A V\V\ - ARMY MEDICAL LIBRARY FOUNDED 1836 WASHINGTON, D.C. • / Woman. \ UNIFORM WITH THIS VOLUME, And by the same Author, LOVE (L ' A M O U R ). * One Vol., 12mo. Muslin. Price $1 oo. WOMAN (2a gemttte.) From the French of M. J. MICHELET, OF THE FACULTY OF LETTERS, CHIEF IN THE HISTORICAL SECTION OF THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES, AUTHOK OF "A HISTORY OF FRANCE," "HISTORY OF THE ROMAN REPUBLIC," "MEMOIRS OF LUTHER," "INTRODUCTION TO UNIVERSAL HISTORY," " L'lNSECTE," "L'OISEAU," "l'AMOUR," ETC., ETC., ETC. Translated from the last Paris Edition, by J. W. Palmer, M.D. autfjor of " 2Tf)c Neto airti tfce ©IU," " iffip ants ©oton tfje ErrafoatilJi," nt. NEW YORK! Rudd & Carleton, 130 Grand Street, paris : l. hachette et c '<*. M DCCC LX. UU Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1860, by EUDD & CAELETON,' in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. R. CRAIGHEAD, Stereoiyper and Elecirotyper, BEaiton 13uiltiing, 81, 83, and 85 Centre Street. Translator's Preface. IN THE AUTHOE'S OWN WOEDS. " This book omits two subjects, the introduction of which in LAmour has been so much censured—adultery and pros- titution. I concluded to leave their discussion to the litera* ture of the day—which is inexhaustible on both those themes. I have demonstrated my problems by straight lines, and left to other writers the complicated illustration by curves. In their books they elaborately pursue the by- paths of love, but never once strike out on its grand and fertile highway—that impregnation which in more elevated passions endures even unto death. Our clever novelists are in the identical fog that in former times enveloped the casuists, who were, moreover, great analysers. Escobar and Busenbaum, who met with the same success as Balzac— fifty editions each, of their works—forgot only one thing in their subtile researches; but that was the very founda- tion of their doctrine. So the writers of to-day lose sight of marriage, and lay down rules for libertinism. vi Preface. " This book differs no less from the serious romances of our great Utopians—Saint-Simon, Fourier, and the rest. They invoke nature, but a very low order of it, in sympa- thy with the degradation of the times; and at once they put their trust in passional attraction, in our very inclina- tion towards that debased nature. In this age of stupen- dous effort, of heroic creation, they have tried to suppress effort; but with such a being as man, an energetic creator, an artist, effort is part of himself, and he is all the better for it. The popular moral instinct perceives this, and that is why those great thinkers have not succeeded in founding a school. Art, labor, and effort rule us all, and what we call nature in ourselves is, most frequently, of our own making, for we create ourselves day by day. I felt the truth of this while pursuing my anatomical studies last year, especially on the brain. The brain is manifestly the organ of work, the incarnation of our daily life. Hence its intense expression, and, if I may so say, its eloquence, in superior individuals; I do not hesitate to call it the most perfect flower, the most touching beauty in nature—affecting in the child, and often sublime in the man. Let them call this Eealism; I am quite indifferent. There are two sorts of realism: the one vulgar and vacant—the other, through the Eeal, attaining the Idea, which is its essence and its highest truth, consequently its inherent nobility. If pru- dery is "shocked" at my poetry of truth, the only pure poetry, it is of no consequence to me; when in U Amour I broke down the stupid barrier which separates literature from the enlightenment of science, I did not ask the advice Preface. vii of those shame-faces, who would be chaster than Nature, and purer than God. "Woman needs a faith, and expects it from man, in or- der to bring up her child; for there can be no education without faith. The day has come when faith may be laid down in a formula. Eousseau could not do it; his age was not ripe for it. Conscience is the test of truth; but it must have two controlling influences—history, which is the con- science of the human race, and natural history, which is the instinctive conscience of nature. Now formerly neither of these two existed; they have been born within the last cen- tury (1760-1860). " When Conscience, History, and Natural History accord —Believe 1" Contents. -----o----- PAQ« Translator's Preface........ v Introbndion. I—Why People do not Marry,...... 12 II.—The Female Operative........ 23 IIL—The "Woman of Letters,...... 32 IT.—No Life for "Woman without Man,......42 |art gust. EDUCATION. I.—Sun, Air, and Light,........53 II.—The first Exchange of Glances, and the Beginnings of Faith, . 57 III.—Play.—The child Teaching its Mother,.....61 IV.—The Frail and Sacred Child,...... 61 X Contents. FAGS V.—Love at Five Years.—The Doll,......*72 VI.—Woman a Eeligion,......... VII.—Love at Ten Years.—Flowers, .... .85 VIII — The Little Household.—The Little Garden.....93 IX.—The Maternities of Fourteen.—The Metamorphosis, . . 98 X.—History as a Basis of Faith,.......l03 XL—Pallas.—Eeason, . ........I13 XII.— Andrea del Sarto's " Charity,"......117 XIII.