'77 c NEURALGIA ITS HISTORY, NATURE, AND TREATMENT. BY CHARLES W. PARSONS, M.D., OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND. THE DISSERTATION TO WHICH THE FISKE FUND PRIZE WAS AWARDED Published by Request of the Rhode Island Medical Society, PHILADELPHIA: T. K. AND P. G. COLLINS, PRINTERS. 1854. k PEIZE ESSAY. HISTORY, NATURE, AND TREATMENT NEURALGIA. NEURALGIA, ITS HISTORY, NATURE, AND TREATMENT. BY CHARLES W. PARSONS, M.D., OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND. THE DISSERTATION 10 WHICH THE FISKE FUND PRIZE WAS AWARDED. VeT'lOST Published by Request of the Rhode Island Medical Society. PHILADELPHIA: T. K. AND P. G. COLLINS, PRINTERS. 1854. dicarSocTett h.H ?t° pFlsk.e/und> Ta* the annual meeting of the Rhode Island Me- fiftvrl.iw7'*heI,duat P«>^ence, June 7, 1854, announced that the premium of fifty dollars offered by them in 1853, for the best dissertation on Neuralgia taKUtorv Zfmolto? °ftreatmmt> had been ™arded t0 th* author of the dissertation bearing " What is writ is writ, Would it were worthier!" Joseph Mauran, M. D., ") Sylvanus Clapp, M. D., I Trustees. u, M. D., J Joseph Mauran, M. D., Sylvanus Clai »_„ . „ Ariel Ballou, Aug. Arnold, Secretary. NEURALGIA. The writer cannot suppose that a detailed description of the symptoms or varieties of locality of neuralgia is expected in this Essay. It is believed that the objects for which this generous foundation was established, and is now administered, will be best consulted by brevity, and a strictly practical aim in the choice of topics'. We shall, therefore, confine ourselves to the fol- lowing subjects:— I. The General Topography of Neuralgia. II. Its Causes. III. Its " Nature," or Pathology. IV. Its Treatment. I. By general topography we mean an account of the kinds of nerves, or divisions of the nervous system in which neuralgia exists; and also some general statements as to the situations iu the course of any nerves, which are its ordinary seats and centres of radiation. We do not mean to include a list of all the individual nerves that are sometimes attacked. Neuralgia is best known as occurring in the cerebro-spinal nerves. Does it ever attack those of the ganglionic or sympathetic system ? Experiment has proved that mechanical irritation of these nerves does not elicit signs of pain till after a time, when congestion or vascular excitement is produced, and then acute pain is caused by such irritation.1 We might expect then that other irritating causes, such as poisons circulating in the blood, or some derangement of different functions, might produce an analogous sensitiveness in the nerves of the sympathetic system. And such is the fact. The analogy of many painful visceral affections to external neuralgia is as complete as the nature of the case admits; though the sensations cannot be described so de- finitely, because the nervous fibres have not so direct and continuous a relation 1 Brachet, Eecherches Experimentales sur les fonctions du Systeme Nerveux Ganglionaire. Paris, 1837. 2 6 with the sensorium as the cerebro-spinal nerves have. These affections, gas- tralgia, nephralgia, Sec, are not necessarily or usually connected with any change of structure. In angina pectoris, one of this class, ossification of the coronary arteries, fatty degeneration of the heart, and other organic altera- tions have been found, but by no means uniformly; they are not, so far as we now know, essential parts of the disease. The attacks of these " visceral neuralgiae" are generally marked by little constitutional disturbance, in pro- portion to their severity. They are paroxysmal, and often the fits arise without any obvious exciting cause. Though very obstinate, they sometimes subside suddenly, we know not why, and their long continuance does not always seri- ously affect the general health, except by the mere amount of suffering. They occasionally alternate with external neuralgia. If the attacks of those which occupy glandular organs sometimes end in a sudden flow of secretion, the same is common also in the analogous affection of the fifth pair.1 It is true that there is generally some functional derangement accompanying the pain, and, of course, the distinct character of these internal neuralgia), as pure nerve-pains, is not so perfectly marked, nor so uncomplicated, as in pains of the superficial nerves. How far the acquired sensitiveness of ganglionic nerves depends on their connections with the cerebro-spinal system, is a question properly of physiology, which we will waive. Among cerebro-spinal nerves, the most superficial ones are said to be the most common seats of well-marked neuralgia. But to this there are many exceptions. Nerves which plunge into the thickness of dense organs have their branches closely interwoven with the tissues around, so that the sen- sorium can only distinguish a diffused pain. Such affections as neuralgia of bone and of the testis (when the spermatic cord is not involved), are called neuralgic, because pain is altogether out of proportion to the slight and in- constant anatomical changes. But in the superficial nerves, pain can be tracked along the nervous trunks, so that a patient can study their anatomy on his own person. Facial, dorso-intercostal, and sciatic neuralgia are believed to be the most common forms. But certain points appear to be the peculiar and favourite rallying points, or foci, of this disease. This part of its history has been particularly investi- gated by Valleix,2 and his observations are among the most interesting addi- tions recently made to our knowledge of this affection. The " focal points" of external neuralgia are generally in the following situations:— 1. The place of emergence of a nervous trunk, as at the supra-orbital and infra-orbital foramina, the crural arch and ischiatic notch, &c. 2. The points where a nervous branch comes out through the muscles, to ramify in the integuments. For example, where the posterior branch of the second cervical appears behind the mastoid process, or where those of the lower spinal nerves become superficial. 