K^JA^tfA 0-& Of>j- THE PSYCHICAL TENDENCIES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, By A. 0. Kellogg, M. D. THE PSYCHICAL TENDENCIES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE. By A. 0. Kellogg, M. D. [The following paper is the concluding one of a series contribu-^ ted to the American Journal of Insanity, under the title, " Con- siderations on the Reciprocal Influence of the Physical Or- ganization and Mental Manifestations." These papers have been received with much favor by the readers of the Journal, have ob- tained at various times flattering notices from the press, and have been in part translated for the columns of European journals. The concluding essay, being of a character to make it proper for publica- tion apart from the remainder of the series, we are happy to reprint, in compliment to the writer, and for the gratification of his numer- ous friends.—Pubs. Journal of Insanity.] " The future elevation of medical science, in all its branches, will be most intimately connected with the advancement of Psychology."—Damerow. Those who have watched carefully the progress of medical science during the last quarter of a century, can not have failed to perceive to what extent the psychological element has entered into, and con- tributed to this advancement. This fact finds illustration not only in the science, legitimately so-called, but in thdse modern systems of practice, which, whether reasonable or unreasonable, philosophical or unphilosophical, true or 2 false, have each found able and conscientious supporters, and equally able and honest opponents—faithful believers, " even unto death," and unfaithful disbelievers ; men having nothing whatever in com- mon with each other except the one sole principle, that in all things they are bound to disagree, and that the same class of facts, observed by opposing sects, shall serve to confirm diametrically opposite theo- ries, and lead to sadly conflicting resuks. One sect goes forth to combat disease armed with the most potent weapons,—the lancet and barber's basin, the blistering plaster and bolus-box—and inscrib- ing upon their banners, as a watchword, " Contraria contrariis curentur." Another, trusting in minute saccharine globules, equally remarkable for their impotence, unfurl their banners inscribed, " Similia similibus curentur" and rush to the contest, shouting, " Great is Hahnemann of the homeopaths !" While some faithful disciple of a third class, like Diogenes in his tub, looks out from his comfortable sitz-bad, or from under the droppings of his shower- bath, and shouting, " Great is Priessnitz of the hydropaths !" seeks to throw cold water upon all sects, systems and patients, applying it to his own indiscriminately. A fourth class, respectable in philo- sophical attainments at least, if not in numbers, in their dealings with human infirmities are beginning to recognize in all cases, and among all sects, the operation of a psychological element as influ- encing the result, as well as one purely physical or physiological, and contend most logically that neither of these elements can be entirely ignored while man is recognized as a composite being. It must be admitted that there is in all systems much good, as well as some evil; in this system perhaps more evil of a positive, in the other of a negative character. Were this not the case, medi- cal science would not be like most other things belonging to the earth; and, judging from the signs of the times, the medical, like the Christian millennium, though approaching is yet some centuries in the future. In former papers we have endeavored to throw some light upon the reciprocal influence of these two elements, the physical and the 3 psychological in human nature, in their intimate relation to the treatment of disease, both physical and mental, (though by these terms we would not be understood as speaking of two distinct and always separable entities; we regard the connection as too intimate, ever to admit of complete separation,) and to show that this influ- ence is in operation in conditions and under circumstances which have not hitherto been sufficiently recognized and acknowledged; and in further proof of this we shall here attempt to examine how far the psychological element has contributed, and still continues almost imperceptibly to contribute to the success of so many conflicting theories and systems of medicine ; and not to those which we have dignified with the names of theory or system only, but to the many forms and phases of charlatanism, which, like parasites, have at- tached themselves to what is now a great, noble, and must become ultimately, a perfect science. In the first place let us consider that most specious, popular, fash- ionable, and, for quite obvious reasons to the attentive observer, suc- cessful medical innovation known as homeopathy, from a psychologi- cal point of view. This most fanciful system maintains, as is well known, that all diseases are cured by the administration of medicines which are ca- pable of inducing in the healthy system disordered actions analogous to those brought about by the disease. With the theory, per se, we shall not quarrel. It may, or may not be quite as true as other theories of obscure and imperfectly understood actions, for aught we know : we therefore leave this an open question. The means, how- ever, by which the theorists suppose they bring about the action in question, we can not, even with the utmost stretch of credulity, rec- ognize. Indeed, when they tell us of the potency of the decillionth part of a grain, of a substance like charcoal, nearly if not quite inert, we are inclined to smile at the wonderful credulity of the hu- man mind, and are only prevented from laughing outright by the thought that this credulity is in itself a powerful curative agent of a character strictly psychological. 4 Looking merely at the physical agencies which this sect profess to employ, we are forced to exclaim, Ex nihilo nihil fit! But when they point us to their results, and defy us to ignore them—to hun- dreds of most intelligent men and women, exclaiming, " I was sick, and am well; great is homeopathy !" " I was dying, and am again made alive and whole; great is Hahnemann of the homeopaths !" we are forced, in the absence of all other means, to recognize the psychological element, which has unconsciously, so far as the prac- titioner and patient are concerned, contributed to, if not been the sole means of the results made manifest—results which it is not the mission of true science to ignore or despise, but to recognize, as far as they go, and to show