—The Revelation of Heroism,.......123 §}ook £5*conb. WOMAN IN THE FAMILY. I.—The Woman who will Love most.—Of a Different Eace, . 13i II.—The Woman who will Love most.—Of the Same Eace, . . 138 III.—The Man who will Love best,.......146 IV—The Proof,..........152 V.—How She gives her Heart away,......158 VI.—Thou shalt leave thy Father and thy Mother, . . . .165 VII.—The Young Wife.—Her Solitary Thoughts, . . . .173 VIII.—She would be his Partner and his Client, .... 180 IX.—Arts and Reading.—The Common Faith,.....186 X.—The great Legend of Africa.—Woman the Goddess of Good- ness. ..........192 XL—How Woman Excels Man,.......200 XII.—The Humiliations of Love.—Confession,.....208 XIII.—The Communion of Love,.......215 XIV.—The Offices of Nature,........222 Contents. xi WOMAN IN SOCIETT. ' PAGE I.—Woman an Angel of Peace and Civilization, . . ■ . .230 II.—Last Love.—Women's Friendships,......234 III.—Woman Protecting Woman.—Caroline Chisholm, . . . 241 IV.—Consolation for Imprisoned Women,.....247 V.—The Healing Art in Woman........254 VI.—The Simples,..........262 VII.—Children—Light—the Future,.......268 NOTES,............279 Introduction. 0 I. WHY PEOPLE DO NOT MARRY. We all perceive the capital fact of our time. From a sin- gular combination of circumstances—social, religious, and economical—Man lives apart from "Woman. And this is be- coming more and more common. They are not merely in dif- ferent and parallel paths; they are as two travellers, starting from the same point, one at full speed, the other at a sluggish pace, but following divergent routes. Man, however weak he may be morally, is nevertheless on a train of ideas, inventions, and discoveries, so rapid that sparks dart from the burning rail. Woman, hopelessly left behind, remains in" the rut of a past of which she herself knows but little. She is distanced, to our sorrow, but either will not or cannot go faster. The worst of it is that they do not seem to desire to come together. They seem to have nothing to say to each other— a cold hearth, a silent table, a frozen couch. " One is not bound," they say, " to put himself out in his own family." But they do no better in society, where polite- 14 Why People do not Marry. ness commands it. Every one knows how a parlor divides itself in the evening into two parlors, one of men, and one of women. It has not been much noticed, but it may be tested, that in a friendly reunion of a dozen persons, if the hostess msists with a sort of gentle violence that the two circles mingle together and the men converse with the women, silence succeeds; there is no more conversation. We must state the thing precisely as it is: they have no longer any ideas in common, any language in common, and even as to what might interest both parties they do not know how to speak, they have too completely lost sight of each other. Soon, if we do not take care, in spite of casual meet- ings, there will no longer be two sexes but two peoples. It is not surprising that the book which combated these tendencies—* little book of the heart, without literary preten- sion, has been on all sides sharply criticised. " X'Amour " threw itself naively into the breach, invoked good-nature, and said " Love again." At these words sharp cries were uttered ; for the diseased core was touched. " No, we will not love, we will not be happy. There is something under all this. Under that reli- gious form which deifies woman, he attempts to strengthen, to emancipate her mind. He seeks for a servile idol,°to bind on his altar." Thus, at the word Union, broke forth all the evils of the time—division, dissolution, the sad solitary tastes, the desire for savage life, which brood in the depths of men's minds The women read and wept. Their directors (priests or philosophers, no matter which) dictated language to them Scarcely did they dare feebly to defend their defender. But they did better, they read over again, they devoured, the for bidden book, they kept it for their leisure hours, and hid it under their pillows. Why People do not Marry. 15 It is well consoled by that, this much-abused book, both for the insults of enemies and the censures of friends. Neither the men of the Middle Ages nor those of Free Love found their account in it. X'Amour sought to lead woman back to the fireside; they preferred the pavement or the convent for her. "A book about marriage, for the family? Scandalous! Rather write thirty romances about adultery—something imaginative, something amusing. You will be much better received." " Why fortify the family?" says a religious journal. " Isn't it perfect already ? Formerly there was something they called adultery, but that is no longer to be seen." " Excuse us," replies a great political thunderer, in a brilliant and extremely effective feuilleton, "we beg your pardon,—it is still to be seen, and everywhere; but there is so little passion in it that it disturbs no one's comfort; it is a thing inherent in French marriages, and almost an institution. Every nation has its own morals, and we are not English." Comfort! yes, that is the evil. Neither the husband nor the lover is troubled by it—nor the wife either; she wishes to get rid of ennui, that is all. But in this lukewarm, blood- less life, in which