3. The points where the terminal branches of a nerve expand in the integu- ments, as at the anterior extremity of the intercostal nerves. 4. The points where the nervous trunks become superficial during their course, as where the ulnar nerve passes the inner condyle. These points are peculiarly liable to suffer in neuralgia; they are, almost 1 The secretions may be apparently perverted during the fits. A patient of Maccul- loch suffered from neuralgia in different superficial nerves, and at last from nephralgia, accompanied by diabetes mellitus. This "was strictly paroxysmal, or the morbid secretion of sugar commenced with the fit, and entirely disappeared in the interval." 2 Traite des Nevralgies, &c. Paris, 1841. 7 without exception, sensitive on pressure in the intervals between the attacks, but much more so during the attacks; at these places there is, in nearly all cases, a constant dull pain, or bruised, tense, or numb feeling; and from these points the lancinating pains diffuse themselves, either by spreading along the nerve in a continuous line, or leaping over to other spots. Pressure sometimes merely increases the dull pain in these points, sometimes causes twinges along the nerves. The extent of surface over which this tenderness exists is very small, often less than a square inch. The tenderness may be absent at one examination, and be found on a subsequent one; it would appear sometimes to intermit. These facts explain, wholly or in part, the various opinions of observers as to the effects of pressure. I have many times examined the points above mentioned as focal points, in facial and sciatic neuralgia, and have only once failed to ascertain that the patients had painful sensations there in the intervals of acute paroxysms, and that pain was produced by pressing these spots. Valleix mentions but one exceptional case—a sciatica, which had ex- isted only twenty-four or thirty-six hours, and was very slight. Neuralgia commonly occurs in the nerves which, in health, are con- ductors of sensation. Is it confined to these, or do some motor nerves ever become morbidly sensitive in this affection ? The inquiry is interesting, be- cause many cases of tic douloureux occupy the side of the face, and follow nearly or exactly the course of the branches of the facial nerve or portio-dura, a motor nerve. They are often believed to be seated in this nerve. Some are accompanied by spasmodic motions of the cheek, which gave rise to the name tic, and these are thought to show that the motor functions of this nerve are implicated. To suppose that the same nerve-fibres are at once sending an impression of pain toward the brain, and also a motor impulse from the brain to the muscles, would be in contradiction to all received notions of physiology. In one case—and perhaps many such have occurred—a competent surgeon con- sidered a neuralgic affection to be seated in this nerve, the pains spreading over the cheek from the stylo-mastoid foramen, where this nerve emerges from the cranium. He divided this nerve near its place of exit, with the effect of paralyzing the muscles of that side of the face, with no mitigation of the pain. As to the inference drawn from muscular spasm accompanying the pain, it has been shown by contemporary observers, that real involuntary spasmodic movements are rare in tic douloureux.1 After all, their existence is explained by the anatomical facts, which will be found, we believe, to account for all these phenomena. Communicating fibres from the inferior maxillary nerve2 join the facial near its point of emergence, behind the jaw, so that the latter contains threads whose origin and endowments are the same as those of the trifacial or fifth nerve. In some dissections, this branch from the fifth nerve has been found as large as the whole portia dura of the seventh. It has been shown by experi- ment that, when the fifth nerve is divided within the cranium, the seventh loses all traces of sensibility. Nor is this all. The posterior branch of the second cervical nerve sends a division to the back part of the scalp, passing almost exactly over that point already named, where the facial nerve issues from the cranium. In many cases, the seventh pair was believed to be affected because the pains started from near the mastoid process. But in many of them it will be found that 1 Rowland and Valleix. They occurred in four out of fourteen cases observed by Valleix, and in sixteen out of fifty-five, whose history he collected. 2 From the ascending branch of the anterior auricular. 8 the starting-point is intermediate between the mastoid process and spine, exactly where this cervical branch comes out from the muscles to become superficial. Indeed, the same thing is mentioned by authors who did not interpret it as 1 would do. Halliday, in his Treatise before me, gives a case of " neuralgia of the facial nerve;" it is stated that the pains "set out from the ocoiput, a little above the nucha, between that and the mastoid process." There bad been a softish swelling in the same spot. It is believed these anatomical circumstances may explain most, if not all the alleged instances of neuralgia of the facial nerve. II. A consideration of the causes of disease is, in a practical point of view, one of the most important parts of its history. It is too common to pay ex- clusive attention to the structural changes, the visible effects of morbific agents, and to classify disease on such principles alone—an error which cannot fail to have its influence on treatment. Of the local causes of neuralgia, the most frequent undoubtedly is exposure to cold and wet. These attacks, in my own observation, are most frequent in the earlier months of spring. A residence in cold, damp situations and cli- mates is a predisposing cause. Bellingeri analyzed the history of forty cases, and found thirty-four of them attributable, as he believed, to exposure of this kind. A cold, dry, and piercing wind, or sitting in a current of air, sitting long in wet clothing, are the exciting causes most often and distinctly recog- nized. Indeed, any agent which deranges the