21444. Misbranding of canned apricots. U. S. v. 14 Cases of Canned Apricots. Decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product ordered sold unless taken down nnder bond for relabeling. (F. & D. nos. 30532, 30556. Sample nos. 42027-A, 42040-A.) This case involved a shipment of a product represented to be solid-pack canned apricots. Examination showed that the article was not solid pack, since it contained water as a packing medium, that it fell below the standard for such canned food established by this Department, and was not labeled to indicate that it was substandard. On June 19, 1933, the United States attorney for the District of Wyoming, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court a libel praying seizure and condemnation of 14 cases of canned apricots at Cheyenne, Wyo., alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce, on or about April 27, 1933, by the Western States Grocery Co., from Salt Lake City, Utah, and charging misbranding in violation of the Food and Drugs Act as amended. The article was labeled in part: " Gateway Brand Solid Pack Pie Apricots * * * Packed by Perry Canning Co., Perry, Utah." It was alleged in the libel that the article was misbranded in that the state- ment on the label, " Solid Pack ", was false and misleading and deceived and misled the purchaser. Misbranding was alleged for the further reason that the article was canned food and fell below the standard of quality and condi- tion promulgated by the Secretary of Agriculture for such canned food, as regards color, uniformity of size, and wholeness, and its package or label did not bear a plain and conspicuous statement prescribed by regulation of this De- partment indicating that it was substandard. On August 14, 1933, no claim having been entered for the property, judgment of condemnation and forfeiture was entered. The decree provided that, upon proof of ownership, the product be delivered to the owner upon payment of costs and the execution of a bond in the sum of $100, conditioned that it be relabeled in conformity with the Federal Food and Drugs Act, otherwise that it be sold by the United States marshal. M. L. WILSON, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.