we invest so little heart, expend so little art, in which not one of the three deigns to make an effort of any sort, everybody languishes, yawns, palls with nauseating comfortableness. We all understand that well, and no one is in a hurry to be married. If our laws of succession did not make women rich, there would be no more marrying, at least not in the large towns. In the country I heard a married man, father of a ib Why People do not Marry. family, a man ' well posted,' indoctrinating a young neigh- bor of his: " If you are to stay here," he said, " you will have to marry; but if you live in Paris, it is not worth the trouble, you can dispense with it easily." We all know the saying which marked the fall of the world's most intellectual people, the Athenians: " Ah, if we could have children without women." It was much worse under the Empire. All the legal penalties, those Julian laws which made a man marry d coup de bdton, were unsuccessful in bringing man and woman together, and it seemed that even the physical passion—that fine necessity which spurs the world along and centuples its energies-^-was extinguished here below. So that, never again to see a woman, men fled even into the Thebais. The motives which now-a-days not only cause marriage to be feared, but estrange women from society, are various and complicated. The first, indisputably, is the increasing misery of poor girls, putting them at the mercy of the world—the easy appropriation of those victims of hunger. Hence satiety and enervation, forgetfulness of any higher love, and mortal ennui at having to solicit tediously what may be had so easily every evening. Even he who has other needs, and a taste for fidelity, who would like to love with a single intensity, infinitely prefers a dependent, gentle, obedient person, who thinks of no rights of her own, and who, if left to-morrow, will not move a step—only wishing to please. The strong and brilliant personality of our girls, which too often asserts itself the very day after the wedding, frightens the celibate. There is no joke in that—the French woman is a character. It affords a chance for immense happiness__ but sometimes for unhappiness also. Our excellent civil laws (which are of the future, and to- Why People do not Marry. 17 tvard which the world is gravitating) have none the less added to the inherent difficulties of the national character. The French woman is an heir, and she knows it,—has a dowry, and she knows it. It is not as in some other countries, where a daughter, if she has any dowry, has it only in money (a fluid which easily runs out in the business of the husband). Here she has real estate, and even if, her own brother should desire to purchase it, the law opposes him, and keeps her rich in fixtures, secured by the dotal code or by certain stipulations. Such fortunes are, almost always enduring. Land does*not take wings, houses do not crumble; they remain to afford her a voice in the matter, a personality scarcely ever possessed by the English or the German woman. The latter, so to speak, are absorbed in the husband ; they sink into him body and property (if they have any property); so that they are, I believe, more completely than our women uprooted from their native family, which would not receive them again. The wife is reckoned as dead by her own people, who rejoice in establishing a daughter so as never again to have expenses on her account. Whatever may happen, and wherever her husband may choose to take her, she will go and remain. On such conditions marriage is less formidable to the men. A curious thing in France, contradictory in appearance but not in reality, is that marriage is very weak, and the esprit de famille very strong. It happens (especially in the provinces, among the rural bourgeoisie), that the wife who has been some time married, as soon as she has children divides her soul in two parts, one for her children, the other for her rela- tives, for her reawakened first affections. What protection, in that case, for the husband ? None, the esprit de famille an- nuls the marriage. One can hardly imagine how wearisome is such a wife, bury- ino- herself in a retrograde past, letting herself down to the 18 Why People do not Marry. level of a superannuated but lively mother, all imbued with old things. The husband lives on quietly,-but soon sickens oi it— discouraged, weary, good for nothing. He loses the ideas and hopes of progress he had acquired in his studies and in youthful society. He is soon killed off by the proprietor, by the dull stifling of that old family hearth. Thus under a dowry of a hundred thousand francs is buried a man who might perhaps have earned as much every year. So says the young man to himself in his time of aspiration and.of confidence. But whether he have more or less, no mat- ter ; if he would take his chance, know what he is capable of, he will send the dowry to the devil. For the sake of the little thing that beats under his left breast, he will not, for five hun- dred francs, become husband to the queen. Bachelors have often told me this. They have also told me another thing; one evening when I had five or six at my house, men of mark, as I was bantering them about their pretended