circulation of the surface for a long time, so that a proper reaction is not established, is capable of inducing attacks. The forms of neuralgia most often produced in this way are, I believe, facial and sciatic. The branches of the trifacial or fifth nerve are distributed over a large extent, many of them are quite near the surface, and the part they supply, the face, is habitually most exposed to changes of temperature. The sciatic nerve is deeply covered, but its fibrous envelop is of denser structure than the neurilemma of other nerves, more allied to the textures usually invaded by rheumatism; and we find, accordingly, that it is very liable to an affection completely analogous to rheumatism in its nature and causes. Sciatica pre- vails in cold, wet seasons, in stormy and changeable weather, and in low and damp places; also, according to European observers, in sailors and fishermen. The severest and most intractable cases I have seen were in Irish labourers, who had been employed in wet and underground work, and wore their clothing wet for hours. Exposure to heat has sometimes produced neuralgic attacks, as in the face of a cook who had to stand over a hot fire a great deal. In connection with this may be mentioned a case I have lately seen in a man whose face is often exposed to the vapours of hydrochloric acid. He says that many of those working in the same business have eruptions on the face, which he has not. His neuralgia has lasted six years, and occupies the terminal branches of the superior maxillary nerve. Direct mechanical injuries are not among the most common causes. Bell- ingeri analyzed forty cases, and found but two of them from injury. Halliday relates twenty-seven, and only two of these came from injury. In several cases proceeding from this cause, the disease has continued for months or even years after the accident; and the origin of the symptoms has been shown by their immediate subsidence upon making an incision over the part. One case in a girl of fifteen, began after a severe blow on the right temple, continued rather mild for the first two months, then ceased for two or three months, and came on again in severe neuralgic fits. No immediate cause for this recur- 9 rence could be ascertained, except that the catamenia had failed to appear. Relief was twice obtained by covering the cicatrix with lunar caustic. This point was so tender at times, that the slightest touch produced acute suffering, which at one time was followed by general convulsions. The catamenia were regularly established about thirteen months after the original injury, and the neuralgia rapidly improved after that time. Venesection is known to have often produced neuralgia, both in the arm and leg. A puncture of the superior maxillary nerve at the infra-orbitary foramen, made for the purpose of applying galvanism, has caused it. In some cases of neuralgia from puncture, it has been proved that the nerve was pierced or partially divided, and a complete division at the wounded part, or about it, has sometimes given relief. But it is not certain that a nerve is touched in all these cases. The analogy of other causes, such as cutaneous eruptions, leads me to doubt whether any inflammation or great disturbance in the cir- culation around a number of the most minute terminal fibres may not serve as an excitant, and whether, therefore, we need always suppose the wound to have reached a nervous trunk. Dr. Rowland mentions a person who had neuralgia i'rom leech-bites, applied to a bubo. Neuralgia seldom begins immediately after the wound, or rather, as soon as the pain caused at the time has subsided. Such a fact is not unknown. One man had a severe laceration on the thigh, leaving some filaments of the sciatic nerve hanging loose. Shooting pains, with spasmodic twitchings, came on in about four hours, and were followed by numbness, &c. All these symptoms were passed in nine days. The disease rarely presented so acute a form. In general, neuralgia following external injuries, begins after cicatrization, or even some months later. With a view to prognosis and treatment, it is very important to distinguish between those cases in which the symptoms come on within a few hours after the injury, and those in which they manifest them- selves after the wound has healed. , In the former, we have more reason to think a wounded nerve has occasioned the pains, and we may suspect a partial division of the nerve. An operation is much more likely to give relief in these cases. " It is always to be feared," says Mayo, " when the nervous symptoms have been slow in coming (and, therefore, have been present for many days), that they are dependent not more upon the injured point of the nerve than on an irritation involving its whole length." Some of those which immediately follow a wound may be presumed to be inflammatory; as in the above-mentioned case which followed laceration. It is important to bear in mind that an injury which had not been suspected of having involved any particular nerve, and perhaps had occurred so long before as to have been forgotten, may still cause acute nervous pains. For example, Dr. Rowland mentions a girl, aged sixteen, who had paroxysms of darting pain in the left temple and side of the head; and upon inquiry it was found that several years previously she had received a severe cut over the right parietal bone, which was long in healing, and this spot had been tender ever since. A large uneven cicatrix was discovered, when the hair had been removed, and a blister over this part, relieved the pain for several weeks. The pains may be much more distant from the seat of injury, and even tenderness of the cicatrix may be wanting as a guide to their true source. Pressure upon nerves is a more common local'cause. It may be made by some foreign body, a tumour, an enlarged or displaced organ, a curved spine, stercoral concretions, the passage of the fcetal head, the pressure of crutches against the armpit, &c. In a neuralgia of the spermatic cord, pain was ex- cited by flatus passing through the caecum. Dr. W. E. Coale, of Boston,