22593. Adulteration and misbranding of oil of lavender and sodium bipbospbate. U. S. v. James Good, Inc., Thomas F. Meehan and Jobn James Cram. Pleas of nolo contendere. Judgment of guilty. Fines, $50. (F. & D. no. 31327. Sample nos. 37487-A, 37527-A.) This case was based on shipments of drugs that were represented to be of pharmacopoeial standard but which were found to be below the standard estab- lished by the United States Pharmacopoeia. On May 4, 1934, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court an information against James Good, Inc., a corporation trading at Philadelphia, Pa., and Thomas Meehan and John James Cram, of Phila- delphia, Pa., alleging shipment by said defendants, in violation of the Food and Drugs Act, on or about April 20, 1933, from the State of Pennsylvania into the State of Maryland, of quantities of oil of lavender and sodium be- phosphate which were adulterated and misbranded. The articles were labeled in part: "Oil of Lavender [or "Sodium Diphosphate"] U. S. P. * * * James Good, Inc. Philadelphia." It was alleged in the information that the articles were adulterated in that they were sold under names recognized in the United States Pharmacopoeia and differed from the standard of strength, quality, and purity as determined by the test laid down in the said pharmacopoeia official at the time of in- vestigation in the following respects: The oil of lavender yielded less than I 30 percent of esters calculated as linalyl acetate, namely, not more than 5.88 percent of esters calculated as linalyl acetate; the odor of said article was not characteristic of lavender flowers and said article was not soluble in three volumes of 70 percent alcohol; the specific gravity of the article at 25° C. was more than 0.888, namely, not less than 0.898; the refruitive index of said article at 20? was more than 1.4640, namely, not less than 1.4726, and! said article, when tested by the method prescribed by the pharmacopoeia for acetins, required less than 4.7 cc of half-normal hydrochloric acid for neutrali- zation, namely, not more than 4.45 cc of half-normal hydrochloric acid for neutralization, whereas the pharmacopoeia provides that oil of lavender shall. yield not less than 30 percent of esters calculated as linalyl acetate; that it shall have the characteristic odor of lavender flowers and shall be soluble in three volumes of 70 percent alcohol; that its specific gravity shall not be more than 0.888 at 25°; that the refruitive index shall not be more than 1.4640 at 20°, and that when tested for acetins not less than 4.7 cc of half- normal hydrochloric acid shall be required for neutralization; and in that the sodium biphosphate when dried to constant weight contained not more than 93 percent NaHaPO* (sodium dihydrogen phosphate) ; 0.4 percent water insoluble matter and chloride, per gram, equivalent to 1.5 cc of fiftieth-normal hydrochloric acid; whereas the said pharmacopoeia provides that sodium bi- phosphate when dried to constant weight shall contain not less than 98 percent of NaHJPO*; that It is freely soluble in water, and that it shall con- tain, per gram, chloride corresponding to not more than 0.2 cc of fiftieth-normal hydrochloric acid; and the standard of strength, quality, and purity of the articles was not declared on the containers thereof. Adulteration was alleged for the further reason that the strength and purity of the articles fell below the professed standard and quality under which they were sold. Misbranding was alleged for the reason that the statements on the labels, M Oil of Lavender U. S. P." and " Sodium Diphosphate U. S. P.", were false and misleading. Misbranding of the oil of lavender was alleged for the further reason that it was a product that contained little, if any, oil of lavender, prepared in imitation of oil of lavender, U. S. P., and was offered for sale and sold under the name of another article, " Oil of Lavender U. S. P." On May 22, 1934, the defendants entered pleas of nolo contendere and were adjudged guilty and the following fines were imposed: James Good, Inc., $30, T. F. Meehan, $10, and John J. Cram, $10 M. L. WILSON, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.