celibacy, one of them, a distinguished savant, uttered these very words to me, and quite seriously: "Never believe that, whatever diversions a man may find without it, he is not unfortunate in having no fireside—I mean a wife who is truly his own. We all know that, we feel it. There is no other repose for the heart; and not to have a wife, sir, be sure is a sombre, cruel, bitter life." Bitter! on that word all the others also laid stress, and spoke as he did. "But," said he, "one consideration deters us. All who work in France are poor. We live by our engagements, by our patronage. We live honestly, I earn six thousand francs; but the wife I should choose would spend that much on her toilet. Their mothers educate them so. Suppose one of these beautiful creatures were bestowed on me, what would become of me the next day, as she left her rich abode to find mine so Why People do not Marry. 19 poor. If I loved her (and I am quite capable of that), imagine the misery, the wickedness into which I might be tempted, to become a little richer, and so displease her a little less. " I shall always remember how being once in a small town of the South, to which it was the fashion to send sick people, I saw a startling apparition pass by a place where the mules were winding along in a cloud of dust. It was a very beau- tiful woman, clothed like a courtesan—a woman, not a girl__ twenty-five years old, puffed out, distended in a fresh and charming silk robe of blue, clouded with white (a master-piece of Lyons), which she dragged abominably through the dirt- iest spots. She seemed not to rest on the earth. Her blonde and pretty head tossed back her jaunty Amazonian hat, which gave her the air of a piquant young page, her whole appearance said,' I jest at everything.' I felt that this idol, monstrously in love with • herself, for all her pride, belonged, from first to last, to those who flattered her, that they mocked her, and that she did not even know what a scruple was. I called Solomon to mind. lM terpens os suum dixit: non sum operata malum.'' This vision remained with me. It was not a person, it was not a thing, but it was the fashion, and the manners of the time, I saw; it will always inspire me with a true terror of marriage." " As for me," said a younger bachelor, " the obstacle, the insuperable scruple, is not crinoline, but religion." We laughed : but he, becoming animated, protested ; " Yes, religion. Women are educated in dogmas which are not ours. Mothers who are so desirous to have their daugh- ters married, give them an education exactly calculated to produce divorce. " What are the dogmas of France ? If France herself does not know, Europe does very well; its hatred perfectly reveals them. An enemy, a very retrograding foreigner, 20 Why People do not Marry. once described them to me thus: ' What renders your France hateful to us,' he said, ' is that beneath its apparent muta- tions it never changes.' It is like a lighthouse in eclipse, with revolving lights. It shows or conceals the flame, but the focus is always the same. What focus ? The wit of Voltaire (long previous to Voltaire) ; in the second place ('89), the grand laws of the Revolution ; and in the third place, the canons of your scientific pope, the Academy of Sciences.' " I disputed it. He insisted; and I now see that he was right. Yes, whatever new questions may arise, '89 is the faith even of those who postpone '89, and refer it to the future. It is the faith of all France, and that is why foreigners condemn us altogether, and without distinction of parties. " Well, the daughters of France are carefully educated to hate and contemn what all France loves and believes in. Thrice they have embraced, weakened, killed the Revolution; first, in the sixteenth century, in the matter of liberty of con- science; then, at the end of the eighteenth, in the question of political liberty. They have devoted themselves to the past, not knowing what indeed that is. They like to listen to those Avho say with Pascal: ' Nothing is sure ; therefore, believe in the absurd.' Women are rich in France; they have much wit, and every means of instruction. But they will not learn anything, nor create a faith for themselves. Let them meet a man of serious faith, a man of heart, who believes and loves established truths, and they say with a smile : ' That man doesn't believe in anything.' " There was a momentary pause. This rather violent sally had nevertheless, I perceived, won the assent of all present. I said to them: " If what you have just advanced be admit- ted, I believe we must say it has been often just the same in other ages, and people have married, nevertheless. Women loved dress and luxury, and were conservative, but the men Why People do not Marry. 