25945. Misbranding and alleged Adulteration of strawberry preserves. U. S. v. 9 Gases of Strawberry Preserves. Default decree of condemnation and destruction. (F. & D. no. 37282. Sample no. 65467-B.) This case involved alleged strawberry preserves which were found to consist of an insufficiently concentrated mixture of fruit and sugar containing added acid and pectin. On March 4, 1936, the United States attorney for the District of Rhode Island, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court a libel praying seizure and condemnation of nine eases of strawberry preserves at Rumford (Bast Providence), R. I., alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce on or about January 8, 1936, by the May- flower Products Inc., from South Boston, Mass., and charging adulteration and misbranding in violation of the Food and Drugs Act. The article was labeled in part: "Singer Brand * * * Pure Strawberry Preserves Packed for Singer Tea Go. Providence, R. I." The article was alleged to be adulterated in that acid and pectin had been mixed and packed with the article so as to reduce or lower its quality; in that an insufficiently concentrated mixture of fruit, sugar, acid, and pectin had been substituted for preserves; and in that acid and pectin had been mixed with the article in a manner whereby inferiority was concealed. Misbranding was alleged for the reason that the designation "Pure Straw- berry Preserves" was false and misleading, and deceived and misled the pur- chaser when applied to a product that resembled preserves but which was insufficiently concentrated and contained added acid and pectin. Misbranding was alleged for the further reason that the article was an imitation of and was offered for sale under the distinctive name of another article. On March 18, 1936, no claimant having appeared, judgment was entered find- ing the product misbranded and ordering that it be condemned and destroyed. W. R. GREGG, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.