21739. Adulteration and misbranding of dried buttermilk:. U. S. v. 135 Bags of Dried Butterinillc. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond for relabeling:. (F. & D. no. 31276. Sample no. 14139-A.) This case involved a shipment of a product which was represented to be dried buttermilk, but which consisted of dried skimmed milk. Examination also showed that the article contained less fat than labeled. On October 26, 1933, the United States attorney for the District of Maryland, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court a libel praying seizure and condemnation of 135 bags of dried buttermilk at Baltimore, Md., alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate com- merce on or about June 26, 1933, by the Universal By-Products Co., from Oakland, Calif., and charging adulteration and misbranding in violation of the Food and Drugs Act. The article was labeled in part: (Tag) "Pure Dried Buttermilk Manufactured by Universal By-Products Co. San Francisco, Calif. Guaranteed Analysis * * * Crude Fat not less than 5.05%." It was alleged in the libel that the article was adulterated in that dried skimmed milk had been substituted wholly or in part for dried buttermilk, which the article purported to be. Misbranding was alleged for the reason that the statements on the tag, " Pure Dried Buttermilk " and " Crude Fat Not Less than 5.05% ". were false and misleading and deceived and misled the purchaser. Misbranding was alleged for the further reason that the article was offered for sale under the distinctive name of another article. On November 10, 1933, the Baltimore Feed & Grain Co., Baltimore, Md., having consented to the entry of a decree, judgment of condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product be released to the claimant upon payment of costs and the execution of a bond in the sum of $1,000, conditioned in part that it be relabeled. M. L. WILSON, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.