21 of those times were doubtless more daring; they faced those perils, hoping that their influence, their energy, above all their love, the master and conqueror of conquerors, would effect happy changes in their favor. Intrepid Curtii, they threw themselves boldly into the gulf of uncertainties, and very happily for us. For, gentlemen, but for the audacity of our fathers, we had never been born. " Now, will you permit a friend older than you to speak with frankness ? Then I shall venture to tell you that if you were truly alone, if you endured with out consolation the life you find so bitter, you would make haste to change it, you would say: Love is strong and can do whatever it will. The greater will be the glory of converting these absurd and charming beauties to reason. With a great, resolute, and persevering purpose, well-chosen means, and skilfully calculated circum- stances, one may do much. But it is necessary to love, to love intensely, and love a single object. No coldness. The cultivated and coveted woman infallibly belongs to the man. If the man of this age complains that he does not reach her soul, it is because he has not what subdues the soul, viz. con- centrated strength of desire. " Now, to speak only of the obstacle first alleged, of the unrestrained pride of women, their madness for the toilet, etc.: it seems to me that this applies especially to the upper classes, to rich ladies, or to those who mingle with wealthy people. There are two or three hundred thousand of these. But do you know how many women there are in France? Eighteen millions, and eighteen hundred thousand marriageable. "It would be great injustice to accuse them all of the wrongs and follies of ' our best society.' If they imitate it at a dis- tance, it is not always from choice. Ladies, by their example, often by their contempt or their ridicule, cause great misfortunes in this way. They impose an impossible luxury 22 Why People do not Marry. on poor creatures who sometimes would not care for it, but who by their position, involving serious interests, are forced to be brilliant; and to be so, they plunge into great extravagance. " Women who have their own peculiar world and so many secrets in common, ought certainly to love each other a little, and sustain each other, instead of warring among themselves. They inflict mutual injury, in a thousand eases, indirectly. The wealthy dame whose luxury changes the costume of the poor girl, does the latter a great wrong—she prevents her marriage; for no workman cares to marry a doll, so expen- sive to dress. If she remains a maiden, she is, perhaps, an office or a shop girl, but even in that capacity the lady still harms her; she prefers to deal with a clerk, in a black coat, a flatterer, and finds him more womanly than the woman. The shopkeepers have thus been led to substitute, at great ex- pense, the clerk for the girl, who cost much less. " What will become of her ? If she is pretty, twenty years of age, she will be 'protected,' and will pass from hand to hand. Soon fading, before thirty, she will become a seam- stress, and work for her ten sous a day. She has no means of living save by earning her bread every night in shame. Thus the woman of wealth, depreciating her own sex, goes on mak- ing celibacy more and more economical, and marriage unpro- fitable, until, by a terrible retribution, her own daughter will never be able to marry. "Do you wish me, gentlemen, to briefly portray the lot of woman in France? No one has yet done it with sim- plicity. This picture, if I do not deceive myself, will touch your hearts, and perhaps enlighten you, and will prevent you from confounding very different classes in the same ana- thema.'' •0' The Female Operative. 23 II. THE FEMALE OPERATIVE. When the English manufacturers, enormously enriched by new machinery, complained to Pitt, saying : " We cannot go on, we do not make money enough," he gave them a terrible answer, a stain on his memory: " Take the children." How much more guilty are those who took women, who opened to the wretchedness of the city girl, to the blindness of the peasant, the fatal resource of an exterminating labor, and the promiscuity of factories! He who takes the woman, takes also the child; for in every one*that perishes, a family is destroyed, many children, and the hope of generations to come. Barbarism of our West! Woman is no longer esteemed fur the love and happiness of man, still less for maternity and the power of reproduction—but as an operative. Operative! an impious, sordid word, which no language ever had, which no period could have ever understood before this iron age, and which alone would counterbalance all our pretended progress. Here comes the close band of economists, doctors of the net proceeds. " But, sir," they say, " the high economic and social necessities! Industry would be obstructed, stopped. In the name of these same poor classes," etc., etc. The first necessity is to live, and palpably, we are perishing. The population no longer increases, and its quality is degene- rating. The peasant girl dies of labor, the female operative of hunger. What children can we expect from them ? Abor- tions, more and more. " But a people does not perish !" Many peoples, even of those which still figure on the map, no longer exist. The Scottish Highlanders have disappeared. Ireland no longer presents a race. Wealthy, absorbing England, that prodi- 24 The Female Operative. gious blood-sucker of the world, does not succeed in renew- ing itself by the most enormous alimentation. The race is changing and growing weak there, has recourse to stimu- lants, to alcohol, and is more and more enfeebled. Those who saw it in 1815 di