25776. Misbranding and alleged Adulteration of macaroni products . U. S. v. 1,000 Cases of Macaroni Products. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture for misbranding, providing for release of the product to t*,e claimant for relabeling. (F. & D. no. 37076. Sample no. 44722-B.) It was charged that this product was a substitute for what it purported to be and that its label bore an erroneous statement concerning an essential ingredient On or about January 16, 1936, the United States attorney for the Western District of Kentucky, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court a libel praying seizure and condemnation of 1,000 cases of macaroni products at Louisville, Ky., alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce on or about January 4, 1936, from New Cumberland, Pa., to Louisville, Ky., and charging adulteration and misbranding In violation of the Food and Drugs Act. The shipment in question was a returned shipment to the original consignee, namely, the Kentucky Macaroni Co., Louisville, Ky. The article was labeled in part: (Case) "Okay Brand Macaroni Products Nothing Cheap but the Price Kentucky Macaroni Co., Louisville, Ky Made from bard wheat flour Net weight 20 Lbs." Adulteration of the product was charged under the allegation that a sub- stance containing an excessive amount of ash was substituted for what the product purported to be, namely, macaroni made from hard wheat flour. Misbranding of the product was charged under the allegations that the label bore the statement, "Macaroni * * * Nothing Cheap But the Price Made from Hard Wheat Flour", and that the said statement was false and mislead- ing and tended to deceive and mislead the purchaser. On March 13, 1936, the Kentucky Macaroni Co., Louisville, Ky., having appeared as claimant, a consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture for Misbranding ofly was entered, providing for release of the product to the claimant for relabeling. W. R. GEEGQ, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.